Abstract
Mites are numerous species of minute arthropods, members of class Arachnida subclass Acari or Acarina and pests of many economic prominence living in a wide range of habitats. Mites are predators and parasites, performing crucial means of biological control, essential herbivores and detritivores, acting fungivorous and saprophytic, vectors of diseases, and play vital role in soil formation. These live on plants and animals, in the depths of ocean, in soil and fresh or brackish water, in lungs of birds and animals, in stored grains and stored products, on leaves of rainforest, and in human clothes and bedding. In spite of magnificent diversity of predaceous, phytophagous and granary mites found on plants and stored grains, these are often overlooked, and even skilled zoologists may be unaware of their importance. This chapter aims to provide an updated analysis of their biology, life history, reproduction and ecology to fill gap in our understanding of these fascinating creatures for pests controlling.
Keywords
- arthropod
- Acari
- mite
- pest
- Phytoseiidae
- control
1. Introduction
Mite complex is worldwide in its distribution in all regions of globe and more prominent in tropical a well as subtropical climates. Mites can be either inflicting damage to humans and animals [1, 2], or pestilent that feed on plants [3] and stored commodities [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23], otherwise predacious which are the carnivorous of leaf-feeding mites and other pests [24]. All harmful types of mites are able to devastate agricultural crops, fruits and vegetables [25, 26]. During the previous few decades, owing to increasing concerns over health, environment and pest resistance risks accompanying with chemical control, and the use of alternate pest management strategies has received considerable attention [27, 28]. In this context, the uses of generalist predators that can perform as a broad spectrum fighters against pests have been greatly encouraged [29, 30, 31].
Currently, mites belonging to the family Phytoseiidae (Arachnida: Mesostigmata) are economically important predators of some phytophagous mites and insects in greenhouses or field crops. Amongst others predators, mass reared phytoseiid mites are commercially available and used, against spider mites, thrips and whiteflies infestations on plants. Phytoseiid mites use odors (kairomones) associated with mite-infested plants to locate their prey or when predators contact spider mite webbing, these intensify their search for prey and may identify prey eggs and distinguish these from non-prey objects. The existence of a water-soluble feeding stimulant on prey eggs as well is postulated [32].
Predator mites which fit to the family Phytoseiidae, are categorized by long legs, with the front pair pointing frontward and comparatively have few hairs (<20 pairs) on their back. The color of mites can differ from deep red to pale yellow liable to the prey items eaten. Mites that feed on whiteflies and thrips are commonly pale yellow to pale tan. Phytoseiid mites have five life stages in life cycle like egg, larva, protonymph, deutonymph and adult. Most mites of this family are free-living predators in the deutonymphal and adult stages on a variety of arthropods in plants or crops. This chapter presents broad-spectrum ideas of the findings in research focusing on rhetorical aspects of biology and ecology of some predacious as well as harmful mites with particular reference to their possible role in biological control [33, 34].
2. Beneficial mites
Beneficial mites are excellent biological control agents and have been used in controlling of tiny mite pests and insect pests that cause a serious damage to many economically important crops.
2.1 Neoseiulus (Amblyseius ) cucumeris (Oudemans)
Cucumeris predatory mite

Figure 1.
Cucumeris populations have somewhat more females than males (64% females). Mite develops through one larval stage and two nymphal stages (protonymph and deutonymph) before becoming adults. The non-feeding larvae emerge from eggs in about 3 days and molt into protonymphs 2 days later. The two nymphal stages last for 7–10 days before developing into adults. Adults live for up to 30 days and eat an average of 1 thrips/day. Cucumeris has a life cycle of 10–12 days at 20°C, while development time at 75°F is 6–9 days and development takes from 8 to 11 days (at 20–25°C). Cucumeris prefers environment with >65% relative humidity (R. H.), but eggs can survive at as low as 40% R. H. Greenhouse
For studying food habits of predatory mite
Cucumeris is an aggressive predator of several soft-bodied pests and generally microclimates inside the greenhouse crop seem to be significant for their existence. Cucumeris feeds on little (first and second instar) thrips on foliage and flowers, and does not nourish on big larvae or adult thrips. The prime targets of Cucumeris are thrips species including western flower thrips (
Cucumeris is an appropriate enemy for many tiny pests of greenhouse crops, and both outdoor and indoor strawberry crop. This is able to live on pollen in the absence of pest and as a result might be used precautionary in crops such as strawberries or capsicums that produce pollen. Cucumeris has been efficaciously used for thrips control in capsicums, cucumbers, berry fruits and eggplants as well as in ornamental crops such as rose and gerbera, and other potted plants. In circumstances having very huge thrips pressure, Cucumeris ought to be always used in combination with the predatory pirate bug
In recent years, various delivery systems (formulations) of
2.2 Neoseiulus (= Amblyseius ) fallacis (Garman)
Mite
Adults of

Figure 2.
Growth from egg to adult takes place in 7–9 days at 70°F, 3 days at 85°F and at 78°F a fourfold rise in numbers can occur within 4 days. Under optimum conditions in the field, densities may increase from 10 predators per 100 leaves to 200–500 predators per 100 leaves in just 2 weeks. Adult mated females enter diapause in response to the short days in the fall (<14 hours of daylight) in plant crevices or other protected areas. As a result, these stop reproducing and move into sheltered areas, such as under bark or ground cover. But, these do not enter diapause in greenhouses or interior plantscapes if the temperature is 64°F (18°C) or above. These emerge as early as bloom, but in reduced numbers due to heavy winter mortality. Fallacis increases in number rapidly and adults become numerous by July or August, and on an average 40–60 eggs are laid. Warmer or cooler conditions accelerate or slow down reproduction/feeding, respectively, and these live about 20 days [46, 47].
Mite predator
2.3 Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot
Predator mite

Figure 3.
Larvae do not attempt to feed and remain inactive near the old egg shell. Although the larval stage does not feed, yet the subsequent nymphs and adults feed on all stages of prey. Both males and females remained in the larval stage for an average of 1.0 ± 0.1 days. Immatures are normally pale salmon in color. The male and female protonymphal stages lasted 1.7 and 1.6 days, respectively. During this time both males and females ate an average of 4–4 eggs of
Due to its tropical origin,
2.4 Neoseiulus (= Amblyseius ) californicus (McGregor)
Predaceous mite
Mite

Figure 4.
Predator
Californicus works in the superlative form while used preventatively, or else when spider mites are initially observed in the crop. It establishes the best early in the crop and when is permitted to build up prior to spider mites found. Predator
Californicus are primarily sent in a loose, vermiculite-based medium and the predator should be distributed evenly through the crop on foliage, with additional material at ends of rows and in hotter areas prone to spider mites. Rates will vary depending on the crop and infestation level, however, the subsequent rates have been determined as preventative @ 25/m2 (2.5 L/ha) releasing 2 weeks apart for 2–3 releases, and after spider mite detection 100–200/m2 (10 L/ha) weekly for at least three applications.
2.5 Swirski mite Amblyseius swirskii (Athias-Henriot)
The species
Adults are pear-shaped, 0.5 mm in length with an unsegmented body and four pairs of long legs, and males may be slightly smaller than females (Figure 5). The eggs are round and transparent white and measure approximately 0.15 mm in diameter. These mites lay their eggs on leaf hairs (trichomes) and along the veins on the inner surface of leaves mainly at the intersection of main and lateral ribs. Females prefer to lay eggs on leaf hairs on the underside of plant leaves near plant domatia (small hairy tufts or pockets found on the lower surface of some leaves), which may be an adaptation to avoid egg from predators. The eggs hatch in about 3 days later. Larvae are pale white to nearly transparent in color and only have three pairs of legs. Mobile stages are beige-pink, droplet shaped and ‘pushed down’ position on short legs. The protonymph (second stage) and deutonymph (third stage) have four pairs of legs and are darker than the larvae. All stages can be found in the corner of main vein and lateral veins, and in the flowers [65, 66].

Figure 5.
In addition to arthropod prey,
Species
2.6 Amblyseius (Neoseiulus ) barkeri (Hughes)
The predatory mite

Figure 6.
The eggs are oval, transparent white and around 0.15 mm in diameter. All stages can be mainly found in the corner of main vein and lateral veins, and in the flowers. When fed on
The predacious mite
It is used against various thrips species and broad mite as well as other tarsonemid mites in greenhouses and indoor plantscapes. It works well on
2.7 Amblyseius andersoni (Chant)
Mite species

Figure 7.
Predatory mite
This predator works well on both inside protected crops and outside in ornamental crops, fruit trees, horticulture, nurseries and seedbeds. The invasion of the predator is realized under the low mass and the average density of 0.25–1 individual per 1 m2of pest population in amounts. Based on the focuses of pest populations, the rate of predator application is increased. This predatory mite is suitable for biologically controlling of some mites. For scouting, if some agile-looking mites are seen running quickly across the leaf’s undersurface, these are probably predators. One predatory mite per every 6 feet of crop row or 2–3 mites per 10–11 square feet are used. For best results, apply the
2.8 Neoseiulus (= Amblyseius ) pseudolongispinosus (Xin, Liang and Ke)
Mite

Figure 8.
Research on the biology of predator
The effectiveness of hunter
A fenvalerate-resistant strain of
Among the effects of different developmental stages of two spider mite species, for instance,
2.9 Cheyletus eruditus (Schrank)
Predatory mite

Figure 9.
The average adult’s body length of
Eggs are laid in clusters and the eggs have a gluey surface, even though these are not very definitely fixed down, but are lightly bound together with silky strands. Development and fecundity are affected by prey type and environmental situations. Per female, the total number of eggs laid ranges from about 19 to 317. The time taken for an egg to develop to an adult within the temperature range of 12–30°C, decreased with an increasing in temperature. It took 33.8 days at 18.5°C, and at 25°C acquired 15.4 days. At 76% relative humidity and with
It is widespread and abundant in grain stores especially those that have significant storage mite problems. Maximum accounts of
The maximum frequently faced ectoparasite in captive snakes is the hematophagous snake mite (
It can be reared in large numbers and this makes it useful in the biocontrol of pest mites that infest harvested cereal and cereal products. For bulk rearing of the predator
3. Harmful mites
Although mites are tiny creatures, these could be extremely harmful to cause great trouble for peoples or in other ways inflicting a variety of problems associated to plants.
3.1 Spider mites (Order: Acari, Family: Tetranychidae)
Spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae), belong to the superfamily Tetranychoidea that comprises five families, of which Tetranychidae is the largest. The common name ‘spider mites’ is so-called because of their ability to produce silken strands as do spiders, which is used to spin webs under that to reproduce and feed. Conversely, the silk glands in mites are situated close to mouth and allied with the mouthparts. From an applied opinion, the silk-producing habit has two vital uses for mites, firstly, falling from foliage and being adjourned from the host on a silk strand permits easy spread by wind and convection currents. Secondly, mats or tents of webbing around the mite colonies provide some degree of protection from natural enemies and treatments with pesticides.
Spider mites appear as tiny moving dots on their hosts by the naked eye. Spider mites are established on a wide variety of vascular plants, comprising shrubs, trees and herbaceous plants, from entirely all over the biosphere. Several horticultural and agricultural crops are affected by these pests, together with greenhouses and field crops, extending from low-growing bushes to fruit trees. Generally, spider mites forage on the lower side of foliage, however will cover the whole leaf surface while their densities are extraordinary. These puncture the plant cells and extract the cell contents. Their nourishing results in tiny clumps of dead cells and a spotted look of infested foliage. Wilting, leaf distortion, dryness and abscission take place with extended and high population invasions. Disturbance of photosynthesis results in plant growth checking and decrease in produce [100, 101]. Two widely distributed spider mites found on a broad range of plants are mention in the ensuing section.
3.1.1 Two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch
Two-spotted spider mite

Figure 10.
If a female has mated, the fertilized eggs develop into both male and female mites, if not mated, the unfertilized eggs develop into males. Eggs are shiny spheres, clear to pale green in color, pearl-like and about 0.14 mm in diameter. Eggs are laid singularly, with females depositing 5–6 eggs per day, with a total of 60–100 eggs per female. Eggs hatch in 3–6 days depending on temperature. Eggs hatch into six-legged larvae, then progress through protonymph and deutonymph stages before becoming to adults. Larvae are about the same size as eggs and the only life stage with six legs (protonymphs, deutonymphs and adults are all eight-legged). The octopods deutonymph is generally larger than the protonymph, although similar in color pattern. Larvae and nymphs complete development in 4–9 days depending on temperature and the females have a pre-oviposition period of 1–2 days. Since generations overlap, all life stages can usually be found simultaneously. There can be nine or more generations per year and adults live about 30 days [104, 105, 106].
Generally, the earlier a foliage is injured by mites, the more detrimental the damage will be to tree health. Midseason injury is less significant, but can combine with other stresses to cause fruit drop, poor fruit color, or reduced effectiveness of growth regulating chemicals. Some steps for spider mites controlling are scouting for the presence of pest, and noting damage and other signs of growing populations, looking for direct damage and other signs of pest, deciding if and when to take control action, choosing the best tool or tools to treat spider mites in growing situation, making spider mite treatments, and applications of biocontrol agents following the label and producer’s instructions [107, 108].
One of the studies investigated the development, fecundity and population density of
3.1.2 Carmine spider mite Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval)
The carmine spider mite
The carmine spider mite is closely related to two-spotted spider mite

Figure 11.
Development times of the carmine spider mite
The major natural predator of the carmine spider mite is a ladybird beetle
In a study, the populations of
3.2 Mould mite Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank)
Mould mite or cheese mite
This mite is 0.2–0.5 mm in length and has a minute translucent body with nearly colorless legs and mouthparts. These besides have a scale on the last terminating segment of the legs. To a certain degree, their slim bodies endure a sequence of hairs, which are more frequent and lengthier than those on

Figure 12.
Under optimum conditions, a generation can be completed in 8–21 days. As the temperature falls, the length of the life cycle increases greatly. This mite will tolerate high temperatures, and the larval stage is particularly susceptible to low and high temperatures with 93.6 and 54% mortality at 10 and 34°C, respectively. Unlike
Laboratory investigations on the biology of
An IPM strategy has been developed to manage infestations of mould mite in stored animal feed, due to the increasing importance as pest of storage facilities and feed processing. This approach includes some features such as adopting striking hygiene practice in and around the processing and storage facility, controlling the moistness content of the processed feed to 12%, rejection of infested grain at the receiving point, and admixing vegetable oil to some feed (2% w/w). Moreover, seven contact insecticides and phosphine fumigant for their effectiveness against the mould mite have been evaluated to measure their potential integration into the IPM tactic. Amongst these, pyrethrin synergized with a newly developed bacterium-based material spinosad, piperonyl butoxide and insect growth regulator s-methoprene controlled the mites. Moreover, the fumigant phosphine at 1 mg/L over a 6 days exposure period also controlled these mites. Until now, the IPM tactic, has resulted in a complete eradication of the mite population in this particular case of stored animal feed [127].
Even though, the predatory mites aggressively feed on many pest species, their reproduction and dispersion to cover the affected area and time spent in prey searching can slow the mites management. Because of this limitation,
In the case of multiple pests inhabiting different plant parts, a higher rate or multiple predator releases may be required to achieve the desired level of control. In some natural pest control programs, various predator species are released to manage a single prey species. Whereas, in some circumstances, release of multiple species may offer a well control, while in other cases species may interact with each other for a possible negative outcome on biological control package. In a study, intraguild predation has been evaluated between three phytoseiid species,
Predator mites are most effective when applied at the first sign of a mites or insect pests infestations. These will typically turn out to be established in the crop afterward one introduction, wherever there persist either mites or pollen for diet. When prey become infrequent, for example,
4. Conclusion
Ongoing studies include the biology and ecology of some mite predators along with pest mites and how biotic and abiotic factors affect pests and their natural enemies. To cut a long story into short, from lookout of biological control of pest mites or insect pests, the knowledge on biology and ecology of some predacious as well as harmful mites is undoubtedly important. A successful management plan requires information about a species biology including its diet, lifecycle and mass releases of predator, how it interacts with the environment and with other species as well as species behavior and how the behavior of both pests and beneficial enemies can be manipulated to reduce or prevent yield losses. Information of the biology and ecology of mite pests and their natural enemies contained in the chapter is a prerequisite to keep a minimum economic impact of pests, eliminate pest menaces by organic pest controlling and implement efficient plantation protection practices with modern thinking on environmental problems.
References
- 1.
Sarwar M. Diseases transmitted by blood sucking mites and integrated mite management for their prevention. American Journal of Food Science and Health. 2016; 2 (6):169-175 - 2.
Sarwar M. Mites (Arachnida: Acarina) affecting humans and steps taking for the solution of problematics. International Journal for Research in Mechanical Engineering. 2016; 1 (7):1-14 - 3.
Sarwar M. Mites (Acarina) as vectors of plant pathogens and relation of these pests to plant diseases. Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal. 2015; 1 (4):150-156 - 4.
Ashfaq M, Sarwar M, Pervez A. A description of two new species (hypopi) of the genus Acotyledon (Acariformes: Acaridae) from Pakistan. Russian Journal of Acarology, Acarina. 1998;6 (1-2):51-57 - 5.
Sarwar M, Ashfaq M, Aslam M. Two new species of genus Histiostoma from Pakistan (Acari: Histiostomatidae). Pakistan Entomologist. 1998;20 (1-2):1-10 - 6.
Ashfaq M, Sarwar M, Aslam M. Taxonomic studies on hypopi of genus Acotyledon Oudemans from Pakistan. Pakistan Entomologist. 1998;20 (1-2):66-74 - 7.
Ashfaq M, Sarwar M, Akbar S. A new species (hypopus) of the genus Lackerbaueria Zakhvatkin (Acarina: Acaridae) from Pakistan. Russian Journal of Acarology, Acarina. 1999;7 (1):53-56 - 8.
Ashfaq M, Sarwar M. Three new hypopi of genus Acotyledon Oudemans (Acarina: Acaridae) from Pakistan. Pakistan Entomologist. 1999;21 (1-2):3-14 - 9.
Ashfaq M, Sarwar M, Akbar S. Two new (hypopus) of the genus Glyphanoetus Oudemans (Acari: Histiostomatidae). Journal of Acarological Society of Japan. 1999;8 (1):21-26 - 10.
Sarwar M. New mite (hypopus) from central Punjab (Pakistan) in the family Acaridae (Acari: Astigmata). Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 2000; 43 (6):374-377 - 11.
Ashfaq M, Sarwar M, Ali A. Two new mite species (hypopi) of the genus Histiostoma (Acari: Histiostomatidae) from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2000;37 (1-2):33-41 - 12.
Sarwar M. Forcellinia tumulus , a new species in Pakistan belonging to the family Acaridae (Acari.). Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 2001;44 (1):33-37 - 13.
Ashfaq M, Sarwar M. Description of two new species (hypopus) of the genus Copronomoia Mahunka (Acari: Histiostomatidae) from Pakistan. Russian Journal of Acarology, Acarina. 2001;9 (1):125-130 - 14.
Sarwar M, Ashfaq M. Contribution towards the taxonomic study on the mite (Hypopus) of the genus Histiostoma Oudemans (Acarina: Histiostomatidae) of Pakistan. Balochistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2002;3 (2):25-35 - 15.
Siddiqui QH, Sarwar M. Pre and post-harvest losses in wheat. Pakistan and Gulf Economist. 2002; 21 (6):30-32 - 16.
Sarwar M, Ashfaq M. Two new Caloglyphus Berlese mites (Astigmata: Acaridae) recorded in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 2004;47 (6):455-461 - 17.
Sarwar M. Stored grain and stored product mites from Pakistan and Azad Kashmir. Pakistan and Gulf Economists. 2004; 23 (10):30-31 - 18.
Sarwar M, Ashfaq M, Akbar S. Numerical taxonomy of two new mite species of the genus Caloglyphus Berlese (Acaridae) from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 2005;48 (5):345-353 - 19.
Sarwar M, Ashfaq M, Nadeem S. On the identity of new acarid mites in genus Caloglyphus Berlese occurring in Asian expanse (Pakistan) (Acarina: Acaridae). Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 2009;1 (1):38-47 - 20.
Sarwar M, Ashfaq M. Contribution toward the description of a new Caloglyphus Berlese mite (Acarina: Acaridae) from collections in Pakistan. Biological Diversity and Conservation. 2010;3 (1):45-50 - 21.
Sarwar M, Ashfaq M. Description of a new Caloglyphus Berlese mite (Acari: Acaridae) infesting pulse in Pakistan. The Nucleus. 2010;47 (1):61-66 - 22.
Sarwar M, Ashfaq M. Studies on taxonomy of a new mite species in the genus Caloglyphus Berlese (Acarina: Acaridae) recognized in Pakistan. Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds. 2012;3 (2):15-20 - 23.
Sarwar M, Ashfaq M. An undescribed mite of genus Caloglyphus Berlese (Acarina: Acaridae) collected from oriental region, Pakistan. Biological Diversity and Conservation. 2012;5 (2):1-6 - 24.
Sarwar M. Feasibility for development of comparative life histories and predation of predatory mites in Phytoseiidae complex and their experimental manipulations for pests control. International Journal of Animal Biology. 2015; 1 (5):150-157 - 25.
Sarwar M. Mite pests (Acari) in mango ( Mangifera indica L.) plantations and implementation of control strategy. Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2015;1 (3):41-47 - 26.
Sarwar M. Frequency of insect and mite Fauna in chilies Capsicum annum L., onionAllium cepa L. and garlicAllium sativum L. cultivated areas, and their integrated management. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production. 2012;3 (5):173-178 - 27.
Sarwar M, Ashfaq M, Ahmad A, Randhawa MA. Assessing the potential of assorted plant powders on survival of Caloglyphus grain mite (Acari: Acaridae) in wheat grain. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Bioresource Engineering Research. 2013;2 (1):1-6 - 28.
Sarwar M. Studies on resistance discrepancy in seeds of local and exotic lentil ( Lens culinaris Medikus) genotypes againstCallosobruchus analis L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). African Entomology: Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa. 2013;21 (2):273-279 - 29.
Sarwar M, Saqib SM. Rearing of predatory seven spotted ladybird beetle Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coccinellidae) on natural and artificial diets under laboratory conditions. Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 2010;42 (1):47-51 - 30.
Shah SMM, Ahmad N, Sarwar M, Tofique M. Rearing of Bactrocera zonata (Diptera: Tephritidae) for parasitoids production and managing techniques for fruit flies in mango orchards. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 2014;34 (S1):108-113 - 31.
Sarwar M, Ahmad N, Rashid A, Shah SMM. Valuation of gamma irradiation for proficient production of parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae & Eucoilidae) in the management of the peach fruit-fly, Bactrocera zonata (Saunders). International Journal of Pest Management. 2015;61 (2):126-134 - 32.
Grafton-Cardwell EE, Ouyang Y, Striggow RA. Predacious mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for control of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) in nursery citrus. Environmental Entomology. 1997; 26 :121-130 - 33.
McMurtry JA, Croft BA. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology. 1997; 42 :291-321 - 34.
Moraes GJD, McMurtry JA, Denmark HA, Campos CB. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa. 2004; 434 :1-494 - 35.
Beard JJ. Taxonomy and biological control: Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae), a case study. Australian Journal of Entomology. 1999;38 :51-59 - 36.
Sarwar M. Comparative life history characteristics of the mite predator Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on mite and pollen diets. International Journal of Pest Management. 2016;62 :140-148 - 37.
Sarwar M, Kongming W, Xuenong X. Evaluation of biological aspects of the predacious mite, Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) due to prey changes using some selected arthropods. International Journal of Acarology. 2009;35 (6):503-509 - 38.
Brodsgaard HF, Hansen LS. Effect of Amblyseius cucumeris andAmblyseius barkeri as biological control agents ofThrips tabaci on glasshouse cucumbers. Biocontrol Science and Technology. 1992;2 :215-223 - 39.
Brodeur J, Bouchard A, Turcotte G. Potential of four species of predatory mites as biological control agents of the tomato russet mite, Aculops lycopersici (Massee) (Eriophyidae). Canadian Entomologist. 1997;129 :1-6 - 40.
Weintraub PG, Kleitman S, Mori R, Shapira N, Palevsky E. Control of broad mites ( Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks)) on organic greenhouse sweet peppers (Capsicum annuum L.) with the predatory mite,Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans). Biological Control. 2003;26 :300-309 - 41.
Arthurs S, McKenzie CL, Chen J, Dogramaci M, Brennan M, Houben K, et al. Evaluation of Neoseiulus cucumeris andAmblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as biological control agents of chili thrips,Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on pepper. Biological Control. 2009;49 :91-96 - 42.
Kakkar G, Kumar V, Seal DR, Liburd OE, Stansly P. Predation by Neoseiulus cucumeris andAmblyseius swirskii onThrips palmi andFrankliniella schultzei on cucumber. Biological Control. 2016;92 (1):85-91 - 43.
Navajas M, Thistlewood H, Lagnel J, Marshall D, Tsagkarakou A, Pasteu N. Field releases of the predatory mite Neoseiulus fallacis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Canada, monitored by pyrethroid resistance and allozyme markers. Biological Control. 2001;20 (3):191-198 - 44.
Helle W, Sabelis MW. Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 1B. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1985. p. 458 - 45.
Haralabos T, Salvatore R. On the identity of Neoseiulus fallacis (Garman 1948) (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae): Redescription of the species and description of the new speciesNeoseiulus garmani . International Journal of Acarology. 2016;42 (8):394-404 - 46.
Croft BA, Messing RH, Dunley JE, Strong WB. Effects of humidity on eggs and immatures of Neoseiulus fallacis, Amblysieus andersoni, Metaseiulus occidentalis andTyphlodromus pyri (Phytoseiidae): Implications for biological control on apple, caneberry, strawberry and hop. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 1993;17 (6):451-459 - 47.
Halliday RB. Mites of Australia: A checklist and bibliography. In: Monographs on Invertebrate Taxonomy, Vol. 5. Australia: CSIRO; 1998. p. 317 - 48.
Pratt PD, Rosetta R, Croft BA. Plant-related factors influence the effectiveness of Neoseiulus fallacis (Acari: Phytoseiidae), a biological control agent of spider mites on landscape ornamental plants. Journal of Economic Entomology. 2002;95 :1135-1141 - 49.
Naher L, Haque M. Biological control of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) usingPhytoseiullus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 2007;3 :550-553 - 50.
Ali FS. Life tables of Phytoseilus macropilis (Banks) (Gamasida: Phytseiidae) at different temperatures. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 1998;22 :335-342 - 51.
Escudero LA, Ferragut F. Life-history of predatory mites Neoseiulus californicus andPhytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on four spider mite species as prey, with special reference toTetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae). Biological Control. 2005;32 :378-384 - 52.
Canias L, Amano H, Ochiai N, Takeda M. Biology and predation of the Japanese strain of Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology. 2006;11 :141-157 - 53.
Tello V, Vargas R, Araya J, Cardemil A. Biological parameters of Cydnodromus picanus andPhytoseiulus persimilis raised on the carmine spider mite,Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae). Ciencia e Investigación Agraria. 2009;36 (2):277-290 - 54.
Hoffmann MP, Frodsham AC. Natural Enemies of Vegetable Insect Pests. Ithaca, NY: Cooperative Extension, Cornell University; 1993. p. 63 - 55.
Opit GP, Nechols JR, Margolies DC. Biological control of two spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), usingPhytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseidae) on ivy geranium: Assessment of predator release ratios. Biological Control. 2004;29 :445-452 - 56.
Tixier MS, Guichou S, Kreiter S. Morphological variation in the biological control agent Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Consequences for diagnostic reliability and synonymies. Invertebrate Systematics. 2008;22 :453-469 - 57.
Gotoh L, Tsuchiya A, Kitashima Y. Influence of prey on developmental performance, reproduction and prey consumption of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology. 2006;40 :189-204 - 58.
Greco NM, Sanchez NE, Liljesthrom GG. Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as a potential control agent ofTetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): Effect of pest/predator ratio on pest abundance on strawberry. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 2005;37 (1-2):57-66 - 59.
Fraulo AB, Liburd OE. Biological control of twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae , with predatory mite,Neoseiulus californicus , in strawberries. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 2007;43 :109-119 - 60.
Xu X, Wang B, Wang E, Zhang ZQ. Comments on the identity of Neoseiulus californicus sensu lato (Acari: Phytoseiidae) with a redescription of this species from southern China. Systematic and Applied Acarology. 2013;18 :329-344 - 61.
Calvo FJ, Bolckmans K, Belda JE. Control of Bemisia tabaci andFrankliniella occidentalis in cucumber byAmblyseius swirskii . BioControl. 2011;56 :185-192 - 62.
Stansly PA, Castillo JA. Control of broadmites, spidermites, and whiteflies using predaceous mites in open-field pepper and eggplant. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society. 2010; 122 :253-257 - 63.
Onzo A, Houedokoho AF, Hanna R. Potential of the predatory mite, Amblyseius swirskii to suppress the broad mite,Polyphagotarsonemus latus on the gboma eggplant,Solanum macrocarpon . Journal of Insect Science. 2012;12 :7 - 64.
Juan-Blasco M, Qureshi JA, Urbaneja A, Stansley PA. Predatory mite, Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae), for biological control of Asian citrus psyllid,Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). Florida Entomologist. 2012;95 :543-551 - 65.
Messelink G. Typhlodromips swirskii (Athias-Henriot) (Acari: Phytoseiidae): A new predator for thrips control in greenhouse cucumber. Integrated Control in Protected Crops, Temperate Climate IOBC/WPRS Bulletin. 2005;28 (1):183-186 - 66.
Chen X, Zhang Y, Ji J, Lin J. Experimental life table for population of Amblyseius swirskii (Athias-Henriot) fed onTetranychus truncatus (Ehara). Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2011;3 :018 - 67.
Lee HS, Gillespie DR. Life tables and development of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) at different temperatures. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 2011;53 :17-27 - 68.
Park HH, Shipp L, Buitenhuis R. Predation, development and oviposition by the predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on tomato russet mite (Acari: Eriophyidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. 2010;103 :563-569 - 69.
Park HH, Shipp L, Buitenhuis R, Ahn JJ. Life history parameters of a commercially available Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) fed on cattail (Typha latifolia ) pollen and tomato russet mite (Aculops lycopersici ). Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 2011;14 :497-501 - 70.
Buitenhuis R, Shipp L, Scott-Dupree C. Dispersal of Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on potted greenhouse chrysanthemum. Biological Control. 2010;52 :110-114 - 71.
Opit GP, Nechols JR, Margolies DC, Williams KA. Survival, horizontal distribution, and economics of releasing predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) using mechanical blowers. Biological Control. 2005; 33 :344-351 - 72.
Hoy CW, Glenister CS. Releasing Amblyseius spp. (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) to controlThrips tabaci (Thysanoptra: Thripidae) on cabbage. Entomophaga. 1991;34 (6):561-573 - 73.
Bonde J. Biological studies including population growth parameters of the predatory mite Amblyseius barkeri [Acarina: Phytoseiidae] at 25°C in the laboratory. Entomophaga. 1989;34 (2):275-287 - 74.
Reda AS, Momen FM. Influence of prey availability on development, prey consumption and reproduction of Typhlodromus pelargonicus andAmblyseius barkeri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Bulletin of the Institute of Zoology Egypt. 1993;41 :105-114 - 75.
Momen FM. Feeding, development and reproduction of Amblyseius barkeri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on various kinds of food substances. Acarologia. 1995;36 (2):101-105 - 76.
Croft BA, Croft MB. Larval survival and feeding by immature Metaseiulus occidentalis ,Amblyseius andersoni andTyphlodromus pyri on life stage groups ofNeoseiulus fallacis Tetranychus urticae Koch and phytoseiid larvae. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 1993;17 (9):685-693 - 77.
Zhang ZQ , Croft BA. A comparative life history study of immature Amblyseius fallacies ,Amblyseius andersoni ,Typhlodromus occidentalis andTyphlodromus pyri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) with a review of larval feeding patterns. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 1994;18 :631-657 - 78.
Ivancich GP. Natural alternative food for Amblyseius andersoni Chant (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on plants without prey. Redia. 1988;71 :161-171 - 79.
Duso C, Camporese P, Van Der Geest LPS. Toxicity of a number of pesticides to strains of Typhlodromus pyri andAmblyseius andersoni (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga. 1992;37 :363-372 - 80.
Duso C, Pasini M. Distribution of the predatory mite Amblyseius andersoni (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on different apple cultivars. Anz. Schadlingsk. Journal of Pest Science. 2003;76 :33-40 - 81.
Chant DA, JA MM. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part I. Neoseiulini new tribe. International Journal of Acarology. 29 (1):3-46 - 82.
Szabo P, Arpad B. A new method for the release of Amblyseius andersoni (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in young apple orchards. European Journal of Entomology. 2013;110 (3):477-482 - 83.
Zou P, Gao JR, Ma EP. A study of food preference and predatory capacity of Amblyseius pseudolongispinosus . Natural Enemies of Insects. 1986;8 (3):137-141 - 84.
Jiang HL, Wang ED, Lu JL, Wang BM, Xu XN. Preference of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and functional responses ofN. californicus andAmblyseius pseudolongispinosus to prey developmental stages ofTetranychus cinnabarinus . Chinese Journal of Biological Control. 2015;31 (1):8-13 - 85.
Xin JL, Liang LR, Ke LS. A new species of the genus Amblyseius from China (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology. 1981;7 (1-4):75-80 - 86.
Zhou AN, Chang SS. Experimental studies on the biological characteristics of Amblyseius pseudolongispinosus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Chinese Journal of Biological Control. 1989;5 (4):153-156 - 87.
Xu X, Liang L. Studies on the behavior and reproduction of Amblyseius pseudolongispinosus (Xin, Liang & Ke) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Journal of Anhui Agricultural University. 1994;21 :81-86 - 88.
Sarwar M, Xuenong X, Kongming W. Effects of different flours on the biology of the pry Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank) (Acarina: Acaridae) and the predatorNeoseiulus pseudolongispinosus (Xin, Liang and Ke) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology. 2010;36 (5):363-369 - 89.
Sarwar M, Xuenong X, Kongming W. Suitability of webworm Loxostege sticticalis L. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) eggs for consumption by immature and adults of the predatory miteNeoseiulus pseudolongispinosus (Xin, Liang and Ke) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 2012;10 (3):786-793 - 90.
Zhu K, Lisheng K, Jieliu X. Selection and genetic analysis of fenvalerate resistance in Amblyseius pseudolongispinosus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology. 1996;1 (1):5-10 - 91.
Sarwar M, Xuenong X, Wang E, Kongming W. The potential of four mite species (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as predators of sucking pests on protected cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) crop. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2011;6 (1):73-78 - 92.
Yang Y, Jiang XH, Xu XN, Wang ED. Effects of two species of spider mites and their different developmental stages on the offspring sex ratios of the predatory mite Amblyseius pseudolongispinosus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Chinese Journal of Biological Control. 2013;29 (1):17-23 - 93.
Barker PS. Bionomics of Cheyletus eruditus (Schrank) (Acarina: Cheyletidae), a predator ofLepidoglyphus destructor (Schrank) (Acarina: Glycyphagidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 1991;69 (9):2321-2325 - 94.
Fain A, Bochkov AV. A review of the genus Cheyletus Latreille, 1776 (Acari: Cheyletidae). Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Entomologie. 2001;71 :83-113 - 95.
Zdarkova E, Horak P. Development of Cheyletus eruditus (Schrank) (Acarina: Cheyletidae) at low temperature. Plant Protection Science. 1999;35 :14-16 - 96.
Pekar S, Zdarkova E. A model of the biological control of Acarus siro byCheyletus eruditus (Acari: Acaridae, Cheyletidae) on grain. Journal of Pest Science. 2004;77 (1):1-10 - 97.
Schilliger LH, Morel D, Bonwitt JH, Marquis O. Cheyletus eruditus (taurrus): An effective candidate for the biological control of the snake mite (Ophionyssus natricis ). Crop Protection. 1986;5 (2):122-124 - 98.
Zdarkova E. Mass rearing of the predator Cheyletus eruditus (Schrank) (Acarina: Cheyletidae) for biological control of acarid mites infesting stored products. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 2013;44 (3):654-659 - 99.
Lukas J, Stejskal V, Jarosik V, Hubert J, Zdarkova E. Differential natural performance of four Cheyletus predatory mite species in Czech grain stores. Journal of Stored Products Research. 2007;43 :97-102 - 100.
Sabelis MW. Development. In: Helle W, Sabelis MW, editors. Spider Mites, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests. Vol. IB. Amsterdam, The Netherland: Elsevier; 1985. pp. 43-53 - 101.
Sarwar M. Some insect pests (Arthropoda: Insecta) of summer vegetables, their identification, occurrence, damage and adoption of management practices. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research. 2014; 1 (4):108-117 - 102.
Raworth DA, Gillespie DR, Roy M, Thistlewood HMA. Tetranychus urticae Koch, two spotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae). In: Mason PG, Huber JT, editors. Biological Control Programmes in Canada, 1981-2000. CAB International; 2002. pp. 259-265 - 103.
Sarwar M. Knowing about identify and mode of damage by insect pests attacking winter vegetables and their management. Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2014; 2 (4):1-8 - 104.
Enohara K, Amano H. Simple method for discriminating six common species of red Tetranychus spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Japan. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology. 1996;40 (4):311-315 - 105.
Zhang ZQ , Jacobson RJ. Using adult female morphological characters for differentiating Tetranychus urticae complex (Acari: Tetranychidae) from greenhouse tomato crops in UK. Systematic and Applied Acarology. 2000;5 :69-76 - 106.
Elmoghazy MME. Survey and taxonomy of mites associated with fruit orchards trees from Sakaka governorate, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Agriculture and Biosciences. 2016; 5 (6):341-346 - 107.
Watanabe MA, Moraes G, Gastaldo IJ, Nicolella G. Biological control of two spotted spider mite with predatory phytoseiids (Acari: Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae) on cucumber and strawberry. Scientia Agricola. 1994; 51 (1):75-81 - 108.
Zhang ZQ. Mites of Greenhouses: Identification, Biology and Control. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2003. p. 244 - 109.
Sarwar M. Influence of host plant species on the development, fecundity and population density of pest Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) and predatorNeoseiulus pseudolongispinosus (Xin, Liang and Ke) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science. 2014;42 (1):10-20 - 110.
Sarwar M, Kongming W, Xuenong X, Wang E. Evaluations of four mite predators (Acari: Phytosiidae) released for suppression of spider mite infesting protected crop of sweet pepper ( Capsicum annuum L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2011;6 (15):3509-3514 - 111.
Popov SY. Long-term characteristics of seasonal development of spider mites of the genus Tetranychus Dufour, 1832 (Acariformes, Tetranychidae) on strawberry in Moscow Province. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie. 2003;82 (1):71-85 - 112.
Ghoshal S, Gupta SK, Mukherjee B. Seasonal abundance of phytophagous and predatory mites on mangrove vegetation and agri-horticultural crops of Sundarban biosphere reserve. Acarina. 2004; 12 (1):49-56 - 113.
Ashutosh S, Pratap KP. First record of the carmine spider mite, Tetranychus urticae , infestingWithania somnifera in India. Journal of Insect Science. 2012;12 :50 - 114.
Kaimal SG, Ramani N. Life cycle of Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval) (Acari: Tetranychidae) on Lablab bean. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences. 2011;1 (2):43-47 - 115.
Sarwar M. Recognition of some lady beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) deadly sighted for insect and mite pests in agroecosystems. International Journal of Entomology Research. 2016; 1 (2):29-34 - 116.
Sarwar M. Biological control to maintain natural densities of insects and mites by field releases of lady beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). International Journal of Entomology and Nematology. 2016; 2 (1):21-26 - 117.
Sarwar M. Mites—the tiny killers to push honeybee colonies into collapse and integrated pest management. International Journal for Research in Applied Physics. 2016; 1 (7):12-21 - 118.
Sarwar M. Mite culprits for causing mortality and reduction in population of honey bee colonies and measures for pests control. International Journal for Research in Applied Chemistry. 2016; 1 (7):10-22 - 119.
Sarwar M. Comparing abundance of predacious and phytophagous mites (Acarina) in conjunction with resistance identification between Bt and non-Bt cotton cultivars. African Entomology: Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa. 2013; 21 (1):108-118 - 120.
Sarwar M. Management of spider mite Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval) (Tetranychidae) infestation in cotton by releasing the predatory miteNeoseiulus pseudolongispinosus (Xin, Liang and Ke) (Phytoseiidae). Biological Control. 2013;65 (1):37-42 - 121.
Mullen GR, OConnor BM. Mites. In: Mullen G, Mullen GR, Durden L, editors. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 2nd ed. Academic Press; 2009. pp. 423-482 - 122.
Canfield MS, Wrenn WJ. Tyrophagus putrescentiae mites grown in dog food cultures and the effect mould growth has on mite survival and reproduction. Veterinary Dermatology. 2010;21 (1):58-63 - 123.
Jeong KY, Kim WK, Lee JS, Lee J, Lee IY, Kim KE, et al. Immunoglobulin E reactivity of recombinant allergen Tyr p 13 from Tyrophagus putrescentiae homologous to fatty acid binding protein. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology. 2005;12 (5):581-585 - 124.
Malik A, Gulati R, Duhan K, Poonia A. Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank) (Acari: Acaridae) as a pest of grains: A review. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2018;6 (2):2543-2550 - 125.
Mostafa AM, Sakr HHI, Yassin EMA, Abdel-Khalik AR. Effect of different diets on the biology of the Astigmatid mite Tyrophagus putrescentiae . Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2013;91 (4):1439-1445 - 126.
Klimov PB, OConnor BM. Acarus putrescentiae Schrank, 1781 (currentlyTyrophagus putrescentiae ; Acariformes, Acaridae): Proposed conservation of usage by designation of a replacement neotype. The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature. 2010;61 (1):24-27 - 127.
Nayak MK. Management of mould mite Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank) (Acarina: Acaridae): A case study in stored animal feed. International Pest Control. 2006;48 (3):128-130 - 128.
Gerson U, Weintraub PG. Mites for the control of pests in protected cultivation. Pest Management Science. 2007; 63 :658-676 - 129.
Maleknia B, Fathipour Y, Soufbaf M. Intraguild predation among three phytoseiid species, Neoseiulus barkeri ,Phytoseiulus persimilis andAmblyseius swirskii . Systematic and Applied Acarology. 2016;21 (4):417-426 - 130.
Beard JJ. A review of Australian Neoseiulus Hughes andTyphlodromips de Leon (Acari: Phytoseiidae: Amblyseiinae). Invertebrate Taxonomy. 2001;15 :73-158