Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Metal Organic Frameworks-Based Optical Thin Films

Written By

Cheng-an Tao, Jianfang Wang and Rui Chen

Submitted: February 12th, 2019 Reviewed: April 11th, 2019 Published: January 15th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.86290

Chapter metrics overview

967 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are organic-inorganic hybrid materials with ordered pore structures assembled by metal centers and organic ligands through coordination bonds, but conventionally they are mostly in powder form. In recent years, metal-organic framework films have received increasing attention due to their potential applications in nanotechnology and nanodevices. The intrinsic ultrahigh porosity of MOFs may lead to a low refractive index of MOF materials. In addition, over 70,000 types of MOFs exist, and their properties can be tuned through the adoption of different metal motifs, organic ligands, or crystal morphologies. These characteristics make MOFs a potential new generation of optical thin film materials. In this chapter, the fabrication methods of MOF thin films, the optical properties of MOF optical thin films, and their application in optical sensors were described.


  • metal-organic frameworks
  • thin film
  • fabrication method
  • optical property
  • refractive index
  • sensor
  • naked eye detection

1. Introduction

An optical film refers to a type of optical dielectric material that is attached to a surface of an optical device and is composed of a thin and uniform layered medium that propagates a light beam through an interface [1]. Commonly used optical films include: reflective films, antireflection films, polarizing films, interference filters, and beamsplitters [2]. Although there are many mature technologies and commercial products, with the increasing requirements of modern optics and optoelectronic devices, the exploration of new optical films is still the focus of current research.

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of porous materials that have developed rapidly in the past 20 years [3, 4]. They are crystalline materials that are composed of inorganic metal ions or metal-oxo cluster nodes and organic bridging ligands through coordination bonds. Due to the diversity of metal ions and organic bridging ligands, and the diversity of coordination linkages, there are theoretically unlimited types of MOFs, and more than 70,000 species have been reported so far, which are still increasing. MOFs have many inherently excellent properties, such as rich and tunable pore structure (pore size, pore shape, and pore opening), large specific surface area, regulatable chemical microenvironment, and good thermal stability [5, 6, 7]. They also can show special luminescent properties, magnetic properties, electrical conductivity, catalytic properties, etc. by selecting a particular metal ion or ligand. These properties make MOFs materials of great potential applications in many fields, such as gas adsorption and storage [8], separation [9], catalysis [10, 11], drug delivery and sustained release [12], medical imaging [12], luminescent materials, sensing [13, 14, 15, 16], and so on.

In the field of optical films also, MOFs can be useful. Its almost infinite variety, tunable optical properties, and some of the inherently superior properties described above make it an excellent material for building optical films. However, MOFs are usually prepared in bulk or in powder form. Preparation of MOFs into a flat and uniform optical film is a prerequisite for their application. The optical properties of optical films are their core properties. How to effectively control their optical properties is a key issue in the study of MOF optical films. Therefore, in this chapter, firstly, five major methods for preparing MOF optical films—spin-coating, dip-coating, self-assembly, direct growth, and step-by-step liquid phase epitaxy (LPE) methods—were introduced, and a comparison of them was made under the consideration of the same MOF as the model. Then, the method of determination of refractive index of MOF films was described. The change of the linkers and post-modification of bridged ligands to control the optical properties of MOF optical films were discussed. At last, MOF thin films used as optical sensors were presented, including monolayer MOF thin films, MOF film-based 1DPC, and MOF film-combined optical fiber.


2. Fabrication methods of MOF thin films

At present, a series of methods have been developed to prepare MOF films [17, 18], but the flatness of most of the resulting films cannot meet the requirements of optical films. To date, there are mainly five typical methods to produce MOF optical films with high quality.

2.1 Spin-coating method

Spin coating is widely used in microfabrication of functional oxide layers on glass or single crystal substrates using sol-gel precursors, where it can be used to create uniform thin films with nanoscale thicknesses [19]. Hinterholzinger et al. [20] reported the fabrication of one-dimensional photonic crystals (1DPCs, also called Bragg stacks) based on zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF)-8 by spin coating for the first time. 1DPC was composed of multilayer of alternative ZIF-8 layers and titanium dioxide layers. In 2013, Lotsch’s group [21] fabricated MOF thin films by spin-coating a MOF nanoparticle suspension onto a flat substrate. Two kinds of MOFs have been explored: one is copper trimesate (Cu3(BTC)2, also known as HKUST-1, HKUST = Hong Kong University of Science & Technology), which contains Cu (II)-paddlewheel-type nodes and trimesate struts, and the other one is the isoreticular metal-organic framework-3 (IRMOF-3, zinc amino-terephthalate).

Our group [16, 22, 23, 24] successfully applied this method to construct many other MOF thin films, such as iron (III) terephthalate MIL-88B (MIL = Materials of Institut Lavoisier), aluminum terephthalate MIL-53, MIL-101(Cr), and their analogs. We [16] reported the first example of flexible MOF optical thin film fabricated by spin coating (Figure 1). The flexible NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) was chosen as the model, and nanorods of NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) were prepared by hydrothermal method, and then MOF optical films prepared by spin-coating. The thickness of the film was nearly proportional to both suspension concentration and rotation cycles, and inversely proportional to the spin speed. And the rod-shaped MOFs tended to be aligned parallel to the substrate due to rotational shear forces. It provides the basis for subsequent application of properties.

Figure 1.

Photograph of a series of NH2-MIL-88B films deposited on silicon wafers with various concentrations (from left to right: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 wt%) by spin-coating method. Reproduced from Ref. [16] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.

2.2 Dip-coating method

As a popular alternative to spin coating, dip-coating methods are frequently employed to produce thin films from sol-gel precursors for research purposes, where it is generally used for applying films onto flat or cylindrical substrates [25]. In 2009, Gérard Férey et al. [26] first synthesized a colloidal dispersion of MIL-89, and then prepared a MIL-89 optical film by a dip-coating method. The film with a surface roughness of approximately 3 nm is very uniform. Subsequently, the team used microwave method to obtain nanoscale MIL-101(Cr) [27], MIL-100(Cr) [28], and MIL-100(Fe) [28], and prepared optical films using them by a similar dip-coating method. The MOF films are deposited from MOF nanoparticles naturally, and their surface roughness is about half of the size of MOF nanoparticles. The premise of this method is to obtain MOF nanoparticles with better dispersibility. MIL-100(Al) particles prepared by the same method cannot be used to fabricate optical thin films because of their large particle size (>500 nm) [28].

2.3 Self-assembly

Self-assembly is a process in which a disordered system of preexisting components forms an organized structure or pattern as a consequence of specific, local interactions among the components themselves, without external direction. The building blocks of self-assembly are not only molecules, but span a wide range of nano- and mesoscopic structures. In 2014, Prof. Huo [15] proposed a method for self-assembly of MOF nanoparticles. First, the nanoparticles of UiO-66 (UiO = University of Oslo) were prepared; then, their surface was modified with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and finally dispersed in mixture of water and ethanol (v:v = 1:1) to obtain a dispersion. A glass substrate was inserted into the water in a culture dish, and a small amount of the above dispersion was dropped on the surface of the water. Then, the MOF nanoparticles were rapidly spread to the surface of the water, and a 2% sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDS) solution was dropped to make the MOF dispersion closely arranged into a single layer film. The film was transferred out to obtain a monolayer MOF film on the glass substrate. The MOF multilayer films can be obtained by repeating the process.

2.4 Direct in situ growth

MOFs prepared by direct in situ growth usually produce thick and rough membranes or dispersive particles. Lu et al. [14] successfully constructed ZIF-8-based optical thin films via a direct growth method that functioned as selective sensors for chemical vapors and gases. They immersed a glass substrate or silicon wafer in a newly prepared ZIF-8 growth solution (2-methylimidazole and Zn(NO3)2 in methanol) at room temperature. After 30 min of growth, a uniform ZIF-8 film of about 50 nm was obtained. More importantly, this process can be repeated, and the thickness of each subsequent growth was increased by about 100 nm, and the resulting film exhibited a very bright structural color. The color changes as the thickness increases, as shown in Figure 3. The method has the advantages of mild reaction conditions, fast growth rate, easy control of thickness, and easy removal of solvent in MOFs after reaction.

2.5 Step-by-step liquid phase epitaxy (LPE)

Step-by-step liquid phase epitaxy alternately deposits metal and organic ligand precursors on a functionalized surface, and the two are assembled by layer-by-layer growth to obtain a MOF film (also called surface-anchored MOF, SurMOF). The MOF prepared by this method has precisely controlled thickness and growth orientation, and the thickness can be regulated by the number of cycles of growth. In 2007, Wöll et al. [29] successfully used this method to prepare crystalline MOF films, such as two-component MOFs, HKUST-1, which alternately deposit copper acetate and BTC (BTC = trimesate) ligands on –COOH or –OH-modified gold substrate. The method is further used to prepare ternary layered MOFs composed of two organic ligands, such as [Cu(bdc)2(dabco)2] (bdc = 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid; dabco = 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane) [30], [Zn2(+/−)(cam)2dabco](cam = (1R,3S)-(+)-camphoric acid) [31], Fe(pz)[Pt(CN)4](pz = pyrazine) [32, 33], DA-MOF(M(L)2(P)2)((M = Cu or Zn; L = naphthalene dicarboxylate or 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoroterephthalic acid); P = dabco) [34], and so on.

The orientation of SurMOF can be regulated by different functional groups on the surface. For example, modifying the carboxyl or hydroxyl groups on the surface of the substrate allows the growth direction of HKUST-1 to be [111] and [100], respectively, under suitable conditions [29]. On the pyridyl- or carboxyl-modified surface, the growth direction of [Cu(bdc)2(dabco)2] is [100] and [001], respectively [30].

Unfortunately, it usually takes a long time to obtain a thicker film of MOFs due to the layer-by-layer growth mechanism. To overcome this shortcoming, researchers further combined this method with the spray method [35, 36], the spin-coating method [37], and the dip-coating method [38], and thereby developed a few improved methods for rapidly preparing the MOF films. Wöll et al. [36] alternately sprayed a solution of Cu2(CH3COO)4·H2O and BTC on a substrate modified with a coordinating group by a high-pressure carrier gas to obtain a HKUST-1 film. The thickness of the cyclic growth can reach 10 nm, and the growth rate of the method is increased by two orders of magnitude compared with the original method. In 2016, Eddaoudi group [37] combined the LPE method with the spin-coating method to achieve the growth of MOF films by spin-coating the metal salt solution and the organic ligand solution on the substrate, respectively. Cu2(bdc)2•xH2O, Zn2(bdc)2•xH2O, HKUST-1, and ZIF-8 films were successively prepared on the surface of substrates such as gold and alumina, which is more effective than traditional LPE methods. MOF films with thicknesses ranging from nm to μm are available. However, compared with the conventional LPE, the roughness of the obtained MOF film is remarkably increased. Particularly, the MOF films having too much growth cycle or growing on a porous substrate are difficult to use as optical films.

In 2014, Benes team [38] at the University of Twente developed a step-by-step dip-coating method that yielded thicker, dense MOFs in a single cycle. They dipped the silicon wafer vertically into the ZnCl2 solution for 30 min, and then pulled it out at a certain rate (0.1–4 mm/s). After washing, it was immersed in the 2-methylimidazole solution for 30 min, then pulled out again, and then washed again. ZIF-8 film can be obtained by drying naturally in a culture dish, wherein the rate of each pulling is controlled to be the same, wherein the thickness of the film can be controlled by the pulling speed. The thickness of the ZIF-8 film is about 100 nm at a pulling rate of 1 mm/s. If the rate is too large or too small, the film thickness will increase. This method has not been extensively studied and has not been reported for the suitability of other types of MOFs.

2.6 Comparison

The above-mentioned five methods have shown success in preparation of MOF thin films, but there is still lack of systematic research on the performance and potential application of the MOF films from the aspects of optical films. Moreover, for the same MOF system, there is a lack of detailed comparison on these preparation methods. Recently, our group [39] chose UiO-66 as a model to prepare UiO-66 thin films by the above-mentioned five methods, respectively (Figure 2). The resultant thin films were denoted as OTF-SP, OTF-DP, OTF-SA, OTF-DG, and OTF-LPE, respectively. The qualities of the films were quantitatively analyzed using surface roughness. The arithmetic average roughness, Ra, is the arithmetic average value of filtered roughness profile and the root mean squared roughness. The OTF-SP film has the best flatness, while the OTF-DG has the worst roughness (Ra = 40.3 nm). The roughness of MOF thin films made of octahedral UiO-66 nanocrystals is generally higher than that of spherical MOF nanoparticles-based thin films [23, 24, 27]. For the dip-coated films, the more the depositions, the larger the roughness due to accumulation. For the self-assembled films, the trend is just the opposite. Their roughness decreases with the increase of depositions, thanks to the interleaved filling of following nanocrystals.

Figure 2.

(A) Crystal structure of UiO-66, consisting of Zr-O metal centers connected by terephthalate linkers. Zr, cyan; C, gray; O, red; H, omitted. (B–F) Illustration of five fabrication methods of MOF optical thin film: (B) spin coating, (C) dip coating, (D) self-assembly, (E) direct in situ growth, (F) LPE method [39].


3. Optical properties of MOF optical thin films

At present, the research on optical properties of MOF optical films is still relatively preliminary, mainly focusing on the determination of their optical constants, especially the refractive index, and the regulation of optical constants.

3.1 Determination of optical constants

Refractive index is one of the important properties and parameters of optical films (such as antireflective coatings, high reflectivity coatings, polarizing films, long/short wave filters, etc.). The main method for determining the optical constant of an optical film of MOFs is an ellipsometry method. Férey et al. [26] reported the optical film of MIL-89 prepared by the dip-coating method and determined its refractive index at 700 nm. Since MIL-89 is a flexible MOF, its refractive index is larger after absorption of water vapor. The change was reduced to 1.45. They used an ellipsometer to monitor the change in refractive index with the water vapor pressure. They also measured the refractive indices of MIL-101(Cr) [27], MIL-100(Cr) [28], and the MIL-100(Fe) [28] optical films at 700 nm, which are 1.18, 1.17, and 1.43, respectively. The optical film prepared by the spin-coating method inevitably has interparticle pores, so the determined values of the refractive index are the effective refractive indices of the MOF optical films, not the intrinsic refractive indices of the MOF materials themselves. Ranft et al. [40] also measured the refractive index of the HKUST-1 optical films prepared by spin coating using ellipsometry, and found it was only 1.20, while Redel et al. [41] studied the refractive index of HKUST-1 optical film prepared by LPE method, and found it was 1.39 at 750 nm, which was much larger than that of the spin-coated HKUST-1 film, and close to the intrinsic refractive indices of HKUST-1, benefiting from the compactness of the optical film prepared by LPE method.

The calculation of the interference fringes on the upper and lower surfaces of the optical film is another method to determine refractive index of an optical film. Lu et al. [14] determined the refractive index of the ZIF-8 film prepared by the direct growth method using this method. The value is 1.39, which is quite different from the value of 1.20 obtained by Ranft et al. [40], mainly because the ZIF-8 film prepared by Ranft et al. is composed of ZIF-8 nanoparticles, while for the dense ZIF-8 film reported by Lu et al. prepared by direct in situ growth, the value (1.39) of refractive index is closer to the that of the ZIF-8 bulk material [14].

Redel et al. [41] prepared two copper-carboxylic acid MOF Cu-BDC films on Si substrate by LPE method. The refractive index of the film was directly measured by spectroscopic ellipsometry, and the refractive index of a series of MOF films with the same Cu-BDC topology but different lengths of organic ligands was predicted. This study also showed the advantages of MOFs in optical applications: compared to the optical properties of traditional inorganic materials, MOF can be used as an optical film active material to adjust the optical properties by changing the composition or structure of the MOF.

For the UiO-66 films prepared by different methods, in general, their refractive index has this order: OTF-SP < OTF-DP < OTF-SA < OTF-LPE. The refractive index of OTF-LPE has the highest value, which can be considered as the intrinsic refractive index of UiO-66 due to the compactness and integrity of the film. The nanocrystal-based films can achieve a refractive index lower than 1.23, which is important for application as antireflection films. Such a low refractive index benefits from the cracks and voids between the UiO-66 nanocrystals. Assuming the intrinsic refractive index of UiO-66 was 1.512, the index of air is 1, the void percent in the film was estimated according to the effective medium theory [7, 23, 42]. The voids of OTF-SP, OTF-DP, and OTF-SA films are about 25, 30, and 23%, respectively.

3.2 Tuning of optical constants

The optical constants of MOF optical films can be regulated in various ways, such as changing the metal ion species, ligand type, crystal type, adsorbing guest molecules, and changing metal ions or ligands by post-modification. But many strategies have not been realized. The way of adsorbing guest molecules is more used in sensing. Here, the manners of changing linkers and post-modification of ligands are introduced to tune the optical constants of optical films.

3.2.1 Tuning through changing of the linkers

Our group [23] reported the regulation of the optical properties of MOF optical films by changing linkers with different functional groups. Five different ligands were selected and synthesized with chromium ions to obtain five MOFs of the same MIL-101 configuration, which were respectively recorded as MIL-101(Cr), NH2-MIL-101(Cr), NO2-MIL-101(Cr), OH-MIL-101(Cr), and (NO2)2-MIL-101(Cr), and the corresponding optical film was produced by spin coating. The refractive index and extinction coefficient of the MOF optical film changed with the change of linkers. The average refractive indices of MIL-101(Cr), NH2-MIL-101(Cr), OH-MIL-101(Cr), and (NO2)2-MIL-101(Cr) optical films were 1.306, 1.268, 1.223, and 1.250, respectively. NO2-MIL-101(Cr) has the lowest refractive index of only 1.208, which is lower than 1.22, making it have great potential in the preparation and application of antireflection coatings [43, 44].

The effect of ligand on the refractive index of MOF materials was further studied by eliminating the effect of porosity of the optical films. The order of the intrinsic refractive indices of MOFs is: (NO2)2-MIL-101(Cr) > NO2-MIL-101(Cr) > NH2-MIL-101(Cr) > OH-MIL-101(Cr) > MIL-101(Cr). The intrinsic refractive index of the MOF material in the same topology increases with the increase of the atomic density of the ligands.

The change of the extinction coefficient k is related to the electron-absorbing and electron-donating states of the ligands. It was found that the substitution of the electron-donating group was good at increasing the value of k, and the electron-withdrawing group would decrease k value.

3.2.2 Tuning through post-modification

Post-modification of ligands is also an effective means to change the optical constants of MOF optical films benefiting from abundant organic chemical reactions. Our group [24] reported the first example of successful regulation of optical films by post-modification of NH2-MIL-53(Al) (see Figure 3). Propionaldehyde, valeraldehyde, and heptaldehyde with different carbon chain lengths were chosen as the modifier. After modification with propionaldehyde and valeraldehyde, the neff of the MOF optical films became larger as the carbon chain length increased, and the refractive index increased from 1.292 to 1.371 (propionaldehyde modification) and 1.424 (valeraldehyde modification). After heptaldehyde modification, the refractive index changed only slightly, from 1.292 to 1.299 (Figure 3F). This is because propionaldehyde and valeraldehyde have small molecular size and can effectively modify MOF, while heptaldehyde has a larger molecular size (10.7 Å) and finds it difficult to enter into the pores of MOF (8.5 Å), so the grafting rate is not high.

Figure 3.

(A) Scheme of tuning the optical properties through post-modification. Photographs of MOF optical thin film without modification (B), modified with propionaldehyde (C), pentanal (D), and heptanal (E). (F) The effective refractive index (n) of MOF optical thin films [24].

In addition, the extinction coefficient (k) is the imaginary part of the complex refractive index and is another important parameter of the optical film. After post-modification, the extinction coefficient of the MOF optical film also changed significantly. This is due to the change in the electronic structure inside the MOFs after post-modification [41]. The stop band width of MOFs after modification decreased from 2.74 to 2.71 eV (propionaldehyde modification) and 2.68 eV (valeraldehyde modification), which is consistent with the change in k. After grafting, the optical properties of the material itself are tuned both due to changing the internal electronic structure of NH2-MIL-53 (Al) and occupying its internal pore structure.


4. The application of MOF films in optical sensors

The application of MOF optical films in optical sensing is also essentially using the changes in optical properties, typically changes in the reflectance spectra (or colors) caused by the stimulation of target molecules.

4.1 Monolayer MOF thin films

Lu and Hupp [14] constructed a ZIF-8 monolayer film-based Fabry-Pérot device, which can serve as a selective sensor for chemical vapors and gases. The red shift of the reflection spectrum was observed within 1 min due to adsorption of propane. The sensor can distinguish n-hexane and cyclohexane due to their different sizes. It can also detect the ethanol from water/ethanol system with a limit as low as 0.3 vol%, corresponding to an ethanol vapor concentration of ca. 100 ppm.

Compared with the rigid pore structure of ZIF-8, the flexible pore structure of MOFs can change more significantly after adsorbing water or organic vapors. Our group [16] chose flexible NH2-MIL-88B as a model MOF to fabricate a Fabry-Pérot device with a vivid color by spin-coating method. The NH2-MIL-88B photonic film displayed high chemical selectivity, for example, acetone induced 380-nm redshifts, while water only led to a redshift of about 50 nm, and the color would change accordingly after absorbing the water or organic vapors (Figure 4), which can be observed by the naked eye. Depending on the nature of the organic solvent and their interaction with NH2-MIL-88B, the selective breathing behavior of NH2-MIL-88B promotes the excellent selectivity of the optical films.

Figure 4.

Photographs of the NH2-MIL-88B optical film upon exposure to various organic vapors. Reproduced from Ref. [16] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.

4.2 MOF thin film-based one-dimensional photonic crystals

A one-dimensional photonic crystal (1DPC), also called Bragg stack, is a periodic nanostructure with a refractive index distribution along one direction [45]. Hinterholzinger et al. [20] presented the fabrication of 1DPC based on ZIF-8 and mesoporous titanium dioxide (TiO2) for the first time. ZIF-8 is intended to impart molecular selectivity, and mesoporous TiO2 is used to ensure high refractive index contrast and to guarantee molecular diffusion within the 1DPC. The 1DPC is sensitive and selective toward a series of chemically similar solvent vapors due to different sorption behavior of the photonic material to the solvent vapors.

In the consideration of replacing the rigid MOF with a flexible MOF, we [22] also prepared a 1DPC by alternately spin-coating NH2-MIL-88B and TiO2, wherein the TiO2 layer functioned as a high-refractive index contrast. The optical properties (color, refractive index, etc.) of the 1DPCs can be adjusted by varying the number of depositions, and the thickness of the film. Benefiting from the flexible pore structure of NH2-MIL-88B, the 1DPCs exhibited a highly selective response to different organic vapors, including dimethyl formamide, isopropanol, methanol, acetone, and ethanol (Figure 5A–C). Typically, the color of the 1DPCs in air and saturated vapors of water and EtOH were different, which can be observed by naked eye (Figure 5D). The 1DPC also can detect ethanol from 0 to 43.8 vol% in a water-ethanol mixture.

Figure 5.

(A) Reflection spectra, (B) shift of the photonic stop band, (C) chromaticity coordinates, and (D) typical images of the NH2-MIL-88B/TiO2 1DPCs upon exposure to various organic vapors. Reproduced from Ref. [22] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Liu et al. [46] described the fabrication of 1DPC by alternate deposition of HKUST-1 and indium tin oxide (ITO) layers by LPE method and sputtering method, among which HKUST-1 was used as low-refractive index layer, and ITO as high-refractive index layer. The 1DPC had a red shift response of only 38 nm for the adsorption of toluene because of the change in refractive index brought about by the adsorbing guest molecules.

4.3 MOF thin film on fiber surfaces

MOF thin films can be deposited not only on the flat surface but also on the nonplanar optical components, which further expands their use as optical sensors. Kim et al. [47] recently reported ZIF-8 films grown on linear fiber surfaces to create optical gas sensors, which are more sensitive to the target gases than Fabry-Pérot devices or 1DPCs based on normal incident light. The resultant sensors showed high sensitivity and selectivity to CO2 gas relative to other small gases such as H2, N2, O2, and CO. They also exhibited rapid (<tens of seconds) response time and excellent reversibility, which may be ascribed to the physisorption of gases into a nanoporous MOF. A refractive index-based sensing mechanism for the MOF-integrated optical fiber platform was proposed.


5. Conclusions

There are five major methods for preparing MOF optical films with high-quality spin coating, dip coating, self-assembly, direct growth, and LPE. Under the consideration of the same MOF (UiO-66) as the model, the MOF film prepared by spin coating has the best flatness, while the one prepared by direct growth is the worst one. The research on optical properties of MOF optical films is still in its early stage, mainly focusing on the determination and regulation of optical constants. The change of the linkers and post-modification of bridged ligands to control the optical properties of optical films have been realized. The application of MOF thin films in optical sensors can induce label-free optical sensors with variable colors exposed to various organic vapors. MOF films not only on the flat surface but also on the non-planar surface (for instance fiber surface) can be served as optical sensors. They can have great selectivity due to different interactions between the target molecules with MOFs. In the future, the quality of optical films will be further improved, and a wide range of chemical modification methods will be applied to control the properties of optical films, which will further meet the needs of specific optical devices. MOF optical films are expected to become the next generation of optical materials.



This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21573285) and Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2018JJ3597).


Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. Wen X, Xiong Q. A large scale perfect absorber and optical switch based on phase change material (Ge2Sb2Te5) thin film. Science China Materials. 2016;59:165-172. DOI: 10.1007/s40843-016-0129-7
  2. 2. Epstein LI. The design of optical filters. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 1952;42:806-810. DOI: 10.1364/josa.42.000806
  3. 3. Sindoro M, Yanai N, Jee A-Y, Granick S. Colloidal-sized metal–organic frameworks: Synthesis and applications. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2013;47:459-469. DOI: 10.1021/ar400151n
  4. 4. Bai Y, Dou Y, Xie L-H, Rutledge W, Li J-R, Zhou H-C. Zr-based metal–organic frameworks: Design, synthesis, structure, and applications. Chemical Society Reviews. 2016;45:2327-2367. DOI: 10.1039/C5CS00837A
  5. 5. Serre C, Mellot-Draznieks C, Surblé S, Audebrand N, Filinchuk Y, Férey G. Role of solvent-host interactions that lead to very large swelling of hybrid frameworks. Science. 2007;315:1828-1831. DOI: 10.1126/science.1137975
  6. 6. Cavka JH, Jakobsen S, Olsbye U, Guillou N, Lamberti C, Bordiga S, et al. A new zirconium inorganic building brick forming metal organic frameworks with exceptional stability. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2008;130:13850-13851. DOI: 10.1021/ja8057953
  7. 7. Park KS, Ni Z, Côté AP, Choi JY, Huang R, Uribe-Romo FJ, et al. Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103:10186-10191. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0602439103
  8. 8. Murray LJ, Dincă M, Long JR. Hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks. Chemical Society Reviews. 2009;38:1294-1314. DOI: 10.1039/B706207A
  9. 9. Kang Z, Fan L, Sun D. Recent advances and challenges of metal–organic framework membranes for gas separation. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2017;5:10073-10091. DOI:10.1039/C7TA01142C
  10. 10. Chen J, Shen K, Li Y. Greening the processes of metal–organic framework synthesis and their use in sustainable catalysis. ChemSusChem. 2017;10:3165-3187. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201700748
  11. 11. Shen C, Mao Z, Xu H, Zhang L, Zhong Y, Wang B, et al. Catalytic mof-loaded cellulose sponge for rapid degradation of chemical warfare agents simulant. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2019;213:184-191. DOI:10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.02.044
  12. 12. Horcajada P, Chalati T, Serre C, Gillet B, Sebrie C, Baati T, et al. Porous metal–organic-framework nanoscale carriers as a potential platform for drug delivery and imaging. Nature Materials. 2010;9:172-178. DOI: 10.1038/nmat2608
  13. 13. Kreno LE, Leong K, Farha OK, Allendorf M, Van Duyne RP, Hupp JT. Metal–organic framework materials as chemical sensors. Chemical Reviews. 2011;112:1105-1125. DOI: 10.1021/cr200324t
  14. 14. Lu G, Hupp JT. Metal−organic frameworks as sensors: A ZIF-8 based Fabry−Pérot device as a selective sensor for chemical vapors and gases. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010;132:7832-7833. DOI: 10.1021/ja101415b
  15. 15. Cui C, Liu Y, Xu H, Li S, Zhang W, Cui P, et al. Self-assembled metal-organic frameworks crystals for chemical vapor sensing. Small. 2014;10:3672-3676. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201302983
  16. 16. Hu Z, Tao C-a, Liu H, Zou X, Zhu H, Wang J. Fabrication of an NH2-MIL-88B photonic film for naked-eye sensing of organic vapors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2014;2:14222-14227. DOI: 10.1039/c4ta01916d
  17. 17. Bétard A, Fischer RA. Metal-organic framework thin films: From fundamentals to applications. Chemical Reviews. 2012;112:1055-1083. DOI: 10.1021/cr200167v
  18. 18. Zacher D, Shekhah O, Wöll C, Fischer RA. Thin films of metal-organic frameworks. Chemical Society Reviews. 2009;38:1418-1429. DOI: 10.1039/b805038b
  19. 19. Hanaor D, Triani G, Sorrell C. Morphology and photocatalytic activity of highly oriented mixed phase titanium dioxide thin films. Surface and Coating Technology. 2011;205:3658-3664. DOI: 10.1016/S0254-0584(02)00138-4
  20. 20. Hinterholzinger FM, Ranft A, Feckl JM, Rühle B, Bein T, Lotsch BV. One-dimensional metal–organic framework photonic crystals used as platforms for vapor sorption. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2012;22:10356-10362. DOI: 10.1039/c2jm15685g
  21. 21. Ranft A, Betzler SB, Haase F, Lotsch BV. Additive-mediated size control of MOF nanoparticles. CrystEngComm. 2013;15:9296-9300
  22. 22. Hu Z, C-a T, Wang F, Zou X, Wang J. Flexible metal–organic framework-based one-dimensional photonic crystals. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2015;3:211-216. DOI: 10.1039/C4TC01501K
  23. 23. Yin W, Tao C-a, Wang F, Huang J, Qu T, Wang J. Tuning optical properties of MOF-based thin films by changing the ligands of MOFs. Science China Materials. 2018;61:391-400. DOI: 10.1007/s40843-017-9143-5
  24. 24. Yin W, Tao C-a, Zou X, Wang F, Qu T, Wang J. The tuning of optical properties of nanoscale MOFs-based thin film through post-modification. Nanomaterials. 2017;7:242. DOI: 10.3390/nano7090242
  25. 25. Scriven L. Physics and applications of dip coating and spin coating. MRS Online Proceedings Library Archive. 1988;121:717-729
  26. 26. Horcajada P, Serre C, Grosso D, Boissiere C, Perruchas S, Sanchez C, et al. Colloidal route for preparing optical thin films of nanoporous metal–organic frameworks. Advanced Materials. 2009;21:1931-1935. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200801851
  27. 27. Demessence A, Horcajada P, Serre C, Boissière C, Grosso D, Sanchez C, et al. Elaboration and properties of hierarchically structured optical thin films of MIL-101(Cr). Chemical Communications. 2009;0:7149-7151. DOI: 10.1039/B915011K
  28. 28. Marquez AG, Demessence A, Plateroprats AE, Heurtaux D, Horcajada P, Serre C, et al. Green microwave synthesis of MIL-100(Al, Cr, Fe) nanoparticles for thin-film elaboration. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. 2012;2012:5165-5174. DOI:10.1002/ejic.201200710
  29. 29. Shekhah O, Wang H, Strunskus T, Cyganik P, Zacher D, Fischer R, et al. Layer-by-layer growth of oriented metal organic polymers on a functionalized organic surface. Langmuir. 2007;23:7440-7442. DOI: 10.1021/la701148z
  30. 30. Zacher D, Yusenko K, Bétard A, Henke S, Molon M, Ladnorg T, et al. Liquid-phase epitaxy of multicomponent layer-based porous coordination polymer thin films of [M(L)(P)0.5] type: Importance of deposition sequence on the oriented growth. Chemistry—A European Journal. 2011;17:1448-1455. DOI: 10.1002/chem.201002381
  31. 31. Liu B, Shekhah O, Arslan HK, Liu J, Wöll C, Fischer RA. Enantiopure metal–organic framework thin films: Oriented SURMOF growth and enantioselective adsorption. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2012;51:807-810. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201104240
  32. 32. Otsubo K, Haraguchi T, Sakata O, Fujiwara A, Kitagawa H. Step-by-step fabrication of a highly oriented crystalline three-dimensional pillared-layer-type metal–organic framework thin film confirmed by synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012;134:9605-9608. DOI: 10.1021/ja304361v
  33. 33. Haraguchi T, Otsubo K, Sakata O, Fujiwara A, Kitagawa H. Remarkable lattice shrinkage in highly oriented crystalline three-dimensional metal–organic framework thin films. Inorganic Chemistry. 2015;54:11593-11595. DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02207
  34. 34. So MC, Jin S, Son H-J, Wiederrecht GP, Farha OK, Hupp JT. Layer-by-layer fabrication of oriented porous thin films based on porphyrin-containing metal–organic frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2013;135:15698-15701. DOI: 10.1021/ja4078705
  35. 35. Shekhah O, Wang H, Zacher D, Fischer RA, Wöll C. Growth mechanism of metal–organic frameworks: Insights into the nucleation by employing a step-by-step route. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2009;48:5038-5041. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200900378
  36. 36. Arslan HK, Shekhah O, Wohlgemuth J, Franzreb M, Fischer RA, Wöll C. High-throughput fabrication of uniform and homogenous MOF coatings. Advanced Functional Materials. 2011;21:4228-4231. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201101592
  37. 37. Chernikova V, Shekhah O, Eddaoudi M. Advanced fabrication method for the preparation of MOF thin films: Liquidphase epitaxy approach meets spin coating method. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016;8:20459-20464. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b04701
  38. 38. Cookney J, Ogieglo W, Hrabanek P, Vankelecom I, Fila V, Benes NE. Dynamic response of ultrathin highly dense ZIF-8 nanofilms. Chemical Communications. 2014;50:11698-11700. DOI: 10.1039/C4CC04754K
  39. 39. Huang Y, Tao CA, Chen R, Sheng L, Wang J. Comparison of fabrication methods of metal-organic framework optical thin films. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:676. DOI: 10.3390/nano8090676
  40. 40. Ranft A, Niekiel F, Pavlichenko I, Stock N, Lotsch BV. Tandem MOF-based photonic crystals for enhanced analyte-specific optical detection. Chemistry of Materials. 2015;27:1961-1970. DOI: 10.1021/cm503640c
  41. 41. Redel E, Wang Z, Walheim S, Liu J, Gliemann H, Wöll C. On the dielectric and optical properties of surface-anchored metal-organic frameworks: A study on epitaxially grown thin films. Applied Physics Letters. 2013;103:091903. DOI: 10.1063/1.4819836
  42. 42. Sihvola A. Mixing rules with complex dielectric coefficients. Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications. 2000;1:393-415. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026511515005
  43. 43. Schulze M, Lehr D, Helgert M, Kley E-B, Tünnermann A. Transmission enhanced optical lenses with self-organized antireflective subwavelength structures for the UV range. Optics Letters. 2011;36:3924-3926. DOI: 10.1364/OL.36.003924
  44. 44. Wongcharee K, Brungs M, Chaplin R, Hong Y, Pillar R, Sizgek E. Sol-gel processing by aging and pore creator addition for porous silica antireflective coatings. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology. 2002;25:215-221. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020243527580
  45. 45. Shen H, Wang Z, Wu Y, Yang B. One-dimensional photonic crystals: Fabrication, responsiveness and emerging applications in 3d construction. RSC Advances. 2016;6:4505-4520. DOI: 10.1039/C5RA21373H
  46. 46. Liu J, Redel E, Walheim S, Wang Z, Oberst V, Liu J, et al. Monolithic high performance surface anchored metal−organic framework Bragg reflector for optical sensing. Chemistry of Materials. 2015;27:1991-1996. DOI: 10.1021/cm503908g
  47. 47. Kim K-J, Lu P, Culp JT, Ohodnicki PR. Metal–organic framework thin film coated optical fiber sensors: A novel waveguide-based chemical sensing platform. ACS Sensors. 2018;3:386-394. DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00808

Written By

Cheng-an Tao, Jianfang Wang and Rui Chen

Submitted: February 12th, 2019 Reviewed: April 11th, 2019 Published: January 15th, 2020