Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa RNA Methyltransferases in Antibiotic Resistance

Written By

Pablo Valderrama-Carmona, Jaison H. Cuartas, Diana Carolina Castaño and Mauricio Corredor

Submitted: September 24th, 2018 Reviewed: February 13th, 2019 Published: April 27th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.85185

Chapter metrics overview

898 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Methyltransferases play a fundamental role in aminoglycoside resistance of Gram-negative bacteria, and some of its mechanisms were described in the past years, especially in Escherichia coli; however, it remains unsolved for other resistant bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Despite hurdles to determine resistance acquisition, high-throughput approaches (genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics) have allowed data mining and analysis in a systemic way. Likewise, bioinformatics modelling of homologous genes or proteins has permitted to elucidate the emerging resistance in this pathogen. P. aeruginosa is a bacterial resistance treat since practically all known resistance mechanisms can be described using this model, particularly RNA methyltransferases. The RNA methyltransferases perform methylation or demethylation of ribosomal RNA to allow or restrict the antibiotic resistance development. The Kgm and Kam methyltransferases families are found in P. aeruginosa and confer resistance to several aminoglycosides. Loss of native methylations may also confer a resistant phenotype. The P. aeruginosa RsmG has high structural homology with Thermus aquaticus protein. Today, molecular data will promote a new paradigm on antibiotic therapy for treatment against P. aeruginosa. This chapter provides an overview of what role P. aeruginosa’s methyltransferases play in antibiotic resistance, induced by methylation or demethylation in the ribosome.


  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  • antibiotic resistance
  • aminoglycoside
  • methyltransferase
  • methylation
  • demethylation
  • 16S RNA

1. Introduction

Nowadays, aminoglycoside antibiotic regimen remains as a prevailing therapy for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogen, predominantly for respiratory complications in cystic fibrosis patients. However, P. aeruginosa strains are emergent multidrug-resistant. Bacteria develop resistance to aminoglycosides by producing aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes such as acetyltransferase, phosphorylase, and adenyltransferase [1]. The bacterial ribosome is a primary antibiotic target, but bacteria can acquire resistance by modification of drug-binding sites. More than 50 years of studies in Escherichia coli have shown that 16S and 23S rRNAs have methylated nucleotides (Figure 1). These molecular modifications are performed by methyltransferases (MTases), which take in charge the transfer of a methyl group from a methyl donor S-adenosyl-l-methionine, better known as AdoMet or SAM [2]. These RNA MTases are diverse in posttranscriptional RNA modification, where single RNA nucleosides are chemically transformed. SAM-dependent MTases are involved in biosynthesis, signal transduction, protein repair, chromatin regulation, and gene silencing [3]. More recently, it was shown that aminoglycoside resistance in E. coli has its primary target within the decoding region of 16S and 23S rRNAs and it is known to have 10 methylated nucleosides in 16S rRNA and 14 methylated nucleotides in 23S rRNA [4].

Figure 1.

Ribonucleotides methylated where the methyl moiety is located either in 16S or 23S ribonucleotides: m6A [66, 67], m62A [68], m5C [67], m4Cm [69], m2G [66], m7G [70], m3U [67, 71], m5U [72], and Ψ [68]. Molecules are designed using the figures on the next web page, The structure shows clearly the methyl (CH3-) but in the last structure bottom does not show this methyl.

Different methylation sites have been identified within the 16S rRNA which yield different aminoglycoside resistance phenotypes [5]. One type group of 16S rRNA methylases is produced by istamycin producer Streptomyces tenjimariensis, which methylates m1A1408 residue. Another group of 16S rRNA methylases is synthesized by gentamicin producer Micromonospora purpurea that methylates residue G1405; nonetheless, in P. aeruginosa the modification takes place in helix 44, with a secondary target in 23S rRNA helix 69 [6]. They bind specifically to the aminoacyl site (A-site) of 16S rRNA within the prokaryotic 30S ribosomal subunits and interfere with protein synthesis [7].

Probably RNA methylation began prior to DNA methylation in the early forms of life evolved on Earth [8], allowing to hypothesize perhaps that methylases appeared before polymerases. Ribonucleotide can be methylated by methyltransferases or demethylated by demethyltransferases. The structure of the bacterial ribosome has a molecular mass of 2.5 mega Daltons. In E. coli, the 50S subunit is composed of 23S rRNA (2904 nt), 5S rRNA (120 nt), and 33 ribosomal proteins, while the 30S subunit is composed of 16S rRNA (1542 nt) and 21 ribosomal proteins (S1–S21) [9].

The 16S rRNA resistance methyltransferases modify only intact 30S subunits, but the molecular details of their target recognition mechanisms are not quite elucidated yet. Such studies are becoming all the more necessary [10]. RNA methylation has been observed in different types of RNA species, viz., mRNA, rRNA, tRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, miRNA, and tmRNAs. Specific RNA methyltransferases are synthesized by cells to label these RNA species according to their needs and prevailing environmental conditions surrounding the cells, and this molecular labeling system is a constituent of epigenetics. New molecular structures provide crucial new insights that may provide a starting point for strategies to suppress these emerging causes of pathogenic bacterial resistance to aminoglycosides [11]. Nonetheless, bacteria develop resistance to aminoglycosides by producing aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes such as acetyltransferase, phosphorylase, and adenyltransferase. These enzymes, however, cannot confer a broad aminoglycoside resistance spectrum due to its substrate specificity [1].


2. Antibiotic resistance

P. aeruginosa has a large genome among Gamma proteobacteria, which allows it to improve many resistance mechanisms in a versatile way, for example, by transmissible plasmids or integrons. P. aeruginosa derepresses the chromosomal AmpC cephalosporinase [12, 13]; it also acquires genes for AmpC enzymes, class A carbenicillinases or β-lactamases, class D oxacillinases, and class B carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzymes [14], as it occurs in other bacteria like E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Other mechanisms include modifying the structure of topoisomerases II and IV to become quinolone resistant [15], decreasing outer membrane permeability by the partial or total failure of OprD proteins [12], overexpressing the active efflux systems with broad substrate patterns [16, 17], or synthesizing aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes as adenylyltransferases, acetyltransferases, and phosphoryltransferases [18].

The range of antibiotic resistance in P. aeruginosa is wide, and it represents a major difficulty for health care by its unsuccessful treatment, as a consequence of its low intrinsic antibiotic susceptibility, an effect of the interaction between multidrug efflux pumps, like mexAB, mexXY [19], AdeABC, and AdeDE genes [17]. Another factor is its efficient capability of acquiring resistance, developed by transfer of horizontal genes, such as specific gene mutations [20], and finally by the low permeability of the cellular membrane [16, 21].

Bacterial multidrug resistance (MDR) is an important concern in P. aeruginosa since this microorganism is capable of mixing several mechanisms, transposons, plasmids, and chromosomally encoded genes, such as methyltransferases or pumps [22]. Methyltransferase genes are spread in bacterial genome ready to trigger antibiotic resistance. Table 1 compares the reported methyltransferase proteins worldwide, being annotated for P. aeruginosa in UniProt database [23].

ProteinGeneSubstrateNucleotide methylatedPosition of methylationLigandUniProt
RlmBrlmB23S rRNAG22512’-O-riboseSAMQ9HUM8
RlmDrlmD23S rRNAU1939C5SAMQ9I525
RlmErlmE23S rRNAU25522’-O-riboseSAMA6VCK9
RlmFrlmF23S rRNAA1618N6SAMA6V0S3
RlmGrlmG23S rRNAG1835N2SAMA6VC08
RlmHrlmH23S rRNAΨ1915N3SAMA6V0A6
RlmJrlmJ23S rRNAA2030N6SAMQ9HUF0
RlmK/LrlmL23S rRNAG2445N2SAMA6V328
RlmMrlmM23S rRNAC24982’-O-riboseSAMA6V7T6
RlmNrlmN23S rRNA and tRNAA2503 in rRNA and A37 in tRNAC2Radical SAMA6V0V7
RsmArsmA16S rRNAA1518 and A1519N6SAMQ9I5U5
RsmBrsmB16S rRNAC967C5SAMQ9I7A9
RsmCrsmC16S rRNAG1207N2SAMA6VC20
RsmDrsmD_216S rRNAG966N2SAMA0A0F6U8H1
RsmErsmE_216S rRNAU1498N3SAMA0A0F6U8B3
RsmGrsmG16S rRNAG527N7SAMA6VF42
RsmHrsmH16S rRNAC1402N4SAMA6VB93
RsmIrsmI16S rRNAC14022’-O-riboseSAMQ9HVZ3
RsmJrsmJ16S rRNAG1516N2SAMQ9HXW0
TrmAtrmAtm/tRNAU54 in tRNA and U341 in tmRNAC5SAMA6VCH5
TrmHtrmHtRNA(Leu)Wobble nucleotide2’-O-riboseSAMA0A0H2ZHL8
TrmJtrmJtRNAC32, U32, and A322’-O-riboseSAMA0A0H2ZF87
TrmLtrmL_2tRNA(Leu)Wobble nucleotide2’-O-riboseSAMA0A0G5X8M9

Table 1.

P. aeruginosa’s rRNA methyltransferases and their point of modifications [23]. The columns are described as follows: first column, the name protein of RNA methyltransferase; second column, the name of its gene; third column, the substrate either 23S or 16S RNA or tRNA; fourth column, the type of nucleotide methylated; fifth column, the electron in nucleotide methylated; sixth column, the ligand for everyone SAM; and seventh column, the UniProt code. Some interesting proteins such as RsmA, RsmG, RsmH, and RsmI are marked in bold.

One mechanism of adaptation which facilitates natural selection in bacteria is the hypermutation of some genes or chromosomal regions. Previous work in patients with P. aeruginosa showed that hypermutation causes a problematic effect during a chronic respiratory infection (CRI) [24], where P. aeruginosa was up to 6.5-fold higher in mutator backgrounds. Other elements associated with high antimicrobial resistance are integrons. These elements were found among isolates from Iran patients with P. aeruginosa, which the int1 integron was prevalent [25].

Integrons linked to transposons, plasmids, and chromosome are responsible for bacterial antibiotic resistance [26, 27]. Integrons are composed of three elements: (1) the integrin-associated promoter (Pc), which is required for transcription and expression of gene cassettes (genetic elements that encode antibiotic resistance genes) within the integrin; (2) the intI gene, in which coding for the integrase IntI is crucial for site-specific recombination; and (3) the adjacent recombination site attI, which is recognized by integrase. On the other hand, P. aeruginosa carrying transposon Tn1696 is an element that encodes the CmlA gene, an exporter of the major facilitator (MF) superfamily which provides antibiotic resistance, specifically against chloramphenicol [28]. P. aeruginosa has a broad spectrum in cephalosporin resistance mechanism, mediated by the extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). High prevalence of multidrug resistance in burn patients and production of oxa-10, per-1, and veb-1 genes by P. aeruginosa isolates confirm the presence of antibiotic-degrading enzymes [29].

The Pathosystems Resource Integration Center (PATRIC) is a massive database that integrates genomic data and analysis tools to support biomedical research on bacterial infectious diseases. The platform provides an interface for biologists to discover data and information and conduct comprehensive comparative genomics and other analyses in a one-step source. PATRIC database provides complete genome information and data regarding susceptibility or resistance [30] to several antibiotics; including aminoglycosides, polymyxin B, colistin, ceftazidime, piperacillin, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and meropenem in P. aeruginosa. We report in Figure 2 antibiotic resistance or susceptibility from different P. aeruginosa strains as well as in Figure 3 with those antibiotics mentioned.

Figure 2.

Resistance and susceptibility profile of P. aeruginosa against a broad spectrum of different types of antibiotics. The data were downloaded from PATRIC database selecting aminoglycosides, beta-lactamases, cephalosporins, licosamides, fluoroquinolones, colistin, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and cefazolin. Many strains are resistant to a wide range of antibiotics (red with a larger percentage), and the most strains are susceptible to colistin (green with larger percentage); on the other hand, the overall strains are resistant to ampicillin, cefotaxime, erythromycin, and nitrofurantoin.

Figure 3.

Strains with P. aeruginosa’s genomes showing susceptibility (green) and resistance (red) against some aminoglycosides (amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin) and other antipseudomonal antibiotics. Many strains are resistant to a wide range of antibiotics (red with a larger percentage), and most strains are susceptible to doxycycline or colistin (green with larger percentage).


3. Resistance to antibiotics through rRNA methylation

Kgm and Kam families are two different groups of SAM-dependent RNA methyltransferases, which modify nucleotides of 16S rRNAs in the specific drug-binding site to confer self-resistance in aminoglycoside-producing bacteria [31]. The Kgm and Kam families have been distinguished based on their nucleotide targets, G1405 and A1408, respectively. The kgmB and armA genes (Kgm family kanamycin gentamicin methyltransferase) methylate m7G1405(N7) position that confers a high level of resistance against gentamicin, kanamycin, and tobramycin. The addition of a methyl group in this position interferes directly with the binding to the antibiotic, inducing a steric hindrance between the modified base and the structure of the antibiotic, causing electrostatic repulsions derived from the positive charge in the modified base [32]. On the other hand, the kamA and npmA genes (Kam family kanamycin-apramycin methyltransferase) methylate m1A1408(N1) position conferring a high level of resistance to kanamycin, apramycin, and neomycin [5].

Another interesting non-aminoglycoside resistance related to RNA methylation is the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin-B (MLSB) antibiotics, which is strongly associated with the expression of the methyltransferase of ErmC RNA that causes the dimethylation of the N-6 atom of adenine and interacts with the nucleotide 2058 in the 23S rRNA. Such antibiotics bind to overlap sites within the 50S ribosomal subunit tunnel near the peptidyl transferase center, either by inhibiting the catalysis directly at the peptidyl transferase site or by acting as a physical barrier to the extension of the peptide chain inside the tunnel [33]. Many more erm-type methyltransferase genes have been identified in a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Among them, the ermB, ermF, and ermA genes are transferred by transposons, and the ermC gene transferred by plasmids. The family of Erm methyltransferases that mediate the mono- or dimethylation of A2058 consists of approximately 40 different classes of methylases [34, 35].


4. Resistance or susceptibility to antibiotics through rRNA demethylation

The rsmG gene encodes a 16S rRNA mRNA which methylates the N7 of nucleotide G527 within the 530 loop of 16S rRNA; one of the main examples is the loss of native methylations that confers a resistance phenotype to streptomycin. Streptomycin interacts with the rRNA in the adduced region (loop 530), and the loss of methylation correlates with a low level of resistance. Although this resistance is at a low dose of antibiotic, the mutation of rsmG apparently has a mutator effect which promotes the appearance of a high number of mutants resistant to high doses of streptomycin [36]. Another interesting aspect is that not only methylation generates resistance; cases have been reported where demethylation also promotes resistance. The first and best characterized example is ksgA gene (RsmA protein), which encodes the native methyltransferase KsgA or RsmA, responsible for the N6 dimethylation of A1518 and A1519 in the 3′-terminal fork of the 16S rRNA in the 30S rRNA. It was the first resistance to aminoglycosides (kasugamycin) associated with demethylation in the 16S rRNA [37]. It was found that adenine methylated by MTase is far from the binding site of kasugamycin, so this demethylation should lead to a conformational rearrangement which would be associated with the acquisition of antibiotic resistance [38].

Another research showed that preventing adenine methylation from occurring, resistance to kasugamycin can be induced; the base U793 fills the site usually occupied by the methylated adenines and the adjacent bases, A792 and A794, [39]. The phenomena mentioned above give place to a conformational change, causing the union site of Ksg to be blocked by the U793. Accordingly, it can be assured that this structural change in the helix 24 causes resistance to Ksg [39].

Likewise, it was found that the tlyA gene in Mycobacterium tuberculosis encodes the MTase 2'-O-ribose TlyA responsible for the C1409 methylations in the 16S rRNA and C1920 in the 23S rRNA. The loss of such methylations confers resistance to capreomycin and viomycin, two antibiotics which bind at the interface of the ribosome subunit and are used to help define their binding site. Another example of the absence of methylations in the 23S rRNA is the lack of methylation in U2584 (E. coli numbering), which causes resistance to sparsomycin in 23S rRNA Halobacterium salinarum [40].

Recent findings regarding intrinsic resistance refer to the Ψ at position 2504 of the 23S rRNA in E. coli, where inactivation of the rluC gene confers significant resistance to clindamycin, linezolid, and tiamulin [41]. The cfr gene was originally discovered in an isolate of a multiresistant plasmid during a follow-up study of chloramphenicol resistance in Staphylococcus spp. isolates. The molecular characterization of the resistance led to the gene encoding a methyltransferase that methylated the nucleotide A2503 in the 23S rRNA. In E. coli and S. aureus, there is a natural methylation of A2503 mediated by the methyltransferase encoded by the yfgB gene (rlmN). The lack of natural methylation in A2503 confers a slight increase in susceptibility to tiamulin, hygromycin A, sparsomycin, and linezolid [42].


5. rRNA methyltransferases associated with aminoglycoside resistance in P. aeruginosa

Methyltransferases have been intensely studied in P. aeruginosa, but this is not the case for RNA methyltransferases, particularly those conferring aminoglycoside resistance. Nowadays, we focus our study in P. aeruginosa methyltransferases using molecular biology, genomics, proteomics, chemistry informatics, and bioinformatics [43, 44, 45]. RsmG, RsmH, and RsmI are RNA methyltransferases, and these have been broadly studied. Six crystal structures have been reported in PDB for RsmG, from Thermus thermophilus with accession numbers 4NXM, 4NXN, 3G88, 3G89 3G8A, and 3G8B [46, 47] and one from E. coli, with number 1JSX [48], and another one from Bacillus subtilis, with number 1XDZ. RsmH and RsmI crystal structures from E. coli are reported in PDB with numbers 3TKA and 5HW4 [49, 50, 51]. Checking these three orthologous genes in the PATRIC database, they are being conserved in P. aeruginosa’s pan-genome.

RsmG well known as 16S rRNA (guanine527-N7)-methyltransferase methylates guanine527 at N7 in 16S rRNA [36, 52] (Table 1) and catalyzes S-adenosyl-L-methionine + guanine527 in 16S rRNA → S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine + N7-methylguanine527 in 16S rRNA (see reaction in UniProt, KEGG, or MetaCyc). Researches in M. tuberculosis reveal that rsmG mutations confer low-level streptomycin resistance; moreover, it has been reported that combining drug resistance mutations of rsmG gene remarkably enhances enzyme production in Paenibacillus agaridevorans [53]. Likewise, for P. aeruginosa, rsmG is conserved in both aminoglycoside-resistant and aminoglycoside-susceptible strains.

RsmH also called S-adenosyl-L-methionine (cytosine1402-N4)-methyltransferase methylates the N4-of cytosine1402 [54] (Table 1). This enzyme catalyzes the following chemical reaction: S-adenosyl-L-methionine + cytosine1402 in 16S rRNA → S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine + N4-methylcytosine1402 in 16S rRNA (see reaction in UniProt, KEGG, or MetaCyc). Experiments performed with gene knockout of rsmH and rsmI have shown in E. coli BW25113 strain that ΔrsmH and ΔrsmI increase in doubling times by 15 and 12%, respectively; however, ΔrsmH/ΔrsmI increases in doubling time by 29% compared with a wild type cultured at 37°C, indicating that gene knockout caused a slight but significant change in phenotype about cellular growth properties in the absence of both rsmH and rsmI [54]. As well as E. coli, P. aeruginosa conserves rsmH and rsmI genes in both aminoglycoside-resistant and susceptible strains; therefore, it is important to study the mutations also in its strains.

RsmI also named S-adenosyl-L-methionine 16S rRNA (cytidine1402–2’-O)-methyltransferase methylates in cytidine1402–2’-O (Table 1). RsmI catalyzes the next chemical reaction: S-adenosyl-L-methionine + cytidine1402 in 16S rRNA → S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine + 2’-O-methylcytidine1402 (see reaction in UniProt, KEGG, or MetaCyc). RsmI and RsmH react on the same nucleotide, but the first methylates in 2’-O, while the second one in -N4 [54]. Such as rsmG and rsmH, the rsmI gene is also conserved in pan-genome. Theoretical modeling of the structure in RsmI protein from P. aeruginosa was performed in iTISSER suit [55], and compared with 5HW4 from E. coli (Figure 4), the homology and the active site in P. aeruginosa are apparently well maintained.

Figure 4.

Structural 3D aligned with chimera 3.1 suit between RsmI proteins from P. aeruginosa (red) and E. coli (blue). Although the alignment displays a structural shifting, the overall topology of the active site is maintained. The protruding residues from each protein depict the active site, harboring SAM (fluorescent green). The structure of E. coli has already been solved by Zhao et al. [49], without obtaining, until now, the crystal structure of RsmI from P. aeruginosa.

Other interesting P. aeruginosa methyltransferases associated with aminoglycoside resistance are m5C1404, m1A1408, and m7G1405 [6]. Among the last group mentioned, there are some well-studied methyltransferases, such as ArmA, RmtA, RmtB, RmtC, RmtD, RmtF, and RmtG (Table 2). This group is characterized for providing resistance to 4,6-disubstituted 2-deoxystreptamine (2-DOS) aminoglycosides [6]. For example, ArmA was found in Klebsiella pneumoniae [56]; as for P. aeruginosa, among 100 Korean multidrug-resistant isolates, 14 carried this enzyme [57]. The armA gene encodes for 16S RNA methyltransferase that methylates guanine (1405)-N7. The same gene in P. aeruginosa (Table 2) presents variable occurrence as it is part of the accessory genome. A multiple alignment, using the listed P. aeruginosa ArmA proteins (16S rRNA (guanine (1405)-N(7))- methyltransferase)) revealed identical homology for this marker.

ProteinModificationStrain locationReference
ArmA16S rRNA m7G1405China and Korea[57, 73]
RmtA16S rRNA m7G1405Japan and Korea[1, 58, 74, 75]
RmtB16S rRNA m7G1405China and India[73, 76]
RmtC16S rRNA m7G1405India[61, 76]
RmtD16S rRNA m7G1405Brazil[77, 78, 79]
RmtF16S rRNA m7G1405India[61, 75]
RmtG16S rRNA m7G1405Brazil[62]

Table 2.

Different 16S rRNA methyltransferases associated with aminoglycoside resistance reported for P. aeruginosa, with classical name, for everyone with the same nucleotide (16S rRNA m7G1405) of isolates from patients who belong to India, Brazil, China, and Korea.

The location of m7G1405 methyltransferase genes across the prokaryotic genome is variable, as it has been found in several studies mentioned above. The rmtA gene in P. aeruginosa carries a mobile element Tn5041 [58, 59] identified previously in Enterobacteriaceae [56], while the rmtB gene identified in Serratia marcescens is located in the flanking of Tn3-like region responsible for multiple antimicrobial resistance [59, 60], and both methyltransferases and mobile elements are present in P. aeruginosa (Table 2). The rmtC and rmtF genes (Table 2) might have been acquired from plasmids as part of mobile genetic elements and finally integrated and stabilized on the chromosome [61]. The rmtG gene (Table 2) is likely located in the chromosome [62]. The m1A1408 methyltransferases are present in pan-aminoglycoside-resistant strains, which were identified by Wachino et al. [63] and provide resistance by these classes of methyltransferases to both 4,5-disubstituted 2-DOS and 4,6-disubstituted 2-DOS aminoglycosides as well as NpmA case. These two classes of methyltransferases are very important for antibiotic resistance, thanks to the similarity of these enzymes with those homologs found in aminoglycoside-producing actinomycetes [6]. Those new genes and proteins will be better studied in expression and structure, to be related to epidemiological data. Looking at Table 2, it seems that the expression of methyltransferase might be related to geographical prescription. However, this hypothesis does not seem well founded: microbiological, molecular, and epidemiological understanding of RNA methyltransferases in P. aeruginosa will allow the rational use of aminoglycosides and maybe will be not replaced for new antibiotics.


6. Final considerations

Antibiotic resistance is a serious concern for public health and environment. To comprehend the molecular interaction of the methyltransferase in aminoglycoside resistance will be a more efficient way to rationalize its use and consumption. It will be better to clarify the panorama of the rational use of the aminoglycosides to diminish the rapid development of resistance before considering its replacement, since P. aeruginosa is still susceptible to them, and, moreover, currently it is known why other Gammaproteobacteria are resistant to them. Why are methylation and demethylation a feedback of the antibiotic environmental pressure in bacteria? Bhujbalrao and Anand [64] suggest us some insights using KsgA, exploring the factors which govern the resistance to antibiotics. They observed within loop1 and loop12 of rRNA switched chimera efficiently methylated mini-RNA substrates in vitro, showing that these structural elements suffice for local orientation of the rRNA. In addition, in vivo they notice that the head domain plays a more critical role in leading the enzyme to the select ribosomal region and serves as a sensor of the global environment.

As Kim et al. [65] discuss in letter to editor (Dr. Hur), investigating with P. aeruginosa and aminoglycoside resistance proposes that “less aminoglycoside consumption correlates with less resistance levels”; therefore, we consider that is a requisite for an antibiotic cycling strategy at the global level; also they discussed the rates of amikacin or gentamicin-resistant declining trends, according to the data from KONSAR Korean program in 2011 either for P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, or Acinetobacter spp. [64]. With the knowledge about aminoglycoside resistance molecular mechanisms comparing to the rational prescription cited in Korea, for example, we hypothesize that low methylation rate in the nucleotide substrate of RsmH or RsmI is close to the anchor point of gentamicin in 16S RNA, indicating a possible association with gentamicin or aminoglycosides resistance [5].

RsmG, RsmH, and RsmI methyltransferases belong to the core genome (constitutive genome), while ArmA is part of the accessory genome with identical protein sequences among close species in Proteobacteria. Nowadays, the enzymatic activity has been well described; however the antibiotic resistance remains unsolved, perhaps as a consequence of broad usage of aminoglycoside in hospital environment, allowing the development of resistant bacteria. In the future, probably the treatment of P. aeruginosa will take into account the genetic trait of each isolate, strain, or species with the set of resistance genes, and surely methyltransferases will be included routinely in clinical care and high throughput or genomic medicine therapies.



We thank the University of Antioquia for their financial support to PhD student Jaison H. Cuartas, project CODI 2017-15753.


  1. 1. Yokoyama K, Doi Y, Yamane K, Kurokawa H, Shibata N, Shibayama K, et al. Acquisition of 16S rRNA methylase gene in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Lancet. 2003;362(9399):1888-1893
  2. 2. Swinehart WE, Jackman JE. Diversity in mechanism and function of tRNA methyltransferases. RNA Biology. 2015;12(4):398-411
  3. 3. Schubert HL, Blumenthal RM, Cheng X. Many paths to methyltransfer: A chronicle of convergence. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2003;28(6):329-335
  4. 4. The RNA Institute, College of Arts and Sciences SU of NY at A. The RNA Modification Database [Internet]. 2018. Available from:
  5. 5. Beauclerk AAD, Cundliffe E. Sites of action of two ribosomal RNA methylases responsible for resistance to aminoglycosides. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1987;193(4):661-671
  6. 6. Gutierrez B, Douthwaite S, Gonzalez-Zorn B. Indigenous and acquired modifications in the aminoglycoside binding sites of Pseudomonas aeruginosa rRNAs. RNA Biology. 2013;10(8):1324-1332
  7. 7. Magnet S, Blanchard JS. Molecular insights into aminoglycoside action and resistance. Chemical Reviews. 2005;105(2):477-497
  8. 8. Rana AK, Ankri S. Reviving the RNA world: An insight into the appearance of RNA methyltransferases. Frontiers in Genetics. 2016;7(99):1-9
  9. 9. Poehlsgaard J, Douthwaite S. The bacterial ribosome as a target for antibiotics. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2005;3(11):870-881
  10. 10. Conn GL, Savic M, Macmaster R. Antibiotic resistance in bacteria through modification of nucleosides in 16S ribosomal RNA. In: Grosjean H, editor. DNA and RNA Modification Enzymes: Structure, Mechanism, Function and Evolution. Texas, USA: Landes Bioscience; 2009. p. 653
  11. 11. MacMaster R, Zelinskaya N, Savic M, Rankin CR, Conn GL. Structural insights into the function of aminoglycoside-resistance A1408 16S rRNA methyltransferases from antibiotic-producing and human pathogenic bacteria. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010;38(21):7791-7799
  12. 12. Castanheira M, Mills JC, Farrell DJ, Jones RN. Mutation-driven β-lactam resistance among contemporary ceftazidime non-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from USA hospitals. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2014;58(11):6844-6850
  13. 13. Livermore DM, Mushtaq S, Ge Y, Warner M. Activity of cephalosporin CXA-101 (FR264205) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia group strains and isolates. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2009;34(5):402-406
  14. 14. Livermore DM. β-Lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 1995;8(4):557-584
  15. 15. Jalal S, Wretlind B. Mechanisms of quinolone resistance in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbial Drug Resistance. 1998;4(4):257-261. Available from:
  16. 16. Poole K. Efflux-mediated multiresistance in Gram-negative bacteria. European Society of Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2004;10(1):12-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00763.x
  17. 17. Poole K. Efflux pumps as antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Annals of Medicine. 2007;39(3):162-176
  18. 18. Strateva T, Yordanov D. Pseudomonas aeruginosa—A phenomenon of bacterial resistance. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2009;58(9):1133-1148
  19. 19. Li X-Z, Poole K, Nikaido H. Contributions of MexAB-OprM and an EmrE homolog to intrinsic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to aminoglycosides and dyes. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2003;47(1):27-33
  20. 20. Shu JC, Chia JH, Siu LK, Kuo AJ, Huang SH, Su LH, et al. Interplay between mutational and horizontally acquired resistance mechanisms and its association with carbapenem resistance amongst extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDR-PA). International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2012;39(3):217-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.023
  21. 21. Li XZ, Zhang L, Poole K. Interplay between the MexA-MexB-OprM multidrug efflux system and the outer membrane barrier in the multiple antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2000;45(4):433-436
  22. 22. Nikaido H. Multidrug resistance in bacteria. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2009;78:119-146
  23. 23. Bateman A, Martin MJ, O’Donovan C, Magrane M, Apweiler R, Alpi E, et al. UniProt: A hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015;43(D1):D204-D212
  24. 24. Mena A, Smith EE, Burns JL, Speert DP, Moskowitz SM, Pérez JL, et al. Genetic adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients is catalyzed by hypermutation. Journal of Bacteriology. 2008;190(24):7910-7917
  25. 25. Khosravi AD, Motahar M, Montazeri EA. The frequency of class1 and 2 integrons in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from burn patients in a burn center of Ahvaz, Iran. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183061
  26. 26. Fluit AC, Schmitz FJ. Resistance integrons and super-integrons. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2004;10(4):272-288. DOI: 10.1111/j.1198-743X.2004.00858.x
  27. 27. Gillings MR. Integrons: Past, present, and future. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2014;78(2):257-277
  28. 28. Bissonnette L, Champetier S, Buisson JP, Roy PH. Characterization of the nonenzymatic chloramphenicol resistance (cmlA) gene of the In4 integron of Tn1696: Similarity of the product to transmembrane transport proteins. Journal of Bacteriology. 1991;173(14):4493-4502
  29. 29. Mirsalehian A, Feizabadi M, Nakhjavani FA, Jabalameli F, Goli H, Kalantari N. Detection of VEB-1, OXA-10 and PER-1 genotypes in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from burn patients. Burns. 2010;36(1):70-74
  30. 30. Gillespie JJ, Wattam AR, Cammer SA, Gabbard JL, Shukla MP, Dalay O, et al. PATRIC: The comprehensive bacterial bioinformatics resource with a focus on human pathogenic species. Infection and Immunity. 2011;79(11):4286-4298
  31. 31. Savic M, Lovrić J, Tomic TI, Vasiljevic B, Conn GL. Determination of the target nucleosides for members of two families of 16s rRNA methyltransferases that confer resistance to partially overlapping groups of aminoglycoside antibiotics. Nucleic Acids Research. 2009;37(16):5420-5431
  32. 32. Tomic TI, Moric I, Conn GL, Vasiljevic B. Aminoglycoside resistance genes sgm and kgmB protect bacterial but not yeast small ribosomal subunits in vitro despite high conservation of the rRNA A-site. Research in Microbiology. 2008;159(9-10):658-662. DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2008.09.006
  33. 33. Skinner R, Cundliffe E, Schmidt FJ. Site of action of a ribosomal RNA methylase responsible for resistance to erythromycin and other antibiotics. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1983;258(20):12702-12706
  34. 34. Roberts MC, Sutcliffe J, Courvalin P, Jensen LB, Rood J, Seppala H. Nomenclature for macrolide and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance determinants. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1999;43(12):2823-2830
  35. 35. Roberts MC. Update on macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin, ketolide, and oxazolidinone resistance genes. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2008;282(2):147-159
  36. 36. Okamoto S, Tamaru A, Nakajima C, Nishimura K, Tanaka Y, Tokuyama S, et al. Loss of a conserved 7-methylguanosine modification in 16S rRNA confers low-level streptomycin resistance in bacteria. Molecular Microbiology. 2007;63(4):1096-1106
  37. 37. Helser TL, Davies JE, Dahlberg JE. Mechanism of Kasugamycin resistance in Escherichia coli. Nature: New Biology. 1972;235:(6):226:229
  38. 38. Schuwirth BS, Borovinskaya MA, Hau CW, Zhang W, Vila-Sanjurjo A, Holton JM, et al. Structures of the bacterial ribosome at 3.5 Å resolution. Science (80-). 2005;310(5749):827-834
  39. 39. Demirci H, Murphy F IV, Belardinelli R, Kelley AC, Ramakrishnan V, Gregory ST, et al. Modification of 16S ribosomal RNA by the KsgA methyltransferase restructures the 30S subunit to optimize ribosome function. RNA. 2010;16(12):2319-2324
  40. 40. Lázaro E, Rodriguez-Fonseca C, Porse B, Ureña D, Garrett RA, Ballesta JPG. A sparsomycin-resistant mutant of Halobacterium salinarium lacks a modification at nucleotide U2603 in the peptidyl transferase centre of 23 S rRNA. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1996;261:231-238
  41. 41. Toh SM, Mankin AS. An indigenous posttranscriptional modification in the ribosomal peptidyl transferase center confers resistance to an array of protein synthesis inhibitors. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2008;380(4):593-597
  42. 42. Toh SM, Xiong L, Bae T, Mankin AS. The methyltransferase YfgB/RlmN is responsible for modification of adenosine 2503 in 23S rRNA. RNA. 2008;14(1):98-106
  43. 43. Mosquera-Rendón J, Cárdenas-Brito S, Pineda JD, Corredor M, Benítez-Páez A. Evolutionary and sequence-based relationships in bacterial AdoMet-dependent non-coding RNA methyltransferases. BMC Research Notes. 2014;7(1):440
  44. 44. Mosquera-Rendón J, Rada-Bravo AM, Cárdenas-Brito S, Corredor M, Restrepo-Pineda E, Benítez-Páez A. Pangenome-wide and molecular evolution analyses of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa species. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):45. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2364-4
  45. 45. Castaño DC, Mosquera-Redón J, Corredor M. Structural and functional genomics analysis of methyltransferase genes and networks associate to understand antibiotic resistance inside the pangenome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In: VII Latin American Congress on Biomedical Engineering CLAIB 2016; Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia: Springer, Singapore. 2016. pp. 702-705
  46. 46. Demirci H, Gregory ST, Dahlberg AE, Jogl G. Crystal structure of the Thermus thermophilus 16 S rRNA methyltransferase RsmC in complex with cofactor and substrate guanosine. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008;283(39):26548-26556
  47. 47. Gregory ST, Demirci H, Belardinelli R, Monshupanee T, Gualerzi C, Dahlberg AE, et al. Structural and functional studies of the Thermus thermophilus 16S rRNA methyltransferase RsmG. RNA. 2009;15(9):1693-1704
  48. 48. Romanowski MJ, Bonanno JB, Burley SK. Crystal structure of the Escherichia coli glucose-inhibited division protein B (GidB) reveals a methyltransferase fold. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics. 2002;47(4):563-567
  49. 49. Zhao M, Wang L, Zhang H, Dong Y, Gong Y, Zhang L, et al. Purification, crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of the 16S rRNA methyltransferase RsmI from Escherichia coli. Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications. 2014;70(9):1256-1259
  50. 50. Wei Y, Zhang H, Gao ZQ , Wang WJ, Shtykova EV, Xu JH, et al. Crystal and solution structures of methyltransferase RsmH provide basis for methylation of C1402 in 16S rRNA. Journal of Structural Biology. 2012;179(1):29-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.04.011
  51. 51. Zhao M, Zhang H, Liu G, Wang L, Wang J, Gao Z, et al. Structural insights into the methylation of C1402 in 16S rRNA by methyltransferase RsmI. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):1-15
  52. 52. Schomburg D, Schomburg I, Chang A. In: Schomburg D, Schomburg I, Chang A, editors. Class 2-3.2 Transferases, Hydrolases: EC 2-3.2. Second. Braunschweig, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013. 698 p
  53. 53. Funane K, Tanaka Y, Hosaka T, Murakami K, Miyazaki T, Shiwa Y, et al. Combined drug resistance mutations substantially enhance enzyme production in Paenibacillus agaridevorans. Journal of Bacteriology. 2018;200(17):e00118-e00188
  54. 54. Kimura S, Suzuki T. Fine-tuning of the ribosomal decoding center by conserved methyl-modifications in the Escherichia coli 16S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010;38(4):1341-1352
  55. 55. Yang J, Yan R, Roy A, Xu D, Poisson J, Zhang Y. The I-TASSER suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods. 2015;12(1):7-8. Available from:
  56. 56. Galimand M, Courvalin P, Lambert T. Plasmid-mediated high-level resistance to aminoglycosides in Enterobacteriaceae due to 16S rRNA methylation. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2003;47(8):2565-2571
  57. 57. Gurung M, Moon DC, Tamang MD, Kim J, Lee YC, Seol SY, et al. Emergence of 16S rRNA methylase gene armA and cocarriage of blaIMP-1in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from South Korea. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2010;68(4):468-470. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.07.021
  58. 58. Yamane K, Doi Y, Yokoyama K, Yagi T, Kurokawa H, Shibata N, et al. Genetic environments of the rmtA gene in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2004;48(6):2069-2074
  59. 59. Yamane K, Wachino JI, Doi Y, Kurokawa H, Arakawa Y. Global spread of multiple aminoglycoside resistance genes. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2005;11(6):951-953
  60. 60. Doi Y, Yokoyama K, Yamane K, Wachino J, Shibata N, Yagi T, et al. Plasmid-mediated 16S rRNA methylase in Serratia marcescens conferring high-level resistance to aminoglycosides. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2004;48(2):491-496
  61. 61. Rahman M, Prasad KN, Pathak A, Pati BK, Singh A, Ovejero CM, et al. RmtC and RmtF 16S rRNA methyltransferase in NDM-1–producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2015;21(11):2059-2062
  62. 62. Francisco GR, Nora STR, Bueno MFC, Da Silva Filho LVRF, De Oliveira Garcia D. Identification of aminoglycoside-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing RmtG 16S rRNA methyltransferase in a cystic fibrosis patient. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2015;59(5):2967-2968
  63. 63. Wachino JI, Shibayama K, Kurokawa H, Kimura K, Yamane K, Suzuki S, et al. Novel plasmid-mediated 16S rRNA m1A1408 methyltransferase, NpmA, found in a clinically isolated Escherichia coli strain resistant to structurally diverse aminoglycosides. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2007;51(12):4401-4409
  64. 64. Bhujbalrao R, Anand R. Deciphering determinants in ribosomal methyltransferases that confer antimicrobial resistance. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2019. Available from:
  65. 65. Kim YA, Park YS, Youk T, Lee H, Lee K. Correlation of aminoglycoside consumption and amikacin- or gentamicin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in long-term nationwide analysis: Is antibiotic cycling an effective policy for reducing antimicrobial resistance? Annals of Laboratory Medicine. 2018;38(2):176-178
  66. 66. Starr JL, Fefferman R. The occurrence of methylated bases in ribosomal ribonucleic acid of Escherichia coli K12 W-6. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1964;239(10):3457-3461. Available from:
  67. 67. Hayashi Y, Osawa S, Miura K. The methyl groups in ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1966;129:519-531
  68. 68. Dubin DT, Gunalp A. Minor nucleotide composition of ribosomal precursor, and ribosomal, ribonucleic acid in Escherichia coli. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1967;134:106-123
  69. 69. Nichols JL, Lane BG. N4-methyl-2′-O-methyl cytidine and other methyl-substituted nucleoside constituents of Escherichia coli ribosomal and soluble RNA. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1966;119:649-651
  70. 70. Isaksson LA, Phillips JH. Studies on microbial RNA. V. A comparison of the in vivo methylated components of ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1968;155:63-71
  71. 71. Fellner P. Nucleotide sequences from specific areas of the 16S and 23S ribosomal RNAs of E. coli. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1969;11(1):12-27
  72. 72. Johnson JD, Horowitz J. Characterization of ribosomes and RNAs from Mycoplasma hominis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1971;247:262-279
  73. 73. Zhou Y, Yu H, Guo Q , Xu X, Ye X, Wu S, et al. Distribution of 16S rRNA methylases among different species of gram-negative bacilli with high-level resistance to aminoglycosides. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2010;29(11):1349-1353
  74. 74. Yamane K, Wachino J, Suzuki S, Shibata N, Kato H, Shibayama K, et al. 16S rRNA methylase-producing, Gram-negative pathogens, Japan. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2007;13(4):642-646
  75. 75. Jin JS, Kwon KT, Moon DC, Lee JC. Emergence of 16S rRNA methylase rmtA in colistin-only-sensitive Pseudomonas aeruginosa in South Korea. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2009;33(5):490-491
  76. 76. Mohanam L, Menon T. Emergence of rmtC and rmtF 16S rRNA methyltransferase in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2017;35(2):282-285
  77. 77. Doi Y, De Oliveira Garcia D, Adams J, Paterson DL. Coproduction of novel 16S rRNA methylase RmtD and metallo-β-lactamase SPM-1 in a panresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate from Brazil. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2007;51(3):852-856
  78. 78. Castanheira M, Fritsche TR, Sader HS, Jones RN. RmtD 16S RNA Methylase in epidemiologically unrelated SPM-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Brazil. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2008;52(4):1587-1588
  79. 79. Lincopan N, Neves P, Mamizuka EM, Levy CE. Balanoposthitis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa co-producing metallo-β-lactamase and 16S rRNA methylase in children with hematological malignancies. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2010;14(4):e344-e347. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2009.04.016

Written By

Pablo Valderrama-Carmona, Jaison H. Cuartas, Diana Carolina Castaño and Mauricio Corredor

Submitted: September 24th, 2018 Reviewed: February 13th, 2019 Published: April 27th, 2019