Comparison of GT and ST distribution in 170 samples tested by both LiPA and Vela NGS.
Determination of viral characteristics including genotype (GT), subtype (ST) and resistance-associated variants (RAVs) profile is important in assigning direct-acting antivirals regimes in HCV patients. To help achieve the best clinical management of HCV patients, a routine diagnostic laboratory should aim at reporting accurate viral GT/ST and RAVs using a reliable diagnostic platform of choice. A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate performance characteristics of a new commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based HCV genotyping assay in comparison to another widely used commercial line probe assay for HCV genotyping. Information on RAVs from deeply sequenced NS3, NS5A and NS5B regions in samples classified as HCV 1a and 1b was harnessed from the fully automated software. Perfect (100%) concordance at HCV genotype level was achieved in GT2 (N = 13), GT3 (N = 55) and GT5 (N = 7). NGS refined the ST assignment in GTs 1, 4 and 6, and resolved previously indeterminate GTs reported by line probe assay. NGS was found to have consistent intra- and inter-run reproducibility in terms of genotyping, subtyping and RAVs identification. Detection of infections with multiple HCV GTs or STs is feasible by NGS. Deep sequencing allows sensitive identification of RAVs in the GT 1a and 1b NS3, NS5A and NS5B regions, but the list of target RAVs is not exhaustive.
- resistance-associated variants
- next-generation sequencing
- hepatitis C
- HCV genotyping
Due to the genetic diversity of the hepatitis C virus (HCV), its accurate genotyping is still currently challenging despite the use of modern molecular techniques. In addition to the six widely-recognised HCV genotypes, a newly identified genotype (GT) 7 was reported in 2015 . Molecular methods including reverse hybridization, real-time PCR and Sanger sequencing are commonly utilised for HCV genotyping and subtyping in clinical laboratories. HCV genotype and subtype (ST) have been the critical factors in decision-making for administering interferon-based therapies for the past decade . According to the latest AASLD guidelines , determination of viral characteristics including GT, ST and resistance-associated variants (RAVs) profile is important in assigning direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) regimes in HCV patients.
To help achieve the best clinical management of HCV patients, a routine diagnostic laboratory should aim at minimising reporting out non-informative HCV genotyping results which are due to inherent limitations of the diagnostic platform of choice. In general, about 2–8.5% of HCV positive samples have been reported to carry “indeterminate” GTs by several commercial assays [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. To tackle uncertainties in determining HCV GT and ST, Sanger sequencing could be utilised to resolve indeterminate or discordant GTs or ST results produced by commercial assays [10, 11]. Despite the ability to provide definitive genotyping information most of the time, unfavourable features of Sanger sequencing including low throughput, time-consuming procedures and relatively high costs, pose a barrier to it becoming routinely adopted as a first-line genotyping method. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), limitations of probe-based genotyping assays and Sanger sequencing for HCV genotyping can be overcome. NGS provides a high-resolution means for direct sequence-based interrogation of the HCV genome. Moreover, NGS also allows concurrent profiling of RAVs where such value-added feature is highly relevant for the clinical management of HCV infection with appropriate use of DAAs.
In the present study, the Sentosa SQ HCV genotyping assay (hereinafter referred to as Vela NGS) (Vela Diagnostics, Singapore) which primarily interrogates the NS5B region of HCV GTs 1–6 by ion torrent-based NGS technology, was evaluated in comparison to the VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (hereinafter referred to as LiPA) (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). HCV indeterminate GTs previously reported in clinical samples by LiPA were resolved using Vela NGS assay with further confirmation by Sanger sequencing. Information on RAVs was also harnessed from deeply sequenced NS3, NS5A and NS5B regions in samples classified as HCV 1a and 1b using Vela NGS.
2. Study design
2.1 Clinical samples
This study was performed on residual sera or plasma from 222 clinical specimens previously received for routine genotyping using the VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Line Probe Assay (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). All samples were stored at -80°C post-LiPA analysis and were only thawed prior to re-analysis by NGS and Sanger sequencing. All samples were de-identified for anonymisation purposes, and hence, the treatment histories remain unknown and cannot be traced. These were all residual samples, which would otherwise be discarded, and were used for the purposes of assay validation only. In such situations, ethics approval is not normally required, as all samples could not be linked back to the original patients after anonymisation.
2.2 NGS by Sentosa SQ HCV genotyping assay
In this study, NGS was performed using Sentosa SQ HCV Genotyping Assay (4 × 16) (Vela Diagnostics, Singapore) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The workflow started with automated extraction of total nucleic acids from 530 μL of sera or plasma using Sentosa SX Virus Total Nucleic Acid Plus II kit (Vela Diagnostics) on Sentosa SX101 (Vela Diagnostics). PCR amplification of the HCV NS3, NS5A and NS5B regions was performed on Veriti 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). In every individual run, a pooled library containing barcoded amplicons of 15 clinical samples and one system control, was prepared by Sentosa SX101. The pooled library was subject to sequencing template preparation and enrichment on Sentosa ST401 (Vela Diagnostics). Sequencing data generated by Sentosa SQ301 (Vela Diagnostics) was automatically channelled for primary and subsequent secondary analyses using Sentosa SQ Suite (Vela Diagnostics) and Sentosa SQ Reporter (Vela Diagnostics), respectively. Auto-generated quality control and pathology reports containing technical information, viral typing, and RAVs (available only for GTs 1a and 1b) results were manually reviewed, respectively.
2.3 VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Line Probe Assay
Total nucleic acids were extracted from 200 μL sera or plasma using EZ1 Virus Mini Kit v2.0 (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) on Biorobot EZ1 (QIAGEN). Using VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Line Probe Assay (LiPA) (Siemens Healthineers), a one-step reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplifying the 5’UTR and core regions was performed on GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems). Reverse hybridisation, washing and colour development steps were performed on Autoblot 3000H (Fujirebio Europe, Gent, Belgium). For GT and ST determination, band patterns were manually scored by aligning the strips to an interpretation chart provided by the manufacturer.
2.4 Sanger sequencing
Sanger sequencing was performed on samples previously reported by LiPA as indeterminate genotype. A primary PCR amplification of a 454 bp fragment of the NS5B region was initially attempted using primers 5Bo8254 and 5Bo8707 . In samples with PCR failure using the above-mentioned primers, a secondary PCR amplifying a 446 bp fragment of the 5’UTR/core regions was subsequently performed using primers UTR45 and Cor490 . PCR products from the amplifiable gene segments were subjected to direct sequencing with BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) using the respective PCR primers on a 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).
2.5 Sequence analysis
Sequence analysis was performed by querying the nucleotide sequences obtained from Sanger sequencing in the Los Alamos hepatitis C sequence database . For Vela NGS, assembled contigs were downloaded from the Sentosa SQ Reporter software. In samples with discordant results between LiPA and Vela NGS, NGS contigs were uploaded to the Los Alamos hepatitis C sequence database  to verify Vela NGS results.
3.1 Concordance between results generated by the Vela NGS and Versant platforms at GT and ST levels
The Vela NGS results at both GT and ST levels were tabulated in Table 1 for 170 clinical samples with GT and/or ST results from LiPA. Perfect (100%) concordance at HCV genotype level was achieved in GT 2 (N = 13), GT 3 (N = 55) and GT 5 (N = 7). For samples reported by LiPA as GT 1 (N = 40), 20% (N = 8) gave discrepant results when compared to Vela NGS. These samples had been previously classified by LiPA as either GT 1a with core inconclusive, GT 1b with 96.1% homology, GT 1b with core inconclusive, or GT 1b with core not available, due to their unconventional band patterns. There was no discrepancy between samples firmly reported as GT 1a and GT 1b by LiPA. In samples reported as GT 4 (N = 16) by LiPA, 43.8% (N = 7) were found to be GT 3 by Vela NGS. Two samples (5.1%) originally reported by LiPA as GT 3 were classified by Vela NGS as GT 6 samples.
At ST level, Vela NGS reclassified 1 sample previously assigned as HCV 1a with core inconclusive by LiPA as 1c. Two samples each reported as 4a/4c/4d and 4e by LiPA, respectively, were reclassified as 4n and 4o by Vela NGS. Another 29 GT 6 (ST c-l) samples reported by LiPA were reassigned by Vela NGS as 6e/6u (N = 1), 6j (N = 1), 6m (N = 9), and 6n (N = 18), respectively. One sample with LiPA 6m (77.9% homology) was reassigned as 6u by Vela NGS.
3.2 Verification of contig sequences generated by the Vela NGS in samples with discordant results
Of the 170 samples tested, there were 104 agreements at both GT and ST levels, 49 partial agreements at genotype but not the subtype levels, and 117 discordant results generated by LiPA and Vela NGS (Table 1). At GT level, the calculated Cohen’s Kappa is 0.869 (95% confidence interval: 0.810–0.928), suggesting good strength of agreement between the two assays. The 66 NGS contig sequences of samples with partial agreement or discordant results were submitted to the online analysis in the Los Alamos hepatitis C sequence database. HCV GT and ST called by Vela NGS were verified in all 66 contigs.
3.3 Intra-run and inter-run reproducibility on GT and ST calling by Vela NGS
HCV genotyping and subtyping results were found to be reproducible for a panel of 5 samples with different HCV GT/ST including 1a, 1b, 2a, 3a and 3b tested in triplicates within a single run on the Vela NGS platform (Figure 1a). For inter-run reproducibility testing (Figure 1b), GT and ST results were consistently reported in another panel of 7 samples including 1a, 1b, 2b, 3a, 4d, 5a and 6n, which were repeatedly tested in three separate runs on different days. Details of viral load and median coverage of the targeted NS5B region are depicted in Figure 1a and b, respectively.
3.4 RAV analysis in GT 1 samples reported by the Vela NGS platform
In the current Vela NGS assay, a list of variants differing from the wild-type codons are detectable for HCV 1a and 1b. The 16 target codons in the NS3 gene are 36, 41, 43, 54, 55, 80, 109, 122, 132 (1a only), 138, 155, 156, 158, 168, 170 (1b only) and 175 (1b only). For NS5A, variants at nine codons including 28 (1a only), 30 (1a only), 31, 32, 54 (1b only), 58, 62 (1b only), 92 and 93, are detectable. Eight codons in the NS5B gene including 414, 419, 422, 423, 495, 499 (1b only), 554 and 559, are also covered in this assay.
Of 13 GT 1a samples (Table 2), five were found to carry at least one target variant in the NS3 gene. Notably, two samples carried the Q80K RAV. For NS5A, the M28A variant was detected in one sample in which NS3 Q80K was also present. None of the GT 1a samples was found to carry any of target variants in the NS5B gene.
|No||ID||GT1 STs||RAVs (variant frequency)|
|1||R02-BC02||1a||S122G (99.21%), D168E (97.07%)||–||–|
|3||R02-BC04||1a||Q80K (25.63%)||M28V (99.47%)||–|
|8||R01-BC04||1b||–||L31M (22.03%), Q54H (98.82%)||V499A (33.65%)|
|9||R01-BC05||1b||–||Q54H (99.11%), Y93H (99.73%)||–|
|10||R01-BC06||1b||Q80L (99.52%), S122G (9.99%)||Q54H (99.05%)||V499A (97.91%)|
|11||R01-BC07||1b||–||Q54H (98.76%), Y93H (99.61%)||–|
|12||R01-BC08||1b||–||Q54H (99.22%), Q62E (99.04%)||–|
|13||R01-BC09||1b||S122G (97.69%)||Q54H (99.21%), Q62E (51.64%)||P495A 8.83%|
|15||R02-BC07||1b||–||Q54H (99.37%)||V499A 98.9%|
|16||R02-BC-11||1b||Q80R (92.29%)||Q62E (5.61%)||V499A 95.15%|
|17||R11-BC14||1b||M175L (99.97%)||Y93H (99.8%)||V499A 98.7%|
|18||R12-BC14||1b||–||Q54H (80.35%), Y93H (8.07%)||–|
|19||R12-BC15||1b||–||Q54H (98.82%), Q62R (99.79%)||–|
Of 18 HCV 1b samples (Table 2), five were detected with at least one target variant in the NS3 gene. Twelve samples were identified with at least one target variant in the NS5A gene. For NS5B, the P495A and V499A variants were detected in one and eight samples, respectively. Notably, there were four samples detected with at least one target variant in each of the NS3, NS5A and NS5B genes.
3.5 Intra-run and inter-run reproducibility on variant calling and frequency
In intra-run reproducibility analysis, the Q80K variant was reproducibly detected in the NS3 gene of the GT 1a samples. Another two variants, namely Q54H and V499A were also repeatedly identified in the NS5A and NS5B genes of the GT 1b sample, respectively. Variant frequencies of the three variants were highly reproducible within run (Figure 1c).
In the inter-run reproducibility study, NS3 S122G and NS5B V499A variants were tested. Variant frequencies of the two variants were found to be highly reproducible among the three separate runs (Figure 1d).
3.6 Vela NGS assigned HCV GT and ST to samples with indeterminate LiPA results
Forty specimens, which were previously reported as HCV indeterminate GT by LiPA, were subject to Vela NGS analysis. Sanger sequencing were successfully performed on NS5b (N = 30) or 5’UTR/core (N = 10) regions in 40 samples (Table 3). Of the 40 samples with Sanger sequencing results, Vela NGS results were confirmed at GT level in 39 samples (97.5%). In a sample with LiPA complex band patterns (5, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15 & 24), a mixed genotypes of GT 2a and GT 3a were assigned by Vela NGS. Sanger sequencing on NS5B showed overlapping nucleotide base calls in the overall sequences, in which putative mixed infection with two different HCV GTs was likely inferred.
|No||LiPA results (bands)||Vela NGS||Sanger sequencing||Concordance at GT or ST level|
|1||Indeterminate (3,6,16,24)||6n||Not amplified||6n||GT & ST|
|2||Indeterminate (3,6,16,24)||6n||Not amplified||6n||GT & ST|
|3||Indeterminate (3,6,16,24)||6n||Not amplified||6n||GT & ST|
|4||Indeterminate (6,7,24)||3b||3b||Not done||GT & ST|
|5||Indeterminate (6,7,24)||6m/6u||Not amplified||6e/6d|
|6||Indeterminate (6,7)||6u||6u/6n||Not done||GT & ST|
|7||Indeterminate (6,7)||6u||6m/6n||Not done|
|8||Indeterminate (6,7)||6u||6n/6a||Not done|
|9||Indeterminate (6)||6m/6l||6d/6e||Not done|
|10||Indeterminate (17,24)||3b||3b||Not done||GT & ST|
|11||Indeterminate (17,18,24)||3b||3b||Not done||GT & ST|
|12||Indeterminate (6,17,24)||3b||3b||Not done||GT & ST|
|13||Indeterminate (7,8,14,15,24)||3a||3a||Not done||GT & ST|
|14||Indeterminate (7,13,17,18)||3b||3b||Not done||GT & ST|
|15||Indeterminate (7,13,17,18,24)||3b||3b||Not done||GT & ST|
|16||Indeterminate (13,16,17,18,24)||3b||3b||Not done||GT & ST|
|17||Indeterminate (13,14,15,18,24)||3b||3b||Not done||GT & ST|
|18||Indeterminate (3,4,13,25)||1a||1a||Not done||GT & ST|
|19||Indeterminate (3,4,7,13,25)||1a||1a||Not done||GT & ST|
|20||Indeterminate (3,4,7,13,24)||6e||6e||Not done||GT & ST|
|21||Indeterminate (3,4,6,7,13,24)||6e||Not amplified||6e/6d||GT & ST|
|22||Indeterminate (5,9,21,24)||6a||Not amplified||6a||GT & ST|
|23||Indeterminate (5,6,9,17,18)||4a||Not amplified||4a||GT & ST|
|24||Indeterminate (5,9,10,13,14,15,24)||2a & 3a||Two mixed sequences||Not done||Likely mixed infections|
|25||Indeterminate (5,8,9,11)||2a||2a||Not done||GT & ST|
|26||Indeterminate (24)||3b||3b||Not done||GT & ST|
|27||Indeterminate (24)||3b||3b||Not done||GT & ST|
|28||Indeterminate (4,5,9,16,21,24)||6a||6a||Not done||GT & ST|
|29||Indeterminate (4,9,21)||6a||Not amplified||6a||GT & ST|
|30||Indeterminate (3,4,6,13,17,18,24,26)||3b||3b||Not done||GT & ST|
|31||Indeterminate (6)||6n/6a||6d/6u||Not done|
|32||Indeterminate (3,4,13,25)||1a||1a||Not done||GT & ST|
|33||Indeterminate (6)||6u||6u||Not done||GT & ST|
|34||Indeterminate (13,16,24)||3b||3b||Not done||GT & ST|
|35||Indeterminate (7)||6u||Not amplified||6v/6l/6d/6k|
|36||Indeterminate (17,18,24)||3b||3b||Not done||GT & ST|
|37||Indeterminate (3,4,5,16,25)||1a||Not amplified||1a||GT & ST|
|38||Indeterminate (5,6,18,24)||3k||3k||Not done||GT & ST|
|39||Indeterminate (8,9,21,24)||6a||6a||Not done||GT & ST|
|40||Indeterminate (3,4,6,16,24)||6q||6q||Not done||GT & ST|
The application of NGS assays to analyse quasispecies HCV genomes has been increasing in recent years. Several laboratory-developed NGS assays had been previously described in the literature for phylogenetic studies , outbreak investigation [15, 16], characterisation of HCV full genome [17, 18] and identification of HCV GT and ST in clinical samples [19, 20]. However, there are fewer reports of adoption of NGS assays in routine HCV genotyping. In 2016, Vela NGS became available as a CE-IVD certified commercial kit for diagnostic use in the clinical laboratories. In this study, we report the performance characteristics of Vela NGS in comparison to the widely used LiPA assay for HCV genotyping.
The performance of Vela NGS in determining the HCV GT and ST in the clinical specimens had been discussed in several previous studies [21, 22, 23]. Perfect agreement at GT level was observed between Vela NGS and LiPA in a study by Manee et al. . Samples with unclear ST results in GTs 2, 3, 4 and 6 reported by LiPA were each assigned with a specific subtype after subject to Vela NGS analysis. Dirani et al.  also performed a direct comparison of GT and ST calling between Vela NGS and LiPA for samples from patients infected with HCV GTs including GT 1, 2, 3 and 4, and found a high concordance (>99%) at GT level between the two tests. Vela NGS was also found to have better performance in assigning HCV STs among the four GTs when compared to LiPA . In another study by Rodriguez et al. , Vela NGS achieved high concordance rates with Sanger sequencing in assigning GTs 1 to 6, 1a and 1b STs, and other STs for GTs 4, 5 and 6. Discrepant calls at ST level was mainly found among HCV GTs 1 and 2 between Vela NGS and Sanger sequencing; the latter was used as the reference method to sequence the 286 bp segment of NS5B for which phylogenetic analysis was performed.
In the present study, discrepancy in results was mainly observed in samples with LiPA GT 1b with incomplete or missing bands at the core region. In this particular result group, GT 6 with different STs were assigned by Vela NGS. This observation was not unexpected as it has been specified in the LiPA interpretation chart that GT 6 (STs c-1) cannot be differentiated from ST 1a and 1b without additional information from the core region sequence. Among LiPA GT 4 samples, all ST 4h were reassigned as GT 3 by Vela NGS. Some geographical regions, for example, Southeast Asia, where GT 6 is highly prevalent , could thus be impacted more by this mis-classification with the use of LiPA method.
In contrast to LiPA which utilises primarily the 5’UTR in GTs 1-6 and core regions for the discrimination of GT 6 STs c-l from 1a and 1b, Vela NGS targets the non-structural genes implicated in both accurate genotyping/subtyping and resistance to DAAs. The LiPA is known to be poor at detecting and identifying recombinant forms of HCV . Due to the assay design of Vela NGS, this may also pose a problem for this platform, despite the application of NGS technology. The HCV recombinant forms can be accurately detected via sequencing of recombination breakpoint junctions or the whole HCV genome . For example, in our study, one previously LiPA-indeterminate sample was reported by the Vela NGS to have mixed HCV infections with HCV 2a and 3a. This NGS finding was confirmed by Sanger sequencing in which overlapping Sanger electropherograms were observed for NS5B.
The Vela NGS offers information on RAVs in HCV 1a or 1b positive samples, where such profiling will be useful when prescribing DAA regimes, and detecting of baseline or emerging RAVs. Targeted assays had been previously developed to identify a specific RAV [27, 28]. RAVs which are found at levels with at least 15% variant frequency, at baseline, are known to confer resistance to certain DAAs , and therefore may impact on the effectiveness of DAA treatment . Vela NGS targets relevant RAVs in three non-structural gene segments (NS3, NS5A and NS5B) of HCV 1a and 1b, and although the RAV profiling is comprehensive but not exhaustive due to the assay design, any baseline RAVs present in any of these DAA target genes, can affect the therapeutic effectiveness . In our study, four HCV 1b samples were found to harbour variants in all three NS3, NS5A and NS5B genes concurrently.
In conclusion, the genotyping results of the Vela NGS were found to be highly concordant with those of the LiPA method. Vela NGS refined the ST assignment in GT 6 and resolved previously indeterminate GTs reported by LiPA. Technically, the HCV Vela NGS was found to have consistent intra- and inter-run reproducibility in terms of GT and ST calling and RAVs identification. Detection of infections with multiple HCV GTs or STs is feasible by Vela NGS. Due to the assay design which relies on investigating the HCV sub-genomic regions, HCV recombinant strains may still be potentially missed. Deep sequencing allows sensitive identification of RAVs in the GT1a and 1b NS3, NS5A and NS5B regions, but the list of target RAVs is not exhaustive. We would also suggest the RAVs detection spectrum should be extended to cover GTs other than HCV 1a and 1b, namely GTs 2-6.
We thank Cui-Wen Chua, Mui-Joo Khoo and Lily Chiu of the Department of Laboratory Medicine at the National University Hospital, Singapore, for their technical assistance in performing the NGS and LiPA analysis. We also thank Vela Diagnostics Singapore for funding the NGS reagents in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Murphy DG, Sablon E, Chamberland J, Fournier E, Dandavino R, et al. Hepatitis C virus genotype 7, a new genotype originating from central Africa. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2015; 53:967-972
Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seeff LB. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: An update. Hepatology. 2009; 49:1335-1374
ASLD-IDSA HCV Guidance Panel. Hepatitis C guidance 2018 update: AASLD-IDSA recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C virus infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2018
Germer JJ, Majewski DW, Rosser M, Thompson A, Mitchell PS, et al. Evaluation of the TRUGENE HCV 5'NC genotyping kit with the new GeneLibrarian module 312 for genotyping of hepatitis C virus from clinical specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2003; 41:4855-4857
Verbeeck J, Stanley MJ, Shieh J, Celis L, Huyck E, et al. Evaluation of Versant hepatitis C virus genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2008; 46:1901-1906
González V, Gomes-Fernandes M, Bascuñana E, Casanovas S, Saludes V, et al. Accuracy of a commercially available assay for HCV genotyping and subtyping in the clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2013; 58:249-253
Némoz B, Roger L, Leroy V, Poveda JD, Morand P, et al. Evaluation of the cobas® GT hepatitis C virus genotyping assay in G1-6 viruses including low viral loads and LiPA failures. PLoS One. 2018; 13:e0194396
Fernández-Caballero JA, Alvarez M, Chueca N, Pérez AB, García F. The cobas® HCV GT is a new tool that accurately identifies Hepatitis C virus genotypes for clinical practice. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0175564
Benedet M, Adachi D, Wong A, Wong S, Pabbaraju K, Tellier R, et al. The need for a sequencing-based assay to supplement the Abbott m2000 RealTime HCV Genotype II assay: A 1 year analysis. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2014; 60:301-304
Larrat S, Poveda JD, Coudret C, Fusillier K, Magnat N, et al. Sequencing assays for failed genotyping with the versant hepatitis C virus genotype assay (LiPA), version 2.0. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2013; 51:2815-2821
Chueca N, Rivadulla I, Lovatti R, Reina G, Blanco A, et al. Using NS5B sequencing for hepatitis C virus genotyping reveals discordances with commercial platforms. PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0153754
Quer J, Gregori J, Rodríguez-Frias F, Buti M, Madejon A, et al. High-resolution hepatitis C virus subtyping using NS5B deep sequencing and phylogeny, an alternative to current methods. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2015; 53:219-226
Kuiken C, Yusim K, Boykin L, Richardson R. The Los Alamos hepatitis C sequence database. Bioinformatics. 2005; 1:379-384
Gonçalves Rossi LM, Escobar-Gutierrez A, Rahal P. Multiregion deep sequencing of hepatitis C virus: An improved approach for genetic relatedness studies. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2016; 38:138-145
Escobar-Gutiérrez A, Vazquez-Pichardo M, Cruz-Rivera M, Rivera-Osorio P, Carpio-Pedroza JC, et al. Identification of hepatitis C virus transmission using a next-generation sequencing approach. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2012; 50:1461-1463
Caraballo Cortes K, Rosińska M, Janiak M, Stępień M, Zagordi O, et al. Next-generation sequencing analysis of a cluster of hepatitis C virus infections in a haematology and oncology center. PLoS One. 2018; 13:e0194816
Salmona M, Caporossi A, Simmonds P, Thélu MA, Fusillier K, et al. First next-generation sequencing full-genome characterization of a hepatitis C virus genotype 7 divergent subtype. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2016; 22:e1-e947
Thomson E, Ip CL, Badhan A, Christiansen MT, Adamson W, et al. Comparison of next-generation sequencing technologies for comprehensive assessment of full-length hepatitis C viral genomes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2016; 54:2470-2484
Pedersen MS, Fahnøe U, Hansen TA, Pedersen AG, Jenssen H, et al. A near full-length open reading frame next generation sequencing assay for genotyping and identification of resistance-associated variants in hepatitis C virus. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2018; 195:49-56
Del Campo JA, Parra-Sánchez M, Figueruela B, García-Rey S, Quer J, et al. Hepatitis C virus deep sequencing for sub-genotype identification in mixed infections: A real-life experience. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2018; 67:114-117
Manee N, Thongbaiphet N, Pasomsub E, Chantratita W. Clinical evaluation of a newly developed automated massively parallel sequencing assay for hepatitis C virus genotyping and detection of resistance-association variants Comparison with a line probe assay. Journal of Virological Methods. 2017; 249:31-37
Dirani G, Paesini E, Mascetra E, Farabegoli P, Dalmo B, et al. A novel next generation sequencing assay as an alternative to currently available methods for hepatitis C virus genotyping. Journal of Virological Methods. 2018; 251:88-91
Rodriguez C, Soulier A, Demontant V, Poiteau L, Mercier-Darty M, et al. A novel standardized deep sequencing-based assay for hepatitis C virus genotype determination. Scientific Reports. 2018; 8:4180
Bunchorntavakul C, Chavalitdhamrong D, Tanwandee T. Hepatitis C genotype 6: A concise review and response-guided therapy proposal. World Journal of Hepatology. 2013; 5:496-504
Schuermans W, Orlent H, Desombere I, Descheemaeker P, Van Vlierberghe H, et al. Heads or tails: Genotyping of hepatitis C virus concerning the 2k/1b circulating recombinant form. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17
Iles JC, Njouom R, Foupouapouognigni Y, Bonsall D, Bowden R, et al. Characterization of hepatitis c virus recombination in Cameroon by use of nonspecific next-generation sequencing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2015; 53:3155-3164
Chui CK, Dong WW, Joy JB, Poon AF, Dong WY, et al. Development and validation of two screening assays for the hepatitis C virus NS3 Q80K polymorphism associated with reduced response to combination treatment regimens containing simeprevir. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2015; 53:2942-2950
Vicenti I, Falasca F, Sticchi L, Bruzzone B, Turriziani O, et al. Evaluation of a commercial real-time PCR kit for the detection of the Q80K polymorphism in plasma from HCV genotype 1a infected patients. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2016; 76:20-23
Pawlotsky JM. Hepatitis C virus resistance to direct-acting antiviral drugs in interferon-free regimens. Gastroenterology. 2016; 151:70-86
Yoshida K, Hai TA, Teranishi Y, Kozuka R, et al. Long-term follow-up of resistance-associated substitutions in hepatitis C virus in patients in which direct acting antiviral-based therapy failed. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017; 18
Mawatari S, Oda K, Tabu K, Ijuin S, Kumagai K. New resistance-associated substitutions and failure of dual oral therapy with daclatasvir and asunaprevir. Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017; 52:855-867