Molar ratios of ODPA_NbO, ODPA_C12N_NbO, and ODPA_CPPA_NbO.
Inorganic Janus nanosheets were successfully prepared using the difference in reactivity between interlayers I and II of layered hexaniobate K4Nb6O17·3H2O. Janus nanosheets exhibit the highest anisotropy among Janus compounds due to their morphology. It is therefore important to prepare Janus nanosheets with stable shapes in various solvents, robust chemical bonds between nanosheets and fuctional groups and high versatility due to surface functional groups. K4Nb6O17·3H2O, which possesses two types of interlayers and two types of organophosphonic acids that react with metal oxides to form robust covalent bonds, was employed to prepare Janus nanosheets for this study. Interlayer I was modified by octadecylphosphonic acid, followed by modification by carboxypropylphosphonic acid mainly at interlayer II. Preparation of Janus nanosheets with two organophosphonate moieties was confirmed by 31P MAS NMR. After these regioselective and sequential modifications, the products were exfoliated into single-layered nanosheets in THF. Two types of derivatives with different repeating distances were recovered from a dispersion containing nanosheets exfoliated by different processes, centrifugation, and solvent evaporation. AFM analysis of the exfoliated nanosheets revealed that the products were Janus compounds. There are high expectations for application of these types of Janus nanosheets in various fields and for design of various Janus nanosheets using this preparation method.
- Janus nanosheets
- organophosphonic acid
- grafting reaction
A Janus compound has two surface properties, and each of these properties appears on one of two sides of the compound . Janus compounds are expected to be applied as functional materials, including electronic paper , solid surfactants , optics materials , and drug delivery system (DDS) vectors . The morphology of Janus compounds is classified into three categories: 0-dimensional compounds such as particles; one-dimensional compounds including cylinders, tubes, and rods; and two-dimensional compounds, typically sheets or discs [6, 7, 8, 9, 10].
There are various methods of preparing Janus nanoparticles. Regioselective surface modification of nanoparticles can produce Janus nanoparticles . By forming nanoparticles with two raw materials, Janus nanoparticles with different compositions can be prepared . Self-assembly and subsequent cross-linking of polymer chains can also produce Janus nanoparticles . Janus rods can be prepared by forming silica using TEOS by the sol-gel method on Fe3O4 regioselectively . Janus cylinders can be prepared by masking one side of a cylinder and conducting subsequent modification of the other side .
Janus nanosheets exhibit the highest anisotropy among Janus compounds due to their unique morphology. They are also useful as emulsifiers, because Janus nanosheets cannot rotate at the interfaces of micelles . Most Janus nanosheets reported so far have consisted of polymers. Stupp et al. reported the preparation of Janus nanosheets by polymerization of oligomers with polymerizable groups . Polymerization of oligomers led to the formation of sheet morphology, because the polymerizable groups were located at the center of an oligomer. Walther et al. used triblock copolymers, polystyrene-
It is therefore obvious that the preparation of inorganic Janus nanosheets is an important issue. There are only a few reports of preparation of Janus nanosheets derived from inorganic compounds, however, comprising silica nanosheets prepared by the sol-gel method [19, 20, 21] and fluorohectorite, which is a layered clay mineral .
Silica-based Janus nanosheets were prepared by hydrolysis and condensation of two trifunctional organoalkoxysilanes. First, phenylalkoxysilane was assembled on the surface of oil in a W/O emulsion and reacted by the sol-gel method. The product, which formed a hollow shell, was further reacted with aminoalkyltrialkoxysilane. The resultant product had phenyl groups and amino groups on the inner and outer surfaces of hollow particles, respectively. Janus nanosheets were obtained by breaking the hollow silica particles using a colloid milling method. The resulting Janus nanosheets have a thickness of 65 nm and a curvature originating from the hollow particle morphology . Another method of preparing silica-based Janus nanosheets using a CaCO3 template was also reported. First, 3-butyldianhydride mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane was assembled on the surface of CaCO3 particles and reacted using a sol-gel process. The products were further reacted with octadecyltrichlorosilane. Janus nanosheets were obtained by removing the templates and crushing the resultant hollow particles. Janus nanosheets with single a nanometer thickness were prepared by this method . These sol-gel preparation methods, which were developed by Yang et al., required adsorption of organosilanes on liquid-liquid interfaces or self-assembly on templates. Thus, these methods restricted the reaction system design and choices of molecules.
Another method of preparing Janus nanosheets using inorganic layered material was reported in which the Janus nanosheets consisted of a sheet of a clay mineral, fluorohectorite, and two cationic polymers. The interlayer of fluorohectorite was selectively exfoliated into double-layered nanosheets. Both surfaces of the products, which had a negative charge, were modified with a cationic polymer, protonated polyethyleneimine-ethylene oxide. After that, the products were exfoliated into single-layered nanosheets, and one surface which had not been modified was reacted with another cationic polymer, protonated dendritic poly(amidoamine). The products had one cationic polymer on one side and the other polymer on the other side of the nanosheets . This preparation method has the advantage that any cationic compound could be used as the modifier, regardless of its functional group. On the other hand, the products use in water was restricted due to the presence of ionic bonds between the surfaces of the clay sheets and the polymers.
Preparation of graphene-based Janus nanosheets has also been developed . For example, two-step functionalization was carried in one report . First, the graphene surface of the substrate was functionalized by a photochlorination reaction. The functionalized graphene was then peeled off the substrate to expose the unmodified side using PMMA film as a mediator. The exposed fresh side of the graphene was further functionalized by phenylation reaction. Graphene-based Janus nanosheets were also prepared using a Pickering emulsion . A graphene oxide (GO) dispersion was mixed with hydrochloric acid and wax, and this mixture was ultrasonicated to prepare a Pickering emulsion. The micelles were then washed with a sodium hydroxide aqueous solution, and GO was adsorbed on the surface of micelles to form a monolayer. The exposed GO surface of the micelles was further modified with alkylamine. Finally, Janus nanosheets were obtained by dissolving wax in chloroform. In the preparation of graphene-based Janus nanosheets, it is necessary that a single layer of graphene be adsorbed on a substrate or at the liquid-liquid interphase to achieve regioselective functionalization.
These earlier studies show that the following conditions are desirable: nanosheets should have covalent bonds with organic groups, the choice of functional groups should not be limited, and regioselective surface modification should be easily achieved. Another preparation method that satisfies the above conditions should therefore be developed.
Some inorganic layered materials have structures in which negatively charged nanosheets and metal cations are piled up alternately. Nanosheets are very thin, just a few atoms thick. On the other hand, their lateral sizes are large, possibly on a micrometer scale. Therefore, these materials have high aspect ratios. From the viewpoints of structure and composition, inorganic layered materials are classified into several categories, including clay minerals [26, 27, 28], layered silicate [29, 30, 31], and layered transition metal oxide [32, 33, 34]. These inorganic layered materials have been used as hosts for inorganic-organic hybrids. There are only two types of reaction for preparing inorganic-organic hybrids: intercalation reactions forming noncovalent bonds and grafting reactions forming covalent bonds. Grafting reactions that form covalent bonds between layer surfaces and organic groups utilize alcohols, carboxylic acids, silane coupling agents, and phosphorous coupling reagents such as organophosphonic acids as modifiers. Grafted organophosphonate moieties, in particular, are seldom eliminated from nanosheet surfaces because organophosphonate moieties form stable M–O–P bonds with nanosheet surfaces, except for Si–O–P bonds, which are known to become hydrolyzed under certain conditions . Surface modification with monolayer can be easily achieved, moreover because homocondensation reactions do not occur between organophosphonic acids under mild conditions . There have been many reports of surface modification by silane coupling agents for clay minerals , layered silicates [38, 39, 40], and layered transition metal oxides [41, 42]. In the case of surface modification by alcohol, there have been reports of polysilicates with ethylene glycol  and aliphatic alcohols , while layered perovskites have been modified with
Layered hexaniobate (K4Nb6O17·3H2O) has a unique structure among layered transition metal oxides; K4Nb6O17·3H2O has two types of interlayers that are piled up alternately and exhibit different reactivities . Interlayer I possesses hydrated water and shows high reactivity, which anhydrous interlayer II exhibits low reactivity. There have been a certain number of reports of reactions between K4Nb6O17·3H2O and organic molecules using the differences in reactivity between interlayer I and interlayer II .
Intercalation of small ammonium ions occurred sequentially, first in interlayer I and then in interlayer II . On the other hand, bulky ammonium ions were intercalated only into interlayer I . Compounds that were modified only in interlayer I were called A-type, and compounds that were modified in both interlayers I and II were called B-type. Kimura et al. modified the K4Nb6O17·3H2O surfaces with phenylphosphonic acid using A-type and B-type ion-exchanged intercalation compounds of K4Nb6O17·3H2O . In their report, bulky dioctadecyldimethylammonium ions were intercalated into only interlayer I, and A-type phenylphosphonate derivatives were obtained using this A-type ammonium intercalation compound as an intermediate. On the other hand, dodecylammonium ions were intercalated into both interlayers I and II and a B-type phenylphosphonate derivative was obtained using this B-type ammonium intercalation compound as an intermediate. Thus, regioselective surface modification of K4Nb6O17·3H2O by organophosphonic acid was successfully achieved.
A variety of nanosheets have been obtained by exfoliation of layered materials , and various methods have been reported for their exfoliation. A simple method of exfoliation is dispersing layered materials in water. Water molecules can intercalate in the interlayer and promote exfoliation . Bulky ammonium ions intercalated in the interlayer can expand the interlayer distance and decrease interactions between the negative charge and positive charge to cause exfoliation. . Mechanical exfoliation using ultrasonication has also been employed . On the other hand,
In this research, the preparation of Janus nanosheets was achieved by taking advantage of the presence of two types of interlayers with different reactivities in K4Nb6O17·3H2O. Interlayer II of an A-type organophosphonic acid derivative of K4Nb6O17·3H2O was reacted with another type of organophosphonic acid. Both sides of niobate nanosheets were modified by two organophosphonic acids regioselectively, because organophosphonic acid could not undergo an exchange reaction and homocondensation. Janus nanosheets could be obtained by exfoliation of the product into single-layer nanosheets in an appropriate solvent, THF. Lipophilic octadecylphosphonic acid (ODPA) and hydrophilic carboxypropylphosphonic acid (CPPA) were chosen as the organophosphonic acids. The properties of both sides of Janus nanosheets were explored by the AFM phase imaging technique. This report is based on a study first reported in Chemical Communications (Figure 1) .
2. Experimental section
An A-type alkylammonium intercalation compound, (2C182MeN)1.0(K, H)3[Nb6O17] (2C182MeN = dioctadecyldimethylammonium ion), was prepared based on the previous report . Octadecylphosphonic acid (ODPA) was synthesized as described elsewhere [61, 62]. Dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride, carboxypropylphosphonic acid (CPPA), 2-butanone, acetone, and tetrahydrofuran (THF) were used without further purification.
First, interlayer I of the A-type alkylammonium intercalation compound was modified by ODPA. The A-type alkylammonium intercalation compound (0.05 g) and ODPA (0.048 g) were used to adjust the Nb:ODPA molar ratio to 1:4 and reacted in 2-butanone (20 mL) at 150°C for 7 days. After the reaction, the crude product was centrifuged, washed with THF and HCl (pH = 3), and air-dried (ODPA_NbO). The cations (K+, H+) in interlayer II were then exchanged with the dodecylammonium ion (C12N+) to expand interlayer II. ODPA_NbO (0.1 g) and dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride (0.19 g) were used to adjust the ODPA:C12N+ molar ratio to 1:10 and reacted in water (10 mL) at 80°C for 3 days. After the reaction, the crude product was centrifuged, washed with water, and air-dried (ODPA_C12N_NbO). Then, interlayer II of ODPA_C12N_NbO was modified by CPPA. ODPA_C12N_NbO (0.05 g) and CPPA (0.05 g) were used to adjust the Nb:CPPA molar ratio to 1:10 before reaction in 2-butanone (10 mL) at 80°C for 3 days. After reaction, the crude product was centrifuged, washed with THF and HCl (pH = 3), and corrected as a precipitate (ODPA_CPPA_NbO). After centrifugation, the product dispersed in supernatant was corrected by slow evaporation of THF (ODPA_CPPA_NbO_evaporation). TEM and AFM samples were prepared by stirring ODPA_CPPA_NbO in THF to exfoliate them into single-layer nanosheets.
XRD analysis (convergence method) was carried out with a Rigaku RINT-1000 diffractometer (Mn-filtered FeK
4. Results and discussion
Figure 2 shows 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of the products. In the spectrum of ODPA_NbO (Figure 2a), signals assignable to the octadecyl group were observed. It is likely that the ODPA moiety was introduced into interlayer I, since dioctadecyldimethylammonium ions, whose presence was required for interlayer modification with organophosphonic acids , were present only in interlayer I. In the spectrum of ODPA_C12N_NbO (Figure 2b), signals assignable to alkyl chains (octadecyl and dodecyl) were observed at 15–43 ppm . In addition, a signal assignable to a carbon atom adjacent to a nitrogen atom was observed at 43 ppm , indicating the presence of C12N+. Since C12N+ is known to be intercalated into both interlayer I and interlayer II , the intercalation of C12N+ into interlayer II was likely to occur. In the spectrum of ODPA_CPPA_NbO (Figure 2c), signals due to alkyl chains were observed at 15–36 ppm. On the other hand, a signal originating from C12N+ at 43 ppm disappeared and a signal due to C=O groups of CPPA was observed at 178 ppm . These results suggest the removal of C12N+ and introduction of the CPPA moiety to ODPA_CPPA_NbO.
Figure 3 shows IR spectra of the products. In the spectrum of ODPA_NbO (Figure 3a), absorption bands due to
Figure 4 shows 31P MAS NMR spectra of the products. A signal was observed at 28 ppm in the spectrum of ODPA_NbO (Figure 4a). This signal was shifted upfield from the chemical shift of the ODPA molecule (33 ppm at 31P MAS NMR) by 5 ppm, indicating that interlayer surface modification by ODPA had proceeded and an Nb–O–P bond had been formed . In the spectrum of ODPA_C12N_NbO (Figure 4b), a signal was observed at 25 ppm. This signal was shifted upfield from 28 ppm, the chemical shift of ODPA_NbO, by 3 ppm. This shift suggests that C12N+ would change the electronic environment around the P atom by an ion exchange reaction with H+ of the P–OH group , although the details were not yet clarified. Thus, it is likely that C12N+ was intercalated not only in interlayer II, but probably also in interlayer I upon the reaction with ODPA_NbO. In the spectrum of ODPA_CPPA_NbO (Figure 4c), a new signal was observed at 31 ppm in addition to the signal at 28 ppm. The signal at 28 ppm was observed in the same position as that of the ODPA moiety of ODPA_NbO, confirming maintenance of the ODPA moiety at interlayer I. Because a signal of a CPPA molecule was observed at 34 ppm, a signal at 31 ppm was assignable to the CPPA moiety. This signal was shifted upfield by 3 ppm, indicating that the CPPA moiety was grafted onto the interlayer surface and a Nb–O–P bond was formed. The above results suggested that ODPA and CPPA formed covalent bonds with the [Nb6O17]4− sheet surface. Since bands assignable to P–OH groups and P=O groups were observed in the IR spectrum of ODPA_CPPA_NbO, ODPA and CPPA were likely to be in a monodentate environment on the surface of [Nb6O17]4− sheet.
Table 1 shows the molar ratio calculated from the ICP measurement and elemental analysis. The molar ratio of ODPA_NbO was P:Nb = 1.3:6.0. On the other hand, the molar ratios of ODPA_C12N_NbO and ODPA_CPPA_NbO were P:Nb = 1.3:6.0 and P:Nb = 3.5:6.0, respectively. Intercalation of C12N+ proceeded without release of the ODPA moiety in ODPA_NbO, because the molar ratio of P and Nb of ODPA_NbO did not change after reaction with a dodecylammonium chloride solution. Also, the molar ratio of P to 6 Nb in ODPA_CPPA_NbO increased by 2.2 (3.5 – 1.3), confirming grafting of the CPPA moiety. Assuming Nb = 6.0, the maximum modification amounts for interlayer I and II are 2.0 . Since the Nb–O–P bond was stable with respect to hydrolysis and no homocondensation between two P–OH groups of phosphonic acid occurred under mild conditions , the amount of the ODPA moiety in interlayer I was estimated to be 1.3 (65% of the maximum modification amount), that of the CPPA moiety at interlayer I was in the range of 0.2–0.7 (10–35% of maximum modification amount), and that of the CPPA moiety in interlayer II was in the range of 1.5–2.0 (75–100% of the maximum modification amount). Thus, an organic derivative with interlayer I and interlayer II dominantly modified with hydrophobic ODPA and hydrophilic CPPA, respectively, were successfully prepared (Figure 5).
Based on the nitrogen ratio of ODPA_NbO, it seems that a small amount of unreacted A-type alkylammonium intercalation compound was present in ODPA_NbO or a small number of released 2C182MeN ions were present in interlayer I
A THF dispersion of nanosheets was easily attained by dispersing ODPA_CPPA_NbO in THF. The resulting dispersion was cast on a TEM grid, and TEM observation was carried out (Figure 6). A sheet-like morphology with low contrast was observed. Spots observed in the electron diffraction (ED) pattern can be assigned to 200, 202, and 002 of the orthorhombic cells, and the lattice parameters were calculated to be
Figure 7 shows XRD patterns of the products. The
Here, the difference between these two
The crystallite sizes calculated from diffraction of the repeating distances using Scherrer’s formula were 3.67 and 7.71 nm for ODPA_CPPA_NbO and ODPA_CPPA_NbO_evaporation, respectively. The crystallite size of ODPA_CPPA_NbO_evaporation was larger than that of ODPA_CPPA_NbO. It should be noted that underestimation could occur with use of lowest-angle diffractions due to the presence of strain . The crystallite sizes could therefore reflect the average thickness of the particles in the stacking direction, making the number of stacked ODPA_CPPA_NbO nanosheets lower than that of stacked ODPA_CPPA_NbO_evaporation nanosheets. On the other hand, the estimated crystallite size could be interpreted as average thickness of a portion of the stacked sheets with an A-type or B-type stacking sequence. Based on this interpretation, ODPA_CPAN_NbO formed via forced restacking by centrifugation has lower stacking regularity or more random stacking than ODPA_CPPA_NbO_evaporation nanosheets restacked under mild conditions.
Figure 9 shows an AFM image of a sample prepared by spin coating of a THF dispersion of ODPA_CPPA_NbO on a Si wafer. It contained many nanosheets that showed a relatively uniform thickness in the range of 2.5–3.0 nm (Figure 9A). This thickness range is approximately equal to the
As marked by the a and b arrows in Figure 9, two different colored nanosheet surfaces were observed in the phase image (Figure 9B). This indicates the presence of two different faces (36–37° and 38–39°) in each Janus nanosheet. This phase difference in the AFM phase image corresponds to the tapping phase gap in the vibration amplitude, and it was reported that the phase difference could occur with a difference in the crystallinity, viscosity, and adhesion of the sample surface [70, 71].
The Janus nanosheets consisted of a hydrophobic surface, which was dominantly covered with the ODPA moiety, and a hydrophilic surface, which was modified with the CPPA moiety. As a result, two chemically different surfaces gave different phases due to differences in the interactions between the apex of the AFM probe and the surfaces of the nanosheets and distinguished visually in the phase image. The origin of the phase contrast would be due to differences in viscosity and hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity. Since the apex of the AFM probe used in this measurement was hydrophilic, it is likely that the high-phase surface and a low-phase surface were assignable to the hydrophilic CPPA moiety and hydrophobic ODPA moiety, respectively.
The c arrow in Figure 9 marks the overlapping area of two nanosheets (a and b). Obviously, these area possessed double-layer thickness. The color of the phase image of this area (Figure 9B) indicates that nanosheet b partially overlapped nanosheet a. Thus, these results indicate that hydrophilic and lipophilic surfaces are facing each other. These results also indicate that the nanosheets prepared in this study exhibited hydrophobicity on one side and hydrophilicity on the other.
Janus nanosheets were successfully prepared by regioselective and sequential surface modification and exfoliation of K4Nb6O17·3H2O, whose interlayer I and interlayer II were dominantly modified by ODPA and CPPA, respectively. Since organophosphonic acids bearing various functional groups can be easily synthesized, Janus nanosheet surfaces can exhibit various properties in addition to hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity. The Janus nanosheets prepared by the present method can be dispersed in many solvents, moreover, because organophosphonic moieties are bound to niobate nanosheets by covalent bonds. The Janus nanosheets prepared in this study can be expected to be applied in surface chemistry research because of the hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity on opposing sides of the nanosheets. Also, by changing the functional groups of organophosphonic acids, novel two-dimensional materials with various functions with potential applications in various fields can be realized.
This work was financially supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “New Polymeric Materials Based on Element-Blocks (No. 2401)” (JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP24102002), “Coordination Asymmetry (JP 23655205),” and Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research (JP17H05378). Reproduced from Ref.  with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
de Gennes PG. Soft matter (Nobel lecture). Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 1992; 31:842-845. DOI: 10.1002/anie.199208421
Nishisako T, Torii T, Takahashi T, Takizawa Y. Synthesis of monodisperse bicolored Janus particles with electrical anisotropy using a microfluidic co-flow system. Advanced Materials. 2006; 18:1152-1156. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200502431
Binks BP, Fletcher PDI. Particles adsorbed at the oil−water Interface: A theoretical comparison between spheres of uniform wettability and “Janus” particles. Langmuir. 2001; 17:4708-4710. DOI: 10.1021/la0103315
Kim M, Anthony SA, Granick S. Activated surface diffusion in a simple colloid system. Physical Review Letters. 2009; 102:178303. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.178303
Seo KD, Doh J, Kim DS. One-step microfluidic synthesis of Janus microhydrogels with anisotropic thermo-responsive behavior and organophilic/hydrophilic loading capability. Langmuir. 2013; 29:15137-15141. DOI: 10.1021/la403015y
Walther A, Muller AHE. Janus particles: Synthesis, self-assembly, physical properties, and applications. Chemical Reviews. 2013; 113:5194-5261. DOI: 10.1021/cr300089t
Lattuada M, Hatton TA. Synthesis, properties and applications of Janus nanoparticles. Nano Today. 2011; 6:286-308. DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2011.04.008
Jiang S, Chen Q, Tripathy M, Luijten E, Schweizer KS, Granick S. Janus particle synthesis and assembly. Advanced Materials. 2010; 22:1060-1071. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200904094
Erhardt R, Zhang M, Boker A, Zettl H, Abetz C, Frederik P, et al. Amphiphilic Janus micelles with polystyrene and poly(methacrylic acid) hemispheres. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2003; 125:3260-3267. DOI: 10.1021/ja028982q
Qi H, Wang W, Li CY. Janus polymer single crystal nanosheet via evaporative crystallization. ACS Macro Letters. 2014; 3:675-678. DOI: 10.1021/mz5002806
Perro A, Reculusa S, Pereira F, Delville MH, Mingotaud C, Duguet E, et al. Towards large amounts of Janus nanoparticles through a protection–deprotection route. Chemical Communications. 2005;(44):5542-5543. DOI: 10.1039/B507486J
Hawker CJ. “Living” free radical polymerization: A unique technique for the preparation of controlled macromolecular architectures. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1997; 30:373-382. DOI: 10.1021/ar960248m
Zhao B, Zhou H, Liu C, Long Y, Yang G, Tungd CH, et al. Fabrication and directed assembly of magnetic Janus rods. New Journal of Chemistry. 2016; 40:6541-6545. DOI: 10.1039/C6NJ00825A
Oratis AT, Farmer TP, Bird JC. Capillary induced twisting of Janus cylinders. Soft Matter. 2017; 13:7556-7561. DOI: 10.1039/C7SM01288H
de Leon AC, Rodier BJ, Luo Q, Hemmingsen CM, Wei P, Abbasi K, et al. Distinct chemical and physical properties of Janus nanosheets. ACS Nano. 2017; 11:7485-7493. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b04020
Stupp SI, Son S, Lin HC, Li LS. Synthesis of two-dimensional polymers. Science. 1993; 259:59-63. DOI: 10.1126/science.259.5091.59
Walther A, Andre X, Drechsler M, Abetz V, Muller AHE. Janus Discs. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2007; 129:6187-6198. DOI: 10.1021/ja068153v
Walther A, Drechsler M, Muller AHE. Structures of amphiphilic Janus discs in aqueous media. Soft Matter. 2009; 5:385-390. DOI: 10.1039/B812321G
Liang F, Shen K, Qu X, Zhang C, Wang Q, Li J, et al. Inorganic Janus nanosheets. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2011; 50:2379-2382. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201007519
Yang H, Liang F, Wang X, Chen Y, Zhang C, Wang Q, et al. Responsive Janus composite nanosheets. Macromolecules. 2013; 46:2754-2759. DOI: 10.1021/ma400261y
Liu Y, Liang F, Wang Q, Qu X, Yang Z. Flexible responsive Janus nanosheets. Chemical Communications. 2015; 51:3562-3565. DOI: 10.1039/C4CC08420A
Stçter M, Gçdrich S, Feicht P, Rosenfeldt S, Thurn H, Neubauer JW, et al. Controlled exfoliation of layered silicate heterostructures into bilayers and their conversion into giant Janus platelets. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2016; 55:7398-7402. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201601611
Ng SW, Noor N, Zheng Z. Graphene-based two-dimensional Janus materials. NPG Asia Materials. 2018; 10:217-237. DOI: 10.1038/s41427-018-0023-8
Zhang L, Yu J, Yang M, Xie Q, Peng H, Liu Z. Janus graphene from asymmetric two-dimensional chemistry. Nature Communications. 2013; 4:1443. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2464
Wu H, Yi W, Chen Z, Wang H, Du Q. Janus graphene oxide nanosheets prepared via Pickering emulsion template. Carbon. 2015; 93:473-483. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.083
Osada M, Sasaki T. Exfoliated oxide nanosheets: New solution to nanoelectronics. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2009; 19:2503-2511. DOI: 10.1039/B820160A
Joussein E, Petit S, Churchman J, Theng B, Righi D, Delvaux B. Halloysite clay minerals—A review. Clay Minerals. 2005; 40(04):383-426. DOI: 10.1180/0009855054040180
Madejova J. FTIR techniques in clay mineral studies. Vibrational Spectroscopy. 2003; 31(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-2031(02)00065-6
Kosuge K, Yamazaki A, Tsunashima A, Otsuka R. Hydrothermal synthesis of magadiite and kenyaite. Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan. 1992; 100(3):326-331. DOI: 10.2109/jcersj.100.326
Brindley GW. Unit cell of magadiite in air, in vacuo, and under other conditions. American Mineralogist. 1969; 54(11-1):1583-1591
Wolf F, Schwieger W. Ion exchange of monovalent cations in synthetic sodium polysilicates with layer structure. Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie. 1979; 457(1):224-228. DOI: 10.1002/zaac.19794570128
Sasaki T, Watanabe M. Osmotic swelling to exfoliation. Exceptionally high degrees of hydration of a layered titanate. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1998; 120(19):4682-4689. DOI: 10.1021/ja974262l
Bizeto MA, Shiguihara AL, Constantino VRL. Layered niobate nanosheets: Building blocks for advanced materials assembly. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2009; 19:2512-2525. DOI: 10.1039/B821435B
Osada M, Sasaki T. Two-dimensional dielectric nanosheets: Novel nanoelectronics from nanocrystal building blocks. Advanced Materials. 2012; 24:210-228. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201103241
Guerrero G, Alauzun JG, Granier M, Laurencin D, Mutin PH. Phosphonate coupling molecules for the control of surface/interface properties and the synthesis of nanomaterials. Dalton Transactions. 2013; 42:12569-12585. DOI: 10.1039/c3dt51193f
Guerrero G, Mutin PH, Vioux A. Anchoring of phosphonate and phosphinate coupling molecules on titania particles. Chemistry of Materials. 2001; 13:4367-4373. DOI: 10.1021/cm001253u
Takahashi N, Kuroda K. Materials design of layered silicates through covalent modification of interlayer surfaces. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2011; 21:14336-14353. DOI: 10.1039/C1JM10460H
Yanagisawa T, Kuroda K, Kato C. Organic derivatives of layered polysilicates. II. Reaction of magadiite and kenyaite with diphenylmethylchlorosilane. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan. 1988; 61:3743-3745. DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.61.3743
Fujita I, Kuroda K, Ogawa M. Synthesis of interlamellar silylated derivatives of magadiite and the adsorption behavior for aliphatic alcohols. Chemistry of Materials. 2003; 15:3134-3141. DOI: 10.1021/cm011698y
Mochizuki D, Shimojima A, Kuroda K. Formation of a new crystalline silicate structure by grafting dialkoxysilyl groups on layered octosilicate. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2002; 124:12082-12083. DOI: 10.1021/ja027512t
Ide Y, Ogawa M. Surface modification of a layered alkali titanate with organosilanes. Chemical Communications. 2003:1262-1263. DOI: 10.1039/B301222K
Nakato T, Hashimoto S. Dispersion of layered hexaniobate in organic solvents through silylation and liquid crystalline behavior of the colloidal suspension. Chemistry Letters. 2007; 36:1240-1241. DOI: 10.1246/cl.2007.1240
Mercier L, Facey GA, Detellier C. Organo-layered silicates. Interlamellar intercation and grafting of ethylene glycol in magadiite. Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications. 1994:2111-2112. DOI: 10.1039/C39940002111
Mitamura Y, Komori Y, Hayashi S, Sugahara Y, Kuroda K. Interlamellar esterification of H-magadiite with aliphatic alcohols. Chemistry of Materials. 2001; 13:3747-3753. DOI: 10.1021/cm010029h
Tahara S, Ichikawa T, Kajiwara G, Sugahara Y. Reactivity of the Ruddlesden-Popper phase H2La2Ti3O10 with organic compounds: Intercalation and grafting reactions. Chemistry of Materials. 2007; 19:2352-2358. DOI: 10.1021/cm0623662
Asai Y, Ariake Y, Saito H, Idota N, Matsukawa K, Nishino T, et al. Layered perovskite nanosheets bearing fluoroalkoxy groups: Their preparation and application in epoxy-based hybrids. RSC Advances. 2014; 4:26932-26939. DOI: 10.1039/c4ra01777c
Shimada A, Yoneyama Y, Tahara S, Mutin PH, Sugahara Y. Interlayer surface modification of the protonated ion-exchangeable layered perovskite HLaNb2O7· xH2O with organophosphonic acids. Chemistry of Materials. 2009; 21:4155-4162. DOI: 10.1021/cm900228c
Nakato T, Kuroda K, Kato C. Syntheses of intercalation compounds of layered niobates with methylviologen and their photochemical behavior. Chemistry of Materials. 1992; 4:128-132. DOI: 10.1021/cm00019a027
Nakato T, Kameyama M, Wei Q, Haga J. Structural response of organically modified layered niobate K4Nb6O17 to the adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenol. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2008; 110:223-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.06.011
Wei Q, Nakato T. Competitive adsorption of phenols on organically modified layered hexaniobate K4Nb6O17. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2006; 96:84-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.06.028
Kimura N, Kato Y, Suzuki R, Shimada A, Tahara S, Nakato T, et al. Single- and double-layered organically modified nanosheets by selective interlayer grafting and exfoliation of layered potassium hexaniobate. Langmuir. 2014; 30:1169-1175. DOI: 10.1021/la404223x
Nicolosi V, Chhowalla M, Kanatzidis MG, Strano MS, Coleman JN. Liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science. 2013; 340(6139):1226400-1226419. DOI: 10.1126/science.1226419
Anderson RL, Ratcliffe I, Greenwell HC, Williams PA, Cliffe S, Coveney PV. Clay swelling—A challenge in the oilfield. Earth Science Reviews. 2010; 98(3-4):201-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.11.003
Ma RZ, Sasaki T. Nanosheets of oxides and hydroxides: Ultimate 2D charge-bearing functional crystallites. Advanced Materials. 2010; 22(45):5082-5104. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201001722
Fan X, Xu P, Zhou D, Sun Y, Li YC, Nguyen MAT, et al. Fast and efficient preparation of exfoliated 2H MoS2 nanosheets by sonication-assisted Lithium intercalation and infrared laser-induced 1T to 2H phase reversion. Nano Letters. 2015; 15(9):5956-5960. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02091
Layek RK, Nandi AK. A review on synthesis and properties of polymer functionalized graphene. Polymer. 2013; 54(19):5087-5103. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.027
Liu J, Chen C, He C, Zhao J, Yang X, Wang H. Synthesis of graphene peroxide and its application in fabricating super extensible and highly resilient nanocomposite hydrogels. ACS Nano. 2012; 6:8194-8208. DOI: 10.1021/nn302874v
Fang M, Wang K, Lu H, Yang Y, Nutt S. Single-layer graphene nanosheets with controlled grafting of polymer chains. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2010; 20:1982-1992. DOI: 10.1039/B919078C
Idota N, Fukuda S, Tsukahara T, Sugahara Y. Preparation of thermoresponsive nanosheets exhibiting phase transitions in water via surface modification of layered perovskite nanosheets with poly( N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm). Chemistry Letters. 2015; 44(2):203-205. DOI: 10.1246/cl.140956
Suzuki R, Sudo M, Hirano M, Idota N, Kunitake M, Nishimi T, et al. Inorganic Janus nanosheets bearing two types of covalently bound organophosphonate groups via regioselective surface modification of K4Nb6O17·3H2O. Chemical Communications. 2018; 54:5756-5759. DOI: 10.1039/C8CC02892C
Woodward JT, Ulman A, Schwartz DK. Self-assembled monolayer growth of octadecylphosphonic acid on mica. Langmuir. 1996; 12:3626-3629. DOI: 10.1021/la9510689
Kim BY, Ratcliff EL, Armstrong NR, Kowalewski T, Pyun J. Ferrocene functional polymer brushes on indium tin oxide viasurface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. Langmuir. 2010; 26:2083-2092. DOI: 10.1021/la902590u
Mello MR, Phanon D, Silveira GQ, Llewellyn PL, Ronconi CM. Amine-modified MCM-41 mesoporous silica for carbon dioxide capture. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2011; 143:174-179. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.02.022
Ghosh S, Yu WZ, Kang S, Bhowmik PC, Xing BS. Sorption and fractionation of a peat derived humic acid by kaolinite, montmorillonite, and goethite. Pedosphere. 2009; 19(1):21-30. DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0160(08)60080-6
Shurvell HF. Spectra-structure correlations in the mid- and far-infrared. In: Chalmers JM, Griffiths PR, editors. Handbook of Vibrational Spectroscopy, Sample Characterization and Spectral Data Processing. Vol. 3. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2002. pp. 1783-1816. DOI: 10.1002/0470027320
Katsumoto Y, Tanaka T, Sato H, Ozaki Y. Conformational change of poly( N-isopropylacrylamide) during the coil-globule transition investigated by attenuated total reflection/infrared spectroscopy and density functional theory calculation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. A. 2002; 106:3429-3435. DOI: 10.1021/jp0124903
Quinones R, Rodriguez K, Iuliucci RJ. Investigation of phosphonic acid surface modifications on zinc oxide nanoparticles under ambient conditions. Thin Solid Films. 2014; 565:155-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.06.057
Vaia RA, Teukolsky RK, Giannelis EP. Interlayer structure and molecular environment of alkylammonium layered silicates. Chemistry of Materials. 1994; 6:1017-1022. DOI: 10.1021/cm00043a025
Nassau K, Shiever W, Bernstein JL. Crystal growth and properties of mica-like potassium niobates. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 1969; 116:348-353. DOI: 10.1149/1.2411844
Ricci D, Braga C. Imaging methods in atomic force microscopy. In: Ricci D, Braga C, editors. Atomic Force Microscopy Biomedical Methods and Applications. New York City: Humana Press; 2014. DOI: P13-23. DOI:10.1385/1592596479
Magonov SN, Whangbo MH. Phase imaging and stiffness in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy. Surface Science. 1997; 375:L385-L391. DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6028(96)01591-9