Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Composition and Properties of Camel Milk

Written By

Rita Rahmeh, Husam Alomirah, Abrar Akbar and Jiwan Sidhu

Submitted: August 15th, 2018 Reviewed: November 19th, 2018 Published: May 2nd, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.82592

Chapter metrics overview

1,855 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Camel is considered as one of the most important and ecologically harmless domesticated animals in the dry region of Asia and Africa. Camels have considerable economic importance not only as a draught animal, but also for their milk and its by-products. They can produce a significant amount of milk from poor feed as compared to any other dairy species. This characteristic, in addition to the growing recognition of the economic value, and health benefits of camel milk make it a center of attention for people, particularly in arid- and semi-arid areas. Moreover, camel milk is a highly nutritious medium permissive for the growth of many diverse bacterial species. These bacterial populations are mainly grouped into pathogenic, spoilage, and technologically relevant bacteria. This chapter reviews the existing knowledge on the composition, nutritional value, health-promoting properties, and economic value of camel milk and its by-products. Furthermore, the relevant studies describing the microbiota of camel milk are included.


  • camel milk
  • pathogens
  • probiotics
  • economic value
  • human health

1. Introduction

Camels are domestic animals exceptionally well-adapted to arid lands. They can survive extended dry periods and heat and reproduce under harsh conditions, intolerable to other domestic animals. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 28 million camels were enumerated worldwide in 2016 [1]. There are two species of camels, one-humped Arabian camels or dromedaries (Camelus dromedarius) found in the Arab peninsula mostly in the Horn of Africa, the Sahel, Maghreb, Middle East, and South Asia. The second species is the two-humped Bactrian camels (Camelus bactrianus) domesticated in China and Mongolia [2]. The economic value and other benefits of camels make them the focus of attention of numerous scientific studies pinpointing the anatomic characteristics, a physiological adaptation of camels to adverse climates, and the bioactive molecules present in camel milk [3]. Their humps consist of stored fat that can be metabolized when food and water are inaccessible beside the ability of their organs to release water when needed. As additional ways for adaptation to their environment, camels have a third, clear eyelid protecting their eyes from sand and flat broader feet for walking in the desert. Camels are multi-purpose animals raised for riding, carrying loads, and producing milk, wool, hair, and meat (Figure 1). Milk is the most valuable camel product and it is known as ‘white gold of the desert’ [4, 5]. It is mainly consumed raw by the Bedouins (people who inhabited the desert) where access to green vegetables and fruits is limited, thus providing, in that case, a significant nutritional relevance. Although camel milk is linked to the culture identity of Bedouins for a long time, small-scale and large-scale farms for intensive production of camel milk have been implemented worldwide only in recent years. The establishment of these farming systems was synchronized with the increased consumer’s interest in unprocessed raw non-bovine milk consumption. While cow milk represents 82% of the total quantity of milk produced in the world, non-bovine dairy species provided 133 million tons in 2016 [1]. Camel is considered one of the most important dairy animals contributing to about 0.3% of the milk produced in the world [1] (Figure 2). Raw camel milk has been reported to possess several technological and medicinal advantages: (i) it can be produced in significant amounts from poor feed than any other dairy species in geographical areas with climatic constraints; (ii) it contributes to the national incomes and the international market integration; and (iii) it satisfies the growing consumer demand for functional foods that, in addition to their nutritional values, have health benefits [6]. Moreover, camel milk is a highly nutritious medium permissive for the growth of many diverse bacterial species. These bacterial populations are mainly grouped into pathogenic, spoilage, and technologically relevant bacteria (health promoter, starter cultures, and preservative agents) [7]. The microbial composition can significantly influence the safety and technological properties of this type of milk. Consequently, the consumption of raw camel milk or of dairy products made with milk that was poorly handled or not properly pasteurized can lead to serious food infections and foodborne diseases. Despite the importance of the information regarding the safety level of raw camel milk, studies investigating its microbiota are limited. Therefore, further studies in this field are required. This chapter reviews the existing knowledge on the composition, nutritional value, health beneficial properties, and economic value of camel milk and its by-products. Furthermore, the relevant studies describing the microbiota of camel milk and the approaches used for their detection are also included.

Figure 1.

Dromedary camel.

Figure 2.

Pie chart showing the percentage of the total quantity of milk produced by different species in the world.


2. Past and present of camel milk

During the last 50 years, a fundamental shift has occurred in the way of housing and managing the camels. Today, in some countries, the extensive or nomadic production system for camels has become semi-intensive or intensive modern well-organized farms and industries [8]. Camels were known as “ships of the desert” commonly used as a mean of transport for thousands of years, carrying up to 600 lbs. on their backs. Currently, they are mainly considered for their milk and meat production, in particular, their milk. Camel milk contributed to the non-bovine milk production with a total amount of 2.7 million tons in 2016 [1]. Since the quantity and quality of milk production are highly dependent on the housing and management of animals, intensive production systems are currently being set up. All the world over, camel milk has proved to be suitable for producing various derived products with significant nutritional value [9].


3. Chemical composition and nutritive value of camel milk

Concurrently with the growing interest in foods that, in addition to their nutritional values, have physiological benefits, the attention toward camel milk is notably increasing [10]. The specific composition of camel milk makes it a promising alternative to bovine milk. Compared with the milk produced by other ruminants, camel milk is mainly valued for its better digestibility in the human gastrointestinal system due to the smallest milk-fat globules and its hypoallergenic properties [11]. As in human milk, dromedary camel and Bactrian camel milk do not contain β-lactoglobulins. There are no reports concerning allergy indicators possessed by these milks. Therefore, α-lactalbumin is the main whey protein in camel milk whereas this protein constitutes only 25% of the total whey proteins in cow milk [12]. Also, the fat globules in camel milk are the smallest among all ruminants, and they do not naturally aggregate due to the absence of agglutinin [9]. Consequently, camel milk can easily be digested and safely consumed by people with weak immune systems or lactose intolerance and can be considered a valid substitute to bovine milk for children more than 2 years old [13, 14]. Moreover, camel milk has lower amounts of fat, protein, and carbohydrates compared to bovine milk [15, 16]. Milk is one of the major contributors to saturated fatty acid (SFA) and unsaturated fatty acid (USFA) intake. The SFA content of milk has received much attention due to its association with the increased cholesterol level in the plasma and subsequently the cardiovascular disease risk. However, the monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) are known to be a healthy cardioprotective type of fat [17]. Interestingly, the SFA content of Bactrian camel milk (average 50/100 g total FA) and dromedary camel milk (average 60/100 g total FA) is lower and slightly lower than that of cow milk, respectively. The MUFA content in dromedary camel milk (56–80/100 g total FAs) is higher than in cow milk (26/100 g total FAs) [18]. This fact may have beneficial effects on consumers with cardiovascular disease risk. Camel milk has higher amounts of certain vitamins and minerals. Its richness in vitamins, especially vitamin C (24–52 mg/kg) which is 3–5 times and 1.5 times higher than bovine and human milk, respectively, gives this milk a great significance in arid areas where green foods are not easily available [19]. Bactrian camel milk is a source of vitamin A (approximately twice that in cow milk) and is high in vitamin D and riboflavin. Two cups of camel milk supply 160% of the recommended nutrient intake of vitamin D (5 μg/day) and 0.5 mg/day of riboflavin [20]. In addition, this milk could provide the most of nutritional mineral requirements of humans due to its mineral content being almost similar to that of human milk [9]. Compared to goat and cow, it contains 55% more zinc, an essential trace element considered as the limiting dietary growth nutrient in populations suffering from deficiencies in micronutrients [21].


4. Health beneficial properties of camel milk

Camel milk is not only valued for its physicochemical composition, but traditionally, camel milk and its fermented products have also been consumed for many years due to consumer’s recognition of its important health-promoting properties. Camel milk has been known for its ability to promote bone formation in infants, and its curative properties against many internal diseases [22]. Nowadays, these medicinal virtues have been scientifically supported, in particular, the association of camel milk with a decreased prevalence of diabetes type I and II by reducing the demand for insulin in patients and improving residual β-cell function in the pancreas, due to its immunomodulatory influence [23]. This hypoglycemic potential is either due to the presence of insulin-like small molecules that are easily absorbed into circulation compared to insulin from other sources or to the existence of insulin in camel milk in indigestible form, i.e., encapsulated in nanoparticles (lipid vesicles) [24]. In addition to its anti-diabetic properties, camel milk and its derived products have a therapeutic role in gastrointestinal ulcers, liver disorders, diarrhea causing viruses, and tuberculosis [25]. Moreover, this milk has received great attention for its ability to cure several diseases including jaundice, lung- and spleen-related illnesses, asthma, anemia, autism, edema, milk allergies, and dermatological autoimmune diseases [15, 16, 26, 27]. Additionally, camel milk is considered a good source of many antimicrobial substances and bioactive compounds, such as, lactoferrins and immunoglobulins, in addition to a greater quantity of lysozyme [28]. The level of lysosomal enzyme (N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase) that provides antimicrobial activity is high in camel milk as compared to other ruminants. This may confer a strong innate immunity providing higher natural resistance toward infections [29]. As camel milk is a highly nutritious medium supporting the growth of various bacterial species, in particular, lactic acid bacteria, it is considered to be a potential source of probiotics and novel bioactive compounds. The few published studies on camel milk have shown that this milk is considered a niche of lactic acid bacteria producing antimicrobial peptides (bacteriocins) (Table 1).

Geographical areaMilk sample typeDetected genusBacteriocinReference
KuwaitRaw camel milkEnterococcus faeciumEnterocins A, B, and P[58]
AlgeriaRaw camel milkEnterococcus faeciumEnterocins L50A and L50B[43]
ChinaFermented camel milk (Shubat)Lactobacillus caseiCaseicin TN-2[22]
JordanRaw and fermented camel milkLactobacillus plantarum
Lactobacillus rhamnosus
Lactobacillus brevis
Lactobacillus paracasei
Lactobacillus fermentum
Bacteriocin-like substances[59]
Saudi ArabiaRaw camel milkLactobacillus acidophilusAcidophilucin AA105[60]
AlgeriaRaw camel milkLeuconostoc mesenteroidesLeucocin B[3]
AlgeriaButter made from camel milkLactobacillus plantarumBacteriocin-like substance[61]

Table 1.

Published studies on isolation of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria from camel milk and its by-products.


5. Economic value of camel milk and its by-products

Although most of the camel milk is consumed raw or fermented by the local community, this milk and its by-products are now being promoted in the market and have considerable economic importance internationally due to the following properties: (i) It has specific nutritional features and health benefits; (ii) camels possess exceptional adaptation to poor quality and quantity of feed, and they can produce a significant amount of milk during the whole year, even during the dry season [30, 31]. Milk yield in camels is approximately 3.5 kg/day in hot summer [32], and it could reach a maximum of 6000 L/lactation in selected breeds in Saudi Arabia [33]; (iii) it has a long lactation period of about 12 months but it may last up to 24 months depending on the farming and breeding systems [21]; (iv) it can significantly contribute to the national revenues as the total production of camel milk was estimated to be 1.3 million tons [34], with the global trade of $10 billion per year; (v) machine milking of dromedaries is now under design to improve the camel milk production [35].

Shortly, a higher amount of camel milk is expected to be available to the dairy industry. There are indications of the potential for growth of this market in the future and that camel milk manufacturers will dramatically expand [36]. Many manufacturers of camel milk-based products are spread out worldwide; for example, Desert Farms (US), Camel Milk Victoria (Australia), Vital Camel Milk (Kenya), Camel Milk UK (UK), Wang Yuan Camel Milk (China), and Camel Milk Australia (Australia). Large camel farms are being established, and increased funding for camel research is noticed. Moreover, a wide variety of camel milk-derived products are now available in the market, including various new dairy products, such as pasteurized milk, fermented milk, flavored milk, butter, cheese, and milk tea [37, 38]. As a specific example, Bactrian camel milk is used for making cheese, butter, and yogurt in Mongolia [13]. Traditional fermented camel milk is produced and consumed in several countries, such as, Shubat (Turkey, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan), Suusac (Eastern Africa, Kenya, and Somalia), and Garis (Sudan and Somalia). Despite the effort made by researchers to produce yogurt from camel milk, the manufacturing of this by-product needs more study due to the fact that camel milk does not easily coagulate [39]. In Dubai, a coffee shop business specializing in different hot and cold drinks and pastries made with fresh camel milk called “Cafe2go” was set up recently. Since 2011, it has expanded successfully to 10 locations in Dubai and Pakistan and is soon to be opened in Oman and Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, camel milk utilization is not limited anymore to the producer region only, but it is now marketed overseas also. It has recently been exported from the United Arab Emirates to the European Union [40]. Furthermore, recent studies have investigated the optimization of fermentation processes [41] and cheese-production from camel milk [42].

Based on the belief of many consumers that camel milk products address various allergies and skin problems, this milk reached the international markets due to the manufacturing of a broad range of healthcare products, including soap, lip balm, hand cream, and lotions. Other cosmetic product lines based on camel milk have also been developed (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Camel milk based products in Australia.


6. Microbiota of camel milk

In light of the industrial interest generated in camel milk, its by-products and its medicinal features, the investigation of the safety and quality of camel milk became mandatory. In the past, the majority of the scientific studies focused on the anatomic characteristics, a physiological adaptation of camels to adverse climates, and the biomolecules present in camel milk [3]. However, information on the microbiology of camel milk is very limited. While many studies focused on the microbiology of cow, sheep, and goats milk, only a few studies have focused on camel milk despite the fact that the difference in the composition of camel milk compared to milk from other animals, its biological features, and its production in a desert environment could underlie significant differences in its microbial ecosystem and its biological characteristics [7, 43].

Nevertheless, the available information on camel milk microbiota originates from studies based mostly on a culture-dependent approach, which is culturing the microbes using general or selective media followed by subsequent analysis.

Milk in general and camel milk, in particular, is a highly nutritious product providing an ideal environment for the growth of a diverse and complex microbial population. The nature and abundance of the microbial load are highly influenced by many parameters, such as, the surrounding environment (conditions of milk collection) and camel health status, in particular, because the mastitis disease has a great influence on the milk bacterial composition [44]. These bacterial populations are mainly grouped into two major categories: (i) beneficial and technologically relevant bacteria and (ii) pathogenic and spoilage bacteria. So far, only a few studies relying on the culture-dependent approach have been conducted on the identification of the bacterial populations of camel milk [5, 45, 46]. These studies are summarized in Table 2. It is well known that the specific bacterial composition of milk has a direct impact on the development of texture and flavor of the finished dairy product [47]. Several lactic acid bacteria present in raw milk have been proven to be technologically relevant in dairy products. Among these bacteria, Lactococcusspp., in particular, Lactococcus lactis, are primarily known for their role as starter cultures for the cheese industry and are also recognized for the production of flavor compounds [48]. Lactobacillusspp. are another example of bacteria found in raw milk, which has been used for many industrial dairy applications. They can contribute to the quality and nutritional value of dairy products through their proteolytic activity and ability to produce aroma compounds [49]. These genera are one of the dominant bacterial populations isolated from camel milk. Beside the technological properties of these microorganisms, it is also known that raw camel milk microorganisms have a health-promoting effect through aiding digestion or reducing the frequency of allergies, including asthma and atopic diseases [50, 51, 52]. In addition, camel milk is dominated by biologically active bacteria that produce many antimicrobials, including bacteriocins, antifungal agents, organic acids, and hydrogen peroxide in camel milk, which probably confer to this milk its extended shelf life, evidently resulting in safer consumption even during storage for several days in the absence of refrigeration [53]. The antimicrobial agents produced by these microbial species might be regarded as biopreservative agents that could be used to extend the shelf life and safety of camel milk products and could be of interest to the dairy industry.

Geographical areaType of camelMilk sample type/sourceAim of the studyMedia usedDetected genusReference
(four zones) (n = 12)
Dromedary camelRaw camel milk
Composite samples
  • Assessment of the hygienic quality of camel milk

  • Detection of LAB and pathogens

MRS; Baird-Parker; Litsky mediumEnterococcus(58.8%)
Different regions in the south of Morocco
(n = 30)
Dromedary camelRaw camel milk
Individual samples
  • Detection of LAB

MRS; M17; MSELactobacillus(37.5%)
(n = 10)
Dromedary camelRaw camel milk
Individual samples
  • Detection of LAB

  • Study of antimicrobial activity and probiotic traits

MRS; M17; KAAEnterococci(51%)
(Four regions)
Almaty, South Kazakhstan,
Kyzylorda, and Atyrau
(n = 26)
Dromedary camelRaw camel milk
Fermented camel milk
Individual samples
  • Detection of LAB and yeast

MRS; M17Enterococcus (51.3%)
Central division of Isiolo district of Kenya (n = 15)
Dromedary camelFermented camel milk
Individual samples
  • Detection of LAB

Abu Dhabi
(n = 50)
Dromedary camelRaw camel milk
Individual samples
  • Study of probiotic traits

Nine regions
Central, western, northern, and eastern geographical areas of Sudan
Dromedary camelFermented camel milk ‘Garis’
  • Identification of the microbial populations present in Garis

  • Detection of LAB and yeast

PCA; MRS; M17; PDAStreptococcus(68%)
Transhumance and nomadic herds (n = 28)
Dromedary camelFermented camel milk ‘Garis’
  • Assessment of the microbial contents

PCA; MRS; M17Streptococcus(50%)
Dongola, Kasala, El Gadarif, El Obied, and Omdurman (n = 12)
Dromedary camelFermented camel milk ‘Garis’
  • Detection of LAB

MRS; M17Lactobacillus(66.6%)
Middle Saudi Arabia
Qassim region (n = 33)
Dromedary camelRaw camel milk
  • Assessment of the microbial quality

  • Detection of pathogens

PCA; PDA; Baird-Parker agarS. aureus(70%)
Fafen zone, Ethiopian Somali regional state (Gursum, Babile) (n = 126)
Dromedary CamelRaw camel milk
  • Assessment of the microbial quality

  • Detection of pathogens

Edwards Medium; MSA; MAC; EMB agar; XLD; Brilliant Green Agar; Salmonella and; Shigella Agar; TSIStaphylococcus(89.8 %)
Streptococcus(53.7 %)
E. coli(31.5 %)
Salmonella(17.6 %)
Klebsiella.(5.6 %)
Enterobacter(5.6 %)
Sinai, Aswan, and Sharqia governorates (n = 185)
Dromedary camelRaw camel milk
  • Monitoring the possibility of transmission of milk borne pathogens

  • Detection of pathogens

E. coli

Table 2.

Published studies on the bacterial populations detected in raw camel milk and its fermented products using culturing methods and subsequent analysis.

On the other hand, microorganisms can also have a negative impact on the quality of camel milk and its shelf life, resulting in milk spoilage. The consumption of raw camel milk contaminated with pathogens can lead to, in some cases, severe illness [46]. Also, the presence of potentially pathogenic bacteria in raw camel milk can have implications for the animal and human health and are, therefore, relevant issues to be considered. Like other dairy animals, camels can also be affected by mastitis, which is defined as the inflammation of one or more of the teats (mammary glands) and is considered as one of the most important diseases in the dairy industry worldwide [54]. It can cause economic loss by reducing the milk production, lower probability of conception, higher treatment cost, and transmission of the disease to other species of animals [55]. It causes suffering for camels and poses a public health risk too. Recent studies on camels have described the effect of mastitis on milk hygiene and yield as well as on the immune system at the level of the mammary gland [40, 56]. Bacterial infections are considered to be the primary cause of mastitis in domestic animals. The major causes of camel mastitis have been investigated using a classical bacterial culturing approach [32, 54, 57]. Thus, the proper control of this disease will not only improve the quality and quantity of camel milk produced but would also reduce the public health risk to the camel milk consuming population.


7. Conclusions

Camel milk is known for its nutritional quality, being rich in vitamins C and A and low in SFA, its smaller fat globules, and being easy to digest and rich in many minerals and bioactive compounds. The medicinal virtues of camel milk and its association with a decreased prevalence of diabetes type I and II have attracted many studies, but more research is needed to dissect the mechanism of action of the insulin-like small molecules, which may be responsible for the anti-diabetic properties present in camel milk. Further studies are also required to examine the role of camel milk in treating several diseases such as gastrointestinal ulcers, liver disorders, and dermatological autoimmune diseases. In addition to that, camel milk has been proven as a highly important source of natural bioactive compounds and antimicrobial substances that could be targeted to develop functional and health promoting products for the well-being of human population in the coming years.


Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


  1. 1. FAO. Food and agriculture organization of the united nations. FAO Stat Div 2016:1.[Accessed: October 28, 2018]
  2. 2. Ji R, Cui P, Ding F, Geng J, Gao H, Zhang H, et al. Monophyletic origin of domestic bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus) and its evolutionary relationship with the extant wild camel (Camelus bactrianus ferus). Animal Genetics. 2009;40:377-382. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01848.x
  3. 3. Benmechernene Z, Fernández-No I, Quintela-Baluja M, Böhme K, Kihal M, Calo-Mata P, et al. Genomic and proteomic characterization of bacteriocin-producingLeuconostoc mesenteroidesstrains isolated from raw camel milk in two southwest Algerian arid zones. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014:1-10. DOI: 10.1155/2014/853238
  4. 4. Wernery U. Camel milk, the white gold of the desert. Journal of Camel Practice and Research. 2006;13:15-26
  5. 5. Davati N, Yazdi FT, Zibaee S, Shahidi F, Edalatian MR. Study of lactic acid bacteria community from raw milk of Iranian one humped camel and evaluation of their probiotic properties. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2015;8:1-6. DOI: 10.5812/jjm.8(5)2015.16750
  6. 6. Alexandraki V, Kazou M, Angelopoulou A, Arena MP, Capozzi V, Russo P, et al. The microbiota of non-cow milk and products. In: Non-Bovine Milk and Milk Products. Cambridge: Elsevier; 2016. pp. 117-159. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-803361-6.00006-5
  7. 7. Quigley L, O’Sullivan O, Stanton C, Beresford TP, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, et al. The complex microbiota of raw milk. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2013;37:664-698. DOI: 10.1111/1574-6976.12030
  8. 8. Faye B. Camel farming sustainability: The challenges of the camel farming system in the XXIth century. Journal of Sustainable Development. 2013;6:74-82. DOI: 10.5539/jsd.v6n12p74
  9. 9. Khalesi M, Salami M, Moslehishad M, Winterburn J, Moosavi-Movahedi AA. Biomolecular content of camel milk: A traditional superfood towards future healthcare industry. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2017;62:49-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.02.004
  10. 10. Hailu Y, Hansen EB, Seifu E, Eshetu M, Ipsen R, Kappeler S. Functional and technological properties of camel milk proteins: A review. The Journal of Dairy Research. 2016;83:422-429. DOI: 10.1017/S0022029916000686
  11. 11. Meena S, Rajput YS, Sharma R. Comparative fat digestibility of goat, camel, cow and buffalo milk. International Dairy Journal. 2014;35:153-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2013.11.009
  12. 12. Alhaj OA, Taufik E, Handa Y, Fukuda K, Saito T, Urashima T. Chemical characterisation of oligosaccharides in commercially pasteurised dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) milk. International Dairy Journal. 2013;26:70-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2012.08.008
  13. 13. Jirimutu LJC, Alam MS, Li HP, Guo MR, Zhang HP. Fatty acid and protein profiles, and mineral content of milk from the wild Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus ferus) in Mongolia. Journal Milchwissenschaft—Milk Science International. 2010;65:21-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01848.x
  14. 14. Shori AB. Camel milk as a potential therapy for controlling diabetes and its complications: A review of in vivo studies. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. 2015;23:609-618. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2015.02.007
  15. 15. Konuspayeva G, Faye B, Pauw ED, Focant J-F. Levels and trends of PCDD/Fs and PCBs in camel milk (Camelus bactrianusandCamelus dromedarius) from Kazakhstan. Chemosphere. 2011;85:351-360. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.097
  16. 16. Arab HH, Salama SA, Eid AH, Omar HA, Arafa E-SA, Maghrabi IA. Camel’s milk ameliorates TNBS-induced colitis in rats via downregulation of inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2014;69:294-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.04.032
  17. 17. Wang DD, Hu FB. Dietary fat and risk of cardiovascular disease: Recent controversies and advances. Annual Review of Nutrition. 2017;37:423-446. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071816-064614
  18. 18. Medhammar E, Wijesinha-Bettoni R, Stadlmayr B, Nilsson E, Charrondiere UR, Burlingame B. Composition of milk from minor dairy animals and buffalo breeds: A biodiversity perspective. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2012;92:445-474. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4690
  19. 19. Kamal M, Karoui R. Monitoring of mild heat treatment of camel milk by front-face fluorescence spectroscopy. LWT- Food Science and Technology. 2017;79:586-593. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.11.013
  20. 20. FAO. Milk and Dairy Products in Human Nutrition. Rome: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-95
  21. 21. Fantuz F, Salimei E, Papademas P. Macro-and micronutrients in non-cow milk and products and their impact on human health. In: Non-Bovine Milk and Milk Products. Cambridge: Academic press; 2016. pp. 209-261. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-803361-6.00009-0
  22. 22. Lü X, Hu P, Dang Y, Liu B. Purification and partial characterization of a novel bacteriocin produced byLactobacillus caseiTN-2 isolated from fermented camel milk (Shubat) of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous region, China. Food Control. 2014;43:276-283. DOI: 10.1016/J.FOODCONT.2014.03.020
  23. 23. Limon A, Gallegos-Perez J-L, Reyes-Ruiz JM, Aljohi MA, Alshanqeeti AS, Miledi R. The endogenous GABA bioactivity of camel, bovine, goat and human milks. Food Chemistry. 2014;145:481-487. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.08.058
  24. 24. Malik A, Al-Senaidy A, Skrzypczak-Jankun E, Jankun J. A study of the anti-diabetic agents of camel milk. International Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2012;30:585-592. DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2012.1051
  25. 25. Khatoon H, Najam R. Bioactive components in camel milk: Their nutritive value and therapeutic application. In: Nutrients in Dairy and Their Implications for Health and Disease. Cambridge: Academic press; 2017. pp. 377-387. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809762-5.00029-2
  26. 26. Salwa MQ , Lina AFK. Antigenotoxic and anticytotoxic effect of camel milk in mice treated with cisplatin. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2010;17:159-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2010.02.010
  27. 27. Osman KM, Samir A, Orabi A, Zolnikov TR. Confirmed low prevalence ofListeria mastitisin she-camel milk delivers a safe, alternative milk for human consumption. Acta Tropica. 2014;130:1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.10.001
  28. 28. Rasheed Z. Medicinal values of bioactive constituents of camel milk: A concise report. International Journal of Health Sciences (Qassim). 2017;11:1-2
  29. 29. Silanikove N, Leitner G, Merin U. Influence of animal health, breed, and diet on non-cow milk composition. In: Non-Bovine Milk and Milk Products. Cambridge: Academic press; 2016. pp. 61-79. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-803361-6.00004-1
  30. 30. Konuspayeva G, Faye B, Loiseau G, Narmuratova M, Ivashchenko A, Meldebekova A, et al. Physiological change in camel milk composition (Camelus dromedarius) 2: Physico-chemical composition of colostrum. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2010;42:501-505. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-009-9450-4
  31. 31. Awoke K, Sisay F. Review on production, quality and use of camel milk in Ethiopia. Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production. 2015;03:1-4. DOI: 10.4172/2332-2608.1000145
  32. 32. Ahmad S, Yaqoob M, Bilal MQ , Muhammad G, Yang L-G, Khan MK, et al. Risk factors associated with prevalence and major bacterial causes of mastitis in dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) under different production systems. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2012;44:107-112. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-011-9895-0
  33. 33. Musaad A, Faye B, Nikhela AA. Lactation curves of dairy camels in an intensive system. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2013;45:1039-1046. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-012-0331-x
  34. 34. Ziane M, Couvert O, Le Chevalier P, Moussa-Boudjemaa B, Leguerinel I. Identification and characterization of aerobic spore forming bacteria isolated from commercial camel’s milk in south of Algeria. Small Ruminant Research. 2016;137:59-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.03.004
  35. 35. Nagy P, Juhasz J. Review of present knowledge on machine milking and intensive milk production in dromedary camels and future challenges. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2016;48:915-926. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-016-1036-3
  36. 36. Al-Ashqar RA, Al-Mohammad Salem KM, Al Herz AKM, Al-Haroon AI, Alluwaimi AM. The CD markers of camel (Camelus dromedarius) milk cells during mastitis: The LPAM-1 expression is an indication of possible mucosal nature of the cellular trafficking. Research in Veterinary Science. 2015;99:77-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.01.011
  37. 37. Al-Saleh AA, Metwalli AAM, Ismail EA. Physicochemical properties of probiotic frozen yoghurt made from camel milk. International Journal of Dairy Technology. 2011;64:557-562. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0307.2011.00699.x
  38. 38. El-Agamy EI. Bioactive components in camel milk. In: Park YW, editor. Bioactive Components in Milk and Dairy Products. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. pp. 159-194. DOI: 10.1002/9780813821504.ch6
  39. 39. Al-Zoreky NS, Al-Otaibi MM. Suitability of camel milk for making yogurt. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2015;24:601-606. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-015-0078-z
  40. 40. Nagy P, Faye B, Marko O, Thomas S, Wernery U, Juhasz J. Microbiological quality and somatic cell count in bulk milk of dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius): Descriptive statistics, correlations, and factors of variation. Journal of Dairy Science. 2013;96:5625-5640. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-6990
  41. 41. Baubekova A, Akhmetsadykova S, Konuspayeva G, Akhmetsadykov N, Faye B, Loiseau G. Biodiversity study of the yeast in fresh and fermented camel and mare’s milk by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Journal of Camel Practice and Research. 2015;22:91. DOI: 10.5958/2277-8934.2015.00014.4
  42. 42. Konuspayeva G, Camier B, Gaucheron F, Faye B. Some parameters to process camel milk into cheese. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture. 2014;26:354. DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.v26i4.17277
  43. 43. Vimont A, Fernandez B, Hammami R, Ababsa A, Daba H, Fliss I. Bacteriocin-producing enterococcus faecium LCW 44: A high potential probiotic candidate from raw camel milk. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:865. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00865
  44. 44. Lima SF, Bicalho ML de S, Bicalho RC. Evaluation of milk sample fractions for characterization of milk microbiota from healthy and clinical mastitis cows. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0193671. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193671
  45. 45. Khedid K, Faid M, Mokhtari A, Soulaymani A, Zinedine A. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the one humped camel milk produced in Morocco. Microbiological Research. 2009;164:81-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2006.10.008
  46. 46. Abera T, Legesse Y, Mummed B, Urga B. Bacteriological quality of raw camel milk along the market value chain in Fafen zone, Ethiopian Somali regional state. BMC Research Notes. 2016;9:285. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-016-2088-1
  47. 47. Gao ML, Hou HM, Teng XX, Zhu YL, Hao HS, Zhang GL. Microbial diversity in raw milk and traditional fermented dairy products (Hurood cheese and Jueke) from Inner Mongolia, China. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2017;16:16019451. DOI: 10.4238/gmr16019451
  48. 48. Ruggirello M, Cocolin L, Dolci P. Fate ofLactococcus lactisstarter cultures during late ripening in cheese models. Food Microbiology. 2016;59:112-118. DOI: 10.1016/J.FM.2016.05.001
  49. 49. Stefanovic E, Kilcawley KN, Roces C, Rea MC, O’Sullivan M, Sheehan JJ, et al. Evaluation of the potential ofLactobacillus paracaseiadjuncts for flavor compounds development and diversification in short-aged cheddar cheese. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9:1506. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01506
  50. 50. Debarry J, Garn H, Hanuszkiewicz A, Dickgreber N, Blümer N, von Mutius E, et al.Acinetobacter lwoffiiandLactococcus lactisstrains isolated from farm cowsheds possess strong allergy-protective properties. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2007;119:1514-1521. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.03.023
  51. 51. Braun-Fahrländer C, Von Mutius E. Can farm milk consumption prevent allergic diseases? Clinical and Experimental Allergy. 2011;41:29-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2010.03665.x
  52. 52. Zibaee S, Hosseini SMA-R, Yousefi M, Taghipour A, Kiani MA, Noras MR. Nutritional and therapeutic characteristics of camel milk in children: A systematic review. Electron Physician. 2015;7:1523-1528. DOI: 10.19082/1523
  53. 53. Omer RH, Eltinay AH. Changes in chemical composition of camel’s raw milk during storage. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2009;8:607-610
  54. 54. Mehamud J, Megersa M, Abebe Y, Ahmed M. Prevalence, risk factors and major bacterial causes of camel mastitis, in Gursum District, Eastern Hararghe, Ethiopia Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Livestock and Fishery, Ethiopia 2. Global Veterinaria. 2017;18:203-208. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.gv.2017.203.208
  55. 55. Hertl JA, Gröhn YT, Leach JDG, Bar D, Bennett GJ, González RN, et al. Effects of clinical mastitis caused by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and other organisms on the probability of conception in New York State Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2010;93:1551-1560. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2599
  56. 56. Hamed H, Gargouri A, Hachana Y, El Feki A. Comparison between somatic cell and leukocyte variations throughout lactation in camel (Camelus dromedarius) and cow’s milk. Small Ruminant Research. 2010;94:53-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.06.008
  57. 57. Regassa A, Golicha G, Tesfaye D, Abunna F, Megersa B. Prevalence, risk factors, and major bacterial causes of camel mastitis in Borana Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2013;45:1589-1595. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-013-0403-6
  58. 58. Rahmeh R, Akbar A, Kishk M, Al Onaizi T, Al-Shatti A, Shajan A, et al. Characterization of semipurified enterocins produced byEnterococcus faeciumstrains isolated from raw camel milk. Journal of Dairy Science. 2018;101:4944-4952. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13996
  59. 59. Abbas MM, Mahasneh AM. Isolation ofLactobacillusstrains with probiotic potential from camel’s milk. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2014;8:1645-1655. DOI: 10.5897/AJMR2013.6598
  60. 60. Abo-Amer AE. Inhibition of foodborne pathogens by a bacteriocin-like substance produced by a novel strain ofLactobacillus acidophilusisolated from camel milk. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology. 2013;49:270-279. DOI: 10.1134/S0003683813030174
  61. 61. Maurad K, Meriem KH, Meriem KH. Probiotic characteristics ofLactobacillus plantarumstrains from traditional butter made from camel milk in arid regions (Sahara) of Algeria. Grasas y Aceites. 2008;59:218-224. DOI: 10.3989/gya.2008.v59.i3.511
  62. 62. Benkerroum N, Boughdadi A, Bennani N, Hidane K. Microbiological quality assessment of Moroccan camel’s milk and identification of predominating lactic acid bacteria. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2003;19:645-648. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025114601811
  63. 63. Akhmetsadykova S, Baubekova A, Konuspayeva G, Akhmetsadykov N, Loiseau G. Microflora identification of fresh and fermented camel milk from Kazakhstan. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture. 2014;26:327. DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.v26i4.17641
  64. 64. Lore T, Mbugua S, Wangoh J. Enumeration and identification of micro flora in suusac, a Kenyan traditional fermented camel milk product. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2005;38:125-130
  65. 65. Abushelaibi A, Al-Mahadin S, El-Tarabily K, Shah NP, Ayyash M. Characterization of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from camel milk. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2017;79:316-325. DOI: 10.1016/J.LWT.2017.01.041
  66. 66. Abdelgadir W, Nielsen DS, Hamad S, Jakobsen M. A traditional Sudanese fermented camel’s milk product, Gariss, as a habitat ofStreptococcus infantariussubsp. infantarius. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2008;127:215-219. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.07.008
  67. 67. Hassan RA, El Zubeir EM, Babiker SA. Chemical and microbial measurements of fermented camel milk ‘“gariss”’ from transhumance and nomadic herds in Sudan. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2008;2:800-804
  68. 68. Ashmaig A, Hasan A, El Gaali E. Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Sudanese fermented camel’s milk (Gariss). African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2009;3:451-457
  69. 69. El-Ziney MG, Al-Turki AI. Microbiological quality and safety assessment of camel milk (Camelus dromedaries) in Saudi Arabia (Qassim region). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2007;5:115-122. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/0502_115122
  70. 70. Alall AA, Gouda AS, Dardir HA, Ibrahim AK. Prevalence of some milk borne bacterial pathogens threatening camel milk consumers in Egypt. Global Veterinaria. 2012;8:76-82

Written By

Rita Rahmeh, Husam Alomirah, Abrar Akbar and Jiwan Sidhu

Submitted: August 15th, 2018 Reviewed: November 19th, 2018 Published: May 2nd, 2019