Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Autophagy-Related Gene Expression Changes Are Found in Pancreatic Cancer and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Written By

Doaa M. Ali and Martin R. Berger

Submitted: April 27th, 2018 Reviewed: August 17th, 2018 Published: November 5th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80981

Chapter metrics overview

1,110 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Genetic alterations can cause cancer, including pancreatic cancer (PC) as well as certain neurodegenerative diseases. Our lab has recently identified genes that are modulated during pancreatic cancer liver metastasis, and some are known to have a role in neurobiology or neurodegenerative diseases. Autophagy or self-eating portrays the lysosomal-dependent degradation and recycling of protein aggregates and defective organisms in eukaryotic cells. Deregulation of autophagy as a cellular mechanism is common in neurodegenerative diseases as well as cancer and may represent a platform by which some genes can affect both disorders. This is exemplified for optineurin, which is an autophagy receptor that was found among genes with intensive modulation of expression in PC liver metastasis. Our results on this autophagy receptor draw the attention to the expression status of this and other autophagy genes in pancreatic cancer progression.


  • pancreatic cancer
  • nervous system
  • neurodegenerative diseases
  • autophagy
  • optineurin

1. Introduction

Recent findings from microarray analyses of cancer cells have shown a growing list of genes with modulated expression, which are known to have importance in diseases other than cancer. This is in particular true for genes or gene families that have been identified to play a role in some neurodegenerative diseases or are a factor in cells of the nervous system, which may have a controlling role on the growth and development of cancer in general and of pancreatic cancer in particular. One cellular property, the alteration of which seems to be related to both types of diseases, is autophagy. In the lines below, we will discuss whether deregulation of autophagy could be a mechanism, which is in common between certain neurodegenerative diseases and pancreatic cancer, and thus may represent a link between two extremely different diseases.


2. Disrupted autophagy links cancer and neurodegenerative diseases

Autophagy is a Greek term that means self-eating and it portrays the lysosomal-dependent way of degrading and recycling cytosolic components in eukaryotic cells. Autophagy is categorized into three different types, that is, microautophagy, macroautophagy, and chaperone-mediated autophagy (Figure 1), which are different in terms of their cargo and the mechanism of their occurrence [1, 2].

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of the three different types of autophagy showing the underlying difference in the mechanisms, microautophagy by invaginations of the lysosomes, macroautophagy through the formation of autophagosomes, and CMA with the targeted protein recognized by chaperones and delivered to the lysosomes through the LAMP2 protein.

Micro-autophagyrefers to the process where minute parts of the cytoplasm become sequestered and later on completely engulfed by lysosomal invaginations [3].

Chaperone-mediated autophagyis a selective pathway of autophagy, where proteins are targeted by the presence of a pentapeptide motif in the amino acid sequence of the substrate proteins, which is recognized by a chaperone protein. This complex is then delivered to the lysosomes for degradation in a receptor-dependent manner [2]. The motif should be accessible to the chaperone protein regardless of its position in the protein, but under normal conditions, it is concealed within the core when the protein is appropriately folded. Substrates for CMA are recognized by chaperones as heat shock cognate protein of 70 kD (hsp70) and cochaperones, which may be responsible for the unfolding of the protein before substrate-chaperone interaction can take place, but without direct interactions in some cases. Cochaperones include proteins PINK as hsp90, hsp40, and Bcl-2–associated athanogene 2 (Bag-1). Then, the substrates bind to the cytosolic tail of lysosome-associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP-2A) and through its multimerization are translocated toward the lysosomal lumen, and this is seen as a limiting step for the pathway [2, 4, 5].

Macroautophagy, referred to below as autophagy, is the most widely investigated type of autophagy and entails the formation of what is called an autophagosome, which is a double membrane structure that is used to deliver cargos later through fusion to lysosomes or endosomes [6]. It is formed through several chronological steps starting from nucleation, elongation, to closure of a phagophore or isolation membrane that leads to the autophagosome formation. Proteins responsible to drive the autophagy process were basically discovered through analyzing the yeast genome and are named autophagy-related (ATG) proteins [6, 7].

Once stimulated, the autophagic process starts with the assembly of the initiation complex (ULK1 complex) and the nucleation complex (BECN1 complex) at the phagophore assembly site and this forms the basis for recruiting other ATG proteins and the elongation of the phagophore membrane [1]. ATG8/LC3 becomes bound to the inner and outer membrane of the phagophore following cleavage by the ATG4 protease and following conjugation to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE). Before closure, all ATGs dissociate and are recycled except for ATG8/LC3, which is located on the outer membrane. This protein is recycled after closure with the assistance of ATG4, while lysosomal enzymes in the autophagosome lumen degrade the ATG8/LC3 attached to the inner membrane.

Autophagosomes later unite with late endosomes and lysosomes to proceed for degradation [1]. LAMP proteins again control the fusion step and protect against degradation of the lysosomal membrane [1, 8].

Autophagy can be either selective or nonselective. During the selective process, specific cargos as aggregated proteins, damaged mitochondria, excess peroxisomes, and invading pathogens undergo degradation after being recognized via autophagy receptors. These autophagy receptors have the ability to recognize degradation signals on cargo proteins and also bind LC3/GABARAP proteins on the forming autophagosome. Among the identified autophagy receptors are p62/SQSTM1 (p62/Sequestosome 1), OPTN (optineurin), NBR1 (neighbor of BRCA1), and NDP52 (nuclear dot protein 52 kDa). All of them possess an ubiquitin-binding domain and LC3-interacting regions (LIRs) [9, 10].

Autophagy is a highly conserved process in mammals and is strictly regulated. One of the major regulators is mTOR through its complex 1 (mTORC1) and its activation exerts an inhibitory effect on autophagy induction. A similar effect is shown with PI3 kinases class I, whereas PI3 kinase class III activity is required for autophagosome formation. Starvation and amino acid depletion result in stimulation of the process. Other regulatory and autophagy inducers are based on an increase in cytosolic calcium, inhibition of inositol triphosphate, or starvation-induced autophagy [6, 11, 12]. Starvation also positively regulates autophagy by activation of AMPK that directly phosphorylates ULK1 or by inhibition of mTORC1 activity, or through inhibitory phosphorylation of nonautophagic BECN1 complexes [1]. Oxidative stress [13], DNA damage [14], and hypoxia [15] are all among the cellular mechanisms that can induce autophagy.

Autophagy has several cellular functions; it provides nutrients, eliminates damaged proteins and organelles, combats against invading microorganisms/pathogens, and in general keeps the homeostasis and balance in cells [1]. Because of its important role and significant cellular implications, defects or deregulation of this process was detected in different human diseases [1]. Infections and pathogens modulate autophagy according to their requirements to secure their survival in host cells. Certain steps of autophagy are hindered in neurodegenerative disorders and proteinopathies are a feature of these disorders. Autophagy is cytoprotective in cardiovascular tissue under physiological conditions, but it is induced in many cardiovascular diseases and is also deregulated in cancer, diabetes, and immune disorders [1].

2.1. Role of autophagy in cancer

In cancer, autophagy can either inhibit or promote cancer development and progression, and this varies according to the genetic lesions, tumor type, and stage. Combating mutagenic reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, DNA damage, genomic instability, and oncogenic proteins are part of the protective functions of autophagy against tumor induction, as they induce autophagy when initiated [16, 17].

With regard to its onco-stimulatory role, downregulation of some autophagy-related genes, as Beclin-1 or ATG5, results in reduced growth of metastatic carcinoma cell lines, while that of ATG7 will promote apoptosis of colon cancer cells. Autophagy also permits tumors to resist stress and apoptotic signals and is connected in advanced cancer to poor prognosis and invasiveness. It increases ATP levels that support cell survival during hypoxia and starvation. Thus, autophagy keeps healthy cells away from malignant transformation through maintaining the cellular homeostasis, but after tumor establishment, it may result in increased tumor progression and invasiveness [16, 17]. Autophagy supports tumor development through improving resistance of cells to endogenous apoptotic signals as well as resistance to chemotherapy and maintains the cancer stem cell compartment [17].

Pancreatic tumors show an elevated level of basal autophagy, more than any other epithelial cancer. The role of autophagy in PDAC needs to be clarified; as some investigations and the effect of anticancer drugs that generate ROS and induce autophagy give rise to the idea that autophagy is protective against cancer and stimulates apoptotic cancer cell death following treatment [18]. On the other hand, a number of reports suggested the role of autophagy in PDAC development. Autophagy was anticipated to be the cellular mechanism responsible for cancer development and progression from pancreatitis to overt carcinogenesis in the presence of K-ras mutations. Different observations supported a harmful role of autophagy, as being strongly induced in the inflammatory process. Inhibition of tumor development was observed after using the autophagy inhibitor chloroquine. Finally, LC3 is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer and downregulation of autophagy genes significantly reduces the growth and colony formation of PDAC cells in vitro [19, 20].

2.2. Role of autophagy in neurodegenerative diseases

Autophagic removal of proteins and damaged organelles is vital for the appropriate function of neurons, not only under pathological conditions, but also at baseline level under normal circumstances, as denoted by some studies [21].

Autophagosomes are very rarely detected in healthy neurons owing to the fact that the brain has a very low level of basal autophagy, or because the robust efficiency of the autophagy processes prevents the autophagosomes from accumulation [21, 22].

Dysfunction in autophagy affects the neuronal function and results in the occurrence of neurodegenerative diseases [23].

Induction of autophagy was anticipated to be an early stress response in axonal dystrophy and to contribute to axon remodeling [24]. Autophagy was shown to play a role in controlling microtubule dynamics and axon regeneration. Autophagy induction encouraged neurite growth, lessened the inhibitory effects of myelin, and reduced the formation of retraction bulbs after axonal injury in cultured cortical neurons [25].

Neurodegeneration is associated with deterioration of cognitive capabilities as well as motor functions with progressive damage to the nerve structure and functions. Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Huntington’s diseases represent the most famous neurodegenerative diseases [26]. They share in common the accumulation of toxic misfolded protein aggregates, as extracellular amyloid protein (Aβ) plaques and intracellular accumulation of tau protein in Alzheimer’s disease, α-synuclein and ubiquitin in Parkinson’s disease, and mutant Huntingtin protein in Huntington’s disease [26]. Defective mitochondria, generating excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS), represent another feature of neurodegenerative diseases, as ROS harm the cellular constituents including DNA, lipids, and proteins [26]. The misfolded proteins are responsible for neuronal damage and death, and hence autophagy becomes a crucial target for the management of neurodegenerative diseases [27].

Recent studies revealed that alterations in autophagy-related genes trigger neurodegenerative diseases [28].

In Alzheimer’s disease, transmembrane amyloid precursor protein (APP) is processed by β- and γ-secretases, which thus produce Aβ peptide [28, 29]. Autophagosomes show γ-secretase activity and represent a possibly active compartment for the production of Aβ and contribute to its deposition in affected neurons in Alzheimer’s disease [30]. Dysfunction of Presenilin-1, associated with familial Alzheimer’s disease, hinders proteolysis in autolysosomes and results in accumulation of Aβ peptides in autophagosomes [28]. Beclin-1 deficiency impedes the autophagic clearance of APP as an autophagy substrate, and it increases the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease [31].

Huntington’s disease is an inherited neurodegenerative disease and shows a range of declining motor, behavioral, and cognitive functions. Mutations in the huntingtin (HTT) gene are associated with cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) expansion, encoding a polyglutamine (polyQ) at the N-terminus of the gene [32]. This mutation affects the interaction of huntingtin with other proteins leading to all the neuropathological changes observed in the disease [33]. Huntingtin protein was shown to function as a scaffold protein for selective macroautophagy through interaction with autophagy pathway components; it cooperates with the autophagy receptor p62 and enables its connection with the essential autophagosome element LC3 and with ubiquitinated substrates. Huntingtin also binds to ULK1, the initiator kinase for autophagy, and this interaction liberates ULK1 from the negative regulation exerted by mTOR [34].

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common progressive neurological disorder characterized by tremors, bradykinesia, rigidity, and loss of postural reflexes. The disease is caused by the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra[28, 35]. Different stages of Parkinson’s disease showed deregulation of autophagy with the aggregation of α-synuclein in ‘Lewy bodies.’ Disrupted mitophagy is a major mechanism in the pathogenesis of the disease through mutations of PINK1 and PARKIN, which are essential for mitochondrial biogenesis and recycling [36]. Physiologically, PINK1 is a target of the ubiquitin-proteasome system after it has been processed by the mitochondrial protease presenilin-associated rhomboid-like (PARL). In depolarized mitochondria, this process is inhibited and PINK1 accumulates on the outer mitochondrial membrane, autophosphorylates, and recruits Parkin to damaged mitochondria. Parkin is an enzyme 3 (E3) ubiquitin ligase, and it was suggested that its ubiquitinated proteins recruit the autophagy receptor p62 to be integrated in an autophagosome for the autophagy degradation of damaged mitochondria (mitophagy) [28].

The two autophagy receptors previously linked to xenophagy, nuclear dot protein 52 kDa (NDP52) and optineurin (OPTN), were identified in a recent study to be the primary receptors for PINK1- and Parkin-mediated mitophagy. In this study, PINK1 recruits these two autophagy receptors, but not p62, to activate mitophagy directly, independent from Parkin. Upon their recruitment to mitochondria, NDP52 and OPTN recruit other autophagy components as ULK1, DFCP1, and WIPI1, thus revealing a function for these autophagy receptors upstream of LC3. While PINK1 begins mitophagy in the absence of Parkin, mitophagy is significantly boosted in the presence of Parkin [37].

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a deadly progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by the degeneration and deterioration of motor neurons. Beside the association of several genes in ALS, it has been reported that mutations in the Sigma-1 receptor (SigmaR1) are related to the autosomal recessive familial form of ALS [28, 38]. SigmaR1 controls calcium transport and its reduced expression can lead to the increased release of calcium from ER, the depolarization of mitochondrial membrane potential, and apoptosis. It reduces autophagic flux and autophagic degradation [28, 39]. Recent exome sequencing studies identified TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) as an important protein in both sporadic and familial ALS. TBK1 phosphorylates OPTN [40], and it was reported that a mutation of OPTN is also associated with ALS [41]. Furthermore, neuron-specific Atg5 and Atg7 knockout mice are associated with motor defects [42]. Beclin-1, the major player in the autophagic initiation process, has been shown to promote ALS by interacting with superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) and its downregulation was associated with aggregation of amyloid-β tau tangles, which are indicators of Alzheimer’s disease (AD).


3. Link between autophagy and the nicotinic cholinergic system

The role of neurology genes in the progression and metastasis of cancer in general has been emphasized recently. In many reviews, Hildegard M. Schuller established the theory that modulation of the autonomic nervous system is responsible for driving cancer development, progression, and resistance to chemotherapy not only in non–small-cell lung cancer and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma but also in other cancers [43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48].

She anticipated the different modifiable risk factors of PDAC development, including smoking, chronic psychological stress, and habitual ingestion of alcohol, to act mostly via the sensitization (α7nAChR) and desensitization (α4nAChR) of nAChRs that drive the expression of proteins, which regulate the synthesis and release of catecholamines and GABA and result in the hyperactivity of Gs-mediated cAMP signaling [47]. α7nAChR activation is responsible for the production of stress neurotransmitters, which are known to promote cancer features, as well as of serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate, while the desensitization of α4nAChR is the main reason for reduced GABA levels, which is known to be a protective neurotransmitter [45]. This is believed to disturb the normal equilibrium and homeostasis of the signaling neurotransmitters in favor of cancer development, progression, and reduced responsiveness to treatment [44].

A link between the nicotinic cholinergic system and autophagy can be thought as follows: in one study, nicotine hindered the macrophage clearance of mycobacterium tuberculosis via inhibition of autophagosome formation in infected T helper cells and macrophages [49]. In another study, nicotine enhanced the proteasome activity and the total protein ubiquitination as well as autophagy as was proven by the occurrence of autophagic vacuoles and increased MAP LC3-II at protein level. These mechanisms help in the downregulation of connexin 43 and limit the communication in endothelial cells based on the involvement of nAChR α4β2 and α3β2, but not α7 [50]. Jeong et al. have shown that melatonin’s neuroprotective effects against prion-mediated neural damage are owing to the activation of autophagy as an outcome of α7nAchR regulation [51].


4. Modulated expression of some neurologic genes in PDAC with special reference to autophagy

Our lab has identified a group of genes, which are modulated during pancreatic cancer liver metastasis [52]. The microarray data are derived from ASML rat PDAC cells that were reisolated from rat liver after they had been implanted intraportally and colonized the rat liver for various periods of time. These genes were arranged according to their fold change versus control cells (more than threefold modulation of expression) at early, intermediate, advanced, and final stages of metastasis, and the resulting genes were investigated by the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis program [53]. Among these genes, a subgroup was identified to have a dual role in neurobiology and cancer metastasis. Thus, from ca. 30,000 genes, as found in a microarray experiment, 14 genes were selected as most promising. They are shown in Table 1. Data describing these genes are retrieved from the NCBI database [54].

Gene symbolSummary
Upregulated genes
Receptor (G protein–coupled) activity modifying protein 1Ramp1Expression is increased in the striatum after repeated L-DOPA administration in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease.
Activating transcription factor 3Atf3Expression is rapidly upregulated in response to nerve injury.
Aristaless-like homeobox 3Alx3Preferential methylation of this gene’s promoter is associated with advanced-stage neuroblastoma.
Sortilin-related VPS10 domain-containing receptor 2Sorcs2These genes are strongly expressed in the central nervous system.
MAP/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 4Mark4Expression is a potential marker for cancer, and the protein may also play a role in Alzheimer’s disease.
Chloride intracellular channel 6Clic6Elevated expression is correlated with poor prognosis in human gliomas.
Downregulated genes
Caveolin 1, caveolae proteinCav1The protein helps in coupling integrins to the Ras-ERK pathway and in promoting cell cycle progression.
Neuritin 1Nrn1The encoded protein promotes neurite outgrowth suggesting its role in promoting neuritogenesis.
Monoamine oxidase A/BMaoA/MaoBThey have an important role in the metabolism of neuroactive and vasoactive amines in the central nervous system and peripheral tissues.
5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 6, G protein–coupledHtr6This receptor is thought to regulate cholinergic neuronal transmission in the brain.
Ly6/neurotoxin 1Lynx1It has the capacity to enhance nicotinic acetylcholine receptor function in the presence of acetylcholine.
Calcium channel, voltage-dependent, beta 4 subunitCacnb4Certain mutations in this gene have been associated with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). Multiple transcript variants for different isoforms have been found.
OptineurinOptnOptineurin plays a role in normal-tension glaucoma and adult-onset primary open angle glaucoma.

Table 1.

Genes with modulated expression.

From this list, some genes attracted our attention, including the autophagy receptor OPTN as well as MAOA/MAOB and CAV1.

What attracted our interest in this group of genes was that they share certain roles in cancer and neurology, and some were reported to have some direct or indirect link to autophagy.

The overexpression of the well-known mitochondrial enzyme MAOA, linked with many psychiatric illnesses, was shown to be associated with prostate cancer. MAOA caused neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer cells through activation of autophagy, ROS production, and downregulation of repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor (REST) [55].

However, at mRNA level, MAOA was not measurably expressed in our panel of human PDAC cell lines. Another aspect, which prevented further experiments, was that the irreversible MAOA-inhibiting drug clorgyline halted the proliferation of BXPC3 cells only at very high concentrations, which rendered further studies of this gene unpromising.

Deficiency of the caveolae protein CAV1 stimulates the basal and inducible autophagy as a cell survival mechanism under starvation. This is a recently described function of CAV1 and lipid rafts in breast cancer development via modulation of lysosomal function and autophagy [56]. Another study reported that CAV1 regulates autophagy positively under oxidative stress and cerebral ischemic injury. CAV1 deficiency limited localization of Beclin-1 (BECN1) to the mitochondria and eliminated LC3 foci formation in response to hydrogen peroxide in the brain of CAV1 knockout mice [57]. CAV1 is related to tumorigenesis and metastasis. CAV1 overexpression in PDAC is associated with poor clinical outcome, as well as chemo- and radioresistance [58]. Moreover, signs of premature neuronal aging and degeneration are evident in CAV1 knockout mice together with increased Aβ, P-tau, and astrogliosis [59].

The gene optineurin (OPTN), which is an autophagy receptor, was also among the genes listed in Table 1. Since OPTN has an important role in many neurodegenerative diseases as well as a function as an autophagy receptor, thus linking autophagy in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, a comprehensive overview of this gene is given as well as an outline of the expression of other autophagy genes in PDAC.


5. Optineurin

OPTN is linked to many neurodegenerative diseases including normal tension glaucoma, primary open-angle glaucoma [60], as well as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [41].

The OPTN gene is located on chromosome 10p13 and translates into a protein of 67-kDa. The mRNA consists of 16 exons; the first 3 are noncoding, while the coding exons give rise to a protein composed of 577 amino acids [61, 62]. OPTN was found to be head to head oriented with the gene coiled-coil domain containing 3 (CCDC3) with a distance of about 98-kb between their 5’UTRs [63]. OPTN has a half-life of around 8 h and its degradation engages the ubiquitin proteasomal system as its level increases following exposure to a proteasome inhibitor, but not to autophagic or lysosomal inhibitors [64].

OPTN encompasses several domains: an NF-κB-essential molecule-like domain, leucine zipper motif, coiled-coil motifs, an ubiquitin-binding domain (UBD), an LC3-interacting region, and a carboxyl (C)-terminal C2H2 type of zinc finger [65, 66].

As a cytoplasmic protein [60], OPTN colocalizes together with myosin VI and Rab8 around the Golgi complex and in vesicles at the plasma membrane [67]. It shows a high level of expression in certain tissues such as retina, brain, heart, skeletal muscle, placenta, testis, and kidney [68].

It interacts with itself to form homo-oligomers [69] and also with other molecules such as Ras-related protein 8 (Rab8) [70], huntingtin [71], myosin VI [72], transferrin receptor [68], LC3/GABARAP [62], polo-like kinase 1 [73, 74], TBK1 [75], as well as metabotropic glutamate receptor, transcription factor IIIA, serine/threonine kinase receptor-interacting protein 1, CYLD lysine 63 deubiquitinase (cylindromatosis, CYLD), and HECT (homologous to the E6-AP carboxyl terminus) domain and ankyrin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 (HACE1) [65]. The structure of OPTN and some interactions are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Graphic illustration of OPTN structural domains and the localization of these domains relative to its amino acid sequence as well as some of its interacting proteins.

OPTN plays different roles under physiological conditions including membrane trafficking, maintenance of the Golgi apparatus, exocytosis, protein secretion, cell division control, regulation of NF-κB, and host defense against pathogens [61, 62, 65, 67].

Its antiviral preventive response was based on its ability to regulate the interferon response in a cell cycle–dependent manner owing to its nuclear translocation together with deubiquitinating enzyme CYLD during the G2/M phase of the cell cycle, which abolishes the inhibitory effect it exerts on TBK1. As a result, the TBK1 activity is increased with enhanced interferon production [76].

The overexpression of OPTN was demonstrated to be protective against H2O2-mediated cell death, a function, which is compromised by a mutated form of OPTN (E50K), resulting in cells that are less fit to survive under stress conditions [70].

Beside all the above stated roles, OPTN is considered as a disease-linked gene. Mutations of OPTN or its altered expression are associated with multiple diseases including normal tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma [60] as well as plenty of neurodegenerative diseases including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [41], ubiquitin-positive intraneuronal inclusions in ALS with dementia, basophilic inclusions in the basophilic type of ALS, neurofibrillary tangles and dystrophic neurites in Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites in Parkinson’s disease, ballooned neurons in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, glial cytoplasmic inclusions in multiple system atrophy, and Pick bodies in Pick’s disease with unknown significance [77]. Reduced OPTN expression in humans might increase the risk of developing Crohn’s disease [78] and dispose to the occurrence of Paget’s disease by enhancing osteoclast differentiation, as OPTN is a recently identified regulator of bone resorption [79].

The OPTN protein was identified as a selective autophagy receptor such as the multidomain scaffold/adaptor protein p62/sequestosome-1 (p62/SQSTM-1) and nuclear domain 10 protein 52 (NDP52) in terms of binding to polyubiquitinated cargoes and brings them to autophagosomes via its LC3-interacting region [65, 80, 81, 82]. In this context, it can help cells to get rid of pathogens as salmonella [80], defective mitochondria [82], and misfolded protein aggregates [83] or can have a role in tumor suppression [81].

The role of OPTN in autophagy can also be independent from ubiquitination [65], where it can distinguish several protein aggregates through its C-terminal coiled-coil domain [84].

The role of OPTN in autophagy extends beyond being an autophagy receptor, as OPTN also plays a role as an autophagy inducer. Overexpression of OPTN in its wild type or mutated E50K forms, or its upregulation by cytokine treatment, was linked to elevated LC3-II levels in retinal ganglion cells, while the level of the proteasome activity marker PSMB5 (proteasome regulatory β 5) was reduced denoting induction of autophagy [64]. In vivo results confirmed the induction of autophagy and the reduction of ubiquitin proteasome pathway upon the injection of wild type and E50K OPTN transfected vectors in rat eyes [85].

Mutation or altered expression of OPTN may result in many diseases as glaucoma, ALS, other neurodegenerative diseases [65], or even cancer [81] owing to the implication of mitochondrial dysfunction and protein aggregation [65]. Mutations in both autophagy receptors p62 and OPTN in Paget’s disease of the bone may attribute to an autophagy-related mechanism of developing this disease [65].

An overview of the RNA-seq data generated by the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) revealed high expression of the OPTN gene across several cancer types (reported as median number fragments per kilo-base of exon per million reads (FPKM)) and was based on mRNA expression in cancer tissues (see Figure 3). In this regard and with data retrieved from the Protein Atlas website [86, 87], pancreatic cancer represents the tumor with the second highest OPTN expression and is topped only by renal cancer.

Figure 3.

Overview of the RNA-seq data in TCGA of 17 cancer cohorts showing the highest OPTN expression in renal cell carcinoma followed by PDAC (expressed in terms of median FPKM) [86,87,88].

Prompted by this result, we analyzed the expression of autophagy genes and autophagy receptors in PDAC in a TCGA cohort with a sample size of 179. Most of the autophagy genes were above average genomic expression, represented by >7.5 log2 rsem (RNA-seq by expectation maximization) except for ATG10, which was below average. OPTN was second highest expressed of all autophagy genes, preceded only by SQSTM1 (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Expression of autophagy-related genes and receptors in a PDAC cohort with a sample size of 179 patients showing high expression of all autophagy-related genes (> 7.5 log2 rsem) except for ATG10.

Based on these findings, we reasoned that OPTN might be involved in important mechanisms associated with cancer as well as with neurodegenerative diseases that require further analysis.


6. Conclusions

In summary, autophagy represents a link between the nervous system and cancer in general as well as pancreatic cancer in particular. The modulated expression of autophagy-related genes in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases highlights the importance of this mechanism and suggests further studies on their regulation and effective targeting. Autophagy is a new background for certain genes in cancer as well as in neurology, and understanding this process may well serve as a platform for understanding the pathogenesis of these diseases in different organs. In addition, there seems to be a special role for OPTN in different neurodegenerative diseases as well as cancer and this protein could well be a target in cancer treatment. The link between nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and autophagy still requires further studies to be properly delineated.



The authors express their gratitude to Dr. Ashwini K. Sharma for the generation of Figure 4 and his continuous support with questions related to bioinformatics. Doaa M. Ali was supported by a PhD Grant from the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD).


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicting interests.


  1. 1. Lippai M, Szatmari Z. Autophagy-from molecular mechanisms to clinical relevance. Cell Biology and Toxicology. 2017;33:145-168. DOI: 10.1007/s10565-016-9374-5
  2. 2. Bejarano E, Cuervo AM. Chaperone-mediated autophagy. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society. 2010;7:29-39. DOI: 10.1513/pats.200909-102JS
  3. 3. Mijaljica D, Prescott M, Devenish RJ. Microautophagy in mammalian cells: Revisiting a 40-year-old conundrum. Autophagy. 2014;(7):673-682. DOI: 10.4161/auto.7.7.14733
  4. 4. Agarraberes FA, Dice JF. A molecular chaperone complex at the lysosomal membrane is required for protein translocation. Journal of Cell Science. 2001;114:2491-2499
  5. 5. Bandyopadhyay U, Kaushik S, Varticovski L, Cuervo AM. The chaperone-mediated autophagy receptor organizes in dynamic protein complexes at the lysosomal membrane. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2008;28:5747-5763. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.02070-07
  6. 6. Eskelinen E-L. New insights into the mechanisms of macroautophagy in mammalian cells. International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology. 2008:207-247
  7. 7. Klionsky DJ, Cregg JM, Dunn WA Jr, Emr SD, Sakai Y, Sandoval IV, et al. A unified nomenclature for yeast autophagy-related genes. Developmental Cell. 2003;45:539-545
  8. 8. Huynh KK, Eskelinen EL, Scott CC, Malevanets A, Saftig P, Grinstein S. LAMP proteins are required for fusion of lysosomes with phagosomes. The EMBO Journal. 2007;26:313-324. DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601511
  9. 9. Deng Z, Purtell K, Lachance V, Wold MS, Chen S, Yue Z. Autophagy receptors and neurodegenerative diseases. Trends in Cell Biology. 2017;27:491-504. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.01.001
  10. 10. Stolz A, Ernst A, Dikic I. Cargo recognition and trafficking in selective autophagy. Nature Cell Biology. 2014;16:495-501. DOI: 10.1038/ncb2979
  11. 11. Petiot A, Ogier-Denis E, Blommaart EF, Meijer AJ, Codogno P. Distinct classes of phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinases are involved in signaling pathways that control macroautophagy in HT-29 cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275:992-998
  12. 12. Jewell JL, Russell RC, Guan KL. Amino acid signalling upstream of mTOR. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2013;14:133-139. DOI: 10.1038/nrm3522
  13. 13. Filomeni G, De Zio D, Cecconi F. Oxidative stress and autophagy: The clash between damage and metabolic needs. Cell Death and Differentiation. 2015;22:377-388. DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2014.150
  14. 14. Gomes LR, Menck CFM, Leandro GS. Autophagy roles in the modulation of DNA repair pathways. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18112351
  15. 15. Fang Y, Tan J, Zhang Q. Signaling pathways and mechanisms of hypoxia-induced autophagy in the animal cells. Cell Biology International. 2015;39:891-898. DOI: 10.1002/cbin.10463
  16. 16. New M, Van Acker T, Long JS, Sakamaki JI, Ryan KM, Tooze SA. Molecular pathways controlling autophagy in pancreatic cancer. Frontiers in Oncology. 2017;7:28. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00028
  17. 17. Galluzzi L, Pietrocola F, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Amaravadi RK, Baehrecke EH, Cecconi F, et al. Autophagy in malignant transformation and cancer progression. The EMBO Journal. 2015;34:856-880. DOI: 10.15252/embj.201490784
  18. 18. Grasso D, Garcia MN, Iovanna JL. Autophagy in pancreatic cancer. International Journal of Cell Biology. 2012;2012:760498. DOI: 10.1155/2012/760498
  19. 19. Kang R, Tang D. Autophagy in pancreatic cancer pathogenesis and treatment. American Journal of Cancer Research. 2012;42:383-396
  20. 20. Iovanna JL. Autophagy contributes to the initiation of pancreatic cancer. Medical Science (Paris). 2017;33:335-339. DOI: 10.1051/medsci/20173303022
  21. 21. Nikoletopoulou V, Papandreou ME, Tavernarakis N. Autophagy in the physiology and pathology of the central nervous system. Cell Death and Differentiation. 2015;22:398-407. DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2014.204
  22. 22. Boland B, Kumar A, Lee S, Platt FM, Wegiel J, Yu WH, et al. Autophagy induction and autophagosome clearance in neurons: Relationship to autophagic pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2008;28:6926-6937. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0800-08.2008
  23. 23. Hara T, Nakamura K, Matsui M, Yamamoto A, Nakahara Y, Suzuki-Migishima R, et al. Suppression of basal autophagy in neural cells causes neurodegenerative disease in mice. Nature. 2006;441:885-889. DOI: 10.1038/nature04724
  24. 24. Wang QJ, Ding Y, Kohtz DS, Mizushima N, Cristea IM, Rout MP, et al. Induction of autophagy in axonal dystrophy and degeneration. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26:8057-8068. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2261-06.2006
  25. 25. He M, Ding Y, Chu C, Tang J, Xiao Q, Luo ZG. Autophagy induction stabilizes microtubules and promotes axon regeneration after spinal cord injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2016;113:11324-11329. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1611282113
  26. 26. Kim M, Ho A, Lee JH. Autophagy and human neurodegenerative diseases-A Fly’s perspective. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18071596
  27. 27. Fujikake N, Shin M, Shimizu S. Association between autophagy and neurodegenerative diseases. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2018;12:255. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00255
  28. 28. Kiriyama Y, Nochi H. The function of autophagy in neurodegenerative diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015;16:26797-26812. DOI: 10.3390/ijms161125990
  29. 29. Zhou ZD, Chan CH, Ma QH, Xu XH, Xiao ZC, Tan EK. The roles of amyloid precursor protein (APP) in neurogenesis: Implications to pathogenesis and therapy of Alzheimer disease. Cell Adhesion & Migration. 2011;45:280-292
  30. 30. Yu WH, Kumar A, Peterhoff C, Shapiro Kulnane L, Uchiyama Y, Lamb BT, et al. Autophagic vacuoles are enriched in amyloid precursor protein-secretase activities: Implications for beta-amyloid peptide over-production and localization in Alzheimer’s disease. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2004;36:2531-2540. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.05.010
  31. 31. Jaeger PA, Pickford F, Sun CH, Lucin KM, Masliah E, Wyss-Coray T. Regulation of amyloid precursor protein processing by the Beclin 1 complex. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11102. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011102
  32. 32. Dayalu P, Albin RL. Huntington disease: Pathogenesis and treatment. Neurologic Clinics. 2015;33:101-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2014.09.003
  33. 33. Li SH, Li XJ. Huntingtin-protein interactions and the pathogenesis of Huntington’s disease. Trends in Genetics. 2004;20:146-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2004.01.008
  34. 34. Rui YN, Xu Z, Patel B, Chen Z, Chen D, Tito A, et al. Huntingtin functions as a scaffold for selective macroautophagy. Nature Cell Biology. 2015;17:262-275. DOI: 10.1038/ncb3101
  35. 35. Jankovic J. Parkinson’s disease: Clinical features and diagnosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2008;479:368-376. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.131045
  36. 36. Gasser T. Molecular pathogenesis of Parkinson disease: Insights from genetic studies. Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine. 2009;11:e22. DOI: 10.1017/S1462399409001148
  37. 37. Lazarou M, Sliter DA, Kane LA, Sarraf SA, Wang C, Burman JL, et al. The ubiquitin kinase PINK1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy. Nature. 2015;524:309-314. DOI: 10.1038/nature14893
  38. 38. Chen S, Sayana P, Zhang X, Le W. Genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: An update. Molecular Neurodegeneration. 2013;8:28. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1326-8-28
  39. 39. Fukunaga K, Shinoda Y, Tagashira H. The role of SIGMAR1 gene mutation and mitochondrial dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Pharmacological Sciences. 2015;127:36-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphs.2014.12.012
  40. 40. Cirulli ET, Lasseigne BN, Petrovski S, Sapp PC, Dion PA, Leblond CS, et al. Exome sequencing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identifies risk genes and pathways. Science. 2015;347:1436-1441. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa3650
  41. 41. Maruyama H, Morino H, Ito H, Izumi Y, Kato H, Watanabe Y, et al. Mutations of optineurin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature. 2010;465:223-226. DOI: 10.1038/nature08971
  42. 42. Metaxakis A, Ploumi C, Tavernarakis N. Autophagy in age-associated neurodegeneration. Cell. 2018;7. DOI: 10.3390/cells7050037
  43. 43. Schuller HM. Neurotransmitter receptor-mediated signaling pathways as modulators of carcinogenesis. Progress in Experimental Tumor Research. 2007;39:45-63. DOI: 10.1159/000100045
  44. 44. Schuller HM. Neurotransmission and cancer: Implications for prevention and therapy. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 2008;19:655-671. DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283025b58
  45. 45. Schuller HM. Regulatory role of the alpha7nAChR in cancer. Current Drug Targets. 2012;13:680-687
  46. 46. Schuller HM. Effects of tobacco constituents and psychological stress on the beta-adrenergic regulation of non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer: Implications for intervention. Cancer Biomarkers. 2013;13:133-144. DOI: 10.3233/CBM-130323
  47. 47. Schuller HM. The neuro-psychological axis of pancreatic cancer as a novel target for intervention. Pancreatic Disorders & Therapy. 2013;03. DOI: 10.4172/2165-7092.1000124
  48. 48. Schuller HM, Zhang L, Weddle DL, Castonguay A, Walker K, Miller MS. The cyclooxygenase inhibitor ibuprofen and the FLAP inhibitor MK886 inhibit pancreatic carcinogenesis induced in hamsters by transplacental exposure to ethanol and the tobacco carcinogen NNK. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2002;128:525-532. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-002-0365-y
  49. 49. Bai X, Stitzel JA, Bai A, Zambrano CA, Phillips M, Marrack P, et al. Nicotine impairs macrophage control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 2017;57:324-333. DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0270OC
  50. 50. Duerrschmidt N, Hagen A, Gaertner C, Wermke A, Nowicki M, Spanel-Borowski K, et al. Nicotine effects on human endothelial intercellular communication via alpha4beta2 and alpha3beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology. 2012;385:621-632. DOI: 10.1007/s00210-012-0738-y
  51. 51. Jeong JK, Park SY. Melatonin regulates the autophagic flux via activation of alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Journal of Pineal Research. 2015;59:24-37. DOI: 10.1111/jpi.12235
  52. 52. Al-Taee KK, Ansari S, Hielscher T, Berger MR, Adwan H. Metastasis-related processes show various degrees of activation in different stages of pancreatic cancer rat liver metastasis. Oncology Research and Treatment. 2014;37:464-470. DOI: 10.1159/000365496
  53. 53. IPA (Qiagen Inc.). 2014. Available from:
  54. 54. Geer LY, Marchler-Bauer A, Geer RC, Han L, He J, He S, et al. The NCBI BioSystems database. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010;38:D492-D496. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp858
  55. 55. Lin YC, Chang YT, Campbell M, Lin TP, Pan CC, Lee HC, et al. MAOA-a novel decision maker of apoptosis and autophagy in hormone refractory neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:46338. DOI: 10.1038/srep46338
  56. 56. Shi Y, Tan SH, Ng S, Zhou J, Yang ND, Koo GB, et al. Critical role of CAV1/caveolin-1 in cell stress responses in human breast cancer cells via modulation of lysosomal function and autophagy. Autophagy. 2015;11:769-784. DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1034411
  57. 57. Nah J, Yoo SM, Jung S, Jeong EI, Park M, Kaang BK, et al. Phosphorylated CAV1 activates autophagy through an interaction with BECN1 under oxidative stress. Cell Death & Disease. 2017;8:e2822. DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2017.71
  58. 58. Lin HH, Lin HK, Lin IH, Chiou YW, Chen HW, Liu CY, et al. Mechanical phenotype of cancer cells: Cell softening and loss of stiffness sensing. Oncotarget. 2015;6:20946-20958. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4173
  59. 59. Head BP, Peart JN, Panneerselvam M, Yokoyama T, Pearn ML, Niesman IR, et al. Loss of caveolin-1 accelerates neurodegeneration and aging. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15697. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015697
  60. 60. Chalasani ML, Swarup G, Balasubramanian D. Optineurin and its mutants: Molecules associated with some forms of glaucoma. Ophthalmic Research. 2009;442:176-184. DOI: 10.1159/000232400
  61. 61. Kachaner D, Genin P, Laplantine E, Weil R. Toward an integrative view of Optineurin functions. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:2808-2818. DOI: 10.4161/cc.20946
  62. 62. Ying H, Yue BY. Cellular and molecular biology of optineurin. International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology. 2012;294:223-258. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394305-7.00005-7
  63. 63. Schilter KF, Reis LM, Sorokina EA, Semina EV. Identification of an Alu-repeat-mediated deletion of OPTN upstream region in a patient with a complex ocular phenotype. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 2015;3:490-499. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.159
  64. 64. Shen X, Ying H, Qiu Y, Park JS, Shyam R, Chi ZL, et al. Processing of optineurin in neuronal cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011;286:3618-3629. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.175810
  65. 65. Ying H, Yue BY. Optineurin: The autophagy connection. Experimental Eye Research. 2016;144:73-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.06.029
  66. 66. Turturro S, Shen X, Shyam R, Yue BY, Ying H. Effects of mutations and deletions in the human optineurin gene. Springerplus. 2014;3:99. DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-99
  67. 67. Sahlender DA, Roberts RC, Arden SD, Spudich G, Taylor MJ, Luzio JP, et al. Optineurin links myosin VI to the Golgi complex and is involved in Golgi organization and exocytosis. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2005;169:285-295. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200501162
  68. 68. Nagabhushana A, Chalasani ML, Jain N, Radha V, Rangaraj N, Balasubramanian D, et al. Regulation of endocytic trafficking of transferrin receptor by optineurin and its impairment by a glaucoma-associated mutant. BMC Cell Biology. 2010;11:4. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2121-11-4
  69. 69. Gao J, Ohtsubo M, Hotta Y, Minoshima S. Oligomerization of optineurin and its oxidative stress- or E50K mutation-driven covalent cross-linking: Possible relationship with glaucoma pathology. PLoS One. 2014;9:e101206. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101206
  70. 70. De Marco N, Buono M, Troise F, Diez-Roux G. Optineurin increases cell survival and translocates to the nucleus in a Rab8-dependent manner upon an apoptotic stimulus. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281:16147-16156. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M601467200
  71. 71. del Toro D, Alberch J, Lazaro-Dieguez F, Martin-Ibanez R, Xifro X, Egea G, et al. Mutant huntingtin impairs post-Golgi trafficking to lysosomes by delocalizing optineurin/Rab8 complex from the Golgi apparatus. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2009;20:1478-1492. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E08-07-0726
  72. 72. Bond LM, Peden AA, Kendrick-Jones J, Sellers JR, Buss F. Myosin VI and its binding partner optineurin are involved in secretory vesicle fusion at the plasma membrane. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2011;22:54-65. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E10-06-0553
  73. 73. Kachaner D, Filipe J, Laplantine E, Bauch A, Bennett KL, Superti-Furga G, et al. Plk1-dependent phosphorylation of optineurin provides a negative feedback mechanism for mitotic progression. Molecular Cell. 2012;445:553-566. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.030
  74. 74. Kachaner D, Laplantine E, Genin P, Weil R. Optineurin: A new vision of cell division control. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:1481-1482. DOI: 10.4161/cc.20116
  75. 75. Gleason CE, Ordureau A, Gourlay R, Arthur JS, Cohen P. Polyubiquitin binding to optineurin is required for optimal activation of TANK-binding kinase 1 and production of interferon beta. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011;286:35663-35674. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.267567
  76. 76. Genin P, Cuvelier F, Lambin S, Corte-Real Filipe J, Autrusseau E, Laurent C, et al. Optineurin regulates the interferon response in a cell cycle-dependent manner. PLoS Pathogens. 2015;411:e1004877. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004877
  77. 77. Osawa T, Mizuno Y, Fujita Y, Takatama M, Nakazato Y, Okamoto K. Optineurin in neurodegenerative diseases. Neuropathology. 2011;31:569-574. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2011.01199.x
  78. 78. Chew TS, O’Shea NR, Sewell GW, Oehlers SH, Mulvey CM, Crosier PS, et al. Optineurin deficiency in mice contributes to impaired cytokine secretion and neutrophil recruitment in bacteria-driven colitis. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2015;8:817-829. DOI: 10.1242/dmm.020362
  79. 79. Obaid R, Wani SE, Azfer A, Hurd T, Jones R, Cohen P, et al. Optineurin negatively regulates osteoclast differentiation by modulating NF-kappaB and interferon signaling: Implications for Paget’s disease. Cell Reports. 2015;13:1096-1102. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.071
  80. 80. Wild P, Farhan H, McEwan DG, Wagner S, Rogov VV, Brady NR, et al. Phosphorylation of the autophagy receptor optineurin restricts Salmonella growth. Science. 2011;333:228-233. DOI: 10.1126/science.1205405
  81. 81. Liu Z, Chen P, Gao H, Gu Y, Yang J, Peng H, et al. Ubiquitylation of autophagy receptor Optineurin by HACE1 activates selective autophagy for tumor suppression. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:106-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.015
  82. 82. Wong YC, Holzbaur EL. Optineurin is an autophagy receptor for damaged mitochondria in parkin-mediated mitophagy that is disrupted by an ALS-linked mutation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111:E4439-E4448. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1405752111
  83. 83. Shen WC, Li HY, Chen GC, Chern Y, Tu PH. Mutations in the ubiquitin-binding domain of OPTN/optineurin interfere with autophagy-mediated degradation of misfolded proteins by a dominant-negative mechanism. Autophagy. 2015;411:685-700. DOI: 10.4161/auto.36098
  84. 84. Korac J, Schaeffer V, Kovacevic I, Clement AM, Jungblut B, Behl C, et al. Ubiquitin-independent function of optineurin in autophagic clearance of protein aggregates. Journal of Cell Science. 2013;126:580-592. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.114926
  85. 85. Ying H, Turturro S, Nguyen T, Shen X, Zelkha R, Johnson EC, et al. Induction of autophagy in rats upon overexpression of wild-type and mutant optineurin gene. BMC Cell Biology. 2015;16:14. DOI: 10.1186/s12860-015-0060-x
  86. 86. Thul PJ, Akesson L, Wiking M, Mahdessian D, Geladaki A, Ait Blal H, et al. A subcellular map of the human proteome. Science. 2017;356. DOI: 10.1126/science.aal3321
  87. 87. Uhlen M, Zhang C, Lee S, Sjostedt E, Fagerberg L, Bidkhori G, et al. A pathology atlas of the human cancer transcriptome. Science. 2017;357. DOI: 10.1126/science.aan2507
  88. 88. Courtesy of Human Protein Atlas.OPTN. OPTN RNA expression overview 2016. Available from:

Written By

Doaa M. Ali and Martin R. Berger

Submitted: April 27th, 2018 Reviewed: August 17th, 2018 Published: November 5th, 2018