Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Drinking Water Treatment and Challenges in Developing Countries

Written By

Josephine Treacy

Submitted: December 2nd, 2017 Reviewed: August 7th, 2018 Published: April 3rd, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80780

Chapter metrics overview

8,574 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Safe drinking water remains inaccessible to many humans in the developing countries. Research continuously innovates to develop efficient and cheap methods to sustain clean water for developing countries. Developing nations are a broad term that includes countries that are less industrialised and have lower per capita income levels than developed countries. This chapter will discuss clean water for drinking water purposes. Pollution concerns of water in developing countries will be categorised in terms of physical, chemical and biological pollutants such as turbidity, organic matter and bacteria. Natural and anthropogenic pollution concerns linking with seasonal factors will be outlined. The multi-barrier approach to drinking water treatment will be discussed. Abstraction points used will be researched. Water treatment systems, medium- to small-scale approaches, will be discussed. The processes involved in removing the contaminants including physical processes such as sedimentation, filtration such as slow-sand filtration, coagulation and flocculation, and disinfectant processes such as chlorination will be reviewed. Other important methods including solar disinfection, hybrid filtration methods and arsenic removal technologies using innovative solid phase materials will be included in this chapter. Rainwater harvesting technologies are reviewed. Safe storage options for treated water are outlined. Challenges of water treatment in rural and urban areas will be outlined.


  • drinking water
  • water source treatment pollution

1. Introduction

Drinking water remains inaccessible to 1.1 million people globally. Safe and readily available drinking water is important for public health. Drinking water can be used for many purposes including cooking, drinking, washing, personal hygiene, irrigation, recreational and industrial use. Water can be classified aided by the ‘environmental quality objective’ for what it is used for and the 'environmental quality standard’ for what is the quality of water for its purpose. Improved water supply, sanitation and better management of water resources can boost countries’ economic growth and can contribute greatly to poverty reduction. The sources of drinking water in developing countries can range from surface water, groundwater, spring water, saline water, bottled water and harvested rainwater [1]. Access to drinking water is monitored by the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the Joint Monitoring Programme for water supply and sanitation (JMP) [2].

Efforts to develop efficient, economical and technologically sound methods to produce clean drinking water for developing countries have increased worldwide [3].

Figures 1 and 2 highlight the importance of scientists to develop and sustain technologies to improve drinking water quality due to the percentage of society lacking suitable drinking water [4]. Water is a key variable within sustainable development goals in terms of environmental, social and economic initiatives as highlighted by the United Nations in 2014 [5]. The discussion on the role of water for sanitation and hygiene in the ‘water development report 2015’ emphasises cost as one of the key challenges for future water needs [6].

Figure 1.

Proportion of population using an improved drinking water source (WHO 2010) [4].

Figure 2.

Global representation of developing countries (WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme [4]).


2. The importance of treating water

As well as accounting for the lack of physical water accessibility due to drought, ‘distance from a water supply’ and polluted water can all affect drinking water accessibility. Water quality issues due to anthropogenic and natural pollution can affect the amount of water available for use. Both surface and groundwater can be contaminated by both anthropogenic and natural contaminations. Microbiology and chemical contaminants in drinking water can cause acute and chronic health effects. Contamination can also affect the aesthetic properties of water systems. The contaminants include:

  • Pathogens—disease-causing organisms that include bacteria, amoebas, viruses and eggs and larvae of parasitic worms [6].

  • Harmful chemicals from human activities and industrial wastes such as pesticides and fertilisers [7].

  • Chemicals and minerals from the natural environment, such as arsenic, common salts and fluorides. In Bangladesh, for example, 1.4 million tube wells have high levels of naturally occurring arsenic [8].

  • Some non-harmful contaminants may influence the taste, smell, colour and turbidity of water and make it unacceptable to the consumer; its examples include zinc, iron, particulate matter and humic material [9].

The physiochemical properties of contaminants of water that can impact its toxicology in water include size, density compared to water, charge, solubility, volatility, polarity, hydrophobic, hydrophilic, boiling point, chemical reactivity and biodegradability [10].

2.1. From source to consumer and the multi-barrier approach

When deciding on the water supply for drinking water purposes an understanding of the stresses on the water source is important. Seasonal variation of the water source is also important to understand in areas such as water level and water table levels and sanitation contamination trends [11]. Throughout this chapter emphasis on the multi-barrier approach to maintain clean water will be described. All parts of the multi-barrier approach, including source selection, treatment type, transport to consumer and storage if necessary are all important to control, to minimise the risk of contamination. The water safety plans (WSPs) manual published in 2009 by the World Health Organization (WHO) guides the multi-barrier approach for the maintenance of good quality drinking water [12, 13]. When deciding on the drinking water supply and subsequence treatment, the WHO safety plan manual encourages people to think of the best treatment taking into consideration local factors. In the International Water Association (IWA), Bonn Charter emphasises the ‘provision of clean safe drinking water which has the trust of consumers’ as a focal point [14] (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

The multi-barrier approach [15].

The multi-barrier approach examines water in detail from source to tap and aids in maintaining the quality of water at each stage. The lesser the number of steps in treatment, the cleaner the water source and the nearer the consumer is to the source are challenges in drinking water management. Other variables to consider include prevention of reentering of contaminants at storage and distribution stages of the process [16]. Indicator parameter studies of facial coliforms have been used in Rangoon Burma of Southeast Asia for storage and distribution control management [16].

2.2. Abstraction points

The source supply is known as the abstraction point. A large priority of water management in developing countries is to supply water from a source that requires little or no treatment rather than a source that requires treatment. Risk management to ensure that the source is protected from pollution is also a priority [17]. The baseline of the water source physiochemical, organic and inorganic composition and its monitoring is a challenge [18]. Supply provision of water source under different conditions such as seasonal factors is important to understand. The types of water abstraction points consist of boreholes, open wells, surface water river and lakes, saline waters and brackish waters. An example of the range of drinking water abstraction types utilised in developing countries can be seen in Table 1 [19].

Source type Drinking water % use Domestic water % use Irrigation % use
Shallow well 68.6 75.4 82.3
Borehole 11.0 4.3 6.5
River 0.7 0.7 1.6
Spring 0.7 0.7 1.6
Wetlands 0 0 1.6
A combinations of above
Due to seasonal factors
9.7 9.4 1.6

Table 1.

Abstraction drinking water supply and % use from case study Ndola [19].

Abstraction water point in certain areas will change at different times of the year corresponding with the dry season and the wet season. Boreholes where citizens dig down to find water would be popular in dry seasons and river water sampling, and the use would be popular in wet season. This is common in areas such as Francistown, Botswana, in South Africa. The Shashe river is used readily in the wet season as stated by a sister of the Cross and Passion order working in the Francistown area. Another source of water for future investigation would be bottled water; bottled water can be bought in from other countries. Bottled water can be classified as natural mineral water, and water source bottled from an underground aquifer still or aerated protected from pollution has no treatment [20]. Issues with confidence in quality, shelf life, storage including refrigeration and transportation to consumer can be a challenge. The cost of transporting bottled water can be costly.

2.3. Rainwater (water harvesting)

Rainwater harvesting can be considered a free source of water. Rainwater precipitation can be very large in certain parts of the globe. Global precipitation climatology, for the period 1979–2017 in millimetres/day, can be visually seen in Figure 4 [21]. This data represents the precipitation estimate from version 2.3 global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) SSAI/NASA GSFC project data [21].

Figure 4.

Global precipitation image provided by David Bolvin (SSAI/NASA GSFA [21]).

Different technologies can be used for rainwater harvesting such as roof water which can be collected through gutters and pipes into storage tanks [22]. Other water harvesting systems that have been developed include farm ponds, community ponds, wells, recharge pits micro-irrigation sprinklers and check dams’ low cost water harvest systems [23]. The advantage of farm ponds and check dams is that water can be stored in the rainy season which can be utilized during the dry season. Recharge pit systems can be used to recharge groundwater aquifers in the rainy season. The Vidarbha region of India has successfully deployed farm pond and pit macro-irrigation systems. Positive outcomes of these technologies include crop irrigation improvements and raised water tables, subsequently increasing the availability of drinking water sources. [23].

From Figure 4, one can see that the estimated rainfall in Africa, Asia and South America is in the range of 4–10 millimetres/day, which can be utilised for water harvesting for the purpose of drinking water, irrigation and washing and cooking. The data in Figure 4 is based on a combination of passive microwave and active radar sensors.

Rainwater can be a significant source of water for an individual, a family or a community. Rainwater harvesting is widely practised in Maldives, India and Sri Lanka [24]. It is very beneficial for tsunami-affected regions where piped water infrastructures are severely damaged [25].

Other areas where rainwater harvesting has been developed include Bhutan and Bangladesh as an alternative source due to the high levels of naturally occurring arsenic in groundwaters [26]. The advantage of using rainwater as a water source is a great benefit to a community if distance from a water supply in rural areas makes water inaccessible.

Rainwater harvesting can levitate issues with storm water and minimise diffuse sources of pollution due to storm water. Harvested rainwater is a water source during the drought season if stored correctly. The treatment of the rainwater if needed would involve point-of-use (POU) treatment technologies which will be discussed later in this chapter.

Globally, sub-Saharan Africa has the largest number of water-scarce countries [27]. Unfortunately, these countries also do not have a large availability of clean drinking water due to urbanisation and industrialisation impact on water quality [27]. Most of the African continent relies on rainfall and surface water for their drinking water supply. Experts estimate that between 75 and 250 million people will live in water-stressed areas of Africa by 2030 [28]. Pollution of rainwater can be due to the transboundary pollution and anthropogenic and naturally occurring pollution such as bird droppings [29]. The key benefits of using rainwater include local water security and reduced central treatment infrastructure needs for water supplies.

2.4. Desalination

Processes such as distillation and evaporation can be used as a means of desalination [30]. Other processes include freeze distillation and reverse osmosis. Freezing salt makes crystals of fresh water form and grow leaving a concentrated brine solution behind [31]. Reverse osmosis involves movement of water from a high concentration to a low concentration. Membrane systems can also be used [32]. The major advantage of desalination is that when chlorination is used as a disinfectant, there is a lower risk of forming disinfectant by-products as the water has a lower organic content [32]. Many developing countries have coastal areas which enable sea water and brackish water following desalination to be used as a drinking water source. The largest challenge to the use of desalination technologies is the cost of the technologies used [33]. Research has shown that cost of desalination can be minimised by using solar and wind energy as an energy supply for reverse osmosis [34].


3. Pollution and abstraction point

The minimising of pollution must be linked with point and diffuse sources of pollution. Categories of pollution risk include point sources and diffuse sources of pollution. Diffuse source of pollution is harder to control and monitor. Diffuse sources of pollution include dry and wet atmospheric deposition. Storm water infiltration from waste storage and septic tanks is also a major concern [35].

Watershed protection refers to the activities preformed on a topographical and hydrological water area in order to protect water quality within a catchment. As an example for drinking water the topography of the watershed basin is studied linking with surface water runoff entering a river or stream. Soil types should be investigated in terms of soil characteristics and water permeability and sand silt and clay composition [36]. Water-permeable soil can impact on the movement of surface water downwards to groundwater causing a transfer of pollution (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Soil types globally [37].

Aquifer protection groundwater quality is dependent on the geology of the subsurface material of which water is drawn. Also, understanding the transport and fate of contaminants requires a study of groundwater geology if any aquifer protection zone treatment is in place. Soil horizon characteristics should also be reviewed. Arsenic is a common naturally occurring metal problem in developing countries as can be seen in Figure 6. Hydraulic pump control to prevent intrusion of sea water is an important variable to control in coastal areas in terms of fresh water aquifer use [38].

Figure 6.

Naturally occurring arsenic in a global perspective [1].

Waste disposal and lack of proper sanitation practices can affect the quality of surface waters and groundwaters. The principle component analysis (PCA) and factor analysis (FA) can be used to minimise the risk of water pollution. The PCA and FA create an inventory of variables that can be an impact on water quality [39]. Figure 7 shows the PCA and FA flow approach in relation to surface water management [40]. Point and diffuse sources and source-receptor mechanisms are also important to understand. Source-receptor mechanisms are important to control and understand, linking to the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of the pollutants that may be natural or anthropogenic [41].

Figure 7.

Point and diffuse sources and seasonal factors and pollution control linking with PCA and FA [40].

The types of waste issues to monitor relate to the pharmaceutical and agricultural industries, oil refining, textile industry, leather industry, fine chemical manufacture, animal and human solid and liquid waste and sediment issues linked with floods and the construction industry.


4. Treatment technologies

Any drinking water treatment technology focuses on source supply, treatment type, storage and transportation to customers. Conventional treatment methods in developed countries can be applied to developing countries. The basic drinking water treatment steps can be seen in Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Drinking water treatment [42].

The first stage of treatment to produce drinking water involves screening the abstraction point water and passing through coarse filters. The water can then be kept in a storage tank where natural sedimentation occurs and natural ultraviolet light can break down pathogens. The next stage is the pre-chemical stage which can involve aeration, use of activated carbon and use of aluminium salts or iron salts. Aluminium salts are the more commonly used. The simplest coagulant is aluminium sulphate Al2(SO4)3.14H2O known as alum. Aluminium sulphate salt is converted to an aluminium hydroxide complex in the water which is known as a polynuclear species Al13O4(OH)247+ and in the presence of polyelectrolytes aids in the coagulation process [43]. The traditional view of coagulation is that it facilitates agglomeration of small colloidal particles into large particles of a size that can be physically removed. Dirt, chemicals and pathogens in the water attach to the aluminium hydroxide during the coagulation process. Dual coagulants, a hydrolysed metal salt and a low concentration of polyelectrolyte, can be used. The most common polyelectrolytes in water treatment consist of polydiallydimethyl ammonium chloride (polyDADMAC) and epichlorohydrin dimethylamine (epiDMA) [43]. Coagulation/flocculation technologies can also remove total organic carbon (TOC). High-charge-density cationic polymers bridge particles of the primary coagulations to form a floc to initiate the flocculation process. Sedimentation and decanting of the water occur at this stage, and the floc can fall out of the water phase. The gravity sedimentation removal of particles from water follows the coagulation/flocculation process. High-rate gravity sedimentation involves blasting flocculation using polymers. This process is commercially known as ACTIFLO process, microsand 70–100 μm is dosed together with the polymer forming a lamella [44]. The lamella settles out of the water clarifying the water [45]. In the dissolved air flotation (DAF) technique, part of the treated water is recycled under pressure to dissolve air in the water as part of the aeration process. The floc attaches to the air bubbles, moves to the top of the water and can be removed [45].

The next stage of the treatment is sand filtration; enhanced filtration systems such as granular media filtration and disinfectant membranes are also readily used. The filtration process can remove excess pathogens and chemicals from the water [46].

The post-chemical stage involves disinfection of the water; disinfectants used include hypochlorous acid, ozone and chloride dioxide [47]. Many water utilities have moved to the use of multiple disinfectant rather than just chlorination. Advanced technology with the use of ultraviolet light to create free radicals which can break down pathogens can also be used.

The most common disinfectant used is chlorine (Cl2) which reacts with water forming.

Cl 2 + H 2 O = HCl + HOCl E1

Hypochlorous acid which is a weak acid can dissociate into hydrogen ion, H+ and hypochlorite ion OCl:

HOCl H + + OCl E2

Both HOCl and OCl can act as disinfectants [47].

Chlorine dosing is the best disinfectant as it can leave a residual in the water to aid disinfection. Ozone and ultraviolet light do not give a residual disinfectant in the water. Post-chemical treatment can also involve pH control. Fluorination can also be used as a post-chemical treatment in certain countries such as Ireland [47].

The water is then stored in reservoirs before being used. Residual disinfection in the storage facility is important to prevent contamination of the storage space. The network management is also very important, and residual disinfection is important to maintain water safety. Microbial slimes in the distribution system pipes can cause the development of waterborne viruses and bacteria and invertebrate grazing in the pipe systems [48]. Lead piping is also an issue in the European countries [49]. Breaks in pipe systems are concerns in terms of society’s water footprint and overall sustainability. Infiltration and leakages in pipe systems are other issues. Excessive particulate matter in pipe systems can also give rise to microorganism build-up [48]. Stagnation in the pipes can also give rise to microbial slimes [48].

Certain privately owned ground water supplies and group schemes incorporate treatments such as aeration and disinfectant using chlorination and ultraviolet light disinfectant [47].

For conventional drinking water treatment, sufficient time for each step of the process, maintenance and energy use is important to management in terms of moving in the direction of an eco-label for water treatment.

4.1. Water treatment in developing countries

In developing countries, the priority is to obtain biologically safe water. Waterborne diseases is a large issue globally especially in tropical countries with poor water supplies [17]. The chemical and physical characteristics of water should not be overlooked, but emphases on the biological quality treatment should be salient.

The treatment that is utilised in developing countries shall now be discussed.

The two treatment systems include:

  1. Central source treatment systems

  2. Point-of-use (POU) treatment

Central source systems involve water treatment in a central location followed by distribution to the consumer. This is known as medium- or large-scale treatment. The treatment is similar to conventional treatment used in developed countries. This type of treatment can be suitable for urban areas in developing countries. Challenges of network contamination and maintenance of the infrastructure are a large concern [48]. The treated water can be transported by tanker to rural areas, if piped networks are not present in a particular area.

Point-of-use (POU) treatment involves ‘informal sources’ treated at source which are also known as small-scale treatment. Risk management in terms of pollution of informal sources such as rainwater, shallow boreholes and small streams treated per household is a large concern [50]. When deciding on which type of POU treatment variables to consider, it should include ease of use, price, time for treatment and volume of water treated.

A selection of point-of-use (POU) treatment commercial systems and small-scale technologies that can be utilised can be seen in Table 2.

Commercial name Information reference
Biosand filter and ceramic water purifier [51]
Kanchan™ Arsenic filter (KAF) [52]
AquaEst RainPC® [53]
Solar disinfection (SODIS) [54]
LifeStraw® [55]
PUR Purifier of Water™ [56]

Table 2.

Selection of point-of-use (POU) treatments and small-scale treatment.

Some interesting point-of-use (POU) treatments will be discussed below.

4.1.1. Chlorination

Chlorination was initially used to disinfect public water supplies since the early 1900s, in cities in Europe and the United States of America. In developing countries, a common method for treating water at source involves using a sodium hypochlorite solution placed in a bottle with directions for use. The user adds one full bottle cap volume of the solution to clear water (or two cups volumes for turbid water) to a standard-sized storage container. The user shakes the container and then waits 30 minutes before drinking. The reason that chlorination is so popular is because it leaves a residual in the water matrix [57].

One of the large challenges of chlorination is the presence of high organic composition that can give rise to the formation of disinfectant-by-products which are considered carcinogenic.

4.1.2. Chlorination and flocculation

Hybrid water treatment technologies are commonly used such as a combination of chlorination and flocculation. An example of the combined technologies involves a small sachet containing both a powdered ferrous sulphate (a flocculant) and calcium hypochlorite (a disinfectant). A commercial design of this approach is known as Pu-R. To use Pu-R, users open the sachet and then add the contents to an open bucket containing 10 litres of water maximum. The bucket contents are stirred for 5 minutes, and the solids in the water will then settle to the bottom of the bucket [56, 57].

The water is then strained through a cotton cloth into a second container; the user then waits 20 minutes for the hypochlorite to inactivate the microorganisms. This technique has been shown to remove bacteria, viruses and protozoa, even in highly turbid waters [58].

Chlorination and flocculation can eliminate the formation of disinfectant by-products as the flocculation process can remove organics from the water.

4.1.3. Filtration

Filtration and innovations in filtration are a growing interest in the water industry. Basic filtration involved the use of porous stones, and a variety of other natural materials have been used to filter visible contaminants from the water for hundreds of years. Filters are an attractive option for household treatment [59]. A number of interrelated removal mechanisms within the filter media are relied upon to achieve high removal efficiencies. These removal mechanisms include the following processes: (1) sedimentation on media (sieve effect), (2) adsorption, (3) absorption, (4) biological action, and (5) straining [60].

There are many porous materials which are locally available and inexpensive options for filtering water. They are simple and easy to use, and the filtering material has a long lifetime. However, filtration has its drawbacks due to maintenance issues such as back flushing of filters and lack of residual effects with regard to disinfection. Again, hybrid water treatment technologies involving basic filtration have been investigated. An interesting membrane hybrid system combining trickling filtration filter and a thin layer of biomass biosand to reduce organic matter can be seen in the literature [61]. Other membrane designs that can be utilised include disc and tubular design, microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. The scope for the removal of contaminants by filtration processes can be seen in Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Filter/membrane particle sizes and what contamination can be removed [62].

4.1.4. Filtration and biosolids

More advanced filtration methods using biosolids have been developed. The biosand filter (BSF) is a slow sand filter which can be adapted for use at home. When the water pours over the filter, a shallow water layer is formed which allows a bioactive layer to grow on top of the sand, which breaks down pathogens in the water. A plate protector prevents the water layer from being disturbed when more water is passed through the filter. In the literature it can be shown that the BSF has high efficiency to remove bacteria and protozoa from the water [63, 64].

An interesting study to remove arsenic from the water in the presence of iron can be seen in the literature in Nigeria using a sand filter. The filter immobilises arsenic (As) via co-oxidation with Fe(11) and sorption to or co-precipitation with the formed Fe(111) to the filter surface [65].

One of the problems with the prolonged use of filters is the potential build-up of biofouling on the surface of the filter [66].

4.1.5. Filtration and chlorination

A combination of filtration and chlorination systems is also regularly used [67]. Ceramic and slow sand filtration lack a residual disinfectant protection of water, to compensate for this filtration followed by chlorination can be used [68, 69].

4.1.6. Innovative solid materials

To remove arsenic (As) metal and its metalloids from drinking water, metal absorption phases have been utilised including iron oxide-coated sand, ferrihydrite red mud, activated alumina, TiO2, FePO4 (amorphous), MnO2, MnO2-loaded resin, natural zeolites (such as clinoptilolite), iron oxide and iron-loaded chelating resin [70]. The use of the biosand iron oxide-coated sand filters to remove viruses from water can be seen in literature. The method consists of electrostatic adsorption of negatively charged virion to sand particles with positively charged iron oxides [71].

4.1.7. Solar disinfectant

The role of natural sunlight to disinfect water has much potential in developing countries. A common method in use is known as the solar disinfection (SODIS) method. Solar disinfection (SODIS) method was initially developed to inexpensively disinfect water used for oral rehydration solutions [72]. The SODIS method involves filling 0.3–2.0 litres of plastic soda bottles with low-turbidity water, followed by shaking to oxygenate the water. The bottles are left for 6 hours in sunny conditions and 2 days if weather is cloudy [73]. Studies have shown that the SODIS method inactivates bacteria and viruses; the protozoa cryptosporidium and giardia are also sensitive to solar irradiation [74]. Other innovations using ultraviolet light can be seen in the literature [75, 76, 77, 78]. One of the major advantages of ultraviolet light technology is its cheapness. One of the challenges is designing the technology for max trapping of the ultraviolet light. Seasonal factors can affect the intensity of the ultraviolet light. Small volumes and length of time to treat the water can be a concern. If water has high turbidity, it is recommended to pretreat with flocculation or filtration before ultraviolet light treatment. Presently, the container type is plastic.

4.1.8. Innovative technologies and nanotechnologies

Photocatalysts based on nanocatalysts such as the TiO2 catalyst harness ultraviolet radiation from the sunlight and use the energy to break down substances such as microbes, pesticides, dyes, crude oils and organic acids [79]. Pilot projects for drinking water purification in developing countries have only begun involving TiO2 immobilised on plastic which is activated by ultraviolet light to disinfect the water [80]. Other nanotechnologies are at developing stage [81, 82].


5. Challenges

Challenges to the drinking water supply in developing countries include the natural scarcity of water source in certain areas. Floods can create more siltation problems in river systems as well as the contamination of rivers and large dams giving rise to source-receptor issues. Climate change and water scarcity are also some of the concerns [83, 84]. Stratification problems in lake abstraction points and aeration of abstraction point to break down the thermocline layer are needed which requires much energy.

Poor access to water and poor water resource management must be addressed. Poor water productivity in the agricultural sector can impact on water quality [85]. Water affordability issues and the challenges of investing in water infrastructure need to be addressed [86, 87]. Storage and confidence in storage facility container to prevent contamination entail education and awareness of cross-contamination [67]. To maintain clean drinking water, an integrated approach is needed in developing countries. Proper management of solid waste and waste water can enhance the quality of our drinking waters [88, 89].

Private companies’ management of water treatment systems is an interesting debate in developing countries [90]. Water conservation and future issues of water recycling have been discussed in developed countries and can also be applied to developing countries.

Large-scale and small-scale technologies are important to review in terms of maintenance and monitoring [91]. Energy and water treatment needs are a concern [92]. Most developing countries are located in regions of the world which have the most droughts and seasonal changes in precipitation and evaporation which challenges the source of the water at different times of the year [93] (Figure 10).

Figure 10.

Variables to consider in integrated water management [88].

Natural disasters such as storms and earthquakes can affect infrastructure of large-scale system and small-scale systems; point-of-use (POU) treatments are needed to compensate for these issues. Education on the use of point-of-use (POU) treatment in local communities must be encouraged [76]. At different times of the year, the water source availability varies for examples rivers are used during the wet season and bore well water sources are used during the dry season.


6. Conclusion

Access to safe drinking water is also considered to be a human right, not a privilege, for every man, woman and child (World Bank, 2018).

The World Health Organization emphasizes that ‘the introduction of water treatment technology without consideration of the socio-cultural aspects of the community and without behavioural, motivational, educational and participatory activities within the community, is unlikely to be successful or sustainable’ [94]. Research, development and deployment (R&D&D) of clean water technologies for developing countries are important to nurture. All these initiatives can help move in the direction of the challenge by the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to halve the proportion of the people without access to safe water by 2015 [95]. Clean water is only as clean as waste water management and treatment linking with global waters and the practically closed loop [96]. Performance management framework surrounding drinking water must be nurtured [97]. Private companies organising treatment systems must be properly introduced [98].

Certain water sources used for different applications challenge our water resources such as industrialisation needs of developing countries. Transport costs and informal sources are important to develop [99]. The human carrying capacity and population increase and water use are important to monitor [100].

Legislation and risk management audits and awareness in terms of water conservation issues and human behaviour towards water are important to address [101, 102].

Informal water supply involving point-of-use (POU) treatment will need to be continuously integrated with central supply systems (CSS) as CSS will not facilitate all water demands [50, 103, 104, 105]. Cost issues for integration need to be addressed [106].

Two key indicators highlighted by the World Bank are ‘annual freshwater withdrawals’ and ‘improved water source’ [107, 108]. Linked with these two key indicators are performance management, public awareness and conservation issues of central treatment systems and point-of-use (POU) treatment [109, 110].

Waterborne diseases will always be researched in the future [111]. Industrial regulation and waste management especially when industrialisation is occurring at a rapid rate in developing countries are important issues in the future. Good waste management practice will always be embedded in achieving clean drinking water supplies [112] (Figure 11).

Figure 11.

Drinking water sustainability [113].

The full multi-barrier approach from the source to the tap linking with policy should be a future strategy [113]. Network maintenance and provisions for same are salient within the strategy [114, 115]. A harmonisation approach to water sustainability should be embedded in future water planning [116, 117]. The harmonisation approach would involve common arrangements, simple procedures and sharing of information and standards [118]. Developing countries should nurture the opportunity to learn from developed countries about their successes and failures. Sustainability and water security will also be embedded in the future of water management. Informed education, information sharing and simplified production are important to ensure good water quality [119]. Health and water are fundamentally interlinked and need to be constantly researched in terms of global development [120, 121, 122, 123].



I wish to acknowledge the Limerick Institute of Technology for facilitating easy access to journals and ordering of interlibrary loans. I wish to thank David Bowlin, of ‘Laboratory of Atmospheres, NASA/GSFC. Greenbelt M.D. USA.; Science Systems and Application, Inc Lanham M.D. USA’, for producing the map of global precipitation. I also wish to acknowledge a sister of the Cross and Passion order who ministered in Francistown South Africa for her insight into the drinking water source during the wet and dry season. I also wish to thank the EPA Ireland for giving me an Image from their Drinking water report Public supplies 2017.


Conflict of interest



  1. 1. Chowdhury S, Mazumder MAJ, Al-Attas O, Husain T. Heavy metals in drinking water: Occurrence, Implication and future needs in development countries. Science of the Total Environment. 2016;569-570:476-488
  2. 2. Shields KF, Bain RE, Cronk R, Wright JA, Bartram J. Association of supply type with fecal contamination of water source and household stored drinking water in developing countries: A bivariate meta-analysis. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2015;123(12):1222-1231
  3. 3. Pandit AB, Kumar JK. Clean water for developing countries. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering. 2015;6:217-246. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061114-123432
  4. 4. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply and Sanitation ( [Accessed: March 4th 2018]
  5. 5. Martins R, Quintal C, Cruz L, Barata E. Water affordability issues in developing countries – The relevance of micro approaches. Utilities Policy. 2016;43(Part A):117-123
  6. 6. Unicef and World Health Organisation. 25 progress on sanitation and drinking water 2015 update and MDG assessment; 2015
  7. 7. Yadav IC, Devi NL, Syed JH, Chemg Z, Li J, Zhang G, et al. Current status of persistent organic pesticides residues in air, water, and soil, and their possible effect on neighbouring countries: A comprehensive review of India. Science of the Total Environment. 2015;511:123-137
  8. 8. Islam S, Ahmed K, Raknuzzaman M, Mamun A-H, Islam KM. Heavy metal pollution in surface water and sediment: A preliminary assessment of an urban river in a developing country. Ecological Indicators. 2015;48:282-291
  9. 9. Aschermann G, Jeihanipour A, Shen J, Mkongo G, Dramas L, Croue J-P, et al. Seasonal variation of organic matter concentration and characteristics in the Maji ya Chai River (Tanzania): Impact on treatability by ultrafiltration. Water Research. 2016;101:370-381
  10. 10. Tchobanoglous G, Trussell R, Hand D, Crittenden J, Principles of Water Treatment [E –Book] Wiley: 2012 Available from ebook Index 2012 Ipswick MA. Accessed [April 29th 2018]
  11. 11. Kostyla C, Bain R, Cronk R. Seasonal variation of fecal contamination in drinking water sources in developing countries: A systematic review. Science of the Total Environment. 2015;514:333-343
  12. 12. WHO 2009. Online: [Accessed: April 1 2018]
  13. 13. Rondi L, Sorlini S, Collivignarelli MC. Sustainability of water safety plans developed in Sub-saharan Africa. Sustainability. 2015;7:11139-11159
  14. 14. Breach B. Drinking Water Quality Management from Catchment to Consumer, A Practical Guide for Utilities based on Water Safety Plans. London: International Water Association IWA; 2012
  15. 15. Ministry for the Environment. Draft Users Guide: National Environmental Standard for Sources of Human Drinking Water. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment; 2009
  16. 16. Han AM, Oo KN, Midorikawa Y, Shwe S. Contamination of drinking water during collection and storage. Tropical and Geographical Medicine. 1989;41(2):138-140
  17. 17. Binnie C, Kimbar M. 5th edition. London: Basic Water Treatment Thomas Telford Ltd Institute of Civil Engineers (ICE) Publishing; 2013
  18. 18. Taib SM, Wahab MNFBA, Rezania S, Din MFM. Spatial and temporal patterns of groundwater quality in Selangor, Malaysia. In: Hong SK, Nakagoshi N, editors. Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Society. Cham: Springer; 2017
  19. 19. Liddle ES, Mager SM, Etienne LN. The importance of community based informal water supply systems in the developing world and the need for formal sector support. The Geographical Journal. 2016;182(1):85-96
  20. 20. Ilson E, Bottled Water: Pure Drink or Pure Hype? Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC), New York. 1999
  21. 21. Global precipitation Image of the GPCPV2.3 Precipitation climatology for the period 1979-2016 expressed in millimeters/day. Image provided by David Bolvin SSAI/NASA GSFC
  22. 22. Oke M, Oyebola O. Assessment of rainwater harvesting potential and challenges in Ijebu Ode Southern Western Part of Nigeria for strategic advice. Scientific Annals of AI. I. Cuza Geography Series. 2014;LX:17-39
  23. 23. Singh J, Pandhi A, Choudhary A. Impact assessment of rainwater Harvesting SBI-CAIM interventions in Vidarbha Region of India. Productivity. 2017;57(4):370-379
  24. 24. Damen B. Meeting country ambitions to tackle climate change in agriculture: A novel analysis of developing country INDCs in Asia and the Pacific. Prepared for the 9th Asian Society of Agricultural Economists International Conference: Transformation in Agricultural and Food Economy in Asia; 2017
  25. 25. Jordan E, Javernick-Will A, Tierney K. Post-tsunami recovery in Tamil Nadu, India: Combined social and infrastructural outcomes. Natural Hazards. 2016;84:1327
  26. 26. Mukherjeea A, Saha D, Harvey CF, Taylor RG, Ahmede KM, Bhanjaa SN. Groundwater systems of the Indian Sub-Continent. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 2015;4:1-14
  27. 27. Santa SDA, Neville EA, wada G, deSherbinin Y, Bernhardt A, Adamo EM, et al. Urban growth and water access in sub-Saharan Africa: Progress, challenges, and emerging research directions. Science of the Total Environment. 2017;607-608:497-508
  28. 28. Ahuja S. Chapter 1: Overview sustaining water the world most crucial resource. In: Chemistry and Water The Science behind Sustaining the World’s most Srucial Resource pg. London: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 1-22
  29. 29. Dugue L, Relvas H, Silveira C, Ferreira J, Monteiro A, Gama C, et al. Evaluating strategies to reduce urban air pollution. Atmospheric Environment. 2016;127:196-204
  30. 30. Jonssen AS, Wimmerstedt R, Harrysson A-C. Membrane distillation - a theoretical study of evaporation through microporous membranes. Desalination. 1985;56:237-249
  31. 31. Fujioka R, Wang LP, Dodbiba G, Fujita T. Application of progressive freeze-concentration for desalination. Desalination. 2013;319:33-37
  32. 32. Conruvo JA. WHO guidance for health and environmental challenges and nutrient minerals. Journal article conference paper water Practice and Technology. Singopore: International water week; 2008;3:4 pp091
  33. 33. Gao L, Yoshikawa S, Iseri Y, Fujimori S, Kanae S. An economic assessment of the global potential for seawater desalination to 2050. Water. 2017;9:763. DOI: 10.3390/w91007/63
  34. 34. Caldera U, Bogdanov D, Breyer C. Local cost of seawater RO desalination based on solar PV and wind energy: A global estimate. Desalination. 2016;385:207-216
  35. 35. O’Shea L. An economic approach to reducing water pollution: Point and diffuse sources. Science of the Total Environment. 2002;282-283:49-65
  36. 36. Mitchell JK, Soga K. Fundamental of soil behaviours. 3rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2005
  37. 37. NRCS Soil Types. US Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Services; 2005
  38. 38. Kumar RD, Datta B. Salt water intrusion processes in coastal aquifers- modelling and management. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2017;780:57-89
  39. 39. Ouyang Y. Evaluation of river water quality monitoring stations by principal component analysis. Water Research. 2005;39(12):2621-2635
  40. 40. Gholizadeh MH, Melesse AM, Reddi L. Water quality assessment and apportionment of pollution sources using APCS-MLR and PMF receptor modeling techniques in three major rivers of South Florida. Science of the Total Environment. 2016;566-567:1552-1567
  41. 41. Nasir MFM, Zali MA, Juahir M, Hussian H, Sharifuddin M, Pamli N. Application of receptor models on water quality data in source apportionment in Kuantan River Basin. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 2012;9(1):18. DOI: 10.1186/1735-2746-9-18
  42. 42. EPA. Drinking Water Report Public Supplies 2017. Wexford, Ireland: EPA Ireland; 2018
  43. 43. Edzwald JK. Water Quality and Treatment: A Handbook on Drinking Water: American Water Works Association AWW. London: Mc Graw Hill; 2011
  44. 44. Veolia Water Solutions And Technology Saint Maurice France Veolia Water Tech. 2018. online:
  45. 45. Edzwald JK. Fundamental of dissolved air flotation. Journal of New England Water Works Association. 2007;121(3):80-112
  46. 46. Gray N. Drinking water Quality Problems and Solutions. 2nd ed. England: Cambridge University Press; 2008
  47. 47. AWWA. AWWA ‘Water Quality division Disinfection Systems Committee’ Committee report disinfectant Survey Part 1 recent changes current practices and water water quality. Journal AWWA. 2008;100(10):79-90
  48. 48. Wright J, Gundry S, Conroy R. Household drinking water in developing countries: A systematic review of microbiological contamination between source and point of use. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2004;(1):106-117
  49. 49. McGinnis S, Rottersman R, Hackman A. An introduction to the complexities of lead in drinking water. Natural Resources and Environment. 2017;32(1):3-7
  50. 50. Arvai J, Post K. Risk management in a developing country context: Improving decisions about point-of-use water treatment among the rural poor in Africa. Risk Analysis. 2012;32(1):67-80
  51. 51. Biosand Filter. Online: [Accessed: April 4 2018] Ceramic Water Purifier. Online: [Accessed: April 4 2018]
  52. 52. Kanchan™Asenic Filter (KAF). Online: [Accessed: April 4 2018]
  53. 53. AquaESt RainPC®. Online: [Accessed: April 4 2018]
  54. 54. Solar disinfection (SOLIS) Centers of Disease Control and Prevention. Online: [Accessed: May 1 2018]
  55. 55. LIfeStraw®. Online: [Accessed: April 4 2018]
  56. 56. PUR Purifier of Water™. Online: [Accessed: April 4 2018]
  57. 57. Arnold BF, Colford JM. Treating water with chlorine at point of use to improve water quality and reduce child diarrhea in developing countries : A Systematic review and Meta Analysis. The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2007;76(2):354-364
  58. 58. Souter PF, Graeme D, Cruickshank MZ, Tankerville BH, Keswick BD, Ellis DE. Evaluation of a new water treatment for point of use household applications to remove microorganisms and arsenic from drinking water. Journal of Water and Health. 2003;1(2):73-84
  59. 59. Sobsey MD, Stauber CE, Casanova LM, Joseph M, Brown JM, Elliott MA. Point of use household drinking water filtration: A practical, effective solution for providing sustained access to safe drinking water in the developing world. Environmental Science & Technology. 2008;42(12):4261-4267. DOI: 10.1021/es702746n
  60. 60. EPA Treatment Manual Filtration. 1995. Online: [Accessed: April 4 2018]
  61. 61. Shin GA, Kim T-Y, Kim H-S, Maeng M-S. Membrane hybrid system combined with a trickling filter and a thin layer of biosand to reduce high levels of organic matter in drinking water in developing countries. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2016;104:541-548
  62. 62. Pure Eater. Online: [Accessed: March 30 2018]
  63. 63. Kaiser N, Liang K, Maertens M, Snider R. 2002 BSF Evaluation Report: Summary of all Lab and Field Studies. Canada: Samaritan’s Purse; 2002. Available from:
  64. 64. Palmateer G, Manz D, Jurovic A, McInnis R, Unger S, Kwan K, et al. Toxicant and parasite challenge of Manz intermittent slow sand filter. Environmental Toxicology. 1999;14:217-225
  65. 65. Nitzsche KS, Lan VM, Trang PTK, Viet PH, Berg M, Voegelin A, et al. Arsenic removal from drinking water by a house hold sand filter in Vietnam_ effect of filter usage practices on arsenic removal efficiency and microbiological water quality. Science of the Total Environment. 2015;502:526-536
  66. 66. Chawla C, Zwijnenburg A, Kemperman AJB, Nijmeijer K. Fouling in gravity driven point of use drinking water treatment systems. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2017;319:89-97
  67. 67. Sobsey MD, Handzel T, Venczel L. Chlorination and safe storage of house hold drinking water in developing countries to reduce water borne diseases. Water Science and Technology. 2003;47(3):221-228
  68. 68. Loo SL, fane AG, Krantz WB, Lim TT. Emergency water supply: A review of potential technologies and selection criteria. Water Research. 2012;46(10):3125-3151
  69. 69. Muhammad N, Sinha R, Krishnan ER, Patterson CL. Ceramic Filter for small system drinking water treatment: Evaluation of membrane Pore size and Importance of integrity Monitoring. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 2009;11:1181-1191
  70. 70. Parimal P. Industrial Water Treatment Process Technology. USA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2017
  71. 71. Bradley I, Straub A, Maraccini P, Markazi S. Iron oxide amended biosand. Water Research. 2011;45(1):4501-4510
  72. 72. Acra A, Karahogopian Y, Raffoul Z. Solar Disinfection of Drinking Water and Oral Rehydration Solutions – Guidelines for Household Application in Developing Countries. Beirut, Lebanon: UNICEF; 1984
  73. 73. Mc Guigan KG, Conroy RM, Mosler HJ, DuPreez M, Ubomba-Jaswa E, Fernandez-Ibanez P. Solar water disinfection (SODIS) a review from bench-top to roof-top. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2012;235-236:29-46
  74. 74. Sommer B, Marino A, Solarte Y, Salas M, Dierolf C, Valiente C, et al. SODIS: An emerging water treatment process. Aqua (Oxford). 1997;46(3):127-137
  75. 75. Wegelin M, Canonica S, Mechsner K, Fleischmann T, Pesaro F, Metzler A. Solar water disinfection: Scope of the process and analysis of radiation experiments. Aqua (Oxford). 1994;43(4):154-169
  76. 76. Albert J, Luoto J, Levine D. End-user preferences for and performance of competing POU water treatment technologies among the rural poor of Kenya. Environmental Science & Technology. 2010;44(12):4426-4432
  77. 77. Simons R, Gabbai UE, Moram MA. Optical fluence modelling for ultraviolet light emitting diode-based water treatment systems. Water Research. 2014;66:338-349
  78. 78. Yumu Lui G, David Roser D, Corkish R, Ashbolt N, Jagals P, Stuetz R. Photovoltaic powered ultraviolet and visible light-emitting diodes for sustainable point-of-use disinfection of drinking waters. Science of the Total Environment. 2014;493:185-196
  79. 79. Savage N, Mamadou SD. Nanomaterials and waterpurification: Opportunities and challenges. Nano Research. 2005;7(4-5):331-342
  80. 80. RCSI. 2018. Online: [Accessed: May 1 2018]
  81. 81. Adeleye AS, Comway JR, Garner K, Huang Y, Yiming S, Keller AA. Engineered nanomaterials for water treatment and remediation: Costs, benefits and applicability. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2016;286:640-662
  82. 82. Santhosh C, Velmurugan V, Jacob G, Jeong SK, Grace AN, Bhatnagar A. Role of nanomaterials in water treatment applications; a review. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2016;306:11116-11137
  83. 83. Mirza MMQ. Climate change and extreme weather events: Can developing countries adapt? Climate Policy. 2003;3(3):233-248
  84. 84. Vairavamoorthy K, Gorantiwar SD, Pathirana A. Managing urban water supplies in developing countries-climate change and water scarcity scenarios. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth parts A/B/C. 2008;33(5):330-339
  85. 85. Cosgrove WJ, Loucks DP. Water management current and future challenges and research directions. In: Water Resource Research. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union (AGU) Publications; 2015
  86. 86. Rodriguez D, Den Berg CV, McMahon A. Investing in water Infrastructure: Capital, Operations and Management World Bank Water Papers 1; 2012. pp. 1-52
  87. 87. Ghosh S, Morella E. Africa Water and Sanitation Infrastructure Directions in Developments Infrastructure Access Affordability and Alternatives. The World Bank; 2011
  88. 88. Blueriver. Online:[Accessed: April 1 2018]
  89. 89. Thompson T, Sobsey M, Bartram J. Providing clean water, keeping water clean an integrated approach. International Journal of Environmental Health Research. 2003;13(Suppl 1): S89-S94
  90. 90. Ameyaw E. A survey of critical success for attracting private sector participation in water supply projects in developing countries. Journal of Facilities Management. 2017;15(1):1472-5967
  91. 91. Nhapi I. Challenges for water supply and sanitation in developing countries: Case studies from Zimbabwe. In: Grafton Q, Daniell K, Nauges C, Rinaudo JD, Chan N, editors. Understanding and Managing Urban Water in Transition. Global Issues in Water Policy. Vol. 15. Dordrecht: Springer; 2015
  92. 92. Water Energy Health and Biodiversity (WEHAB) Working Group. A Framework for Action on Water and Sanitation (United Nations Preparation for the World Summit on Sustainable Development); 2002. Available from: [Accessed: March 30th 2018]
  93. 93. Gamble DW, Donovan Campbell DL, Allen LT, Barker D, Curtis S, McGregor D, et al. Climate change, drought, and Jamaican agriculture: Local knowledge and the climate record. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2010;100(4):880-893
  94. 94. Vail LS, Homnick D. Waterborne disease. Journal of Alternative Medicine Research. 2006;8(1):7-15
  95. 95. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. Water for Life: Making it happen. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO & UNICEF; 2005. Available from:
  96. 96. Treacy J. Chapter: 35 Wastewater operation requirements and distribution systems. In: Eslamian S, editor. Urban Water Reuse Handbook. 1st ed. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group; 2015. DOI: 10.1201/b19646-44
  97. 97. Sattarov M, Volkova T. A performance management framework for water utilities in developing countries. Journal of Business and Management. 2017;(13):91-109
  98. 98. Challenges for Water Supply and Sanitation in Developing Countries: Case Studies from Zimbabwe. Online: [Accessed: March 18 2018]
  99. 99. Mintz E, Bartram J, Lochery P, Wegelin M. Not just a drop in the bucket Expanding Access to point of use water treatment. American Journal of Public Health. 2001;91(10):1565-1570
  100. 100. Fiebelkorn AP, Person B, Quick RE, Vindigni SM, Jhung M, Bowen A, et al. Systematic review of behavior change research on point-of-use water treatment interventions in countries categorized as low- to medium-development on the human development index. Social Science and Medicine. 2012;75:622-633
  101. 101. Anderson B, Romani J, Phillips H, Wentzel M, Tlabela K. Exploring environmental perceptions, behaviors and awareness: Water and water pollution in South Africa. Population and Environment. 2007;28:133-161
  102. 102. McDaniels T, Gregory R, Fields D. Democratizing risk management: Successful public involvement in local water management decisions. Risk Analysis. 1999;19:497-510
  103. 103. Yumu Lui G, Roser D, Corkish R, Ashbolt NJ, Stuetz R. Point-of-use water disinfection using ultraviolet and visible light-emitting diodes. Science of the Total Environment. 2016;553:626-635
  104. 104. Procter and Gamble Company. Press Release: New P&G Technology Improves Drinking Water in Developing Countries, Procter and Gamble, Cincinnati, Ohio; 2001
  105. 105. Crump JA, Otieno PO, Slutsker L. Household based treatment of drinking water with flocculant-disinfectant for preventing diarrhoea in areas with turbid water source in rural western Kenya: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2005;331:478
  106. 106. Holm R, Singinib W, Gwayic S. Comparative evaluation of the cost of water in northern Malawi: From rural water wells to science education. Applied Economics. 2016;48(47):4573-4583
  107. 107. Water Treatment World Health Organization. Online: [Accessed: Jan 18th 2018]
  108. 108. WHO. 2018. Online: [Accessed: January 9th 2018]
  109. 109. Sattarov M, Volkova T. A performance Management Framework. Journal of Business and Management. 2017;13:91-109
  110. 110. Combating Waterborne Diseases at the Household Level (pdf). World Health Organization; 2007 Part 1. ISBN 978-92-4-159522-3
  111. 111. Massoud MA, Al-Abady A, Jurdi M, Iman Nuwayhid I. The challenges of sustainable access to safe drinking water in rural areas of developing countries: Case of Zawtar El-Charkieh, Southern Lebanon. Journal of Environmental Health. 2010;72(10):24-30
  112. 112. Babayemi JO, Ogundiran MB, Osbanjo O. ‘Overview of Environmental Hazards and Health effects of pollution in developing countries A case study of Nigeria’. Environmental Quality Management. 2016;26(1):51-71
  113. 113. Lantagne DS, Quick R, Mintz-Navig ED. 2006 - Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage Options in Developing Countries. Online: Wilson_center_water_stories_expanding_opportunities_in_small_scale_water_and-sanitation_projects_2007_pdf [Accessed: Jan 20 2018]
  114. 114. Gilbert G, Cooper WJ, Rice RG, Pacey GE. Disinfectant Residual Measurement Methods. Denver, CO: AWWA Research Foundation, American Water Works Association; 1987
  115. 115. American Water Works Association. Water quality and treatment: A handbook of community water supplies. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc; 1999
  116. 116. Global Water Partnership, What is IWRM? 2013. Online: [Accessed: Feb 4 2018]
  117. 117. Market report 2016-2021 Global Point Of use Water treatment System Market report 2016-2021- Analysis, Technologies & Forecasts-Key Vendors: 3M Sompany, LG Electronics, Pentair-research and Markets
  118. 118. Development Gateway: Aid Harmonisation and Alignment for Grater Aid Effectiveness. Online: [Accessed: May 2 2018]
  119. 119. Fiebelkorn AP, Person B, Quick RE, Vindigni SM, Jhung M, Bowen A, et al. Systematic review of behaviour change research on point-of-use water treatment interventions in countries categorized as low-to medium-development on the human development index. Social Science and Medicine. 2012;25:622-633
  120. 120. Mc Michael AJ. The urban environment and health in a world of increasing globalization: Issues for developing countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation. 2000;78(9):1117-1126
  121. 121. Kenel PP, Schlaman JC. Preserving sustainable water supplies for future generations. Journal AWWA. 2005;97(7):78
  122. 122. Richter BD, Blount ME, Bottorff C, Brooks HE, Demmerle A, Gardner BL, et al. Assessing the sustainability of urban water supply systems. Journal AWWA. 2018;110:2
  123. 123. Denver Water. Your Water: Environmental Planning and Stewardship. 2017. Online: [Accessed: April 29 2018]

Written By

Josephine Treacy

Submitted: December 2nd, 2017 Reviewed: August 7th, 2018 Published: April 3rd, 2019