Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Embryo Manipulation Techniques in the Rabbit

Written By

María-Luz García

Submitted: February 11th, 2018 Reviewed: August 22nd, 2018 Published: November 5th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.81089

Chapter metrics overview

1,192 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Rabbits are both productive and classic laboratory animals. Some particularities of female reproductive physiology make the rabbit an extraordinary model for the study of embryology and assisted reproductive techniques. For instance, as the ovulation is induced, the embryo development can be known with accuracy. Embryos are surrounded by a mucin coat which is crucial to prevent embryo mortality. Besides, the anatomy of the uterus does not allow embryo transmigration between both uterine horns, and so it is possible to test different reproductive techniques. Knowledge on early embryo development, and on influencing factors, has allowed to develop new insights into embryo manipulation, such as recovery, transfer, cryopreservation, in vitro fertilisation, cloning, or transgenesis. Also the rabbit may be used as a model for human reproductive health, because rabbit embryo and feto-placental development are similar to the human. This chapter reviews the aspects of the reproductive physiology in the female rabbit and discusses some embryo manipulation techniques available in the species.

Keywords

  • development
  • embryo
  • rabbit
  • reproductive techniques
  • survival

1. Introduction

Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is a livestock species reared either for the production of hair, skin or meat [1] or as an experimental reference for other species, such as pigs or humans [2]. In rabbit meat production, litter size is an important economic trait [3, 4], and has been the objective in selection programs [5]. Litter size components are ovulation rate, fertilisation rate and prenatal survival, the latter component being defined by the embryo and foetal survival. Prenatal survival is around 30% [6], 15% corresponding to embryonic period. Therefore, knowledge of rabbit embryology is crucial for rabbit production.

Research in embryo biology using the rabbit as a model is associated with a number of well-known pioneer investigations on reproductive biology, e.g., fertilisation [7], oviduct physiology [8], embryo survival [9], prenatal mortality [10], experimental embryology [11], embryo in vitroculture [12], preimplantation embryo development in vivoand in vitro[13, 14] and embryo cryopreservation [15]. The reproductive characteristics of the rabbit have led to the development of embryo technologies with applications in genetic improvement, in the spread of genetic material or the study of diseases.

Advertisement

2. Reproductive particularities of the female

Female rabbit has certain physiological and anatomical characteristics, which make it especially important for the study of embryology and the application of embryo reproductive techniques.

The rabbit belongs to the few species in which ovulation is induced by mating [16, 17]. The coitus leads to the nervous stimulation of the vagina, triggering the production of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in the hypothalamus. Under the influence of GnRH, the anterior pituitary secretes the gonadotrophins and the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), which regulates follicular development, and the luteinizing hormone (LH), which leads to ovulation [16, 17]. In the absence of a mating stimulus, ovulation can be triggered by hormonal treatment, with either GnRH analogues [18, 19, 20] or human chorionic gonadotrophin hormone (hCG) [21]. As a consequence of induced ovulation, the age of the embryos [hours post coitum (hpc)] is precisely known.

Rabbit has a short reproductive cycle. Female sexual maturity occurs at about 17–20 weeks of age, depending on lines [5]. Gestation lasts for 31 days. Female shows oestrus early in post-partum, during lactation. Different reproductive systems can be used in rabbits’ production, according to the production system: intensive (mating 4 days post-partum), semi-intensive (mating 11 days post-partum), semi-extensive (mating 18 days post-partum) or extensive (mating after weaning) [22]. Weaning takes place at 28 days of lactation. This implies that females sustain lactation and gestation simultaneously, except for the extensive system, but this overlap depresses sexual receptivity, ovulation, fertilisation, implantation and embryo survival due to hormonal antagonism between prolactin and gonadotropins [23, 24].

The morphology of the rabbit uterus represents a uterus duplex, i.e., constituted by two separated fully functional uterine horns and cervices opening into a sole vagina [2]. This morphology allows the transfer of two sets of embryos into the same recipient female without the occurrence of inter-horn migration. So, this species is particularly suitable to study the prenatal survival [25].

Advertisement

3. Reproductive cycle, ovulation and fertilisation

Female rabbits do not have a typical oestrus cycle [26]. Their period of sexual receptivity is influenced by the development of follicular populations. The receptivity can be identified by the colour red or purple of the vulva [27]. The development of follicles occurs normally in waves, with 5–10 follicles in each ovary with an oocyte inside each. The follicles produce oestrogen for 12–14 days. After this period, if there is no ovulation, the follicles degenerate, the oocytes are reabsorbed, and the oestrogen and sexual receptivity decrease. After about 4 days, a new wave of follicular growth begins. So, the reproductive cycle lasts 16–18 days, of which 12–14 days, the female is receptive and the remaining 4 days, it does not accept the male.

If ovulation takes place, the follicles become corpus luteum, starting a luteal phase characterised by high levels of progesterone that block new follicular waves. Whenever fertilisation, implantation and gestation occur, the corpus luteum is maintained throughout pregnancy. The oocytes are captured by the ovarian bursa of the infundibulum and are quickly transported through the ampulla, due to muscular contractions and ciliary activity. Fertilisation occurs shortly after ovulation in the ampulla by capacitated sperm that has already been present for 10–12 h in the female tract [28]. Fertilisation rate is generally high, about 95% [29, 30].

But if no fertilisation is achieved, or early embryonic losses are produced, the uterus produces prostaglandin-2α (PGF) 17 days after ovulation, which has luteolytic action. The progesterone levels decrease and a new wave of follicular growth is produced.

Advertisement

4. Embryo development

After fertilisation, the resulting zygote progresses through the next stage of development rather quickly in the isthmus and uterotubal junction. Table 1 shows the timing of in vivoembryo development between 24 and 84 hpc. Overlap of different embryo developmental stages is commonly observed [30, 31, 32, 33], and it could be related to the duration of ovulation or the oviductal and uterine fluid compositions [34, 35]. It is known that a high ovulation rate increases the overall duration of ovulation, and later ovulating follicles may be fertilised later [36].

hpcZygote2-cells4-cells8-cells16-cellsEarly morulaeCompacted morulaeBlastocystExpanded blastocyst
24XX
28XX
30XXX
48XXX
62XX
72XXX
84XX

Table 1.

Timing of in vivoembryo development in rabbits.

hpc: hours post coitum.

Early embryo losses, defined from fertilisation to implantation, have been estimated at around 15% [6] and they may result of an inherited abnormal development, an asynchronism between the stage of embryo development and the uterine environment, or to an inadequate steroidogenic pattern [14, 37].

4.1. Embryo coats

The extracellular coverings of rabbit embryos are structurally more complex than in most mammalian embryos. The peculiarity of rabbit embryos is that they are surrounded not only by the zona pellucida but also by a mucin coat (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Rabbit compacted morulae. The image shows the measurements commonly used to assess early rabbit embryos.

Zona pellucida is an extracellular embryonic coat that surrounds the early embryo (Figure 1). Zona pellucida proteins are synthesised by the oocyte and the granulosa cells to form concentric layers consisting of cross-linked zona proteins [38]. The steadiness of zona pellucida allows the intrazonal diameter of the embryo to remain constant (around 120 μm) up to 72 hpc [33, 39]. The zona pellucida thickness itself ranges between 15.9 and 19.2 μm [32, 40]. The zona pellucida selects morphologically normal spermatozoa [41], indices the acrosomal reaction [42] preventing polyspermy [43] and protects early embryo integrity during the transport through the oviduct [44]. It affects fertilisation; a thicker zona pellucida was found in oocytes with failed fertilisation collected from the oviducts compared with those of embryos [40]. Moreover, recent studies have shown that zona pellucida thickness is 8% lower in females under heat stress than in thermal comfort conditions, decreasing the number of normal embryos [45].

The mucin coat is a layer of acid mucopolysaccharides, which is deposited on the embryos during the passage through the oviduct [46]. The mucin coat thickness depends on the time spent in the oviduct [46], and it is half the thickness for embryos at 48 hpc (around 50 μm) than at 72 hpc (around 100 μm) [33]. The thickness of the mucin coat is essential for rabbit embryos to develop at term because it physically prevents the embryos from direct exposure to a deleterious uterine environment and allows them to expand until the appropriate time for implantation [46]. When in vitroembryos are transferred into recipients, the lack of a mucin coat predisposes to subsequent failure of pregnancy [47].

The embryo is covered by the zona pellucida and a mucin coat until 72–96 hpc. The zona pellucida disappears by then, and it is substituted by neozona (4.5 days) when the blastocysts enter into the uterus, while the mucin coat is covered by a new layer, named gloiolemma, around 6 days of gestation [38].

Advertisement

5. Rabbit pregnancy

Gestation depends upon the early embryo’s signalling its presence to the maternal system, a process termed maternal recognition of pregnancy [48]. The maternal recognition does not occur until the end of the first third of gestation [49], when the presence of the embryos is required to induce continued progesterone secretion by the corpus luteum.

Rabbits have a decidual and discoid haemochorial placenta [50]. The individual weight of the foetal placenta is higher than the individual weight of the maternal placenta, and both are higher for a live foetus than dead foetus [51]. Concerning the position in the uterus, the heaviest maternal and foetal placentae, and foetuses, are located near the oviduct [51, 52], probably due to the greater uterine space per foetus and higher blood flow in this region [53].

Abdominal palpation makes the simplest pregnancy diagnosis method, and it can perform by 12 dpc (days post coitum). To know not only the number of implanted embryos but also the ovulation rate, estimated from the number of corpora lutea in the ovary, it is necessary to perform a laparoscopy. Parturition takes place after 31 days of gestation.

Advertisement

6. Embryo cryopreservation

Since the 1970’s, rabbit embryos can be cryopreserved and stored with optimal efficiency [54]. Embryo cryopreservation can be used as a tool in setting up genetic resources banks that preserve the genetic diversity and protect against loss through diseases or hazards [55, 56]. The establishment of control populations from cryopreserved embryos of genetically selected lines allows estimating the response to selection [6]. It further enables the mobility of genetic material in animal breeding, facilitating the diffusion of genetic improvement of animals with higher genetic value [57].

The first cryopreservation protocols were based on freezing. However, these have been replaced by the vitrification technique because it is an easier and cheaper technique. Vitrification permits the rapid cooling of the liquid medium avoiding ice crystal formation by the use of high levels of cryoprotectants. Several protocols have been developed for embryo vitrification, providing a survival rate ca. 60% after transfer [58, 59, 60, 61, 62]. Some vitrification procedures and solutions applied in rabbit [58, 61, 62] are similar to those used in human [63, 64]. An example of a protocol is one that is carried out in two steps, at 20°C. First, embryos are placed for 2 min in a vitrification solution consisting of 12.5% (v/v) dimethyl sulphoxide (3.5 M) and 12.5% (v/v) ethylene glycol (4.4 M) in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) supplemented with 0.2% (w/v) of bovine serum albumin (BSA). In the second step, embryos are suspended for 1 min in a solution of 20% (v/v) dimethyl sulphoxide, and 20% (v/v) ethylene glycol in DPBS supplemented with 0.2% of BSA. Thereafter, the embryos suspended in the vitrification medium are loaded into 0.25 ml plastic straws, and two sections of DPBS are added at the beginning and the end of each straw, separated from the embryo containing medium by air bubbles. Finally, straws are sealed, identified and plunged into liquid nitrogen at −196°C [62].

Devitrification is performed by immersing the central and the final sections of the straws in a water bath at 20°C for 10 s. The vitrification medium is eliminated in two steps. First, embryos are expelled with the vitrification medium into a solution of DPBS with 0.33 M sucrose for 5 min; then, embryos are washed in a solution of DPBS for another 5 min [62]. The purpose is the elimination of the high concentration of cryoprotectants, which are toxic for embryos, as soon as possible.

The most recommended embryonic stage for cryopreservation is the compacted morulae. However, by different methodologies, it is also possible to cryopreserve cells from oocytes to blastocysts [65, 66, 67], bisected embryos [68] or cloned embryos [69].

A complete cryopreservation procedure involves several embryo manipulations such as in vitrohandling, the exposure to toxic concentrations of cryoprotectants, or transfer into a female reproductive tract. The success of the vitrification-thawing procedures depends on the concentration and composition of the vitrification solution, the cooling and thawing conditions, the procedure used to dilute embryos from the vitrification solution, and the volume of the vitrification solution [70]. The genotype of the embryo and the genotype of the recipient female also affect the efficiency of the vitrification-thawing procedure [71].

Retarded embryonic development is produced in cryopreserved embryos, and it may be due to a slow and gradual restoration of normal metabolic and synthetic activities of the thawed embryo [72]. So, asynchrony between vitrified embryos and recipient females is applied to obtain higher rates of embryos developed to term [73]. Cryopreservation and transfer procedures affect the RNA expression [74], and consequently the placental transcriptome and proteome [75]. Vitrification also affects foetal survival and growth and modifies the placental development at term [60, 76] and growth from birth to adult age [77]. Nonetheless, positive long-term effects of cryopreservation and transfer procedures on female offspring reproduction have been reported, namely in the litter size and the number of newborns alive at birth [78].

Advertisement

7. Embryo reproductive techniques

Expanding knowledge on the embryology of the rabbit, the effective cryopreservation of embryos and the reproductive particularities of the rabbit allowed the development of embryo reproductive techniques. These techniques have been successfully applied in the rabbit industry and have been extrapolated to other species. Next, reproductive technologies related to the embryo are discussed, such as the embryo recovery and transfer, in vitrofertilisation, cloning and production of transgenic embryos.

7.1. Embryo recovery and transfer

The ability to recover and transfer preimplantation embryos has numerous associated applications which are inevitably linked to translational molecular genetics, cell biology and assisted reproductive technology [79]. In 1890, the first successful mammalian embryo transfer was performed in rabbits [80]. Nowadays, this technique has become a routine practice in human medicine [81].

Embryo transfer includes the generation of preimplantation embryos along with the development of those embryos until term in different recipient females. Production of preimplantation embryos can be achieved in vivoor in vitro. In both cases, superovulation protocols can be applied to ensure the maximum number of embryos recovered per donor. The classical protocols have been performed with equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) or FSH (Table 2) [21, 82, 83, 84, 86, 87, 88]. But, both the number and quality of the oocytes obtained are highly variable when eCG is administrated [21, 83, 86]. The use of LH on super stimulation has been studied using porcine FSH (pFSH). The results are also variable due to the different LH concentration present, contamination from other hormones, inconsistencies within and among batches, and the possibility of the spread of diseases [88]. Nowadays, because of break-through in recombinant technology, it is possible to easily dispose of LH and FSH in an isolated manner [81], and the treatment with recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) alone or supplemented with LH is effective in stimulating superovulation without affecting the embryo quality [85].

HormoneDoseOvulation inductionOvulation rateRecovered embryosReference
eCG200 IU19.28.8[21]
20 IU/kg BW120 IU hCG28.714.2[82]
FSH5 × 9 μg/ml /12 h1.6 μg buserelin acetate26.721.2[83]
6 × 0.5 mg /12 h150 IU hCG26.521.3[84]
pFSH3 × 18 μg/ml /24 h2 μg buserelin acetate34.4[85]
rhFSH3 × 0.6 μg /24 h2 μg buserelin acetate16.6[85]

Table 2.

Examples of superovulation protocols.

eCG: equine chorionic gonadotropin; FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; pFSH: porcine FSH; rhFSH: recombinant human FSH; BW: Body weight; hCG: human chorionic gonadotrophin hormone.

Fertilisation of the oocytes can be achieved by natural mating or artificial insemination, if embryos are produced in vivo. Artificial insemination is usually performed with fresh or cooled semen stored for short periods of time (under 36 h) [89, 90], and obtains a high fertility rate and prolificacy. However, when fresh semen is used the sperm concentration per ml should be 4 million [91], while it should be increased to 15 million if the semen is refrigerated [89]. Fresh or cooled semen is used in the rabbit industry to improve breeding management [22]. However, frozen semen presents poor fertility after thawing [92, 93] and it is used mainly for conservation of banking resources, international exports and research [94].

A good understanding of the chronology of events that follows the ovulation is crucial to the recovery of preimplantation embryos [78]. At 24 hpc, all the embryos can be found in the isthmus [95]. At 78 hpc about one-third of the embryos are already found beyond the uterotubal junction, whereas at 84 hpc more than 90% of the embryos have reached the uterus [95]. Embryo implantation occurs between 120 and 144 hpc [96]. Considering the chronology of embryo development some techniques have been developed to recovery embryos at any stage and location.

Embryos can be recovered by non-surgical, post-mortemor laparoscopy. In the non-surgical method, PGF is administered 50–55 h after mating. It produces the expelling of embryos, located in the oviduct or the uterus, toward the vagina, where embryos can be recovered without surgery [97, 98]. This procedure has an efficacy of 40% [97, 98]. When embryos are obtained post-mortem, the entire reproductive tract is removed after the female is euthanised. The embryos are recovered by perfusion of each oviduct and the first third of the uterus with 5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.2% of BSA [33]. This method allows a retrieval rate of 64% [99]. Laparoscopy is a method that allows the recovery of both preimplantation embryos and also of oocytes [100]. If multiple cycles of embryo collection are required, this method is chosen because it guarantees minimal invasion through the use of a small entrance in the peritoneal cavity. However, this procedure has a lower efficacy in primiparous or multiparous females (around 50%), compared with nulliparous females (73%) [99].

Recovered embryos are subjected to morphological grading (Table 3, [101, 102, 103]); they are usually classified as having ‘good quality’ when they present homogenous cellular mass and intact zona pellucida and mucin coat [104]. Normal embryos can be maintained under in vitroconditions or cryopreserved until transferred. Zygotes have been successfully developed into blastocyst in vitro[10, 31, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108]. One example of culture media is TCM199 supplemented with 0.1% of BSA and culture is performed in 500 μl of medium layered under paraffin oil at 38.5°C, 5% CO2 and saturated humidity [109]. However, these culture media do not mimic the uterine environment, and as a consequence, embryos developed in vitrohave fewer cells and lower intrazonal diameter and mucin coat thickness than embryos developed in vivo, which reduces pregnancy rates after embryo transfer [40, 106].

Embryo-grade categories1Score grade2Size blastomeresCytoplasmic fragments
Good qualityGrade 1EqualNone
Grade 2EqualMinor
Fair qualityGrade 3UnequalNone or few
Poor qualityGrade 4UnequalMajor
Grade 5AnySevere or complete

Table 3.

Grading score used for rabbit embryos.

Embryos are clustered in embryo-grade categories following the Shulman criterion.


Embryos are graded following the Veeck and Maloney criterion.


Embryo transfer is performed by surgery (laparotomy) [110, 111] or by laparoscopy [112], into the oviducts or each one of the uterine horns. The use of laparoscopy aims at minimising the invasion site of the reproductive organs and in situmanipulation [79]. To guarantee the success of the transfer, a minimum number of embryos have to be transferred, and asynchrony between the embryo development and the recipient female has to occur [65, 70, 113]. On one hand, at least two foeto-placental units are required to maintain the gestation [114, 115], and on the other hand, when the survival rate is high, competition between foetuses can lead to a lower foetal survival [115]. So, the number of transferred embryos recommended per recipients ranges between 10 and 13 for both fresh and cryopreserved embryos [71, 116]. If the number of transferred embryos per donor female is lower than this range, it is possible to transfer embryos from two donor females to each of the uterine horns of the recipient female, to ensure the survival of the embryos [71]. In case it is necessary to know the origin of the transferred embryos, it is recommended to perform a caesarean to the recipient female [71]. In general, asynchrony is obtained by artificially inducing ovulation in recipient female between 0 and 6 h before the donor females, for fresh embryos, or between 6 and 12 h before, for in vitrocultured or cryopreserved embryos [60, 65, 70, 113]. Besides, an association of the recipient genotype with implantation rate, foetal losses and offspring rate at birth has been documented [70, 71]. The recipient female usually belongs to a maternal line because recipient genotype is crucial in providing an adequate uterine environment to support adhesion, embryo-uterine cross-talk and placental and foetal development to term after vitrified and fresh embryo transfer [70, 111].

Embryo recovery and transfer influences mRNA expression of late blastocyst before implantation and may result in faulty embryonic implantation [117]. Transferred embryos have a lower transcript abundance of the transcription factor octamer binding 4 (OCT4) and higher epithelial membrane protein 1 (EMP1) [117]. OCT4 is a key regulator of the pluripotency maintenance system [118], and the main function of this transcriptional factor is to repress or activate several target genes involved in cell differentiation and early embryonic development [119]. The altered expression of OCT4 in the preimplantation embryo is associated with lower embryo quality [120]. EMP1 is involved in the regulation of cell cycle or cell-cell recognition, and high levels of EMP1 expression have been related to cell differentiation and arrest [121]. Signals involved in cell proliferation and differentiation during gastrulation and implantation events could be disturbed with embryo manipulation.

7.2. In vitrofertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Oocyte collection and extracorporeal fertilisation represent an important embryo production in rabbits [73]. These embryos are of scientific interest for cloning and transgenesis [73].

Both in vitrofertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) have been successfully developed [122, 123]. For IVF, oocytes are incubated with sperm for 5 h, and then moved to the embryo culture medium containing TCM199 medium suspended with 1.25 mM pyruvate, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10% FBS, and cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2 [122, 123]. For ICSI, the micromanipulation is performed in the fertilisation medium on a warm microscope stage at 37°C. Cumulus cells of mature oocytes are removed by hyaluronidase treatment and gentle pipetting. The injection needle used for rabbit sperm is of 5.0 μm inner diameter. After injection, the oocytes were transferred to embryo culture medium [123].

7.3. Cloning and transgenesis

Cloning involves the transfer of a nucleus from a multicellular embryo, foetal or adult cell into an enucleated metaphase II (MII) oocyte [124]. This oocyte has the ability to incorporate the transferred nucleus and support development of a new embryo. Cloning of embryos by nuclear transfer technology (NT) has been developed in several species [125, 126, 127]; the rabbit was a pioneering species in NT by introducing embryonic cells into enucleated oocytes, at the end of the 1980s [128, 129]. However, the use of highly differentiated somatic cells as nuclear donors remained a challenge. It was not until 2002 that live clones were generated from NT with freshly prepared adult rabbit cumulus cell [130]. And later, clones were produced from foetal [131] and adult fibroblast [132].

Overall, rabbit NT efficiency depends on the enucleation of the recipient oocyte, fusion of the transplanted nucleus to the enucleated oocyte, activation of the oocyte and reprogramming of the transferred nucleus. On enucleation, the visualisation of the MII is difficult, because of the presence of dark cytoplasmic granules. To overcome this problem, MII can be detected with low ultraviolet light, which allows the removal of MII and polar body under visible light using an enucleation pipette with a minimal volume of oocyte cytoplasm [133]. Enucleation rates vary from 60 to 90% [134, 135], and the age of the recipient oocyte plays an important role in successful NT [136, 137]. Briefly, for nuclear transplantation, single donor cell is introduced beneath the zona pellucida of the enucleated oocytes by micromanipulators. Electro-cell fusion (3.2 kV/cm, 20 μs and three pulses) is applied to fuse the donor cell with the cytoplasm of the reconstructed embryos [138].

Classically, gene transfer has been carried out by microinjection of DNA constructs into fertilised oocytes or by using viral factors. Notwithstanding, with the progress in molecular technology, embryos have been genetically modified using most recently developed tools including TALEN [14] and CRISPR-Cas9 [139, 140] (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing systems.

Both techniques, cloning and transgenesis, have low applications in livestock production due to problems derived from detection of genetically superior animals and evaluation of the clones and the transgenic animals [141]. Some implications for the use of transgenic rabbits nowadays include to act as bioreactors [142] or model for detailed analysis of spermatogenesis [143], and more recently, to establish embryonic stem cell lines from blastocyst stage rabbit embryos cloned by somatic cell NT [138, 144].

Advertisement

8. Conclusion

There are clear advantages in the use of rabbit for embryo studies. The embryo development is similar to human, so rabbit is a suitable model for the application of embryo reproductive techniques. Important insights have been developed successfully in embryo recovery and transfer, cryopreservation, in vitrofertilisation, cloning or transgenesis. In addition, these findings have been applied to improve rabbit breeding.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Advertisement

Abbreviation list

BSAbovine serum albumin
CRISPR-Cas9clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated nuclease Cas9
DPBSDulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline
eCGequine chorionic gonadotropin
EDTAethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
EMP1higher epithelial membrane protein 1
FBSfoetal bovine serum
FSHfollicle-stimulating hormone
GnRHgonadotropin-releasing hormone
hCGhuman chorionic gonadotrophin
ICSIintracytoplasmic sperm injection
IVFin vitro fertilisation
LHluteinizing hormone
MIImetaphase II
NTnuclear transfer technology
OCT4transcription factor octamer binding 4
PGF2αprostaglandin F-2α
rhFSHrecombinant human FSH
TALENtranscription activator-like effector nucleases

References

  1. 1. Available from:http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
  2. 2. Fischer B, Chavatte-Palmer P, Viebahn C, Navarrete Santos A, Duranthon V. Rabbit as a reproductive model for human health. Reproduction. 2012;144:1-10
  3. 3. Cartuche L, Pascual M, Gómez EA, Blasco A. Economic weights in rabbit meat production. World Rabbit Science. 2014;22:165-177
  4. 4. Prayaga KC, Eady S. Rabbit farming for meat production in Australia: Preliminary estimates of economic values for production traits. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2000;13:357-359
  5. 5. Khalil MH, Baslega M. Rabbit Genetic Resources in Mediterranean Countries. Zaragoza: CIHEAM; 2002. 262 p
  6. 6. García ML, Baselga M. Estimation of genetic response to selection in litter size of rabbits using cryopreserved control population. Livestock Production Science. 2002;74:45-53
  7. 7. Austin CR. Fertilization and the transport of gametes in the pseupregnant rabbit. The Journal of Endocrinology. 1949;6(1):63-70
  8. 8. Bishop DW. Active secretion in the rabbit oviduct. The American Journal of Physiology. 1956;187(2):347-352
  9. 9. Hafez ESE. Effects of over-crowding in utero on implantation and fetal development in the rabbit. The Journal of Experimental Zoology. 1964;156(3):269-287
  10. 10. Adams CE. Studies on prenatal mortality in the rabbit,Oryctolagus cuniculus: The amount and distribution of loss before and after implantation. The Journal of Endocrinology. 1960;19:325-344
  11. 11. Chang MC. Development and the fate of transferred rabbit ova or blastocyst in relation to the ovulation time of recipients. The Journal of Experimental Zoology. 1950;114(1):197-225
  12. 12. Kane MT, Foote RH. Culture of two- and four-cell embryos to the expanding blastocyst stage in synthetic media. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 1970;133(3):921-925
  13. 13. Development of preimplantation rabbit embryosin vivoandin vitro: I. An ultrastructural comparison. Developmental Biology. 1973;35(2):262-282
  14. 14. Maurer RR, Beier HM. Uterine proteins and developmentin vitroof rabbit preimplantation embryos. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1976;48:33-41
  15. 15. Smith AU. Behaviour of fertilized rabbit eggs exposed to glycerol and to low temperatures. Nature. 1952;170:374-375
  16. 16. Harris G. The induction of ovulation in the rabbit, by electrical stimulation of the hypothalamo-hypophysial mechanism. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B; London; May 1, 1937. pp. 374-394
  17. 17. Bakker J, Baum MJ. Neuroendocrine regulation of GnRH release in induced ovulators. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 2000;21:220-262
  18. 18. Quintela LA, Peña AI, Vega D, Gullón J, Prieto MC, Barrio M, et al. Ovulation induction in rabbi does submitted to artificial insemination by adding buserelin to the seminal dose. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. 2004;44:79-88
  19. 19. Rebollar PG, Dal Bosco A, Millán P, Cardinali R, Brecchia, Sylla L, et al. Ovulating induction methods in rabbit does: The pituitary and ovarian response. Theriogenology. 2012;77:292-298
  20. 20. Viudes-de-Castro MP, Lavara R, Marco-Jiménez F, Cortell C, Vicente JS. Ovulation induced by mucosa vaginal absorption of buserelin and triptorelin in rabbit. Theriogenology. 2007;68:1031-1036
  21. 21. Mehaisen GMK, Vicente JS, Lavara R, Viudes-de-Castro MP. Effect of eCG dose and ovulation induction treatments on embryo recovery and in vitro development post-vitrification in two selected lines of rabbit does. Animal Reproduction Science. 2005;90:175-184
  22. 22. Castellini C, Dal Bosco A, Arias-Álvarez M, Lorenzo PL, Cardinali R, Garcia PR. The main factors affecting the reproductive performance of rabbit does: A review. Animal Reproduction Science. 2010;122:1874-1872
  23. 23. Ubilla E, Rebollar PG. Influence of the postpartum day on plasma estradiol-17β levels, sexual behaviour, and conception rate, in artificially inseminated lactating rabbits. Animal Reproduction Science. 1995:337-344
  24. 24. Kermabon AY, Belair L, Theau-Clement M, Salesse R, Djiane J. Effect of anaestrus and bromacryptine treatment on the expression of prolactin and LH receptors in the rabbit ovary during lactation. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1994:131-138
  25. 25. Mocé ML, Santacreu MA, Climent A, Blasco A. The effect of divergent selection for uterine capacity on prenatal survival in rabbits: Maternal and embryonic genetic effects. Journal of Animal Science. 2004:68-73
  26. 26. Hulot F, Mariana JC. HCG-induced ovulation in two rabbit breeds: Effects of dose, season and sexual behaviour. Livestock Production Science. 1988, 1988;20:257-267
  27. 27. Maertens L, Luzi F, Grilli G. Effects of PMSG induced oestrus on the performances of rabbit does: A review. World Rabbit Science. 1995;3:191-199
  28. 28. Chang MC. Fertilization capacity of spermatozoa deposited into the fallopian tubes. Nature. 1951;168(4277):697-698
  29. 29. Bolet G, Theau-Clement M. Fertilisation rate and preimplantation embryonic development in two rabbit strains of different fecundity, in purebreeding and crossbreeding. Animal Reproduction Science. 1994;36:153-162
  30. 30. Peiró R, Santacreu MA, Climent A, Blasco A. Early embryonic survival and embryo development in two lines of rabbits divergently selected for uterine capacity. Journal of Animal Science. 2007;85:1634-1639
  31. 31. Carney EW, Foote RH. Effects of superovulation, embryo recovery, culture system and embryo transfer on development of rabbit embryos in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1990;80:543-551
  32. 32. Calle EW, García ML, Blasco A, Argente MJ. Correlated response in early embryonic development in rabbits selected for litter size variability. World Rabbit Science. 2017;25(4):323-327
  33. 33. García ML, Blasco A, Argente MJ. Embryologic changes in rabbit lines selected for litter size variability. Theriogenology. 2016;86:1247-1250
  34. 34. Fujimoto S, Rawson JMR, Dukelow WR. Hormonal influences on the time of ovulation in the rabbit as determined by laparoscopy. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1974;38:97-103
  35. 35. Hunter MG, Robinson RS, Mann GE, Webb R. Endocrine and paracrine control of follicular development and ovulation rate in farm species. Animal Reproduction Science. 2004;82-83:461-477
  36. 36. Torres S, Hulot F, Sevellec C. Early stages of embryonic development in two rabbit genotypes. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. 1987;27:715-719
  37. 37. Fischer B, Beier HM. Uterine environment in early pregnancy. In: Sreenan JM, Diskin MG, editors. Embryonic Mortality in Farm Animals. Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science. Springer, Dordrecht; 1986. p. 93-108
  38. 38. Herrler A, Beier HM. Early embryonic coats: Morphology, function, practical apllications. Cells, Tissues, Organs. 2000;166:233-246
  39. 39. Jung T, Fischer B. Correlation between diameter and DNA or protein synthetic activity in rabbit blastocysts. Biology of Reproduction. 1988;39:1111-1116
  40. 40. Marco-Jiménez F, Naturil-Alfonso C, Jiménez-Trigos E, Lavara R, Vicente JS. Influence of zona pellucida thickness on fertilization, embryo implantation and birth. Animal Reproduction Science. 2012;132:96-100
  41. 41. Liu DY, Baker HWG. Defective sperm-zona pellucida interaction: A major cause of failure of fertilization in clinical in vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction. 2000;15:702-708
  42. 42. Okabe M. Mechanism of fertilization: A modern view. Experimental Animals. 2014;63(4):357-365
  43. 43. Nawroth F, Müller P, Wolf C, Sudik R. Is the zona pellucida thickness of metaphase-II oocytes in an IVF/ICSI program influenced by the patient’s age? Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2001;52:55-59
  44. 44. Sun YP, Xu Y, Cao T, Su YC, Guo YH. Zona pellucida thickness and clinical pregnancy outcome following in vitro fertilization. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2005;89:258-262
  45. 45. García ML, Argente MJ. Exposure to high ambient temperatures alters embryology in rabbits. International Journal of Biometeorology. 2017;61:1555-1560
  46. 46. Murakami H, Imai H. Successful implantation of in vitro cultured rabbit embryos after uterine transfer: A role for mucin. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 1996;43:167-170
  47. 47. Joung SJ, Kim HJ, Choi WS, Im KS, Lee SH, Park CS, et al. Effects of transferring in vitro-cultured rabbit embryos to recipient oviducts on mucin coat deposition, implantation and development. Zygote. 2004;12(3):215-219
  48. 48. Niswender GD, Juengel JL, McGuire WJ, Belfiore CJ, Wiltbank MC. Luteal function: The estrous cycle and early pregnancy. Biology of Reproduction. 1994;50:239-247
  49. 49. Browning JY, Keyes PL, Wolf RC. Comparison of serum progesterone, 20α-dihydroprogesterone, and estradiol-17β in pregnant and pseudopregnant rabbits: Evidence for postimplantation recognition of pregnancy. Biology of Reproduction. 1980;23:1014-1019
  50. 50. Hafez RSE, Hafez B. Reproduction in Farm Animals. 7th ed. New York: Wiley; 2000. pp. 3-12
  51. 51. Argente MJ, Santacreu MA, Climent A, Blasco A. Relationships between uterine and fetal traits in rabbits selected on uterine capacity. Journal of Animal Science. 2003;81:1265-1273
  52. 52. Poigner J, Szendro ZS, Levai A, Biro-Nemeth E, Radnai I. Weight of new-born rabbits in ralation to their number and position within the uterus in unilaterally ovariectomised does. Proceedings of the 7th World Rabbit Congress. Valencia 4-7 July 2000. pp. 231-237
  53. 53. Duncan SLB. The partition of uterine blood flow in the pregnant rabbit. Journal of Physiology (London). 1969;204:421-433
  54. 54. Banks H, Maurer RR. Survival of frozen rabbit embryos. Experimental Cell Research. 1974;89:188-196
  55. 55. Wildt DE, Rall WF, Critser JK, Monfort SL, Seal US. Genome resource banks. Bioscience. 1997;47:689-698
  56. 56. Joly T, Vicente JS, Theau-Clement M, García-Ximénez F, Besenfelder U, Renard JP. Cryopreservation of genetic resources in rabbit species: Practical application. In: Proceedings of 6th World Rabbit Congress. Toulouse. Vol. 2. 1996. pp. 293-298
  57. 57. García ML, Blumetto O, Capra G, Vicente JS, Baselga M. Vitrified embryo transfer of two selected Spanish rabbit lines to Uruguay. In: Proceedings of the 7th World Rabbit Congress. Valencia 4-7 July 2000. pp. 139-142
  58. 58. Kasai M, Hamaguchi Y, Zhu SE, Miyake T, Sakurai T, Machida T. High survival of rabbit morulae after vitrification in an ethylene glycol-based solution by a simple method. Biology of Reproduction. 1992;46:1042-1046
  59. 59. López-Bejar M, López-Gatius F. Nonequilibrium cryopreservation of rabbit embryos using a modified (sealed) open pulled straw procedure. Theriogenology. 2002;58:1541-1552
  60. 60. Mocé ML, Blasco A, Santacreu MA. In vivo development of vitrified embryos: Effects on prenatal survival and placental development. Theriogenology. 2010;73:704-710
  61. 61. Silvestre MA, Saeed AM, Ecribá MJ, García-Ximénex F. Vitrification of in vitro cultured rabbit morulae. Theriogenology. 2003;76:113-124
  62. 62. Vicente JS, Viudes-de-Castro MP, García ML. In vivo survival rate of rabbit morulae after vitrification in a medium without serum protein. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. 1999;39:657-662
  63. 63. Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T, Wada S, Oka C, Kasai M, et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts using cryoloops: Clinical outcome of 233 cycles. Human Reproduction. 2003;18:384-391
  64. 64. Son WY, Yoon SH, Yoon HJ, Lee SM, Lim JH. Pregnancy outcome following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified on electron microscopy grids after induced collapse of the blastocele. Human Reproduction. 2003;18:137-139
  65. 65. Al Hasani S, Kirsch J, Diedrich K, Blanke S, Van der Ven H, Krebs D. Successful embryo transfer of cryopreserved and in-vitro fertilized rabbit oocytes. Human Reproduction. 1989;4:77-79
  66. 66. Dobrinsky JR, Balise JJ, Robl JM. Development of vitrified embryos. Theriogenology. 1990;213(abstr):33
  67. 67. Gajda B, Smorag Z. Factors affecting the survival of one- and two-cell rabbit embryos cryopreserved by vitrification. Theriogenology. 1993;39:499-506
  68. 68. Kobayashi K, Nagashima H, Yamakawa H, Kato Y, Ogawa S. The survival of whole and bisected rabbit morulae after cryopreservation by the vitrification method. Theriogenology. 1990;33:777-788
  69. 69. Rao VH, Heyman Y, Chesne P, Renard JP. Freezing and recloning of nuclear transfer embryos in rabbits. Theriogenology. 1998;49(abstr):328
  70. 70. Marco-Jiménez F, Lavara R, Jiménez-Trigos E, Vicente JS.In vivodevelopment of vitrified rabbit embryos: Effects of vitrification device, recipient genotype, and asynchrony. Theriogenology. 2013;79:1124-1129
  71. 71. Vicente JS, García-Ximénez F. Effect of recipient doe genotype on survival rate at birth of frozen rabbit embryos. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. 1993;33:229-234
  72. 72. Whittingham DG, Anderson E. Ultraestructural studies of frozen-thawed 8-cellmouse embryos. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1976;48:137-140
  73. 73. Tsunoda Y, Soma T, Sugie T. Effect of post-ovulatory age of recipient on survival of frozen-thawed rabbit morulae. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1982;65:483-487
  74. 74. Saenz-de-Juano MD, Marco-Jiménez F, Peñaranda DS, Joly T, Vicente JS. Effects of slow freezing procedure on late blastocyst gene expression and survival rate in rabbit. Biology of Reproduction. 2012;87:1-9
  75. 75. Saenz-de-Juano MD, Marco-Jiménez F, Schmaltz-Panneau B, Jimenez-Trigos E, Viudes-de-Castro MP, Peñaranda DS, et al. Vitrification alters rabbit foetal placenta at transcriptomic and proteomic level. Reproduction. 2014;147:789-801
  76. 76. Vicente JS, Saenz-de-Juano MD, Jiménez-Trigos E, Viudes-de-Castro MP, Peñaranda DS, Marco-Jiménez F. Rabbit morula vitrification reduces early foetal growth and increases losses throughout gestation. Cryobiology. 2013;67:321-326
  77. 77. Lavara R, Baselga M, Marco-Jiménez F, Vicente JS. Embryo vitrification in rabbits: Consequences for progeny growth. Theriogenology. 2015;84:674-680
  78. 78. Lavara R, Baselga M, Marco-Jiménez F, Vicente JS. Long-term and transgenerational effects of cryopreservation on rabbit embryos. Theriogenology. 2014;81:988-992
  79. 79. Besenfelder U, Haas C, Brem G. Reproduction technology and gene transfer in rabbits. In: Proceedings of the 7th World Rabbit Congress. 4-7 July 2000. Valencia Spain, Volume A. pp. 37-59
  80. 80. Biggers JD. Walter Heape, FRS: A pioneer in reproductive biology. Centenary of his embryo transfer experiments. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1991;93:173-186
  81. 81. El Hajj N, Haaf T. Epigenetic disturbances in in vitro cultured gametes and embryos: Implications for human assisted reproduction. Fertility and Sterility. 2013;99:632-641
  82. 82. Tsiligianni T, Saratsi A, Besenfelder U, Anastasiadis A, Vainas E, Saratsis P, et al. The use of cytological examination of vaginal smears (CEVS) in the selection of rabbits for superovuation. Theriogenology. 2004;61:989-995
  83. 83. Salvetti P, Theau-Clement M, Beckers JF, Hurtaud J, Guerin P, Neto V, et al. Effect of luteinizing hormone on embryo production in superovulated rabbit does. Theriogenology. 2007;67:1185-1193
  84. 84. Kauffman RD, Schmidt PM, Rall WF, Hoeg JM. Superovulation of rabbits with FSH alters in vivo development of vitrified morulae. Theriogenlogy. 1998;50:1081-1092
  85. 85. Cortell C, Salvetti P, Thierry J, Viudes-de-Castro MP. Effect of different superovulation stimulation protocols on adenosine triphosphate concentration in rabbit oocytes. Zygote. 2015;23:507-513
  86. 86. Chrenek P, Makarerich A, Vasicek D, Laurincik J, Bulla T, Gajaraska T, et al. Effects of superovulation, culture and microinjection on development of rabbit embryos in vitro. Theriogenology. 1998;50:659-666
  87. 87. Cortell C, Vicente JS, Mocé E, Marco_Jiménez F, Viudes-de-Castro MP. Efficiency of repeated in vivo oocyte and embryo recovery after rhFSH treatment in rabbits. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2008;45:155-159
  88. 88. Viudes-de-Castro MP, Cortell C, Mocé E, Marco-Jiménez F, Joly T, Vicente JS. Effect of recombinant gonadotropins on embryo quality in superovulated rabbit does and immune response after repeated treatments. Theriogenology. 2009;72:655-662
  89. 89. Roca J, Martínez S, Vázquez JM, Lucas X, Parrilla I, Martínez EA. Viability and fertility of rabbit spermatozoa diluted in Tris-buffer extenders and stored at 15°C. Animal Reproduction Science. 2000;64:103-112
  90. 90. López-Gatius F, Sances G, Sáncho M, Yániz J, Santaloria P, Gutiérrez R, et al. Effect of solid storage at 15°C on the subsequent motility and fertility of rabbit semen. Theriogenology. 2005;64:252-260
  91. 91. Viudes de Castro MP, Vicente JS. Effect of sperm count on the fertility and prolificity rates of meat rabbits. Animal Reproduction Science. 1997;46:313-319
  92. 92. Graham JK, Mocé E. Fertility evaluation of frozen/thawed semen. Theriogenology. 2005;64:492-504
  93. 93. Mocé E, Vicente JS. Rabbit sperm cryopreservation: A review. Animal Reproduction Science. 2009;110:1-24
  94. 94. Lavara R, Mocé E, Baselga M, Vicente JS. Freezability genetics in rabbit semen. Theriogenology. 2017;102:54-58
  95. 95. Bourdage RJ, Halbert SA. Distribution of embryos and 500-μm microspheres in the rabbit oviduct: Controls for acute motion analysis during transport. Biology of Reproduction. 1988;38:282-291
  96. 96. Blandau RJ. Biology of eggs and implantation. In: Sex and Internal Secretions. Eds: Young WC and Corner GW. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Company. pp. 707-882
  97. 97. Takeda T, Tsutsumi Y, Tanabe Y, Yamamoto K. Administration of prostaglandin F(2α) for the recovery of fertilized eggs from the vaginas of rabbits. Fertility and Sterility. 1977;28:759-761
  98. 98. Gajda B, Jura J, Smorag Z. Nonsurgical embryo collection in rabbits. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 1988;23:149-153
  99. 99. Mehaisen GMK, Vicente JS, Lavara R.In vivoembryo recovery rate by laparoscopy technique from rabbit does selected for growth rate. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2004;39:347-351
  100. 100. Besenfelder U, Brem G. Laparoscopic embryo transfer in rabbits. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1993;99:53-56
  101. 101. Peiró R, Gallego M, Blasco A, Santacreu MA. Effect of divergent selection for uterine capacity on embryonic survival and development at 30h post-mating in unilaterally ovariectomized rabbit females. World Rabbit Science. 2015;23:241-245
  102. 102. Shulman A, Bennun I, Ghetler Y, Kaneti H, Shilon M, Beyth Y. Relationship between embryo morphology and implantation rate afterin-vitrofertilization treatment in conception cycles. Fertility and Sterility. 1993;60:123126
  103. 103. Veeck LL, Maloney M. Insemination and fertilization. In: Jones HW, Jones GS, Hodgen GD, Rosenwaks Z, editors. In-Vitro Fertilization-Norfolk. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. pp. 168-200
  104. 104. Maurer RR. Advances in rabbit embryo culture. In: Daniel JC, editor. Methods in Mammalian Reproduction. New York: Academic Press. pp. 259-272
  105. 105. Li J, Foote RH. Culture of rabbit zygotes into blastocyst in protein-free medium with 1% to 20% oxygen. Journal Reproduction and Fertilty. 1993;98:163-167
  106. 106. Jin DI, Kim DK, Im KS, Choi WS. Successful pregnancy after transfer of rabbit blastocyst grown in vitro from single-cell zygotes. Theriogenology. 2000;54:1109-1116
  107. 107. Escribá MJ, Silvestre MA, Saeed AM, García-Ximénez F. Comparison of the effect of two different handling media on rabbit zygote development ability. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. 2001;41:181-186
  108. 108. Sultana F, Hatori M, Shimozawa N, Ebisawa T, Sankai T. Continuous observation of rabbit preimplantation embryos in vitroby using a culture device connected to a microscope. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. 2009;48:52-56
  109. 109. Saenz-de-Juano MD, Naturil-Alfonso C, Vicente JS, Maco-Jiménez F. Effect of different culture systems on mRNA expression in developing rabbit embryos. Zygote. 2011;21:103-109
  110. 110. Hafez ESE. Endocrine control of reception, development and loss of rabbit ova. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1962;3:14-25
  111. 111. Techakumphu M, Wintenberger Torrés S, Sevellec C. Survival of rabbit embryos after synchronous or asynchronous transfer. Animal Reproduction Science. 1987;13:221-228
  112. 112. García-Ximénez F, Vicente JS, Santacreu MA. Embryo transfer in lactating rabbit by laparoscopy. Animal Reproduction Science. 1991;24:343-346
  113. 113. Maurer RR, Onuma H, Foote RH. Viability of cultured and transferred rabbit embryos. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1970;21:417-422
  114. 114. Adams CE. Studies on prenatal mortality in the rabbit,Oryctolagus cuniculus: The effect of transferring varying numbers of eggs. The Journal of Endocrinology. 1962;24:471-490
  115. 115. Adams CE. Maintenance of pregnancy relative to the presence of few embryos in the rabbits. The Journal of Endocrinology. 1970;48:243-249
  116. 116. Vicente JS, García-Ximénez F. Direct transfer of vitrified embryos. Theriogenology. 1996;45:811-815
  117. 117. Saenz-de-Juano MD, Marco-Jiménez F, Vicente JS. Embryo transfer manipulation cause gene expression variation in blastocysts that disrupt implantation and offspring rates at birth in rabbit. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2016;207:50-55
  118. 118. Foygel K, Choi B, Jun S, Leong DE, Lee A, Wong CC, et al. A novel and critical role for Oct4 as a regulator of the maternalembryonic transition. PLoS One. 2008;3:e4109
  119. 119. Smith C, Berg D, Beaumont S, Standley NT, Wells DN, Pfeffer PL. Simultaneous gene quantitation of multiple genes in individual bovine nuclear transfer blastocyst. Reproduction. 2007;133:231-242
  120. 120. Gendelman M, Roth Z. Seasonal effect on germinal vesicle-stage bovine oocytes is further expressed by alterations in transcript levels in the developing embryo associated with reduced developmental competence. Biology of Reproduction. 2012;86:1-9
  121. 121. Wulf P, Suter U. Embryonic expression of epithelial membrane protein 1 in early neurons. Brain Research. Developmental Brain Research. 1999;116:169-180
  122. 122. Al-Hasini S, Trotnow S, Sadtler C, Hahn J. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer of pre-ovulatory rabbit oocytes. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 1986;21:187-195
  123. 123. Lan C, Xiaohui D, Qingzhao F, Anran X, Chun-yan H, Hongling Y, et al. Development potential of oocytes fertilized by conventionalin vitrofertilization(IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) after cryopreservation and mesometrial autotransplantation of rabbit ovarian tissue. Animal. 2008;2:1371-1376
  124. 124. Mitalipov SM, White KL, Farrar VR, Morrey J, Reed WA. Development of nuclear transfer and parthenogenetic rabbit embryos activated with inositol 1,4,5-Triphospate. Biology of Reproduction. 1999;60:821-827
  125. 125. Campbell KHS, McWhir J, Ritchie WA, Wilmut I. Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature. 1996;380:64-66
  126. 126. Bondioli KR, Westhusin ME, Looney CR. Production of identical bovine offspring by nuclear transfer. Theriogenology. 1990;33:165-174
  127. 127. Prather RS, Sims MM, First NL. Nuclear transplantation in early pig embryos. Biology of Reproduction. 1989;41:414-418
  128. 128. Stice SL, Robl JM. Nuclear reprogramming in nuclear transplant rabbit embryos. Biology of Reproduction. 1988;39:657-654
  129. 129. Yang X, Jiang S, Kovacs A, Foote RH. Nuclear totipotency of cultured rabbit morulae to support full-term development following nuclear transfer. Biology of Reproduction. 1992;47:636-643
  130. 130. Chesne P, Adenot PG, Viglietta C, Baratte M, Boulanger L, Renard JP. Cloned rabbits produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature Biotechnology. 2002;20:366-369
  131. 131. Yang F, Hao R. Rabbit somatic cell cloning: Effect of donor cell type, histone acetylation status and chimeric embryo complementation. Reproduction. 2007;133:219-230
  132. 132. Li S, Chen X, Fang Z, Shi J, Sheng HZ. Rabbits generated from fibroblasts through nuclear transfer. Reproduction (Cambridge, England). 2006;131:1085-1090
  133. 133. Daniel N, Chesné P. Nuclear transfer in rabbit. In: Beaujean N, Jammes H, Jouneau A, editors. Nuclear Reprogramming. Methods and Protocols. 2nd ed. England: Humana Press; 2015. pp. 15-24
  134. 134. Collas P, Robl JM. Factors affecting efficiency of nuclear transplantation in the rabbit embryo. Biology of Reproduction. 1990;43:877-884
  135. 135. Yin XJ, Kato Y, Tsunoda Y. Effect of enucleation procedures and maturation conditions on the development of nuclear-transferred rabbit oocytes receiving male fibroblast cells. Reproduction. 2002;124:41-47
  136. 136. Cervera RP, García-Ximénez F. Oocyte and nuclear donor cell type affect the technical efficiency of somatic cloning in rabbits. Zygote. 2003;11:151-158
  137. 137. Du F, Xu J, Zhang J, Gao S, Carter MK, He C, et al. Beneficial effect of young oocytes for rabbit somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cloning and Stem Cells. 2009;11:131-140
  138. 138. Intawich P, Siriboon C, Chen C, Chiu Y, Lin T, Kere M, et al. Derivation and characterization of putative embryonic stem cells from cloned rabbit embryos. Theriogenology. 2016;86:1799-1810
  139. 139. Tang C, Zhang Q, Li X, Yang Y, Quan L Lai L. Targeted modification of CCR5 gene in rabbits by TALEN. Hereditas. 2014;36:360-368
  140. 140. Honda A, Hirose M, Sankai T, Yasmin L, Yuzawa K, Honsho K, et al. Single-step generation of rabbits carrying a targeted allele of a tyrosinase gene using CRISPR/Cas9. Experimental Animals. 2015;64:31-37
  141. 141. Blasco A. The role of genetic engineering in livestock production. Livestock Science:200813191-200813201
  142. 142. Castro FO, De la Fuente J, Rodriguez A, Limonta J, Riego E, Aguirre A, et al. Expression of recombinant proteins in the milk of transgenic mice in rabbits. Implications for the use of transgenic rabbits as bioreactors. Biotecnologia Aplicada. 1996;13:27
  143. 143. Hoffmann OI, Kerekes A, Lipták N, Hiripi L, Szilard B, Szaloki G, et al. Transposon-based reporter marking provides functional evidence for intercellular bridges in the male germline of rabbits. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):1-16
  144. 144. Fang ZF, Gai H, Huang YZ, Li SG, Chen XJ, Shi JJ, et al. Rabbit embryonic stem cell lines derived from fertilized, parthenogenetic or somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Experimental Cell Research. 2006;312:3669-3682

Written By

María-Luz García

Submitted: February 11th, 2018 Reviewed: August 22nd, 2018 Published: November 5th, 2018