Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Virulence Factors of Uropathogenic E. coli

Written By

Sorwer Alam Parvez and Dolilur Rahman

Submitted: March 1st, 2018 Reviewed: June 15th, 2018 Published: November 15th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.79557

Chapter metrics overview

2,261 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

In order for a successful infection and creating a satisfactory environment inside the host, strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) need some special features that are achieved by expressing particular genes, called virulence factors. Two of the most important surface virulence factors of UPEC are type 1 fimbriae and P fimbriae that are crucial for the colonization process inside the urinary tract. Expression of these virulence factors converts a commensal strain into an uropathogen. Beside these factors, outer membrane proteins also contribute to virulence being involved in the secretory machinery; an example of such type is TolC protein that transfers α-hemolysin across the outer membrane of E. coli. However, α-hemolysin along with many other toxins serves various pathogenic roles during UTIs including adhesion, colonization, cytotoxic activity, etc. Moreover, virulence factors located on bacterial surface including capsule and lipopolysaccharides may also have the contribution to UTIs providing antiphagocytosis and antibactericidal complement activity.

Keywords

  • virulent factors
  • E. coli
  • UPEC
  • urinary tract infection
  • type 1 fimbriae
  • P fimbriae
  • α-hemolysin
  • cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (CNF1)
  • siderophores
  • hemin uptake system
  • flagellar motility

1. Introduction

The most commonly living microorganism of the human gastrointestinal tract and also the most common causative agent of bacterial urinary tract infection is E. coli[1]. Though they remain in a good relationship with their hosts, they might appear as a subject of consideration in immunocompromised hosts. This common inhabitant of the gastrointestinal tract usually remains in a symbiotic relationship with the host and plays a role in maintaining the homeostasis of the intestinal tract. Though most of the strains of E. coliare harmless, some serotypes can cause food poisoning. E. colipresent in the normal human microbiota produces vitamin K2. Strains of E coli, however, obtaining ability to colonize inside the urinary tract and to make themselves safe from the host immune system, become uropathogenic E. coli. UPEC causes >80% of UTI [2]. Urinary tract infections are very common, and approximately 10% of people [3] and half of all women (at least one time) become infected throughout their life. According to a study, more than 100,000 patients in the United States are hospitalized annually due to urinary tract infections [4], and in the year 2011, 400,000 patients were hospitalized, and the estimated cost was about 2.8 billion USD [5]. Infections can occur in both upper and lower urinary tracts. Lower urinary tract infection is known as cystitis, and in the case of upper urinary tract infection, it is called pyelonephritis. Without distinction of site, in order to cause infection, the causative agent must at first dodge the host’s immune system and colonize in the urinary tract [6]. Several different virulent factors are needed for the bacterial population to cause infections [7]; for instance, pathogenic strains of E. coliexpress adherence factors which form pili or fimbriae of different types for their attachment in the sites where they usually do not live [7]; these are structural virulence factors and predominantly include P fimbriae and type 1 fimbriae [1]. Fimbrial adhesins such as PapG and CsgA are virulence factors that facilitate the attachment of E. coli[8]. In animal models, type 1 fimbriae aggrandize the chance survival of E. coli[9]. Beside these, UPEC can impair host immune system by a variety of ways [10], such as toxins and iron acquisition systems, and these are called secreted virulence factors. The production of these virulence factors by UPEC may cause an inflammatory response which makes a possible pathway for UTI symptoms [1]. However, both the host and the uropathogenic E. colistrain have different roles in the establishment and colonization process in the urinary tract [11]. Here in this chapter, different types of important virulence factors of uropathogenic E. coliwill be discussed.

In Gram-negative and some Gram-positive bacteria, virulence genes are allocated in particular segments (about 10–200 kilo bases in size) of their genome which have different G + C content than the other parts of the genome that are termed as pathogenicity islands. They are present in the virulent strains but present rarely in the nonpathogenic strains of the same species. These sequences can be transferred horizontally from species to species [12]. Pathogenicity islands encode virulence factors such as adherence factors, toxins, and iron acquisition systems which are important virulence factors of UPEC.

Advertisement

2. Adhesion

Urine of uninfected person is sterile due to urinary flow and antimicrobial activity of uric acid. Regular flow of urine does not allow microorganism to colonize inside the urinary tract. However, attachment of E. colito uroepithelial cells allows them to overwhelm the effect of urine flow. For many pathogenic microorganisms, it is considered as the first step in the colonization process [13, 14], and both the host and E. colifunction in this process. The ability of UPEC to colonize depends upon the expression of different fimbrial adhesins. For a successful adherence to the host cell surface, UPEC expresses many adherence factors which are crucial for attachment and thus regarded as virulence factors. Many bacterial adhesins are organized in a thin filamentous structure called fimbriae or pili although there are evidences of presence of adhesins in the cell surface of bacteria. Adhesins of fimbrial nature are important during attachment process [15]. Fimbriae, also known as pili, are long hair-like structures contained in the cell surface of bacteria that recognize specific compounds usually carbohydrates of the target host cells [11]. Pili are the short form of fimbriae and might be used interchangeably with fimbriae. Fimbriae consist of oligomeric pilin proteins. These proteins are arranged in such a manner that they form a helical cylindrical structure and are both thinner and shorter than flagellum. These proteinaceous structures are expressed in uropathogenic strains of E. coliand are considered as virulence factors [11]. Most of the receptors for these fimbriae are carbohydrates. They include type 1 fimbriae, P fimbriae, and thin aggregative fimbriae [16]. Many bacterial pathogens can produce an array of these adhesins, and often inhibition of a single adhesin may cost enough to a bacterium to lose its virulence. Functions of pili or fimbriae are not limited only to adhesion and can help in many other crucial pathways for the microbe to survive and evade the immune system of the host. Evolution of different types of adhesins plays a role in tissue tropism.

In gram-negative bacteria like UPEC, adhesins are unveiled by chaperone-usher-assisted pathway. This pathway involves two proteins, one is a periplasmic chaperone, and the other is a protein called usher. Usher act as the base of the structure, and the function of chaperone is folding and recruitment of the subunits [17, 18]. In absence of the chaperone, pilin proteins are degraded and misfolded and thus cannot be assembled in the form of a mature pilus. On the other hand, usher helps to mature the fimbriae and its transportation through the outer assuring integrity of the outer membrane. The constituents of usher proteins are an N-terminal domain (NTD), 24-stranded beta-barrel channel, a plug domain, and two C-terminal domains (CTD). In uropathogenic E. colistrains, chaperone-usher family fimbriae are more abundant.

2.1. Type 1 fimbriae

In 99% of E. colistrains, genes to encode type 1 fimbriae are present [19], and during urinary tract infections, they damage urinary tract cells by mediating an increased inflammation [20]. In order to enter into the host cells of the urinary tract, type 1 fimbriae play a great role. Type 1 fimbriae are remarkably versatile virulence factors of UPEC that can stabilize the attachment of the bacteria to different type of cells throughout the urinary tract. Though in Bowman’s capsules and glomerulus their binding sites could not be identified, a strong affinity of type 1 fimbriae was found in proximal tubules and vessel walls. In the bladder, they bind strongly to muscular layers and moderately to vessel walls. Receptors for type 1 fimbriae were also found in the distal tubules and collecting ducts. They can also induce their binding to the surface of macrophages [9]. These fimbriae recognize uroplakin from bladder epithelial cells and mannoside-containing host proteins. Unlike many other important types of adhesins, these are encoded by the bacterial backbone DNA [21] and are mainly composed of FimA proteins along with FimF, FimG, and FimH [17]. FimA proteins are most in number but are not pivotal for virulence. Among other subunits of type 1 fimbriae, allelic variations of FimH determine the sugar specificity and deletion of fimHresults in less amount of colonization in mouse models of ascending UTI, and colonization could be restored by expression of plasmid with fimHgene [20]. FimH alone or in association with LPS can stimulate toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) to initiate particular signaling cascade that may activate the humoral immune response. Many studies revealed that expression of type 1 fimbriae results in virulence and loss of expression results in loss of expression but their presence cannot be correlated with UTI as normal fecal strains also have equally expressed type 1 fimbriae [22]. However, type 1 fimbriae-mediated attachment is a crucial stage for cystitis. Adhesins of these fimbriae are mannose sensitive.

2.2. P fimbriae

P-fimbriated E. coliare pyelonephritogenic and attach to the carbohydrate structure alpha-D-Galp-(1-4)-beta-D-Galp. In the kidney, they bind strongly to Bowman’s capsule, glomerulus, and endothelial cells of vessel walls. This highly organized composite structure is composed of six subunits at least. Once P fimbriae expressed E. colienter the urinary tract, they establish bacteriuria and help to cross the epithelial barrier to enter the bloodstream and can cause hemagglutination of erythrocytes [14]. This type of fimbriae is encoded by papgene cluster (also known as fsoand fst), and pap + strains remain longer in the intestinal flora than pap- strains [23]. P antigens are expressed in the cell surface of red blood cells and in various cells lining in the urinary tract. P1 (present in glycoproteins in human), P, PK, and LKE antigens act as the receptors for P-fimbriated UPEC. P-fimbriated E. colicannot agglutinate red blood cells that lack P antigen. Isolated P fimbriae can bind to a synthetic analogue of its receptor, and experimental application of that analogue impedes infection process.

There are at least nine genes in the pap gene cluster with two restriction sites at two ends. The regulatory part starts the following Eco R1 consisting of papI and papB. Then papA, papH, papC, papD, papE, papF, and papG are situated, and after these, Bam HI is present. Approximately 1000 of subunits form a P fimbria, being united in a helical manner. Among them the major constituent is the protein subunit PapA (19.5 KD), and minor subunits are PapE (16.5 KD), PapF (15 KD), and PapG (35 KD). In the periplasmic space, PapD (27.5 KD) may be present and can also be incorporated in the structure. Another protein PapC, which is the largest one with 80 KD of mass, assists the process by transporting the subunits outside the part of the cell. Though PapA is the major constituent, it is not mandatory for attachment, and among many serotypes, PapA molecules show high homology with the amino acids of N and C termini. PapA also has an average level of similarity with structural subunits of other E. colifimbriae including type 1 fimbriae. The minor subunits at the tip of fimbria determine the specificity to the receptor. Many mutational analyses revealed that mutation in PapA does not affect the adherence, while mutation in other genes (i.e. papEFG) does not hamper fimbrial structural appearance. In the fine structure of P fimbriae, a PapF-PapG complex is formed which is attached to PapA (bulk potion of the structure) subunits through PapE subunits. Finally, PapH terminates the assembly of the fimbriae and attaches thereby [16]. An important thing is that the amino acid sequence of PapG is approximately similar to that of Shiga toxin. Shiga toxin is found in some serotypes of E. coli.Another role of PapG was found in some variants of P fimbriae which is they can initiate subunit polymerization [14].

Many experiments show that expression of these fimbriae is not relevant to urinary tract infection, while more sophisticated other experiments have concluded about their role in pathogenesis. However, during infection in immunocompromised patients, less expression of P fimbriae is observed, which indicated that P fimbriae are needed to overcome certain types of host immune attacks. Although P fimbriae can initiate inflammatory responses by activating TLR4 [24], it protects UPEC from human polymorphonuclear leukocytes (hPMNLs). In the rapidly changing environment through the urinary tract, environmental influences affect the expression of P fimbriae. Expression of P fimbriae is favored at 37°C and inhibited at a range of 18–22 °C, but there are some variations in this phenomenon. The temperature-dependent expression is controlled by a region close to papBof the pap gene cluster.

2.3. Dr/Afa adhesins

Dr blood group antigen is a membrane protein of red blood cells and located on the decay accelerating factor (DAF) that protects red blood cells from being degraded or lysed by autologous complements. Another important function of DAF is to regulate complement cascade [25]. These antigens are recognized by Dr and Afa adhesin family of uropathogenic E. coli.There are both fimbrial (F1845 and O75X) and non-fimbrial (AFA I and AFA II) types of adhesins. Immuno-invasion of UPEC by hiding from the host humoral immune response is somehow mediated by Dr family of adhesins [26]. These microscopically invisible fimbriae are present in the cell wall, and their structural and organization properties are quite different from other types of fimbriae [13]. Chloramphenicol can inhibit O75X binding to a specific part of the Dr antigen, but it cannot inhibit other adhesins of this family which indicates that Dr family adhesins can recognize specific sites at the Dr [25]. For years, several studies were conducted to identify specific sites for binging of Dr family hemagglutinins. For instance, a strong affinity of O75X was found to Bowman’s capsule, proximal and distal tubules, and the collecting duct basement membranes. In the bladder, they strongly bind to connective tissues.

2.4. Other fimbriae as virulence factors

F1C is a virulence factor responsible for urinary tract infections, which is encoded by an operon of seven genes, i.e., focAICDFGH, where FocA is the major subunit and FocH is the tip adhesin [26]. F1C receptors are present in bladder endothelium and muscular layer. They cannot bind to the epithelium. They bind to glomeruli, distal tubules, collecting ducts, and vascular endothelial cells. Studies show that F1C fimbriae and pyelonephritis are correlated though there is a little difference in the prevalence of type 1 fimbriae in UTI strains and normal fecal isolates. Prevalence of F1C fimbriae in normal fecal isolates is 10% which is 16% in UTI strains [26]. S fimbriae are genetically identical to F1C fimbriae and differ only by the tip adhesin SfaS. Criteria that are needed to be recognized as a virulence factor were determined by different studies regarding S fimbriae. There are some other adhesins that are not crucial for the survival of UPEC strains such as F9 fimbriae.

Advertisement

3. Toxins

Several toxic substances or proteins secreted by uropathogenic strains of E. coliplay a consequential role as virulence factors in UTIs. However, toxins have the ability to alter the host cell signaling cascade and modulate inflammatory responses. Several in vitro and in vivo studies showed that toxins also contribute to the stimulation of the host cell death and releasing of necessary nutrients, which provide the ability to access deeper tissues within the urinary tract [27]. In 1987, CDT toxin (cyclomodulins) was first reported as virulent toxin in UPEC [28] which opened a new door in the study of the pathogenesis of UTIs, and then many other toxins in UPEC were reported including α-hemolysin (HlyA), cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (CNF1), secreted autotransporter toxin (SAT), cytolysin A, plasmid-encoded toxin (PET), vacuolating autotransporter toxin (VAT), Shigella enterotoxin-1 (ShET-1), arginine succinyl-transferase (AST), etc.

3.1. α-hemolysin

Among all the toxins, α-hemolysin (HlyA) is very important which is a lipoprotein and belongs to the RTX (repeats in toxin) toxins family [13, 29, 30]. HlyA is a pore-forming toxin and causes inducible nitric-oxide-synthase (iNOS)-mediated cell membrane injury and apoptosis [31]. However, HlyA can lyse erythrocytes and nucleated host cells at high concentration by a process enabling UPEC which may damage the host immune effector cells for gaining enhanced access to the host nutrients and iron stores. But when the concentration is low, HlyA can induce the apoptosis of target host cells and promote the exfoliation of bladder epithelial cells [13, 32, 33]. Besides, HlyA can also contribute to nephropathogenicity, which was proved by infecting mice transurethrally or intravesically with toxin producer and nonproducer isogenic clone pairs of E. coli[34]. A recent study showed that HlyA regulates the dephosphorylation of Akt, which is a multifunctional signaling regulator and responsible for controlling inflammatory responses in the host, as well as the cell cycle control [35]. Moreover, HlyA has the role in the increased production of IL-6 and IL-8 by inducing Ca2+ oscillations in renal epithelial cells [36].

3.2. Cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (CNF1)

Another virulence factor secreted by E. colinamed cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (CNF1) is also involved in UTIs and stimulates actin stress fiber formation and membrane ruffle formation in a Rho GTPase-dependent manner that results in the entry of E. coliinto the cells [37]. The toxin has a remarkable effect on the actin skeletal of HEp-2 cells and produces large vacuoles in HEp-2 cells [28]. However, several in vitro and in vivo studies showed that this protein interferes with polymorphonuclear phagocytosis and evokes apoptotic death of bladder epithelial cells and may lead to bladder cell exfoliation and to enhanced bacterial access to underlying tissue [38, 39]. In addition, there is also a possibility of the association of CNF1 with the hemolysin in the virulence mechanism, which is beneficial for the bacteria [28].

3.3. Secreted autotransporter toxin (SAT)

Secreted autotransporter toxin (SAT) may also be important as a virulence factor for the pathogenesis of UTIs being had a toxin activity against cell lines of bladder or kidney origin. SAT is a serine protease autotransporter which falls within one subgroup of autotransporters recently classified as the SPATE (serine protease autotransporters of Enterobacteriaceae) family and associated with pyelonephritic E. colistrains [40, 41]. SAT may have the cytopathic activity that results in the damage of the host tissue and may increase the propagation ability of the UPEC. However, this toxin may facilitate entry of pyelonephritogenic strains into the bloodstream resulting from specific damage to the glomeruli and proximal tubules [40].

3.4. Cytolethal distending toxin (CDT)

Cytolethal distending toxin, having a unique property of damaging the DNA of the target cell, was first reported in pathogenic E. coliin 1987 [28, 42]. This toxin has the ability to arrest the cell cycle and contributes to the pathogenesis of UTIs [43, 44]. However, CDT is an operon product encoding three proteins including CdtA, CdtB, and CdtC proteins which are encoded by cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC genes, respectively [28]. CDT has DNase I-like enzymatic activity and attacks DNA, while the other bacterial toxins attack the cell membrane or different targets within the cytoplasm [45]. This unique property of attacking DNA damages the target cell DNA which results in progressive cell distending leading to cell death [27].

3.5. Other toxins

Some others including cytolysin A and toll/interleukin (IL-1) receptor (TIR) domain-containing protein (Tcp) are also considered as virulence factors in UTIs [46, 47]. The former causes apoptosis of the host cells [47], while the other has the ability to subvert TLR signaling that gives a survival advantage during UTIs [46]. However, Tcp is associated with pyelonephritis but rare in environmental E. coli, in fecal flora of healthy children and in less severe forms of UTI [27]. Besides these, Tcp has also the role in the human avoidance system and cytopathic effect on the kidney [48].

In addition to these toxins, vacuolating autotransporter toxin (VAT), Shigella enterotoxin-1 (ShET-1) and arginine succinyltransferase (AST) may also contribute to UTIs. VAT has the cytotoxic effect on the bladder and kidney, while the two others are involved in the invasion of the infections [48]. However, VAT is a highly protected immunogenic protein that belongs to the protease family of SPATE [28].

Advertisement

4. Siderophores

Iron is a very important molecule for all living beings, and E. coliuses iron for transporting and storing oxygen, DNA synthesis, electron transport, and metabolism of peroxides. But the amount of iron availability is reduced in the host urinary tract during UTIs [49]. In response to this, E. colipossesses some multiple functionally redundant systems that mediate iron uptake by secreting low-molecular-weight Fe3+-chelating molecules which are known as siderophores [50]. Iron utilization, mediated by these siderophores, is critical for colonization of the urinary tract by UPEC [51]. There are four distinct siderophore systems found in E. colisuch as yersiniabactin, aerobactin, enterobactin, and salmochelin [52]. These systems also include some genes such as ent genes encoding enterobactin, iuc genes encoding aerobactin, and iro genes encoding an ent-like system. However, all these systems are expressed under low-iron conditions and are negatively regulated by ferrous iron and the ferric uptake regulator Fur [53].

4.1. Aerobactin

Aerobactin is a low-weight molecule and a hydroxamate siderophore with a higher Fe3+-binding stability in acidic environments and is maximally produced at low pH [44, 53]. This siderophore extracts Fe3+ from host iron-binding proteins and is taken up through an outer membrane receptor protein [44]. However, aerobactin has many advantages over other siderophores and is formed from the condensation of two lysine molecules and one citrate catalyzed by an enzyme named aerobactin synthase [13, 25, 30].

4.2. Enterobactin

Enterobactin is another specialized highly prevalent catecholate siderophore which is less soluble and less stable than aerobactin [53, 54, 55]. But this siderophore has a higher iron affinity and can deferrate transferrin more rapidly than aerobactin in aqueous solution [13, 54]. However, iron is released from enterobactin through the hydrolysis of this siderophore [13]. Besides these, enterobactin may afford UPEC the ability to colonize within an iron-limiting environment such as the urinary tract [56]. But this siderophore has a limitation that it can be inactivated by host proteins such as serum albumin and siderocalin [25].

4.3. Yersiniabactin

Yersiniabactin, a mixed-type siderophore, is widespread in Enterobacteriaceaeincluding E. coliand encoded on the high-pathogenicity island [53]. Yersiniabactin has a high iron affinity and produced yersiniabactin-Fe3+ complex binding to the iron molecule which recognizes the specific bacterial outer membrane TonB-dependent receptor and Fyu (Psn). The iron molecule is released from yersiniabactin in the cytosol with the help of membrane-embedded proteins [57]. In addition, this siderophore increases resistance to copper stress by chelating Cu2+ [10].

4.4. Salmochelin

Salmochelin is a glucosylated derivative of enterobactin which is not recognized by siderocalin and thus escapes from the host immune response [53]. However, siderocalin, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is also known as lipocalin 2 that binds enterobactin and prevents its uptake [53, 56]. To overcome this, enterobactin is modified to salmochelin by glucosylation via the action of glucosyltransferase and is not recognized by lipocalin 2 [56]. However, a recent study found that salmochelin siderophore receptor IroN is involved in the invasion of urothelial cells, and thus IroN may play both an iron uptake receptor and an internalization factor in the establishment of urinary tract infections [26].

4.5. Hemin uptake system

There is another iron acquisition system called hemin uptake system including ChuA and Hma, which involves direct upregulation of haem receptors. This system uptakes free iron during UTIs, and several studies found its role in bacterial growth and biofilm formation [48, 58, 59]. ChuA expression is regulated by other regulatory proteins, for instance, in uropathogenic E. colistrain 536, increase in RfaH level induces the expression of ChuA [60]. But the other receptor Hma functions independently of ChuA, and a residue, Tyr-126, is necessary for its function. However, both ChuA and Hma contribute to haem utilization which is required for the maximum kidney colonization [51].

Advertisement

5. Capsule

The main role of a capsule is to cover and protect the bacterium from various unfavorable conditions as well as the host immune system, which is mainly constituted of polysaccharide [1]. The capsule provides protection against engulfment and complement-mediated bactericidal effect in the host, also including antimicrobial resistance and antiserum activity [1, 48]. Certain capsulars, such as K1 and K5, prevent a proper humoral immune response of the infected host by showing a molecular mimicry to tissue components [1]. The K1 polysaccharide, a linear α2–8-linked sialic acid homopolymer, has a very important role in IBC development as well as in the multiple stages of UTI pathogenesis [27, 50].

Advertisement

6. Lipopolysaccharide

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is an integral component of the cell wall and consists of the highly conserved lipid A-core and repeating O-antigen subunits that differ greatly between strains based on the sugar residues and their linkage patterns within the repeating subunits [37, 61]. LPS is very well known to activate host response and to induce nitric oxide and cytokine (IL-1, TNF-α) production which enhances the inflammatory response [1, 15]. It also induces the synthesis of specific antibodies to the somatic antigen and exerts an immune-adjuvant effect that promotes the humoral immune response to other antigens of the pathogen. However, certain antigenic types of LPS are also involved in resistance of the pathogen to the killing effect of the normal human serum [46]. According to study upon animal models, acute renal failure due to LPS depends on the systemic response to LPS and does not depend on expression of functional LPS receptor, TLR4, in the kidney. But it is not clear whether LPS plays a role in mediating a renal failure and acute allograft injury in patients with ascending UTIs [1].

Advertisement

7. Motility

Flagellum is an organelle that is responsible for bacterial motility and plays a role in the initial adhesion phase of biofilm formation [1, 62]. A recent study showed that motility is involved in the migration of the infection from the bladder to the kidneys [63]. About 70–90% of all urinary tract infections is caused by flagellated UPEC, and pathogenesis involves contact between the bacteria and epithelial cell surface of the urinary tract [1]. However, flagellar motility enhances the ability of E. coliby adaptive responses to attractive or repellent environmental stimuli [15].

Advertisement

8. Mechanism of immune escape

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in the epithelial cells of the mammalian bladder can recognize lipopolysaccharides (LPS) of bacterial cell wall, and the downstream signaling cascade produces IL-6 and IL-8, of which IL-8 is well known as an important chemoattractant for neutrophils. Urinary levels of IL-6 and IL-8 are measurable in UPEC-infected human and murine models. There is another pathway parallel to this one that is responsible for increased levels of IL-6 and IL-8 in urine. Upon TLR-4 activation by LPS, intracellular level of cAMP is increased and results in of Ca2+ influx. Later, cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) becomes phosphorylated. Phosphorylation of CREB results in the expression of IL-6 and IL-8 [24]. Mutation in TLR4 in murine models revealed its role on bacterial pathogenesis. There are other receptors related to UTI pathogenesis. One of such is CXCR1, but there are both types of evidences that demonstrate the positive and “no correlation” of CXCR1 with recurrent UTIs. Polymorphisms in IL-8 genes were found to have a correlation with pyelonephritis in the case of no correlation with CXCR1 mutation [19, 64]. TLR4 can be activated by the presence of type 1 fimbriae and P fimbriae.

As there are enough studies to evidence the activation of immune response against UPEC strains, there must be some ways that are used by these bacteria to overcome unfavorable situations early in the infection. Incubation of human urothelial cells with type 1-fimbriated UPEC strains resulted in increased apoptosis. In the case of a nonpathogenic type 1-fimbriated strain (HB101) of E. coli, rate of apoptosis was approximately 50% of that of pathogenic strains of UPEC [65]. UPEC blocks NF-ĸB, and this results in apoptosis and a decreased cytokine secretion.

Another indispensable way is the expression of toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing protein (TcpC), which was discovered in UPEC strain CFT073. TcpC interacts with myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88), a protein that, in human, is encoded by MYD88gene. Interaction of TcpC and MyD88 subsequently stops downstream signaling pathways mediated by TLRs.

Modification of capsular lipopolysaccharides specific to the pathogenic strain can cause the failure of TLR4 to recognize the pathogen. However, LPS biosynthetic genes encoded by rfa, rfboperons, and surAare the factors responsible for the suppression of TLR-initiated signaling cascades. Biosynthesis of a number of outer membrane proteins and fimbriae is facilitated by the protein encoded by surA, which is a periplasmic cis-trans prolyl isomerase [66, 67].

Advertisement

9. Conclusions

Several epidemiological, serological, and bacteriological studies revealed that uropathogenic E. coliis the pathogen most frequently associated with UTIs. In recent years, our understanding of virulence factors and behavior of this pathogen is increased remarkably. Several studies showed that E. colicolonizes the urinary tract and may ascend toward the bladder to cause cystitis. If it is left untreated, UPEC may ascend the ureters to the kidney and establish a secondary infection. Our increased understanding of its virulence factors can uncover novel approaches to control UPEC-mediated UTIs. However, accumulation of theoretical knowledge through virulence studies allows practical applications and may facilitate the application of more precise approaches in phenotypic or molecular diagnosis and epidemiology.

References

  1. 1. Bien J, Sokolova O, Bozko P. Role of uropathogenicEscherichia colivirulence factors in development of urinary tract infection and kidney damage. International Journal of Nephrology. 2012:e681473
  2. 2. Wurpel DJ, Beatson SA, Totsika M, Petty NK, Schembri MA. Chaperone-usher fimbriae ofEscherichia coli. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52835
  3. 3. Farajnia S, Alikhani MY, Ghotaslou R, Naghili B, Nakhlband A. Causative agents and antimicrobial susceptibilities of urinary tract infections in the northwest of Iran. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2009;13(2):140-144
  4. 4. Johnson JR, Stamm WE. Urinary tract infections in women: Diagnosis and treatment. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1989;111(11):906-917
  5. 5. Simmering JE, Tang F, Cavanaugh JE, Polgreen LA, Polgreen PM. The increase in hospitalizations for urinary tract infections and the associated costs in the United States, 1998-2011. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. Oxford University Press. 2017;4(1):e281
  6. 6. Müller CM, Åberg A, Straseviçiene J, Emődy L, Uhlin BE, Balsalobre C. Type 1 fimbriae, a colonization factor of uropathogenicEscherichia coli, are controlled by the metabolic sensor CRP-cAMP. PLoS Pathogens. 2009;5(2):e1000303
  7. 7. Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. PathogenicEscherichia coli. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2004;2(2):123
  8. 8. Luna-Pineda VM, Ochoa S, Cruz-Córdova A, Cázares-Domínguez V, Vélez-González F, Hernández-Castro R, et al. Urinary tract infections, immunity, and vaccination. Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México. 2018;75(2):67-78
  9. 9. Vizcarra IA, Hosseini V, Kollmannsberger P, Meier S, Weber SS, Arnoldini M, et al. How type 1 fimbriae helpEscherichia colito evade extracellular antibiotics. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:18109
  10. 10. Olson PD, Hunstad DA. Subversion of host innate immunity by uropathogenicEscherichia coli. Pathogens. 2016;5(1):2
  11. 11. Winberg J. P-fimbriae, bacterial adhesion, and pyelonephritis. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1984;59(2):180
  12. 12. Hacker J, Blum-Oehler G, Mühldorfer I, Tschäpe H. Pathogenicity islands of virulent bacteria: Structure, function and impact on microbial evolution. Molecular Microbiology. 1997;23(6):1089-1097
  13. 13. Johnson JR. Virulence factors inEscherichia coliurinary tract infection. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 1991;4(1):80-128
  14. 14. Riegman N, Die I, Leunissen J, Hoekstra W, Bergmans H. Biogenesis of F71 and F72 fimbriae of uropathogenicEscherichia coli: Influence of the FsoF and FstFG proteins and localization of the Fso/FstE protein. Molecular Microbiology. 1988;2(1):73-80
  15. 15. Emody L, Kerenyi M, Nagy G. Virulence factors of uropathogenicEscherichia coli. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2003;22:29-33
  16. 16. Collinson SK, Emödy L, Kay WW. Thin aggregative fimbriae from diarrheagenicEscherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology. 1992;174(13):4490-4495
  17. 17. Klemm P, Schembri MA. Bacterial adhesins: Function and structure. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2000;290(1):27-35
  18. 18. Volkan E, Kalas V, Hultgren S. Pili and fimbriae of gram-negative bacteria. Molecular Medical Microbiology. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press. 2015:147-162
  19. 19. Vigil PD, Alteri CJ, Mobley HL. Identification of in vivo-induced antigens including an RTX family exoprotein required for uropathogenicEscherichia colivirulence. Infection and Immunity. 2011;79(6):2335-2344
  20. 20. Connell I, Agace W, Klemm P, Schembri M, Mărild S, Svanborg C. Type 1 fimbrial expression enhancesEscherichia colivirulence for the urinary tract. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1996;93(18):9827-9832
  21. 21. Hallstrom KN, McCormick BA. Pathogenicity islands: Origins, structure, and roles in bacterial pathogenesis. Molecular Medical Microbiology. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2015:303-314
  22. 22. Nielubowicz GR, Mobley HL. Host–pathogen interactions in urinary tract infection. Nature Reviews Urology. 2010;7(8):430
  23. 23. Wullt B, Bergsten G, Connell H, RoÈllano P, Gebretsadik N, Hull R, et al. P fimbriae enhance the early establishment ofEscherichia coliin the human urinary tract. Molecular Microbiology. 2000;38(3):456-464
  24. 24. Hunstad DA, Justice SS. Intracellular lifestyles and immune evasion strategies of uropathogenicEscherichia coli. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2010;64:203-221
  25. 25. Nowicki B, Labigne A, Moseley S, Hull R, Hull S, Moulds J. The Dr hemagglutinin, afimbrial adhesins AFA-I and AFA-III, and F1845 fimbriae of uropathogenic and diarrhea-associatedEscherichia colibelong to a family of hemagglutinins with Dr receptor recognition. Infection and Immunity. 1990;58(1):279-281
  26. 26. Spurbeck RR, Mobley HL. UropathogenicEscherichia coli.Escherichia Coli. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2013:275-304
  27. 27. Agarwal J, Srivastava S, Singh M. Pathogenomics of uropathogenicEscherichia coli. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2012;30(2):141
  28. 28. Soltani S, Emamie AD, Dastranj M, Farahani A, Davoodabadi A, Mohajeri P. Role of toxins of uropathogenicEscherichia coliin development of urinary tract infection. British Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2018;21(1):e.JPRI.39188
  29. 29. Eberspächer B, Hugo F, Bhakdi S. Quantitative study of the binding and hemolytic efficiency ofEscherichia colihemolysin. Infection and Immunity. 1989;57(3):983-988
  30. 30. Bhakdi SUCHARIT, Mackman N, Nicaud JM, Holland IB.Escherichia colihemolysin may damage target cell membranes by generating transmembrane pores. Infection and Immunity. 1986;52(1):63-69
  31. 31. Chen M, Jahnukainen T, Bao W, Daré E, Ceccatelli S, Celsi G. UropathogenicEscherichia colitoxins induce caspase-independent apoptosis in renal proximal tubular cells via ERK signaling. American Journal of Nephrology. 2003;23(3):140-151
  32. 32. Russo TA, Davidson BA, Genagon SA, Warholic NM, MacDonald U, Pawlicki PD, et al.E. colivirulence factor hemolysin induces neutrophil apoptosis and necrosis/lysis in vitro and necrosis/lysis and lung injury in a rat pneumonia model. American Journal of Physiology. Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. 2005;289(2):L207-L216
  33. 33. Cavalieri SJ, Bohach GA, Snyder IS.Escherichia coliα-hemolysin: Characteristics and probable role in pathogenicity. Microbiological Reviews. 1984;48(4):326-343
  34. 34. Den Bosch JF, Emödy L, Kétyi I. Virulence of haemolytic strains ofEscherichia coliin various animal models. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 1982;13(4):427-430
  35. 35. Ristow LC, Welch RA. Hemolysin of uropathogenicEscherichia coli: A cloak or a dagger? Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 2016;1858(3):538-545
  36. 36. Uhlen P, Laestadius A, Jahnukalnen T. α-Haemolysin of uropathogenicE. coliinduces Ca2+ oscillations in renal epithelial cells. Nature. 2000;405(6787):694-697
  37. 37. Bower JM, Eto DS, Mulvey MA. Covert operations of uropathogenicEscherichia coliwithin the urinary tract. Traffic. 2005;6(1):18-31
  38. 38. Mills M, Meysick KC, O'Brien AD. Cytotoxic necrotizing factor type 1 of uropathogenicEscherichia colikills cultured human uroepithelial 5637 cells by an apoptotic mechanism. Infection and Immunity. 2000;68(10):5869-5880
  39. 39. Fiorentini C, Fabbri A, Matarrese P, Falzano L, Boquet P, Malorni W. Hinderance of apoptosis and phagocytic behaviour induced byEscherichia colicytotoxic necrotizing factor 1: Two related activities in epithelial cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1997;241(2):341-346
  40. 40. Guyer DM, Radulovic S, Jones FE, Mobley HL. Sat, the secreted autotransporter toxin of uropathogenicEscherichia coli, is a vacuolating cytotoxin for bladder and kidney epithelial cells. Infection and Immunity. 2002;70(8):4539-4546
  41. 41. Guyer DM, Henderson IR, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. Identification of sat, an autotransporter toxin produced by uropathogenicEscherichia coli. Molecular Microbiology. 2000;38(1):53-66
  42. 42. Guerra L, Cortes-Bratti X, Guidi R, Frisan T. The biology of the cytolethal distending toxins. Toxins. 2011;3(3):172-190
  43. 43. Féria CP, Correia JD, Gonçalves J, Machado J. Detection of virulence factors in uropathogenicEscherichia coliisolated from humans, dogs and cats in Portugal. In: Genes and Proteins Underlying Microbial Urinary Tract Virulence. Boston, MA: Springer; 2002. pp. 305-308
  44. 44. Tóth I, Hérault F, Beutin L, Oswald E. Production of cytolethal distending toxins by pathogenicEscherichia colistrains isolated from human and animal sources: Establishment of the existence of a new cdt variant (type IV). Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2003;41(9):4285-4291
  45. 45. Ladant D, Alouf JE, Popoff MR. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. London: Academic Press; 2005
  46. 46. Cirl C, Wieser A, Yadav M, Duerr S, Schubert S, Fischer H, et al. Subversion of toll-like receptor signaling by a unique family of bacterial toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain–containing proteins. Nature Medicine. 2008;14(4):399
  47. 47. Lai XH, Arencibia I, Johansson A, Wai SN, Oscarsson J, Kalfas S, et al. Cytocidal and apoptotic effects of the ClyA protein fromEscherichia colion primary and cultured monocytes and macrophages. Infection and Immunity. 2000;68(7):4363-4367
  48. 48. Jahandeh N, Ranjbar R, Behzadi P, Behzadi E. UropathogenicEscherichia colivirulence genes: Invaluable approaches for designing DNA microarray probes. Central European Journal of Urology. 2015;68(4):452
  49. 49. Henderson JP, Crowley JR, Pinkner JS, Walker JN, Tsukayama P, Stamm WE, et al. Quantitative metabolomics reveals an epigenetic blueprint for iron acquisition in uropathogenicEscherichia coli. PLoS Pathogens. 2009;5(2):e1000305
  50. 50. Olson PD, Justice SS, Hunstad D.Escherichia coliin urinary tract infections. Molecular Medical Microbiology. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2015;76(7):1373-1387
  51. 51. Hagan EC, Mobley HLT. Haem acquisition is facilitated by a novel receptor Hma and required by uropathogenicEscherichia colifor kidney infection. Molecular Microbiology. 2008;71(1):79-91
  52. 52. Neilands JB, Bindereif A, Montgomery JZ. Genetic basis of iron assimilation in pathogenicEscherichia coli. In: Genetic Approaches to Microbial Pathogenicity. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1985. pp. 179-195
  53. 53. Hagberg L, Jodal U, Korhonen TK, Lidin-Janson G, Lindberg U, Eden CS. Adhesion, hemagglutination, and virulence ofEscherichia colicausing urinary tract infections. Infection and Immunity. 1981;31(2):564-570
  54. 54. Warner PJ, Williams PH, Bindereif A, Neilands JB. ColV plasmid-specific aerobactin synthesis by invasive strains ofEscherichia coli. Infection and Immunity. 1981;33(2):540-545
  55. 55. De Lorenzo V, Martinez JL. Aerobactin production as a virulence factor: A reevaluation. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 1988;7(5):621-629
  56. 56. Wiles TJ, Kulesus RR, Mulvey MA. Origins and virulence mechanisms of uropathogenicEscherichia coli. Experimental and Molecular Pathology. 2008;85(1):11-19
  57. 57. Billips BK, Forrestal SG, Rycyk MT, Johnson JR, Klumpp DJ, Schaeffer AJ. Modulation of host innate immune response in the bladder by uropathogenicEscherichia coli. Infection and Immunity. 2007;75(11):5353-5360
  58. 58. Reigstad CS, Hultgren SJ, Gordon JI. Functional genomic studies of uropathogenicEscherichia coliand host urothelial cells when intracellular bacterial communities are assembled. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007;282(29):21259-21267
  59. 59. Garcia EC, Brumbaugh AR, Mobley HL. Redundancy and specificity ofEscherichia coliiron acquisition systems during urinary tract infection. Infection and Immunity. 2011;79(3):1225-1235
  60. 60. Nagy G, Dobrindt U, Emody L, Karch H, Hacker J. Expression of hemin receptor molecule ChuA is influenced by RfaH in UropathogenicEscherichia colistrain 536. Infection and Immunity. 2001;69(3):1924-1928
  61. 61. Sarkar S, Ulett GC, Totsika M, Phan MD, Schembri MA. Role of capsule and O antigen in the virulence of uropathogenicEscherichia coli. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94786
  62. 62. Ong CLY, Ulett GC, Mabbett AN, Beatson SA, Webb RI, Monaghan W, et al. Identification of type 3 fimbriae in uropathogenicEscherichia colireveals a role in biofilm formation. Journal of Bacteriology. 2008;190(3):1054-1063
  63. 63. Lane MC, Alteri CJ, Smith SN, Mobley HL. Expression of flagella is coincident with uropathogenicEscherichia coliascension to the upper urinary tract. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(42):16669-16674
  64. 64. Lundstedt AC, McCarthy S, Gustafsson MC, Godaly G, Jodal U, Karpman D, et al. A genetic basis of susceptibility to acute pyelonephritis. PLoS One. 2007;2(9):e825
  65. 65. Klumpp DJ, Weiser AC, Sengupta S, Forrestal SG, Batler RA, Schaeffer AJ. UropathogenicEscherichia colipotentiates type 1 pilus-induced apoptosis by suppressing NF-κB. Infection and Immunity. 2001;69(11):6689-6695
  66. 66. Justice SS, Hunstad DA, Harper JR, Duguay AR, Pinkner JS, Bann J, et al. Periplasmic peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerases are not essential for viability, but SurA is required for pilus biogenesis inEscherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology. 2005;187(22):7680-7686
  67. 67. Klemm P. Fimbrial adhesins ofEscherichia coli. Reviews of Infectious Diseases. May-Jun 1985;7(3):321-340

Written By

Sorwer Alam Parvez and Dolilur Rahman

Submitted: March 1st, 2018 Reviewed: June 15th, 2018 Published: November 15th, 2018