Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Application of Heterogeneous Catalysts in Dechlorination of Chlorophenols

Written By

Fuchong Li, Yansheng Liu, Linlei Wang, Xu Li, Tianqiong Ma and Guangbi Gong

Submitted: March 13th, 2018 Reviewed: May 26th, 2018 Published: October 24th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.79134

Chapter metrics overview

1,038 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Chlorophenols (CPs) is a very important kind of basic organic chemical intermediates such as sanitizers, germicides, insecticides and so on; but CPs also constitutes a particular group of priority pollutants that widely distribute in wastewater and the polluted groundwater. Because of their acute toxicity, persistence and low biodegradability, their emissions have been progressively restricted by strong legal regulations. In this chapter, we focused on methods for degrading of CPs recent years, especially by using new heterogeneous catalytic hydrogenation methods to the dechlorination of CPs. The purpose is to introduce scientific research workers and companies to waste water treatments in order to inspire and further better protect the environment.


  • heterogeneous catalysts
  • dechlorination
  • chlorophenol
  • core-shell
  • environment

1. Introduction

The global water storage is up to 1.45 billion cubic kilometers (Figure 1), but the number of water storage can be produced and used directly by people is very less. Water is widely used in industries, agriculture, homes and so on, but keeping water quality becomes a major challenge for the coming decades. There are many factors that cause water damage. Industrial wastewater, agricultural wastewater, and domestic wastewater may be the main pollution sources (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Beautiful earth.

Figure 2.

Chemical pollution is the largest source of pollution.

The development of chemical technology growing changed our lives. More and more food, medicine, cars, and appliance made by industries come to our lives. However, pollution problems were generating while we are enjoying our lives. Not only polluting the water and the air, but also seriously polluting the people’s physical and health. Solving and treating the toxic organic compounds in wastewater are becoming an important project and research in recent years. It is becoming an important things for the government, companies, and academic research [1].

Chlorophenols (CPs) constitute a series of common organic compounds and intermediate involved in industrial processes such as fungicides, insecticides and dye precursors [2]. Chlorophenols (CPs) are also used in preservatives, papermaking and cosmetics industries. But because of acute toxicity, persistence and low biodegradability, chlorophenols especially such as chlorophenol, 2-chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, and 5-chlorophenol are highly toxic substances [3]. Their emissions have been progressively restricted by strong legal regulations. (Most chlorophenol compounds can interfere with endocrine, may cause cancer, cell mutations or teratogenesis, are almost non-biodegradable and difficult to remove from the environment. Therefore, they are a list of priority control pollutants by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and China Environmental Monitoring Center.)

In fact, chlorophenols and their derivatives may be produced by the chlorination of phenols. The phenol reacts with chlorination in the presence of high concentrations of chlorine and the toxicity of chlorophenols increases with its degree of chlorination and usually are difficult to degrade. These chlorophenols released into the natural environment can cause serious pollution, especially causing water pollution.

Conventional wastewater treatment based primarily on biological processes are not very efficient for the treatment of toxic or non-biodegradable and high-concentration wastewaters. Therefore, in order to protect our environment, it is necessary to develop efficient technologies for treating organic wastewater containing chlorine.


2. Application of heterogeneous catalysts in dechlorination

Recent years, the scientific community and the engineering technical community have begun to pay more attention to the CPs degradation or removal. In order to achieve this goal, large numbers of methods have been employed, such as oxidation (Fenton, O3 and so on), aerobic/anaerobic biodegradation [4, 5], photocatalytic degradation [6], thermal combustion, catalytic reaction based on polymer membrane [7] and reduction dechlorination. In the chapter of this book, we classified these methods into two major categories: oxidation and reduction reactions in Table 1. In order to give the readers a clear understanding of the processing methods of the entire CPs treatments, we generally explain each method briefly. Because of heterogeneous catalysis is a cost-effective method for CPs treatments. We will give a detailed explanation and summary.

2.1. Photo-catalytic oxidation

Photocatalytic method [8, 9] is an advanced oxidation process (AOP). In common, semiconductor photocatalysts were needed to the oxidation reaction. Using higher than the semiconductor energy band gap light. For example, anatase which band gap is about 3.2 eV. Thus only ultraviolet light (wavelength <388 nm) can be effectively applied for electricity to be inspired to the conduction band from electronic valence band to generating a pair of holes and electrons in Figure 3. The hole–electron pair may be not stable enough. If they are not to combine together immediately, the two species (hole–electron pair) respectively may react with oxygen or water to generate oxidizing species, such as hydroxyl radicals, hydrogen oxygen free radical, superoxide free radicals and so on, hydroxyl radicals directly attack the phenol. The proposed mechanism for the photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol by photocatalysts (GR-Eu2O3/TiO2) was described by Mallanaicker Myilsamy in Figure 4 [10]:

Figure 3.

Theory of photocatalytic method.

Figure 4.

Proposed mechanism for the photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol [10].

There are several influence factors of this AOP.

The first: Photocatalysis: catalyst which determines the type of the light and speed of the reaction is a key factor we need to consider. Due to its high catalytic activity, low cost, chemical stability, non-toxicity, TiO2 was usually applied as the most efficient photocatalyst in this AOP [11, 12]. Based on the photocatalytic mechanism of electron–hole, some metal nanoparticles were also used to prevent the combination of hole and electron pair [13, 14].

Other factors such as the amount of catalyst added, illumination angle, solvent, reaction temperature and so on will also affect the whole reaction efficiency [9].

Recent research directions focused on the development and synthesis of improved photocatalytic materials (such as core-shell nanoparticles, bimetals catalyst and so on), with two major lines aiming at (i) better charge separation and better charge migration (ii) visible-light driven photocatalysis. Claude Descorme has summed up most of the catalyst types in his review [9].

2.2. Sonocatalysis (ultrasonic reaction method)

Ultrasonic reaction (sonocatalysis) is also considered as an advanced oxidation process (AOP). It is well known that ultrasonic wave can greatly promote heat movement of molecules in the reaction, accelerating the reaction process, thus lots of scientists like to choose ultrasonic reaction method to the low reaction activities reagents, the entire process reaction temperature is not too high. The chemical processes of the sonocatalysis may involve two parts (I) free radical process and (II) pyrolysis process under ultrasonic wave. Recent research directions focused on the development of the more efficient reactor, for example (Figure 5), and catalyst which can be applied to decrease the frequencies [15, 16].

Figure 5.

Scheme of the self-excited ultrasonic irradiation device.

2.3. Fenton method

Fenton method [17] is also a AOP method which uses ferrous or cuprous salts (Fe2+ +Cu2+) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for generating powerful oxidant, i.e., hydroxyl radicals produced in situ Figure 6.

Figure 6.

The mechanism of Fenton method.

For the Fenton method to the dechlorination of Chlorophenols, the important parameter is probably the operating pH, In the presence of a homogeneous catalyst, an optimum is generally observed around pH 3. In fact, when pH < 2.5, the Fe(II) (H2O)2+ will generate while the pH higher than 4, free iron and reduced concentration of hydroxyl precipitation of iron oxide. The pH can also affect the stability of the heterogeneous catalyst, now most research has focused on the development of more stable and regeneration or be used in a wide pH range catalyst [18].

2.4. O3 oxidation

Ozone oxidation is also a kind of VOP, both ozone oxidation and Fenton oxidation also produce free radicals such as •OH to degradation of organochlorine, especially for the organochlorine pollution which contain multiple bonds such as C〓N, C〓C has a better effect; while some limitations still exist in terms of the O3 oxidation, chlorophenol concentrations, catalyst costs and its recovery and so on.

2.5. Hydrodechlorination

Heterogeneous catalyst replaced the homogeneous catalyst because of solving the catalyst recycling problem, especially for the precious metal catalysts, the catalyst costs were reduced. Heterogeneous catalyst have some advantages (Figure 7) compared with homogeneous catalyst, e.g., (I) Large surface area, especially for the porous heterogeneous catalyst, it may increase the reactant transmission rate in the catalyst. For gas phase reaction, surface adsorption effect will greatly increase the rate of the reaction. (II) The activity site will be discrete well in order to prevent its aggregation. (III) Diversified structure monomers to build diversified structure, morphology and functional catalyst. Wang Wei et al. [19], detailed introduced the nanocatalyst materials development which can be divided into three categories: inorganic materials, organic materials, and hybrid materials (Figure 8) and depicts some representative examples ranging from 0D discrete materials to 3D extended structures, from inorganic to pure organic components, from disordered to regular arrangements, and from non-porous to porous nature. In recent years, covalent organic frameworks attract more and more people’s attention because of its large surface area and regular structure [20, 21, 22].

Figure 7.

Heterogeneous catalysts applied in HDC.

Figure 8.

The classification of heterogeneous catalyst carrier and its development [19].

From 0D to 3D nanomaterials, all of them may be likely to be good candidates as the heterogeneous catalyst. Organic chlorides, especially of 4-chloride-phenol is a kind of highly toxic compound. Hydrogenated dechlorination (HDC) is an efficient method for toxic compound treating. Although this method does not lead to complete degradation of the organic chlorides pollutant but generates a less toxic (biodegradable) compound or a chemical of possible commercial important product via halogen atoms elimination with hydrogen (Figure 9) hydrochloric acid was produced in HDC reaction process in stoichiometric amount and the catalyst deactivation in this acid conditions is an important issue.

Figure 9.

Hydrogenated dechlorination (HDC).

Recently most research focused on the development of more stable and efficient catalyst designed. According to the type and number of the metal, catalyst can be divided into single and bimetals center catalyst activity. Hence, a rapid, efficient, and green approach to the fabrication of effective catalyst Al2O3 shows a highly mechanical resistance with high catalytic activity and the potential applications the HDC of 4-CP has significant meaning for environmental protection. Pd0 as the most effective metal active center for the HDC reaction usually applied with other metal cooperate to improve the catalytic efficiency and stability, like Pd-Bi [23, 24], Pd–Tl [25], Pd-Fe [26], and Ni@Pd [27] also have been extensively researched, in addition, the catalyst carrier has become the important role in improving the activity and stability of catalytic, such as Pd/Al2O3, Pd/zeolites, Pd/activated carbon (AC), SiO2 supported Pd nanocatalysts.

As we know, for organic chloride, with chlorine content is higher, the toxicity become stronger at the same time, to be more difficult to removal chlorine from the organic chloride compound. Bimetal catalyst was reported to solve this issue by Anwar [28]. The pentachlorophenol (PCP, 10–20 mg min−1) through the bimetal catalyst Ag0/Fe0 loaded on the heating column (25 × 1 cm) in scCO2(supercritical carbon dioxide) was removed. After the reaction was operated for 1 h at 450°C, organically-bound chlorine was liberated, virtually quantitatively, from a 20% (w/v) feedstock stream (0.1 ml min−1 merged with 4 ml min−1 scCO2). In extended operations, about 70°C, the reactor to 14 h of continuous running, no obvious activity loss if the chloride ion was washed every 3 h. In fact, catalytic activity was also related with the reaction temperature, pressure, solvent, and so on. The production of the pentachlorophenol (PCP) was a series of methylated phenols or methylated benzenes (Figure 10).

Figure 10.

Pentachlorophenol treated by Ag0/Fe0 catalyst [28].

Jovanovic studied the dechlorination of p-chlorophenol in a microreactor with bimetallic Pd/Fe catalysts [29]. The bimetallic catalyst Pd/Fe was prepared by electroless deposition of Pd on the reactor plate surfaces. The chemistry of the dechlorination of p-chlorophenol on Pd/Fe catalysts involves three sets of chemical reactions (Figure 11) namely surface reactions, solution reactions, and actual dechlorination reactions. These reactions are found to be dependent on several parameters, including the pH, the Pd/Fe interface area, the extent of palladization, the ratio of the Pd/Fe interfacial area to the amount of chlorine to be removed, and the amount of dissolved oxygen.

Figure 11.

Dechlorination of p-chlorophenol on Pd/Fe catalysts.

2.5.1. How to design and synthesize catalyst of the HDC

  • Catalyst carrier with large surface area to increase the adsorption quantity of H2 in order to increase the speed of the reaction rate while could reduce the pressure.

  • Improve the recovery efficiency of nanocatalyst.

  • Prevent the by-products hydrochloric acid damage to the catalyst.

2.5.2. Core-shell catalyst

Nanometer catalysts because of their nanosize effect may be an efficient heterogeneous catalyst model which are widely used in many different catalytic reaction, such as, catalysis, biological medicine, material chemistry, sensors and so on [30]. As a nanomaterials, core-shell structure catalyst materials can be synthesized through the grafting reaction method step by step.

Because of the advantages that core-shell nanomaterials own (Figure 12) precious metals (Pd, Rh, Au…) can be loaded on core-shell nanoparticles by stronger chemical bonds, such as coordination bond or covalent bonds.

Figure 12.

The advantages of core-shell nanoparticles.

Elena Diaz et al. [31] studied the kinetics of hydrodechlorination of 4-chlorophenol on alumina and activated carbon supported Pd and Rh catalysts. The hydrodechlorination of 4-chlorophenols based on Pd and Rh on γ-alumina and activated carbon was investigated in continuously stirred basket reactors (20–40°C and 1 bar). For 4-chlorophenol, the reaction rate shows a first-order dependence. All catalysts are effective in removing 4-chlorophenol. Phenol, cyclohexanone and cyclohexanol were identified as reaction products (Figure 13). The hydrogenation of 4-chlorophenol to phenol was in the range of 146–478 L/kgcat h for Pd/Al2O3, 179–713 L/kgcat h for Pd/AC, and 44–172 L/kgcat h for Rh/AC. In all cases, the klconstant shows a much larger value than k2, indicating that the formation of phenol is superior to cyclohexanone as the first reaction step (Table 2).

Figure 13.

STEM micrograph of Pd/Al2O3 catalyst (a) and TEM micrographs of Pd/AC (b) and Rh/AC catalysts(c).

Oxidation methodReduction method
Photo-catalytic oxidation [8, 9]Ultrasonic reactionFentonO3/CWAO OxidationHydrodechlorination
Under light conditions, catalyst surface generate hole and electronics, then water reacts with oxygen free radicals.Ultrasonic wave can greatly promote the AOP.Fe2+ and H2O2 for generating hydroxyl radical (•OH).•OH to degradation of organochlorine.Via halogen atoms elimination with hydrogen.

Table 1.

The classification of dechlorination reaction.

T (°C)Kinetic constant (L/kgcat h)Pd/Al2O3Pd/ACRh/AC
20k1146 ± 50.995179 ± 360.99144 ± 50.992
k210 ± 5018 ± 5
k39 ± 310 ± 47 ± 5
30k1201 ± 110.976460 ± 370.97696 ± 80.986
k229 ± 10041 ± 8
k320 ± 522 ± 713 ± 8
k48 ± 4
40k1478 ± 160.994713 ± 360.992172 ± 130.982
k266 ± 12113 ± 1965 ± 12
k345 ± 410 ± 311 ± 6
k410 ± 4

Table 2.

The kinetics of hydrodechlorination of 4-chlorophenol on Pd/Al2O3, Pd/AC, Rh/AC.

Wu et al. [32] designed and synthesized Fe3O4@SiO2@Pd-Au catalyst (Figure 14). Fe3O4@SiO2@Pd-Au was synthesized with the reduction of Pd2+ and Au3+. The amine-modified silica is coated on the outer layer of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles to be a carrier for Pd-Au nanoparticles, where in the amine acts as a bridge connecting the Pd-Au nanoparticles to the support, making it highly dispersible, the magnetic properties of Fe3O4. allows the catalyst to be recycled. The performance of the catalyst was evaluated by hydrodechlorination of 4-chlorophenol (25°C, atmospheric pressure, a certain amount of 4-CP, 0.05 g NaOH, 0.5 g catalyst). The results showed that Pd nanoparticles have higher activity in HDC of 4-CP then the Au nanoparticle, the Pd-Au alloy increases the conversion significantly and achieves a complete conversion of HDC within 20 min, much faster than the Pd metal catalyst (Figure 15).

Figure 14.

Synthesis procedure of Fe3O4@SiO2@Pd-Au catalyst.

Figure 15.

4-CP HDC conversions on different catalysts.

Li et al. [33]., studies a high efficient Pd nanocatalysts (Pd/Fe3O4@C) applied in HDC. Pd nanoparticles in magnetic carbon shell can effectively improve the catalytic activity, separation and reusable. Catalyst was synthesized by Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a core, and then a layer of carbon layer on the outside package, finally by APTES modified carbon layer improving Pd loaded (Figure 16). Pd/Fe3O4@C can be recycled at least five times without obvious loss activity. Pd/Fe3O4@C is not only used in the aqueous solution of 4-chlorophenol hydrogenation dechlorination but also be used for reduction of 4-nitrophenol.

Figure 16.

Design and synthesize the Pd/Fe3O4 @C catalyst.

Porous materials are widely used in catalysis, gas adsorption, separation and other fields because of their large surface area and structure controllable. Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) materials are a kind of regular porous material formed by DCC chemistry by metal and organic ligand [34]. Controllable design of adjustable nanostructures in metal-organic frameworks is in Figure 17.

Figure 17.

Controllable design of tunable nanostructures inside metal–organic frameworks.

Noble metal nanoparticles (NMNPs) have attracted attention as the activity center. But NMNPs were easy blocking pores of active carbon, and leaching from carbon nanotubes, and graphene faces in the process of catalytic. In order to solve these problems, Dong used metal organic framework (MOF) to synthesize the porous carbon (MPC) which can provides a large surface area and pore (Figure 18) not only can make the active center (Pd NPs) scattered on it well, but also has paramagnetic behavior that the catalyst can be easily recycled [35].

Figure 18.

MPC utilized as a catalyst support to fabricate Au and Pd NP-based nanocatalysts.


3. Conclusion and outlook

Hydrogenated dechlorination degradation is an important method for the organochlorine degradation. Catalyst activity and its lifetime are two key points for the HCP, especially for the noble metal catalyst. In order to solve the recycling or reunion problems of noble metal catalyst, designing a suitable catalyst support becomes more important, core-shell type, organic porous materials, especially organic crystal type of porous materials, which is developing rapidly in recent years, such as MOF (metal organic frameworks) and COFs (covalent organic frameworks) materials because of the rules of uniform structure and large specific surface area that can bring some advantages to metal catalyst loading, design and synthesis coordination bond or other stronger bond to combine the metal and carrier is one of the important measure to prevent the catalyst loss.


  1. 1. Pera-Titus M, Garcıa-Molina V, Banos MA. Degradation of chlorophenols by means of advanced oxidation processes: A general review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2004;47:219-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.09.010
  2. 2. Ramamoorthy S, Ramamoorthy S. Chlorinated Organic Compounds in the Environment: Regulatory and Monitoring Assessment. Vol. 9. Lewis Publishers; 1997. p. 1538. ISBN: 1566700418
  3. 3. de Pedro ZM, Diaz E, Mohedano AF, Casas JA, Rodriguez JJ. Compared activity and stability of Pd/Al2O3 and Pd/AC catalysts in 4-chlorophenol hydrodechlorination in different pH media. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2011;103:128-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.apceatb.2011.01.018
  4. 4. Buitron G, Schoeb ME, Moreno-Andrade L, Moreno JA. Evaluation of two control strategies for a sequencing batch reactor degrading high concentration peaks of 4-chlorophenol. Water Research. 2005;39:1015-1024. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.12.023
  5. 5. Majumder PS, Gupta SK. Degradation of 4-chlorophenol in UASB reactor under methanogenic conditions. Bioresource Technology. 2008;99:4169-4177. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.08.062
  6. 6. Ormad MP, Ovelleiro JL, Kiwi J. Photocatalytic degradation of concentrated solutions of 2,4-dichlorophenol using low energy light identification of intermediates. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2001;(3):157-166
  7. 7. Fritsch D, Kuhr K, Mackenzie K, Kopinke FD. Hydrodechlorination of chlorooganic in ground water by palladium catalysts part 1. Development of polymer-based catalysts and membrane reactor tests. Catalysis Today. 2003;82:105-118. DOI: 10.1016/S0920-5861(03)00208-6
  8. 8. Ge T, Han J, Qi Y. The toxic effects of chlorophenols and associated mechanisms in fish. Aquatic Toxicology. 2017;184:78-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.01.005
  9. 9. Claude Descorme. Catalytic wastewater treatment: Oxidation and reduction processes. Recent studies on chlorophenols. Catalysis Today. 2017;297:324-334. DOI: org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.03.039
  10. 10. Myilsamy M, Mahalakshmi M, Subha N. Visible light responsive mesoporous graphene-Eu2O3/TiO2 nanocomposites for the efficient photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol. RSC Advances. 2016;6:35024-35035. DOI: 10.1039/C5RA27541E
  11. 11. Zhao W, Ma W, Chen C. Efficient degradation of toxic organic pollutants with Ni2O3/TiO2-xBx under visible irradiation. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2004;126(15):4782-4783. DOI: 10.1021/ja0396753
  12. 12. Kim W, Tachikawa T. Efficient degradation of toxic organic pollutants with Ni2O3/TiO2-xBx under visible irradiation. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2009;113(24):10603-10609. DOI: 10.1021/ja0396753
  13. 13. Zhu Z, Liu F, Zhang H. Photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol over Ag/MFe2O4 (M = Co, Zn, Cu, and Ni) prepared by a modified chemical co-precipitation method: A comparative study. RSC Advances. 2015;5:55499-55512. DOI: 10.1039/C5RA04608D
  14. 14. Huerta Aguilar CA, Pandiyan T, Arenas-Alatorre JA, Singh N. Oxidation of phenols by TiO2-Fe3O4-M (M = Ag or Au) hybrid composites under visible light. Separation and Purification Technology. 2015;149:265-278. DOI: org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.05.019
  15. 15. Papadaki M, Emery RJ, Abu-Hassan MA, Dıaz-Bustos A, Metcalfe IS, Mantzavinos D. Sonocatalytic oxidation processes for the removal of contaminants containing aromatic rings from aqueous effluents. Separation and Purification Technology. 2004;34:35-42. DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00172-2
  16. 16. Dai Z, Chen A, Kisch H. Efficient Sonochemical Degradation of 4-Chlorophenol Catalyzed by Titanium Dioxide Hydrate. Chemistry Letters. 2005;34(12):1706. DOI: 10.1246/cl.2005.1706
  17. 17. Posada D, Betancourt P, Liendo F. Catalytic wet air oxidation of aqueous solutions of substituted phenols. Catalysis Letters. 2006;106:81-88. DOI: 10.1007/s10562-005-9195-2
  18. 18. Subramanian G, Madras G. Supplementary information remarkable enhancement of Fenton degradation at wide pH range promoted by thioglycolic acid. Chemical Communications. 2017;53:1136-1139. DOI: 10.1039/C6CC09962A
  19. 19. Ding S-Y, Wang W. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs): From design to applications. Chemical Society Reviews. 2013;42:548-568. DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35072f
  20. 20. Côté AP, Benin AI, Ockwig NW. Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science. 2005;310:1166-1170. DOI: 10.1126/science.112041
  21. 21. Thomas A. Functional materials: From hard to soft porous frameworks. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2010;49:8328-8344. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201000167
  22. 22. Ding S-Y, Gao J, Wang Q. Construction of covalent organic framework for catalysis: Pd/COF-LZU1 in Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reaction. American Chemical Society. 2011;133:19816-19822. DOI: 10.1021/ja206846p
  23. 23. Witońska I, Królak A, Karski S. Bi modified Pd/support (SiO2, Al2O3) catalysts for hydrodechlorination of 2,4-dichlorophenol. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2010; 331:21-28. DOI: org/10.1016/j.molcata.2010.07.011
  24. 24. Karski S. Activity and selectivity of Pd–Bi/SiO2 catalysts in the light of mutual interaction between Pd and Bi. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2006;253:147-154. DOI: org/10.1016/j.molcata.2006.03.013
  25. 25. Karski S, Witońska I, Gołuchowska J. Catalytic properties of Pd–Tl/SiO2 systems in the reaction of liquid phase oxidation of aldoses. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2006;245:225-230. DOI: org/10.1016/j.molcata.2005.10.004
  26. 26. Izabela AW, Michael JW, Binczarski M . Pd–Fe/SiO2 and Pd–Fe/Al2O3 catalysts for selective hydrodechlorination of 2,4-dichlorophenol into phenol. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2014;393:248-256. DOI: org/10.1016/j.molcata.2014.06.022
  27. 27. Dong Z, Le X, Dong C. Ni@Pd core–shell nanoparticles modified fibrous silica nanospheres as highly efficient and recoverable catalyst for reduction of 4-nitrophenol and hydrodechlorination of 4-chlorophenol. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2015;162:372-380. DOI: org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.009
  28. 28. Kabir A, Marshall WD. Dechlorination of pentachlorophenol in supercritical carbon dioxide with a zero-valent silver–iron bimetallic mixture. Green Chemistry. 2001;3:47-51. DOI: 10.1039/b008122l
  29. 29. Goran N. Jovanovic, Polona Zÿ nidaršič Plazl, Ploenpun Sakrittichai, Khaled Al-Khaldi. Dechlorination of p-Chlorophenol in a Microreactor with Bimetallic Pd/Fe Catalyst. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2005;44:5099-5106. DOI: 10.1021/ie049496+
  30. 30. Gawande MB, Goswami A, Asefa T. Core–shell nanoparticles: Synthesis and applications in catalysis and electrocatalysis. Chemical Society Reviews. 2015;44:7540-7590. DOI: 10.1039/C5CS00343A
  31. 31. Elena D, Casas JA, Mohedano ÁF. Kinetics of 4-chlorophenol hydrodechlorination with alumina and activated carbon-supported Pd and Rh catalysts. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2009;48:3351-3358. DOI: 10.1021/ie801462b CCC: $40.75
  32. 32. Zhijie W, Sun C, Chai Y. Fe3O4@SiO2@Pd-Au: A highly efficient and magnetically separable catalyst for liquid-phase hydrodechlorination of 4-chlorophenol. RSC Advances. 2011;1:1179-1182. DOI: 10.1039/c1ra00491c
  33. 33. Chen C, Li Y, Jia X. Wavelength-focusing organic molecular materials with diazoacetate or fumarate as a monofluorophore. New Journal of Chemistry. 2017;41:3693-3709. DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ90039B
  34. 34. Chen L, Luque R, Li Y. Controllable design of tunable nanostructures inside metal–organic frameworks. Chemical Society Reviews. 2017;46:4614-4630. DOI: 10.1039/c6cs00537c
  35. 35. Dong Z, Le X, Liu Y. Metal organic framework derived magnetic porous carbon composite supported gold and palladium nanoparticles as highly efficient and recyclable catalysts for reduction of 4-nitrophenol and hydrodechlorination of 4-chlorophenol. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2014;2:18775-18785. DOI: 10.1039/C4TA04010D

Written By

Fuchong Li, Yansheng Liu, Linlei Wang, Xu Li, Tianqiong Ma and Guangbi Gong

Submitted: March 13th, 2018 Reviewed: May 26th, 2018 Published: October 24th, 2018