Abstract
Lower valent cation-doped CeO2 materials have attracted remarkable research interest for the electrolyte application in solid oxide fuel cells operating in the intermediate temperature range (500–700°C). At these temperatures, the oxygen-ion conductivity of gadolinium-doped ceria is about an order of magnitude higher than that of yttria-stabilized zirconia. The oxygen-ion diffusion in the cubic fluorite structure of CeO2 is dependent on several factors such as charge valence and size of dopant cation, doping amount, etc. In the literature, several conductivity trends have been reported as a function of these parameters and are explained by the atomistic computational models. This chapter describes the highlights of the various activities that have been done in this regard to provide insights into the mechanisms underlying the oxygen-ion conduction process in acceptor-doped ceria.
Keywords
- bulk ionic conductivity
- doped ceria
- local defect complexes
- defect chemistry
- solid oxide fuel cells
- electrolyte
1. Introduction
Cerium oxide is the most thoroughly investigated material for the application in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) working in the intermediate-temperature range (500–700°C) [1, 2]. This is because of its pronounced catalytic properties, substantial oxygen-ion conductivity (on doping with lower valent metal oxides) and good phase and thermal stability in the given temperature range. The high catalytic activity in ceria is associated with the presence of Ce4+/Ce3+ redox couple which is a key to improve the electrochemical properties of the electrodes. Although this is one area where most of the papers related to ceria have been produced, in this chapter, we restrict our discussion to its usefulness as an electrolyte in SOFCs [3].
Ceria exhibits a cubic fluorite crystal structure that possesses a relatively large interionic open space facilitating fast oxygen-ion diffusion inside the lattice (shown in Figure 1). This open structure is stable from room temperature to its melting point (~2400°C) and allows to accommodate high levels of point defect disorder [4]. Several properties such as ionic conduction, thermoelectric effect, mixed ionic-electronic conductivity, etc., can be altered and tailored by controlling the concentration of these zero-dimensional defects [5]. As a result, the defect engineering in ceria plays a vital role in improving its properties for the electrolyte application.

Figure 1.
Schematic of a cubic fluorite structure of CeO2. Ce4+ and O2− are shown by blue and red spheres, respectively.
Oxygen-ion conduction in ceria is mediated through a vacancy diffusion mechanism. In oxidizing atmospheres, the cubic fluorite structure of pure CeO2 does not have any oxygen vacancy defects. As a result, pure CeO2 itself is a poor oxygen-ion conductor. The oxygen vacancy defects are introduced into the CeO2 structure by partially substituting Ce4+ with acceptor cations inside the lattice. This can be expressed through the following defect reaction in Kröger-Vink notation.
Thus, the impurity center

Figure 2.
Schematic showing the jump of an oxygen vacancy from one tetrahedral to another through a migration edge. Ce4+, A3+ and O2− are shown by blue, green, and red spheres, respectively, while oxygen vacancy is shown by red cube.
For a pure oxygen-ion conductor, oxygen-ion conductivity (
where
These electrons are typically localized in the periphery of Ce3+, leading to the formation of small polarons (
Oxygen-ion diffusion in doped ceria is a thermally activated process. The temperature dependent behavior of the oxygen-ion conductivity can be expressed through Arrhenius relationship given by,
where
where
It is noteworthy to mention that even though the total conductivity of polycrystalline samples is influenced by the conductivity inside the grains and grain boundaries, in this chapter, we only refer to the grain (bulk) conductivity which occurs by oxygen-ion jump through the regular lattice and is not affected by the microstructural characteristics of the sample. Thus, the bulk ionic conduction is the inherent property of the doped material [8]. On the other hand, the conduction in grain boundaries is dependent on several factors such as impurity segregation, space-charge region, etc. [9]. Both the bulk and grain boundary conductivity can be estimated by acquiring an impedance spectrum over a frequency range (typically 10 MHz to 0.01 Hz) on the polycrystalline sample [10]. As grain boundaries show higher capacitance value (in the range from 10−8 to 10−11 F) compared to the bulk region (~ 10−12 F), two distinct arcs are typically observed associated with these phenomena [10]. On fitting the impedance data using an analog equivalent electric circuit, the resistance offered by bulk and grain boundary regions is estimated which can be then be used in determining the corresponding conductivities.
The bulk conductivity has a significant dependence on the concentration of oxygen vacancy which is controlled by the doping amount according to

Figure 3.
Bulk ionic conductivity is plotted against the dopant concentration (
Besides the doping amount, the physical properties of dopant cations also influence the bulk conductivity of ceria. Numerous investigations have been performed to understand these correlations in doped ceria systems [1, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. Figure 4 depicts the dependence of ionic conductivity in A0.10Ce0.90O1.95 on the ionic size of the trivalent dopant cation (A3+) at 600°C. While the work performed by Omar et al. [15] showed a continuous increase in the bulk conductivity with the increase in ionic size, others [17, 20, 21, 22] reported a conductivity maximum around Gd3+ and Sm3+. It is interesting to note that the maximum in conductivity observed around these cations is independent of dopant concentration [6]. In the literature, several empirical, semi-empirical and atomistic models have been reported to clarify this and elucidate the effect of doping amount and the dopant-type on the conductivity. This chapter reviews some of these models to provide insights into the mechanisms underlying the oxygen-ion conduction process in doped ceria.

Figure 4.
Bulk ionic conductivity of A
2. Formation of local defect complexes
Whenever charged point defects (
Figure 5 depicts a case where

Figure 5.
Oxygen vacancy defect trapped inside the tetrahedral void to form local defect complex. Ce4+, A3+ and O2− are shown by blue, green, and red spheres, respectively, while oxygen vacancy is shown by red cube.
The binding energy associated with the local defect structures is mainly dependent on the electrostatic attraction of the defects caused by the effective charges in the lattice. Further, it also includes terms due to the relaxation of the lattice around the defect which depends on the polarizability and the size of dopant cation. Several groups have found a difference in the magnitudes of
In the literature, several methods have been used to determine the association enthalpy. Omar et al. [42] have taken a difference in the magnitudes of

Figure 6.
Association enthalpy (Δ
3. Elastic lattice strain
The amount of local defect structures increases with the incorporation of oxygen vacancies inside the lattice. For achieving high oxygen-ion conductivity, the association of defects needs to be minimized. Kilner and Brook [45] stated that the oxygen-ion conductivity in doped CeO2 could be enhanced if the elastic strain present in the lattice is lowered. Kim [46] partially replaced acceptor cations in fluorite-structured MO2 (where M is a tetravalent cation) and studied the change in lattice parameter of the host oxides. By performing multiple regression analysis, an empirical model was developed that can predict the elastic strain in doped ceria systems for any given dopant cation. This model takes into consideration the size mismatch and difference in charge valence between the dopant and host cations and the dopant concentration. Further, Kim [46] proposed the concept of critical ionic radius (
In a similar study, Hong and Virkar [47] calculated the
To examine the validity of minimum strain’s hypothesis, Omar et al. [23] have carried out the experimental studies using a novel co-doping strategy in ceria. A co-dopant pair of Lu3+ and Nd3+ were chosen and added in a ratio such that the weighted average dopant ionic radius of co-dopants matches the magnitude of

Figure 7.
Elastic strain is plotted against the dopant concentration [
On plotting the activation energy for oxygen-ion diffusion in trivalent cation-doped CeO2, it has been found that the minimum value for activation energy occurs for Sm3+ which possesses a much larger ionic radius than the

Figure 8.
Lattice parameter mismatch between A0.10Ce0.90O2-
4. Dopant cation-oxygen vacancy interaction energetic
In the past, multiple atomistic computer simulation techniques have been used to study the interaction energetic involved between the cations and oxygen vacancies in acceptor cation-doped CeO2. Butler et al. [48] reported that the ionic radius of dopant has a major influence on the stability of defect complexes. Minervini et al. [49] studied the binding energy of an oxygen vacancy with dopant cation using the energy minimization techniques. It was found that the oxygen vacancies prefer to reside in the first neighboring sites of small dopant cations and in the second neighboring sites of large dopant cations. For Gd3+ dopant cation, the oxygen vacancy shows similar preference to reside in first and second neighboring sites. Moreover, the binding energy was also estimated to be lowest in Gd3+-doped CeO2. Although these theoretical studies show a close match with the experimental results, they are based on empirical atomistic models.
Andersson et al. [16] performed the quantum mechanical calculations within the density functional theory (DFT) formalism in trivalent cation-doped CeO2. Both electrostatic and elastic interaction energies between the dopant cation and oxygen vacancy located in nearest neighbor (NN) site and in the next to nearest neighbor (NNN) site (of dopant cation) were predicted using the

Figure 9.
Total interaction energy between dopant cation and oxygen vacancy sitting in nearest neighbor (NN) and next to nearest neighbor (NNN) site (of dopant cations) for rare- earth dopant cations. The negative numbers imply attractive interactions. The
Unfortunately, Pm is a radioactive element and cannot be used as a dopant in ceria. The best dopant should be having an effective atomic number around Pm3+ (61) with an ionic radius of 1.093 Å. According to Andersson et al. [16], a co-doping approach, with Sm3+ and Nd3+ as co-dopants, provides an experimental scenario for examining the validity of this hypothesis. Omar et al. [8, 42] have studied the influence of co-doping Sm3+ and Nd3+ on the oxygen-ion conductivity of CeO2. Sm3+ and Nd3+ were added in an equal ratio to obtain the effective atomic number of Pm3+, that is, 61. By doing so, similar total interactions between the dopant cations and oxygen vacancies sitting in NN and NNN sites (of dopant cations) are expected, which may lead to enhancement in the oxygen-ion conductivity. It was reported that for compositions containing 10 mol.% of dopant, Sm3+ and Nd3+-doped ceria exhibits 14% higher grain ionic conductivity than that of Gd0.10Ce0.90O2.95 at 550°C, in air (shown in Figure 3). The obtained high conductivity of co-doped samples validates the density functional theory prediction about Pm3+ to be the best dopant cation for achieving high oxygen-ion conductivity in CeO2.
5. Migration enthalpy in the local environment
Although several investigations have shown the formation of local defect structures in doped ceria systems, only a few models exist which describe the doping fraction at which they start appearing and directly influencing the conductivity. Also, in several experimental investigations, the observed trend in macroscopic migration enthalpy is attributed to the microscopic level association between dopant cation and oxygen vacancies without a thorough understanding of underlying atomistic level mechanisms. In earlier studies, the local defect structures are considered as one of the chemical species whose concentration is described using the equilibrium thermodynamics [1, 39]. However, this approach does not take into account the interactions between the local defect structures, especially at higher doping concentrations (>10 mol.% A2O3).
Multiple atomistic simulations studies have been performed to comprehend the relationships between the macroscopic conductivity and the migration in various local environments. In one of the earlier theoretical studies, Murray et al. [50] used Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations to consider the migration enthalpy in the local environment to estimate the oxygen-ion conductivity as a function of doping level. It was reported that at higher doping concentration, oxygen vacancies tend to reside next to dopants, and thus do not contribute toward ionic conduction.
In a similar investigation, Nakayama et al. [51] used
In recent work by Koettgen et al. [6], the oxygen-ion conductivity was calculated as a function of the doping amount by combining
Figure 10 shows the schematic of trapping and blocking effects. The energy of the system as a function of a reaction coordinate for the corresponding configuration is also shown. It was demonstrated that both these effects have an impact on the observed ionic conductivity. While blocking effect determines the doping fraction at which the maximum in conductivity is observed, it is the trapping effect which limits the maximum ionic conductivity value. Thus, this study clarifies that the optimal doping concentration to achieve the maximum ionic conductivity cannot be predicted only by trapping effect (association between dopant cation and oxygen vacancies) which is commonly assumed in the literature.

Figure 10.
The energy of the system as a function of the reaction coordinate for the configuration change that is shown below in rare-earth-doped ceria. In trapping effect, migration enthalpy increases if the oxygen-ion jump weakens the association between the oxygen vacancies and the dopants. In case of blocking effect, the migration energy increases for an increasing number of large dopants at the migration edge: cerium ions (green), rare-earth ions (blue), oxygen ions (red spheres), and oxygen vacancies (red boxes) [
6. Summary and conclusion
This chapter reviews some of the highlights of investigations performed on lower-valent cation-doped ceria materials which have been considered strong candidates for the electrolyte application in SOFCs operating at the intermediate-temperature range. Some of the basic characteristics of doped ceria relating to its high oxygen-ion conductivity are discussed. The maximum in conductivity observed by adding a large amount of lower-valent dopant cation is explained on the basis of formation of local defect structures. The extent of formation of these local defect structures cannot be lowered by just minimizing the elastic lattice distortion. It has been emphasized that the concept of critical ionic radius alone cannot explain the maximum oxygen-ion conductivity observed in Pm3+-doped CeO2 as found by the first-principles density functional theory calculations. Particular attention has been given to a more recent atomistic simulations study on rare-earth-doped ceria which calculates the migration energies for all the possible jump configurations that may present in rare-earth-doped CeO2. This study explains the importance of the shape of migration energy barrier and its impact on the ionic conductivity.
Acknowledgments
Author would like to acknowledge IIT Kanpur for supporting in writing this chapter.
References
- 1.
Inaba H, Tagawa H. Ceria-based solid electrolytes - review. Solid State Ionics. 1996; 83 :1-16 - 2.
Steele BCH. Appraisal of Ce1 -y GdyO2-y /2 electrolytes for IT-SOFC operation at 500o C. Solid State Ionics. 2000;129 :95-110 - 3.
Mogensen M, Sammes NM, Tompsett GA. Physical, chemical and electrochemical properties of pure and doped ceria. Solid State Ionics. 2000; 129 :63-94 - 4.
Omar S, Nino JC. Consistency in the chemical expansion of fluorites: A thermal revision of the doped ceria. Acta Materialia. 2013; 61 :5406-5413 - 5.
Tuller HL, Bishop SR. Tailoring material properties through defect engineering. Chemistry Letters. 2010; 39 :1226-1231 - 6.
Koettgen J, Grieshammer S, Hein P, Grope BOH, Nakayama M, Martin M. Understanding the ionic conductivity maximum in doped ceria: Trapping and blocking. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2018; 20 :14291-14321 - 7.
Zhu H, Ricote S, Coors WG, Chatzichristodoulou C, Kee RJ. Equilibrium and transient conductivity for gadolium-doped ceria under large perturbations: II. Modeling. Solid State Ionics. 2014; 268 :198-207 - 8.
Omar S, Wachsman ED, Nino JC. Higher ionic conductive ceria based electrolytes for SOFCs. Applied Physics Letters. 2007; 91 :144106 - 9.
Guo X, Waser R. Electrical properties of the grain boundaries of oxygen ion conductors: Acceptor-doped zirconia and ceria. Progress in Materials Science. 2006; 51 :151-210 - 10.
Irvine JTS, Sinclair DC, West AR. Electroceramics: Characterization by impedance spectroscopy. Advanced Materials. 1990; 2 :132-138 - 11.
Wang DY, Park DS, Griffith J, Nowick AS. Oxygen-ion conductivity and defect interactions in Yttria-doped ceria. Solid State Ionics. 1981; 2 :95-105 - 12.
Yahiro H, Eguchi Y, Eguchi K, Arai H. Oxygen ion conductivity of the ceria-samarium oxide system with fluorite structure. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry. 1988; 18 :527-531 - 13.
Yahiro H, Ohuchi T, Eguchi K, Arai H. Electrical-properties and microstructure in the system ceria alkaline-earth oxide. Journal of Materials Science. 1988; 23 :1036-1041 - 14.
Zhang TS, Ma J, Kong LB, Chan SH, Kilner JA. Aging behavior and ionic conductivity of ceria-based ceramics: A comparative study. Solid State Ionics. 2004; 170 :209-217 - 15.
Omar S, Wachsman ED, Jones JL, Nino JC. Crystal structure-ionic conductivity relationships in doped ceria systems. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 2009; 92 :2674-2681 - 16.
Andersson DA, Simak SI, Skorodumova NV, Abrikosov IA, Johansson B. Optimization of ionic conductivity in doped ceria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006; 103 :3518 - 17.
Balazs GB, Glass RS. AC-impedance studies of rare-earth-oxide doped ceria. Solid State Ionics. 1995; 76 :155-162 - 18.
Butler V, Catlow CRA, Fender BEF, Harding JH. Dopant ion radius and ionic-conductivity in cerium dioxide. Solid State Ionics. 1983; 8 :109-113 - 19.
Gerhardt-Anderson R, Nowick AS. Ionic conductivity of CeO2 with trivalent dopants of different ionic radii. Solid State Ionics. 1981; 5 :547-550 - 20.
Perez-Coll D, Marrero-Lopez D, Nunez P, Pinol S, Frade JR. Grain boundary conductivity of Ce0.8Ln0.2O2- d ceramics (Ln = Y, La, Gd, Sm) with and without co-doping. Electrochimica Acta. 2006;51 :6463-6469 - 21.
Zając W, Molenda J. Electrical conductivity of doubly doped ceria. Solid State Ionics. 2008; 179 :154-158 - 22.
Mogensen M, Lindegaard T, Hansen UR, Mogensen G. Physical properties of mixed conductor solid oxide fuel cell anodes of doped CeO2. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 1994; 141 :2122-2128 - 23.
Omar S, Wachsman ED, Nino JC. A co-doping approach towards enhanced ionic conductivity in fluorite-based electrolytes. Solid State Ionics. 2006; 177 :3199-3203 - 24.
Sánchez-Bautista C, Dos santos-García AJ, Peña-Martínez J, Canales-Vázquez J. The grain boundary effect on dysprosium doped ceria. Solid State Ionics. 2010; 181 :1665-1673 - 25.
Tianshu Z, Hing P, Huang H, Kilner J. Ionic conductivity in the CeO2–Gd2O3 system (0.05≤Gd/Ce≤0.4) prepared by oxalate coprecipitation. Solid State Ionics. 2002; 148 :567-573 - 26.
Fuentes RO, Baker RT. Structural, morphological and electrical properties of Gd0.1Ce0.9O1.95 prepared by a citrate complexation method. Journal of Power Sources. 2009; 186 :268-277 - 27.
Keqin H, Man F, Goodenough JB. Synthesis and electrical properties of dense Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 ceramics. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1998; 81 :357-362 - 28.
Reddy KR, Karan K. Sinterability, Mechanical, Microstructural, and electrical properties of gadolinium-doped ceria electrolyte for low-temperature solid. Journal of Electroceramics. 2005; 15 :45-56 - 29.
Cioateră N, Pârvulescu V, Rolle A, Vannier RN. Effect of strontium addition on europium-doped ceria properties. Solid State Ionics. 2009; 180 :681-687 - 30.
Li LP, Lin XM, Li GS, Inomata H. Solid solubility and transport properties of Ce1- x Ndx O2-d Nanocrystalline solid solutions by a sol-gel route. Journal of Materials Research. 2001;16 :3207-3213 - 31.
Aneflous L, Musso JA, Villain S, Gavarri JR, Benyaich H. Effects of temperature and Nd composition on non-linear transport properties in substituted Ce1- x Ndx O2-δ cerium dioxides. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2004;177 :856-865 - 32.
Stephens IEL, Kilner JA. Ionic conductivity of Ce1- x Ndx O2-x /2. Solid State Ionics. 2006;177 :669-676 - 33.
Zhu JX, Zhou DF, Guo SR, Ye JF, Hao XF, Cao XQ, Meng J. Grain boundary conductivity of high purity neodymium-doped ceria nanosystem with and without the doping of molybdenum oxide. Journal of Power Sources. 2007; 174 :114-123 - 34.
Yamazaki S, Matsui T, Sato T, Arita Y, Nagasaki T. EXAFS study of reduced ceria doped with lanthanide oxides. Solid State Ionics. 2002; 154-155 :113-118 - 35.
Yamazaki S, Matsui T, Ohashi T, Arita Y. Defect structures in doped CeO2 studied by using XAFS spectrometry. Solid State Ionics. 2000; 136-137 :913-920 - 36.
Deguchi H, Yoshida H, Inagaki T, Horiuchi M. EXAFS study of doped ceria using multiple data set fit. Solid State Ionics. 2005; 176 :1817-1825 - 37.
Ohashi T, Yamazaki S, Tokunaga T, Arita Y, Matsui T, Harami T, Kobayashi K. EXAFS study of Ce1− x GdxO2−x /2. Solid State Ionics. 1998;113-115 :559-564 - 38.
Jain P, Avila-Paredes HJ, Gapuz C, Sen S, Kim S. High-resolution 89Y and 45Sc NMR spectroscopic study of short-range structural order in Nanocrystalline Y- and Sc-doped CeO2 and ZrO2. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2009; 113 :6553-6560 - 39.
Kilner JA, Waters CD. The effects of dopant cation-oxygen vacancy complexes on the anion transport properties of non-stoichiometric fluorite oxides. Solid State Ionics. 1982; 6 :253-259 - 40.
Rai A, Mehta P, Omar S. Ionic conduction behavior in Sm x Nd0.15-x Ce0.85O2-δ . Solid State Ionics. 2014;263 :190-196 - 41.
Nowick AS, Lee WK, Jain H. Survey and interpretation of pre-exponentials of conductivity. Solid State Ionics. 1988; 28 :89-94 - 42.
Omar S, Wachsman ED, Nino JC. Higher conductivity Sm3+ and Nd3+ co-doped ceria-based electrolyte materials. Solid State Ionics. 2008; 178 :1890-1897 - 43.
Nowick AS, Wang DY, Park DS, Griffith J. Oxygen-ion conductivity and defect structure of CeO2 doped with CaO and Y2O3. In: Vashishta P, Mundy JN, Shenoy GK, editors. Fast Ion Transport in Solids: Electrodes and Electrolytes. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland Publishing Co.; 1979 - 44.
Zhan ZL, Wen TL, Tu HY, Lu ZY. AC impedance investigation of samarium-doped ceria. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2001; 148 :A427-A432 - 45.
Kilner JA, Brook RJ. A study of oxygen ion conductivity in doped nonstoichiometric oxides. Solid State Ionics. 1982; 6 :237-252 - 46.
Kim DJ. Lattice-parameters, ionic conductivities, and solubility limits in fluorite-structure MO2 oxide (M = Hf4+, Zr4+, Ce4+, Th4+, U4+) solid-solutions. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1989; 72 :1415-1421 - 47.
Hong SJ, Virkar AV. Lattice-parameters and densities of rare-earth-oxide doped ceria electrolytes. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1995; 78 :433-439 - 48.
Butler V, Catlow CRA, Fender BEF, Harding JH. Dopant ion radius and ionic conductivity in cerium dioxide. Solid State Ionics. 1983; 8 :109-113 - 49.
Minervini L, Zacate MO, Grimes RW. Defect cluster formation in M2O3-doped CeO2. Solid State Ionics. 1999; 116 :339-349 - 50.
Murray AD, Murch GE, Catlow CRA. A new hybrid scheme of computer simulation based on Hades and Monte Carlo: Application to ionic conductivity in Y3+ doped CeO2. Solid State Ionics. 1986; 18-19 :196-202 - 51.
Nakayama M, Martin M. First-principles study on defect chemistry and migration of oxide ions in ceria doped with rare-earth cations. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2009; 11 :3241-3249