Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Declining Transmission of Malaria in India: Accelerating Towards Elimination

Written By

Sunil Dhiman, Vijay Veer and Vas Dev

Submitted: February 6th, 2018 Reviewed: April 6th, 2018 Published: July 18th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.77046

Chapter metrics overview

2,042 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


India is ecologically vast and has close to a billion-population living at risk of malaria. Given the evidence-based present-day intervention tools and large-scale implementation, India has recorded declining trends in disease transmission from 2 million cases in 2001 to close to a million cases in 2017 and embarked upon malaria elimination in keeping with the Global Technical Strategy by 2030. India is malaria endemic, but transmission intensities varied across its landscape with just few States of the east, central and northeast contributing bulk (80%) of total positive cases. Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax are the predominant infections of which there has been steady increase in proportions of the former for constituting >60% of total cases what was 50:50 in 2001, a phenomenon attributed to emerging drug resistance. With the rolling out of the available intervention tools, malaria elimination is foreseeable yet there are multiple challenges which must be addressed to overcome the constraints. We strongly advocate continued disease surveillance and monitoring, universal coverage and intensification of core-interventions for prevention and treatment prioritizing high-risk States, strengthening cross-border collaborations for information sharing and coordinated activities, and above all sustained allocation of resources, creating the enabling environment to end malaria transmission.


  • malaria elimination
  • epidemiology
  • Plasmodium falciparum
  • drug-resistance
  • mosquito vectors
  • insecticide resistance
  • Southeast Asia

1. Introduction

The advent of new intervention tools including Noble prize-winning discovery of Artemisinin by Tu Youyou for treatment of malaria combined with large-scale implementation of insecticide-treated netting materials for vector containment has once again renewed the optimism of malaria elimination globally. Malaria map is shrinking with more than 35 countries certified to be malaria free, and another 21 countries that are likely to reach zero indigenous transmission (categorized as E-2020) are set to be declared malaria free by 2020 [1, 2]. Many more countries are moving forward from control to elimination. The Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 2016–2030 envisages: (i) to reduce global malaria mortality rates and case incidence by at least 90% compared to 2015 levels, (ii) to make at least 35 countries malaria free that reported cases in 2015 and (iii) preventing re-establishment in countries with no indigenous transmission [3]. Among member countries of the Southeast Asia Region of WHO (SEAR), Maldives and Sri Lanka have already been certified malaria free in 2015 and 2016, respectively, and Bhutan is targeting elimination in the foreseeable future. In the past decade, India has registered drastic decrease in cases and have formulated National Framework for Malaria Elimination (2016–2030) in close alignment with the Global Technical Strategy for Malaria, Roll Back Malaria Action (RBM), Investment to defeat Malaria (AIM) and the Asia Pacific Leaders Malaria Alliance (APLMA) for shared experiences and coordinated action to eliminate malaria (zero indigenous cases) throughout the country by 2030 [4]. The said task is set to be accomplished in phased manner with the following objectives: (i) eliminate malaria in all 26 low-to-moderate transmission States/Union Territories (UTs) by 2022, (ii) reduce the case incidence to <1 per 1000 population by 2024 in all States/UTs, (iii) interrupt indigenous transmission throughout the country by 2027 and (iv) prevent re-establishment of local transmission and maintain malaria-free status by 2030 and beyond.

India is historically endemic for both Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum malaria and has history of successes and resurgences [5, 6]. Malaria was on the verge of elimination post-independence in 1960s with 0.1 million cases and no death, yet it reared its ugly head again in 1970s with record number of six million cases and many deaths attributed to technical and operational constraints. Transmission is largely seasonal corresponding to rainy season with record of focal disease outbreaks characterized by high rise in cases and attributable deaths. In 2017, India reported 0.84 million cases, the highest disease burden in SEAR member countries of WHO [4, 7]. Almost all Indian States and UTs are reporting cases, which can be broadly stratified into three different categories based on Annual Parasite Incidence (API) per 1000 population, that is, Category—I (total of 15 States/UTs including districts with API < 1) that are targeted for elimination phase, Category—II (total of 11 States/UTs with API < 1 with one or more districts reporting > 1 API) marked for pre-elimination phase and Category—III (total of 10 States/UTs with > 1 API) targeted for intensified control operations. With the rolling out of the present day evidence-based intervention tools, disease transmission is on the steady decline presenting window of opportunity to accelerate toward universal coverage for malaria prevention and treatment. India is a huge country (population 1.3 billion) with majority populous (80%) living at risk of malaria. The task is enormous and daunting. Given the political commitment and National Framework developed by the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP) of Government of India, malaria elimination is foreseeable, yet there are multiple challenges which must be addressed to overcome the constraints. In this chapter, we attempt to enumerate some of these issues helping strengthen healthcare services in combating malaria menace enabling elimination by due date.


2. Malaria transmission in India: current distribution and parasite formula

Malaria transmission is heterogenous across Indian landscape for its diverse ecology and multiplicity of disease vectors [8]. Malaria is a serious public health concern and almost all 36 States/UTs are consistently contributing cases, but transmission intensities varied ranging from low-to-moderate (Table 1). Among these, north-eastern, eastern and central Indian States consistently contributed 80% of the total disease burden having concentration of cases (API > 10) associated with large forest cover, ethnic tribes, poverty and high rainfall (Figure 1). These included States of Odisha (formerly Orissa) and Jharkhand (eastern India), Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh (central India) and Meghalaya and Tripura (northeast India), which together contributed >65% of P. falciparum cases. Approximately a billion population of India resides in malaria endemic areas, however, 80% of malaria cases are reported by just 20% of the population living in the forest-fringe, tribal and foothills hard-to-reach areas of the country little aware of disease prevention and access to treatment [9]. These areas are prone to periodic disease outbreaks resulting in flare up of cases and attributable mortality accounting for inter-annual variation in reported morbidity. From the epidemiological data for the past 17 years (2001–2017), disease transmission trends are observed to be declining from two million cases in 2001 to close to a million cases in 2017 (Figure 2). However, consequent to the introduction of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) beginning 2010 coupled with insecticide-treated netting materials (ITNs); there has been drastic decrease in cases and deaths. P. falciparum and P. vivax are the predominant infections of which there has been steady increase in proportions of the former parasite species presently constituting >60% of total cases what was 50:50 in 2001. Every single death was attributed to P. falciparum, majority of which were contributed by high-risk States of north-eastern, eastern and central India (Figure 3). The distribution of P. malariae is patchy, recorded in indigenous tribes of eastern, north-eastern and central India [10, 11, 12], but transmission of P. ovale except for few sporadic reports could not be clearly ascertained [13, 14, 15]. There exists no record of P. knowlesi malaria in India making inroads in other Southeast Asian countries [16].

No State/Union Territories 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total malaria cases Plasmodium falciparum cases Deaths Total malaria cases Plasmodium falciparum cases Deaths Total malaria cases Plasmodium falciparum cases Deaths Total malaria cases Plasmodium falciparum cases Deaths
1 Andhra Pradesh 21,077 15,511 0 25,042 18,709 0 23,613 17,443 0 16,913 11,944 0
2 Arunachal Pradesh 6082 2338 9 5088 1714 7 3144 911 2 1538 487 0
3 Assam 14,540 11,210 11 15,557 11,675 4 7826 5686 6 5473 4131 0
4 Bihar 2043 699 0 4006 1286 1 5205 895 0 3175 356 2
5 Chhattisgarh 128,993 108,874 53 144,886 123,839 21 148,220 121,503 61 141,310 115,153 0
6 Goa 824 42 0 651 75 1 742 130 0 653 75 2
7 Gujarat 41,608 6253 16 41,566 7232 7 44,783 6298 6 37,801 3502 2
8 Haryana 4485 45 1 9308 726 3 7866 552 0 6887 904 0
9 Himachal Pradesh 102 1 0 60 1 0 121 19 0 95 9 0
10 Jammu & Kashmir 291 21 0 216 8 0 242 11 0 226 0 0
11 Jharkhand 103,735 46,448 8 104,800 54,993 6 141,414 83,232 15 92,770 42,047 1
12 Karnataka 14,794 1329 2 12,445 1598 0 11,078 1746 0 6529 1118 0
13 Kerala 1751 305 6 1549 400 4 1547 419 2 1194 317 2
14 Madhya Pradesh 96,879 41,638 26 100,597 39,125 24 69,106 22,304 3 46,176 15,554 3
15 Maharashtra 53,385 25,770 68 56,603 31,139 59 23,983 7815 26 18,133 5929 19
16 Manipur 145 72 0 216 119 0 122 58 0 80 22 0
17 Meghalaya 39,168 37,149 73 48,603 43,828 79 35,147 31,867 45 16,433 14,974 11
18 Mizoram 23,145 21,083 31 28,593 24,602 21 7583 5907 9 5710 4978 0
19 Nagaland 1936 647 2 1527 532 3 828 316 0 394 188 1
20 Orissa 395,035 342,280 89 436,850 369,533 80 449,697 389,332 77 352,140 297,554 25
21 Punjab 1036 14 0 596 13 0 693 8 0 808 12 0
22 Rajasthan 15,118 603 4 11,796 662 3 12,741 1031 5 6837 377 0
23 Sikkim 35 18 0 27 11 0 15 5 0 12 3 0
24 Tamil Nadu 8729 339 0 5587 355 0 4341 242 0 5449 197 0
25 Telangana 5189 4602 0 10,951 10,206 4 3512 2617 1 2688 2170 0
26 Tripura 51,240 49,653 96 32,525 30,074 21 10,546 9545 14 7040 6572 6
27 Uttarakhand 1171 89 0 1466 73 0 961 47 0 532 14 0
28 Uttar Pradesh 41,612 326 0 42,767 371 0 39,238 158 0 32,345 159 0
29 West Bengal 26,484 4981 66 24,208 5775 34 35,236 5928 59 30,008 4632 29
30 A.N. Islands 557 109 0 409 77 0 485 140 0 404 67 0
31 Chandigarh 114 0 0 152 1 1 157 0 0 114 1 0
32 D & N Haveli 669 90 1 418 46 0 375 30 0 297 16 0
33 Daman & Diu 56 4 0 84 18 0 48 7 0 37 4 0
34 Delhi 98 0 0 54 0 0 31 0 0 577 2 0
35 Lakshadweep 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0
36 Puducherry 79 3 0 54 5 1 76 11 0 59 13 0
All India total 1,102,205 722,546 562 1,169,261 778,821 384 1,090,724 716,213 331 840,838 533,481 103

Table 1.

Malaria-attributable morbidity and mortality in different States and Union Territories (UTs) of India during 2014–2017*.

Source: Ref. [7].

Figure 1.

Malaria stratification by Annual Parasite Incidence (API) in Indian States for data based on 2014. API 10 corresponds to 10 confirmed cases per 1000 population. Source: Ref. [4].

Figure 2.

Malaria-attributable morbidity and mortality in India during 2001–2017. Malaria positive cases denote confirmed diagnosis by presence of malarial parasite in finger-prick blood-smears; Pf cases denote positivity for Plasmodium falciparum; death cases are attributed to confirmed falciparum malarial infection. Source: Ref. [7].

Figure 3.

Distribution of malaria-attributed deaths in different geoepidemiological regions of India for data based on 2014–2017. NE refers to group of seven sister States of northeast India including Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura; Central States include Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh; Eastern States include Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha (formerly Orissa) and West Bengal; Western States include Maharashtra, Goa, Gujarat and Rajasthan. In the remaining Indian States and Union Territories, death cases were few and far (not shown). Source: Ref. [7].

The reported cases and deaths; however, are far from acccurate for disease surveillance that can be best described as fragmented and there is no system in place to capture data from private and public sectors alike, least the asymptomatic cases [17]; WHO estimates are much higher to the tune of >10 million cases and deaths manifold [1]. Nevertheless, the presented data showed disease transmisison trends in relation to existing interventions, and monitoring and evaluation in practice.


3. Multiple disease vectors and insecticide resistance

India holds the distinction in malaria epidemiological research for Noble prize-winning discovery that malaria is transmitted by mosquitoes by Sir Ronald Ross on the day of August 20, 1897, and for monumental work on faunistic surveys dating back to 1930s [18]. Of the 58 anopheline species recorded in India [19], six major vector taxa are implicated in malaria transmission, including Anopheles culicifacies s.l., An. fluviatilis s.l., An. minimus s.l., An. dirus s.l., An. sundaicus s.l. and An. stephensi [20]. All of these, except An. stephensi, are species complexes among which members were repeatedly incriminated as vectors evidenced by detection of live sporozoites in salivary glands across range of their distribution [21, 22]. With added tools of molecular taxonomy; however, there have been significant advances in understanding sibling-species composition of these taxa [23, 24, 25], distribution and their bionomics helping target species-specific control interventions in place and time (Table 2). Among these, An. culicifacies is the most widespread and extensively studied for its sibling species composition (A, B, C, D and E), distribution range, seasonal prevalence, larval ecology, feeding and breeding behavior and disease transmission relationships [26]. Species E is the most efficient malaria vector of all having predilection for human host, while species B is a poor vector for its zoophilic characteristics. The other three species (A, C and D) are responsible for local transmission in areas of their predominance [27]. This taxon is the most abundant rural vector in plains of mainland India generating about 65% of cases annually and held responsible for focal disease outbreaks associated with build-up of vector density. It is regarded as highly adaptive species for its diverse breeding habitats and invading new territories in degraded forests of north-eastern India evidenced by records of rising density and incrimination [28, 29, 30]. Its control has become a formidable challenge for having grown multi-resistant virtually to all available insecticides including pyrethroids opening new vistas for research on newer interventions that are sustainable, cost-effective and community-based [31, 32, 33].

Anopheles species/taxa Sibling species prevalent in India (total identified) Diagnostic cytotaxonomic/molecular tools Breeding habitats Feeding behavior (peak biting activity) Resting habitats Sporozoite infectivity (%) Insecticide susceptibility status Distribution range
An. culicifacies s.l. A,B,C,D and E (5) Fixed paracentric inversions, PCR based sequencing of 28S-D3 domain; ITS2-PCR-RFLP; rDNA ITS2 Rain water collections, riverine pools, rice fields, seepage water, streams, borrow pits, irrigation channels Predominantly zoophilic except ‘E’ (A and B: 22:00–23:00; C and D: 18:00–21:00; no data for E) Human-dwellings indoors and cattle sheds Incriminated (0.3–20) Resistant to DDT, malathion and pyrethroids Throughout rural India
An. fluviatilis s.l. S, T, U and Form ‘V’ (4) Fixed paracentric inversions; PCR based sequencing of rDNA ITS2; 28S rDNA-D3 Seepage water foothill streams, irrigation channels, river ecology, shallow wells Sibling species ‘S’—highly anthropophilic (20:00–24:00); ‘T’—zoophilic S—human dwellings indoors; T—cattle sheds Incriminated Highly susceptible to all residual insecticides Throughout India except north-eastern States
An. minimus s.l. An. minimus s.s. (3) rDNA ITS2; 28S rDNA-D3 Perennial foothill seepage water streams Highly anthropophilic (01:00—04:00) Human-dwellings indoors Incriminated (3.0) Highly susceptible to all residual insecticides North-eastern of Arunachala Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura, and Eastern State of Odisha
An. dirus s.l. An. baimaii (8) Karyotypic studies, polytene chromosome analysis, gene-enzyme variation, DNA probes, rDNA ITS2; SCAR-PCR Jungle water pools, Elephant foot-prints Highly anthropophilic (21:00—24:00) Exophilic Incriminated (1.9) Highly susceptible to all residual insecticides North-eastern of Arunachala Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura
An. sundaicus s.l. An. sundaicus cytotype D (4) Mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase 1 and cytochrome-b; rDNA ITS2; 28S rDNA-D3 Brackish water including swamps, salt water lagoons, creeks as well as fresh water Predominantly zoophilic except indoor resting populations (21:00—04:00) Both indoors and outdoors Incriminated Highly susceptible to all residual insecticides Andaman & Nicobar Islands
An. stephensi Not applicable Domestic containers, building construction sites, overhead water storage tanks, underground cement tanks, desert coolers Predominantly anthropophilic (22:00—24:00) Endophilic Incriminated Resistant to DDT and Malathion Urban metropolitan cities of India

Table 2.

Bionomics, distribution and sibling-species composition of the dominant mosquito vector taxa of human malaria in India*.

Source: Refs. [20, 23, 24, 25]; rDNA, ribosomal DNA; SCAR, sequence characterized amplified region; ITS2, internal transcribed spacer 2; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

An. fluviatilis complex is just as widespread and have overlapping distribution with An. culicifacies throughout India [20]. Among its sibling species, that is, S, T, U and form ‘V’; it is species S which is highly anthropophilic and responsible for maintaining hyperendemic malaria predominantly in foothills of eastern India contributing ~15% of reported cases [34]. It shares similar bionomical characteristics with yet another efficient malaria vector species An. minimus s.s for breeding in foothill seepage water streams and resting indoors in human dwellings [35]. Both are highly susceptible to residual insecticides. An. minimus instead is the most predominant vector species of north-eastern States of India and has long history of disappearance and re-appearance stymying the control authorities. It is reckoned as the most efficient vector species for its high anthropophily (human blood index > 90%) and fulminating focal disease outbreaks taking heavy toll of human lives [36]. It is a perennial species and widely incriminated practically all months of the year with average sporozoite infection rate of 3% [37]. This species exhibits high behavioral plasticity for avoiding sprayed surfaces for weeks and establishing extra-domiciliary transmission in response to indoor residual spraying (IRS). While this species has staged comeback in eastern State of Odisha after lapse of 45 years [38], the populations of An. minimus once again are reported diminishing in erstwhile domains of its distribution in northeast India corroborated by evidence of reducing disease transmission [35]. It presents an unprecedented opportunity to strengthen interventions to keep populations of this species at bay helping achieve malaria elimination specific to the region at sub-national level.

Within the An. dirus complex, An. baimaii is the only vector occurring in India with a wide prevalence in the north-eastern States and has been recorded in high densities and incriminated in range of its distribution [39]. It is just as efficient vector species with strong predilection for human host but distinct from An. minimus for its breeding and resting characteristics [40, 41]. It is a forest dweller affecting forest-fringe human settlements along inter-country and inter-state border areas causing devastating disease outbreaks often in conjunction with An. minimus; together they contribute 10% of reported cases in the country [42]. Its control has become difficult for peak biting activity during second quartile (21:00–00:00) of the night as well as exophilic resting behavior avoiding sprayed surfaces. Its populations along with that of An. minimus are also depleting owing to deforestation and urbanization [29, 30]. However, niche thus vacated by both these species is accessed by An. culicifacies s.l. and has established foothold erstwhile recorded in low-density [26, 28]. Among sibling species of the An. sundaicus complex, cytotype species D has been characterized with a regional importance presently confined to Andaman and Nicobar Islands [43]. It is a brackish water species, largely zoophilic and susceptible to residual insecticides.

An. stephensi is the only urban vector species breeding in domestic containers and often associated with tropical aggregation of labor at construction sites in metropolitan cities [44]. The species is resistant to multiple insecticides and its control focused on ‘source reduction’ to contain urban malaria. Due to continued urbanization and associated labor migration, urban malaria is viewed as a growing menace contributing about 10% of cases in the country [5, 6, 7].

Besides these dominant vectors, member species of An. maculatus s.l., An. annularis s.l. and An. subpictus s.l. are also implicated; however, these species are considered of lesser significance for being predominantly zoophilic [45, 46]. Vector control is an integral part of the malaria control strategy in India and huge investment is made annually to contain build-up of disease vectors averting epidemic malaria. What is tantamount to vector control is the entomological surveillance for developing malaria-risk maps, judicious application of insecticides, monitoring insecticide-resistance and residual efficacy, universal coverage for population at risk and continued research for newer interventions, which are community-based and sustainable. We strongly believe that judicious mix of technologies that are situation-specific and doable would help save operational costs in resource-poor settings. The country is in dire need of skilled entomologist/taxonomists (an expertise that is getting scarce) to meet the human resource requirements for control of malaria, and other vector-borne diseases, as well as vector surveillance post-elimination to prevent re-establishment of local transmission in malaria-free territories.


4. Drug-resistant malaria

Of the two prevalent malaria parasite species, the rising proportions of P. falciparum is of grave concern for presently constituting >60% of total reported cases in the country [5, 7]. Rising trends of P. falciparum are largely attributed to fast emerging drug-resistance over space and time in parallel with phenomenon happening in countries of the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) of Southeast Asia [47]. Historically, chloroquine (CQ) was the most commonly used drug for treatment ever since inception of the control program in 1953 for its efficacy and affordability. It had become obsolete since its first report of treatment failure in Assam (northeast India) way back in 1973 [48]. Subsequently, drug-resistant foci had multiplied for which northeast is considered corridor for spread to rest of peninsular India resulting in steady rise in proportions of P. falciparum what was 13% in 1978 to 65% in present day malaria [49]. Northeast India shares wide border with Myanmar contiguous with GMS countries which is porous for cross-border migration, facilitating entry of drug-resistant strains enroute to the rest of India and beyond. Malaria transmission along this border is intense vectored by An. minimus and An. baimaii (the two most efficient vector species), and healthcare access is inadequate resulting in indiscriminate and sub-optimal doses inter-alia, poor vector control, illiteracy and treatment-seeking behavior; all contributing to propagation and spread of drug-resistant malaria strains [50]. Chloroquine therapy was subsequently upgraded to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) in 2004 as first-line treatment in selected districts reporting CQ-resistant malaria [51]. The therapeutic efficacy of SP was short lived resulting in substantial rise in cases in the following years [52]. It was in 1990s that the development of artemisinin-derivatives raised new hopes for treatment of drug-resistant malaria for its fast acting schizontocidal properties. Initially, artemisinin was used as monotherapy for treatment of severe and complicated clinical malaria, discontinued in 2009 due to high recrudescence rate and risk of resistance for being commonly prescribed medicine by private practitioners and public sector alike [53]. In 2010, the program adopted ACT by combining it with SP, that is, artesunate + SP (AS + SP) for treatment of every single case of P. falciparum malaria in high-risk districts [54]. Mass scale introduction of this combination did result in appreciable transmission reduction in endemic communities formerly intractable. It continues to be in practice throughout India except in the northeast region where it has been replaced by yet another combination therapy, that is, artemether + lumefantrine (AL) in 2013 due to declining efficacy of AS + SP combination drug [55]. The emergence of artemisinin resistance in Southeast Asia [56]; however, is a matter of grave concern for its movement westwards to India for having it detected in Myanmar close to the Indian border in northeast [57]. Genomic studies have already detected mutations in the ‘kelch 13’ propeller region (Pfk 13) linked to artemisinin resistance in north-eastern States, but to lesser frequency [58]. It is of utmost importance to periodically monitor the therapeutic efficacy of drug-regimen in force for radical cure and keep vigil on circulation of counterfeit drugs. The cost of spread of artemisinin-resistant malaria would be colossal, threatening the control and elimination efforts.


5. Plasmodium vivax malaria: the neglected parasite

The Southeast Asian countries contribute most of the vivax cases (58%) in the World of which India is the largest contributor [1]. Historically, much of the control efforts continue to be focused on control of falciparum malaria due to its associated severity and critical illness; the vivax malaria remained a neglected parasite [59]. Paradoxically, control of falciparum malaria is rather measurable in relation to interventions due to development of gametocytaemia 9–10 days post primary infection; instead the formation of gametocytes in vivax malaria is concurrent within few days of initial infection even before the patient seeks treatment permitting uninterrupted transmission. This biological characteristic of vivax malaria along with intrinsic ability of formation of latent hibernating ‘hypnozoites’ has made control efforts a difficult proposition. Nevertheless, the control of vivax malaria is gaining eminence in the context of malaria elimination across the continents [60].

The magnitude of vivax malaria is huge but grossly underestimated throughout India and continues to be neglected [61]. The transmission and distribution of vivax malaria varied across Indian States/UTs, but large concentrations of cases are occurring in urban metropolitan cities [7]. Although it remains highly susceptible to CQ therapy [62, 63, 64, 65, 66], its elimination is one difficult issue owing to latent stage ‘hypnozoites’ in the liver causing relapses amounting to extended morbidity over months/years. The only available anti-relapse drug ‘primaquine (PQ)’ does not guarantee radical cure much due to extended therapy over days coupled with poor compliance resulting in repeated episodes [67, 68, 69]. In addition, the administration of PQ is associated with several issues including contraindication in special groups, that is, infants, pregnant or lactating mothers, and inborn glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency syndromes due to associated hemolytic anemia; these population groups are excluded from primaquine therapy. There exists no diagnostics for detection of G6PD at point-of-care in the present surveillance system except few laboratories procedure for which it is time consuming and impractical in field conditions where the problem exists. Further, given the available technologies, the detection of latent hypnozoites and sub-patent parasitemia is presently not built in the disease surveillance.

The primary attack of vivax malaria is invariably associated with acute paroxysm presenting classical symptoms but treatable and rarely fatal [70, 71, 72]; although few sporadic cases of CQ-resistant cases have been reported in India and several other countries [73]. There is acute need of alternative 8-aminoquinolines, which are safe and universally applicable for radical cure across all population groups preventing relapses. As of today, we stand ill equipped to tackle this stubborn parasite calling for renewed attack both on parasite and disease vectors in reducing parasite reservoir which is likely to persist for long.


6. Asymptomatic malaria

India is historically endemic for malaria with record of devastating epidemics in the pre-DDT era and varied population groups have been subject to repeated attacks of malarial bouts, resulting in acquired immunity and consequent build-up of asymptomatic sub-patent parasitemia in the endemic communities, serving as infectious reservoir for continued transmission. In India, the surveillance program is aimed at taking blood-smears from those who are either febrile (active surveillance) or presenting themselves (passive surveillance) for malaria diagnosis or treatment. There is no built-in mechanism to detect asymptomatic cases or even low-density/sub-patent parasitemia in the endemic communities. These infections may go undetected with conventional diagnostic techniques leaving them untreated, except for mass-blood surveys/mass-drug administrations that are conducted only to contain epidemics. Asymptomatic malaria is more abundant than assumed and have been reported in different endemic States of India; however, the extent and distribution vary corresponding to transmission intensities [74, 75, 76, 77]. Asymptomatic parasitemia is often associated with gametocyte carriage and may persist infectious throughout the year to mosquito vectors. These gametocytes are unable to cause clinical symptoms of malaria, rather ensure the uninterrupted transmission of malaria in the presence of efficient vectors. Asymptomatic cases remain undetected and not accounted for disease incidence amounting to gross underestimates.

Asymptomatic malaria in India remains entrenched in low-socioeconomic groupings living in forest-fringe communities, particularly along inter-border areas (both inter-province and international borders), which are largely inaccessible (marred with insurgent activities), wherein healthcare infrastructure is meager or even non-existent. Such areas are ‘hot-spots’ for explosive disease outbreaks due to mixing/importation of drug-resistant strains associated with illegal migration more so in the northeast (the gateway to India) that shares wide international border with Myanmar, a member country of GMS (an epicenter of multi-drug resistant malaria) and other WHO SEAR countries. Asymptomatic malaria has been documented for both P. falciparum and P. vivax, yet the magnitude was much higher for the former parasite species, more so in the winter months/dry-season, for example, in north-eastern State of Assam, for the high-risk districts surveyed, it varied from 7.1 to 31.1% in P. falciparum and 0.6–6.1% in P. vivax [78]. But on average, 12.8% of afebrile subjects were positive for malaria compared to 34.4% of those presenting with fever, and gametocyte carriage varied from 1.31 to 2.16%. Major bottleneck in eliminating asymptomatic malaria parasite is the absence of standard guidelines and diagnostic procedures aimed at targeting asymptomatic carriers. Malaria control program in practice is largely limited to the qualitative detection of parasite mostly in febrile human hosts and subsequently treating with suitable drugs; however, no attention is given on follow up for quantification of malaria parasite till radical cure. Moreover, a universally accepted parasite level for categorizing a patient as asymptomatic is also not available. Quantification and treating asymptomatic malaria has become increasingly important and relevant for disrupting transmission, requisite for achieving malaria elimination.


7. Cross-border malaria

India shares vast international border with Nepal, Bhutan and China to the North, Myanmar to the East, Bangladesh to the South and Pakistan to the West. Among these, borders with Myanmar and Bangladesh are of immediate concern for their high endemicity and common disease vectors and ecology in the adjoining vicinity on either side of the border [79, 80]. These border areas are porous for cross-migration and have high forest cover inhabited by indigenous tribes living in impoverished conditions. These communities have poor access to healthcare services and are at high-risk to disease outbreaks attributed to drug-resistant strains originating from the GMS countries. These populations are largely marginalized and just as reluctant to seek treatment amounting to unattended parasite reservoirs. Border with Myanmar in particular is believed to be the corridor for entry of drug-resistant strains to northeast India for onward spread. The detection of artemisinin-resistant malaria in closer proximity to Indian border is seen as threat for making its way to India and beyond, similar to the path that was followed by CQ-resistant malaria [48, 49]. Cross-border malaria transmission from neighboring endemic countries can be daunting task and has regional implications jeopardizing the elimination efforts [81, 82]. For example, most cases reported in Bhutan (a country that is heading for malaria elimination), are imported from adjoining districts of Assam seeking treatment on other side of the border. Labor migration across borders engaged in developmental projects is unstoppable for want of livelihood and there exists every possibility of re-entry of malaria given the similar vectors and ecology. It is important to characterize the imported malaria strains enabling interventions well in place and time to prevent re-establishment of local transmission in declared malaria-free territories [83]. Inter-country coordinated efforts are deemed essential to maintain vigil and strengthening border-posts (entry/exit doors) with capacity to detect and treat malaria in the migrant/itinerant labor force at the earliest available opportunity. In keeping the same mandate, India has joined hands with the Asia Pacific Malaria Elimination Network (APMEN) countries for shared experiences and coordinated action to achieve malaria elimination by 2030 [84]. Mitigating cross-border malaria should be accorded priority in context of malaria elimination.


8. Strengthening health systems

India has a well-structured vector-borne disease control program in place providing logistics support along with guidance and monitoring/evaluation services to malaria endemic States/UTs [4, 7]. Utilizing the evidence-based intervention tools and large-scale implementation, India has registered notable decline in cases and malaria-attributable deaths in the preceding few years (Figures 2 and 3). Among these, roll-out of ACT for treatment of every single case of P. falciparum malaria, rapid diagnostics test (RDT) kits for on-the-spot diagnosis and large-scale provision of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) for vector control have resulted in rich dividends in reducing disease transmission in areas formerly intractable. Malaria threat is seen receding presenting an unprecedented opportunity for upscaling interventions in achieving universal coverage for populations at any risk making elimination an achievable target. However, the logistics requirement is huge for which increased funding from donors (both national and international agencies) and political commitment for sustained allocation of resources is of paramount importance for strengthening healthcare services reaching the outreach population groups for equitable access. A humble beginning has been made under National Health Mission (NHM), which envisages achievement of universal access to equitable, affordable and quality healthcare services both in urban and rural India [85]. Much needed disease surveillance in the country is further strengthened by Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) to detect early warning signals for impending disease outbreaks instituting interventions to thwart the disease onslaught and spread [86]. Both these establishments have helped the program immensely in strengthening laboratory services averting disease outbreaks, as well as human resource development in providing training to State surveillance officers, rapid response teams and other medical and paramedical staffs. However, continuing education program is need of the hour for upgrading skills to keep pace with the changing technologies as well as to fill the void due to attrition of skilled workforce. The induction of Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA) have proven boon to the program ensuring door-to-door surveillance raising new levels of confidence in the poverty-stricken communities. Host of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)/media coverage have increased the reach of services in remote/inaccessible areas helping combating illness and saving lives. Collectively, communities today stand better informed and clearly benefitted by increased awareness on disease prevention and control.


9. The way forward

In India, some States (Sikkim and Himachal Pradesh) and UTs (Lakshadweep, Daman & Diu and Puducherry) are already reporting <100 cases, while others recorded substantial decrease (>50%) in cases over past few years, for example, Assam and Karnataka (Table 1). Given the reducing transmission levels, malaria elimination at sub-national level is seemingly achievable. However, the emergence of artemisinin-resistant malaria and possible spread, coupled with multiple insecticide resistance in disease vectors (Table 2), could reverse the gains for which disease surveillance, monitoring and evaluation should be the corner-stone activity. P. vivax and asymptomatic malaria continue to be unattended and should be accorded priority for reducing parasite reservoir in the endemic communities. Priority should be accorded for strengthening healthcare services in high-risk States of eastern, central and north-eastern States helping mitigate disease onslaught and deter entry and spread of drug-resistant strains in India. Inter-sectoral linkages with research establishments and medical colleges for developing innovative newer interventions (possibly vaccines), assessing therapeutic efficacy of antimalarials and upgradation of drug-treatment policy, human resource development and field-evaluation of newer technologies, including innovative vector control approaches, are vital before these are incorporated in the control program. Disease epidemiology is rapidly changing in the face of fast urbanization, deforestation and anomalous weather conditions opening new vistas, which must be watched for targeting interventions in place and time. Mosquito vectors are invading new territories, and adapting to altered ecology establishing outdoor transmission in response to strengthening insecticide interventions, which are largely based on indoor residual applications. We strongly advocate the judicious mix of technologies used in an integrated manner to overcome the challenges of outdoor transmission and growing insecticide resistance threatening the efficacy of present day intervention tools. There remains of scope of newer interventions in Indian geo-epidemiological conditions, namely, eave tubes, attractive sugar baits, nano-synthesized pesticides loaded with microbial- and plant-borne compounds, for trapping adult mosquito vectors and population reduction presently being put to field evaluation in African countries (Beier, personal communication). It is the high time to strengthen the entomological component at the State/Zonal level for monitoring vector densities and insecticide resistance targeting interventions averting impending disease outbreaks. Above all, educating communities and stakeholders on disease prevention and control should be the guiding principle for increased compliance and harmonious action. Increased allocation of resources (both from State and Central assistance), for ensuring universal coverage of interventions, should be given utmost priority in reducing parasite reservoir much below threshold density disrupting transmission [87]. It is time accelerating towards elimination and let there be no complacency at various echelons of operation for keeping disease at bay. Outside Africa, Southeast Asia is the largest contributor of cases and source of spread of drug-resistant malaria for which it is strongly advocated that larger share of global investments in this part of the World would go a long way in alleviating poverty and malaria. In summary, given the enormity of disease burden and myriad of issues, odds are all against, yet concerted efforts should be made in rendering malaria a thing of the past; together we can beat malaria.



We are thankful to Professor S. Manguin (Montpellier, France) for inviting us to contribute this article for this compilation, and the Directorate of National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Directorate of Health Services, Government of India for grant of permission to data access.


ACTartemisinin-based combination therapy
AIMaction and investment to defeat malaria
ALartemether lumefantrine
APIannual parasite incidence
APLMAAsia Pacific Leaders Malaria Alliance
APMENAsia-Pacific Malaria Elimination Network
ASHAAccredited Social Health Activist
AS + SPartesunate + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine
G6PDglucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase
GMSGreater Mekong Subregion
IDSPIntegrated Disease Surveillance Project
IRSindoor residual spray
ITNinsecticide treated nets
ITS-2internal transcribed spacer-2
LLINlong-lasting insecticidal nets
NGONon-Governmental Organization
NHMNational Health Mission
NVBDCPNational Vector Borne Disease Control Programme
PCRpolymerase chain reaction
PfPlasmodium falciparum
Pfk 13Plasmodium falciparum kelch 13
RBMroll back malaria
RDTrapid diagnostic test
SCARSequence Characterized Amplified Region
SEARWHO Southeast Asia Region
UTUnion Territory
WHOWorld Health Organization


  1. 1. World Health Organization (WHO). World Malaria Report 2017. Geneva. Available from: [Accessed: 20 February 2018]
  2. 2. Newby G, Bennett A, Larson E, Cotter C, Shretta R, Phillips AA, Feachem RG. The path to eradication: A progress report on the malaria-eliminating countries. Lancet. 2016;387:1775-1784
  3. 3. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Technical Strategy 2016-2030. Global Malaria Programme. Geneva: World Health Organization. 30 pp. Available from: [Accessed: 20 February 2018]
  4. 4. National Framework for Malaria Elimination in India 2016-2030. Directorate of National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP). Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. p. 43. Available from: [Accessed: 20 February 2018]
  5. 5. Sharma VP. Re-emergence of malaria in India. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 1996;103:26-45
  6. 6. Sharma VP. Fighting malaria in India. Current Science. 1998;75:1127-1140
  7. 7. National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Government of India. Malaria. Available from: [Accessed: February 20, 2018]
  8. 8. Das A, Anvikar AR, Cator LJ, Dhiman RC, Eapen A, Mishra N, Nagpal BN, Nanda N, Raghavendra K, Read AF, Sharma SK, Singh OP, Singh V, Sinnis P, Srivastava HC, Sullivan SA, Sutton PL, Thomas MB, Carlton JM, Valecha N. Malaria in India: The centre for the study of complex malaria in India. Acta Tropica. 2012;121:267-273
  9. 9. Sharma VP. Continuing challenge of malaria in India. Current Science. 2012;102:678-682
  10. 10. Yadav RS, Sharma VP, Ghosh SK, Kumar A. Quartan malaria—An investigation on the incidence of Plasmodium malariae in Bisra PHC, District Sundergarh, Orissa. Indian Journal of Malariology. 1990;27:85-94
  11. 11. Dev V. Plasmodium malariae—A case of quartan malaria in Assam. Journal of Communicable Diseases. 2000;32:149-151
  12. 12. Bharti PK, Chand SK, Singh MP, Mishra S, Shukla MM, Singh R, Singh N. Emergence of a new focus of Plasmodium malariae in forest villages of district Balaghat, Central India: Implications for the diagnosis of malaria and its control. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2013;18:12-17
  13. 13. Singh R, Jain V, Singh PP, Bharti PK, Thomas T, Basak S, Singh N. First report of detection and molecular confirmation of Plasmodium ovale from severe malaria cases in Central India. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2013;18:1416-1420
  14. 14. Prakash A, Mohapatra PK, Bhattacharya DR, Goswami BK, Mahanta J. Plasmodium ovale: First case report from Assam, India. Current Science. 2003;84:1187
  15. 15. Jambulingam P, Mohapatra SS, Das LK, Das PK, Rajagopal PK. Detection of Plasmodium ovale in Koraput district of Orissa State. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 1989;89:115-116
  16. 16. Cox-Singh J. Zoonotic malaria: Plasmodium knowlesi, an emerging pathogen. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. 2012;25:530-536
  17. 17. Dhingra N, Jha P, Sharma VP, Cohen AA, Jotker RM, Rodriguez PS, Bassani DG, Suraweera W, Laxminarayan R, Peto R. Adult and child mortality in India: A nationally representative mortality survey. Lancet. 2010;376:1768-1774
  18. 18. Christopher SR. The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Diptera, Vol. IV. Family Culicidae, Tribe Anophelini. London: Taylor and Francis; 1933. p. 371
  19. 19. Das BP, Rajagopal R, Akiyama J. Pictorial key to the species of Indian anopheline mosquitoes. Journal of Pure and Applied Zoology. 1990;2:131-162
  20. 20. Dev V, Sharma VP. The dominant mosquito vectors of human malaria in India. In: Manguin S, editor. Anopheles Mosquitoes: New Insights into Malaria Vectors. Croatia: InTech Open Access; 2013. pp. 239-271. DOI: 10.5772/55215
  21. 21. Rao TR. The Anophelines of India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research; 1984. p. 596
  22. 22. Nagpal BN, Sharma VP. Indian Anophelines. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.; 1995. p. 416. ISBN: 81-204-0929-9
  23. 23. Subbarao SK. Anopheline Species Complexes in South and South-East Asia. Geneva. World Health Organization (WHO); 2007. p. 102. ISBN: 978-92-9022-294-1
  24. 24. Manguin S, Garros C, Dusfour I, Harbach RE, Coosemans M. Bionomics, taxonomy and distribution of the major vector taxa of Anopheles subgenus Cellia in Southeast Asia: An updated review. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2008;8:489-503
  25. 25. Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Chareonviriyaphap T, Patil AP, Temperley WH, Gething PW, Elyazar IRF, Kabaria CW, Harbach RE, Hay SI. The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Asia-Pacific region: Occurrence data, distribution maps, and bionomics precis. Parasites & Vectors. 2011;4:89
  26. 26. Sharma VP, Dev V. Biology and control of Anopheles culicifacies Giles 1901. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2015;141:525-536
  27. 27. Subbarao SK. The Anopheles culicifacies complex and control of malaria. Parasitology Today. 1988;4:72-75
  28. 28. Bhuyan M, Das NG, Chakraborty BC, Talukdar PK, Sarkar PK, Das SC. Role of Anopheles culicifacies during an outbreak of malaria in Garubandha PHC, Assam. Journal of Communicable Diseases. 1997;29:243-246
  29. 29. Saxena R, Nagpal BN, Singh VP, Srivastava A, Dev V, Sharma MC, Gupta HP, Tomar AS, Sharma S, Gupta SK. Impact of deforestation on known malaria vectors in Sonitpur district of Assam, India. Journal of Vector Borne Diseases. 2014;51:211-215
  30. 30. Nasreen A, Nagpal BN, Kapoor N, Srivastava A, Gupta HP, Saxena R, Shamim A, Kumar V, Gupta SK, Singh VP, Dev V, Nanda N, Valecha N. Impact of ecological and climatic changes on vectors of malaria in four North-eastern States of India. Indian Journal of Ecology. 2016;43:1-15
  31. 31. Singh OP, Raghavendra K, Nanda N, Mittal PK, Subbarao SK. Pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles culicifacies in Surat district Gujarat, West India. Current Science. 2002;82:547-550
  32. 32. Raghavendra K, Verma V, Srivastava HC, Gunasekaran K, Sreehari U, Das AP. Persistence of DDT, malathion & deltamethrin resistance in Anopheles culicifacies after their sequential withdrawal from indoor residual spraying in Surat district, India. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2010;132:260-264
  33. 33. Sahu SS, Sahu K, Gunasekaran T, Vijayakumar JP. Triple insecticide resistance in Anopheles culicifacies: A practical impediment for malaria control in Odisha State, India. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2015;142:59-63
  34. 34. Nanda N, Yadav RS, Subbarao SK, Joshi H, Sharma VP. Studies on Anopheles fluviatilis and Anopheles culicifacies sibling species in relation to malaria in forested hilly and deforested riverine ecosystems in northern Orissa, India. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association. 2000;16:199-205
  35. 35. Dev V, Manguin S. Biology, distribution and control of Anopheles (Cellia) minimus in the context of malaria transmission in northeastern India. Parasites & Vectors. 2016;9:585
  36. 36. Dev V, Ansari MA, Hira CR, Barman K. An outbreak of P. falciparum malaria due to Anopheles minimus in Central Assam. Indian Journal of Malariology. 2001;38:32-38
  37. 37. Dev V. Anopheles minimus: Its bionomics and role in the transmission of malaria in Assam, India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1996;74:61-66
  38. 38. Jambulingam P, Sahu SS, Manonmani A. Reappearance of Anopheles minimus in Singhbum hills of hills of East-Central India. Acta Tropica. 2005;96:31-35
  39. 39. Prakash A, Walton C, Bhattacharyya DR, O’Loughlin SM, Mohapatra PK, Mahanta J. Molecular characterization and species identification of Anopheles dirus and An. minimus complexes in north-east India using r-DNA ITS-2. Acta Tropica. 2006;100:156-161
  40. 40. Dutta P, Bhattacharyya DR, Khan SA, Sharma CK, Mahanta J. Feeding pattern of Anopheles dirus, the major vector of forest malaria in North-east India. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 1996;27:378-381
  41. 41. Dutta P, Khan SA, Bhattacharyya DR, Khan AB, Sharma CK, Mahanta J. Studies on the breeding habitats of the vector mosquito Anopheles baimaii and its relationship to malaria incidence in Northeastern region of India. EcoHealth. 2010;7:498-506
  42. 42. Prakash A, Mohapatra PK, Bhattacharyya DR, Sharma CK, Goswami BK, Hazarika NC, Mahanta J. Epidemiology of malaria outbreak (April/May 1999) in Titabor Primary Health Centre, district Jorhat (Assam). Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2000;111:121-126
  43. 43. Das MK, Nagpal BN, Sharma VP. Mosquito fauna and breeding habitats of anophelines in Car Nicobar Island, India. Indian Journal of Malariology. 1998;35:197-205
  44. 44. Sumodan PK, Kumar A, Yadav RS. Resting behaviour and malaria vector incrimination of Anopheles stephensi in Goa, India. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 2004;20:317-318
  45. 45. Prakash A, Bhattacharyya DR, Mohapatra PK, Mahanta J. Role of the prevalent Anopheles species in the transmission of Plasmodium falciparum, and P. vivax in Assam State and north-eastern India. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology. 2004;98:559-568
  46. 46. Dhiman S, Bhola RK, Goswami D, Rabha B, Kumar D, Baruah I, Singh L. Polymerase chain reaction detection of human host preference and Plasmodium parasite infections in field collected potential malaria vector species. Pathogens and Global Health. 2012;106:177-180
  47. 47. Shah NK, Dhillon GPS, Dash AP, Arora U, Meshnick SR, Valecha N. Antimalaria drug resistance of Plasmodium falciparum in India: Changes over space and time. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2011;11:57-64
  48. 48. Sehgal PN, Sharma MID, Sharma SL, Gogai S. Resistance to chloroquine in falciparum malaria in Assam State, India. Journal of Communicable Diseases. 1973;5:175-180
  49. 49. Sharma VP. Status of drug-resistance in malaria in India. In: Mahajan RC, editor, Multi-drug Resistance in Emerging Re-emerging Diseases. Delhi: Narosa Publications. pp. 191-202
  50. 50. Mohapatra PK, Namchoom NS, Prakash A, Bhattacharya DR, Goswami BK, Mahanta J. Therapeutic efficacy of anti-malarials in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in an Indo-Myanmar border area of Arunachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2003;118:71-76
  51. 51. Dev V, Phookan S, Barman K. Therapeutic efficacies of antimalarial drugs in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Assam, north-eastern India. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology. 2003;97:783-791
  52. 52. Dev V, Sharma VP. Hojai. Malaria transmission and disease burden in Assam: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Parasitic Diseases. 2009;33:13-22
  53. 53. Mishra N, Anvikar AR, K Shah NK, Kamal VK, Sharma SK, Srivastava HC, Das K, Pradhan K, Kumar H, Gupta YK, Gupta P, Dash AP, Valecha N. Prescription practices and availability of artemisinin monotherapy in India: Where do we stand? Malaria Journal. 2011;10:360
  54. 54. Dev V, Biswas S, Joshi H, Prajapati SK, Valecha N, Dash AP. Safety and efficacy of aretsunate + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in northeast India. Parassitologia. 2009;51:29-34
  55. 55. Mishra N, Kaitholia K, Srivastava B, Shah NK, Narayan JP, Dev V, Phookan S, Anvikar AR, Rana R, Bharti RS, Sonal GS, Dhariwal AC, Valecha N. Declining efficacy of artesunate plus sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine in northeastern India. Malaria Journal. 2014;13:284
  56. 56. Phyo AP, Nkhoma S, Stepniewska K, Ashley EA, Nair S, McGready R, ler Moo C, Al-Saai S, Dondorp AM, Lwin KM, Singhasivanon P, Day NP, White NJ, Anderson TJ, Nosten F. Emergence of artemisinin-resistant malaria on the western border of Thailand: A longitudinal study. Lancet. 2012;379:1960-1966
  57. 57. Tun KM, Imwong M, Lwin KM, Win AA, Hlaing TM, Hlaing T, Lin K, Kyaw MP, Plewes K, Faiz MA, Dhorda M, Cheah PY, Pukrittayakamee S, Ashley EA, Anderson TJ, Nair S, McDew-White M, Flegg JA, Grist EP, Guerin P, Maude RJ, Smithuis F, Dondorp AM, Day NP, Nosten F, White NJ, Woodrow CJ. Spread of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Myanmar: A cross-sectional survey of the K13 molecular marker. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2015;15(4):415-421
  58. 58. Mishra N, Prajapati SK, Kaitholia K, Bharti RS, Srivastava B, Phookan S, Anvikar AR, Dev V, Sonal GS, Dhariwal AC, White NJ, Valecha N. Surveillance of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum in India using the kelch13 molecular marker. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2015;59:2548-2553
  59. 59. Joshi H, Prajapati SK, Verma A, Kang S, Carlton JM. Plasmodium vivax in India. Trends in Parasitology. 2008;24:228-235
  60. 60. Shanks GD. Control and elimination of Plasmodium vivax. Advances in Parasitology. 2012;80:301-341
  61. 61. Sharma VP, Dev V, Phookan S. Neglected Plasmodium vivax malaria in northeastern States of India. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2015;141:546-555
  62. 62. Srivastava HC, Yadav RS, Joshi H, Valecha N, Mallick PK, Prajapati SK, Dash AP. Therapeutic responses of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum to chloroquine, in an area of western India where P. vivax predominates. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology. 2008;102:471-480
  63. 63. Rishikesh K, Kamath A, Hande MH, Vidyasagar S, Acharya RV, Acharya V, Belle J, Shastry AB, Saravu K. Therapeutic assessment of chloroquine-primaquine combined regimen in adult cohort of Plasmodium vivax malaria from a tertiary care hospital in southwestern India. Malaria Journal. 2015;14:310
  64. 64. Nandy A, Addy M, Maji AK, Bandyopadhyay AK. Monitoring the chloroquine sensitivity of Plasmodium vivax from Calcutta and Orissa, India. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology. 2003;97:215-220
  65. 65. Ganguly S, Saha P, Guha SK, Das S, Bera DK, Biswas A, Kundu PK, Saha B, Ray K, Maji AK. In vivo therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine alone or in combination with primaquine against vivax malaria in Kolkata, West Bengal, India, and polymorphism in pvmdr1 and pvcrt-o genes. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2013;57:1246-1251
  66. 66. Valecha N, Joshi H, Eapen A, Ravinderan J, Kumar A, Prajapati SK, Ringwald P. Therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine in Plasmodium vivax from areas with different epidemiological patterns in India and their Pvdhfr gene mutation pattern. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2006;100:831-837
  67. 67. Adak T, Sharma VP, Orlov VS. Studies on the Plasmodium vivax relapse pattern in Delhi, India. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1998;59:175-179
  68. 68. Yadav RS, Ghosh SK. Radical curative efficacy of five-day regimen of primaquine for treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria in India. Journal of Parasitology. 2002;88:1042-1044
  69. 69. Rajgor DD, Gogtay NJ, Kadam VS, Kamtekar KD, Dalvi SS, Chogle AR, Aigal U, Bichile LS, Kshirsagar KKC. Efficacy of 14-day primaquine regimen in preventing relapses in patients with Plasmodium vivax malaria in Mumbai, India. Transactions Royal Society Tropical Medicine & Hygiene. 2003;97:438-440
  70. 70. Valecha N, Pinto RG, Turner GD, Kumar A, Rodrigues S, Dubhashi NG, Rodrigues E, Banaulikar SS, Singh R, Dash AP, Baird JK. Histopathology of fatal respiratory distress caused by Plasmodium vivax malaria. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2009;81:75-62
  71. 71. Kochar DK, Das A, Kochar SK, Saxena V, Sirohi P, Garg S, Kochar A, Khatri MP, Gupta V. Severe Plasmodium vivax malaria: A report on serial cases from Bikaner in Northwestern India. American Journal of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene. 2009;80:194-198
  72. 72. Mishra VN, Singh DJ. Cerebral malaria by Plasmodium vivax. Journal of Association of Physicians of India. 1989;37:411
  73. 73. Dua VK, Kar PK, Sharma VP. Chloroquine resistant 7. Plasmodium vivax malaria in India. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 1996;1:816-819
  74. 74. Das NG, Dhiman S, Talukdar PK, Goswami D, Rabha B, Baruah I, Veer V. Role of asymptomatic carriers and weather variables in persistent transmission of malaria in an endemic district of Assam, India. Infection Ecology and Epidemiology. 2015;5:25442
  75. 75. Ganguly S, Saha P, Guha SK, Biswas A, Kundu PK, Mali AK. High prevalence of asymptomatic malaria in a tribal population of Eastern India. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2013;51(5):1439-1444
  76. 76. Chourasia MK, Raghavendra K, Bhatt RM, Swain DK, Meshram HM, Meshram JK, Suman S, Dubey V, Singh G, Prasad KM, Kleinschmidt I. Additional burden of asymptomatic and sub-patent malaria infections during low transmission season in forested tribal villages in Chhattisgarh, India. Malaria Journal. 2017;16:320
  77. 77. Laishram DD, Sutton PL, Nanda N, Sharma VL, Sobti RC, Carlton JM, Joshi H. The complexities of malaria disease manifestations with a focus on asymptomatic malaria. Malaria Journal. 2012;11:29
  78. 78. Dev V, Phookan S, Sharma VP, Dash AP, Anand SP. Malaria parasite burden and treatment seeking behavior in ethnic communities of Assam, Northeastern India. Journal of Infection. 2006;52:131-139
  79. 79. Dev V, Sangma BM, Dash AP. Persistent transmission of malaria in Garo hills of Meghalaya bordering Bangladesh, north-east India. Malaria Journal. 2010;9:263
  80. 80. Dhiman S, Goswami D, Rabha B, Gopalakrishnan R, Baruah I, Singh L. Malaria epidemiology along Indo-Bangladesh border in Tripura State, India. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2010;41(6):1279-1289
  81. 81. Wangdi K, Gatton ML, Kelly GC, Banwell C, Dev V, Clements AC. Malaria elimination in India and regional implications. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2016;16:e214-e224
  82. 82. Wangdi K, Gatton ML, Kelly GC, Clements AC. Cross-border malaria: A major obstacle for malaria elimination. Advances in Parasitology. 2015;89:79-102
  83. 83. Dharmawardena P, Premaratne RG, Gunasekera WM, Hewawitarane M, Mendis K, Fernando D. Characterization of imported malaria, the largest threat to sustained malaria elimination from Sri Lanka. Malaria Journal. 2015;14:177
  84. 84. Asia Pacific Malaria Elimination Network (APMEN). Elimination 2030—Working Together for Malaria Free Asia Pacific. Available from: [Accessed: 20 February 2018]
  85. 85. National Health Mission. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. Available from: [Accessed: 28 February 2018]
  86. 86. Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme, National Centre for Disease Control, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. Available from: [Accessed: 28 February 2018]
  87. 87. Sharma VP. Battling malaria iceberg incorporating strategic reforms in achieving Millennium Development Goals & malaria elimination in India. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2012;136:907-925

Written By

Sunil Dhiman, Vijay Veer and Vas Dev

Submitted: February 6th, 2018 Reviewed: April 6th, 2018 Published: July 18th, 2018