Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Fat Deposition, Fatty Acid Composition, and Its Relationship with Meat Quality and Human Health

Written By

Taiane da Silva Martins, Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos, Lenise Freitas Mueller, Fernando Baldi, Tamyres Rodrigues de Amorim, Adrielle Matias Ferrinho, Julian Andres Muñoz, Ingrid Harumi de Souza Fuzikawa, Gabriella Vespe de Moura, Jéssica Luana Gemelli and Angélica Simone Cravo Pereira

Submitted: November 23rd, 2017 Reviewed: April 25th, 2018 Published: October 10th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.77994

Chapter metrics overview

2,174 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The consumer’s profile has changed, and in recent years, there has been a greater concern for the nutritional quality of meat, especially in relation to fat that compose it. The meat fat composition can contribute to the onset of cardiovascular disease. On the other hand, fat is an essential component in the human diet, as well as providing energy; it contains essential fatty acids (FAs) that must be present in food. The meat nutritional properties are largely related to its fat content and fatty acid composition. In addition, fat gives flavor to food, helps in the absorption of vitamins, and plays an important role in the immune response, for humans, and animals. The fat nutritional and sensory quality in meat that is determined by the fatty acid composition can affect the degree of fat saturation, the storage stability, and flavor. There are several factors that can influence the fatty acid composition, such as animals’ species, breed, sex, and diet, causing various changes in carcass, as well as in tissues and chemical meat composition.


  • animal production
  • animal fat
  • lipid composition
  • flavor
  • polyunsaturated fatty acids
  • human nutrition

1. Introduction

Meat provides important nutrients for the human diet, including vitamin B, minerals such as iron, and the essential fatty acids [1, 2]. The fat deposition in muscles and the meat fatty acid (FA) composition are factors that affect the meat quality and primarily influence flavor, juiciness, and tenderness [3, 4, 5]; therefore, they are important in meat industry. The fat also assists in the transport and absorption of fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K by the intestine and plays an important role in the immune response, both in humans and in animals [6]. Furthermore, fat is related to the quality; protects the carcass from the cold; is considered a visual attractive, striking the meat acceptability by the consumer; and is associated with human health issues [7, 8].

For consumers, flavor and nutritional value are important attributes for meat quality and can influence the purchasing power [9]. However, currently, there is a growing concern not only about the fat excessive consumption but also its composition and impact on health, particularly those of animal origin [10]. The fatty acid profile of intramuscular fat is important for human health, since the intramuscular fat cannot be extracted or removed before consumption of meat [11]. The high consumption of saturated fatty acids (SFAs) is associated with elevation of serum cholesterol and low-density lipoproteins (LDL) which are risk factors for the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases [12]. For these reasons, the animal products are criticized, as they have a high SFA content and labeled as harmful to health [6, 13].

These concerns are based on recommendations in health authorities and nutritionists that support the notion that saturated fat from meat has negative impacts on health. However, in most cases, this information is widespread in digital media and disseminated without scientific support to “crucify” especially red meat, making it the villain to health. Therefore, further clarification of the actual impact of the meat and fat consumption to human health, considering other indirect factors related to its consumption, which can harm human health, such as physical inactivity, obesity, and intake of alcoholic beverages, among others, become necessary.


2. Literature review

2.1. Fat deposition

The development of adipose tissue also begins at the pre-birth, around the third month of pregnancy, when embryonic cells derived from the mesenchyme, like fibroblasts, differentiate to give rise to adipoblasts or primitive cells from adipose tissue. After differentiation, there is no way a cell return to the initial state. Once formed, the adipoblasts undergo an exponential multiplication phase forming preadipocytes [14]. Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is the enzyme responsible for breaking down the triglycerides, caused by fatty acids, and glycerol circulation, endothelial and synthesized by the adipocyte level, also acts as a cell flag, since, when expressed, it stimulates a new wave hyperplastic adipose tissue [14]. After the occurrence of this new wave of proliferation, new adipocyte proliferation inhibitor cell signalers, such as glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH) and fatty acid synthase (FAD), are detected. The cells then receive the signal to initiate the accumulation of lipids, when they become termed themselves adipocytes [14].

During differentiation, preadipocytes undergo morphological changes as well as the selective expression of certain genes. The sequential expression of certain transcription factors, such as the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein factor, SREBP/sterol regulatory element-binding protein, and the family of transcription factors PPAR/proliferator-activated receptor peroxisome, have a key role in the conversion stages of adipocytes [15].

The deposition of intramuscular fat is apparently regulated by different factors when compared with those regulating fat depositions in fatty tissues, such as subcutaneous, metabolic differences existing between them. Intramuscular adipocytes have higher activity of the enzymes hexokinase and phosphofructokinase. The subcutaneous adipose tissue exhibits higher levels of lipogenic enzymes such as NADP-malate dehydrogenase, fosfogluconate-6-dehydrogenase, and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, showing unique roles in lipid metabolism [16, 17].

The adipose tissue mass, therefore, is controlled by the balance between cell proliferation (hyperplasia) and increased cell size (hypertrophy). The uptake of free fatty acids in the cytosol full of lipid droplets in triacylglycerol contributes to adipocyte hypertrophy [14]. In ruminants, adipocytes play an important role as energy reserve, and occasioning changes in animal fat deposition in accordance with their physiological state, such as during pregnancy or termination phase. In addition, adipocytes act as true endocrine cells, secreting several hormones and endocrine signals which are directly related to animal production. Among these substances, leptin, IGF-1, interleukins, and resistin, among others, stand out [18].

The deposition of fat in cattle, as well as other animal species, is reflected by nutrition and sex and used for the genetic group [19]. Thus, there is a wide interest in manipulating the chemical composition of meat, through the regulation of its biosynthesis. For better understanding of the effects of nutrition on lipid metabolism and consequently on the quality of meat, recent research has made association between gene expression and nutrition area known as nutrigenomics [20, 21, 22, 23].

Gene expression is the process whereby information contained in the DNA structure is transmitted to the mRNA and protein products [24]. The binding of specific transcription factors to specific DNA sequences controls this process. The key transcriptional factors involved in lipid metabolism regulatory elements are proteins related to sterol (SREBP-1c) [25], the activated receptor peroxisome proliferator-γ (PPAR), and proliferator-activated receptor peroxisome-α (PPARα). These genes were associated with the synthesis and oxidation of fatty acids in the different organs and tissues of the animal body [26, 27].

The interactions between the nutrients that compose the diet and the synthesis and activity of lipogenic enzymes can illustrate the numerous possibilities regarding lipid deposition in adipose tissue. This is possible because the biological activity displayed by certain dietary fatty acids can stimulate or inhibit specific lipogenic genes encoding enzymes [22]. For example, sources of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) can increase transcription of genes that encode the lipoprotein lipase enzyme (LPL); the connector transporter to fatty acid 4 (FABP4), PPARα [28], and PPAR [26]; and decrease expression of the gene encoding stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD1) [21] and SREBP-1c [29].

The oleic acid concentration presents in the meat bovine fat if dependent of the expression of stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD) and its activity. SCD has been identified and reported as one of the genes associated with fatty acid composition of beef. This is a limitation of SFA responsible for the conversion of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) in mammalian adipocytes. The composition of the fatty acids stored in fat deposits reflects the previous action SCD substrates such as stearic acid and palmitic acid [30]. Accordingly, higher levels of concentrate feed in the finishing period of the animals confined result in a higher concentration of oleic acid and MUFA in the intramuscular fat [31]. Although the adipogenic mechanism is extremely complex, several genes were identified and confirmed as being responsible for fatty acid composition in beef [20, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41].

2.2. Fatty acid composition and its relationship with human health

Besides its importance for the sensory characteristics of the meat, the fat content and their FA composition are relevant to the quality, especially for issues related to human health [42, 43]. The composition of the FA of animal origin can be influenced by diet (forage and grain), by the digestive system, and by the biosynthetic processes of the animal [44]. In ruminants, the FA’s profile is not a direct reflection of FA composition from the feed due to the complex reactions of biohydrogenation caused by rumen microorganisms [8, 16, 42].

Furthermore, the FA composition may also be different depending on the breed, species (Table 1) [13, 45], and sexual condition [46, unpublished data]. Wood et al. [13] showed that the meat has an average 50% of SFA, 40% of MUFA, and 10% of PUFA acids. The meat FAs are mainly medium to long chain, from 12 to 22 carbon atoms, with the basic structure CH3- (CH2)n-COOH. Low concentrations of FA short-chain C8–C10 are observed in mutton fat [13].

Item4:0–10:012:014:016:018:0Total trans18:1n918:2n618:3n320:4n620:5n322:5n322:6n3n6: n3
ChickenDark meatNDNDND20.46.00.842.716.62.60.4ND0.40.45.0
Light meatNDNDND18.96.00.936.

Table 1.

Major fatty acids of milk, beef, lamb, pork, poultry, and eggs (g/100 g total FA).

ND = not detected.

Source: Woods and Fearon [44].

In general, the meat fat of the ruminant has a higher concentration of SFA and lower polyunsaturated:saturated relationship compared to the nonruminant meat. This fact is due to the FA of biohydrogenation process unsaturated on rumen by the action of microorganisms [46, 47, 48]. However, not all SFAs are considered hypercholesterolemic (which increase the levels of bad cholesterol (LDL)). The most undesirable FA, according to French et al. [49], would be myristic acid (C14:0), which represents only 3% of total FA in meat [50]. Howsoever, the main SFAs present in beef intramuscular fat are the palmitic (C16:0) and stearic (C18:0) acids, which make up more than 50% of the total lipid composition [51, 52, 53]. The presence of SFA in beef is the main cause of concern and associations of human health with cardiovascular disease and obesity, by influencing cholesterol blood levels [54].

However, palmitic FA has lower hypercholesterolemic effect and stearic FA (43% of total SFA in meat [50], has no effect because it becomes oleic acid (C18: 1 n-9) in the body [55], and thus does not influence blood cholesterol levels. The intramuscular fat beef also has a higher overall concentration of MUFA, mainly oleic acid and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). Oleic acid may decrease the circulating concentration of LDL cholesterol in humans and is considered a “healthy” fat [56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61]. Higher oleic acid values are desirable for having hypocholesterolemic action, with the advantage of not lower HDL cholesterol (good cholesterol), and act to protect against coronary heart disease [50].

The relation between n6 and n3 is particularly beneficial (balanced) in meat from ruminants. These FAs have several effects on the immune and inflammatory response. The n-3 FA has suppressive effects such as inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation, antibody production, and cytokine expression of adhesion molecules and activation of natural killer cells (NK). The n-6 FA has both effects: inhibitory and stimulating the immune response [60]. The balance of daily intake of foods that are sources of FA n-6 and n-3 is important in human health, and recommendations vary according to some authors and countries. The trend of convergence of the n-6:n-3 ratio of FA is in the range from 4:1 to 5:1 [61, 62, 63]. The essential FAs include the n-3 and n-6 families, which are not biologically synthesized by humans, but they are necessary for biological processes and therefore should be eaten in the human diet.

After n-3 ingestion, the FA biosynthesis of eicosapentaenoic acid—C20:5 (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid—C22:6 (DHA) occurs in the body. The first FA is involved in cardiovascular protection in adults [64], and the second is essential for brain development and visual system, associated with maternal and child health [65].

The arachidonic acid (C20:4 n-6) and EPA give rise to eicosanoids, thromboxanes, prostaglandins, and leukotrienes. Their presence in the bloodstream can provide vasoconstrictor responses or vasodilator, stimulation or inhibition of platelet aggregation, and pro effects or anti-inflammatory drugs [66, 67].

The conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) is a representative of micro-components in animal products, with a mixture of FA, which occurs as intermediate biohydrogenation of PUFAs [68]. This substance is interesting to act as a powerful natural anticarcinogenic and reduce atherosclerosis and diabetes [69].

The red meat consumption and cardiovascular disease, obesity, and colon cancer are mainly due to the saturated fat content [70, 71]. On the other hand, more recent studies indicate that processed meats, not the red fresh beef, increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and obesity [72]. However, other researchers have shown the benefits of lean meat as part of a healthy diet [73, 74, 75]. Furthermore, the meat with higher fat content produces lower levels of mutagenic heterocyclic aromatic amines, especially pasture-fed animals [76], indicating that the consumption of beef presents additional benefit.

According to Oostindjer et al. [77], data on associations between red meat intake and colorectal cancer are inconsistent, and the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Therefore, it is unlikely that moderate consumption of red meat as part of a balanced diet increases the chances of cardiovascular disease or colon cancer [78].

2.3. The influence of diet on the meat fatty acid composition

The animal’s diet has been demonstrated as one of the factors determining the different changes in carcass composition and tissue as well chemistry of meat cuts [79]. The concentrated and bulky proportions and their respective sources are some of the factors which determine the quantity and quality of lipids present in animal products [80, 81].

The biohydrogenation process of unsaturated FA that happens in the rumen, and the composition of FAs in the ruminant’s meat, can be affected by breed, diet composition, and management [8, 13, 42, 45, 82]. Still, the factors that influence the chemical and physical components present in the meat can mention the age, sex, and anatomical location of cutting and the muscle [83]. Comparisons between eight different meat cuts showed that composition of breast fatty acids presented lower concentrations of stearic and palmitic acids, lower myristic concentrations, and higher MUFA concentrations represented by oleic acid [84].

The age specifically affects the MUFA content by means of SCD gene expression and enzyme activity [85]. Typically, the MUFA:SFA relationship increases with age, in muscle neutral lipids, and total fat of cattle [13, 85]. The inclusion of sources of MUFA in animal diet improves milk, meat, and eggs FA profile by increasing the proportion of MUFA:SFA, reducing the proportion of n6:n3 FA and increasing CLA levels in ruminant products [44]. However, one should take precautions as the addition of these sources of FA in animal diets may result in some adverse effects. For example, large quantities of MUFAs in the diet can affect ruminal activity, reducing milk production, and the concentrations of fat and protein, while the increase in PUFA levels in meat could result in lower maintenance and worse taste in meat products [44].

French et al. [46] observed that the longissimus dorsimuscle in ruminants fed with grasses showed a higher CLA production, two to three times as compared with the meat of ruminants fed with feedlot diets with high grain content. Accordingly, several subsequent studies have shown that the use of forage in the diet significantly increases the percentage of CLA, especially cis-9 and trans-11, up to twice the total fatty acids found in meat from animals which received greater proportion of grain in the diet [86, 87, 88, 89].

The use of grain in cattle feed feedlot during the termination period is directly responsible for difference between FA compositions. Cattle fed with grain increases the absolute monounsaturated and saturated fat content of the meat while simultaneously decreasing absolute content of n-3 [89, 90].

Accordingly, Ferrinho et al. [91] observed differences in FA composition as a function of the cottonseed inclusion level in the diet. The total SFAs were not affected by diet, but differences were observed for branched chain fatty acids (BCFA), cis- and trans-monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFAcis/trans), unconjugated (nc) dienes, and in some individual PUFA. The BCFA and MUFAcis levels were higher in meat from cattle fed with the control diet compared with those receiving cottonseed.

Similarly, Díaz [92] reported that FA composition observed in longissimus dorsiand quadriceps femorisof lambs resulted in low percentage of stearic acid and high palmitic and linoleic acid values when compared to animals maintained on pasture. This difference is due to the FA composition in the diet, since fodder contains higher levels of linolenic FA and precursor n-3 series fans. In contrast, the concentrate has a high content of linoleic acid, the precursor of the n-6 series [93].

Likewise, Pelegrini et al. [94] evaluated the FA profile of sheep meat terminated at pasture or confinement observing a higher content of PUFAs in animals kept on pasture. This variation of the fat composition is responsible for the characteristic flavor of the meat of animals whose diet was based on pasture or concentrated [92].

In monogastric domestic animals, it is possible to change the composition of the FA of meat in the diet, since the FA in the diet is absorbed by the intestine unchanged and embedded tissues. Linoleic acid, for example, is not synthesized, and the concentrations present in the tissues respond rapidly to changes in diet. In contrast, MUFAs and SFAs are synthesized and are less influenced by the diet [95].

Morel et al. [96] studied the effect of fat sources in the diet on the FA profile in the pigs’ meat and reported that diets rich in PUFAs increase the levels of linoleic acid (18,2) and linolenic acid (C18:3) in muscle longissimus dorsiand subcutaneous fat. The composition of the poultry carcasses can also be altered by the type and amount of FA diet. Supplementation with unsaturated FA enables the deposition of these tissues in poultry [97]. Broilers require high energy concentrations in the feed, making it necessary to use oils, which eventually will influence the meat FA composition [98]. Increasing the proportion of n-3 series in the diet may have a beneficial effect regarding the nutritional quality of poultry meat and then decrease the levels of total lipids and cholesterol [97].

In a study using oil in chicken diet with the aim to evaluate the effect of different dietary lipid sources, the author reported that the chickens fed with the offal fat diet showed a higher percentage of MUFAs in the carcass and significant values of the palmitoleic acid. Besides, the linoleic acid was found to have high concentration in soybean oil [99], which confirms that the FA profile in the substrate is influenced by dietary fat sources used [100]. Subsequently, the effects of CLA supplementation in poultry diet during growth, diets containing different percentages of CLA ranging from 0% to 1.5%, were evaluated. It was observed that as increased levels of CLA in the diet, CLA is increased accumulation-in meat and decreased abdominal fat of poultry [101].

2.4. Genetic factor that influence the fatty acid composition

There is a growing market demand for healthier fat sources, and several strategies have been used to improve the meat FA profile, such as dietary manipulation and animal breeding. However, the high cost to obtain the phenotypic information and the fact that this trait can be only obtained after slaughter limits the genetic improvement through traditional selection. Although FA profile is not considered selection criteria, genomic selection is an important tool to improve the genetic progress of this trait, since the animal can be availed early in life, even at birth, reducing the generation interval and low cost [32]. In this sense, Cesar et al. [37] and Aboujaoude et al. [35] reported that selection for beef FA profile in Zebu cattle is very feasible, since there is additive genetic variation for most beef fatty acids in Zebu cattle.

Therefore, information on the genetic differences between breeds and genetic parameters to develop breeding programs are essential. Thus, estimates of heritability and genetic and phenotypic correlations are key attributes. Differences in the fatty acid composition between purebred and crossbred cattle has been extensively evaluated on different production systems. In contrast, genetic studies reporting parameters (heritability and genetic correlations) for fatty acid profile are plentiful for monogastric animals, particularly pigs but, however, are still scarce in cattle, or the number of data used is limited [102].

However, estimates of parameters of genetic or genetic variability within breeds for fatty acid composition have been widely studied. Currently, the availability of genomic data for selection of traits associated with meat quality and lipid profile in cattle has increased [103], since there is a collection of information by research institutions, especially in Nellore herds [32, 35, 37, 104].

Heritability estimates for the meat fatty acid profile have been different in magnitude and, as a result, probably different in populations and used data structure, applied estimation methods, sampled tissue, etc. Furthermore, when comparing the estimates obtained in different breeds, differences in the activity of enzymes related to fatty acid desaturation can influence the estimated genetic variability [105]. Heritabilities and genetic correlations to fatty acid proportion were estimated to correspond to some studies and observations of the phenotypic level compared to the level of intramuscular fat [11].

Methods such as SNP-BLUP (single nucleotide polymorphism-best linear unbiased predictor) have been proposed to predict the genomic breeding values. This method allows to obtain less biased and applicable genomic evaluations, which is the most viable method when considering the computational cost [32].

Various fatty acids were identified positively and negatively in different biological processes in the skeletal muscle and other tissues. Knowing the biological processes associated with fatty acid content in the skeletal muscle and identifying differentially expressed genes (DEG) and functional pathways related to the regulation of gene expression associated with the fatty acid profile contribute to the understanding of how some FAs modulate metabolism and may have a protective function for health [36] as well as its potential for use in animal selection.

2.5. Effects of fatty acids on meat quality

The proportions of intramuscular fat present in the meat as well as its composition are associated with the juiciness, flavor, tenderness, and overall acceptability [106]. Besides these traits, the meat shelf life (pigment and lipid oxidation) is influenced by the composition thereof.

The FAs are involved in various technological aspects of meat quality because they have different fusion points. Groups of fat cells containing fat solidified with a high fusion point are whiter than when it contains liquid fat with a lower fusion point. This fat has another color, and appearance quality is affected by the FA [8]. The adipose tissue of ruminants is naturally firmer than that of pigs because the FA profile is more saturated. In bovine finishing period, the concentration of SFA in relation to the unsaturated increases, but beyond a certain level of fat in the animal, this ratio decreases. In fatty cattle the fat is soft, mainly due to an increase in relation to the oleic stearic and palmitic acids [107].

However, 90% of the volatile compounds in the meat, subjected to a cooking method, arise from the oxidation of unsaturated FA [108]. These volatile compounds contribute to the flavor and odor of meat, and unsaturated FAs are particularly important in the development of flavor [109], since the FA degradation of the n-9 family can produce hexanal, heptenol, decanal, octanal, heptanal, and nonanal. The oxidation of n-3 fatty acids gives rise to 1-penten-3-ol and propanal, and degradation of n-6 fatty acids will form hexanal, pentanal pentylfuran, pentanol, hexanol, 1-octenol, and 2-octenol [110].

Correspondingly, the group of aldehydes (pentanal, hexanal, hexenal, heptanal, nonanal, octenal, octanal) is the most frequently identified in meat samples submitted to cooking; among them it is possible to highlight hexanal, which represents about 90% of total aldehydes, and it can be produced from the oxidation of oleic, linoleic, and arachidonic fatty acids and degradation from other aldehydes, such as 2,4-decadienal [111].

The color change is due to the oxidation of oxymyoglobin (red) to metmyoglobin (brown), and this reaction usually occurs along the rancidity. Li and Liu [112] have shown that lipid oxidation products can promote the oxidation of the pigment and vice versa, although the strength of the relationship between these two aspects of shelf life is sometimes low. Antioxidants, in particular α-tocopherol (vitamin E), have been used to retard lipid oxidation and color in addition to prolong the life of meat products [113, 114].

Warren et al. [115] compared the grazing pasture-fed and grain-fed cattle and found that bright red color associated with oxymyoglobin was retained longer, simulating retail condition in cattle fed on pasture. Although the total concentration of unsaturated FA was similar in both groups, the animals were grazing beef with high concentrations of n-3 and the feed grain increased levels of n-6. It was found that antioxidants naturally present in the pasture probably caused higher levels of vitamin E in the tissue of these animals, with benefits to lower lipid oxidation and better color retention.

In studies with sheep, Kasapidou et al. [116] reported that low concentrations of vitamin E in the fabric are associated with lesser amounts of both n-6 and n-3 FAs in tissues. This suggests that the loss of in vivo PUFAs occurs when the antioxidant status is low. It is well known that marbling plays an important role in meat quality and sensory palatability of beef [53]. It has also been shown that in some countries growing score marbling corresponds to more acceptable taste, greater juiciness, bigger texture, and therefore greater palatability and acceptability [51, 117, 118, 119, 120].

These results implied that high concentrate grain-fed beef could increase intramuscular fat (IMF) content and the proportion of oleic acid, thus increasing the sensory palatability of Hanwoo beef [53]. Lee et al. [121] reported differences between gene expression of FABP4, SCD, PPARγ, titin, and nebulin in longissimusmuscle from high- and low-marbled Hanwoo steers. PPARγ and SCD gene were highly expressed in the low-marbled group, the SCD being related to the FA profile of the meat and the conversion of stearic acid to oleic acid. The SCD gene was associated with fatty acid composition and converts stearic acid into oleic acid. However, the FABP4 gene had a higher gene expression pattern in the high-marbled group relative to the low-marbled group.


3. Final consideration

It is already known that the fat contains essential fatty acids that must be present in the feed, to providing more energy than carbohydrates and proteins. Fat also provides flavor to food, assisting in the transport and absorption of fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K by the intestine and plays a major role in the immune response, both in humans and animals. Thus, fat consumption that contains good fatty acid quality is essential while assisting in reducing the consumption of foods rich in simple carbohydrates, once the excessive intake of these compounds is detrimental to health.

The fatty acid composition of both adipose tissue and domestic animal muscle tissue depends on numerous factors, including intrinsic factors such as species, breed, genetics and age, and extrinsic factors such as food. These factors have direct effects on the meat quality. It is noteworthy also that the digestion of lipids present in the diet depends on the animal species.

Today, the search for healthy foods that meet the requirements of consumers in its qualitative aspect as nutrition, increasing concentrations of CLA, respecting the reasons of PUFA:SFA, n6: n3, stipulated by public health authorities is crucial, in order to prevent the development of cardiovascular disease and a possible incidence of some types of tumors and diabetes, among others.

Given the above, it is noted that the fat deposition and fatty acid profiles have great influence on meat quality evaluations, and its association with human health should be undertaken with caution and greater scientific support. However, additional studies are necessary to elucidate the real impact of fat consumption on human healthy.


  1. 1. Pereira PM, Vicente AF. Meat nutritional composition and nutritive role in the human diet. Meat Science. 2013;93(3):586-592. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.09.018
  2. 2. Williams P. Nutritional composition of red meat. Nutrition and Dietetics. 2007;64:S113-S119. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0080.2007.00197.x
  3. 3. Wood JD. Consequences for meat quality of reducing carcass fatness. In: Wood JD, Fisher AV, editors. Reducing Fat in Meat Animals. London: Elsevier Applied Science; 1990. pp. 344-397
  4. 4. Wood JD, Enser M, Fisher AV, Nute GR, Richardson RI, Sheard PR. Manipulating meat quality and composition. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 1999;58:363-370. DOI: org/10.1017/S009665199000488
  5. 5. Webb EC. Manipulating beef quality through feeding. South African Animal Science. 2006;7:5-15
  6. 6. Webb EC, O’Neill HA. The animal fat paradox and meat quality. Meat Science. 2008;80:28-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.029
  7. 7. Shingfield KJ, Bonnet M, Scollan ND. Recent developments in altering the fatty acid composition of ruminant-derived foods. Animal. 2013;7(1):132-162. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112001681
  8. 8. Wood JD, Richardson RI, Nute GR, Fisher AV, Campo MM, Kasapidou E, Enser M. Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: A review. Meat Science. 2004;66(1):21-32. DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00022-6
  9. 9. Forrest JC, Aberle ED, Hedrick HB, Judge MD, Merkel RA. Principles of Meat Science. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co.; 1975. p. 417
  10. 10. Scollan ND, Dannenberger D, Nuernberg K, Richardson I, MacKintosh S, Hocquette JF, Moloney AP. Enhancing the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality. Meat Science. 2014;97(3):384-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.02.015
  11. 11. De Smet S, Raes K, Demeyer D. Meat fatty acid composition as affected by fatness and genetic factors: A review. Animal Research. 2004;53:81-98. DOI: 10.1051/animres:2004003
  12. 12. Katan MB, Zock PL, Mensink RP. Effects of fats and fatty acids on blood lipids in humans: An overview. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1994;60:1017-1022
  13. 13. Wood JD, Enser M, Fisher AV, Nute GR, Sheard PR, Richardson RI, Hugles SI, Whittington FM. Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: A review. Meat Science. 2008;78(4):343-358. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.019
  14. 14. Hossner KL. Hormonal Regulation of Farm Animal Growth. Vol. 221. Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado,USA: CABI Publishing; 2005. DOI: 10.1079/9780851990804.0000
  15. 15. Gregorie FM, Smas CM, Sul HS. Understanding adipocyte differentiation. Physiological Reviews. 1998;78(3):783-809. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1998.78.3.783
  16. 16. Miller MF, Cross HR, Lunt DK, Smith SB. Lipogenesis in acute and 48h cultures of bovine intramuscular and subcutaneous adipose tissue explants. Journal of Animal Science. 1991;69(2):162-170. DOI: 10.2527/1991.691162x
  17. 17. May SG, Savell JW, Lunt DK, Wilson JJ, Laurenz JC, Smith SB. Evidence for preadipocyte proliferation during culture of subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissues from Angus and Wagyu crossbred steers. Journal of Animal Science. 1994;72(12):3110-3117. DOI: 10.2527/1994.72123110x
  18. 18. Miner JL. The adipocyte as an endocrine cell. Journal of Animal Science. 2004;82(3):935-941. DOI: 10.2527/2004.823935x
  19. 19. Mapiye C, Aalhus JL, Turner TD, Rolland DC, Basarab JA, Baron VS, McAllister TA, Block HC, Uttaro B, Lopez-Campos O, Proctor SD, Dugan ME. Effects of feeding flaxseed or sunflower-seed in high-forage diets on beef production, quality and fatty acid composition. Meat Science. 2013;95:98-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.03.033
  20. 20. Teixeira PD, Oliveira DM, Chizzotti ML, Chalfun-Junior A, Coelho TC, Gionbelli M, Paiva LV, Carvalho JRR, Ladeira MM. Subspecies and diet affect the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism and chemical composition of muscle in beef cattle. Meat Science. 2017;133:110-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.06.009
  21. 21. Herdmann A, Nuernberg K, Martin J, Nuernberg G, Doran O. Effect of dietary fatty acids on expression of lipogenic enzymes and fatty acid profile in tissues of bulls. Animal, Cambridge. 2010;4(5):755-762. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731110000431
  22. 22. Jump DB. Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and regulation of gene transcription. Current Opinion in Lipidology. 2002;13(2):155-165
  23. 23. Oliveira DM, Chalfun-Junior A, Chizzotti ML, Barreto HG, Coelho TC, Paiva LV, Ladeira MM. Expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism in the muscle of beef cattle fed soybean or rumen-protected fat, with or without monensin supplementation. Animal Science. 2014;92(12):5426-5436. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-7855
  24. 24. Eggen A, Hocquette JF. Genomic approaches to economic trait loci and tissue expression profling: Application to muscle biochemistry and beef quality. Meat Science. 2004;66(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00020-2
  25. 25. Xu J, Teran-Garcia M, Park JH, Nakamura MT, Clarke SD. Polyunsaturated fatty acids suppress hepatic sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1 expression by accelerating transcript decay. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276(13):9800-9807. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M008973200
  26. 26. Bionaz M, Chen S, Khan MJ, Loor JJ. Functional role of PPARs in ruminants: Potential targets for fine-tuning metabolism during growth and lactation. PPAR Research. 2013;2013:1-28. DOI: 10.1155/2013/684159
  27. 27. Takanada I, Kouzmenko AP, Katos S. Wnt and PPAR gamma signaling in osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2009;5(8):442-447. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.137
  28. 28. Kersten S. Integrated physiology and systems biology of PPARα. Molecular Metabolism. 2014;3(3):354-371. DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2014.02.002
  29. 29. Botolin D, Wang Y, Christian B, Jump DB. Docosahexaenoic acid (22:6, n-3) regulates rat hepatocyte SREBP-1 nuclear abundance by Erk-and 26S proteasome-dependent path ways. Journal of Lipid Reaserach. 2006;47(1):181-192. DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M500365JLR200
  30. 30. Kim YC, Ntambi JM. Regulation of stearoyl-CoA desaturase genes: Role in cellular metabolism and preadipocyte differentiation. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1999;266(1):1-4. DOI:10.1006/bbrc. 1999.1704
  31. 31. Seon-Tea J, Young-Hwa H, Damian F. Characteristics of Hanwoo cattle and health implications of consuming highly marbled Hanwoo beef. Meat Science. 2017;132:45-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.262
  32. 32. Chiaia HL, Peripoli E, Silva RM, Aboujaoude C, Feitosa FL, Lemos MV, Berton MP, Olivieri BF, Espigolan R, Tonussi RL, Gordo DG, Bresolin T, Magalhães AF, Júnior GA, Albuquerque LG, Oliveira HN, Furlan JJ, Ferrinho AM, Mueller LF, Tonhati H, Pereira ASC, Baldi F. Genomic prediction for beef fatty acid profile in Nellore cattle. Meat Science. 2017;128:60-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.02.007
  33. 33. De Souza RT, Chizzotti ML, Vital CE, Baracat-Pereira MC, Barros E, Busato KC, Gomes RA, Ladeira MM, da Silva Martins T. Differences in beef quality between Angus (Bos taurus taurus) and Nellore (Bos taurus indicus) cattle through a proteomic and phosphoproteomic approach. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0170294. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170294
  34. 34. Martins TS, Sanglard LMP, Silva W, Chizzotti ML, Rennó LN, Serão NVL, Silva FF, Guimarães SEF, Ladeira MM, Dodson MV, Du M, Duarte MS. Molecular factors underlying the deposition of intramuscular fat and collagen in skeletal muscle of Nellore and Angus cattle. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139943. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139943
  35. 35. Aboujaoude C, Pereira ASC, Feitosa FLB, Lemos MVA, Chiaia HLJ, Berton MP, Baldi F. Genetic parameters for fatty acids in intramuscular fat from feedlot-finished Nellore carcasses. Animal Production Science.2016. DOI: 10.1071/AN16107
  36. 36. Cesar ASM, Regitano LCA, Poleti MD, Andrade SCS, Tizioto PC, Oliveira PSN, Felício AM, Nascimento ML, Chaves ASC, DPD1 L, Tullio RR, Nassu RT, Koltes JE, Fritz-Waters E, Mourão GB, Zerlotini-Neto A, Reecy JM, Coutinho LL. Differences in the skeletal muscle transcriptome profile associated with extreme values of fatty acids content. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):961. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-3306-x
  37. 37. Cesar AA, Regitano LC, Mourão GB, Tullio RR, Lanna DP, Nassu RT, Coutinho LL. Genome-wide association study for intramuscular fat deposition and composition in Nellore cattle. BMC Genetics. 2014;15:1-15. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-39
  38. 38. Giusti J, Castan E, Dal Pai M, Arrigoni MDB, Baldin SR, De Oliveira HN. Expression of genes related to quality of Longissimus dorsi muscle meat in Nellore (Bos indicus) and Canchim (5/8 Bos taurus× 3/8 Bos indicus) cattle. Meat Science. 2013;94(2):247-252. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.02.006
  39. 39. Wei S, Duarte MS, Zan L, Du M, Jiang Z, Guan L, Chen J, Hausman GJ, Dodson MV. Cellular and molecular implications of mature adipocyte dedifferentiation. Journal of Genomics. 2013;1:5. DOI: 10.7150/jgen.3769
  40. 40. Wei S, Du M, Jiang Z, Duarte MS, Fernyhough-Culver M, Albrecht E, Will K, Zan L, Hausman GJ, Elabd EMY, Bergen WG, Basu U, Dodson MV. Bovine dedifferentiated adipose tissue (DFAT) cells: DFAT cell isolation. Adipocytes. 2013;2(3):148-159. DOI: 10.4161/adip.24589
  41. 41. Duarte MS, Paulino PV, Das AK, Wei S, Serão NV, Fu X, Harris SM, Dodson MV, Du M. Enhancement of adipogenesis and fibrogenesis in skeletal muscle of Wagyu compared with Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 2013;91(6):2938-2946. Epub 2013/03/20. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5892 pmid:23508025
  42. 42. Enser M, Hallett KG, Hewett B, Fursey GAJ, Wood JD, Harrington G. Fatty acid content and composition of UK beef and lamb muscle in relation to production system and implications for human nutrition. Meat Science. 1998;49(3):329-341. DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00144-7
  43. 43. Pighin D, Pazos A, Chamorro V, Paschetta F, Cunzolo S, Godoy F, Grigioni G. A contribution of beef to human health: A review of the role of the animal production systems. The Scientific World Journal. 2016. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8681491
  44. 44. Woods VB, Fearon AM. Dietary sources of unsaturated fatty acids for animals and their transfer into meat, milk and eggs: A review. Livestock Science. 2009;126:1-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.07.002
  45. 45. Smith SB, Lunt DK, Chung KY, Choi CB, Tume RK, Zembayashi M. Adiposity, fatty acid composition, and delta-9 desaturase activity during growth in beef cattle. Animal Science Journal. 2006;77:478-486. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2006.00375.x
  46. 46. French P, Stanton C, Lawless F, O'Riordan EG, Monahan FJ, Caffrey PJ, Moloney AP. Fatty acid composition, including conjugated linoleic acid of intramuscular fat from steers offered grazed grass, grass silage or concentrate-based diets. Journal of Animal Science. 2000;78(11):2849-2855. DOI: 10.2527/2000.78112849x
  47. 47. Dugan MER, Kramer JKG, Robertson WM, Meadus WJ, Aldai N, Rolland DC. Comparing subcutaneous adipose tissue in beef and muskox with emphasis on trans 18:1 and conjugated linoleic acids. Lipids. 2007;42(6):509-518. DOI: 10.1007/s11745-007-3051-7
  48. 48. Aldai N, Nájera AI, Dugan MER, Celaya R, Osoro K. Characterisation of intramuscular, intermuscular and subcutaneous adipose tissues in yearling bulls of different genetic groups. Meat Science. 2007;76(4):682-691. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.02.008
  49. 49. French P, O’riordan EG, Monahan FJ, Caffrey PJ, Moloney AP. Fatty acid composition of intra-muscular triacylglycerols of steers fed autumn grass and concentrates. Livestock Production Science. 2003;81(2):307-317. DOI: 10.2527/2000.78112849x
  50. 50. Freitas AK. Características da carcaça, da carne e perfil dos ácidos graxos de novilhos Nelore inteiros ou castrados em duas idades [thesis]. Goiânia: Federal University of Goias; 2006
  51. 51. Frank D, Ball A, Hughes J, Krishnamurthy R, Piyasiri U, Stark J, Watkins P, Warner R. Sensory and flavor chemistry characteristics of Australian beef: Influence of intramuscular fat, feed and breed. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2016;64(21):4299-4311. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00160
  52. 52. Hwang YH, Joo ST. Fatty acid profiles of ten muscles from high and low marbled (quality grade 1 ++ and 2) Hanwoo beef. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources. 2016;36:679-688. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.5.679
  53. 53. Hwang YH, Joo ST. Fatty acid profiles, meat quality and sensory palatability of grain-fed and grass-fed beef from Hanwoo, American and Australian crossbred cattle. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources. 2017;37:153-161. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.2.153
  54. 54. Bingham SA, Hughes R, Cross AJ. Effect of white versus red meat on endogenous N-nitrosation in the human colon and further evidence of a dose response. The Journal of Nutrition. 2002;132(11):3522S-3525S
  55. 55. Sinclair AJ. Dietary fat and cardiovascular disease: The significance of recent developments for the food industry. Food Australia. 1993;45:226
  56. 56. Kwon HN, Choi CB. Comparison of lipid content and monounsaturated fatty acid composition of beef by country of origin and marbling score. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition. 2015;44:1806-1812
  57. 57. Melton LM, Amiri W, Backus DR. Flavor and chemical characteristics of ground beef from grass-forage-grain- and grain-finished steers. Journal of Animal Science. 1982;55(1):77-87
  58. 58. Rudel L, Park S, Sawyer K. Compared with dietary monounsaturated and saturated fat, polyunsaturated fat protects African green monkeys from coronary artery atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1995;15:2101-2110. DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.15.12.2101
  59. 59. Smith SB. The animal fatty acid synthase: One gene, one polypeptide, seven enzymes. FASEB Journal. 1994;8:1248-1259
  60. 60. Calder PC, Albers R, Antoine JM, Blum S, Bourdet-Sicard R, Ferns GA, Folkerts G, Friedmann PS, Frost GS, Guarner F, Løvik M, Macfarlane S, Meyer PD, M'Rabet L, Serafini M, van Eden W, van Loo J, Vas Dias W, Vidry S, Winklhofer-Roob BM, Zhao J. Inflammatory disease processes and interactions with nutrition. British Journal of Nutrition. 2009;101:1-45. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114509377867
  61. 61. Nordic Council of Ministers. Nordic nutrition recommendations. Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition. 1996;40:161-165
  62. 62. Schaefer EJ. Lipoproteins, nutrition, and heart disease. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2002;75:191-212
  63. 63. Scientific Review Committee. Nutrition recommendations. Ottawa: Canadian Government Publishing Centre, Supply and Services Canada. 1990
  64. 64. Laaksonen DE, Nyyssönen K, Niskanen L, Rissanen TH, Salonen JT. Prediction of cardiovascular mortality in middle-aged men by dietary and serum linoleic and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2005;165(2):193-199. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.2.193
  65. 65. Öhlund I, Hörnell A, Lind T, Hernell O. Dietary fat in infancy should be more focussed on quality than on quantity. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2007;62(9):1058-1054. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602824
  66. 66. Calder P. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, inflammation, and inflammatory diseases. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2006;83:1505S-1519S
  67. 67. Luu NT, Madden J, Calder PC, Grimble RF, Shearman CP, Chan T, Dastur N, Howell WM, Rainger GE, Nash GB. Dietary supplementation with fish oil modifies the ability of human monocytes to induce an inflammatory response. Journal of Nutrition. 2007;137:2769-2774
  68. 68. Bauman DE, Baumgard LH, Corl BA, Griinari JM. Biosynthesis of conjugated linoleic acid in ruminants. Proceedings of the American Society of Animal Science. 1999;7:1-15. DOI: 10.2527/jas2000.77E-Suppl1f
  69. 69. Rainer L, Heiss CJ. Conjugated linoleic acid: Health implications and effects on body composition. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2004;104(6):963-968. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2004.03.016
  70. 70. Cross AJ, Leitzmann MF, Gail MH, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Sinha R. A prospective study of red and processed meat intake in relation to cancer risk. PLoS Medicine. 2007;4(12):e325
  71. 71. Kontogianni MD, Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C, Chrysohoou C, Stefanadis C.Relationship between meat intake and the development of acute coronary syndromes: The CARDIO2000 case-control study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2008;62:171-177. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602713
  72. 72. Micha R, Wallace SK, Mozaffarian D. Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2010;121:2271-2283. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924977
  73. 73. Campbell WW, Tang M. Protein intake, weight loss, and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2010;65A(10):1115-1122. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glq083
  74. 74. Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM, Schulze MB, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Hu FB.Stampfer Red meat consumption and mortality: Results from 2 prospective cohort studies. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2012;172(7):555-563. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.2287
  75. 75. Roussell MA, Hill AM, Gaugler TL, West SG, Heuvel JP, Alaupovic P, Gillies PJ, Kris-Etherton PM. Beef in an optimal lean diet study: Effects on lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2012;95:9-16. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.111.016261
  76. 76. Szterk A, Waszkiewicz-Robak B. Influence of selected quality factors of beef on the profile and the quantity of heterocyclic aromatic amines during processing at high temperature. Meat Science. 2014;96(3):1177-1184. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.11.019
  77. 77. Oostindjer M, Alexander J, Amdam GV, Andersen G, Bryan NS, Chen D, Corpet DE, De Smet S, Dragsted LO, Haug A, Karlsson AH, Kleter G, de Kok TM, Kulseng B, Milkowski AL, Martin RJ, Pajari AM, Paulsen JE, Pickova J, Rudi K, Sodring M, Weed DL, Egelandsdal B. The role of red and processed meat in colorectal cancer development: A perspective. Meat Science. 2014;97(4):583-596. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.02.011
  78. 78. McAfee AJ, McSorley EM, Cuskelly GJ, Moss BW, Wallace JM, Bonham MP, Fearon AM. FearonRed meat consumption: An overview of the risks and benefits. Meat Science. 2010;84(1):1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.029
  79. 79. Senegalhe FBD, Burin PC, Fuzikawa IHS, Penha DS, Leonardo AP. Ácidos Graxos na Carne e Gordura de Ovinos. Enciclopédia Biosfera. Centro Científico Conhecer – Goiânia. 2014;10(18):18
  80. 80. Oliveira AC, Silva RR, Oliveira HC, Almeida VVS, Garcia R, Oliveira ULC. Influence of diet, sex and genotype on the lipid profile of sheep meat. Archivos de Zootecnia. 2013;62:57-72
  81. 81. Kouba M, Mourota J. A review of nutritional effects on fat composition of animal products with special emphasis on n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Biochimie. 2011;93(1):13-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.02.027
  82. 82. Duckett SK, Wagner DG, Yates LD, Dolezal HG, May SG. Effects of time on feed on beef nutrient composition. Journal of Animal Science. 1993;71:2079-2088. DOI: 10.2527/1993.7182079x
  83. 83. Mueller LF. Sexual Condition Effects on Performance, Carcass Traits and Beef Quality of Feedlot Crossbred Angus x Nellore Cattle [Thesis]. Pirassununga: University of Sao Paulo; 2017
  84. 84. Turk SN, Smith SB. Carcass fatty acid mapping. Meat Science. 2009;81(4):658-663. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.005
  85. 85. Smith SB, Kawachi H, Choi CB, Choi CW, Wu G, Sawyer JE. Cellular regulation of bovine intramuscular adipose tissue development and composition. Journal of Animal Science Abstract-Meat Quality: Regulation of Intramuscular fat deposition. 2009;87(14):72-82. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1340
  86. 86. Daley CA, Abbott A, Doyle PS, Nader GA, Larson S. A review of fatty acid profiles and antioxidant content in grass-fed and grain-fed beef. Nutrition Journal. 2010;9(1):9-10. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-10
  87. 87. Duckett SK, Neel JPS, Fontenot JP, Clapham WM. Effects of winter stocker growth rate and finishing system on: 3. Tissue proximate, fatty acid, vitamin and cholesterol content. Journal of Animal Science. 2009;87(9):2961-2970. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-1850
  88. 88. Lorenzen CL, Golden JW, Martz FA, Grun IU, Ellersieck MR, Gerrish JR, Moore KC. Conjugated linoleic acid content of beef differs by feeding regime and muscle. Meat Science. 2007;75(1):159-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.06.025
  89. 89. Van Elswyk ME, McNeill SH. Impact of grass/forage feeding versus grain finishing on beef nutrients and sensory quality: The U.S. experience. Meat Science. 2014;96:535-540. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.08.010
  90. 90. Cordain L, Watkins BA, Florant GL, Kelher M. Fatty acid analysis of wild ruminant tissues: Evolutionary implications for reducing diet-related chronic disease. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2002;56(3):181. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601307
  91. 91. Ferrinho AM, Nassu RT, Aldai N, Bravo-Lamas L, Furlan MLN, Toda BM, Utembergue BL, Rezende RG, Mueller LF, Furlan JJM, Zanata M, Baldi F, Pereira ASC. Whole cottonseed, vitamin E and finishing period affect the fatty acid profile and sensory traits of meat products from Nellore cattle. 2018;138:15-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.12.002
  92. 92. Díaz MT, Velasco S, Cañeque V, Lauzurica S, Huidobro FR, Pérez C, González J, Manzanares C. Use of concentrate or pasture for fattening lambs and its effect on carcass and meat quality. Small Ruminant Research. 2002;43:257-268. DOI: 10.1016/S09214488(02)00016-0
  93. 93. Rhee KS. Fatty acids in meats and products. In: Chow CK, editor. Fatty Acids in Fods and their Health Implications. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1992. pp. 65-93
  94. 94. Pelegrini LFV, Pires CC, Kozloski GV, Terra NN, Baggio SR, Campagnol PCB, Galvani DB. Perfil de ácidos graxos da carne de ovelhas de descarte de dois grupos genéticos submetidas a dois sistemas de manejo. Ciência Rural. 2007;37(6):1786-1790
  95. 95. Wood JD, Enser M. Factors influencing fatty acids in meat and the role of antioxidants in improving meat quality. British Journal of Nutrition. 1997;78(1):S49-S60. DOI: 10.1079/BJN19970134
  96. 96. Morel PCH, Mc Intoshi JC, Janz JAM. Alteration of the fatty acid profile of pork by dietary manipulation. Journal of Animal Science. 2006;19(3):431-437. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2006.431
  97. 97. Ajuyah AO, Lee KH, Hardin RT, Sim JS. Changes in the yield and in the fatty acid composition of whole carcass and selected meat portions of broiler chickens fed full-fat oil seeds. Poultry Science. 1991;70(11):2304-2314. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0702304
  98. 98. Lopez-Ferrer S, Baucells MD, Barroeta AC, Grashorn MA. N-3 enrichment of chicken meat. 1. Use of very long-chain fatty acids in chicken diets and their influence on meat quality: Fish oil. Poultry Science. 2001;80(6):741-752. DOI: 10.1093/ps/80.6.741
  99. 99. Lara LJC, Baiao NC, Aguilar CAL, Cançado MA, Fiuza MA, Ribeiro BRC. Rendimento, composição e teor de ácidos graxos da carcaça de frangos de corte alimentados com diferentes fontes lipídicas. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 2006;58(1):108-115. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-09352006000100016
  100. 100. Sirri F, Tallarico N, Meluzzi A, Franchini A. Fatty acid composition and productive traits of broiler fed diets containing conjugated linoleic acid. Poultry Science. 2003;82(8):1356-1361. DOI: 10.1093/ps/82.8.1356
  101. 101. Suksombat W, Boonmme T, Lounglawan P. Effects of various levels of conjugated linoleic acid supplementation on fatty acid content and carcass composition of broilers. Poultry Science. 2007;86:318-324
  102. 102. Lemos MVA, Chiaia HLJ, Berton MP, Feitosa FLB, Aboujaoude C, Pereira ASC, Albuquerque LG, Ferrinho AM, Mueller LF, Mazalli MR, Furlan JJM, Carvalhero R, Gordo DM, Espigolan R, Duckett SK, Baldi F. Genome-wide association between single nucleotide polymorphisms with beef fatty acid profile in Nellore cattle using the single step procedure. BMC Genomics. 2016;172:13-225. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2511-y
  103. 103. Magalhães AFB, de Camargo GMF, Fernandes GA, Junior GDGM, Tonussi RL, Costa RB, Espigolan R, Silva RMO, Bresolin T, Andrade WBF, Takada L, Feitosa FB, Baldi F, Carvalheiro R, Chardulo LAL, Albuquerque LG. Genome-wide association study of meat quality traits in Nellore cattle. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157845. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157845
  104. 104. Feitosa FLB, Olivieri BF, Aboujaoude C, Pereira ASC, Lemos MVA, Chiaia HLJ, Berton MP, Peripolli E, Ferrinho AM, Mueller LF, Mazalli MR, Albuquerque LG, Oliveira HN, Tonhati H, Espigolan R, Tonussi RL, Silva RMO, Gordo DGM, Magalhães AFB, Aguilar I, Baldi F. Genetic correlation estimates between beef fatty acid profile with meat and carcass traits in Nellore cattle finished in feedlot. Journal of Applied Genetics. 2017;58(1):123-132. DOI: 10.1007/s13353-016-0360-7
  105. 105. Inoue K, Kobayashi M, Shoji N, Kato K. Genetic parameters for fatty acid composition and feed efficiency traits in Japanese black cattle. Animal. 2011;5(7):987-994. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731111000012
  106. 106. Jeremiah LE, Dugan ME, Aalhus JL, Gibson LL. Assessment of the relationship between chemical components and palatability of major beef muscles and muscle groups. Meat Science. 2003;65(3):1013-1019. DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00309-1
  107. 107. Wood JD. Fat deposition and the quality of fat tissue in meat animals. In: Wiseman J, editor. Fats in Animal Nutrition. 37th ed. London: Butterworths; 1984. pp. 407-435
  108. 108. Domínguez R, Gómez M, Fonseca S, Lorenzo JM. Effect of different cooking methods on lipid oxidation and formation of volatile compounds in foal meat. Meat Science. 2014;97:223-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.01.023
  109. 109. Mottram DS. Flavour formation in meat and meat products: A review. Food Chemistry. 1998;62(4):415-424. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00076-4
  110. 110. Volden J, Bjelanovic M, Vogt G, Slinde E, Skaugen M, Nordvi B, Egelandsdal B. Oxidation progress in an emulsion made from metmyoglobin and different triacylglycerols. Food Chemistry. 2011;128(4):854-863. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.03.106
  111. 111. Nieto G, Banon S, Garrido MD. Effect of supplementing ewes diet with thyme (Thymus zygis spp. gracilis) leaves on the lipid oxidation of cooked lamb meat. Food Chemistry. 2011;125:1147-1152. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.09.090
  112. 112. Li YF, Liu SM. Reducing lipid peroxidation for improving colour stability of beef and lamb: On-farm considerations. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2012;92(4):719-726. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4715
  113. 113. Renerre M, Deker E, Faustman C, Lopez-Bote CJ. Oxidative processes and myoglobin. In: Decker EA, Faustam C, Lopez-Bote CJ, editors. Antioxidants in Muscle Foods. New York: John Wiley; 2000. pp. 113-133
  114. 114. Yang A, Brewster MJ, Lanari MC, Tume RK. Effect of vitamin E supplementation on α-tocopherol and β-kerotene concentrations in tissues from pasture-and grain-fed cattle. Meat Science. 2002;60(1):35-40
  115. 115. Warren HE, Scollan ND, Hallett K, Enser M, Richardson, RI, Nute GR, Wood JD. The effects of breed and diet on the lipid composition and quality of bovine muscle. In: Proceedings of the 48th Congress of Meat Science and Technology ICoMST; 25-30 August 2002; Rome; 2002. pp. 370-371
  116. 116. Kasapidou E, Wood JD, Sinclair LD, Wilkinson RG, Enser M. Diet and vitamin E metabolism in lambs: Effects of dietary supplementation on meat quality. In: Proceedings of the 47th Congress of Meat Science and Technology; 2001. p. 42-43
  117. 117. Corbin CH, O'Quinn TG, Garmyn AJ, Legako JF, Hunt MR, Dinh TT, Rathmann RJ, Brooks JC, Miller MF. Sensory evaluation of tender beef strip loin steaks of varying marbling levels and quality treatments. Meat Science. 2015;100:24-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.09.009
  118. 118. Hunt MR, Garmyn AJ, O'Quinn TG, Corbin CH, Legako JF, Rathmann RJ, Miller MF. Consumer assessment of beef palatability from four beef muscles from USDA choice and select graded carcasses. Meat Science. 2014;98(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.010
  119. 119. Legako JF, Dinh TTN, Miller MF, Adhikari K, Brooks JC. Consumer palatability scores, sensory descriptive attributes, and volatile compounds of grilled beef steaks from three USDA quality grades. Meat Science. 2016;112:77-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.10.018
  120. 120. Jung EY, Hwang YH, Joo ST. Chemical components and meat quality traits related to palatability of ten primal cuts from Hanwoo carcasses. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources. 2015;35(6):859-866. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.6.859
  121. 121. Lee SH, Cho YM, Lee SH, Kim BS, Kim NK, Choy YH, Kim KH, Yoon D, Im SK, Oh SJ, Park EW. Identification of marbling-related candidate genes in M. Longissimus dorsi of high- and low marbled Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) steers. BMB Reports. 2008;41(12):846-851

Written By

Taiane da Silva Martins, Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos, Lenise Freitas Mueller, Fernando Baldi, Tamyres Rodrigues de Amorim, Adrielle Matias Ferrinho, Julian Andres Muñoz, Ingrid Harumi de Souza Fuzikawa, Gabriella Vespe de Moura, Jéssica Luana Gemelli and Angélica Simone Cravo Pereira

Submitted: November 23rd, 2017 Reviewed: April 25th, 2018 Published: October 10th, 2018