Hip Arthroscopy (HA) is considered to be a demanding surgery with a steep and slow learning curve. Adequate HA instrumentation is required to perform a reproducible surgery. The technique most commonly used to access the hip is through the central compartment or from the “Inside-Out” with continuous distraction and specialized access equipment. Newer techniques start from the peripheral compartment called “Outside-In” techniques, these techniques have a safer access with a more controlled environment avoiding iatrogenic scuffing of the acetabulum, labrum or femoral head. The purpose of this surgical and novel variant technique from the “Outside-In” which we call simple, easy, and elegant is an excellent choice and can be part of the armament for young surgeons who are initiating in hip arthroscopy and preservation, our technique has been very reproducible and reliable with good to excellent results with very few complications.
- hip arthroscopy
- peripheral compartment first
- hip arthroscopy without fluoroscopy
- simple hip arthroscopy
- outside-in technique for hip arthroscopy
The hip joint anatomy is known to be surrounded by a strong soft tissue mantle and muscles; this deep and constrained anatomy makes hip distraction very difficult. Hip arthroscopy (HA) is considered to be a demanding surgical procedure compared to other joint arthroscopies and is known to have a steep and very slow learning curve (Figure 1) [1, 2].
Hip arthroscopy is a unique specialty, which initiated in the nineteenth century. The last decade has seen an exponential rise in the number surgeries performed worldwide . The procedure itself has evolved throughout this years.
Michael Burman was responsible for first cases describing hip arthroscopy in cadavers in 1931. He had developed a device comprised of a 4 mm trocar and a 3 mm arthroscope. Burman used this to examine 20 hip joints and after this, He then stated “it is manifestly impossible to insert a needle between the head of the femur and acetabulum.” He could never entry to the central compartment of the hip as all his surgeries were without traction. Later, Takagi in 1939 reported the first clinical application of hip arthroscopy in four patients: two with Charcot’s joint, one with tuberculosis, and one with septic arthritis .
Hip arthroscopy is a rapidly expanding procedure that has been gaining popularity in the medical field since the 1980s. Initially, the indications for hip arthroscopy were much more limited than for other joints because the hip joint anatomy which is known to be surrounded by strong soft tissue and muscles, which presents additional challenges to access and have adequate maneuverability inside the hip. With improved instruments, hip distractors, patients positioning, equipment, hip capsular management and hip exposure techniques, the indications for hip arthroscopy have greatly expanded. In experienced and trained hands, this minimally invasive procedure may offer the potential for reduced iatrogenic neurovascular lesions [5, 6].
The most used arthroscopic surgical technique and worldwide used is the called “Inside-Out technique” which enters the hip joint through the central compartment (CC), with continuous distraction. This technique needs the aid of hip cannulated needles, a specialized hip access system, fluoroscopy and a hip fracture table (HFT) or distractor, adequate distraction is important in HA to avoid surgical iatrogenic complications like labral penetrations, labrum resections and also scuffing of the femoral head cartilage [7, 8].
Newer techniques have been published in performing HA from the “Outside-In” to approach the hip joint extra-articularly and starting from the peripheral compartment (PC) first, other techniques do not use specialized cannulated needles or a hip access system; and others have developed radiographic and anatomic landmarks to approach the anterior capsule without fluoroscopy (Figure 2) [7, 9, 10].
This “Outside-In” techniques have been developed to perform HA simple, safely, reproducible and more reliably; but what is most important they have been developed to avoid iatrogenic cartilage lesions while accessing the hip joint. As we all know HA has the disadvantage of being difficult and demanding because of his steep learning curve, is a very tedious procedure to perform and the operating room staff must be familiarized positioning the patient on a hip fracture table. Another very important factor is that this procedure has too much radiation burden from fluoroscopy .
Performing HA reproducibly in third world countries has been challenging and the struggle in getting access to all HA equipment has made surgeons develop newer techniques; we developed this “Outside-In” technique which we call,
We started performing hip arthroscopy with this technique in January 2015–May 2017, 230 patients underwent HA, 116 patients with cam impingement, 55 Pincer impingement, 23 with mixt FAI, 4 internal snapping hips, 3 traumatic dislocation of the hip, 8 GII hip arthritis, 14 patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head, 2 hip dysplasia, 3 Leg-Calve-Perthes and 2 patients with subspine impingement. Complications presented where, 1 patient with HA and core decompression presented erectile dysfunction who recovered at 6 weeks, 1 patient with numbness at the lateral thigh region who lasted 2 weeks, 1 patient presented a transitory femoral nerve palsy for 1 week, 1 patient developed a knee hematoma from traction, 1 patient developed a catastrophic supero-lateralization of the femoral head who underwent an uneventful THA (she had arthritis grade III and dysplasia), no infections, no instability. The follow-up of our patients was made at 2 years postoperatively.
2. Surgical technique
HA is performed in the modified supine position, with the patient supported on a conventional hip fracture table (HFT) (MAQUET Gmbh, Rastatt, Germany), under general anesthesia, no muscle relaxants are used, although they may be added. Knee and shoulder instruments are used through the entire case (Figure 3). The padded counter traction post is applied against the proximal femur deliberately lateralizing this post, both feet and shins are also well padded. The foot of the operative hip is taking out the HFT clamp and afterwards positioned over the mayo table (Medical products Monterrey, Mexico) . Radiographic landmarks are routinely marked in a simple AP pelvis and reproduced on the patient’s operative hip with anatomic landmarks. Portals are established to access the PC and CC: A anterolateral portal (AL) used for vision, immediately anterior to the trochanteric tip, a peritrochanteric space portal (PSP) used as a working portal, situated 3 cm distally from the AL and over the anterior trochanteric border, and a new modified mid- anterior portal which is located 1.5 cm above and between AL and PSP, which we call the trochanteric triangle portal (TTP) (Figures 4 and 5). A hip bursa resection is performed with a shaver or a radio frequency (RF) wand and posteriorly a longitudinal capsulotomy is performed to access the head–neck junction to perform a femoral osteochondroplasty (FOC) for the cam morphology, if there is a pincer impingement acetabuloplasty is performed without distraction. Afterwards an arthroscopic dynamic impingement test (ADIT) is performed with the help of the surgical assistant, fellow or nurse, and it will be useful to evaluate FOC. After finishing on the peripheral compartment a surgical assistant will place the free foot and attach it to the HFT clamp, this to distract the hip under controlled arthroscopic vision. A thorough evaluation in the CC is performed. Labral repair is tackle from the TTP portal if needed, ligamentum teres injuries or tears are also treated. A capsule closure is performed if the patient presents with generalized ligamentous laxity. A 30° arthroscopic lens is used throughout the peripheral compartment to perform a femoral osteochondroplasty, an exchange to a 70° arthroscope is done to enter the CC and if a labral repair is needed. The entire case of HA is performed without fluoroscopy.
Two hundred and thirty patients underwent an uneventful HA through the same surgical approach from the outside-in technique which we call “simple, easy, and elegant,” none of the patients presented with iatrogenic scuffing of the femoral heal, labral resection or penetrations, no infections, avascular necrosis or instability was presented.
HA is evolving tremendously over these past years, more reliable and reproducible techniques are being described and published with excellent results; this described arthroscopic technique has allowed us to create a more practical environment outside and inside the hip joint, better maneuverability to the hip when the boot/foot is out of the HFT clamp, we have found easier access to the hip with no needles or cannulated obturators, also less iatrogenic chondral damage and cero radiation to the surgical team. Dienst et al. has mentioned that portal placement to the hip joint is probably the most demanding step during HA and extreme care must be taken in these critical steps which are related to the thick soft-tissue mantle; less force of traction is applied when the capsulotomy is done prior distraction, their published results demonstrated that soft tissue injuries and nerve dysfunction are extremely rare. Doron et al. describes an extracapsular technique for the non-distractable hip, but they still use fluoroscopy to establish the AL portal. Salas AP. describes a technique accessing the anterior capsule fibers with radiographic and anatomic landmarks without using a fluoroscope, performing a capsulotomy to tackle the cam morphology .
The author (APS) started HA with the “Inside-Out” technique and difficulty was encounter in every case due to lack of arthroscopic disposables, materials and access systems; but the passion in performing HA and to develop a simple, reproducible and reachable technique for all surgeons was the goal. Our technique called
Care should be considered in dysplastic hips with generalized ligamentous laxity because iatrogenic instability can occur, a labral repair, capsule closure or tightness is recommended in this cases. With this developed technique we want to demonstrate that HA is accessible and it can be performed in a simple and safely way, that the expensive hip disposables and hip instrumentation are not a barrier to start HA.
Hip Arthroscopy is difficult and becomes a challenge to the young Orthopedic Surgeons, this technique made
Salas AP. Radiographic and anatomic landmarks to approach the anterior capsule in hip arthroscopy. Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery. 1 September 2015; 2(4):431-437
Dienst M, Seil R, Kohn DM. Safe arthroscopic access to the central compartment of the hip. Arthroscopy. Dec 2005; 21(12):1510-1514
Montgomery SR et al. Trends and demographics in hip arthroscopy in the United States. Arthroscopy. 2013; 29(4):661-665
Byrd JW. Hip arthroscopy. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2006; 14(7):433-444
DeLee J, Drez D, Miller MD. DeLee & Drez’s Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010
Rath E, Tsvieli O, Levy O. Hip arthroscopy: An emerging technique and indications. The Israel Medical Association Journal. 2012; 14(3):170-174
Wettstein M, Dienst M. Arthroscopy of the peripheral compartment of the hip. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2005; 15:225-230
Domb B, Hanypsiak B, Botser I. Labral penetrations rate in a consecutive series of 300 hip arthroscopies. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2012; 40:864-869
Cuellar-Gutierrez R, Ruiz-Iban MA, Cuellar-Ayestaran A, Sanchez-Sobrino A, Oteo-Alvaro A. Peripheral compartment as the initial access for hip arthroscopy in complex cases: A technical note. Healio Orthopedics. The Cutting Edge. June 2013; 36(6):456-462
Nogier A, Boyer T. Is it possible to perform a safe and efficient hip arthroscopy without fluoroscopy? In: International Society for Hip Arthroscopy, Annual Meeting, Boston. Electronic Poster. 2012
Adib F, Donovan S, Wolff AB, Ochiai D. Fluroscopy in hip arthroscopy. Journal of Athletic Medicine. June 2013; 1(1):15-22
Salas AP, Gonzalez-Campos M, Gonzalez-Bazaldua JLA, Salas-Perez AD. The Mayo table technique. Arthroscopy Techniques. June 2016; 5(3):e459-e463
Doron R, Amar E, Rath E, Sampson T, Ochiai D, Matsuda DK. Arthroscopy of the non-distractable hip: A novel Extracapsular approach. Arthroscopy Techniques. December 2014; 3(6):e723-e725