Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Abundance and Diversity of Earthworms in Managed and Non- Managed Fallow Lands of Calakmul Reserve of Campeche, Mexico

Written By

Esperanza Huerta Lwanga, Lucero Sánchez-del Cid, Ligia Esparza- Olguín, Eduardo Martinez-Romero, Ben de Jong and Susana Ochoa-Gaona

Reviewed: 19 February 2018 Published: 05 November 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.75619

From the Edited Volume

Earthworms - The Ecological Engineers of Soil

Edited by Sajal Ray

Chapter metrics overview

1,058 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

In Mexico, the best preserved tropical rain forest is found in Calakmul Reserve, where fallow land management has been established. Fallow lands are developed as a consequence of a successional vegetation process after clearing the primary vegetation and milpa production. Forty-nine sites were studied, where 17 were managed fallow lands, 24 non-managed fallow lands, and 8 tropical rain forests. Earthworms were collected at the end of the raining season, and four monoliths of 25 × 25 × 30 cm were developed per site according to the TSBF method. We observed how Zapatadrilus siboney, a native species was dominant in managed and non-managed fallow lands. Earthworm’s total biomass and density were not significantly different between the managed and non-managed fallow lands. Earthworm’s species richness was significantly low in non-managed fallow lands. We observed a strong correlation between earthworm density and richness with the age of the fallow lands (r2: 0.9 and 0.7; p < 0.05, respectively). The management type of the fallow land seems to affect earthworm biomasses (r2: 0.56; p < 0.05).

Keywords

  • Calakmul reserve
  • Zapatadrilus siboney
  • managed and non-managed fallow lands

1. Introduction

Calakmul is one of the most important biosphere reserves, where it is possible to find primary tropical rain forests, secondary vegetation, and managed lands. It has an extension of 723,185 ha, where 65% can be potentially managed (Esparza-Olguin, personal communication). Among the managed areas, fallow lands are developed as a consequence of a successional vegetation process after clearing the primary vegetation and milpa production. Fallow land management is developed by the reserve inhabitants, where wood, herbs, fruits, vegetal carbon, or honey is extracted or collected; even though it is an ancient practice, there is no information about the effects of this management over soil conditions. Earthworms constitute 60–90% of soil macroinvertebrate biomass [1], and they are considered as soil quality indicators [2]; they can inform about the degree of perturbation that can be taken place within a terrestrial ecosystem. In natural system, native earthworms are dominant [3], while exotic earthworms can inhabit managed systems due to their width range of tolerance to different pH and temperature conditions [3]. Earthworms provide soil ecosystem services such as infiltration, and they participate in soil organic matter dynamics and green house mitigation [4]. The objective of this study was to describe earthworm’s communities among managed and non-managed fallow lands, in Calakmul Reserve.

Advertisement

2. Material and methods

Calakmul Reserve is located at 18°37′02″N and 89°33′00″W. The mean annual precipitation is 1076 mm with the mean temperature of 22.5°C. It is possible to find abundant karst outcroppings which characterize the shallow soils of the Calakmul region [5]. Forty-nine plots among nine communal settlements (ejidos) of Calakmul Reserve were selected. Within the fallow lands, 17 were managed and 24 were non-managed; fallow lands were successional vegetation belonging to evergreen tropical rain forest or subcaducifolius rain forests. Eight tropical rain forests were also sampled. Earthworms were collected at the end of the raining season, according to the TSBF method [6], where four monoliths of 25 × 25 × 30 cm per plot were done. Earthworms were preserved in 94% alcohol for further identification in the laboratory of soil of El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Campeche. Data was normalized, and ANOVA were performed in order to observe significant differences between managed and non-managed fallow lands; also Pearson correlation was developed among variables. A canonical analysis was performed with data of managed and non-managed fallow lands from the subcaducifolius rain forest; as environmental variables, we used fallow land age, density and richness of plants, and type of management (extraction of vegetal carbon, forestall management, and apiculture); and as species variables, we used earthworm biomass, density, and richness.

Advertisement

3. Results

We found six earthworm morphospecies belonging to the Acanthodrilidae family; most of the individuals were juveniles. Among adults we identified one native species Zapatadrilus siboney and one peregrine species Dichogaster crawi, where Zapatadrilus siboney was dominant in managed and non-managed fallow lands. Only two ecological earthworm categories were found in this study: endogeics and epigeics. Earthworm’s biomass and density (Figures 1 and 2) were not significantly different between managed and non-managed fallow lands, but earthworm species richness was significantly different (Figure 3); fallow lands without management had the lowest earthworm’s species number (Figure 3). Regarding the age of the fallow lands, we observed a significant correlation between age of the fallow land and abundance and richness of earthworms (r2: 0.9, 0.7; p ≤ 0.05, respectively), independently of the management and the type of vegetation (evergreen tropical rain forest or subcaducifolius rain forest). Vegetation structure between tropical rain forests and managed or non-managed old fallow lands (≥25 years) was not significantly different, but the vegetation composition of the tropical rain forest was significantly different, i.e., tropical rain forest had tree species with the hardest wood trunk compared with those found in non-managed fallow lands and managed fallow lands (Table 1). After the canonical analysis developed with data of fallow lands from the subcaducifolius fallow lands, we observed with 99% of inertia explained how earthworm density is strongly correlated with the age of the fallow land (r2: 0.7; p < 0.05) and lightly correlated with vegetation richness (r2: 0.4; p < 0.05, Figure 4). Earthworm biomass seems to be affected by the type of fallow land management (r2: 0.56; p < 0.05).

Figure 1.

Earthworm biomass (g.m2) in different land uses. Managed fallow land (MFL), non-managed fallow lands (NMFL), and tropical rain forest (TRF).

Figure 2.

Earthworm density (ind.m2) in different land uses. Managed fallow land (MFL), non-managed fallow lands (NMFL), and tropical rain forest (TRF).

Figure 3.

Earthworm richness in different land uses. Managed fallow land (MFL), non-managed fallow lands (NMFL), and tropical rain forest (TRF).

Plot no.Ejido nameVegetation typeMAgePlant speciesZs
1Álvaro ObregónFallow land SCPNon20Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, GfNo
2Álvaro ObregónFallow land SCPWith20Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, NeNo
3Álvaro ObregónFallow land SCPWith15Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Nex
4Álvaro ObregónFallow land SCPWith12Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Nex
5Álvaro ObregónFallow land SCPNon15Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gfx
6Álvaro ObregónFallow land SCPWith20Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Nex
7Álvaro ObregónFallow land SCPWith15Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Nex
8Álvaro ObregónFallow land SCPNon20Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gfx
9Álvaro ObregónFallow land SCPWith25Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, NeNo
10Álvaro ObregónFallow land SCPNon15Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, GfNo
11Km 120Fallow land SCPWith19Lg, Bs, Ey, Ca, Ly, Gf, Tp, Nsx
12Km 120Fallow land SCPNon15Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gfx
13Km 120Fallow land SCPWith17Lg, Bs, Ey, Ca, Ly, Gf, Tp, Nsx
14Km 120Fallow land SCPNon17Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gfx
15Km 120Fallow land SCPWith18Lg, Bs, Ey, Ca, Ly, Gf, Tp, Nsx
16Km 120Fallow land SCPWith18Lg, Bs, Ey, Ca, Ly, Gf, Tp, Nsx
17Km 120Fallow land SCPWith17Lg, Bs, Ey, Ca, Ly, Gf, Tp, Nsx
18Km 120Fallow land SCPNon18Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gfx
19Km 120Fallow land SCPNon19Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gfx
20Km 120Fallow land SCPWith19Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Nex
21Km 120Fallow land SCPNon17Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gfx
22Pueblo de MoreliaFallow land SCPWith17Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Nex
23Pueblo de MoreliaFallow land SCPWith18Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Nex
24Pueblo de MoreliaFallow land SCPWith19Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Nex
25Pueblo de MoreliaFallow land SCPWith19Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Nex
26Pueblo de MoreliaTRF SCPNon>25Ly, Ey, Tp, Dl, Kf, Bs, Ba, Mzx
27Km 120TRF SCPNon>25Ly, Ey, Tp, Dl, Kf, Bs, Ba, Mzx
28Km 120TRF SCPNon>25Ly, Ey, Tp, Dl, Kf, Bs, Ba, Mzx
29Puebo de MoreliaTRF SCPNon>25Ly, Ey, Tp, Dl, Kf, Bs, Ba, Mzx
30Ley de FomentoFallow land EGNonCa, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mbx
31Ley de FomentoTRF EGNonPs, Ss, Ei, Py, Mpx
32Ley de FomentoFallow land EGNon12Ca, Ns, Pp, Bs, Lg, Tp, Gcx
33Ley de FomentoFallow land EGNonCa, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mbx
34Centauro del NorteFallow land EGNon30Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mbx
35Centauro del NorteFallow land EGNon20Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mbx
36Centauro del NorteFallow land EGNon12Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mbx
37Centauro del norteTRF EGNonPs, Ss, Ei, Py, Mpx
38Narciso MendozaFallow land EGNonCa, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mbx
39Narciso MendozaTRF EGNonPs, Ss, Ei, Py, Mpx
40Narciso MendozaFallow land EGNon10Ca, Ns, Pp, Bs, Lg, Tp, Gcx
41Narciso MendozaFallow land EGNon30Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mbx
42Unidad de TrabajoFallow land EGNonCa, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mbx
43Unidad de TrabajoTRF EGNonPs, Ss, Ei, Py, Mpx
44Unidad de TrabajoFallow land EGNonCa, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mbx
45Unidad de TrabajoFallow land EGNonCa, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mbx
46ConhuasFallow land EGNon7Ca, Ns, Pp, Bs, Lg, Tp, Gcx
47ConhuasFallow land EGNon20Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mbx
48ConhuasTRF EGNonPs, Ss, Ei, Py, Mpx
49Nuevo BecalFallow land EGNonCa, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mbx

Table 1.

Presence of Zapatadrilus siboney (Zs) along the studied sites.

Ejido: communal settlement where owners can or cannot sell the land. M, management; fallow land SCP, subcaducifolius forest; TRF SCP, tropical rain forest with subcaducifolius characteristics; fallow land EG, fallow land with almost evergreen characteristics (subperennifolius); TRF EG, tropical rain forest with subperennifolius characteristics. Plant species combinations according to vegetation type: Ca, Ns, Pp, Bs, Lg, Tp, Gc, Croton arboreus, Nectandra salicifolia, Piscidia piscipula, Bursera simaruba, Lonchocarpus guatemalensis, Bursera simaruba, Nectandra salicifolia, Thouinia paucidentata, Guettarda combssi; Ps, Ss, Ei, Py, Mp, Pouteria reticulata, Sideroxylon salicifolium, Eugenia ibarrae, Piper yucatanense, Murraya paniculata; Lg, Bs, Ey, Ca, Ly, Gf, Tp, Ns, Lonchocarpus guatemalensis, Bursera simaruba, Esenbeckia yaaxhokob, Croton arboreus, Lonchocarpus yucatanensis, Gymnopodium floribundum, Thouinia paucidentata, Nectandra salicifolia; Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Ne, Bursera simaruba, Lonchocarpus yucatanensis, Thouinia paucidentata, Diospyros salicifolia, Eugenia ibarrae, Lonchocarpus guatemalensis, Neomillspaughia emarginata; Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gf, Lonchocarpus yucatanensis, Lonchocarpus guatemalensis, Bursera simaruba, Thouinia paucidentata, Hampea trilobata, Esenbeckia yaaxhokob, Gymnopodium floribundum; Ly, Ey, Tp, Dl, Kf, Bs, Ba, Mz, Lonchocarpus yucatanensis, Esenbeckia yaaxhokob, Thouinia paucidentata, Drypetes lateriflora, Krugiodendron ferreum, Bursera simaruba, Brosimum alicastrum, Manilkara zapota.

Figure 4.

Earthworm community and vegetation characteristics (abundance and richness) among managed and non-managed fallow lands of subcaducifolius forests in Calakmul reserve, after a canonical analysis (99.7% of inertia explained at first axis p < 0.05).

Advertisement

4. Discussion

Fallow land management in Calakmul has been spread among the inhabitants of the reserve; this economical practice allows them to obtain resources (mainly economical) without damaging the environment. In this study we observed that the management of the fallow land doesn’t produce an effect over earthworm communities, while the age of the fallow land is more important. The age of fallow lands informs about the plant composition, where an important succession process has been taken place within 25–30 years (>vegetation cover, >diversity, >organic matter in the soil), and earthworms respond to this process. Zapatadrilus siboney, endogeic species found in Cuba and north and center of Mexico, has been spread in Calakmul [7, 8] where forest and fallow lands are present. In Mexico, 102 earthworm species have been described, with 51 natives and 51 exotics; in Campeche, only 8 native species and 3 exotics have been found [8]; native species are confined to undisturbed systems. Native species, as being less tolerant to different ranges of temperature and pH [3], can be useful as indicators of soil quality [2]; in this study, Zapatadrilus siboney as native species was not affected by the fallow land management, which suggests us that this management can be used in other parts of Mexico where forest vegetation wants to be preserved. Earthworms, as ecosystem engineers [9], have an important role in edaphic processes [10, 11], and more studies are required in tropics, in order to study the relationship between native species and their role in soil quality enhancement.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge all the land owners who allow us to do this work and MAREBICA project.

References

  1. 1. Huerta E. Étude comparative des facteurs qui déterminent la biomasse et la densité de vers de terre dans les zones naturelles et anthropisées dans les sols de tropiques [PhD these]. Paris: Université Paris VI Pierre et Marie Curie; 2002. p. 181
  2. 2. Huerta E, Kampichler C, Geissen V, Ochoa-Gaona S, de Jong B, Hernández-Daumás S. Towards an ecological index for tropical soil quality based on soil macrofauna. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2009;44(8):1056-1062
  3. 3. Fragoso C. Las lombrices de tierra de México (Annelida, Oligochaeta): Diversidad, ecología y manejo. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie). 2001;1:131-171
  4. 4. Lavelle P, Decaëns T, Aubert M, Barot S, Blouin M, Bureau F, Margerie P, Mora P, Rossi J-P. Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2001;42:S3-S15
  5. 5. Pérez-Salicrup D. Forest types and their implications. In: Turner BL, Geoghegan IIJ, Foster DR, editors. Integrated Land-change Science and Tropical Deforestation in the Southern Yucatán: Final Frontiers. University Press, Oxford, UK; 2004. p. 63-80
  6. 6. Anderson JM, Ingram JSI. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CAB International; 1993. p. 222
  7. 7. Rodriguez C, Fragoso C. Especies nuevas de Zapatadrilus James 1991. (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae registradas en Cuba. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie). 1995;64:21-33
  8. 8. Fragoso C, Rojas P. Biodiversidad de lombrices de tierra (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Crassiclitellata) en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 2014;85:S197-S207
  9. 9. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos. 1994;69:373-386
  10. 10. Edwards CA, Bohlen P J. Biology and ecology of earthworms. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall. Suffolk. 1994. p. 426
  11. 11. Lavelle P, Spain AV. Soil Ecology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 654

Written By

Esperanza Huerta Lwanga, Lucero Sánchez-del Cid, Ligia Esparza- Olguín, Eduardo Martinez-Romero, Ben de Jong and Susana Ochoa-Gaona

Reviewed: 19 February 2018 Published: 05 November 2018