Presence of
Abstract
In Mexico, the best preserved tropical rain forest is found in Calakmul Reserve, where fallow land management has been established. Fallow lands are developed as a consequence of a successional vegetation process after clearing the primary vegetation and milpa production. Forty-nine sites were studied, where 17 were managed fallow lands, 24 non-managed fallow lands, and 8 tropical rain forests. Earthworms were collected at the end of the raining season, and four monoliths of 25 × 25 × 30 cm were developed per site according to the TSBF method. We observed how Zapatadrilus siboney, a native species was dominant in managed and non-managed fallow lands. Earthworm’s total biomass and density were not significantly different between the managed and non-managed fallow lands. Earthworm’s species richness was significantly low in non-managed fallow lands. We observed a strong correlation between earthworm density and richness with the age of the fallow lands (r2: 0.9 and 0.7; p < 0.05, respectively). The management type of the fallow land seems to affect earthworm biomasses (r2: 0.56; p < 0.05).
Keywords
- Calakmul reserve
- Zapatadrilus siboney
- managed and non-managed fallow lands
1. Introduction
Calakmul is one of the most important biosphere reserves, where it is possible to find primary tropical rain forests, secondary vegetation, and managed lands. It has an extension of 723,185 ha, where 65% can be potentially managed (Esparza-Olguin, personal communication). Among the managed areas, fallow lands are developed as a consequence of a successional vegetation process after clearing the primary vegetation and milpa production. Fallow land management is developed by the reserve inhabitants, where wood, herbs, fruits, vegetal carbon, or honey is extracted or collected; even though it is an ancient practice, there is no information about the effects of this management over soil conditions. Earthworms constitute 60–90% of soil macroinvertebrate biomass [1], and they are considered as soil quality indicators [2]; they can inform about the degree of perturbation that can be taken place within a terrestrial ecosystem. In natural system, native earthworms are dominant [3], while exotic earthworms can inhabit managed systems due to their width range of tolerance to different pH and temperature conditions [3]. Earthworms provide soil ecosystem services such as infiltration, and they participate in soil organic matter dynamics and green house mitigation [4]. The objective of this study was to describe earthworm’s communities among managed and non-managed fallow lands, in Calakmul Reserve.
2. Material and methods
Calakmul Reserve is located at 18°37′02″N and 89°33′00″W. The mean annual precipitation is 1076 mm with the mean temperature of 22.5°C. It is possible to find abundant karst outcroppings which characterize the shallow soils of the Calakmul region [5]. Forty-nine plots among nine communal settlements (ejidos) of Calakmul Reserve were selected. Within the fallow lands, 17 were managed and 24 were non-managed; fallow lands were successional vegetation belonging to evergreen tropical rain forest or subcaducifolius rain forests. Eight tropical rain forests were also sampled. Earthworms were collected at the end of the raining season, according to the TSBF method [6], where four monoliths of 25 × 25 × 30 cm per plot were done. Earthworms were preserved in 94% alcohol for further identification in the laboratory of soil of El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Campeche. Data was normalized, and ANOVA were performed in order to observe significant differences between managed and non-managed fallow lands; also Pearson correlation was developed among variables. A canonical analysis was performed with data of managed and non-managed fallow lands from the subcaducifolius rain forest; as environmental variables, we used fallow land age, density and richness of plants, and type of management (extraction of vegetal carbon, forestall management, and apiculture); and as species variables, we used earthworm biomass, density, and richness.
3. Results
We found six earthworm morphospecies belonging to the Acanthodrilidae family; most of the individuals were juveniles. Among adults we identified one native species

Figure 1.
Earthworm biomass (g.m2) in different land uses. Managed fallow land (MFL), non-managed fallow lands (NMFL), and tropical rain forest (TRF).

Figure 2.
Earthworm density (ind.m2) in different land uses. Managed fallow land (MFL), non-managed fallow lands (NMFL), and tropical rain forest (TRF).

Figure 3.
Earthworm richness in different land uses. Managed fallow land (MFL), non-managed fallow lands (NMFL), and tropical rain forest (TRF).
Plot no. | Ejido name | Vegetation type | M | Age | Plant species | Zs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Álvaro Obregón | Fallow land SCP | Non | 20 | Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gf | No |
2 | Álvaro Obregón | Fallow land SCP | With | 20 | Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Ne | No |
3 | Álvaro Obregón | Fallow land SCP | With | 15 | Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Ne | x |
4 | Álvaro Obregón | Fallow land SCP | With | 12 | Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Ne | x |
5 | Álvaro Obregón | Fallow land SCP | Non | 15 | Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gf | x |
6 | Álvaro Obregón | Fallow land SCP | With | 20 | Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Ne | x |
7 | Álvaro Obregón | Fallow land SCP | With | 15 | Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Ne | x |
8 | Álvaro Obregón | Fallow land SCP | Non | 20 | Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gf | x |
9 | Álvaro Obregón | Fallow land SCP | With | 25 | Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Ne | No |
10 | Álvaro Obregón | Fallow land SCP | Non | 15 | Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gf | No |
11 | Km 120 | Fallow land SCP | With | 19 | Lg, Bs, Ey, Ca, Ly, Gf, Tp, Ns | x |
12 | Km 120 | Fallow land SCP | Non | 15 | Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gf | x |
13 | Km 120 | Fallow land SCP | With | 17 | Lg, Bs, Ey, Ca, Ly, Gf, Tp, Ns | x |
14 | Km 120 | Fallow land SCP | Non | 17 | Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gf | x |
15 | Km 120 | Fallow land SCP | With | 18 | Lg, Bs, Ey, Ca, Ly, Gf, Tp, Ns | x |
16 | Km 120 | Fallow land SCP | With | 18 | Lg, Bs, Ey, Ca, Ly, Gf, Tp, Ns | x |
17 | Km 120 | Fallow land SCP | With | 17 | Lg, Bs, Ey, Ca, Ly, Gf, Tp, Ns | x |
18 | Km 120 | Fallow land SCP | Non | 18 | Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gf | x |
19 | Km 120 | Fallow land SCP | Non | 19 | Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gf | x |
20 | Km 120 | Fallow land SCP | With | 19 | Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Ne | x |
21 | Km 120 | Fallow land SCP | Non | 17 | Ly, Lg, Bs, Tp, Ht, Ey, Gf | x |
22 | Pueblo de Morelia | Fallow land SCP | With | 17 | Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Ne | x |
23 | Pueblo de Morelia | Fallow land SCP | With | 18 | Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Ne | x |
24 | Pueblo de Morelia | Fallow land SCP | With | 19 | Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Ne | x |
25 | Pueblo de Morelia | Fallow land SCP | With | 19 | Bs, Ly, Tp, Ds, Ei, Lg, Ne | x |
26 | Pueblo de Morelia | TRF SCP | Non | >25 | Ly, Ey, Tp, Dl, Kf, Bs, Ba, Mz | x |
27 | Km 120 | TRF SCP | Non | >25 | Ly, Ey, Tp, Dl, Kf, Bs, Ba, Mz | x |
28 | Km 120 | TRF SCP | Non | >25 | Ly, Ey, Tp, Dl, Kf, Bs, Ba, Mz | x |
29 | Puebo de Morelia | TRF SCP | Non | >25 | Ly, Ey, Tp, Dl, Kf, Bs, Ba, Mz | x |
30 | Ley de Fomento | Fallow land EG | Non | Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mb | x | |
31 | Ley de Fomento | TRF EG | Non | Ps, Ss, Ei, Py, Mp | x | |
32 | Ley de Fomento | Fallow land EG | Non | 12 | Ca, Ns, Pp, Bs, Lg, Tp, Gc | x |
33 | Ley de Fomento | Fallow land EG | Non | Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mb | x | |
34 | Centauro del Norte | Fallow land EG | Non | 30 | Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mb | x |
35 | Centauro del Norte | Fallow land EG | Non | 20 | Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mb | x |
36 | Centauro del Norte | Fallow land EG | Non | 12 | Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mb | x |
37 | Centauro del norte | TRF EG | Non | Ps, Ss, Ei, Py, Mp | x | |
38 | Narciso Mendoza | Fallow land EG | Non | Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mb | x | |
39 | Narciso Mendoza | TRF EG | Non | Ps, Ss, Ei, Py, Mp | x | |
40 | Narciso Mendoza | Fallow land EG | Non | 10 | Ca, Ns, Pp, Bs, Lg, Tp, Gc | x |
41 | Narciso Mendoza | Fallow land EG | Non | 30 | Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mb | x |
42 | Unidad de Trabajo | Fallow land EG | Non | Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mb | x | |
43 | Unidad de Trabajo | TRF EG | Non | Ps, Ss, Ei, Py, Mp | x | |
44 | Unidad de Trabajo | Fallow land EG | Non | Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mb | x | |
45 | Unidad de Trabajo | Fallow land EG | Non | Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mb | x | |
46 | Conhuas | Fallow land EG | Non | 7 | Ca, Ns, Pp, Bs, Lg, Tp, Gc | x |
47 | Conhuas | Fallow land EG | Non | 20 | Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mb | x |
48 | Conhuas | TRF EG | Non | Ps, Ss, Ei, Py, Mp | x | |
49 | Nuevo Becal | Fallow land EG | Non | Ca, Lg, Ll, Ns, Mz, Bt, Mb | x |
Table 1.
Ejido: communal settlement where owners can or cannot sell the land. M, management; fallow land SCP, subcaducifolius forest; TRF SCP, tropical rain forest with subcaducifolius characteristics; fallow land EG, fallow land with almost evergreen characteristics (subperennifolius); TRF EG, tropical rain forest with subperennifolius characteristics. Plant species combinations according to vegetation type: Ca, Ns, Pp, Bs, Lg, Tp, Gc,

Figure 4.
Earthworm community and vegetation characteristics (abundance and richness) among managed and non-managed fallow lands of subcaducifolius forests in Calakmul reserve, after a canonical analysis (99.7% of inertia explained at first axis p < 0.05).
4. Discussion
Fallow land management in Calakmul has been spread among the inhabitants of the reserve; this economical practice allows them to obtain resources (mainly economical) without damaging the environment. In this study we observed that the management of the fallow land doesn’t produce an effect over earthworm communities, while the age of the fallow land is more important. The age of fallow lands informs about the plant composition, where an important succession process has been taken place within 25–30 years (>vegetation cover, >diversity, >organic matter in the soil), and earthworms respond to this process.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge all the land owners who allow us to do this work and MAREBICA project.
References
- 1.
Huerta E. Étude comparative des facteurs qui déterminent la biomasse et la densité de vers de terre dans les zones naturelles et anthropisées dans les sols de tropiques [PhD these]. Paris: Université Paris VI Pierre et Marie Curie; 2002. p. 181 - 2.
Huerta E, Kampichler C, Geissen V, Ochoa-Gaona S, de Jong B, Hernández-Daumás S. Towards an ecological index for tropical soil quality based on soil macrofauna. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2009; 44 (8):1056-1062 - 3.
Fragoso C. Las lombrices de tierra de México (Annelida, Oligochaeta): Diversidad, ecología y manejo. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie). 2001; 1 :131-171 - 4.
Lavelle P, Decaëns T, Aubert M, Barot S, Blouin M, Bureau F, Margerie P, Mora P, Rossi J-P. Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2001; 42 :S3-S15 - 5.
Pérez-Salicrup D. Forest types and their implications. In: Turner BL, Geoghegan IIJ, Foster DR, editors. Integrated Land-change Science and Tropical Deforestation in the Southern Yucatán: Final Frontiers. University Press, Oxford, UK; 2004. p. 63-80 - 6.
Anderson JM, Ingram JSI. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CAB International; 1993. p. 222 - 7.
Rodriguez C, Fragoso C. Especies nuevas de Zapatadrilus James 1991. (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae registradas en Cuba. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie). 1995; 64 :21-33 - 8.
Fragoso C, Rojas P. Biodiversidad de lombrices de tierra (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Crassiclitellata) en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 2014; 85 :S197-S207 - 9.
Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos. 1994; 69 :373-386 - 10.
Edwards CA, Bohlen P J. Biology and ecology of earthworms. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall. Suffolk. 1994. p. 426 - 11.
Lavelle P, Spain AV. Soil Ecology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 654