Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Biomaterial from Oil Palm Waste: Properties, Characterization and Applications

Written By

Rudi Dungani, Pingkan Aditiawati, Sri Aprilia, Karnita Yuniarti, Tati Karliati, Ichsan Suwandhi and Ihak Sumardi

Submitted: November 16th, 2017 Reviewed: March 12th, 2018 Published: July 18th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.76412

Chapter metrics overview

2,838 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Oil palm are among the best known and most extensively cultivated plant families, especially Indonesia and Malaysia. Many common products and foods are derived from oil palm, its making them one of the most economically important plants. On the other hand, declining supply of raw materials from natural resources has motivated researchers to find alternatives to produce new materials from sustainable resources like oil palm. Oil palm waste is possibly an ideal source for cellulose-based natural fibers and particles. Generally, oil palm waste such as oil palm empty fruit bunches, oil palm trunk, oil palm shell and oil palm ash are good source of biomaterials. Lack of sufficient documentation of existing scientific information about the utilization of oil palm waste raw materials for biomaterial production is the driving force behind the this chapter. Incorporation of various types of biomaterial derived from oil palm waste resources as reinforcement in polymer matrices lead to the development of biocomposites products and this can be used in wide range of potential applications. Properties and characterization of biomaterial from oil palm waste will not only help to promote further study on nanomaterials derived from non-wood materials but also emphasize the importance of commercially exploit oil palm waste for sustainable products.


  • waste as green potential
  • cellulose fiber
  • oil palm particle
  • nanocellulose
  • biocomposites

1. Introduction

Sensitivity and concern for ecology and technology have sparked a new tendency towards the use of environmentally friendly materials in the world. Environmental-friendly “waste to wealth” programs are becoming increasingly important as a step to exploit and use biomass materials as raw material for biocomposite products for added value and new products. Biomass fibers (natural fibers, agricultural waste fibers, industrial timber waste etc.) have many techno-economic advantages over synthetic fibers such as glass fibers, carbon fiber and so on. Even in 1938, history has shown how Henry Ford uses soybean residues as a major raw material for the production of car interior frames components.

In general, there is continuous attempts to produce more high-value products from biomass. For example, biomass fibers from palm oil (OPBF) can be found continuously from oil palm fractures during pruning activities, when processing from oil palm stems during replanting (after 25 years) and periodic processing. Until this day, palm oil processing activities yield only 10% palm oil and palm kernel oil while the remaining 90% remain in the form of biomass or waste is still not used for the industry.

The oil palm industry has been producing a lot of oil palm biomass wastes in field and oil palm mills. The waste from mill consist of pressed fruit fibers (PFF), empty fruit bunch (EFB), oil palm shell (OPS), palm oil mill effluent (POME), whilst the other wastes from the plantation comprises of oil palm trunks (OPT) and oil palm fronds (OPF) during replanting after achieving its economic life spans [1]. The increase in oil palm plantation has been producing the waste in large quantities during the replanting; especially oil palm fronds (OPF) and oil palm trunk (OPT). Generally, 24% of OPF obtained from each oil palm trees in a year during harvesting at fresh fruit bunches (FFB) in the field. Meanwhile, OPT accounted for 70% of the replanting activities [2]. This means the potentiality of OPT availability would increase continuously as plantation is increasing and replanting is done throughout the year. Along with these two wastes, there are also other wastes like empty fruit bunch (EFB), oil palm shell (OPS) and waste (effluent) palm oil mill effluent (POME) [3].

These renewable biomass sources can be used for the development of biocomposites, power generation, paper production, construction board fillers, solid wood, mulching and soil conditioning as well as many other uses. Availability, price, performance, and biodegradable nature are among the factors that act as catalysts to promote the use of lignocellulose fiber of oil palm wastes as a value-added product. The oil palm sector generates a large number of biomass categorized as agricultural wastes which up to now only 10% are used as alternative raw materials for biocomposite-based industries, industrial raw materials, fertilizers, animal feeds, chemical derivatives and others. Much of this residual waste is not used but contributes to severe environmental problems when left in processing factories and farms just like that. Previous research on biomass and other agricultural waste has shown potential in its use for the production of various types of value-added products such as medium-density panel, chip board, thermoset composite and thermoplastic, nano biocomposite, pulp and paper manufacture [4, 5].

Through intensive research and development attempts, the world’s oil palm biomass has been commercialized in a variety of biomass-based products. The use of lignocellulosic material from oil palm biomass for various types of value-added products through chemical processing, physical and biological innovation is now evolving.


2. Oil palm waste as green potential

Palm oil is one commodity which demand is growing very rapidly in world and provide an important contribution to economic development. Increased demand for palm oil in the form of vegetable oils encourage the countries to spur the development of oil palm plantations. Consequently, with the increasing development of the palm oil industry will cause the increase in palm oil mill effluents.

Despite this enormous production, the oil consists of only a minor fraction of the total biomass produced in the plantation. The remainder consists of a huge amount of lignocellulosic materials in the form of fronds (OPF), trunk (OPT), empty fruit bunches (EFB), pressed fruit fiber (PFF), pruning oil palm frond (POPF), and oil palm ash (OPA). Fortunately, all of the wastes are categorized as organic wastes that are environmentally degradable. However, owing to the large quantities generated, these wastes have the potential to pollute the environment. Sumanthi et al. [6] reported that the amount of biomass produced by an oil palm tree, include oil and lignocellulosic materials, is 231.5 kg dry weight/year.

Globally, oil palm biomass is produced and utilized in million metric tonnes annually. With the anticipated higher fresh fruit bunch yields and increase in planted areas in the world expected to produce more than 295 million tonnes of wastes annually. In Malaysia, the oil palm waste are produced of 135 million tonnes annually [7]. Meanwhile, Indonesia produced 143 million tonnes of the oil palm biomass annually [8, 9].

Solid wastes of EFB and OPT has higher potential for commercial exploitation than the other types of biomass waste [8]. Consequently, EFB and OPT, which collectively comprise the bulk of lignocellulosic waste are available for commercial exploitation. However, producer countries of oil palm in the world such Malaysia and Indonesia, the zero-waste strategy must applicated to maintain the competitive edge of oil palm industry [9]. Other potential biomass wastes were OPF from the plantation fields. Fronds are obtained during regular pruning on FFB harvesting, when trees exceeding the economical age are felled [10].

An oil palm tree reaches an average volume of 1.638 m3 after its commercial life span [11]; therefore, more than 20 and 18.5 million m3 of biomass from OPT are available annually in Malaysia and Indonesia, respectively. Bakar et al. [11] also reported that, the high OPT that can be used only 2/3 parts and recovery of oil palm lumber (outer part) generated an average of several patterns is tested is 30% [11], it can be generated about 5 million m3.

The oil palm wastes can be utilized to produce various types value added products which mean the resources of the substitute’s material on wood-based industry. Many studies have investigated the utilization of solid oil palm wastes, utilization of EFB as alternative of fertilizer using EFB waste and liquid waste of oil palm factory as filler in biocomposites have been done for particleboard or fiberboard using cement as adhesive or thermosetting adhesive such as an urea formaldehyde have been conducted [3]. EFB can also be used as a major component of specialized construction materials [12, 13]. Previous studies and the latest on oil palm biomass waste have shown the potentiality in its use for the production of various types of value-added products such as medium density panels, block board, laminated veneer lumber (LVL), mineral-bonded particleboard, plywood, chipboard, thermoset and thermoplastic composites, nanobiocomposite, pulp and paper manufacturing [14]. Islam et al. [15] used OPS as activated carbon. Abdul Khalil et al. [16] investigated the conversion of OPT and oil palm EFB into new plywood. Other researchers such as Zaidon et al. [17] and Deraman et al. [18] worked on making particleboard by mixing EFB and rubber wood. Oil palm biomass wastes in field and oil palm mills is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Various oil palm waste form and its derivative.

The motivation for using OPT as plywood was initially due to the difficulty in obtaining good quality timber, as well as the abundance of OPT in developing countries like Malaysia and Indonesia [3]. However, oil palm-based plywood mills only utilize about 40% of the OPT and the other 60% is discarded as waste due to its insufficient properties [19]. Only the outer part of OPT can be used for plywood, while the inner part of OPT, which is not strong enough to use as lumber, is discarded in large amounts. It is highly susceptible to degradation agents due to its high moisture content (around 80%) [19]. Abdul Khalil et al. [16] investigated the development of hybrid plywood by utilizing OPT and oil palm EFB. The results showed that hybridization of EFB with OPT improves some of the properties like bending strength, screw withdrawal, and shear strength of the plywood.


3. Properties and characterization of various oil palm waste and their products

3.1. Structure and morphology of oil palm tree

The cell wall structure of oil palm fibers consists of primary layer (P) and secondary layer (S1, S2 and S3). In general, oil palm fibers have varied variations in size, shape and structure of cell walls. Almost all the fiber structures are round. The layers of S1, S2 and S3 are strongly bonded and form structures such as sandwiches where microfibrils S1 and S3 corners are parallel to S2 layers. This sandwich structure provides additional strength to fiber for resistance to water strain, curve resistance to compressive strength, and bending stiffness to bending force. The primary walls of all oil palm fibers look like a thin layer. Some primary walls are clearly distinguishable between the middle lamella to each other.

Studies show that the S2 layer is the majority layer of cell wall. This layer affects the strength of a single fiber. OPT fibers are found to have the most thick S2 layers of 3.43 μm. According to the S2 layer thickness, the OPT is estimated to have the highest strength as the fiber strength is dependent on the cellulose microfibrils that are in line with the fiber axis of the S2 layer [13, 20, 21].

3.2. Properties of various oil palm wastes

EFB fibers are hard and strong multicellular fibers that have a central part called lacuna. Its porous surface morphology is important to provide better mechanical links with matrix resin for composite fabrication [22]. The fiber cross section is a polygon with a bundle or a vascular packet that is compact and surrounded by thickened layers of cells. Vascular fibers in monocytes are usually surrounded by several layers of thick cell walls that serve to provide tensile strength to side compression power [23]. OPF fibers consist of various sizes of vascular bundles. Vascular files are widely found in thin-walled parenchyma tissues. Each bundle consists of round gloves, vessels, fibers, phloem, and parenchyma tissue. The xylem and phloem tissues are clearly distinguishable where the phloem is divided into two separate parts in each bundle [12].

Different chemical compositions according to plant species and parts in the plant itself. It also varies by location, geographical condition, age, climate and soil conditions [24]. Table 1 shows the differences in chemical composition between various types of oil palm biomass waste.

FibersExtractive (%)Holocellulose (%)Cellulose (%)Hemicellulose (%)Lignin (%)Ash (%)

Table 1.

Chemical composition of oil palm biomass waste.

Sources: [25, 26, 27, 28, 29].

In order for many applications, oil palm solid waste has physical and mechanical properties. Table 2 shows the properties include physical and mechanical of different part of oil palm solid waste. These properties are very important in reinforcement of biomass in polymer composites. Dungani et al. [34] investigated that physical, mechanical and chemical properties of various oil palm waste were examined to assess for many applications.

Density (gr/cm3)0.7–1.551.1
Tensile strength (MPa)0.1–0.47151.73–82.40300–600
Young modulus (GPa)1–91.70.95–1.8615–32
Elongation et break (%)8–18119.5–12.15

Table 2.

Physical and mechanical properties oil palm solid waste.

Sources: [30, 31, 32, 33].

3.3. Isolation and characterization of cellulose fibers from oil palm waste

Many researcher investigated the isolation and characterization cellulose fibers from oil palm waste. They studied about isolation of cellulose from many part of oil palm waste, which are chemical treatment and mechanical treatment. There are several ways to isolate cellulose from oil palm solid waste, such as homogenization, ultrasonication, electrospinning, acid hydrolysis, and steam explosion [33]. The main purpose of extracting cellulose is to remove existing non-cellulose components such as hemicellulose, lignin, extractive compounds to obtain cellulosic nano fiber [35].

The following are the results of several researchers who conducted their research on oil palm solid waste. Nasution et al. [36] report their research has isolated cellulose from EFB with hydrochloric acid. The result show that the microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) was found in the form of alpha cellulose. From SEM analysis this treatment affected the structural of morphological of resulting of microfibrillated cellulose. Chieng et al. [37] investigated extraction nanocellulose from OPMF by acid hydrolysis. They used sulfuric acid to remove amorphous region of cellulose to found nanocellulose crystalline. The result show that increased crystallinity of cellulose after removing hemicellulose and lignin. After analysis process the fiber surface to be smoother and reduction in diameter and size. The diameter of nanocellulose about 1–6 nm and rod-like shape.

Nordin et al. [38] also isolated cellulose with sulfuric acid from OPF. The result show that nanocrystalline cellulose improved. From TEM analysis showed good dispersion of individual fiber resulted from chemo-mechanical treatment. They were subjected that the nanocellulose derived from OPF is suitable for many application such as tissue engineering, medical implants, drug delivery, wound dressing and cardiac devices due to their excellent properties. Nazir et al. [39] produced cellulose from EFB with formic acid and hydrogen peroxide. Owolabi et al. [40] studied isolation of cellulose from OPF rachis vascular bundle using sodium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide.

Shanmugarajah et al. [41] studied isolation of nanocellulose from EFB and investigated with sulfuric acid. Indarti et al. [42] produced cellulose nanocrystal from EFB by TEMPO mediated process follow with ultrasonication. They studied the effect of drying and solvent exchange process on thermal stability.

3.4. Production and characterization of particles from oil palm waste

Several methods has been implied by researcher to produce nanoparticle such as mechanical process, supercritical fluid extraction and solvent extraction [43]. These methods are intended for removing the residual impurities from sources including mechanical pressing. Nanoparticles as one form of nanomaterials like nanotubes and nanolayer, depend on the numbers of dimensions in nano range. Nano particles are small size, narrow size distribution, high dispersion tendency and lower aggregation form [44]. Producing nanomaterials could be preparing by different methods, such as mechanical treatments, chemical treatments, electrospinning method and so on.

Abdul Khalil et al. [43] investigated that OPS as nanoparticles for reinforcement in polymer composites. In prepared the nanoparticles, they used solvent extraction method. From analysis, the shape and surface of defatted OPS particles were angular, crushed shapes and irregular. Liauw et al. [45] stated that the bioresources when used extraction with supercritical fluid, the high purity of oil could produced.

Many researchers also concerned to produce oil palm nanoparticles in the form of activated carbon and oil palm ash. Ruiz et al. [46] produced and characterized the activated carbon particle from OPS. Sukiran et al. [47] studied biochar particles from EFB by pyrolysis process by using fluidized bed reactor. Biochar particles can be used as fuel in form of briquettes, reinforcement in polymer composites, as antifouling in polymer membranes, biocatalyst and ink. Abdul Khalil et al. [48] investigated nanoparticles from oil palm ash (OPA) which is rich siliceous material. They successful reduce the size with ball mill process for 30 hours. Saba et al. [44] investigated nanoparticles from EFB with physical treatment and chemical treatment. To reduce macromolecular size to nano-size used high energy ball mill. Nasir et al. [49] succeeded to produce reduced rapheme oxide from rapheme oxide using OPL, PKS and EFB.


4. Potential application of oil palm waste-based composites

Over the past few decades, the polymer science have been development in a wide spectrum since emergence natural fiber-reinforced polymer composite materials. Its natural fiber composites have used in various applications such as automotive components, package trays, door panels, headliners, dashboards and interior parts [50].

Utilization of natural fiber like oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) in polymer composites have some advantages such as low density, low cost, renewability, and biodegradability [51, 52]. The use of biomass from oil palm wastes has been demonstrated at the laboratory and pre-production levels as alternative raw wood materials for biocomposite production, for example particleboard, medium density fiberboard (MDF) and others [53]. These are the essential features and properties of fibers that are important and enable integration of oil palm biomass waste into existing industries for the purpose of product production.

4.1. Oil palm waste-based conventional composite

The biomass wastes include trunk, empty fruit bunch, leaf, mesocarp fiber, etc. are convertible into various biocomposite products. The type of conventional composite performance can be tailored to the end use of the product with each category classification is simple low and high density. Conventional composites are used in some structural and non-structural product applications, including panels for internal closure purposes to panels for outdoor use in furniture and multi-building support structures. Review on each potential biocomposite products can be manufactured from oil palm waste is presented in Table 3.

Type of conventional compositeReferences
Veneer and plywoodMokhtar et al. [54] and Rosli et al. [55]
Compressed lumberChoowang and Hiziroglu [56] and Choowang [57]
Sandwich panelSrivaro et al. [58] and Srivaro [59]
FiberboardsOnuorah [60] and Ramli et al. [53]
ParticleboardsSudin and Shaari [61] and Haslett [62]

Table 3.

Conventional composite based on oil palm waste.

4.2. Oil palm waste-based polymer composites

This section provides an overview of use of oil palm waste fiber in the field of composite material. Bio-based polymers such as polylactic acid (PLA), polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), cellulose ester, soy-based plastic, starch plastic, polymer trimethylene terephthalate (PTT), functional vegetable oil-based resin and thermoset and elastomer biocomposites (Table 4) has revolutionized the plastic and petroleum world with biodegradable polymer.

EFB/polyesterAbdul Khalil et al. [63]
OPF/phenol formaldehydeSreekala et al. [64]
OPF/glycidyl methacrylateRozman et al. [65]
Oil palm fibers/rubberIsmail et al. [66]
Oil palm wood flour/natural rubberIsmail et al. [67]
EFB (carbon black)/epoxyAbdul Khalil et al. [68]
EFB/polycaprolactoneIbrahim et al. [69]
EFB/phenol formaldehydeChai et al. [70]
Short palm tree fibers-polyesterKaddami et al. [71]
Short palm tree fibers-epoxyKaddami et al. [71]
Polyethylene modified with crude palm oilMin et al. [72]
EFB fiber/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)Siyamak et al. [73]
EFB fiber/polyethyleneArif et al. [74]
EFB fiber/poly(vinyl chloride)Abdul Khalil et al. [75]
OPT fiber/polypropyleneAbdul Khalil et al. [76]

Table 4.

Thermoset based on biocomposite polymer and elastomer.

Additionally, oil palm fiber can be used as a filler in thermoplastics and thermoset composites (Table 5). This composite has extensive applications in automotive furniture and components. In Malaysia, research and development in this area has finally reached commercialization levels to develop the thermoplastic composite, thermoset and elastomer composite for components used in the manufacture of proton cars [6]. In addition, hybrid composites also have lower modulus of storage than non-hybrid oil palm/PF composite composites. Research and production of various hybrid composites based on oil palm fiber are listed in Table 6.

Polyethylene/tapioca starch/EFB biofilmRoshafima and Wan Aizan [77]
Polypropylene/EFBRozman et al. [78]
High-density polyethylene composites/EFBMohd Ishak et al. [79]
High-density polyethylene composites/OPF/EFBRozman et al. [80]
Poly(vinyl chloride)/EFBBakar et al. [81]
Polyurethane/EFBRozman et al. [82]
Polypropylene/EFB-oil palm derived celluloseKhalid et al. [83]

Table 5.

Thermoplastic-based biocomposites polymer.

Hybrid compositesReferences
Oil palm fiber-glass fiber/epoxyJawaid and Abdul Khalil [84]
EFB-glass fiber/polypropyleneRozman et al. [85]
EFB-glass fiber/polyesterAbdul Khalil et al. [26]
EFB bio-composites hybridized-kaoliniteAmin and Khairiah [86]
Oil palm fibers-glass fiber/polyesterKumar et al. [87]
EFB-glass fiber/phenol formaldehydeSreekala et al. [64]
Sisal-oil palm fibers/natural rubberKhanam et al. [88]
EFB-glass fiber/vinylesterAbdul Khalil et al. [89]
EFB-jute/epoxyJawaid et al. [90]

Table 6.

Oil palm fiber-based hybrid composites.


5. Conversion of oil palm waste-based lignocellulosic to nanocellulose

Lignocellulosic of oil palm fibers such as hemicellulose, lignin and especially cellulose are also potentially exploited in nanotechnology. The pulp fiber from the oil palm fiber to produce a network structure unit such as nano-sized mesh called cellulose microfibril, it are obtained through mechanical treatment of pulp fibers which include smoothing process and high-pressure homogenizer process. The degree of fiber fibrillation of the pulp will increase the flexural flexibility of the fiber [75, 84]. This increase is due to the complete fibrillation of most fibers. The use of pulp (cellulose) as a reinforced booster with additional high pressure homogenization, composite strength will increase linearly against water resistance values and other properties [91].

In general, related materials such as hydrolyzed microcrystalline cellulose will rapidly clot when it is drained [92]. This, will complicate the next process. Therefore, surface modification should be carried out so that cellulose has compatibility with the matrix. Examples of applications for surface-made nanofibrillar celluloses are high-performance films and materials of nanocomposites, materials with superb hydrophobic surfaces as well as optical properties, electrical conductivity, magnetic or unique adsorption, new wood-based fibers with nanoscans or modified surface textures [93]. Products include filters, textiles, films, packaging materials, casting and mold components.

There are various methods had been reported for isolation of oil palm waste-based lignocellulosic to nanocellulose or nanoparticles, its can either in chemical treatment, mechanical treatment, and chemo-mechanical treatment processes [39, 94, 95] considered that alkali treatment seems to be effective in the removal of lignin and hemicelluloses components in palm oil EFB fiber. Mazlita et al. [96] suggested that chemical-sonication process were successfully generated from oil palm trunk (OPT) lignocellulosic biomass.

The characteristic of nanocellulose of oil palm wastes has great potential in applications such as strength enhancers polymer composites has been studied since the first half of the twentieth century. Nanocellulose extracted from oil palm biomass lignocellulosic can be classified in two main subcategories, nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) and nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC). Research on the isolation nanofibres from oil palm biomass such as empty fruit bunch have been conducted over the years [97]. It has been reported that cellulose nanofibers from cellulosic oil palm fiber can used as a reinforcing agent in composites materials. Meanwhile, research in the use of oil palm waste nanofiller such as oil palm shell and oil palm ash for manufacturing of wood composites have been carried out by Dungani et al. [98] and Sasthiryar et al. [99]. In general, the results of these studies indicate that, the addition of nanofiller can improve the properties of composites. The research development of isolation of nanocellulose of oil palm biomass and its related methods in various treatment are shown in Table 7.

Cellulose nanofibers were produced by hydrolyzing OPEFB with sulfuric acidFahma et al. [39]
Microfibrillated celluloses from OPEFBGoh et al. [100]
Production defatted OPS nanoparticlesDungani et al. [101] and Rosamah et al. [102]
Nanofibrillated from EFB using ultrasound assisted hydrolysisRosazley et al. [103]
EFB nanocrystalline cellulose was isolated from OPEFB microcrystalline celluloseRohaizu and Wanrosli [104]
Nanocellulose from OPF using alkaline processesMohaiyiddin et al. [105]
Production cellulose nanocrystals from OPF by hydrolysis treatmentSaurabh et al. [106]
Isolation of cellulose nanowhiskers from oil palm mesocarp fibers by acid hydrolysis and microfluidizationAdriana et al. [107]
Production cellulose nanocrystals from OPF by chemo-mechanical treatmentNordin et al. [38]
Oil palm mesocarp fiber as a source for the production of cellulose nanocrystalsChieng et al. [108]
Nanofillers obtained from OPAAbdul Khalil et al. [7]
The utilization of OPA as a nanofiller for the development of polymer nanocompositesBhat and Abdul Khalil [109]
Nanocellulose was extracted from OPT fibers by a chemi-mechanical techniqueSurip et al. [110]
Cellulose nanocrystals were isolated from OPT using acid hydrolysis method and total chlorine free methodLamaming et al. [111]

Table 7.

Events in the exploration of isolation nanocellulose from oil palm biomass with various methods and their related applications.


6. Conclusion

The oil palm industry produces a high amount of waste during harvesting, replanting and processing at the plant. Generally, up to this day only 10% of the use of oil palm biomass residues is used as a biocomposite industrial raw material or as an alternative substitute material for wood raw materials. Oil palm waste that has lignocellulose content can be produce biomaterial as reinforcement in conventional biocomposite products (molded product panel, plywood, fiberboard, hybrid biocomposite, etc.) and advanced biocomposites (thermoplastics, thermosets and elastomers). Biomaterial can produce with or without treatment. That mean is the biomaterial from oil palm tree can be made from the fiber and isolated the cellulose content. Biomaterial from oil palm waste played an important role in the polymer composites and it can classified according to their origin. The types of biomaterial can be prepared from trunk, empty fruit bunch, frond, and shell. Reinforcement of biomaterials from different part of oil palm tree in thermoplastics and thermoset will give different characteristics. The different characteristic because of the physical and mechanical properties of oil palm fibers are mainly depended on their chemical content. The reinforcement oil palm waste into polymer composites have shown the sensitivity of certain mechanical and thermal properties to moisture absorption. These phenomena can be decreased by the employ fiber surface treatment.

In additions, biomaterial from oil palm waste reinforce in polymer composites could increase biodegradability, decrease environmental pollution, reduces cost and hazards. The waste disposal issue has directed most scientific research into eco-composite materials that can be readily degraded and assimilated by biological agent. The characterization of biomaterial reinforce in polymer matrix give some performance like, physical properties, chemical properties, mechanical composition, and also interaction between fiber as nanomaterial and matrix.



The authors would like to thank Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) for providing Research University Grants (P3MI-ITB) and Ministry of Research, Technology and High Education for the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS-115/RISTEKDIKTI/2016).


Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.


  1. 1. Erwinsyah RC. Thermal insulation material from oil palm empty fruit bunch fibres. Journal of Biotropia. 2007;14(1):32-50. DOI: 10.11598/btb.2007.14.1.23
  2. 2. Abdul Khalil HPS, Amouzgar P, Jawaid M, Hassan A, Ahmad F, Hadiyane A, Dungani R. New approach to oil palm trunk core lumber material properties enhancement via resin impregnation. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy. 2012;6(3):1-10. DOI: 10.1166/jbmb.2012.1212
  3. 3. Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat AH, Jawaid M, Amouzgar P, Ridzuan R, Said MR. Agro-wastes: Mechanical and physical properties of resin impregnated oil palm trunk core lumber. Polymer Composites. 2010;3(4):638-644. DOI: 10.1002/pc.20841
  4. 4. Abdul Khalil HPS, Bakare IO, Khairul A, Issam AM, Bhat IUH. Effect of anhydride modification on the thermal stability of cultivated Acacia mangium. Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology. 2011;31:154-171. DOI: 10.1080/02773813.2010.510586
  5. 5. Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat AH, Ireana Yusra AF. Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: A review. Journal Carbohydrate Polymers. 2011;87:963-979. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.078
  6. 6. Sumanthi S, Chai SP, Mohamed AR. Utilization of oil palm as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2008;12(9):2404-2421. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.06.006
  7. 7. Abdul Khalil HPS, Rus Mahayuni AR, Bhat IH, Dungani R, Almulali MZ, Abdullah CK. Characterization of various organic waste nanofillers obtained from oil palm ash. BioResources. 2012;7(4):5771-5780
  8. 8. Yuliansyah AT, Hirajima T, Rochmadi R. Development of the Indonesian palm oil industry and utilization of solid waste. Journal of Mining and Materials Processing Institute of Japan. 2009;125(12):583-589. DOI: 10.2473/journalofmmij.125.583
  9. 9. Hambali E, Thahar E, Komarudin A. The potential of oil palm and rice biomass as bioenergy feedstock. In: I7th Biomass Asia Workshop; 2-3 July 2010, Jakarta-Indonesia. Jakarta: BAW; 2010. pp. 125-143
  10. 10. Erwinsyah. Improvement of oil palm wood properties using bioresin [thesis]. Dresden: Fakultät für Forst-, Geo- und Hydrowissenschaften, Technische Universität Dresden; 2008
  11. 11. Bakar ES, Rachman O, Hermawan D, Karlinasari L, Rosdiana N. Utilization of oil palm trunk (Elaeis guineensisJacq) as conctruction materials and furniture (I): Physical, chemical and natural durability properties of oil palm wood. Journal of Forest Products Technology. 1998;11(1):1-11
  12. 12. Abdul Khalil HPS, Alwani MS, Ridzuan R, Kamarudin H, Khariul A. Chemical composition, morphological characteristics, and cell wall structure of Malaysian oil palm fibers. Journal of Polymer Plastics Technology and Engineering. 2008;47(3):273-280. DOI: 10.1080/03602550701866840
  13. 13. Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat IH, Khairul A. Preliminary study on enhanced properties and biological resistance of chemically modifiedAcaciaspp. BioResources. 2010;5(4):2720-2737
  14. 14. Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat AH. Oil Palm Biomass: Fiber Cultivation, Production and its Varied Applications. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2010. 113 p
  15. 15. Islam MN, Zailani R, Ani FN. Pyrolytic oil from fluidized bed pyrolysis of oil palm shell and its characterization. Renewable Energy. 1999;17(1):73-84. DOI: 10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00112-8
  16. 16. Abdul Khalil HPS, Fazita N, Bhat AH, Nik Fuad NA. Development and material properties of new hybrid plywood from oil palm biomass. Materials and Design. 2010;31:417-427. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.040
  17. 17. Zaidon A, Nizam AMN, Noor MYM, Abood F, Paridah MT, Yuziah MYN, Jalaludin H. Properties of particleboard made from pretreated particles of rubberwood, EFB and rubberwood-EFB blend. Journal of Applied Science. 2007;7(8):1145-1151. DOI: 10.3923/jas.2007.1145.1151
  18. 18. Deraman M, Zakaria S, Husin M, Aziz AA, Ramli R, Moktar A, Sahri MH. X-ray diffraction studies on fiber of oil palm empty fruit bunch and rubberwood for medium-density fiberboard. Journal of Materials Science Letters. 1999;18:249-253
  19. 19. Rafidah J, Asma W, Puad E, Mahanim SMA, Shaharuddin H. Toward zero waste production of value added products from waste oil palm trunk (WOPT). In: Proceedings of 8th Biomass Asia Workshop; 2-3 July 2012, Hanoi-Vietnam. Hanoi: BAW; 2012. pp. 25-46
  20. 20. Abdul Khalil HPS, Siti Alwani M, Mohd Omar AK. Cell wall structure of various tropical plant waste fibers. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology. 2007;35:9-15
  21. 21. Bhat IUH, Abdullah CK, Abdul Khalil HPS, Ibrahim MH, Nurul Fazita MR. Properties enhancement of oil palm waste: Oil palm trunk lumber. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2010;29:3301-3308. DOI: 10.1177/0731684410372262
  22. 22. Sreekala MS, Kumaran MG, Thomas S. Oil palm fibers: Morphology, chemical composition, surface modification and mechanical properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1997;66:821-835. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19971031)66:5
  23. 23. Dickison W. Integrative Plant Anatomy. New York: Harcourt Academic Press; 2000. 205 p
  24. 24. Rowell RM, Han JS, Rowell JS. Characterization and factors effecting fiber properties. In: Frollini E, Leão AL, Mattoso LHC, editors. Handbook of Natural Polymers and Agrofibers Composites. 2nd ed. São Carlos: Embrapa Instrumentação Agropecuária; 2000. pp. 115-134
  25. 25. Law KN, Wan Daud WR, Ghazali A. Morphological and chemical nature of fiber strands of oil palm empty-fruit-bunch (OPEFB). BioResources. 2007;2(3):352-362
  26. 26. Abdul Khalil HPS, Hanida S, Kang CW, Nik Fuaad NA. Agro-hybrid composite: The effects on mechanical and physical properties of oil palm fiber (EFB)/glass hybrid reinforced polyester composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2007;26(2):203-218. DOI: 10.1177/0731684407070027
  27. 27. Punsuvon P, Anpanurak W, Vaithanomsat P, Tungkananuruk N. Fractionation of chemical components of oil palm trunk by steam explosion. In: Proceedings of 31st Congress on Science and Technology of Thailand; 14-17 December 2005. Thailand: Suranaree University of Technology; 2005. pp. 166-189
  28. 28. Shinoj S, Visvanathan R, Panigrahi S, Kochubabu M. Oil palm fiber (OPF) and its composites: A review. Industrial Crops and Products. 2011;33(1):7-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.09.009
  29. 29. Arami-Niya A, Wan Daud WMA, Mjalli FS. Using granular activated prepared from oil palm shell by ZnCl2 and physical activation for methane adsoption. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2010;89(2):197-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2010.08.006
  30. 30. Khanam PN, Abdul Khalil HPS, Jawaid M, Reddy GR, Narayana CS, Naidu SV. Sisal/carbon fiber reinforced hybrid composites: Tensile, flexural and chemical resistance properties. Journal of Polymers and the Environment. 2010;18:727-733. DOI: 10.1007/s10924-010-0210-3
  31. 31. Jawaid M, Abdul Khalil HPS, Abu Bakar A. Mechanical performance of oil palm empty fruit bunches/jute fibres reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2010;527(29):7944-7949. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.005
  32. 32. Khalid M, Ratnam CT, Luqman CA, Salmiaton A, Choong TSY, Jalaludin H. Thermal and dynamic mechanical behavior of cellulose- and oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB)-filled polypropylene biocomposites. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering. 2009;48(12):1244-1251. DOI: 10.1080/03602550903282986
  33. 33. Nafu YR, Tendo JF, Njeugna E, Oliver G, Cooke KO. Extraction and characterization of fibres from the stalk and spikelets of empty fruit bunch. Journal of Applied Chemistry. 2015;2015:1-10. DOI: 10.1155/2015/750818
  34. 34. Dungani R, Karina M, Subyakto AS, Hermawan D, Hadiyane A. Agricultural waste fibers towards sustainability and advanced utilization: A review. Asian Journal Plant Science. 2016;15(1-2):42-55. DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2016
  35. 35. Ahmad Z, Saman HM, Tahir PM. Oil palm trunk fiber as bio-waste resources for concrete reinforcement. International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering. 2010;5(2):199-207
  36. 36. Nasution H, Yurnaliza Y, Veronicha V, Irmadani I, Sitompul S. Preparation and characterization of cellulose microcrystalline (MCC) from fiber of empty fruit bunch palm oil. In: Proceedings of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; 14-15 December 2017. Indonesia: IOP Publishing Ltd; 2017. pp. 1-8
  37. 37. Chieng BCW, Lee SH, Ibrahim NA, Then YY, Loo YY. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from oil palm mesocarp fiber. Polymer. 2017;9(8):1-11. DOI: 10.3390/polym9080355
  38. 38. Nordin NA, Sulaiman O, Hashim R, Kassim MHM. Oil palm frond waste for the production of cellulose nanocrystals. Journal of Physical Science. 2017;28(2):115-126. DOI: 10.21315/jps2017.28.2.8
  39. 39. Nazir MS, Wahjoedi BA, Yussof AW, Abdullah MA. Eco-friendly extraction and characterization of cellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunches. BioResources. 2013;8(2):2161-2172
  40. 40. Owolabi FAWT, Arniza G, Wan Daun WR, Alkharkhi AFM. Effect of alkaline peroxide pre-treatment on microfibrillated cellulose from oil palm fronds rachis amenable for pulp and paper and bio-composite production. BioResources. 2016;11(2):3013-3026. DOI: 10.15376/biores.11.2.3013-3026
  41. 41. Shanmugarajah B, Kiew PL, Chew IML, Choong TSY, Tan KW. Isolation of nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) from palm oil empty fruit bunch (EFB): Preliminary result on FTIR and DLS analysis. Chemical Engineering Transactiions. 2015;45:1705-1710. DOI: 10.3303/CET1545285
  42. 42. Indarti E, Roslan R, Husin M, Wan Daud WS. Polylactic acid bionanocomposites filled with nanocrystalline cellulose from TEMPO-oxidized oil palm lignocellulosic biomass. BioResources. 2016;11(4):8615-8626
  43. 43. Abdul Khalil HPS, Hossain MS, Amiranajwa N, Fazita ASN, Haafiz RMR, Suraya LNM, Dungani R, Fizree HM. Production and characterization of the defatted oil palm shell nanoparticles. Sains Malaysiana. 2016;45(5):833-839
  44. 44. Saba N, Tahir PM, Abdan K, Ibrahim NA. Preparation and characterization of fire retardant nano-filler from oil palm empty fruit bunch fibers. BioResources. 2015;10(3):4530-4543
  45. 45. Liauw MY, Natan FA, Widiyanti P, Ikasari D, Indraswati N, Soetaredjo FE. Extraction of neem oil (Azadirachta indicaA. Juss) using n-hexane and ethanol: Studies of oil quality kinetic and thermodynamic. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2008;3(3):49-54
  46. 46. Ruiz H, Zambtrano M, Giraldo L, Sierra R, Pirajan JCM. Production and characterization of activated carbon from oil-palm shell for carboxylic acid adsorption. Oriental Journal of Chemistry. 2015;31(2):753-762. DOI: 10.13005/ojc/310217
  47. 47. Sukiran MA, Abnisa F, Daud WMAW, Bakar MA, Loh SK. A review of torrefaction of oil palm solid wastes for biofuel production. Energy Conversion and Management. 2017;49:101-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.07.011
  48. 48. Abdul Khalil HPS, Fizree HM, Jawaid M, Alattas OS. Preparation and characterization of nano-structured materials from oil palm ash: A bio-agricultural waste from oil palm mill. BioResources. 2011;6(4):4537-4546
  49. 49. Nasir S, Hussein MZ, Yusof NA, Zainal Z. Oil palm waste-based precursors as a renewable and economical carbon sources for the preparation of reduced grapheme oxide from grapheme oxide. Nanomaterials. 2017;7(7):182-188. DOI: 10.3390/nano7070182
  50. 50. Holbery J, Houston D. Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites in automotive applications. Journal of Minerals, Metals & Materials Society. 2006;58(11):80-86. DOI: 10.1007/s11837-006-0234-2
  51. 51. Rozman HD, Ismail H, Jaffri RM, Aminullah A, Ishak ZAM. Mechanical properties of polyethylene-oil palm empty fruit bunch composites. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering. 1998;37(4):495-507. DOI: 10.1080/03602559808001376
  52. 52. Ibrahim NA, Hashim N, Abdul Rahman MZ, Wan Yunus WMZ. Mechanical properties and morphology of oil palm empty fruit bunch-polypropylene composites: effect of adding ENGAGE 7467. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. 2011;24(5):713-732. DOI: 10.1177/0892705711401549
  53. 53. Ridzuan R, Shaler S, Jamaludin MA. Properties of medium density fibreboard from oil palm empty fruit bunch fibre. Journal of Oil Palm Research. 2002;14(2):34-40
  54. 54. Mokhtar A, Hassan K, Aziz AA, Wahid MB. Plywood from oil palm trunks. Journal of Oil Palm Research. 2011;23:1159-1165
  55. 55. Rosli F, Ghazali CMR, Abdullah MMAB, Hussin K. A review: Characteristics of oil palm trunk (OPT) and quality improvement of palm trunk plywood by resin impregnation. BioResources. 2016;11(2):5565-5580
  56. 56. Choowang R, Hiziroglu S. Properties of thermally-compressed oil palm trunks (Elaeis guinensis). Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 2015;27(1):39-46
  57. 57. Choowang R. Effects of hot pressing on resistance of compressed oil palm wood to subterranean termite (Coptotermes gestroiWasmann) attack. BioResources. 2014;9(1):656-661
  58. 58. Srivaro S, Matan N, Lam F. Stiffness and strength of oil palm wood core sandwich panel under center point bending. Materials & Design. 2015;84:154-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.097
  59. 59. Srivaro S. Utilization of bamboo as lightweight sandwich panels. Materials Science/Medziagotyra. 2016;22(1):60-64. DOI: 10.5755/
  60. 60. Onuorah EO. Properties of fiberboards made from oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) stem and/or mixed tropical hardwood sawmill residues. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 2005;17(4):497-507
  61. 61. Sudin R, Shaari K. Effect of wood/gypsum ratio and density on strength properties of gypsum-bonded particleboard from oil palm stems. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 1991;4(1):80-86
  62. 62. Haslett AN. Suitability of oil palm trunk for timber uses. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 1990;2(3):243-251
  63. 63. Abdul Khalil HPS, AzuraMN, Issam AM, Said MR, Mohd Adawi TO. Oil palm empty fruit bunches (OPEFB) reinforced in new unsaturated polyester composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2008;27:1817-1826. DOI: 0.1177/0731684407087619
  64. 64. Sreekala MS, George J, Kumaran MG, Thomas S. The mechanical performance of hybrid phenol-formaldehyde-based composites reinforced with glass and oil palm fibers. Composites Science and Technology. 2002;62:339-353. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00219-6
  65. 65. Rozman HD, Kumar RN, Abdul Khalil HPS, Abusamah A, Lim PP. Preparation and properties of oil palm composite based on methacrylic silane and glycidyl methacrylate. European Polymer Journal. 1997;33:225-230. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-3057(96)00220-0
  66. 66. Ismail H, Rosnah N, Rozman HD. Effects of various bonding systems on oil palm fiber reinforced rubber composites. European Polymer Journal. 1997;33:1231-1238. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-3057(96)00254-6
  67. 67. Ismail H, Jaffri RM, Rozman HD. Oil palm wood flour filled natural rubber composites: Fatigue and hysteresis behaviour. Polymer International. 2000;49:618-622. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0126(200006)49:6
  68. 68. Abdul Khalil HPS, Firoozian P, Bakare IO, Akil HM, Noor AM. Exploring biomass based carbon black as filler in epoxy composites: Flexural and thermal properties. Materials and Design. 2010;31:3419-3425. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.044
  69. 69. Ibrahim NA, Ahmad SNA, Yunus WMZW, Dahlan KZM. Effect of electron beam irradiation and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) addition on mechanical properties of polycaprolactone with empty fruit bunch fiber (OPEFB) composite. Express Polymer Letters. 2009;3:226-234. DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.29
  70. 70. Chai L, Zakaria S, Chia C, Nabihah S, Rasid R. Physico-mechanical properties of PF composite board from EFB fibers using liquefaction technique. Iranian Polymer Journal. 2009;18:917-923
  71. 71. Kaddami H, Dufresne A, Khelifi B, Bendahou A, Taourirte M, Raihane M, Issartel N, Sautereau H, Gerard JF, Sami N. Short palm tree fibers: Thermoset matrices composites. Composites: Part A. 2006;37:1413-1422. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.020
  72. 72. Min AM, Chuah TG, Chantara TR. Thermal and dynamic mechanical analysis of polyethylene modified with crude palm oil. Materials and Design. 2008;29:992-999. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.03.023
  73. 73. Siyamak S, Ibrahim NA, Abdolmohammadi S, Wan Yunus WZ, Rahman MZ. Effect of fiber esterification on fundamental properties of oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) biocomposites. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012;13:1327-1346. DOI: 10.3390/ijms13021327
  74. 74. Arif MF, Yusoff PS, Ahmad MF. Effects of chemical treatment on oil palm empty fruit bunch reinforced high density polyethylene composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2010;29:2105-2118. DOI: 10.1177/0731684409348976
  75. 75. Abdul Khalil HPS, Tehrani MA, Davoudpour Y, Bhat AH, Jawaid M, Hasan A. Natural fiber reinforced poly(vinyl chloride) composites: A review. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2013;32:330-356. DOI: abs/10.1177/0731684412458553
  76. 76. Abdul Khalil HPS, Poh BT, Jawaid M. The effect of soil burial degradation of oil palm trunk fiber-filled recycled polypropylene composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2010;29:1653-1663. DOI: 10.1177/0731684409102939
  77. 77. Roshafima RA, Wan Aizan WAR. Low density polyethylene/tapioca starch biofilm with palm oil as processing aid for food packaging. In: Proceeding of The International Conference on Advances Materials and Processing Technologies; 14-17 December 2008. Kingdom of Bahrain: IEEE; 2008. pp. 156-169
  78. 78. Rozman HD, Peng GB, Mohd Ishak ZA. The effect of compounding techniques on the mechanical properties of oil palm empty fruit bunch-polypropylene composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1998;70:2647-2655. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981226)70
  79. 79. Mohd Ishak ZA, Aminullah A, Ismail H, Rozman HD. Effect of silane-based coupling agents and acrylic acid based compatibilizers on mechanical properties of oil palm empty fruit bunch filled high-density polyethylene composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1998;68:2189-2203. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980627)68
  80. 80. Rozman HD, Tay GS, Kumar RN, Abusamah A, Ismail H, Mohd Ishak ZA. The effect of oil extraction of the oil palm empty fruit bunch on the mechanical properties of polypropylene-oil palm empty fruit bunch-glass hybrid composites. Polymer Plastic Technology Engineering. 2001;40:103-115. DOI: 10.1080/00914030500306446
  81. 81. Bakar AA, Hassan A, Yusof AFM. Effect of oil palm empty fruit bunch and acrylic impact modifier on mechanical properties and processability of unplasticized poly(vinyl chloride) composites. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering. 2005;44:1125-1137. DOI: 10.1081/PTE-200065237
  82. 82. Rozman HD, Ahmadhilmi KR, Abubakar A. Polyurethane (PU)-oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) composites: The effect of EFBG reinforcement in mat form and isocyanate treatment on the mechanical properties. Polymer Testing. 2004;23:559-565. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2003.11.004
  83. 83. Khalid M, Ratnam CT, Chuah TG, Ali S, Choong TSY. Comparative study of polypropylene composites reinforced with oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber and oil palm derived cellulose. Materials and Design. 2008;29:173-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.002
  84. 84. Jawaid M, Abdul Khalil HPS. Cellulosic/synthetic fiber reinforced polymer hybrid composites: A review. Journal Carbohydrate Polymers. 2011;86:1-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.043
  85. 85. Rozman HD, Tay GS, Kumar RN, Abusamah A, Ismail H, Mohd Ishak ZA. The effect of oil extraction of the oil palm empty fruit bunch on the mechanical properties of polypropylene-oil palm empty fruit bunch-glass hybrid composites. Polymer Plastic Technology Engineering. 2001;40:103-115. DOI: abs/10.1081/PPT-100000058
  86. 86. Amin KAM, Khairiah HB. Palm-based bio-composites hybridized with kaolinite. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2007;105:2488-2496. DOI: 10.1002/app.25536
  87. 87. Kumar RN, Wei LM, Rozman HD, Bakar AA. Fire resistant sheet moulding composites from hybrid reinforcements of oil palm fibers and glass fiber. International Journal of Polymeric Material. 1997;37:43-52
  88. 88. Khanam,PN, Abdul Khalil HPS, Reddy GR, Naidu SV. Tensile, flexural and chemical resistance properties of sisal fiber reinforced polymer composites: Effect of fiber surface treatment. Journal of Polymers and The Environment. 2011;19:115-119. DOI: 10.1007/s10924-010-0219-7
  89. 89. Abdul Khalil HPS, Kang CW, Khairul A, Ridzuan R, Adawi TO. The effect of different laminations on mechanical and physical properties of hybrid composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2009;28:1123-1137. DOI: abs/10.1177/0731684407087755
  90. 90. Jawaid M, Abdul Khalil HPS, Bakar AA, Khanam PN. Hybrid composite made from oil palm empty fruit bunches/jute fibers: Water absorption, thickness swelling and density behavior. Journal of Polymers and The Environment. 2011;19:106-109. DOI: 10.1007/s10924-010-0203-2
  91. 91. Kamel S. Nanotechnology and its applications in lignocellulosic composites: A mini review. Express Polymer Letters. 2007;1:546-575. DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.78
  92. 92. Gabriel AS. Introduction to nanotechnology and its applications to medicine. Surgical Neurology. 2004;61:216-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2003.09.036
  93. 93. Schmidt D, Shah D, Giannelis EP. New advances in polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science. 2002;6:205-212. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0286(02)00049-9
  94. 94. Fahma F, Iwamoto S, Hori N, Iwata T, Takemura A. Isolation, preparation, and characterization of nanofibers from oil palm empty-fruit-bunch (opefb). Cellulose. 2010;17:977-985. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-010-9436-4
  95. 95. Fahma F, Iwamoto S, Hori N, Iwata T, Takemura A. Effect of pre-acid-hydrolysis treatment on morphology and properties of cellulose nanowhiskers from coconut husk. Cellulose. 2011;18:443-450. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-010-9480-0
  96. 96. Mazlita Y, Lee HV, Hamid SBA. Preparation of cellulose nanocrystals bio-polymer from agro-industrial wastes: Separation and characterization. Polymers & Polymer Composites. 2016;24(9):719-728
  97. 97. Ferrer A, Filpponen I, Rodríguez A, Laine J, Rojas OJ. Valorization ofresidual empty palm fruit bunch Fibers (EPFBF) by microfluidization: Produc-tion of nanofibrillated cellulose and EPFBF nanopaper. Bioresource Technology. 2012;125:249-255. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.108
  98. 98. Dungani R, Abdul Khalil HPS, Islam MN, Davoudpour Y, Rumidatul A. Modification of the inner part of the oil palm trunk lumber (OPTL) with oil palm shell (OPS) nanoparticles and phenol formaldehyde (PF) resin: Physical, mechanical and thermal properties. BioResources. 2013;9(1):455-471
  99. 99. Sasthirya S, Abdul Khalil HPS, Ahmad ZA, Islam MN, Dungani R, Fizree HM. Carbon nanofiller-enhanced ceramic composites: Thermal and electrical studies. BioResources. 2014;9(2):3143-3151
  100. 100. Goh KY, Ching YC, Chuah CH, Abdullah LC, Liou NS. Individualization of microfibrillated celluloses from oil palm empty fruit bunch: Comparative studies between acid hydrolysis and ammonium persulfate oxidation. Cellulose. 2016;23:379-390. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-015-0812-y
  101. 101. Dungani R, Islam MN, Abdul Khalil HPS, Hartati S, Abdullah CK, Dewi M, Hadiyane A. Termite resistance study of oil palm trunk lumber (OPTL) impregnated with oil palm shell meal and phenol- formaldehyde resin. BioResources. 2013;8(4):4937-4950
  102. 102. Rosamah E, Hossain MS, Abdul Khalil HPS, Nadira WOW, Dungani R, Nur Amiranajwa AS, Suraya LMN, Fizree HM, Mohd Omar AK. Properties enhancement using oil palm shell nanoparticles of fibers reinforced polyester hybrid composites. Advanced Composite Materials. 2017;26(3):259-272. DOI: 10.1080/09243046.2016.1145875
  103. 103. Rosazley R, Shazana MZ, Izzati MA, Fareezal AW, Rushdan I, Ainun ZMA. Characterization of nanofibrillated cellulose produced from oil palm empty fruit bunch fibers (OPEFB) using ultrasound. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought. 2016;6:28-35
  104. 104. Rohaizu R, Wanrosli WD. Sono-assisted TEMPO oxidation of oil palm lignocellulosic biomass for isolation of nanocrystalline cellulose. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2017;34:631-639. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.040
  105. 105. Mohaiyiddin MS, Lin OH, Owi WT, Chan CH, Chia CH, Zakaria S, Villagracia AR, Md Akil H. Characterization of nanocellulose recovery fromElaeis guineensisfrond for sustainable development. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2016;18:2503-2512. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-016-1191-2
  106. 106. Saurabh CK, Dungani R, Owolabi AF, Atiqah NS, Zaidon A, Sri Aprilia NA, Sarker ZM, Abdul Khalil HPS. Effect of hydrolysis treatment on cellulose nanowhiskers from oil palm (Elaeis guineesis) fronds: morphology, chemical, crystallinity, and thermal characteristics. BioResources. 2016;11(3):6742-6755
  107. 107. de Adriana C, de Sena NAR, Vanessa R, Vanessa KA, Carolina CA, Marcio TC, Luiz HMC, José MM. Production of cellulose nanowhiskers from oil palm mesocarp fibers by acid hydrolysis and microfluidization. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2017;17(7):4970-4976. DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2017.13451
  108. 108. Chieng BW, Lee SH, Ibrahim NA, Then YY, Loo YY. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from oil palm mesocarp fiber. Polymer. 2017;9(355):1-11. DOI: 10.3390/polym9080355
  109. 109. Bhat AH, Abdul Khalil HPS. Exploring nano filler based on oil palm ash in polypropylene composites. BioResources. 2011;6:1288-1297
  110. 110. Surip SN, Bonnia NN, Anuar H. Nanofibers from oil palm trunk (OPT): Preparation & chemical analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications; 23-26 September 2012. Indonesia: IEEE; 2012. pp. 809-812
  111. 111. Lamaminga J, Hashim R, Sulaimana O, Leh CP, Sugimoto T, Nordin NA. Cellulose nanocrystals isolated from oil palm trunk. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2015;127:202-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.043

Written By

Rudi Dungani, Pingkan Aditiawati, Sri Aprilia, Karnita Yuniarti, Tati Karliati, Ichsan Suwandhi and Ihak Sumardi

Submitted: November 16th, 2017 Reviewed: March 12th, 2018 Published: July 18th, 2018