## Abstract

A theoretical investigation of the effects of the parabolic, shifted parabolic, hill-like, and cup-like parabolic confining electric potentials on photoionization cross section (PCS) in a spherical quantum dot is presented. Each of the parabolic potentials is superimposed on an infinite spherical square quantum well (ISSQW) potential. The parabolic potential blueshifts the peaks of the PCS, while the shifted parabolic potential causes a redshift. As the so-called strength of cup-like parabolic potential is increased, the peak of the PCS becomes redshifted for the s → p transition, but blueshifted for the p → d , d → f (and so forth) transitions. On the contrary, an increase in the strength of the hill-like parabolic potential blueshifts peaks of the PCS for s → p transitions, while it redshifts those of transitions between higher states.

### Keywords

- photoionization cross section
- confining electric potential
- spherical quantum dot
- hydrogenic impurity

## 1. Introduction

Recent advances in nanofabrication technology have made it possible to fabricate nanostructures of different sizes and geometries [1, 2, 3]. Nanostructures have a wide range of applications including in nanomedicine [4, 5], optoelectronics [6, 7], energy physics [8, 9, 10, 11, 12], and gas sensing [13]. Now, even with utmost care and employing the most advanced techniques, it is not possible to fabricate nanostructures which are free of impurities. It may be advantageous, however, to introduce impurities into a nanostructure at the fabrication stage. The presence of such deliberately introduced impurities can lead to improved performance of nanodevices, for example, enhancement of electrical conductivity of semiconducting materials [14]. The impurity may actually be positively charged, in which case an electron may become bound to it, thus forming an electron-hole pair. Photoionization is one of the useful probes for the particular nature of electron-impurity interactions in low-dimensional systems. In the process of photoionization, upon absorbing sufficiently enough energy from the irradiating electromagnetic field, the electron can break free from the impurity. In a sense, photoionization is the classical analog of the binding energy problem. Certainly, the subtlety in photoionization effects is in the variety of conditions in low-dimensional systems. These conditions include quantization of the electron’s energy levels as well as the optical properties of the specimen.

In this regard, photoionization studies on nanostructures could offer insight into the electron-impurity interaction in a wide variety of conditions. These photoionization effects have fueled significant interest in the processes of photoionization in low-dimensional systems. The effects of geometry and hydrostatic pressure on photoionization cross section (PCS) have been reported in concentric double quantum rings [15]. The effect of applied electric field on photoionization cross section has also been probed in cone-like quantum dots [16]. The role that impurity position plays in modifying the PCS in a core/shell/shell quantum nanolayer [17] and a purely spherical quantum has been investigated [18]. Overall, it has been found that photoionization transitions are independent of the photon polarization for a centered impurity, while the transitions are dependent on the photon polarization when the impurity is off-centered. Influences of intense laser field and hydrostatic on PCS in pyramid-shaped quantum dots have also been reported [19]. There also have been studies of PCS in spherical core/shell zinc blende quantum structures under hydrostatic pressure and electric field [20].

In this chapter, the effect of geometry of confining electric potential on centered donor-related PCS in spherical quantum dots is investigated. The electric potentials considered are the parabolic, shifted parabolic, cup-like, and the hill-like potentials, all of which have a parabolic dependence on the radial distance of the spherical quantum dot. To start with, the Schrödinger equation is solved for the electron’s eigenfunctions and energy eigenvalues within the effective mass approximation. It is emphasized that the treatment of photoionization process given here is limited only to isotropic media.

## 2. Theory

The basic problem of photoionization involves an electron deemed to be bound to a donor charge or indeed a center of positive charge embedded in a semiconductor specimen. An electron, upon absorbing sufficiently enough energy from the irradiating electromagnetic field, can be “liberated” from the electrostatic field of the positive charge. Now, in low-dimensional systems, the energy of an electron is quantized into different energy levels. The process of photoionization can thus involve intermediate transitions wherein an electron in some initial state _{1-x}Al_{x}As matrix, with a donor impurity embedded at its center. Now, one of the physical quantities that are useful in the description of this binding energy-like problem is called photoionization cross section. This quantity may be regarded as the probability that a bound electron can be liberated by some appropriate radiation per unit time per unit area, given by [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]

where * l*values of the final and initial states will be unity. In the investigations carried out here, the evaluations of the PCS are for transitions only between two electron’s energy subbands. For purposes of computation, therefore, the Dirac delta function in Eq. (1) is replaced by its Lorentzian equivalent given by

where this is the so-called Lorentzian linewidth.

Now, in view of spherical symmetry, the solutions of the Schrödinger wave equation are sought in the general form * l*and

*, respectively. The radial part of the total wave function,*m

where

### 2.1. The electron’s wave functions

The specific forms of the solutions of the differential equation described above depend on the particular electric confining potential considered. Here, the different radially dependent forms of the so-called intrinsic electric confinement potential of the spherical quantum dot, in turn, taken into account in solving Eq. (3) are (shown in Figure 1) (1) simple parabolic, (2) shifted parabolic, (3) bi-parabolic (cup-like), and (4) inverse bi-parabolic (hill-like), each superimposed on an infinite spherical square quantum well (ISSQW).

#### 2.1.1. Parabolic potential

When the parabolic potential (PP), which has the form

and infinity elsewhere, is inserted into the Schrödinger equation (Eq. (2)) in the presence of the donor impurity, then the second-order differential equation is solvable in terms of the Heun biconfluent function [22, 23].

with

and the arguments

Eq. (5) is the complete solution of the differential equation given earlier; however, the second solution diverges at the origin and so

The electron’s energy spectrum is derived from numerically solving Eq. (8) for its roots

#### 2.1.2. Shifted parabolic potential

This potential is convex: maximum at the center and decreases parabolically to assume a minimum value (here taken as zero) at the radius

and infinity elsewhere. The solution to the radial component of the Schrödinger equation (Eq. (3)) corresponding to this potential is also in terms of the Heun biconfluent function (Eq. (5)) but with [23]

and the arguments

The energy spectrum is given by the usual boundary conditions at the walls of the SQD as

where

#### 2.1.3. The bi-parabolic (cup-like) potential

The solution to the Schrödinger equation for the bi-parabolic potential

and infinity elsewhere, in the presence of the impurity, is in terms of the Heun biconfluent function (Eq. (5)) [24] with

and the arguments

Requiring that the electron wave function should vanish at the walls of the SQD avails the energy spectrum for an electron in an SQD with an intrinsic bi-parabolic potential as

where

#### 2.1.4. The inverse lateral bi-parabolic (hill-like) potential

The hill-like potential has a concave parabolic increase in the radial distance from the center to reach maximum at a radial distance half the radius

and infinity elsewhere. The radial component of the Schrödinger equation for this potential in the presence of the impurity is also solvable in terms of the Heun biconfluent function (Eq. (5)) but with [24]

and the arguments

Application of the boundary conditions at the walls of the SQD avails the energy spectrum as

with

## 3. Results and discussions

The parameters used in these calculations are relevant to * GaAs*quantum dots: effective electronic mass

*Å in the absence of the hydrogenic impurity. The parabolic potential shifts the electron wave functions toward the center of the SQD, while the shifted parabolic potential (SPP) shifts the electron wave functions toward the walls of the SQD. As stated earlier, the cup-like is zero at*R = 250

Figure 3 depicts the variation of the first-order * R*at which the first-order and the second-order transition energies coincide. For the system investigated here, this radius is in the neighborhood of

_{0}

*Å. For SQDs with radii less (greater) than*R

_{0}= 171

*, the second-order transition energies are more (less) than the first-order transition energies. The parabolic potential and hill-like potentials reduce the value of this radius as they intensify. On the contrary, increasing the strengths of the shifted parabolic potential and the cup-like potentials increases*R

_{0}

*, sending it to infinity as it intensifies further. In this case,*R

_{0}

*) state and enhances transition energies involving higher states. The hill-like potential increases only the transition energies involving the ground state but decreases transition energies involving higher states.*s

Figure 4 shows the sum of the * R = 250* Å, where the dashed curve is for an ISSQW (

*, thus the*R

_{0}

Figure 5 depicts the summed normalized PCS for the * R = 250* Å. The dashed curve is associated with the ISSQW (

Figure 6 illustrates the normalized * R = 250* Å. The dashed curve is for the purely ISSQW (

Figure 7 depicts the variation of the normalized * R = 250* Å. Here also, the dashed curve represents the purely ISSQW (

## 4. Conclusions

The electron’s wave functions in a spherical quantum dot with a centered donor impurity have been obtained, and these were utilized to evaluate the effects of the geometry of confining electric potentials on PCS in an SQD. The parabolic potential enhances photoionization transition energies independent of the initial or the final state, while the shifted parabolic potential decreases the transition energies, also independent of the order of transition. As a result, the parabolic potential blueshifts the peaks of the PCS, while the shifted parabolic potential redshifts the peaks, for all transitions. The cup-like and the hill-like potentials exhibit a selective enhancement or a reduction of transition energies. The hill-like parabolic potential enhances the transition energies involving the ground state but dwindles those involving higher states. A consequence of this effect is that the hill-like parabolic potential blueshifts peaks of

## Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.