Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Photochemical Degradation Processes of Painting Materials from Cultural Heritage

Written By

Rodica-Mariana Ion, Alexandrina Nuta, Ana-Alexandra Sorescu and Lorena Iancu

Submitted: 02 November 2017 Reviewed: 04 March 2018 Published: 17 October 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.76169

From the Edited Volume

Photochemistry and Photophysics - Fundamentals to Applications

Edited by Satyen Saha and Sankalan Mondal

Chapter metrics overview

1,544 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


This chapter describes some recent studies and applications of photochemistry in the physical–chemical characterization of two acrylic paint materials based on phthalocyanines and the study of the photodegradation (photobleaching) processes which could occur, caused by exposure to artificial irradiation, similar as in the museum. The studies in this paper has been conducted on phthalocyanines, these compounds being known as organic colorants in painting. Their color depends not only on the chemical nature of the colorant, which play an important role in the kinetics and degree of aging, but also on the compounds added to the paints (TiO2, micas, arylamide yellow). The techniques used in such studies involve UV–Vis spectroscopy, gloss, and colorimetric measurements, comparing our results with similar ones from the literature.


  • phthalocyanine
  • absorption
  • photobleaching
  • artifacts

1. Introduction

Photochemistry is the science that deals with the study of physical and chemical processes that arise from the interaction between radiation used for irradiation and absorbing molecules [1].

The light radiation together in the presence of oxygen induces photooxidative reactions on synthetic organic materials, mostly based on chain scission and cross-linking reactions of polymers used as binders in artists’ paints, such as acrylics [2]. Photodegradation reactions cause changes in the physical and mechanical properties of the materials such as yellowing phenomena, cracking, embrittlement, and stiffening of the paint films as well as changes in solubility. The general photodegradation processes on polymers are initiated by the absorption of photons by the molecules [3]. The excited molecule loses the absorbed energy through initiation, propagation, and termination reactions. In case of acrylates, two processes, chain scission and crosslinking, are competing, depending on the length of the side groups [4].

The carbonyl groups from the acrylic structure are also sensitive to secondary photodegradation reactions, such as Norrish reactions [5]. The photooxidation takes generally place at first in the uppermost layer of the paints and proceeds toward the bulk, depending on the radiation, oxygen diffusion, time of exposure, and the characteristics of the materials exposed to the radiation. The additives present in the paint formulations might interfere with the photooxidative reactions and could act by catalyzing and promoting or preventing photodegradation reactions, depending on their chemical properties and color [6].

In the present chapter, the influence of different types of phthalocyanines, such as Phthalo Blue and Phthalo Green (Table 1), on the photostability of acrylic paints [7] is studied. Investigations were carried out on unaged and artificially aged self-made and commercially available acrylic paints. Thus, paints were exposed to artificial accelerated aging using a Hg medium-pressure lamp, with spectral range comparable to outdoor solar radiation.

Table 1.

The structure of the Phthalocyanine blue and Phthalocyanine green pigments.

For the identification and characterization of acrylic films could be mentioned some non-invasive techniques, as: infrared spectroscopy Fourier-transformed (FTIR) in the attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode, UV–Vis spectroscopy, gloss and colorimetric measurements, all these techniques being useful for color changes and ageing processes investigations.

Taking into account that Phthalo Blue and Phthalo Green are the trade names for phthalocyanine pigments which are widely found in original modern and contemporary artworks [8], in the present work, phthalocyanines containing copper (CuPc), having Color Index (CI) name Pigment Blue 15 (PB15), and metal-free phthalocyanine (H2Pc), PB16, are discussed. The PB15 can present polymorphism (PB15:x), and each crystalline form is characterized by different chemical and color properties [9]. The green phthalocyanines are copper-based phthalocyanines which are completely chlorinated (Pigment Green 7) or chlorinated and brominated (Pigment Green 36) (Table 1).


2. General aspects about phthalocyanines

In 1935, the Imperial Chemical Industries began to manufacture copper phthalocyanine, and such compounds were introduced in the commerce with the name of “Monastral Fast Blue” at a London fair in November 1935, and from 1936 produced also in the USA, under other names [10]. In 1936 IG Farbenindustrie began to produce copper phthalocyanine at Ludwigshafen, and in the late 1930s, the DuPont Company, at Deepwater Point, New Jersey, began to produce copper phthalocyanine; the Standard Ultramarine and Color Company started its production in 1949 [11]. Particularly, since the end of the Second World War, phthalocyanine pigments became widely used [12]. Commercially, available pigments of different producers (Maimeri, Winsor & Newton, Lefranc & Bourgeois, etc.) containing phthalocyanines PB15:1, PB15:3, and PG7 were chosen and applied on different kinds of supports, as cardboard. Samples of pigment were prepared using acrylic colors. Phthalocyanine molecules (Pc) are composed of four indole units—pyrrole rings linked by nitrogen atoms conjugated with benzene rings. They have an extensively conjugated aromatic chromophore, exhibit UV–Vis absorption spectra with intense π-π* transitions [13]. They have an increased aromatic character which explains the intense near-infrared absorption of these compounds. Metalation reduces the electron density at the inner nitrogen atoms and in UV–Vis spectra produces a hypsochromic shift which depends on the electronegativity of the metal.

The stability of metal phthalocyanines is due to formation of four equivalent N → metal bonds involving filling of vacant ns, np, and (n − 1)d or nd orbitals of the cation with electrons of the central nitrogen atoms.

Dyes and pigments are used in the mixture with polymer materials to provide color-changing properties. Under such context, Cu-phthalocyanine dye can help stabilize against degradation but in other situations such as photochemical aging can actually accelerate degradation. The excited Cu-phthalocyanine may abstract hydrogen atoms from methyl groups in the Pc, which increase the formation of free radicals. This acts as the starting points for the sequential photooxidation reactions leading to the degradation of the phthalocyanine [14].

Electron transfer sensitization is a mechanism where the excited Cu-phthalocyanine abstracts electrons from Pc to form Cu-Pc radical anion and Pc radical cations. These species in the presence of oxygen can cause oxidation of the aromatic ring [15].


3. Light effects on pigments

3.1. Photophysical aspects

Light is the electromagnetic radiation released by an external source of energy. Photochemistry uses radiation that has an energy between 1 eV and 1 KeV, corresponding to visible radiation with λ = 400–700 nm and ultraviolet radiation with λ = 200–400 nm. Radiation used in photochemistry is selectively absorbed by the molecules with which it interacts.

To initiate a photochemical reaction, the formation of an electronically excited state in a molecule is decisive. Such an excited molecule can be regarded as a new species, characterized by properties other than those of the same basic molecule. The excited-state molecule has a certain electronic distribution responsible for the specific chemical reactivity compared to the fundamental chemical state. The essence of an organic photochemical reaction is the activation of the molecules produced by the absorption of a photon. The main processes that occur during the light action on paints are identified in Jablonski diagram (Figure 1):

Figure 1.

Jablonski diagram.

(a) Non-radiative processes, where the excited-state species release the excess of energy as heat by three different processes: vibrational relaxation (VR), through which the excited molecule decreases its vibrational energy within a single electronic state, internal conversion (IC); meaning a transition between two electronic states with the same spin multiplicity, generally followed by vibrational relaxation; and intersystem crossing (ISC), which involves the transition between two electronic states with different spin multiplicity, generally followed by vibrational relaxation.

(b) Radiative processes. The excited-state species release the excess of energy as electromagnetic radiation. There are two known processes: fluorescence (F), as spontaneous emission of radiation upon transition between two electronic states with the same spin multiplicity, and phosphorescence (P), known as a spontaneous emission of radiation upon transition between two electronic states with different spin multiplicity.

(c) Other deactivation processes, identified by photochemical or photophysical reactions which compete the excited-state molecules.

3.2. Photooxidation reaction

The photooxidation is a degradation of a compound in the presence of oxygen or ozone. The initiation of photooxidation reactions is due to the existence of chromophore groups in the molecules. For example, in a polymer case, by photooxidation, aldehydes, ketones, and carboxylic acids along or at the end of polymer chains are generated. The photooxidation reaction induces a chemical change that reduces the polymer’s molecular weight. The material will become more brittle, with a reduction in its tensile, impact, and elongation strength. Also, a discoloration and loss of surface smoothness accompany photooxidation. High temperature significantly increases the effect of photooxidation.

The photooxidation reactions include chain scission, cross-linking, and secondary oxidative reactions, which obey the following process steps that can be considered [16], as follows (Figure 2):

  1. Initial step: Free radicals are formed by photon absorption.

  2. Chain propagation step: A free radical reacts with oxygen to produce a polymer peroxy radical (POO•). This reacts with a polymer molecule to generate polymer hydroperoxide (POOH) and a new polymer alkyl radical (P•).

  3. Chain branching: Polymer oxy radicals (PO•) and hydroxy radicals (HO•) are formed by photolysis.

  4. Termination step: Cross-linking is a result of the reaction of different free radicals with each other.

Figure 2.

Adopted after [17, 18].

From mechanistic point of view, during the photooxidation two main reaction types occur (Figure 3):

Figure 3.

Mechanism of the photo-oxidation reaction.

Type I mechanism: a photosensitizer (PS) in its singlet or triplet excited state reacts with a substrate via (a) electron transfer or (b) hydrogen abstraction to yield free radicals, which will readily react with oxygen to form peroxide radicals and in turn start a radical chain reaction. These radicals react with oxygen to form reactive organic species (ROS).

Type II mechanism: in this process, the sensitizer in its excited state (commonly in its triplet state) transfers its energy to ground-state molecular oxygen, giving rise to the PS in its ground state and singlet oxygen (1O2), a very reactive oxygen species. On type II reaction, an energy transfer during a collision between the excited photosensitizer and molecular oxygen occurs, as it is reported in the literature’s report. Usually, a photosensitizer, not degraded through photobleaching by 1O2 or other processes, can produce 103–105 molecules of singlet oxygen [19].


4. Mechanism of phthalocyanine oxidative photobleaching

The main factors, which affect the photobleaching, are:

  • Triplet excited state with long-lived triplet states and high triplet quantum yields induce a higher rate of photobleaching [20].

  • Radiation type, the ultraviolet light being more effective in promoting phthalocyanine photobleaching than Q-band excitation [21].

The presence of oxygen favors the bleaching of metallic phthalocyanines (MPcs) predominantly due to photooxidation [22]. The oxygen concentration in oxygen-saturated solutions is [O2] = 10−3–10−2 mol/l. The reaction between 3Pc* and oxygen is diffusion-controlled reaction, so that it is very rapid (kO2 = 109–1010 l/(mol. s)). A type I photooxidation reaction occurs only if kA[A] has a value of 106–107 s−1. If kA or [A] has small values, then type II reaction occurs (if oxygen is present in small concentration). If kA has a great value, then type III reaction occurs (the oxygen is completely absent in the system).

4.1. Photooxidation study case

The tested compounds in this chapter were Phthalo Blues (CI names PB15:1, PB15:3, PB15:6, and PB16) and Phthalo Green (PG7) with the chemical structure shown in Table 2; all these structures have been exposed to irradiation with polychromatic light generated by a Hg medium lamp 375 nm.

Acrylic paintsMarket namePigment
143Phthalo BluePhthalocyanine Blue PB15
159Primary BluePhthalocyanine Blue PB15
718Metallic BlueTitanium dioxide-coated mica PW6; Phthalocyanine Blue PB15
335Emerald GreenArylamide Yellow 10G PY3;
Phthalocyanine Green PG7
375Sap GreenArylamide Yellow 5GX PY 74; Phthalocyanine Blue PB15
719Metallic GreenTitanium dioxide-coated mica PW6; Phthalocyanine Green PG7
154Phthalo TurquoisePhthalocyanine Blue PB15;
Phthalocyanine Green PG7
343Hookers GreenPhthalocyanine Green PG7; Iron oxide PR101; Arylamide Yellow 5GX PY 74
386Phthalo GreenPhthalocyanine Green PG7

Table 2.

The composition of the tested acrylic paints.

The tested samples are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The cardboard painted with blue and green pigments.

A low photostability of Phthalo Green compared with Phthalo Blue has been observed, similar with the photodegradation study of the Heliogen Blau 6900 and Heliogen Grün L8730 standard solutions (Figures 5 and 6).

Figure 5.

Photodegradation kinetics of Heliogen Blue 6900 and Heliogen Grün L8730 standard solutions.

Figure 6.

Photodegradation kinetics of some acrylic paints.

For all tested samples, measurements of gloss degree and optical parameters (ΔEx* and Δbx*) were performed. The variation of these parameters was also measured during the photodegradation process with polychromatic light irradiation provided by an artificial light source similar to solar radiation spectrum. After analyzing the obtained results, it was possible to assign that the gloss degree decreases gradually after irradiation with polychromatic radiation (at the samples 375, 335, 154, 343, and 386), while at the other samples (718, 719, 143, 159), there is a significant decrease in this parameter recorded in the first 30 min, followed by a new slight increase of gloss degree. In the case of acrylic paints containing TiO2 and micas, a decrease of the gloss parameter after the first 30 min of irradiation was observed, most probably due to the role of TiO2, recognized as photocatalyst which generates OH radicals and, in this case a good contributor to photocatalytic degradation processes (Figures 7 and 8). In the case of the paints that contain arylamide yellow, a limited stability of these paints is observed, due to this pigment light sensitivity. This behavior is proven by a low increase gloss index for the paints that contain arylamide yellow (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Gloss parameter variation.

Figure 8.

Gloss parameter variation in case of acrylic paints containing TiO2 and micas.

The same trends are recorded for the ΔEx* and Δbx* optical measurements, Figures 9 and 10 for ΔEx* and Figures 11 and 12 for Δbx*.

Figure 9.

Changes of ΔEx* for irradiated samples at different times.

Figure 10.

Changes of ΔEx* for irradiated metallic samples at different times.

Figure 11.

Changes of Δbx* for irradiated samples at different times.

Figure 12.

Changes of Δbx* for irradiated metallic samples at different times.

With regard to the change of the sample yellowness (Δb* = |bf*–bi*|), the following classes are specified: stable for Δb* ≤ 3 points of absolute increase, moderately stable for Δb* > 3 and Δb* ≤ 8 points of absolute increase, and unstable for Δb* > 8 points of absolute increase. In this way, at the samples 143, 159, 718, and 719 (samples that contains TiO2, micas, arylamide yellow), the yellowness corresponds to an increase of the unstability (Δb* > 8), obeying the abovementioned rule, while for the samples 375, 335, 154, 343, and 386 (Δb* > 3 and ≤ 8), the yellowness corresponds to a moderate stability, as shown in Figures 11 and 12. For all the paints, subsequent light exposure resulted in a more severe degradation with large deterioration in optical properties. However, this tendency is the same as for Δb* parameter: moderately stable for all the samples, except the samples 143, 159, 718, and 719, with a high instability.

During the irradiation with polychromatic light, in the UV–Vis spectra of these pigments, either in solution or painted on cardboard, some minor changes evidenced in the spectral region between 480 and 840 nm could be observed, as follows:

  • An insignificant decrease of Heliogen Blau 6900 absorbance, both at 660 and 860 nm, concomitant with a small increase of absorbance at 472 nm (Figure 13).

  • A strong decrease of Heliogen Grün L8730 absorbance, visible both for Soret band from 447 nm and for the bands from 690 and 805 nm, most probably due to the high number of chlorine atoms present as substituents in the pigment structure, responsible for new generated species. The irradiation with Hg lamp (which contains a high level of UV radiation) causes dissociation of the chlorine substituents, leading to free radical formation [23] and new species visible by the new wideband from 495 nm (Figure 14).

  • This behavior is exhibited for the cardboard painted with Heliogen Grün L8730, the spectral changes and absorbance decrease being observed most predominantly in the visible area (the absorption bands from 690 and 805 nm); in the near UV area, the changes attributed to Soret band are not visible, due to the presence of TiO2 in the paint composition, this metallic oxide being responsible for the wide and not defined band from this area (Figure 15).

Figure 13.

Spectral changes of Heliogen Blau 6900 in solution during light irradiation.

Figure 14.

Spectral changes of Heliogen Grün L8730 in solution during light irradiation.

Figure 15.

Spectral changes of cardboard painted with Phthalo Green during light irradiation.

If the Pc oxidative photobleaching occurs via singlet oxygen species, the unsaturated bonds of phthalocyanine chromophoric system are oxidized [24], singlet oxygen being responsible for the phthalocyanine photobleaching [25]. There are some limited studies about photobleaching of MPcs in solution; because of its complex reaction, the product isolation is very difficult; and the final photooxidation products are obtained in insufficient amount (phthalimides and phthalonitriles) [26, 27]. Similar results have been described for porphyrin structures, which are related compounds with phthalocyanines [28, 29, 30]. Formation of highly toxic hydrogen cyanide upon ruby laser irradiation of the tattoo pigment Phthalocyanine Blue has been reported [31] (Figure 16).

Figure 16.

Decomposition pattern of Phthalocyanine Blue (PB15:3) based on the pyrolysis and laser irradiation.


5. Conclusions

By means of the abovementioned experiments, the following has been observed:

  • In solution the green pigment is more degradable than the blue pigment.

  • In acrylic paints containing these pigments, the photodegradation is more intense in the first 20–30 min of irradiation; after that, depending on the presence or absence of other compounds (TiO2, micas, etc.), an increase of the optical parameters is observed.

Since the photodegradation results for pigments and acrylic paints are not fully correlated, some additional studies are needed in order to elucidate the photodegradation mechanism and products.

However, it is necessary to strictly observe that some protective measures regarding the uncontrolled exposure of paintings using these acrylic paints are necessary, in order to avoid the irreversible degradation processes of artworks.



This paper received the financial support of the projects: PN 120BG/2016 and PN-III-P1-1.2-PCCDI2017-0476.


Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest.


Author informations

R. M. Ion, A. Nuta, A. A. Sorescu, and L. Iancu contributed equally to this work.


  1. 1. Ion RM. Photochemistry. Principles and Applications. Bucharest: FMR Ed.; 2005
  2. 2. Learner T. Modern Paints Uncovered. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute; 2008
  3. 3. Jablonski E, Learner T, Hayes T, Golden M. The Conservation of Acrylic Emulsion Paintings: A Literature Review. Tate Papers, Tate's Online Research Journal; 2004
  4. 4. Chiantore O, Trossarelli L, Lazzari M. Photooxidative degradation of acrylic and methacrylic polymers. Polymer. 2000;41:1657-1668
  5. 5. Hamid H. Handbook of Polymer Degradation. New York: CRC Press; 2000
  6. 6. Feller RL. Accelerated Ageing: Photochemical and Thermal Aspects. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute; 1994
  7. 7. Pintus V, Ploeger R, Chiantore O, Wei S, Schreiner M. Thermal analysis of the interaction of inorganic pigments with p(nBA/MMA) acrylic emulsion before and after UV ageing. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2012;114:33-43
  8. 8. Defeyt C, Strivay D. PB15 as 20th and 21st artists' Pigments: Conservation Concerns, e-PS. 2014;11:6-14
  9. 9. Anghelone M, Jembrih-Simbürger D, Schreiner M. Identification of copper phthalocyanine blue polymorphs in unaged and aged paint systems by means of micro-Raman spectroscopy and random Forest. Spectrochimica Acta Part A. 2015;149:419-425. DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2015.04.094
  10. 10. Gettens RG, Stout GL. Pigment and Inert materials, In Painting Materials. A Short Encyclopaedia. D. Van Nostrand, New York; 1962. Dover Editions; 1966. pp. 91-185
  11. 11. Moser FH, Thomas AL. Phthalocyanine Compounds. London: Chapman and Hall; 1963
  12. 12. Quillen Lomax S. Phthalocyanine and quinacridone pigments: Their history, properties and use. Reviews in Conservation. 2005;6:19
  13. 13. Mugarza A, Robles R, Krull C, Korytar R, Lorente N, Gambardella P. Electronic and magnetic properties of molecule-metal interfaces: Transition metal phthalocyanines adsorbed on ag(100). Physical Review B. 2012;85:55437. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.155437
  14. 14. Geuskens G, David C. The photo-oxidation of polymers – A comparison with low molecular weight compounds. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 1979;51:233-240
  15. 15. Saron C, Zulli F, Giordano M, Felisberti MI. Influence of copper-phthalocyanine on the photodegradation of polycarbonate. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2006;91(12):3301-3311
  16. 16. Rabek JF. Photostabilization of Polymers: Principles and Application. England: Elsevier Science Publisher Ltd; 1990
  17. 17. Morlat S, Gardette J-L. Phototransformation of water-soluble polymers. I: Photo- and thermooxidation of poly(ethylene oxide) in solid state. Polymer. 2001;42:6071-6079
  18. 18. de Sainte Claire P. Degradation of PEO in the solid state: A theoretical kinetic model. Macromolecules. 2009;42:3469e3482
  19. 19. De Rosa MC, Crutchley RJ. Photosensitized singlet oxygen and its applications. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2002;233/234:351-371
  20. 20. Spikes J, Lier J, Bommer JJ. A comparison of the photoproperties of zinc phthalocyanine and zinc naphthalocyanine tetrasulfonates: Model sensitizers for the photodynamic therapy of tumors. Photochemistry and Photobiology A. 1995;91:193-198
  21. 21. d’Alessandro N, Tonucci L, Morvillo A, Dragani LK, Di Deo M, Bressan MJ, Thermal stability and photostability of water solutions of sulfophthalocyanines of Ru(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Fe(III) and Co(II). Organometallic Chemistry. 2005;690:2133-2141
  22. 22. Kuznetsova NA, Makarov DA, Yuzhakova OA, Solovieva LI, Kaliya OL. Study on the photostability of water-soluble Zn(II) and Al(III) phthalocyanines in aqueous solutions. Journal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines. 2010;14:968-974
  23. 23. Moore DE. Drug-induced cutaneous photosensitivity: Incidence, mechanism, prevention and management. Drug Safety. 2002;25:345-337
  24. 24. Bonnett R, Martinez G. Photobleaching of sensitizers used in photodynamic therapy. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:9513-9547. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)00952-8
  25. 25. Schnurpfeil G, Sobbi AK, Spiller W, Kliesch H, Wöhrle D. Photo-oxidative stability and its correlation with semi-empirical MO calculations of various tetraazaporphyrin derivatives in solution. Journal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines. 1997;1:159-167
  26. 26. Cook MJ, Chambrier I, Cracknell SJ, Mayes DA, Russell DA. Octaalkyl zinc phthalocyanines: Potential photosensitizers for use in the photodynamic therapy of cancer. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 1995;62:542-545
  27. 27. Kuznetsova NA, Kaliya OL. Oxidative photobleaching of phthalocyanines in solution. Journal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines. 2012;16:705-712. DOI: 10.1142/S1088424612300042
  28. 28. Ion RM. Spectrophotometric study of the photodegradation reaction of the tetra-aryl-porphyrins. The hydroperoxide effect. Revista de Chimie. 1995;46(2):134
  29. 29. Teodorescu L, Ion RM. New aspects on the photodegradation of the porphyrinic photosensitizers. Revista de Chimie. 1990;41(4):312-318
  30. 30. Siejak A, Wróbel D, Ion RM. Study of resonance effects in copper phthalocyanines. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2006;181(2-3):180-187
  31. 31. Schreiver I, Hutzler C, Laux P, Berlien HP, Luch A. Formation of highly toxic hydrogen cyanide upon ruby laser irradiation of the tattoo pigment phthalocyanine blue. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:12915. DOI: 10.1038/srep12915

Written By

Rodica-Mariana Ion, Alexandrina Nuta, Ana-Alexandra Sorescu and Lorena Iancu

Submitted: 02 November 2017 Reviewed: 04 March 2018 Published: 17 October 2018