Sampling effort by location for determining distribution and abundance of peat reefs based on sidescan transects in the Mullica River – Great Bay estuary during summer and fall 2017.
Salt marshes, especially those of Spartina alterniflora, are among the most productive habitats on Earth. The peat that is formed and accumulates there, as below-ground biomass, can be dispersed in a number of ways, through calving off the marsh edge along bays, in creeks, and other locations as occurs in the Mullica River – Great Bay estuary in southern New Jersey. Based on a variety of sampling approaches, including those collected by sidescan sonar and direct collection, we provide new insights into the ecological role of dispersed peat. Some of this is ice rafted on the marsh surface during storms. Elsewhere, and most commonly, it falls into the intertidal channels or flats where it may continue to support the growth of Spartina, and associated invertebrates such as Geukensia demissa. If it is deposited subtidally these may not be as likely, but in these situations the peat provides structured habitat for other animals such as fishes, crabs, shrimps, and bivalves.
- peat reefs
- salt marshes
- habitat complexity
Salt marshes are some of the most productive ecosystems on Earth. How that production is dispersed is a frequent focus, particularly in the form of detritus [1, 2, 3]. Other, unrecognized forms of dispersal, such as that for salt marsh peat, are infrequently studied. Peat in salt marshes results from the degradation of roots, stems and leaves of marsh plants, particularly
One of the main causes of separation of marsh peat from the marsh platform is the bank being undercut by the current because the lower mud layer is less stable than the peat, and washes away first [12, 13, 14]. This leads to a peat overhang that then breaks off and falls away from the marsh edge into intertidal and subtidal waters. Three distinct forms of slump are observed during this process . Rotational slump occurs when the peat slides down the bank on its side, with the marsh vegetation facing the bank. Non-rotational subsidence occurs when the block does not move, but sinks straight downwards, creating a ledge. Freefall slump occurs when the peat fractures cleanly from the bank and falls away from the marsh into the channel, as in peat reefs. The timing and size of bank failures is influenced by geological factors specific to each marsh, such as peat thickness and channel depth [14, 16]. High storm frequency leads to higher rates of erosion, which can cause seasonal and geographical variation among otherwise similar salt marshes . Peat reef formation may be enhanced by eutrophication as well . It has been shown that other marshes in the northeastern U.S. experience bank failure [14, 16, 19, 20, 21], but marshes there have not been observed to experience extreme channel migration . A study in Sapelo Island, Georgia showed that the water volume of a coastal salt marsh had not changed significantly in 200 years, meaning erosion and deposition were in equilibrium in that system .
The subsurface peat reefs are fairly resilient. For example, a study conducted at Nauset Marsh in Cape Cod, Massachusetts established that a 2-meter long peat reef that had fallen into a tidal creek has a lifespan between 7.5 and 15 years before it erodes away , meaning there is enough time for it to be colonized by a variety of organisms . Various crustaceans were found year-round on the peat reefs, including juvenile
2. Study site
The Mullica River - Great Bay estuary in southern New Jersey (Table 1, Figure 1) is dominated by tidal salt marshes [25, 26]. This system is relatively unaffected by urbanization due to the small human population living in the watershed [23, 25, 27], so it can be assumed that human impact on the natural processes here is minimal. The marsh surface in the lower estuary, at higher salinities, is dominated by
|Sample Number||Location||Marsh seascape type||Dominant marsh vegetation||Approximate salinity (ppt)||Transect length (m)||Range of depths surveyed (m)||Range of depths for peat reefs (m)||Density of peat reefs (Reefs per 100 m of bank scanned)|
|1||Little Sheepshead Creek||Thoroughfare||25–32||1910||0.6–6.8||0.8–6.7||6.79|
|2||Big Sheepshead Creek||Thoroughfare||26–31||2350||0.0–4.3||0.7–3.4||0.70|
|6A||Seven Islands||Island Thoroughfare||28–30||1450||2.6–5.2||3.3–5.2||10.07|
|6B||Seven Islands||Island Thoroughfare||28–30||1560||0.5–3.5||1.4–3.5||1.15|
|6C||Seven Islands||Island Thoroughfare||28–30||1220||0.7–4.0||2.4–3.9||4.02|
|13||Wading River (Lower)||River||7–12||4740||1.4–9.3||No Reefs||0.00|
Within these marshes the morphology of channels can vary along the salinity gradient and presumably along a creek development gradient. Dead end creeks dominated by
3.1. Peat reef mapping
Fifteen locations of varying depths (Table 1, Figure 1) were sampled during the summer and fall of 2017. Some of the representative sites include Little Thorofare, Big Thorofare, Little Sheepshead, Big Sheepshead and Jimmies Creek in the Sheepshead Meadows. The mouths of these waterways are between 2 and 6 km from the Little Egg Inlet, so they experience a 1 m range in tidal influence and a salinity range of 23.6–34.5 ppt . The average depth in each creek ranges from 0.7 m to 4.2 m (Table 1). All of these creeks, thoroughfares, and channels are stable features, as they are evident on aerial photographs from the 1930s (historicaerials.com).
Bottom images of the study sites were mapped using a Helix 10 Humminbird side imaging sonar in the summer and fall of 2017. Data was collected at high tide to reflect the maximum possible number of submerged peat reefs, and because the shallower creeks cannot be accessed by boat at low tide. Both banks of the creek were scanned in narrower creeks (Teal Creek, Fence Creek, Jerry Creek, Bass River, Mathis Thorofare, Motts Creek, Little Thorofare, Jimmies Creek), while only one bank of the wider creeks and rivers were scanned (Wading River, Ballanger Creek, Nacote Creek, Big Thorofare, Big Sheepshead Creek, Little Sheepshead Creek).The recordings were downloaded to the program HumViewer and the locations of individual peat reefs were manually plotted using the Waypoints feature of Humviewer. Peat reef length was measured using the HumViewer program. GPS coordinates and depth of the peat reefs were downloaded to Google Earth and ArcGIS to create a map that showed distribution patterns of the peat reefs throughout the study area (Figure 1). Abundance in creeks was categorized as number of reefs per 100 m of marsh bank scanned (Table 1).
3.2. Faunal sampling
Field sampling was done in the summer and fall of 2017 to see which organisms utilize peat reefs as habitat relative to adjacent areas without peat reefs. The peat reefs and accompanying organisms were collected in large, enclosable mesh (4.8 mm) bags that surrounded the reef. These were returned to the laboratory for additional analysis. This technique was limited to peat reefs that were small enough and in water less than 2 m deep so that they could easily be collected. An additional seine haul with a 7.6 m, (4.8 mm) mesh seine net was performed adjacent to peat reefs in an area where no reefs were present. The collected reefs were measured (length, width, height) and volume was determined by water displacement. All fish, shrimp, crabs, and bivalves in each collection were removed, identified, measured, and expressed as catch-per-unit-effort, or CPUE (Table 2). Most fish and shrimp were measured as total length, fish with forked tails were measured as fork length, and crabs were measured as carapace width. Some components of the fauna at each study site/habitat type (e.g. fish, macroinvertebrates) were identified, measured, and released in the field. Others were removed from the peat reefs in the laboratory and then released.
|Species/taxa||Abundance at peat reef (CPUE)||Length – range at peat reef (mm)||Abundance adjacent to peat reef (CPUE)||Length – range adjacent to peat reef (mm)|
4.1. Peat reef formation
The formation of peat reefs in the study watershed occurs at the marsh edge when marsh peat and the associated marsh vegetation, fauna, and sediments calve off or split off from the marsh platform (Figure 2). Most are then either deposited in the low intertidal or subtidal portions of the adjacent waterway. These are evident and can be mapped because they are clearly visible on sidescan sonar images (Figure 3). Based on this approach, the in situ estimates ranged from 0.1 to 15.0 m in length (n = 1916), with most from 0.7 to 4.0 m (Figure 4).
Intertidal and shallow subtidal peat reefs that could be observed from the surface often still contained the
In other instances, during cold winters, individual peat reefs were ice rafted on to the marsh surface (Figure 5). In the following spring,
4.2. Distribution of peat reefs
Based on sidescan sonar surveys throughout the salinity gradient in the Mullica River — Great Bay estuary, the highest densities occurred in the lower, saltier portions of the estuary (Figure 1, Table 1). Transect length, number of banks scanned, and water depth may have influenced the estimates of peat reef distribution and density. Transect lengths ranged from short creeks at the upper end of the estuary (Fence = 630 m, Jerry = 1290 m, Teal Creek = 1190 m) to much longer for several rivers (Bass River = 5210 m, Wading River = 4740 m, Nacote Creek = 7040 m) and thoroughfares (Motts Creek = 5940 m, Mathis Thorofare = 5330 m) (Table 1, Figure 1). The depth varied between and within transects (Table 1). Some of the deepest depths (>6 m) occurred in thoroughfares, some creeks, and rivers and ranged to 7.2 m. All of these types of marsh seascape had variable depths and the deeper holes were irregular in occurrence (Figures 6, 7, 8). Many of the deepest holes occurred in bends in thoroughfares and creeks (personal observation).
The density of peat reefs also varied independently of marsh seascape type (Table 1, Figures 6–8). Some of the highest and lowest densities occurred in thoroughfares, including those around islands. Peat reef densities in rivers and creeks were typically lower. The variability that occurred is evident when individual peat reefs are mapped along the transects of the Sheepshead Meadows (Figure 9). In some thoroughfares the peat reefs are quite sporadic or in distinct patches (Big Thorofare, Jimmies Creek, Little Sheepshead Creek). In others, they are more or less continuous, as in Little Thorofare.
The size of peat reefs, based on sidescan sonar images, ranged from 0.1 to 15.0 m in length (Figure 4). The reefs that were sampled in situ and brought back to the laboratory were smaller and collected primarily from the Sheepshead Meadows, Seven Islands, and Story Islands (Figure 1). These came from 0.5 to 1.4 m water depth and ranged from, 23 to 13 cm in length, 15 to 50 cm in width, 13 to 51 cm in height, 0.5 to 77 liters in volume, and 3.1 to 73.0 kg in weight.
4.3. Associated fauna
A variety of fishes (n = 14 species), crabs (n = 7 species), shrimps (n = 4 species) and bivalves (n = 5 species), were collected at peat reefs and on adjacent substrate without peat, with some species having a distinct pattern based on occurrence and abundance (Table 2). All faunal groups had more species collected on peat reefs. Also individuals of a single species were typically more abundant on peat reefs. This was most obvious for bivalves and crabs but also occurred for fish and shrimp. The most striking example is for the bivalves (n = 3227 individuals), all of which occurred only on the peat reef. Of these the most abundant, by far, was
5.1. Peat reefs in marsh seascapes
The wide distribution and abundance of forming and submerged peat reefs in the Mullica River — Great Bay estuary indicates that they may play significant roles in this relatively undisturbed ecosystem. This includes influences on the geomorphology and ecology based on our studies of peat reefs and the associated fauna, and the natural history of the system . Also importantly, the findings from our study estuary probably reflect the importance of peat reefs in other estuaries. This is particularly likely in marshes in the northeastern United States, i.e. those stretching from Maine to southern New Jersey, that are characteristically composed of peat substrates [13, 33]. This general pattern is evident from other studies in Massachusetts marshes [14, 18, 19]. The frequency of occurrence of peat reefs may be less so in more southern marshes, from Delaware Bay and south to Florida, because marsh peat is less common [13, 33]. The difference may also be reflected in the more frequent occurrence of slump blocks in these southern marshes [13, 15].
Another source of geographical variation in marsh peat dispersal is ice rafting [9, 10]. It is much more likely that this will be a frequent occurrence in New England marshes because of the increasing frequency of ice formation at the colder temperatures in more northern marshes. In addition, the frequency of occurrences in the study estuary over time is likely to diminish because of increasing water temperatures and the decreasing frequency of cold winters in this estuary  and others  in the region. Variation in the occurrences of ice rafting could also occur because ice formation is more frequent in the upper portion of the estuary, which can be colder, as a result of the lower salinities there [34, 35] and distance from the moderating influence of the ocean .
The distribution of peat reefs in the study area, although quite variable, is influenced by marsh seascape type. The overall reduced number of peat reefs further up the estuary may be due to changes in vegetation along the salinity gradient. This appears most evident along the edges of low salinity creeks where the invasive form of
An earlier study in the same system found that waves, from storms or boat traffic, may also influence erosion at the edge and thus peat reef formation . This same pattern has been identified from commercial boat traffic in other systems . Another potential contributor is eutrophication influenced reduction in the structural integrity of creek banks . Once peat reefs are formed they may last relatively long periods of time. Peat reefs in Nauset Marsh on Cape Cod were estimated to last 7.5–15 years .
5.2. Ecological significance of peat reefs
Intertidal and subtidal peat reefs provide relatively unrecognized habitat for estuarine flora and fauna that do not occur on the marsh platform as indicated in this study. The abundant mud crabs (
The complex structure of peat reefs, such as living and decaying
This study could not have been completed without the laboratory and field support of the RUMFS staff. Of these, Roland Hagan, Thomas Johnson, Maggie Shaw, and Stacy VanMorter were particularly helpful. Rose Petrecca assisted by identifying invertebrates. Pat Filardi volunteered his time for the field sampling. Funding for Christina Welsh was provided by the Stacy Moore Hagan Memorial Undergraduate Estuarine Science Internship Program from Stockton University in collaboration with RUMFS. The Manasquan Marlin and Tuna Club donated the Helix 10 Humminbird sidescan sonar unit. We are grateful to all of the above.
Darnell RM. Organic detritus in relation to the estuarine ecosystem. In: Lauff GH, editor. Estuaries. 83rd ed. Washington, DC: A.A.A.S; 1967. pp. 376-382
Odum EP, De la Cruz AA. Pariculate organic detritus in a Georgia salt marsh-estuarine ecosystem. In: Lauff GH, editor. Estuaries. 83rd ed. Washington, DC: A.A.A.S; 1967. pp. 383-388
Teal JM. Energy flow in the salt marsh ecosystem of Georgia. Ecology. 1962; 43:614-624
Kerwin IA, Pedigo RA. Synecology of a Virginia salt marsh. Chesapeake Science. 1971; 12(3):125-130
Nixon SW, Oviatt CA. Ecology of a New England salt marsh. Ecological Monographs. 1973; 43(4):463-498
Force E. Facies of Holocene sediments of the Tuckerton Marshes, New Jersey [thesis]. Lehigh U., Bethlehem, PA; 1968. 51 p
Smith KK, Good RE, Good NF. Production dynamics for above and belowground components of a New Jersey Spartina alternifloratidal marsh. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science. 1979; 9:189-201
Squires ER, Good RE. Seasonal changes in the productivity, caloric content, and chemical composition of a population of salt-marsh cord-grass ( Spartina alterniflora). Chesapeake Science. 1974; 15:63-71
Hardwick-Whitman MN. Aerial survey of a salt marsh: Ice rafting to the lower intertidal zone. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 1986; 22:379-383
Hardwick-Whitman MN. Biological consequences of ice rafting in a New England salt marsh community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 1985; 87:283-298
Pihl L, Cattrijsse A, Codling I, Mathieson S, McLusky DS, Roberts C. Habitat use by fishes in estuaries and other brackish areas. Fishes in Estuaries. 2002:10-53
Browne JP. Long-term erosional trends along channelized salt marsh edges. Estuaries and Coasts. 2017; 40:1566-1575
Frey RW, Basan PB. Coastal salt marshes. In: Davis RA Jr, editor. Coastal Sedimentary Environments. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Verlag; 1985. pp. 225-301
Rowan AT. Bank erosion, bank stability, and channel migration in salt marsh tidal channels [thesis]. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University; 1988. 168 p
Howard JD, Frey RW. Characteristic physical and biogenic sedimentary structures in Georgia estuaries. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin. 1973; 57:1169-1184
Hartig EK, Gornitz V, Kolker A, Mushacke F, Fallon D. Anthropogenic and climate-change impacts on salt marshes of Jamaica Bay, New York City. Wetlands. 2002; 22(1):71-89
Letzsh WS, Frey RW. Deposition and erosion in a Holocene salt marsh, Sapelo Island, Georgia. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 1980; 50(2):529-542
Deegan LA, Johnson DS, Warren RS, Peterson BJ, Fleeger JW, Fagherazzi S, Wollheim WM. Coastal eutrophication as a driver of salt marsh loss. Nature. 2012; 490:388-394
Able KW, Heck KL, Fahay MP, Roman CT. Use of salt marsh peat reefs by small juvenile lobsters on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Estuaries. 1988; 11:83-86
Schwimmer RA. Rates and processes of marsh shoreline erosion in Rehoboth Bay, Delaware, U.S.A. Journal of Coastal Research. 2001; 17(3):672-683
Watson EB, Wigand C, Davey EW, Andrews HM, Bishop J, Raposa KB. Wetlands loss patterns and inundation-productivity relationships prognosticate widespread salt marsh loss for southern New England. Estuaries and Coasts. 2017; 40(3):662-681
Redfield AC. Development of a New England salt marsh. Ecological Monographs. 1972; 42:201-237
Able KW. Measures of juvenile fish habitat quality: Examples from a National Estuarine Research Reserve. In: Benaka LR, editor. Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation. Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society, Symposium 22; 1999. pp. 134-147
Able KW, Heck KL Jr, Fahay MP, Roman CT. Use of salt-marsh peat reefs by small juvenile lobsters on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Estuaries. 1988; 11(2):83-86
Kennish MJ. Jacques Cousteau National Estuarine Research Reserve. In: Kennish MJ, editor. Estuarine Research Monitoring and Resource Protection. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2004. pp. 59-115
Able KW. Mapping the Mullica Valley: Natural history landscapes. Sojourn. 2017; 1(1):33-44
Able KW, Hoden R, Witting D, Durand JB. Physical parameters of the Great Bay-Mullica River estuary. Technical Report. Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences. The State University of New Jersey. 1992; Contribution 92-06
Lathrop RG, Cole MB, Showalter RD. Quantifying the habitat structure and spatial pattern of New Jersey (USA) salt marshes under different management regimes. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 2000; 8:163-172
Able KW, Hagan SM, Brown SA. Mechanisms of marsh habitat alteration due to Phragmites: Response of young-of-the-year mummichog ( Fundulus heteroclitus) to treatment for Phragmitesremoval. Estuaries. 2003; 26(2B):484-494
Able KW, Hagan SM. The impact of common reed, Phragmites australis, on essential fish habitat: Influence on reproduction, embryological development and larval abundance of mummichog ( Fundulus heteroclitus). Estuaries. 2003; 26(1):40-50
Able KW. Station 119: From Lifesaving to Marine Research. West Creek, NJ: Down the Shore Publishing; 2015
Able KW. Natural history: An approach whose time has come, passed, and needs to be resurrected. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2016; 73(9):2150-2155
Chapman VJ. Salt Marshes and Salt Deserts of the World. New York, NY: Interscience; 1960. p. 392
Able KW, Fahay MP. Ecology of Estuarine Fishes: Temperate Waters of the Western North Atlantic. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2010. p. 584
Minello TJ, Zimmerman RJ, Medina R. The importance of edge for natant macrofauna in a created salt marsh. Wetlands. 1994; 14:184-198
Davis SE III, Allison JB, Driffill MJ, Zhang S. Influence of vessel passages on tidal creek hydrodynamics at Aransas National Wildlife Refuge (Texas, United States): Implications on materials exchange. Journal of Coastal Research. 2009; 25(2):359-365
Barshaw DE, Able KW. Tethering as a technique for assessing predation rates in different habitats: An evaluation using juvenile lobsters Homarus americanus. Fishery Bulletin. 1990; 88(2):415-417
Barshaw DE, Able KW, Heck Jr KL. Salt marsh peat reefs as protection for postlarval lobsters Homarus americanusfrom fish and crab predators: Comparisons with other substrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 1994:203-206
Sheaves M, Baker R, Nagelkerken I, Connolly R. True value of estuarine and coastal nurseries for fish: Incorporating complexity and dynamics. Estuaries and Coasts. 2015; 38(2):401-414
Manderson JP. Seascapes are not landscapes: An analysis performed using Bernhard Riemann’s rules. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2016; 73(7):1831-1838
Good RA, Good NF, Frasco BR. A review of primary production and decomposition dynamics of the belowground marsh component. In: Kennedy VS, editor. Estuarine Comparison. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc; 1982. pp. 139-157
Able KW. Ghost forests in the Mullica Valley: Indicators of sea level rise. Sojourn. Forthcoming
Deegan LA, Bowen JL, Drake D, Fleeger JW, Friedrichs CT, Galvan KA, Hobbie JE, Hopkinson C, Johnson DS, Johnson JM, LeMay LE, Miller E, Peterson BJ, Picard C, Sheldon S, Sutherland M, Vallino J, Warren RS. Susceptibility of salt marshes to nutrient enrichment and predator removal. Ecological Applications. 2007; 17(5):S42-S63