Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Fusarium Mycotoxins and Metabolites that Modulate Their Production

Written By

Sandra N. Jimenez-Garcia, Lina Garcia-Mier, Juan F. Garcia-Trejo, Xóchitl S. Ramirez-Gomez, Ramon G. Guevara-Gonzalez and Ana A. Feregrino-Perez

Submitted: May 23rd, 2017 Reviewed: December 1st, 2017 Published: July 25th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72874

Chapter metrics overview

1,937 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The genus Fusarium is a group of fungi producing several types of toxins with toxicological effect in both humans and animals. Such fungi are commonly found in soils so it can contaminate various types of crops, preferably cereals, leading to significant economic losses. Relative humidity, storage temperature and various handling in cereales increase the possibility of contamination by Fusarium toxins. Cereals naturally have secondary metabolites that may help attenuate contamination by these toxins, but it is necessary to know strategies and mechanisms that generate inactivation mycotoxins. This chapter reviews relevant information about cereal mycotoxin contamination, as well as the production of cereal secondary metabolites as a strategy to reduce the possibility of mycotoxin contamination.

Keywords

  • Fusarium
  • mycotoxin
  • secondary metabolites
  • cereals
  • detoxification

1. Introduction

Mycotoxins produced by fungi of the genus Fusarium have the universal distribution, and economic importance given their toxicity for animals, humans and plant pathogens, which infect and colonize various cereal crops such as maize, rice, wheat and oats in temperate and semi-tropical areas. Among the mycotoxin-producing species are F. sporotrichioides, F. graminearum and F. verticillioides, which produce toxins such as zearalenone, zearalene, deoxynivalenol or nivalenol, T-2 toxin and diacetoxyscirpenol [1]. These toxins generate diverse diseases to crops and contamination to diverse types of cereals mainly to maize being of toxicological concern the ear rot [2]. Therefore, the contamination prevention could be generated by the biosynthesis the Fusarium during the crop. Then, the development of Fusarium can be triggered by the environmental conditions, agricultural practices and range of susceptibility [3]. Biochemical resistance is directly associated with specific proteins and metabolites that focus on the biosynthetic analysis of mycotoxins explaining the sporadic occurrence of the mycotoxins as fungal metabolites. Several studies indicate that secondary metabolites present in cereals can modulate the production of mycotoxins, and these are important in plant response to fungal contaminations, such as, the phenolic compounds that control or prevent the response to mycotoxins [4]. Phenolic acids, including ferulic acid, tannins and proanthocyanidins, are the most abundant in cereal showing the highest potential to function as fungal growth inhibitor [1, 3]. In this sense, the objective of this chapter is the review of the main mycotoxins of the genus Fusarium that affects cereals, as well as the production of secondary metabolites that can modulate their production. The above will gather relevant information on possible inhibition options in cereal contamination by mycotoxins of the genus Fusarium, including major mycotoxin-producing species, cereal contamination by mycotoxins (economic losses, implications to food safety and health), cereal secondary metabolites with antifungal activity and possible mechanisms that modulate inhibition of mycotoxin production of Fusarium species.

Advertisement

2. Overview of major mycotoxin-producing species

The genus Fusarium comprises an outsize cluster that includes animal and plant pathogenic species with great biological properties [5]. Some species are used as biocontrol agents, as industrially applicable enzymes, and some cause diseases in many agronomical crops and are probably the most prevalent toxin-producing fungi [6]. The genera Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium are filamentous fungi and produce mycotoxins that are toxic and/or carcinogenic secondary metabolites produced under appropriate environmental conditions [7]. Fusarium produces three of the most important of mycotoxins, such as fumonisins, trichothecenes or zearalenone, and these furthermore produce emerging mycotoxins as well as fusaproliferin, beauvericin, enniatins and moniliformin [8].

Mycotoxins possess biological activities that represent a problem for both human and animal health (Figure 1). The ingestion of these compounds can cause chronic disease, morbidity and death and reduce the resistance to pathogens [9]. Most mycotoxin are stable during food processing, and these are commonly resistant to chemical and thermal changes. Mycotoxins can also come to the human by animal products [10, 11].

Figure 1.

Group of mycotoxin-producing species.

2.1. Aflatoxins

Aflatoxins (B1, B2, G1, G2) are difuranocoumarin synthesized by Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus present in soil and various organic materials. Aflatoxin-producing species has been reported in a wide variety of food commodities (maize, peanuts, barley oats, rice, cottonseed, spices and figs [12]. Optimal conditions for their propagation are high temperature and humidity (30–33°C, 0.99 water activity) [13]. Aflatoxins showed carcinogenic, teratogenic, hepatotoxic, mutagenic and immunosuppressive effects; specific limits have been set on average to 50 mg/kg for total aflatoxins.

2.2. Trichothecenes

Trichothecenes can be divided into four types: A (T-2 and HT-2 toxins, diacetoxyscirpenol), B (deoxynivalenol, nivalenol), C and D, and these are the main and most diverse chemical groups of the three major classes of Fusarium mycotoxins [14, 15]. These are shaped by a set sesquiterpenoids with or without a tricyclic nucleus. Trichothecenes are small, amphipathic molecules that can move passively across cell membranes [16, 17]. The most prevalent contaminants in wheat, barley, oats and maize are trichothecenes of types A and B. Exposure to these toxins can cause immunological problems, vomiting, skin dermatitis, hemorrhagic lesions, acute diseases and gastroenteritis. Trichothecenes in wheat behaves as phytotoxic were causing chlorosis, inhibition of root elongation, and dwarfism [4, 9]. Trichothecenes show several inhibitory effects such as inhibition of proteins, DNA and RNA synthesis on the primary metabolism of eukaryotic cells [18].

2.3. Deoxynivalenol

Trichothecene of type B (deoxynivalenol) is produced by Fusarium graminearum and Fusarium culmorum; these mycotoxin-producing species are found in wheat, rye, barley and oats [18]. These are a group of toxins with a keto group at carbon 8 of the parent epoxytrichothecene nucleus [19]. Deoxynivalenol is divided into five types (deoxynivalenol, 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol, 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol, fusarenon-X and nivalenol). “ribotoxic stress response” is produced by deoxynivalenol added the ribosome in eukaryotic cells [20]. The impact of deoxynivalenol on the immune system ranges from immunosuppression to immunostimulation, according to its concentration, duration and time of exposure [19].

2.4. Nivalenol

Nivalenol are the main mycotoxins produced by F. cerealis, F. poae, F. nivale, F. culmorum and F. graminearum. Maize red ear rot throughout is caused by nivalenol [21]. As expected, they reportedly also share many toxicological properties, such as the inhibition of cell proliferation, induction of interleukin-8 secretion and the involvement of stress-activated MAPKs and nuclear factor-κΒ in the signal transduction pathways of toxicities [15].

2.5. Zearalenone

Zearalenone is a mycotoxin, which have a structure of estrogenic lactone; they have sufficient structural similarity and these synthesized by various Fusarium species—F. graminearum, F. culmorum and F. crookwellense. Zearalenone is found in cereals, mainly maize, and processed foods and these are a non-highly toxic mycotoxin [10, 22]. These mycotoxins have been producing of estrogenic effects in animals and the stimulation of human breast cancer cells growth. Zearalenone is a mycotoxin producing of host-contaminated corn [9]. Also, inhibiting the gene expression caused by zearalenone produced severe hepatic illness. Zearalenone has been shown to be immunotoxin and hepatotoxic and nephrotoxic and an enhancer of lipid peroxidation [19, 23].

2.6. Fumonisins

Fusarium verticillioides and F. moniliforme produced by Fumonisins (A, B, C, P) are toxic secondary metabolites, mycotoxins non-fluorescent, common fungal contaminants in grains and agricultural commodities [24]. These are analogous to sphingolipids, and intake of contaminated foods with fumonisins B1 has been associated with equine leukoencephalomalacia, porcine pulmonary edema and liver cancer in rats and decreased body weights in chickens [8, 23]. The exposure levels ranging from 0.02 to 0.2 mg/kg in body weight have been found of fumonisin concentration; these are within the limit of intake. Although fumonisins are relatively thermal stability, these may undergo reactions in food systems that alter their chemical structure and toxicity and is potentially hazardous to the health of both humans and animals [25].

Advertisement

3. Overview of mycotoxin-contaminating cereals

Mycotoxin contamination can occur pre-harvest when the crop plant is growing or post-harvest during processing. Storage of cereals at temperatures over 37°C increases humidity during prolonged storage times is a factor for crops and cereals to be susceptible to mold growth and mycotoxin contamination [16]. The susceptibility of the grain is another factor to consider, presenting greater susceptibility maize and lower rice. Animal pests, weeds and pathogens impact yield and quality of cereals. F. graminearum mostly affects cereals, including maize, wheat and barley. The predominant Fusarium species associated with ear and stalk rots are F. graminearum followed by F. verticillioides, F. proliferatum and F. culmorum [21]. These Fusarium species are also capable of producing mycotoxins, which contribute to pre-harvest contamination of human food and animal feed impacting health [7]. Among Fusarium spp., F. graminearum is the most common agent causing Fusarium head blight [26]. The major mycotoxin type of F. graminearum, F. sporotrichioides and Fusarium avenaceum is the trichothecene type-B mycotoxin class of fungi capable of producing deoxynivalenol and its derivatives (3Ac-deoxynivalenol, 15Ac-deoxynivalenol) or nivalenol. The nivalenol-producing isolates of F. graminearum have been found to be more aggressive in maize than the deoxynivalenol-producing isolates [15]. On the other hand, maize production is mainly affected by diseases caused by the species Fusarium proliferatum, F. verticillioides and F. subglutinans and mycotoxin generators including fusaric acid, fusarins and fumonisins. Among fumonisins, fumonisin B1 (FB1), FB2 and FB3 are most frequently encountered in maize kernels [1, 27]. Fusarium sporotrichioides is a common soil-borne plant pathogen causing dry rot of potato [28].

Advertisement

4. Cereal secondary metabolites with antifungal activity

A component of the plant resistance to Fusarium and their toxins is related to the capacity of plant tissues to reduce the fungal infestation and mycotoxin accumulation (e.g. zearalenone, type B trichothecenes, fumonisins) throughout the presence of secondary metabolites. Secondary metabolites are compounds produced by plants for which no role has yet been found in growth, photosynthesis, reproduction or other “primary” functions; however, it has been found that they are implicated in plant defense. The presence of secondary metabolites along with temperature, water activity, pH and nutrients have been identified as key features regulating Fusarium and their mycotoxins [29].

Plant endogenous compounds can be both constitutively synthesized and induced in response to pathogen infection. Recent metabolomic studies have pointed an important amount of cereal metabolites produced by cereals such as fatty acids, amino acids and their derivatives, carbohydrates, amines and polyamines, terpenoids, benzoxazinoid derivatives and phenylpropanoids that contribute to the resistance of Fusarium and low mycotoxin accumulation (Figure 2). These metabolites are derived from primary and secondary metabolism [30]. Based on their biosynthetic origins, plant secondary metabolites can be divided into three major groups: phenylpropanoids, terpenoids and nitrogen-containing alkaloids. The secondary metabolites that play a role in the plant resistance to Fusarium and mycotoxin accumulation are listed below.

Figure 2.

Cereal secondary metabolites with antifungal activity.

4.1. Phenylpropanoids

Phenolic compounds are secondary metabolites that are produced by descend from the phenylpropanoid pathway and are synthesized by plants from the amino acid phenylalanine. Plant biosynthesis produces various phenols that can be grouped commonly as flavonoids and phenolics. Flavones, flavonols, flavanones, flavan-3-ols, anthocyanidins, isoflavones, coumarins, stilbenes and lignans are the main flavonoids. These are structurally distinct because of their specific hydroxylation, methylation and conjugation patterns, with various monosaccharides and disaccharides. Phenolic acids found in cereals exist in both soluble (free) and insoluble (cell wall-bound) forms [31]. The major portion of phenolic compounds is in the outer part of grains. Moreover, phenolic acids, predominantly ferulic and coumaric acid, play an important role in limiting polysaccharide degradation by exogenous enzymes, where they act as a cross-link between polysaccharides and between polysaccharides and lignin [32].

Phenolic compounds in plants are involved in the interaction between the pathogen and the plant. For example, the phenolic acids accumulated throughout the development of wheat-kernel development impact positively the resistance to Fusarium [33]. It has been reported the fungicidal efficiency of phenolic compound considering IC50 values. These values rank between 0.7 and >10 mM [30].

It has been stated that the most maize-resistant genotypes exhibited high levels of phenylpropanoids, which were related to low levels of disease severity and grain fumonisin (FUMO) concentration [34]. In a study using wheat cultivars (winter and spring), significantly higher amounts of free phenolic compounds were found in the glumes, lemmas and paleas of the spring cultivar prior to and at all sampling times after inoculation, in comparison to the winter wheat cultivar. The spring cultivar exhibited resistance against initial infection by the fungus. It was found that the amount of p-coumaric acid increased significantly in the glumes, lemmas and paleas of the spring cultivar concluding that phenolic compounds appear to play a role in the resistance of the cultivars to F. culmorum [35]. In the same way, a study with date palm roots showed that date palm roots contain four cell wall-bound phenolics identified as p-hydroxybenzoic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid and sinapic acid. The contents of p-coumaric acid and ferulic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, sinapic acid and lignin in the resistant cultivars to F. oxysporum were about 2, 8.4, 4.5 and 1.8 times higher than those in the susceptible cultivars [36].

Regarding mycotoxin production, cinnamic acid derivatives such as sinapic, caffeic, p-coumaric, chlorogenic and ferulic acids are efficient inhibitors of TCTB (type B trichothecenes) production by F. graminearum and F. culmorum. It is important to mention that the effect of phenolic compounds is strain and molecule dependent [37].

An amount of studies support that phenolic compounds have a role in enhanced plant resistance to Fusarium [38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43]. Besides, number of studies related to phenolic acids supports that in cereals, cell wall-bound ferulic acid along with its dehydrodimers and free chlorogenic acid could be pivotal components of the resistance to toxigenic Fusarium species [34].

4.2. Terpenoids

Terpenes are the most numerous and structurally diverse plant natural products. The plethora of terpenoid compounds is biosynthetically assembled from only two simple precursors, isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP). Plant terpenoids include compounds ranging from C5 hemisesquiterpenes to C40 tetraterpenes, with diverse physical and chemical properties leading to lipophilic or hydrophilic, volatile or non-volatile metabolites [44].

Several terpenoids have their roles in plant defense against biotic and abiotic stresses, or they are treated as signal molecules to attract the insects of pollination. In a study using cyclic terpenes (limonene, menthol, menthone and thymol) against F. verticillioides, limonene and thymol showed the highest inhibitory effects on F. verticillioides development. Thymol was the most active inhibitor of fumonisin B1 biosynthesis [45].

In the last year, essential oils, which composition mainly include terpenes and terpenoids, from different plants were used in the prevention of fungi and mycotoxins accumulation in cereals. A study using Melissa officinalis, Salvia officinalis, Coriandrum sativum, Thymus vulgaris, Mentha piperita and Cinnamomum zeylanicum showed that all these essential oils have an inhibitory effect on fungal contamination of wheat seeds. This ability was dose-dependent. Regarding mycotoxin development, the best control on fumonisins production was recorded for Cinnamomum zeylanicum [46]. Similar findings regarding essential oils were done by Daferera et al. [47]; Fusarium sp. was completely inhibited by oregano, thyme, dictamnus and marjoram essential oils at moderately low concentrations (85–300 μg/mL). Also, oils from Cymbopogon citratus, Ocimum basilicum and Ocimum gratissimum were the most effective in vitro, completely inhibiting the growth of F. verticillioides. The application of these oils at concentrations of 8, 6.4 and 4.8 μL/g inhibit the growth of F. verticillioides in maize for a period of 21 days. It was also observed that the production of fumonisin was not affected by the lower concentration (4.8 μL/g) [48].

On the other hand, in a cromatografy study, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were identified using GC-MS in oats, barley and wheat infected by three species of Fusarium, including species that caused cortical rot disease in wheat, and two terpenes were identified (linalool and β-caryophyllene), which found higher concentrations with respect to the controls [49].

The metabolomics as a tool helped in to identify the metabolites in barley that are related to resistance against Fusarium head blight FHB exposed that metabolites conferring resistance mainly belonged to phenylpropanoid, flavonoid, fatty acid and terpenoid metabolic pathways [50]. A research by Wang et al. [51] exposed a number of genes involved in secondary metabolites biosynthesis are specifically responsive to F. verticillioides inoculation in BT-1 kernels. Terpenoid biosynthesis and diterpenoid biosynthesis were particularly increased by F. verticillioides inoculation. See Ref. [29] to review a list of terpenoids conferring resistance to Fusarium.

4.3. Alkaloids

Alkaloids are a group of chemical compounds that mostly contain basic nitrogen atoms. Saponins are a class of glycosylated triterpenes; steroids and steroidal alkaloids synthesized from the mevalonate or non-mevalonate pathway in plants. These compounds are absent in most monocotyledon plants and all cereals except in oat. The glycosylated form confers activity to avenacins, contrary to other compounds such as avenacosides, benzoxazanoids and other compounds with antifungal activity, then only with active in its form of aglycone [52]. Vacuoles are the reservoir of inactive avenosides, which allow them to be available when there is tissue damage caused by pathogenic fungi causing their activation; this results in alteration of the membranes and consequently the formation the biologically active aglycone. In a research performed by the homozygous mutant, A. strigose lines and the wild-type line were inoculated with fungal pathogens to assess the effects of the saponin-deficient mutations on plant disease resistance. The results exhibited that mutant plants showed increased susceptibility to Fusarium culmorum and Fusarium avenaceum revealing an implication of saponins in the plant resistance [53].

The best-known alkaloids of grasses are hordenine and gramine. Hordenine is found in many plant species and in cereals; it has been reported in barley, millet and sorghum. The reports of their allelopathic effects may imply a resistance to Fusarium and their mycotoxins; however, no specific reports have been found.

Several compounds within the monoterpene indole alkaloid class are known to exhibit anti-fungal properties. Secologanin production is induced by the application of methyl jasmonate in C. roseus, perhaps suggesting a link between defense-related signaling pathways and monoterpene indole alkaloid production. A study using double haploid barley lines differing in Fusarium head blight sensitivity observed metabolite accumulation and found secologanin was constitutively produced in resistant lines [54]. Few alkaloid compounds have been identified within wheat. A more detailed understanding of how cereal crops and related grass species respond to Fusarium pathogens will reveal novel mechanisms of resistance.

4.4. Benzoxazinoid

Benzoxazinoids (Bxs) are widely distributed in cereals discovered in the 1950s. A range of biological roles such as allelopathy, resistance to insects and defense against pathogens has been attached to them [55]. Benzoxazinoids are synthesized in the shikimate pathway from the amino acid tryptophan. They are present in maize; wheat, rye and certain wild barley species, however, have not been found in cultivated barley varieties, oat or rice. Bxs are stored in an inactive glucoside form in plant vacuoles or plastids to avoid toxicity to the plant itself; through the enzymatic activation and chemical degradation, the tissue disrupted form the active benzoxazinoid [56]. In a research using wheat, principal component analyses demonstrated a correlation between the susceptibility to FHB and the concentrations of range of Bxs [57]. The benzoxazinoid 2-β-glucopyranoside-2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIMBOA-glc), α-tocopherol and the flavonoids homo-orientin and orientin were identified as potential inhibitors of (deoxynivalenol) DON accumulation in a study with wheat that correlates accumulation in Fusarium-infected winter and spring wheat cultivars [58].

A plethora of secondary metabolites have been reported to inhibit Fusarium and their mycotoxins; however, the molecular mechanisms of plant resistance to both are needed to provide a deeper understanding of the mode of actions of the metabolites as well as the mechanisms of detoxification.

Advertisement

5. Possible mechanisms and management that modulate inhibition of mycotoxin production of Fusarium species

Mycotoxins produced by Fusarium spp. include different compounds with trichothecenes, fumonisins, zearalenone and emerging toxins such as fusaproliferin, enniatins, beauvericin and moniliformin [10]. This mycotoxins genus can infect cereals directly during ripening, harvesting or storage, the crop soil affecting plant growth and development, which makes its eradication complex and difficult, but various strategies are used to reduce this contamination, butte the best strategies cannot completely eradicate mycotoxin contamination. Prevention strategies during cultivation and storage aim to eliminate mycotoxins; some of the strategies used are crop rotation; in this sense, Schaafsma et al. [59] observed in a 4-year study that planting a crop other than wheat 2 years previous to planting a wheat crop significantly decreased the level of DON in wheat grain in 1 year out of four. This type of studies support the theory that crop residues are the source of Fusarium toxin inoculum, so alternating crops would reduce the possibility of contamination. However, studies such as that reported by Fernández-Blanco et al. [25] indicate that wheat grown consecutively (each year) has less contamination by Fusarium toxins than alternately grown wheat. Urea fertilization is another strategy to reduce contamination by Fusarium sp. as mentioned by Teich [60] and Martin et al. [61], where they applied urea instead of ammonium nitrate, with fewer pollution symptoms observed. Among the aspects to consider in order reducing Fusarium contamination is the cultivation season, since it has been documented that winter varieties develop and mature before spring varieties, which reduce the risk of Fusarium infection, for avoid that flowering coincides with spore release.

Alternatives to chemical fungicides, such as biocontrol agents, have been tested extensively in both the greenhouse and field environment, but the toxins of Fusarium control efficacy under field conditions have not been consistent [62]. However, some of the strategies to reduce contamination at the crop level are not always effective, so at the storage level it is sought to address other types of strategies.

5.1. Storage

The mycotoxins generated by Fusarium sp. usually present with greater incidence during the storage. The conditions for the mycotoxins biosynthesis are the grain with temperature 25–32°C, moisture between 16 and 30% and air RH of 80 and 100% [63]. This is why the strategies to mitigate and inhibit mycotoxins are postharvest management and storage strategies. Postharvest management has a significant role in mitigation of mycotoxins through good management in grain food chains during harvesting, cleaning, drying, storage and processing. The control of moisture, temperature and humidity to safe storage levels laid a key to mitigate mycotoxins in grains. Ouzounidou et al. [64] indicate that reduction in oxygen and increase in carbon dioxide concentrations generate effects on the growth of fungi. Decreasing O2 to minor of 0.14% and increasing CO2 to more of 50% are required for inhibition of mycelial growth and will prevent mycotoxin [65]. The degree of inhibition achieved by elevated CO2 concentrations is dependent on other environmental factors, such as relative humidity (RH) and temperature [66]. Irradiation is usually used as a mitigation of mycotoxins; 4–6 kGy gamma-irradiation reduces Fusarium toxins and was eliminated at 8 kGy [67]. Both inhibition and elimination of Fusarium mycotoxins can be attributed to providing energy, which results in reactions and changes molecular structures.

5.2. Chemical and biological control

Another strategy is the application of chemical control as fungicides; however, this application can sometimes be ineffective and even increase the production of mycotoxins [68, 69]. That is why another alternative is the use of natural products in specific essential oils and antioxidant compounds. In stored cereals, the application of natural preservatives and essential oils generate inhibition on Fusarium mycotoxins production is found [46]. On the other hand, the agreement of chemical compounds and natural products can generate a reduction of 90% in deoxynivalenol (DON) (Fusarium toxin) as reported by Magan [70] in agreeing BHA (butyl hydroxyl anisole), PP (propyl paraben), resveratrol and cinnamon oil. In relation to the use of natural compounds, a study of phenolic extract of Spirulina sp. reported by Pagnussatt et al. [71] indicates that the Spirulina LEB-18 extract led to mycelial growth inhibitions that ranged between 50% and 90% in addition, the extract inhibits production of nivalenol (NIV) and deoxynivalenol (DON) in 73%. This may be attributed to the extract composition (main constituents were gallic and caffeic acid). Apparently, these compounds act as fungal stressors when they hamper the energy abstention due to the lower glucose availability [72]. This may trigger the production of secondary metabolites to compensate and limit the apparent competition by the substrate of the medium [73].

Biological control is another strategy in the reduction and incidence of Fusarium toxin using living microorganism’s whit Bacillus spp. [74], Pseudomonas spp. [75] and Streptomyces spp. [74]. The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains have been examined for their potential to detoxify zearalenone (ZEA) that is an estrogenic mycotoxin produced by Fusarium [76]. Sangsila et al. [77] showed that these strains of LAB are capable of ZEA detoxification in a range of 29.74–83%, where the strain with the best binding capacity was JM0812 with 83% at an initial concentration of ZEA of 74.7 μg/ml, followed by UM054 and UM055 with 82.78 and 81.69%, respectively.

Mycoparasitism is the mechanism by which a fungus parasitized another fungus and is used with biocontrol strategy. Many studies suggested that mycoparasitism was associated with competition for nutrients and space, generation of antibiotic and induction of systemic resistance on Fusarium spp. [78, 79, 80]. Competition for nutrients and space in the soil is considered to be responsible for the phenomenon of fungistasis via the inhibition of the germination of fungal spores in soil [81]. The deprivation of the resource in the soils is partly responsible for the suppressive nature of soils. When the antagonists present in sufficient quantity at the right time and place and can use nutrients more efficiently than the pathogen, this competition can be used as an effective biological control.

On the other hand, the production of metabolites toxic is another strategy used for the control of diverse strains of Fusarium. Dunlap et al. [82] in B. amyloliquefaciens AS 43.3 identified nine gene clusters encoding for the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites associated with the biological control of Fusarium. The application of gases like ozone is another strategy for the detoxification of mycotoxins; Li et al. [83] obtained a reduction of 57.3% in DON by ozonation, with the moisture content of 17% in wheat. The ozone is a gas, has a favorable penetration and can decompose the double bonds in organisms and further produces simple products with less double bond and low molecular weight; in addition, it can decompose to oxygen voluntarily with non-toxic residual. Other strategie is the application of photocatalytic activity of graphene/Zno hybrids can be useful to degrade DON up to 99% according to Bai et al. [84]. The information on possible mechanism and strategies that can help detoxification of mycotoxins has increased, however, the road is still long.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

We want to thank PFCE 2017 economic support for the realization of this research.

References

  1. 1. Atanasova-Penichon V, Pons S, Pinson-Gadais L, Picot A, Marchegay G, Bonnin-Verdal M-N, Ducos C, Barreau C, Roucolle J, Sehabiague P. Chlorogenic acid and maize ear rot resistance: A dynamic study investigating Fusarium graminearum development, deoxynivalenol production, and phenolic acid accumulation. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2012;25(12):1605-1616
  2. 2. Atanasova-Penichon V, Bernillon S, Marchegay G, Lornac A, Pinson-Gadais L, Ponts N, Zehraoui E, Barreau C, Richard-Forget F. Bioguided isolation, characterization, and biotransformation by Fusarium verticillioides of maize kernel compounds that inhibit fumonisin production. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2014;27(10):1148-1158
  3. 3. Atanasova-Penichon V, Barreau C, Richard-Forget F. Antioxidant secondary metabolites in cereals: Potential involvement in resistance to fusarium and mycotoxin accumulation. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7(1):566
  4. 4. McCormick SP, Stanley AM, Stover NA, Alexander NJ. Trichothecenes: From simple to complex mycotoxins. Toxins. 2011;3(7):802-814
  5. 5. Geiser DM, Aoki T, Bacon CW, Baker SE, Bhattacharyya MK, Brandt ME, Brown DW, Burgess LW, Chulze S, Coleman JJ. One fungus, one name: Defining the genus fusarium in a scientifically robust way that preserves longstanding use. Phytopathology. 2013;103(5):400-408
  6. 6. Edel-Hermann V, Brenot S, Gautheron N, Aimé S, Alabouvette C, Steinberg C. Ecological fitness of the biocontrol agent fusarium oxysporum fo47 in soil and its impact on the soil microbial communities. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2009;68(1):37-45
  7. 7. Luz C, Saladino F, Luciano F, Mañes J, Meca G. Occurrence, toxicity, bioaccessibility and mitigation strategies of beauvericin, a minor fusarium mycotoxin. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2017;107(1):430-439
  8. 8. Waalwijk C, Vanheule A, Audenaert K, Zhang H, Warris S, van de Geest H, van der Lee T. Fusarium in the age of genomics. Tropical Plant Pathology. 2017;42(1):184-189
  9. 9. Escrivá L, Font G, Manyes L. In vivo toxicity studies of fusarium mycotoxins in the last decade: A review. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2015;78(1):185-206
  10. 10. Marin S, Ramos A, Cano-Sancho G, Sanchis V. Mycotoxins: Occurrence, toxicology, and exposure assessment. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2013;60(1):218-237
  11. 11. Kaushik G. Effect of processing on mycotoxin content in grains. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2015;55(12):1672-1683
  12. 12. De Boevre M, Di Mavungu JD, Landschoot S, Audenaert K, Eeckhout M, Maene P, Haesaert G, De Saeger S. Natural occurrence of mycotoxins and their masked forms in food and feed products. World Mycotoxin Journal. 2012;5(3):207-219
  13. 13. Yoshizawa T. Natural Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Small Grain Cereals (Wheat, Barley, Rye, Oats, Sorghum, Millet, Rice). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1991. pp. 301-324
  14. 14. Summerell BA, Leslie JF. Fifty years of fusarium: How could nine species have ever been enough? Fungal Diversity. 2011;50(1):135
  15. 15. Patriarca A, Pinto VF. Prevalence of mycotoxins in foods and decontamination. Current Opinion in Food Science. 2017;14(1):50-60
  16. 16. Alshannaq A, Yu J-H. Occurrence toxicity, and analysis of major mycotoxins in food. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14(6):632-652
  17. 17. Cortinovis C, Pizzo F, Spicer LJ, Caloni F. Fusarium mycotoxins: Effects on reproductive function in domestic animals—A review. Theriogenology. 2013;80(6):557-564
  18. 18. Alassane-Kpembi I, Kolf-Clauw M, Gauthier T, Abrami R, Abiola FA, Oswald IP, Puel O. New insights into mycotoxin mixtures: The toxicity of low doses of type b trichothecenes on intestinal epithelial cells is synergistic. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 2013;272(1):191-198
  19. 19. Pasquali M, Migheli Q. Genetic approaches to chemotype determination in type b-trichothecene producing fusaria. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2014;189(1):164-182
  20. 20. Maresca M. From the gut to the brain: Journey and pathophysiological effects of the food-associated trichothecene mycotoxin deoxynivalenol. Toxins. 2013;5(4):784-820
  21. 21. Basler R. Diversity of Fusarium species isolated from UK forage maize and the population structure of F. graminearum from maize and wheat. PeerJ. 2016;4(1):e2143
  22. 22. Riberi WI, Tarditto LV, Zon MA, Arévalo FJ, Fernández H. Development of an electrochemical immunosensor to determine zearalenone in maize using carbon screen printed electrodes modified with multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polyethyleneimine dispersions. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2017;254(1):1271-1277
  23. 23. Bielas W, Niżański W, Nicpoń J, Partyka A, Mordak R, Nowak M, Ciaputa R. Effect of zearalenone on circulating testosterone concentration, testicular and epididymal morphology and epididymal sperm characteristics in wild boars. Theriogenology. 2017;102(1):59-66
  24. 24. Ferre FS. Worldwide occurrence of mycotoxins in rice. Food Control. 2016;62(1):291-298
  25. 25. Fernández-Blanco C, Frizzell C, Shannon M, Ruiz M-J, Connolly L. An in vitro investigation on the cytotoxic and nuclear receptor transcriptional activity of the mycotoxins fumonisin b1 and beauvericin. Toxicology Letters. 2016;257(1):1-10
  26. 26. Legrand F, Picot A, Cobo-Díaz JF, Chen W, Le Floch G. Challenges facing the biological control strategies for the management of Fusarium head blight of cereals caused by F. graminearum. Biological Control. 2017;113(1):26-38
  27. 27. Brown DW, Butchko RA, Busman M, Proctor RH. Identification of gene clusters associated with fusaric acid, fusarin, and perithecial pigment production in Fusarium verticillioides. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 2012;49(7):521-532
  28. 28. Jiang C, Song J, Zhang J, Yang Q. Identification and characterization of the major antifungal substance against fusarium sporotrichioides from Chaetomium globosum. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2017;33(6):108
  29. 29. Gauthier L, Atanasova-Penichon V, Chéreau S, Richard-Forget F. Metabolomics to decipher the chemical defense of cereals against fusarium graminearum and deoxynivalenol accumulation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015;16(10):24839-24872
  30. 30. Atanasova-Penichon V, Barreau C, Richard-Forget F. Antioxidant secondary metabolites in cereals: Potential involvement in resistance to fusarium and mycotoxin accumulation. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7(1):1-16
  31. 31. Dykes L, Rooney L. Phenolic compounds in cereal grains and their health benefits. Cereal Foods World. 2007;52(3):105-111
  32. 32. LB-MZ-K NÉMETH. Total phenolic contents and antioxidant capacities of cereal and pseudocereal genotypes. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2007;46(4):150-157
  33. 33. McKeehen JD, Busch RH, Fulcher RG. Evaluation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) phenolic acids during grain development and their contribution to fusarium resistance. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1999;47(4):1476-1482
  34. 34. Sampietro DA, Fauguel CM, Vattuone MA, Presello DA, Catalán CA. Phenylpropanoids from maize pericarp: Resistance factors to kernel infection and fumonisin accumulation by Fusarium verticillioides. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2013;135(1):105-113
  35. 35. Siranidou E, Kang Z, Buchenauer H. Studies on symptom development, phenolic compounds and morphological defence responses in wheat cultivars differing in resistance to fusarium head blight. Journal of Phytopathology. 2002;150(4-5):200-208
  36. 36. El Modafar C, El Boustani E. Cell wall-bound phenolic acid and lignin contents in date palm as related to its resistance to fusarium oxysporum. Biologia Plantarum. 2001;44(1):125-130
  37. 37. Boutigny A-L, Barreau C, Atanasova-Penichon V, Verdal-Bonnin M-N, Pinson-Gadais L, Richard-Forget F. Ferulic acid, an efficient inhibitor of type b trichothecene biosynthesis and tri gene expression in fusarium liquid cultures. Mycological Research. 2009;113(6):746-753
  38. 38. Bollina V, Kushalappa AC, Choo TM, Dion Y, Rioux S. Identification of metabolites related to mechanisms of resistance in barley against fusarium graminearum, based on mass spectrometry. Plant Molecular Biology. 2011;77(4-5):355
  39. 39. Gunnaiah R, Kushalappa AC. Metabolomics deciphers the host resistance mechanisms in wheat cultivar sumai-3, against trichothecene producing and non-producing isolates of Fusarium graminearum. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2014;83(1):40-50
  40. 40. Kaswan S, Kaswan V, Kumar R. Organic farming as a basis for sustainable agriculture—A review. Agricultural Reviews. 2012;33(1):27-36
  41. 41. Kumaraswamy KG, Kushalappa AC, Choo TM, Dion Y, Rioux S. Mass spectrometry based metabolomics to identify potential biomarkers for resistance in barley against fusarium head blight (Fusarium graminearum). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2011;37(8):846-856
  42. 42. Paranidharan V, Abu-Nada Y, Hamzehzarghani H, Kushalappa A, Mamer O, Dion Y, Rioux S, Comeau A, Choiniere L. Resistance-related metabolites in wheat against Fusarium graminearum and the virulence factor deoxynivalenol (don). Botany. 2008;86(10):1168-1179
  43. 43. Lattanzio V, Lattanzio VM, Cardinali A. Role of phenolics in the resistance mechanisms of plants against fungal pathogens and insects. Phytochemistry: Advances in Research. 2006;661(1):23-67
  44. 44. Singh B, Sharma RA. Plant terpenes: Defense responses, phylogenetic analysis, regulation and clinical applications. 3. Biotech. 2015;5(2):129-151
  45. 45. Dambolena J, López A, Cánepa M, Theumer M, Zygadlo J, Rubinstein H. Inhibitory effect of cyclic terpenes (limonene, menthol, menthone and thymol) on fusarium verticillioides mrc 826 growth and fumonisin b1 biosynthesis. Toxicon. 2008;51(1):37-44
  46. 46. Sumalan R-M, Alexa E, Poiana M-A. Assessment of inhibitory potential of essential oils on natural mycoflora and fusarium mycotoxins production in wheat. Chemistry Central Journal. 2013;7(1):32
  47. 47. Daferera DJ, Ziogas BN, Polissiou MG. The effectiveness of plant essential oils on the growth of Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium sp. and Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. Michiganensis. Crop Protection. 2003;22(1):39-44
  48. 48. Fandohan P, Gbenou JD, Gnonlonfin B, Hell K, Marasas WF, Wingfield MJ. Effect of essential oils on the growth of Fusarium verticillioides and fumonisin contamination in corn. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2004;52(22):6824-6829
  49. 49. Piesik D, Pańka D, Delaney KJ, Skoczek A, Lamparski R, Weaver DK. Cereal crop volatile organic compound induction after mechanical injury, beetle herbivory (Oulema spp.), or fungal infection (Fusarium spp.). Journal of Plant Physiology. 2011;168(9):878-886
  50. 50. Bollina V, Kumaraswamy GK, Kushalappa AC, Choo TM, Dion Y, Rioux S, Faubert D, Hamzehzarghani H. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics application to identify quantitative resistance-related metabolites in barley against fusarium head blight. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2010;11(6):769-782
  51. 51. Wang Y, Zhou Z, Gao J, Wu Y, Xia Z, Zhang H, Wu J. The mechanisms of maize resistance to fusarium verticillioides by comprehensive analysis of rna-seq data. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7(1):1654
  52. 52. Osbourn AE. Saponins in cereals. Phytochemistry. 2003;62(1):1-4
  53. 53. Papadopoulou K, Melton R, Leggett M, Daniels M, Osbourn A. Compromised disease resistance in saponin-deficient plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999;96(22):12923-12928
  54. 54. Chamarthi SK, Kumar K, Gunnaiah R, Kushalappa AC, Dion Y, Choo TM. Identification of fusarium head blight resistance related metabolites specific to doubled-haploid lines in barley. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2014;138(1):67-78
  55. 55. Frey M, Schullehner K, Dick R, Fiesselmann A, Gierl A. Benzoxazinoid biosynthesis, a model for evolution of secondary metabolic pathways in plants. Phytochemistry. 2009;70(15):1645-1651
  56. 56. Du Fall LA, Solomon PS. Role of cereal secondary metabolites involved in mediating the outcome of plant-pathogen interactions. Metabolites. 2011;1(1):64-78
  57. 57. Søltoft M, Jørgensen LN, Svensmark B, Fomsgaard IS. Benzoxazinoid concentrations show correlation with Fusarium head blight resistance in Danish wheat varieties. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 2008;36(4):245-259
  58. 58. Etzerodt T, Gislum R, Laursen BB, Heinrichson K, Gregersen PL, Jørgensen LN, Fomsgaard IS. Correlation of deoxynivalenol accumulation in Fusarium-infected winter and spring wheat cultivars with secondary metabolites at different growth stages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2016;64(22):4545-4555
  59. 59. Schaafsma A, Ilinic LT, Miller J, Hooker D. Agronomic considerations for reducing deoxynivalenol in wheat grain. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology. 2001;23(3):279-285
  60. 60. Teich A. Less wheat scab with urea than with ammonium nitrate fertilizers. Cereal Research Communication. 1987;15(1):35-38
  61. 61. Martin R, MacLeod J, Caldwell C. Influences of production inputs on incidence of infection by Fusarium species on cereal seed. Plant Disease. 1991;75(8):784-788
  62. 62. McMullen M, Bergstrom G, De Wolf E, Dill-Macky R, Hershman D, Shaner G, Van Sanford D. A unified effort to fight an enemy of wheat and barley: Fusarium head blight. Plant Disease. 2012;96(12):1712-1728
  63. 63. Shanahan JF, Brown WM, Blunt T, Croissant RL. Aflatoxins. Service in action; no. 0.306. 2003
  64. 64. Ouzounidou G, Ntougias S, Asfi M, Gaitis F, Zervakis GI. Raw and fungal-treated olive-mill wastewater effects on selected parameters of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) growth—The role of proline. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B. 2012;47(7):728-735
  65. 65. Magan N, Aldred D. Post-harvest control strategies: Minimizing mycotoxins in the food chain. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2007;119(1):131-139
  66. 66. Paster N, Bullerman LB. Mould spoilage and mycotoxin formation in grains as controlled by physical means. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1988;7(3):257-265
  67. 67. Aziz N, Attia ES, Farag S. Effect of gamma-irradiation on the natural occurrence of fusarium mycotoxins in wheat, flour and bread. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 1997;41(1):34-37
  68. 68. Audenaert K, Callewaert E, De Saeger S, Höfte M, Haesaert G. Hydrogen peroxide induced by application of triazole fungicides triggers deoxynivalenol (don) production by Fusarium graminearum. BMC Microbiology. 2010;10(1):1-14
  69. 69. Audenaert K, Landschoot S, Vanheule A, Waegeman W, De Baets B, Haesaert G. Impact of fungicide timing on the composition of the Fusarium head blight disease complex and the presence of deoxynivalenol (DON) in wheat. In: Thajuddin N, editor. Fungicides-Beneficial and Harmful Aspects. 1st ed. Rijeka: InTech; 2011. pp. 79-98
  70. 70. Magan N. Mycotoxin contamination of food in Europe: Early detection and prevention strategies. Mycopathologia. 2006;162(3):245-253
  71. 71. Pagnussatt FA, Del Ponte EM, Garda-Buffon J, Badiale-Furlong E. Inhibition of Fusarium graminearum growth and mycotoxin production by phenolic extract from Spirulina sp. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2014;108(1):21-26
  72. 72. Picot A, Barreau C, Pinson-Gadais L, Caron D, Lannou C, Richard-Forget F. Factors of the Fusarium verticillioides-maize environment modulating fumonisin production. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 2010;36(3):221-231
  73. 73. Jayashree T, Subramanyam C. Antiaflatoxigenic activity of eugenol is due to inhibition of lipid peroxidation. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 1999;28(3):179-183
  74. 74. Palazzini JM, Ramirez ML, Torres AM, Chulze SN. Potential biocontrol agents for fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol production in wheat. Crop Protection. 2007;26(11):1702-1710
  75. 75. Wang L-Y, Xie Y-S, Cui Y-Y, Xu J, He W, Chen H-G, Guo J-H. Conjunctively screening of biocontrol agents (bcas) against Fusarium root rot and Fusarium head blight caused by Fusarium graminearum. Microbiological Research. 2015;177(1):34-42
  76. 76. Zhao L, Jin H, Lan J, Zhang R, Ren H, Zhang X, Yu G. Detoxification of zearalenone by three strains of Lactobacillus plantarum from fermented food in vitro. Food Control. 2015;54(1):158-164
  77. 77. Sangsila A, Faucet-Marquis V, Pfohl-Leszkowicz A, Itsaranuwat P. Detoxification of zearalenone by Lactobacillus pentosus strains. Food Control. 2016;62(1):187-192
  78. 78. Popiel HA, Takeuchi T, Burke JR, Strittmatter WJ, Toda T, Wada K, Nagai Y. Inhibition of protein misfolding/aggregation using polyglutamine binding peptide qbp1 as a therapy for the polyglutamine diseases. Neurotherapeutics. 2013;10(3):440-446
  79. 79. Kosawang C, Karlsson M, Vélëz H, Rasmussen PH, Collinge DB, Jensen B, Jensen DF. Zearalenone detoxification by zearalenone hydrolase is important for the antagonistic ability of Clonostachys rosea against mycotoxigenic Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Biology. 2014;118(4):364-373
  80. 80. Xue AG, Chen Y, Voldeng HD, Fedak G, Savard ME, Längle T, Zhang J, Harman GE. Concentration and cultivar effects on efficacy of clo-1 biofungicide in controlling Fusarium head blight of wheat. Biological Control. 2014;73(1):2-7
  81. 81. Bonanomi G, D’Ascoli R, Scotti R, Gaglione S, Caceres MG, Sultana S, Scelza R, Rao M, Zoina A. Soil quality recovery and crop yield enhancement by combined application of compost and wood to vegetables grown under plastic tunnels. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2014;192(1):1-7
  82. 82. Dunlap CA, Bowman MJ, Schisler DA. Genomic analysis and secondary metabolite production in bacillus amyloliquefaciens as 43.3: A biocontrol antagonist of fusarium head blight. Biological Control. 2013;64(2):166-175
  83. 83. Li M, Guan E, Bian K. Effect of ozone treatment on deoxynivalenol and quality evaluation of ozonised wheat. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A. 2015;32(4):544-553
  84. 84. Bai X, Sun C, Liu D, Luo X, Li D, Wang J, Wang N, Chang X, Zong R, Zhu Y. Photocatalytic degradation of deoxynivalenol using graphene/Zno hybrids in aqueous suspension. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2017;204(1):11-20

Written By

Sandra N. Jimenez-Garcia, Lina Garcia-Mier, Juan F. Garcia-Trejo, Xóchitl S. Ramirez-Gomez, Ramon G. Guevara-Gonzalez and Ana A. Feregrino-Perez

Submitted: May 23rd, 2017 Reviewed: December 1st, 2017 Published: July 25th, 2018