Abstract
Water stress exists in most sugarcane cultivation areas, which are not supported by irrigation system and have low rain precipitation. Better understanding of physiological and biochemical mechanism, underlying plants response to water stress, have been achieved to develop drought-tolerant plants by biotechnology approach. To survive and grow normally, plants use a range of strategies to cope the water stress such as changes in gene expression and accumulation of organic compound called compatible solutes. Observation of drought stress response in sugarcane found the presence of a drought-inducible protein called SoDip22 and that the expression was induced by drought stress and ABA hormone treatments. However, the function of this drought-inducible protein has not been elucidated and only suggested that the protein may play an important role in maintenance of water molecule during water deficit state. Biochemical studies on the drought-tolerance mechanism have shown that nontoxic small compound of compatible solute accumulated during water deficit condition. Genetic engineering of glycine betaine (GB), acting as a compatible solute, has been applied for enhancement of water stress tolerance. In sugarcane, bacterial betA gene encodes for choline dehydrogenase (CDH) has successfully introduced and resulted in the transgenic drought-tolerance sugarcane. The CDH converts choline into betaine aldehyde, which is then converted to GB. The overexpression of betA gene increased GB contents that act as an osmoprotectant and help sugarcane acclimate in water deficit condition. This chapter reports the development of biotechnology for drought-tolerant sugarcane.
Keywords
- sugarcane
- transgenic
- drought-tolerance
- betA gene
- glycine betaine
1. Introduction
Climate changes have been considered as a serious issue in the past few decades and have an impact on the agriculture production and human health. The climate variability and change are projected to result in the frequency of extremely high-temperature events, floods, and drought conditions. The global increase in temperature is predicted to enhance water losses due to high evapotranspiration rate and resulted in the increase of water stress. Many reports had been published that drought stress can impose decreasing of plants growth and losses in plant productivity. In addition, increasing human population that was predicted by US Census Bureau over 9 million in 2050, will need more demand for food, energy, and the residence. Expansion of city, as a consequence of increasing human occupancy, has significant impact on the displacement of farmland from well-irrigated system toward rain-fed marginal soil which might lose agriculture production.
Sugarcane is a major crop to produce sugar in tropical region and that sugar is extracted from sugarcane stem at sugarcane factory throughout the harvesting session. The stem is shredded, crushed, and pressed to produce juice that is separated from bagasse, the fibrous portion of sugarcane stem. The juice is then clarified and boiled to produce syrup, and through multiple rounds of crystallization to produce sucrose. The remaining black thick syrup called molasses is then separated as a by-product of sugarcane industry. Bagasse has several applications, including generation of power for the mill, papermaking, livestock feed and may be a useful source for production of various derivate of cellulose fiber, and fermentation of bagasse to produce ethanol. Due to still remaining high sugars, the molasses is used for alcohol and other fermentation products as well as a stock feed supplement. The molasses and another by-product called as filter cake are often used as a fertilizer on the cane fields. The various valuable products from sugarcane have put the plant as an economically important plant in tropical region. Increasing sugarcane production and processing would not only increase sugar supply and increase farmers income, but also enhance energy security by using bioethanol from sugarcane production and improve the environment.
Water is one of the most critical environments and plays a crucial role in the life of plants. The availability of water has a potential effect on plant’s growth and productivity. The disruption of the plant water status due to drought stress condition reduces the plant survival, growth, and productivity in the environment. In the photosynthetically C4 plant species, sugarcane is considered a plant with high water-uptake efficiency. During day time, the C4 plants can slightly close their stomata to minimize evapotranspiration rate without any effect on photosynthetic carbon assimilation. Although sugarcane needs dry season before harvesting, the plant requires optimum water availability during the vegetative growth. Adequacy water supply during vegetative phase will enhance rapid growth, stem elongation, and internodes formation. On the other hand, limited water availability will stack sugarcane growth and seriously affect on sugar production [1]. Since sugarcane is a valuable crop in the tropical countries that is being used for sugar production and others products such as bioethanol, energy, feed, thus a strategy for development of new sugarcane cultivars tolerance to water stress will be an important issue.
The development of a new plant cultivar could be gained either by conventional breeding program or biotechnology approaches. Although sugarcane improvement by cross breeding program had been successfully implemented, creating a new variety through breeding program is laborious and take times around 12 years or even more. Sugarcane is a complex organism with high ploidy levels and chromosome number of 2n = 80 with a basic chromosome number (x) of 10 [2], and has limitation for the development of new cultivars. The flowering occurrence under field condition is variable, influenced by variety and environmental conditions such as altitude and day length. Sugarcane is a cross-pollinating species although selfing occurs at low levels [3]. Sugarcane pollen is very small, rapidly desiccated, having a half-life only 12 minutes and no longer viable beyond 35 minutes and is immediately dried. Thus, biotechnological approach is believed to become crucial to overcome the limitations of classical sugarcane breeding. Development of transgenic sugarcane may foster the development for creation of new sugarcane cultivars with various important traits such as drought tolerance, high sucrose content, resistance to diseases, high yield of ethanol and biomass for fuels.
Recently, it has been reviewed that understanding of water stress mechanism in sugarcane from molecular, biochemical, and physiological perspectives will be the most promising strategies for developing the biotechnology [1]. From the physiological perspective, to survive and develop normally, plants adapt to water stress with various strategies including altered gene expression [4] and accumulation of specific compound called compatible solutes such as proline, sugar alcohol, and betaine [5, 6]. Water stress increases the level of ABA, and the hormone involved in the signal transduction of gene expression converting the adaptation to the water stress [7, 8]. The change in water stress-related gene expression associated with sucrose accumulation and the genes encoding enzymes involved in amino acid metabolism have been reported in sugarcane [9, 10]. In addition, Glycine betaine (GB) is a compatible solute that is believed to act as an osmoprotectant and converting plant to adapt to the water stress condition in several plants including sugarcane. Understanding molecular and physiological mechanism on the water stress is a major challenge in developing biotechnology of drought-tolerant sugarcane. The objective of this review is to report the development of biotechnology of drought-tolerant sugarcane using the gene that induces glycine betaine accumulation as well as to summarize an efficient method for genetic transformation method mediated by
2. Physiological and molecular drought stress responses in sugarcane
Water stress is one of the most critical environmental abiotic stresses that affect plant’s growth and productivity. It was estimated by the International Water Management Institute that by the year 2025, one third of the world will be occupied with severe water scarcity. Moreover, the climate change will induce competition between the use for human consumption and irrigation, which in turn affects the displacement of agriculture to non-irrigated marginal area that reduced in agricultural productivity. When subjected to water deficit or drought stress, plants undergo alteration in physiological started with reduction in protein synthesis, stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate. Depending on the plants species, drought stress condition will accumulate the compatible solutes to protect cell from serious damage in drought stress tolerant plants. Under rehydration after mild water deficit, almost every plant can return to normal growth, but if the stress was severe, some plants will not survive and dry.
Sugarcane is photosynthetically classified as C4 plant that adapted well in tropical climate. The C4 plants are often considered to be a better adapted to water limitation environments than most other crops, particularly as they are able to maintain leaf photosynthesis with slightly stomatal close and increase in water-use efficiency. The C4 photosynthesis is characterized by the presence of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) as the primary carboxylation enzyme located in mesophyll cell, and by ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) as the secondary carboxylation enzyme located in bundle sheath cells of anatomy C4 leaf. Fixation of CO2 from atmosphere is catalyzed by PEPC in the mesophyll cells to form C4 acid (malate and/or aspartate) which is then transported into the bundle sheath cells. The metabolites transport process generates a much higher concentration of CO2 in the bundle sheath cells than the external atmospheres. This elevated concentration of CO2 at the carboxylation site of Rubisco results in suppression of photorespiration. It was believed that PEPC has high affinity to assimilate CO2 from atmosphere [11, 12] and allow high rates of photosynthetic carbon assimilation to occur when stomata are slightly closed to prevent evapotranspiration. This PEPC has a significant role in C4 photosynthesis carbon assimilation and is regulated by environmental conditions such as light [13], water stress [14], and nitrogen availability [15]. Although limited reports, the enzymes involved in CO2 concentration mechanism in C4 plant are considered to play significant role in water resistant [16, 17].
Sugarcane is an important crop to produce sugar and dry condition is commonly observed in sugarcane farm in tropical agriculture. Dry season or drying prior to harvest in irrigated sugarcane cultivation is an important strategy to enhance sucrose content in stem [18, 19]. Gradual water deficit during sugarcane maturation reduce stem elongation and leaf development, but more sucrose become available for storage in stem [18]. In the pathway of sucrose biosynthesis, sucrose-phosphate synthase (SPS) is believed to be a key enzyme for sucrose synthesis in plants [20]. A comparison study on the sucrose content in sugarcane cultivated in different agro-climate showed that dry-land cultivated sugarcane accumulated more sugar compared with wet-land and observation in

Figure 1.
Enhancement of SPS levels in sugarcane leaves after drought stress (A) and ABA hormone (B) treatments. Two-months old sugarcane plants grown in green house were treated by either drought stress or ABA hormone. The drought stress was initiated by left sugarcane plants without watering and the SPS activity, SPS protein levels, and sucrose contents were measured at indicated times (A). (B) The fully developed youngest leafs were sprayed with ABA solution at indicated concentration for 1 and 2 days. Total proteins were extracted from the fully developed youngest leaves and the SPS activity was measured according to the method described in [
Drought stress induces a wide range of physiological and biochemical responses in plants, including alteration in gene expression. The change in gene expression was triggered both by ABA-dependent and ABA-independent regulatory mechanism. Furthermore, identification by microarray analysis had classified two groups of drought-inducible genes in
Water deficit causes various changes in biochemical reactions, including the production of a complex variety of secondary metabolites. Water stress induces the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants which are highly reactive or toxic that causes damage to cellular component such as proteins, lipids, carbohydrate, and DNA. The ROS also controls many processes such as cell cycle and programmed cell death [26]. Exposure of plants to drought condition increases production of ROS such as free radical (O2*, superoxide radicals, OH* hydroxyl radical, HO2* perhydroxy radical) and non-radical forms (H2O2, hydrogen peroxide and O2, singlet oxygen). To ensure survival under drought stress condition, plants have developed efficient antioxidant machinery that is able to scavenger and detoxify ROS [27]. Plants possess enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense system to protect plant cell from oxidative stress by scavenging ROS. The enzymatic activity such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione reductase (GR) and non-enzymatic antioxidants such as ascorbic acid, reduced glutathione, phenolic, alkaloids, and amino acids can work together to scavenge ROS. Water deficit induced the change activities of SOD, CAT, APX, and GR, according to variety and stress intensity in sugarcane. Drought-tolerant sugarcane exhibited higher CAT and APX activities in the early stage of drought, while the activity of GR was highest at the end of drought stress period compared with drought-sensitive sugarcane [28]. The increase of SOD, CAT and APX under drought stress was further confirmed in most tested sugarcane cultivars [29]. Thus, the activities of ROS scavenging enzymes may be used as a marker of water stress tolerant sugarcane.
Many plants respond to water deficit stress by accumulating non-enzymatic antioxidants defense system to protect from oxidative damage by ROS. Ascorbic acid is one of antioxidants that prevent or minimize the damage caused by ROS. The ascorbic acid has ability to donate electrons in numerous reactions and protect the cell membranes by scavenging the superoxide radical and hydroxyl radical [27]. Furthermore, glutathione is another important antioxidant that is capable of preventing damage caused by ROS. Glutathione exists either in reduced or in oxidized form and it is a crucial metabolite to perform multiple functions including plant responses modulation under abiotic and biotic stresses [30]. Despite ROS scavenging enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants which had been reported to enhance drought tolerance in several transgenic plants [27], their application for developing drought-tolerant sugarcane is still meager.
The accumulation of non-toxic small molecule metabolites referred as compatible solutes or osmoprotectant such as sugar, proline and betaines help plants to survive under osmotic stress [5, 31]. These metabolites may have a role to protect cell membrane and maintain osmotic potential. Studies at physiological, biochemical, and molecular levels suggest that compatibles solutes perform important function in adjustment of plant against salinity and drought stress. Sugar and sugar alcohols have been accepted as osmoprotectant that provide membrane protection and scavenging ROS. The higher accumulation of sugar, such as trehalose, fructans, sucrose, acts as osmoprotectant under drought stress in plants [32]. Sugarcane can accumulate high content of sucrose in storage parenchyma of stem cell that may create osmotic gradient and act as osmoprotectant. Under water deficit, there was a change in stress-related gene expression and sucrose accumulation, but the mechanism responding to the water stress was different. Some genes expression such as genes encoding for asparagine synthase (AS), biosynthesis of proline (OAT), sugar transports were positively correlated, but the genes encoding for proline biosynthetic pathway (P5CS) and the bZIP transcription factor TF1 were negatively correlated with sucrose contents in sugarcane mature culm. The proline content was increased under water deficit condition, but was negatively correlated with sucrose concentration and suggested that proline has no osmoprotectant role in sugarcane [9]. Although the role of proline on osmotolerance remains controversial in plants, evaluation of transgenic sugarcane overexpressing heterologous
The glycine betaine (GB) is one of the compatible solutes and an amphoteric quaternary amine that is considered as the most compatible solute that plays an important role in protecting plants under environmental stress [5, 34]. The GB is synthesized by plants at various capacity, such as spinach and barley accumulate high of GB, whereas
Genetic transformation has a potential role to introduce a new trait in plant cell, including the introduction of new pathway for the biosynthesis of compatible solutes and resulting in transgenic plant with improved tolerance to environmental stress. There are many techniques for introducing a new gene into plant cell such as direct transformation using particle bombardments, micro injection or electroporation and indirect transformation using
3. Development of an efficient method for Agrobacterium -mediated transformation for sugarcane
The genetic improvement of sugarcane cultivars has been achieved to increase sugar productivity with the cultivars created by conventional breeding. The sugarcane (
Plant cell has a totipotency ability to regenerate and differentiate into whole plant that completed with leafs, stem and root. The totipotency ability has been used for plant multiplication or micropropagation by inducing meristematic plant tissue in the medium supplemented with plant growth regulator to produce somatic embryogenesis callus, which in turn regenerate into whole plants. In sugarcane, the somatic embryogenesis callus is produced by induction of meristematic leaf tissue on the MS (Murashige and Skoog) medium containing 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4 D), and the embryogenic callus is then regenerated into whole plant on the MS free hormone [37]. Thus, considerable effort has been expended to use this micropropagation technique for providing the demand of numerous sugarcane seed. However, the application of tissue culture through somatic embryogenesis induces somaclonal variation in sugarcane [38, 39] that causes variants of phenotype, although it will be reverted to original parental thereafter [38]. Moreover, the presence of somaclonal variation is frequently used to obtain new type of sugarcane cultivars such as resistance to Fiji disease and mildew [40] and resistance to eyespot disease [41]. Although there is wide diversity of the usage, the somatic embryogenesis has been widely used as a part in genetic transformation system for the improvement of sugarcane cultivars [35].
Micropropagation of sugarcane can be also performed by direct regeneration of both apical and axillary meristem buds. The regeneration from axillary buds reduces the somaclonal variation events and is routinely used for mass multiplication of sugarcane [42, 43]. However, axillary buds isolated from field grown sugarcane stalk were frequently contaminated with bacteria and should use unexpected strong sterilant such as mercury chloride (HgCl2) before cultured on MS media. Thus, the proper concentration should be carefully selected since this HgCl2 sterilant is extremely harmful. Alternatively,
Genetic transformation technology serves as a useful and practical tool to introduce particular traits for crop improvement. Several genetic transformation methods have been attempted for delivery and expression of transgenes in plants. First genetic transformation methods for sugarcane were developed by direct introduction of desired genes using electroporation [47], polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment [48], and particle bombardment [49]. These methods were considered less efficient compared to the indirect genetic transformation using
Genetic transformation system has been developed for sugarcane with distinct agronomically important traits, transformation methods, explant and culture condition. However, the use of

Figure 2.
Workflow of the
The achievement of the current sugarcane transformation technology still needs further development. A number of undetermined conditions such as DNA promoter that drives the gene expression, selectable marker,
Among the factors considered as limiting the recovery of transgenic plant is the involvement of selection marker in genetic transformation system. The selection of genetically transformed cell can be conducted through positive selection and negative selection. The positive selection is referred as those that promote the growth of transformed tissue and negative selection is the use selective agents, killing or fully inhibiting the growth of untransformed cell [63]. The use of gene for selectable marker in combination with targeted gene is directed to identify and allow surviving the transformed cell, and inhibit the growth of non-transformed cell in the media containing appropriate selective agents. Therefore, the use of selectable marker provides easy protocol to support proliferation of transformed cell and remove the un-transformed cell. Among the widely used selectable markers, the genes responsible for resistance of antibiotic kanamycin (
4. Genetic engineering of glycine betaine (GB) synthesis improves drought tolerance in sugarcane
Glycine betaine (
Glycine betaine is an osmoprotectant found in wide range of microorganisms, plants, and animals that are synthesized under various environmental stresses [5]. Glycine betaine is mainly synthesized from choline as the substrate through two-step reactions, dehydrogenation of choline, and oxygenation of betaine aldehyde (Figure 3). In higher plants, choline is converted by choline monoxygenase (CMO) to betaine aldehyde, and then converted into glycine betaine by betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) to GB [34, 86]. In microorganism and mammalian cells, GB is also synthesized by two-step pathway, but choline is converted to betaine aldehyde by choline dehydrogenase (CDH) and not by CMO, and then to GB by same BADH activity [34, 87]. In contrast, a single step-reaction catalyzed by choline oxidase (COD) for synthesis of GB is found in some microorganism such as

Figure 3.
The biosynthesis pathway of glycine betaine (GB) in microorganism and plant cells. Choline is oxidized to GB by two enzymes, choline monoxygenase (CMO) and betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) in plant cells. Depending on the species of microorganism, they operate two distinct pathways. In
The gene involved in the biochemical pathway can be used either to increase or diminish metabolite product by overexpressing or silencing the gene responsible for the metabolism. In the case of metabolite engineering of GB, the enzymes involved in the biochemical pathway have been focused as a potential target to engineer the content in the non-accumulator plants. For that reason, the genes encoding for the enzymes involved in pathway of GB biosynthesis have been cloned from various microorganisms and plants that accumulate GB. In microorganism, gene encoding CDH (
Genetic engineering of GB synthesis in plants has focused only with individual gene involved in the pathway of GB biosynthesis. The gene encoding COD from
Plant tolerance environmental stress should be achieved by genetic engineering of BADH since the enzyme acts oxidizing betaine aldehyde into GB. The betaine aldehyde is a toxic compound and should not be accumulated in the cell. Transgenic carrot (
Microorganism CDH is an useful enzyme for enhancing accumulation of GB into new species because the enzyme is able to catalyze in two reactions such as oxidation of choline to betaine aldehyde and also converting betaine aldehyde into GB [90, 109]. The purified recombinant CDH from
Several experiments on the effect of addition exogenous GB have been reported to improve sprouting sugarcane bud under heat and chilling stresses [113]. However, there is almost no report concerning accumulation of GB content in sugarcane. Therefore, enhancing GB synthesis with genetic engineering is considered to be a potential method for improving drought stress tolerance in sugarcane. The drought-tolerance transgenic sugarcane has been developed by introduction of
Genomic analysis by PCR (polymerase chain reaction) and Southern Blot confirmed the presence of stable insertion of

Figure 4.
Growth performance of drought-tolerant sugarcane overexpressed
To investigate the growth and productivity of transgenic sugarcane under water limited condition, the sugarcane was grown in non-irrigated dry land of experiment station. Cultivation of the transgenic sugarcane was carried out under confined and limited field trial system according to the regulation for assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMO). Comparison of the drought-tolerance transgenic sugarcane with the wild-type showed almost no difference in the germination of lateral buds and the initial growth rate. However, with the start of dry season, non-transgenic sugarcane showed retardation and elongation of stem. The internode of non-transgenic sugarcane becomes shorten during the dry season, but not the internode of transgenic sugarcane (Figure 4D, E). The internode of transgenic sugarcane was normally elongated at the similar size as expected and was not affected by dry season. The measurement of sugarcane yield of cane stalk significantly increased compared with non-transgenic plants, although the sucrose content was not different. Similar results were observed that drought-tolerance sugarcane lines have higher productivity stalk height and stalk weight than the susceptible line [116, 117]. In conclusion, all together the results showed that the transgenic sugarcane expression
The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (2000), which protects biological diversity from the potentially risk due to the use of transgenic plants, has been ratified by Indonesian government. Thus, for the commercialization of drought-tolerance sugarcane, biosafety assessment has been completed such as environmental safety, food, and feed safety. The environment safety assessment claimed that the drought-tolerance sugarcane has no effect on biodiversity, the occurrence of gene flow, and potentially to be an invasive crop. Bioinformatics BLASTP analysis suggested CDH protein encoded by
Acknowledgments
The author thanks Dr. Nurmalasari Darsono and Dr. Yudhi Rinanto for providing the experimental results, and also Suvia Widyaningrum and Intan Ria Neliana for their assistances. The authors also thank the PUSNAS 2017 - Research Grant and University of Jember for the support of funding.
References
- 1.
Ferreira THS, Tsunada MS, Bassi D, Araújo P, Mattiello L, Guidelli GV, et al. Sugarcane water stress tolerance mechanisms and its implications on developing biotechnology solutions. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8 :1-18. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01077/full - 2.
de Morais LK, de Aguiar MS, de Albuquerque e Silva P, Câmara TMM, Cursi DE, Júnior ARF, et al. Breeding of Sugarcane. In: Cruz VMV, Dierig DA, editors. Industrial Crops. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2015. pp. 29-42. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1447-0_2 - 3.
McIntyre CL, Jackson PA. Low level of selfing found in a sample of crosses in Australian sugarcane breeding programs. Euphytica. 2001; 117 (3):245-249 - 4.
Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2006; 58 (2):221-227. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl164 - 5.
Rhodes D, Hanson AD. Quaternary ammonium and tertiary sulfonium compounds in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 1993; 44 (1):357-384. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pp.44.060193.002041 - 6.
Ingram J, Bartels D. The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 1996; 47 (1):377-403 - 7.
Bray EA. Plant responses to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science. 1997; 2 (2):48-54. DOI: 10.1016/s1360-1385(97)82562-9 - 8.
Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene expression and signal transduction in water-stress response. Plant Physiology. 1997; 115 (2):327. DOI: 10.2307/4277903 - 9.
Iskandar HM, Casu RE, Fletcher AT, Schmidt S, Xu J, Maclean DJ, et al. Identification of drought-response genes and a study of their expression during sucrose accumulation and water deficit in sugarcane culms. BMC Plant Biology. 2011; 11 (1):12. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229 - 10.
Sugiharto B, Ermawati N, Mori H, Aoki K, Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Yamaya T, et al. Identification and characterization of a gene encoding drought-inducible protein localizing in the bundle sheath cell of sugarcane. Plant & Cell Physiology. 2002; 43 (3):350-354 - 11.
von Caemmerer S, Furbank RT. Strategies for improving C4 photosynthesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2016; 31 :125-134 - 12.
Lopes MS, Araus JL, van Heerden PDR, Foyer CH. Enhancing drought tolerance in C4 crops. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2011; 62 (9):3135-3153. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.04.003 - 13.
Bakrim N, Prioul J-L, Deleens E, Rocher J-P, Arrio-Dupont M, Vidal J, et al. Regulatory phosphorylation of C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (a cardinal event influencing the photosynthesis rate in sorghum and maize). Plant Physiology. 1993; 101 (3):891-897. DOI: 10.1104/pp.101.3.891 - 14.
Bastide B, Sipes D, Hann J, Ting IP. Effect of severe water stress on aspects of crassulacean acid metabolism in Xerosicyos. Plant Physiology. 1993; 103 (4):1089-1096. DOI: 10.2307/4275511 - 15.
Sugiharto B, Miyata K, Nakamoto H, Sasakawa H, Sugiyama T. Regulation of expression of carbon-assimilating enzymes by nitrogen in maize leaf. Plant Physiology. 1990; 92 (4):963-969 - 16.
Jeanneau M, Vidal J, AG DB, Lebouteiller M, Hodges D, Gerentes P, et al. Manipulating PEPC levels in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2002; 53 (376):1837-1845. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erf061 - 17.
Ghannoum O. C4 photosynthesis and water stress. Annals of Botany. 2008; 103 (4):635-644. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn093 - 18.
Robertson MJ, Inman-Bamber NG, Muchow RC, Wood AW. Physiology and productivity of sugarcane with early and mid-season water deficit. Field Crops Research. 1999; 64 (3):211-227. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4290(99)00042-8 - 19.
Inman-Bamber N. Sugarcane water stress criteria for irrigation and drying off. Field Crops Research. 2004; 89 (1):107-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.018 - 20.
Huber SC, Huber JL. Role and regulation of sucrose-phosphate synthase in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 1996; 47 (1):431-444. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.431 - 21.
Sugiharto B, Sato M, Tamura Y, Tanio M, Takagi H. Activities of carbon assimilating and sucrose metabolizing enzyme in different Saccharum species. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of SABRAO Tsukuba Japan, H-03 (CD-ROM); 2005 - 22.
Quick P, Siegl G, Neuhaus E, Feil R, Stitt M. Short-term water stress leads to a stimulation of sucrose synthesis by activating sucrose-phosphate synthase. Planta. 1989; 177 (4):535-546. DOI: 10.2307/23379756 - 23.
Fresneau C, Ghashghaie J, Cornic G. Drought effect on nitrate reductase and sucrose-phosphate synthase activities in wheat ( Triticum durum L.): Role of leaf internal CO2. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2007;58 (11):2983-2992. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm150 - 24.
Sugiharto B, Sakakibara H, Sumadi ST. Differential expression of two genes for sucrose-phosphate synthase in sugarcane: Molecular cloning of the cDNAs and comparative analysis of gene expression. Plant & Cell Physiology. 1997; 38 (8):961-965. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029258 - 25.
Worrell AC. Expression of a maize sucrose phosphate synthase in tomato alters leaf carbohydrate partitioning. The Plant Cell. 1991; 3 (10):1121-1130. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.3.10.1121 - 26.
Sawitri WD. Identification of chinese cabbage sentrin as a suppressor of bax-induced cell death in yeast. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012; 22 (5):600-606. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1109.09038 - 27.
Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2010; 48 (12):909-930. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 - 28.
Cia MC, Guimarães ACR, Medici LO, Chabregas SM, Azevedo RA. Antioxidant responses to water deficit by drought-tolerant and -sensitive sugarcane varieties: Water-deficit responses by sugarcane. The Annals of Applied Biology. 2012; 161 (3):313-324. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2012.00575.x - 29.
dos Santos CM, de Almeida Silva M. Physiological and biochemical responses of sugarcane to oxidative stress induced by water deficit and paraquat. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2015; 37 (8). DOI: 10.1007/s11738-015-1935-3 - 30.
Gill SS, Anjum NA, Hasanuzzaman M, Gill R, Trivedi DK, Ahmad I, et al. Glutathione and glutathione reductase: A boon in disguise for plant abiotic stress defense operations. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2013; 70 :204-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.05.032 - 31.
Chen TH, Murata N. Enhancement of tolerance of abiotic stress by metabolic engineering of betaines and other compatible solutes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2002; 5 (3):250-257. DOI: 10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00255-8 - 32.
Singh M, Kumar J, Singh S, Singh VP, Prasad SM. Roles of osmoprotectants in improving salinity and drought tolerance in plants: A review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology. 2015; 14 (3):407-426. DOI: 10.1007/s11157-015-9372-8 - 33.
Molinari HBC, Marur CJ, Filho JCB, Kobayashi AK, Pileggi M, Júnior RPL, et al. Osmotic adjustment in transgenic citrus rootstock Carrizo citrange ( Citrus sinensis Osb. XPoncirus trifoliata L. Raf.) overproducing proline. Plant Science. 2004;167 (6):1375-1381. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.07.007 - 34.
Sakamoto A, Murata N. The role of glycine betaine in the protection of plants from stress: Clues from transgenic plants. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2002; 25 (2):163-171. DOI: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00790.x - 35.
Bower R, Birch RG. Transgenic sugarcane plants via microprojectile bombardment. The Plant Journal. 1992; 2 (3):409-416. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.1992.00409.x - 36.
Lakshmanan P, Geijskes RJ, Aitken KS, Grof CLP, Bonnett GD, Smith GR. Sugarcane biotechnology: The challenges and opportunities. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant. 2005; 41 (4):345-363. DOI: 10.1079/IVP2005643 - 37.
Lee TSG. Micropropagation of sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture – PCTOC. 1987;10 :47-55 - 38.
Burner DM, Grisham MP. Induction and stability of phenotypic variation in sugarcane as affected by propagation procedure. Crop Science. 1995; 35 (3):875 - 39.
Hoy JW, Bischoff KP, Milligan SB, Gravois KA. Effect of tissue culture explant source on sugarcane yield components. Euphytica. 2003; 129 (2):237-240 - 40.
Krishnamurthi M, Tlaskal J. Fiji desease resistant Saccharum officinarum Var. Pindar subclones from tissue culture. Proceedings - International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. 1974;15 :130-137 - 41.
Mendoza EMT. Sugarcane biotechnology: Trends and prospects for the Philippine sugar industry. Philippine Journal of Crop Science. 2000; 25 (2):73-83 - 42.
Manickavasagam M, Ganapathi A, Anbazhagan VR, Sudhakar B, Selvaraj N, Vasudevan A, et al. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation and development of herbicide-resistant sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrids) using axillary buds. Plant Cell Rep. 2004; 23 :134-143. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-004-0794-y - 43.
Sugiharto B, Sato M, Tamura Y, Tanio M, Takagi H. Development of an efficient Agrobacterium – mediated transformation method in sugarcane. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of SABRAO Tsukuba Japan, 1-Ac (CD-ROM); 2005 - 44.
Lorenzo JC, González BL, Escalona M, Teisson C, Borroto C. Sugarcane shoot formation in an improved temporary immersion system. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 1998; 54 (3):197-200 - 45.
Biradar S, Biradar DP, Patil VC, Patil SS, Kambar NS. In vitro plant regeneration using shoot tip culture in commercial cultivar of sugarcane. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2009; 22 (1):21-24 - 46.
Saad AIM, Elshahed AM. Plant Tissue Culture Media. In: Leva A, editor. Recent advances in plant in vitro culture. Rijeka: InTech; 2012. DOI: 10.5772/50569 - 47.
Rathus C, Birch RG. Stable transformation of callus from electroporated sugarcane protoplasts. Plant Science. 1992; 82 (1):81-89. DOI: 10.1016/0168-9452(92)90010-j - 48.
Chen WH, Gartland KMA, Davey MR, Sotak R, Gartland JS, Mulligan BJ, et al. Transformation of sugarcane protoplasts by direct uptake of a selectable chimaeric gene. Plant Cell Reports. 1987; 6 (4):297-301. DOI: 10.1007/bf00272003 - 49.
Franks T, Birch RG. Gene transfer into intact sugarcane cells using microprojectile bombardment. Functional Plant Biology. 1991; 18 (5):471-480. DOI: 10.1071/pp9910471 - 50.
Dai S, Zheng P, Marmey P, Zhang S, Tian W, Chen S, et al. Comparative analysis of transgenic rice plants obtained by agrobacterium-mediated transformation and particle bombardment. Molecular Breeding. 2001; 7 (1):25-33 - 51.
Vaucheret H, Béclin C, Elmayan T, Feuerbach F, Godon C, Morel J-B, et al. Transgene-induced gene silencing in plants: Transgene-induced gene silencing. The Plant Journal. 1998; 16 (6):651-659. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00337.x - 52.
Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T. Efficient transformation of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) mediated by agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. The Plant Journal. 1994;6 (2):271-282. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1994.6020271.x - 53.
Ishida Y, Saito H, Ohta S, Hiei Y, Komari T, Kumashiro T. High efficiency transformation of maize ( Zea mays L.) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens . Nature Biotechnology. 1996;14 (6):745-750. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0696-745 - 54.
May GD, Afza R, Mason HS, Wiecko A, Novak FJ, Arntzen CJ. Generation of transgenic banana ( Musa acuminata ) plants via agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Nature Biotechnology. 1995;13 (5):486-492. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0595-486 - 55.
Frame BR. Agrobacterium tumefaciens -mediated transformation of maize embryos using a standard binary vector system. Plant Physiology. 2002;129 (1):13-22. DOI: 10.2307/4280434 - 56.
Enríquez-Obregón GA, Vázquez-Padrón RI, Prieto-Samsonov DL, Gustavo A, Selman-Housein G. Herbicide-resistant sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) plants by agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Planta. 1998;206 (1):20-27. DOI: 10.1007/s004250050369 - 57.
Arencibia AD, Carmona ER, Tellez P, Chan M-T, S-M Y, Trujillo LE, et al. An efficient protocol for sugarcane ( Saccharum spp. L.) transformation mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens . Transgenic Research. 1998;7 (3):213-222 - 58.
de la Riva GA, Gonzalez-Cabrera J, Vazquez-Padron R, Ayra-Pardo C. Agrobacterium tumefaciens : A natural tool for plant transformation. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 1998;1 (3):24-25. DOI: 10.2225/vol1-issue3-fulltext-1 - 59.
Elliott AR, Campbell JA, Brettell RIS, Grof CPL. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sugarcane using GFP as a screenable marker. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. 1998; 25 (6):739. DOI: 10.1071/pp98066 - 60.
Gallo-Meagher M, Irvine JE. Effects of tissue type and promoter strength on transient GUS expression in sugarcane following particle bombardment. Plant Cell Reports. 1993; 12 (12):666-670. DOI: 10.1007/bf00233416 - 61.
Gallo-Meagher M, Irvine JE. Herbicide resistant transgenic sugarcane plants containing the bar gene. Crop Science. 1996; 36 (5):1367. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600050047x - 62.
Liu D, Oard SV, Oard JH. High transgene expression levels in sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) driven by the rice ubiquitin promoter RUBQ2. Plant Science. 2003;165 (4):743-750. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9452(03)00234-6 - 63.
Miki B, McHugh S. Selectable marker genes in transgenic plants: Applications, alternatives and biosafety. Journal of Biotechnology. 2004; 107 (3):193-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.10.011 - 64.
Wilmink A, Dons JJM. Selective agents and marker genes for use in transformation of monocotyledonous plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 1993; 11 (2):165-185. DOI: 10.1007/bf02670474 - 65.
Hauptmann RM, Vasil V, Ozias-Akins P, Tabaeizadeh Z, Rogers SG, Fraley RT, et al. Evaluation of selectable markers for obtaining stable transformants in the gramineae. Plant Physiology. 1988; 86 (2):602-606. DOI: 10.1104/pp.86.2.602 - 66.
Torregrosa L, Lopez G, Bouquet A. Antibiotic sensitivity of grapevine: A comparison between the effect of hygromycin and kanamycin on shoot development of transgenic 110 richter rootstock ( Vitis Berlandieri xVitis rupestris ). South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 2017;21 (1):32-39 - 67.
Twyman RM, Stöger E, Kohli A, Capell T, Christou P. Selectable and screenable markers for rice transformation. In: testing for genetic manipulation in plants. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2002. p. 1-17 - 68.
Lin YJ, Zhang Q. Optimising the tissue culture conditions for high efficiency transformation of indica rice. Plant Cell Reports. 2005; 23 (8):540-547. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-004-0843-6 - 69.
Que Q, Elumalai S, Li X, Zhong H, Nalapalli S, Schweiner M, et al. Maize transformation technology development for commercial event generation. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2014; 5 . DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00379/abstract - 70.
Sreeramanan S, Maziah M, Abdullah MP, Rosli NM, Xavier R. Potential selectable marker for genetic transformation in banana. Biotechnology. 2006; 5 (2):189-197. DOI: 10.3923/biotech.2006.189.197 - 71.
Rathore KS, Chowdhury VK, Hodges TK. Use of bar as a selectable marker gene and for the production of herbicide-resistant rice plants from protoplasts. Plant Molecular Biology. 1993; 21 (5):871-884. DOI: 10.1007/bf00027118 - 72.
Long D, Wu X, Yang Z, Lenk I, Nielsen KK, Gao C. Comparison of three selectable marker genes for transformation of tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) plants by particle bombardment. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant. 2011;47 (6):658-666. DOI: 10.1007/s11627-011-9382-3 - 73.
Parveez GKA, Majid NA, Zainal A, Rasid OA. Determination of minimal inhibitory concentration of selection agents for selecting transformed immature embryos of oil palm. Asia-Pacific Journal of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. 2007; 15 (3):133-146 - 74.
Joyce P, Kuwahata M, Turner N, Lakshmanan P. Selection system and co-cultivation medium are important determinants of agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sugarcane. Plant Cell Reports. 2010; 29 (2):173-183. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-009-0810-3 - 75.
Bakhsh A, Anayol E, Ozcan S. Comparison of transformation efficiency of five Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains inNicotiana tabacum L. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture. 2014;26 (3):259. DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.v26i3.16437 - 76.
Ahmadpour R, Zare N, Asghari-Zakaria R, Sheikhzadeh P. Enhancement of agrobacterium-mediated transformation efficiency in immature embryo of Triticum aestivum , cv Arya. Iranian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding. 2015;4 (1):45-53 - 77.
Yadav S, Sharma P, Srivastava A, Desai P, Shrivastava N. Strain specific agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Bacopa monnieri . Journal, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology. 2014;12 (2):89-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2014.11.003 - 78.
Chetty VJ, Ceballos N, Garcia D, Narváez-Vásquez J, Lopez W, Orozco-Cárdenas ML. Evaluation of four Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains for the genetic transformation of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivar micro-tom. Plant Cell Reports. 2013;32 (2):239-247. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-012-1358-1 - 79.
Wei T. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and assessment of factors influencing transgene expression in loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.). Cell Research. 2001;11 (3):237-243. DOI: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290092 - 80.
Jin S, Zhang X, Nie Y, Guo X, Huang C. Factors affecting transformation efficiency of embryogenic callus of upland cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum ) withAgrobacterium tumefaciens . Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2005;81 (2):229-237. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-004-5209-9 - 81.
Gorham J. Betaines in higher plants – Biosynthesis and role in stress metabolism. In: Wallsgrove RM, editor. Amino Acids and their Derivatives in Higher Plants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995. pp. 173-204. DOI: 10.1017 /CBO9780511721809.013 - 82.
Kishitani S, Watanabe K, Yasuda S, Arakawa K, Takabe T. Accumulation of glycinebetaine during cold acclimation and freezing tolerance in leaves of winter and spring barley plants. Plant, Cell & Environment. 1994; 17 (1):89-95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00269.x - 83.
Bohnert HJ, Nelson DE, Jensen RG. Adaptations to environmental stresses. The Plant Cell. 1995; 7 (7):1099 - 84.
Yang X, Lu C. Photosynthesis is improved by exogenous glycinebetaine in salt-stressed maize plants. Physiologia Plantarum. 2005; 124 (3):343-352. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00518.x - 85.
Ashraf M, Foolad MR. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007; 59 (2):206-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006 - 86.
Sakamoto A, Murata N. The use of bacterial choline oxidase, a glycinebetaine-synthesizing enzyme, to create stress-resistant transgenic plants. Plant Physiology. 2001; 125 (1):180-188. DOI: 10.2307/4279641 - 87.
Khan MS, Yu X, Kikuchi A, Asahina M, Watanabe KN. Genetic engineering of glycine betaine biosynthesis to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Biotechnology. 2009; 26 (1):125-134 - 88.
Ikuta S, Imamura S, Misaki H, Horiuti Y. Purification and characterization of choline oxidase from Arthrobacter globiformis . Journal of Biochemistry (Tokyo). 1977;82 (6):1741-1749 - 89.
Nyyssölä A, Kerovuo J, Kaukinen P, von Weymarn N, Reinikainen T. Extreme halophiles synthesize betaine from glycine by methylation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 2000; 275 (29):22196-22201. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m910111199 - 90.
Landfald B, Strøm AR. Choline-glycine betaine pathway confers a high level of osmotic tolerance in Escherichia coli . Journal of Bacteriology. 1986;165 (3):849-855. DOI: 10.1128/jb.165.3.849-855.1986 - 91.
Andresen PA, Kaasen I, Styrvold OB, Boulnois G. Molecular cloning, physical mapping and expression of the bet genes governing the osmoregulatory choline-glycine betaine pathway of Escherichia coli . Microbiology. 1988;134 (6):1737-1746. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-134-6-1737 - 92.
Gadda G, McAllister-Wilkins EE. Cloning, expression, and purification of choline dehydrogenase from the moderate halophile Halomonas elongata . Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2003;69 (4):2126-2132. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69 - 93.
Rozwadowski KL, Khachatourians GG, Selvaraj G. Choline oxidase, a catabolic enzyme in Arthrobacter pascens, facilitates adaptation to osmotic stress in Escherichia coli . Journal of Bacteriology. 1991;173 (2):472-478. DOI: 10.1128/jb.173.2.472-478.1991 - 94.
Deshnium P, Los DA, Hayashi H, Mustardy L, Murata N. Transformation of Synechococcus with a gene for choline oxidase enhances tolerance to salt stress. Plant Molecular Biology. 1995; 29 (5):897-907. DOI: 10.1007/bf00014964 - 95.
Rathinasabapathi B. Metabolic engineering for stress tolerance: Installing osmoprotectant synthesis pathways. Annals of Botany. 2000; 86 (4):709-716. DOI: 10.1006/anbo.2000.1254 - 96.
Russell BL, Rathinasabapathi B, Hanson AD. Osmotic stress induces expression of choline monooxygenase in sugar beet and amaranth. American Society of Plant Biologists – ASPB. 1998; 116 :859-865. DOI: 10.2307/4278159 - 97.
Sakamoto A, Murata N. Genetic engineering of glycinebetaine synthesis in plants: Current status and implications for enhancement of stress tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2000; 51 (342):81-88 - 98.
Quan R, Shang M, Zhang H, Zhao Y, Zhang J. Engineering of enhanced glycine betaine synthesis improves drought tolerance in maize: Glycine betaine improves maize drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2004; 2 (6):477-486. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2004.00093.x - 99.
Hayashi H, Alia ML, Deshnium P, Ida M, Murata N. Transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana with the codA gene for choline oxidase; accumulation of glycinebetaine and enhanced tolerance to salt and cold stress. The Plant Journal. 1997;12 (1):133-142. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.12010133.x - 100.
Hayashi H. Alia, Sakamoto a, nonaka H, Chen THH, Murata N. Enhanced germination under high-salt conditions of seeds of transgenic Arabidopsis with a bacterial gene (codA) for choline oxidase. Journal of Plant Research. 1998; 111 (2):357-362 - 101.
Sakamoto A, Murata AN. Metabolic engineering of rice leading to biosynthesis of glycinebetaine and tolerance to salt and cold. Plant Molecular Biology. 1998; 38 (6):1011-1019. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006095015717 - 102.
Huang J, Hirji R, Adam L, Rozwadowski KL, Hammerlindl JK, Keller WA, et al. Genetic engineering of glycinebetaine production toward enhancing stress tolerance in plants: Metabolic limitations. Plant Physiology. 2000; 122 (3):747-756 - 103.
Nuccio ML, Russell BL, Nolte KD, Rathinasabapathi B, Gage DA, Hanson AD. The endogenous choline supply limits glycine betaine synthesis in transgenic tobacco expressing choline monooxygenase. The Plant Journal. 1998; 16 (4):487-496. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00316.x - 104.
Shirasawa K, Takabe T, Takabe T, Kishitani S. Accumulation of glycinebetaine in rice plants that overexpress choline monooxygenase from spinach and evaluation of their tolerance to abiotic stress. Annals of Botany. 2006; 98 (3):565-571. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl126 - 105.
Kumar S. Plastid-expressed betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene in carrot cultured cells, roots, and leaves confers enhanced salt tolerance. Plant Physiology. 2004; 136 (1):2843-2854. DOI: 10.2307/4356634 - 106.
Rathinasabapathi B, McCue K, Gage D, Hanson A. Metabolic engineering of glycine betaine synthesis: Plant betaine aldehyde dehydrogenases lacking typical transit peptides are targeted to tobacco chloroplasts where they confer betaine aldehyde resistance. Planta. 1994; 193 (2). DOI: 10.1007/BF00192524 - 107.
Ishitani M, Nakamura T, Han SY, Takabe T. Expression of the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene in barley in response to osmotic stress and abscisic acid. Plant Molecular Biology. 1995; 27 (2):307-315. DOI: 10.1007/bf00020185 - 108.
Sakamoto A, Valverde R, Alia CTHH, Murata N. Transformation of Arabidopsis with the codA gene for choline oxidase enhances freezing tolerance of plants. The Plant Journal. 2000; 22 (5):449-453. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00749.x - 109.
Cánovas D, Vargas C, Kneip S, Morón M-J, Ventosa A, Bremer E, et al. Genes for the synthesis of the osmoprotectant glycine betaine from choline in the moderately halophilic bacterium Halomonas elongata DSM 3043. Microbiology. 2000;146 (2):455-463. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-146-2-455 - 110.
Lilius G, Holmberg N, Bülow L. Enhanced NaCl stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco expressing bacterial choline dehydrogenase. Nature Biotechnology. 1996; 14 (2):177-180. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0296-177 - 111.
Saneoka H, Nagasaka C, Hahn DT, Yang WJ, Premachandra GS, Joly RJ, et al. Salt tolerance of glycinebetaine-deficient and –containing maize lines. Plant Physiology. 1995; 107 (2):631-638 - 112.
Lv S, Yang A, Zhang K, Wang L, Zhang J. Increase of glycinebetaine synthesis improves drought tolerance in cotton. Molecular Breeding. 2007; 20 (3):233-248. DOI: 10.1007/s11032-007-9086-x - 113.
Rasheed R, Wahid A, Farooq M, Hussain I, Basra SMA. Role of proline and glycinebetaine pretreatments in improving heat tolerance of sprouting sugarcane ( Saccharum sp.) buds. Plant Growth Regulation. 2011;65 (1):35-45. DOI: 10.1007/s10725-011-9572-3 - 114.
Smith DM, Inman-Bamber NG, Thorburn PJ. Growth and function of the sugarcane root system. Field Crops Research. 2005; 92 :169-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.017 - 115.
Jangpromma N, Thammasirirak S, Jaisil P, Songsri P. Effects of drought and recovery from drought stress on above ground and root growth, and water use efficiency in sugarcane (‘ Saccharum officinarum’ L.). Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2012;6 (8):1298 - 116.
de Silva MA, da Silva JAG, Enciso J, Sharma V, Jifon J. Yield components as indicators of drought tolerance of sugarcane. Science in Agriculture. 2008; 65 (6):620-627. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-90162008000600008 - 117.
Machado RS, Ribeiro RV, Marchiori PER, Machado DFSP, Machado EC, de Landell MGA. Biometric and physiological responses to water deficit in sugarcane at different phenological stages. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2009; 44 (12):1575-1582. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2009001200003 - 118.
Waltz E. Beating the heat. Nature Biotechnology. 2014; 32 (7):610-613