Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Wave Propagation in Porous Materials

Written By

Zine El Abiddine Fellah, Mohamed Fellah, Claude Depollier, Erick Ogam and Farid G. Mitri

Submitted: June 7th, 2017 Reviewed: November 6th, 2017 Published: December 20th, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72215

Chapter metrics overview

1,547 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


This chapter provides different models for the acoustic wave propagation in porous materials having a rigid and an elastic frames. The direct problem of reflection and transmission of acoustic waves by a slab of porous material is studied. The inverse problem is solved using experimental reflected and transmitted signals. Both high- and low-frequency domains are studied. Different acoustic methods are proposed for measuring physical parameters describing the acoustic propagation as porosity, tortuosity, viscous and thermal characteristic length, and flow resistivity. Some advantages and perspectives of this method are discussed.


  • acoustic porous materials
  • porosity
  • tortuosity
  • viscous and thermal charactertistic lengths
  • fractional derivatives

1. Introduction

More than 50 years ago, Biot [1, 2] proposed a semi-phenomenological theory which provides a rigorous description of the propagation of acoustic waves in porous media saturated by a compressible viscous fluid. Due to its very general and rather fundamental character, it has been applied in various fields of acoustics such as geophysics, underwater acoustics, seismology, ultrasonic characterization of bones, etc. Biot’s theory describes the motion of the solid and the fluid, as well as the coupling between the two phases. The loss of acoustic energy is due mainly to the viscosity of the fluid and the relative fluid-structure movement. The model predicts that the acoustic attenuation, as well as the speed of sound, depends on the frequency and elastic constants of the porous material, as well as porosity, tortuosity, permeability, etc. The theory predicts two compressional waves: a fast wave, where the fluid and solid move in phase, and a slow wave where fluid and solid move out of phase. Johnson et al. [3] introduced the concept of tortuosity or dynamic permeability which has better described the viscous losses between fluid and structure in both high and low frequencies.

Air-saturated porous materials such as plastic foams or fibrous materials are widely used in passive control and noise reduction. These materials have interesting acoustic properties for sound absorption, and their use is quite common in the building trade and automotive and aeronautical fields. The determination of the physical parameters of the medium from reflected and transmitted experimental data is a classical inverse scattering problem.

Pulse propagation in porous media is usually modeled by synthesizing the signal via a Fourier transform of the continuous wave results. On the other hand, experimental measurements are usually carried out using pulses of finite bandwidth. Therefore, direct modeling in the time domain is highly desirable [410]. The temporal and frequency approaches are complementary for studying the propagation of acoustic signals. For transient signals, the temporal approach is the most appropriate because it is closer to the experimental reality and the finite duration of the signal. However, for monochromatic harmonic signals, the frequency approach is the most suitable [11].

Fractional calculus has been used in the past by many authors as an empirical method to describe the viscoelastic properties of materials (e.g., see Caputo [12] and Bagley and Torvik [13]). The fact that acoustic attenuation, stiffness, and damping in porous materials are proportional to the fractional powers of frequency [4, 5, 7, 9, 10] suggests that fractional-order time derivatives could describe the propagation of acoustic waves in these materials.

In this chapter, acoustic wave propagation in porous media is studied in the high- and the low-frequency range. The direct and inverse scattering problems are solved for the mechanical characterization of the medium. The general Biot model applied to porous materials having elastic structure is treated, and also the equivalent fluid model, used for air-saturated porous materials ( Figures 1 and 2 ).

Figure 1.

Air-saturated plastic foam.

Figure 2.

Human cancellous bone sample.


2. Porous materials with elastic frame

In porous media, the equations of motion of the frame and fluid are given by the Euler equations applied to the Lagrangian density. Here, uand Uare the displacements of the solid and fluid phases. The equations of motion are given by [1, 2]


where P, Q, and Rare the generalized elastic constants, φis the porosity, Kfis the bulk modulus of the pore fluid, Ksis the bulk modulus of the elastic solid, and Kbis the bulk modulus of the porous skeletal frame. Nis the shear modulus of the composite as well as that of the skeletal frame. The equations which explicitly relate P, Q, and Rto φ, Kf, Ks, Kb, and Nare given by


ρmnis the “mass coefficients” which are related to the densities of solid (ρs) and fluid (ρf) phases by


The Young modulus and the Poisson ratio of the solid Esand νsand of the skeletal frame Eband νbdepend on the generalized elastic constant P, Q, and Rvia the relations:


The mass coupling parameter ρ12between the fluid and solid phases is always negative:


where αis the tortuosity of the medium. The damping of the acoustic wave in porous material is essentially due to the viscous exchanges between the fluid and the structure. To express the viscous losses, the dynamic tortuosity is introduced [3] αωgiven by


where j2=1, ωis the angular frequency, σis the fluid resistivity, k0is the viscous permeability, and Λis the viscous characteristic length given by Johnson et al. [3]. The ratio of the sizes of the pores to the viscous skin depth thickness δ=2η/ωρ01/2gives an estimation of the parts of the fluid affected by the viscous exchanges. In this domain of the fluid, the velocity distribution is perturbed by the frictional forces at the interface between the viscous fluid and the motionless structure. At high frequencies, the viscous skin thickness is very thin near the radius of the pore r. The viscous exchanges are concentrated in a small volume near the surface of the frame δ/r1. The expression of the dynamic tortuosity αωis given by [3]


The range of frequencies such that viscous skin thickness δ=2η/ωρ01/2is much larger than the radius of the pores r


is called the low-frequency range. For these frequencies, the viscous forces are important everywhere in the fluid. When ω0, the expression of the dynamic tortuosity becomes


α0is the low-frequency approximation of the tortuosity introduced by Lafarge in [14] and Norris [15]:


where vris the microscopic velocity. The angle brackets represent the average of the random variable over the sample of material. In the time domain, and in the high-frequency domain, the dynamic tortuosity (Eq. 7) αωacts as the operator, and its expression is given by [8]


δtis the Dirac function. In this model the time convolution of t1/2with a function is interpreted as a semi-derivative operator according to the definition of the fractional derivative of order νgiven by Samko et al. [16]:


where 0ν<1and Γxis the gamma function. A fractional derivative acts as a convolution integral operator and no longer represents the local variations of the function. The properties of fractional derivatives and fractional calculus are given by Samko et al. [16].

The introduction of the tortuosity operator α˜t(Eq. 11) in Biot’s Eqs. (1) and (2) to describe the inertial and viscous interactions between fluid and structure will express the propagation equations in the time domain. When α˜tis used instead of αin Eqs. (1) and (2), the equations of motion (1) and (2) will be written as [17]


In these equations, the temporal operators ρ˜11t, ρ˜12t, and ρ˜22trepresent the mass coupling operators between the fluid and solid phases and are given by


where α˜tis given by Eq. (11).

The wave equations of dilatational and rotational waves can be obtained using scalar and vector displacement potentials, respectively. Two scalar potentials for the frame and the fluid, Φsand Φf, are defined for compressional waves giving


where A=2φρfαΛηρf, Δis the Laplacian, and 3/2t3/2represents the fractional derivative following the definition given by Eq. (12).

Two distinct longitudinal modes called fast and slow waves are obtained by the resolution of the eigenvalue problem of the matrix of Biot (Eq. (14)). On a basis of fast and slow waves Φ1tand Φ2t, one can have


where λ˜1tand λ˜2tare the “eigenvalue operators” of the Biot matrix (Eq. (14)). Their expressions are given by


Their corresponding eigenvectors are






Coefficients R, P, and Qare given by


The fast and slow waves Φ1and Φ2are obeying to the following propagation equations along the xaxis:


where the coefficients vi, hii=12, and dare constants, respectively, given by




where Eq. (18) is a fractional propagation equations [17] in time domain of the fast and slow waves, respectively. These equations describe the attenuation and the spreading of the temporal signal propagating inside the porous material. These fractional propagation equations have been solved and well-studied in the case of rigid porous materials using the equivalent fluid model.


3. Porous materials with rigid frame

In the acoustics of porous media, two situations can be distinguished: elastic and rigid frame materials. In the first case, the Biot [1, 2] theory is best suited. In the second case, the acoustic wave cannot vibrate the structure. The equivalent fluid model is then used, in which the acoustic wave propagates inside the saturating fluid [8, 11]. The equations for the acoustics in the equivalent fluid model are given by


In these relations, pis the acoustic pressure. The first equation is the Euler equation, and the second one is a constitutive equation obtained from the equation of mass conservation associated with the behavior (or adiabatic) equation. These equations can be obtained from the Biot Eqs. (1, 2) by canceling the solid displacement. Assuming that the porous medium studied is homogeneous and has a linear elasticity, we obtain easily the following wave equation (propagation along the xaxis) for the acoustic pressure in a lossless porous material:


In Eq. (20), the viscous and thermal losses that contribute to the sound damping in acoustic materials are not described. The thermal exchanges are generally negligible near viscous effects in the porous materials obeying to the Biot theory, this is not the case for air-saturated porous materials using the equivalent fluid model. To take into account the fluid-structure exchanges, the density and compressibility of the fluid are “renormalized” by the dynamic tortuosity αωand the dynamic compressibility βω, via the relations ρραωand KfKf/βω, giving the following wave equation in frequency domain (Helmholtz equation) for a lossy porous material:


The thermal exchanges to the fluid compressions-dilatations are produced by the wave motion. The parts of the fluid affected by the thermal exchanges can be estimated by the ratio of a microscopic characteristic length of thermal skin depth thickness δ=2η/ωρPr1/2(ηis the fluid viscosity; Pris the Prandtl number).

The expression of the dynamic compressibility is given by


where γis the adiabatic constant, the magnitude k0introduced by Lafarge [14] called thermal permeability by analogy to the viscous permeability, and Λis the thermal characteristic length. The low-frequency approximation of βω[14] is given by


where k0, which has the same size (area) that of Darcy’s permeability of k0, is a parameter analogous to the parameter k0but is adapted to the thermal problem.

In a high-frequency limit, Allard and Champoux [18] showed the following behavior of βω:


Replacing αωand βωgiven by Eqs (18) in Eq. (21), we obtain the following lossy equation for porous materials in the high-frequency domain:


In the time domain (using the convention /t), we obtain the following fractional propagation equation:


In this equation, the term 3/2pxtt3/2is interpreted as a semi-derivative operator following the definition of the fractional derivative of order ν, given by Samko and coll. [16]. The solution of the wave Eq. (26) with suitable initial and boundary conditions is by using the Laplace transform. Fis the medium’s Green function [9] given by




where hτξhas the following form:



and Δ=b2.

Let us consider a homogeneous porous material which occupies the region 0xL; the expressions of the reflection and transmission coefficients in the frequency domain are given by




These expressions are simplified by taking into account the reflections at the interfaces x=0and x=L; the expressions of the reflection and transmission operators are given in time domain by


where δtis the Dirac function and Fis the Green function of the medium given by Eq. (27). In the next sections, we will use the reflected and transmitted waves for solving the inverse problem in order to characterize the porous materials.

3.1. Ultrasonic measurement of porosity, tortuosity, and viscous and thermal characteristic lengths via transmitted waves

The experimental setup consists of two transducers broadband Ultran NCT202 with a central frequency of 190 kHz in air and a bandwidth of 6 dB extending from 150 to 230 kHz [19]. A pulser/receiver 5058PR Panametrics sends pulses of 400 V. The high-frequency noise is avoided by filtering the received signals above 1 MHz. Electronic interference is eliminated by 1000 acquisition averages. The experimental setup is shown in Figure 3 . The inverse problem is to find the parameters α, φ, Λ, and Λwhich minimize numerically the discrepancy function UαφΛΛ=i=1i=Npexptxtiptxti2,wherein pexptxtii=1,2,nis the discrete set of values of the experimental transmitted signal and ptxtii=1,2,nis the discrete set of values of the simulated transmitted signal predicted from Eq. (33). The least squares method is used for solving the inverse problem using the simplex search method (Nelder-Mead) [20] which does not require numerical or analytic gradients.

Figure 3.

Experimental setup of the ultrasonic measurements.

Consider a sample of plastic foam M1, of thicknesses 0.8±0.01cm. Sample M1 was characterized using classic methods [2131] and gave the following physical parameters φ=0.85±0.05, α=1.45±0.05, Λ=30±1μm, and Λ=60±3μm. Figure 4 shows the experimental incident signal (dashed line) generated by the transducer and the experimental transmitted signal (solid line). After solving the inverse problem simultaneously for the porosity φ, tortuosity α, and viscous and thermal characteristic lengths Λand Λ, we find the following optimized values: φ=0.87±0.01, α=1.45±0.01, Λ=32.6±0.5μm, and Λ=60±0.5μm. The values of the inverted parameters are close to those obtained by conventional methods [2131]. We present in Figures 5 and 6 the variation of the minimization function Uwith the porosity, tortuosity, viscous characteristic length, and the ratio between Λand Λ. In Figure 7 , we show a comparison between an experimental transmitted signal and simulated transmitted signal for the optimized values of φ, α, Λ, and Λ. The difference between the two curves is small, which leads us to conclude that the optimized values of the physical parameters are correct.

Figure 4.

Experimental incident signal (solid line) and experimental transmitted signal (dashed line).

Figure 5.

Variation of the minimization functionUwith porosity and tortuosity.

Figure 6.

Variation of the cost functionUwith the viscous characteristic lengthΛand the ratioΛ/Λ.

Figure 7.

Comparison between the experimental transmitted signal (black dashed line) and the simulated transmitted signals (black line) using the reconstructed values ofϕ,α,Λ, andΛ.

3.2. Measuring flow resistivity of porous material via acoustic reflected waves at low-frequency domain

In the low-frequency domain, the viscous forces are important everywhere in all the fluid saturating the porous material. The thermal exchanges between fluid and structure are favored by the slowness of the cycle of expansion and compression in the material. The temperature of the frame is practically unchanged by the passage of the sound wave because of the high value of its specific heat: the frame acts as a thermostat; the isothermal compressibility is directly applicable. In this domain, the viscous skin thickness δ=2η/ωρ01/2is much larger than the radius of the pores r


We consider the low-frequency approximations of the response factor αωand βω. When ω0, Eqs. (22) and (6), respectively, become


For a wave traveling along the direction ox, the generalized forms of the basic Eqs. (19) in the time domain are now


where the Euler equation is reduced to Darcy’s law which defines the static flow resistivity σ=η/k0. The wave equation in time domain is given by


The fields which are varying in time, the pressure, the acoustic velocity, etc. follow a diffusion equation with the diffusion constant:


The diffusion constant Dis connected to Darcy’s constant k0(called also the viscous permeability) by the relation


where ηis the fluid viscosity.

The expression of the reflection coefficient Rzin Laplace domain (put z=for obtaining the frequency domain of Rω), is given by [32]


The development of these expressions in exponential series leads to the reflection coefficient:


The multiple reflections in the material are taken into account in these expressions. As the attenuation is high in the porous materials, the multiple reflection effects are negligible. Let us consider the reflections at the interfaces x=0and x=L:


The reflection scattering operator is calculated by taking the inverse Laplace transform of the reflection coefficient.

We infer [32] that


where erf is the error function. By putting


we obtain


Using the relation


which with the variable change u/B=y, yields


The reflection scattering operator is then given by


3.2.1. Acoustic parameter sensitivity

Consider a sample of porous material having a physical parameters that correspond to quite common acoustic materials, as follows: thickness L=4cm, porosity φ=0.9, flow resistivity σ=30000Nm4s, and radius of the pore r=70μm. Let us study the sensitivity of the main parameters using numerical simulations of waves reflected by a porous material. Fifty percent variation is applied to the physical parameters (flow resistivity σand porosity φ).

To obtain the simulated reflected waves, we use the incident signal given in Figure 8 (dashed line). The result (reflected wave) is the wave given in the same figure ( Figure 8 ) in solid line. The spectra of the two waves (incident and reflected) are given in Figure 9 . From Figure 8 , we can see that there is just an attenuation of the reflected wave without dispersion, since the two waves have the same spectral bandwidth ( Figure 9 ). Figure 8 shows the results obtained after reducing flow resistivity by 50%of its initial value. The wave in dashed line corresponds to the simulated reflected signal for σ=30000Nm4sand the second one (solid line) to σ=15000Nm4s. The values of the porosity φ=0.9and thickness L=4cmhave been kept constant. When the flow resistivity is reduced, the amplitude of reflected wave decreases by 30% of its initial value. Physically, by reducing the flow resistivity, the medium is less resistive, since the viscous effects become less important in the porous material, and thus the amplitude of the reflected wave decreases. No change is observed in the reflected wave when reducing the porosity by 50%of its initial value. We can conclude that the porosity has no significant sensitivity in reflected mode.

Figure 8.

Incident signal (dashed line) and simulated reflected signal (solid line).

Figure 9.

Spectrum of incident signal (dashed line) and spectrum of reflected signal (solid line).

For the propagation of transient signals at low frequency, a guide (pipe) [32], having a diameter of 5 cm and of length 50 m, is chosen. The pipe can be rolled without perturbations on experimental signals (the cutoff frequency of the tube fc4kHz). The same microphone (Brüel & Kjær, 4190) is used for measuring the incident and reflected signals. Burst is provided by synthesized function generator Stanford Research Systems model DS345-30 MHz. A sound source driver unit “Brand” constituted by loudspeaker Realistic 40-9000 is used. The incident signal is measured by putting a total reflector in the same position than the porous sample. The experimental setup is shown in Figure 10 . Consider a cylindrical sample of plastic foam M1 of flow resistivity value σ=40000±6000Nm4s. This value is obtained using the method of Bies and Hansen [33]. The sample M1 has a diameter of 5 cm and a thickness of 3 cm. Figure 11 shows the experimental incident wave (solid line) generated by the loudspeaker in the frequency bandwidth (35–75) Hz, and the experimental reflected signal (dashed line), with their spectra. There is no dispersion, since the two signals have practically the same bandwidth. The minimization of the function Ugives the solution if the inverse problem:


where pexprxtii=1,2,Nand prxtii=1,2,Nrepresent the discrete set of values of the experimental reflected signal and of the simulated reflected signal, respectively. The optimized value of σ=40500±2000Nm4sis obtained by solving the inverse problem. The variation of the minimization function Uwith the flow resistivity σis given in Figure 12 . A comparison between experiment and theory is given in Figure 13 . The difference between theory and experiment is slight, which leads us to conclude that the optimized value of the flow resistivity is good.

Figure 10.

Experimental setup of acoustic measurements.

Figure 11.

Experimental incident signal (solid line) and experimental reflected signal (dashed line), and their spectra, respectively.

Figure 12.

Variation of the minimization functionUwith flow resistivityσ.

Figure 13.

Comparison between experimental reflected signal (dashed line) and simulated reflected signal (solid line) for the sample M1.

This alternative acoustic method has the advantage of being simple and effective since it requires the use of only one microphone and therefore no calibration problem. In addition, this approach is different from conventional methods (Bies and Hansen [33]) that involve the use of fluid flow measurement techniques and pressure differences. The mathematical analysis of the reflected wave at low frequency is quite simple, because this wave is not propagative in the medium but simply diffusive (having the same frequency band with the incident signal). The wave reflected by the resistive materials has the advantage of being easily detectable experimentally compared to the transmitted wave.


4. Conclusion

Acoustic propagation in porous media involves a large number of physical parameters when the structure is elastic. This number is reduced when the structure is rigid, because the mechanical part does not intervene and thus remains only the acoustic part. The study of high and low frequencies separately solves the inverse problem and characterizes the porous materials in the domain of influence of the physical parameters. The proposed methods are simple and effective and allow an acoustic characterization of porous materials using transmitted or reflected experimental waves.


  1. 1. Biot MA. The theory of propagation of elastic waves in fluid-saturated porous solid. I. Low frequency range. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1956;28:168
  2. 2. Biot MA. The theory of propagation of elastic waves in fluid-saturated porous solid. I. Higher frequency range. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1956;28:179
  3. 3. Johnson DL, Koplik J, Dashen R. Theory of dynamic permeability and tortuosity in fluid-saturated porous media. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1987;176:379-402
  4. 4. Szabo TL. Time domain wave equations for lossy media obeying a frequency power law. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1994;96:491
  5. 5. Szabo TL. Causal theories and data for acoustic attenuation obeying a frequency power law. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1995;97:14
  6. 6. Norton V, Novarini JC. Including dispersion and attenuation directly in time domain for wave propagation in isotropic media. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2003;113:3024
  7. 7. Chen W, Holm S. Modified Szabo’s wave equation models for lossy media obeying frequency power law. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2003;113:3024
  8. 8. Fellah ZEA, Depollier C. Transient acoustic wave propagation in rigid porous media: A time domain approach. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2000;107(2):683-688
  9. 9. Fellah ZEA, Fellah M, Lauriks W, Depollier C, Angel Y, Chapelon JY. Solution in time domain of ultrasonic propagation equation in porous material. Wave Motion. 2003;38:151-163
  10. 10. Fellah ZEA, Depollier C, Fellah M. Direct and inverse scattering problem in porous material having a rigid frame by fractional calculus based method. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2001;244(2):359-366
  11. 11. Allard JF. Propagation of Sound in Porous Media : Modeling Sound Absorbing Materials. London: Chapman and Hall; 1993
  12. 12. Caputo M. Vibration of an infinite plate with a frequency dependent Q. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1976;60:634-639
  13. 13. Bagley RL, Torvik PJ. On the fractional calculus model of viscoelastic behavior. Journal of Rheology. 1983;30:133-155
  14. 14. Lafarge D, Lemarnier P, Allard JF, Tarnow V. Dynamic compressibility of air in porous structures at audible frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1996;102:4
  15. 15. Norris AN. On the viscodynamic operator in Biot’s equations of poroelasticity. Journal of Wave-Material Interaction. 1986;1:365-380
  16. 16. Samko SG, Kilbas AA, Marichev OI. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives Theory and Applications. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers; 1993
  17. 17. Fellah M, Fellah ZEA, Mitr FG, Ogam E, Depollier C. Transient ultrasound propagation in porous media using biot theory and fractional calculus: Application to human cancellous bone. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2013;133(4):683-688
  18. 18. Allard JF, Champoux Y. New empirical equations for sound propagation in rigid frame fibrous materials. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1992;91:3346-3353
  19. 19. Fellah ZEA, Sadouki M, Fellah M, Mitri FG, Ogam E, Depollier C. Simultaneous determination of porosity, tortuosity, viscous and thermal characteristic lengths of rigid porous materials. Journal of Applied Physics. 2013;114:204902-204905
  20. 20. Lagarias JC, Reeds JA, Wright MH, Wright PE. Convergence properties of the Nelder–mead simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM Journal on Optimization. 1998;9:112Ű147
  21. 21. Leclaire P, Kelders L, Lauriks W, Glorieux C, Thoen J. Determination of the viscous characteristic length in air-filled porous materials by ultrasonic attenuation measurements. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1996;99:1944
  22. 22. Ayrault C, Moussatov A, Castagnède B, Lafarge D. Ultrasonic characterization of plastic foams via measurements with static pressure variations. Applied Physics Letters. 1999;74:3224
  23. 23. Moussatov A, Ayrault C, Castagnède B. Porous material characterization ultrasonic method for estimation of tortuosity and characteristic length using a barometric chamber. Ultrasonics. 2001;39:195
  24. 24. Leclaire P, Kelders L, Lauriks W, Brown NR, Melon M, Castagnède B. Determination of viscous and thermal characteristic lengths of plastic foams by ultrasonic measurements in helium and air. Journal of Applied Physics. 1996;80:2009
  25. 25. Fellah ZEA, Depollier C, Berger S, Lauriks W, Trompette P, Chapelon JY. Determination of transport parameters in air saturated porous materials via ultrasonic reflected waves. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2003;113(5):2561-2569
  26. 26. Fellah ZEA, Berger S, Lauriks W, Depollier C, Chapelon JY. Inverse problem in air-saturated porous media via reflected waves. Review of Scientific Instruments. 2003;74(5):2871
  27. 27. Fellah ZEA, Berger S, Lauriks W, Depollier C, Aristégui C, Chapelon JY. Measuring the porosity and the tortuosity of porous materials via reflected waves at oblique incidence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2003;113(5):2424
  28. 28. Fellah ZEA, Berger S, Lauriks W, Depollier C, Trompette P, Chapelon JY. Ultrasonic measuring of the porosity and tortuosity of air- saturated random packings of beads. Journal of Applied Physics. 2003;93:9352
  29. 29. Fellah ZEA, Mitri FG, Depollier D, Berger S, Lauriks W, Chapelon JY. Characterization of porous materials having a rigid frame via reflected waves. Journal of Applied Physics. 2003;94:7914
  30. 30. Fellah ZEA, Berger S, Lauriks W, Depollier C, Fellah M. Measurement of the porosity of porous materials having a rigid frame via reflected waves : A time domain analysis with fractional derivatives. Journal of Applied Physics. 2003;93:296
  31. 31. Fellah ZEA, Mitri FG, Fellah M, Ogam E, Depollier C. Ultrasonic characterization of porous absorbing materials: Inverse problem. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2007;302:746-759
  32. 32. Sebaa N, Fellah ZEA, Fellah M, Lauriks W, Depollier C. Measuring flow resistivity of porous material via acoustic reflected waves. Journal of Applied Physics. 2005;98:084901
  33. 33. Bies DA, Hansen CH. Flow resistance information for acoustical design. Applied Acoustics. 1980;13:357-391

Written By

Zine El Abiddine Fellah, Mohamed Fellah, Claude Depollier, Erick Ogam and Farid G. Mitri

Submitted: June 7th, 2017 Reviewed: November 6th, 2017 Published: December 20th, 2017