Pseudo–first-order rate constants,
Abstract
The reactions of four tetrakis(arylisocyanide)cobalt(II) complexes, [Co(CNR)4(ClO4)2] {R = 2,6-Me2C6H3 (A), 2,4,6-Me3C6H2 (B), 2,6-Et2C6H3 (C), and 2,6-iPr2C6H3 (D)}, with two pyridines, 4-CNpy and 4-Mepy, have been kinetically studied in trifluoroethanol medium. Each of the reactions, which was monitored over a temperature range of 293 to 318 K, exhibited two distinct processes proposed to be an initial fast substitution process followed by a slow reduction process. For each pyridine, steric hindrance was observed to play a significant role in the rates of the reactions, which decrease with increasing size of the arylisocyanide ligand in the order k(A) > k(B) > k(C) > k(D). Addition of each of three triarylphosphines, PR3 (R = Ph, C6H4Me-p, C6H4OMe-p), to solutions of pentakis(t-octylisocyanide)cobalt(II), [Co(CNC8H17-t)5](ClO4)2, resulted in a shift in the λmax of the electronic spectrum accompanied by a change in color of the solutions. The shift is attributed to ligand substitution. The reactions of the cobalt(II) complex [Co(CNC8H17-t)5]2+ with the triarylphosphines are proposed to proceed via a combination of substitution, reduction, and disproportionation mechanisms with final formation of disubstituted Co(I) complexes. The order of reactivity of the complex with the triarylphosphines was found to be P(C6H4OMe-p)3 > P(C6H4Me-p)3 > PPh3. This order is explained in terms of the electron donating/π-acceptor properties of the phosphines.
Keywords
- substitution
- redox
- organoisocyanide
- cobalt(II)
- kinetics
- mechanisms
1. Introduction
Although isocyanides (C≡N-R) are versatile ligands in organometallic chemistry, their roles and applications in chemical systems have always been overshadowed by those of the CO ligand [1, 2]. Isocyanides show stronger σ-donor and weaker π-acceptor character which can be tuned by the substituent R and the complex fragment to which they are coordinated. The metal fragment has a substantial influence on the reactivity and stability of coordinated isocyanide ligands. Isocyanides form metal-ligand π-bonds by the back donation of electrons from the filled dπ orbitals of the metal center to the empty π* orbitals of the isocyanide ligand. Phosphine ligands on their part are phosphorus based, and they exhibit synergic interactions when they bond to metal centers. Phosphines (PR3) utilize the
Early studies on alkylisocyanide and arylisocyanide cobalt(II) complexes dating back to the sixties showed that while some of these complexes were reported as cobalt(II) dimers, a number of monomeric pentacoordinate cobalt(II) complexes were also reported [6, 11]. Reactions of cobalt(II)alkylisocyanide complexes with triarylphosphines have been studied and characterized as ligand substitution/reduction [10] with most reactions giving corresponding disubstituted five coordinate cobalt(I) complexes as final products, while the reactions of the cobalt(II) complexes with triarylarsines resulted in initial substitution, which at least in one case was accompanied by oxidation of the ligand to triarylarsine oxide and that of the cobalt(II) to cobalt(III) [12]. Spectra studies on these complexes suggested that some of them produce tetragonal structures in the solid state, while solution decomposition leads to tetrahedral geometry.
The five-coordinate alkylisocyanide complexes were known to generally react with tertiary phosphines to produce reduction/ligand substitution products of the type [Co(CNR)3(PR’3)2]X, X = ClO4 or BF4 [13–15], exceptions being reactions with tri-n-alkylphosphines, which led to disproportionation/ligand substitution products of the types [Co(CNR)3(PR’3)2]X and [Co(CNR)3(PR’3)2]X3, X = ClO4, BF4 [13–15]. On the other hand, the five-coordinate arylisocyanide cobalt(II) complexes can react with tertiary phosphines to give monosubstituted cobalt(I) products of the type [Co(CNR)4(PR’3)]X or di-substituted cobalt(I) products of the type [Co(CNR)3(PR’3)2]X depending principally on the level of steric hindrance in the arylisocyanide ligand [7, 16–20].
Conversely, triarylarsine ligands react with five-coordinate alkylisocyanide cobalt(II) complexes to produce primarily ligand-substituted six-coordinate Co(II) complexes of the type trans-[Co(CNR)4(AsR’3)2]X2, X = ClO4, BF4; PR’3 = AsPh3, As(C6H4Me-p)3 [21]; although the Co(III) complex, [Co(CNCH2Ph)4{OAs(C4H4Me-P)3}2](BF4)3, has also been observed [12].
Apart from the many pentakis(arylisocyanide)cobalt(II) complexes that have been prepared, the synthesis and characterization of a number of tetrakis(arylisocyanide)bis(perchlorato)cobalt(II) complexes have also been reported [4, 22–24]. Earlier studies showed that these pentakis and tetrakis cobalt(II) complexes react with amines to undergo reduction to their corresponding cobalt(I) complexes of the general formula [Co(CNR)5]X. In some cases, when R was sufficiently bulky, e.g. R = CHMe2, CMe3 and C6H3iPr2, six-coordinate disubstituted intermediates like [Co(CNR)4(py)2](ClO4)2 were isolated [25–27]. It has also been observed that arylisocyanide cobalt(II) complexes are reduced in the presence of free arylisocyanide ligands or coordinating anions [6].
Reactions of cobalt(II) perchlorate hexahydrate with t-octylisocyanide, CNCMe2CH2CMe3, in absolute ethanol are said to be different from known reactions of the same cobalt(II) salt with other alkylisocyanides but rather similar to reactions with arylisocyanide in which the monomeric five-coordinate complex is formed [28] according to the equation

Unlike octahedral transition metal complexes, the formation, stability, and mechanistic behavior of five-coordinate square pyramidal or trigonal bipyramidal first row transition metal complexes have received significantly less attention. Such five-coordinate complexes can exhibit substantially different ligand substitution/redox behavior.
Some isocyano analogues of [Co(CO)4] in the −1, 0, and +1 oxidation states were synthesized a few years back [29] using m-terphenyl isocyanide as the stabilizing ligand. The same ligand was later employed in the synthesis of the isocyano counterpart of HCo(CO)4 followed by a study of its decomposition and catalytic hydrogenation [30]. Figueroa and co-workers [31] most recently synthesized some isocyanide palladium(0) complexes as catalysts for the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling of aryl bromides and arylboronic acids.
Despite the extensive information on the synthesis and characterization of these organoisocyanide cobalt(II) complexes, little is known about kinetic studies on their substitution/reduction reactions. This chapter reports the kinetic studies on the substitution and redox reactions of two pyridines with some six-coordinate
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and syntheses of complexes
RNCHO, R = 2,6-Et2C6H3, 2,6-Me2C6H3, 2,6-iPr2C6H3 and 2,4,6-Me3C6H2, were prepared from commercial RNH2 (Aldrich) and formic acid as described by McKusick and Webster [32]. These formamides were then used in the syntheses of the organoisocyanides. Co(ClO4)2.6H2O was obtained commercially from Strem Chemicals. Anhydrous diethyl ether was filtered through an alumina column before use and the
2.2. Instrumentation
IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer 2000 FTIR spectrophotometer over the range 4000 to 400 cm−1. Samples of the tetrakis(arylisocyanide)cobalt(II) complexes were prepared and run as Nujol mulls on NaCl plates or solution spectra over the range 3000 to 1000 cm−1. The solutions from the reactions of Pyridine with the complexes in CF3CH2OH were used in their original state after the reaction was complete. Pyridine-CF3CH2OH mixture was used for background subtraction. Solution electronic spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-2501PC spectrophotometer equipped with a Peltier TC 240A temperature regulator attachment over the range 1100–200 nm. Carbon, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen elemental analyses were performed on a Vario EL CHNOS Elemental Analyzer. Kinetic measurements were obtained from the Shimadzu spectrophotometer for the relatively slow reactions and a Hi-tech scientific SF-61 DX2 single mixing stopped-flow spectrophotometer for the fast reactions.
2.3. Kinetics
Kinetic measurements were taken on the Shimadzu UV-Vis spectrophotometer mentioned earlier for the slow reactions as well as on the stopped-flow spectrophotometer for the fast reactions. The cell compartments for both instruments were well thermostatted for constant temperature measurements between the temperatures of 293 and 318 K. This was done using the TC-240A temperature controller with the UV-Vis spectrophotometer, while water was circulated from a Neslab RTE 7 thermocirculator to the cell compartment of the stopped-flow equipment. Prior to kinetic measurements, the stabilities of the
The kinetics were followed under pseudo-first-order conditions with the pyridines in concentrations which were 10 times or more greater than those of the
3. Conclusion
3.1. Kinetic studies
3.1.1. Reactions of the four tetrakis(arylisocyanide)cobalt(II) complexes A, B, C, and D with pyridines
All absorbance decay curves obtained while monitoring the reactions between the pyridines and the

Figure 1.
Typical absorbance decay curve for the reduction of [Co(CNC6H3Et2)4(ClO4)2] complex by 4-CNpy at 298 K.
It was also noticed that on addition of each pyridine, an immediate change from green to a nearly colorless solution (substitution) followed by slow development of a deep yellow solution (reduction), which persisted at the end of the reactions was observed. Repeated scans of the visible spectra on addition of each pyridine also showed a bathochromic shift of d-d transition by about 20 to 35 nm (Figure 2). This shift can be attributed to the substitution of the solvent molecules from the Co(II) inner shell by the incoming pyridine ligand (Eq. 2).

Figure 2.
Spectral changes of a [Co(CNC6H4Et2-2,6)4(ClO4)2] solution in trifluoroethanol on addition of pyridine at 298 K.

Similar observations have been reported by Becker [8, 21] in his work on the synthesis of some organoisocyanide cobalt(II) complexes as well as by other authors [34–37] in their investigations on reactions of cobalt(II) protoporphyrin complexes with amine ligands. The reduction of the
As explained earlier, the fast process was followed using stopped-flow techniques, while the slow process was followed using the conventional ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry. Linear regression plots were used for the determination of the pseudo first-order rate constants. For convenience, we use
103[4-CNpy], M | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | |
3.30 | 21.9 | 18.9 | 16.4 | 12.2 |
4.63 | 23.8 | 21.0 | 18.2 | 12.9 |
6.61 | 27.1 | 23.2 | 19.7 | 15.7 |
7.60 | 28.7 | 24.6 | 21.3 | 16.3 |
9.25 | 30.9 | 27.0 | 23.1 | 17.6 |
12.14 | 38.6 | 32.9 | 27.5 | 20.4 |
15.18 | 40.2 | 34.3 | 29.8 | 24.5 |
19.80 | 48.1 | 40.7 | 35.1 | 28.1 |
16.6 | 14.8 | 12.7 | 8.7 | |
1610 | 1331 | 1143 | 992 |
Table 1.

Figure 3.
Plots of observed rate constants (
For pyridine, the corresponding
The data fit well to the rate law described by the following equation:

This is consistent with octahedral substitution involving a two-step ligand-ligand replacement, according to the following mechanism:


where
From plots of
104[4-Mepy], M | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | |
3.30 | 29.9 | 27.3 | 23.6 | 20.8 |
4.63 | 34.2 | 30.8 | 26.5 | 23.3 |
6.61 | 39.1 | 34.2 | 29.5 | 26.0 |
7.60 | 43.1 | 36.1 | 31.6 | 27.9 |
9.25 | 47.6 | 39.8 | 34.2 | 30.1 |
12.14 | 55.1 | 45.0 | 39.3 | 34.2 |
15.18 | 66.0 | 52.6 | 43.6 | 37.5 |
19.80 | 78.9 | 61.5 | 52.0 | 44.9 |
19.80 | 2.59 | 1.33 | 0.35 | 0.162 |
19.2 | 17.1 | 15.1 | 8.3 | |
1720 | 1550 | 1430 | 1030 | |
21.0 | 20.6 | 18.4 | 16.6 | |
29,751 | 20,652 | 16,909 | 14,213 |
Table 2.
Pseudo–first-order rate constants,
In contrast, the slow reduction processes exhibited different kinetic behavior as compared to the substitution process. Plots of

Figure 4.
Plots of ks′ against concentration of 4-CNpy for the reduction of the four cobalt(II) complexes at 298 K.

giving the rate law:

Rearrangement of Eq. 5 gives

Values of
103[4-CNpy], M | 105 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | |
3.30 | 1.23 | 0.67 | 0.24 | 0.079 |
4.63 | 1.44 | 0.85 | 0.27 | 0.094 |
6.61 | 1.90 | 0.94 | 0.30 | 0.106 |
7.60 | 1.98 | 1.08 | 0.31 | 0.112 |
9.25 | 2.20 | 1.13 | 0.33 | 0.131 |
12.14 | 2.27 | 1.24 | 0.34 | 0.138 |
15.18 | 2.43 | 1.29 | 0.35 | 0.150 |
164.2 | 195.3 | 260.9 | 209.2 | |
3.49 | 1.74 | 0.398 | 0.198 |
Table 3.
Pseudo–first-order rate constants,
A | B | C | D | |
---|---|---|---|---|
19.2 | 17.1 | 15.1 | 8.3 | |
1720 | 1550 | 1430 | 1030 |
Table 4.
For the reactions of the three pyridines under similar conditions, our results show that while 4-CNpy reacted at a slower rate than pyridine, 4-Mepy reacted at a faster rate. This observation can be explained in terms of the basicity of the amines. The CN group is an electron withdrawing substituent and therefore reduces the electron density of the pyridine ring, making 4-CNpy a weaker electron donor and hence less basic than pyridine. On the other hand, the methyl substituent on pyridine increases the electron density of the ring such that 4-Mepy is a better electron donor and a more basic amine than pyridine. Since ligands usually coordinate to metal centers by acting as Lewis bases donating lone pairs of electrons to the empty metal d-orbitals, more basic amines will be better coordinating ligands and will form more stable complexes as compared to less basic amines. This can be used to explain the higher reactivity of 4-Mepy and lower reactivity of 4-CNpy when they are compared to pyridine.
3.1.2. Reaction of [Co(CNC8H17-t)5](ClO4)2 complex with triphenylphosphine in dichloromethane
Addition of PPh3 to solutions of the

Figure 5.
Typical repeated scans of the reaction of [co(CNC8H17-t)5]2+ with PPh3 in CH2Cl2 at 298 K.
When the reaction of [Co(CNC8H17-t)5]2+ with PPh3 was monitored at a fixed wavelength on the UV-VIS spectrophotometer over a period of 1 to 3 hours, some complex kinetics were observed as shown in Figure 6. Different attempts made to analyze the data did not yield any meaningful result. Repeated infrared scans were then employed to probe further insight into the mechanism of the reactions.

Figure 6.
Typical absorbance decay curve for the reaction of [Co(CNCHMe2)5]2+ with PPh3 at 880 nm.
Stopped-flow kinetic trace for the substitution process between [Co(CNC8H17-t)5](ClO4)2 and PPh3 showed a perfect fit to a single exponential function (Figure 7), showing a first order dependence on the Co(II) complex.

Figure 7.
Typical kinetic trace for the reaction between [Co(CNC8H17-t)5]2+ and PPh3 fitted to a single exponential function.
The observed rate constants, ks, were found to increase with concentration of PPh3 and plots of ks against [PPh3] were linear with nonzero intercepts, with a first-order dependence on triphenylphosphine. This result is consistent with the following rate law:

This is similar to the rate law reported for the substitution reaction between freshly prepared solution of [Co(CNC8H17-t)5]2+ and PPh3 where it was suggested that the substitution process involved a solvent-assisted replacement of one isocyanide ligand with PPh3 [46]. However, the stale solutions in this study substitutes at slower rates. For example, while the second order rate constant for the substitution of the isocyanide ligand by PPh3 in the freshly prepared solution at 298 K was 943 M−1 s−1, the rate constant for the stale solution was 782 M−1 s−1. It is suggested that the stale solutions contain solvent molecules in their coordination shells as a cobalt(II) intermediate before undergoing substitution of one isocyanide ligand by PPh3.
Attempts to analyze the complex kinetic traces did not yield meaningful results, and therefore, infrared studies were employed in an effort to probe further insight into the mechanism of the reactions. The repeated infrared scan taken over a period of 3 hours for reactions of solutions of the Co(II) complex with PPh3 show gradual disappearance of the Co(II) peak just as the Co(I) peak became more intense. Twelve hours after the reaction between the t-octyl Co(II) complex and PPh3 started, the infrared spectra of the reaction mixture showed the isocyanide stretching frequencies largely associated with pentakis Co(I) isocyanide complexes as well as some peaks characteristic of mono- and di-substituted Co(II) and the starting Co(II) complex. This observation is an indication of a slow reaction between [Co(CNC8H17-t)5]2+ and PPh3 probably involving some multistep processes including pre-equilibria. This is similar to what was obtained with freshly prepared solutions of [Co(CNC8H17-t)5]2+ and an indication of similar reaction mechanisms, which could include the following reaction pathways:



3.1.3. Reaction of [Co(CNC8H17-t)5]2+ complex with tri(p-tolyl)phosphine and tris(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphine
When P(C6H4Me-p)3 and P(C6H4OMe-
Infrared spectra taken at different time intervals show that there was fast reduction of the Co(II) complex to Co(I) as strong peaks of the Co(I) complexes appear immediately after addition of these phosphines. Furthermore, the reactions of the two phosphines with stale solutions of the Co(II) complex also resulted in disproportionation reactions. This is evidenced by the observed infrared peaks due to the Co(III) and Co(I) analogues of the Co(II) complex with the di-substituted Co(III) complex, showing its characteristic isocyanide stretching frequency at 2234 cm−1 and its Co(I) analogue at 2063 cm−1 (Figure 8). Earlier studies had recorded similar observation in the reactions of some alkylisocyanide cobalt(II) complexes with tri-(p-tolyl)phosphine and 2-furylphosphine [47, 48].

Figure 8.
Isocyanide stretching frequencies for the reaction between stale [Co(CNC8H17-t)5 and tris(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphine at different time intervals (A–F).
Among the possible processes that take place in these reactions are:




Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to University of Botswana Research Committee for funding.
References
- 1.
Han Y, Huynh HV. Dalton Transactions. 2009;(12):2201 - 2.
Slaughter LM. Inorganic Chemistry Communications. 2008; 29 :46 - 3.
Bodner GM. Inorganic Chemistry. 1975; 14 :2694 - 4.
Becker CAL. Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic and Metal-Organic Chemistry. 1992; 22 (4):437 - 5.
Becker CAL, Sebobi GS, Simane NT. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 2002; 334 :327 - 6.
Malatesta L, Bonati F. Isocyanide Complexes of Metals. New York, Chapter 7 and references therein: John Wiley; 1969 - 7.
Becker CAL. Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic and Metal-Organic Chemistry. 1979; 9 :445 - 8.
Becker CAL. Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic and Metal-Organic Chemistry. 1992; 22 :99 - 9.
Becker CAL, Motladiile S. Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic and Metal-Organic Chemistry. 2001; 31 (9):1545 - 10.
Becker CAL. Journal of Coordination Chemistry. 2000; 50 :89 - 11.
Cotton FA, Dunne TG, Wood JS. Inorganic Chemistry. 1964; 3 :1495 - 12.
Becker CAL. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 1993; 203 :175 - 13.
Becker CAL, Al-Qallaf SA, Cooper JC. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 1991; 188 :99 - 14.
Becker CAL, Biswas MAS, Cooper JC. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 1991; 188 :191 - 15.
Becker CAL, Biswas MAS. Journal of Coordination Chemistry. 1993; 29 :227 - 16.
Dart JW, Lloyd ML, Mason R, McCleverty JA, Williams J. Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions. 1973:1747 - 17.
Bordignon E, Croatto U, Mazzi U, Orio AA. Inorganic Chemistry. 1974; 13 :935 - 18.
Otsuka S, Rossi M. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan. 1973; 46 :3411 - 19.
Becker CAL. Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry. 1980; 42 :27 - 20.
Becker CAL, Homsy NK. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 1984; 89 :93 - 21.
Becker CAL. Journal of Coordination Chemistry. 1994; 31 :337 - 22.
Becker CAL, Cooper JC. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 1989; 158 :141 - 23.
Becker CAL. Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic and Metal-Organic Chemistry. 1995; 25 :1455 - 24.
Oyetunji OA, Paphane BD, Becker CAL. Transition Metal Chemistry. 2006; 31 :951 - 25.
Becker CAL, Odisitse S. Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic and Metal-Organic Chemistry. 2000; 30 :1547 - 26.
Becker CAL. Journal of Coordination Chemistry. 1992; 26 :231 - 27.
Becker CAL, Biswas MAS. Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic and Metal-Organic Chemistry. 1995; 25 :269 - 28.
Becker CAL, Ramotadima O, Makono VB, Baipoledi KC, Ahmad J. Journal of Coordination Chemistry. 2008; iFirst :1 - 29.
Margulieux GW, Weidermann N, Lacy DC, Moore CE, Rheingold AL, Figueroa JS. Journal of American Chemical Society. 2010; 132 (14):5033 - 30.
Carpenter AE, Rheingold AL, Figueroa JS. Organometallics. 2016; 35 (14):2309 - 31.
Barnett BR, Labios LA, Stauber JM, Moore CE, Rheingold AL, Figueroa JS. Organometallics. 2017; 36 (4):944 - 32.
McKusick BC and Webster OW, Organic Syntheses, vol. 41, Wiley, New York, 1961, pg 102–103 - 33.
Becker CAL, Cooper JC. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 1991; 182 :25 - 34.
Pavlovic D, Asperger S, Domi B. Journal of the Chemical Society Dalton Transactions. 1986:2535 - 35.
Stynes DV, Stynes HC, James BR, Ibers JA. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1973; 95 :1796 - 36.
Datta-Gupta N. Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry. 1972; 33 :419 - 37.
Dokuzovic Z, Ahmeti X, Pavlovic D, Murati I, Asperger S. Inorganic Chemistry. 1982; 21 :1576 - 38.
Becker CAL, Davis BL. Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry. 1977; 39 :781 - 39.
Becker CAL. Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry. 1975; 37 :703 - 40.
Becker CAL. Journal of Coordination Chemistry. 1993; 29 :147 - 41.
Spillane WJ, Hogan G, McGrath P, King J. Journal of the Chemical Society Dalton Transactions. 1998; 2 :309 - 42.
Ojo J, Ige J, Ogunlusi G, Owoyomi O, Olaseni E. Transition Metal Chemistry. 2006; 31 :337 - 43.
King RB, Saran MS. Inorganic Chemistry. 1972; 11 (9):2112 - 44.
Becker CAL, Anisi A, Myer G, Wright JD. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 1986; 111 (1):11 - 45.
Albertin G, Bordignon E, Orio AA, Rizzardi G. Inorganic Chemistry. 1975; 14 (4):944 - 46.
Oyetunji OA, Ramokongwa G, Becker CAL. Journal of Coordination Chemistry. 2013; 66 :2489 - 47.
Becker CAL. Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic and Metal-Organic Chemistry. 1998; 28 (7):1145 - 48.
Sweigart DA, Cooper DE, Millican JM. Inorganic Chemistry. 1974; 13 :1272