Various carbon materials and their physical properties.
Among the various kinds of fuel cell, polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) is the most prominent energy conversion device for portable applications. The catalyst-supporting materials provide active triple phase boundary for electrochemical reactions where the reactant molecules can easily interact with the catalyst surface. Catalysts play a vital role for improving the overall efficiency of the fuel cells through the advancement in the catalyst and their supporting materials for cathodic oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in PEMFCs. The supporting materials mainly contribute to increase the electrocatalytic activity of the catalysts by providing more active surface area and extended life-time. The major roles of supporting materials are (i) they act as electron source with improved conductivity; (ii) they hold the metal nanoparticles; (iii) they possess higher surface area and (iv) they should have better stability under operating conditions. In this chapter, the various supporting materials were reviewed carefully based on their nature and performance toward the electrochemical reduction of oxygen for PEMFCs. They are classified into three major categories as (i) carbon supports; (ii) carbon-free supports, and (iii) polymer nanocomposites. In summary, the overall view on support materials and their role on electrocatalysis for fuel cell reactions is provided.
- oxygen reduction reaction
- carbon supports
- clay minerals
- metal oxides
- support-free catalysts
In order to move toward a sustainable existence in our extreme energy-dependent society, there is a convincing need to adopt environmentally sustainable methods for energy production, storage, and conversion . A significant task is being placed to produce power without damaging our ecological system. The fossil fuels such as coal and petroleum products are nonrenewable, and burning of these fuels increases the level of pollution and leads to global warming. Nowadays, many eco-friendly alternatives are explored as possible renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, tidal, and hydrothermal power but can be availed only at a particular climatic season. Till date, the internal combustion engines (ICEs) are used as major energy source to meet the global energy demand in wide range of applications . ICEs are involved in the conversion of heat energy to mechanical energy and further used to generate the electrical energy, and this combustion process emits harmful greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), etc. The limited availability of fossil fuels and emission of pollutant gases propel the search of alternative and sustainable clean energy sources [1, 2, 3].
Among the various alternative energy sources, fuel cell is the most reliable choice with efficient energy conversion technology which converts chemical energy into an electrical energy through electrochemical reactions namely anodic oxidation and cathodic reduction reactions. Fuel cells are clean energy conversion device, where the oxidant and reductant are continuously supplied to produce electricity, unlike primary batteries that contain pre-packed chemical components. Fuel cells can provide long-term solutions as sustainable and efficient energy conversion devices with minimum or zero emission of greenhouse gases . Significant environmental benefits are expected on fuel cells, particularly for automobile sector and power generation for stationary and portable applications.
Basically, fuel cell is an electrochemical cell, which continuously converts the chemical energy of a fuel and an oxidant to electrical energy in an electrode-electrolyte system, designed for continuous feeding of reactants at a high temperature in the presence of an electrocatalyst to catalyze the oxidation and reduction reactions .
(i) Hydrogen at the anode undergoes oxidation to form protons as shown below.
(ii) Oxygen at the cathode undergoes reduction to from water as given below .
Generally, pure hydrogen, methanol, ethanol, etc., can be taken as a fuel that can be oxidized at the anode, while the oxygen or air is taken as the oxidant and get reduced at the cathode. Here, the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) has sluggish reaction kinetics due to a complex multistep reaction mechanism, which can be catalyzed by electrocatalysts. Electrocatalysts are mostly the metal nanoparticles embedded or decorated over the supporting materials, which provide uniform dispersion to the metal nanoparticles, stability by physical intact, higher surface area, and good electron/proton conductivity that helps to construct three phase boundary. This chapter deals about the role and importance of advanced supporting materials such as various kind of carbon materials, noncarbonaceous supports like inorganic materials, and conductive polymeric supports for cathodic oxygen reduction in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs).
2. Types of fuel cells
Fuel cells are classified in many ways as direct and indirect fuel cells based on operating temperature, the state of matter of the elements of the fuel cell, and the type of electrolyte used. As shown in Figure 1, the fuel cells are classified based on their operating temperature such as low-temperature fuel cells and high-temperature fuel cells. Proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC), direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC), and alkaline fuel cell (AFC) are placed under the category of low-temperature fuel cells.
Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC), and phosphoric acid fuel cell (PAFC) are placed under the category of high-temperature fuel cells. Among this classification, PEMFCs are more attractive and reliable than other fuel cells due to the wide range of application, high efficiency, and near zero emission of pollutants, and it could be a basic system for DMFC and AFC. The alkaline or acidic solutions are used as electrolytes in fuel cells called
3. Proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC)
The proton exchange membrane fuel cell also known as the polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell works at typically less than 100°C with special polymer electrolyte membranes. This lower temperature fuel cell is the preferred choice for transportation vehicles, portable applications like hand held devices because of its quick start-up, low operating temperature, and excellent energy efficiency. The electrolyte in this fuel cell is an ion exchange membrane—perfluorinated sulfonic acid polymer—commercially sold as Nafion, a good proton-conducting ionomer [5, 9]. The only byproduct in this fuel cell is water, and the water management in the PEMFC is critical for efficient performance. The fuel cell must operate under conditions where the byproduct water does not evaporate faster than it is produced, because the membrane should be kept under hydrated conditions.
Figure 2 shows the schematic representation of cross sectional view of PEMFC. The low operation temperature of PEMFC requires active electrocatalysts such as Pt. The hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR) is relatively facile and requires low Pt loading of ca. 0.05 mg/cm2 . However, the oxygen reduction is sluggish, and the rate of ORR is most critical at the cathode and requires more active element like platinum (Pt). Typically, the carbon-supported Pt nanoparticles (Pt/C) having ~2–3 nm size and high Pt surface area (~100 m2/g) is ideal to enhance the reaction rate. Although the use of Pt/C is preferred compared to other catalysts due to the acid resistant property of Pt, corrosion of carbon support and the loss of expensive electrocatalyst push the research community to find the other alternative solutions in terms of advanced supporting materials to increase the activity by higher surface area and life time of Pt, Pt-M alloy, and non-n Pt catalysts without compromising the fuel cell efficiency .
Among the fuel cells, PEMFCs have got huge attention due to
high energy conversion efficiency,
low operating temperature (around 100°C),
almost zero emission of pollutants with water as the only byproduct, and
can be used for automobile applications because of its portability and easy to operation.
Although PEMFC has many advantages as stated above, the wide spread usage and commercialization are not realized due to the
(i) The direct 4-electron transfer reduction reaction to H2O.
(ii) The parallel 2-electron transfer reduction reaction to form H2O2.
4. Catalyst supports
Catalysts are supported on high surface area materials which are playing a major role to increase electrochemically active surface area of electrocatalysts by providing uniform dispersion and accessibility of active sites for fuel cell reactions. The electrocatalyst with active surface area must be intact directly with electronic and ionic conducting materials, and hence, it is named as
5. Carbon supports
Carbon materials are widely employed catalyst support for energy applications, and its multidimensional structure provides high electrical conductivity and surface area with greater chemical and electrochemical stability. Carbon supports are the major choice of catalyst support for fuel cell reactions in both anode and cathode electrocatalysts to conduct electrons and heat in [20, 21]. A common choice of carbon support material is Vulcan Carbon XC-72 (VC, BET specific surface area 254 m2/g), due to low cost, high-specific surface area, adhesion properties with catalyst particles and distribution, better interaction with the polymer, and high conductivity [21, 22, 23]. It has noticeable disadvantages such as carbon corrosion owing to its surface oxidation to produce CO2 during fuel cell operation and results in dissolution of Pt nanoparticles from the carbon support leading to low Pt utilization and less performance .
Carbon corrosion is one of the key factors inducing cathode electrocatalyst (Pt/C) degradation in PEM fuel cells. It is electrochemical oxidation and thus needs to be investigated
Carbon monoxide (CO) is thermodynamically unstable and therefore slowly converted to CO2.
Pt is also found to catalyze the carbon oxidation . Under fuel cell operating conditions, the corrosion rate is significant, leading to large voltage degradation, and further, the CO formed deactivates the Pt catalysts. Several reports reveal that the corrosion of carbon support reduces the integrity of the catalyst layer and enhances Pt dissolution [25, 26, 27, 28]. Figure 3 shows the TEM images (Figure 3a and b) of Pt/C captured before and after the durability test, and Figure 3c depicts the same as a schematic representation . Wang et al. have reported the effect of carbon support corrosion on the stability of Pt/C using two different carbon support materials such as Vulcan carbon XC-72 (VC) and Black Pearls 2000 (BP-2000). They have concluded that the decrease in ECSA of Pt embedded carbon support materials reveals the loss of Pt nanoparticles during the accelerated durability test due to surface oxidation of carbon supports.
Among these conventional carbon supports, carbon nanotubes and graphene derivatives have got huge attention and employed as major catalyst supports for fuel cell applications due to its excellent physiochemical properties. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are the family of carbon allotropes consist of
An exceptionally outstanding performance was derived from the new carbon supporting material for ORR namely graphene, an iconic carbon form in the history of material sciences. It is a single-layer
|Name of the material||Nature of porosity||Specific surface area (m2/g)||Electrical conductivity (S/cm)||Ref. no.|
|Vulcan carbon||Micro porous||254||4.0|||
|Carbon black||Micro porous||475||1.4|||
|Single-walled carbon nanotube||Micro porous||400–900||102–106|||
|Multi-walled carbon nanotube||Mesoporous||200–400||103–105|||
|Graphite||Meso-/microporous||10–20||2–3 × 104|||
6. Carbon-free catalyst supports
In general, carbon-free supports are mostly inorganic metal oxides, and other mineral oxides possess better corrosion resistance, improved interaction with metal nanoparticles, and stable morphology. However, these materials are poor in electrical conductivity, and low porosity leads to less specific surface area than highly porous supporting materials. The major inorganic additives are metal oxides (SiO2, TiO2, CeO2, etc., [40, 41]), some of the carbides (WC, VC, etc., [42, 43]), and layered silicate materials such as clay minerals [44, 45], which are increasingly used as catalyst supports for PEM fuel cells. Clay minerals belong to a subtype of phyllosilicates with characteristic layered structures. Two basic layered structural units are important in the formation of the clay-structured materials: the tetrahedral structure formed by silicon and oxygen atoms and the octahedral structure formed by aluminum/magnesium and oxygen atoms. The tetrahedral units are linked through their corners, forming a tetrahedral sheet, whereas the octahedral units are edge-linked, resulting in an octahedral sheet. The structural framework of the clay platelets is basically composed of these two kinds of sheets joined together to form layers.
Layered silicates are clay minerals built of two structural units. The simplest form of clay minerals is the 1:1 structure (e.g.
Like naturally occurring clay minerals, synthetic clay also employed as catalyst support for cathodic oxygen reduction in PEM fuel cells. Amino propyl functionalized Mg-phyllosilicate clay employed as catalyst support for ORR in PEMFC [49, 50]. The amino groups of synthetic clay hold metal nanoparticles by physical interaction and increase the stability of the catalyst than conventional carbon supports. In Figure 4, the layered structure of aminoclay is schematically presented. The structure of aminoclay contains 2:1 Mg-phyllosilicate layer with surface functionalized arm-like amino propyl groups. Hence, the amino groups can hold the metal nanoparticles and provides uniform distribution for the preparation of polymer nanocomposite membranes.
7. Polymer nanocomposites
The proton conducting membranes are inserted between the anodic and cathodic compartments to prevent mixing of reactants and to conduct protons formed due to the oxidation of hydrogen at the anodic compartment to cathodic side. The polymer electrolyte membrane should possess high proton conductivity, low fuel permeability, good thermal stability, and better film forming ability, and more importantly, it should be of low cost and should have high durability. Under fuel cell-operating conditions, it should have sufficient water uptake and moderate swelling, excellent electrochemical stability in an aggressive environment like low or high pH solutions, and good mechanical strength, i.e., significant stability in structure and morphology . Nafion is a perfluorinated ionomer containing hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) backbone with pendant-like side chains of perfluorinated vinyl ethers terminated by perfluorosulfonic acid groups as shown in Figure 5.
Nafion has many key properties such as thermal, mechanical, and chemical stability and, most importantly, high water-saturated proton conductivities during long-term fuel cell operation. Teflon-like PTFE backbone provides the long-term durability during the oxidative and reductive fuel-cell operating conditions . But the drawbacks of Nafion membrane include low conductivity under low humidification, poor performance at elevated temperatures (above 90°C), and high cost. Therefore, in order to improve the properties of Nafion under fuel cell working conditions, some nanoscale additives are usually added to obtain Nafion nanocomposites [17, 51, 52]. Therefore, an extensive research has been attempted by many researchers to synthesize novel polymer nanocomposite materials by blending with suitable polymers and organic/inorganic additives with improved physicochemical properties. Many conducting polymers were used such as poly(aniline), poly(ethylene oxide), poly(styrene), poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(propylene), poly(vinylpyrrolidone), and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), etc., along with Nafion to form polymer blends. In polymer nanocomposites, inorganic additives such as quaternary ammonium salts, SiO2, TiO2, WO2, etc. [40, 41, 52, 53] and layered silicate minerals such as clay minerals  are used as fillers and used as catalyst supports for energy applications. Aminoclay/Nafion nanocomposite membranes were prepared through sol–gel approach with embedded Pt nanoparticles by simple chemical reduction method. The electrocatalytic performance and durability of Pt nanoparticles–embedded Aminoclay/Nafion toward ORR were studied for PEMFC [49, 50].
In electrochemical processes, the electron transfer between solid-liquid interfaces is the elementary step, and the interfacial properties such as conductivity, surface area, etc. have significant influence on electron transfer . In contact with electrolytic solution, electrodes (catalyst materials) can act as a source or a sink for electrons to change the electroactive species according to classical voltammetry. The nature of the electrode surface can alter the efficiency of the electron-transfer process and mass-transport regime. Therefore, it is extremely important to obtain the desired electrochemical properties at the interface between the electrode and the electrolytic solution by modifying the electrode surface. In conventional electrochemical cells, bulk Pt was employed as electrocatalyst to catalyze the fuel cell reactions and thus have disadvantage of low surface area and poor utilization [54, 55, 56]. Later on, the nanosized electrocatalysts got more attention especially in energy applications due to their unique physical and chemical properties. Nanomaterials show size, shape, and composition-dependent properties, and a single material can show a wide range of properties and applications depending on the size [57, 58, 59]. As the dimensions of a particle decrease, the surface-area/volume ratio drastically increases. When this ratio is large, the low-coordinate atoms on the particle surface predominate and dominate the particle properties called as
In conclusion, catalyst-supporting materials are playing a crucial role for improving the overall efficiency by enhancing the activity and stability for PEMFCs. The major requirements of promising supporting materials for fuel cell catalysis are high surface area, good electrical conductivity, porosity, and better stability under fuel cell operating conditions. Carbon supports are widely used supporting materials for ORR in PEMFC. Due to the surface oxidation, conventional carbon supports diminish the activity of catalysts under fuel cell operating conditions. In order to overcome these issues without compromising the performance of catalysts, novel carbon materials such as CNT, graphene and its derivatives, noncarbon supports, and conducting polymers are used as catalyst supports for ORR. Hence, the overall efficiency and performance of the fuel cell are laid on nature of the catalysts and their supporting materials, which can provide sufficient
Serrano E, Rus G, Martinez JG. Nanotechnology for sustainable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2009; 13:2373-2384. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.003
Wagner FT, Lakshmanan B, Mathias MF. Electrochemistry and the future of the automobile. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2010; 1:2204-2219. DOI: 10.1021/jz100553m
Dresselhaus MS, Thomas IL. Alternative energy technologies. Nature. 2001; 414:332-337. DOI: 10.1038/35104599
Debe MK. Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature. 2012; 486:43-51. DOI: 10.1038/nature11115
Carrette L, Friedrich KA, Stimming U. Fuel cells-fundamentals and applications. Fuel Cells. 2001; 1:5-39. DOI: 10.1002/1615-6854(200105)1
Steel BCH, Heinzel A. Materials for fuel-cell technologies. Nature. 2001; 414:345-352. DOI: 10.1038/35104620
Haile SM. Fuel cell materials and components. Acta Materialia. 2003; 51:5981-6000. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00331-6
Kordesch K, Simader G. Fuel Cells and their Applications. New York: VCH Publishers; 1996. DOI: 10.1002/352760653X
Mauritz KA, Moore RB. State of understanding of Nafion. Chemical Reviews. 2004; 104:4535-4585. DOI: 10.1021/cr0207123
Urgeghe C. Oxygen Evolution and Oxygen Reduction in Electrochemical Energy Conversion, [Thesis]. France: Universita degli Studi di Ferrara;
Markovic NM, Schmidt TJ, Stamenkovic V, Ross PN. Oxygen reduction reaction on Pt and Pt bimetallic surfaces: A selective review. Fuel Cells. 2001; 1:105-116. DOI: 10.1002/1615-6854(200107)1
Wee JH. Applications of proton exchange membrane fuel cell systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2007; 1(11):1720-1738. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2006.01.005
Gottesfeld S. Electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction in polymer electrolyte fuel cells: A brief history and a critical examination of present theory and diagnostics, fuel cell catalysis. In: Koper MTM, editor. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009. DOI: 10.1002/9780470463772.ch1
Song C, Zhang J. Electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reaction, in PEM fuel cell electrocatalysts and catalyst layers. In: Zhang J, editor. Springer; 2008. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84800-936-3_2
Zaidi SMJ. Research trends in polymer electrolyte membranes for PEMFC. In: Zaidi SMJ, Matsuura T, editors. Springer, LLC; 2009. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73532-0
Antolini E, Gonzalez ER. Polymer supports for low-temperature fuel cell catalysts. Applied Catalysis A. 2009; 365:1-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.05.045
Smitha B, Sridhar S, Khan AA. Solid polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cell applications—A review. Journal of Membrane Science. 2005; 259:10-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.035
Ozdemir SS, Buonomenna MG, Drioli E. Catalytic polymeric membranes: Preparation and application. Applied Catalysis A. 2006; 307:167-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2006.03.058
Wang Y, Chen KS, Mishler J, Cho SC, Adroher XC. A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research. Applied Energy. 2011; 88:981-1007. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.09.030
Antolini E. Carbon supports for low-temperature fuel cell catalysts. Applied Catalysis. B, Environmental. 2004; 88:1-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.09.030
Candelaria SL, Shao Y, Zhou W, Li X, Xiao J, Zhang JG, Wang Y, Liu J, Li J, Cao G. Nanostructured carbon for energy storage and conversion. Nano Energy. 2012; 1:195-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2011.11.006
Ferreira PJ, la O’ GJ, Horn YS, Morgan D, Makharia R, Kocha S, Gasteiger HA. Instability of Pt/C electrocatalysts in proton exchange membrane fuel cells—A mechanistic investigation. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2005; 152:A2256-AA227. DOI: 10.1149/1.2050347
Wang J, Yin G, Shao Y, Zhang S, Wang Z, Gao Y. Effect of carbon black support corrosion on the durability of Pt/C catalyst. Journal of Power Sources. 2007; 171:331-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.084
Xu F, Wang M, Liu Q, Sun H, Simonson S, Ogbeifun N, Stach EA, Xie J. Investigation of the carbon corrosion process for polymer electrolyte fuel cells using a rotating disk electrode technique. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2010; 157:B1138-B1145. DOI: 10.1149/1.3484621
Young A, Colbow V, Harvey D, Rogers E, Wessel S. A semi-empirical two step carbon corrosion reaction model in PEM fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2013; 160:F381-F388. DOI: 10.1149/2.061304jes
Meier JC, Galeano C, Katsounaros I, Topalov AA, Kostka A, Schuth F, Mayrhofer KJJ. Degradation mechanisms of Pt/C fuel cell catalysts under simulated start-stop conditions. ACS Catalysis. 2012; 2:832-843. DOI: 10.1021/cs300024h
Shao Y, Yin G, Gao Y. Understanding and approaches for the durability issues of Pt-based catalysts for PEM fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources. 2007; 171:558-566. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.004
Borup RL, Davey JR, Garzon FH, Wood DL, Inbody MA. PEM fuel cell electrocatalyst durability measurements. Journal of Power Sources. 2006; 163:76-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.009
Paul DR, Robeson LM. Polymer nanotechnology: Nanocomposites. Polymer. 2008; 49:3187-3204. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.017
Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Jorio A. Unusual properties and structure of carbon nanotubes. Annual Review of Materials Research. 2004; 34:247-278. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.matsci.34.040203.114607
Miners SA, Rance GA, Khlobystov AN. Chemical reactions confined within carbon nanotubes. Chemical Society Reviews. 2016; 45:4727-4746. DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00090H
Nie H, Cui M, Russell TP. A route to rapid carbon nanotube growth. Chemical Communications. 2013; 49:5159-5161. DOI: 10.1039/C3CC41746H
Eatemadi A, Daraee H, Karimkhanloo H, Kouhi M, Zarghami N, Akbarzadeh A, Abasi M, Hanifehpour Y, Joo SW. Carbon nanotubes: Properties, synthesis, purification, and medical applications. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2014; 9:393-402. DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-393
Mallakpour S, Soltanian S. Surface functionalization of carbon nanotubes: Fabrication and applications. RSC Advances. 2016; 6:109916-109935. DOI: 10.1039/C6RA24522F
Raccichini R, Varzi A, Passerini S, Scrosati B. The role of graphene for electrochemical energy storage. Nature Materials. 2015; 14:271-279. DOI: 10.1038/nmat4170
Ayalaa P, Rubiod A, Rummeli M, Rubio A, Pichler T. The doping of carbon nanotubes with nitrogen and their potential applications. Carbon. 2010; 48:575-586. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.10.009
Panchakarla LS, Govindaraj A, Rao CNR. Boron-and nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes and graphene. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 2010; 363:4163-4174. DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2010.07.057
Liu Y, Kumar S. Polymer/carbon nanotube nano composite fibers–A review. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2014; 6:6069-6087. DOI: 10.1021/am405136s
Liu YL. Effective approaches for the preparation of organo-modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes and the corresponding MWCNT/polymer nanocomposites. Polymer Journal. 2016; 48:351-358. DOI: 10.1038/pj.2015.132
Tripathi BP, Shahi VK. Organic-inorganic nanocomposite polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cell applications. Progress in Polymer Science. 2011; 36:945-979. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.12.005
Jalani NH, Dunn K, Datta R. Synthesis and characterization of Nafion-MO2 (M= Zr, Si, Ti) nanocomposite membranes for higher temperature PEM fuel cells. Electrochimica Acta. 2005; 51:553-560. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.05.016
Liu Y, Kelly TG, Chen JG, Mustain WE. Metal carbides as alternative electrocatalyst supports. ACS Catalysis. 2013; 3:1184-1194. DOI: 10.1021/cs4001249
Calvillo L, Valero-Vidal C, Agnoli S, Sezen H, Rudiger C, Kunze-Liebhauser J, Granozzi G. Combined photoemission spectroscopy and electrochemical study of a mixture of (oxy) carbides as potential innovative supports and electrocatalysts. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016; 8:19418-19427. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b04414
Paul DR, Robeson LM. Polymer nanotechnology: Nanocomposites. Polymer. 2008; 49:3187-3204
Bitinis N, Hernandez M, Verdejo R, Kenny JM, Manchado MAL. Recent advances in clay/polymer nanocomposites. Advanced Materials. 2011; 23:5229-5236. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201101948
Datta KKR. Investigations on clay hybrids and carbon based nanostructures [Ph.D. thesis]. India: Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research; 2011
Kickelbick G. Hybrid Materials: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications. Wiley-VCH; 2006 978-3-527-31299-3
Lebeau B, Brendle J, Marichal C, Patil AJ, Muthusamy E, Mann S. One-step synthesis and solvent-induced exfoliation of hybrid organic-inorganic phyllosilicate-like materials. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2006; 6:352-359. DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2006.910
Narayanamoorthy B, Datta KKR, Eswaramoorthy M, Balaji S. Improved oxygen reduction reaction catalyzed by Pt/clay/Nafion nanocomposite for PEM fuel cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2012; 4:3620-3626. DOI: 10.1021/am300697q
Narayanamoorthy B, Datta KKR, Balaji S. Kinetics and mechanism of electrochemical oxygen reduction using Pt/clay/Nafion catalyst layer for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2012; 387:213-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.08.002
Moilanen DE, Piletic IR, Fayer MD. Tracking water’s response to structural changes in nafion membranes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. A. 2006; 110:9084-9088. DOI: 10.1021/jp0623084
Ozdemir SS, Buonomenna MG, Drioli E. Catalytic polymeric membranes: Preparation and application. Applied Catalysis A. 2006; 307:167-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2006.03.058
Hickner MA, Ghassemi H, Kim YS, Einsla BR, McGrath JE. Alternative polymer systems for proton exchange membranes (PEMs). Chemical Reviews. 2004; 104:4587-4612. DOI: 10.1021/cr020711a
Raimondi F, Scherer GG, Kotz R, Wokaun A. Nanoparticles in energy technology: Examples from electrochemistry and catalysis. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2005; 44:2190-2209. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200460466
Chen A, Holt-Hindle P. Platinum-based nanostructured materials: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Chemical Reviews. 2010; 110:3767-3804. DOI: 10.1021/cr9003902
Whitesides GM. Nanoscience, nanotechnology and chemistry. Small. 2005; 1:172-179. DOI: 10.1002/smll.200400130
Chen J, Lim B, Lee EP, Xia Y. Shape-controlled synthesis of platinum nanocrystals for catalytic and electrocatalytic applications. Nano Today. 2009; 4:81-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2008.09.002
Tao AR, Habas S, Yang P. Shape control of colloidal metal nanocrystals. Small. 2008; 4:310-325. DOI: 10.1002/smll.200701295
Guo S, Zhang S, Sun S. Tuning nanoparticle catalysis for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2013; 52:8526-8544. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201207186
Gilliam RJ, Kirk DW, Thorpe SJ. Influence of structural, microstructural and electrical properties on electrocatalytic performance at the nanoscale. Electrocatalysis. 2011; 2:1-19. DOI: 10.1007/s12678-011-0038-1
Zhou X, Gan Y, Du J, Tian D, Zhang R, Yang C, Dai Z. A review of hollow Pt-based nanocatalysts applied in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources. 2013; 232:310-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.062
Zhou ZY, Tian N, Li JT, Broadwell I, Sun SG. Nanomaterials of high surface energy with exceptional properties in catalysis and energy storage. Chemical Society Reviews. 2011; 40:4167-4185. DOI: 10.1039/C0CS00176G