Summary of
Abstract
In this chapter, the complete mitochondrial genome of Guatemalan potato moth, Tecia solanivora (Povolny, 1973) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is presented as a model to understand how to characterize and study a mitogenome in insects. It was sequenced, analyzed, and compared with other lepidopteran insects. T. solanivora mitogenome is a circular double-stranded molecule, typically found in insects and containing 37 genes, all them well described over the other lepidopteran mitogenomes sequenced. Interestingly, in this mitogenome was found a gene arrangement in the tRNA-Met gene different from the ancestral arrangement, but commonly present in insect mitogenomes. Other important characteristics are the high A + T-biased and negative AT- and GC-skews contents, but also unusual canonical start codons in 12 protein-coding genes and an incomplete stop codon in the cytochrome oxidase subunit II gene consisting of just a Thymine. Another common feature shared with lepidopteran mitogenomes is the A + T-rich region. It is characterized by having 325 bb, the ‘ATAGA’ motif, a 17 bp poly (T) stretch and a (AT)8 element preceded by the ‘ATTTA’ motif. Likewise, this mitogenome has 21 intergenic spacer regions. In addition, an update about other recent mitogenomes research done mainly over lepidopteran insects considered crop pests is presented. On the other hand, a novel development based on induced mutations by CRISPR-Cas9 in the mitogenomes seeking applicable capability for pest control is shown. The utility of this study is to improve scientific databases and support future studies of population genetic in lepidopteran.
Keywords
- mitogenomes
- mitochondrial genome
- crop pests
- lepidopteran
- insects
1. Introduction
Crop loss is a function of one or more biotic factors, each of which may be contributing to a reduction in yield, whereas yield loss is the reduction in yield caused by a single pathogen or a pest [1]. Even so, there is no doubt that crop losses due to pests and diseases are a major threat to incomes of rural families and to food security worldwide [2]. Although there are a large number of different living organisms that affect agricultural crops (biotic factors) and therefore they are called pests or pathogens, organisms from Lepidoptera order within Insecta class are considered one of the most economically important pests due to huge crop losses caused by them, crop losses, in terms of quantity and quality that can occur in the field (pre-harvest) or in the storage (post-harvest) [3].
Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) is the second largest order in Insecta, is species-rich containing over 155,000 described species, and occurs in nearly all regions and a wide variety of habitats [4]. A combination of features has conspired to render the Lepidoptera one of the most studied groups of organisms; on account of this, research on lepidopteran insects has been carried out during the past century. Nevertheless, only few years ago, scientists are seeking answers on genomes as a key to revalidate previously generated data or redirect mechanisms of pest control. In this context, mitochondrial genomes (mtgenomes or mitogenomes) are very important subject for different scientific disciplines including, among others, animal health, comparative and evolutionary genomics, molecular evolution, phylogenetic, population genetics, and biogeographic studies [5, 6]. Therefore, it is not surprising that approximately 500 mitogenomes of insects have been determined and subsequently deposited in GenBank [6]. Surprisingly, one of the most recent report shows that only 140 complete Lepidoptera mitogenomes (28 families from 12 superfamilies) have been sequenced and deposited in genomes databases [7], which contrasts with the number of described species in this order, as previously mentioned. In this perspective, it has been the growing research efforts of scientist around the world seeking to expand the knowledge barrier of one mitochondria of Lepidoptera. Figure 1 shows continuous growth in the number of scientific publications in this field, showing records subtracted from literature databases: Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect.

Figure 1.
Growing in the number of publications with the words “Mitogenome AND Lepidoptera” at the title, abstract or keywords of scientific articles. Records were subtracted from literature databases; Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect.
In the present chapter, the complete mitogenome of
2. Mitochondrial genome in insects
In insects, the mitochondrial genome is a circular double-stranded molecule typically between 14,000 and 20,000 bp. It contains 13 PCGs, 2 rRNAs, 22 tRNAs, and a control region (also known as the A + T-rich region), which are organized and oriented in different ways [8]. This genome has been widely used for phylogeny studies, phylogeography, population genetics, and molecular diagnostics. It has also been used to identify novel genes relevant for future studies [9], because of its small size, maternal inheritance, low recombination rate, relatively rapid evolutionary frequency, and multiple copies per cell [10]. Consequently, mitogenome sequences are rapidly evolving with about 500 insect species currently sequenced [6].
3. Characterization of insect mitogenomes
The complete mitogenome of
3.1. Genome sequencing and assembling
3.2. Gene annotation and compositional analysis
To predict the protein-coding genes (PCGs), rRNA genes and tRNA genes from
3.3. Genome structure, organization, and base composition obtained
The

Figure 2.
Map of the mitochondrial genome of T. solanivora. Protein-coding genes (names with underline) coded on the majority strand arrows going in clockwise direction, while the rest going counterclockwise. The tRNA genes are designated by tRNA-amino acid codes. The rRNAs two and they are located next to tRNA-val and the A + T-rich region (control region) is indicated by a square.
Gene | Direction | Position (bp) | Length (bp) | Anticodon | Start codon | Stop codon |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forward | 1–68 | 68 | CAT | |||
Forward | 70–134 | 65 | GAT | |||
Reverse | 136–204 | 69 | TTG | |||
Forward | 259–1269 | 1011 | ATT | TAA | ||
Forward | 1268–1336 | 69 | TCA | |||
Reverse | 1329–1394 | 66 | GCA | |||
Reverse | 1406–1471 | 66 | GTA | |||
Forward | 1475–3010 | 1536 | CGA | TAA | ||
Forward | 3006–3073 | 68 | TAA | |||
Forward | 3074–3754 | 681 | ATG | T | ||
Forward | 3756–3826 | 71 | CTT | |||
Forward | 3837–3904 | 68 | GTC | |||
Forward | 3905–4072 | 168 | ATT | TAA | ||
Forward | 4066–4743 | 678 | ATG | TAA | ||
Forward | 4743–5531 | 789 | ATG | TAA | ||
Forward | 5534–5600 | 67 | TCC | |||
Forward | 5601–5954 | 354 | ATT | TAA | ||
Forward | 5964–6030 | 67 | TGC | |||
Forward | 6030–6095 | 66 | TCG | |||
Forward | 6101–6166 | 66 | GTT | |||
Forward | 6181–6246 | 66 | GCT | |||
Forward | 6247–6315 | 69 | TTC | |||
Reverse | 6314–6380 | 67 | GAA | |||
Reverse | 6364–8097 | 1734 | ATT | TAA | ||
Reverse | 8113–8178 | 66 | GTG | |||
Reverse | 8183–9523 | 1341 | ATG | TAA | ||
Reverse | 9523–9816 | 294 | ATG | TAA | ||
Forward | 9819–9883 | 65 | TGT | |||
Reverse | 9884–9949 | 66 | TGG | |||
Forward | 9952–10,479 | 525 | ATA | TAA | ||
Forward | 10,497–11,642 | 1146 | ATA | TAA | ||
Forward | 11,646–11,712 | 67 | TGA | |||
Reverse | 11,730–12,665 | 936 | ATA | TAG | ||
Reverse | 12,669–12,736 | 68 | TAG | |||
Reverse | 12,737–14,065 | 1329 | ||||
Reverse | 14,089–14,155 | 67 | TAC | |||
Reverse | 14,157–14,926 | 770 | ||||
A + T region | 14,927–15,251 | 325 |
Table 1.
When we compared with other reported Lepidoptera family mitogenomes, it found an identical gene order and orientation of the mitochondrial genes of this species to other lepidopteran moths, including
The typical lepidopteran arrangement of the tRNAs (tRNA-Met, tRNA-Ile, tRNA-Gln) was observed in the

Figure 3.
Gene arrangement of the
The nucleotide composition determined in the entire
nt % | Whole mtDNA | Protein-coding sequence | Concatenated PCGs | rRNAs | tRNAs | IGs | A + T-rich region | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st# | 2nd# | 3rd# | |||||||
A% | 38.6 | 35.3 | 21.3 | 38.3 | 31.7 | 43.8 | 40.5 | 44.4 | 42.8 |
T% | 39.6 | 36.6 | 48.2 | 49.2 | 44.7 | 39.9 | 40.2 | 44.4 | 48.3 |
C% | 13.3 | 11.0 | 17.0 | 7.3 | 11.7 | 5.2 | 8.1 | 7.6 | 6.2 |
G% | 8.4 | 17.7 | 13.5 | 5.2 | 11.9 | 11.1 | 11.2 | 3.5 | 2.8 |
A + T% | 78.2 | 71.9 | 69.5 | 87.5 | 76.4 | 83.7 | 80.7 | 88.8 | 91.1 |
C + G% | 21.7 | 28.7 | 30.5 | 12.5 | 23.7 | 16.3 | 19.3 | 11.1 | 9.0 |
AT-Skew% | −0.013 | −0.018 | −0.387 | −0.125 | −0.170 | 0.047 | 0.004 | 0 | −0.060 |
GC-Skew% | −0.226 | 0.233 | −0.115 | −0.168 | 0.008 | 0.362 | 0.161 | −0.36 | −0.378 |
Table 2.
Nucleotide composition of
Species | Length (bp) | A% | G% | T% | C% | A + T% | G + C% | AT-skew | GC-skew |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15,251 | 38.6 | 8.4 | 39.6 | 13.3 | 78.2 | 21.7 | −0.013 | −0.226 | |
15,236 | 38.54 | 8.05 | 40.37 | 13.03 | 78.91 | 21.08 | −0.023 | −0.236 | |
15,314 | 39.37 | 7.30 | 43.29 | 10.04 | 82.66 | 17.34 | −0.047 | −0.158 | |
15,327 | 39.17 | 7.63 | 41.65 | 11.55 | 80.82 | 19.18 | −0.031 | −0.204 | |
15,338 | 39.26 | 7.69 | 41.04 | 12.02 | 80.30 | 19.71 | −0.022 | −0.220 | |
15,360 | 39.34 | 7.58 | 41.28 | 11.79 | 80.62 | 19.37 | −0.024 | −0.217 | |
15,384 | 39.65 | 7.81 | 40.13 | 12.41 | 79.78 | 20.22 | −0.006 | −0.227 | |
15,516 | 40.67 | 7.46 | 41.11 | 10.76 | 81.78 | 18.22 | −0.005 | −0.181 | |
15,566 | 39.22 | 7.77 | 40.94 | 12.07 | 80.16 | 19.84 | −0.021 | −0.217 | |
15,680 | 40.15 | 7.88 | 40.24 | 11.73 | 80.39 | 19.61 | −0.001 | −0.196 |
Table 3.
Comparison of nucleotide composition and skewness between
3.4. Protein-coding genes (PCGs)
The protein-coding genes (PCGs) encompassed 11,191 bp of the entire assembled sequence (73.38%) and exhibited an A + T content of 76.4%. Nine of the 13 PCGs are coded on the majority strand (ATP6, ATP8, COI, COII, COIII, Cytb, NAD2, NAD3, and NAD6), while the rest (NAD1, NAD4, NAD4L, and NAD5) are coded on the minority strand. For the protein-coding genes, the A + T content was calculated for the three-codon positions, and they showed few differences from other Lepidoptera mitogenomes.
Twelve PCGs were identified in the
For the stop codon genes, we found the TAA codon in 11 of the PCGs, coinciding with the mitogenomes of other Lepidoptera, including
The CDpT or Codons Per Thousand Codons of the

Figure 4.
Codon distribution and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) in
3.5. Transfer RNA and ribosomal RNA genes
It was found that
Similar to other mitochondrial sequences from insect species, there were two rRNAs in
3.6. Noncoding and overlapping regions
Most of the intergenic regions in this mitogenome were short (≤15 bp) and the total length of the noncoding regions in the mtDNA of
This sequence (S1) could be considered as a mitogenome marker for Lepidoptera order, and it most likely originated from a partial NAD2 gene duplication [19]. Intergenic sequence S2 (23 bp) was found between rRNA-Large and tRNA-Val. Intergenic sequences S3 and S4 (17 bp) separate genes NAD6 and Cytb, and the tRNA-Ser2 and NAD1 genes, respectively. The latter sequence contains the “ATACTAA” motif, typically found in other lepidopterans [9, 23, 51]. This motif plays an apparent role as a recognition site for the protein implicated in mitochondrial transcription termination (mtTERM) [52]. Furthermore, this sequence has been recognized for being highly conserved, with a length ranging between 17 and 20 bp [23].
Furthermore, in the
3.7. The A + T-rich region
The A + T-rich region is a noncoding region with 325 bp length located between rRNA-Small and tRNA-Met. The region contains 91.1% AT nucleotides, with negative AT- and GC-skew values (Table 2), meaning that it is biased for the nitrogen base thymine, as reported for the mitogenomes of other lepidopterans. One exception to this trend is
This A + T region is a conserved structure commonly found in other Lepidoptera, which includes the “ATAGA” motif followed by a 17-bp poly-T stretch, just like in
3.8. Phylogenetic relationships
To illustrate the phylogenetic relationship of
4. Other recent studies with mitogenomes of Lepidopteran considered crop pests
A search carried out on August 04, 2017 in Scopus database showed that after publishing the scientific paper made by authors from this chapter [7], scientists have published 62 other studies on mitochondrial genomes of lepidopteran insects. Most of them were focused on understanding their composition, organization, motifs, and the inference of phylogenetic relationships between these organisms [41, 56–58]. However, recently, [59] reported besides of typifying the mitogenomes of
On the other hand, we must highlight the importance of studying of insect pests mitogenomes, this allows to propose hypotheses related with the evolutionary origin of the different larval stages, which causes significant damage to crops during this state, and could predict which is the most adaptable state to each type of environment as for example in Parapoynx
5. Novel techniques for pest control using mtDNA
Pest species represent a major ongoing threat to global biodiversity, demanding effective management approaches are required that regulate pest numbers, while minimizing collateral damage to nontarget species. Species-specific pest controls have been developed in order to be long-lasting measures and effectives [68]. One of these methods is called the sterile insect technique (SIT), whereby sterile males are introduced into target populations, so that they could be produced continuously within the targeted populations for control, and thus reducing production of females when mating with them. However, the SIT generally requires continuous large-scale production and introduction of sterile evils to sustain population suppression [69].
At the level of maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been identified naturally occurring mutations that cause male infertility. These mutations have little or no impact on females, and hence are minimally or not selected against (i.e. are self-perpetuating in nature). Due to those kinds of mutations, have only been identified in some model systems such as mice and fruit flies, they are likely to be widespread in nature threatening small populations viability of endangered species. Currently, a novel variant of the SIT, is the recently proposed Trojan female technique (TFT), based on the use of naturally occurring mutations or induced by CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats system) in the mtDNA [69]. The consortium aims to harness these mutations to develop a widely applicable capability for pest control, through the release of Trojan females carrying the mutations [68, 69].
With this technique, males that inherit these mutations will have fewer offspring than wild-type males, while females will remain normal (fertile). It is well known that mtDNA is generally maternally inherited, so this sex-bias in effects will reduce selection pressure against the TFT mutation. When females carrying the TFT mutation are released into a pest population, they could cause multi-generational population suppression. However, while promising well and scientific means to control pest populations or disease vectors, the release of genetically engineered animals raises into ethical issues and a debate is currently underway discussing safety and regulatory concerns [68, 69].
6. Conclusion
In this chapter, the complete mitochondrial genome of
References
- 1.
Nutter FW, Teng PS, Royer MH. Terms and concepts for yield, crop loss, and disease thresholds. Plant Disease. 1993; 77 :211-215 - 2.
Cerda R, Avelino J, Gary C, et al. Primary and secondary yield losses caused by pests and diseases: Assessment and modeling in coffee. PLoS One. 2017; 12 :e0169133 - 3.
EC O. Crop losses to pests. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 2006; 144 :31 - 4.
Kristensen NP, Scoble MJ, Karsholt O. Lepidoptera phylogeny and systematics: The state of inventorying moth and butterfly diversity. Zootaxa. 2007; 1668 :699-747 - 5.
Ma H-F, Zheng X-X, Peng M-H, et al. Complete mitochondrial genome of the meadow moth, Loxostege sticticalis (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae), compared to otherPyraloidea moths . Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 2016;19 :697-706 - 6.
Cameron SL. How to sequence and annotate insect mitochondrial genomes for systematic and comparative genomics research. Systematic Entomology. 2014; 39 :400-411 - 7.
Ramírez-Ríos V, Franco-Sierra ND, Alvarez JC, et al. Mitochondrial genome characterization of Tecia solanivora (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and its phylogenetic relationship with other lepidopteran insects. Gene. 2016;581 :107-116 - 8.
Boore JL. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. 1999; 27 :1767-1780 - 9.
Cameron SL, Whiting MF. The complete mitochondrial genome of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta , (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Sphingidae), and an examination of mitochondrial gene variability within butterflies and moths. Gene. 2008;408 :112-123 - 10.
Avise JC. Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1994 - 11.
Pulliandre N, Dupas S, Dangles O, Zeddam J, Capdevielle-Dulac C, Barbin K, Torres-Leguizamon M, Silvain J. Genetic bottleneck in invasive species: The potato tuber moth adds to the list. Biological Invasions. 2008; 10 :319-333 - 12.
Torres-Leguizamón M, Dupas S, Dardon D, Gómez Y, Niño L, Carnero A, Padilla A, Merlin I, Fossoud A, Zeddam J, Lery X, Capdevielle-Dulac C, Dangles O, Silvain J. Inferring native range and invasion scenarios with mitochondrial DNA: The case of T. solanivora successive north-south step-wise introductions across Central and South America. Biological Invations. 2011;13 :1505-1519 - 13.
Villanueva-Mejía DF, Ramírez-Ríos V, Arango-Lsaza RE, et al. Phylogeography of Tecia solanivora from Colombia based on cytochrome oxydase i and cytochrome b mitochondrial genes. South West Entomology. 2015;40 :775-788 - 14.
Zeddam JL, Orbe K, Léry X, Dangles O, Dupas S, Silvain J. An isometric virus of the potato tuber moth Tecia solanivora (Povolny) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) has a tri-segmented RNA genome. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2008;99 :204-211 - 15.
Villanueva D, Saldamando CI. Tecia solanivora , Povolny (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): una revisión sobre su origen, dispersión y estrategias de control biológic. Ing y Cienc. 2013;9 :197-214 - 16.
Daniel ZR, Ewan B. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Research. 2008; 18 :821-829 - 17.
Wyman Stacia K, Jansen RK, Bore JL. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20 :3252-3255 - 18.
Koichiro T, Daniel P, Nicholas P, Glen S, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2011:1-9 - 19.
Cao S-S, Du Y-Z. Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Chilo auricilius and comparison with three other rice stem borers. Gene. 2014;548 :270-276 - 20.
YP W, Li J, Zhao JL, TJ S, Luo AR, Fan RJ, Chen MC, Wu CS, Zhu C. The complete mitochondrial genome of the rice moth, Corcyra cephalonica . Journal of Insect Science. 2012;12 :1536-2442 - 21.
Eun-Seung L, Sik SK, Moo-Sang K, Hyungjin P, Cho Soowon KC-B. The mitochondrial genome of the smaller tea tortrix Adoxophyes honmai (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Gene. 2006;373 :52-57 - 22.
Liu S, Xue D, Cheng R, Han H. The complete mitogenome of Apocheima cinerarius (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Ennominae) and comparison with that of other lepidopteran insects. Gene. 2014;547 :136-144 - 23.
Lu H-F, Su T-J, Luo A-R, Zhu C-D, Wu C-S. Characterization of the complete mitochondrion genome of diurnal moth Amata emma (Butler) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) and its phylogenetic implications. PLoS One. 2013;8 :1-14 - 24.
Chen MM, Li Y, Chen M, Wang H, Li Q, Xia RX, Zeng CY, Li Y. Complete mitochondrial genome of the atlas moth, Attacus atlas (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) and the phylogenetic relationship of Saturniidae species. Gene. 2014;545 :95-101 - 25.
Dai LS, Zhu BJ, Liu QN, Wei GQ, Liu CL. Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Bombyx mori strain H9 (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae). Gene. 2013;519 :326-334 - 26.
Hong MY, Lee EM, Jo YH, et al. Complete nucleotide sequence and organization of the mitogenome of the silk moth Caligula boisduvalii (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) and comparison with other lepidopteran insects. Gene. 2008;413 :49-57 - 27.
Zhu BJ, Liu QN, Dai LS, Wang L, Sun Y, Lin KZ, Wei GQ, Liu CL. Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Diaphania pyloalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralididae). Gene. 2013;527 :283-291 - 28.
Coates BS, Sumerford DV, Hellmich RL, Lewis LC. Partial mitochondrial genome sequences of Ostrinia nubilalis andOstrinia furnicalis . International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2005;1 :13-18 - 29.
Kim JS, Park JS, Kim MJ, Kang PD, Kim SG, Jin BR, Han YS, Kim I. Complete nucleotide sequence and organization of the mitochondrial genome of eri-silkworm, Samia cynthia ricini (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 2012;15 :162-173 - 30.
Wang JP, Cao TW, Xuan SB, Wang H, Zhang M, bo Ma E. The complete mitochondrial genome of Sasakia funebris (Leech) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) and comparison with other Apaturinae insects. Gene. 2013;526 :336-343 - 31.
Behura SK, Lobo NF, Haas B, deBruyn B, Lovin DD, Shumway MF, Puiu D, Romero-Severson J, Nene V, Severson D. Complete sequences of mitochondria genomes of Aedes aegypti andCulex quinquefasciatus and comparative analysis of mitochondrial DNA fragments inserted in the nuclear genomes. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2011;41 :770-777 - 32.
Nian L, Yuan H. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Acrida cinerea (Acrididae: Orthoptera) and comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes in orthoptera. Comparative and Functional Genomics. 2010:1-16 - 33.
Yukuhiro K, Sezutsu H, Itoh M, Shimizu K, Banno Y. Significant levels of sequence divergence and gene rearrangements have occurred between the mitochondrial genomes of the wild mulberry silkmoth, Bombyx mandarina , and its close relative, the domesticated silkmoth,Bombyx mori . Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2002;19 :385-1389 - 34.
Yang L, Wei ZJ, Hong GY, Jiang ST, Wen L. The complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Phthonandria atrilineata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Molecular Biology Reports. 2009;36 :1441-1449 - 35.
Paola S, Simonato Mauro BA, Negrisolo E. The complete mitochondrial genome of the bag-shelter moth Ochrogaster lunifer (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae). BMC Genomics. 2008;9 :331 - 36.
Pan M, Yu Q, Xia Y, et al. Characterization of mitochondrial genome of Chinese wild mulberry silkworm, Bomyx mandarina (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae). Science in China. Series C, Life Sciences. 2008;51 :693-701 - 37.
Kim MI, Baek JY, Kim MJ, Jeong HC, Kim KG, Bae CH, Han YS, Jin BR, Kim I. Complete nucleotide sequence and organization of the mitogenome of the red- spotted apollo butterfly, Parnassius bremeri (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) and comparison with other lepidopteran insects. Molecules and Cells. 2009;28 :347-363 - 38.
Hong G, Jiang S, Yu M, Yang Y, Li F, Xue F, Wei Z. The complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the cabbage butterfly, Artogeia melete (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica Shanghai. 2009;41 :446-455 - 39.
Liu Y, Li Y, Pan M, Dai F, Zhu X, Lu C, Xiang Z. The complete mitochondrial genome of the Chinese oak silkmoth, Antheraea pernyi (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica Shanghai. 2008;40 :693-703 - 40.
Fenn JD, Cameron SL, Whiting M. The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the Mormon cricket (Anabrus simplex: Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera) and an analysis of control region variability. Insect Molecular Biology. 2007;16 :239-252 - 41.
Kim MJ, Wang AR, Park JS, et al. Complete mitochondrial genomes of five skippers (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) and phylogenetic reconstruction of Lepidoptera. 2014; 549 : 97-112 - 42.
Margam VM, Coates BS, Hellmich RL, Agunbiade T, Seufferheld MJ, et al. Mitochondrial genome sequence and expression profiling for the legume pod borer Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). PLoS One;6 . Epub ahead of print 2011. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016444 - 43.
Stewart JB, Beckenbach A. Characterization of mature mitochondrial transcripts in Drosophila, and the implications for the tRNA punctuation model in arthropods. Gene. 2009; 445 :49-57 - 44.
Clary DO, Wolstenholme DR. Genes for cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, URF2, and three tRNAs in Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. Nucleic Acids Research. 1983; 11 :6859-6872 - 45.
Ojala D, Montoya J, Attardi G. tRNA punctuation model of RNA processing in human mitochondria. Nature. 1981; 290 :470-474 - 46.
Jiang ST, Hong GY, Yu M, Li N, Yang Y, Liu YQ, Wei ZJ. Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of the giant silkworm moth, Eriogyna pyretorum (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2009;5 :351-365 - 47.
Hao J, Sun M, Shi Q, Sun X, Shao L, Yang Q. Complete mitogenomes of Euploea mulciber (Nymphalidae: Danainae) and libythea celtis (Nymphalidae: Libytheinae) and their phylogenetic implications. ISRN Genomics. 2013;14 - 48.
Kim I, Lee EM, Seol KY, et al. The mitochondrial genome of the Korean hairstreak, Coreana raphaelis (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Insect Molecular Biology. 2006;15 :217-225 - 49.
Kim MJ, Jun J, Kim I. Complete mitochondrial genome of the mulberry white caterpillar Rondotia menciana (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae). Mitochondrial DNA. 2014;25 :1-3 - 50.
Y-P W, Zhao J-L, T-J S, et al. The complete mitochondrial genome of Leucoptera malifoliella Costa (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae). DNA and Cell Biology. 2012;31 :1508-1522 - 51.
Yong-Qiang C, Ma C, Ji-Yue C, Yang DR. The complete mitochondrial genomes of two ghost moths, Thitarodes renzhiensis andThitarodes yunnanensis : The ancestral gene arrangement in Lepidoptera. BMC Genomics. 2012;13 :276 - 52.
Taanman J. The mitochondrial genome: Structure, transcription. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA): Bioenergetics. 1999; 1410 :103-123 - 53.
Hou LX, Ying S, Yang XW, Yu Z, Li HM, Qin X. The complete mitochondrial genome of Papilio bianor (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae), and its phylogenetic position within Papilionidae. Mitochondrial DNA. Epub ahead of print 2014. DOI: 10.3109/19401736.2013.873923 - 54.
Zhao JL, Zhang YY, Luo AR, Jiang GF, Cameron SL, Zhu C. The complete mitochondrial genome of Spilonota lechriaspis Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Molecular Biology Reports. 2011;38 :3757-3764 - 55.
Van Oppen MJH, Hislop NR, Hagerman PJ, Miller D. Gene content and organization in a segment of the mitochondrial genome of the scleractinian coral Acropora tenuis : Major differences in gene order within the anthozoan subclass Zoantharia. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1999;16 :1812-1815 - 56.
Zhu X-Y, Xin Z-Z, Wang Y, et al. The complete mitochondrial genome of Clostera anachoreta (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae) and phylogenetic implications forNoctuoidea species. Genomics. 2017;109 :221-226 - 57.
Jeong SY, Kim MJ, Kim S-S, et al. Complete mitochondrial genome of the endangered Lycaenid butterfly Shijimiaeoides divina (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2017;28 :242-243 - 58.
Zou Z, Min Q, Cheng S, et al. The complete mitochondrial genome of Thitarodes sejilaensis (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae), a host insect ofOphiocordyceps sinensis and its implication in taxonomic revision of Hepialus adopted in China. Gene. 2017;601 :44-55 - 59.
Park JS, Kim MJ, Jeong SY, et al. Complete mitochondrial genomes of two gelechioids, Mesophleps albilinella andDichomeris ustalella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), with a description of gene rearrangement in Lepidoptera. Current Genetics. 2016;62 :809-826 - 60.
Chen M, Tian L-L, Shi Q-H, et al. Complete mitogenome of the Lesser Purple Emperor Apatura ilia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Apaturinae) and comparison with other nymphalid butterflies. Dongwuxue Yanjiu. 2012;33 :191-201 - 61.
Castro LR, Austin a D, Dowton M. Contrasting rates of mitochondrial molecular evolution in parasitic Diptera and Hymenoptera. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2002; 19 :1100-1113 - 62.
Dyubankova N, Sochacka E, Kraszewska K, et al. Contribution of dihydrouridine in folding of the D-arm in tRNA. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 2015; 13 :4960-4966 - 63.
Lowe TM, Eddy SR. TRNAscan-SE: A program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Research. 1996; 25 :955-964 - 64.
Kim MJ, Jeong HC, Kim SR, et al. Complete mitochondrial genome of the nerippe fritillary butterfly, Argynnis nerippe (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Mitochondrial DNA. 2011;22 :86-88 - 65.
Cameron SL, Lambkin CL, Barker SC, et al. A mitochondrial genome phylogeny of Diptera: Whole genome sequence data accurately resolve relationships over broad timescales with high precision. Systematic Entomology. 2007; 32 :40-59 - 66.
Walker F. ‘Pyralides’, List of the Specimens of Lepidopterous Insects in the Collection of the British Museum London: Printed by order of the Trustees1859. p. 509-1036 - 67.
Chen Q, Chen Z-S, X-S G, et al. The complete mitogenome of Parapoynx crisonalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), with phylogenetic relationships amongst three acentropine larval forms. Aquatic Insects. 2017;38 :79-91 - 68.
Dowling DK, Tompkins DM, Gemmell NJ. The trojan female technique for pest control: A candidate mitochondrial mutation confers low male fertility across diverse nuclear backgrounds in Drosophila melanogaster . Evolutionary Applications. 2015;8 :871-880 - 69.
Wolff JN, Tompkins DM, Gemmell NJ, et al. Mitonuclear interactions, mtDNA-mediated thermal plasticity, and implications for the Trojan Female Technique for pest control. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6 :30016