Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Endotracheal Intubation in Children: Practice Recommendations, Insights, and Future Directions

Written By

Maribel Ibarra-Sarlat, Eduardo Terrones-Vargas, Lizett Romero- Espinoza, Graciela Castañeda-Muciño, Alejandro Herrera-Landero and Juan Carlos Núñez-Enríquez

Submitted: March 6th, 2017 Reviewed: July 11th, 2017 Published: December 20th, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.70356

Chapter metrics overview

2,381 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Management of airway is mandatory in a critically ill child with severe trauma or any other situation that threatens his or her life. It is important, that clinicians who attend critically ill pediatric patients requiring airway management know the rapid sequence intubation (RSI) procedure, identify a patient with difficult airway, know the devices and techniques for the management of difficult airway, and look for receiving a formal training in endotracheal intubation (ETI). Future strategies for teaching and/or training clinicians in pediatric and neonatal ETI should be evaluated through conducting controlled clinical trials to identify which type will be the most effective by considering the less number of attempts and complications.


  • endotracheal intubation
  • children
  • review
  • training
  • procedure

1. Introduction

Management and securing permeability of airway are mandatory in a critically ill child with severe trauma or any other situation that threatens his or her life. Airway’s management can be defined as the performance of maneuvers and the use of devices that enable a correct and safe ventilation to patients that need this care.

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is one of the procedures that every physician attending critically ill pediatric patients must not only know but also getting the skills and experience necessaries to effectively perform.

In this chapter, we will summarize the most practical recommendations of ETI technique in children. In addition, we will discuss important anatomical particularities of the children’s airway. We include a section of devices that could help permeate the airway of pediatric patients with a difficult airway; and recent results of studies conducted regarding the association between the level of previous training in pediatric ETI and success rates.

1.1. Indications of ETI in children

  1. Patient with an unstable airway. In this category, integrity of airway is affected by different infectious, anatomical and neurological diseases. Some examples are: (a) upper airway infectious (CROUP, bacterial tracheitis, etc.), (b) traumatisms, (c) congenital syndromes accompanied with macroglossia or micrognathia, (d) cystic hygroma, (e) branchial cleft cyst, (f) thyroglossal duct cyst, and (g) those patients with a large anterior mediastinal mass (non-Hodgkin lymphoma, acute leukemia, etc.). During childhood, the most common cause is infections [1].

  2. Patient with neurological dysfunction secondary to trauma, seizures, metabolic disease, or toxic ingestion. Classically, we can find patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 or less, or a deterioration in the GCS score from 14 to 10.

  3. Patient with impaired gas exchange:

    1. Hypoxia. One of the most common indications of ETI. Clinically, the patient presents with respiratory distress, tachypnea, increased work of breathing, and an increase in alveolar-arterial gradient. Some causes of hypoxia are airway obstruction, hypoventilation, ventilation/perfusion mismatch, hemoglobinopathies, abnormal pulmonary diffusion, and intracardiac right to left shunt.

    2. Hypercarbia. The pathophysiologic phenomenon consists of alteration in ventilation. There exists a reduced lung compliance and a V/Q mismatch increasing physiologic dead space. Alteration in ventilation can also be secondary to muscle weakness, altered mental status, exposure to toxins, or iatrogenic oversedation.

  4. Patient with lower airway obstruction. Hypercarbia, tachypnea, increased work of breathing, wheezing, and a prolonged expiratory phase are characteristic. As lower obstruction progresses, dynamic hyperinflation and air trapping worsen, leading to a silent chest (inaudible breath sounds). This obstruction is common in asthma and bronchiolitis. We must remember that children can get intubated by this indication but it has been described an increase in mean airway pressure that may impede venous return. Therefore, under this indication children should only be intubated in EXTREME CIRCUMSTANCES [1].

  5. Patient with a reduction of mechanical load, as seen in shock state and some patients with cardiovascular dysfunction.


2. Practice recommendations for pediatric endotracheal intubation

2.1. Rapid sequence intubation

By using rapid sequence intubation (RSI) method, a clinician can effectively achieve pediatric endotracheal intubation (ETI), however, we previously must identify if the patient has one or more of the following features related with a difficult airway [2]:

  • To have congenital abnormalities related with a difficult airway such as Pierre Robins Syndrome and/or Treacher Collins Syndrome.

  • A previous difficult ETI.

  • A poor mouth opening, large tongue or tonsils, small chin, short mandible, decreased neck mobility, and/or an evidence of partial upper airway obstruction.

Note: later in this chapter, you can find information about the causes, techniques, and a variety of devices a clinician may use for the management of children with difficult airway.

2.1.1. Preparation

  1. If it is not performed in an emergency setting (elective intubation), an informed consent must be obtained from the child’s parents explaining the technique, complications, and benefits of performing the procedure [3].

  2. All the materials to be used should be functional.

  3. Team should consist of three persons (at least).

  4. Patient’s heart and respiratory rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, (capnography when available) must be monitored during the procedure.

  5. Oxygen supply must be at least 10 l/min and suction equipment must be available and it must have pressures around 80–120 mm Hg.


  1. An appropriate mask and bag for ventilation. We must select the mask size that fits the nasal bridge and the chin of the patient without covering the eyes (Figure 1). Bag used for infants and young children is named pediatric bag (which provides a tidal volume of approximately 400–500 ml); for older children and adolescents, an adult bag should be used (providing a tidal volume of 1000 ml) [3, 4, 5].

  2. Endotracheal tubes (ETs). Uncuffed ETs are mainly indicated for neonates, infants, and young children (<8 years). The correct size of these ETs can be calculated according to the equation (child’s age/4) + 4. On the other hand, the formula (child’s age/2) + 3.5 might be used for cuffed ETs. Other methods to calculate ETs size include comparing the child’s fifth finger with the internal diameter of the ET or by using resuscitation tape such as the Broselow Luten tape, and it is recommendable to have one size larger and smaller of the selected tube.

  3. Stylet. Adult sized for 5.5 tubes and beyond, pediatric ones for lower endotracheal tubes.

  4. Laryngoscope handle and blade. The first one can be an adult or pediatric one, and the second can be straight or curved depending on the experience of the laryngoscopist. The blades used in pediatrics ranged from 00 (extremely premature neonates) to 4. Blades 0–1 are used for preterm and full-term neonates, size 1 for infants. At age 2, size 2 blade; at this age, a curved blade can be used. For ages 10 and above, a number 3 blade is recommended.

  5. Colorimetric end tidal carbon dioxide devices or capnography monitors.

  6. Tape or a commercial holder to secure the endotracheal tube.

  7. Syringe for cuff inflation.

  8. Nasogastric and orogastric tubes.

Figure 1.

(A) The correct size for the child because it covers the area between nasal bridge and chin. (B) The mask elected is not correct, it covers part of the eyes of the patient. (C) The mask elected is not correct it covers the area far from the chin.

Tips and tricks

To remember all the preparatory equipment before starting intubation

You can use the STOP MAIDmnemonic to remember all the preparatory equipment before starting ETI procedure:


Tools for intubation;


Positioning (sniffing position so that the external auditory canal is anterior to shoulder);


Assistant, Ambu bag with facemask, airway devices;

Intravenous access;

Drugs (sedation, neuromuscular blocking medications).

2.1.2. Preoxygenation phase

With all the necessary tools already prepared, next, we must position the patient for the denominated preoxygenation phase. This position consists in a sniffing situation avoiding hyperextension and/or hyperflexion of the neck. The correct sniffing position is the one with exterior auditory canal anterior to the shoulders (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

(A) Correct sniffing position is shown the external auditory canal is anterior to the shoulders of the patient. (B) Incorrect position because neck is hyperextended. (C) Incorrect position because patient’s neck has hyperflexion.

Selection of ventilation technique relies on the number of persons available at preoxygenation phase:

  • One-person ventilation technique. The head must be positioned backwards, using the C-E technique and the chin must be elevated pressing and sealing the mask to the face. Sealing is very important. We may corroborate that ventilation technique is correct when elevation of the chest is observed (Figure 3).

  • Two-person ventilation technique. One member of the health care professional team will use the C-E technique but now with two hands while the other person will be pressing the bag (Figure 4).

Figure 3.

One-person C-E ventilation technique is illustrated.

Figure 4.

Two-person C-E ventilation technique. First person is doing a double hand C-E maneuver while a second person (not shown in the image) is pressing the bag.

After patient is positioned, then, ventilation must start with 100% inspired oxygen creating an oxygen reservoir. It is important to avoid hyperventilation. Therefore, a slow ventilation lasting around a second each must be applied being overall preoxygenation phase duration 3–5 min.

2.1.3. Sedation and neuromuscular blockade

Premedication increases success rate of pediatric ETI independently from degree of previous training [6]. By using the rapid sequence intubation in children, success rate of 52% and a complication rate of 61% can be achieved [7], however, sedation can be omitted in obtunded or comatose patients and neuromuscular blockade must be avoided in patients with difficult airway. Table 1 summarizes the drugs, indications, and doses used for sedation and neuromuscular blockade during pediatric ETI procedure.

MedicationsIndicationsDoses (IV)
SedationEtomidateHemodynamic instability, neuroprotective0.3 mg/kg
KetamineHemodynamic instability, patients with bronchospasm and septic shock1–2 mg/kg
MidazolamIt can cause hemodynamic instability0.2–0.3 mg/kg
PropofolIn hemodynamically stable patients1–1.5 mg/kg
ThiopentalNeuroprotection3–5 mg/kg
NM blockersRocuroniumFor children in which succinylcholine is contraindicated0.6–1.2 mg/kg
SuccinylcholineDo not use in extensive crush injury, chronic myopathy2 mg/kg

Table 1.

Drugs, indications, doses for achieving sedation and neuromuscular (NM) blockade during pediatric ETI.

2.1.4. Procedure

Clinician may most easily perform direct laryngoscopy by standing behind to the patient’s head and with height of the bed adjusted to the level of the laryngoscopist xiphoid appendix (Figure 5). After sedation and neuromuscular blocking, the clinician must perform a scissor maneuver to open mouth before laryngoscopy. Then, laryngoscope must be held in the left hand (regardless of dominance), inserting the blade in the right side of the patient’s mouth along the base of the tongue following the contour of the pharynx, and sweeping the tongue to the left.

Figure 5.

Proper position of laryngoscopist and correct introduction of laryngoscope after opening patient’s mouth through a scissor maneuver (not shown).

Once the tongue and soft tissues are retracted, clinician must recognize the following anatomic structures: epiglottis, arytenoid cartilage, and esophagus (Figure 6). After identifying epiglottis, this must be elevated exposing the vocal cords by handling laryngoscope at a 45° angle. Next step, endotracheal tube (ET) must be inserted into the trachea by holding it (with right hand) like a pencil (Figure 7).

Tips and tricks

To identify epiglottis and/or glottic structures

If epiglottis and/or glottic structures are not visible, blade must be pulled back slowly until they are visible. Other useful technique for helping to identify epiglottis and/or glottic structures is the named “Sellick maneuver” or so known as “cricoid pressure” (Figure 8). To perform it, another member of the reanimation team slightly push the region of cricoid cartilage while laryngoscopist observes the structures and introduce ET.

To calculate ETT length insertion

ET length insertion can be determined by any of the following two formulas [5, 8, 9]:

#1- (Patient’s age (in years)/2) + 12

#2- ET internal diameter * 3

Note: we recommend first equation because it has been reported as more accurate.

Figure 6.

A comparison between a real larynx and a model. Structures of the larynx must be identified before trying to insert ET. (A) Glottis, (B) Vocal cords. (C) Epiglottis.

Figure 7.

ET is introduced like a pencil into the airway.

Figure 8.

Sellick’s Maneuver (also known as cricoid pressure).

ET insertion in airway must be confirmed by the observation chest wall rise and down with ventilations, auscultation of breath sounds in both axillae and not heard over stomach, and, to observe an adequate oxygen saturation (>90%). Radiographically, a correct position of the tube is below the thoracic inlet and 3 cm above the carina (Figure 9). In case of ETT is located at esophagus or right bronchus, immediate measures must be taken to remove it and secure an adequate ventilation of patient (Figures 9 and 10).

Tips and tricks [5, 10]

In case of acute respiratory deterioration after intubation

Remember the mnemonic DONEwhich can help you to identify the probable causes:

Deviationof ETT to the main bronchus or misplacement during suction. Signs that can suggest this are asymmetric elevation of the thorax or asymmetric auscultation, specially the right hemithorax.

Obstructiondue to secretions obstructing tube’s lumen.

Pneumothoraxif are present signs as breath sounds diminished on the affected side, conduction of vocal vibrations to the surface of the chest may be increased, and hyperresonant at percussion.

Equipment, if problem is in the ventilator hardware or software.

Figure 9.

X-ray on the left shows a misplaced endotracheal tube which is in the right bronchus. Right X-ray shows a correct placement of the endotracheal tube, where the tip is located above the carina.

Figure 10.

ET located in esophagus.


3. Neonatal intubation

3.1. Indications

ETI in neonates can be most commonly performed as an emergency procedure or as part of an elective or semi-elective treatment:

  1. Emergency. When mask ventilation or non-invasive mechanical ventilation fails, in case of structural or congenital airway abnormalities, diaphragmatic hernia, prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation, if thoracic compressions are needed, surfactant administration and for direct tracheal aspirations if thick secretions exist [11].

  2. Elective/semi elective. Prematurity, positive pressure ventilation lasting more than 1-min, in case of ET must be changed, and in patients with an unstable airway [11].

3.2. Important anatomical considerations in neonates

In comparison to older children, adolescents and adults, anatomy of neonatal upper airway structures is different, being neonates a subpopulation where the ETI becomes a challenge. Some of these differences are the following: (a) a tongue proportionately larger, in consequence, trying to sweep it during ETI might be difficult and its backward movement might result in an airway obstruction; (b) epiglottis is longer, narrower, less flexible, and sometimes omega-shaped; (c) a cranial position of larynx can be an obstacle for observing the glottis during laryngoscopy, being this issue the reason why is preferable to use straight blades rather than curved ones in neonates; and (d) trachea is proportionally shorter and narrower [12, 13].

It is important to highlight, that neonates <1000 g, >4000 g, or those with congenital craniofacial abnormalities have less chance to be intubated at first attempt, representing a subgroup of neonates with a difficult airway which require special attention [14].

On the other hand, each attempt of intubation in neonates provokes injury of the mucosa which subsequently leads to an inflammation decreasing the caliber of the field of observation, and therefore, making the intubation less effective. Currently, it has been recommended a limit of 20 s for each intubation attempt in neonates, and if it fails, the ET must be removed and patient must be ventilated with a mask-bag reservoir until recovery [11, 15, 16].

Tips and tricks

Premedication phase in neonates is different from older children

In neonates, premedication phase must be only used as part of an elective ETI and not for emergency situations.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Canadian Pediatric Society (CPS) recommend a combination of vagolytic agents and neuromuscular blockers for premedication phase in neonates. Also, the AAP recommends that muscular blockers and sedatives must not be used alone without analgesia [3].

Tips and tricks

ET size election for neonates

Election of ET size based on neonate’s weight and gestational age:

Weight (g)Gestational age (weeks)ET size (internal diameter in mm)

3.3. Estimating length insertion of ET in neonates

Two methods may be used, and the objective is to place the tip of ET in the middle portion of trachea.

  1. DNT method

    We must add 1 cm to the distance (cm) between the newborn’s nasal septum and ear tragus (Figure 11) [17].

  2. Gestational age method (Table 2)

  3. “7-8-9 rule” method: in 1979, Tochen described a simple equation for the ET insertion length based on patient’s weight at birth.

Gestational age (weeks)ET length insertion (cm) from the patient’s lipsWeight (g)

Table 2.

Gestational age method to calculate ET length insertion [18].

Figure 11.

DNT method.

Formula: 1.17 * weight at birth (kg) + 5.58.

This equation has been supported by the AAP and the American Heart Association (AHA), establishing ET insertion length can be calculated by adding 6 cm to the newborn weight (e.g., for a newborn weighing 1 kg = 1 + 6 = 7 cm), from the patient’s lip [14].

Tips and tricks

ET length insertion when nasotracheal intubation is used

When nasotracheal intubation is performed, the ET length must increase in 20% (e.g., for a newborn weighing 2 kg: (2 kg + 6) × 1.2 = 9.6 cm). We must also take in consideration that the 7-8-9 rule can overestimate the insertion length in newborns with a birth weight less than 1000 g. In consequence, it is preferred to use the gestational age method (Table 2) [18].


4. Management of the child with difficult airway (DA)

Difficult airway can be defined as the clinical situation in which a conventionally trained physician has trouble for achieving an effective upper airway ventilation with a face mask, for tracheal intubation or both and where interact patient’s factors, setting conditions and operator skills [19]. First, we must evaluate child’s airway to identify those clinical, and/or laboratory factors that could make difficult to achieve ETI. Among the anatomical factors related with DA are the form and size of mouth, nose, mandible, neck, existence of masses or congenital malformations, and other childhood diseases that eventually could difficult ETI (Figure 12, Tables 3 and 4) [20, 21, 22, 23, 24].

Figure 12.

Difficult airway for ETI based on modified Mallampati classification [25,26].

  • Cranium’s bone displacement. Apert syndrome, Crouzon syndrome, hydrocephalus

  • Mandible hypoplasia. Pierre Robin syndrome, Treacher Collins syndrome, Goldenhar syndrome, Apert syndrome

  • Abnormal neck mobility. Klippel-Fleil syndrome, Down syndrome, mucopolisacaridosis

  • Limited oral aperture: Sheldon Freedman syndrome, Hallerman-Strieff syndrome, bullous epidermolysis

  • Small oral cavity: Pierre Robin syndrome, Treacher-Collins syndrome

  • Macroglossia: hypothyroidism, Beckwith Wiedemann syndrome, Down syndrome, mucopolisacaridosis

  • Airway or neck masses: cystic hygroma, teratomas, hemangiomas

  • Laryngeal or subglottic anomalies

Table 3.

Pediatric syndromes associated with DA.

  • Epiglottitis

  • Abscess (subma

  • Foreign body

  • Cervical column lesion

  • Skull base fracture

  • Maxillary or mandible lesion

  • Laryngeal fracture

  • Postintubation laryngeal edema

  • Facial trauma

  • Burns

  • Upper airway tumors (pharynx, larynx)

  • Inferior airway tumors (trachea, bronchi, mediastinal)

  • Post-radiation area

  • Angioedema

  • Anaphylactic shock (laryngeal edema)

  • Anquilosis

  • Juvenile Rheumatoid arthritis

  • Spastic cerebral paralysis

  • Tetanus

  • Lung hemorrhage

  • Obesity

  • Cranium-facial malformations

  • Micrognathia

  • Superior incisive protrusion

  • Short and wide neck

  • Big tongue

  • Previous intubation difficulty

  • Oral aperture limitation

  • Clift lip and palate

  • Mallampati classes 3 or 4 (Figure 12)

Table 4.

Childhood diseases associated with DA.

4.1. Devices and techniques for the management of the child with DA

DA devices can be classified according to the anatomical structure from where they will act and/or on their optical properties [27]:

4.2. Supraglottic airway devices

4.2.1. Classic laryngeal mask

It was developed in 1980 by Dr Archie Brain and forms part of the rescue devices in the ASA algorithm for the difficult airway management. It was designed to be situated in the hypopharynx, with an anterior aperture situated at the glottis entrance, the mask’s border is made of a silicone inflatable cuff, sealing the hypopharynx permitting positive pressure ventilation (less than 20 cm H2O). The mask is introduced using the index finger of the dominant hand as a guide towards the hypopharynx, following the palate’s curvature, until a resistance is felt, then the cuff must be inflated with a determined volume (the specific volume comes in a legend on the mask itself and depends of the number of the mask). Choosing the size mask depends on the weight of the patient. As complications of the procedure we can find aspiration of gastric contents, uvula, and pharyngeal pillars lesions (Figure 13).

Figure 13.

Laryngeal mask.

4.2.2. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway

In 2000 Brain published the description of a new laryngeal mask that tried to improve the airway’s protection against gastric aspiration. This was accomplished by including a second tube lateral to the airway’s tube and which in its distal end is located on the tip of the mask. This tube has the function of separating the digestive tract from the respiratory, and also Permits accessing the stomach with an orogastric probe (Figure 14) [28].

Figure 14.

ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.

4.2.3. Fastrach or intubation laryngeal mask (ILMA)

This type of laryngeal mask is designed with the objective of achieving intubation through the mask itself, it consists of an anatomically curved rigid tube, wide enough to accept in it endotracheal tubes this end is united to rigid metal loop that makes the insertion much easier, removal, and adjustment of the position with one hand only. Once installed, and ventilation achieved an ET is inserted, the mask is then removed maintaining the tube in place, with a specially designed stylet, so that after the mask is removed the ET remains in place (Figure 15).

Figure 15.

FASTRACH or intubation laryngeal mask (ILMA).

Other type of Fastrach laryngeal mask(2005) with an incorporated camera, permits once it has been introduced into the hypopharynx, setting a monitor on the outer part of the mask so that it can be possible introducing an ET under direct vision (Figure 16).

Figure 16.

New type of Fastrach laryngeal mask.

4.2.4. Combitube

This device can only be used to ventilate in emergency situations. It was designed in Austria in the year 1980. Insertion is easy for any person and insertion is blindfold. It consists of a double lumen latex tube that combines the functions of an esophageal obturator and a conventional ET. Combitube has two balloons which inflate from the exterior. First one corresponds to an oropharyngeal balloon (85–100 ml of capacity) situated in a proximal position to the pharyngeal perforations with a function of serves as a sealing of the oral and nasal cavity; second one, is called traqueo-esophagic balloon, and needs a volume of 12–15 ml to seal the trachea or esophagus. Combitube can be placed either in the esophagus or in trachea, and in case of tube passes to the esophagus, the patient can still be ventilated because the perforations existing in combitube esophageal lumen, and the stomach can be aspirated from the tracheal lumen. In case of combitube is set in the trachea, the patient can also be ventilated from the trachea lumen (Figure 17) [29, 30].

Figure 17.


4.3. Transglottic airway devices

4.3.1. Gum Elastic Bougie

Eschman Guideor Gum Elastic Bougie(GEB) is a semi-flexible guide of polyester covered in resin (to avoid laryngeal trauma). GEB has a 15-Fr diameter and can be introduced in 6 mm internal diameter tubes. Insertion technique consists of sliding the angulated tip underneath the epiglottis, then, dragging at the tracheal cartilages must be perceived (Figure 18) [31].

Figure 18.

Gum Elastic Bougie (GEB).

4.3.2. Lightwand device (Trachlight)

In some countries, a lighted stylet is used for ETI, this is the called Trachlight. It is based on transillumination of the soft tissue of the neck with a high effectivity for achieving intubation in an approximate time of 25 s (Figure 19) [32].

Figure 19.

Lightwand device (Trachlight).

4.4. Optical devices

4.4.1. Video laryngoscopes

They are laryngoscopes that carry in its distal blade’s end a high-resolution video camera to visualize the glottis and to introduce an ET without the need of observing the glottis directly but through a high-resolution screen which can be located in the same device or at the patient’s side. Among the main complications reported are the soft palate lesions (Figure 20).

Figure 20.

Video laryngoscope.


5. Insights and future directions

5.1. Direct laryngoscopy vs. video laryngoscopy

Learning curve (LC) in the case of the direct laryngoscopy requires of approximately of 45–50 previous intubations [33], while LC for video laryngoscopy is around 5 attempts. ETI using a video laryngoscopy is possible with little training, due to transmitted image from the blade’s distal tip makes easier the visualization of the larynx entrance. When intubation attempts using Miller or Macintosh laryngoscopes or video laryngoscopy fail other methods to secure pediatric airway are recommended to be used (i.e. supraglottic devices). Recent studies have reported that ETI with video laryngoscopy even performed by less experienced medical personnel, increases significantly the success rate in the first attempt in comparison with direct laryngoscopy [34]; moreover, it has been reported that video laryngoscopy decreases the intubation time with less desaturation and less failure rate when it is compared with conventional laryngoscopy [35, 36]. Nevertheless, other video laryngoscope methods (GlideScope) implying other type of learning (mainly based on exploration), have resulted to be inferior to direct laryngoscopy regarding the time required for ETI [37].

5.2. Importance of formal training in pediatric ETI

Until date there is no standard definition for the term proficiency in pediatric/neonatal airway ETI. In a recent study, defined a formal training in pediatric airway management as having received at least 2 weeks of training by pediatric anesthesiology teachers. In that study was reported that after formal training, intubation success rate increased from 65.1 to 75.7% (p= 0.01), and it was observed a significant decreasing in the number of intubation attempts (p= 0.01). However, they did not find statistically significant differences in the time for achieving Intubation nor for the frequency of complications [38].

In a study conducted by Kerrey et al., where rapid sequence intubation technique was used, pediatricians in emergency departments and anesthesiologist had higher success rates (88–91%) in comparison to physicians in formation (45%) [7]. These results were similar to the reported by Goto et al. where intubation success was higher at the first attempt in pediatricians (OR 2.36; CI 95% 1.11–4.97) and in emergency room physicians (OR 3.2; CI 95% 1.78–5.83) in comparison to pediatric residents of the first and second year [39].

It has also been evaluated the skills for neonatal ETI between residents. Interestingly, skills significantly improved with a success rate from 27% during the first year of formation to 79% for the second year. Number of attempts also improved decreasing from 3.6 to 1.2 from the first to the second year, respectively [38]. This and other study results highlight the relevance of implementing training strategies from early stages of education in medicine to effectively achieve ETI in children with the less number of attempts and complications [6, 40, 41].

5.2.1. ETI training models, live models, and simulation training sessions for increasing success in pediatric and neonatal intubation

Recently, it has been mentioned that there are no differences in the learning curve or the skills for performing neonatal intubation by comparing live models versus ETI training models. Retention curves with a follow-up of 6, 18 and 52 weeks remain constant after 6 weeks and get lost after 18 and 52 weeks; although, retention is higher when skill levels are higher too [42, 43]. Additionally, it has been reported that educational interventions such as training sessions using didactic and simulation components have not been related with an improvement in intubation success rate; even, performance points decrease after 8 weeks of the intervention [44]. Importantly, other studies have not found differences in pediatric ETI success rate at first attempt by comparing groups with and without training [45].


6. Conclusions

It is important to highlight, that clinicians who attend critically ill pediatric patients requiring airway management know the rapid sequence intubation procedure, identify a patient with difficult airway, know the devices and techniques for the management of difficult airway, and look for receiving a formal training. Future strategies for teaching and/or training clinicians in pediatric and neonatal ETI should be evaluated through conducting controlled clinical trials to identify which type is the most effective by considering the less number of attempts and complications.


  1. 1. Rimensberger P. Pediatric and Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation. From Basics to Clinical Practice. 1st ed. New Delhi, India: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2015. 1642 p
  2. 2. Russo SG, Becke K. Expected difficult airway in children. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2015;28(3):321-326
  3. 3. Emergency endotracheal intubation in children [database on the Internet]. UpToDate. 2015 [cited 2017-06-01]
  4. 4. Staple L, O'Connell K. Pediatric rapid sequence intubation: An in-depth review. Pediatric Emergency Medicine Reports. 2013;18(1):1
  5. 5. Kleinman ME, de Caen AR, Chameides L, Atkins DL, Berg RA, Berg MD, et al. Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2010;122(16 Suppl 2):S466-S515
  6. 6. Le CN, Garey DM, Leone TA, Goodmar JK, Rich W, Finer NN. Impact of premedication on neonatal intubations by pediatric and neonatal trainees. Journal of Perinatology. 2014;34(6):458-460
  7. 7. Kerrey BT, Rinderknecht AS, Geis GL, Nigrovic LE, Mittiga MR. Rapid sequence intubation for pediatric emergency patients: Higher frequency of failed attempts and adverse effects found by video review. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2012;60(3):251-259
  8. 8. Curley MA, Arnold JH, Thompson JE, Fackler JC, Grant MJ, Fineman LD, et al. Clinical trial design—Effect of prone positioning on clinical outcomes in infants and children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Journal of Critical Care. 2006;21(1):23-32; Discussion - 7
  9. 9. Nichols D, Shaffner D. Rogers’ Textbook of Pediatric Intensive Care. 5 ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015
  10. 10. Engorn B, Flerlage J. The Harriet Lane Handbook. 20 ed. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier; 2014
  11. 11. Weiner G, Zaichkin J. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. 7 ed. Amsterdam; New York: American Academy of Pediatrics. American Heart Association; 2016
  12. 12. Vijayasekaran S, Lioy J, Maschhoff K. Airway disorders of the fetus and neonate: An overview. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2016;21(4):220-229
  13. 13. Murphy M, Walls R. Manual of Emergency Airway Management. 4 ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2012
  14. 14. Johansen LC, Mupanemunda RH, Danha RF. Managing the newborn infant with a difficult airway. Infant. 2012;8(4):116-119
  15. 15. Smereka J. Which laryngoscope method should inexperienced intubators use for child intubation? American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2016;34(8):1729-1730
  16. 16. O'Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: Success rates, duration, and adverse effects. Pediatrics. 2006;117(1):e16-e21
  17. 17. Gray MM, Delaney H, Umoren R, Strandjord TP, Sawyer T. Accuracy of the nasal-tragus length measurement for correct endotracheal tube placement in a cohort of neonatal resuscitation simulators. Journal of perinatology. 2017:[Epub ahead of print]
  18. 18. Kempley ST, Moreiras JW, Petrone FL. Endotracheal tube length for neonatal intubation. Resuscitation. 2008;77(3):369-373
  19. 19. Auroy Y, Benhamou D, Pequignot F, Bovet M, Jougla E, Lienhart A. Mortality related to airway complications. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(4):366-370
  20. 20. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. Major complications of airway management in the UK: Results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: Anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2011;106(5):617-631
  21. 21. Adewale L. Anatomy and assessment of the pediatric airway. Paediatric Anaesthesia. 2009;19(Suppl 1):1-8
  22. 22. Jenkins IA, Saunders M. Infections of the airway. Paediatric Anaesthesia. 2009;19(Suppl 1):118-130
  23. 23. Infosino A. Pediatric upper airway and congenital anomalies. Anesthesiology Clinics of North America. 2002;20(4):747-766
  24. 24. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 1993;78(3):597-602
  25. 25. Samsoon GL, Young JR. Difficult tracheal intubation: A retrospective study. Anaesthesia. 1987;42(5):487-490
  26. 26. Santos AP, Mathias LA, Gozzani JL, Watanabe M. Difficult intubation in children: Applicability of the Mallampati index. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. 2011;61(2):156-158 159-162, 184-187
  27. 27. Miller DM. A proposed classification and scoring system for supraglottic sealing airways: A brief review. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2004;99(5):1553-1559; Table of contents
  28. 28. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA ‘ProSeal’–A laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2000;84(5):650-654
  29. 29. Agro F, Frass M, Benumof JL, Krafft P. Current status of the combitube: A review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2002;14(4):307-314
  30. 30. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(5):1269-1277
  31. 31. Viswanathan S, Campbell C, Wood DG, Riopelle JM, Naraghi M. The eschmann tracheal tube introducer. (Gum elastic bougie). Anesthesiology Review. 1992;19(6):29-34
  32. 32. Inoue Y. Lightwand intubation can improve airway management. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2004;51(10):1052-1053
  33. 33. Imashuku Y, Kojima A, Takahashi K, Kitagawa H. Endotracheal intubation training for clinical trainees in Japan is the anesthesiology training not necessary? Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2016;31:34
  34. 34. Madziala M, Okruznik M, Cobo SA, Almira EF, Smereka J. Gold rules for pediatric endotracheal intubation. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2016;34(8):1711-1712
  35. 35. Sakurai Y, Tamura M. Efficacy of the Airway Scope (Pentax-AWS) for training in pediatric intubation. Pediatrics International. 2015;57(2):217-221
  36. 36. Moussa A, Luangxay Y, Tremblay S, Lavoie J, Aube G, Savoie E, et al. Videolaryngoscope for teaching neonatal endotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2016;137(3):e20152156
  37. 37. Johnston LC, Auerbach M, Kappus L, Emerson B, Zigmont J, Sudikoff SN. Utilization of exploration-based learning and video-assisted learning to teach GlideScope videolaryngoscopy. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2014;26(3):285-291
  38. 38. Leung SK, Cruz AT, Macias CG, Sirbaugh PE, Patel B. Improving pediatric emergency care by implementing an eligible learner Endotracheal Intubation Policy. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2016;32(4):205-209
  39. 39. Goto T, Gibo K, Hagiwara Y, Okubo M, Brown DF, Brown CA 3rd, et al. Factors Associated with first-pass success in pediatric intubation in the emergency department. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2016;17(2):129-134
  40. 40. Dongara AR, Modi JJ, Nimbalkar SM, Desai RG. Proficiency of residents and fellows in performing neonatal intubation. Indian Pediatrics. 2014;51(7):561-564
  41. 41. Downes KJ, Narendran V, Meinzen-Derr J, McClanahan S, Akinbi HT. The lost art of intubation: Assessing opportunities for residents to perform neonatal intubation. Journal of Perinatology. 2012;32(12):927-932
  42. 42. Andreatta PB, Dooley-Hash SL, Klotz JJ, Hauptman JG, Biddinger B, House JB. Retention curves for pediatric and neonatal intubation skills after simulation-based training. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2016;32(2):71-76
  43. 43. Andreatta PB, Klotz JJ, Dooley-Hash SL, Hauptman JG, Biddinger B, House JB. Performance-based comparison of neonatal intubation training outcomes: Simulator and live animal. Advances in Neonatal Care. 2015;15(1):56-64
  44. 44. Finan E, Bismilla Z, Campbell C, Leblanc V, Jefferies A, Whyte HE. Improved procedural performance following a simulation training session may not be transferable to the clinical environment. Journal of Perinatology. 2012;32(7):539-544
  45. 45. Nishisaki A, Donoghue AJ, Colborn S, Watson C, Meyer A, Brown CA 3rd, et al. Effect of just-in-time simulation training on tracheal intubation procedure safety in the pediatric intensive care unit. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(1):214-223

Written By

Maribel Ibarra-Sarlat, Eduardo Terrones-Vargas, Lizett Romero- Espinoza, Graciela Castañeda-Muciño, Alejandro Herrera-Landero and Juan Carlos Núñez-Enríquez

Submitted: March 6th, 2017 Reviewed: July 11th, 2017 Published: December 20th, 2017