Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Application of Taguchi-Based Design of Experiments for Industrial Chemical Processes

Written By

Rahul Davis and Pretesh John

Reviewed: April 27th, 2017 Published: March 7th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.69501

Chapter metrics overview

3,379 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Design of experiment is the method, which is used at a very large scale to study the experimentations of industrial processes. It is a statically approach where we develop the mathematical models through experimental trial runs to predict the possible output on the basis of the given input data or parameters. The aim of this chapter is to stimulate the engineering community to apply Taguchi technique to experimentation, the design of experiments, and to tackle quality problems in industrial chemical processes that they deal with. Based on years of research and applications, Dr. G. Taguchi has standardized the methods for each of these DOE application steps. Thus, DOE using Taguchi approach has become a much more attractive tool to practicing engineers and scientists. And since the last four decades, there were limitations when conventional experimental design techniques were applied to industrial experimentation. And Taguchi, also known as orthogonal array design, adds a new dimension to conventional experimental design. Taguchi method is a broadly accepted method of DOE, which has proven in producing high-quality products at subsequently low cost.


  • DOE
  • Taguchi method
  • industrial chemical processes
  • parameter optimization

1. Introduction

Industries are engaged in a variety of activities such as developing new products, improving previous designs, maintenance, controlling and improving ongoing processes and some more. Experimentation is a frequent task in these activities to measure and analyse the output, and for this purpose engineers/researchers use many tools like statistics, analytical models, etc., regardless of their background in it [1].

Montgomery [2] writes,

“Experiments are performed in almost any field of enquiry and are used to study the performance of processes and systems. The process is a combination of machines, methods, people and other resources that transforms some input into an output that has one or more observable responses. Some of the process variables are controllable, whereas other variables are uncontrollable, although they may be controllable for the purpose of a test. The objectives of the experiment include: determining which variables are most influential on the response, determining where to set the influential controllable variables so that the response is almost always near the desired optimal value, so that the variability in the response is small, so that the effect of uncontrollable variables are minimized.”

In today’s era, the purpose of experiments in industries is essentially optimization and robust design analysis (RDA, which is used to make the system less sensitive to variations in uncontrollable noise factors or in other words to make the system robust). DOE, or experimental design, is the name given to the techniques used for guiding the choice of the experiments to be performed in an efficient way. In a general way, the process analysis can be expressed as the study of the cause-effect relationships which may be carried out by drawing inferences from a finite number of samples. And one of the most important purposes of it is to design sampling experiments that are productive and cost-effective and provide a sufficient data base in a qualitative sense [3]. Design of experiments has been applied successfully in diverse fields such as agriculture (improved crop yields have created grain surpluses), the petrochemical industry (for highly efficient oil refineries) and Japanese automobile manufacturing (giving them a large market share for their vehicles), and still its implementation area is spreading and providing the optimized results. These developments are due in part to the successful implementation of design of experiments. The reason to use design of experiments is to implement valid and efficient experiments that will produce quantitative results and support sound decision-making [4].

1.1. Brief history

Statistical experimental design, together with the basic ideas underlying DOE, was born in the 1920s from the work of Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher [5]. Fisher was the statistician who created the foundations for modern statistical science. The second era for statistical experimental design began in 1951 with the work of Box and Wilson [6], who applied the idea to industrial experiments and developed the response surface methodology (RSM), which is used to find out the relationships between various process parameters and one or more responses. The work of Dr. Genichi Taguchi in the 1980s [7], despite having been very controversial (described briefly in heading 2.4), had a significant impact in making statistical experimental design popular and stressed the importance it can have in terms of quality improvement.

Usually, data subject to experimental error (noise) are involved, and the results can be significantly affected by noise. Thus, it is better to analyse the data with appropriate statistical methods. The basic principles of statistical methods in experimental design are replication, randomization and blocking. Replication is the repetition of the experiment to obtain a more precise result (sample mean value) and to estimate the experimental error (sample standard deviation). Randomization refers to the random order in which the runs of the experiment are to be performed. In this way, the conditions in one run neither depend on the conditions of the previous run nor predict the conditions in the subsequent runs. Blocking aims at isolating a known systematic bias effect and prevents it from obscuring the main effects [8]. This is achieved by arranging the experiments in groups that are like one another. In this way, the sources of variability are reduced, and the precision is improved.

The design of experiments (DOE) is explained by Lye [9], as a methodology for systematically applying statistics to experimentation. In DOE, a sequence of tests is designed in which purposeful vary the input parameters (factors) of a product or process to examine the reasons of the variation in the output response [10]. By the end of the twentieth century, DOE was no longer viewed as merely a stand-alone tool, because it was packaged together with a structured initiative for business improvement known as Six Sigma. Moreover, an increased emphasis on DOE took place during this period in Six Sigma literature [11]. DOE is a good tool to understand and optimize products or process parameters. It is quick as well as cost-effective.

1.2. Advantages of DOE

With real engineering examples, Czitrom [12] listed the following advantages of DOE:

  • A good amount of data can be obtained with lesser resources (experiments, time, material, etc.).

  • The estimates of the effect of each factor (variable) on the response are more precise.

  • It is a systematic way to estimate the interactions between the process factors.

  • There is experimental information in a larger region of the factor space.

1.3. DOE techniques

A survey was carried out within the industry which identifies the needs of using an efficient and practical technique for the experimentation. It was surveyed that 76% of industries consider themselves in need of a methodology [13]. So here are listing some of the techniques that are in use in Industries. The list of the techniques considered is far from being complete since the aim of the section is just to introduce the reader into the topic showing the main techniques which are used in practice [14].

  • Randomized complete block design

  • Latin square

  • Full factorial

  • Fractional factorial

  • Central composite

  • Box-Behnken [15]

  • Plackett-Burman [16]

  • Taguchi [7]

  • Random

  • Halton, Faure and Sobol sequences

  • Latin hypercube

  • Optimal design

  • Response surface design

Several DOE techniques are available to the experimental designer. However, as it always happens in optimization, there is no best choice. The correct DOE technique selection depends on the problem to be investigated and on the aim of the experimentation.

M. Cavzzuti [14] concluded that items to be considered are:

  1. The number of experiments N which can be afforded. In determining the number of experiments, an important issue is the time required for a single experiment. There is a lot of difference between whether the response variable is extracted from a quick simulation in which a number is computed or taken from a spreadsheet or it involves the setting up of a complex laboratory experiment. In the former case, it could take a fraction of a second to obtain a response, and in the latter one, each experiment could take days.

  2. The number of parameters k of the experiment. For many DOE techniques, the number of experiments required grows exponentially with the number of parameters (Figure 1). Not necessarily to use a cheap technique is the best choice, because a cheap technique means imprecise results and insufficient design space exploration. Unless the number of experiments which can be afforded is high, it is important to limit the number of parameters as much as possible to reduce the size of the problem and the effort required to solve it. Of course, the choice of the parameters to be discarded can be a particularly delicate issue. This could have done by applying a cheap technique (like Plackett-Burman etc.) as a preliminary study for estimating the main effects.

Figure 1.

Number of experiments required by the DOE techniques [14].


2. Introduction to Taguchi method

2.1. Brief history

After the Second World War, allied forces observed some of the major drawbacks of the Japanese telephone system, that is, extremely poor quality and unsuitability for long-term communication purposes. To overcome these drawbacks, an improved system was required, for this the allied command recommended establishing research facilities to develop a state-of-the-art communication system. At that time, the electrical communication laboratories (ECL) were came on the stage with Dr. Genichi Taguchi (Figure 2) in charge of improving the R&D productivity and enhancing product quality. It was observed that the ratio of the time and money expended on engineering experimentation and testing is very high than the efforts given to the process of creative brainstorming to minimize the expenditure of resources. He noticed that the process of inspection, screening and salvaging cannot improve poor quality. The inspection process is done to check the quality but it can’t increase the quality by itself. Therefore, he believed that quality concepts should be based upon, and developed around, the philosophy of prevention.

Figure 2.

Dr. G. Taguchi [17].

This moved Taguchi to develop new optimizing methods of the processes of engineering experimentation. He believed that the best way to improve quality was to design and build it into the product. He quoted that [18], “Cost is more important than quality but quality is the best way to reduce cost.”

He developed the techniques which are now known as Taguchi methods (TM). His main contribution lies not in the mathematical formulation of the design of experiments, but rather in the accompanying philosophy. Taguchi method is different from the traditional techniques because of Taguchi’s concepts of design. By his methods, he developed Robust Manufacturing systems that are insensitive to daily or seasonal variations of environment, wears or other noise factors. His philosophy had far reaching consequences, yet it is founded on three very simple concepts [19].

Taguchi’s new technique consist of three concepts about quality, these are:

  1. Quality should be designed into the product and not inspected into it.

  2. Quality is better achieved by minimizing the deviation from a target. The product should be so designed that it is immune to uncontrollable environmental factors.

  3. The cost quality should be measured as a function of deviation from the standard and the losses should be measured system-wide.

In Taguchi’s thinking, the quality improvement is an ongoing effort. He endeavoured continually to reduce the variation around the target value. Right population selection as near to the target value or desired value is the first stair step of the quality improvement. And to accomplish this, Taguchi designed experiments using especially constructed tables known as “orthogonal arrays” (OA). It makes the design of experiments very easy and consistent.

Taguchi’s two most important contributions to quality engineering are as follows:

  1. The use of Gauss’s quadratic loss function to quantify quality.

  2. The development of robust designs (parameter and tolerance design).

Since the early 1980s when applications to different industries began in western hemisphere, the Taguchi method is evaluated in different platforms like books, articles, panel discussions, etc. Taguchi methods have touched most of the manufacturing processes to optimize the process in such a way so that noise factors do not affect the output. Several reports [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29] evaluated Taguchi methods from a statistical standpoint. In these reports, the parameter design received the most attention. These reports confirm that Dr. Taguchi made important contributions to quality engineering; however, without some basic statistical knowledge, it is hard to apply his technique. Specifically, the use of signal-to-noise ratios in identifying the nearly best factor levels to minimize quality losses may not be efficient [30].

2.2. Taguchi method

In Taguchi method, we assume that we are designing an engineering system—it might be a machine that performs some intended function or it might be a production process. We use the knowledge of fundamental about the system and process parameters for efficient experimentation. We can skip all the extra effort that might have gone in to investigating interactions. By this, we can decrease the number of factors. Taguchi categorize the factors in two sets:

  1. Control factors, which are under our control.

  2. Noise factors, which are not under our control, except during experiments in the laboratories.

In the 1920, Sir R. A. Fisher first proposed the DOE with multiple factors known as Factorial Design of Experiments. In the full factorial design, we work on the all possible combinations extruded from the preselected set of factors. Mostly all industrial experiments depends upon on the number of factors and if we consider all possible combination then it becomes harder and also time consuming to execute a large sequence of experiments. The full fractional design consists of kn experiments, where “k” is the number of levels of factors and “n” is the number of factors (factors are the different variables, which determine the functionality or performance of a product or system). After that, partial factorial method came into the existence. In this, the number of experiments is reduced, and only a small set from all possibilities is selected, which produces the most information.

Taguchi’s approach complements the following two important areas:

  • Taguchi constructed a special set of orthogonal arrays (OA) to lay out his experiments. Taguchi prepared a new set of standard OAs which could be used for a number of experimental situations.

  • He also devised a standard method for analysis of the results.

As mentioned, the full factorial design requires many experiments to be carried out. It becomes laborious and complex, if the number of factors increases. To overcome this problem, Taguchi suggested a specially designed method called the use of orthogonal array. In this, we can study the more factors or parameter space with lesser number of experiments. Opposite to full factorial analysis, the Taguchi method reduces the number of experimental runs to a reasonable one, in terms of cost and time, using orthogonal arrays [31]. For example, if there are three factors called A, B and C, all are examined with two levels called “1” and “2” (in general, they are referred as “1” and “−1”). Then, according to the full fractional, the number of experiments should be 23 = 8. In Table 1, the full fractional array is shown; such experiments can find all main and two and three factor interactions.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 1 1 2 1 2 2
1 2 1 2 2 1 2
2 2 1 1 2 2 1
1 1 2 1 2 2 2
2 1 2 2 2 1 1
1 2 2 2 1 2 1
2 2 2 1 1 1 2

Table 1.

Full fractional factor assignments to experimental array columns.

But at the same time, Taguchi’s L8 array can deal with seven factors and their two levels as shown in Table 2, such experiments can find all seven main factors effects.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 1 1 2 1 2 2
1 2 1 2 2 1 2
2 2 1 1 2 2 1
1 1 2 1 2 2 2
2 1 2 2 2 1 1
1 2 2 2 1 2 1
2 2 2 1 1 1 2

Table 2.

Orthogonal array factor assignments to experimental array columns.

So, it can be seen that the full fractional method is dealing with three factors, and orthogonal array is dealing with seven factors in same eight experimental runs.

Taguchi method is based on mixed levels, highly fractional factorial designs and other orthogonal designs. It distinguishes between control variables and noise variables. In this, we choose two sets of parameters, that is, controlled and noise parameters or variables. Respectively, we choose orthogonal designs also. The design chosen for the controlled variable is known as inner array and for the noise variables is known as outer array. The combination of the inner and the outer arrays gives the crossed array, which is the list of all the samples scheduled by the Taguchi method. It means that for each sample in the inner array, the full set of experiments of the outer array is performed. The advantage of this cross combination is that it provides the information about the relation between the parameters which plays very important for the robust system designing.

Then, it is recommended by Dr. Taguchi to use the quality loss function to measure the performance characteristics. The quality loss function is a continuous function that is defined in terms of the deviation of a design parameter from an ideal or target value. The value of this loss function is further transformed into signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio. Performance characteristics are available in three categories to determine the S/N ratio:

  • Nominal-the-Best

  • Larger-the-Best

  • Smaller-the-Best

The Taguchi method has four basic phases in the optimization process, these are as follows:

  1. First phase is to timely thinking about the quality characteristics and determining the parameters which important to the product or process.

  2. In second phase the experiments sequence is designed and executed accordingly.

  3. In third phase of the optimization process the statistical analysis is done to determine the optimum conditions.

  4. Finally in the fourth phase the confirmation test is run with the optimum conditions.

Barrado et al. [32] expanded above-mentioned four phases into the following steps for implementing Taguchi experimental design:

  1. Step 1. Selection of the output or target parameters.

  2. Step 2. Identification of the input parameters and their levels.

  3. Step 3. Determining the suitable orthogonal array (OA).

  4. Step 4. Assign factors and interactions to the columns of the array.

  5. Step 5. Conduct the experiments.

  6. Step 6. Statistical analysis and the signal-to-noise ratio and determining the optimum setting of the factor levels.

  7. Step 7. Perform confirmatory experiment (if necessary).

First of all, the input parameters and the respective operation levels and output or responses are selected. After this choice, the best fitted or economical matrix experiment or orthogonal array is selected [33, 34]. Here, in Table 3, the array selector is shown.

Numbers of Parameters (P) Number of levels
2 3 4 5
2 L4 L9 L16 L25
3 L4 L9 L16 L25
4 L8 L9 L16 L25
5 L8 L18 L16 L25
6 L8 L18 L32 L25
7 L8 L18 L32 L50
8 L12 L18 L32 L50
9 L12 L18 L32 L50
10 L12 L27 L32 L50
11 L12 L27 L50
12 L16 L27 L50
13 L16 L27
14 L16 L36
15 L16 L36
16 L32 L36
17 L32 L36
18 L32 L36
19 L32 L36
20 L32 L36
21 L32 L36
22 L32 L36
23 L32 L36
24 L32
25 L32
26 L32
27 L32
28 L32
29 L32
30 L32
31 L32

Table 3.

Taguchi orthogonal array selector.

After performing the experiments as per the chosen array, we choose the desired signal-to-noise ratio function (smaller-the-better, larger-the-better and nominal-the-better). The S/N ratio is a logarithmic function which can also be defined as an inverse of variance. Generally in the optimization of the process or product design and in minimizing the variability we use it. If we maximize the S/N ratio, we reduce the variability of the process against undesirable changes in noise factors. Because S/N ration and variance are inversely proportional, so the chosen factors should produce maximum value of S/N so that we get the minimum variability.

Three types of common problems and respective signal-to-ratio function are presented in Table 4.

Choose… S/N ratio formulas Use when the goal is to…
Smaller the better S / N = 10 log [ 1 n i = 1 n y i 2 ] Minimize the response
Nominal the better S / N = 10 log µ 2 σ 2 Target the response and you want to base the S/N ratio on means and standard deviations
Larger the better S / N = 10 log [ 1 n i = 1 n 1 y i 2 ] Maximize the response

Table 4.

Types of problems and respective signal-to-ratio function.

In Table 4, yi denotes the nth observations of response variable and μ2 denotes the square of mean and σ2 the variance of the observations of the replicated response values.

For analysing the data, one of the most common methods used is ANOVA. ANOVA is a statistical technique that assesses potential differences in a scale-level dependent variable by a nominal-level variable having two or more categories [35]. The ANOVA is developed by Sir Ronald Fisher in 1918. It is the extended version of T test and Z test. The reason of its origin was the limitations of the T & Z tests which have the problem of only allowing the nominal level variable to have just two categories. This analysis method is also famous with the title “The Fisher Analysis of Variance.”

The use of ANOVA depends on the research design. Commonly, ANOVAs are used in three ways:

  1. One-way ANOVA

  2. Two-way ANOVA

  3. N-way multivariate ANOVA.

2.3. Applications of Taguchi method in industrial chemical processes

The Taguchi method is used whenever the settings of interest parameters are necessary, not only for manufacturing processes. Therefore, the Taguchi approach is used in many domains such as environmental sciences [36, 37], agricultural sciences [38], physics [39], statistics [40], management and business [41], medicine [42] and in chemical processes as well [43]. Here, some of the literature reviews are given, which clearly show the application of Taguchi method in the chemical processes of various industries.

The identification and incorporation of quality costs and robustness criteria are becoming a critical issue while addressing chemical process design problems under uncertainty. Fernando P. Bernardo et al. [44] used Taguchi loss functions along with other robustness criteria and presented a systematic design framework. They conducted their study within a single-level stochastic optimization formulation, and an efficient cubature technique is used for the estimation of the expected values. An optimal design was discovered, together with a robust operating policy. It was observed that these parameters maximizes average process performance.

Kundu et al. [45] investigated the optimal operation conditions to prepare activated carbon (AC) using palm kernel shell (PKS). They choose four control factors for their research which were irradiation time, microwave power, concentration of impregnation substance which was phosphoric acid and impregnation ratio between acid and PKS aided by Taguchi optimization method. After successful implementation of Taguchi method, the optimal settings were found and the optimal levels were microwave power of 800 W, irradiation time of 17 min, impregnation ratio of 2 and concentration of acid 85% (undiluted). After the confirmation test with optimal settings, activated carbon with high BET surface area of 1473.55 m2 g−1 and high porosity was obtained.

Zolfaghari et al. [46] presented a systematic optimization approach by using the Taguchi method for removal of lead (Pb) and mercury (Hg) by a nanostructure, zinc oxide-modified mesoporous carbon CMK-3 denoted as Zn-OCMK-3. CMK-3 was synthesized by using SBA-15 and then oxidized by nitric acid. Their investigation using Zn-OCMK-3 in the frame of the Taguchi method brought forth the optimum conditions for Pb and Hg adsorption from water. The determined optimum conditions for removal of Pb (II) and Hg (II) were the agitation time of 120 min, the initial concentration of 10 mg/l, the temperature of 35 ◦C, the dose of 0.7 g/l, and the pH of 6. Based on the confirmation test under optimum conditions for Zn-OCMK-3, it was observed that this nanoporous carbon is very effective in removing the lead and mercury with a high pollutant removal efficiency (PRE) i.e. 97.25% for Pb (II) and 99% for Hg (II). Removal of lead and mercury were highly concentration dependent. Number of Pb and Hg ions highly increase from initial concentration of 10–400 mg/l. It is also observed that a lot of ions cannot be adsorbed at high concentration, which reduce the removal efficiency.

Venkata Mohan et al. [47] applied design of experimental methodology (DOE) by Taguchi approach to find out the effects of selected factors on the H2 production with the final aim of optimizing the process. They selected four factors for their research study, that is, inlet pH, inoculum type, feed composition and inoculum pre-treatment methods. Here, also Taguchi method enhanced the process. Results showed significant variation and process efficiency. Among the factors studied with respect to H2 production, feed composition showed stronger influence followed by inlet pH, pre-treatment method and origin of the inoculum. Taguchi approach also permits process optimization of system by a set of independent factors (over a specific region of interest (levels) by identifying the influence of individual factors, establishing the relationship between variables and operational conditions and finally estimate the performance at optimum levels obtained. By using optimized conditions of the factors, the rate of H2 production can be enhanced by almost threefold (0.376–1.166 mmol/day), same positive enhanced results were recorded for substrate degradation also.

Taguchi-based DOE methodology provides a systematic and efficient mathematical approach to understand complex process of fermentative H2 production and substrate degradation for the optimization of the near optimum design parameters, only with a few well-defined experimental sets [48].

Messias Borges Silva et al. [49] applied Taguchi method in optimization of the treatment conditions of polyester-resin effluent by means of Advanced Oxidative Processes (AOPs). The output parameter were Chemical oxygen demand (COD). Their study consist of two type of evaluation. First one is, the influence individual independent parameter and the second one is the respective interactions effect. This allowed determining the most statistically significant variables and the optimal conditions. The treatment by means of advanced oxidative process provided an approximate 35% reduction in chemical oxygen demand of the polyester-industry wastewater. However, when compared to studies describing the treatment of this effluent by Advanced Oxidative Processes, it was seen that the results were relevant. This investigation confirms the effectiveness of Taguchi Method in the industrial chemical processes.

Liao et al. [50] applied the Taguchi method and designs of experiments (DOE) approach to optimize parameters for chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) processes in wafer manufacturing. Planning of experiments was based on a Taguchi orthogonal array table to determine an optimal setting, and significant results were found.

S. V. Mohan et al. [51] applied the Taguchi robust experimental design (DOE) methodology on a dynamic anaerobic process treating complex wastewater by an anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor (AnSBBR). Their work was to optimize the process and also at the other hand to evaluate the influence of distinct factors on the process. They considered the uncontrollable (noise) factors. This is the first kind of study of anaerobic process evaluation and process optimization by using the Taguchi methodology adopting dynamic approach.

The biological oxidation of ferrous ion by iron-oxidizing bacteria is potentially a useful industrial process for removal of H2S from industrial gases, desulphurization of coal, removal of sulfur dioxide from flue gas, treatment of acid mine drainage and regeneration of an oxidant agent in hydrometallurgical leaching operations that pH of feed solution has the most contribution in the biooxidation rate of ferrous ion. When the parameters were set according to Taguchi approach, the biological reaction rate was obtained. Mousavi et al. [52] studied and find out the optimum values of the process parameters on the ferrous biooxidation rate by immobilization of a native Sulfobacillus species on the surface of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) particles in a packed-bed bioreactor using Taguchi method. L16 array was used with five factors and their four levels. Temperature, initial pH of feed solution, dilution rate and initial concentration of Fe3+ and aeration rate are considered as input parameters in Taguchi technique. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the optimum conditions and most significant process parameters affecting the reaction rate. Results indicated that pH of feed solution has the most contribution in the biooxidation rate of ferrous ion. When the parameters were set according to Taguchi approach, the biological reaction rate was obtained 8.4 g L−1 h−1.

Taguchi robust design method with L9 orthogonal array was implemented to optimize experimental conditions for the preparation of nano-sized silver particles using chemical reduction method [53]. The parameters for chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) in an ultra-large-scale integrated (ULSI) planarization process are explored using the Taguchi method [54]. So, it can be seen easily the popularity of the Taguchi method in industrial chemical processes.

2.4. Advantages and disadvantages of Taguchi method

The foundation of the DOE in Taguchi method (TM) is orthogonal array design that is very simple method for analysing the outputs. His work was controversial and criticized by some researchers for being inefficient and ineffective in some cases [55]. But still the simplicity of Taguchi method increased its use in manufacturing industries. Here, some of the advantages and disadvantages are discussed briefly which clears its popularity even in the clouds of controversies. A survey shows that 51% of respondents are familiar with TM, although only 14% of them apply it [13].

The key step of the TM is to increasing the quality level with less affecting the cost factor. TM provides the optimal settings for the processes which can improve quality, and these settings attained from TM are also insensitive to the variation of noise factors. Basically, classical process parameter design is complex and not easy-to-use, and at the other hand, Taguchi technique is user friendly [56].

Another advantage of the Taguchi method is that it emphasizes a mean performance characteristic value close to the target value rather than a value within certain specification limits, thus improving the product quality. Also, it is straightforward and easy to apply to many engineering situations, this property makes it a powerful yet simple tool for industries. It can be used to quickly narrow the scope of a research project or to identify problems in a manufacturing process from data already in existence [57].

It is probably unfortunate that the important concepts advocated by Taguchi have been overshadowed by controversy associated with his approach to modelling and data analysis. There have been several research papers and books which explain, review, or raise questions on the Taguchi’s ideas [55, 58]. One of its demerit is that the results obtained from it are only relative. It is unable to indicate exactly which parameters have the highest effect on the performance or response.

Another debating topic is that when orthogonal array do not tests all the possible combinations of the factors, then this method should not be adopted with all relationships between all factors. The Taguchi method has been criticized for its difficulty in accounting for interactions between parameters.

Another limitation is that the Taguchi methods are offline. So in the case of dynamically changing processes for example a simulation study, the TM is not appropriate. And also, the Taguchi method is most effectively applied at the designing stage of a product development, it cannot help after the process is started. Because TM deals with designing quality rather than correcting for poor quality [59].


3. Conclusion

Industries are in the need of the method of conducting experiments which optimize processes and increase the quality of products. Same is desired in chemical industrial processes also. For this, design of experiments is the basic step of quality improvement via optimized processes. And this requires proper planning and layout of the experiments and accurate analysis of the results. And Dr. G. Taguchi studied these issues very well and developed his method. Thus, DOE using Taguchi approach has become a much more attractive tool to practicing engineers and scientists. Since the conventional experimental design techniques were applied to industrial applications or processes, these conventional methods were always covered with drawbacks and limitations. And Taguchi array, also known as orthogonal array design, adds a new dimension to conventional experimental design. Taguchi method is a broadly accepted method of DOE which has proven in producing high-quality products at subsequently low cost. In most of the industrial applications or processes, the researchers and scientists used Taguchi method with other analytical tools in their research works, and in industrial chemical processes, it is also showing great results in optimization of the processes. A very important and fundamental part of Taguchi’s method is to make sure that the product performs well even in noise; it helps in making the product long lasting. Taguchi’s method can be applied in a very short amount of time; it does not take a lot of effort and improves the processes dramatically. The manufacturing industries can improve their processes very quickly and efficiently by applying the Taguchi’s method. Around Industrial chemical processes, Taguchi method is showing the outstanding performance by optimizing the process parameters and reducing the number of experiments via orthogonal arrays. Taguchi method gives a new height to the processes by making them cost-effective and quick with improved quality.


  1. 1. Bisgaard S. Teaching statistics to engineers. The American Statistician. 1991;45(4):274-283. DOI: 10.2307/2684452
  2. 2. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 5th ed. New York: Wiley; 2000
  3. 3. Toutenburg H, Shalabh. Statistical Analysis of Designed Experiments. 3rd ed. Heidelberg: Springer Texts in Statistics; 2009. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1148-3_1
  4. 4. Telford JK. A brief introduction to design of experiments. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest. 2009;27(3):224-232
  5. 5. Fisher RA. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; 1925
  6. 6. Box GEP, Wilson KB. Experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1951;13:1-45
  7. 7. Taguchi G, Wu Y. Introduction to Off-line Quality Control. Nagoya: Central Japan Quality Control Association; 1980
  8. 8. NIST/SEMATECH. NIST/SEMATECH e-handbook of statistical methods. 2006. Retrieved from
  9. 9. Lye LM. Tools and toys for teaching design of experiments methodology. In: 33rd Annual General Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2005
  10. 10. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 6th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; Hoboken, NJ. 2005
  11. 11. Brady JE, Allen TT. Six Sigma literature: A review and agenda for future research. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 2006;22:335-367
  12. 12. Czitrom V. One factor at a time versus designed experiments. The American Statistician. 1991;53(2):126-131
  13. 13. Tanco M, Viles E, Ilzarbe L, Álvarez MJ. Manufacturing Industries Need Design of Experiments (DOE). In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering. 2007;2:1108-1112. London: Newswood Limited. ISBN:978-988-98671-2-6
  14. 14. Cavazzuti M. Design of Experiments. In Optimization Methods: From Theory to Design. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2013, pp. 13-42. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-31187-1_2
  15. 15. Box GEP, Behnken D. Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics. 1960;2:455-475
  16. 16. Plackett RL, Burman JP. The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika. 1946;33(4):305-325
  17. 17.
  18. 18. AZquotes. Taguchi’s quote. Retrieved from Accessed on January 2017
  19. 19. Ranjit R. A Primer on the Taguchi Method (Competitive Manufacturing Series), Van Nostrand Reinhold. ISBN-10: 0442237294, ISBN-13: 978-0442237295
  20. 20. Box GEP, Fung CA. Minimizing Transmitted Variation by Parameter Design. Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison, (Report no. 8). 1986
  21. 21. Box GEP, Bisgaard S, Fung C. An explanation and critique of Taguchi’s contributions to quality engineering. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 1988;4(2):123-131
  22. 22. Box GEP, Jones S. Designing products that are robust to the environment. Total Quality Management. March 1992;3(3):265-282
  23. 23. Bisgaard S. Quality Engineering and Taguchi Methods: A Perspective. The Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement of University of Wisconsin, Madison (CQPI Report no. 40). 1990
  24. 24. Czitrom V. An Application of Taguchi’s Methods Reconsidered. ASA Meeting, Washington, DC. 1946
  25. 25. Bisgaard S, Diamond NT. An Analysis of Taguchi’s Method of Confirmatory Trials. CQPI Reports (Report no. 60). 1990
  26. 26. Bisgaard S. Process Optimization- going Beyond Taguchi Methods. CQPI Reports (Report no. 70). 1991
  27. 27. Bisgaard S. A comparative analyses of the performance of Taguchi’s linear graphs. CQPI Reports (Report no. 82). 1992
  28. 28. Bisgaard S, Ankenman B. Analytic Parameter Design. CQPI Reports (Report no. 103). 1993
  29. 29. Steinberg D, Burnsztyn D. Noise Factors, Dispersion Effects and Robust Design. CQPI Reports (Report no. 107). 1946
  30. 30. Maghsoodloo S, Ozdemir G, Jordan V, Huang C H. Strengths and limitations of Taguchi’s contributions to quality, manufacturing, and process engineering. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2004;23(2):73-126. DOI: 10.1016/S0278-6125(05)00004-X
  31. 31. Taguchi G, Jugulum R, Taguchi S. Computer-based Robust Engineering: Essentials for DFSS. Milwoukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press; 2004
  32. 32. Barrado E, Vega M, Grande P, Del Valle JL. Optimization of a purification method for metal-containing wastewater by use of a Taguchi experimental design. Water Research. 1996;30(10):2309-2314. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(96)00119-4
  33. 33. Padke MS. Quality Engineering Using Robust Design. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1989
  34. 34. Taguchi G, Konishi S. Taguchi Methods Orthogonal Arrays and Linear Graphs: Tools for Quality Engineering. Dearborn, Michigan: American Supplier Institute; 1987
  35. 35. Statistics Solutions. ANOVA [WWW Document]. 2013. Retrieved from
  36. 36. Daneshvar N, Khataee AR, Rasoulifard MH, Pourhassan M. Biodegradation of dye solution containing Malachite green: Optimization of effective parameters using Taguchi method. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007;143(1-2):214-219
  37. 37. Du Plessis BJ, De Villiers GH. The application of the Taguchi method in the evaluation of mechanical flotation in waste activated sludge thickening. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2007;50(2):202-210. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.06.014
  38. 38. Tasirin SM, Kamarudin SK, Ghani JA, Lee KF. Optimization of drying parameters of bird's eye chilli in a fluidized bed dryer. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;80(2):695-700
  39. 39. Wu CH, Chen WS. Injection moulding and injection compression moulding of three-beam grating of DVD pickup lens. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 2006;125(2):367-375
  40. 40. Villafranca RR, Zúnica L, Zúnica RR. Ds-optimal experimental plans for robust parameter design. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. 2007;137(4):1488-1495
  41. 41. Elshennawy AK. Quality in the new age and the body of knowledge for quality engineers. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. 2004;15(5-6):603-614
  42. 42. Ng EYK, Ng WK. Parametric study of the biopotential equation for breast tumour identification using ANOVA and Taguchi method. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing. 2006;44(1-2):131-139
  43. 43. Houng JY, Liao JH, Wu JY, Shen SC, Hsu HF. Enhancement of asymmetric bio reduction of ethyl 4-chloro acetoacetate by the design of composition of culture medium and reaction conditions. Process Biochemistry. 2007;42(1):1-7
  44. 44. Bernardo FP, Pistikopoulos EN, Saraiva PM. Quality costs and robustness criteria in chemical process design optimization. Computers and Chemical Engineering. 2001;25:27-4
  45. 45. Kundu A, Gupta BS, Hashim MA, Redzwan G. Taguchi optimization approach for production of activated carbon from phosphoric acid impregnated palm kernel shell by microwave heating. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015;105:420-427. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.093
  46. 46. Zolfaghari G, Sari AE, Anbia M, Younesi H, Amirmahmoodi S, Nazari AG. Taguchi optimization approach for Pb(II) and Hg(II) removal from aqueous solutions using modified mesoporous carbon. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2011;192:1046-1055
  47. 47. Mohan SV, Raghavulu SV, Mohanakrishna G, Srikanth S, Sarma PN. Optimization and evaluation of fermentative hydrogen production and wastewater treatment processes using data enveloping analysis (DEA) and Taguchi design of experimental (DOE) methodology. International journal of hydrogen energy. 2009;34:216-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.044
  48. 48. Mohan SV, Reddy BP, Sarma PN. Ex-situ slurry phase bioremediation of chrysene contaminated soil with the function of metabolic function: process evaluation by data enveloping analysis (DEA) and Taguchi design of experimental methodology (DOE). Bioresource Technology. 2009;100(1):164-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.020
  49. 49. Silva MB, Carneiro LM, Silva JPA, Oliveira IS, Filho HJI, Almeida CRO. An application of the Taguchi method (robust design) to environmental engineering: Evaluating advanced oxidative processes in polyester-resin wastewater treatment. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2014;5:828-837. DOI: 10.4236/ajac.2014.513092
  50. 50. Liao HT, Shie JR, Yang YK. Applications of Taguchi and design of experiments methods in optimization of chemical mechanical polishing process parameters. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2008;38:674-682. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-007-1124-7
  51. 51. Mohan SV, Rao NC, Prasad KK, Muralikrishna P, Rao RS, Sarma PN. Anaerobic treatment of complex chemical wastewater in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor: Process optimization and evaluation of factors interaction using the Taguchi dynamic DOE methodology. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2005;90(6):732-745
  52. 52. Mousavi SM, Yaghmaei S, Jafari A, Vossoughi M, Ghobadi Z. Optimization of ferrous biooxidation rate in a packed bed bioreactor using Taguchi approach. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification. 2007;46(10):935-940. DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2007.06.010
  53. 53. Kim KD, Han DN, Kim HT. Optimization of experimental conditions based on the Taguchi robust design for the formation of nano-sized silver particles by chemical reduction method. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2004;104(1-3):55-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2004.08.003
  54. 54. Ho CY, Lin ZC. Analysis and application of grey relation and ANOVA in chemical–mechanical polishing process parameters. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2003;21(1):10-14. DOI: 10.1007/s001700300001
  55. 55. Nair VN. Taguchi's parameter design: A panel discussion. Technometrics. 1992;31(2): 127-161
  56. 56. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Singapore: Wiley. 1991
  57. 57. Fraley S, Oom M, Terrien B, Date JZ. Design of Experiments via Taguchi Methods: Orthogonal Arrays: The Michigan Chemical Process Dynamic and Controls Open Text Book. USA. 2006. 678-698
  58. 58. Parks J. On stochastic optimization: Taguchi methods demystified, its limitations and fallacy clarified. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. 2006;16(1):87-101
  59. 59. Unitek Miyachi Group. Welding material control. Technical Application Brief. 1999;2:1-5

Written By

Rahul Davis and Pretesh John

Reviewed: April 27th, 2017 Published: March 7th, 2018