Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Fire in the Mediterranean Region: A Case Study of Forest Fires in Portugal

Written By

Ana Cristina Gonçalves and Adélia M.O. Sousa

Submitted: December 9th, 2016 Reviewed: April 24th, 2017 Published: November 8th, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.69410

Chapter metrics overview

2,055 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Forest fires are a common disturbance in many forest systems in the world and in particular in the Mediterranean region. Their origins can be either natural or anthropogenic. The effects in regard to the time trends, vegetation, and soil will be reflected in the species distribution, forest composition, and soil potential productivity. In general, it can be said that the larger the fire and the shorter the time between two consecutive occurrences, the higher the probability to originate shifts in vegetation and soil degradation. In the Mediterranean region, the number of fire ignitions does not reflect the burnt area due to the occurrence of very large fires. The latter occur in a very small proportion of the number of ignitions, but result in very large burnt areas. Also there seems to be an increasing trend toward larger fires in the Mediterranean region due mainly to climatic and land use changes. This case study highlights the importance of vegetation regrowth a short time after the fire to maintain both forest systems and soil conservation.


  • Portugal
  • burnt area
  • number of fires
  • spatial dynamic
  • temporal dynamic
  • vegetation

1. Introduction

Mediterranean forest types can be characterized by their heterogeneity, whether climatic, edaphic, geomorphologic, floristic, biogeographic or historical, and instability and vulnerability, consequences of the former and due to genetic and ecological factors as well as to the anthropogenic actions [1]. The Mediterranean flora is composed of a wide variety of tree, shrub, and herbaceous species, and their distribution depends on the edaphoclimatic conditions and on human intervention [1, 2]. The climatic conditions that are most influential on the species distribution and growth are the temperature and the precipitation, as well as their interactions. In the Mediterranean basin the mean annual temperatures vary between 5 and 8°C and the mean annual precipitation ranges from 300 mm to more than 2500 mm [1] with a marked seasonal and annual variability. As a result, droughts are frequent and vary between a couple of weeks and more than six months [1, 2]. In addition, rain falls frequently in torrential short-duration events mainly in autumn and in winter. Thus, growth is limited to mainly spring and autumn, and when the moisture balance is favorable, the growth can be luxurious [2]. Nonurban land use in the Mediterranean basin is distributed in a mosaic pattern with the three most frequent uses being forest, pasture, and agricultural cultures. This spatial arrangement is composed of very small areas with diffuse edges [13].

Fire was, and still is, a common feature in the Mediterranean landscape. Historically, fire has been described as having two main forces of ignition: natural, to a lesser extent, caused usually by summer lightning storms, not considered to be significant as frequently is followed by torrential rainfall [2]; and anthropogenic, in earlier times to clear areas for pasture, hunting, grazing, and/or agriculture [1, 2], though in ancient times it was also considered a war weapon [2].

Fires are common in many forest systems around the world, and in particular in the Mediterranean region. Forest fires can be a minor or major disturbance in forest ecosystems depending on their intensity and result in stand’s species composition and structure changes [4, 5]. Thus the analysis of the spatial distribution and temporal frequency of forest fires and their relation to vegetation—trees, shrubs and herbaceous plants—is of utmost importance. In this chapter, a review of the origins (Section 2); of the effects of the time trends, on vegetation and on soil (Section 3); of the evaluation of pre- and post-fire vegetation dynamics with remote sensing (Section 4); and of the analysis of the fires, number, and burnt area, for the Mediterranean region and for Portugal (Section 5) is made. A case study is also presented to compare the vegetation prior the fire with that of regeneration after the fire (Section 6).


2. Origins of forest fires in the Mediterranean region

Forest fires are a driving force in the evolution, distribution, and organization of the forests around the world [46]. Fires may have a strong effect both on the vegetation and on the soil carbon sequestration and sinks as they may reduce regeneration and, consequently, the potential biomass accumulation [79], carbon stocks [10], and timber [4, 5]. Forest fires are one of the primordial factors affecting the Mediterranean-type ecosystems [11], causing more destruction to trees than all the other hazards, such as diseases, insects, wind throws, and frosts [12].

Humans have been using fire since ancient times [13, 14] and since 10,000 years ago have influenced their regime [15]. While in earlier times fire was linked to land management, currently other causes prevail. Since a couple of decades, an intensification in the fire occurrences has been observed, due to the combined effects of climate change [1621] and alterations in the land use, such as the abandonment of agricultural lands, decrease in grazing, urban areas increase, and the interaction between the urban and the wildland areas [11, 2236]. As a result, change in the vegetation structure and species composition occurred [30, 36]. Forest fires in the Mediterranean ecosystems have complex effects on the ecological processes due to the differential responses to the vegetation structures and fire regimes [3739]. The post-fire evolution of vegetation community is a consequence of its resilience [40, 41] which can be linked to biodiversity (e.g. [30, 42]), vegetation structure (e.g. [43]), and ecosystem functions (e.g. [44]).

Fire damages can be evaluated by their direct impacts that are the physical changes in the flora and fauna of the ecosystems affected; and the indirect losses, consequence of the former and which relate to the impacts on the economy and environment of both the burnt and the neighboring areas. Noteworthy are also the tangible losses that can be expressed in monetary terms, and the intangible losses of difficult quantification though affecting both the environment and the economy [45].

Any fire regime can be described as the function of a suite of variables. The most commonly used ones to describe a fire regime are the nature, pattern (size), season, intensity (energy released), and recurrence. Of notice are the features regarding fire recurrence, namely frequency, which is characterized by the number of fires within a life span in an area; and the mean fire return interval, that is the time interval between successive fires [46]. Fire frequency has a major role in the vegetation due to its effects on the regeneration and recruitment of plants, especially of trees, after a fire. In the Mediterranean basin, many fire regimes have a mean fire return interval of 15–20 years [36, 47], which can reduce the number of species because sexual maturity is not reached, and consequently no seed is available to enable plant regeneration and recruitment [48, 49]. Fire effects can be evaluated by fire intensity, fire severity, and burn severity [50, 51]. The latter is the more frequently used [5255].


3. Effects of fires on the Mediterranean stands and forests

3.1. Time trends on forest fires

Most of the detected fires are small and can be seen as minor disturbances. However, large fires, though in a much smaller number, can be considered as major disturbances and can cause considerable impacts both at the landscape level with the destruction of large areas of vegetation and at the economic and social levels [56, 57]. According to the affected vegetation strata, fires can be classified as ground, surface, and crown fires [58]. The surface fires are recognized as having less impact on the vegetation communities and are sometimes used to control vegetation as prescribed burnings. They can be more easily controlled and extinguished [5]. On the contrary, when a fire evolves to a crown fire, its suppression is almost always impossible, causing also major impacts on the vegetation [59]. The transition from surface to crown fire is related to the vertical and horizontal arrangement of the vegetation. While a vegetation community with continuous horizontal and vertical spatial distribution can enhance fire spread into crowns, their discontinuity can reduce it [6063]. The effects of heterogeneous vegetation structures in the fire behavior [6468], as well as the “ladder effect” [69], result from the vegetation vertical and horizontal connectivity.

The term “megafire” is often used to classify very large fires, though no definition exists. They are frequently derived from several large fires, resulting in very large burnt areas and high damage levels, both in the vegetation and at the socioeconomic level. Megafires can be classified using three criteria: (i) fire behavior, corresponding to their intensity and spread rate [70]; (ii) resistance to control by suppression activities [71]; and (iii) fire severity, corresponding to the affected area, fatalities, burn severity, and economic losses [72]. San-Miguel-Ayanz et al. [11] analyzed megafires in Portugal, Spain, and Greece, and refer that each megafire was a singular event, with a set of large fires concentrated in time and space in one fire season. These events seem to be linked with extreme meteorological conditions, for example very high temperatures, very low humidity, and lightning storms. The same authors refer that the number of ignitions and the fast spread of fire (due to vegetation and topographic conditions) can be of major importance. The behavior of megafires makes it difficult to control their spread and suppress them [71, 73], and their control and extinction is only possible when they spread to lower fuel load vegetation or when the weather turns cooler and wetter [74].

3.2. Vegetation

Vegetation can be characterized according to their fire proneness. The typical vegetation of the Mediterranean regions is one of the most fire prone [14, 75]. In these vegetation types, fire had, and still has, a key role in its dynamics and structure. The role of fire dates back to the early Holocene [76] with a continuous role onward [14, 77, 78]. Fire has been recognized as affecting the landscape at the long term; however, its effects vary as function of the regeneration patterns of the vegetation, topography, and fire history [24, 79]. Vegetation community resilience has been verified as a significant proportion of these communities were able to maintain their characteristics [24].

Several authors refer that the fire risk is expected to increase in a frame of climate change in the Mediterranean region, especially in the European part (e.g. [80, 81]) as a consequence of the increase in drought events [82]. Thus the knowledge of soils and plant communities’ behavior after fire is of utmost importance [78, 8385]. Also, the foreseen longer and more frequent drought events along with the higher temperatures might enhance the expansion of plants better adapted to those climatic conditions [86, 87].

The plants’ post-fire regeneration depends on their adaptive traits, which can be divided into: (i) resprouters, plants that have protected buds that are able to develop after the fire; and (ii) seeders, which correspond to plants that are affected by fires but have seed banks either in the canopy and/or in the soil that are able to maintain the germination ability [4, 9]. Additionally, there is a suite of factors controlling the development of the post-fire vegetation development: (i) the pre-fire plant species composition [8892]; (ii) the severity and intensity of fire [6]; (iii) the season of fire occurrence [93]; (iv) the regeneration ability, by resprouting or seed bank in the canopy, and soil [9, 94, 95].

The post-fire dynamics of vegetation community is a very slow process that can be divided into three stages: initial, transition, and advanced. The initial stage is characterized by an intensive regeneration of the vegetation existing prior to the fire, including trees, shrubs, climbers, and herbaceous plants [8892, 96] either by resprouting or by seed germination. The growing space let available by the fire is rapidly occupied, and about two years after the fire the species richness reaches a maximum [89, 90]. However, the spatial arrangement of the plants shows a high heterogeneity, characteristic of the Mediterranean ecosystems [89, 97]. This variability is also related to the site characteristics, with low species diversity been found in the sites where water is the main limiting factor [89, 98]. With time, competition for growing space increases gradually, limiting the regeneration of new seedlings, while some saplings tend to disappear, resulting in a decrease of species diversity [89]. The transition stage is the consequence of the increasing competition with the less-competitive plants (frequently herbaceous plants) disappearing while others gradually increase their frequency, such as shrubs, climbers, and some trees species [89]. The advanced stage is the consequence of the species characteristics (especially growth rate and life span) and site characteristics (especially temperature, water, and nutrient availability). At this stage, species with low growth rates and long life cycles are found (mainly trees but also some shrubs and climbers), while species of fast growth and shorter life spans tend to disappear [77, 89].

Short-time fire intervals may have a strong effect on the presence and abundance of species [36, 99102] and may originate shifts in the predominant species in the Mediterranean ecosystems [103, 104]. As a result, infrequent fires or fires with medium and long return intervals tend to promote tree plant communities, while short return interval fires originate shrub- and herbaceous-dominant communities and also an intensification of the fire regime [8, 9, 46, 81, 99, 105].

3.3. Soil

The effects of fire on vegetation are easily perceived as they can be seen. However, the effects of fire on the soil are more difficult to recognize. Several authors [55, 106108] refer the impacts of fire on the chemical, physical, and biological properties of the soils.

After a fire the soil properties can be affected by precipitation: total precipitation, intensity, and its temporal patterns [108]. Torrential rainfalls, characteristic to the Mediterranean region, are of special importance due to their negative effect on soil fertility as it increases the risk of runoff, erosion, and nutrient losses [32, 109111]. As a result of the burning of the vegetation, some nutrients increase their availability immediately after the fire, such as nitrogen [106, 112], phosphorous [55, 106108], and potassium [108]. Nonetheless, all three nutrients decrease about one year after the fire, explained, at least partially, by the losses originated by the rainfall. However, these effects are partially minimized under drought conditions [106]. Contrarily, soil carbon is partially or almost completely destroyed during the fire. As fires frequently occur during the hot dry months, the soil carbon after the fire will be recovered at a slow rate [106, 108, 113, 114], and similarly the carbon mineralization rate is also quite low under drought [106, 115118].

The effect of vegetation on soil conservation is well known [119121], and soil erosion and land degradation processes depend on it [122]. Also, erosive processes tend to increase after the occurrence of fires as soil is exposed [123], and the risk increases with the increase in the time needed for the vegetation to develop to a minimum ground cover threshold [122124]. Several authors referred that most of the post-fire sediments are observed in the first year [123, 125, 126] and that the highest susceptibility to soil erosion occurs 4–6 months after the fire [125]. The protective effects of vegetation on soils [119121] are due to both the ground cover and the improvement of the hydrological properties of the soil [125]. Contrarily, repeated fires in the same area, due to the direct effect of the fire on soil properties and the loss of vegetation, originate higher risk of water erosion and consequently increase soil degradation processes [125].

Fires are frequently followed by salvage cuttings in order to attain some timber economic return. These cuttings have two disadvantages in the short term; one is that it might increase soil erosion risk [127, 128]; and the other is that the damaged wood will not decompose in situand consequently does not restore or increase the soil carbon stocks [129]. In the medium and long terms, it may further increase the erosion hazard [130] and reduce the soil seed bank, the establishment of seedlings, and the belowground resprouting organs [131133].

In studies in Pinus pinasterstands, several authors [129, 134136] stress that in unburnt stands the aboveground biomass, and thus the carbon stock, is considerably higher than in those that have burnt one or more times. On the contrary, in the latter the most important carbon stocks seem to be the soil organic carbon [134, 137, 138]. These findings are important in forest management, as after the fire the risk of soil erosion increases [139] and considerable soil losses may occur [140143].

Fire occurrence, spread, and burnt area can be minimized with management practices that go toward the heterogeneity of the landscape [144]. Fuel loads and vertical and horizontal spatial distribution of the vegetation communities can promote or reduce the fire risk. Oak-dominated stands or forests may enhance the opportunities to reduce the burnt area [145] or reduce the fire risk [18]. However, the opposite is encountered in pine stands or forests and shrublands [146] where the vegetation structure has a higher degree of continuity [147]. Gutierrez and Lozano [148] state that according to their analysis carried out from 1980 to 2010, about 35% of the damages caused by forest fires could have been avoided if appropriated practices had been set out. The same authors refer also that there are significant differences between southern European countries (France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain) that were more efficient in controlling the fire damage in 2007 and 2009–2010 than other European countries (Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Estonia, and Finland).


4. Remote sensing evaluation of pre- and post-fire vegetation dynamics

Remote sensing has a primary role in the assessment [149153] of pre- and post-fire vegetation [154] as it can be used even in the inaccessible areas or where the costs of fieldwork are prohibitive [155]. Time series of satellite images that can be used in monitoring the dynamics of vegetation are also of major importance [154, 156].

Pre- and post-fire vegetation have different spectral and spatial responses which allow their dynamics evaluation with remote sensing [157]. Though many methodologies and techniques exist, the most frequently used are image classification, vegetation indices, and spectral mixture analysis. Image classification enables the transformation of remotely sensed data into land cover/use classes, using either supervised or unsupervised techniques [154]. Vegetation indices have a strong relation with biomass and leaf area index, thus suitable for vegetation evaluation both prior and after fire events, whether spatially or temporally [52, 154, 158166]. One of the most frequently used indices is Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) [52, 167169]. Other vegetation indices are also widely used, such as Soil Advanced Vegetation Index (SAVI) and Transformed Soil Advanced Vegetation Index (TSAVI) [52, 154, 157, 170]. Spectral mixture analysis enables the discrimination of the different fraction in each pixel. It is especially important in low and medium spatial resolution satellite images where each pixel is almost always composed of vegetation, soil, or other land cover/use. Thus it is suited for the post-fire analysis of the vegetation regrowth as instead of one spectral signature, it detects the cover fraction within each pixel [49, 158, 171]


5. Dynamics of fire

5.1. Mediterranean region

The statistics of forest fires in the Mediterranean basin countries had started in 1980s for France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain, while for Croatia, Morocco, and Turkey, the first data are from the 1990s; for Cyprus and Slovenia, from the 2000s; and for Algeria and the former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia around 2010s. Lebanon data are available for two years (2012 and 2015) and no data are available for Albania, Egypt, Israel, Libya, Montenegro, Syria, and Tunisia [172]. The larger number of fires per year is found in Portugal and Spain, more than 10,000 per year, followed by Italy, between 5,000 and 10,000 (Figure 1, top). These three countries have more than 100,000 ha of burnt area annually (Figure 1, center). There seems to be a trend toward larger number of fires and burnt area for the Iberian Peninsula. When analyzing the mean burnt area per fire and per country (Figure 1, bottom), it can be seen that for Slovenia, France, Turkey, Portugal, and Morocco, areas are smaller than 10 ha; in Algeria, Spain, Italy, and Cyprus, the mean burnt area per fire between 11 ha and 15 ha is found, while for former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia, it is 23 ha, for Greece, 31 ha, and for Croatia, 47 ha. These results point to the rather large number of small fires and a small number of fire events with very large burnt areas or megafires, as referred in other studies (e.g. [11, 74]). Another study [23] refers that for many European countries the more frequently affected areas are the wildland-urban interface, though regional variability is observed.

Figure 1.

Average number of fires (top), average area of fires (center) and mean dimension of burnt area per fire per year (bottom), per country, in the period 1980–2015.

The temporal analysis of the number of fires and burnt area per country will be focused on the five European Mediterranean countries which have data available from 1980 onward. For this evaluation, from 1980 to 2015, four classes of five-year period and one of six-year period were considered. There seems to be a different trend for the number of fires and for the burnt area. France and Greece have the lowest number of fires with a rather small annual fluctuation values while Portugal and Spain have the highest values and an increasing trend up to 1995–1999 with a decreasing trend onward. Italy has an increasing trend up to 1990–1994 and decreasing afterward (Figure 2). The burnt area variability per country is larger than that of the number of fires. Similar to the number of fires, France and Greece have the lowest values of burnt area, but the variability between all time periods is larger, with an ascending trend during the 1980s, decreasing in the 1990s onward, except during 2000–2004 for France and irregular for Greece. Italy has predominantly descending trend in the burnt area values, especially noticeable from 1990–1994 onward. Portugal has an increasing trend of burnt area values up to 2000–2004, where the highest value was attained, and a rather constant value in the next two time periods. Spain has burnt area value increases from the first to the second time periods and a decreasing trend in the following two time periods and a rather constant trend afterward. The highest aforementioned values seem to be linked to the occurrence of megafires, namely in Italy in 1989; in Spain in 1989, 1994, and 2006; in Portugal in 2003 and 2005; and in Greece in 2007 [11, 74]. Furthermore, the changes in land use, in particular the decrease in or abandonment of agricultural, pastoral, and forestry activities, seem to have promoted the increase in the number of fires and burnt area [11, 2230, 33, 34]

Figure 2.

Number of fires (a) and burnt area (b) per country per five-year periods.

5.2. Portugal

A more detailed analysis for the dynamics of forest fires for Portugal for the time series data of 1980–2015 [173] was done, aggregating the burnt area per fire in the classes: <1, 1–25, 25–100, 100–500, and >500 ha. Most fires (66.5%) have burnt areas of less than 1 ha, corresponding to the lowest proportion of the total burnt area (3%). Contrarily, fires with burnt areas of more than 500 ha have the smallest number of events (0.5%), but have the largest proportion of burnt area (50%). The observed relation for the remaining classes is the following: the smaller the number of fires, the larger the burnt area (29.3, 2.5, 1.2% and 14, 12, 22%, respectively for burnt areas of 1–25, 25–100, and 100–500 ha). Other research describes similar trends [11, 174].

When the number of fires and burnt area is analyzed per NUT3 territorial units, it can be seen that the highest values are in northern and central Portugal (Figure 3). Though with different methodologies, several authors attained similar results [22, 174, 175]. In addition, a similar trend of inverse proportionality between the number of fires and burnt area is observed for all 23 NUT3 regions, with some variability for the five aforementioned classes of burnt area. Yet, variability is also observed within each of the NUT3 regions, if a smaller territorial unit is considered, for example the municipality (Figure 4). There seems to be more homogeneity in the municipalities of the northeastern and central eastern Portugal and more heterogeneity for those of coastal Portugal. This variability can be related to the occurrence of large fires, such as those referred by Fernandes et al. [73] and Tedim et al. [74]. And also with land use, especially the composition, structure and fuel loads of the forest systems [22, 174, 175]. The lower number of fires and burnt area corresponds to the agroforestry systems, which are characterized frequently by a tree cover of evergreen oaks (Quercus suberand Quercus rotundifolia), and pasture with extensive grazing [176, 177] thus with a horizontal and vertical discontinuity [174, 178, 179]. At the other edge are the forest systems composed mainly of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) and/or Tasmanian blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus), especially those with a well-developed shrub layer [178] corresponding to systems with higher horizontal and vertical continuity, and larger fuel loads, where the higher number of fires and larger burnt area occurs [22, 174, 175]. A similar trend was described for Pinus halepensisin Spain [60]. The temporal dynamics of the burnt area presents a rather large variability, increasing from the smallest to the largest class of burnt area (Figure 5), showing a similar trend to the observed by San-Miguel-Ayanz et al. [11]. There seems to be an inverse relation between the burnt area of the fires larger than 500 ha and that of the remaining classes, that is smallest burnt areas per year for the class larger than 500 ha correspond to the highest burnt areas per year in the other five classes (Figure 5). Noteworthy are the peaks of 2003 and 2005, as already referred, which are linked with the occurrence of megafires [11, 74].

Figure 3.

Average number of fires (left) and burnt area (right) per NUT3 region of Portugal in the period 1980–2015.

Figure 4.

Average number of fires (left) and burnt area (right) per municipality region of Portugal in the period 1980–2015.

Figure 5.

Burnt area per class of burnt area and per year.

It seems that the temporal and spatial patterns of fires are linked with the vegetation community structure both in density of ignitions [22] and burnt area [22, 175] with a positive trend for the former in Portugal since the 1980s [106, 174, 180]. The shrublands are among the vegetation communities mostly affected by fire due to the high rate of spread and low firefighting priority [27, 28, 181185].


6. Case study

6.1. Study area and remote sensing data

Mapped burnt areas in 2013 by the Portuguese Forest Services were used to study the vegetation recovery, which also encompass the affected main land cover/use types. The analyses of the vegetation recovery for large fire scars were carried out, using the vegetation index NDVI calculated with Landsat 8 images for the four years: 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016.

The study area is located in northern central Portugal (Figure 6), one of the most affected regions by forest fires (cf. Figures 3 and 4) in the summer during dry season (June to September). The climate is Mediterranean, with a mean precipitation per month of 120 mm in the rainy season (December and May), decreasing in summer to 30 mm per month [186]. According to the land use map of Portugal (COS06), the studied areas are mainly composed of Pinus pinaster(37%), pastures (20%), Eucalyptus globulus(19%), annual crops (20%), oak (5%), and other broadleaved species (6%).

Figure 6.

Study areas location (a) and false color composite Landsat image (RGB—SWIR, NIR, Red) (b).

Remote sensing data was available from Landsat 8 satellite images (Table 1) obtained from the United States Geological Survey (USGS), Glovis Visualization Viewer (GLOVIS) platform. A temporal time series of four years, of 2013 (fires’ occurrence year), 2014, 2015, and 2016, was used (Table 2). The images were selected considering a similar acquisition date, to minimize cloud cover and phenological stage effects. Four fires were considered. The image of 2013 (6 july, 2013), covering Fire1, Fire2, and Fire4, corresponds to pre-fire image, and the other images to the post-fire, one, two, and three after the fire. As to Fire3 that occurred at the beginning of June of 2013 all images are post-fire. Thus, the time series enables the temporal vegetation analyses for a time frame of three years after the fire event. The satellite images were geometrically adjusted, image to image, considering that of 2013 as reference, to ensure a minimum geometric pixel deviation.

Landsat 8 OLI and TIR bands
Bands(μm)Spatial resolution (m)
b5Near Infrared (NIR)0.845–0.88530
b6Short Wave Infrared (SWIR1)1.560–1.66030
b10Thermal Infrared I (TIR1)10.6–11.19100
b11Thermal Infrared II (TIR2)11.5–12.51100
b8Short Wave Infrared (SWIR2)2.100–2.30030

Table 1.

Band characterization of the Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) satellite.

Satellite/sensorAcquisition dateFireMonth of fire eventArea (ha)
Landsat 8 OLI06/07/2013Fire1July6391

Table 2.

Date of Landsat 8 images acquisition (WRS-2 204/32) and burnt area of the four fires.

6.2. Methodology

For this study four burnt areas were extracted using the fire perimeter provided by the Portuguese Forest Services [173]. Figure 7 shows the fire scars with false-color composite images for the four years and an image with two active fires (Fire2 and Fire4).

Figure 7.

False-color composite Landsat 8 images (RGB—SWIR, NIR, Red) for 2013 (a), 2014 (b), 2015 (c), and 2016 (d) and an image with active Fire2 and Fire4 (e), including the burnt area perimeter (black line).

The vegetation indices based on red (RED) and near infrared (NIR) bands are directly related to the vegetation photosynthetic activity [187], which is highly reflective in the NIR region and strongly absorbing in the RED [188]. As already referred, one of the mostly used indices to evaluate the vegetation changes, especially after fire, is NDVI [188]. It is particularly used to assess vegetation regeneration after the fire [52, 157, 170, 189]. This index is rather sensitive to vegetation activity presenting a strong decrease after fire due to the partial or total destruction of the vegetation, thus it is indicative of the fire damage [52].

In this study, the NDVI was used to calculate on the basis of the normalized difference between NIR and RED bands (NDVI = ((NIR−RED)/(NIR+RED)). It was calculated both for pre- (NDVIpre) and post-fire (NDVIpost) periods, as the mean value of NDVI before and after (for the 2014, 2015, and 2016 images) the fire event. The dates of satellite image acquisition were deliberately chosen to be a few days prior to the fire event and afterward annually in approximately the same dates, to eliminate the possible variations originated by the different vegetation phenological stage. The mean NDVI was obtained with the pixels located inside the selected burnt areas. The temporal vegetation variation was analyzed with the difference between the NDVI pre- and post-fire.

6.3. Post-fire analysis

In Figure 7, a strong decrease in NIR (green color tones) and increase in Red (rose color tones) reflectance within the fire perimeter from pre-fire image (Figure 7a) and the one acquired one year later (Figure 7b) for Fire1, Fire2, and Fire4 can be observed. For the two following years, 2015 (Figure 7c) and 2016 (Figure 7d), the fire scars are less evident. These changes are confirmed by the NDVI values (Figure 8), with the highest values of NDVI in the pre-fire image (2013) indicating the presence of dense vegetation and a relevant decrease in these values in the post-fire image (2014), where the fire scar is present. In the following two years, 2015 and 2016, an increase in the NDVI values can be observed, demonstrating a gradual recovery of vegetation, and even more accentuated in 2016. For Fire3 there is no pre-fire image, Figure 8 shows a low NDVI value for 2013 (image acquired a few days after the fire event) and a gradual increase for next years in analysis. The increasing values of NDVI are indicative of the vegetation regeneration either by seed or by sprouts [4, 9, 94, 95], shortly after the fire [8892, 96]. Nevertheless, for these fires, more than three years are necessary to achieve the pre-fire NDVI values, values, depending on several factors such as the pre-fire plant species composition [8992], season of fire occurrence [93], and severity and intensity of fire [6]. The vegetation recovery will have also the advantage of reducing substantially the erosion risk [119121, 125].

Figure 8.

Evolution of mean NDVI values of the fire events from 2013 to 2016.

The interannual difference of the NDVI (Figure 9), the pre- and post-fire, shows also a gradual vegetation recovery, in the affected areas, by different land cover vegetation types. For all different land cover types the vegetation regeneration is similar. Differences of mean NDVI are between 0.2 and 0.25 for Fire1 and Fire2, and between 0.1 and 0.15 for Fire4. Lower mean NDVI points to lower severity, that is the maintenance of some vegetation or some live tree crowns after the fire event, which enables seed regeneration [9, 94, 95]. Therefore small positive differences were encountered for the Pinus pinasterand Eucalyptus globulus(Fire1), where the fire scar is accentuated one year after the fire event, as can be observed in Figure 7. The regeneration of these species is not sufficiently fast to increase the NDVI values.

Figure 9.

Difference of mean NDVI values per vegetation type (MP – Maritime pine, UP – Umbrella pine, EC – Tasmanian blue gum, OB – Other broadleaf species, Oak, NP – Natural pastures, AC – Annual culture).


7. Conclusions

Forest fires are a frequent feature in forest ecosystems. In the Mediterranean and, in particular in Portugal, they occur on regular annual basis. Nonetheless a wide range of variability, whether spatial or temporal, exists, partially explained by the type of forest system and the climate, especially in relation to the high temperatures and low humidity. The most affected systems are those with high spatial, both vertical and horizontal continuity, and large fuel loads. In Portugal the most affected areas are those covered by Pinus pinasterand Eucalyptus globulus, which are also areas with larger burnt areas. The species characteristics, high flammability, as well as the large continuous areas when compared to other species, high stand density of trees and shrubs can explain, at least partially, the fire propagation. The spatial analysis detected regional differences. In northern and central Portugal, the number of fires and the burnt area as well as the frequency of fires were much larger than those in southern Portugal. This seems to be linked with vegetation type. While the forest areas of northern and central Portugal are predominantly of Pinus pinasterand Eucalyptus globulus, in the southern Portugal the evergreen oaks (Quercus suberand Quercus rotundifolia) dominate the forest landscape. The NDVI based on a time series Landsat 8 satellite images allows the monitoring and evaluation of post-fire vegetation regeneration. The interannual difference of NDVI enables better understanding of the temporal variability of the recovery vegetation after the fire event, and a reduction of the potential soil erosion risk in the Mediterranean ecosystems. The differences between fires and land cover types can be an indicator of the fire severity.



This work is funded by National Funds through FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology under the Project UID/AGR/00115/2013.


  1. 1. Quezel P, Tomaselli R, Morandini R. Mediterranean forests and maquis: ecology, conservation and management. MAB Technical notes 2. Paris: UNESCO; 1977. p. 94
  2. 2. Thirgood VC. Man and the Mediterranean Forest: A History of Resource Depletion. London: Academic Press; 1981. p. 194
  3. 3. Massada AB, Kent R, Blank L, Perevolotsky A, Hadar L, Carmel Y. Automated segmentation of vegetation structure units in a Mediterranean landscape. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2012;33(2):346-364
  4. 4. Oliver CD, Larson BC, editors. Forest Stand Dynamics. Update ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1996. p. 544
  5. 5. O’Hara KL. Multiaged Silviculture Managing for Complex Forest Stand Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 213
  6. 6. Keeley J, Bond W, Bradstock R, Pausas J, Rundel P. Fire in Mediterranean Ecosystems: Ecology, Evolution and Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. p. 515
  7. 7. Alday JG, Santana VM, Lee H, Allen KA, Marrs RH. Aboveground biomass accumulation patterns in moorlands after prescribed burning and low-intensity grazing. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2015;17:388-396
  8. 8. Odion DC, Moritz MA, DellaSala DA. Alternative community states maintained by fire in the Klamath Mountains, USA. Journal of Ecology. 2010;98:96-105
  9. 9. Santana VM, Baeza MJ, Marrs RH, Vallejo VR. Old-field secondary succession in SE Spain: Can fire divert it? Plant Ecology. 2010;211:337-349
  10. 10. Bowman DM, Murphy BP, Boer MM, Bradstock RA, Cary GJ, Cochrane MA, Fensham RJ, Krawchuk MA, Price OF, Williams RJ. Forest fire management, climate change, and the risk of catastrophic carbon losses. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2013;11:66-67
  11. 11. San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Moreno JM, Camia A. Analysis of large fires in European Mediterranean landscapes: Lessons learned and perspectives. Forest Ecology and Management. 2013;294:11-22
  12. 12. Alexandrian D, Esnault F, Calabri G. Forest fires in the Mediterranean area. Unasylva. 2000;197(50):35-41
  13. 13. Guiomar N, Godinho S, Fernandes PM, Machado R, Neves N, Fernandes JP. Wildfire patterns and landscape changes in Mediterranean oak woodlands. Science of the Total Environment. 2005;536:338-352
  14. 14. Naveh Z. The evolutionary significance of fire in the Mediterranean region. Vegetatio. 1975;21:199-208
  15. 15. Daniau AL, d’Errico F, Goni MFS. Testing the hypothesis of fire use for ecosystem management by Neanderthal and upper Palaeolithic modern human populations. PLoS One. 2010;5(2):e9157. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009157
  16. 16. Amatulli G, Camia A, San-Miguel-Ayanz J. Estimating future burned areas under changing climate in the EU-Mediterranean countries. Science of the Total Environment. 2013;450-451:209-222
  17. 17. Bedia J, Herrera S, Gutiérrez JM, Zavala G, Urbieta IR, Moreno JM. Sensitivity of fire weather index to different reanalysis products in the Iberian Peninsula. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 2012;12:699-708
  18. 18. Moriondo M, Good P, Durao R, Bindi M, Giannakopoulos C, Corte-Real J. Potential impact of climate change on fire risk in the Mediterranean area. Clinical Research. 2006;31:85-95
  19. 19. Pausas JP. Changes in fire and climate in the eastern Iberian Peninsula (Mediterranean Basin). Climate Change. 2004;63:337-350. DOI: 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000018508.94901.9c
  20. 20. Dale VH, Joyce LA, McNulty S, Neilson RP, Ayres MP, Flannigan MD, Hanson PJ. Climate change and forest disturbances. Bioscience. 2001;51(9):723-734
  21. 21. Torn MS, Fried JS. Predicting the impacts of global warming on wildland fire. Climate Change. 1992;21:257-274. DOI: 10.1007/BF00139726
  22. 22. Nunes AN, Lourenco L, Meira ACM. Exploring spatial patterns and drivers of forest fires in Portugal (1980-2014). Science of the Total Environment. 2016;573:1190-1202
  23. 23. Modugno S, Balzter H, Cole B, Borrelli P. Mapping regional patterns of large forest fires in Wildland–Urban Interface areas in Europe. Journal of Environmental Management. 2016;172:112-126
  24. 24. Stamou Z, Xystrakis F, Koutsias N. The role of fire as a long-term landscape modifier: Evidence from long-term fire observations (1922-2000) in Greece. Applied Geography. 2016;74:47-55
  25. 25. Pausas JG, Keeley J. Abrupt climate-independent fire regime changes. Ecosystems. 2014;17:1109-1120
  26. 26. Pausas JG, Keeley J. Evolutionary ecology of resprouting and seeding in fireprone ecosystems. New Phytologist. 2014;204(1):55-65
  27. 27. Ganteaume A, Camia A, Jappiot M, San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Long-Founel M, Corinne L. A review of the main driving factors of forest fire ignition over Europe. Environmental Management. 2013;51:651-662
  28. 28. Oliveira S, Oehler F, San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Camia A, Pereira JMC. Modeling spatial patterns of fire occurrence in Mediterranean Europe using multiple regression and random forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 2012;275:117-129
  29. 29. Pausas JG, Fernández-Muñoz S. Fire regime changes in the Western Mediterranean Basin: From fuel-limited to drought-driven fire regime. Climatic Change. 2012;110:215-222
  30. 30. Moreira F, Viedma O, Arianoutsou M, Curt T, Koutsias N, Rigolot E, Barbati A, Corona P, Vaz P, Xanthopoulos G, Mouillot F. Landscape-wildfire interactions in Southern Europe: Implications for landscape management. Journal of Environmental Management. 2011;92:2389-2402
  31. 31. Catry FX, Rego F, Moreira F, Fernandes PM, Pausas JG. Post-fire tree mortality in mixed forests of Central Portugal. Forest Ecology and Management. 2010;260:1184-1192
  32. 32. Wittenberg L, Malkinson D. Spatio-temporal perspectives of forest fires regimes in a maturing Mediterranean mixed pine landscape. European Journal of Forest Research. 2009;128:297-304
  33. 33. Badia A, Saur D, Cerdan R, Llurdes JC. Causality and management of forest fires in Mediterranean environments: An example from Catalonia. Environmental Hazards. 2002;4(1):23-32
  34. 34. Giovannini G, Vallejo R, Lucchesi S, Bautista S, Ciompi S, Llovet J. Effects of land use and eventual fire on soil erodibility in dry Mediterranean conditions. Forest Ecology and Management. 2001;147:15-23
  35. 35. Pausas JG, Vallejo VR. The role of fire in European Mediterranean ecosystems. In: Chuvieco E, editor. Remote Sensing of Large Wildfires in the European Mediterranean Basin. Berlin: Springer; 1999. pp. 3-16
  36. 36. Eugenio Gosalbo M, Lloret F. Fire recurrence effects on the structure and composition of MediterraneanPinus halepensiscommunities in Catalonia (Northeast Iberian Peninsula). Ecoscience. 2004;11(4):446-454
  37. 37. Ne'eman G, Lahav H, Izhaki I. Recovery of vegetation in a natural East Mediterranean pine forest on Mount Carmel, Israel as affected by management strategies. Forest Ecology and Management. 1995;75:17-26
  38. 38. Naveh Z. Fire in the Mediterranean region. A landscape ecological perspective. In: Goldammer JG, Jenkins MJ, editors. Fire in Ecosystem Dynamics: Mediterranean and Northern Perspectives. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing; 1990. pp. 1-20
  39. 39. Naveh Z. Effects of fire in the Mediterranean region. In: Kozlowski TT, Ahlgren CE, editors. Fire and Ecosystems. Physiological Ecology: A Series of Monographs Texts and Treatises. New York: Academic Press; 1974. p. 423
  40. 40. Díaz-Delgado R, Lloret F, Pons X, Terradas J. Satellite evidence of decreasing resilience in Mediterranean plant communities after recurrent wildfires. Ecology. 2002;83:2293-2303
  41. 41. Sá-Torres JPC. Patterns and drivers of wildfire occurrence and post-fire vegetation resilience across scales in Portugal [thesis]. Porto: University of Porto; 2013
  42. 42. Kazanis D, Arianoutsou M. Long-term post-fire vegetation dynamics inPinus halepensisforests of Central Greece: A functional group approach. Plant Ecology. 2004;171:101-121
  43. 43. Lee SW, Lee MB, Lee YG, Won MS, Kim JJ, Hong S. Relationship between landscape structure and burn severity at the landscape and class levels in Samchuck, South Korea. Forest Ecology and Management. 2009;258:1594-1604
  44. 44. Silva JS, Vaz P, Moreira F, Catry F, Rego FC. Wildfires as a major driver of landscape dynamics in three fire-prone areas of Portugal. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2011;101:349-358
  45. 45. Handmer J, Proudley B. The economics of interface wildfires. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, General Technical Report PSWGTR-208. Albany: USDA; 2008. pp. 627-637
  46. 46. Schaffhauser A, Curt T, Tatoni T. Fire-vegetation interplay in amosaic structure ofQuercus suberwoodlands and Mediterranean maquis under recurrent fires. Forest Ecology and Management. 2011;262:730-738
  47. 47. Baeza MJ, De Luis M, Raventos J, Escarré A. Factors influencing fire behaviour in shrublands of different stand ages and the implications for using prescribed burning to reduce wildfire risk. Journal of Environmental Management. 2002;65:199-208
  48. 48. Curt T, Adra W, Borgniet L. Fire-driven oak regeneration in French Mediterranean ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management. 2009;258:2127-2135
  49. 49. Pausas GJ, Carbo E, Caturla RN, Gil JM, Vallejo R. Post fire revegetation patterns in the Eastern Iberian Peninsula. Acta Oecologica. 1999;20(5):499-508
  50. 50. Jain T, Pilliod D, Graham R. Tongue-tied. Wildfire. 2004;4:22-26
  51. 51. Lentile LB, Holden ZA, Smith AMS, Falkowski MJ, Hudak AT, Morgan P, Lewis SA, Gessler PE, Benson NC. Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2006;15:319-345
  52. 52. Bastos A, Gouveia CM, DaCamara CC, Trigo RM. Modelling post-fire vegetation recovery in Portugal. Biogeosciences. 2011;8:3593-3607
  53. 53. Röder A, Hill J, Duguy B, Alloza JA, Vallejo R. Using long time series of Landsat data to monitor fire events and post-fire dynamics and identify driving factors. A case study in the Ayora region (Eastern Spain). Remote Sensing of Environment. 2008;112:259-273
  54. 54. Smithwick EAH, Turner MG, Mack MC, Chapin FS. Postfire soil N cycling in Northern conifer forests affected by severe, stand-replacing wildfires. Ecosystems. 2005;8:163-181
  55. 55. Neary DG, Klopatek CC, DeBano LF, Ffolliott PF. Fire effects on belowground sustainability: A review and synthesis. Forest Ecology and Management. 1999;122:51-71
  56. 56. Strauss D, Bednar L, Mees R. Do one percent of the forest fires cause ninety-nine percent of the damage? Forest Science. 1989;35:319-328
  57. 57. Beverly J, Martell D. Characterizing extreme fire and weather events in the Boreal Shield Ecozone of Ontario. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2005;133:5-16
  58. 58. Pyne SJ, Andrews PL, Laven RD. Introduction to Wildland Fire Science. New York: Wiley; 1996. p. 769
  59. 59. Alexander ME. Help with making crown fire hazard assessments. In: Fischer WC, Arno SF, editors. Protecting people and homes from wildfire in the interior west. Proceedings of the symposium and workshop, October 6-8, 1988; Missoula, USA. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-251. Missoula: USDA Forest Service; 1988. pp. 147-156
  60. 60. Alvarez A, Gracia M, RetanaJ. Fuel types and crown fire potential inPinus halepensisforests. European Journal of Forest Research. 2012;131:463-474
  61. 61. Raymond CL, Peterson DL. Fuel treatments alter the effects of wildfire in a mixed-evergreen forest, Oregon, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2005;35:2981-2995
  62. 62. Cruz MG, Alexander ME, Wakimoto RH. Modeling the likelihood of crown fire occurrence in conifer forest stands. Forest Science. 2004;50:640-658
  63. 63. van Wagner CE. Conditions of the start and spread of crown fires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 1977;7:23-34
  64. 64. Duguy B, Vallejo R. Land-use and fire history effects on post-fire vegetation dynamics in Eastern Spain. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2008;19:97-108
  65. 65. Arca B, Duce P, Laconi M, Pellizzaro G, Salis M, Spano D. Evaluation of FARSITE simulator in Mediterranean maquis. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2007;16:563-572
  66. 66. Sandberg DV, Riccardi CL, Schaaf MD. Fire potential rating for wildland fuelbeds using the fuel characteristic classification system. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2007;37:2456-2463
  67. 67. Keeley J, Fotheringham CJ, Baer-Keeley M. Determinants of postfire recovery and succession in Mediterranean-climate shrublands of California. Ecological Applications. 2005;15:1515-1534
  68. 68. Hély C, Bergeron Y, Flannigan MD. Effects of stand composition on fire hazard in mixed-wood Canadian boreal forest. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2000;11:813-824
  69. 69. Fernandes PM, Rigolot E. The fire ecology and management of maritime pine (Pinus pinasterAit.). Forest Ecology and Management. 2007;241:1-13
  70. 70. McRae R, Sharples J. A conceptual framework for assessing the risk posed by extreme bushfires. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 2011;26(2):47-53
  71. 71. Williams J, Hamilton L. The Mega-Fire Phenomenon: Toward a More Effective Management Model. A Concept Paper. Washington: The Brookings Institution Center for Public Policy Education; 2005. Available from:[Accessed: 1 February 2017]
  72. 72. Turner MG, Romme WH, Gardner RH. Pre-fire heterogeneity, fire severity, and early post-fire plant reestablishment in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 1999;9:21-36
  73. 73. Fernandes PM, Pacheco AP, Almeida R, Claro J. The role of fire-suppression force in limiting the spread of extremely large forest fires in Portugal. European Journal of Forest Research. 2016;135:253-262. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-015-0933-8
  74. 74. Tedim F, Remelgado R, Borges C, Carvalho S, Martins J. Exploring the occurrence of mega-fires in Portugal. Forest Ecology and Management. 2013;294:86-96
  75. 75. Bond WJ, Keeley JE. Fire as a global “herbivore”: The ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2005;20:387-394
  76. 76. Carríon JS, van Geel B. Fine-resolution Upper Weichselian and Holocene palynological record from Navarrés (Valencia, Spain) and a discussion about factors of Mediterranean forest succession. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 1999;106:209-236
  77. 77. Baeza MJ, Valdecantos A, Aloloza JA, Vallejo VR. Human disturbance and environmental factors as drivers of long-term post-fire regeneration patterns in Mediterranean forests. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2007;18:243-252
  78. 78. Retana J, Espelta JM, Habrouk A, Ordonez JL, de Sola-Morales F. Regeneration patterns of three Mediterranean pines and forest changes after a large wildfire in Northeastern Spain. Ecoscience. 2002;9:89-97
  79. 79. Bradstock RA, Hammill KA, Collins L, Price O. Effects of weather, fuel and terrain on fire severity in topographically diverse landscapes of Southeastern Australia. Landscape Ecology. 2010;25(4):607-619
  80. 80. Lloret F, Marí G. A comparison of medieval and the current fire regimes in managed pine forests of Catalonia (NE Spain). Forest Ecology and Management. 2001;141:155-163
  81. 81. Mouillot F, Rambal S, Joffre R. Simulating climate change impacts on fire frequency and vegetation dynamics in a Mediterranean-type ecosystem. Global Change Biology. 2002;8:423-437
  82. 82. Pal JS, Giorgi F, Bi X. Consistency of recent European summer precipitation trends and extremes with future regional climate projections. Geophysical Research Letters. 2004;31:L13202
  83. 83. Maracchi G, Sirotenko O, Bindi M. Impacts of present and future climate variability on agriculture and forestry in the temperate regions: Europe. Climatic Change. 2005;70:117-135
  84. 84. Rodrigo A, Retana J, Pico FX. Direct regeneration is not the only response of Mediterranean forests to large fires. Ecology. 2004;85:716-729
  85. 85. Lavorel S, Canadell J, Rambal S, Terradas J. Mediterranean terrestrial ecosystems: Research priorities on global change effects. Global Ecology & Biogeography Letters. 1998;7:157-166
  86. 86. Chauchard S, Carcaillet C, Guibal F. Patterns of land-use abandonment control tree-recruitment and forest dynamics in Mediterranean mountains. Ecosystems. 2007;10:936-948
  87. 87. Cheddadi R, Guiot J, Jolly D. The Mediterranean vegetation: What if the atmospheric CO2 increased? Landscape Ecology. 2001;16:667-675
  88. 88. González-De Vega S, De Las Heras J, Moya D. Resilience of Mediterranean terrestrial ecosystems and fire severity in semiarid areas: Responses of Aleppo pine forests in the short, mid and long term. Science of the Total Environment. 2016;573:1171-1177
  89. 89. Capitanio R, Carcaillet C. Post-fire Mediterranean vegetation dynamics and diversity: A discussion of succession models. Forest Ecology and Management. 2008;255:431-439
  90. 90. Guo Q. Early post-fire succession in California chaparral: Changes in diversity, density, cover and biomass. Ecological Research. 2001;16:471-485
  91. 91. Herranz JM, Martínez-Sánchez JJ, Marín A, Ferrandis P. Post-fire regeneration ofPinus halepensisMiller in a semi-arid area in Albacete province (South-Eastern Spain). Ecoscience. 1997;4:86-90
  92. 92. Thanos CA, Daskakakou EN, Nikolaidou S. Early post-fire regeneration of aPinus halepensisforest on Mount Parnis, Greece. Journal of Vegetation Science. 1996;7:273-280
  93. 93. Moore PF. Forest landscape restoration after fires. In: Stephanie M, Vallauri D, Dudley N, editors. Forest Restoration in Landscapes, Beyond Planting Trees. Cidade: Springer; 2005. p. 427
  94. 94. Santana VM, Alday JG, Baeza MJ. Effects of fire regime shift in Mediterranean Basin ecosystems: Changes in soil seed bank composition among functional types. Plant Ecology. 2014;215:555-566
  95. 95. De Las Heras J, Martínez-Sánchez JJ, González-Ochoa AI, Ferrandis P, Herranz JM. Establishment ofPinus halepensisMill. saplings following fire: Effects of competition with shrub species. Acta Oecologica. 2002;23:91-97
  96. 96. Wittenberg L, Malkinson D, Beeri O, Halutzy A, Tessler N. Spatial and temporal patterns of vegetation recovery following sequences of forest fire in a Mediterranean landscape Mt. Carmel, Israel. Catena. 2007;71:76-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2006.10.007
  97. 97. Saïd S. Floristic and life form diversity in post-pasture succession on a Mediterranean island (Corsica). Plant Ecology. 2001;162:67-76
  98. 98. Gracia M, Retana J, Roig P. Mid-term successional patterns after fire of mixed pine-oak forests in NE Spain. Acta Oecologica. 2002;23:405-411
  99. 99. Tessler N, Wittenberg L, Greenbaum N. Vegetation cover and species richness after recurrent forest fires in the Eastern Mediterranean ecosystem of Mount Carmel, Israel. Science of the Total Environment. 2016;572:1395-1402
  100. 100. Tessler N, Sapir Y, Wittenberg L, Greenbaum N. Recovery of Mediterranean vegetation after recurrent forest fires: Insight from the 2010 forest fire on Mount Carmel, Israel. Land Degradation & Development. 2015;27:1424-1431. DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2419
  101. 101. Lloret F, Pausas J, Vila M. Responses of Mediterranean plant species to different fire frequency in Garraf Natural Park (Catalonia, Spain): Field observations and modeling predictions. Plant Ecology. 2003;167:223-235. Available from:
  102. 102. Zedler PH, Gautier CR, McMaster GS. Vegetation change in response to extreme events: The effect of a short interval between fires in California chaparral and coastal scrub. Ecology. 1983;64:809-818. Available from: seq=9#page_scan_tab_contents
  103. 103. Eugenio Gosalbo M, Lloret F, Alcañiz JM. Regional patterns of fire recurrence effects on calcareous soils of MediterraneanPinus halepensiscommunities. Forest Ecology and Management. 2006;221:313-318
  104. 104. Pausas JG. Simulating Mediterranean landscape pattern and vegetation dynamics under different fire regimes. Plant Ecology. 2006;187:249-259
  105. 105. Vilà-Cabrera A, Saura-Mas S, Lloret F. Effects of fire frequency on species composition in a Mediterranean shrubland. Ecoscience. 2008;15:519-528
  106. 106. Hinojosa MB, Parra A, Laudicina VA, Moreno JM. Post-fire functionality and microbial community structure in a Mediterranean shrubland subjected to experimental drought. Science of the Total Environment. 2016;573:1178-1189
  107. 107. Caon L, Vallejo VR, Coen RJ, Geissen V. Effects of wildfire on soil nutrients in Mediterranean ecosystems. Earth-Science Reviews. 2014;139:47-58
  108. 108. Certini G. Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: A review. Oecologia. 2005;143:1-10
  109. 109. Lane PN, Sheridan GJ, Noske PJ, Sherwin CB. Phosphorus and nitrogen exports from SE Australian forests following wildfire. Journal of Hydrology. 2008;361:186-198
  110. 110. Shakesby RA, Doerr SH. Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent. Earth-Science Reviews. 2006;74:269-307
  111. 111. Thomas AD, Walsh RP, Shakesby RA. Nutrient losses in eroded sediment after fire in eucalyptus and pine forests in the wet Mediterranean environment of Northern Portugal. Catena. 1999;36:283-302
  112. 112. Karhu K, Dannenmann M, Kitzler B, Díaz-Pinés E, Tejedor J, Ramírez DA, Parra A, Resco V, Moreno JM, Rubio A, Guiaraes-Povoas L, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Butterbach-Bahl K, Ambus P. Fire increases the risk of higher soil N2O emissions from Mediterranean macchia ecosystems. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 2015;82:44-51
  113. 113. Parra A, Ramírez DA, Resco V, Velasco A, Moreno JM. Modifying rainfall patterns in a Mediterranean shrubland: System design, plant responses and experimental burning. International Journal of Biometeorology. 2012;56:1033-1043
  114. 114. González-Pérez JA, González-Vila FJ, Almendros G, Knicker H. The effect of fire on soil organic matter—a review. Environment International. 2004;30:855-870
  115. 115. Hedo J, Lucas-Borja ME, Wic C, Andrés-Abellán M, De Las Heras J. Soil microbiological properties and enzymatic activities of long-term post-fire recovery in dry and semiarid Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensisM.) forest stands. Solid Earth. 2015;6:243-252
  116. 116. Goberna M, Garcia C, Insam H, Hernández MT, Verdú M. Burning fire-prone Mediterranean shrublands: Immediate changes in soil microbial community structure and ecosystem functions. Microbial Ecology. 2012;64:242-255
  117. 117. Vargas R, Collins SL, Thomey ML, Johnson JE, Brown RF, Natvig DO, Friggens MT. Precipitation variability and fire influence the temporal dynamics of soil CO2 efflux in an arid grassland. Global Change Biology. 2012;18:1401-1411
  118. 118. Schimel J, Balser TC, Wallenstein M. Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology. 2007;88:1386-1394
  119. 119. Schoenholtz SH, Miegroet H, Burger JA. A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: Challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecology and Management. 2000;138:335-356
  120. 120. Jenny H. The Soil Resource. Origin and Behaviour. Ecological Studies. Vol. 37. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1983. p. 377
  121. 121. Kohnke H, Bertrand AR. Soil Conservation. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1959. p. 298
  122. 122. Shakesby RA, Coelho COA, Ferreira AD, Terry JP, Walsh RPD. Wildfire impacts on soil erosion and hydrology in wet Mediterranean forest, Portugal. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 1993;3:95-110
  123. 123. Inbar M, Tamir M, Wittenberg L. Runoff and erosion processes after a forest fire in Mount Carmel, a Mediterranean area. Geomorphology. 1998;24(1):17-33
  124. 124. Cerda A. Changes in overland flow and infiltration after a rangeland fire in a Mediterranean scrubland. Hydrological Processes. 1998;12:1031-1042
  125. 125. Campo J, Andreu V, Gimeno-Garcia E, Gonzalez O, Rubio JL. Occurrence of soil erosion after repeated experimental fires in a Mediterranean environment. Geomorphology. 2006;82:376-387
  126. 126. Cerda A, Doerr SH. The influence of vegetation recovery on soil hydrology and erodibility following fire: An eleven year investigation. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2005;14(4):423-437
  127. 127. Malvar MC, Martins MA, Nunes JP, Robichaud PR, Keizer JJ. Assessing the role of pre-fire ground preparation operations and soil water repellency in post-fire runoff and inter-rill erosion by repeated rainfall simulation experiments in Portuguese eucalypt plantations. Catena. 2013;108:69-83
  128. 128. Fernández C, Veja JA, Fonturbel T, Pérez-Gorostiaga P, Jiménez E, Madrigal J. Effects of wildfire salvage logging and slash treatments on soil degradation. Land Degradation & Development. 2007;18:591-607
  129. 129. Gonzalez M, Augusto L, Gallet-Budynek A, Xue J, Yauschew-Raguenes N, Guyon D, Trichet P, Delerue F, Niollet S, Andreasson F, Achat DL, Bakker MR. Contribution of understory species to total ecosystem aboveground and belowground biomass in temperatePinus pinasterAit. forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 2013;289:38-47
  130. 130. Wagenbrenner JW, MacDonald LH, Coats RN, Robichaud PR, Brown RE. Effects of post-fire salvage logging and a skid trail treatment on ground cover, soils, and sediment production in the interior Western United States. Forest Ecology and Management. 2015;335:176-193
  131. 131. Boucher D, Gauthier S, Noël J, Greene DF, Bergeron Y. Salvage logging affects early post-fire tree composition in Canadian boreal forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 2014;325:118-127
  132. 132. Maia P, Pausas JG, Vasques A, Keizer JJ. Fire severity as a key factor in post-fire regeneration ofPinus pinaster(Ait.) in Central Portugal. Annals of Forest Science. 2012;69:489-498
  133. 133. Fernández C, Vega JA, Fonturbel T, Jiménez E, Pérez-Gorostiaga P. Effects of wildfire, salvage logging and slash manipulation onPinus pinasterAit. recruitment in Orense (NW Spain). Forest Ecology and Management. 2008;255:1294-1304
  134. 134. Santana VM, González-Pelayo O, Maia PAA, Varela ME, Valdecantos A, Vallejo VR, Keizer JJ. Effects of fire recurrence and different salvage logging techniques on carbon storage inPinus pinasterforests from Northern Portugal. European Journal of Forest Research. 2016;135:1107-1117
  135. 135. Nunes L, Lopes D, Rego FC, Gower ST. Aboveground biomass and net primary production of pine, oak and mixed pine–oak forests on the Vila Real district, Portugal. Forest Ecology and Management. 2013;305:38-47
  136. 136. Porté A, Trichet P, Bert D, Loustau D. Allometric relationships for branch and tree woody biomass of maritime pine (Pinus pinasterAit.). Forest Ecology and Management. 2002;158:71-83
  137. 137. Martí-Roura M, Casals P, Romanyà J. Temporal changes in soil organic C under Mediterranean shrublands and grasslands: Impact of fire and drought. Plant Soil. 2011;338:289-300
  138. 138. Kaipainen T, Liski J, Pussinen A, Karjalainen T. Managing carbon sinks by changing rotation length in European forests. Environmental Science & Policy. 2004;7:205-219
  139. 139. Shakesby RA. Post-wildfire soil erosion in the Mediterranean: Review and future research directions. Earth-Science Review. 2011;105:71-100
  140. 140. Hosseini M, Keizer JJ, González-Pelayo O, Prats SA, Ritsema C, Geissen V. Effect of fire frequency on runoff, soil erosion, and loss of organic matter at the micro-plot scale in North-Central Portugal. Geoderma. 2016;269:126-137
  141. 141. Martins MA, Machado AI, Serpa D, Prats SA, Faria SR, Varela ME, González-Pelayo O, Keizer JJ. Runoff and inter-rill erosion in a maritime pine and a eucalypt plantation following wildfire and terracing in North-Central Portugal. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics. 2013;61:261-268
  142. 142. Prats SA, Malvar MC, Vieira DCS, MacDonald L, Keizer JJ. Effectiveness of hydromulching to reduce runoff and erosion in a recently burnt pine plantation in Central Portugal. Land Degradation & Development. 2013;27:1319-1333
  143. 143. Prats SA, MacDonald LH, Monteiro M, Ferreira AJ, Coelho CO, Keizer JJ. Effectiveness of forest residue mulching in reducing post-fire runoff and erosion in a pine and a eucalypt plantation in North-Central Portugal. Geoderma. 2012;191:115-124
  144. 144. Loepfe L, Martinez-Vilalta J, Piñol J. Management alternatives to offset climate change effects on Mediterranean fire regimes in NE Spain. Climate Change. 2012;115:693-707
  145. 145. Regos A, Aquilué N, Retana J, Cáceres M, Brotons L. Using unplanned fires to help suppressing future large fires in Mediterranean forests. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94906. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094906
  146. 146. Barros AMG, Pereira JMC. Wildfire selectivity for land cover type: Does size matter? PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84760. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.008476
  147. 147. Fernandes P. Combining forest structure data and fuel modelling to classify fire hazard in Portugal. Annals of Forest Science. 2009;66:1-9
  148. 148. Gutiérrez E, Lozano S. Avoidable damage assessment of forest fires in European countries: An efficient frontier approach. European Journal of Forest Research. 2013;132:9-21
  149. 149. Tansey K, Grégoire J-M, Stroppiana D, Sousa A, Silva J, Pereira JMC, Boschetti L, Maggi M, Brivio PA, Fraser R, Flasse S, Ershov D, Binaghi E, Graetz D, Peduzzi P. Vegetation burning in the year 2000: Global burned area estimates from SPOT VEGETATION data. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 2003;109:D14S03. DOI: 10.1029/2003JD003598
  150. 150. Tansey K, Grégoire J-M, Binaghi E, Boschetti L, Brivio PA, Ershov D, Flasse S, Fraser R, Graetz D, Maggi M, Peduzzi P, Pereira JMC, Silva J, Sousa A, Stroppiana D. A global inventory of burned areas at 1 km resolution for the year 2000 derived from Spot Vegetation data. Climate Change. 2004;67(2):345-377
  151. 151. Sousa AMO, Pereira JMC, Silva JMN. Evaluating the performance of multitemporal image compositing algorithms for burned area analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2003;24(6):1219-1236
  152. 152. Pereira JMC, Sá ACL, Sousa AMO, Silva JMN, Santos TN, Carreiras JMB. Spectral characterisation and discrimination of burnt areas. In: Chuvieco E, editor. Remote Sensing of Large Wildfires in the European Mediterranean Basin. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1999. pp. 123-138
  153. 153. Pereira JMC, Sousa AMO, Sá ACL. Regional-scale burnt area mapping in Southern Europe using NOAA-AVHRR 1km data. In: Chuvieco E, editor. Remote Sensing of Large Wildfires in the European Mediterranean Basin. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1999. pp. 139-155
  154. 154. Gitas I, Mitri G, Veraverbeke S, Polychronaki A: Advances in remote sensing of post-fire vegetation recovery monitoring – A review. In: Fatoyinbo, L, editor. Remote sensing of biomass – principles and applications. Rijeka: InTech; 2012. pp. 144-170
  155. 155. McRoberts R, Tomppo E, Naesset E. Advanced and emerging issues on national forest inventories. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2010;25:368-381
  156. 156. Bolton DK, Coops NC, Wulder MA. Characterizing residual structure and forest recovery following high-severity fire in the western boreal of Canada using Landsat time-series and airborne lidar data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2015;163:48-60
  157. 157. Vila G, Barbosa P. Post-fire vegetation regrowth detection in the Deiva Marina region (Liguria-Italy) using Landsat TM and ETM+ data. Ecological Modelling. 2010;221:75-84
  158. 158. Fernandez-Manso A, Quintano C, Roberts DA. Burn severity influence on post-fire vegetation cover resilience from Landsat MESMA fraction images time series in Mediterranean forest ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2016;184:112-123
  159. 159. Dubovyk O, Landmann T, Erasmus BFN, Tewes A, Schellberg J. Monitoring vegetation dynamics with medium resolution MODIS-EVI time series at sub-regional scale in southern Africa. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2015;8:175-183
  160. 160. Meng R, Dennison PE, Huang C, Moritz MA, D’Antonio C. Effects of fire severity and post-fire climate on short-term vegetation recovery of mixed-conifer and red fir forests in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2015;171:311-325
  161. 161. Chen W, Moriya K, Sakai T, Koyama L, Cao C. Monitoring of post-fire forest recovery under different restoration modes based on time series Landsat data. European Journal of Remote Sensing. 2014;47:153-168
  162. 162. Chu T, Guo X. Remote sensing techniques in monitoring post-fire effects and patterns of forest recovery in boreal forest regions: A review. Remote Sensing. 2014;6:470-520
  163. 163. Di Mauro B, Fava F, Busetto L, Crosta GF, Colombo R. Post-fire resilience in the Alpine region estimated from MODIS satellite multispectral data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2014;32:163-172
  164. 164. Lanorte A, Lasaponara R, Lovallo M, Telesca L. Fisher–Shannon information plane analysis of SPOT/VEGETATION normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) time series to characterize vegetation recovery after fire disturbance. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2014;26:441-446
  165. 165. Goetz SJ, Fiske GJ, Bunn AG. Using satellite time-series data sets to analyze fire disturbance and forest recovery across Canada. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2006;101:352-365
  166. 166. Riaño D, Chuvieco E, Ustin S, Zomer R, Dennison P, Roberts D, Salas J. Assessment of vegetation regeneration after fire through multitemporal analysis of AVIRIS images in the Santa Monica Mountains. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2002;79:60-71
  167. 167. Ireland G, Petropoulos GP. Exploring the relationships between post-fire vegetation regeneration dynamics, topography and burn severity: A case study from the Montane Cordillera Ecozones of Western Canada. Applied Geography. 2015;56:232-248
  168. 168. Petropoulos GP, Griffiths HM, Kalivas DP. Quantifying spatial and temporal vegetation recovery dynamics following a wildfire event in a Mediterranean landscape using EO data and GIS. Applied Geography. 2014;50:120-131
  169. 169. Sever L, Leach J, Bren L. Remote sensing of post-fire vegetation recovery; a study using Landsat 5 TM imagery and NDVI in North-East Victoria. Journal of Spatial Science. 2012;57:75-191
  170. 170. White J, Ryan K, Key C, Running S. Remote sensing of forest fire severity and vegetation recovery. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 1996;6:125-136
  171. 171. Quintano C, Fernández-Manso A, Shimabukuro YE, Pereira G. Spectral unmixing: A review. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2012;33:5307-5340
  172. 172. EFFIS. European Forest Fire Information System. 2017. Available from:[Accessed: 3 January 2017]
  173. 173. ICNF. Defesa da Floresta Contra Incêndios [Defense of Forest Against Fires]. Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas [in Portuguese]. 2017. Available from:[Accessed: 3 January 2017]
  174. 174. Marques S, Borges JG, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Moreira F, Carreiras JMB, Oliveira MM, Cantarinha A, Botequim B, Pereira JMC. Characterization of wildfires in Portugal. European Journal of Forest Research. 2011;130:775-784
  175. 175. Parente J, Pereira MG, Tonini M. Space-time clustering analysis of wildfires: The influence of dataset characteristics, fire prevention policy decisions, weather and climate. Science of the Total Environment. 2016;559:151-165
  176. 176. Eichhorn MP, Paris P, Herzog F, Incoll LD, Liagre F, Mantzanas K, Mayus M, Moreno G, Papanastasis VP, Pilbeam DJ, Pisanelli A, Dupraz C. Silvoarable systems in Europe—past, present and future prospects. Agroforestry Systems. 2006;67:29-50
  177. 177. Jose S, Gillespie AR, Pallardy SG. Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems. 2004;61:237-255
  178. 178. Godinho-Ferreira P, Azevedo A, Rego F. Carta da Tipologia Florestal de Portugal Continental [Map of the forest typology of continental Portugal]. Silva Lusitana. 2005;13(1):1-34 [in Portuguese]
  179. 179. Gonçalves AC, Dias SS, Ferreira AG, Ribeiro NA: Landscape diversity patterns in Alentejo forest area. In: Schnabel S, Ferreira AG, editors. Sustainability of Agrosilvopastoral Systems. Advances in GeoEcology. Reiskirchen: Catena Verlag; 2004; Vol. 37. 2004. pp. 255-261
  180. 180. Rodrigues M, San Miguel J, Oliveira S, Moreira F, Camia A. An insight into spatial–temporal trends of fire ignitions and burned areas in the European Mediterranean countries. Journal of Earth Science and Engineering. 2013;3:497-505
  181. 181. Nunes AN. Regional variability and driving forces behind forest fires in Portugal: An overview of the last three decades (1980-2009). Applied Geography. 2012;34:576-586
  182. 182. Carmo M, Moreira F, Casimiro P, Vaz P. Land use and topography influences on wildfire occurrence in Northern Portugal. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2001;100:169-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.017
  183. 183. Bajocco S, Ricotta C. Evidence of selective burning in Sardinia (Italy): Which land cover classes do wildfires prefer? Landscape Ecology. 2008;23:241-248
  184. 184. Sebastián-López A, Salvador-Civil R, Gonzalo-Jiménez J, San Miguel-Ayanz J. Integration of socio-economic and environmental variables for modelling long-term fire danger in Southern Europe. European Journal of Forest Research. 2008;127:149-163
  185. 185. Nunes MCS, Vasconcelos MJ, Pereira JMC, Dasgupta N, Alldredge RJ, Rego FC. Land cover type and fire in Portugal: Do fires burn land cover selectively? Landscape Ecology. 2005;20:661-673
  186. 186. IPMA. Normais Climatológicas [Climate Normals]. Instituto Português do Mar e da atmosfera [in Portuguese]. 2017. Available from:[Accessed: 24 March 2017]
  187. 187. Mutanga O, Adam E, Cho MA. High density biomass estimation for wetland vegetation using WorldView-2 imagery and random forest regression algorithm. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2012;18:399-406
  188. 188. Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In: 3rd ERTS Symposium, NASA SP-351. Vol. I. Washington DC: NASA; 1973. pp. 309-317
  189. 189. van Leeuwen W. Monitoring the effects of forest restoration treatments on post-fire vegetation recovery with MODIS multitemporal data. Sensors. 2008;8:2017-2042

Written By

Ana Cristina Gonçalves and Adélia M.O. Sousa

Submitted: December 9th, 2016 Reviewed: April 24th, 2017 Published: November 8th, 2017