Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Radical Mechanisms in the Metallocenes

Written By

Betul Caliskan

Submitted: 22 October 2016 Reviewed: 03 April 2017 Published: 05 July 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.68952

From the Edited Volume

Recent Progress in Organometallic Chemistry

Edited by Mohammed Muzibur Rahman and Abdullah Mohamed Asiri

Chapter metrics overview

2,941 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


A special class of sandwich complexes is the metallocenes. The best-known members are the metallocenes of the formula M(C5H5)2, where M = zirconium, zinc, titanium, hafnium, vanadium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, iron, ruthenium, osmium, cobalt, rhodium, and nickel. Besides the two cyclopentadienyl rings, the metal can have additional ligands depending on its valence state. These species are also called bis(cyclopentadienyl)metal complexes. Bis(cyclopentadienyl) complexes are called metallocenes or sandwich compounds. Metal-centred radical and cyclopentadienyl radical structures can occur in the metallocene. The anion and cation radicals can also be formed by charge transfer transition.


  • metallocenes
  • sandwich compound
  • organometallic compounds
  • cyclopentadienyl complex
  • π-complexes
  • σ-complexes
  • ionic complexes

1. Introduction

The first metallocene to be classified was ferrocene and was discovered simultaneously in 1951 by Kealy and Pauson; Keally and Pauson were trying to synthesize fulvalene by oxidation of a cyclopentadienyl salt with anhydrous FeCl3. However, instead of this, C10H10Fe is obtained [1]. Miller et al. also reported the same iron product obtained from the reaction of cyclopentadiene with iron in the presence of aluminum, potassium or molybdenum oxides [2]. Wilkinson et al. [3] and Fischer and Pfab [4] studied ferrocene (Figure 1) and received the Nobel Prize in 1973 for their work on sandwich compounds. In the bond between the iron atom and the carbon atoms in the cyclopentadienyl (Cp) ligands, each of the carbon atoms contributes equally to the bond. They found that each of the carbon atoms contributed equally to the bond between the carbon atoms in the cyclopentadienyl ligands and the iron atom. In this connection, the effective electrons are the electrons in the d-orbitals of the iron and the π-electrons in the p-orbitals of the Cp ligands. This complex is called ferrocene. This kind of construction was called the metolocene. Co and Ni were used as metals in the first metallocenes. Metallocenes of many elements derived mostly from derivatives used instead of cyclopentadienide have been prepared [5].

Figure 1.



2. Classification of metallocenes

A metallocene is a compound typically consisting of two cyclopentadienyl anions (Cp, which is C5H5) bound to a metal center (M) in the oxidation state II, with the resulting general formula (C5H5)2M. For metalocene derivatives, titanocene dichloride and vanadocene dichloride are the best examples. Some metallocenes and their derivatives exhibit catalytic properties, but metallocenes are seldom used industrially. Cationic group 4 metallocene derivatives are concerned with [Cp2ZrCH3]+ catalyze olefin polymerization. Metallocenes are a subset of organometallic compounds called sandwich compounds.

In Figure 1, the two parallel structures are cyclopentadienyl anions, which are aromaticly stable and show an ordered arrangement.

Ferrocene, (C5H5)2Fe or Cp2Fe, is systematically called bis(η5-cyclopentadienyl)iron(II). Due to the ferrocene name, the first found compound, this type of ferrocene-like structure is called metallocene. IUPAC describes a metallocene as a transition metal between two cyclopentadienyl anions which consist of parallel planes with equal bond lengths and strengths in the sandwich structure. The term “hapticity” means that the equivalent of the five carbon atoms of a cyclopentadienyl ring is completely equivalent. It is pronounced as “pentahapto.” It is expressed as η5. There are exceptions, such as uranocene, in which a uranium atom is sandwiched between two cyclooctatetraene rings.

IUPAC defines the term metalocene as a combination of a d-block metal and a sandwich structure. However, the metallocene term expressed by the sign of the -ocene is also applied to compounds such as manganocene or titanocene dichloride (Cp2TiCl2) in which the aromatic rings are not parallel or to the i non-transition metal compounds (Cp2Ba) such as barocene in the chemical literature.

Some metallocene complexes of actinides have been reported to have three cyclopentadienyl ligands for a monometallic complex, and all have been reported to bind η5 [6].

5-C5H5)-metallocene complexes can be classified as shown in Table 1 [7]. Various (η5-C5H5)-metal complexes are also shown in Figures 24.

Formula Description
[(η5-C5H5)2M] Symmetrical, classical “sandwich” structure
[(η5-C5H5)2MLx] Bent or tilted Cp rings with additional ligands, L
[(η5-C5H5)MLx] Only one Cp ligand with additional ligands, L (“piano-stool” structure)

Table 1.

Classification of (η5-C5H5)-metal complexes.

Figure 2.

Sandwich or metallocene complexes.

Figure 3.

Bent or tilted metallocenes.

Figure 4.

Half-sandwich complexes (“piano-stool” complexes).

Metallocene complexes can also be classified by type [7]:

  1. Parallel (sandwich)

  2. Half-sandwich

  3. Bent or tilted

  4. Multi-decker [8]

  5. More than two Cp ligands

2.1. Sandwich compound

In organometallic chemistry, a sandwich compound is a chemical compound containing a metal attached to two arene ligands via haptic-covalent bonds. The arenes have the formula CnHn, substituted derivatives (for example Cn(CH3)n) and heterocyclic derivatives (for example BCnHn+1). Since the metal is usually placed between the two rings, it is said to be a “sandwiched.” The metallocene is a special sandwich complex class.

The sandwich compound term entered to the organometallic nomenclature with their studies identifying the structure of ferrocene by X-ray crystallography of Dunitz et al. [9]. The correct structure was proposed several years ago by Robert Burns Woodward and Ernst Otto Fischer separately. The structure helped to explain the unknowns of ferrocene’s conformers with an iron atom trapped between two parallel cyclopentadienyl rings. This result showed better the power of X-ray crystallography and accelerated the growth of organometallic chemistry [10]. Ferrocene, a sandwich compound, is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Ferrocene, the archetypal sandwich compound.

The metallocene is generally expressed by the formula M(C5H5)2 where M = Cr, Fe, Co, Ni, Pb, Zr, Ru, Rh, Sm, Ti, V, Mo, W, and Zn. Metallosenes are also called bis (cyclopentadienyl) metal complexes.

Apart from the metallocene, the parallel sandwich complexes can be listed as follows. These are not metallocene. However, these are parallel and sandwich compounds.

  • Mixed cyclopentadienyl complexes: Its general structure is M(C5H5)(CnHn), such as Ti(C5H5)(C7H7) and (C60)Fe(C5H5Ph5).

  • Bis(benzene)complexes: Its general structure is M(C6H6)2, such as bisbenzene chromium.

  • Bis(cyclooctatetraenyl) complexes: Its general structure is M(C8H8)2, such as U(C8H8)2 and Th(C8H8)2.

  • Bis(cyclobutadienyl) complexes: Its general structure is M(C4H4)2, such as Fe(C4H4)2.

The sandwich compounds can also be formed with inorganic ligands such as Fe(C5Me5)(P5) and [(P5)2Ti]2− [11].

2.2. Half-sandwich compounds

It is also called piano-stool compounds. The name of the piano-stool compounds originates from the fact that the structure is likened to a “stool” having a seat with a facial planar organic compounds such as benzene or cyclopentadiene and legs with ligands such as CO or allyl. The metallocenes may have a larger half-sandwich compound family even with a planar organic ligand attached to the surface instead of the two ligands.

2.2.1. Monometallic half-sandwich compounds

These compounds are organometallic. The general structure of the half-sandwich compounds consists of the cyclic polyhapto ligand bound to MLn, where L is a conjugated ligand [12]. (C5H5)TiCl3 and (C5H5)Co(CO)2 complexes are among the best examples of this group. Half-sandwich compounds according to the cyclic polyhapto ligand can be examined in two categories: (η5-C5H5) piano stool compounds and (η6-C6H6) piano stool compounds.

  1. 5-C5H5) piano stool compounds: It contains the cyclopentadienyl ligand, (η5-C5H5), as the cyclic polyhapto ligand of the half-sandwich complex. (η5-C5H5)V(CO)4, (η5-C5H5)Cr(CO)3H, (η5-C5H5)Mn(CO)3, (η5-C5H5)Cr(CO)3H, [(η5-CH3C5H4)Fe(CO)3]+, (η5-C5H5)V(CO)4I and (η5-C5H5)Co(CO)2 complexes are among the best examples of this group. (η5-C5H5)Co(CO)2 complex is shown in Figure 6.

  2. 6-C6H6) piano stool compounds: It contains the benzene ring, (η6-C6H6), as the cyclic polyhapto ligand of the half-sandwich complex. The general structure of these compounds consists (η6-C6H6)ML3, where L is typically CO-conjugated ligand and M are metals such as Cr, Mo, W, Mn(I), and Re(I). (η6-C6H6) piano stool complexes are stable compounds with a variety of chemical and material applications and an example of (η6-C6H6) piano stool complex is given in Figure 7. The first studies on the (η6-C6H6)Cr(CO)3 compound were carried out in 1957 and 1958 [1315]. The crystal structure was determined in 1959 [16]. The subsequent studies came in 1987 and 1989 [17, 18]. The ball-and-stick model of methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl, a “piano stool” compound and CpFe(CO)2I, an example of an unsymmetrical piano stool complex, are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively.

Figure 6.

5-C5H5) piano stool compound.

Figure 7.

6-C6H6) piano stool compound.

Figure 8.

Ball-and-stick model of methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl, a “piano stool” compound.

Figure 9.

CpFe(CO)2I is an example of an unsymmetrical piano stool complex.

2.2.2. Dimetallic half-sandwich compounds

Compounds such as the cyclopentadienyliron dicarbonyl dimer and cyclopentadienylmolybdenumtricarbonyl dimer can be considered a special case of half-sandwiches, except that they are dimetallic [17]. A structurally related species is [Ru(C6H6)Cl2]2.

2.3. Bent metallocene

In organometallic chemistry, bent metallocenes are a subset of metallocenes. In bent metallocenes, the ring systems coordinated to the metal are not parallel but are tilted at an angle. A common example of a bent metallocene is Cp2TiCl2 [19, 20]. Titanocene dicarbonyl, an example of a bent metallocene, is given in Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Titanocene dicarbonyl is an example of a bent metallocene.

Bent metallocene dichlorides of molybdenum and tungsten are also prepared via indirect routes that involve redox at the metal centers.

Bent metallocenes have C2v symmetry. The non-Cp ligands are arrayed in the wedge area. The bent metallocene is represented by the formula Cp2ML2. For bent metallocenes, the value of L-M-L angle affects the number of electrons. Molybdocene dichloride (Cp2MoCl2) has a Cl-Mo-Cl angle of 82°. In niobosen dichloride, this angle is slightly over 85.6°. For zirconocene dichloride, this angle is greater than 92.1°. This slope indicates that the boundary orbit is directed towards the MCl2 plane. However, it expresses that the MCl2 angle does not divide [21].

2.4. Multi-decker sandwich compounds

The dicationic triscyclopentadienyl dinickel complex [Ni2Cp3](BF4)2 was the first multidecker sandwich complex. Since this discovery, many multidecker sandwich compounds have been discovered. Especially, the triple deckers are the most important [22]. Different multi-decker sandwich complexes have been obtained by adding Cp*Ru+ to preformed sandwich complexes [23].

Triple-decker complexes are composed of three Cp anions and two metal cations in alternating order. The first triple-decker sandwich complex, [Ni2Cp3]+, was reported in 1972. [Ni2Cp3]+, an example of a triple-decker sandwich complex, is shown in Figure 11. Many examples have been reported subsequently, often with boron-containing rings [8].

Figure 11.

[Ni2Cp3]+ is an example of triple-decker sandwich complex.


3. Radical properties of metallocenes

3.1. Cyclopentadienyl radical and metal-substituted cyclopentadienyl radicals

EPR/spin trapping experiments were performed by direct irradiation of benzene solutions of the zirconocenes in the spectrometer cavity. Various spin traps have been used to determine the nature of the cyclopentadienyl-type radical species. These spin traps include N-tert-butyl-α-phenylnitrone (PBN), nitrosodurene (ND), and 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) [24, 25]. According to the NIEHS Spin Trap Database [24, 25], the hyperfine coupling constants (hfcc) of the spin adducts detected can be attributed to the cyclopentadienyl type radicals [26]. Therefore, the primary photochemical act can be described by Figure 12.

Figure 12.

The formation of the cyclopentadienyl-type radical from the zirconocenes.

The presence of radical intermediates in the zirconocenes’ photochemical reactions suggests a possible use as photoinitiators for radical polymerisation processes. In order to test the effectiveness of these organometallic photoinitiators, Similar EPR/spin trapping experiments were carried out in the presence of different alkenes such as 1-pentene, methyl methacrylate (MMA) and tert-butyl acrylate (tBA) and in different solvents such as benzene and dichloromethane. During irradiation of the zirconocene/alkene mixtures, the growth of the EPR signal of a carbon-centred radical was detected [26].

Due to the resonance state of the cyclopentadienyl radical, the bonds to the cyclopentadienyl ring are easily homolized. This situation is discussed in two respects. First, the photolysis is applied to a wide variety of cyclopentadienyl-metallic compounds by ultraviolet light. This effect leads to the cyclopentadienyl radicals and the metal-centered radicals. Some of these radicals have been characterized by EPR spectroscopy. Second, t-butoxyl radicals react with some other cyclopentadienyl-metallic compounds by removing hydrogen to give the metal-substituted cyclopentadienyl radicals.

The general characteristic of many cyclopentadienyl-metallic compounds is that they are not reactive. However, some are quite active. They also exhibit a stability profile for the cyclopentadienyl (5-anulene) ligand, where homolytic reactions are present. This causes the reactions to be homolytic. This has two important consequences. It causes the carbon-metal bond, which is the formation point of the metal-centered radicals and the cyclopentadienyl radicals, to be light-sensitive. Second, if bimolecular homolytic substitution does not readily occur at the metal center, hydrogen may be abstracted from the ring to give a metal-substituted cyclopentadienyl radical [27].

The photosensitivity work of the cyclopentadienyl-metal bond was first applied to tin(IV) derivatives. No significant EPR signal can be detected if simple alkyltin compounds are irradiated in solution with ultraviolet light in an EPR spectrometer cavity. Under the same conditions, cyclopentadienyltin(IV) compounds, η1-CpSnL3 (,L = Cp, alkyl, aryl, Cl, MeCO2, etc.) give a strong sextet spectrum of cyclopentadienyl radicals [28]; this obscures the spectrum of the radical Sn ˙ L 3 , but this radical can be identified by virtue of its characteristic reactions with reagents such as alkenes, alkyl halides, and 1,2-diones. For this reason, it is seen that it contains simple unimolecular homolysis. The pentahapto cyclopentadienyltin(II) compounds similarly show the spectrum of the Cp . radical, but an insoluble solid separates, and the fate of the tin moiety is unknown [29]. Similar studies have been carried out on cyclopentadienyl derivatives of other metals. The cyclopentadienyl derivatives of other metals, CpMLn, have been subjected to similar works. When M, lithium, mercury, tin(IV), tin(II), lead(IV), lead(II), titanium(IV), or zirconium(IV) are used as metals, M, the spectrum of the cyclopentadienyl radical is obtained. Cyclopentadienyl derivatives of beryllium, magnesium, boron, silicon, and germanium exhibit a very poor spectrum, but, in the presence of di-t-butyl peroxide, the compounds Cp2Be, CpBeCl, Cp2Mg, and CpGeCl3 give the cyclopentadienyl radical under the effect of an SH2 reaction in the metal center [30, 31].

When the metal carries both cyclopentadienyl and alkyl (R) groups, cleavage of the Cp─M and R─M bonds may be in competition. Irradiation of alkylcyclopentadienyltin(IV) compounds gives only the cyclopentadienyl radical but cyclopentadienyltriethyl-lead gives Cp . above −50°C and E ˙ t below −100°C, and both in between [28, 32]. Bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium dichloride give a rather weak C p . spectrum, but Cp2ZrMe2 gives only the methyl radical [33].

Cyclopentadienylmethylberyllium reacts with t-butoxyl radicals to show predominantly the spectrum of the cyclopentadienyl radical below −60°C, but at −30°C the concentrations of cyclopentadienyl and methyl radicals are approximately equal [34]. However, with cyclopentadienylmethyl mercury at the normal concentration, the principal species which are observed are C p . at −75°C, and M e . at −130°C [35].

The EPR spectra have been studied with the parent cyclopentadienyl radical generated by several routes such as γ-irradiation on both crystalline [36, 37] and liquid cyclopentadiene [38], by pyrolysis of a molecular beam of ferrocene and azobenzene [39] and recently by hydrogen abstraction of cyclopentadiene with the tert-butoxy radical in solution [40, 41].

EPR spectroscopy has been used to study the photolysis of the compounds (C5H5)2ZrCl2, (Me5C5)2ZrCl2, (C5H5)2ZrMe2, (C5H5)2ZrMeCl and (C5Me5)2ZrMe2. The cyclopentadienyl radical is formed in the first two compounds, and the methyl radical is formed in the third and fourth compounds. But it can be said that both cyclopentadienyl and methyl radical exist in (C5Me5)2ZrMe2 compound [42].

The experimental and theoretical observations reported above are consistent with the notion that the reactive excited state in the bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium dichloride (Cp2ZrCl2), bis(pentamethyl-cyclopentadienyl)zirconium dichloride (Cp2*ZrCl2) and bis(indenyl)zirconium dichloride (Ind2ZrCl2) complexes are of the L → Zr (L = Cp, Cp*, Ind) charge transfer type. Such the ligand-to-metal charge-transfer (LMCT) states would lead to formal reduction of the metal and oxidation of the ring system. Consistent with LMCT excitation, these excited states may dissociate, giving rise to free L ˙ and L Z ˙ r C l 2 radicals. These results are consistent with the earlier reports of photochemistry of zirconium complexes parallel to titanium derivatives for (C5H5)2ZrCl2 [43].

The reaction shown in Figure 12 is very consistent with the EPR results. In this reaction, the photo-induced cleavage of one of the L─Zr bonds as the primary excited state reaction is generally believed to be the case [44].

3.2. Anion and cation radicals formed in metallocenes

The redox, photophysical, and photochemical properties of the homologous bent metallocenes of group 4 transition metals are emphasized. On the systematic variation of the definition of ligands of metal ions (Ti, Zr, or Hf), auxiliary π- and monodentate σ- (Cl, Me) ligands, a comparative analysis of electron transfer induced transformations and ligand-to-metal charge transfer excited states was carried out for bent metalocene complexes. Linear correlations between optical and redox HOMO-LUMO electron transitions are found for such organometallic π-complexes. It is proposed that the combination of spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques provide important diagnostics to determine “ionization potential” and “electron affinity” in the solution and the energy gap in metalocene complexes [45].

For the synthesis of dithiolane complexes [Cp(2)M(S(2)C(2)(H)R)] (M = Mo or W; R = phenyl, pyridin-2-yl, pyridin-3-yl, pyridin-4-yl or quinoxalin-2-yl) and [Cp(2)Mo(S(2)C(2)(Me)(pyridin-2-yl)] compounds were prepared. These compounds are electrochemically subjected to one-electron reduction and one-electron oxidation process. For a Mo compound, each redox exchange occurs at a more positive potential than the value for a W compound. Mono-cations of both compounds were produced by chemical and electrochemical oxidation. For [Cp(2)Mo(S(2)C(2)(H)R)](+)/[Cp(2)Mo(S(2)C(2)(H)R)] (R = Ph or pyridin-3-yl) redox pairs, the changes in Mo─S, SC and CC bond lengths of the {MoSCCS} moiety are consistent with the oxidation process involving an electron loss from the π-orbital in Mo─S and C─S antibonding and C─C bonding. When the EPR spectrum of each Mo cation is examined, it is understood that the unpaired electron is weakly bound to the ditiolan proton. According to the results of DFT calculations, the unpaired electrons in the monoanions are localized on the metal, more than mono-cations. Furthermore, according to the EPR spectrum, the hyperfine structure splits of mono anions containing Mo are larger than those of mono cations. The reduction of [Cp(2)W(S(2)C(2)(H)(quinoxalin-2-yl)] takes place at a more positive potential than expected for Mo. The EPR spectrum of the mono-anion is typical for an organic radical. DFT calculations show that these properties are due to the addition of a the electron to quinoxalin-2-yl π-orbital [46].

The cyclic voltammetry of cobaltocene and nickelocene revealed five redox states, from dication to dianion. In situations where it is not possible to work with conventional electrodes at traditional temperatures, operation potential can be extended using low-temperature solvents (SO2, THF) and ultramicroelectrode techniques. The Cp2M0/−, Cp2M −/2−, and Cp2M +/2+ redox reactions of the previously known Cp2M0/+redox couples are shown [47].

The classical metalocenes, ferrocene, and ruthenocene are easily soluble in the pure ethyl 2-cyanoacrylate (CA) monomer. The electronic spectra of the resulting solutions show a near-ultraviolet absorption band as a result of the charge-transfer transition to the solvent (metallocene → CA). The one-electron oxidation of the metallocene occurs when this band is exposed to irradiation. The anionic polymerization of the electrophilic monomer begins with the addition of the latter species to CA [48].

A large series of studies have been devoted to metallocenes, starting with the simplest representatives of compounds of this class-ferrocene [49] and its derivatives [5055]. Comparison of the results of the calculation by the Hückel molecular orbital method with the observed hyperfine structure of EPR spectra [51] yields a quantitative distribution of the spin density in the radical-anion. Overall, the ferrocenyl group is destabilizing compared with the phenyl group. In the presence of both groups in one molecule, the degree of delocalization of the spin density is greater in the direction of the benzene ring [52].

Stable paramagnetic semiquinones of the metallocene series are formed on oxidation of ketones containing the a methylene group [53, 54].

The ease of the one-electron oxidation of metallocene derivatives is confirmed by the formation of paramagnetic salts, where the anionic component may consist of the radical-anion derived from the organic one-electron acceptor tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) [56]. Such salts are in essence organometallic analogues of charge transfer complexes [57].

Ferrocene and its derivatives turn into cation radicals by the reversible one-electron oxidation. These radicals are called “ferricenium” cations. The iron atom is the center of the cation radical and localized. Conversely, the hole transfers via conjugated systems were proven for bis(ferrocenyl) ethylene cation radical [58] and thebis (fulvaleneiron) cation radical [59]. The unpaired electron is delocalise on both metallocene residues in the bis (fulvaleneiron) cation radical, and Extended Huckel MO calculations [60] support this situation. Alternatively, very rapid intra-ionic intervalence electron transfer can occur between the formal Fe(II) and Fe(III) atoms. In general, the ethylene bonds in the organic cation radicals are weak and the barrier to rotation is significantly reduced relative to the neutral ethylene derivative. This property of the ethylene bond in the cation radicals has been used to investigate many reaction mechanisms [61]. The cation radicals of the ferrocenyl ethylene are not subject to the cis-to-trans isomerization process. The calculations show that the cation radical center is only in the iron atom, not in the ethylene bond [62]. Therefore, one-electron oxidation of ferrocenyl ethylene occurs at the iron atom. For this reason, the stable enol bound to a ferrocene redox center gives a cation radical through an electron oxidation. This species is characterized as a ferricenic salt rather than an enol cation radical [63].

The cationic forms of the metalocene (the metallocinium cations) provide interesting possibilities by forming charge-transfer complexes with various biological macromolecules. Although the suitability of the metallocene compounds has not been discussed yet, Szent-Györgyi emphasized that the charge-transfer interactions of metallocene compounds are of interest to biological problems [64].

The basic coenzymes are all conjugate compounds: DPN, TPN, FAD, FMN, quinones, folic acids, pyridoxal phosphate, etc. The all of the significant coenzymes are all conjugated compounds: DPN, TPN, FAD, FMN, quinones, folic acids, pyridoxal phosphate, etc. Likewise, steroids and a large numbers of pharmacological agents contain suitable conjugate moieties for the charge transfer interactions. The electronic delocalization is thought to be one of their main features [65]. It seemed of interest, therefore, to examine the possible electron-donor properties of some biologically important molecules, particularly of conjugated systems likely to be involved in electron-transfer phenomena in relation to the acceptor characteristics of the metallocenes. The capacity of metallocinium cations to accept π-electrons might, in fact, be employed toward this end. They could serve as probes of the electron-donating characteristics of conjugated biological systems. The ferricinium, the bis-benzene-chromium, and the cobalticinium cations apparently display the required physicochemical properties. All these compounds have aromatic properties. The ferricinium, the bis-benzene-chromium, and the cobalticinium cations contain two parallel conjugated rings, which are either five- or six-membered. They are readily soluble in water. Aqueous solutions of the ferricinium salts [66] and bis-benzene-chromium salts [67] are reasonably stable in the dark.

The cobalticinium salts are exceptionally stable in water [68]. The simple application of a metallic cation between the two aromatic rings has three important consequences for the investigation of biological systems:

  1. The aromatic system becomes more soluble in water.

  2. It becomes a good electron acceptor.

  3. The tightly bound metal ion can be identified by optical, EPR and NMR spectra and is an excellent label of the aromatic system.

The solubility in water of the metallocinium cations has a distinct advantage. Most of the conventional π-acceptors can only be examined in less polar solvents such as chloroform or dimethylformamide [69].

The formation of stable η5-complexes between fullerenes and transition metals is highly improbable because the conjugated system is rather strongly delocalized, and the polarization of the atoms of the five-member face is weak. There is an opinion that the fullerene structure will change by the addition of R groups, hydrogen (H), methyl (Me), or phenyl (Ph) to the α-position of the same five-membered face, and thus the conjugate system will deteriorate.

The cyclopentadienyl ion obtained from the fullerene plays an important role in the formation of complexes with transition metals [70]. The molecular structure of ferrocene/C70-fullerene hybrid [71] is given in Figure 13. There are two obstacles to producing the cyclopentadienyl ion: first, it is difficult to form a barrier around the cyclopentadienyl ring. And the second is the difficulty in ionizing to produce the cyclopentadienyl group.

Figure 13.

Molecular structure of ferrocene/C70-fullerene hybrid.

The same idea, that is, double-decker ferrocene complexes, has also been examined by the Nakamura group [72, 73]. They studied both theoretical and experimental arguments and found that the addition of a second ferrocene fraction leads to strong instability and can produce very short-lived radical ion pairs [74]. The complex 2η5-π-(CpFe)2-C60H10 [75], double-decker ferrocene complex, is shown in Figure 14.

Figure 14.

Complex 2η5-π-(CpFe)2-C60H10.


4. Conclusion

In metallocenes, the radicals can occur in a variety of ways. Photolysis (ultraviolet light), radiolysis (gamma-irradiation), spin trapping and photochemical reactions can be created radical. It has been observed that a wide variety of radicals are formed by these methods. The ionic radicals are formed through charge-transfer interactions.

Metallocenes can form a wide variety of radicals. However, the two main types of radical groups gain weight. These are the cyclopentadienyl radicals and the ionic radicals. The cyclopentadienyl radicals are distinguished as the cyclopentadienyl radical and the metal-centered cyclopentadienyl radical.

Other radicals that can occur outside of these radicals can be expressed as follows: the carboncentred radical, the metal-centred radical, various anion and cation radicals of metallocenes, dianion and dication radicals, and semiquinone radicals of metallocenes.


  1. 1. Kealy TJ, Pauson PL. A new type of organo-iron compound. Nature. 1951;168(4285):1039-1040. DOI: 10.1038/1681039b0
  2. 2. Miller SA, Tebboth JA, Tremaine JF. Dicyclopentadienyliron. Journal of the Chemical Society. 1952:632-635. DOI: 10.1039/JR9520000632
  3. 3. Wilkinson G, Rosenblum M, Whiting MC, Woodward RB. The structure of iron bis-cyclopentadienyl. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1952;74(8):2125-2126. DOI: 10.1021/ja01128a527
  4. 4. Fischer EO, Pfab W. Cyclopentadien-metallkomplexe, ein neuer typ metallorganischer verbindungen. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung B. 1952;7(7):377-379. DOI: 10.1515/znb-1952-0701
  5. 5. Chirik PJ. Group 4 transition metal sandwich complexes: Still fresh after almost 60 years. Organometallics. 2010;29(7):1500-1517. DOI: 10.1021/om100016p
  6. 6. Brennan JG, Andersen RA, Zalkin A. Chemistry of trivalent uranium metallocenes: Electron-transfer reactions. Synthesis and characterization of [(MeC5H4)3U]2E (E=S, Se, Te) and the crystal structures of hexakis(methylcyclopentadienyl)sulfidodiuranium and tris(methylcyclopentadienyl)(triphenylphosphine oxide)uranium. Inorganic Chemistry. 1986;25(11):1761-1765. DOI: 10.1021/ic00231a008
  7. 7. Long NJ. Metallocenes: Introduction to Sandwich Complexes. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 1998
  8. 8. Grimes RN. Boron clusters come of age. Journal of Chemical Education. 2004;81(5):657-672. DOI: 10.1021/ed081p657
  9. 9. Dunitz JD, Orgel LE, Rich A. The crystal structure of ferrocene. Acta Crystallographica. 1956;9(4):373-375. DOI: 10.1107/S0365110X56001091
  10. 10. Miessler GL, Tarr DA. Inorganic Chemistry. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2004
  11. 11. Urnius E, Brennessel WW, Cramer CJ, Ellis JE, Schleyer P von R. A carbon-free sandwich complex [(P5)2Ti]2-. Science. 2002;295(5556):832-834. DOI: 10.1126/science.1067325
  12. 12. Elschenbroich C. Organometallics. 3rd ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2006
  13. 13. Natta G, Ercoli R, Calderazzo F. (η-C6H6)Cr(CO)3. Chimica e Industria. 1958;40(12):1003-1007
  14. 14. Fischer EO, Öfele K, Essler H, Fröhlich W, Mortensen JP, Semmlinger W. Über Aromatenkomplexe von metallen, XXIV. Über gemischte tricarbonylkomplexe des chroms, molybdäns und wolframs mit benzol und seinen derivaten. Chemische Berichte. 1958;91(12):2763-2772. DOI: 10.1002/cber.19580911231
  15. 15. Fischer EO, Öfele K. Über aromatenkomplexe von metallen, XIII benzol-chrom-tricarbonyl. Chemische Berichte. 1957;90(11):2532-2535. DOI: 10.1002/cber.19570901117
  16. 16. Corradini P, Allegra G. X-ray determination of the structure of tricarbonylchromium-benzene. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1959;81(9):2271-2272. DOI: 10.1021/ja01518a065
  17. 17. Begley MJ, Puntambekar SG, Wirght AH. A di-iron-anthracene complex via ultrasonics. Journal of the American Chemical Society. Chemical Communications. 1987;(16):1251-1252. DOI: 10.1039/C39870001251
  18. 18. Begley MJ, Puntambekar SG, Wright AH. Synthesis and reactivity of a new class of half-sandwich arene-iron complex: Structure of [C6H3Me3Fe(C3H5)(CO)]PF6 . Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 1989;362(1-2):C11–C14. DOI: 10.1016/0022-328X(89)85301-X
  19. 19. Green JC. Bent metallocenes revisited. Chemical Society Reviews. 1998;27(4):263-272. DOI: 10.1039/A827263Z
  20. 20. Erker G, Kehr G, Fröhlich R. Group 4 bent metallocenes and functional groups—Finding convenient pathways in a difficult terrain. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2006;250(1-2):36-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.04.006
  21. 21. Prout K, Cameron TS, Forder RA, Critchley SR, Denton B, Rees GV. The crystal and molecular structures of bent bis-π-cyclopentadienyl-metal complexes: (a) bis-π-cyclopentadienyldibromorhenium(V) tetrafluoroborate, (b) bis-π-cyclopentadienyldichloromolybdenum(IV),(c)bis-π-yclopentadienylhydroxomethylaminomolybdenum(IV) hexafluorophosphate, (d) bis-π-cyclopentadienylethylchloromolybdenum(IV), (e) bis-π-cyclopentadienyldichloroniobium(IV), (f) bis-π-cyclopentadienyldichloromolybdenum(V) tetrafluoroborate, (g) μ-oxo-bis[bis-π-cyclopentadienylchloroniobium(IV)] tetrafluoroborate, (h) bis-π-cyclopentadienyldichlorozirconium. Acta Crystallographica. 1974;B30:2290-2304. DOI:10.1107/S0567740874007011
  22. 22. Beck V, O'Hare D. Triple-decker transition metal complexes bridged by a single carbocyclic ring. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 2004;689(24):3920-3938. DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2004.06.011
  23. 23. Fagan PJ, Ward MD, Calabrese JC. Molecular engineering of solid-state materials: Organometallic building blocks. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1989;111(5):1698-1719. DOI: 10.1021/ja00187a024
  24. 24. Sostero S, Rehorek D, Polo E, Traverso O. Spin trapping and some reactions of ruthenium centred radicals. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 1993;209(2):171-176. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)85138-5
  25. 25. di Martino S, Sostero S, Traverso O, Rehorek D, Kemp TJ. Spin trapping of radicals formed during the photolysis of the dimeric iron carbonyl complexes [η5-C5H5)Fe(CO)2]2 and [(η5-C5Me5)Fe(CO)2]2 . Inorganica Chimica Acta. 1990;176(1):107-112. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)85100-2
  26. 26. Polo E, Barbieri A, Sostero S, Green MLH. Zirconocenes as photoinitiators for free-radical polymerisation of acrylates. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. 2002;2:405-409. DOI: 10.1002/1099-0682(20022)2002:2“405::AID-EJIC405”3.0.CO;2-G
  27. 27. Davies AG. Photolytic reactions of cyclopentadienylmetallic compounds. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 1982;54(1):23-28. DOI: 10.1351/pac198254010023
  28. 28. Barker PJ, Davies AG, Tse M-W. The photolysis of cyclopentadienyl compounds of tin and mercury. Electron spin resonance spectra and electronic configuration of the cyclopentadienyl, deuteriocyclopentadienyl, and alkylcyclopentadienyl radicals. Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2. 1980;(6):941-948. DOI: 10.1039/P29800000941
  29. 29. Kira M, Watanabe M, Sakurai H. Chemistry of organosilicon compounds. 131. Substituent effects by deuterium and alkyl groups and carbon-13 hyperfine coupling constants of cyclopentadienyl radicals as studied by electron spin resonance. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1980;102(16):5202-5207. DOI: 10.1021/ja00536a014
  30. 30. Kira M, Watanabe M, Sakurai H. Chemistry of organosilicon compounds. 100. Substituent effects on the electron spin resonance spectra of cyclopentadienyl radicals. Removal of degeneracy by organosilyl groups. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1977;99(24):7780-7785. DOI: 10.1021/ja00466a006
  31. 31. Barker PJ, Davies AG, Henriquez R, Nedelec J-Y. An electron spin resonance study of the effect of group IV substituents in cyclopentadienyl radicals. Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2. 1982;6:745-750. DOI: 10.1039/P29820000745
  32. 32. Davies AG, Hawari JA-A, Gaffney C, Harrison PG. An electron spin resonance study of the photolysis of some cyclopentadienyl-lead compounds: the comparison with tin. Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2. 1982;5:631-635. DOI: 10.1039/P29820000631
  33. 33. Brindley PB, Davies AG, Hawari JA-A. An ESR study of the photolysis of dicyclopentadienyltitanium dichloride. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 1983;250(1):247-256. DOI: 10.1016/0022-328X(83)85055-4
  34. 34. Davies AG, Lusztyk E, Lusztyk J. An electron spin resonance study of the methylcyclopentadienyl radicals, MenH5 –nC5⋅(n= 1-5). Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2. 1982;6:729-736. DOI: 10.1039/P29820000729
  35. 35. Davies AG, Lusztyk J. The pentamethylcyclopentadienyl radical: generation, electron spin resonance spectrum, and reaction kinetics. Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications. 1980;12:554-555. DOI: 10.1039/C39800000554
  36. 36. Ohnishi S-I, Sugimoto S-I, Nitta I. Photoinduced change of organic free radicals as studied by ESR. I. Conversion of allyl‐type to alkyl‐type radicals in irradiated polyethylene. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1963;39(10):2647-2653. DOI: 10.1063/1.1734077
  37. 37. Liebling GR, McConnell HM. Study of molecular orbital degeneracy in C5H5 . The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1965;42(11):3931-3934. DOI:
  38. 38. Fessenden RW, Ogawa S. On variations in the hyperfine splitting of benzene negative ion and on the value of Q. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1964;86(17):3591-3592. DOI: 10.1021/ja01071a062
  39. 39. Zandstra PJ. Electron spin resonance of cyclopentadienyl. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1964;40(2):612-612. DOI: 10.1063/1.1725177
  40. 40. Krusic PJ, Kochi JK. Electron spin resonance of aliphatic hydrocarbon radicals in solution. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1968;90(25):7155-7157. DOI: 10.1021/ja01027a065
  41. 41. Kawamura T, Kochi JK. The structure and conformation of stannyl and related radical adducts to cyclopentadiene by ESR. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 1973;47(1):79-88. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-328X(00)92842-0
  42. 42. Atkinson JM, Brindley PB, Davies AG, Hawari JA-A. An ESR study of the photolysis of cyclopentadienylzirconium compounds. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 1984;264(1-2):253-261. DOI: 10.1016/0022-328X(84)85151-7
  43. 43. Tsai Z-T, Brubaker Jr., CH. Photolysis of titanocene dichloride. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 1979;166(2):199-210. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-328X(00)91634-6
  44. 44. Barbieri A, Droghetti A, Sostero S, Traverso O. Photochemistry of ansa-zirconocenes: ethylene-bis(1-indenyl)- and ethylene-bis(4, 7-dimethyl-1-indenyl) zirconium dichlorides. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 1999;129(3):137-142. DOI: 10.1016/S1010-6030(99)00167-7
  45. 45. Loukova GV, Strelets VV. A review on molecular electrochemistry of metallocene dichloride and dimethyl complexes of group 4 metals: Redox properties and relation with optical ligand-to-metal charge transfer transitions. Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications. 2001;66:185-206. DOI: 10.1135/cccc20010185
  46. 46. Whalley AL, Blake, AJ, Collison D, Davies ES, Disley HJ, Helliwell M, Mabbs FE, McMaster J, Wilson C, Garner CD. Synthesis, structure and redox properties of bis(cyclopentadienyl)dithiolene complexes of molybdenum and tungsten. Dalton Transactions. 2011;40:10457-10472. DOI: 10.1039/C1DT10663E
  47. 47. Bard AJ, Garcia E, Kukharenko S, Strelets VV. Electrochemistry of metallocenes at very negative and very positive potentials. Electrogeneration of 17-electron Cp2Co2+, 21-electron Cp2Co2-, and 22-electron Cp2Ni2- species. Inorganic Chemistry. 1993;32(16):3528-3531. DOI: 10.1021/ic00068a024
  48. 48. Sanderson CT, Palmer BJ, Morgan A, Murphy M, Dluhy RA, Mize T, Amster IJ, Kutal C. Classical metallocenes as photoinitiators for the anionic polymerization of an alkyl 2-cyanoacrylate. Macromolecules. 2002; 35(26):9648-9652. DOI: 10.1021/ma0212238
  49. 49. McDonnell JJ, Cafen G, Michealson R. Paramagnetic metallocenes: Interannular electron transfer. Tetrahedron Letters 1969;10(49):4251-4254. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)88667-6
  50. 50. Danen WC, West CT. Electron spin resonance study of radical anions derived from substituted ferrocenes. Tetrahedron Letters, 1970;11(3):219-222. DOI: 10.1016/0040-4039(70)80030-2
  51. 51. Elschenbroich C, Cais M. Organometallic studies XXIX. Electron spin resonance of ferrocene-substituted radical anions. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 1969;18(1):135-143. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-328X(00)80241-7
  52. 52. Bigam G, Hooz J, Linke S, McClung RED, Mosher MW, Tanner DD. An electron spin resonance examination of ferrocenylalkyl- and aryl ketyls. Canadian Journal of Chemistry. 1972;50(12):1825-1830. DOI: 10.1139/v72-293
  53. 53. McDonnell JJ, Pochopien DJ. Paramagnetic metallocenes. Oxidation of ferrocenylketnes. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 1971;36(15):2092-2098. DOI: 10.1021/jo00814a014
  54. 54. McDonnell JJ, Pochopien DJ. Ferrocenebenzosemiquinones. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 1972;37(25):4064-4067. DOI: 10.1021/jo00798a018
  55. 55. McDonnell JJ. Oxidation of ferrocenyl ketones. Tetrahedron Letters. 1969;10(25):2039-2042. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)88080-1
  56. 56. Reis AH Jr, Preston LD, Williams JM, Peterson SW, Candela, GA, Swartzendruber LJ, Miller JS. Crystal and molecular structure of the paramagnetic 1:1 decamethylferrocenium 7, 7, 8, 8-tetracyano-p-quinodimethanide dimer salt: {[Fe(C5Me5)2]+.cntdot.}2(TCNQ)22-. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1979;101(10):2756-2758. DOI: 10.1021/ja00504a058
  57. 57. Milaeva ER, Rubezhov AZ, Prokof'ev AI, Okhlobystin OYu. The unpaired electron in transition metal complexes. Russian Chemical Reviews. 1982;51(10):1638-1673
  58. 58. Delgado-Pena F, Talham DR, Cowan DO. Near-IR spectroscopic studies of mixed-valence di-, tri-, and tetraferrocene derivatives. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 1983;253(3):C43-C46. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-328X(00)99241-6
  59. 59. Kirchner RF, Loew GH, Mueller-Westerhoff UT. Theoretical study of the electromagnetic properties of bis(fulvalene)diiron in its three oxidation states. Inorganic Chemistry. 1976;15(11):2665-2670. DOI: 10.1021/ic50165a020
  60. 60. LeVanda C, Bechgaard K, Cowan DO, Mueller-Westerhoff UT, Eilbracht P, Candela GA, Collins RL. Bis(fulvalene)diiron, its mono- and dications. Intramolecular exchange interactions in a rigid system. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1976;98(11):3181-3187. DOI: 10.1021/ja00427a021
  61. 61. Schmittel M, Langels A. Enol radical cations in solution. Part 12. Synthesis and electrochemical investigations of a stable enol linked to a ferrocene redox centre. Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2. 1998;(3):565-572. DOI: 10.1039/A707743B
  62. 62. Todres ZV. Tetrahedron report number 224: Ethylenic compounds as probes for the study of donor-acceptor interaction. Tetrahedron 1987;43(17):3839-3861. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)81667-7
  63. 63. Todres ZV. Cis/trans conversion of potassium derivatives of 2- and 4-nitrostilbenes. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 1992;441(3):349-354. DOI: 10.1016/0022-328X(92)80165-T
  64. 64. Szent-Györgyi A. Introduction to a Submolecular Biology. Academic Press; New York, 1960. pp. 67-74. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-395612-5.50010-5
  65. 65. Szent-Györgyi A. Horizons in Biochemistry. Kasha M, Pullman B, editors. Academic Press; New York, NY. 1962. pp. 564-580
  66. 66. Pauson PL. Organometallic Chemistry. Zeiss H, editor. Reinhold Publishing Corporation; New York, NY. 1960
  67. 67. Zeiss HH, Wheatley PJ, Winkler HJS. Benzenoid Metal Complexes: Structural determinations and chemistry. The Ronald Press Company; New York, NY. 1966
  68. 68. Cotton FA. Progress in Inorganic Chemistry. Chapter-1. In: Wilkinson G, Cotton FA, editors. Cyclopentadienyl and Arene Metal Compounds). 1959. pp. 1-124. DOI: 10.1002/9780470166024.ch1
  69. 69. Briegleb G. Elektronen Donator-Acceptor Komplexe. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1961
  70. 70. Chistyakov AL, Stankevich IV. Cyclopentadienyl type η5-π-complexes of C60 fullerene derivatives with indium and thallium: Simulation of molecular and electronic structure by the MNDO/PM3 method. Russian Chemical Bulletin. 1997;46(11):1832-1837. DOI: 10.1007/BF02503767
  71. 71. Kaji T, Shimada T, Inoue H, Kuninobu Y, Matsuo Y, Nakamura E, Saiki K. Molecular orientation and electronic structure of epitaxial bucky ferrocene (Fe(C60(CH3)5)C5H5) thin films. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2004;108(28):9914-9918. DOI: 10.1021/jp037668v
  72. 72. Matsuo Y, Tahara K, Nakamura E. Synthesis and electrochemistry of double-decker buckyferrocenes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2006;128(22):7154-7155. DOI: 10.1021/ja061175x
  73. 73. Marczak R, Wielopolski M, Gayathri SS, Guldi DM, Matsuo Y, Matsuo K, Tahara K, Nakamura E. Uniquely shaped double-decker buckyferrocenes—Distinct electron donor−acceptor interactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2008;130(48):16207-16215. DOI: 10.1021/ja8013902
  74. 74. Soto D, Salcedo R. Coordination modes and different hapticities for fullerene organometallic complexes. Molecules. 2012;17(6):7151-7168. DOI: 10.3390/molecules17067151
  75. 75. Matsuo Y, Iwashita A, Nakamura E. Synthesis and derivatization of iridium(i) and iridium(iii) pentamethyl[60]fullerene complexes. Organometallics. 2005;24(1):89-95. DOI: 10.1021/om049333l

Written By

Betul Caliskan

Submitted: 22 October 2016 Reviewed: 03 April 2017 Published: 05 July 2017