Origin, number of registered and relative frequency of fenugreek crop distributed across the given countries.
Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) is an annual forage legume and a traditional spice and aromatic crop that has been grown for centuries across the Indian subcontinent. In addition to South Asia, the crop is also grown in some parts of North Africa, Middle East, Mediterranean Europe, China, South East (SE) Asia, Australia, the USA, Argentina and Canada. The plant has been used traditionally in Indian Ayurvedic medicines as well as in traditional Tibetan and Chinese medication for several centuries. Modern research has also demonstrated that fenugreek seed and leaves are useful in the treatment of a number of diseases including successfully reducing blood sugar and blood cholesterol levels in both animals and humans. The plant has recently attracted great interest in the pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and functional food industries due to its rich medicinal properties.
- Trigonella foenum-graecum
Furthermore, being a forage legume and a natural nitrogen fixer, it could be easily incorporated in the local crop cycles (short-term rotation) for natural replenishment of soil, for fixation of nitrogen and for feeding the livestock as hay or silage ( Figure 1 ). The crop grows well under rainfed conditions and hence cost of production is lower compared to other commercial crops suitable for semiarid regions.
Fenugreek is also well known as a global spice crop grown in all the major continents (depending on soil and climatic conditions) across the globe including parts of North Africa, Mediterranean Europe, Russia, Middle East, China, India, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, parts of Far East and SE Asia, Australia, the USA, Canada and Argentina [7, 8]. India once maintained and still holds the largest fenugreek harvested area in the world .
The crop has been recommended for agricultural production in the dry and semiarid localities of the continents of Asia, Africa and Latin America [3, 4, 9, 10]. The plant has been used extensively for centuries as a traditional forage crop in several ancient civilizations across Eurasia. Fenugreek has been reported to be used as an important medicinal herb in Indian Ayurvedic medicinal practices as well in traditional Chinese medication and Tibetan medicines for the treatment of several diseases in humans and also in animals. Ancient Islamic scholars and physicians have also recorded the use of fenugreek in traditional Islamic medicinal practices in ancient texts and scriptures . Modern clinical trials have also established without doubt the efficacy of this medicinal herb in the treatment of several human and animal diseases [5, 8, 11]. Relative frequencies of the major well-known accessions of fenugreek which are produced all over the world are listed out in Table 1 .
|Origin||Number of reported fenugreek accessions||
||Average forage production 1961–2013 (t)a per country|
2. Medicinal properties and chemical constituents
Fenugreek leaves and seed are known to have major medicinal properties and have been reported to significantly reduce both blood glucose and cholesterol levels in human and animal subjects in clinical trials around the world . Fenugreek is therefore highly sought after as a chemurgic crop in the local, regional and international pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and functional food industries and markets as a medicinal herb . Fenugreek seed and leaves are a rich source of a wide diversity of medicinally rich phytochemicals like steroidal saponins (diosgenin), fenugreekine (alkaloid), galactomannan (carbohydrate), 4-hydroxy isoleucine (amino acid) among several others [4, 7, 11, 12]. More specifically, fenugreek seed itself contain carbohydrates (45–60%) as in mucilaginous fiber (galactomannans), proteins (20–30%) enriched in tryptophan and lysine, lipids (5–10%) or fixed oil, alkaloids of pyridine type (0.2–0.38%) as in trigonelline; choline (0.5%), and other materials including carpaine and gentianine, flavonoids (apigenin, luteolin, orientin, quercetin, vitexin and isovitexin) and 4-hydroxyisoleucine (0.09%), lysine and histidine, arginine, calcium and iron, saponins (0.6–1.7%), glycosides such as, yamogenin, tigogenin, neotigogenin and diosgenin (generating steroidal sapogenins on hydrolysis); and sitosterol and cholesterol, vitamins (A, B1, C) and nicotinic acid; n-alkanes and sesquiterpenes (0.015%) known as volatile oils . Fenugreek has been also reported to be rich in antioxidant  and antimicrobial properties .
Agronomic production of fenugreek crop has been well studied and reported in arid and semiarid regions of the world and has been well documented in primary literature [15, 17]. Climatic and edaphic environmental (external condition) factors as well as genetic makeup (internal condition) are greatly accounted for metabolic processes in fenugreek crop . It is also believed that the regulation of yield potential in fenugreek is feasible through either breeding programs or modification of cultural treatments [18, 19]. Fenugreek crop growth has been found to be significantly increased by the application of phosphate fertilizer . The plant has indeterminate growth habit and hence mutant population generated through physical and chemical mutating agents have been reported to be successful in generating plants with determinate and fast growing habits [11, 21]. The crop has been found to be attacked by several biological agents like insects, fungi, bacteria and non-biological diseases like micronutrient deficiency, flooding, salinity, stagnant water [22–24].
4. Species, names, origin and distribution
There are noticeable discrepancies in the range of reported species of fenugreek (around 70–97) in the literature [25–29]; however, older taxonomies like Linnaeus have explicitly accentuated on the existence of 260 species . Across the mentioned species of fenugreek, the following are mostly celebrated as for their medicinal and pharmaceutical properties :
Fenugreek is an ancient and multipurpose crop in various geographical latitudes. Species of fenugreek have been identified in the five continents of Asia, Africa, Europa and Australia; being cultivated mostly in North America, West and South Asia, Australia, Russia, Meddle East, North West of Africa. Potential areas for fenugreek production are parts of South East Asia, Japan, Central Asia (Mongolia), wide parts of Africa and South America ( Figure 2 ).
There are widespread uncertainties regarding the probable ancestry of
Many experts unanimously agree that the direct wild ancestor of fenugreek is
5. Chromosome number
There are many species in the
There are few studies about the variation in chromosome number in fenugreek. For instance, Raghuvanshi and Joshi  and Joshi and Raghuvanshi  reported that there is an extra B chromosome in some of the fenugreek genotypes. As far as we know, the presence of this type of chromosome can affect plant growth and development . In some researches, it is observed that same species show different behaviors in terms of having B chromosome. For example, some
6. Molecular genetic diversity
Knowledge of genetic diversity among plants can help to provide beneficial information in the selection of breeding materials for hybridization programs and mapping quantitative trait loci . Review of literatures show that using DNA markers for investigating the genetic diversity of fenugreek does not have a long history in the world. Dangi et al.  studied the genetic diversity of two different species of fenugreek (
Sundaram and Purwar  evaluated genetic diversity and species relation among two taxonomically
Kumar et al.  investigated the genetic diversity of five common fenugreek varieties of India using nine RAPD and seven fluorescently labeled amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) primers. These RAPD primers produced a total of 47 bands in the size range of 200–5000 bp with an average polymorphism of 62.4%. AFLP marker produced a total of 669 bands in the size range of 50–538 bp. The results revealed that RAPD markers were more polymorphic than AFLP markers where the reproducibility of AFLP markers was more than RAPD markers.
Ahari et al.  assessed the genetic diversity among and within 20 Iranian fenugreek landraces using AFLP markers. Five AFLP primers combinations used in this study produced a total of 147 bands within the molecular weights ranging from 50 to 500 base pairs of which 87% were polymorphic. The results of polymorphism information content (PIC) showed that there was a high polymorphism existed among Kashan (0.79), Broojerd and Kashan (to 0.93) landraces, which shows the moderate and high genetic diversity among these populations. These results demonstrated high efficiency of AFLP markers for investigation the genetic diversity among Iranian fenugreek populations.
Haliem and Al-Huqail  investigated the correlation between biochemical characteristics such as acid phosphatase, and glutamate-oxaloacetate transaminase isozymes, and amino acid composition and molecular variations of seven wild
Al-Maamari et al.  investigated the genetic relationship of 20 Omani fenugreek accessions and compare their relationship with four accessions from Iraq and Pakistan using 6 AFLP primer combinations. A total of 1852 polymorphic loci were produced from these combinations. A high level of genetic diversity (H) was found in Omani populations (0.2146) compared to Pakistani (0.0844) and Iraqi (0.1620) populations. They concluded that the average level of genetic variation among fenugreek populations shows their long history of cultivation and frequent exchange of fenugreek genetic material among regions in Oman.
Hora et al.  studied the diversity and phylogenetic relationships of different varieties of fenugreek (eight varieties and six populations) collected from northern India using RAPD and ISSR markers. The high similarity coefficient values suggested a diverse genetic diversity in fenugreek populations in India. They concluded that these two molecular markers (RAPD and ISSR) can be used effectively to evaluate genetic diversity and assess genetic relationship.
7. Mutation breeding
Fenugreek becomes more important economically, agronomically and environmentally, day-to-day all over the world. In recent years, revealing the nutritional and medicinal value of fenugreek, its low soil expectations, and a relatively broad adaptation to the different regions, the scope of its cultivation spread from America to India [7, 30, 57]. For example, this plant has been called as a new species in Canada. There are few fenugreek genotypes that are adapted to the climatic conditions of western Canada. In such cases, mutation breeding can be used to generate new genetic variation in an existing gene pool for a certain trait . Such a mutation breeding can be used for a large number of alleles at the same time to correct a particular trait . Colloquially, mutations called every change in the DNA sequence which ultimately leads to a change in the individual’s genotype. Gene mutation is a good affair in plant breeding, because it facilitates the selection . Up to now, mutation breeding has created dramatic changes in the species of legume crops [61–63]. For instance, Mahna et al.  used mutation breeding to increase the diosgenin content in
According to the researches, it can be concluded that most of the mutations are recessive, can be observed to segregate in a 3:1 ratio in diploid crops like fenugreek [35, 42, 65], and for observation of such mutations, we should wait until the second generations . Vice versa, dominant mutations are rare and can be observed in the first generations . Since fenugreek is self-pollinated and the determinate trait is governed by recessive genes , mutation breeding can be used to generate mutant plants with a determinate growth habit without losing beneficial adaptations and other agronomic traits in the base population .
Application of mutation breeding in fenugreek is expressed in several studies. There are two major types of mutation: spontaneous and induced. Some varieties of fenugreek have been created through spontaneous mutations [35, 42, 69–70]. RH 3129 variety is produced from spontaneous mutation in a Moroccan cultivar and had high level of diosgenin content and twin pods [35, 69, 71]. In creating new varieties of fenugreek, the effect of induced mutations should not be ignored. RH 3112 cultivar with higher diosgenin content and seed yield and RH 3118 cultivar with higher protein content are two main cultivars which are made by induced mutations [35, 42, 69, 70]. Chemical mutation is also important in the production of new varieties of fenugreek. Basu  by inducing the seed of Tristar variety using EMS, produced new population with higher height, seed yield, seed number per pod, biomass yield, total number of pods and number of twin pods.
Also, the results show that the impact of chemical mutation is much more than physical one [18, 68–70, 72–74]. Among chemical mutagens, it is observed that EMS can induce mutation successfully in the fenugreek [35, 69, 71]. Basu  studied the effect of different levels of EMS on fenugreek (Tristar variety). He found that EMS by alkylating guanine base and mispairing or mismatch pairing in the genome, effectively induced variation in the fenugreek populations and the mutants which were generated by 300 μM EMS had the best characters.
Also the results of various studies show that more than one genotype should be used in mutation breeding program [60, 74]. This is because different genotypes respond differently to a mutagen.
8. Fenugreek tissue culture
One way of producing variation is tissue culture. Several techniques such as somatic embryogenesis, callus regeneration and micropropagation have been reported in fenugreek [75–77]. Malhotra  reviewed various studies on in vitro regeneration and callus induction on fenugreek. Aasim et al.  performed a successful in vitro shoot regeneration of fenugreek plants on MS medium containing TDZ. The reports show that
Shekhawat and Galston  examined different culture media and concluded that medium containing 0.1 mg/L of BAP, zeatin, glutamine and asparagines was suitable for callus induction and differentiation, rapid cell division and growth. Azam and Biswas  believed that callus induction and growth were more successful on MS medium supplemented with naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), 2,4-D, kinetin and coconut water. El-Bahr  had a different view; he believes that fenugreek callus had its best growth on MS medium containing 3% sucrose and 2 mg 2,4-D.
Hence, the crop has huge international demand in the associated pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and functional food industries. Our globe represents a wide range of agro-ecosystems on the earth with suitable dry, arid and semiarid climatic regimes suitable for the cultivation of fenugreek. Although the crop is crown to a limited amount in potential regions of fenugreek production, namely Africa, Central and South America and Southeast of Asia, but it has the potential to be grown under larger areas as a chemurgic crop with significant economic and commercial potential for the nation. Furthermore, being a forage legume and a natural nitrogen fixer; it could be easily incorporated in the local crop cycles of different geological regions for replenishing the soil naturally. The crop grows well under rainfed conditions and hence cost of production is lower compared to other commercial crops suitable for Iranian agroclimatic regimes.
Basu SK. Seed production technology for fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.) in the Canadian [Master of Science thesis]. Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada: Department of Biological Sciences University; 2006.
Basu A, Basu SK, Kumar A, Sharma M, Chalghoumi R, Hedi A, Solorio-Sánchez FJ, Ramírez-Avilés L, Balogun MO, Hafez EE, Cetzal-Ix W. Fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.), a potential new crop for Latin America. American Journal of Social Issues and Humanities. 2014; 4(3): 148–162.
Basu SK, Agoramoorthy G. Fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL): Production challenges and opportunities for Asia, Africa and Latin America. American Journal of Social Issues and Humanities. 2014; Fenugreek Special Issue (March/April): 1–2.
Zandi P, Basu SK, Bazrkar Khatibani L, Balogun M, Aremu MO, Sharma M, Kumar A, Sengupta R, Li X, Li Y, Tashi S, Hedi A, Cetzal-Ix W. Fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.) seed: A review of physiological and biochemical properties and their genetic improvement. Acta Physiologia Plantarum. 2015; 37: 1714. DOI:10.1007/s11738-014-1714-6
Acharya S, Srichamroen A, Basu S, Ooraikul B, Basu T. Improvement in the nutraceutical properties of fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.). Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology. 2006; 28(1): 1–9.
Mehrafarin A, Qaderi A, Rezazadeh Sh, Naghdi Badi H, Noormohammadi Gh, Zand E. Bioengineering of important secondary metabolites and metabolic pathways in fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum graecumL.). Journal of Medicinal Plants. 2010; 9(35): 1–18.
Acharya SN, Thomas JE, Basu SK. Fenugreek: An “old world” crop for the “new world”. Biodiversity. 2006; 7(3&4): 27–30. DOI: 10.1080/14888386.2006.9712808
Acharya SN, Blade S, Mir Z., Moyer JS. Tristar fenugreek. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2007; 87: 901–903. DOI: 10.4141/P06-047
Acharya SN, Thomas JE, Basu SK. Fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.) an alternative crop for semiarid regions of North America. Crop Science. 2008; 48: 841–853. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2007.09.0519
Solorio-Sánchez F, Solorio-Sánchez B, Basu SK, Casanova-Lugo F, Sarabia-Salgado L, Ku-Vera J, Aguilar-Pérez C, Ramírez-Avilés L, Noguera-Savelli E, Cetzal-Ix W, Infante-Cruz Á, Petit-Aldana J, Ayala-Basulto A. Opportunities to grow annual forage legume fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) under Mexican silvopastoral system. American Journal of Social Issues and Humanities. 2014; Fenugreek Special Issue (March/April): 86–95.
Zandi P, Shirani Rad AH, Daneshian J, Bazrkar Khatibani L. Agronomic and morphologic analysis of Fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.) under nitrogen fertilizer and plant density via factor analysis. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2011; 6(5): 1134–1140. DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.004
Basu SK, Thomas JE, Acharya SN. Prospects for growth in global nutraceutical and functional food markets: A Canadian perspective. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2007; 1(4): 637–649.
Acharya SN, Acharya K, Paul S, Basu SK. Variation in the antioxidant and anti-leukemic properties among different Western Canada grown fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.) genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2011; 91(1): 99–105. DOI: 10.4141/cjps10025
Thomas JE, Basu SK, Acharya SN. Identification of Trigonellaaccessions which lack antimicrobial activity and are suitable for forage development. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2006; 86(3): 727–732. DOI: 10.4141/P05-155
Basu SK, Acharya SN, Thomas JE. Colchicine treatment produces genetic improvement in fenugreek seed size and yield. Graduates studies Association (GSA). Proceedings Multidisciplinary Graduate Research Conference. 2007; 1(1): 37–43.
Basu SK, Acharya SN, Thomas JE. Foliar spray to improve fenugreek seed yield and reduce maturity duration. Graduates studies Association (GSA). Proceedings Multidisciplinary Graduate Research Conference. 2007; 1(1): 44–50.
Zandi P, Shirani Rad AH, Daneshian J, Bazrkar Khatibani L. Evaluation of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density effects on yield and yield components of fenugreek in double cropping. Journal of Plant Production (Chamran University, Ahvaz), 2013; 35(4): 81–91.
Basu SK, Acharya SN, Bandara MS, Friebel D, Thomas JE. Effects of genotype and environment on seed and forage yield in fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.) grown in western Canada. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2009; 3(6): 305–314.
Zandi P, Daneshian J, Shirani Rad AH. Determination of Ideal nitrogen fertilizer rate and plant density in fenugreek under dry farming conditions. In: The regional congress on modern results in agronomy and nanotechnology; 12 October 2010; Quds, Alborz, Iran: Azad University of Quds; 2010.
Basu SK, Acharya SN, Thomas JE. Application of phosphate fertilizer and harvest management for improving fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.) seed and forage yield in a dark brown soil zone of Canada. KMITL Science and Technology Journal. 2008; 8(1): 1–7.
Basu SK, Acharya SN, Thomas JE. Genetic improvement of fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.) through EMS induced mutation breeding for higher seed yield under prairie conditions of western Canada. Euphytica. 2008; 160: 249–258. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-007-9545-9
Basu SK, Acharya SN, Thomas JE. A report on powdery mildew infestations caused by Erysiphe polygoniD.C. in North America grown fenugreek. Journal of Mycopathological Research. 2006; 44(2): 253–256.
Basu SK, Acharya SN, Cárcamo HA, Thomas JE. Study on the potential insect pests of fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.) in North America with particular emphasis on the western flower thrips ( Frankliniella occidentalisPergande) in the greenhouse and plant bugs ( Lygusand Adelphocoris, Miridae, Hemiptera) in the field. Journal of Environment and Sociobiology. 2006; 3(1): 1–7.
Chakraborty N, Chatterjee S, Basu SK, Acharya K. Fungal diseases of fenugreek. American Journal of Social Issues and Humanities. 2014; Fenugreek Special Issue (March/April): 171–185.
Vasil’chenko IT. Bericht über die Artender Gattung (SSSR.1:10). TrigonellaTrudy Botany Instituta Akademii Nauk. 1953; 17: 331–333.
Hector JN. Introduction to the Botany of Field Crops (Non Cereals), Johannesburg: Central News Agency Ltd.; 1936. 1127p.
Rouk HF, Mangesha H. Fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.), its relationship, geography and economic importance. Experiment Station Bulletin. No. 20. Dire Dawa, Ethiopia: Imperial Ethiopian College of Agriculture and Mechanical Arts; 1963. pp. 120–127.
Hutchinson J. The Genera of Flowering Plants. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1964. pp. 947–952.
Fazli FRY. Studies in steroid-yielding plants of the genus Trigonella[PhD dissertation]. England: University of Nottingham; 1967.
Petropoulos GA. Fenugreek, The Genus Trigonella. London and New York: Taylor and Francis; 2002. 255 p.
Mehrafarin A, Rezazadeh S, Naghdi Badi H, Noormohammadi Gh, Zand E, Qaderi A. A review on biology, cultivation and biotechnology of fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.) as a valuable medicinal plant and multipurpose. Journal of Medicinal Plants. 2011; 10(37): 6–24.
Vavilov NI. Studies in the origin of cultivated plants. Bulletin of Applied Botany and Plant Breeding. Leningrad. 1926; 16(2): 1–248.
De Candolle A. Origin of Cultivated Plants. New York: Hafner; 1964. 468 p.
Fazli FRY, Hardman R. The spice, fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.): Its commercial varieties of seed as a source of diosgenin. Tropical Science. 1968; 10: 66–78.
Petropoulos GA. Agronomic, genetic and chemical studies of Trigonella foenum graecumL. [PhD dissertation]. England: Bath University; 1973.
Darlington CD, Wylie AP. Chromosome Atlas of Flowering Plants. 2nd ed. London: George Allen & Unwin; 1955. 519 p.
Singh A, Roy RP. Karyological studies in Trigonella, Indigoferaand Phaseolus. The Nucleus (Calcutta). 1970; 13: 41–54.
Ladizinsky G, Vosa CG. Karyotype and C-banding in Trigonellasection foenum-graecum(Fabaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolutions. 1968; 153(1–2): 1–5.
Srivastava A, Raghuvanshi SS. Buffering effect of B-chromosome system of Trigonella foenum graecumagainst different soil types. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1987; 75: 807–810. DOI: 10.1007/BF00265609
Reasat M, Karapetyam J, Nasirzadeh A. Karyotypic analysis of Trigonellagenus of Fars Province. Iranian Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research. 2002; 11(1): 127–145.
Dundas IS, Nair RM, Verlin DC. First report of meiotic chromosome number and karyotype analysis of an accession of Trigonella balansae. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 2006; 49: 55–58.
Singh A, Singh D. Karyotype studies in Trigonella. The Nucleus (Calcutta).1976; 19: 13–16.
Marc RC, Capraru G. Influence of sodium phosphate (E 339) on mitotic division in Trigonella foenum-graecumL. Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iasi Sec. II a. Genetica si Biologie Moleculara. 2008; 9(1): 67–70.
Roy RP, Singh A. Cytomorphological studies of the colchicines-induced tetraploids Trigonella foenum-graecumL. Genetica Iberian. 1968; 20(1–2): 37–54.
Raghuvanshi SS, Joshi S. Trigonella foenum-graecumB chromosome. Current Science. 1964; 33: 654–654.
Joshi S, Raghuvanshi SS. B-chromosome, pollen germination in situand connected grains in Trigonella foenum-graecumL. Beitrage zur Biologie der Pflanzen 1968; 44: 161–166.
Singh A. Studies on the interspecific hybrids of Trigonella corniculataand T. hamosaand T. cretica. Genetica (Dordrecht). 1973; 44: 264–269.
Lakshmi N, Rao TV, Rao Venkateswara T. Karyological and morphological investigations on some inbred strains of TrigonellaL. Genetica Iberian. 1984; 36(3–4): 187–200.
Kordrostami M, Rabiei B, Kumleh HH. Association analysis, genetic diversity and haplotyping of rice plants under salt stress using SSR markers linked to SalToland morpho-physiological characteristics. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 2016; 302: 871–890. DOI: 10.1007/s00606-016-1304-8
Dangi RS, Lagu MD, Choudhary LB, Ranjekar PK, Gupta VS. Assessment of genetic diversity in Trigonella foenum-graecumand Trigonella caeruleausing ISSR and RAPD markers. BMC Plant Biology. 2004; 4: 13. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-4-13
Sundaram S, Purwar S. Assessment of genetic diversity among fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.), using RAPD molecular markers. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 2011; 5: 1543–1548.
Kumar V, Srivastava N, Singh A, Vyas MK, Gupta S, Katudia K, Vaidya K, Chaudhary S, Ghosh A, Chikara SK. Genetic diversity and identification of variety-specific AFLP markers in fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecum). African Journal of Biotechnology. 2012; 11: 4323–4329.
Ahari DS, Hassandokht MR, Kashi AK, Amri A. Evaluation of genetic diversity in Iranian fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.) landraces using AFLP markers. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 2014; 30(1): 155–171.
Haliem EA, Al-Huqail AA. Correlation of genetic variation among wild Trigonella foenumgraecum L. accessions with their antioxidant potential status. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2014; 13: 10464–10481. DOI: 10.4238/2014.December.12.8.
Al-Maamari IT, Al-Sadi AM, Al-Saady NA. Assessment of genetic diversity in fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum graecumL.) in Oman. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2014; 16: 813–818.
Hora A, Malik CP, Kumari B. Assessment of genetic diversity of Trigonella foenum- graecumL. in northern India using RAPD and ISSR markers. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016; 8(1): 179–183.
Montgomery JE, King JR, Doepel L. Fenugreek as forage for dairy cattle. In: Proceedings of the 26th Western Canadian Dairy Seminar (WCDS) Advances in Dairy Technology; 4–7 March 2008; Red Deer, Alberta: WCDS; 2006. Vol. 20, Abstract, p. 356.
Fehr WR. Principles of Cultivar Development: Theory and Technique. Vol. II. USA: Macmillan Publishing Company; 1993. 536 p.
Chopra VL. Mutagenesis: Investigating the process and processing the outcome for crop improvement. Current Science. 2005; 89: 353–359.
Yadav SS, McNeil DL, Stevenson PC (edited). Lentil: An Ancient Crop for Modern Times. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2007. pp. 1–450. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6313-8
Sigurbjornsson B, Micke A. Philosophy and accomplishments of mutation breeding. In: Polyploidy and Induced Mutations in Plant Breeding (Proceedings of two Meetings Joint FAO/IAEAO Division and EUCARPIA, Bari, Italy, 1972). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); 1974. pp. 303–343.
Sigurbjornsson B. Induced mutations. In: Wood DR, editor. Crop Breeding. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America; 1983. pp. 153–176.
Toker C, Yadav SS, Solanki IS. Mutation breeding. In: Yadav SS, McNeil D, Stevenson PC, editors. Lentil: An Ancient Crop for Modern Times. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer; 2007. pp. 209–224. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6313-8_13
Mahna SK, Raisinghani G, Jain SC. Diosgenin production induced mutants of Trigonella corniculata. Fitoterapia. 1994; 65: 515–516.
Gaul H, Aastveit K. Induced variability of culm length in different genotypes of hexaploid wheat following X-irradiation and EMS treatment. Savrem. Contemporary Agriculture. 1966; 11: 263–276.
Micke A, Donini B. Induced mutations. In: Hayward MD, Bosemark NO, Romagosa I, editors. Plant Breeding Principles and Prospects. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1993. pp. 52–62.
Choudhary AK, Singh VV. An induced determinate mutant in fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum graecumL.). Journal of Spices and Aromatic Crops. 2001; 10(1): 51–53.
Basu SK, Acharya SN, Thomas JE. Genetic improvement of fenugreek through EMS-induced mutation breeding for higher seed yield under western Canada prairie condition. Euphytica. 2007; 160(2): 249–258. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-007-9545-9
Laxmi V, Gupta MN, Dixit BS, Srivastava SN. Effects of chemical and physical mutagens on fenugreek oil. Indian Drugs. 1980; 18(2): 62–65.
Laxmi V, Datta SK. Chemical and physical mutagenesis in fenugreek. Biological Memoirs. 1987; 13(1): 64–68.
Petropoulos GA, Kouloumbis P. Botany. In: Petropoulos GA, editor. Fenugreek: The Genus Trigonella, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants-Industrial Profiles. London: CRC Press; 2002. pp. 9–17.
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). Manual on Mutation Breeding. 2nd ed. Technical Report Series No. 119, Vienna: IAEA; 1987. 288 p.
Ganapathy S, Nirmalakumari A, Senthil N, Souframanie J, Raveendran TS. Isolation of macro mutations and Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency in little Millet Varieties. World. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2008; 4(4): 483–486.
Begum T, Dasgupta T. A comparison of the effects of physical and chemical mutagens in sesame ( Sesamum indicumL.). Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2010; 33(4): 761–766. DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572010005000090
Azam M, Biswas AK. Callus culturing its maintenance and cytological variations in Trigonella foenum-graecum. Current Science 1989; 58: 844–847.
Provorov NA, Tikhonovich IA. Genetic resource for improving nitrogen fixation in legume–shizobia symbiosis. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 2004; 50(1): 89–99. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022957429160
Aasim M, Khawar MK, Sancak C, Ozcan S. In vitro shoot regeneration of fenugreek. American-Eurasia Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 2009; 3(2): 135–138.
Malhotra SK. Breading potential of indigenous germplasm of seed spices. In: Singh DK, Chowdhuary H, editors. Vegetable Crops: Genetic Resources and Improvement. New Delhi: New India Publishing House; 2011. pp. 477–497.
Zhang L, Lu YT. Calmodulin-binding protein kinases in plants. Trends in Plant Science. 2003; 8: 123–127. DOI: 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00013-X
El-Nour MEM, Lamia S, Mohammed, Bader Eldin AS. In vitro callus induction of fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.) using differentt media with different Auxins concentrations. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America. 2014; 4(3): 243–251. DOI:10.5251/abjna.2013.4.3.243.251
Shekhawat NS, Galston AW. Mesophyll protoplasts of fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecumL.): Isolation, culture and shoot regeneration. Plant Cell Reports. 1983; 2(3): 119–121. DOI: 10.1007/BF00269333.
El-Bahr MK. Influence of sucrose and 2, 4-D on Trigonella foenum-graecumtissue culture. African Journal of Agricultural Science. 1989; 16(1–2): 87–96.