Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Food Wastes as Valuable Sources of Bioactive Molecules

Written By

Sonia A. Socaci, Anca C. Fărcaş, Dan C. Vodnar and Maria Tofană

Submitted: May 9th, 2016 Reviewed: October 3rd, 2016 Published: February 22nd, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/66115

Chapter metrics overview

2,763 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Food industry produces worldwide millions of tons of plant‐derived wastes which can be exploited as sources of high‐value components: proteins, fibres, polysaccharides, flavour compounds or different phytochemicals. These bioactive compounds can be valorised as functional ingredients in food, pharmaceutical, health care, cosmetic and other products. Using the recovered bioactive molecules as functional ingredients represents a sustainable alternative of food wastes exploitation as inexpensive source of valuable compounds, while developing innovative food and non‐food products with health‐promoting benefits and at the same time contributing to an efficient waste reduction management. This chapter gives an overview of the main classes of bioactive compounds recovered from food wastes and their potential applications as functional chemicals, without being exhaustive.


  • bioactive compounds
  • functional ingredients
  • food waste exploitation
  • renewable resources
  • recovered biomolecules

1. Introduction

Large amounts of wastes are generated annually by the food industry, their efficient management and valorisation representing one of the main objectives of European Union (EU) actions against food waste and towards sustainable development [1, 2]. The Waste Framework Directive [3] emphasised the importance of prevention of waste generation and the exploitation of wastes by reuse and recycling. Thus, in the ‘bioeconomy’ concept, the possibilities of conversion of renewable biological resources into economically viable products are addressed. In 2014, the European Commission provided the definition for the term ‘food waste’ as ‘food (including inedible parts) lost from the food supply chain, not including food diverted to material uses such as bio‐based products, animal feed, or sent for re‐distribution' [4]. The processing by‐products are also included among food waste, if these are not used for other high‐value functions (e.g. animal feed and industrial uses). In this chapter, we address only the exploitation of plant‐derived by‐products as sources of bioactive compounds.

Until few decades ago, food wastes, if not discarded into environment, were mainly used as animal feed. Nowadays, this attitude towards wastes changed, especially due to the growing interest in protecting the environment but also due to the increasing awareness of the benefits deriving from their exploitation. The by‐products resulted from the processing of raw vegetables contain sometimes appreciable amounts of bioactive compounds such as proteins, dietary fibres, polysaccharides, fatty acids, flavour compounds and phytochemicals (e.g. polyphenols) that can be extracted, purified, concentrated and reused as functional ingredients in food industry or other related sectors (e.g. pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and health‐care products) [5, 6].


2. Bioactive compounds recovered from plant‐derived wastes and their potential applications

2.1. General overview

The wastes generated from the food industry can be separated into two main categories: plant‐derived wastes and animal‐derived wastes. The animal‐derived wastes can be divided in three subcategories: (i) meat products, (ii) fish and seafood and (iii) dairy products, whereas the plant‐derived wastes can be classified into four subcategories: (i) cereals (e.g. rice bran, wheat bran and brewers’ spent grain), (ii) root and tubers (e.g. potato peel, sugar beet and molasses), (iii) oil crops and pulses (e.g. sunflower seeds, soybean seed and olive pomace) and (iv) fruit and vegetables (e.g. orange peel, grape pomace, apple pomace, tomato skin and pomace) [5, 7]. We further focus only on the plant‐derived wastes chemical characterisation in terms of composition and content in functional compounds. The plant‐derived by‐products and especially those from fruits, vegetables and oil crops processing are generated in large amounts, some of them being produced in millions of tons annually worldwide [5, 810]. Disposal of such quantities of waste represents a challenge and an environmental problem. Apart from being used as animal feeds or fertilisers, the research conducted in the last decades clearly showed that the by‐products resulted from processing of plant materials contained valuable nutrients which could be exploited in the development and production of new functional ingredients [1115].

There is a wide range of extraction techniques used for the isolation and purification of the bioactive compounds from plant‐derived wastes, some of them being based on new emerging techniques. The development of new extraction methods as well as the optimisation of existing ones, in order to increase, for example, the extraction yield or the selectivity for a certain compound, or to improve the production of a natural bioactive compound from a waste, has seen a real upsurge in the last decade [16]. Nevertheless, there is no universal extraction technique for the bioactive compounds. When an extraction technique is chosen, several criteria have to be considered, such as waste composition, aggregation state, homogeneity, and so on. Also, plant‐derived waste is prone to microbial degradation, so an appropriate way of preservation is necessary for its storage and further exploitation. One of the most common and economically feasible methods used for preservation is the drying of the waste and thus reducing the water content and lowering the microbiological activity [11].

Compound class  Waste origin  By‐product source Extraction techniques References
Proteins Cereals Brewers’ spent grain Ultrasonic‐assisted extraction [17]
Sequential extraction of proteins and arabinoxylans [18]
Enzymatic‐assisted extraction [19]
Oil crops Rapeseed meal Ultrasound‐assisted aqueous extraction  [20]
Sunflower meals Alkaline solubilization and acid
Hazelnuts meal Solvent extraction (water, acetone) [22]
Canola meals Alkaline solubilization and acid
precipitation (Isoelectric precipitation)
[23, 24]
Electro‐activated solutions (non‐invasive extraction method) [25]
Salt precipitation [24]
Palm kernel cake Enzymatic hydrolysis [26]
Fruits and
Apricot kernel cake Alkaline solubilization and acid
Polysaccharides Cereals Brewers’ spent grain Enzymatic hydrolysis [28]
Sequential extraction of proteins and arabinoxylans [18]
Acid hydrolysis [29]
Fruits and
Citrus peel and apple pomace  Subcritical water extraction [30]
Orange peel Microwave extraction [31]
Lipids Cereals Brewers’ spent grain Soxhlet extraction [32]
Fruit and
Grape seeds Pressurized carbon dioxide extraction with compressed carbon dioxide as solvent and ethanol as co‐solvent [33]
Supercritical fluid extraction [34]
Polyphenols Cereals Brewers’ spent grain Alkaline hydrolysis [35]
Oil crops Rapeseed Ultrasound‐assisted aqueous extraction [20]
Olive by‐products Continuous counter‐current liquid‐liquid extraction [36]
Chemical (acid) hydrolysis [37]
Sunflower meals Mild‐acidic protein extraction with adsorptive removal of phenolic compounds [38]
Fruits and
Tomato pomace and skin Enzymatic‐assisted extraction/solvent extraction [16]
Potato peels and tubers Pressurized liquid extractor [39]
Solvent extraction (stirring) [40]
Ultrasound extraction [41]
Orange peels Nanofiltration [42]
Forest fruits pomaces Supercritical fluid extraction [43]
Apple pomace Ultrasound extraction [44]
Grape seeds Supercritical fluid extraction [45]
Carotenoids Fruits and
Tomato pomace and skin Enzymatic‐assisted extraction [16]
Citrus peel Ultrasound extraction [46]
Sea buckthorn seeds Supercritical carbon dioxide fluid
Essential oils Fruit and
Citrus peel Solvent extraction, distillation, hydrodistillation [48]

Table 1.

Examples of bioactive compounds from plant‐derived wastes and the employed extraction techniques.

In Table 1, examples of some of the most common extraction technique for the main classes of high‐value compounds and their sources are given.

2.2. Proteins

Proteins are macronutrients with an important role in human nutrition, having high nutritional value. Nowadays, the consumers are more concerned about their health and are starting to realise the tight correlation between health and diet. The trend is towards vegetarianism, and thus finding new plant sources of protein is crucial for the food industry. For a by‐product to be considered as a source of protein, it has to fulfil major requirements: to have high protein content and this protein to be quality protein (well‐balanced essential amino acid composition) [12]. Also, the allergic or toxic substances that may be present in the by‐product must be removed prior to its utilisation as source of protein.

The main wastes with a relatively high content of protein are the defatted meals obtained from oil industry, including sunflower, canola, rapeseed, but also palm and peanuts. The defatted by‐products generated from oil refineries (oil cake, stem and grain husk) are not only good sources of proteins but are also available in large quantities and at a low cost.

Sunflower proteins have been extensively evaluated as food ingredients. Sunflower seeds content in proteins ranges between 10% and 27.1% (dry weight (DW) basis), thus making the sunflower oil cake a good source of quality protein. The sunflower protein isolate's or concentrate's characteristic is the relatively high content in phenolics, compounds that may alter the proteins’ functional properties and their shelf life [49]. However, the current tendency is not to obtain protein isolates free of phenolics, but to keep these compounds into the isolates due to the antioxidant activity they exert. The protein concentrates containing different concentrations of phenolics were studied and the results showed that they have high water solubility, moderate water‐holding capacity, emulsifying, foaming and gelation capacity similar to commercial isolates [21].

Another source of plant protein is the canola seeds. These seeds contain two main types of storage proteins: salt‐soluble (cruciferin) and water‐soluble (napin), the total protein content in the defatted canola meal being around 32% [24]. The concentration of proteins in canola protein isolates, when conventional direct alkaline extraction is used, ranged between 66% and 76% [23, 24], while using salt precipitation method may increase the concentration of proteins in isolates up to 93% [24]. There are new emerging non‐invasive methods, such as electro‐activated solutions, that can be used for the extraction of proteins from canola meals with better extraction yields by solubilising the proteins without damaging their native conformations and maintaining their functional properties [25].

Rapeseed stem, the residual biomass remaining after the extraction of oil, represents roughly 30% of the plant and may also be considered to be used for proteins’ recovery. The protein concentration in the rapeseed stem extract, using a green solvent (water) in an enhanced ultrasound extraction, was up to 0.03 g BSA/100 g DW. The ultrasound‐assisted extraction showed an increase in extractability and at the same offering the possibility of scaling up [20].

Functional proteins can also be extracted from hazelnut cake (contains up to 54.4% proteins). The isolated hazelnut meal protein was found to exert good antioxidant activity (158–461 mmol Trolox/kg), iron chelation (60.7–126.7 mmol EDTA/kg), antiproliferative activity on colon cancer cells (IC50: 3.0–4.6 mg/ml) and good oil absorption (7.4–9.4 g/g) [22].

In the palm oil‐producing countries (e.g. Indonesia and Malaysia), the palm kernel cake is one of the main by‐products generated by food industry [26]. Palm kernel cake contains in average 15–21% crude protein, but it is deficient in lysine, methionine and tryptophan, and thus has a poor utility being usually used as feed for ruminants [50, 51]. Nevertheless, palm kernel cake is still a potential source of plant protein. The extracted protein isolates have a 68.50% protein concentration when alkaline extraction was used. Attempts in optimisation of extraction technology were carried out in order to transform the extracted protein into a bioactive plant protein (e.g. by enzymatic hydrolysis) by adding functional properties such as antioxidant function [26, 52].

Cereal origin wastes represent another potential source of bioactive molecules, including plant proteins. Brewers’ spent grain is the main insoluble residue generated by the brewing industry. This by‐product results after the production of wort and it mainly consists in barley grain husks with minor fractions of pericarp and endosperm [53]. Its chemical composition is dependent on several intrinsic and extrinsic factors (barley cultivar, harvest time, type of malt used in the brewing process, mashing conditions, etc.) [54], but regardless of these factors it contains appreciable amounts of valuable compounds (proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, polyphenols and minerals) that remain unexploited in the brewing process. Brewers’ spent grain has a high content (18–35.4%, w/w) [18, 55, 56] of quality protein, with lysine accounting for 14.3% of total protein content [55]. The extraction of protein from brewers’ spent grain may be performed by classical alkaline extraction, but recently new integrated processes are developed for a more efficient exploitation of this by‐product. For example, simultaneous extraction of proteins and arabinoxylans by use of alkaline reagents directly from brewers’ spent grain without any pre‐treatment [18] has a great potential to be scaled up being an innovative environmental friendly process that allows the recycling of the reagents and at the same time saving 93% in costs [57]. The incorporation of chitosan into the brewers’ spent grain protein had as result a composite film with antimicrobial and antioxidant activities which can be used in packaging materials for foods [58].

The apricot kernel press cake, the waste remaining after the oil extraction, contains 34.5% crude protein which may be valorised by as protein isolates. In this case, before the alkaline extraction of proteins, a pre‐step of detoxification is required in order to remove the HCN present in the kernel cake. The obtained isolates had a protein concentration of 68.8% and fairly good functional properties, especially water and oil absorption capacity and foaming properties [27].

The proteins recovered from plant‐derived wastes have several functional properties when incorporated in food products: emulsifying agents, film‐forming properties, flavour binding, viscosity increase by binding the water and gelation properties. The recovered proteins are successfully used for food fortification, especially in meat and milk products, infant formulae, bakery products and pasta products [20, 22, 27, 59].

2.3. Polysaccharides

Polysaccharides are widely distributed in nature, with about 99% being located in plants and vegetables, the representative ones including starch, cellulose, hemicelluloses, pectin and inulin [60]. These compounds are also referred to as dietary fibre and can be divided into two categories based on their water solubility [61]:

  1. insoluble dietary fibre—are insoluble in water and resistant to hydrolysis by digestive tract enzymes (cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin—non‐carbohydrate compounds);

  2. soluble dietary fibres are soluble in water and well fermented by digestive tract enzymes (pectin, inulin, gums and mucilages).

In plants, polysaccharides have important functional roles: maintaining the living cell structure, and water binding or energy suppliers. These properties are exploited by the food industry and other related fields in the development of new food additives, functional ingredients or materials for bioactive molecules delivery and controlled release. Their suitability for pharmaceutical or medicinal uses is due to their innocuousness, biocompatibility, biodegradability and water solubility. Thus, there is an increasing and constant interest in finding new sources of plant‐derived polysaccharides—the bioagro‐waste streams being very promising in this sense [60, 62].

The fruit‐ and vegetable‐processing sector produces wastes (peels, pulp and seeds) that are rich, low cost and sustainable sources of polysaccharides. After isolation and purification, the recovered polysaccharides may have manifold applications.

Pectin is a polysaccharide with a heterogeneous structure that depends on the plant origin, the part of the plant where it is located (peels, pulp, seed, etc.) and how it is extracted. The ‘building block’ is the uronic acid residue link through α‐1‐4‐glycosidic bonds, forming a galacturonyl polymer backbone. The structural diversity of pectin provides a wide range of physico‐chemical and functional properties (gelling, emulsifier, thickening agents, film‐forming, water‐holding, prebiotic activities, etc.) essential for food industry. According to the Joint Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) Expert Committee on Food Additives and the European Commission, a pectic polysaccharide must have a content of minimum 65% in galacturonic acid [6063]. Wastes such as orange peels or apple pomace are well‐known sources of pectins, but there are also other waste streams that can be exploited in this sense. The pectins from 26 vegetable wastes were characterised in a very complex study, in the framework of EU project NOSHAN, including orange peel, onion hulls, parsley, endive roots and leaves, leek leaves, fresh cabbage, pea pod, sugar beet flakes, berries, apple pomace, sea buckthorn pulp, hop, olive pomace, tomato skin, grape pomace, whole pear and shabal. The results showed that the structure of the pectin extracted from wastes is similar to that from the raw matrices, although the methylation and acetylation degrees are lower due to the processing and/or enzymatic actions. The collected data also emphasise the potential of the recovered pectin to be used either as food additives or other applications (if the minimum concentration in galacturonic acid is not reached) [63].

The most important sources of soluble dietary fibres are the wastes derived from citrus fruits processing. The pectin content differs considerably among citrus varieties, but it generally ranges between 20% and 30% of citrus peel dry weight. Cellulose and hemicellulose can also be recovered from citrus waste as it comprises approximately 50–60% of citrus peel weight. The dietary fibres are not only present in high amount in citrus peels but also have important features due to the presence of associated bioactive constituents (flavonoids and vitamin C) with antioxidant properties, which may provide additional health‐promoting effects [64, 65]. For example, the pectin extracted from citrus peel and apple pomace by subcritical water extraction (with maximum yields of 22 and 17%, respectively) showed a high antioxidative and anti‐tumour activity [30]. Soluble dietary fibres also reduce the intestinal absorption of blood cholesterol, whereas insoluble dietary fibre associates to water absorption and intestinal regulation apart from the well‐known probiotic and health benefits [66].

As previously mentioned, brewers’ spent grain besides being a source of quality plant protein is also a good source of carbohydrates, their level being up to 50% of the by‐product weight [28]. The main carbohydrates in brewers’ spent grain are cellulose (∼17% dw) [13, 18, 32] and hemicelluloses, mainly arabinoxylan (25–28% dw) [13, 18]. The vegetable matrices being rich in hemicelluloses can be hydrolysed (e.g. with diluted acid) in order to release the monosaccharides (xylose and arabinose) which can be further subjected to a fermentation process to generate valuable products (e.g. xylitol, a sweetener used in food industry) [29]. Arabinoxylans are considered dietary fibres with a broad range of potential uses as functional ingredients in food products. Their extraction from brewers’ spent grain may be performed under strong alkali conditions and also by using an innovative fully integrated process that sequentially extracts the proteins and arabinoxylans [18].

2.4. Phenolics

Phenolics are among the most studied phytochemicals in the last decades. The interest showed by the scientific community in finding new and unconventional sources of phenolic compounds is due to the many studies that suggested that there is an association between the consumption of diets rich in phenolic compounds and a reduced risk of cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases [37, 66, 67]. Also, the recovery of phenolic compounds from food processing by‐products and their use as functional ingredients sustain the increasing efforts for a sustainable food production.

During fruit processing, the beverage industry leaves between 25 and 35% mass of the raw material called fruit pomace. Unfortunately, some part of pomace in the fruit industry still goes to landfill, and causes environmental pollution and huge losses of valuable materials which could be exploited as a great variety of natural additives and many health‐promoting ingredients (phenolic compounds, vitamins, carotenoids and dietary fibre) [68, 69]. Phenolic compounds of different plant sources such as grape and apple pomace are known as potent antioxidants and radical scavengers. The wine‐making industries produce millions of tons of residues (grape pomace), which represents a management issue from both ecological and economical point of view [70]. Grape pomace is a phenolic‐rich dietary fibre matrix that combines the benefits of both fibre and antioxidants in the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular diseases [66]. Moreover, the grape seeds are considered to be a disposable waste material by the majority of wineries. They are usually discarded, burned or used as animal feed [45]. The oil extracted from the grape seed offers a wide range of benefits for human health, due to its high content of unsaturated fatty acids and antioxidant compounds such as monomeric flavan‐3‐ols, phenolic acids and oligomeric proanthocyanidins, which is the reason why the valorisation of this by‐product is of great interest. Crude grape seed oil consists mainly of linoleic and oleic unsaturated fatty acids and also of palmitic and stearic saturated fatty acids [33, 34]. A study regarding the chemical characterisation of the grape seed extracts obtained by supercritical CO2 extraction showed that their content in trans‐resveratrol was similar to the contents reported in the literature for red wines. This demonstrates that a considerable amount of trans‐resveratrol remains unexploited in grape seeds after the fermentation process [33]. An alternative of reuse of grape seeds is as flour incorporated in food products. For example, formulations of frankfurters with grape seed flour showed a decrease in oxidation processes (due to the strong antioxidant activity of the flour), increased total dietary fibre content and water‐holding capacity of the final product [59], while the addition of apple pomace extract in meat products reduces the number of synthetic antioxidants needed to be added, and increases the health‐promoting properties of the finished product [68].

Besides being a serious environmental problem, olive by‐products can also represent a precious resource of potentially valuable molecules. It is worth mentioning that 98% of olive fruit phenols are lost during oil extraction. These compounds are distributed between the olive mill wastewaters (OMWs) phase (approximately 53%) and the solid phase—the ‘pomace’ (approximately 45%). Consequently, only a 2% fraction of the phenolic classes remains the oil phase depending on the extraction system and olive variety [71]. The evidence relating to decreased prevalence of chronic heart diseases, atherosclerosis or other diseases caused by oxidative stress, through a Mediterranean diet, has oriented scientific research towards the best use of olive‐processing by‐products (olive leaves and olive mill wastewaters) in order to produce purified natural antioxidants or high antioxidant‐rich preparations that could be incorporated in foods, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals [37, 67]. The studies on chemical constituents of olive leaves revealed that phenolic compounds stand out as predominant micronutrients, hydroxytyrosol and oleuropein considered as majority [72]. For example, the hydroxytyrosol‐rich olive leaf extract had an inhibitory activity against breast cancer cell proliferation [37]. Also, phenolic‐rich extract from OMW and hydroxytyrosol and oleuropein extracts from olive leaves had very pronounced hypocholesterolaemic effects, hypoglycaemic effect, protective action against lipid peroxidation and enhanced antioxidant defence system [73, 74].

Sunflower seeds contain high amounts of polyphenols such as caffeoylquinic and caffeic acids, accounting up to 4% dw. Among all, 5‐O‐caffeoylquinic acid (chlorogenic acid) is the predominant compound. To achieve sustainability of sunflower processing and complete utilisation of by‐products arising from sunflower oil production, polyphenols co‐extracted during sunflower protein recovery from the expeller were recovered by adsorption technology. In addition, an integrated process was optimised in order to enhance the recovery of polyphenolics as by‐products of protein production from sunflower press cake [38, 75].

Other unconventional source of phenolic compounds is the potato peels. Phenolic acids are the most abundant phenolic compounds in potatoes peels, the main representative being the chlorogenic acid (up to 95–98% of phenolic compounds) [39, 76]. It is present in the form of three main isomers: chlorogenic acid (5‐O‐caffeoylquinic acid), neochlorogenic acid (3‐O‐caffeoylquinic acid) and cryptochlorogenic acid (4‐O‐caffeoylquinic acid) [76]. Its extraction from potato peels may be performed by conventional solvent extraction [40], ultrasound‐assisted extraction [41] or using an optimised solvent extraction using pressurised liquid extractor [39]. The optimisation of an extraction method is a crucial step for researchers to accurately quantify the content in phenolic compounds and also to be able to estimate their potential health benefits when incorporated in food as functional ingredients. The extracted quantity of phenolic acids from potato peels depends not only on the method parameters but also on genetic factors. While the total phenolics content varies between cultivars and geographical regions, the most abounding isomer of chlorogenic acid was in all cases the 5‐O‐caffeoylquinic acid [39, 40].

2.5. Carotenoids

Carotenoid compounds are known for their health‐promoting effects, especially due to their high free radical‐scavenging activity. Being powerful antioxidants, when ingested they protect the human body from the damaging actions of the reactive oxygen species and thus lowering the risk of several chronic diseases (cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and cancer). They are fat‐soluble pigments which are responsible for the bright‐yellow colour of many fruits and vegetables [77].

Lycopene is the main carotenoid found in tomatoes. Some studies suggested that a direct correlation may be established between the consumption of foods rich in lycopene and a low risk of prostate cancer [78].

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is the second‐most consumed vegetable in the world [79]. The solid by‐products resulted from its processing into food products such as tomato juice, paste, puree, ketchup and sauce reaching up to 50,000 tons per year [16]. Their exploitation as a source of carotenoids (mainly lycopene) may provide economic benefits. Several techniques are used for the extraction of lycopene from tomato by‐products of which enzymatic‐assisted process is a promising one. When enzymatic method is used, the tomato by‐products are pre‐treated by crude enzyme extracts with pectinolytic, cellulolytic and cutinolytic activities prior to their conventional solvent extraction. The results showed an enhancement in the extraction of lycopene from tomato by‐products (2.7 mg/100 g) and also a higher overall antioxidant activity for the enzymatic extract (even higher than that of BHA) compared to the one obtained by conventional ethanol extraction [16].

In general, bioaccessibility of carotenoids is low. However, in some fruits, such as mango and papaya, they are present in oil droplet in an esterified form with fatty acids. This kind of structure enhances their extraction and bioavailability during digestion [80]. Poor postharvest technology is one of the major inconveniences in mango annual production, accounting for nearly 60–80% of losses. Therefore, processing mango into flour represents a viable alternative for its use as a functional ingredient and to reduce wastage. The carotenoid content of mango flours ranged from 56.46 to 160.64 μg/g and was found to be higher in ripe mango flours than in green mango flours. In addition, the flour processed from the mango peel has been found to contain significant superior qualities than that from mango pulp in terms of total phenolic, anthocyanins, flavonoids and vitamin C contents and antioxidant activities [81].

Citrus waste is voluminous, heterogeneous, chemically complex and highly biodegradable; therefore, it cannot be disposed of in a landfill without a previous valorisation, in order to avoid both economic loss and environmental pollution issues. About 40–50% of the quantity of this fruit is processed for juice and marmalade production and approximately 50–60% w/w of the processed fruit becomes waste. This by‐product contains a wide range of bioactive compounds, such as essential oils, carotenoids, fibre, hesperidin and limonin, which have many applications in food, cosmetic and pharmaceutical industry. After the production of orange juice, the remaining outer layer called flavedo contains considerable amounts of the natural carotenoids. These bioactive compounds comprise approximately 0.1–0.5% of citrus peel dry weight. The major carotenoids available in citrus are α‐ and β‐carotene, lutein, zeaxanthin and β‐cryptoxanthin, which are known to be responsible for a wide range of functional properties, mainly offering protection against the reactive oxygen species damaging actions at the cellular level [64, 8284].

2.6. Other compounds

The wastes from fruits and vegetables can be exploited by microbial processing in order to obtain valuable enzymes such as amylolytic enzymes from banana waste, mango kernels; pectinolytic enzymes from orange peel, lemon peel; tannase from grape seeds; protease from mango peel, potato peel; lipase from coconut cake, lemon peel; and invertase from orange peel, banana peel. The microbial treatment can also be used for the production of organic acids, including lactic acid, citric acid, succinic acid and acetic acid from wastes of potatoes, banana, mango, apple, pineapple and many others [85]. These valuable chemicals can be further exploited as raw materials for other processes or as functional ingredients for newly developed food products and so on [86]. Another example of valuable products recovered from fruit wastes, more exactly, from citrus fruits peels (orange, mandarin, lime, lemons, etc.), is the essential oils. Citrus essential oils extracted from the peels discarded after the fruits processing can be valorised: as flavouring agents in different food products (e.g. soft drinks and confectioneries), perfumes, personal care products, household products; in food preservation enhancing the product's shelf life due to their antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, and thus representing an attractive alternative to synthetic antioxidants and preservatives; and as functional chemicals in agriculture as insects repellent and other more uses [48, 8789].


3. Conclusion

Food wastes are renewable resources of high‐value extractable or convertible chemicals which can be exploited for the development of new functional ingredients, respectively, for the generation of bio‐fuels. The scientific research is focused on finding new ways of valorisation of food industry by‐products by identifying or optimising the most appropriate extraction methods for the recovery of the biomolecules, as well as by strengthening the cooperation with food industry partners in implementing adequate solutions for a sustainable development and increased competitiveness.

The ‘zero‐waste’ desiderate can be reached by reusing the high‐value compounds from by‐products in innovative and unconventional ways which may generate profits in a sustainable food production system. The recovered biomolecules are also of great interest for pharmaceutical industry (e.g. carrier agents and controlled release), cosmetics, agriculture, chemical industry and so on.



This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS–UEFISCDI, project number PN‐II‐RU‐TE‐2014‐4‐0842. Authors S.A. Socaci and A.C. Fărcaş contributed equally to this work.


  1. 1. EU actions against food waste. Available from: [Accessed: 2016‐08‐12]
  2. 2. HLPE. Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome 2014. Available from:‐i3901e.pdf [Accessed:2016.08.12]
  3. 3. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2008/98/EC. Available from:http://eur‐ [Accessed: 2006‐08‐12]
  4. 4. Amendment of Directive 2008/98/EC. Available from: http://eur‐‐content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52014PC0397[Accessed: 2006‐08‐12]
  5. 5. Ravindran R, Jaiswal AK. Exploitation of food industry waste for high‐value products. Trends in Biotechnology. 2016;34(1):58–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.10.008
  6. 6. Gil‐Chavez GJ, Villa JA, Ayala‐Zavala JF, Heredia JB, Sepulveda D, Yahia EM, Gonzalez‐Aguilar GA. Technologies for extraction and production of bioactive compounds to be used as nutraceuticals and food ingredients: An overview. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2013;12:5–23. DOI: 10.1111/1541‐4337.12005
  7. 7. Galanakis CM. Recovery of high added‐value components from food wastes: Conventional, emerging technologies and commercialized applications. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2012;26:68–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2012.03.003
  8. 8. Baiano A. Recovery of biomolecules from food wastes—A review. Molecules. 2014;19:14821–14842. DOI: 10.3390/molecules190914821
  9. 9. Djilas S, Čanadanović‐Brunet J, Ćetković G. By‐products of fruits processing as a source of phytochemicals. Chemical Industry #x0026; Chemical Engineering Quarterly. 2009;15(4):191-202. DOI: 10.2298/CICEQ0904191D
  10. 10. Pfaltzgraff LA, De Bruyn M, Cooper EC, Budarin V, Clark JH. Food waste biomass: A resource for high‐value chemicals. The Royal Society of Chemistry. 2013;15:307–314. DOI: 10.1039/c2gc36978h
  11. 11. Farcas AC, Socaci SA, Tofana M, Dulf FV, Mudura E, Diaconeasa Z. Volatile profile, fatty acids composition and total phenolic content of brewers’ spent grain by‐product with potential use in the development of new functional foods. Journal of Cereal Science. 2015;64:34–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2015.04.003
  12. 12. Oreopoulou V, Tzia C. Utilization of plant by‐products for the recovery of proteins, dietary fibers, antioxidants, and colorants. In: Oreopoulou V, Russ W, editors, volume 3. Utilization of By‐Products and Treatment of Waste in the Food Industry. Springer; New York, USA. 2007, p. 209–232. DOI: 10.1007/978‐0‐387‐35766‐9_11
  13. 13. Mussatto SI. Generating biomedical polyphenolic compounds from spent coffee or silverskin. In: Preedy V, editors. 1st ed. Coffee in Health and Disease Prevention. Elsevier; San Diego, USA. 2015, p. 93–106. DOI: 10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐409517‐5.00011‐5
  14. 14. Sormoli ME, Langrish T. Spray drying bioactive orange‐peel extracts produced by Soxhlet extraction: Use of WPI, antioxidant activity and moisture sorption isotherms. LWT ‐ Food Science and Technology. 2016;72:1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.04.033
  15. 15. Teixeira A, Baenas N, Dominguez‐Perles R, Barros A, Rosa E, Moreno DA, Garcia‐Viguera C. Natural bioactive compounds from winery by‐products as health promoters: A review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014;15:15638–15678. DOI:10.3390/ijms150915638
  16. 16. Azabou S, Abid Y, Sebii H, Felfoul I, Gargouri A, Attia H. Potential of the solid‐state fermentation of tomato by products by Fusarium solani pisi for enzymatic extraction of lycopene. LWT‐ Food Science and Technology. 2016;68:280–287. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.11.064
  17. 17. Tang DS, Tian YJ, He YZ, Li L, Hu SQ, Li B. Optimisation of ultrasonic‐assisted protein extraction from brewer's spent grain. Czech Journal of Food Sciences. 2010;28:9–17.
  18. 18. Vieira E, Rocha MAM, Coelho E, Pinho O, Saraiva JA, Ferreira I, Coimbra MA. Valuation of brewer's spent grain using a fully recyclable integrated process for extraction of proteins and arabinoxylans. Industrial Crops and Products. 2014;52:136–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.10.012
  19. 19. Niemi P, Martins D, Buchert J, Faulds CB. Pre‐hydrolysis with carbohydrases facilitates the release of protein from brewer's spent grain. Bioresource Technology. 2013;136:529–534. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.076
  20. 20. Yu X, Gouyo T, Grimi N, Bals O, Vorobiev E. Ultrasound enhanced aqueous extraction from rapeseed green biomass for polyphenol and protein valorization. Comptes Rendus Chimie. 2016;19:766–777. DOI: 10.1016/j.crci.2016.03.007
  21. 21. Salgado PR, Molina Ortiz SE, Petruccelli S, Mauri AN. Functional food ingredients based on sunflower protein concentrates naturally enriched with antioxidant phenolic compounds. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 2012;89:825–836. DOI: 10.1007/s11746‐011‐1982‐x
  22. 22. Aydemir LY, Gökbulut AA, Baran Y, Yemenicioglu A. Bioactive, functional and edible film‐forming properties of isolated hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) meal proteins. Food Hydrocolloids. 2014;36:130–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.09.014
  23. 23. Manamperi WAR, Wiesenborn DP, Chang SKC, Pryor SW. Effects of protein separation conditions on the functional and thermal properties of canola protein isolates. Journal of Food Science. 2011;76(3):266–273. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750‐3841.2011.02087.x
  24. 24. Karaca AC, Low N, Nickerson M. Emulsifying properties of canola and flaxseed protein isolates produced by isoelectric precipitation and salt extraction. Food Research International. 2011;44:2991–2998. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.07.009
  25. 25. Gerzhova A, Mondor M, Benali M, Aider M. Study of the functional properties of canola protein concentrates and isolates extracted by electro‐activated solutions as non‐invasive extraction method. Food Bioscience. 2015;12:128–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2015.10.002
  26. 26. Ng KL, Ayob MK, Said M, Osman MdA, Ismail A. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of palm kernel cake protein (PKCP) for producing hydrolysates with antiradical capacity. Industrial Crops and Products. 2013;43:725– 731. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.017
  27. 27. Sharma PC, Tilakratne BMKS, Gupta A. Utilization of wild apricot kernel press cake for extraction of protein isolate. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2010;47(6):682–685. DOI: 10.1007/s13197‐010‐0096‐z
  28. 28. Niemi P, Faulds CB, Sibakov J, Holopainen U, Poutanen K, Buchert J. Effect of a milling pre‐treatment on the enzymatic hydrolysis of carbohydrates in brewer's spent grain. Bioresource Technology. 2012;116:155–160. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.043
  29. 29. Mussatto SI, Roberto IC. Acid hydrolysis and fermentation of brewer's spent grain to produce xylitol. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2005;85(14):2453–2460. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2276
  30. 30. Wang X, Chen Q, Lü X. Pectin extracted from apple pomace and citrus peel by subcritical water. Food Hydrocolloids. 2014;38:129–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.12.003
  31. 31. Maran JP, Sivakumar V, Thirugnanasambandham K, Sridhar R. Optimization of microwave assisted extraction of pectin from orange peel. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2013; 97:703–709. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.052
  32. 32. Niemi P, Tamminen T, Smeds A, Viljanen K, Ohra‐Aho T, Holopainen‐Mantila U, Faulds CB, Poutanen K, Buchert J. Characterization of lipids and lignans in brewer's spent grain and its enzymatically extracted fraction. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2012b;60:9910-9917. DOI: 10.1021/jf302684x
  33. 33. Dalmolin I, Mazutti MA, Batista EAC, Meireles MAA, Oliveira JV. Chemical characterization and phase behavior of grape seed oil in compressed carbon dioxide and ethanol as co‐solvent. Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2010;42(6):797–801. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2010.02.003
  34. 34. Prado MJ, Dalmolin I, Carareto ND, Basso RC, Meirelles AJ, Oliveira JV, Batista EA, Meireles MA. Supercritical fluid extraction of grape seed: Process scale‐up, extract chemical composition and economic evaluation. Journal of Food Engineering. 2012;109:249–257. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.10.007
  35. 35. Mussatto SI, Dragone G, Roberto IC. Ferulic and p‐coumaric acids extraction by alkaline hydrolysis of brewer's spent grain. Industrial Crops and Products. 2007;25:231–237. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.11.001
  36. 36. Allouche N, Fki I, Sayadi S. Toward a high yield recovery of antioxidants and purified hydroxytyrosol from olive mill wastewaters. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2004;52(2):267–273. DOI: 10.1021/jf034944u
  37. 37. Bouallagui Z, Han J, Isoda H, Sayadi S. Hydroxytyrosol rich extract from olive leaves modulates cell cycle progression in MCF‐7 human breast cancer cells. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2011;49:179–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.10.014
  38. 38. Weisz GM, Carle R, Kammerer DR. Sustainable sunflower processing—II. Recovery of phenolic compounds as a by‐product of sunflower protein extraction. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2013;17:169–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2012.09.009
  39. 39. Luthria DL. Optimization of extraction of phenolic acids from a vegetable waste product using a pressurized liquid extractor. Journal of Functional Foods. 2012;4:842–850. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2012.06.001
  40. 40. Ieri F, Innocenti M, Andrenelli L, Vecchio V, Mulinacci N. Rapid HPLC/DAD/MS method to determine phenolic acids, glycoalkaloids and anthocyanins in pigmented potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) and correlations with variety and geographical origin. Food Chemistry. 2011;125:750–759. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.09.009
  41. 41. Singhai PK, Sarma BK, Srivastava JS. Phenolic acid content in potato peel determines natural infection of common scab caused by Streptomyces spp. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2011;27:1559–1567. DOI: 10.1007/s11274‐010‐0608‐z
  42. 42. Conidi C, Cassano A, Drioli E. Recovery of phenolic compounds from orange press liquor by nanofiltration. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2012;90:867–874. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2012.07.005
  43. 43. Laroze LE, Díaz‐Reinoso B, Moure A, Zúñiga ME, Domínguez H. Extraction of antioxidants from several berries pressing wastes using conventional and supercritical solvents. European Food Research and Technology. 2010;231:669–677. DOI: 10.1007/s00217‐010‐1320‐9
  44. 44. Pingret D, Fabiano‐Tixier AS, Bourvellec CL, Renard CMGC, Chemat F. Lab and pilot‐scale ultrasound‐assisted water extraction of polyphenols from apple pomace. Journal of Food Engineering. 2012;111:73–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.01.026
  45. 45. Agostini F, Bertussi RA, Agostini G, Atti dos Santos AC, Rossato M, Vanderlinde R. Supercritical extraction from vinification residues: Fatty acids, α‐tocopherol, and phenolic compounds in the oil seeds from different varieties of grape. Scientific World Journal. 2012;790–486. DOI: 10.1100/2012/790486
  46. 46. Sun Y, Liu D, Chen J, Ye X, Yu D. Effects of different factors of ultrasound treatment on the extraction yield of the all‐trans‐β‐carotene from citrus peels. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2011;18: 243–249. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.05.014
  47. 47. Kagliwal LD, Patil SC, Pol AS, Singhal R S, Patravale VB. Separation of bioactives from sea buckthorn seeds by supercritical carbon dioxide extraction methodology through solubility parameter approach. Separation and Purification Technology. 2011;80:533–540. DOI :10.1016/j.seppur.2011.06.008
  48. 48. Thongnuanchan P, Benjakul S. Essential oils: Extraction, bioactivities, and their uses for food preservation. Journal of Food Science. 2014;79(7):1231–1249. DOI: 10.1111/1750‐3841.12492
  49. 49. Gonzalez‐Perez S, Vereijken JM. Sunflower proteins: overview of their physicochemical, structural and functional properties. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2007;87:2173–2191. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2971
  50. 50. Chong CH, Zulkifli I, Blair R. Effects of dietary inclusion of palm kernel cake and palm oil, and enzyme supplementation on performance of laying hens. Asian‐Australian Journal of Animal Science. 2008;21(7):1053–1058. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2008.70581
  51. 51. Saenphoom P, Liang JB, Ho YW, Loh TC, Rosfarizan M. Effect of enzyme treatment on chemical composition and production of reducing sugars in palm (Elaeis guineenis) kernel expeller. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10(68):15372–15377. DOI: 10.5897/AJB11.1211
  52. 52. Zarei M, Ebrahimpour A, Abdul‐Hamid A, Anwar F, Saari N. Production of defatted palm kernel cake protein hydrolysate as a valuable source of natural antioxidants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012;13:8097–8111. DOI: 10.3390/ijms13078097
  53. 53. Mussatto SI. Brewer's spent grain: a valuable feedstock for industrial applications. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2014;94:1264–1275. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6486
  54. 54. Santos M, Jiménez JJ, Bartolomé B, Gómez‐Cordovés C, del Nozal MJ. Variability of brewer's spent grain within a brewery. Food Chemistry. 2003;80:17–21. DOI: 10.1016/S0308‐8146(02)00229‐7
  55. 55. Waters DM, Jacob F, Titze J, Arendt KE, Zannini E. Fibre, protein and mineral fortification of wheat bread through milled and fermented brewer’ s spent grain enrichment. European Food Research and Technology. 2012;235:767–778. DOI: 10.1007/s00217‐012‐1805‐9
  56. 56. Farcas A, Socaci S, Tofana M, Muresan C, Mudura E, Salanta L, Scrob S. Nutritional properties and volatile profile of brewer's spent grain supplemented bread. Romanian Biotechnological Letters. 2014;19(5):9705–9714.
  57. 57. Coimbra MA, Pinto MI, Martins MA, Ferreira ME, Saraiva JM, Castro Pinho OM. Integrated process for extracting proteins and arabinoxylans from brewer's spent grain. Available from: [Accessed: 2016‐07‐21]
  58. 58. Lee J, Lee J, Yang HJ, Song KB. Preparation and characterization of brewer's spent grain protein‐chitosan composite films. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2015;52:7549. DOI: 10.1007/s13197‐015‐1941‐x
  59. 59. Ozvural EB, Vural H. Grape seed flour is a viable ingredient to improve the nutritional profile and reduce lipid oxidation of frankfurters. Meat Science. 2011;88(1):179–183. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.12.022
  60. 60. Poli A, Anzelmo G, Fiorentino G, Nicolaus B, Tommonaro G, Di Donato P. Polysaccharides from wastes of vegetable industrial processing: New opportunities for their eco‐friendly re‐use. In: Elnashar M, editors. Biotechnology of Biopolymers. InTech; Rijeka, Croatia. 2011, p. 32–56. DOI: 10.5772/16387
  61. 61. Dhingra D, Michael M, Rajput H, Patil RT. Dietary fibre in foods: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2012;49(3):255–266. DOI: 10.1007/s13197‐011‐0365‐5
  62. 62. Di Donato P, Poli A, Taurisano V, Nicolaus B. Polysaccharides: Applications in biology and biotechnology/Polysaccharides from bioagro‐waste new biomolecules‐life. Polysaccharides. 2014;1–29. DOI: 10.1007/978‐3‐319‐03751‐6_16‐1
  63. 63. Müller‐Maatsch J, Bencivenni M, Caligiani A, Tedeschi T, Bruggeman G, Bosch M, Petrusan J, Droogenbroeck B, Elst K, Sforza S. Pectin content and composition from different food waste streams. Food Chemistry. 2016;201:37–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.01.012
  64. 64. El‐Sharnouby GA, Aleid SM,Al‐Otaibi MM. Conversion of processed citrus wastes into nutritional components. Journal of Food Processing and Technology. 2013;4:8. DOI: 10.4172/2157‐7110.1000259
  65. 65. Ferrentino G, Asaduzzaman Md, Scampicchio MM. Current technologies and new insights for the recovery of high valuable compounds from fruits by‐products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1180589
  66. 66. Zhu F, Du B, Zheng L, Li J. Advance on the bioactivity and potential applications of dietary fibre from grape pomace. Food Chemistry. 2015;186:207–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.057
  67. 67. Bouallagui Z, Bouaziz M, Han J, Boukhris M, Rigane G, Friha I, Jemai H, Fki I, Ghorbel H, Isoda H, Sayadi S. Valorization of olive processing by‐products: Characterization, investigation of chemico‐biological activities and identification of active compounds. Journal of Arid Land Studies. 2012;22(1):61–64.
  68. 68. Peiretti PG, Gai F. Fruit and pomace extracts: applications to improve the safety and quality of meat products. In: Owen JP, editors. Fruit and Pomace Extracts Biological Activity, Potential Applications and Beneficial Health Effects. Nova Science; New York, USA. 2015, p. 1–28.
  69. 69. Kruczek M, Drygas B, Habryka C. Pomace in fruit industry and their contemporary potential application. World Scientific News. 2016;48:259–265.
  70. 70. Fontana AR, Antoniolli A, Bottini R. Grape pomace as a sustainable source of bioactive compounds: Extraction, characterization, and biotechnological applications of phenolics. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2013;61(38):8987–9003. DOI: 10.1021/jf402586f
  71. 71. Rodis PS, Karathanos VT, Mantzavinou A. Partitioning of olive oil antioxidants between oil and water phases. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002;50(3):596–601. DOI: DOI: 10.1021/jf010864j
  72. 72. Bouaziz M, Grayer RJ. Simmonds Monique SJ, Damak M, Sayadi S. Identification and antioxidant potential of flavonoids and low molecular weight phenols in olive cultivar chemlali growing in Tunisia. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2005;53:236–241. DOI: 10.1021/jf048859d
  73. 73. Jemai H, Fki I, Bouaziz M, Bouallagui Z, El Feki A, Isoda H, Sayadi S. Lipid‐lowering and antioxidant effects of hydroxytyrosol and its triacetylated derivative recovered from olive tree leaves in cholesterol‐fed rats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008;56(8):2630–2636. DOI: 10.1021/jf072589s
  74. 74. Jemai H, El Feki A, Sayadi S. Antidiabetic and antioxidant effects of hydroxytyrosol and oleuropein from olive leaves in alloxan‐diabetic rats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2009;57(19):8798–8804. DOI: 10.1021/jf901280r
  75. 75. Weisz GM, Schneider L, Schweiggert U, Kammerer DR, Carle R. Sustainable sunflower processing — I Development of a process for the adsorptive decolorization of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) protein extracts. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2010;11:733–741. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2010.05.005
  76. 76. Akyol H, Riciputi Y, Capanoglu E, Caboni MF, Verardo V. Phenolic compounds in the potato and its byproducts: An overview. International Journal of Molecular Science. 2016;17:835. DOI:10.3390/ijms17060835
  77. 77. Rao AV, Rao LG. Carotenoids and human health. Pharmacological Research. 2007;55:207–216. DOI:10.1016/j.phrs.2007.01.012
  78. 78. Rao LG, Guns E, Rao AV. Lycopene: Its role in human health and disease. AgroFood Industry Hi‐Tech. 2003;55:35–30.
  79. 79. Socaci SA, Socaciu C, Muresan C, Fărcas A, Tofană M, Vicas S, Pintea A. Chemometric discrimination of different tomato cultivars based on their volatile fingerprint in relation to lycopene and total phenolics content. Phytochemical Analysis. 2014;25(2):161–169. DOI: 10.1002/pca.2483
  80. 80. Courraud J, Berger J, Cristol JP, Avallone S. Stability and bioaccessibility of different forms of carotenoids and vitamin A during in vitro digestion. Food Chemistry. 2013;136:871–877. DOI: doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.08.076
  81. 81. Abdul Aziz NA, Wong LM, Bhat R, Cheng LH. Evaluation of processed green and ripe mango peel and pulp flours (Mangifera indica var. Chokanan) in terms of chemical composition, antioxidant compounds and functional properties. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2012;92:557–563.DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4606
  82. 82. Wilkins MR, Suryawati L, Maness NO, Chrz D. Ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces marxianus in the presence of orange‐peel oil. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2007a;23:1161–1168. DOI:10.1007/s11274‐007‐9346‐2
  83. 83. Negro V, Mancini G, Ruggeri B, Fino D. Citrus waste as feedstock for bio‐based products recovery: Review on limonene case study and energy valorization. Bioresource Technology. 2016;214:806–815. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.006
  84. 84. Siles JA, Vargas F, Gutiérrez MC, Chica AF, Martín MA. Integral valorisation of waste orange peel using combustion, biomethanisation and co‐composting technologies. Bioresource Technology. 2016;211:173–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.056
  85. 85. Panda SK, Mishra SS, Kayitesi E, Ray RC. Microbial‐processing of fruit and vegetable wastes for production of vital enzymes and organic acids: Biotechnology and scopes. Environmental Research. 2016;146:161–172. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.12.035
  86. 86. Laufenberg G, Kunz B, Nystroem M. Transformation of vegetable waste into value added products: (A) the upgrading concept; (B) practical implementations. Bioresource Technology. 2003;87:167–198. DOI: 10.1016/S0960‐8524(02)00167‐0
  87. 87. Bakry AM, Abbas S, Ali B, Majeed H, Abouelwafa MY, Mousa A, Liang L. Microencapsulation of oils: A comprehensive review of benefits, techniques, and applications. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2016;15:143–182. DOI: 10.1111/1541‐4337.12179.
  88. 88. Calo JR, Crandall PG, O'Bryan CA, Ricke SC. Essential oils as antimicrobials in food systems—A review. Food Control. 2014;54:111–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.12.040
  89. 89. Miguel MG. Antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory activities of essential oils: A short review. Molecules. 2010;15:9252–9287. DOI: 10.3390/molecules15129252

Written By

Sonia A. Socaci, Anca C. Fărcaş, Dan C. Vodnar and Maria Tofană

Submitted: May 9th, 2016 Reviewed: October 3rd, 2016 Published: February 22nd, 2017