Thermophysical properties of different base fluid and CNTs.
Abstract
This chapter discusses the magnetic field effects on the flow of CattanneoChristov heat flux model for waterbased CNT suspended nanofluid over a stretching sheet. According to the authors, knowledge idea of CattanneoChristov heat flux model for waterbased CNT suspended nanofluid is not explored so far for stretching sheet. The flow equations are modeled for the first time in the literature transformed into ordinary differential equations using similarity transformations. The numerical solutions are computed using shooting technique and compared with the literature for the special case of pure fluid flow and found to be in good agreement. Graphical results are presented to illustrate the effects of various fluid flow parameters on velocity, heat transfer, Nusselt number, Sherwood number, and skin friction coefficient for different types of nanoparticles.
Keywords
 boundary layer flow
 nanofluid
 stretching sheet
 CattanneoChristov heat flux model
 numerical solution
1. Introduction
From recent few decades, heat transfer enhancement of the nanofluid has turned out to be a topic of main interest for the researchers and scientists. The word “nanofluid” was derived by Choi [1]. He defines a liquid suspension comprising ultrafine particles whose diameter is less than 50 nm. Xuan and Roetzel [2] investigated the mechanism of heat transfer enhancement of the nanofluid. According to them, the nanofluid is a solidliquid mixture in which metallic or nonmetallic nanoparticles are suspended. The suspended ultrafine particles change transport properties and heat transfer performance of the nanofluid, which exhibits a great potential in enhancing heat transfer. They found that the reduced Nusselt number is a decreasing function of each nanofluid parameters. Khanafer et al. [3] discussed buoyancydriven heat transfer enhancement in a twodimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids. The natural convective boundarylayer flow of a nanofluid over a vertical plate is studied analytically by Kuznetsov and Nield [4]. Boundary layer laminar nanofluid flow over the stretching flat surface has been investigated numerically by Khan and Pop [5]. They show that the reduced Nusselt number is a decreasing function of each dimensionless number, while the reduced Sherwood number is an increasing function of higher Prandtl number. Ebaid and his coauthors [6–10] present boundarylayer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet with different flow geometries and with different conditions. Wang [11] discussed free convection on a vertical stretching surface. Scaling group transformation for MHD(Magneto hydrodynamic) boundarylayer flow of a nanofluid past a vertical stretching surface in the presence of suction/injection was discussed by Kandasamy et al. [12].
Fourier [13] was the first who discussed the heat transfer phenomenon in 1822. The equation presented by him was parabolic in nature and has draw back that in initial disturbance is felt instantly throughout the whole medium. Cattaneo [14] modifies the “Fourier law of heat conduction in which he added the thermal relaxation term. The addition of thermal relaxation time causes heat transportation in the form of thermal waves with finite speed.” Christov [15] in this contest discussed Oldroyd upperconvected derivative as an alternative of time plagiaristic to complete the materialin variant formulation. This model is known as CattaneoChristov heat flux model. Tibullo et al. [16] described the uniqueness of CattaneoChristov heat flux model for incompressible fluids. Mustafa [17] presented the CattaneoChristov heat flux model for Maxwell fluid over a stretching sheet. According to him, velocity is inversely proportional to the viscoelastic fluid parameter. Further, fluid temperature has inverse relationship with the relaxation time for heat flux and with the Prandtl number. Very recently, Salahuddin et al. [18] discussed MHD flow of CattanneoChristov heat flux model for Williamson fluid over a stretching sheet with variable thickness. They solved nonlinear problem numerically by using implicit finite difference scheme known as Keller box method. They observed that large values of wall thickness parameter and Weissenberg number are suitable for reduction in velocity profile. For further details, see Refs. [11, 12, 19–32].
The aim of this chapter is to discuss the magnetic field effects on the flow of CattanneoChristov heat flux model for waterbased CNT suspended nanofluid over a stretching sheet. Because according to the authors, knowledge idea of CattanneoChristov heat flux model for waterbased CNT suspended nanofluid is not explored so far for stretching sheet. The flow equations are modeled for the first time in the literature transformed into ordinary differential equations using similarity transformations. The numerical solutions are computed using shooting technique and compared with the literature for the special case of pure fluid flow and found to be in good agreement. Graphical results are presented to illustrate the effects of various fluid flow parameters on velocity, heat transfer, Nusselt number, Sherwood number, and skin friction coefficient for different types of nanoparticles.
2. Formatting mathematical model
We discuss the twodimensional nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet with water as based fluids surrounding single and multiwall CNTs. The flow is supposed to be laminar, steady, and incompressible. The base fluid and the CNTs are usual to be in updraft stability. Sheet is whispered to be stretched with the dissimilar velocity
With the above analysis, the boundary layer equations for the proposed model, i.e., continuity, momentum, and energy equations, can be written as follows:
where
where
Further,
where
Corresponding boundary conditions are as follows:
where
Introducing the following similarity transformations, we have
Making use of Eqs. (6, 8) in Eqs. (1–5), we have
where
The quantity of practical interest, in this study, is the skin friction coefficient
where
3. Numerical scheme
The nonlinear ordinary differential equations (9)–(10) subject to the boundary conditions (11) have been solved numerically using an efficient RungeKutta fourthorder method along with shooting technique. The asymptotic boundary conditions given by Eq. (11) were replaced by using a value of 15 for the similarity variable
4. Results and discussion
In this section, the graphical explanation of the numerical results for velocity, temperature, skin friction coefficients, Nusselt number, and stream lines is expressed with respect to certain changes in the physical parameters through illustrations (Figures 2–7). A comparative study for pure water, SWCNT and MWCNT, is also depicted through Tables 1–5.
(Figure 2a and b) represents the changes in the fluid velocity profiles with respect to different values of solid nanoparticle volume fraction. Figure 2(a) shows the variation in solid volume fraction of nanoparticles with respect to Hartmann number M. As Hartmann number is the ratio of electromagnetic forces to the viscous forces. It is observed that when Hartmann number increases, electromagnetic forces will be dominant to the viscous forces that give declines in the velocity field (see Figure 2(a)). Figure 2(b) shows the variation in solid nanoparticle volume fraction with slip parameter β on velocity profile. It is analyzed that with an increase in slip parameter, velocity profile decreases. Further with an increase in solid nanoparticle volume fraction, velocity profile increases, and boundary layer thickness also increases with the increase in Hartmann number M, slip parameter, and solid nanoparticle volume fraction.
Temperature profile for different values of solid nanoparticle volume fraction with the variation in thermal relaxation time γ, Hartmann number M, and slip parameter β is presented in Figure 3(a–c). Temperature profile decreases with the rise in thermal relaxation time, but thermal boundary layer increases with an increase in thermal relaxation time (see Figure 3(a)). Figure 3(b) depicts that with an increase in electromagnetic forces as compared to the viscous forces, temperature profile and thermal boundary layer increase rapidly. Temperature profile and thermal boundary layer also increase rapidly with the rise in slip parameter (see Figure 3(c)). Moreover, temperature profile and thermal boundary layer increase with an increase in solid nanoparticle volume fraction.
Physical properties  Base fluid  Nanoparticles  

Water  SWCNT  MWCNT  

997  2600  1600 

4179  425  796 

0.613  6600  3000 
Pr  Present results  Khan et al. [20]  Khan & Pop. [5]  Wang [11]  Kandasamy et al. [12] 

0.07  0.0663  0.0663  0.0663  0.0656  0.0661 
0.20  0.1691  0.1691  0.1691  0.1691  0.1691 
0.70  0.4539  0.4539  0.4539  0.4539  0.4542 
2  0.9114  0.9114  0.9113  0.9114  0.9114 
7  1.8954  1.8954  1.8954  1.8954  1.8952 
20  3.3539  3.3539  3.3539  3.3539  – 
70  6.4622  6.4622  6.4621  6.4622  – 

Cf  









SWCNT  0.0 0.1 0.2 
1 1.22904 1.51940 
0.43016 0.54480 0.70245 
1.11803 1.35495 1.65690 
0.46912 0.58833 0.75286 
MWCNT  0.0 0.1 0.2 
1 1.17475 1.39935 
0.43016 0.53298 0.67377 
1.11803 1.30590 1.54755 
0.46912 0.57942 0.73047 

Nusselt number  




















SWCNT  0.0 0.1 0.2 
1.77095 2.66543 3.22397 
1.33685 2.03231 2.49289 
1.74513 2.60424 3.13585 
1.25641 1.89346 2.31928 
1.71287 2.48958 2.95535 
1.08479 1.58280 1.92489 
1.52688 2.07111 2.37985 
0.70076 0.92785 1.11466 
MWCNT  0.0 0.1 
1.77095 2.63339 
1.33685 2.02350 
1.74513 2.57329 
1.25641 1.88386 
1.71287 2.46327 
1.08479 1.57551 
1.52688 2.05686 
0.70076 0.92736 
Variation in skin friction coefficient for SWCNT and MWCNT with slip parameter β and Hartmann number M is presented in Figure 4(a and b). It is seen that with the augment in M, electromagnetic strength is elevated in contrast to thick strength, skin friction coefficient rises for SWCNT as well as for MWCNT, but with the increase in slip parameter, skin friction coefficient decreases for both SWCNT and MWCNT. It is also seen that density and thermal conductivity of SWCNT are greater as compared to the MWCNT; therefore, the skin friction coefficient for SWCNT is greater as compared to the MWCNT.
Nusselt number for SWCNT and MWCNT shows the variation in Hartmann number M, thermal relaxation time γ, and slip parameter β. It is observed that the higher values of thermal relaxation time γ raise the Nusselt number for SWCNT as well as for MWCNT, and it is also analyzed that Nusselt number gives the larger values for SWCNT than MWCNT (see Figure 5(a–c)). Increasing values of Hartmann number M and slip parameter β decrease the Nusselt number for both SWCNT and MWCNT. But due to high density and thermal conductivity of SWCNT, Nusselt number for SWCNT is higher than MWCNT.
Streamlines and Isotherms are presented in Figures 6(a–c) and 7(a–c), respectively. It is analyzed from Figures 6 and 7 that for increasing Hartmann number M and thermal relaxation time γ, streamlines and Isotherms are going close to origin.
5. Conclusions
This chapter discussed the magnetic field effects on the flow of CattanneoChristov heat flux model for waterbased CNT suspended nanofluid over a stretching sheet. Key points of the performed analysis are as follows:
It is observed that when Hartmann number increases, electromagnetic forces will be dominant to the viscous forces that give declines in the velocity.
It is analyzed that with an increase in slip parameter, velocity profile decreases. Further, with an increase in solid nanoparticle volume fraction, velocity profile increases.
Boundary layer thickness also increases with the increase in Hartmann number M, slip parameter β, and solid nanoparticle volume fraction ϕ.
Temperature profile decreases with the rise in thermal relaxation time, but thermal boundary layer increases with an increase in thermal relaxation time.
It depicts that with an increase in electromagnetic forces as compared to the viscous forces, temperature profile and thermal boundary layer increase rapidly.
Temperature profile and thermal boundary layer also increase rapidly with the rise in slip parameter.
Temperature profile and thermal boundary layer increase with an increase in solid nanoparticle volume fraction.
Skin friction coefficient increases for SWCNT as well for MWCNT, but with the increase in slip parameter, skin friction coefficient decreases for both SWCNT and MWCNT.
It is also seen that thickness and thermal conductivity of SWCNT are better as compared to the MWCNT; consequently, the skin friction coefficient for SWCNT is better as compared to MWCNT.
It is pragmatic that the superior values of thermal relaxation time γ hoist the Nusselt number for SWCNT as well as for MWCNT, and it is also analyzed that Nusselt number gives the wellbuilt principles for SWCNT as evaluated to MWCNT.
It is analyzed from Figures 6 and 7 that for rising Hartmann number M and thermal relaxation time γ, streamlines and isotherms are departing shut to source.


( 

( 












( 








( 
( 




References
 1.
S.U.S. Choi, Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles, in: D.A. Siginer, H.P. Wang (Eds.), Developments and Applications of NonNewtonian Flows, ASME, New York, vol. 66 (1995) 99–105.  2.
Y. Xuan, W. Roetzel, Conceptions for heat transfer correlation of nanofluids, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 43 (2000) 3701–3707.  3.
K. Khanafer, K. Vafai, M. Lightstone, Buoyancydriven heat transfer enhancement in a twodimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 46 (2003) 3639–3653.  4.
A.V. Kuznetsov, D.A. Nield, Natural convective boundarylayer flow of a nanofluid past a vertical plate, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 49 (2010) 243–247.  5.
W.A. Khan, I. Pop, Boundarylayer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet, Int. J. Heat Mass Tranfer 53 (2010) 2477–2483.  6.
A. Ebaid, H.A. Elarabawy, Y. Nader, New exact solutions for boundarylayer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet, Int. J. Differential Equ. 2013 (Article ID 865464) 8.  7.
A. Ebaid, E.H. Aly, Exact analytical solution of the peristaltic nanofluids flow in an asymmetric channel with flexible walls: Application to cancer treatment, Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2013 (Article ID 825376) 8.  8.
A. Ebaid and A.M. Wazwaz, On the generalized Expfunction method and its application to boundary layer flow at nanoscale, J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 11(1) (2014) 178–184.  9.
A. Ebaid, E.H. Aly, N.Y. Abdelazem, Analytical and numerical investigations for the flow and heat transfer of nanofluids over a stretching sheet with partial slip boundary condition, J. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 8(4) (2014) 16391645.  10.
A. Ebaid, H.K. AlJeaid, H. AlAly, Notes on the Perturbation Solutions of the Boundary Layer Flow of Nanofluids Past a Stretching Sheet, Appl. Math. Sci. 7(122) (2013) 6077–6085.  11.
C.Y. Wang, Free convection on a vertical stretching surface, ZAMM J. Appl. Math. Mech. 69(11) (1989) 418–420.  12.
R. Kandasamy, P. Loganathan, P. Puvi Arasu, Scaling group transformation for MHD boundarylayer flow of a nanofluid past a vertical stretching surface in the presence of suction/injection, Nuclear Eng. Design 241(6) (2011) 2053–2059.  13.
B.J. Fourier, Theorie Analytique De Lachaleur, Jacques Gabay, Paris, 1822.  14.
C. Cattaneo, Sulla conduzionedelcalore, AttiSemin. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena Reggio Emilia 3 (1948) 83–101.  15.
C.I. Christov, On frame indifferent formulation of the Maxwell–Cattaneo model of finitespeed heat conduction, Mech. Res. Commun. 36 (2009) 481–486.  16.
V. Tibullo, V. Zampoli, A uniqueness result for the Cattaneo–Christov heat conduction model applied to incompressible fluids, Mech. Res. Commun. 38 (2011) 77.  17.
M. Mustafa, Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model for rotating flow and heat transfer of upper convected Maxwell fluid, AIP Adv. 5 (2015) 047109.  18.
T. Salahuddin, M.Y. Malik, A. Hussain, S. Bilal, M. Awais, MHD flow of Cattanneo–Christov heat flux model for Williamson fluid over a stretching sheet with variable thickness: Using numerical approach, J. Magnet. Magnet. Mater. 401 (2016) 991–997.  19.
N.S. Akbar, E. Abdelhalim, Z.H. Khan, Numerical analysis of magnetic field effects on EyringPowell fluid flow towards a stretching sheet, J. Magnet. Magnet. Mater. 382 (2015) 355–358.  20.
Z.H. Khan, W.A. Khan, R.J. Culham, Estimation of boundarylayer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet: A revised model, J. Hydrodyn. (2015).  21.
N.S. Akbar, Z.H. Khan, S. Nadeem, W.A. Khan, Doublediffusive natural convective boundarylayer flow of a nanofluid over a stretching sheet with magnetic field, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 26(1) (2016) 108–121.  22.
M. Sheikholeslami, D.D. Ganji, M. GorjiBandpy, S. Soleimani, Magnetic field effect on nanofluid flow and heat transfer using KKL model, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 45 (2014) 795–807.  23.
H. Togun, G. Ahmadi, T. Abdulrazzaq, A.J. Shkarah, S.N. Kazi, A. Badarudin, M.R. Safaei, Thermal performance of nanofluid in ducts with double forwardfacing steps, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 47 (2015) 28–42.  24.
M. Sheikholeslami, R. Ellahi, H.R. Ashorynejad, G. Domairry, Effects of heat transfer in flow of nanofluids over a permeable stretching wall in a porous medium, J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 11(2) (2014) 486–496.  25.
M. Sheikholeslami, D.D. Ganji, M.Y. Javed, R. Ellahi, Effect of thermal radiation on magnetohydrodynamics nanofluid flow and heat transfer by means of two phase model, J. Magnet. Magnet. Mater. 374 (2015) 36–43.  26.
M. Sheikholeslami, M. GorjiBandpy, Free convection of ferrofluid in a cavity heated from below in the presence of an external magnetic field, Powder Technol. 256 (2014) 490–498.  27.
M. Sheikholeslami, M. GorjiBandpy, D.D. Ganji, Lattice Boltzmann method for MHD natural convection heat transfer using nanofluid, Powder Technol. 254 (2014) 82–93.  28.
M. Sheikholeslami, M. GorjiBandpy, D.D. Ganji, Numerical investigation of MHD effects on Al_{2}O_{3}water nanofluid flow and heat transfer in a semiannulus enclosure using LBM, Energy 60 (2013) 501–510.  29.
M. Sheikholeslami, R. Ellahi, M. Hassan, S. Soleimani, A study of natural convection heat transfer in a nanofluid filled enclosure with elliptic inner cylinder, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 24 (2014) 1906–1927.  30.
M. Sheikholeslami, M. Gorji, M. Bandpy, R. Ellahi, M. Hassan, S. Soleimani, Effects of MHD on Cuwater nanofluid flow and heat transfer by means of CVFEM, J. Magnet. Magnet. Mater. 349 (2014) 188–200.  31.
M. Sheikholeslami, M. Bandpy, M.G.R. Ellahi, R. Zeeshan, A simulation of MHD CuOwater nanofluid flow and convective heat transfer considering Lorentz forces, J. Magnet. Magnet. Mater. 369 (2014) 69–80.  32.
R. Ellahi, M. Gulzar, M. Sheikholeslami, Effects of heat transfer on peristaltic motion of Oldroyd fluid in the presence of inclined magnetic field, J. Magnet. Magnet. Mater. 372 (2014) 97–106.