Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Soil Contamination in Forest and Industrial Regions of Bulgaria

Written By

Nikolina Tzvetkova, Ludmila Malinova, Mariana Doncheva, Dilyanka Bezlova, Krassimira Petkova, Diana Karatoteva and Ralitza Venkova

Submitted: March 15th, 2016 Reviewed: June 27th, 2016 Published: December 21st, 2016

DOI: 10.5772/64716

Chapter metrics overview

1,479 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Based on systematic data from 1988 to 2015, the main sources of soil contamination in forest and industrial areas of Bulgaria were presented. The processes of soil acidification and eutrophication as well as accumulation of heavy metals in forest and industrial soils were analysed. The content of heavy metals in soils, pasture grasses and medicinal plants from two National Parks—Central Balkan and Pirin, as well as from two Natural Parks—Bulgarka and Strandzha was also reported. Data on heavy metals accumulation in leaves of tree species in some industrial areas of the country were presented as well. Soil and plant contamination with heavy metals were estimated according to the applied criteria of ICP Forests.


  • air pollution
  • atmospheric depositions
  • forest soils
  • heavy metals
  • medicinal plants
  • foliar analysis
  • protected area

1. Introduction

Soil and air pollution turned to be a serious ecological problem during the last decades. Significant elevation of pollutant concentrations was established in many European countries [14]. The alteration of the chemical composition of ecosystems near emission sources is among the main environmental impacts of industry. Industrial sources make a significant contribution to environmental pollution of soil and plants with the emitted heavy metals [5, 6]. Irrespective of their sources in the soil, accumulation of heavy metals can degrade soil quality and reduce crop yield and the quality of agricultural products and thus negatively impact the health of human, animals and the ecosystem [7].

Forest ecosystems present one of the main parts of biosphere. They affect the composition and the quality of atmosphere and also shape climate conditions both on regional and on global scales [8, 9]. The forest stands were endangered from the harmful effect of air and soil pollutants [1013]. Global change involves simultaneous and rapid alterations in several key environmental parameters that control the dynamics of forests [14]. Climate change and air pollution affect forests by changes in soil processes, tree growth, species composition and distribution, increased plant susceptibility to biotic and abiotic stress factors, increased fire danger, decreased water resources and recreation value [9, 15, 16]. The physical and ecological conditions of forest ecosystems have been influenced mainly by the deposition of atmospheric pollutants and by changing climatic conditions with a series of warm and dry periods. Apart from the weather conditions, heavy metals were shown to be one of the primary causes of tree damages. The knowledge of the heavy metal accumulation in soil, the origin of these metals and their possible interactions with soil properties are priority objectives in the environmental monitoring [17, 18]. The surface soil layer is of particular interest in the forest ecosystem monitoring due to its role as a stable adsorbent of the deposited atmospheric substances. The behaviour of heavy metals in soils and their impact on the living organisms have been described in details in the literature. The main effects of their increased concentration are connected with inhibited microbial activity, delayed litter decomposition processes, changes in nutrient availability and increased accumulation from the plants [1924].

The movement of air masses from urban and industrial regions results in frequent episodes of high levels of ozone in forests. Being a major phytotoxic atmospheric pollutant in most European countries, ozone is a significant cause of reduction in growth of tree vegetation [2527]. It has been shown that the indirect forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land carbon exchange could be an important factor and can induce a positive feedback for global warming [28]. High concentrations of ozone occur not only in areas with large sources of pollution but also in suburban and rural sites, located away from major sources of emissions [29, 30]. Elevated concentrations of ambient ozone are also of great concern for our country because ozone is turned to be the most important air pollutant in both relatively clear forest areas in Bulgaria [3133]. At the suburban and remote mountain sites forest trees were subject to the impact of elevated ozone concentrations at especially the beginning of the vegetation period when the growth process is intensive [33].

The major contributor to forest degradation was also sulphur dioxide, a gaseous substance with direct and powerful phytotoxic and acidifying effects. Nitric oxides affect woody plants directly by entering through the stomata and indirectly through soil acidification and environmental eutrophication. Drought stress predisposes trees to the negative effect of pollutants [25, 34].

National parks and other protected areas despite their special management regimes are subjected to air pollution. Air pollution impact was reported by the National Parks Conservation Association of the USA. The analyses showed that national parks have significant air pollution problems and 36 of them at times experienced “moderate” or worse ozone pollution [35]. Air pollution affects European Protected Areas as well. Moderate-to-high ozone levels were measured inside Spanish national parks and protected areas [36]. Air pollution represents a serious hazard for the ecosystems in national parks in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and other countries [37, 38].

Despite considerable research on the mechanisms of damage, it still remains a challenge to distinguish pollution injury from natural stress injury in the field [39]. Little research has been done in regard to the tolerance of trees to metal pollution, due to the size and longevity of most species. Information is still needed on the precise limits of tolerance of individual plant species, particularly trees, to metals.


2. Air pollution

2.1. Emissions of certain air pollutants and tendencies

The main sources of emission of air pollutants on the territory of Bulgaria (sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter) are the thermal power stations (TPS), operating on solid fuels and fuel oil, road transport and household sources [40]. In 2013, the annual emissions of sulphur dioxide were 193.97 kt/year. The thermal power stations were the main sources of sulphur dioxide—72% (see Figure 1). The annual emission of nitrogen oxides was 123.54 kt. The thermal power stations and road transport had the biggest share—62% of the total amount, equally divided between the two sectors (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Main sources of sulphur dioxide in Bulgaria, 2013.

One of the pollutants, causing the most serious problems regarding air quality in the major Bulgarian cities, is particulate matter (PM10). The total amount of PM10 in 2013 was 42.44 kt. The main source of particulate matter emissions is domestic heating—59% of PM10 (see Figure 3) and 82% of PM2, 5.

The emissions of the main pollutants tend to decrease for the period 2009–2013. This trend is most clearly observed for sulphur dioxide, resulting from the construction of desulphurization installations to the major thermal power stations (TPS), operating on coal. The increased emissions in 2011 were the result of burned larger quantities lignite coal throughout the year (see Figure 4).

Figure 2.

Main sources of nitrogen dioxide in Bulgaria, 2013.

Figure 3.

Distribution of particulate matter emissions by sources.

The share of the emission sources changed over the years—in 2009, sulphur dioxide from the TPS was 93.9% of the total amount, reported in Bulgaria; the main source of nitrogen oxides was the road transport—49% of the total emissions in the country.

The condition of the air in Bulgaria is controlled by the National Air Quality Monitoring System. Three of the air quality monitoring units equipped with automatic measuring stations (AMS), monitor the air condition in forest territories. These are the stations for intensive monitoring (IM), located in the regions of Yundola, Vitinya and Staro Oryahovo. The observations are carried out in relation to the implementation of the International Cooperative Programme “Forests”. The aim is to trace the transfer of pollutants and their impact on the different components of the forest ecosystems. The concentrations of the following pollutants are measured—sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, nitrogen dioxide and ozone. The ML®9850 sulphur dioxide analyser is an ultraviolet fluorescence spectrophotometer for continuously measuring of SO2 concentrations. The ML®9841A nitrogen oxides analyser works on the basis of gas-phase chemiluminescence detection to perform continuous analysis of nitric oxide (NO), total oxides of nitrogen (NOx), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Non-dispersive ultraviolet photometer serves as the basis for the ML®9812 Ozone Analyser. The atmospheric depositions in the open and under the forest canopies are also measured—quantity, acidity, concentration of acidic and basic ions and heavy metals [41].

Figure 4.

Tendencies in emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and PM10 (2009–2013).

2.2. Atmospheric pollutants in the intensive monitoring stations

The average annual concentrations of sulphur dioxide varied from 3.97 to 17.4 μg m−3 for the region of St. Oryahovo, from 3.62 to 18.5 μg m−3 for Vitinya and from 2.09 to 12.9 μg m−3 in Yundola (see Figure 5). The highest values for St. Oryahovo and Vitinya stations were determined in 2008 and for Yundola in 2009. In the period 2008–2011, there was a significant decrease of the annual concentrations from 4.5 to 6 times, followed by a gradual increase until 2015.

The trends regarding the average annual values of sulphur dioxide were almost the same for the three stations, regardless of the considerable distance between them, which indicates that nearly identical regional values occurred as a result of the transfer. The measured concentrations did not exceed the limit value (LV) for vegetation protection [42].

Figure 5.

Average annual concentrations of sulphur dioxide (LV–limit value).

The annual mean values for nitrogen oxides varied in a wider range—from 5.03 to 20.6 μg m−3 for the region of St. Oryahovo, from 7.87 to 51.6 μg m−3 for Vitinya and from 3.37 to 19.8 μg m−3 for Yundola (see Figure 6). Higher values were measured during the first 2 years of the period 2008–2015; the lowest values were registered in 2011 for St. Oryahovo and Vitinya, and in 2014, for Yundola.

Figure 6.

Average annual concentrations of nitrogen oxides (LV–limit value).

During the period 2008–2011, the tendency was similar to that of sulphur dioxide and was characterized by decreased concentrations; after that period, the values continued to decrease with insignificant fluctuations for St. Oryahovo and Yundola. Regarding the region of Vitinya, the values gradually increased till 2015. The measured concentrations exceeded the LV for vegetation protection only in 2008 for the region of Vitinya [42].

The AOT40 index (index of accumulated ozone exposure over a threshold of 40 ppb (80 μg m−3), calculated for the period from May to July, was used to assess the ozone impact on forest ecosystems. The data, presented on Figure 7, indicate that ozone is almost constant stress factor for the forests in the region of Yundola, where the target value for protection of vegetation was exceeded for the prevailing part of the period 2008–2015, with a maximum value in 2015—about 2 times above the target value [42].

Figure 7.

Index of accumulated ozone exposure over a threshold of 40 ppb (80 μg m−3) (AOT40). TV—target value for protection of vegetation.

No exceedances of AOT40 were registered for the region of St. Oryahovo; for the region of Vitinya, the AOT40 was exceeded in two years—2011 and 2015 [42].

2.3. Atmospheric pollutants in industrial regions

The study was made in Devnya region—a big industrial zone in the Eastern Bulgaria. Forest vegetation consisted of 20-year-old plantations of Celtis australisL. and Fraxinus americanaL. grown at 500 m from the sources of intensive air pollution and near a highroad with heavy traffic. Even-aged control stands were grown as plantations in relatively unpolluted region about 15,000 m far from the chemical plants. The air pollutants, emitted from Devnya industrial region, included sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, CO, HF, NH3, Cl2, HCl, CaO, CaCO3, high levels of silicon, solid and liquid aerosols, organic compounds, particulate matter of dust and soot, Al and heavy metals. The great part of nitrogen oxides and sulphur dioxide are dissolved as nitric and sulphuric acids, which causes acid rains on the region. The monitoring of air pollution in the industrial region was made continuously by automatic station.

Monitoring data for sulphur dioxide during 2004 showed a wide variation of 1-h means between 1.3 and 210 μg m−3. There were many short time events of high sulphur dioxide concentrations mainly during the winter period. The maximal 24-h values of sulphur dioxide were between 10.5 and 39.3 μg m−3. Within the six-month growth period of trees (April—September), the month values for sulphur dioxide were between 4.8 and 17 μg m−3 (Figure 8).

Figure 8.

Month values for SO2 in Devnya industrial region during the growing period of 2004.

Maximal 24-h means of NO2 for 2004 were between 10 and 30 ppb. The all of 4-h means for NO2 were below 80 μg m−3 for the entire period of monitoring. Month average concentration of nitrogen dioxide during the growth period of 2004 varied between 20.5 and 55 μg m−3 (Figure 9).

Figure 9.

Month values for NO2 in Devnya industrial region during the growing period of 2004.

The maximal 24-h means of ozone concentrations within six-month growth period of 2004 varied between 55 and 83 μg m−3. The highest values of the maximal 24-h means for ozone concentrations were observed in July and August (Figure 10).

Figure 10.

Maximal 24-h means of ozone concentrations in Devnya industrial region during the growing period of 2004.

The average and maximal 1-h concentrations of ozone were 52.2 and 103.5 μg m−3, respectively. Over the growing season of 2004, the daily means of ozone concentrations were only during a few days below 50 μg m−3. The target value of the index AOT40 for protection of vegetation [42] was permanently exceeded during the 5-year period of monitoring (Figure 11). In 2003, the index AOT40 was 3 times above the target value.

Figure 11.

Index of accumulated ozone exposure over a threshold of 40ppb (80 μg m−3) (AOT40) during the five-year period (1999–2003).

On the basis of the data processing for the concentrations of SO2, NOx and O3 in the air in Devnya region, we can draw the conclusion that the most remarkable air pollution is with ozone. Therefore, a negative effect on the forest ecosystems during the growth period should be expected mainly for the ozone. This pollutant is turned to be the most important ecological risk factor for woody plant in the region during the period of their high physiological activity. In regions with low NOx concentration, ozone formation is dependent entirely on NOx (NOx sensitive regions) [43]. In contrast to the threshold value for accumulated ozone dose (10,000 μg m−3) concerned the six-month growing period of trees, some studies showed that a possible effect of ozone occurs only at very high AOT40 (>70,000 μg m−3) [44].

2.4. Atmospheric depositions in the intensive monitoring stations

The amount of depositions for the period 2008–2015 is presented on Figure 12, which shows significant variation over the years. The average acidity of depositions for the respective period varied from pH 5.06 to pH 6.75 for the region of St. Oryahovo, from pH 5.05 to pH 5.5 for Vitinya and from 5.42 to 5.89 for the region of Yundola (see Figure 13).

Figure 12.

Amount of atmospheric depositions in the open. St. O—stationar Staro Oriahovo, V—stationar Vitinia, Yu—stationar Yundola.

Figure 13.

Acidity of atmospheric depositions in the open. St. O—stationar Staro Oriahovo, V—stationar Vitinia, Yu—stationar Yundola.

From the presented data, it can be concluded that during the respective period, the depositions in the region of Vitinya were within the scope of “acid rain”—pH < 5.5. Regarding the other two regions, the acidic depositions were observed only in certain years—2011, 2012 and 2015 for St. Oryahovo, and in 2014, for Yundola.

The amount of sulphate sulphur varied within the range from 0.35 to 4.3 kg ha−1 annually for the region of St. Oryahovo, from 1.91 kg to 7.78 kg ha−1 annually for Vitinya and from 1.57 to 10.53 kg ha−1 annually for Yundola (see Figure 14).

Figure 14.

Intake of sulphate sulphur with the deposition in the open. St.O—stationar Staro Oriahovo, V—stationar Vitinia, Yu—stationar Yundola.

The relatively low concentration of sulphur dioxide in the region of Yundola did not correlate with the high sulphur levels in the depositions. The amount of nitrogen depositions in the region of Yundola was also higher—from 3.01 to 10.46 kg ha−1 annually (see Figure 15).

Figure 15.

Intake of nitrogen (ammonium and nitrate) with the depositions in the open. St.O—stationar Staro Oriahovo, V—stationar Vitinia, Yu—stationar Yundola.


3. Pollution of soils, observed by the forest ecosystem monitoring network

The International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests operating under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP), level I, has been implemented in Bulgaria since 1986, and level II—since 1998. The “Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests” (1986–2010), adopted by the Programme, is implemented in order to study the acid status, eutrophication and heavy metal content in soils. A significant part of the obtained results has been published [4549]. The results, obtained for soils of a total of 104 soil profiles, were summarized for a 20-year period—from 1986 until 2008 [50].

The results for Cambisols and Luvisols from the regions of western Balkan Mountains, Sredna Gora, Rhodope Mountains and Strandzha, obtained for the period 2009–2015, are presented in this book. Data on 62 level I soil profiles from the national forest ecosystem monitoring network were summarized.

3.1. Soil acidification

The implementation of the forest ecosystem monitoring in Bulgaria began in 1986—a period when soil acidification in some parts of Europe had already been proven [5156].

Figure 16.

pHCaCl2 in Cambisols for the periods 1998–2008 and 2009–2015.

The lack of basic information about time series data, obtained from permanent sample plots in the past, did not allow to record the impacts of regional and/or global transfer of acid atmospheric depositions on soils, as well as the subsequent restoration processes due to the measures undertaken. On the basis of the information, obtained for a 20-year period, it was proven that soil acidity is stable over time and did not change for the period from 1986 to 2008 [50].

The trends of stability in soil acidity continued for the period 2009–2015. The absence of statistically significant differences between the values of pHCaCl2 for the periods from 1998 to 2008 and from 2009 to 2015 for Cambisols and Luvisols is presented on Figures 16 and 17.

Figure 17.

pHCaCl2 in Luvisols for the periods 1998–2008 and 2009–2015.

The average pH value of Cambisols was 4.28 and 4.78 of Luvisols, respectively. The buffer range, assessed using Ulrich’s concept [57], did not change and remained in the “mostly low” category. It was mainly due to proton exchange with base cations.

The analysis of the available information allows to conclude that there no impact of acid atmospheric depositions on pH of the monitored Cambisols and Luvisols for the period 1986–2015.

3.2. Soil eutrophication

The ratio organic C/N organic layer: organic C/N mineral layer in forest soils has been accepted as the indicator for changes occurring in nitrogen cycle due to increased amounts of nitrogen depositions. It is considered that regarding soils in forest ecosystems in Europe, the values of this ratio, which are below the critical minimum (1.0), occur in areas with increased deposition of nitrogen-containing components. Exceptions are determined in the northern parts of the continent due to causes of natural origin—harsh climatic conditions, delayed decomposition and accumulation of organic matter [22]. The changes, occurring in soils under the impact of nitrogen depositions, are towards eutrophication [58, 59]. According to ICP Forest data (2011), 61% of the soils on the continent are sensitive to this process. Under the impact of eutrophication, nitrogen in soils shifts from a state of shortage to saturation—a process, most clearly expressed in northern and Central Europe [60].

No decrease of this ratio under the critical level, due to increased nitrogen depositions, was registered for soils in Bulgaria during the period 1998–2008 [50] (see Table 1).

[org. C/total N (litter)]/[org. C/total N (surface soil layer)]
OL/0–10 cm2.520.331.872.80
OF/0–10 cm2.081.180.435.52
OL/0–10 cm3.742.041.396.63
OFH/0–10 cm1.702.040.802.38

Table 1.

Ratio org. C/total N in litter (mull—OL and OF and moder—OL and OFH) compared to the ratio org. C/total N in 0–10 cm soil layer.

The results, obtained during the next evaluation period (2009–2015), confirmed this trend. The minimum values, specified in Table 1—0.43 for the period 1998–2008 and 0.80 for the period 2009–2015, were determined in spruce stands from the Rhodope Mountains at an altitude of 1400–1600 m (in the regions of Shiroka polyana locality and Progled village). The stands are located on flat terrains with northern exposure, where the accumulation of organic matter occurs. Under the influence of the cold mountain climate, the decomposition of the organic matter is delayed. Since there are other sample plots in these areas, the results of which are not below the critical limit, it can be assumed that the determined low ratios are the result of naturally occurring processes.

3.3. Heavy metal content in soils in forest ecosystems

It is considered that heavy metal content in litter represents the sum of their background concentration plus the contribution of atmospheric depositions [61]. The amounts of heavy metals in litter and soils in forest ecosystems in Bulgaria have been a subject to monitoring since 1986. The lack of previous information does not allow determining the impacts of regional and/or global transfer of pollutants. The assessment of data, collected in the period 1986–2008, reveals that in most of the cases the heavy metal content in litter was higher compared to the surface soil layer. The conducted analysis proved that litter, formed on more acidic and scarce in some element soils, contains higher concentrations than the surface soil layer of the respective soil profile. This is most clearly expressed for Cu and Mn. The results, obtained for copper, are presented on Figures 18 and 19 [50].

It has been determined that the high soil acidity creates a large amount of easily accessible for the plants forms of heavy metals, which is one of the main ways to enrich the litter. In such cases, the high concentrations of heavy metals in litter should be considered as a function of soil acidity and not as a contamination with aerosol origin.

Figure 18.

Reaction of soil solution. pH-a—reaction of soils where the Cu content in litter is higher than the content in the surface soil layer; pH-b—reaction of soils where the Cu content in litter is lower than the content in the surface soil layer.

Figure 19.

Copper content in soils with moder type of litter. (a)—copper content in soils where the concentration of copper in litter is higher than the concentration in the surface soil layer; (b)—copper content in soils where the concentration of copper in litter is lower than the concentration in the surface soil layer.

The content of Cu, Pb and Zn in soils from the regions of western Balkan Mountains, Sredna Gora, Rhodope Mountains and Strandzha remained relatively constant for the period 1986–2008 [50]. That tendency remained over time due to the absence of statistically proven differences in the content of Cu, Pb and Zn in Cambisols and in Luvisols for the periods 1998–2008 and 2009–2015 (see Figures 2025).

Figure 20.

Cu content in Cambisols in the periods 1998–2008 and 2009–2015.

Figure 21.

Cu content in Luvisols in the periods 1998–2008 and 2009–2015.

Figure 22.

Pb content in Cambisols in the periods 1998–2008 and 2009–2015.

Figure 23.

Pb content in Luvisols in the periods 1998–2008 and 2009–2015.

Pollution was determined in some areas, located near industrial enterprises. Pollution of Regosols, based on an example of the copper producing plant near the town of Pirdop, which affects mainly the surface soil layer and litter due to active absorption of copper from plants in acidic environment (pH H2O = 4.34) is presented on Figure 26.

Figure 24.

Zn content in Cambisols in the periods 1998–2008 and 2009–2015.

Figure 25.

Zn content in Luvisols in the periods 1998–2008 and 2009–2015.

Due to the lack of norms for evaluation of soil pollution with heavy metals in forest ecosystems in Bulgaria, the accumulation rate (AR) has been accepted as the criterion for its confirmation. It is calculated as the ratio between the concentration of a certain metal in the surface soil layer (0–10 cm) and the layer 60–80 or 20–40 cm, depending on the soil depth. According to some authors [62, 63] when AR >1.50, the soil is polluted and the main pollution source is the atmospheric depositions. Regarding the soils from agricultural lands in Bulgaria, these rates were differentially calculated by types of metals back in 1978 [64] and the AR values are close to 1.5.

Figure 26.

Cu content in Regosols (mg kg−1). OL—unaltered dead remains of plants; OFH—fragmented partly decomposed and well-decomposed organic matter.

The forest ecosystem soils are characterized by biogenic-accumulative processes, which are part of the forest soil-forming process. Under its influence, the rates increase regardless of the presence or absence of exchangeable acidity [50] and repeatedly exceed the value of 1.50. These processes should be taken into consideration when assessing heavy metal content in soils and should not be considered as pollution. Average and maximum values of AR were determined for the soils from the regions of western Balkan Mountain, Sredna Gora, Rhodope Mountain and Strandzha, calculated on the basis of data, collected in the period from 1986 to 2015, from sites located away from industrial emission sources.

The maximum accumulation rates as the result of the natural heavy metal content in surface soil layers are presented in Table 2.

Soil unitpHH2OMnZnCuPb

Table 2.

Ratio org. C/total N in litter (mull—OL and OF, and moder—OL and OFH) compared to the ratio org. C/total N in 0–10 cm soil layer.

Higher values should be determined in order to prove pollution.

3.4. Nutrient and heavy metal content in Devnya industrial zone

Soil in the territory of Devnia industrial region is of the type Haplic kastanozems, with pH 7.3 and well supplied with basic nutrients. The humus content varied between 2.00 and 3.56%, total nitrogen was in the range of 0.135–0.344% [65]. The mean values of nutrients and heavy metals determined in surface soil layers in the open and under the plantations with Frainus americanaand Celtis australisfor 10-year period (1996–2005) are reported in Table 3.

ElementIn the openFr. americanaL.Celtis australisL.
Polluted areaControlPolluted areaControlPolluted areaControl
P (mg/100 g)
K (mg/100 g)800.3698.6595.6405.8984.3807.8
Ca (mg/100 g)3984.7848.34450.6596.54000.51103.2
Mg (mg/100 g)421.6318.3400.5255.8469.8350.8
Cu (mg/kg)74.626.978.617.544.318.8
Zn (mg/kg)65.834.351.230.880.039.6
Pb (mg/kg)40.019.638.517.241.324.1

Table 3.

Ten year (1996–2005) mean values of nutrients and heavy metals in soil in the open and under plantations of Fraxinus americanaL. and Celtis australisL. in Devnya industrial region: Polluted area and Control—at 500 and 15,000 m from the point source of pollution, respectively.

The data showed a higher content of all analysed elements in the polluted area. In the open, at 500 m to the emission sources, the level of Ca (4.7 times more than the control) and P (2 times above the control) was particularly increased, while the content of K and Mg increased with 15 and 32%, respectively. The surface soil layers of the industrial area contained 2.8 times more copper, 2 times more lead and 1.9 times more zinc than the remote area. Remarkable accumulation of calcium was found under the plantations with Fraxinus americana—7, 5 times more than under the control plantation, while under the plantations with Celtis australis,this accumulation was 3.6 times more than the control. The accumulations of the other macroelements in the surface soil under the two plantations were approximately the same. This accumulation is due to dust and aerosol deposition entering the soil from industrial production and transport. This is especially true for calcium, phosphorus and copper. Potassium, phosphorus and magnesium had higher values under the plantation with Celtis australis. The mean concentrations of heavy metal in the polluted soil ranged from 44.3 to 78.6 mg/kg for Cu, from 51.2 to 80 mg/kg for Zn and from 38.5 to 41.3 mg/kg for Pb. The highest content of copper was established in the soil under Fr. americanaand of zinc—under C. australis. The lead content in the polluted soil was almost the same in the open and under of the two plantations. Most elements in the polluted zone, with the exception of calcium and copper, were accumulated in largest quantities in the soil under the plantation with C. australis. This can be used in the selection of species for afforestation in such areas. As the metals have a different mobility, they are transported from roots to shoots in different manner. Zn is more mobile than Cu and Pb [66], and the accumulation of Zn in the aboveground parts of the trees could be expected to be more intensive. The observed levels of Zn and Pb in the studied soil were within the range of the maximum tolerable levels. The soil content of Cu in the open and under the plantation with Fr. americanaslightly exceeded the maximum tolerable level [17]. Results showed that under the impact of the local industrial emissions the soils in Devnya region were contaminated with heavy metals.

3.5. Nutrient and heavy metal content in leaves of tree species in Devnya industrial region

According to the data for the leaf chemical composition of Frainus americanaL. and Celtis australisL., grown in Devnya industrial zone, there were well-pronounced differences between polluted and control trees in relation to leaf nutrient concentrations (Table 4).

ElementFraxinus americanaL.Celtis australisL.
N (%)0.94 ± 0.080.73 ± 0.061.2880.66 ± 0.130.87 ± 0.090.759
P (mg/gDW)1.34 ± 0.112.98 ± 0.170.4501.05 ± 0.171.15 ± 0.260.942
K (mg/gDW)12.82 ± 0.1719.95 ± 0.440.64312.87 ± 0.3422.32 ± 0.810.577
Ca (mg/gDW)30.07 ± 0.4822.00 ± 0.221.36787.3 ± 0.5454.15 ± 1.131.612
Mg (mg/gDW)3.45 ± 0.223.72 ± 0.170.9284.33 ± 0.273.52 ± 0.191.230
Cd (mg/100 gDW)0.143 ± 0.050.140 ± 0.051.0210.380 ± 0.070.242 ± 0.061.570
Cu (mg/100 gDW)1.383 ± 0.171.333 ± 0.171.0382.067 ± 0.330.917 ± 0.332.254
Fe (mg/100 gDW)13.183 ± 0.1711.867 ± 1.261.11119.850 ± 0.7915.650 ± 0.611.268
Mn (mg/100 gDW)9.433 ± 0.244.833 ± 0.171.9528.133 ± 0.395.167 ± 0.171.574
Zn (mg/100 gDW)2.317 ± 0.171.083 ± 0.242.1391.283 ± 0.521.175 ± 0.181.092
Pb (mg/100 gDW)2.283 ± 0.810.950 ± 0.362.4034.650 ± 0.552.917 ± 0.171.594

Table 4.

Nutrients and metals content (M ± SD, N = 3) in the leaves of Fraxinus americanaL. and Celtis australisL. growing in the polluted and control area and ratio polluted versus control.

A misbalance was observed in some nutrients in the damaged trees. Total nitrogen increases in damaged Fr. americanatrees and decreases in polluted leaves of C. australis. The higher total nitrogen content in damaged leaves mainly was due to the presence of nitrogen oxides in polluted air masses, coming from the emission sources in this area. Trees take up nitrogen from the soil and air. The highest level of total nitrogen was found in the damaged leaves of Fr. americana, while the damaged leaves of C. australishad relatively poor nitrogen supply. Total phosphorus showed a severe decrease in damaged leaves of Fr. americana. In two of the tree species, polluted leaves had extremely lowered content of potassium. Decreased levels of total phosphorus and potassium may cause alteration in nutrient uptake because of their less efficient retranslocation in polluted stands [67]. Due to the high level of calcium in the soil, the leaves in both control and damaged trees had a great amount of calcium. A more pronounced tendency for calcium and magnesium accumulation in polluted region was found in the leaves of C. australis, despite of the antagonistic effect of calcium on magnesium uptake. Among the elements, the greatest accumulation was established for calcium (from 3.5 to 7 times higher than the control) and phosphorus (on average 2 times over the control). The higher magnesium level in damaged leaves of C. australiscould be explained with an increased exchange of magnesium in polluted soils. The lower nutrients content in polluted leaves, especially of potassium and phosphorus, was due to the inhibition of total functional activity in damaged trees. The decreased concentration of potassium, known to play an important role in water regime regulation, might be regarded as an indicator for a water misbalance in polluted leaves [68]. Some specificity was found in the accumulation of separate micronutrients and heavy metals among the species. The most pronounced difference between damaged and control trees were found in copper, manganese, zinc and lead concentrations. Remarkable copper accumulation was observed in the leaves of C. australis. Severe manganese accumulation was found in polluted leaves both of Fr. americanaand C. australis. According to some authors, manganese toxicity might be a significant constraint for the health of forests on disturbed soils [69]. The accumulation of zinc was higher in polluted leaves of Fr. americana. Cadmium was accumulated mostly in the leaves of afflicted C. australistrees and exceeded the levels of toxicity [22]. The greater amount of soluble manganese is favourable to iron availability. In polluted stands, iron was accumulated extremely by Fr. americanaand moderately by the leaves of C. australis. Complex changes in chemical composition, disturbed balance of nutrient elements and increase in the content of heavy metals accompanied decline processes [68]. An uptake of heavy metals by plants occurs together with nutrients through the roots or directly through leaves. The entry of elements through the leaves is more significant for the pollution ones. The slightly alkaline reaction of soil in Devnya region does not create a large amount of easily accessible for the plants forms of heavy metals. Therefore, the accumulation of heavy metals in the leaves might be mainly due to the deposition of air pollutants. Zinc, being an essential element to the plant metalloenzymes, is translocated extensively and its uptake is dependent on metal concentration in extractable fraction in soil as well [70, 71]. The response of vegetation to pollutants depends on the degree of pollutant loading. At low pollutant loads, vegetation can act as a sink for pollutants, and no or minimal physiological alteration occurs [39]. In our study, such role may play C. australis. The content of copper, cadmium and especially lead in the leaves of C. australisexceeded the excessive values for tree vegetation and can be regarded as damaging [17]. Although the heavy metals are mostly below the critical levels of decreased growth, they may threaten tree vegetation in the region. Hence, the area studied was with slight to moderate heavy metal contamination. The accumulation levels obtained are air and soil orientated [72, 73]. The examined species accumulated mainly lead, copper, zinc and manganese.

In conclusion, each of these pollutants can be suggested as an indicator for the influence of industrial emission on the soil of the region. Changes in foliar element concentrations, however, can take place long before pollution-mediated plant injuries, and foliar element content is commonly used as biomonitor to investigate the distribution of air pollution.


4. Pollution of soils in protected areas

The content of heavy metals and other pollutants in soils from the territories of national and nature parks in the country is poorly studied. With the exception of soils from Strandzha Nature Park, their territories are not subject to monitoring within the national forest ecosystem monitoring network. Due to the large mapping areas, steep terrains and difficult access, some authors apply the landscape ecological approach, which allows to specify relatively homogeneous landscape units in relation to selected criteria [7477]. They are accepted as a representative sample and serve for conducting different scientific studies, including assessment of soil pollution.

Central Balkan National Parkwas established in 1991 in order to protect self-regulating ecosystems and is characterized by exceptional biodiversity, communities and habitats of rare and endangered species. The park occupies the highest part of the Balkan Mountains and has a total area of 72,021.07 ha, being the second largest national park in Bulgaria. Some authors reported pollution of soils and plants in pastures with copper, arsenic, lead and cadmium, as well as leaves of Fagus silvatica[78]. Natural soil enrichment with cadmium was determined in some areas [79, 80].

Analysis of the park landscape structure was performed in 2015 [81, 82], and 71 relatively homogenous territorial units in relation to the soil-forming rocks and terrain were established within the “forest” landscape category. Analysis of soils and plants was performed using a representative sample—“landscape formed on schists”. The soil is Regosols with 20 cm soil depth. Soil material in the layer 10–20 cm showed enrichment of soil-forming rocks with copper, arsenic and cadmium (see Table 5). The amounts of Cu and Cd in the litter repeatedly exceeded the toxic levels determined for forests in Europe [22], 20 and 3.5 mg kg−1, respectively.

Depth (cm)pH (H2O)pH (CaCl2)MnZnCuCdAs
mg kg−1

Table 5.

Content of heavy metals and arsenic in soils from the area of the Central Balkan National Park.

The content of heavy metals and arsenic in Pinus sylvestrisneedles was also analysed at the same site (Table 6).

Needle agePbCuMnZnCd
μg g−1
Current year2.715.745936.80.49
Ranges ICP forests3.942.28–7.7172.05–91232–77.50.05–0.45
1 year4.922.1146649.60.54
Ranges ICP forests0.14–5.591.96–6.88222.05–1331.9531.5–960.06–0.50

Table 6.

Content of heavy metals in Pinus sylvestrisneedles from the area of Central Balkan National Park.

Repeatedly increased copper content was determined in comparison with the established variation limits of these elements within the ICP Forests [41]. The exceedances of manganese and cadmium were relatively low.

Bulgarka Nature Parkis adjacent to the Central Balkan National Park. The park is located on the northern slopes of the central part of the Balkan range, occupying a total area of 21,772.163 ha. Environmental pollution risk in landscapes formed by alpine pastures, due to the soil enrichment with heavy metals, was determined on the park territory [79]. The maximum measured values of lead in soils reached 497 mg kg−1 and of arsenic—112 mg kg−1. These values were determined at the pasture of the Malusha locality. The following herbaceous plants were identified as strongly lead-accumulating plants: Holcus lanatus(29.29 mg kg−1), Thymus sp.(42.32 mg kg−1), Viola tricolor(9.81 mg kg−1), etc. Arsenic-accumulating plants are Viola dacica(3.1 mg kg−1), Rubus idaeus(2.9 mg kg−1), Fragaria vesca(1.5 mg kg−1), etc. [83].

The studies of heavy metal content in soils and plants of Pirin National Parkare also very limited. The park was created in 1962 in order to preserve the natural character of the ecosystems and landscapes along with their plant and animal communities and habitats. The park territory, occupying 40,356.0 ha, has not been differentiated into appropriate landscape units yet. In order to study the soil pollution in 2015, the authors carried out a research on representative for the area soil units (see Table 7).

Soil unitHorizonDepthpHPbCuMnZnCd
cm(H2O)mg kg−1
UmbrisolsA turf0–85.75816549821.35
Rendzic LeptosolsA05–05.8271063681.55

Table 7.

Heavy metal content in soils from the territory of the Pirin National Park.

Only cadmium content can be assessed as excessive in accordance with the criteria on forest soils [22].

Strandzha Nature Parkis the only park in the country with a developed national forest ecosystem monitoring network. The park was established in 1995, occupying an area of 116,054.21 ha, and is aimed at long-term preservation of the unique nature of the drainage basins of the Veleka and Rezovska rivers. The studies of heavy metal content for the period 1987–2008, carried out at 11 sample plots, indicated the absence of pollution or natural soil enrichment. The average values of Cu, Pb and Zn in Luvisolsand Alisolsfor the period 2009–2015 (see Table 8) also confirmed this tendency.

Soil unitValueCuPbZn
mg kg−1

Table 8.

Heavy metal content in soils from the territory of the Strandzha Nature Park.

Single studies carried out in the Uzunbodzhak biosphere reserve, located on the territory of the Strandzha Nature Park, also confirmed the absence of soil pollution [84].


5. Conclusion

The content of Pb, Cu and Zn in Cambisolsand Luvisolsfrom the regions of the western Balkan Mountains, Sredna Gora, Rhodope Mountains and Strandzha, remained stable during the period 1986–2015. Soils were not affected by acidic atmospheric depositions. The high heavy metal content in litter should be evaluated in relation to the soil pH. When evaluating the pollution of soils with heavy metals, it is necessary to take into consideration the maximum coefficients of their natural accumulation in the surface soil layers. Higher values of these coefficients should be achieved in order to determine pollution. It is necessary to expand the studies of heavy metal content in soils in national and nature parks. Sometimes, environmental risks can occur due to natural enrichment of soils with certain toxic elements. It is recommended to perform soil mapping and, if necessary, to restrict harvesting of medicinal plants and pasture in particular areas.



This publication was supported with the Projects No 93/2015, 97/2015 and 18/2016, financed by University of Forestry, Sofia.


  1. 1. Solberg S, Derwent RG, Hov O, Langner J, Lindskog A. European abatement of surface ozone in a global perspective. Ambio. 2005;34(1):47–53.
  2. 2. Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ. Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. EXS. 2012;101:133–64. doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_6.
  3. 3. Hu Y, Liu X, Bai J, Shih K, Zeng EY, Cheng H. Assessing heavy metal pollution in the surface soils of a region that had undergone three decades of intense industrialization and urbanization. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2013;20:6150–9. doi:10.1007/s11356-013-1668-z.
  4. 4. Soheil S, Mohammadi-Roozbahani M, Sorooshnia R, Karimi H. Assessment of heavy metal contamination in surface soils of Ahvaz IV Industrial Estate, Khuzestan Province, Iran. Iran J Agric Res. 2016;4(1):53–61.
  5. 5. Aksoy A, Sahin U, Duman F. Robinia pseudoacacia L. As a possible biomonitor of heavy metal pollution in Kayseri. Turk J Biol. 2000;24:279–84.
  6. 6. Miśkowiec P, Łaptaś A, Zięba K. Soil pollution with heavy metals in industrial and agricultural areas: a case study of Olkusz District. J Elementol. 2015;20(2):353–62. doi:10.5601/jelem.2014.19.3.691
  7. 7. Nagajyoti PC, Lee KD, Sreekanth TVM. Heavymetals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2010;8(3):199–216. doi:10.1007/s10311-010-0297-8
  8. 8. Percy KE, Ferretti M. Air pollution and forest health: toward new monitoring concepts. Environ Pollut. 2004;130:113–26. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2003.10.034
  9. 9. Baciak M, Warmiński K, Bęś A. The effect of selected gaseous air pollutants on woody plants. Forest Res Pap. 2015;76(4):401–9. doi:10.1515/frp-2015-0039
  10. 10. Wieser G, Tegischer K, Tausz M, Häberle K-H, Grams TEE, Matyssek R. Age effects on Norway spruce (Picea abies) susceptibility to ozone uptake: a novel approach relating stress avoidance to defense. Tree Physiol. 2002;22:583–90. doi:10.1093/treephys/22.8.583
  11. 11. Lu W, Wang X, Wang W, Leung AY, Yuen K. A preliminary study of ozone trend and its impact on environment in Hong Kong. Environ Int. 2002;28:503–12. doi:10.3390/s111211235
  12. 12. Karlsson PE, Uddlingb J, Braunc S, Broadmeadowd M, Elvirae S, Gimenoe BS, et al. New critical levels for ozone effects on young trees based on AOT40 and simulated cumulative leaf uptake of ozone. Atmos Environ. 2004;38(15):2283–94. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.027
  13. 13. Smidt S, Herman F. Evaluation of air pollution-related risks for Austrian mountain forests. Environ Pollut. 2004;130(1):99–112. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2003.10.027
  14. 14. Aber J, Neilson RP, McNulty S, Lenihan JM, Bachelet D, Drapek RJ. Forest processes and global environmental change: predicting the effects of individual and multiple stressors. BioScience. 2001;51(9):735–51. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0735:FPAGEC]2.0.C
  15. 15. Saxe H, Cannell M, Jonnsen O, Ryan M, Vourlitis G. Tree and forest functioning in response to global warming. J New Phytologist. 2001;149:369–400.
  16. 16. Bytnerowicz A, Omasa K, Paoletti E. Integrated effects of air pollution and climate change on forests: a northern hemisphere perspective. Environ Pollut. 2007;147(3):438–45. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2006.08.028
  17. 17. Rademacher P. Atmospheric Heavy Metals and Forest Ecosystems. Geneva and Brussels: UN/EC Federal Research Center for Forestry and Forest Products UN/ECE and EC. Ed.; 2001. 19 p.
  18. 18. Wuana RA, Okieimen FE. Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. Int Scholarly Res Netw ISRN Ecol. 2011. doi:10.5402/2011/402647.
  19. 19. Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1989. 439 p.
  20. 20. Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H. 2001. Trace Elements in Soils. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press; 2001. 413 p.
  21. 21. Sheila R. Retention, transformation and mobility of toxic metals in soil. In: Sheila M. Ross, ed. Toxic Metals in Soil-Plant System. Bristol: Department of Geography, University of Bristol; 1994.
  22. 22. Vanmechelen L, Groenemans R, Van Ranst E, editors. Forest Soil Condition in Europe. Forest Soil Co-ordinating Centre ed. International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution on Forest: UN-ECE; Brussels Geneva. 1997. 261 p.
  23. 23. ICP-Forest and ICP-IM. Cause-Effect Relationships of Forest Ecosystems. UN-ECE; Hamburg, Helsinki. 1998. 20 p.
  24. 24. ICP Forests and ICP Integrated Monitoring. Joint Report “Cause-effect Relationships of Forest Ecosystems”: Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products. Finnish Environment Institute; Hamburg, Helsinki. 2002. 46 p.
  25. 25. Ribas A, Peñuelas J. Biomonitoring of tropospheric ozone phytotoxicity in rural Catalonia. Atmos Environ. 2003;37:63–71.
  26. 26. Muzika RM, Guyette RP, Zielonka T, Liebhold AM. The influence of O3, NO2 and SO2 on growth ofPicea abiesandFagus sylvaticain the Carpathian Mountains. Environ Pollut. 2004;130:65–71. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2003.10.021
  27. 27. Matyssek R, Sandermann H, Wieser G, Booker F, Cieslik S, Musselman R, Ernst D. The challenge of making ozone risk assessment for forest trees more mechanistic. Environ Pollut. 2008;156(3):567–82. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2008.04.017
  28. 28. Ashmore MR. Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation. Plant Cell Environ. 2005;28(8):949–64. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01341.x
  29. 29. Kalabokas P, Viras L, Bartzis J, Repapis C. Mediterranean rural ozone characteristics around the urban area of Athens. Atmos Environ. 2000;34:5199–208.
  30. 30. Dueñas C, Fernández MC, Cañete S, Carretero J, Liger E. Analyses of ozone in urban and rural sites in Málaga (Spain). Chemosphere. 2004;56:632–9. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.04.013
  31. 31. Doncheva-Boneva M, Tzvetkova N. Atmospheric pollutants in the region of ecological station “Yundola”. J Environ Prot Ecol. 2003; 4(2):269–74.
  32. 32. Tzvetkova N, Doncheva M. Investigation on the ozone load of three representative for Bulgaria forest ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the Third Balkan Scientific Conference “Study, Conservation and Utilization of Forest Resources,” Sofia, 2001. p. 252–7.
  33. 33. Tzvetkova N, Parvanova P, Anev S, Donev E. Ozone monitoring in some urban and mountain regions of Bulgaria and the effect of ozone on tree vegetation. In: Efe R, Ozturk M, Ghazanfar S, editors. Environment and Ecology in the Mediterranean Region. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012. p. 135–46.
  34. 34. Löw M, Herbinger K, Nunn A, Häberle K, Leuchner M, Heerdt C, Werner H, Wipfler P, Pretzsch H, Tausz M, Matyssek R. Extraordinary drought of 2003 overrules ozone impact on adult beech trees (Fagus sylvatica). Trees. 2006;20:539–48. doi:10.1007/s00468-006-0069-z
  35. 35. Polluted Parks: How Dirty Air Is Harming America’s National Parks [Internet] [Updated 2015]. Available from:
  36. 36. Sanz M, Sanz F, Calatayud V, Sanchez-Peña G. Ozone in Spain’s National Parks and protected forests. Short Communication. Proc Impacts Air Pollut Climate Change Forest Ecosyst TheScientificWorldJOURNAL. 2007;7(S1):67–77. doi:0.1100/tsw.2007.8.
  37. 37. Katrer F, Turnock D. Environmental Problems in East-Central Europe. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2002. 464 p.
  38. 38. Vacek S, Búlek L, Schwarz O, Hejcmanová P, Mikeska M. Effect of air pollution on the health status of spruce stands, a case study in the Krkonoše Mountains, Czech Republic. Mountain Res Dev. 2013;33:40–50. doi:10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-12-00028.1
  39. 39. Innes J. Forest Health: Its Assessment and Status. Wallingford, UK: Cab International; 1993. 687 p.
  40. 40. Executive Environment Agency. NRSPE—National Report on the State and Protection of the Environment of the Republic of Bulgaria 2008–2013. [Internet] [Updated: 2014]. Available from:
  41. 41. Rautio P, Fürst A, Stefan K, Raitio H, Bartels U, 2010: Sampling and Analysis of Needles and Leaves. 19 pp. Manual Part XII. In: Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests, UNECE, ICP Forests Programme. Co-ordinating Centre, Hamburg. ISBN: 978-3-926301-03-1.
  42. 42. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe. In: Official Journal of the European Union; 2008. - EUR-Lex - Europa.eu
  43. 43. Suppan P, Schadler G. The impact of highway emissions on ozone and nitrogen oxide levels during specific meteorological conditions. Sci Total Environ. 2004;334–335:215–22. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.060
  44. 44. Ferretti M, Calderisi M, Bussotti F. Ozone exposure, defoliation of beech (Fagus sylvaticaL.) and visible foliar symptoms on native plants in selected plots of South-Western Europe. Environ Pollut. 2007;145(3):644–51. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2006.02.028
  45. 45. Malinova L, Pavlova E, Doncheva-Boneva M. Regional levels of macro-and microelements in some components of common pine and spruce ecosystems in the Western Rhodopes. Balkan Ecology. 1998;1:99–108 (in Bulgarian).
  46. 46. Kolarov D, Pavlova E, Pavlov D, Doncheva M, Malinova L, Tsvetkova N, Nikolova M, Bezlova D, Bencheva S, editors. Intensive Monitoring of Forest ecosystem in Bulgaria. Sofia: University of Forestry; 2002. 160 p (in Bulgarian).
  47. 47. Pavlova E, Pavlov D, Malinova L, Doncheva-Boneva M, Nikolova M. Intensive monitoring of forest ecosystems—methodology on procedures of data sampling, analysis and evaluation. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Forest Impact on Hydrological Processes and Soil Erosion 40 Years of Foundation of Experimental Watershed Study Site in Yundola, Yundola, Bulgaria; 2005. p. 190–200.
  48. 48. Pavlova E, Pavlov D, Malinova L, Doncheva-Boneva M, Nikolova M. Intensive monitoring of forest ecosystems—Yundola station. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Forest Impact on Hydrological processes and Soil Erosion “40 years of Foundation of Experimental Watershed Study Site in Yundola,” Yundola, Bulgaria; 2005. p. 200–214.
  49. 49. Pavlova E, Pavlov D, Malinova L, Doncheva-Boneva M, Rosnev B, Mirchev P, Petkov P, Georgiev G, Grozeva M, Velizarova E, Popov G, Gjuleva V, Tzakov H, Stoikov H. 20 years monitoring of forest ecosystems in Bulgaria. In: Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests. MOEW, MAF, UF, BAS; Publ. House Minerva, 2006. p. 24–238 (in Bulgarian).
  50. 50. Malinova L. Physicochemical and Chemical Soil Parameters from the Forest Ecosystems Monitoring Network [Dissertation]. University of Forest, Sofia; 2014. p. 195 (in Bulgarian).
  51. 51. Hallbacken L, Tamm O. Changes in soil acidity from 1927 to 1982–1984 in a forest area of south-west Sweden. Scand J For Res. 1986;1:219–32. doi:10.1080/02827588609382413
  52. 52. Erikson E, Karltun E, Lundmark E. Acidification of forest soil in Sweden. Ambio. 1992;21:150–4.
  53. 53. Vitousek P, Aber J, Howarth R. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: “sources and consequences.” Ecol Appl. 1997, vol. 7(3):737–50. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007 [0737:HAOTGN]2.0.CO;2
  54. 54. Moffat A, Benham S, Morison J, Pitman R, Vanguelova E, Wilkinson M, Yamuki S. Memorial seminar. The value of forest monitoring in developing forest ecosystems science in Britain. In: Derome K, Rautio P, Merila P, editors. Research for Ecosystem Function and Restoration of Heavy Metal Polluted Soils. John Demore Ambassador forForest Monitoring in Europe. Rovaniemi, Finland; In: Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki, Finland; 2010. p. 28–29.
  55. 55. Cools N, De Vos B. Availability and evaluation of European forest soil monitoring data in the study on the effects of air pollution on forests [Internet] [Updated: 2011]. Available from:
  56. 56. Erisman W. The European nitrogen problem in a global perspective. In: Sutton M, Howard C, Erisman W, Billen G, Bleeker A, Grennfelt P, van Grinsven H, Grizzetti B. editors. The European Nitrogen Assessment. Cambridge University Press; New York, 2011, vol. 2. p. 9–31.
  57. 57. Ulrich B. Soil acidity and its relations to acid deposition. In: Ulrich B, Pankrath J, editors. Effects on Accumulation of Air Pollution on Forest Ecosystems. Boston: Reidel; 1983. p. 1–29.
  58. 58. ICP Forest. The Condition of Forests in Europe. Executive Report: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe ed.; Brussels. 2011. 26 p.
  59. 59. De Vos B, Cools N. Forest Soil Condition in Europe. Research Institute for Nature and Forest. Brussels. Forest Soil Coordinating Centre; 2011. 16 p.
  60. 60. Aber D, Nadelhoffer J, Steudler P, Melillo, M. Nitrogen saturation in northern forest ecosystems. BioScience. 1989;39:379–86.
  61. 61. De Vos B, Iost S, Cools N. Soil and soil solution research: separate tracks leading to an integrated approach within ICP Forest. Research for ecosystem function and restoration of heavy metal polluted forests. In: Ukonmaanaho L, Derome K, Rautio P, Merila P, editors. John Demore–Ambassador for Forest Monitoring in Europe. Memorial Seminar. Rovaniemi, In: Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki, Finland Finland; 2010. p. 25–26.
  62. 62. Mutsch F. Indication of long-range transport of heavy metals based on the Austrian Forest Soil Monitoring System. Environ Sci Pollut Res. (Special Issue) 1998;1:81–7.
  63. 63. Walthert L, Zimmermann S, Blaser P, Luster J, Lüscher P. Forest soils in Switzerland. Volume 1. Basics and region Jura Bimensdorf, Bern: Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL; 2004. p. 150–163.
  64. 64. Chuldjian H. Chemical Forms of Copper in the Soil and Their Toxicity to Plants in the Process of Industrial Pollution [Dissertation]. Institute of Soil Science “N. Poushkarov,” Sofia; 1978 (in Bulgarian).
  65. 65. Yorova K, Petkova K, Kondov I. Industrial pollution impact on the soil condition in different tree species sample plantations in the region of Devnya. For Ideas. 1998;4(4):36–45 (in Bulgarian).
  66. 66. Greger M. Metal availability, uptake, transport and accumulation in plants. In: Prasad MNV, editor. Heavy Metal Stress in Plants from Biomolecules to Ecosystems. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2004. p. 1–27.
  67. 67. Nieminen T, Helmisaari HS. Nutrient retranslocations inPinus sylvestrisL. growing along heavy metal pollution gradient. Tree Physiol. 1996;16:825–31. doi:10.1093/treephys/16.10.825
  68. 68. Tzvetkova N, Hadjiivanova C. Chemical composition and biochemical changes in needles of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestrisL.) stands at different stages of decline. Trees. 2006;20:405–9. doi:10.1007/s00468-006-0052-8
  69. 69. Clair S, Lynch JP. Photosynthetic and antioxidant enzyme responses of sugar maple and red maple seedlings to excess manganese in contrasting light environments. Funct Plant Biol. 2004;31(10):1005–14. doi:10.1071/FP04049
  70. 70. Van Assche F, Clijsters H. Effects of metals on enzyme activity in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1990;13:195–213. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1990.tb01304.x
  71. 71. Doumett S, Lamperi L, Checchini L, Azzarello E, Mugnai S, Mancuso S, Petruzzelli G, Del Bubba M. Heavy metal distribution between contaminated soil andPaulownia tomentosa, in a pilot-scale assisted phytoremediation study: influence of different complexing agents. Chemosphere. 2008;72:1481–90. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.04.083
  72. 72. Dogan Y, Baslar S, Ugulu I. A study on detecting heavy metal accumulation through biomonitoring: content of trace elements in plants at Mount Kazdagi in Turkey. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2014;12(3):627–36. doi:10.15666/aeer/1203_627636
  73. 73. Kaya G, Okumus N, Yaman M. Lead, cadmium and copper concentrations in leaves ofNerium oleanderL. andRobinia pseudoacaciaL. as biomonitors of atmospheric pollution. Frezenius Environ Bull. 2010;19(4a):669–75.
  74. 74. Malinova L. Impact of Industrial Pollution on the Ecological Landscape Units of the Sofia Mountain [Dissertation]. Forestry Institute, Sofia; 1988 (in Bulgarian).
  75. 75. Dobrinova D. Landscape Ecological Assessment of Plana Mountain [Dissertation]. Forestry Institute, Sofia; 1989 (in Bulgarian).
  76. 76. Malinova D. Typological Landscape Structure of “Bulgarka” National Park [Dissertation]. University of Forestry, Sofia; 2007 (in Bulgarian).
  77. 77. Zakova-Alexandrova D. A Study of Erosion in Landscape near Attractions “Melnik Pyramids” [Dissertation]. University of Forestry; 2014 (in Bulgarian).
  78. 78. Bezlova D, Doncheva M, Malinova L. Influence of UM pirdop copper smelter plant on Central Balkan National Park. J Environ Prot Ecol. 2001;1:125–9.
  79. 79. Karatoteva D, Malinova L. Macro and microelement contents in soil from some grassland landscape of “Central Balkan” national park. Bulg J Agricul Sci, vol. 22 (4), 2016 (in press).
  80. 80. Malinova L. Regosols in “Central Balkan“ national park. Bulg J Agricul Sci. 2016;1:21– 25.
  81. 81. Karatoteva D. Landscape investigation in the forest area of “Central Balkan” National park. Bulg J Agricul Sci. 2016 a;1:26–29.
  82. 82. Karatoteva D. Heavy metal contents in grassland landscapes in “Central Balkan” National Park. In: International Conference “Balkanereco 16,” Sofia, 2016 b (in press).
  83. 83. Malinova D, Tsvetkova E. Evaluation of contamination of some plant species from various landscapes throughout the park “Bulgarka”. For Sci. 2010;3:43–52 (in Bulgarian).
  84. 84. Bezlova D, Malinova L, Stefanova S. Ecological surveys in uzunbodzhak biospherereserve. In: University of Forestry, editor. Proceedings of the International ScientificConference “50 Years University of Forestry,” Sofia, 2003. p. 137–141.

Written By

Nikolina Tzvetkova, Ludmila Malinova, Mariana Doncheva, Dilyanka Bezlova, Krassimira Petkova, Diana Karatoteva and Ralitza Venkova

Submitted: March 15th, 2016 Reviewed: June 27th, 2016 Published: December 21st, 2016