List of works devoted to the study of low-temperature thermochemical treatments of stainless steels ranked by type of treatment and stainless steel class
Plasma technology used to perform thermochemical treatments is well established for the majority of steels, but it is not the case for the different stainless steel classes. Thus, important scientific and technological achievements can be expected in the coming years regarding plasma-assisted thermochemical treatment of such steels. The metallurgical aspects as well as the application cost-efficiency of stainless steels impose specific requirements for the thermochemical treatment, such as easy native chromium-rich oxide layer removal and surface activation at low temperature, which do not appear for other steel classes (plain, low-alloy, and tool steels). Thus, due to the highly reactive physicochemical environment created by the plasma, plasma-assisted technology presents advantages over other “conventional” technologies like those performed in gas or liquid environments. Low temperature is needed to avoid the reduction of corrosion resistance of stainless steels, by suppressing chromium carbide/nitride precipitation, and, in this case, good surface properties are achieved by the formation of treated layers containing metastable phases. Such attributes make the low-temperature plasma thermochemical treatments of stainless steels an important R&D field in the domain of plasma technology and surface treatments, and the goal of this chapter is to introduce the reader to this important topic.
- Low-temperature thermochemical treatments
- Stainless steels
- Surface treatments
Stainless steels are iron alloys mainly based on the Fe-Cr-Ni and Fe-Cr-C systems. The main characteristic of this class of alloys is its expressively high corrosion resistance when compared with other iron-based alloys. Thus, the main applications of these materials are related to parts exposed to corrosive operation environments, from cutlery to petroleum and nuclear industries. The corrosion resistance of these steels is related to the formation of a continuous and passive chromium-rich oxide layer on the steel surface, also termed native oxide layer. This layer is promptly formed when the part is exposed to atmospheres containing oxygen, for steels containing at least 10.5 wt.% Cr in solid solution (solved in the steel matrix), which result in the so-called stainless steels. Due to the raw materials and processing costs, stainless steels are usually more expensive than other steels and have their application restricted to cases where corrosion resistance is important. However, in most of these applications, it remains very competitive compared with other corrosion-resistant alloys.
Even for the case of high-strength stainless steels, like those of the martensitic class, the need for high-performance parts strongly justifies the use of surface-hardening treatments, aiming to enhance the wear/fatigue resistance and to extend the part service life. Keeping in mind that corrosion resistance is the dominant criterion for these steels, it is unacceptable for any applied surface treatment to cause significant corrosion resistance decrease of a treated part.
Thermochemical treatments like nitriding and carburizing are among the most known surface-hardening treatments. As an example, very good results have been achieved when (plasma) nitriding is applied to plain, low-alloy, and tool steel parts. In such cases, treatment temperatures in the order of 500°C–580°C, and for times not much longer than 36 h, are usually applied. Differently, inappropriate results are observed if similar treatment temperatures and times are used to nitride stainless steels, since their treated surfaces will present strong corrosion resistance reduction, due to chromium nitride (CrN/Cr2N) precipitation. Thus, for stainless steels, v, making it possible to produce very hard treated surfaces with the same, or even higher, corrosion resistance than the untreated stainless steel surface. Such achievements can be obtained if the treatment temperature is set to a value high enough to activate interstitial (N and C) atom diffusion, and low enough to avoid significant Cr (substitutional) diffusion, thus keeping unaltered the chromium content in solid solution.
Another important aspect to be considered when applying a thermochemical treatment in a stainless steel is that the native oxide layer, important for corrosion resistance, also acts as a diffusion barrier for atoms from the treatment atmosphere (N and C) diffusing into the steel surface. Thus, in such thermochemical treatments, it is necessary, first of all, to remove or reduce this oxide layer to allow the diffusion of N/C atoms, aiming to alter the composition of the surface under treatment. Therefore, in the case of plasma-assisted thermochemical treatments, plasma has two main tasks:
To reduce and/or remove by sputtering the native oxide layer; and
To create an environment for which the N/C chemical potential is higher than its chemical potential in the original steel surface, enabling the N/C surface alloying, and thus the surface hardening.
Considering the aforementioned main points, to present the plasma-assisted low-temperature thermochemical treatments of stainless steels in a didactical way, the next two sections will discuss some fundamentals on stainless steels and plasma-assisted thermochemical treatments. After presenting the fundamentals, a section is devoted to present the typical results of low-temperature thermochemical treatments of stainless steels, and then, the chapter ends with some conclusions and final remarks.
2. Fundamentals of stainless steels and low-temperature thermochemical treatments
Depending on the alloy composition, mainly on the Cr, Ni, and C contents, stainless steels can present different microstructures at room temperature, being classified by this criterion. The three main stainless steel classes are the austenitic, martensitic, and ferritic, with duplex, and precipitation-hardening classes also present. Since Cr is the most important component regarding stainless steel corrosion resistance, it plays a major role in low-temperature thermochemical treatments, independently of the considered stainless steel class.
At low temperature, Cr has higher affinity to N/C than to Fe. Thus, under the thermodynamics basis, instead of an interstitial solid solution, chromium nitrides/carbides would be expected to be formed during the stainless steel surface alloying with such elements, leading to a consequent reduction of Cr content in solid solution. Nevertheless, the nucleation of a new phase presents some energetic barriers that need to be overcome, implying the existence of a critical nucleus size to start the precipitation of a new phase. Since the nucleation process is strongly related to atomic diffusion, and it is especially restrictive in solid state, the main parameters to be controlled to prevent nitrides/carbides nucleation process are temperature and time. If low enough temperature and time are used, no nucleation process is started and no chromium nitride/carbide is formed. In such conditions, metastable supersaturated solid solutions known as N/C-expanded phases tend to be formed. The above-mentioned aspects comprise the basis of the low-temperature thermochemical treatments used to stainless steels surface hardening.
The formation of these important metastable phases are possible since the atoms being introduced in the treated surface are interstitials (N and C), and Cr is a substitutional atom. As it is well-known from diffusion processes, interstitial atoms tend to present high diffusion coefficients and low diffusion activation energies when compared to substitutional atoms. Thus, it is possible to heat stainless steel components up to a temperature that is
high enough to attain a significant diffusion of interstitial (N and C) atoms; and
low enough to avoid significant diffusion of substitutional (Cr) atoms.
At these conditions, the kinetics of the treated layer growth is acceptable and the energetic barrier for nucleation of chromium nitrides/carbides is not overcome. In stainless steels, the N/C surface alloying is accompanied by an expansion of the lattice parameters, which explains the use of the term “expanded” to the obtained phases. For austenitic stainless steels, the obtained phases can be termed as nitrogen- or carbon-expanded austenite, also known as S-phase, for the nitriding and carburizing treatment, respectively. The analog phases for martensitic stainless steels are nitrogen- or carbon-expanded martensite, respectively.
At this point, it is important to inform the reader that the precipitation of chromium nitrides/carbides will consume Cr atoms from the steel matrix. Therefore, in the surrounding of the precipitates, the original steel matrix Cr content in solid solution will be depleted and the corrosion resistance will be locally reduced. In several cases, the Cr content in such areas can be reduced to values lower than 10.5 wt.%, which is the minimum acceptable value for stainless steels, leading the steel to be sensitized. This phenomenon is referred to as sensitization and must be strongly avoided since, as aforementioned, the high corrosion resistance of stainless steels is the main property justifying its use instead of other lower cost steels.
It is worth mentioning that the corrosion resistance in stainless steels is attributed to the formation of a passive and very stable native oxide layer that hinders the oxidation process continuity. The very negative Gibbs free energy variation for the Cr-rich native oxide layer formation is directly related to the high Cr-O atoms affinity, and to its strong stability. Thus, this native oxide layer is hard to reduce/remove at low temperatures by conventional (gas/liquid) processes, and if it is present in the treating surface, the thermochemical treatment cannot be successfully carried out since the oxide layer prevents the diffusion of O atoms as well as the diffusion of N/C atoms. At this point, it is possible to assert that the reduction/removal of the stable oxide layer is easily attained by plasma processes, but as the affinity of Cr with O is even higher than its affinity with N and C atoms, special attention must be spent for two technological aspects of the low-temperature thermochemical processes, to know
the process gas mixture purity; and
the vacuum chamber leakage and/or degassing.
Even very low oxygen partial pressures can inhibit the reduction/removal of the native oxide layer of the stainless steel surface, practically stopping the diffusion of interstitial atoms (N and C) from the gas phase into the steel. On the other hand, if the oxygen content in the atmosphere is low enough, the action of the very reductive plasma species like atomic hydrogen (H), allied to sputtering process (usually using Ar atoms in the plasma gas mixture for this purpose), will make the native oxide layer reduction/removal easier, enabling N and C atoms to diffuse into the steel.
The last aspect that merits to be considered in this section is only important for martensitic stainless steels, which can present a metastable phase matrix (the martensite phase), for different metastability degrees, depending on the tempering stage for which the as-quenched martensite was subjected. Consequently, besides considering the possibility of chromium nitride/carbide formation instead of expanded phases during thermochemical treatment, it is also important to take into account the possibility of variations in the martensite properties. It will occur if the martensite tempering process takes place simultaneously with the thermochemical treatment, it can be undesirable or a strategy to reduce the treatment steps. The temperatures applied in low-temperature thermochemical treatments, usually in the 300°C–450°C range, is similar to the temperatures used for the tempering of steels. Thus, aiming to keep practically unaltered the treated material bulk properties, thermochemical treatments must be carried out at a temperature lower than that applied in the tempering treatment (as a reference, the reader can specify 50°C lower than the tempering temperature). However, if the thermochemical treatment is carried out at a higher temperature than the tempering was performed, the bulk material properties will be compatible to those obtained for a part tempered using the thermochemical treatment temperature and time.
After this brief presentation on the most important metallurgical aspects of stainless steels for understanding the main aspects related to its low-temperature thermochemical treatments, in the next section, the reader will be introduced to the fundamentals of the plasma low-temperature thermochemical treatments technology. For readers who want to go deeper into the metallurgical aspects of this important class of steels, the authors suggest the following books or review papers [1–3].
3. Fundamentals of plasma for low-temperature thermochemical treatments
This section aims to present the fundamentals of low-temperature plasma thermochemical treatments in a comprehensive way, focusing on the most important physicochemical interaction between the plasma and the stainless steel surface. Most of the fundamentals presented are valid for all stainless steel classes and thermochemical treatments.
As indirectly mentioned in the previous section, the term low-temperature thermochemical treatment, when applied to stainless steels, refers to a treatment condition (temperature and time) where the Cr diffusion and new Cr-rich phase formation can be neglected. In such a condition, Cr is kept in solid solution, and no important reduction of the surface corrosion resistance is expected. At low-temperature treatment, even if the formation of the undesirable Cr-nitride/carbide phases is expected by thermodynamics, it does not occur since the transformation kinetics is limited by the atomic diffusion process, which is negligible in present case. Consequently, both the treatment and the formed phases are not in thermodynamic equilibrium.
Therefore, in the treated surface, metastable phases will be formed, the so-called expanded phases, as previously seen. These phases are supersaturated solid solutions containing N/C interstitial atoms (N for nitriding, C for carburizing, and both N and C for nitrocarburizing) in a metastable condition. The temperature limit to produce expanded phases, in detriment of precipitates, will be dependent on the steel structure, which exerts important influence on the diffusion process, being typically lower than 450°C and 400°C for austenitic and martensitic stainless steels nitriding, respectively. As a diffusion-controlled process, time is also important, varying typically from 4 to 48 h depending on the steel class, treatment temperature, and desired treated layer thickness. In fact, these values are only guidelines since it can be dependent on several other parameters. Thus, other aspects influencing the diffusion rate will also influence the limit temperature as, for example, the steel composition and its previous heat treatment [4, 5]. Considering the different types of stainless steels, as a general rule, limit temperature and time are higher for austenitic than for martensitic stainless steels. Taking into account the different types of thermochemical treatments, as a general rule, limit temperature and time are higher for carburizing than for nitriding, which is related to the different N-Cr and C-Cr affinities.
For low-temperature treatments, the necessary heating effect to attain the treatment temperature can be easily reached using only plasma heating. However, the use of hot wall reactors (with auxiliary heating systems) can be desirable for some applications, which enable the control of plasma reactivity and treatment temperature independently. Nevertheless, plasma also plays other important roles on low-temperature thermochemical treatments, which can be listed as follows:
It creates a very reactive environment with high N and/or C chemical potential, enabling N/C atoms to be added to the surface under treatment;
It creates a very reductive environment helping the removal of the native oxide layer and preventing its re-formation (related to hydrogen species present on the gas mixture);
It promotes sputtering of the native oxide layer from the stainless steel surface (mainly related to heavy species on the gas mixture, like Ar); and
It heats the parts to the desired temperature by momentum transfer as energetic species bombard the part’s surface (for hot wall plasma reactors, the treatment temperature is controlled by the auxiliary resistive heating system, and for other reactors, it is controlled by adjusting the plasma parameters).
All the above-mentioned “plasma roles” are related to the plasma physicochemical environment. Points iii and iv are related to plasma physical interactions with the part surface, and points i and ii are related to the nonequilibrium plasma state and so very reactive chemical environment. This very active physicochemical environment is created principally by inelastic collisions of energetic electrons with neutral atoms/molecules from the gas mixture, promoting, for example, ionization, excitation, and dissociation. These reactions occurring in the plasma environment are important for thermochemical treatments since, for example, by using typical plasma nitriding/carburizing parameters in a hot wall reactor, the atmospheres are not active if plasma is off. In other words, nitriding/carburizing will only take place if the plasma glows, promoting the formation of nitriding/carburizing species like atomic nitrogen from molecular nitrogen and/or atomic carbon from hydrocarbides (C
The aforementioned interactions are due to the high-energy plasma species (electrons, ions, and neutrals). The mechanism by which these species gain energy will depend on the applied plasma excitation technology, and virtually all of them could be applied for the purpose of thermochemical treatments. However, direct current (DC) plasma is the most applied in the industrial applications of low-temperature thermochemical treatments To be precise, the most industrially applied plasma excitation technology is the “pulsed-DC plasma excitation.” In this case, the plasma behavior is very similar to continuous DC excitation. Pulsed DC technology is used to reduce the arcing problems, which are more frequent in industrial reactors. This reduction is achieved by introducing a period of some tens of microseconds where plasma is switched off.
To be precise, the most industrially applied plasma excitation technology is the “pulsed-DC plasma excitation.” In this case, the plasma behavior is very similar to continuous DC excitation. Pulsed DC technology is used to reduce the arcing problems, which are more frequent in industrial reactors. This reduction is achieved by introducing a period of some tens of microseconds where plasma is switched off.
The simplest way to generate DC plasma is by applying a difference of potential between two electrodes placed into a low pressures chamber with the desired gas mixture. For thermochemical treatments, these parameters are in the range of 300–1000 V and 1–10 Torr, respectively. After applying a sufficient difference of potential between two electrodes, gas breakdown will occur. If the parameters were correctly set, after a short time (on the order of some microseconds), a steady-state abnormal glow discharge will be established, covering the whole cathode surface, which is essential for the homogeneity of the treatment. In this condition, the interaction of fast The terms “fast” and “slow” are related to species with high and low kinetic energy, respectively. As a reference, slow species have kinetic energy near to that related to thermal agitation level.
The terms “fast” and “slow” are related to species with high and low kinetic energy, respectively. As a reference, slow species have kinetic energy near to that related to thermal agitation level.
Due to this potential distribution (Fig. 2), the electric field is restricted to the cathode and anode sheath, being that the cathode fall is considerably more intense than the anode fall. Thus, the most energetic species of DC plasma will be found close to the cathode sheath boundaries. In the cathode sheath region, high-energy ions and fast neutrals (created by charge exchange collisions) are found, being accelerated to the cathode surface by the referred potential fall. However, electrons, pulled away from the cathode (part) surface (also termed “secondary electrons”; for more details, the reader is invited to see Chapman ) due to the impingent species bombarding the surface (see Fig. 1), enter the glow region with very high energy. Positive ions are mainly created by electron-neutral collisions in the glow region and are accelerated in the cathode sheath toward the cathode surface. The charge exchange collision occurs just when an ion travelling along the sheath collides with a neutral species. In such a case, an electron from the neutral slow specie is transferred to the fast ion (presenting kinetic energy proportional to the work performed by the electrical field on the charged particle), neutralizing it. At this moment, the original ion becomes a fast neutral, and the slow neutral (presenting kinetic energy related to the environment thermal agitation level) becomes a slow ion. This new-formed ion will be also accelerated by the remainder potential fall towards the cathode. For a typical operating condition, this phenomenon is important, and as a consequence, the mean energy of ions striking the cathode is lowered and an important number of fast neutrals will also strike it. Such ions and fast neutrals are the origins of the most important physical interactions presented in Fig. 1. As previously commented, the plasma species bombardment will also promote the ejection of secondary electrons from the cathode surface, which are also represented in Fig. 1. Despite secondary electrons not being directly related to thermochemical treatments, in DC plasma, they have a fundamental role in the discharge maintenance. Since secondary electrons travel along the cathode sheath and due to their high mean free path achieve high energy, in a steady-state discharge, they are the origins of most ionization (ion creation), excitation, and dissociation collisions/reactions in the glow region. As a matter of fact, the electron collision processes are the origin of the very reactive plasma environment creation.
In most DC plasma thermochemical treatments, the part subjected to the treatment acts as the cathode of the discharge, where most of the energetic species bombardment tends to occur. In addition, since the species excitation close to the cathode is more intense (related to the high-energy electrons accelerated by the higher potential fall), generally, the cathode is subjected to a more reactive environment than that close to the anode. Thus, for parts acting as cathodes, this means that those parts are surrounded by the most active physicochemical environment of the discharge.
The aforementioned phenomena are valid for all thermochemical treatments. However, to perform different thermochemical treatments, different sources/precursors of interstitial atoms can be considered. The most common gases applied for this purpose are N2 and CH4, for nitriding and carburizing, respectively, which are the most applied stainless steels low-temperature thermochemical treatments. Besides the interstitial atoms precursor, other gases are also present in the discharge gas mixture to accomplish particular roles. To ensure a very reductive plasma environment, H2 has been strongly applied. In this case, the dissociation of H2 molecules will produce H atoms, and it will substantially increase the capability of the environment to reduce oxides. Eventually, Ar is also added to the gas mixture to enhance heating and/or sputtering effects without participating directly in the surface chemical reactions. Other heavy noble gases could also be used, but Ar is the most abundant, and of lower cost, very important aspects to be considered for an industrial process.
Other heavy noble gases could also be used, but Ar is the most abundant, and of lower cost, very important aspects to be considered for an industrial process.
In short, the two main plasma tasks in low-temperature thermochemical treatments, as previously presented, are easily attained. The inelastic collisions/reactions in the glow region are responsible by creating active/reactive species in enough amounts to increase the N/C chemical potential on the stainless steel surface, with consequent diffusion into the material. Additionally, the reduction/sputtering of the stainless steel native oxide layer, necessary to effectively allow N/C surface alloying, is a direct consequence of the plasma–surface physicochemical interactions. To accomplish this task, plasma acts by two ways, as follows:
by means of sputtering, which is a mechanical/physical interaction, being efficiently promoted by heavy species bombardment like argon; and
by means of oxide reduction, which is due to the high reductive environment created by hydrogen-containing gas mixtures that can considerably reduce the temperature for oxides reduction [7, 8]. By considering that the native oxide layer is composed by Cr-oxide only (without Fe atoms), thermodynamic data have shown that, for 1 atm pressure, a hydrogen gas purity of 99.999% is not enough to reduce Cr-oxide at temperatures up to 700°C (such statement is taken from the reading of Ellingham–Richardson diagrams for oxide formation). Thus, one can conclude that plasma is essential to remove/reduce the native oxide layer at low temperatures. It is worth noting that this point is not yet completely understood by researchers, but it is a consensus that plasma strongly contributes to remove the oxide layer by sputtering and/or to reduce it by means of reductive species, which is the case of atomic hydrogen. Despite the absence of any comments here about the role of C in oxidation–reduction reactions, C also tends to promote reduction of oxides. Thus, C atoms possibly would be important when aiming to reduce the stainless steel native oxide layer, at least for the case of low-temperature plasma carburizing treatments.
Finally, from a technological point of view, gas purity and leakage in the plasma reactor used for low-temperature thermochemical treatments are to be also emphasized. If these “parameters” are adequate, no special attention must be paid to ensure the native oxide layer reduction, being one important advantage of plasma over other possible low-temperature gas/liquid environment thermochemical treatments of stainless steels.
On the other hand, it is important to mention that the two very probable main drawbacks of plasma process are
its relatively high cost of installation (despite the low-temperature DC plasma technology and know-how that can be easily transferred to companies specialized in “conventional” plasma thermochemical treatments, with the possibility of using existing equipment); and
the existence of some important geometric restrictions, which can be related to the component as well as to the discharge design. In this case, hollow cathode formation, edge effects, and difficulties to treat internal surfaces of too low diameter holes or narrow gaps are examples of the related geometric restrictions.
For readers who want to go deeper into plasma physics for materials treatment, the authors suggest to consult some books such as Chapman  and Lieberman and Lichtenberg , or the other chapters of this book.
4. Typical results obtained for low-temperature thermochemical treatments of stainless steels
Ichii et al. 1986 cited by  is one of the oldest references found using low-temperature thermochemical treatments and obtaining the related expanded phases. Its title is “Structure of the ion-nitrided layer of 18–8 stainless steel.” Thus, apparently, one of the earliest successful low-temperature thermochemical treatments was plasma nitriding, which at first was known as ion nitriding.
Low-temperature thermochemical treatments of austenitic stainless steels are by far the most studied subject in the present area, with the majority of papers dealing with low-temperature nitriding, followed by low-temperature carburizing and then, in minor amounts, other treatments like nitrocarburizing or sequential (nitriding/carburizing) treatments. Probably this fact is related to the great number of industrial applications of this steel type. Regarding the other stainless steel classes, the application of low-temperature thermochemical treatments for martensitic stainless steel is the second more studied group. In this case, again, the majority of papers deal with the nitriding process, and only few papers have been devoted to carburizing and other thermochemical treatments. The other stainless steel classes are considerably less studied. To illustrate this point, the authors present the results of a recently performed bibliographic research on the subject in Table 1.
|Nitriding||                            ||           || ||    || |
|Carburizing||                ||    |||
|Nitrocarburizing||    || ||  |
|Sequential nitriding/carburizing|| |||
As the main objective of thermochemical treatments is to promote surface hardening and the main required characteristic of stainless steels is its corrosion resistance, several works are devoted to determining both the wear and corrosion resistances of low-temperature treated surfaces. Another group of papers has been devoted to the study of more fundamental aspects, like the process kinetics, the metastable phase formation, the metastable phase structure, and the chromium nitrides/carbides precipitation phenomena.
In the next subsections, based on works referred to in Table 1, the typical results obtained by plasma low-temperature thermochemical treatments for the different classes of stainless steels are presented concerning scientific as well as technological aspects. Considering that more information is available for austenitic and martensitic stainless steels nitriding and carburizing treatments, these topics are treated in more details. For other stainless steels and treatments, only some guidelines are presented.
4.1. Austenitic stainless steels
Despite the large number of works dedicated to low-temperature thermochemical treatments of austenitic stainless steels, the large majority of research is carried out for AISI 304, 304L, 316, and 316L steels. Since nitriding and carburizing processes are very similar, typical results for both treatments are discussed together.
For austenitic stainless steels, the low-temperature treated surface is constituted of N-expanded and C-expanded austenite for nitriding and carburizing, respectively. These phases consist of supersaturated interstitial solid solutions, for which the crystalline structure lattice parameters are expanded by the presence of the interstitial atoms solved in it, as previously commented. The enlargement of the austenite lattice parameter can be easily detected by the shift of the diffraction peaks to lower 2
When the treatment temperature is too high or the treatment time is too long, precipitation of chromium nitrides/carbides can be observed along the original austenite grain boundaries, being strongly indicative that the corrosion resistance of the treated surface was decreased. According to Egawa et al. , the limit temperature for low-temperature nitriding and carburizing, related to chromium nitrides/carbides precipitation in the grain boundaries, is practically independent of the steel composition. For treatments of 4 h, Egawa et al.  reported a limit temperature in the range of 430°C–440°C and 540°C–560°C for the low-temperature nitriding and the low-temperature carburizing of austenitic stainless steels, respectively, this difference being attributed to the different N-Cr and C-Cr chemical affinities.
For the nitriding process, the N-expanded austenite microstructure confers a surface hardness that usually attains 1200 HV, which is associated to a dissolved nitrogen content ranging between 20 and 45 at.% [10-13]. For carburizing, the typical surface hardness is around 1000 HV, which is associated to a dissolved carbon content of about 10 at.% [14–16].
Concerning the depth hardness profiles, in the low-temperature nitrided layers, a sharp hardness decrease is usually observed in the treated layer/substrate bulk interface, whereas for low-temperature carburized layers, a smooth transition tends to be observed. From a mechanical point of view, the referred smooth transition all over the treated layer leads to a smooth properties transition, being, in this case, preferable with respect to the sharp one.
The treated layers performance, regarding their potential industrial applications, is closely linked to the treated layer microstructure, and it has been the main subject of several works. The treated surface characteristics enable considerable gains to the surface wear resistance, with reported wear reductions by a factor of up to 20. Such gains are accomplished with the maintenance or even enhancement of the surface corrosion resistance. Additionally, due to the compressive stresses introduced in the treated layer, fatigue life is also increased, and compressive residual stresses between 2 and 3 GPa are commonly reported (information compiled from refs. [10, 11, 13, 17–23].
For the treated surface, corrosion resistance results found in the literature are less conclusive, but generally, if the low-temperature treatment condition is respected, there is a tendency to obtain increased corrosion resistance for the treated surfaces. The most important gains in corrosion resistance are reported for low-temperature carburizing treatments.
4.2. Martensitic stainless steels
In martensitic stainless steels, due to the high crystalline defects density of the as-quenched martensite tetragonal structure, the diffusion of atoms tends to be faster (higher diffusion coefficients for both the interstitial and substitutional atoms) than those verified for the austenite face-centered cubic structure. On the one hand, it enables higher growth kinetics to the treated layer, but, on the other hand, it also reduces the limit treatment temperature to avoid chromium nitrides/carbides precipitation. Thus, thermochemical treatments of martensitic stainless steels are usually performed at lower temperatures and for shorter times than those used for austenitic ones. Among the martensitic stainless steels, AISI 420 is the main studied steel of the present group, and it is taken as an example to illustrate this section.
In contrast to austenitic stainless steels, the low-temperature treated surface of martensitic stainless steels is usually composed of expanded phases, such as the nitrogen-expanded martensite for nitriding and carbon-expanded martensite for carburizing, as well as nitrides and carbides (ε-M2-3N and M3C type, respectively). ε-M2-3N and M3C are closely related to ε-Fe2-3N and Fe3C (cementite) phases, but as the treatment is performed at low temperature, Cr is supposedly also solved in ε-iron nitride and cementite. Hence, the most precise way to describe such phases would be by substituting Fe by M, where M would represent the main substitutional (metallic) alloying elements present on the steel. Thus, the possible more precise description for such compounds would be (Fe, Cr)2-3N and (Fe, Cr)3C, respectively.
ε-M2-3N and M3C are closely related to ε-Fe2-3N and Fe3C (cementite) phases, but as the treatment is performed at low temperature, Cr is supposedly also solved in ε-iron nitride and cementite. Hence, the most precise way to describe such phases would be by substituting Fe by M, where M would represent the main substitutional (metallic) alloying elements present on the steel. Thus, the possible more precise description for such compounds would be (Fe, Cr)2-3N and (Fe, Cr)3C, respectively.
The expanded martensite is also a supersaturated interstitial solid solution, and similar to the expanded austenite, it is detected by the shift of diffraction peaks to lower 2
For martensitic stainless steels, the limit temperature for nitrides/carbides precipitation in the grain boundaries is around 350°C–400°C  and 450°C  for 4 h low-temperature nitriding and carburizing, respectively. As this class of steels tends to present a metastable matrix, the heat treatment performed prior to the surface treatment (in this case, the steel tempering treatment) has significant influence on low-temperature nitriding as presented by Cardoso et al. . Due to the similarities between nitriding and carburizing, it is expected that the same effect can be important on low-temperature carburizing.
For the nitriding process, the obtained treated layer microstructure confers a surface hardness that usually attains 1470 HV, associated to a dissolved nitrogen content of 11 at.% . For carburizing, the typical surface hardness is around 900 HV . Up to this moment, no information has been found on the carbon content of the C-expanded martensite. Unreported measurements from the authors of this chapter indicate carbon contents on average at the white-aspect layer (outer layer) in the order of 25 at.% and around 4 at.% in the diffusion layer, but additional efforts must be conducted to confirm such results.
Concerning the depth hardness profiles, similar to austenitic stainless steels, low-temperature nitriding presents a sharp hardness decrease in the treated layer/substrate bulk interface, whereas for low-temperature carburizing a smooth hardness decrease is present.
Similar to the case of austenitic stainless steels, the treated surface characteristics enable considerable gains in the material wear resistance (a wear reduction of 97% is reported in ref. ), accompanied by the maintenance or even an enhancement of the surface corrosion resistance. Again, due to compressive stress in the treated layer, the fatigue life is also increased (information compiled from refs. [28–31]).
For the treated surface corrosion resistance results, few papers have been found, but it seems that the general trend is similar to that of the austenitic steels.
4.3. Ferritic, duplex, and precipitation hardening stainless steels
Works on low-temperature thermochemical treatments of ferritic stainless steels are rare in the literature and, apparently, it is more difficult to form expanded phases in such steels. The low-temperature treatments of Duplex stainless steels are roughly similar to those performed in austenitic as well as in ferritic stainless steels at the same time. However, the diffusion of interstitials from one phase to the other one, perpendicular to the surface under treatment, especially for substrates of small grain size, can be important making the treatment kinetics closer than expected for grains of different phases. However, unpublished results of the authors of this chapter, working on low-temperature Duplex steel plasma nitriding, have shown that the layer growth kinetics next to austenite grains is expressively higher than that verified next to ferrite grains. As in the other steels, the treatments promote a considerable hardening and as a consequence increase in the wear resistance.
Precipitation hardening steels tend to present similar behaviors verified for the martensitic steels. As it is the case for all stainless steels, after low-temperature thermochemical treatments, significant surface hardening is obtained, leading the wear resistance of the treated surface to become also improved. Concerning the corrosion resistance, the results presented in the literature are somehow in disagreement. Some papers present an enhancement of the surface corrosion resistance after treatment and others present a decrease of this important property.
Taking into account the results on low-temperature thermochemical treatments of stainless steels, it seems that the corrosion resistance is very sensitive to the treatment parameters, and generally, there is a set of parameters that makes it possible to enhance the corrosion resistance of the treated surface with respect to the chemically unaltered substrate bulk.
4.4. Nitrocarburizing and sequential treatments
The main idea in applying low-temperature nitrocarburizing and sequential low-temperature carburizing and nitriding treatments is related to the possibility of obtaining a treated layer with a smoother hardness transition, when compared to the nitride layers, and higher surface hardness than that obtained in the carburized surfaces. Another motivation would be verifying if the C introduction into the surface would enable the obtainment of precipitation- free treated surfaces at higher treatment temperatures than that used for the nitriding process.
According to Cheng et al. , for AISI 316 (austenitic) steel, the plasma nitrocarburizing possess has the advantages of both nitriding (high hardness) and carburizing (deep case depth and smooth hardness profile) treatments. However, it was observed that the addition of CH4 to the gas mixture did not increase the limit temperature to obtain precipitation-free layers. Treating the AISI 420 (martensitic) steel, Anjos et al.  obtained a comportment that is closer to the nitriding process, so the advantages pointed out for austenitic stainless steels was not clearly found for the studied martensitic steel.
Studies on the sequential treatments, especially in austenitic stainless steels, also present the possibility of obtaining high hardness (typically attained from nitriding) and smooth hardness profiles (which is typically attained from carburizing) [34,35].
Considering the performance of both treatments in terms of wear, when the primary objective of high hardness and smooth hardness profiles are achieved, it tends to be better than nitriding and carburizing. Concerning corrosion resistance, the treated surface also tends to present higher corrosion resistance than the untreated surface.
5. Conclusion and final remarks
The studies on low-temperature plasma thermochemical treatments of stainless steels are relatively new, but they are already appliedand accessible industrially. Most of the present knowledge on this subject comes from works developed for austenitic stainless steels, which occur in profusion in the literature. Considering the treatments of martensitic stainless steels, the number of works is considerably lower, and for the other stainless steels, the respective works are considerably rare. The application of such treatments has proved to be very efficient in producing surfaces with high hardness, wear, and corrosion resistances and compressive residual stresses. As a consequence, the treated parts tend to present longer life when subject to severe wear, corrosive environments, and also cyclic loadings. Thus, from a technological point of view, such plasma-assisted treatments can be broadly applied. On the other hand, from the scientific point of view, several opened questions remain to be answered. As these treatments are carried out at low temperatures, the thermodynamic equilibrium cannot be attained in the solid state, and metastable phases tend to be formed. Thus, the mechanisms of formation of such phases are not yet completely understood. Considering the application potentiality, the mechanism on the origin of the corrosion resistance of surfaces composed or containing such phases is not yet completely explained. These are some examples of very basic opened questions, so it is clear that low-temperature plasma thermochemical treatments nowadays comprise an important R&D field. The development of research will very probably extend the current known range of application potentialities, enabling new industrial applications, while also being expected to bring important growth to this plasma technology in the coming years.
Folkhard E, editor. Welding Metallurgy of Stainless Steels. 1st ed. Vienna: Springer; 1988. 279 p.
Lippold CJ, Damian KJ, editors. Welding Metallurgy and Weldability of Stainless Steels. 1st ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2005. 376 p.
Lo K H, Shek C H, Lai JKL. Recent developments in stainless steels. Materials Science and Engineering. 2009;65(4–6):39–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.mser.2009.03.001
Cardoso R P, Brunatto SF, Scheuer CJ. Low-temperature nitriding kinetics of stainless steel: effects of prior heat treatment. In: Colás R., Totten G.E., editors. Encyclopedia of Iron, Steel, and Their Alloys. 1st ed. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2015 (in press). DOI: 10.1081/E-EISA-120051669
Ferreira L M, Brunatto SF, Cardoso RP. Martensitic stainless steels low-temperature nitriding: dependence of substrate composition. Materials Research. 2015;18(3):622–627. DOI: 10.1590/1516-1439.015215
Chapman B. Glow Discharge Processes: Sputtering and Plasma Etching. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1980. 406 p.
Belmonte T, Thiébaut J M, Michel H, Cardoso R P, Maliska A. Reduction of metallic oxides by late Ar-H2-N2 postdischarges. I. Application to copper oxides. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A. 2002;20(4):1347–1352. DOI: 10.1116/1.1484096
Belmonte T, Thiébaut J M, Michel H, Cardoso R P, Maliska A. Reduction of metallic oxides by late Ar–H2–N2 postdischarges. II. Applications to iron oxides. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A. 2002;20(4):1353–1357. DOI: 10.1116/1.1484097
Lieberman M A, Lichtenberg A J. Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2005. 572 p.
Menthe E, Rie K T. Further investigation of the structure and properties of austenitic stainless steel after plasma nitriding. Surface and Coatings Technology. 1999;116–119 :199–204. DOI: 10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00085-7
Egawa M,Ueda N, Nakataa K, Tsujikawa M, Tanaka M. Effect of additive alloying element on plasma nitriding and carburizing behavior for austenitic stainless steels. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2010;205(s1):S246–S251. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.07.093
Renevier N, Collingnon P, Michel H, Czerwiec T. Low temperature nitriding of AISI 316L stainless steel and titanium in a low pressure arc discharge. Surface and Coatings Technology. 1999;111:128–133.DOI:10.1016/S0257-8972(98)00722-1
Wang J, Xiang J, Peng Q, Fan H, Wang Y, Li G, Shen B. Effects of DC plasma nitriding parameters on microstructure and properties of 304L stainless steel. Materials Characterization. 2009;60:197–203. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2008.08.011
Souza R M, Ignat M, Pinedo C E, Tschiptschin A P. Structure and properties of low temperature plasma carburized austenitic stainless steels. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2009;204:1102–1105. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.04.033
Sun Y. Kinetics of low temperature plasma carburizing of austenitic stainless steels. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2005;168:189–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.10.005
Tsujikawa M, Yamauchi N, Ueda N, Sone T, Hirose Y. Behavior of carbon in low temperature plasma nitriding layer of austenitic stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2005;193:309–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.08.179
Menthe E, Bulak A, Olfe J, Zimmermann A, Rie K-T. Improvement of the mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steel after plasma nitriding. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2000;133–134:259–263.DOI:10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00930-0
Liang W, Xiaolei X, Bin X, Zhiwei Y, Zukun H. Low temperature nitriding and carburizing of AISI304 stainless steel by a low pressure plasma arc source. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2000;131:563–567.DOI:10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00836-7
Wang L, Xu X, Yu Z, Hei Z. Low pressure plasma arc source ion nitriding of austenitic stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2000;124:93–96.DOI:10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00637-4
Yetim A F, Yazici M. Wear resistance and non-magnetic layer formation on 316l implant material with plasma nitriding. Journal of Bionic Engineering. 2014;11:620–629. DOI: 10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60073-1
Stinville J C, Cormier J, Templier C, Villechaise P. Monotonic mechanical properties of plasma nitrided 316L polycrystalline austenitic stainless steel: mechanical behaviour of the nitrided layer and impact of nitriding residual stresses. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2014;605:51–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.03.039
Yazici M, Çomakli O,Yetim T, Yetim A F, Çelik A. The effect of plasma nitriding temperature on the electrochemical and semiconducting properties of thin passive films formed on 316 L stainless steel implant material in SBF solution. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2015;261:181–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.11.037
Reis R F, Villanova R L, Costa K D, Durante G C. Nitrogen surface enrichment of austenitic stainless steel ISO 5832-1: SHTPN vs low-temperature plasma nitriding. Materials Research. 2015;18(3):575–580. DOI: 10.1590/1516-1439.352014
Allenstein A N, Cardoso RP,Machado KD, Weber S, Pereira KMP, dos Santos C.A.L., Panossian C A L, Panossian Z, Buschinelli A JA, Brunatto SF. Strong evidences of tempered martensite-to-nitrogen-expanded austenite transformation in CA-6NM steel. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2012;552:569–572. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.075
Scheuer C J, Cardoso R P, Pereira R, Mafra M, Brunatto S F. Low temperature plasma carburizing of martensitic stainless steel. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2012;539:369–372. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.085
Brunatto SF, Cardoso RP, Scheuer CJ. DC low-temperature plasma carburizing of martensitic stainless steel. In: Colás R., Totten G.E., editors. Encyclopedia of Iron, Steel, and Their Alloys. 1st ed. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2015 (in press). DOI: 10.1081/E-EISA-120051667
Scheuer CJ, Cardos RP, Mafra M, Brunatto SF. AISI 420 martensitic stainless steel low-temperature plasma assisted carburizing kinetics. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2013;214:30–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.10.060
Espitia L A, Varela L, Pinedo C E, Tschiptschin A P. Cavitation erosion resistance of low temperature plasma nitrided martensitic stainless steel. Wear. 2013;301:449–456. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.029
ScheuerCJ, Cardoso RP, das Neves JCK, Brunatto SF. Dry sliding wear behavior of low-temperature plasma carburized AISI 420 steel. In: October 4–8; Columbus OH. 2015.
Xi Y T, Liu D X, Han D. Improvement of mechanical properties of martensitic stainless steel by plasma nitriding at low temperature. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters). 2008;21(1):21–29. DOI: 10.1016/S1006-7191(08)60015-0
Bruhl S P, Charadia R, Simison S, Lamas D G, Cabo A. Corrosion behavior of martensitic and precipitation hardening stainless steels treated by plasma nitriding. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2010;204:3280–3286. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.03.036
Cheng Z, Li C X, Dong H, Bell T. Low temperature plasma nitrocarburising of AISI 316 austenitic stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2005;191:195–200. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.03.004
Anjos A D, Scheuer C J, Brunatto S F, Cardoso R P. Low-temperature plasma nitrocarburizing of the AISI 420 martensitic stainless steel: microstructure and process kinetics. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2015;275:51–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.03.039
Buhagiar J, Li X, Dong H. Formation and microstructural characterisation of S-phase layers in Ni-free austenitic stainless steels by low-temperature plasma surface alloying. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2009;204:330–335. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.07.030
Tsujikawa M, Yoshida D, Yamauchi N, Ueda N, Sone T, Tanaka S. Surface material design of 316 stainless steel by combination of low temperature carburizing and nitriding. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2005;200:507–511. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.02.051
Adachi S, Ueda N. Combined plasma carburizing and nitriding of sprayed AISI 316L steel coating for improved wear resistance. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2014;259:44–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.07.010
Adachi S, Ueda N. Surface hardness improvement of plasma-sprayed AISI 316L stainless steel coating by low-temperature plasma carburizing. Advanced Powder Technology. 2013;24:818–823. DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2012.12.011
Allenstein A N, Lepienski C M, Buschinelli A J A, Brunatto S F. Improvement of the cavitation erosion resistance for low-temperature plasma nitrided Ca-6NM martensitic stainless steel. Wear. 2014;309:159–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2013.11.002
Allenstein A N, Lepienski C M, Buschinelli A J A, Brunatto S F. Plasma nitriding using high H2 content gas mixtures for a cavitation erosion resistant steel. Applied Surface Science. 2013;277:15–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.03.055
Alves Jr C, de Araújo F O, Ribeiro K J B, da Costa J A P, Sousa R R M, de Sousa R S. Use of cathodic cage in plasma nitriding. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2006;201:2450–2454. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.04.014
Balusamy T, Sankara Narayanan T S N, Ravichandran K, Park I S, Lee M H. Plasma nitriding of AISI 304 stainless steel: Role of surface mechanical attrition treatment. Materials Characterization. 2013;85:38–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2013.08.009
Bell T. Surface engineering of austenitic stainless steel. Surface Engineering. 2002;18(6):415–422. DOI: 10.1179/026708402225006268
Bobadilla M, Tschiptschin A. On the nitrogen diffusion in a duplex stainless steel. Materials Research. 2015;18(2):390–394. DOI: 10.1590/1516-1439.337714
Chemkhi M, Retraint D, Roos A, Garnier C, Waltz L, Demangel C, Proust G. The effect of surface mechanical attrition treatment on low temperature plasma nitriding of an austenitic stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2013;221:191–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.01.047
Collins S R, Willians P C, Marx S V, Heuer A, Ernst F, Kahn H. Low-temperature carburization of austenitic stainless steels. In: Dossett J, Totten G E, editors. ASM Handbook, Vol 4D, Heat Treating of Irons and Steels. ASM International; 2014. p. 451–460.
Czerwiec T, Renevier N, Michel H. Low-temperature plasma-assisted nitriding. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2000;131:267–277. DOI: 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00792-1
Ernst F, Cao Y, Michal G M, Heuer A H. Carbide precipitation in austenitic stainless steel carburized at low temperature. Acta Materialia. 2007;55:1895–1906. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.049
Fernandes F A P, Casteletti L C, Gallego J. Microstructure of nitrided and nitrocarburized layers produced on a superaustenitic stainless steel. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2013;2(2):158–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2013.01.007
Fernandes F A P, Heck S C, Pereira R G, Picon C A, Nascente P A P, Casteletti L C. Ion nitriding of a superaustenitic stainless steel: Wear and corrosion characterization. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2010;204:3087–3090. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.02.064
Fewell M P, Mitchell D R G, Priest J M, Short K T, Collins G A. The nature of expanded austenite. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2000;131:300–306. DOI: 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00804-5
Fewell M P, Priest J M, Baldwin M J, Collins G A, Short K T. Nitriding at low temperature. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2000;131:284–290. DOI: 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00793-3
Kim S K, Yoo J S, Priest J M, Fewell M P. Characteristics of martensitic stainless steel nitrided in a low-pressure RF plasma. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2003;163–164:380–385. DOI: 10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00631-X
Kliauga A M, Pohl M. Effect of plasma nitriding on wear and pitting corrosion resistance of X2 CrNiMoN 22 5 3 duplex stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology. 1998;98:1205–1210. DOI: 10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00240-5
Kurelo B C E S, de Souza G B, da Silva S L R, Daudt N F, Alves Jr C, Torres R D, Serbena F C. Tribo-mechanical features of nitride coatings and diffusion layers produced by cathodic cage technique on martensitic and supermartensitic stainless steels. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2015;275:41–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.03.052
Larish B, Brusky U, Spies H -J. Plasma nitriding of stainless steels at low temperatures. Surface and Coatings Technology. 1999;116–119:205–211. DOI: 10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00084-5
Lee I. Effect of processing temperatures on characteristics of surface layers of low temperature plasma nitrocarburized AISI 204Cu austenitic stainless steel. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China. 2012;22:S678-S682. DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(12)61785-3
Lee I. The effect of molybdenum on the characteristics of surface layers of low temperature plasma nitrocarburized austenitic stainless steel. Current Applied Physics. 2009;9:S257-S261. DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2009.01.030
Leyland A, Lewis D B, Stevenson P B, Matthews A. Low temperature plasma diffusion treatment of stainless steels for improved wear resistance. Surface and Coatings Technology,. 1993;62:608–617. DOI: 10.1016/0257-8972(93)90307-A
Li W, Li X, Dong H. Effect of tensile stress on the formation of S-phase during low-temperature plasma carburizing of 316L foil. Acta Materialia. 2011;59:5765–5774. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.053
Li Y, Xu H, Zhu F, Wang L. Low temperature anodic nitriding of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Materials Letters. 2014;128:231–234. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.04.121
Liang W. Surface modification of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel by plasma nitriding. Applied Surface Science. 2003;211:308–314. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-4332(03)00260-5
Lin K, Li X, Sun Y, Luo X, Dong H. Active screen plasma nitriding of 316 stainless steel for the application of bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39:21470–21479. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.102
Lio R L, Qiao Y J, Yan M F, Fu Y D. Effects of rare earth elements on the characteristics of low temperature plasma nitrocarburized martensitic stainless steel. Journal of Materials Science and Technology. 2012;28(11):1046–1052. DOI: 10.1016/S1005-0302(12)60171-6
Liu R L, Yan M F. Improvement of wear and corrosion resistances of 17-4PH stainless steel by plasma nitrocarburizing. Materials and Design. 2010;31:2355–2359. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.069
Liu R L, Yan M F. The microstructure and properties of 17-4PH martensitic precipitation hardening stainless steel modified by plasma nitrocarburizing. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2010;204:2251–2256. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.12.016
Mendes A F, Scheuer C J, Joanidis I L, Cardoso R P, Mafra M, Klein AN, Brunatto S F. Low-temperature plasma nitriding of sintered PIM 316L austenitic stainless steel. Materials Research. 2014;17(1):100–108. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-14392014005000064
Nagtsuka K, Nishimoto A, Akamatsu K. Surface hardening of duplex stainless steel by low temperature active screen plasma nitriding. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2010;209:S295-S299. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.08.012
Nakasa K, Yamamoto A, Wang R, Sumomogi T. Effect of plasma nitriding on the strength of fine protrusions formed by sputter etching of AISI type 420 stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2015;272:298–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.03.048
Nii H, Nishimoto A. Surface modification of ferritic stainless steel by active screen plasma nitriding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2012;379(012052):1–7. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/379/1/012052
Pinedo C E, Varela L B, Tschiptschin A P. Low-temperature plasma nitriding of AISI F51 duplex stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2013;232:839–843. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.109
Scheuer C J, Cardoso R P, Zanetti F I, Amaral T, Brunatto S F. Low-temperature plasma carburizing of AISI 420 martensitic stainless steel: influence of gas mixture and gas flow rate. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2012;206:5085–5090. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.06.022
Sun Y, Haruman E. Effect of electrochemical potential on tribocorrosion behavior of low temperature plasma carburized 316L stainless steel in 1 M H 2 SO 4 solution. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2011;205:4280–4290. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.048
Sun Y, Haruman E. Tribocorrosion behaviour of low temperature plasma carburised 316L stainless steel in 0.5 M NaCl solution. Corrosion Science. 2011;53:4131–4140. DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.08.021
Sun Y. Response of cast austenitic stainless steel to low temperature plasma carburizing. Materials and Design. 2009;30:1377–1380. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.005
Sun Y. Tribocorrosion behavior of low temperature plasma carburized stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2013;228:S342-S348. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.05.105
Tsujikawa M, Egawa M, Sone T, Ueda N, Okano T, Higashi K. Modification of S phase on austenitic stainless steel using fine particle shot peening. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2013;228:S318-S322. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.05.111
Tsujikawa M, Egawa M, Ueda N, Okamoto A, Sone T, Nakata K. Effect of molybdenum and copper on S-phase layer thickness of low-temperature carburized austenitic stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2008;202:5488–5492. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.06.096
Tsujikawa M, Noguchi S, Yamauchi N, Ueda N, Sone T. Effect of molybdenum on hardness of low-temperature plasma carburized austenitic stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2007;201:5102–5107. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.127
Wang S, Cai W, Li J, Wei W, Hu J. A novel rapid D.C. plasma nitriding at low gas pressure for 304 austenitic stainless steel. Materials Letters. 2013;105:47–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.04.031
Yan M F, Liu R L, Wu D L. Improving the mechanical properties of 17-4PH stainless steel by low temperature plasma surface treatment. Materials and Design. 2010;21:2270–2273. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.005
Yun-tao X, Dao-xin L, Dong H. Improvement of erosion and erosion–corrosion resistance of AISI420 stainless steel by low temperature plasma nitriding. Applied Surface Science. 2008;254:5953–5958. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.03.189
- To be precise, the most industrially applied plasma excitation technology is the “pulsed-DC plasma excitation.” In this case, the plasma behavior is very similar to continuous DC excitation. Pulsed DC technology is used to reduce the arcing problems, which are more frequent in industrial reactors. This reduction is achieved by introducing a period of some tens of microseconds where plasma is switched off.
- The terms “fast” and “slow” are related to species with high and low kinetic energy, respectively. As a reference, slow species have kinetic energy near to that related to thermal agitation level.
- Other heavy noble gases could also be used, but Ar is the most abundant, and of lower cost, very important aspects to be considered for an industrial process.
- ε-M2-3N and M3C are closely related to ε-Fe2-3N and Fe3C (cementite) phases, but as the treatment is performed at low temperature, Cr is supposedly also solved in ε-iron nitride and cementite. Hence, the most precise way to describe such phases would be by substituting Fe by M, where M would represent the main substitutional (metallic) alloying elements present on the steel. Thus, the possible more precise description for such compounds would be (Fe, Cr)2-3N and (Fe, Cr)3C, respectively.