Open access peer-reviewed chapter

New Catalytic Systems for Fixation of Carbon Dioxide into Valuable Poly(Alkylene Carbonates)

Written By

Bahareh Bahramian and Fariba Dehghani

Submitted: April 14th, 2015 Reviewed: November 9th, 2015 Published: February 3rd, 2016

DOI: 10.5772/61969

Chapter metrics overview

4,079 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Fixation of carbon dioxide into valuable products is a promising method to mitigate the issues of global warming and decrease the consumption of fossil-fuel carbon sources. Poly alkylene carbonates (PACs) are environmentally friendly and low-cost polymers that are synthesized from copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxides. PACs are contemplated as an alternative to commercially available non-degradable polymers in the market for a broad range of applications. However, a burden for the synthesis of this group of polymers is the chemical activation of thermodynamically stable CO2. It is, therefore, imperative to develop a catalyst with high efficiency to overcome this hurdle. In this chapter, we describe the development and recent advances in the catalytic systems that have been designed to activate CO2 for copolymerization with epoxides. In particular, we will focus on the industrial trends presented in the patents for conversion of CO2 into PACs.

Keywords

  • Carbon Dioxide Fixation
  • Epoxides
  • Polycarbonates
  • Catalysts

1. Introduction

Carbon dioxide is one of the main greenhouse gases that contributes to global warming [1]. One of the approaches to tackle this issue is to fix CO2 as a raw material into valuable polymers [2]. The polymer industry is an emerging market that mostly relies on petrochemical products derived from fossil-fuel feedstocks. However, CO2 is a cheap, renewable, non-toxic and the most abundant carbon source. The consumption of CO2 as a reactant for the synthesis of carbon-based products is a key step to cut down the reliance on the fossil fuels.

Alternative copolymerization of CO2 with epoxides, such as propylene oxide (PO) and cyclohexene oxide (CHO), results in the formation of biodegradable PACs. As the physical properties of PACs are comparable to conventional polymers, they can be used for a broad range of applications such as packaging, agricultural and biomedical industries [3]. One of the obstacles in the synthesis of PACs is the design of an efficient catalyst that can reduce the activation energy of thermodynamically stable CO2 for such polymerization reaction [4]. In addition to activity, it is pivotal to design a selective catalyst that reduces the yield of by-products during the PAC copolymerization reactions [5]. Other factors that are contemplated in developing a catalyst are cost and toxicity.

Since 1696 that poly(propylene carbonate) (PPC) was synthesized, many efforts have been attempted to design catalysts [6]. These catalysts are mainly classified into two categories: (1) homogeneous and (2) heterogeneous. This classification is based on their solubility in the reaction media; therefore, the homogenous catalysts are those that are in the same phase as reactants and heterogeneous are those that are in another phase. Regardless of large number of research in this area, only a few of conventional metal-based heterogeneous catalysts have been used for the commercial PACs synthesis that possess acceptable activity and selectivity for large-scale production [3]. However, physical properties of this type of catalysts affect their selectivity and activity remarkably. For example, particle size, crystallinity, microstructure and morphology are key factors that show impact on the activity of a catalyst and the yield of the final product [79]. Many bench-scale studies have been conducted to promote the catalyst activity for the synthesis of PACs, and particularly poly(propylene carbonate) [3, 10]. In this chapter, we provide an insight about these types of catalysts. Prior to a discussion about catalyst, the main advantages of PACs are described. Then various catalysts that are available for their synthesis are introduced, followed by discussion about strategies that have been undertaken to promote the activity of these catalysts and finally, an overview of patents filed for the synthesis of PACs are briefly reviewed.

Advertisement

2. Copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides

Direct copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides such as ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, isobutylene oxide, cycloheptene oxide, cyclopentene oxide and cyclohexene oxide results in the formation of PACs, which is a typical example of fixation of CO2 in polymers [11]. PACs have excellent physical properties, including low density, transparency, durability, colourability and processability, and also they exhibited decent electrical insulation properties [12]. Accordingly, these types of polymers have a broad range of applications in electronics, optical media and have been used for the preparation of sheets, automotive productions, medical devices and healthcare products [10]. Furthermore, they are commercially used as a binder, plasticizer and raw material for polyurethane synthesis [3]. However, the most important feature of PACs that has attracted attention in recent years, as a potent alternative for conventional polymers, is their biodegradability. PACs degrade into water and CO2 when exposed to moisture and enzymes or non-sterilized soil such as landfills [3]. PACs can be considered as an alternative to non-degradable polymers to address the growing concerns about the disposal of plastics in municipal waste, shortage of allocated spaces for landfills and consumer pressure for sustainable products. The list of some companies that use PACs in commercial scale for different purposes is presented in Table 1. PPC is used in combination with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) to make a scratch resistance plastic by Bayer MaterialScience [13]. Furthermore, poly(propylene carbonate) and poly(hydroxybutyrate) are blended with other polymeric materials or mixed with inorganic solids to form the alternative plastic to acrylonitrile butadiene styrene by Baden Aniline and Soda Factory (BASF) –a chemical company [14]. Cardia Bioplastics (CO2 Starch Pty Ltd) has developed a method to manufacture commercially PPC/starch blends [15], and they currently manufacture huge amount of degradable plastic bags globally from this blend.

Name of CompanyCountryApplicationWebsite
Life Cycle ProductsEnglandPlastic bag and waste management productswww.lifecycleproducts.co.uk
Nature Works PackagingAustraliaShopping bagwww.natureworkspackaging.com
Drogaria AraujoBrazilBiohybrid™ bagswww.araujo.com.br
AZOmaterialsEnglandOrganic binders for nanoparticleswww.azom.com
NovomerUSAPolyurethane hot-melt adhesivewww.novomer.com
Mengxi High-tech GroupChinaMedical dressings, biodegradable packagingwww.mengxigroup.com
Jiangsu Jinlong-CAS Chemical Co., LtdChinaBiodegradable packagingwww.zkjlchem.com
TaiZhou BangFeng Plastic Co., LtdChinaDisposable biodegradable disheswww.cn-bf.net
Cardia BioplasticsTMAustraliaShopping bagwww.cardiabioplastics.com

Table 1.

List of Some Companies That Use PACs in Commercial Scale

PACs can be used for biomedical applications as an alternative to current biodegradable polymers such as poly(lactic acid) (PLA). For example, enzymatic degradation of PPC leads to producing benign products that include only water and CO2, which does not cause any inflammation in biological environment. However, PLA degrades by hydrolysis and generates lactic acid, reduces the pH in surrounding tissue leads to inflammation. In addition, studies by Zhong et al. in 2012 and Yang et al. in 2013 demonstrated the potential of using PPC for producing scaffolds for tissue engineering application [1618].

PACs are superior polymers for the agricultural purposes. For example, they can be used for the production of plastic films for agricultural mulches as an alternative to non-degradable polyethylene. It is therefore eradicating the risk of accumulation of plastic residues in agricultural spots, the high cost of collecting mulches after the harvesting season and contamination with soil and dirt. PACs can also be used for designing biodegradable packaging products as they are transparent and have minimal permeability to oxygen and water [19].

It is pivotal to determine the presence of any impurities that may have an adverse effect on physical properties and also the toxicity of a product fabricated from a polymer for food and biomedical applications. For instance, in processing PACs, the type of epoxide, by-product, catalyst and any other impurities may have an impact on their properties [20]. In an ideal copolymerization, CO2 and epoxide molecules form carbonate linkage. However, in reality, two molecules of epoxide may also bond and produce undesirable products. The presence of ether linkage has adverse effects on properties such as mechanical strength, thermal transition, thermal decomposition temperatures and molecular weight [21]. Therefore, the design of an active catalyst plays a critical role in promoting selectivity for the synthesis of favourable copolymer and reducing the rate of reaction of undesirable products.

Advertisement

3. PACs synthesis

The first discovery of PACs synthesis goes back to 1969 when Inoue et al. used a mixture of diethyl zinc (ZnEt2) and water as a catalyst to conduct the copolymerization of CO2 and propylene oxide and form PPC [22]. Shortly after that, the same group successfully used triethylaluminium as another organometallic catalyst for the synthesis of PPC [6]. However, the yield of the copolymerization reaction in the presence of these catalysts was low due to the formation of side products and presence of ether linkages on the polymer backbone. To address the issue of low catalyst activity, other hydrogen donor compounds rather than water have been used in combination with ZnEt2 [23, 24]. It was found that donor compounds with two or three active hydrogen sites formed multi-site catalytic systems with higher activity and selectivity compared with mono-site components. Therefore, the reaction was conducted towards alternative copolymerization of CO2 and PO, and the amount of undesirable cyclic propylene carbonate (cPC) reduced. Furthermore, a series of metal salts of acetic acid were used to catalyze the copolymerization of carbon dioxide and PO [25, 26]. Besides, a combination of zinc hydroxide with dicarboxylic acids was used to enhance the yield of desirable polymer product; among all, catalyst system derived from zinc, hydroxide and glutaric acid showed the superior activity [27].

One common mechanism proposed for the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides is coordination–insertion mechanism catalyzed via metal compounds with Lewis acid and Lewis base active sites [10, 28]. In the coordination step, the epoxide molecule is coordinated by the metallic centre of a catalyst (Lewis acid active site) and then attacked by nucleophile site (Lewis base site) and undergone ring opening to form metal-bound alkoxide [10]. The nucleophilic attack can take place by either the nucleophile active site on the metal catalyst (bifunctional homogenous catalysts) or a separate compound (binary catalysts) and resulted to activation of alkoxide [20]. CO2 molecule then inserted into the metal-oxygen bond and initiated the reaction by forming metal carbonate. Up to this stage, all the steps were associated with the activity of the catalyst; however, the pathway of the reaction after this step relies on the selectivity of the catalyst. In fact, selectivity is a function of the type of alkoxide. Commonly, the metal carbonate goes towards its ring closure and forms propylene carbonate or propagates by multiple coordination and insertion of CO2 and produces polycarbonate chain [29]. If the second pathway is followed by the alternative coordination–insertion mechanism, the resulted polycarbonate has 100% carbonate linkage in its structure; however, some catalysts can also homopolymerize epoxides and form ether linkages on the backbone of polymer [10]. The schematic of suggested coordination–insertion mechanism for the copolymerization of epoxides and CO2 is demonstrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Coordination–insertion mechanism suggested for the copolymerization of epoxides with CO2

Advertisement

4. Catalytic systems for CO2/epoxide polymerization

Since 1696 when PPC was first synthesized, many efforts were carried out to develop both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts with high selectivity [30]. In the following section, various types of homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts that have been used for the reaction between CO2 and epoxides are described.

4.1. Homogenous catalysts

Triphenyl phosphate (TPP) compounds with a metal atom in the centre were the first group of homogeneous catalyst reported for copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides [31, 32]. TPP compounds showed high activity; however, this catalysts were not very efficient, and the yield of PACs was very low even after more than one weak reaction. Nitrogen donors compounds such as N-methylimidazole and (4-dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP) were added to TPP compounds to enhance the yield of reaction. However, this catalyst system could only be used for the copolymerization of COH and CO2. For the other epoxides, only cyclic alkylene carbonates were produced [33, 34].

Chen et al. investigated the effect of metal type located in the centre of TPP compounds on the activation of propylene oxide. It was found that the type of metal influenced the acidity strength of catalysts and, therefore, the strength of epoxide metal bond and the yield of copolymer synthesis [35]. Among three types of metal used in this study, chromium-based catalyst exhibited higher selectivity compared to Al and Co towards the formation of PPC from the reaction between PO and CO2.

In a metal complex catalyst, the metal acts as Lewis acid to attack the epoxide and after that the nucleophile part of the catalyst opens the epoxide ring. The nucleophile part of the catalyst can be either a ligand attached to the metal complex or a co-catalyst. In the former group, the nucleophile ligand can often be a salen, a porphyrin, a phthalocyanine or an amido macrocycle [30]. The nature of metal in the catalyst is critical in its activity and selectivity and also the quality of the resulted polymer. Indeed, the strength of epoxide metal bond can determine the pathway of reaction. When this bond is too weak, the reaction proceeds towards formation of ether linkages and backbiting while the high strength of the bond may lead to closure of the ring and formation of cyclic carbonates [36].

After TPP compounds, great number of metal complex catalytic systems such as phenoxide [3739] and β-diiminate (BDI) [29, 40] were investigated in terms of their activity for copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides that are discussed in this section.

4.1.1. Phenoxide complexes

Phenoxide compounds include an aryl ligand that plays the role of nucleophile site of a catalyst [41]. It was found that the activity of a catalyst is dramatically higher when the phenoxide compounds contain zinc atom as a metal centre [42]. It was found that this group of metal complexes are only able to activate and catalyze CHO to react with CO2 and are not efficient in activation of other epoxides such as PO [37, 43, 44].

4.1.2. β-diiminate complexes

BDI is a family of complexes that include an aryl or acyl ligand with the molecular formula of LnMOR (R: alkyl, acyl) [40]. BDIs have broad applications in inorganic as well as organic and polymer synthesis, especially in the polymerization of lactides [45]. In the case of copolymerization of epoxides and CO2, BDIs have been used in a large number of studies. The results demonstrated that both the nature of metal centre and the aryl ligand have significant effect on the activity and selectivity of the catalyst [29, 40, 46]. For example, only zinc metal showed remarkable efficiency and selectivity towards the copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide [47, 48].

4.1.3. Metal salen complexes

Salens are a class of organic compounds including 1,6-bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)-2,5-diazahexa-1,5-diene ligand that are broadly used in the synthetic chemistry [49]. Metal salen complexes were first used for the ring opening copolymerization of epoxides in 1995 [50]. This family of catalysts has several advantages over other complexes for the copolymerization of epoxides and CO2. They are highly selective towards the synthesis of polycarbonates in the mild reaction condition (ambient temperature) [51]. Metal salen catalysts can be categorized according to the type of metal in the centre.

Chromium-based salen complexes ((salen)CrCl) were efficient in the copolymerization of epoxides and CO2 [52]. Two years after the first discovery, Jacobsen et al. successfully synthesized PCHC with 100% carbonate linkage using chiral salen chromium chloride catalyst [53]. The chromium-based salen complexes, however, showed low activity in the copolymerization of CO2 and PO due to the negligible differences between the activation energy of PO and PPC compared to cyclohexene carbonate (CHC) versus poly(cyclohexene carbonate) (PCHC) [54]. Therefore, the selectivity of the catalyst is a critical factor for the copolymerization of PO and CO2. The addition of co-catalyst was found to be an efficient approach to tackle this issue. In 2003, Rieger et al. attempted to add co-catalyst 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP) to chromium salen and were able to successfully synthesize PPC with 98% carbonate linkage and minimal PC side product [55]. They proposed that strong coordination of DMAP to chromium promoted the propagation of polymer chain and formation of carbonate linkages. The type of initiator was another factor that had an impact on the selectivity of chromium salen catalysts for the synthesis of PPC. It was found that changing the initiator from phosphines to azide in combination with Cr(salen)N3 catalyst significantly stimulated the reaction pathway towards the formation of PPC rather than cyclic propylene carbonate [56].

The metal centre has a pivotal role in catalyst activity and selectivity of the metal salen complexes. The first cobalt salen complexes (Co(salen)AOc) was introduced in 2003 for the copolymerization of PO and CO2, which resulted in producing PPC with 99% carbonate linkage [57]. In addition, it was found that similar to the chromium salen catalysts, the addition of co-catalyst to the cobalt salen complexes has an impact on their activity and selectivity. For instance, the addition of sub-stoichiometric amount of bis(triphenylphosphine)iminium (PPN) as co-catalyst to a cobalt salen increased the yield of PPC synthesis to 36% with 99% carbonate linkage [58]. However, any further effect on yield enhancement led to the formation of cyclic propylene compounds due to backbiting degradation of the polymer chain. To accomplish high activity of a catalyst without losing the selectivity, Nakano et al. designed a cobalt salen complex with piperidinyl and piperidinium arms [59]. This modification resulted in producing 99% PPC with 97% conversion yield. Basically in this reaction, the side arms played the role of in situ co-catalysts. This approach was a breakthrough in the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides as it reduced the catalyst loading significantly. Similarly, a cobalt complex containing two tertiary amine cations on pendant arms was designed and showed high activity and above 90% conversion yield for very low catalyst loadings such as 1:50,000 (catalyst/ PO) [60].

Many research activities have focused on the area of homogeneous catalysts for CO2–epoxide copolymerization due to the design flexibility and high activity. However, none of them has been used in large scale due to complicated synthesis process and low selectivity for PACs copolymerization. On the other hand, heterogeneous catalysts are generally non-toxic and economically viable due to the simpler synthesis process and easier handling. In the next section, the heterogeneous catalysts that are designed for the synthesis of PACs are described.

4.2. Heterogeneous catalysts

4.2.1. Organometallic compounds

The organometallic compounds for the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides are designed from the combination of a hydrogen donor compound and a metal-based complex to activate CO2 and open the ring of the epoxide. The commonly used hydrogen donors are water, primary amines, dihydric phenols, trihydric phenols, aromatic dicarboxylic acids and aromatic hydroxycarboxylic acids [61]. Several efficient organometallic catalysts with well-defined structures have been developed for the copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxide. However, the activity of the catalyst derived from zinc hydroxide and glutaric acid was superior compared to other compounds [27]. Ree et al. copolymerized PO and CO2 using zinc glutarate (ZnGA) obtained from various zinc sources. As a result, zinc glutaric derived from zinc oxide and glutaric acid yielded the highest catalyst activity of 64 g /g of catalyst [62]. Discovery of the catalyst activity of zinc glutarate for copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides was a breakthrough in the field especially after 1995 when Darensbourg et al. substituted organic solvents, as the reaction media, by supercritical fluid [63]. This makes the copolymerization process more environmentally friendly and economically viable.

4.2.2. Double-Metal Cyanide (DMC) complexes

DMCs are another group of heterogeneous catalyst that are efficiently used for the homopolymers of epoxides. The first DMCs that showed average activity for copolymerization of PO and CO2 to produce PPC were Zn3[Fe(CN)6]2 and Zn3[Co(CN)6]2, a double-metal cyanide compound based on Zn and Fe or Co [6466]. The activity of zinc–cobalt–DMC catalyst was comparable with zinc glutarate [3, 21]. However, it was found that the system suffered from low selectivity at low temperatures and poor activity at high temperatures [67]. In addition to these catalysts, Darensbourg et al. and Robertson et al. attempted to modify the catalyst structure by increasing the crystallinity of DMC-based catalyst [68, 69]. It was also found that the low molecular weight polyols could act as an initiator to activate DMCs and promote the copolymerization reaction [70].

4.2.3. Rare earth metal catalysts

In the very first attempts, rare earth metal complexes such as Y(P204)3–Al(i-Bu)3–glycerine were used for the copolymerization of PO and CO2 and formation of high molecular weight PPC. However, the structure of the resulted copolymer consisted of up to 90% of ether linkages [71]. In the next discoveries, rare earth metal catalysts showed an increase in selectivity and reduction in synthesis time for copolymerization of CO2 with epoxides [7274]. Yttrium carboxylate in combination with ZnEt2 significantly improved carbonate linkage percentage on the PPC and PCHC backbone [75]. A ternary catalytic system of rare earth complex, diethyl zinc and glycerine resulted in an extremely high molecular weight PPC [76]. Likewise, PO was successfully copolymerized with CO2 and formed PPC by using Y(CCl3COO)3, ZnEt2 and glycerine ternary system [76]. Rare earth metal catalytic systems, in general, can be used to adjust the microstructure of the polymer chain. For instance, head-to-tail linkage and molecular weight distribution of PPC was successfully adjusted by using yttrium carboxylate as a catalyst.

Comparing all heterogeneous catalytic systems created so far, conventional zinc glutarate is the only catalyst that has been used commercially for alternative copolymerization of CO2 and PO. Zinc glutarate exhibits high activity and favourable selectivity [62, 77]. It is cheap, non-toxic and easy to synthesize and can be used for manufacturing relatively high molecular weight PPC with superior carbonate linkage percentage [5]. However, its activity is still one or two order of magnitude lower than the common catalysts used for synthesis of conventional polyolefins [78]. Therefore, enhancement of the catalytic activity of ZnGA was the topic of several studies [79].

4.2.4. Catalyst activity of zinc glutarate

Particle size, crystallinity, microstructure and morphology are the key factors that have impacts on activity and yield of the final product. These characteristics can be tuned by changing the source of zinc and glutarate, their particle size, purity, synthesis method and processing condition.

Ree et al. studied the effect of various zinc sources on the activity of ZnGA catalyst [62]. Their results showed that the highest activity of ZnGA was achieved when zinc was derived from zinc oxide. Zinc glutarate from various sources of glutarate was synthesized in another study carried out by Ree et al. [7]. Results of catalyst activity demonstrated that the yield of PPC was significant when zinc oxide and glutaric acid were used for the synthesis of ZnGA. The effect of zinc and glutarate source and synthesis media on the microstructure of ZnGA was also investigated in a study carried out by Kim et al. [8]. This study demonstrated that the highest activity was acquired when ZnGA was synthesized in toluene media due to achieving low surface area and perfect crystallinity.

Particle size and purity of reactants are other parameters that have effect on the activity of ZnGA [9]. It was shown that highly pure ZnO with large particle size resulted in ZnGA with the superior crystallinity and large particle size. In addition, in a bench-scale study, it was shown that when magnetic stirring was used rather than other methods of mixing, the degree of crystallinity of ZnGA was promoted and resulted in achieving higher yield and larger molecular weight PPC. In yet another study, Pluronic PE6400 was used as an amphiphilic template to increase the degree of crystallinity and enhance the surface area of ZnGA [79]. It is important to note that in this study a mixture of ethanol/water was used as a solvent for the synthesis of ZnGA, and they achieved 83 g PPC/g activity for ZnGA. The yield of PPC production was increased nearly 20% when this catalyst was used for the copolymerization reaction.

Reducing the particle size of crystalline particles of ZnGA is another strategy that has been carried out to increase the catalyst activity [9]. Ball milling method can be used to reduce the particle size; however, it is important to optimize the processing time as long-hour milling might reduce the degree of crystallinity. It was also attempted to increase the surface area to elevate the ZnGA catalyst activity. As an example, PPC with the yield of 115.2 g PPC/g catalyst was obtained when high surface montmorillonite (MMT) was used for ZnGA support [80].

Optimization of the reaction condition was the subject of several studies with the aim of increasing the yield of polymerization. High yield of 126 g PPC/g catalyst was reported for a zinc glutarate supported on a perfluorinated compound with PO/catalyst ratio of 200 ml/g under mechanical stirring [81]. An optimum PO/catalyst ratio of 312 ml/g resulted in PPC yield of 160 g PPC/g catalyst for ZnGA prepared using ultrasonic stirring method [9]. Duan et al. in 2010 investigated the effect of pressure on the yield of copolymerization, product composition, molecular structure and thermal stability of PPC [82]. The results showed a significant enhancement in catalyst selectivity towards the formation of PPC and reduction of by-products. Dehghani research group established a green method to synthesis ZnGA in supercritical CO2 and eliminated usage of the organic solvent [2]. This study demonstrated that the crystallinity of catalyst produced in this solvent-free process was a function of processing parameters such as temperature and pressure. In addition, the yield of PPC copolymerization was significantly improved when catalyst processed by this technique was compared to ZnGA that was synthesized in toluene.

4.3. New advances in the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides

To enhance the catalytic activity and selectivity towards the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides, several measures have been taken such as bimetallic catalyst systems, non-metallic catalysts, ionic liquids (ILs), and supported catalysts.

4.3.1. Bimetallic catalyst systems

The idea behind the bimetallic pathway for the copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxides is to conduct the ring opening of epoxide and activation of carbon dioxide at the same time. In fact, one of the metal centres is in charge of the coordination and activation of the epoxide and the other metal centre associates with coordination and activation of CO2 [28]. It was found that the bimetallic pathway involved a second-order dependence on the metal concentration, whereas the monometallic pathway associated with a first order kinetic [30]. For instance, a double zinc centre complex showed high activity and selectivity in the conversion of cyclohexene oxide and CO2 to PCHC at very low CO2 pressure [83]. Particularly, the bimetallic pathway showed remarkable improvement in the catalyst activity of the salen catalysts. In addition, a piperidinium end-capped (salen) Co(III) complex copolymerized PO and CO2 without the generation of cyclic propylene carbonate [59].

4.3.2. Non-metallic catalysts and ionic liquids

An ionic liquid is a salt in which the ions are poorly coordinated. Accordingly, these solvents are liquid at the temperatures below 100°C, or even at room temperature. ILs are broadly used as reaction media, co-catalyst and catalyst for the chemical reactions. In the case of the reaction of epoxides and CO2, several researchers have focused on the application of ILs. The mechanism of the reaction involved ring opening of the epoxide through a nucleophilic attack by the anion followed by insertion of carbon dioxide and ring closure [28]. Indeed, the absence of metallic centre as Lewis acid resulted in the selectivity of reaction towards the formation of cyclic carbonate compounds [30]. 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate successfully activated CO2 and propylene oxide for the synthesis of propylene carbonate [84]. Under high-pressure condition, 100% conversion of propylene oxide was achieved by using 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate as catalyst [85]. However, the reaction was only selective towards the formation of cPC, and no polymer was achieved.

4.3.3. Supported catalytic systems

In these systems, the active catalyst should be anchored to the supporting material through a strong covalent bond in order to avoid possible leaching during the reaction. In fact, the immobilization of a catalyst on the solid support enables its rapid recovery and recycling. However, in some cases, immobilization shows adverse effect on catalyst activity due to limiting the diffusion of the reactants and intermediate compounds into and from the active sites of the catalyst [30]. Mesoporous materials with high surface area such as MCM-41 or SBA-15 have been used as supports to tackle this hurdle [28]. The zn β-diiminate catalyst was supported on controlled pore glass, and mesoporous SBA-15. This catalyst showed significant activity in the alternating copolymerization of CHO and CO2. However, the resulted copolymer contains higher ether linkages than their corresponding non-supported catalysts due to the starvation of the active sites, particularly in the last stages of the reaction [86].

Recoverable aluminium salen catalysts bonded to poly(ethylene glycol bismethacrylate) and polystyrene exhibited comparable catalyst activity in the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides [87]. Chromium salen catalysts anchored on the aminopropylsilyl-modified silica in combination with an IL were used to catalyze the reaction of the styrene oxide and CO2 [88]. The resulted catalysts exhibited 100% conversion yield; however, they were only selective towards the formation of cyclic carbonates.

Metal salen complexes were also immobilized on the surface of supporting material to facilitate their recovery after synthesis. For instance, zinc β-diiminate complex is immobilized on the surface of mesoporous silica (SBA-15), and this catalyst was used for the copolymerization of CHO and CO2. However, ether linkage also occurred in the presence of this catalyst. In another study, chromium salen catalyst, immobilized on the surface of silicates, was used for the copolymerization of styrene oxide and CO2 with nearly 50% activity and 80% selectivity [88]. In yet another example, aluminium salen catalyst, bonded on the surface of the polystyrene, was used for the copolymerization of CO2 and styrene oxide [87]. In addition to the potential of being recovered, the supported aluminium salen catalyst exhibited similar activity to the unsupported aluminium salen compounds.

Advertisement

5. Industrial activities and commercial advances

A list of patents filed for the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxide is shown in Table 2. Since 1969, most patents filed for the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides focused on developing heterogeneous catalysts, particularly zinc-based catalysts. The first catalyst, diethyl zinc, was developed by Inoue et al. in 1973 [89]. This patent that was sponsored by Nippon Oil Seal Industry Company demonstrated that the presence of co-catalyst significantly increased the yield of the copolymerization of ethylene oxide and CO2 nearly threefold. The co-catalyst includes a hydrogen donor-based compound that was added to an organometallic compound, formed from metals that belonged to group II or group III [90].

A process for preparing soluble zinc catalysts by the reaction of zinc compounds with either a dicarboxylic acid anhydride or an alcohol or a monoester of a dicarboxylic acid was reported and filed in 1987 [91]. This catalyst system that was soluble in most of solvents was useful for the copolymerization of epoxides and carbon dioxide to form polycarbonates. In 1989 and 1990, two patents, both sponsored by Japanese companies such as Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, were filed for the development of several catalysts containing zinc oxide that reacted with an organic dicarboxylic acid such as glutaric acid or adipic acid [92, 93]. These patents introduced zinc glutarate from the source of zinc oxide and glutaric acid as the most efficient catalyst for the copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide.

In 1998, dicarboxylic acids were used to successfully synthesize co-, ter-, and block-polymers from epoxides and carbon dioxide. This study that was sponsored by Buna Sow Leuna Olefinverbund GmbH consisted of two dicarboxylic acids, which could be aliphatic, aromatic or a mixture of the two, in combination with a divalent inorganic zinc salt [94]. In 2003 and 2004, new patents were filed to investigate catalyst efficiency of a range of zinc complexes synthesized from different dicarboxylic acids (chosen from pentane diol, hexane diol, 1,5-dibromopentane, 1,5-dichloropentane, 1,6-dichlorohexane, 1,6-dibromohexane, glutaronitrile, adiponitrile, glutarimide, adipamide, glutaralaldehyde and adipaldehyde) precursor and zinc precursor (chosen from zinc acetate dihydrate, zinc hydroxide, zinc nitrate hexahydrate, zinc perchlorate hexahydrate, zinc oxide and zinc sulphate) [95, 96]. Among them, the complex synthesized of zinc perchlorate hexahydrate and glutaronitrile showed the highest yield of 67% over a period of 30-h reaction for copolymerization of PO and carbon dioxide.

As mentioned before, zinc carboxylates, particularly zinc glutarate, are the only group of catalysts that could be effective in the commercial and large-scale synthesis of polycarbonates. However, the activity of this group of catalysts is still remarkably lower than the conventional catalysts used for the synthesis of polyolefins. Consequently, many research and development activities are still focusing on novel catalysts for the synthesis of polycarbonates. For this purpose, most patents in the last decade focused on designing bimetallic or metal cyanide compounds to increase both yield and selectivity for the synthesis of polycarbonates [97]. For example, highly selective and active cobalt containing cyanide catalysts for producing poly(alkylene carbonates) from alkylene oxide and carbon dioxide was documented in 2005 [98]. However, the final product has still 10% cyclic carbonate by-product. In 2009, bimetallic complex of Zn(H), Co(II), Mn(II), Mg(II), Fe(II), Cr(III)-X or Fe(III)-X was reported for copolymerization of carbon dioxide and cyclohexene oxide or propylene oxide [99]. Following these developments in 2012, a catalyst was invented from the reaction of one double-metal cyanide compound, one organic complexing agent and one primary alcohol having 6–24 carbon atoms (sponsored by Henkel Ag & Co.). The compound was effective in catalyzing both homopolymerizations of epoxides or copolymerization of epoxides with carbon dioxide [100]. In the same year, a process for the synthesis of a polycarbonate from carbon dioxide and epoxides using a bimetallic catalyst system and a chain transfer agent was reported [101]. This invention that was sponsored by Imperial Innovations Limited exhibited that bimetallic complexes were successful in improvement of both activity and selectivity of PACs synthesis and accomplished above 90% yield of copolymerization with 99% carbonate linkage.

Patent NumberCatalystEpoxideActivity
(g/g catalyst)
Reference
US 3585168Diethyl zinc and water aPropylene oxide
Ethylene oxide
Styrene oxide
Isobutylene oxide
[89]
US 4783445Soluble zinc-based catalysts as a result of the reaction of zinc compounds (zinc oxide and zinc acetate) and dicarboxylic acids (maleic anhydride and monomethyle adipate) aEthylene oxide
Propylene oxide
Cyclohexene oxide
[91]
US 4943677Zinc polycarboxylate catalyst (from zinc oxide and glutaric acid) in present of a hydrogen donor compound such as phenol and benzoic acid (acidity range 3-20 pKa) aPropylene oxide[102]
US 4981948zinc containing solid catalyst by contacting zinc oxide with an organic dicarboxylic acid (oxalic acid, malonic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, 1,5-pentane dicarboxylic acid, 1,6-hexane dicarboxylic acid, 1,8-octane dicarboxylic acid and 1,10-decane dicarboxylic acid) and aromatic dicarboxylic acids (phthalic acid, isophthalic acid, terephthalic acid, 1,2-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, 1,3-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, 1,4-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, 1,5-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, 1,6-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, 1,7-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, 1,8-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, 2,3-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, 2,5-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, 2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid and 2,7-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid) aPropylene oxide60.7 (max)[92]
US 5026676Zinc carboxylate catalyst by reaction of zinc compounds (zinc oxide, Zn(OH)2, Zn(CO3)2 and Zn(OAc)2) with a dicarboxylic acid (glutaric acid or adipic acid) aPropylene oxide26 (max)[93]
WO 2003029325Zinc glutarate and zinc-cobalt based double metal cyanide catalyst aPropylene oxide
Ethylene oxide
[97]
WO 2004000912Catalysts from the oxidizing of a dicarboxylic acid precursor (chosen from pentanediol, hexanediol, 1,5-dibromopentane, 1,5-dichloropentane, 1,6-dichlorohexane, 1,6-dibromohexane, glutaronitrile, adiponitrile, glutarimide, adipaimide, glutaraldehyde and adipaldehyde) and a zinc precursor (chosen from zinc acetate dihydrate, zinc hydroxide, zinc nitrate hexahydrate, zinc perchlorate hexahydrate, zinc oxide and zinc sulphate) aPropylene oxide[95]
US 20060089252Cobalt salen catalyst bPropylene oxide[98]
WO 2009130470Bimetallic complex of Zn(II), Co(II), Mn(II), Mg(II), Fe(II), Cr(III)-X or Fe(III)- XbCyclohexene oxide
Propylene oxide
[99]
WO 2012136658Double-metal cyanide compound bPropylene oxide[100]
WO 2013034750Bimetallic catalyst with metal centre from (Mg(II), Zn(II), Ca(II), Ge(II), Co(II), Mn(II), Ti(II), Fe(II), Cr(II), Cr(III)-X, Co(III)-X, Mn(III)-X, Fe(III)-X, A1(III)-X, Ti(III)-X, V(III)-X, Ge(IV)-(X)2 or Ti(IV)-(X)2) bCyclohexene oxide[101]

Table 2.

List of the Filed Patents in the Field of CO2 and Epoxide Copolymerization

a Heterogeneous catalysts, b Homogeneous catalysts


Advertisement

6. Conclusions

This review demonstrated the significant advances that have been accomplished for developing active catalysts for the copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxides in the last four decades. In fact, a broad range of catalysts have been designed and examined with high activity and selectivity for the synthesis of biodegradable poly(alkylene carbonates). In addition, the mechanistic aspects of CO2 cycloaddition to epoxides have been recognized and reported. Regardless of the structure of the catalyst and some slight differences, the overall mechanism proposed for the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides is coordination–insertion mechanism catalyzed via metal compounds with Lewis acid and Lewis base active sites.

Homogeneous catalysts for CO2–epoxide copolymerization were proposed such as phenoxide, β-diiminate and metal salen complexes. The two former groups only showed activity for copolymerization of CHO and CO2. In addition, salen catalysts exhibited activity and selectivity for a broader range of epoxides copolymerized by CO2. However, none of these homogenous catalysts was used in commercial scale due to complicated synthesis process and low selectivity. Among several heterogeneous catalysts designed, organometallic complexes, particularly zinc glutarate, are the most effective catalysts because of both high activity and selectivity, low cost, non-toxicity and simple manufacturing process. In the last decade, attempts have been undertaken to design bimetallic catalysts to enhance activity towards copolymerization of CO2 with epoxides. However, these studies are still in their infancy and have not yet used in the commercial scale.

In summary, the biodegradable polycarbonates are promising polymers that are produced from bonding CO2 with epoxides that are partially renewable with huge market value for production of broad range of products such as food packaging materials, healthcare devices and agricultural mulches. Developing an efficient catalyst that reduces the cost and minimizes the catalyst consumption and by-product is still attractive as an alternative to non-degradable polymers in many applications to remedy the global issue of plastic wastes in landfills.

References

  1. 1. Song C: Global challenges and strategies for control, conversion and utilization of CO2 for sustainable development involving energy, catalysis, adsorption and chemical processing. Catalysis Today. 2006; 115: pp. 2–32 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2006.02.029
  2. 2. Zhong X, Dehghani F: Solvent free synthesis of organometallic catalysts for the copolymerization of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2010; 98: pp. 101–111
  3. 3. Qin Y, Wang X: Carbon dioxide-based copolymers: Environmental benefits of PPC, an industrially viable catalyst. Biotechnology Journal. 2010; 5: pp. 1164–1180 DOI: 10.1002/biot.201000134
  4. 4. Sakakura T, Choi J-C, Yasuda H: Transformation of carbon dioxide. Chemical Reviews. 2007; 107: pp. 2365–2387 DOI: 10.1021/cr068357u
  5. 5. Luinstra G A: Poly(propylene carbonate), old copolymers of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide with new interests: Catalysis and material properties. Polymer Reviews. 2008; 48: pp. 192–219
  6. 6. Inoue S, Koinuma H, Tsuruta T: Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxide with organometallic compounds. Die Makromolekulare Chemie. 1969; 130: pp. 210–220 DOI: 10.1002/macp.1969.021300112
  7. 7. Ree M, Bae J Y, Jung J H, Shin T J, Hwang Y T, Chang T: Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide using various zinc glutarate derivatives as catalysts. Polymer Engineering and Science. 2000; 40: pp. 1542–1552
  8. 8. Kim J S, Ree M, Shin T J, Han O H, Cho S J, Hwang Y T, Bae J Y, Lee J M, Ryoo R, Kim H: X-ray absorption and NMR spectroscopic investigations of zinc glutarates prepared from various zinc sources and their catalytic activities in the copolymerization of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. Journal of Catalysis. 2003; 218: pp. 209–219
  9. 9. Meng Y Z, Du L C, Tiong S C, Zhu Q, Hay A S: Effects of the structure and morphology of zinc glutarate on the fixation of carbon dioxide into polymer. Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 2002; 40: pp. 3579–3591
  10. 10. Kember M R, Buchard A, Williams C K: Catalysts for CO2/epoxide copolymerization. Chemical Communications. 2011; 47: pp. 141–163
  11. 11. Wang S J, Du L C, Zhao X S, Meng Y Z, Tjong S C: Synthesis and characterization of alternating copolymer from carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2002; 85: pp. 2327–2334
  12. 12. Thorat S D, Phillips P J, Semenov V, Gakh A: Physical properties of aliphatic polycarbonates made from CO2 and epoxides. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2003; 89: pp. 1163–1176 DOI: 10.1002/app.12355
  13. 13. http://www.materialscience.bayer.com/en: Access Date 16/06/2015
  14. 14. http://www.basf.com.au/apex/ANZ/en/: Access Date 16/06/2015
  15. 15. Changping C, Scheirs J, Polymer/thermoplastic starch compositions, 2011, Google Patents
  16. 16. Zhong X, Lu Z, Valtchev P, Wei H, Zreiqat H, Dehghani F: Surface modification of poly(propylene carbonate) by aminolysis and layer-by-layer assembly for enhanced cytocompatibility. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2012; 93: pp. 75–84
  17. 17. Zhong X, Dehghani F: Fabrication of biomimetic poly(propylene carbonate) scaffolds by using carbon dioxide as a solvent, monomer and foaming agent. Green Chemistry. 2012; 14: pp. 2523–2533
  18. 18. Yang G, Su J, Gao J, Hu X, Geng C, Fu Q: Fabrication of well-controlled porous foams of graphene oxide modified poly(propylene-carbonate) using supercritical carbon dioxide and its potential tissue engineering applications. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2013; 73: pp. 1–9 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2012.11.004
  19. 19. Seo J, Jeon G, Jang E S, Bahadar Khan S, Han H: Preparation and properties of poly(propylene carbonate) and nanosized ZnO composite films for packaging applications. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2011; 122: pp. 1101–1108
  20. 20. Taherimehr M, Pescarmona P P: Green polycarbonates prepared by the copolymerization of CO2 with epoxides. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2014; 131: pp. 41141/1–41141/17 DOI: 10.1002/app.41141
  21. 21. Zhang X H, Wei R J, Sun X K, Zhang J F, Du B Y, Fan Z Q, Qi G R: Selective copolymerization of carbon dioxide with propylene oxide catalyzed by a nanolamellar double metal cyanide complex catalyst at low polymerization temperatures. Polymer. 2011; 52: pp. 5494–5502
  22. 22. Inoue S, Koinuma H, Tsuruta T: Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxide. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Letters. 1969; 7: pp. 287–292 DOI: 10.1002/pol.1969.110070408
  23. 23. Kuran W, Pasynkiewicz S, Skupińska J: On the mechanism of the carbon dioxide/propylene oxide alternating copolymerization in the presence of organozinc catalysts. Die Makromolekulare Chemie. 1977; 178: pp. 2149–2158 DOI: 10.1002/macp.1977.021780802
  24. 24. Kuran W, Pasynkiewicz S, Skupińska J, Rokicki A: Alternating copolymerization of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide in the presence of organometallic catalysts. Die Makromolekulare Chemie. 1976; 177: pp. 11–20 DOI: 10.1002/macp.1976.021770102
  25. 25. Soga K, Uenishi K, Hosoda S, Ikeda S: Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide with new catalysts. Die Makromolekulare Chemie. 1977; 178: pp. 893–897 DOI: 10.1002/macp.1977.021780325
  26. 26. Soga K, Uenishi K, Ikeda S: Homopolymerization of propylene oxide and copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide with metal salts of acetic acid. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Chemistry Edition. 1979; 17: pp. 415–423 DOI: 10.1002/pol.1979.170170211
  27. 27. Soga K, Imai E, Hattori I: Alternating copolymerization of CO2 and propylene oxide with the catalysts prepared from Zn(OH)2 and various dicarboxylic acids. Polymer Journal. 1981; 13: pp. 407–410 DOI: 10.1295/polymj.13.407
  28. 28. Pescarmona P P, Taherimehr M: Challenges in the catalytic synthesis of cyclic and polymeric carbonates from epoxides and CO2. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2012; 2: pp. 2169–2187 DOI: 10.1039/c2cy20365k
  29. 29. Moore D R, Cheng M, Lobkovsky E B, Coates G W: Mechanism of the alternating copolymerization of epoxides and CO2 using β-diiminate zinc catalysts:  Evidence for a bimetallic epoxide enchainment. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2003; 125: pp. 11911–11924 DOI: 10.1021/ja030085e
  30. 30. Laugel G, Rocha C C, Massiani P, Onfroy T, Launay F: Homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis for the synthesis of cyclic and polymeric carbonates from CO2 and epoxides: A mechanistic overview. Advanced Chemistry Letters. 2013; 1: pp. 195–214 DOI: 10.1166/acl.2013.1036
  31. 31. Aida T, Ishikawa M, Inoue S: Alternating copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxide catalyzed by the aluminum porphyrin-quaternary organic salt or triphenylphosphine system. Synthesis of polycarbonate with well-controlled molecular weight. Macromolecules. 1986; 19: pp. 8–13 DOI: 10.1021/ma00155a002
  32. 32. Kruper W J, Dellar D D: Catalytic Formation of cyclic carbonates from epoxides and CO2 with chromium metalloporphyrinates. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 1995; 60: pp. 725–727 DOI: 10.1021/jo00108a042
  33. 33. Aida T, Inoue S: Catalytic reaction on both sides of a metalloporphyrin plane. Alternating copolymerization of phthalic anhydride and epoxypropane with an aluminum porphyrin-quaternary salt system. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1985; 107: pp. 1358–1364 DOI: 10.1021/ja00291a041
  34. 34. Kojima F, Aida T, Inoue S: Fixation and activation of carbon dioxide on aluminum porphyrin. Catalytic formation of a carbamic ester from carbon dioxide, amine, and epoxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1986; 108: pp. 391–395 DOI: 10.1021/ja00263a008
  35. 35. Chen P, Chisholm M H, Gallucci J C, Zhang X, Zhou Z: Binding of propylene oxide to porphyrin− and salen−M(III) cations, where M = Al, Ga, Cr, and Co. Inorganic Chemistry. 2005; 44: pp. 2588–2595 DOI: 10.1021/ic048597x
  36. 36. Srivastava R, Bennur T H, Srinivas D: Factors affecting activation and utilization of carbon dioxide in cyclic carbonates synthesis over Cu and Mn peraza macrocyclic complexes. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2005; 226: pp. 199–205 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2004.10.034
  37. 37. Darensbourg D J, Niezgoda S A, Holtcamp M W, Draper J D,Reibenspies J H: Syntheses, structures, and binding constants of cyclic ether and thioether adducts of soluble cadmium(II) carboxylates. Intermediates in the homopolymerization of oxiranes and thiiranes and in carbon dioxide coupling processes. Inorganic Chemistry. 1997; 36: pp. 2426–2432 DOI: 10.1021/ic9701120
  38. 38. Darensbourg D J, Wildeson J R, Yarbrough J C, Reibenspies J H: Bis 2,6-difluorophenoxide dimeric complexes of zinc and cadmium and their phosphine adducts:  Lessons learned relative to carbon dioxide/cyclohexene oxide alternating copolymerization processes catalyzed by zinc phenoxides. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2000; 122: pp. 12487–12496 DOI: 10.1021/ja002855h
  39. 39. Darensbourg D J, Zimmer M S, Rainey P, Larkins D L: Solution and solid-state structures of phosphine adducts of monomeric zinc bisphenoxide complexes. Importance of These Derivatives in CO2/Epoxide Copolymerization Processes. Inorganic Chemistry. 2000; 39: pp. 1578–1585 DOI: 10.1021/ic990594a
  40. 40. Cheng M, Moore D R, Reczek J J, Chamberlain B M, Lobkovsky E B, Coates G W: Single-site β-diiminate zinc catalysts for the alternating copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides:  Catalyst synthesis and unprecedented polymerization activity. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2001; 123: pp. 8738–8749 DOI: 10.1021/ja003850n
  41. 41. Geerts R L, Huffman J C, Caulton K G: Soluble zinc bis(aryloxides). Inorganic Chemistry. 1986; 25: pp. 1803–1805 DOI: 10.1021/ic00231a018
  42. 42. Darensbourg D J, Niezgoda S A, Draper J D, Reibenspies J H: Mechanistic aspects of the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides by soluble zinc bis(phenoxide) catalysts as revealed by their cadmium analogues. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1998; 120: pp. 4690–4698 DOI: 10.1021/ja9801487
  43. 43. Darensbourg D J, Holtcamp M W: Catalytic activity of zinc(II) phenoxides which possess readily accessible coordination sites. Copolymerization and terpolymerization of epoxides and carbon dioxide. Macromolecules. 1995; 28: pp. 7577–7579 DOI: 10.1021/ma00126a043
  44. 44. Darensbourg D J, Holtcamp M W, Struck G E, Zimmer M S, Niezgoda S A, Rainey P, Robertson J B, Draper J D, Reibenspies J H: Catalytic activity of a series of Zn(II) phenoxides for the copolymerization of epoxides and carbon dioxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1999; 121: pp. 107–116 DOI: 10.1021/ja9826284
  45. 45. Chamberlain B M, Cheng M, Moore D R, Ovitt T M, Lobkovsky E B, Coates G W: Polymerization of lactide with zinc and magnesium β-diiminate complexes:  Stereocontrol and mechanism. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2001; 123: pp. 3229–3238 DOI: 10.1021/ja003851f
  46. 46. Byrne C M, Allen S D, Lobkovsky E B, Coates G W: Alternating copolymerization of limonene oxide and carbon dioxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2004; 126: pp. 11404–11405 DOI: 10.1021/ja0472580
  47. 47. Allen S D, Moore D R, Lobkovsky E B, Coates G W: High-activity, single-site catalysts for the alternating copolymerization of CO2 and propylene oxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2002; 124: p. 14284-14285 DOI: 10.1021/ja028071g
  48. 48. Chisholm M H, Navarro-Llobet D, Zhou Z: Poly(propylene carbonate). 1. More about poly(propylene carbonate) formed from the copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide employing a zinc glutarate catalyst. Macromolecules. 2002; 35: pp. 6494–6504
  49. 49. Venkataramanan N S, Kuppuraj G, Rajagopal S: Metal–salen complexes as efficient catalysts for the oxygenation of heteroatom containing organic compounds—synthetic and mechanistic aspects. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2005; 249: pp. 1249–1268 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2005.01.023
  50. 50. Martinez L E, Leighton J L, Carsten D H, Jacobsen E N: Highly enantioselective ring opening of epoxides catalyzed by (salen)Cr(III) complexes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1995; 117: pp. 5897–5898 DOI: 10.1021/ja00126a048
  51. 51. Klaus S, Lehenmeier M W, Anderson C E, Rieger B: Recent advances in CO2/epoxide copolymerization—New strategies and cooperative mechanisms. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2011; 255: pp. 1460–1479 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2010.12.002
  52. 52. Jacobsen E N: Asymmetric catalysis of epoxide ring-opening reactions. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2000; 33: pp. 421–431 DOI: 10.1021/ar960061v
  53. 53. Darensbourg D J, Yarbrough J C: Mechanistic aspects of the copolymerization reaction of carbon dioxide and epoxides, using a chiral salen chromium chloride catalyst. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2002; 124: pp. 6335–6342 DOI: 10.1021/ja012714v
  54. 54. Darensbourg D J, Yarbrough J C, Ortiz C, Fang C C: Comparative kinetic studies of the copolymerization of cyclohexene oxide and propylene oxide with carbon dioxide in the presence of chromium salen derivatives. In situ FTIR measurements of copolymer vs cyclic carbonate production. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2003; 125: pp. 7586–7591 DOI: 10.1021/ja034863e
  55. 55. Eberhardt R, Allmendinger M, Rieger B: DMAP/Cr(III) Catalyst ratio: The decisive factor for poly(propylene carbonate) formation in the coupling of CO2 and propylene oxide. Macromolecular Rapid Communications. 2003; 24: pp. 194–196 DOI: 10.1002/marc.200390022
  56. 56. Darensbourg D J, Mackiewicz R M, Phelps A L, Billodeaux D R: Copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides catalyzed by metal salen complexes. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2004; 37: pp. 836–844 DOI: 10.1021/ar030240u
  57. 57. Qin Z, Thomas C M, Lee S, Coates G W: Cobalt-based complexes for the copolymerization of propylene oxide and CO2: Active and selective catalysts for polycarbonate synthesis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2003; 42: pp. 5484–5487 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200352605
  58. 58. Cohen C T, Chu T, Coates G W: Cobalt catalysts for the alternating copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide:  Combining high activity and selectivity. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2005; 127: pp. 10869–10878 DOI: 10.1021/ja051744l
  59. 59. Nakano K, Kamada T, Nozaki K: Selective formation of polycarbonate over cyclic carbonate: Copolymerization of epoxides with carbon dioxide catalyzed by a cobalt(III) complex with a piperidinium end-capping arm. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2006; 45: pp. 7274–7277 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200603132
  60. 60. Noh E K, Na S J, S S, Kim S-W, Lee B Y: Two components in a molecule:  Highly efficient and thermally robust catalytic system for CO2/epoxide copolymerization. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2007; 129: pp. 8082–8083 DOI: 10.1021/ja071290n
  61. 61. Sugimoto H, Inoue S: Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxide. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 2004; 42: pp. 5561–5573 DOI: 10.1002/pola.20319
  62. 62. Ree M, Bae J Y, Jung J H, Shin T J: A new copolymerization process leading to poly(propylene carbonate) with a highly enhanced yield from carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 1999; 37: pp. 1863–1876 DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0518(19990615)37:12<1863::aid-pola16>3.0.co;2-k
  63. 63. Darensbourg D J, Stafford N W, Katsurao T: Supercritical carbon dioxide as solvent for the copolymerization of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide using a heterogeneous zinc carboxylate catalyst. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 1995; 104: pp. L1–L4 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1381-1169(95)00142-5
  64. 64. Kruper W J, Swart D J, Carbon dioxide oxirane copolymers prepared using double metal cyanide complexes, 1985, Google Patents
  65. 65. Chen L-B: Activation and copolymerization of CO2 by macromolecule-metal complexes. Makromolekulare Chemie. Macromolecular Symposia. 1992; 59: pp. 75–82 DOI: 10.1002/masy.19920590108
  66. 66. Kim I, Yi M J, Byun S H, Park D W, Kim B U, Ha C S: Biodegradable polycarbonate synthesis by copolymerization of carbon dioxide with epoxides using a heterogeneous zinc complex. Macromolecular Symposia. 2005; 224: pp. 181–192 DOI: 10.1002/masy.200550616
  67. 67. Kim I, Yi M J, Lee K J, Park D-W, Kim B U, Ha C-S: Aliphatic polycarbonate synthesis by copolymerization of carbon dioxide with epoxides over double metal cyanide catalysts prepared by using ZnX2 (X = F, Cl, Br, I). Catalysis Today. 2006; 111: pp. 292–296 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.10.039
  68. 68. Darensbourg D J, Adams M J, Yarbrough J C: Toward the design of double metal cyanides for the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides. Inorganic Chemistry. 2001; 40: pp. 6543–6544 DOI: 10.1021/ic0155941
  69. 69. Robertson N J, Qin Z, Dallinger G C, Lobkovsky E B, Lee S, Coates G W: Two-dimensional double metal cyanide complexes: highly active catalysts for the homopolymerization of propylene oxide and copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide. Dalton Transactions. 2006; 45: pp. 5390–5395
  70. 70. Chen S, Hua Z, Fang Z, Qi G: Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide with highly effective zinc hexacyanocobaltate(III)-based coordination catalyst. Polymer. 2004; 45: pp. 6519–6524 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.07.044
  71. 71. Chen X, Shen Z, Zhang Y: New catalytic systems for the fixation of carbon dioxide. 1. Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide with new rare-earth catalysts-RE(P204)3-Al(i-Bu)3-R(OH)n. Macromolecules. 1991; 24: pp. 5305–5308 DOI: 10.1021/ma00019a014
  72. 72. Shen Z, Chen X, Zhang Y: New catalytic systems for the fixation of carbon dioxide, 2. Synthesis of high molecular weight epichlorohydrin/carbon dioxide copolymer with rare earth phosphonates/triisobutyl-aluminium systems. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics. 1994; 195: pp. 2003–2011 DOI: 10.1002/macp.1994.021950610
  73. 73. Guo J-T, Wang X-Y, Xu Y-S, Sun J-W: Copolymerizations of carbon dioxide and epoxides in the presence of rare earth coordinate catalyst. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2003; 87: pp. 2356–2359 DOI: 10.1002/app.11923
  74. 74. Liu B, Zhao X, Wang X, Wang F: Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide with neodymium trichloroacetate-based coordination catalyst. Polymer. 2003; 44: pp. 1803–1808 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00034-X
  75. 75. Quan Z, Wang X, Zhao X, Wang F: Copolymerization of CO2 and propylene oxide under rare earth ternary catalyst: design of ligand in yttrium complex. Polymer. 2003; 44: pp. 5605–5610 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00561-5
  76. 76. Tao Y, Wang X, Zhao X, Li J, Wang F: Double propagation based on diepoxide, a facile route to high molecular weight poly(propylene carbonate). Polymer. 2006; 47: pp. 7368–7373 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.08.035
  77. 77. Ree M, Hwang Y, Kim J S, Kim H, Kim G: New findings in the catalytic activity of zinc glutarate and its application in the chemical fixation of CO2 into polycarbonates and their derivatives. Catalysis Today. 2006; 115: pp. 134–145
  78. 78. Pokasermsong P, Praserthdam P: Comparison of activity of Ziegler-Natta catalysts prepared by recrystallization and chemical reaction methods towards polymerization of ethylene. Engineering Journal. 2009; 13: pp. 57–64
  79. 79. Kim J S, Kim H, Yoon J, Heo K, Ree M: Synthesis of zinc glutarates with various morphologies using an amphiphilic template and their catalytic activities in the copolymerization of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 2005; 43: pp. 4079–4088
  80. 80. Wang J T, Zhu Q, Lu X L, Meng Y Z: ZnGA-MMT catalyzed the copolymerization of carbon dioxide with propylene oxide. European Polymer Journal. 2005; 41: pp. 1108–1114
  81. 81. Zhu Q, Meng Y Z, Tjong S C, Zhao X S, Chen Y L: Thermally stable and high molecular weight poly(propylene carbonate)s from carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. Polymer International. 2002; 51: pp. 1079–1085 DOI: 10.1002/pi.847
  82. 82. Jintang D, Jiajun W, Lianfang F, Long W, Xueping G: Pressure dependence of the CO2/propylene oxide copolymerization catalyzed by zinc glutarate. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2010; 118: pp. 366–371
  83. 83. Lee B Y, Kwon H Y, Lee S Y, Na S J, Han S-i, Yun H, Lee H, Park Y-W: Bimetallic anilido-aldimine zinc complexes for epoxide/CO2 copolymerization. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2005; 127: pp. 3031–3037 DOI: 10.1021/ja0435135
  84. 84. Peng J, Deng Y: Cycloaddition of carbon dioxide to propylene oxide catalyzed by ionic liquids. New Journal of Chemistry. 2001; 25: pp. 639–641 DOI: 10.1039/b008923k
  85. 85. Kawanami H, Sasaki A, Matsui K, Ikushima Y: A rapid and effective synthesis of propylene carbonate using a supercritical CO2-ionic liquid system. Chemical Communications. 2003; 7: pp. 896–897 DOI: 10.1039/b212823c
  86. 86. Yu K, Jones C W: Silica-immobilized zinc β-diiminate catalysts for the copolymerization of epoxides and carbon dioxide. Organometallics. 2003; 22: pp. 2571–2580 DOI: 10.1021/om030209w
  87. 87. Alvaro M, Baleizao C, Carbonell E, El Ghoul M, García H, Gigante B: Polymer-bound aluminium salen complex as reusable catalysts for CO2 insertion into epoxides. Tetrahedron. 2005; 61: pp. 12131–12139 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2005.07.114
  88. 88. Alvaro M, Baleizao C, Das D, Carbonell E, García H: CO2 fixation using recoverable chromium salen catalysts: use of ionic liquids as cosolvent or high-surface-area silicates as supports. Journal of Catalysis. 2004; 228: pp. 254–258 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2004.08.022
  89. 89. Shohei I, Hideomi K, Teiji T: Process for producing copolymer of epoxide and carbon dioxide, 1971, Google Patents
  90. 90. Shohei I, Masaki K, Nobuyuki M, Tadamichi T, Masanori Y, Catalyst for copolymerizing epoxy compounds with carbon dioxide, 1975, Google Patents
  91. 91. Sun H, Soluble epoxide/carbon dioxide copolymerization catalysts, 1988, Google Patents
  92. 92. Kawachi H, Minami S, Armor J N, Rokicki A, Stein B K, Zinc-containing solid catalyst, process of preparing same and process for preparing polyalkylene carbonate, 1991, Google Patents
  93. 93. Motika S A, Pickering T L, Rokicki A, Stein B K, Catalyst for the copolymerization of epoxides with CO2, 1991, Google Patents
  94. 94. Kogut S, Rom C, Schimmel K H, Wagenknecht E, Catalyst system for producing polyalkylene carbonates, 1999, Google Patents
  95. 95. Jong-Sung K, Kie-Soo K, Seung-Jae M, Moon-Hor R, Method of preparing catalyst for polymerization of aliphatic polycarbonate and method of polymerizing aliphatic polycarbonate using same, 2003, Google Patents
  96. 96. Döring M P D, Kröger M D, New substituted N-phenyl-3-phenylaminoacrylimidate zinc complexes useful as catalysts, especially for polycarbonate production by reaction of epoxides with carbon dioxide, 2005, Google Patents
  97. 97. Bohres E, Heinemann J, Luinstra G, Verfahren zur herstellung aliphatischer polycarbonate, 2003, Google Patents
  98. 98. Coates G, Qin Z, Cohen C, Polycarbonates made using highly selective catalysts, 2006, Google Patents
  99. 99. Williams C K, Kember M, Knight P, Bimetallic catalytic complexes for the copolymerization of carbon dioxide and an epoxide, 2009, Google Patents
  100. 100. Klein J, Kragl U, Kunze C, Marquardt M, Paetzold E, Zander L, Katalysator zur epoxidpolymerization und zur copolymerization von epoxid mit kohlendioxid, 2012, Google Patents
  101. 101. Williams C, Kember M, Buchard A,Jutz F, Method of synthesising polycarbonates in the presence of a bimetallic catalyst and a chain transfer agent, 2013, Google Patents
  102. 102. Rokicki A, Making poly(alkylene carbonates) of controlled molecular weight, 1990, Google Patents

Written By

Bahareh Bahramian and Fariba Dehghani

Submitted: April 14th, 2015 Reviewed: November 9th, 2015 Published: February 3rd, 2016