Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Interaction Between Brucella and the Host Cell in Phagocytosis

Written By

Suk Kim

Submitted: December 4th, 2014 Reviewed: September 8th, 2015 Published: November 19th, 2015

DOI: 10.5772/61463

Chapter metrics overview

1,621 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Brucella spp. are facultative intracellular parasitic pathogens that can survive and multiply in professional and nonprofessional phagocytes. These pathogens are responsible for brucellosis, which can cause abortion in domestic animals and undulant fever in humans. Brucella spp. can survive in a variety of cells and their virulence and chronic infections are thought to be due to their ability to evade the killing mechanisms within host cells, one of which is the inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion. Lipid raft-associated molecules, such as GPI-anchored proteins, GM1 ganglioside, and cholesterol, are selectively integrated into Brucella-containing macropinosomes following the internalization of Brucella into macrophages, continuously sustaining a dynamic state of the phagosomal membrane. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are important systems that detect microbial invasion via recognition of microbial components that triggers signaling pathways to promote the expression of genes and regulate innate immune responses. Recent several studies have revealed the importance between TLRs-Brucella interactions to control Brucella infection. Here, we reviewed selected aspects of lipid raft-associated molecules and TLRs-Brucella interaction, which may help to understand the mechanism of Brucella pathogenesis.

Keywords

  • Brucella
  • phagocytes
  • lipid-rafts associated molecules
  • TLRs
  • intracellular survival

1. Introduction

Brucellosis is a major zoonotic disease worldwide that causes a serious debilitating disorder in humans known as undulant fever, and abortion and sterility in domestic animals.

Brucellaspp. are gram-negative and facultative intracellular bacteria that can survive and replicate within professional and nonprofessional phagocytes [1, 2]. Six well-recognized species of Brucellaare known according to host preference: B. melitensis(sheep and goats), B. abortus(cattle), B. suis(hogs), B. ovis(sheep), B. canis(dogs), and B. neotomae(wood rats) [3]. In the past few years, Brucellahas been recovered from several marine mammals, including cetaceans and pinnipeds, that belong to two potential new species, B. pinnipedialisand B. ceti[4]. Recently, a new species of Brucella, B. microti, was isolated from wild common voles suffering from a systemic disease [5, 6]. B. melitensis, B. abortus, and B. suisstrains cause abortion and infertility in their natural hosts, goats and sheep, cattle and swine, respectively. Humans can also acquire Brucellosis in a form of a severe, debilitating febrile illness as a result of contact with infected animals or their products [7]. B. ovisis a natural pathogen of sheep where it primarily causes epididymitis and infertility in rams [8].

B. canisinfection causes abortion and infertility in dogs [9]. Although B. ovisand B. canisare important in animals, human infection with B. canisis rare [10], and human infection with B. ovishas not been reported. B. neotomae, which infects only desert wood rats, is not known to be associated with clinical disease in any host species.

Brucellaspecies, in contrast to other intracellular pathogens, do not produce exotoxins, antiphagocytic capsules or thick cell walls, resistance forms, or fimbriae and do not show antigenic variation [11]. The key aspect of the virulence of Brucellais thought to be due to their ability to avoid the killing mechanisms within macrophages [12, 13].

The most common points of entry of Brucellaare the respiratory, digestive, and genital tracts of both animals and humans. Brucellaenters the phagocytic cells in an unknown cellular site and spreads throughout the body by the regional lymph nodes. Brucellashows high tropism in macrophages, especially monocytes in the liver, spleen, mammary glands, and reproductive tracts. Chronic brucellosis mainly leads to bacterial resistance to host immune response and host debilitated health status [14].

A tenth of the total Brucellawill survive to avoid phagocytosis and penetrate cell membrane for intracellular growth; macrophages are the most important for a successful infection. During the infection, Brucellacan interfere with the macrophage function, particularly the inhibition of IFN-γ [15] and TNF-α expression [16], and the reduction of antigen presentation and subsequent T cell activation [17]. Brucellainside dendritic cells (DC) contributes to the chronic infection and induced low levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and increased MHC II expression [18]. Placental trophoblasts produce erythritol during the last trimester and increases carbon source for Brucellaand this pathogen caused abortion or stillbirth of the infected fetus by inducing placental damage [19] and targeting giant trophoblasts [20]. Brucellahas also been reported in other cell types and are studied with cell models and lines such as human pulmonary epithelial cells, caprine uterine epithelial cells, human osteoblastic cell lines, murine neurons, bovine and human polymorphonuclear, and many other cells lines. Surprisingly, extracellular brucellae were observed on the 21st day post infection [21–26].

Phagocytosis is a critical step for a successful immune reaction against microbial pathogens that provokes both degradation of pathogens and the subsequent presentation of pathogen peptide antigens. Ligation of various phagocytic receptors, including Fc gamma receptors and complement receptor 3, activates a series of intracellular signal transductions that induce dynamic and rapid rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton essential for phagocytic uptake [27]. Several host cells such as M cells, macrophages, and neutrophils ingest Brucellaby zipper-like phagocytosis [28]. In addition, Brucellainvades macrophages through lipid raft microdomains [29]. Phagocytosis of Brucellain both epithelial cells and macrophages requires F-actin polymerization [30, 31].

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are the best characterized pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) of host cells. Receptor-ligand interaction via TLRs leads to the production of antimicrobial peptides and proinflammatory cytokines through NF-κB, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and other various signaling pathways [32]. As a result, TLR signaling is crucial to develop host innate immune response, including recruitment of DCs and T effector cells, upregulation of MHC I and II on antigen presenting cells (APCs), and extension of adaptive immunity against infection. In Brucellosis, many studies have reported that TLRs play important roles in controlling Brucellainfection. When unopsonized B. melitensis, B. abortus, and B. suisstrains internalize into macrophages and epithelial cells, the Brucella-containing vacuoles (BCVs) enter into an intracellular trafficking pathway that results in the development of specialized membrane-bound compartments [33–38] known as replicative phagosomes or brucellosomes [39]. Interactions between the O-chain of Brucellasmooth LPS and the lipid rafts on the surface of macrophages have been shown to be important for mediating entry into host cells in a manner that leads to the development of replicative phagosome [40]. During the initial stages of intracellular trafficking of the BCVs, these compartments suffer temporary interactions with lysosomes [41] which results in their acidification [34, 42] and initiate extensive interaction with the endoplasmic reticulum [33]. Eventually, intracellular pH rises to a level that allows intracellular replication of the Brucella. In epithelial cells, the BCVs during development of the replicative phagosome acquire properties resembling autophagosomes [37], which does not appear to be the case in macrophages [33]. Studies employing the human monocytic cell line THP-1 and B. abortusstrains opsonized with hyperimmune IgG have also shown that when the Brucellainternalizes host macrophages in this manner, the resulting BCVs also undergo temporary association with the lysosomal compartment and become acidified but do not interact extensively with the ER [43]. This altered intracellular trafficking limits the fusion of the BCVs with lysosomes, which minimizes the exposure of these bacteria to the bactericidal proteins that reside in these intracellular compartments [43].

In this section, we will discuss the key roles of several receptors for Brucellaincluding immune response, signal transduction cascade, and phagocytic pathway for Brucellainfection within host cells.

Advertisement

2. The roles of lipid rafts on Brucella infection

Brucellaproliferates within professional and nonprofessional phagocytic host cells including macrophages, epitheloid HeLa cells, fibroblasts NIH3T3, Vero cells, MDBK cells, etc., and successfully bypasses the bactericidal effects of phagocytes [13]. The macrophage response to infection has important consequences for both the survival of phagocytized bacteria and the further development of host immunity. For many bacterial pathogens, adherence to the host tissue is believed to be essential for virulence, and the microbial characteristics that promote adherence to receptors on a host cell surface are considered to be attributes of virulence [44]. For intracellular pathogens, including Brucella, the nature of the interaction with the host cell will have important consequences for pathogen survival, proliferation, and dissemination, as well as the development of specific immunity [45]. Lipid rafts are specialized membrane microdomains rich in cholesterol, glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins, and GM1 gangliosides [46]. Evidence regarding the potential role of lipid rafts in host-pathogen interactions has been continuously accumulated, and lipid rafts have been implicated as portals of entry for intracellular pathogens [47]. Several studies have implicated the involvement of lipid rafts in the entry and endocytic pathway of B. abortusin host cells. These studies indicated that lipid raft-associated molecules, such as GPI-anchored proteins, GM1 ganglioside, and cholesterol, are selectively integrated into Brucella-containing macropinosomes following the internalization of Brucellainto macrophages, continuously sustaining a dynamic state of the phagosomal membrane [48]. Moreover, the internalization route of Brucellainto phagocytic cells determines the intracellular fate of these bacteria, and this event is modulated by lipid rafts [48].

2.1. Roles of lipid rafts-associated molecules in Brucella infection

Time-lapse videomicroscopy has been used to follow the internalization of B. abortusstrains by mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages [35]. After contact of macrophages with wild-type B. abortus, the bacteria move around from the site of initial contact and swim on the macrophage surface, which often lasts up to several minutes; ruffling of the generalized plasma membrane occurs before the eventual enclosure in large vacuoles. In contrast, contact of the virB4 mutant of B. abortuswith the target macrophage results in a much smaller ruffling restricted to the area near the bacteria and uptake is more rapid than for the wild-type strain. If the bacteria are deposited onto macrophages by centrifugation, generalized actin polymerization around the site of bacterial binding was observed in the wild-type strain when stained with phalloidin to detect actin filament formation by using fluorescence microscopy, which can also be observed by phase-contrast microscopy and the virB4 mutant shows primarily small regions of phalloidin staining at the sites of binding. Therefore, B. abortusappears to promote events on the macrophage cell surface that are dependent on the presence of the VirB system. In case of B. abortus, macropinocytosis occurs within minutes of attachment to bacteria on the surface of the macrophage. During bacterial contact, effector molecule(s) are translocated by the VirB system to the target cell, which initiates the process that leads to formation of the macropinosome [29, 35]. These macropinosomes are induced transiently and shrink rapidly, with the majority of vacuoles appearing tightly apposed against the bacterial surface within 20 minutes after their initial appearance. In addition, macropinosomes are probed with other components associated with lipid raft-associated molecules, such as GM1 gangliosides and cholesterol, by incubating B. abortusand biotin-labeled cholera toxin B subunit (CTB), which binds GM1-gangliosides, simultaneously with macrophages. CTB localizes around the internalized wild-type strain with kinetics of association similar to those for aerolysin-labeled GPI-anchored proteins. In contrast, colocalization of CTB with the virB4 mutant was much less pronounced, suggesting that the formation of the VirB-dependent macropinosome includes a sorting process that allows transient association of lipid raft-associated components with macropinosomes containing B. abortus.

2.2. Roles of cellular prion protein in Brucella infection

In addition to membrane sorting for brucella infection, key roles have been made in describing bacterial entry where it has been shown that these bacteria penetrate into the macrophage through a particular structure found in eukaryotic cells, lipid rafts, or lipid microdomains [48]. In order to interact with lipid rafts, Brucellarequires smooth LPS to avoid the bactericidal arsenal of macrophages that strains with rough LPS (without an O-side chain) encounter [40]. Moreover, a report has proposed that Brucellainteracts with the cellular prion protein of macrophages (PrpC), a protein anchored by a GPI-link in lipid rafts. This interaction was found to be mediated by the membrane expression of BrucellaHSP60 [49].

2.3. Roles of clathrin in Brucella infection

Lipid raft-associated clathrin is essential for host-pathogen interactions in infectious processes. The focus of a recent study was to elucidate the clathrin-mediated phagocytic mechanisms of Brucella[50]. From that study, the clathrin dependency of Brucellainfection in HeLa cells was investigated with an infection assay and immunofluorescence microscopy. The redistribution of clathrin in the membrane and phagosomes was detected through sucrose gradient fractions of lipid rafts and the isolation of Brucella-containing vacuoles (BCVs), respectively (Fig. 1). Clathrin and dynamin were concentrated into lipid rafts upon Brucellainfection, and the entry and intracellular survival of Brucellawere abrogated by clathrin inhibition in HeLa cells. Clathrin disruption decreased actin polymerization and the colocalization of BCVs with clathrin and Rab5 but not LAMP-1. Consequently, our data verified that clathrin plays a fundamental role in the entry and intracellular survival of Brucellavia the interaction with lipid rafts and actin rearrangement, which determines the early intracellular trafficking of Brucellato its advantage.

Advertisement

3. General aspects of toll-like receptors

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are single-pass type I transmembrane-spanning proteins with a single intracellular Toll/interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor (TIR) domain and multiple extracellular leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) responsible for binding to ligands that recognize and are activated by a small collection of microbe-derived molecules [51]. Through studies of targeted mutants among 13 paralogous TLRs, 10 in humans and 12 in mice, the diverse mode of ligands recognition of individual TLRs were determined, except for TLR8, TLR10 (only present in humans), and TLR11–13 (only present in mice). TLR2 is activated by lipopeptides and other gram-positive bacterial components in conjunction with either TLR1 or TLR6; TLR4 detects LPS, which requires accessory protein MD-2; TLR5 detects flagellin; TLR3 detects poly I:C, a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) analog; TLR9 detects unmethylated DNA and CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG-DNA) proposed to be delivered by Granulin and high mobility group (HMG) B proteins through an ability to bind simultaneously to both CpG-DNA and TLR9; and TLR7 is activated by single-stranded RNA and its synthetic analogs such as resiquimod, imiquimod, and loxoribine. All known TLR dimer structures display the same arrangement with the two carboxy-terminal tails closely juxtaposed and the amino termini at opposite ends but each varies in modes of ligand recognition [51–54]. This conformation may be required to bring the intracellular TIR domains into close proximity to initiate signaling. TLR activation can induce cell-intrinsic antimicrobial activity such as activation of TLR2 and TLR4 can recruit NADPH oxidase assembly and mitochondria to bacteria-containing phagosome, which lead to a burst of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species within this compartment [55–57]. Evidence suggests that possibly through recruitment of vacuolar-ATPase subunits to the phagosomal membrane, TLR signaling can cause a rapid acidification of the phagosome in which TLR signaling has occurred [53, 54, 58, 59]. These activities increase the antimicrobial capacity of the phagosome, although some bacteria have actually cooped these signals to regulate their virulence programs. Expression and secretion of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) such as β-defensins and cathelicidin can also be induced by TLRs upon detection of microbial ligands, which further supports the role of TLR-mediated detection in cell-intrinsic antimicrobial activity [60–62]. However, pathogens have evolved a variety of strategies to avoid TLR signaling such as altering their surface structures, interfering with TLR signaling pathways, and inhibiting, escaping, or subverting phagocytosis [52]. Brucellaspp. are recognized by TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9, which identifies lipopolysaccharide (LPS), lipoproteins, and bacterial DNA, respectively [63].

3.1. TLRs and Brucella infection

The involvement of TLR2 and TLR4 in recognizing Brucellawas reported in several studies. TLR2 was proposed to induce secretion of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12, and IL-10 in peritoneal macrophages stimulated by B. abortuslipoproteins, such as Omp16 and Omp19 [64], responsible for pro-inflammatory response, but no role was observed in controlling the pathogen in vivo [63]. TLR4, in cooperation with TLR9, was demonstrated in B. melitensisresistance [65]. The interaction of TLR4 with non-canonical BrucellaLPS induces activation of NF-κB, and its interaction with Brucellaspp. lumazine synthase stimulates maturation of dendritic cells [66] followed by increased expression of co-stimulatory molecules and major histocompatibility class II, as well as the production of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-12p70 [63].

Maturation of dendritic cells and production of IL-12 and TNF-α in macrophages and dentritic cells are impaired [67], and levels of inflammatory chemokines RANTES (CCL5), MCP-1 (CCL2) and MIP-1α (CCL) are reduced in the absence of MyD88 protein during Brucellainfection [65]. MyD88 molecule is required for the development of IFN-γ producing T cells and control of brucellosis [65], suggesting that induction of Th1 response during the infection is regulated by a MyD88-dependent pathway [63]. Furthermore, this molecule is used by other inflammatory signaling pathways that include IL-1 and IL-18 [58]. However, IL-18 was observed to have no role in controlling murine brucellosis [63].

Brucellaappears to interfere in TLR signaling by producing inhibitory homologues of Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain, such as B. abortusBtp1, which targets TLR2 signaling down-modulating maturation of infected dendritic cells and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines [18], and B. melitensisTcpB that interacts with MyD88 in vitro impeding TLR2 and TLR4 activation pathway and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines [68].

3.2. Roles of individual TLRs in Brucella infection

3.2.1. TLR2

The role of TLR2 in Brucellainfection remains controversial. Some studies suggest that TLR2 is not required to control Brucellainfection in the mouse [67, 69, 70]. However, other studies indicate that TLR2 is important for clearance of Brucellafrom the lung following aerosol exposure [71], cytokine production such as TNFα and IL-12 [64, 65, 67, 72, 73], MHC-II expression [74], and down regulation of the type I receptor for the Fc portion of IgG (FcγRI, CD64) [15].

3.2.2. TLR4

The role of TLR4 in Brucellainfection also remains disputed. Some studies suggest that TLR4 is required to control Brucellareplication in the mouse [65, 69, 70], others reveal that TLR4 is not involved [67, 75]. Lee et al. [76] reported that TLR4-associated Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) activation in the early cellular signaling events plays an essential role in B. abortus-induced phagocytosis by macrophages (Fig. 2), implying the significance of JAK2 in pathogenesis of Brucella[65]. TLR2, TLR4, and MyD88 play diverse roles in Brucellaantigen specific antibody production and antibody class switching [71].

3.3. TLR6

TLR6 is an important component that triggers an innate immune response against B. abortus. TLR6 is recruited to the macrophage phagosome and recognizes bacterial peptidoglycan and lipoproteins [77]. TLR6 also plays a role in bacterial diacylated lipopeptides recognition such as MALP2, but is not essential for cytokine production in response to triacylated lipopeptides. TLR6, in cooperation with TLR2, recognizes Brucellaand further activates NF-κB signaling in vitro and is required for the efficient control of B. abortusinfection in vivo [78].

3.4. TLR9

TLR9 plays a role in controlling B. abortusinfection in mice [65, 67]. Furthermore, TLR9 partially mediates the expression of IL-12 by dendritic cells in response to heat-killed B. abortus[79]. TLR9 plays a significant role in preventing B. ovisreplication in vivo, but only MyD88 is required for wild type levels of inflammation [80].

Figure 1.

The role of clathrin in the entry and intracellular survival ofB. abortusin non-professional phagocytes. A and B: HeLa cells were pretreated with 12.5 μM CPZ, a clathrin inhibitor, for 45 minutes prior to infection withB. abortusat an MOI of 10 for the indicated times. C–E: HeLa cells were transiently transfected with control or clathrin siRNA, whose optimal conditions were evaluated by Western blotting (C), and subsequently infected according to the procedure described above (D and E). Bacterial internalization and intracellular survival efficiency were determined by evaluating the protection of internalized bacteria from gentamicin killing and calculating the log10 CFU, respectively. The data represent the mean ± S.D. of triplicate trials from three independent experiments. Differences that were statistically significant compared with untreated samples are indicated. *,p< 0.05; **,p< 0.01; ***,p< 0.001 [50].

Figure 2.

Diagram illustrating the phagocytic signaling pathway initiated by TLR4-linked JAK2 activation during the internalization ofB. abortusinto macrophage. The interaction ofB. abortuswith TLR4 induces the activation of Cdc42 GTPase and JAK2, and the subsequent activation of PI3K and MAPKs promotes actin polymerization. This event contributes to the phagocytosis ofB. abortusby macrophage. Lines with arrows denote an activating reaction and dotted lines denote uncertainty of the reaction [76].

Advertisement

4. Conclusion

Throughout this chapter, we described the interaction between Brucellaand lipid rafts-associated molecules and TLRs, including interacting specific molecules (ligands), immune response, signal cascade, and controlling strategies. This review may help to understand the pathogenic and defense mechanisms of Brucellosis. Furthermore, the understanding of lipid rafts-associated molecules and TLRs-mediated controlling of intracellular parasitic bacterial infection would be helpful to eradicate these diseases.

Advertisement

Abbreviation

IFN-γInterferon gamma
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor alpha
DCDendritic cell
MHC IIMajor histocompatibility complex
TLRToll-like receptor
PRRsPattern recognition receptors
NF-κBNuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
MAPKMitogen-activated protein kinase
APCsAntigen-presenting cells
BCVsBrucella-containing vacuoles
LPSLipopolysaccharide
IgGImmunoglobulin
EREndoplasmic reticulum
GPIGlycosylphosphatidylinositol
GM1Monosialotetrahexosylganglioside
CTBCholera toxin B
PrpCCellular prion protein
HSP60Heat shock protein 60
LAMP-1Lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1
ILIntracellular Toll/interleukin
TIRIntracellular Toll/interleukin receptor
LRRsLeucine-rich repeats
HMGHigh mobility group
NADPHNicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
AMPsAntimicrobial peptides
OmpOuter membrane protein
RANTESRegulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted
MCP-1Monocyte chemotactic protein 1
MIP-1αMacrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha
ThT helper
JAK2Janus kinase 2
MALP-2Macrophage-activating lipopeptide-2

References

  1. 1. Detilleux PG, Deyoe BL, Cheville NF. Entry and intracellular localization ofBrucellaspp. in Vero cells: Fluorescence and electron microscopy. Vet Pathol. 1990; 27: 317-328.
  2. 2. Detilleux PG, Deyoe BL, Cheville NF. Penetration and intracellular growth ofBrucella abortusin nonphagocytic cells in vitro. Infect Immun. 1990; 58: 2320-2328.
  3. 3. Ko J, Splitter GA. Molecular host-pathogen interaction in brucellosis: Current understanding and future approaches to vaccine development for mice and humans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003; 16: 65-78.
  4. 4. Foster G, Osterman BS, Godfroid J, Jacques I, Cloeckaert A.Brucella cetisp. nov. andBrucella pinnipedialissp. nov. forBrucellastrains with cetaceans and seals as their preferred hosts. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57: 2688-2693.
  5. 5. Hubalek Z, Scholz HC, Sedlacek I, Melzer F, Sanogo YO, Nesvadbova J. Brucellosis of the common vole (Microtus arvalis). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007; 7: 679-687.
  6. 6. Scholz HC, Hubalek Z, Sedlacek I, Vergnaud G, Tomaso H, Al Dahouk S, Melzer F, Kampfer P, Neubauer H, Cloeckaert A, Maquart M, Zygmunt MS, Whatmore AM, Falsen E, Bahn P, Gollner C, Pfeffer M, Huber B, Busse HJ, Nockler K.Brucella microtisp. nov., isolated from the common voleMicrotus arvalis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008; 58: 375-382.
  7. 7. Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akritidis N, Christou L, Tsianos EV. The new global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006; 6: 91-99.
  8. 8. Buckrell BC, McEwen SA, Johnson WH, Savage NC. Epididymitis Caused byBrucella ovisin a Southern Ontario Sheep Flock. Can Vet J. 1985; 26: 293-296.
  9. 9. Wanke MM. Canine brucellosis. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004; 82: 195-207.
  10. 10. Corbel MJ. Brucellosis: An overview. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997; 3: 213-221.
  11. 11. Finlay BB, Falkow S. Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997; 61: 136-169.
  12. 12. Sangari FJ, Aguero J. Molecular basis ofBrucellapathogenicity: An update. Microbiologia. 1996; 12: 207-218.
  13. 13. Ugalde RA. Intracellular lifestyle ofBrucellaspp. Common genes with other animal pathogens, plant pathogens, and endosymbionts. Microbes Infect. 1999; 1: 1211-1219.
  14. 14. Martirosyan A, Moreno E, Gorvel JP. An evolutionary strategy for a stealthy intracellularBrucellapathogen. Immunol Rev. 2011; 240: 211-234.
  15. 15. Barrionuevo P, Delpino MV, Velasquez LN, Garcia Samartino C, Coria LM, Ibanez AE, Rodriguez ME, Cassataro J, Giambartolomei GH.Brucella abortusinhibits IFN-gamma-induced Fc gamma RI expression and Fc gamma RI-restricted phagocytosis via toll-like receptor 2 on human monocytes/macrophages. Microbes Infect. 2011; 13: 239-250.
  16. 16. Caron E, Gross A, Liautard JP, Dornand J.Brucellaspecies release a specific, protease-sensitive, inhibitor of TNF-alpha expression, active on human macrophage-like cells. J Immunol. 1996; 156: 2885-2893.
  17. 17. Forestier C, Deleuil F, Lapaque N, Moreno E, Gorvel JP.Brucella abortuslipopolysaccharide in murine peritoneal macrophages acts as a down-regulator of T cell activation. J Immunol. 2000; 165: 5202-5210.
  18. 18. Salcedo SP, Marchesini MI, Lelouard H, Fugier E, Jolly G, Balor S, Muller A, Lapaque N, Demaria O, Alexopoulou L, Comerci DJ, Ugalde RA, Pierre P, Gorvel JP.Brucellacontrol of dendritic cell maturation is dependent on the TIR-containing protein Btp1. PLoS Pathog. 2008; 4: e21.
  19. 19. Tobias L, Cordes DO, Schurig GG. Placental pathology of the pregnant mouse inoculated withBrucella abortusstrain 2308. Vet Pathol. 1993; 30: 119-129.
  20. 20. Kim S, Lee DS, Watanabe K, Furuoka H, Suzuki H, Watarai M. Interferon-gamma promotes abortion due toBrucellainfection in pregnant mice. BMC Microbiol. 2005; 5: 22.
  21. 21. Ferrero MC, Fossati CA, Baldi PC. SmoothBrucellastrains invade and replicate in human lung epithelial cells without inducing cell death. Microbes Infect. 2009; 11: 476-483.
  22. 22. Meador VP, Hagemoser WA, Deyoe BL. Histopathologic findings inBrucella abortus-infected, pregnant goats. Am J Vet Res. 1988; 49: 274-280.
  23. 23. Delpino MV, Fossati CA, Baldi PC. Proinflammatory response of human osteoblastic cell lines and osteoblast-monocyte interaction upon infection withBrucellaspp. Infect Immun. 2009; 77: 984-995.
  24. 24. Garcia Samartino C, Delpino MV, Pott Godoy C, Di Genaro MS, Pasquevich KA, Zwerdling A, Barrionuevo P, Mathieu P, Cassataro J, Pitossi F, Giambartolomei GH.Brucella abortusinduces the secretion of proinflammatory mediators from glial cells leading to astrocyte apoptosis. Am J Pathol. 2010; 176: 1323-1338.
  25. 25. Iyankan L, Singh DK. The effect ofBrucella abortuson hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide production by bovine polymorphonuclear cells. Vet Res Commun. 2002; 26: 93-102.
  26. 26. Rolan HG, Xavier MN, Santos RL, Tsolis RM. Natural antibody contributes to host defense against an attenuatedBrucella abortusvirB mutant. Infect Immun. 2009; 77: 3004-3013.
  27. 27. Gruenheid S, Finlay BB. Microbial pathogenesis and cytoskeletal function. Nature. 2003; 422: 775-781.
  28. 28. Ackermann MR, Cheville NF, Deyoe BL. Bovine ileal dome lymphoepithelial cells: Endocytosis and transport ofBrucella abortusstrain 19. Vet Pathol. 1998; 25: 28-35.
  29. 29. Watarai M, Makino S, Fujii Y, Okamoto K, Shirahata T. Modulation ofBrucella-induced macropinocytosis by lipid rafts mediates intracellular replication. Cell Microbiol. 2002; 4: 341-355.
  30. 30. Guzman-Verri C, Chaves-Olarte E, von Eichel-Streiber C, Lopez-Goni I, Thelestam M, Arvidson S, Gorvel JP, Moreno E. GTPases of the Rho subfamily are required forBrucella abortusinternalization in nonprofessional phagocytes: Direct activation of Cdc42. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 44435-44443.
  31. 31. Kusumawati A, Cazevieille C, Porte F, Bettache S, Liautard JP, Sri Widada J. Early events and implication of F-actin and annexin I associated structures in the phagocytic uptake ofBrucella suisby the J-774A.1 murine cell line and human monocytes. Microb Pathog. 2003; 28: 343-352.
  32. 32. Kawai T, Akira S. TLR signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2006; 13: 816-825.
  33. 33. Celli J, de Chastellier C, Franchini DM, Pizarro-Cerda J, Moreno E, Gorvel JP.Brucellaevades macrophage killing via VirB-dependent sustained interactions with the endoplasmic reticulum. J Exp Med. 2003; 198: 545-556.
  34. 34. Arenas GN, Staskevich AS, Aballay A, Mayorga LS. Intracellular trafficking ofBrucella abortusin J774 macrophages. Infect Immun. 2000; 68: 4255-4263.
  35. 35. Kim S, Watarai M, Makino S, Shirahata T. Membrane sorting during swimming internalization ofBrucellais required for phagosome trafficking decisions. Microb Pathog. 2002; 33: 225-237.
  36. 36. Naroeni A, Jouy N, Ouahrani-Bettache S, Liautard JP, Porte F.Brucella suis-impaired specific recognition of phagosomes by lysosomes due to phagosomal membrane modifications. Infect Immun. 2001; 69: 486-493.
  37. 37. Pizarro-Cerda J, Meresse S, Parton RG, van der Goot G, Sola-Landa A, Lopez-Goni I, Moreno E, Gorvel JP.Brucella abortustransits through the autophagic pathway and replicates in the endoplasmic reticulum of nonprofessional phagocytes. Infect Immun. 1998; 66: 5711-5724.
  38. 38. Rittig MG, Alvarez-Martinez MT, Porte F, Liautard JP, Rouot B. Intracellular survival ofBrucellaspp. in human monocytes involves conventional uptake but special phagosomes. Infect Immun. 2001; 69: 3995-4006.
  39. 39. Kohler S, Michaux-Charachon S, Porte F, Ramuz M, Liautard JP. What is the nature of the replicative niche of a stealthy bug namedBrucella? Trends Microbiol. 2003; 11: 215-219.
  40. 40. F, Naroeni A, Ouahrani-Bettache S, Liautard JP. Role of theBrucella suislipopolysaccharide O antigen in phagosomal genesis and in inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion in murine macrophages. Infect Immun. 2003; 71: 1481-1490.
  41. 41. Starr T, Ng TW, Wehrly TD, Knodler LA, Celli J.Brucellaintracellular replication requires trafficking through the late endosomal/lysosomal compartment. Traffic 2008; 9: 678-694.
  42. 42. Porte F, Liautard JP, Kohler S. Early acidification of phagosomes containingBrucella suisis essential for intracellular survival in murine macrophages. Infect Immun. 1999; 67: 4041-4047.
  43. 43. Bellaire BH, Roop RM, 2nd, Cardelli JA. Opsonized virulentBrucella abortusreplicates within nonacidic, endoplasmic reticulum-negative, LAMP-1-positive phagosomes in human monocytes. Infect Immun. 2005; 73: 3702-3713.
  44. 44. Casadevall A, Pirofski L. Host-pathogen interactions: The attributes of virulence. J Infec Dis. 2001;1884: 337-344.
  45. 45. Jimenez de Bagues MP, Dudal S, Dornand J, Gross A. Cellular bioterrorism: HowBrucellacorrupts macrophage physiology to promote invasion and proliferation. Clin Immunol. 2005;114: 227-238.
  46. 46. Brown DA, London E. Functions of lipid rafts in biological membranes. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1998; 14: 111-136
  47. 47. Gatfield J, Pieters J. Essential role for cholesterol in entry of mycobacteria into macrophages. Science 2000; 288: 1647-1650.
  48. 48. Naroeni A, Porte F. Role of cholesterol and the ganglioside GM(1) in entry and short-term survival ofBrucella suisin murine macrophages. Infect Immun. 2002; 70: 1640-1644.
  49. 49. Watarai M, Kim S, Erdenebaatar J, Makino S, Horiuchi M, Shirahata T, Sakaguchi S, Katamine S. Cellular prion protein promotesBrucellainfection into macrophages. J Exp Med. 2003; 198: 5-17.
  50. 50. Lee JJ, Kim DG, Kim DH, Simborio HL, Min W, Lee HJ, Her M, Jung SC, Watarai M, Kim S. Interplay between clathrin and Rab5 controls the early phagocytic trafficking and intracellular survival ofBrucella abortuswithin HeLa cells. J Biol Chem. 2013; 288: 28049-28057.
  51. 51. Moresco EM, LaVine D, Beutler B. Toll-like receptors. Curr Biol. 2011; 21: 488-493.
  52. 52. Arpaia N, Barton GM. The impact of Toll-like receptors on bacterial virulence strategies. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013; 16: 17-22.
  53. 53. Blander JM, Medzhitov R. Regulation of phagosome maturation by signals from toll-like receptors. Science 2004; 304: 1014-1018.
  54. 54. Blander JM, Medzhitov R. Toll-dependent selection of microbial antigens for presentation by dendritic cells. Nature. 2006; 440: 808-812.
  55. 55. Lambeth JD. NOX enzymes and the biology of reactive oxygen. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004; 4: 181-189.
  56. 56. Underhill DM, Ozinsky A. Phagocytosis of microbes: Complexity in action. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002; 20: 825-852.
  57. 57. West AP, Brodsky IE, Rahner C, Woo DK, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Walsh MC, Choi Y, Shadel GS, Ghosh S. TLR signalling augments macrophage bactericidal activity through mitochondrial ROS. Nature. 2011; 472: 476-480.
  58. 58. Arpaia N, Godec J, Lau L, Sivick KE, McLaughlin LM, Jones MB, Dracheva T, Peterson SN, Monack DM, Barton GM. TLR signaling is required forSalmonella typhimuriumvirulence. Cell. 2011; 144: 675-688.
  59. 59. Trombetta ES, Ebersold M, Garrett W, Pypaert M, Mellman I. Activation of lysosomal function during dendritic cell maturation. Science. 2003; 299: 1400-1403.
  60. 60. Redfern RL, Reins RY, McDermott AM. Toll-like receptor activation modulates antimicrobial peptide expression by ocular surface cells. Exp Eye Res. 2011; 92: 209-220.
  61. 61. Rodriguez-Martinez S, Cancino-Diaz ME, Cancino-Diaz JC. Expression of CRAMP via PGN-TLR-2 and of alpha-defensin-3 via CpG-ODN-TLR-9 in corneal fibroblasts. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90: 378-382.
  62. 62. Tauszig S, Jouanguy E, Hoffmann JA, Imler JL. Toll-related receptors and the control of antimicrobial peptide expression in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000; 97: 10520-10525.
  63. 63. Oliveira SC, de Oliveira FS, Macedo GC, de Almeida LA, Carvalho NB. The role of innate immune receptors in the control ofBrucella abortusinfection: Toll-like receptors and beyond. Microbes Infect. 2008; 10: 1005-1009.
  64. 64. Giambartolomei GH, Zwerdling A, Cassataro J, Bruno L, Fossati CA, Philipp MT. Lipoproteins, not lipopolysaccharide, are the key mediators of the proinflammatory response elicited by heat-killedBrucella abortus. J Immunol. 2004; 173: 4635-4642.
  65. 65. Macedo GC, Magnani DM, Carvalho NB, Bruna-Romero O, Gazzinelli RT, Oliveira SC. Central role of MyD88-dependent dendritic cell maturation and proinflammatory cytokine production to controlBrucella abortusinfection. J Immunol. 2008; 180: 1080-1087.
  66. 66. Berguer PM, Mundinano J, Piazzon I, Goldbaum FA. A polymeric bacterial protein activates dendritic cells via TLR4. J Immunol. 2006; 176: 2366-2372.
  67. 67. Weiss DS, Takeda K, Akira S, Zychlinsky A, Moreno E. MyD88, but not toll-like receptors 4 and 2, is required for efficient clearance ofBrucella abortus. Infect Immun. 2005; 73: 5137-5143.
  68. 68. Cirl C, Wieser A, Yadav M, Duerr S, Schubert S, Fischer H, Stappert D, Wantia N, Rodriguez N, Wagner H, Svanborg C, Miethke T. Subversion of Toll-like receptor signaling by a unique family of bacterial Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain-containing proteins. Nat Med. 2008; 14: 399-406.
  69. 69. Campos MA, Rosinha GM, Almeida IC, Salgueiro XS, Jarvis BW, Splitter GA, Qureshi N, Bruna-Romero O, Gazzinelli RT, Oliveira SC. Role of Toll-like receptor 4 in induction of cell-mediated immunity and resistance toBrucella abortusinfection in mice. Infect Immun. 2004; 72: 176-186.
  70. 70. Copin R, De Baetselier P, Carlier Y, Letesson JJ, Muraille E. MyD88-dependent activation of B220-CD11b+LY-6C+ dendritic cells duringBrucella melitensisinfection. J Immunol. 2007; 178: 5182-5191.
  71. 71. Pei J, Ding X, Fan Y, Rice-Ficht A, Ficht TA. Toll-like receptors are critical for clearance ofBrucellaand play different roles in development of adaptive immunity following aerosol challenge in mice. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012; 2: 115.
  72. 72. Huang LY, Aliberti J, Leifer CA, Segal DM, Sher A, Golenbock DT, Golding B. Heat-killedBrucella abortusinduces TNF and IL-12p40 by distinct MyD88-dependent pathways: TNF, unlike IL-12p40 secretion, is Toll-like receptor 2 dependent. J Immunol. 2003; 171: 1441-1446.
  73. 73. Zwerdling A, Delpino MV, Barrionuevo P, Cassataro J, Pasquevich KA, Garcia Samartino C, Fossati CA, Giambartolomei GH.Brucellalipoproteins mimic dendritic cell maturation induced byBrucella abortus. Microbes Infect. 2008; 10: 1346-1354.
  74. 74. Barrionuevo P, Cassataro J, Delpino MV, Zwerdling A, Pasquevich KA, Garcia Samartino C, Wallach JC, Fossati CA, Giambartolomei GH.Brucella abortusinhibits major histocompatibility complex class II expression and antigen processing through interleukin-6 secretion via Toll-like receptor 2. Infect Immun. 2008; 76: 250-262.
  75. 75. Barquero-Calvo E, Chaves-Olarte E, Weiss DS, Guzman-Verri C, Chacon-Diaz C, Rucavado A, Moriyon I, Moreno E.Brucella abortususes a stealthy strategy to avoid activation of the innate immune system during the onset of infection. PLoS One 2007; 2: e631.
  76. 76. Lee JJ, Kim DH, Kim DG, Lee HJ, Min W, Rhee MH, Cho JY, Watarai M, Kim S. Toll-like receptor 4-linked Janus kinase 2 signaling contributes to internalization ofBrucella abortusby macrophages. Infect Immun. 2013; 81:2448-2458.
  77. 77. Ozinsky A, Underhill DM, Fontenot JD, Hajjar AM, Smith KD, Wilson CB, Schroeder L, Aderem A. The repertoire for pattern recognition of pathogens by the innate immune system is defined by cooperation between toll-like receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000; 97:13766-13771.
  78. 78. de Almeida LA, Macedo GC, Marinho FA, Gomes MT, Corsetti PP, Silva AM, Cassataro J, Giambartolomei GH, Oliveira SC. Toll-like receptor 6 plays an important role in host innate resistance toBrucella abortusinfection in mice. Infect Immun. 2013; 81:1654-1662.
  79. 79. Huang LY, Ishii KJ, Akira S, Aliberti J, Golding B. Th1-like cytokine induction by heat-killedBrucella abortusis dependent on triggering of TLR9. J Immunol. 2005; 175: 3964-3970.
  80. 80. Vieira AL, Silva TM, Mol JP, Oliveira SC, Santos RL, Paixao TA. MyD88 and TLR9 are required for early control of Brucella ovis infection in mice. Res Vet Sci. 2013; 94: 399-405.

Written By

Suk Kim

Submitted: December 4th, 2014 Reviewed: September 8th, 2015 Published: November 19th, 2015