Catalogue of traditional fermented beverages of South America.
Abstract
Fermentation is one of the oldest forms of food preservation in the world. In South America, most fermented beverages are nondairy products featuring several other food raw materials such as cereals, fruits, and vegetables. Generally, natural fermentations are carried out by yeast and lactic acid bacteria forming a complex microbiota that acts in cooperation. Yeast have a prominent role in the production of beverages, due to the ability to accumulate high levels of ethanol and to produce highly desirable aroma compounds, but lactic acid bacteria are particularly important in fermentation because they produce desirable acids, flavor compounds, and peptides that inhibit the growth of undesirable organisms. Among the South America beverages based on cereals and vegetables, the fermented beverages chicha, caxiri, cauim and champús, and cachaça, a fermented and distilled beverage, could be cited. Genetic and physiological analyses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from cachaça have been shown to present interesting traits for beer production, such as flocculation and production of aroma compounds, fundamental to high-quality beer. The study of these traditional beverages allows the identification of new microorganism strains displaying enhanced resistance or new flavor and aroma profiles that could lead to applications in several industries and ultimately new products.
Keywords
- yeast
- lactic acid bacteria
- fermented beverages
- South America
- cachaça
1. Introduction
Alcoholic beverages have been consumed by mankind since ancient times. These products of fermented sugar-rich goods, namely, cereals, roots, and fruits, are present worldwide since the oldest records [1, 2]. In fact, several of mankind’s milestones, such as the dawn of agriculture, are closely linked with the production of some type of alcoholic beverages. Similar processes of fermentation emerged independently in many civilizations across the globe. Interestingly, the main players of the whole process are relatively few, mostly yeast from the
This chapter aims to contribute to a comprehensible analysis of the role of yeast and LAB on the production of fermented beverages from South America. The microbiological diversity associated with the fermentation of a wide diversity of raw materials, from sugarcane to cassava, as well as new potential biotechnological applications will be addressed.
1.1. Ethanol and lactic acid fermentation
1.1.1. Yeast diversity and metabolism
Yeast are unicellular fungi, being the simplest eukaryotes. Present in a great number of environments, yeast can be found not only in decomposing fruit, trees, and soils but also in commensal relationships with higher eukaryotes, humans included, and even saltwater. The high diversity of species, almost 1500 species have been described [6], is closely related to this wide distribution. Some of these yeast are adapted to extreme environments, such as high salt concentrations [7], low pH [8], or extremely cold temperatures [9, 10]. The genus
Yeast, as other heterotrophic organisms, have the anabolism coupled with catabolism. In one hand, the oxidation of organic molecules, as sugars, yields adenosine 5-triphosphate (ATP) that, in turn, is used as an energy resource for the cell. On the other hand, such organic molecules can also be used as building blocks or to generate intermediary compounds for the synthesis of other compounds, some of which with high commercial value.
The high diversity of environments where yeast can be found is closely related to the variety of carbon sources that can be used. Hexoses such as glucose, fructose, galactose, or mannose are the most common substrates, but some species can use pentoses like xylose or arabinose. Several industrial relevant species can metabolize disaccharides as maltose, lactose, or sucrose, and some, as
In order to use glucose as carbon source, first and foremost, yeast have to sense the presence of this sugar in the surrounding environment and then express the adequate proteins to transport it across the plasma membrane [15, 16]. Whenever glucose is sensed in the medium, changes in the cell proteome will occur. Several processes contribute to the overall change in enzymes levels, including alteration of mRNA translation rates, mRNA stability, or protein synthesis and/or degradation. However, the major response is the extensive upregulation of a large number of genes required for the metabolism of glucose, such as genes encoding glycolytic pathway enzymes, leading to the adaptation to the fermentative metabolism. Moreover, in genes encoding for proteins involved in the metabolism of alternative substrates, gluconeogenic and respiratory pathways are repressed strongly by glucose (for reviews, see [17, 18]). In
Following uptake by the hexose transporters, glucose enters the glycolytic pathway in order to be metabolized to pyruvate (Figure 1, steps from glucose to pyruvate), whereby the production of energy in the form of ATP is coupled to the generation of intermediates and reducing power in the form of NADH for biosynthetic pathways [21, 22]. The phosphorylation of glucose to glucose-6-phosphate, requiring ATP, is the initial step of glycolysis, by the action of the hexokinases (Hxk1/2p) and the glucokinase (Glk1p), which are linked to high-affinity glucose uptake. The glucose-6-phosphate is then isomerized to fructose-6-phosphate by the phosphoglucose isomerase, encoded by
These two resulting compounds can be interconverted, in a reversible way, by the action of the triosephosphate isomerase (Tpi1p). Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate is further metabolized to ultimately yield pyruvate, while some of the dihydroxyacetone phosphate follows gluconeogenesis. This step is fundamental for the osmotic and redox homoeostasis, as the dihydroxyacetone can be converted to glycerol yielding NAD+. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate is first oxidized by NAD+ and then phosphorylated under the catalysis of the 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Tdh1/2/3p). The resulting 1,3-diphosphoglycerate is, in turn, converted to 3-phosphoglycerate by the action of phosphoglycerate kinase (Pgk1p), yielding 1 molecule of ATP. The enzyme phosphoglycerate mutase (Pgm1p) promotes the relocation of the phosphate group from C3 to C2, allowing the dehydration by the enolase (Eno1/2 p), resulting in the phosphoenolpyruvate. Then the pyruvate kinase (Pyk1p) converts this highly energetic molecule to pyruvate, yielding a second molecule of ATP.

Figure 1.
Glycolysis and alcoholic fermentation steps on
The pyruvate molecule can be further processed through different metabolic alternatives, the respiratory or the fermentative pathways (Figure 2). The selection of one of the route depends greatly on the expression or repression of some genes, which in turn are tightly regulated on the environmental conditions [24]. The genus to which the yeast belongs also plays a role in the prevalence of one route over the other.
The fermentative pathway is particularly relevant to industry, as several important commodities are produced through this process (characteristic of particular organisms). In

Figure 2.
Pyruvate metabolic fates. The pyruvate yielded during glycolysis can be converted into two intermediates of TCA cycle: acetyl-CoA, by the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDH), and/or oxaloacetate, by pyruvate carboxylases (Pyc1/2p). These molecules can be transported into the mitochondria by the pyruvate carriers (Mpc1p or Mpc2p) and the oxaloacetate carrier (Oac1p), respectively. Another alternative is the decarboxylation to acetaldehyde, by the pyruvate decarboxylase (Pdc1/5/6p), which ultimately can yield ethanol. Adh1p—alcohol dehydrogenase; Ald5p—acetaldehyde dehydrogenase; Acs1/2p—acetyl-CoA synthases; Yat1/2p—carnitine acetyltransferases (adapted from [
Although most microorganisms ferment in the absence of oxygen, this is not always the case. Even if oxygen is available, high concentrations of sugars present in the environment will lead yeast to choose fermentation over respiration. This inhibition of aerobic metabolism if glucose is available, both in the presence or absence of oxygen, is denominated the Crabtree effect [28].
During aerobic respiration (Figure 3), acetyl-CoA is produced by the decarboxylation of the glycolytic pyruvate, by the action of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. Then acetyl-CoA will enter the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, where it will be used to generate reducing equivalents, NADH and FADH2. These molecules will fuel the oxidative phosphorylation, through the highly conserved electron transport chain. Besides the production of reducing coenzymes, the TCA cycle provides intermediates to several other biochemical pathways, including the synthesis of amino acids and nucleotides (for reviews, see [22, 32]).

Figure 3.
Aerobic respiration in
1.1.2. Lactic acid bacteria
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) constitute an ubiquitous and heterogeneous group capable of fermenting carbohydrate with the production of lactic acid as a major end product [34]. LAB are found in diverse nutrient-rich habitats associated with plant and animal’s matter, as well as in respiratory, gastrointestinal, and genital tracts of humans [35, 36]. A typical LAB is Gram positive, present a GC content below 55%, generally nonsporulating, usually nonmotile, fastidious, catalase negative (pseudocatalase may occur in some LAB), aerotolerant, and acid tolerant [34]. Taxonomic parameters have distributed LAB members into two phyla,
Usually, LAB members are nonpathogenic organisms with a reputed generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status. The
1.1.2.1. Pathway of homolactic and heterolactic acid fermentation in LAB
LAB are able to live in the presence of oxygen; however, they obtain their energy by substrate-level phosphorylation. These bacteria do not present a functional respiratory system, as they lack the ability to synthesize cytochromes and porphyrins, key components of respiratory chains [45, 46]. Therefore, an important parameter used in the differentiation of the LAB species is the type of lactate fermentations: homofermentative and heterofermentative [35]. As a general rule, homofermentative lactic acid bacteria use the Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas pathway (EMP pathway or glycolysis) to produce pyruvate, while heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria use the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). However, a third pathway, the Bifidum pathway, presents distinct reactions (Figure 4) [45, 46].
In the homofermentative lactate fermentation, as the name implies, the major end product generated is lactate. Initially, two ATP molecules are produced per mole of glucose via the oxidation of phosphoglyceraldehyde. In a second stage, NADH molecules resulting from the previous oxidative stage are used to reduce the pyruvate, forming lactate [45, 46]. The overall reaction is as follows:
Some representative homolactic LAB genera include
Conversely, in the heterofermentative lactate fermentation pathway, lactate is not the only end product; significant amounts of CO2 and ethanol, or acetate, are also produced. In this pathway, lactate is produced by the decarboxylation and isomerization reactions of the PPP. Glucose is oxidized to ribulose-5-phosphate that is isomerized to xylulose-5-phosphate, which in turn is cleaved to form phosphoglyceraldehyde and acetyl phosphate. The phosphoglyceraldehyde molecule is oxidized to pyruvate by reactions of glycolytic pathway, whereas the acetyl phosphate is reduced to ethanol [45, 46]. The overall reaction is as follows:
1.1.2.2. Bifidum pathway
The Bifidum pathway is a particular metabolic route found in

Figure 4.
Schematic representation of the metabolism of hexoses by lactic acid bacteria (adapted from [
1.1.2.3. LAB—beverage industry applications
Over the years, LAB has been explored on a large scale in several food industry segments (processing of meats, vegetables, and beverages) occupying a central role in these niches [43, 48–50]. Withal, there are some reasons that explain their use in the food production industry. Among these are the following: the production of antimicrobial substances, which restricts the growth of harmful microorganisms, and the production of metabolites, which influences the nutritional, texture, and organoleptic qualities of the end products [36, 51]. Moreover, LAB have also been used as probiotics, which shows several potential health benefit [52]. Thus, in general, LAB enhances the shelf life and microbial safety of end products [43]. However, based on the microorganisms profile present in the raw material, their effects may be either beneficial or disadvantageous to the food processing. For instances, malolactic fermentation (MLF) is a secondary fermentation in wine normally carried out by LAB, especially by
2. Fermented beverages of South America
The traditional foods, mainly those produced by spontaneous fermentation, are present in the daily life of the population and play an important role in the cultural identity of different communities [59]. Indigenous or traditional fermented foods refer to the products that, since the beginning of history, are an integral part of the diet and can be prepared in household or cottage industry, using simple techniques and equipments [60].
In South America, there are various traditional fermented beverages, mainly produced by fermentation of cereals, vegetables, and root tubers. Among these beverages could be cited the traditional beverages
|
|
|
|
|
cassava, rice, peanuts | Lactic acid bacteria (LAB), |
Brazil |
|
cassava | LAB, |
Brazil |
|
maize |
|
Colombia |
|
maize | LAB |
Peru |
|
sugarcane |
LAB, other yeast |
Brazil |
2.1. Caxiri
Ramos et al. (2010) investigated the microbiota involved in
2.2. Cauim
For the preparation of beverages with other substrates, the procedure is similar to
Almeida et al. (2006) found LAB as the dominant microorganisms during
2.3. Champús
In Colombia, the beverage is produced by boiling the kernels of maize, for about 2 hours. Thereafter, the beans are cooled to room temperature, and then fruits,
2.4. Chicha
In the Andean region, the most common maize
The production process of
In some Andean countries is produced the
In Ecuador, in addition to
In
The
2.5. Cachaça
In Brazil,
|
|
|
Copper | mg/L | 5.0 |
Ethyl carbamate | μg/L | 210.0 |
Volatile acidity | mg/100mL anhydrous ethanol | 150.0 |
Total esters | mg/100mL anhydrous ethanol | 200.0 |
Aldehydes | mg/100mL anhydrous ethanol | 30.0 |
Total higher alcohols* | mg/100mL anhydrous ethanol | 360.0 |
Furfural+HMF+ | mg/100mL anhydrous ethanol | 5.0 |
Methanol | mg/100mL anhydrous ethanol | 20.0 |
Acrolein | mg/100mL anhydrous ethanol | 5.0 |
Particles in suspension | - | Absent |
Dry extract | g/L | 6.0 |
Total sugars | g/L | 6.0 |
38-48 |
Table 2.
Components present in
Source: Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply - Brazil
*Sum of isobutyl (2-methyl-1-propanol), isoamyl (2-methyl-1-butanol and 3-methyl-1-butanol), and n-propyl (1-propanol) alcohols.
+ 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural
2.5.1. Production
The main raw material for the production of
2.5.2. Microorganisms
As important as the preparation of the medium is the preparation of microorganisms that will ferment the sugarcane juice, the so-called foot-of-vat. Traditionally,
2.5.3. Fermentation
The
2.5.4. Distillation
After fermentation of sugarcane juice, the medium is taken to steel distillation columns (industrial
2.5.5. Aging
The
Alcohols are relatively stable to oxidation but can form significant amounts of aldehydes in the presence of phenol and water. Aldehydes are highly reactive and may oxidize to form the corresponding organic acid. Through esterification reactions, acids react with alcohols to form esters, which soften the odor of aldehydes, giving a pleasant odor to the
3. Yeast and LAB new potential applications
South America presents a wide variety of fermented and distilled beverages, which have several unique characteristics, greatly influenced by the fermentative metabolism of microorganisms. Therefore, those microorganisms present a large potential for utilization in the development of new beverages, or even in new biotechnological applications. In this context, several scientific works have focused in the isolation and characterization of such microorganisms [11, 86, 87].
3.1. Wild yeast
During fermentation, yeast and LAB cells are submitted to several stress factors, such as: high osmotic pressure and hydrostatic pressure, high concentrations of ethanol, anaerobic atmosphere, temperature, and nutrient limitation [98]. Such pressures promote the genetic adaptation of the individuals, leading to the survival of only the fittest cells. The increasing number of such alterations will lead to changes in the fermentation subproducts, some of which contribute to the organoleptic properties of the final products. Consequently, some of those subproducts may contribute to improve the beverages and, in this way, increasing the diversification of this industrial niche. Furthermore, the utilization of microorganisms isolated from traditional products, as
Recently, wild yeast isolates from
3.2. Mixed fermentation yeast/LAB
Recently, our research group started a work to approach the utilization of both yeast and LAB in the fermentation of
In a study from another research group, a mixed fermentation of
Both studies show that the use of bacteria and yeast simultaneously in fermentation apparently does affect the growth of both cultures. Similarly, the ethanol production in these mixed fermentations was the same. Furthermore, the use of mixed fermentations appears to improve the aroma of both beer and
3.3. New spirits
Brazil is the country with the world's largest fruit production; however, there is a huge postharvest waste of raw material that generates losses to the farmer. Therefore, there is the necessity to develop new processes and products to reduce these losses. In this context, an alternative is the use of these fruits for the production of alcoholic beverages [103].
In a previous study, a research group developed a fermentation process from
In another study, it was evaluated the quality of fruit spirits produced through different treatments [105]. Mango, grape, and passion fruit were used as raw materials, and the fermentation was performed using
As noted in these studies, alcoholic beverages obtained from tropical fruits were well accepted in sensory tests, demonstrating the potential application of these substrates in the production of new beverages.
Another study had as objective to obtain and characterize a new spirit from the fermentation of cheese whey. The cheese whey is a by-product of the dairy industry that has a high impact in the environment. The researchers used the yeast
From these studies, we can see distinct possibilities for the production of new beverages, by changing the yeast strain/species, or using blends of different microorganisms, such as yeast and LAB. Moreover, it is possible to use several different substrates for the production of these beverages, such as fruit and cheese whey.
4. Conclusion
Studies on South American beverages are scarce when compared to other beverages like wine, beer, or even sake. This is mainly due to years of neglect to research in these countries. Until recently, the economic difficulties of the South American countries prevented investments in scientific research. Nowadays, with the economic stability, these countries increased the scientific funding, and a new reality seems to arise. In this context, the understanding of the microorganisms present in typical South American beverages opens the door to the development of new technologies, contributing to the overall scientific and economic development of such countries. For example, the isolation of yeast in
Acknowledgments
The authors were supported by grants from the following Brazilian agencies: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais.
References
- 1.
McGovern PE, Zhang J, Tang J, Zhang Z, Hall GR, Moreau RA, Nuñez A, Butrym ED, Richards MP, Wang C. Fermented beverages of pre- and proto-historic China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:17593. - 2.
Faria-Oliveira F, Puga S, Ferreira C. Yeast: World's finest Chef . In: Muzzalupo I, editor. Food Industry. Rijeka: Intech; 2013. p. 519–547. DOI: 10.5772/53156 - 3.
Erten H, Ağirman B, Gündüz C, Çarşanba E, Sert S, Bircan S, Tangüler H. Importance of yeast and lactic acid bacteria in food processing. In: Malik A, Erginkaya Z, Ahmad S, Erten H, editors. Food Processing: Strategies for Quality Assessment. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 351–378. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1378-7_14 - 4.
Katina K, Poutanen K. Nutritional aspects of cereal fermentation with lactic acid bacteria and yeast. In: Gobbetti M, Gänzle M, editors. Handbook on Sourdough Biotechnology. Springer US; 2013. p. 229–244. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5425-0_9 - 5.
Larsson K, Ansell R, Eriksson P, Adler L. A gene encoding a glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD+) complements an osmosensitive mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Mol Microbiol. 1993;10:1101–1111. - 6.
Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T. The Yeast: A Taxonomic Study. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011. - 7.
Kejžar A, Gobec S, Plemenitaš A, Lenassi M. Melanin is crucial for growth of the black yeast Hortaea werneckii in its natural hypersaline environment. Fungal Biol. 2013;117:368–379. DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2013.03.006 - 8.
Gadanho M, Libkind D, Sampaio JP. Yeast diversity in the extreme acidic environments of the Iberian pyrite belt. Microbial Ecol. 2006;52:552–563. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-006-9027-y - 9.
Hashim N, Bharudin I, Nguong D, Higa S, Bakar F, Nathan S, Rabu A, Kawahara H, Illias R, Najimudin N, Mahadi N, Murad A. Characterization of Afp1, an antifreeze protein from the psychrophilic yeast Glaciozyma antarctica PI12 . Extremophiles. 2013;17:63–73. DOI: 10.1007/s00792-012-0494-4 - 10.
Tsuji M, Yokota Y, Shimohara K, Kudoh S, Hoshino T. An application of wastewater treatment in a cold environment and stable lipase production of antarctic basidiomycetous yeast Mrakia blollopis . PLoS One. 2013;8:e59376. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059376 - 11.
Conceição LEFR, Saraiva MAF, Diniz RHS, Oliveira J, Barbosa GD, Alvarez F, da Mata Correa LF, Mezadri H, Coutrim MX, Afonso RJdCF, Lucas C, Castro IM, Brandão RL. Biotechnological potential of yeast isolates from cachaça: the Brazilian spirit. ""Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2015;42:237–246. DOI: 10.1007/s10295-014-1528-y - 12.
Steensels J, Verstrepen KJ. Taming wild yeast: potential of conventional and nonconventional yeast in industrial fermentations. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2014;68:61–80. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-micro-091213-113025 - 13.
Kongkiattikajorn J. Production of amylase from Saccharomyces diastaticus sp. and hydrolysis of cassava pulps for alcohol production. J Agric Sci Technol B. 2012;2:909–918. - 14.
Laluce C, Mattoon JR. Development of rapidly fermenting strains of Saccharomyces diastaticus for direct conversion of starch and dextrins to ethanol. App Environ Microbiol. 1984;48:17–25. - 15.
Spencer-Martins I. Transport of sugars in yeast: implications in the fermentation of lignocellulosic materials. Biores Technol. 1994;50:51–57. - 16.
Kruckeberg AL, Dickinson JR. Carbon metabolism. In: Dickinson JR, Schweizer M, editors. The metabolism and molecular physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae . London: CRC; 2004. p. 42–103. - 17.
Gancedo JM. The early steps of glucose signalling in yeast. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:673–704. - 18.
Galdieri L, Mehrotra S, Yu S, Vancura A. Transcriptional regulation in yeast during diauxic shift and stationary phase. Omics. 2010;14:629–638. - 19.
Meijer MM, Boonstra J, Verkleij AJ, Verrips CT. Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is related to the glucose concentration rather than the glucose flux. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:24102–24107. - 20.
Rintala E, Wiebe M, Tamminen A, Ruohonen L, Penttilä M. Transcription of hexose transporters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is affected by change in oxygen provision. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:53. - 21.
Nelson DL, Cox MM. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. New York: W. H. Freeman; 2008. - 22.
Rodrigues F, Ludovico P, Leão C. Sugar metabolism in yeast: an overview of aerobic and anaerobic glucose catabolism. In: Rosa CA, Peter G, editors. Biodiversity and Ecophysiology of Yeast. 2006. p. 101–121. - 23.
Pretorius IS. Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast. 2000;16:675–729. - 24.
Pronk JT, Steensma HY, Van Dijken JP. Pyruvate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Yeast. 1996;12:1607–1633. - 25.
van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA. Redox balances in the metabolism of sugars by yeast. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1986;32:199–224. - 26.
Eriksson P, André L, Ansell R, Blomberg A, Adler L. Cloning and characterization of GPD2 , a second gene encoding aDL -glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD+) inSaccharomyces cerevisiae , and its comparison withGPD1 . Mol Microbiol. 1995;17:95–107. - 27.
Norbeck J, Påhlman AK, Akhtar N, Blomberg A, Adler L. Purification and characterization of two isoenzymes of DL -glycerol-3-phosphatase fromSaccharomyces cerevisiae . J Biol Chem. 1996;271:13875–13881. - 28.
Crabtree HG. Observations on the carbohydrate metabolism of tumours. Biochem J. 1929;23:536. - 29.
De Deken R. The Crabtree effect: a regulatory system in yeast. J Gen Microbiol. 1966;44:149. - 30.
Golshani-Hebroni SG, Bessman SP. Hexokinase binding to mitochondria: a basis for proliferative energy metabolism. J Bioenerg Biomemb. 1997;29:331–338. - 31.
Skinner C, Lin SJ. Effects of calorie restriction on life span of microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;88:817–828. - 32.
Murray DB, Haynes K, Tomita M. Redox regulation in respiring Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1810:945–958. - 33.
Feldmann H. Yeast metabolism. In: Feldmann H, editor. Yeast Molecular Biology—A Short Compendium on Basic Features and Novel Aspects. Munich: Adolf-Butenandt-Institute, University of Munich; 2005. - 34.
Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT. Bergey's Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology. Springer Science & Business Media; 2005. - 35.
Liu W, Pang H, Zhang H, Cai Y. Biodiversity of Lactic Acid Bacteria. In: Zhang H, Cai Y, editors. Lactic Acid Bacteria. Springer Netherlands; 2014. p. 103–203. 10.1007/978-94-017-8841-0_2 - 36.
Hoover DG, Steenson LR. Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria. Academic Press; 2014. - 37.
Horvath P, Coute-Monvoisin AC, Romero DA, Boyaval P, Fremaux C, Barrangou R. Comparative analysis of CRISPR loci in lactic acid bacteria genomes. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;131:62–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.05.030 - 38.
Stiles ME, Holzapfel WH. Lactic acid bacteria of foods and their current taxonomy. Int J Food Microbiol. 1997;36:1–29. - 39.
Klein G, Pack A, Bonaparte C, Reuter G. Taxonomy and physiology of probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol. 1998;41:103–125. - 40.
Felis GE, Dellaglio F. Taxonomy of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2007;8:44. - 41.
Giraffa G, Chanishvili N, Widyastuti Y. Importance of lactobacilli in food and feed biotechnology. Res Microbiol. 2010;161:480–487. DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.03.001 - 42.
König H, Fröhlich J. Lactic acid bacteria. In: Biology of Microorganisms on Grapes, in Must and in Wine. Springer; 2009. p. 3–29. - 43.
Ananou S, Maqueda M, Martínez-Bueno M, Valdivia E. Biopreservation, an ecological approach to improve the safety and shelf-life of foods. In: Communicating Current Research and Educational Topics and Trends in Applied Microbiology. Formatex; 2007. p. 475–486. - 44.
Howarth GS, Wang H. Role of endogenous microbiota, probiotics and their biological products in human health. Nutrients. 2013;5:58–81. - 45.
White D, Drummond JT, Fuqua C. The physiology and biochemistry of prokaryotes. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. - 46.
Romano AH, Eberhard SJ, Dingle SL, McDowell TD. Distribution of the phosphoenolpyruvate: glucose phosphotransferase system in bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1970;104:808–813. - 47.
Kandler O. Carbohydrate metabolism in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1983;49:209–224. - 48.
Leroy F, De Vuyst L. Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends Food Sci Tech. 2004;15:67–78. - 49.
Justé A, Malfliet S, Waud M, Crauwels S, De Cooman L, Aerts G, Marsh TL, Ruyters S, Willems K, Busschaert P. Bacterial community dynamics during industrial malting, with an emphasis on lactic acid bacteria. Food Microbiol. 2014;39:39–46. - 50.
Bokulich NA, Bamforth CW. The microbiology of malting and brewing. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013;77:157–172. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00060-12 - 51.
Smid EJ, Kleerebezem M. Production of aroma compounds in lactic fermentations. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2014;5:313–326. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-food-030713-092339 - 52.
Soomro AH, Masud T, Kiran A. Role of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in food preservation and human health–a review. Pak J Nutr. 2002; - 53.
Liu SQ. A review: malolactic fermentation in wine—beyond deacidification. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92:589–601. - 54.
Swiegers JH, Bartowsky EJ, Henschke PA, Pretorius IS. Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2005;11:139–173. - 55.
Nedovic VA, Durieuxb A, Van Nedervelde L, Rosseels P, Vandegans J, Plaisant AM, Simon JP. Continuous cider fermentation with co-immobilized yeast and Leuconostoc oenos cells. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2000;26:834–839. - 56.
Rouse S, Sun F, Vaughan A, Sinderen D. High-throughput isolation of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria, with potential application in the brewing industry. J Inst Brew. 2007;113:256–262. - 57.
Vaughan A, Eijsink VGH, O'Sullivan TF, O'Hanlon K, Van Sinderen D. An analysis of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria isolated from malted barley. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;91:131–138. - 58.
Lowe DP, Arendt EK. The use and effects of lactic acid bacteria in malting and brewing with their relationships to antifungal activity, mycotoxins and gushing: a review. J Inst Brew. 2004;110:163–180. - 59.
Almeida EG, Rachid CC, Schwan RF. Microbial population present in fermented beverage 'cauim' produced by Brazilian Amerindians. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;120:146–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.06.020 - 60.
Aidoo KE, Nout MJ, Sarkar PK. Occurrence and function of yeast in Asian indigenous fermented foods. FEMS Yeast Research. 2006;6:30–39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2005.00015.x - 61.
Blandino A, Al-Aseeri M, Pandiella S, Cantero D, Webb C. Cereal-based fermented foods and beverages. Food Res Int. 2003;36:527–543. - 62.
Osorio-Cadavid E, Chaves-Lopez C, Tofalo R, Paparella A, Suzzi G. Detection and identification of wild yeast in Champús, a fermented Colombian maize beverage. Food Microbiol. 2008;25:771–777. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2008.04.014 - 63.
Ramos CL, de Almeida EG, Pereira GVdM, Cardoso PG, Dias ES, Schwan RF. Determination of dynamic characteristics of microbiota in a fermented beverage produced by Brazilian Amerindians using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;140:225–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.029 - 64.
Santos CC, Almeida EG, Melo GV, Schwan RF. Microbiological and physicochemical characterisation of caxiri , an alcoholic beverage produced by the indigenousJuruna people of Brazil. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;156:112–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.03.010 - 65.
Steinkraus K. Handbook of Indigenous Fermented Foods, revised and expanded. CRC Press; 1995. - 66.
Vallejo JA, Miranda P, Flores-Félix JD, Sánchez-Juanes F, Ageitos JM, González-Buitrago JM, Velázquez E, Villa TG. Atypical yeast identified as Saccharomyces cerevisiae by MALDI-TOF MS and gene sequencing are the main responsible of fermentation of chicha, a traditional beverage from Peru. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2013;36:560–564. DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2013.09.002 - 67.
Gomes F, Lacerda I, Libkind D, Lopes C, Carvajal E, Rosa C. Traditional foods and beverages from South America: microbial communities and production strategies. In: Krause J, Fleischer O, editors. Industrial Fermentation: Food Processes, Nutrient Sources and Production Strategies. 2009. p. 79–114. - 68.
Piló FB. Leveduras e bactérias lácticas associadas à chicha , uma bebida tradicional produzida no Equador [thesis]. Belo Horizonte, MG: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; 2014. - 69.
Elizaquível P, Pérez-Cataluña A, Yépez A, Aristimuño C, Jiménez E, Cocconcelli PS, Vignolo G, Aznar R. Pyrosequencing vs. culture-dependent approaches to analyze lactic acid bacteria associated to chicha , a traditional maize-based fermented beverage from Northwestern Argentina. Int J Food Microbiol. 2015;198:9–18. - 70.
Lago C, Landoni M, Cassani E, Doria E, Nielsen E, Pilu R. Study and characterization of a novel functional food: purple popcorn. Mol Breed. 2013;31:575–585. - 71.
Schwarz M, Hillebrand S, Habben S, Degenhardt A, Winterhalter P. Application of high-speed countercurrent chromatography to the large-scale isolation of anthocyanins. Biochem Eng J. 2003;14:179–189. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-703X(02)00219-X - 72.
Miller C. Fruit production of the ungurahua palm ( Oenocarpus bataua subsp.bataua , Arecaceae) in an indigenous managed reserve. Econ Bot. 2002;56:165–176. - 73.
Cox L, Caicedo B, Vanos V, Heck E, Hofstaetter S, Cordier J. A catalogue of some ecuadorean fermented beverages, with notes on their microflora. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1987;3:143–153. - 74.
Puerari C, Magalhães-Guedes KT, Schwan RF. Physicochemical and microbiological characterization of chicha, a rice-based fermented beverage produced by Umutina Brazilian Amerindians. Food Microbiol. 2015;46:210–217. - 75.
Carvajal Barriga EJ. Arqueología Microbiana. Nuestra Ciencia. 2012;14:3–7. - 76.
Chang CF, Lin YC, Chen SF, Carvajal Barriga EJ, Barahona PP, James SA, Bond CJ, Roberts IN, Lee CF. Candida theae sp. nov., a new anamorphic beverage-associated member of theLodderomyces clade. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;153:10–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.09.012 - 77.
Cavalcante MS. A verdadeira história da cachaça. São Paulo: Sá editora; 2011. 608 p. - 78.
Lei 10958/04. Presidency of the Republic. Brasilia. Brazil, 2004. - 79.
IBRAC. Instituto Brasileiro da Cachaça. IBRAC. 03/08/2015. http://www.ibrac.net/ - 80.
Lobo P, Jaguaribe E, Rodrigues J, Da Rocha F. Economics of alternative sugar cane milling options. Appl Therm Eng. 2007;27:1405-1413. - 81.
Meade GP, Chen JC. Cane Sugar Handbook. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1977. - 82.
Duarte WF, Amorim JC, Schwan RF. The effects of co-culturing non- Saccharomyces yeast withS. cerevisiae on the sugar cane spirit (cachaça) fermentation process. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2013;103:175–194. - 83.
Aquarone E, Borzani W, Schmidell W, Lima UdA. Biotecnologia Industrial. São Paulo: Edgard Blücher Ltda; 2001. 523 p. - 84.
Passoth V, Olstorpe M, Schnurer J. Past, present and future research directions with Pichia anomala . Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2011;99:121–125. DOI: 10.1007/s10482-010-9508-3 - 85.
Gomes F, Silva C, Marini M, Oliveira E, Rosa C. Use of selected indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for the production of the traditional cachaça in Brazil. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;103:2438-2447. - 86.
Vicente MA, Fietto LG, Castro IM, dos Santos AN, Coutrim MX, Brandao RL. Isolation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains producing higher levels of flavoring compounds for production of “cachaça ” the Brazilian sugarcane spirit. Int J Food Microbiol. 2006;108:51–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.10.018 - 87.
Oliveira VA, Vicente MA, Fietto LG, Castro IM, Coutrim MX, Schuller D, Alves H, Casal M, Santos JO, Araujo LD, da Silva PH, Brandao RL. Biochemical and molecular characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains obtained from sugar-cane juice fermentations and their impact incachaça production. Appl Environ Microbiology. 2008;74:693–701. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01729-07 - 88.
Campos C, Silva C, Dias D, Basso L, Amorim H, Schwan R. Features of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a culture starter for the production of the distilled sugar cane beverage, cachaça in Brazil. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;108:1871–1879. - 89.
de Souza APG, Vicente MdA, Klein RC, Fietto LG, Coutrim MX, de Cássia Franco Afonso RJ, Araújo LD, da Silva PHA, Bouillet LÉM, Castro IM, Brandão RL. Strategies to select yeast starters cultures for production of flavor compounds in cachaça fermentations. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;101:379–392. DOI: 10.1007/s10482-011-9643-5 - 90.
Schwan RF, Mendonca AT, da Silva Jr JJ, Rodrigues V, Wheals AE. Microbiology and physiology of Cachaça (Aguardente ) fermentations. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2001;79:89–96. - 91.
Oliveira Cd, Garíglio H, Ribeiro M, Alvarenga M, Maia F. Cachaça de Alambique–Manual de Boas Práticas Ambientais e de Produção. Belo Horizonte. SEAPA/SEMAD/AMPAQ/FEAM/IMA, 2005. - 92.
Martino DBd. Aguardente: O destilado do século 21. Revista Engarrafador Moderno. 1998;84–88. - 93.
Cardeal ZL, de Souza PP, da Silva MD, Marriott PJ. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography for fingerprint pattern recognition in cachaça production. Talanta. 2008;74:793–799. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.07.021 - 94.
Bortoletto AM, Alcarde AR. Assessment of chemical quality of Brazilian sugar cane spirits and cachaças. Food Control. 2015;54:1–6. - 95.
da Silva AA, do Nascimento ES, Cardoso DR, Franco DW. Coumarins and phenolic fingerprints of oak and Brazilian woods extracted by sugarcane spirit. J Sep Sci. 2009;32:3681–3691. DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200900306 - 96.
Bortoletto AM, Alcarde AR. Congeners in sugar cane spirits aged in casks of different woods. Food Chem. 2013;139:695–701. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.12.053 - 97.
de Souza PP, Siebald HG, Augusti DV, Neto WB, Amorim VM, Catharino RR, Eberlin MN, Augusti R. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry fingerprinting of Brazilian artisan cachaça aged in different wood casks. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55:2094–2102. DOI: 10.1021/jf062920s - 98.
Lei H, Zhao H, Yu Z, Zhao M. Effects of wort gravity and nitrogen level on fermentation performance of brewer’s yeast and the formation of flavor volatiles. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;166:1562–1574. - 99.
Araújo TM. Caracterização bioquímico-molecular de cepas de Saccharomyces cerevisiae isoladas de dornas de fermentação de cachaça para produção de cervejas [thesis]. Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto; 2013. - 100.
Campos ACS. Caracterização de bactérias lácticas para serem utilizadas em processos fermentativos consorciados entre leveduras e bactérias na produção de cerveja. [thesis]. Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto; 2014. - 101.
Sakamoto K, Konings WN. Beer spoilage bacteria and hop resistance. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;89:105–124. - 102.
Carvalho FP, Duarte WF, Dias DR, Piccoli RH, Schwan RF. Interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae andLactococcus lactis in the fermentation and quality of artisanal cachaça. Acta Sci Agron. 2014;37:51–60. - 103.
Dias DR, Schwan RF, Lima LCO. Metodologia para elaboração de fermentado de cajá ( Spondias mombin L .). Ciênc Tecnol Aliment. 2003;23:342–350. - 104.
Vogt E, Jakob L, Lemperle E, Weiss E. El vino: obtención, elaboración y análisis. Zaragoza: Acribia; 1986. - 105.
da Silva MC, de Azevedo LC, de Carvalho MM, de Sá AGB, dos Santos Lima M. Elaboração e avaliação da qualidade de aguardentes de frutas submetidas a diferentes tratamentos. Revista Semiárido De Visu. 2011;1:92–106. - 106.
Dragone G, Mussatto SI, Vilanova M, Oliveira J, Teixeira J, Silva JBA. Obtenção e caracterização de bebida destilada a partir da fermentação do soro de queijo. Braz J Food Tech. 2009;120–124.