Open access

Baculovirus Gene Expression

Written By

Marcelo F. Berretta, M. Leticia Ferrelli, Ricardo Salvador, Alicia Sciocco and Víctor Romanowski

Submitted: October 12th, 2012 Published: November 20th, 2013

DOI: 10.5772/56955

Chapter metrics overview

2,847 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Baculoviridae is a diverse family of insect viruses with large, double-stranded, circular DNA genomes packaged in rod-shaped, enveloped nucleocapsids. A characteristic feature of baculoviruses is the production of paracrystalline occlusion bodies (OBs) which surround the assembled virions at late times of infection. Baculoviruses produce lethal infections in their hosts and OBs protect the virions in the environment after death of the insect until uptake by another susceptible host. Other insect viruses also produce OBs such as entomopoxviruses (EPV) and cytoplasmic polyhedrosis viruses (CPV). EPV and CPV replicate in the cytoplasm of infected cells; in contrast, baculoviruses replicate within the nucleus. According to the size and shape of OBs, baculoviruses were traditionally classified into two genera: nucleopolyhedrovirus (NPV), which produce large OBs known as polyhedra, and granulovirus (GV), which produce small ovoid OBs or granules. The major proteins that form each class of OB are known as polyhedrin and granulin, respectively. Recently, after several baculoviral genomes have been sequenced, a new classification based on the phylogenetic relationships between species within the family was accepted [1-2]. Four genera were defined: Alphabaculovirus (lepidopteran NPV), Betabaculovirus (lepidopteran GV), Gammabaculovirus (hymenopteran NPV) and Deltabaculovirus (dipteran NPV). Baculoviruses are not infectious to vertebrates and they were known from far before they were recognized as viral entities as they produced disease outbreaks in the silkworm rearing. There are more than 600 species described in the literature [3] and some of them are widely used as bioinsecticides to control insect pests in agriculture and forestry [4]. A feature that differentiates baculovirus from other DNA viruses that replicate in the nuclei of infected cells is that they encode a novel DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. This enzyme, of uncertain evolutionary origin, is responsible for transcription of baculovirus late and very late genes. At this time of the infection the transcription of most cellular genes is shutoff and the synthesis of the polyhedrin/granulin becomes prominent to finally account for up to 95% of total cellular protein production. This high capacity of protein synthesis has been exploited for the development of baculoviruses as vectors for expression of foreign proteins.


2. Two types of virus progeny serve at different steps of host invasion

Alphabaculoviruses and betabaculoviruses produce virions of two phenotypic classes: occlusion-derived virus (ODV) and budded-virus (BV). Nucleocapsids of both types of virus particles are assembled in the nucleus of the infected cell. During the late phase of infection, when proteins of the nucleocapsid are expressed, BVs are produced as the newly formed nucleocapsids exit the cell, acquiring their envelopes from the cell membrane during the budding process. BVs disseminate the infection within the host by entering other cells via a mechanism of receptor-mediated endocytosis. ODVs arise at very late times, when nucleocapsids are enveloped in membrane units derived from the nuclear envelope to finally be embedded in the OBs. OBs persist in the environment after liquefaction of the insect cadaver and are responsible for the horizontal transmission of the virus between hosts. Upon ingestion by a susceptible insect larva, OBs are dissolved in the alkaline environment of the midgut and ODVs are released. The ODVs move through the peritrophic membrane and nucleocapsids are delivered into midgut epithelial cells through a mechanism of membrane fusion mediated by specific viral proteins known as per os infectivity factors (PIFs). This primary infection in the midgut is followed by a secondary infection, consisting in the dissemination of BVs to other tissues. In contrast to this infection cycle, which is typical of lepidopteran-specific baculoviruses, infections of gammabaculoviruses and deltabaculoviruses are restricted to the midgut of their hosts.


3. Nuclear events associated with infection

Baculovirus infection causes cells to enlarge and stop dividing; the nucleus swells and forms the virogenic stroma (VS), which is the nuclear compartment where the viral DNA is replicated and the nucleocapsids of virus progeny are assembled. The host chromatin adopts a marginal distribution at 24 hours post infection (hpi), when the VS becomes evident. At this time, it was shown that histone H4 fused to fluorescent protein markers colocalizes with the chromatin in the periphery but not with the VS [5]. The new distribution of the chromatin is determined by the replication of the virus and may have effects in changes operated in the expression of host genes and the progression of the cell cycle. At late times, ODVs become occluded into OBs in the periphery of the VS.

Apparently, the nucleocapsids of NPVs enter the nucleus through the nuclear pores, whereas the genome of GVs is probably injected [6]. Virions of baculoviruses are devoid of histones, in turn the DNA in the nucleocapsid is packed in association with viral protein P6.9, a basic DNA-binding protein. This small polypeptide is rich in arginine, serine and threonine residues, a feature similar to proteins called protamines present in the nuclei of spermatids in many animals and plants. The positive arginine residues in protamines neutralize the negative charges in the DNA backbone while serine and threonine mediate interaction between protamine molecules, resulting in a high condensation of genomic DNA. Once it is uncoated into the nucleus, the DNA dissociates from P6.9 through the phosphorylation of the protein. During infection the viral DNA appears to be organized in the form of nucleosomal-like structures in association with P6.9, as suggested by experiments of micrococcal nuclease digestion of isolated nuclei [7].


4. Transcription program of baculovirus genes

In general, genes of DNA viruses are transcribed in a temporal sequence and the process is highly regulated by infection-derived mechanisms and proteins from both host and viral origin. This stepwise mode of gene expression ensures the availability of gene products required for the progression into the next phase of the infection. Baculoviruses express their genes in three successive phases designated as early, late and very late (figure 1). Early genes are transcribed by the host RNA polymerase II before virus DNA replication, while late and very late genes are transcribed by a virus-encoded RNA polymerase, after starting of viral DNA replication. Products of a number of early genes are required for virus DNA synthesis and for expression of late/very late genes, and at least one late gene product is also needed for expression of very late genes. The progression of the infection into the late phase correlates with the transcriptional shutoff of cellular and early viral genes. Genes belonging to the different temporal classes are encoded in both DNA strands without any associative distribution in the genome. A number of baculovirus genes contains promoters with sequence elements characteristic of both early and late classes. Their transcription is regulated independently at each temporal phase which ensures their expression throughout the infection [8]. Most of our knowledge of baculovirus gene regulation comes from studies in Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV), which is the type species of the family. This alphabaculovirus has a wide host range and causes productive infections in permissive insect cell-lines Sf21 (and its clonal isolate Sf9), derived from Spodoptera frugiperda [9] and TN368, from Trichoplusia ni [10]. The genome of AcMNPV encodes 154 predicted open reading frames (ORFs) [11]. Roughly, one half corresponds to late genes, according to the sequence elements present in their promoters. About 25 gene products, mostly of early genes, have functions directly or indirectly related to gene expression.

Figure 1.

Kinetics of transcription of baculovirus genes. The time courses of steady-state level of transcripts (y axis) of the three AcMNPV temporal classes of genes, in Sf21 cells, are shown schematically. Solid lines represent mRNAs in wild-type (wt) infection; dotted lines represent idealized transcriptional profiles in infections in which a virus gene required for either DNA replication or late transcription was silenced by RNAi (denoted by “-”). Early genes are transcribed by the host RNA polymerase II before virus DNA replication, which initiates 6 to 9 hours post infection (hpi). Transcripts of early genes are detectable within 1 hpi, reach a maximum between 6 to 12 hpi and diminish thereafter (shutoff). Transcription of late and very late genes depends on viral DNA replication and is performed by a virus-encoded RNA polymerase. Transcription of late genes begins with the onset of DNA replication and continues mainly up to 24 hpi, while transcription of very late genes bursts around 18 hpi and continues through 72 hpi. The figure shows that late/very late gene transcription is abolish by silencing p47, a gene that encodes a subunit of the RNA polymerase, which is essential for the activity of the enzyme. A similar effect is shown as consequence of silencing lef3, a gene essential for virus DNA replication, since DNA replication is required for transcription of late/very late genes. However, the effects of silencing these genes on expression of early genes are different. When p47 is silenced, early gene transcription declines as in wild-type infection; in contrast, silencing of lef3 blocks the reduction of transcription, indicating that DNA replication, rather than late transcription, is a primary determinant of the shutoff of early genes (adapted from [65]).


5. Expression of early genes

At the time the virus reaches the nucleus, the template DNA for transcription as well as proteins of the virion that are carried over and may activate transcription are at their lowest levels. Therefore, the success of the infection depends on the ability of the virus to efficiently redirect the cellular system to express early genes encoded in its genome. Baculovirus DNA is infectious without any accompany protein, as proved by the infection that follows after transfection of permissive cells with viral DNA. This indicates that baculovirus early promoters are responsive to the RNA pol II and accordingly, their structural organization resembles that of the host genes which are transcribed into mRNAs.

Promoters of baculovirus early genes consist in a core region and regulatory proximal sequences that may be recognized for specific binding of transcription factors from either the host or the virus. The core promoter includes two characteristic elements: a TATA-box-like sequence and a transcription initiator (INR), although one or both are absent in some early promoters [12]. The TATA box is the site for assembly of the preinitiation transcription complex by first binding of TATA binding protein (TBP). After the RNA pol II is recruited to the complex, transcription starts about 30 nucleotides downstream of the position of the TATA-box. The INR determines the starting site for transcription (nucleotide +1 of the primary transcript), and ensures proper initiation when there is no TATA-box present. CAGT is the most conserved INR sequence motif in baculovirus early promoters. Other activating sequences can be found either upstream of the core promoter or downstream, in the 5´UTR of the regulated gene.

Besides the sequences within the promoter region that modulate expression of a gene through the binding of regulatory proteins, there are sequences that enhance transcription from promoters even if they are located at a long distance. In baculoviruses there are non-coding regions known as homologous regions (hr) that play the role of enhancers [13] (see below).

Baculovirus early genes can be subdivided into two categories: immediate-early (ie) and delayed-early genes. Expression of ie-genes does not require viral factors, whereas the transcription of delayed-early genes was shown to need activation by ie-genes in transient expression assays. The major transactivator of AcMNPV early genes is the product of ie1, a gene that is present in all lepidopteran baculoviruses [14].

Other ie-genes known to regulate the expression of early genes are ie2 and pe38. ie2 is conserved only in group I alphabaculoviruses, one the two phylogenetic lineages in which members of this genus can be separated. In transient expression experiments it was determined that ie2 increases IE1-mediated transactivation of early promoters when ie1 is present at low concentrations [15]

5.1. Immediate early transactivator IE1

AcMNPV IE1 is a 582 aminoacids long protein exhibiting general characteristics of transcription factors (figure 2). It has a modular organization with domains associated to different functions: dimerization, nuclear import, DNA-binding, transactivation and replication [16-17]. Dimer formation is required for nuclear localization since the protein mutated in the dimerization domain cannot be imported into the nucleus [18]. IE1 transactivates early promoters including its own. Two mechanisms are postulated by which IE1 is capable of activating an early promoter: one independent and one dependent on DNA-binding. In the first one, IE1 activates transcription by interaction with cell factors recruited to the promoter regulatory regions. In the DNA-binding-dependent mechanism, the activation depends on binding of IE1 to hr sequences which function as enhancers. The hrs contain a variable number of imperfect palindromic repeats in tandem, separated by non-palindromic sequences. The palindromes are conserved within a genome but differ widely between genomes. In AcMNPV the imperfect palindrome consensus sequence has a length of 28 nucleotides with a central EcoRI site. According to the current knowledge, each subunit of the IE1 dimer interacts with a corresponding hemipalindrome during binding to an hr. Binding of IE1 to the enhancer increases the effective concentration of IE1 molecules able to interact with cellular factors in the promoter region. It was found that hrs also bind cellular factors in sites overlapping palindromic repeats and within interpalindromic regions [19-20]. Hrs are enriched in sequence motifs similar to cAMP and TPA response elements known to interact with transcription factors of the bZIP family. This is consistent with the ability of hrs to enhance transcription from baculovirus early promoters even in the absence of viral factors (see [21]for a review).

It has been reported that AcMNPV IE1 down-regulates the expression of certain genes. Promoters of these genes contain a sequence motif similar to one half of a typical hr palindrome which still functions as a target for IE1 binding; however, IE1 bound to this sequence is no longer able to promote activation, instead it functions as a repressor [22].

IE1 is the only known baculoviral gene that is expressed as part of a product of alternative splicing designated IE0. Compared to IE1, AcMNPV IE0 contains 54 additional aminoacids at its N-terminus. Both protein species are required for an efficient infection, although each one is dispensable given the other is present [23].

Figure 2.

Functions of IE1 during the replicative cycle of AcMNPV. IE1 is targeted to the nucleus by a nuclear localization element (NLE) that becomes functional upon IE1 dimerization. The NLE is determined by a small basic domain (BDII) located at the C-terminus of the molecule adjacent to a helix-loop-helix dimerization domain. IE1 transactivates early promoters through interacting directly with transcription factors in the promoter (A) or via binding to hr enhancers (B). The hr-mediated transactivation mechanism depends on the interaction of the basic domain I (BDI) of each IE1 monomer in the dimer with a corresponding hemipalindrome of an hr repeat. IE1 may bind sequences within a promoter that resemble an hr palindrome half-site and down-regulate rather than activate transcription, as observed in transient expression assays (C). With the onset of viral DNA replication, early transcripts are down-regulated and there is a switch to the viral-encoded RNA polymerase which takes over transcription of late genes. At this stage, IE1 is required for the replication of virus DNA. Hrs may serve as origins of replication and it appears that binding of IE1 to hrs recruits requisite factors to assemble the replication complex (D). This IE1 function is associated with the N-terminal domain of the protein designated as the replication domain. This domain mediates phosphorylation of IE1 at the initiation of DNA replication. It has been proposed that this event is timely regulated and determines the functional switch of IE1 from transcription- to replication-associated activities. IE1 functional domains for replication, transactivation and dimerization, are indicated in lower panel with I, II and III, respectively (adapted from [37]


6. Expression of late and very late genes

Experiments using α-amanitin, an inhibitor of RNA pol II, showed that the synthesis of virus-specific mRNA becomes resistant to the drug with the progression of the infection, indicating that a novel RNA polymerase is induced in infected cells [24-25]. In AcMNPV-infected cells this viral encoded enzyme transcribes late genes mostly from 6 to 24 hpi and very late genes between 18 and 72 hpi. These times correlate with the production of BVs and ODVs, respectively. Expression of late genes depends on viral DNA replication. When replication is blocked with the DNA synthesis inhibitor aphidicolin, transcription of late genes is also inhibited [26]. In accordance to this dependency, whose nature is not known, genes involved in DNA replication are also required for transcription of late genes, and therefore, they are considered as a subset of the factors regulating late gene expression, collectively known as late expression factors (lefs). The remaining lefs, including those encoding the multi-subunit RNA polymerase, are considered to regulate transcription-specific events. AcMNPV lefs were discovered using different approaches including temperature-sensitive mutations mapping and transient assays of plasmid DNA replication and late gene expression (for review see [8]). In transient expression assays, a plasmid containing a reporter gene under control of a late promoter was cotransfected into cells with an overlapping clone library representing the AcMNPV genome [27]. Genomic DNA fragments containing lefs were identified as a consequence of the lack of reporter activity when they were omitted in cotransfections. Gradual shortening of those fragments led to the identification of each lef. Nineteen AcMNPV lefs were identified as required for activation of the late promoter in this system: lef1 to lef12, ie1, ie2, dnapol, p143, p35, p47 and 39k [28] (Table 1). In addition to the lefs, a gene designated vlf1 was found necessary to support expression from a very late promoter. Some other genes influence DNA replication or late gene expression either directly or indirectly, and may be considered as lefs also [8]. Differences in reports on the relative contribution of specific genes appear to be consequence of different experimental approaches utilized in studies.

ORF name ORF number Amino acid residues Homologs in baculovirus lineages§ Functional class LEF function
lef1 14 266 core Replication DNA primase
lef2 6 210 core Replication primase accessory protein
dnapol 65 984 core Replication DNA polymerase
p143 95 1221 core Replication DNA helicase
lef11 37 112 α-I, α-II, β, γ Replication
lef3 67 385 α-I, α-II, β Replication ssDNA binding protein
ie1 147 582 α-I, α-II, β Replication transactivator of early genes, hr-binding protein
lef7 125 226 α-I, α-II*, β* Replication possible ssDNA binding protein
ie2 151 408 α-I Replication transactivator of early genes,
cell-cycle control
p35 135 299 α-I*, α-II*, β* Replication apoptosis inhibitor
lef4 90 464 core Transcription RNA polymerase subunit, capping enzyme,
lef8 50 876 core Transcription RNA polymerase subunit
lef9 62 490 core Transcription RNA polymerase subunit
p47 40 401 core Transcription RNA polymerase subunit
lef5 99 265 core Transcription transcription initiation factor
lef6 28 173 α-I, α-II, β Transcription
39k/pp31 36 275 α-I, α-II*, β Transcription DNA binding protein
lef10 53A 78 α-I, α-II*, β* Transcription
lef12 41 181 α-I, α-II* Transcription

Table 1.

AcMNPV lefs

§ Core genes have homologs in all sequenced baculoviruses. α-I, α-II: Group I and Group II of alphabaculoviruses, respectively. β: betabaculoviruses, γ: gammabaculoviruses.

*There is at least one member in the indicated group having an homolog of the corresponding gene.

6.1. Replication lefs

Among lefs involved in viral DNA replication [29-30], four baculovirus core genes are essential for this process: lef1, lef2, dnapol and p143; they were required in transient assays for plasmid replication as well as for late gene expression. lef1 is a DNA primase that interacts with lef2, a primase accessory protein [31]. dnapol encodes a DNA polymerase with 3' to 5' exonuclease activity. The sequence of dnapol is the most conserved among baculovirus replication lefs; the phylogeny of the family Baculoviridae inferred from its sequence is congruent with that resulting from the analysis of all core genes altogether, suggesting that dnapol is an ancestral gene [32]. P143 is a helicase that requires ATP to unwind DNA. Two other AcMNPV replication lefs, ie1 and lef3, which are present in all lepidopteran baculoviruses, are also essential as determined in transient assays. Nevertheless, their absence in the genome of γ- and δ-baculoviruses suggests that there may be functional homologs of these genes involved in replication/gene expression in species belonging to these genera. LEF3 is a single stranded DNA-binding protein that promotes unwinding of DNA duplex and annealing of complementary strands [33]. LEF3 interacts with p143 and shuttles this molecule to the nucleus [34].

The actual function of IE1 in DNA replication is poorly understood, nonetheless it appears to depend on the hr-binding capacity of IE1. Hr regions function not only as enhancers of early genes but also serve as origins of DNA replication in plasmid replication assays [35]. It was shown that in the presence of an hr element, transiently expressed IE1 adopts a focal distribution within the nucleus. When LEF3 and P143 are simultaneously expressed they localize to the hr-induced IE1 foci [36]. This suggests that IE1 functions by recruiting viral replication factors to the hr origin. The switch to the replication activity of IE1 seems to be timely regulated by phosphorylation [37].

Other genes have a stimulatory effect in transient replication/late expression assays. These are ie2, lef7 and p35. IE2 is a transactivator involved in cell cycle arrest [38] and LEF7 has sequence similarity to single stranded-DNA binding proteins. Both are present in all genomes of group I α-baculoviruses and LEF7 is also present in some other α- and β-baculoviruses. P35 blocks the apoptotic response of cells triggered by DNA replication through inhibition of effector caspases [39]. The contribution of P35 in transient assays reflects its protective effect against apoptosis, and therefore represents an indirect requirement for replication and late gene expression. Actually, it may be replaced in the assays by a member of the baculovirus iap (inhibitor of apoptosis) gene family with similar results. ie2, lef7 and p35 are dispensable for the infection of TN368 cells by AcMNPV [40]; hence, they are considered as host range factors able to extend the infectivity of AcMNPV towards Sf21 cells.

AcMNPV lef11, which was necessary for late gene expression in transient assays, was not required in transient plasmid replication assays. However, an AcMNPV lef 11-null bacmid was unable to replicate its DNA [41]. Therefore, lef11 is essential for DNA replication in the context of the virus infection and may be considered as a replication lef.

6.2. Transcription lefs

The viral RNA polymerase is a complex of the products of four baculovirus core genes: lef4, lef8, lef9 and p47. LEF8 and LEF9 have motifs present in the two large subunits of RNA polymerases from prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and are supposed to participate of the catalytic domain. Their sequences are the most highly conserved among LEFs. The role of LEF4 as a capping enzyme is discussed below, while the specific function of P47 remains to be elucidated. The polymerase complex was chromatographycally isolated as a fraction that was active in in vitro transcription assays using template DNA containing signals specific of baculovirus late gene promoters [42]. In the complex, the four subunits are present in an equimolar ratio.

lef5 is a core gene that encodes a protein with sequence similarity to the eukaryotic transcription elongation factor TFIIS, however, in vitro assays evidenced the ability of LEF5 to increase the transcriptional activity of the viral RNA polymerase at the initiation step rather than to have any effect in the elongation process [43]. The remaining lefs have a distribution among species restricted to lepidopteran baculoviruses. 39k (also known as pp31) and lef10 are considered essential for late gene expression although their specific role in transcription is not known. 39K binds single- and double-stranded DNA and localizes to the virogenic stroma during infection. LEF10 is a small polypeptide without homology to known proteins. lef6 and lef12 are considered auxiliary lefs because although they were shown necessary in transient assays (lef12 is dispensable in TN368 cells), knockout mutants for these genes sustained late gene expression with minor deviations from wild type virus [44-45].

Figure 3.

Cascade of baculovirus gene transcription events. Diagram of the AcMNPV genome indicating the localization of the genes encoding key proteins involved in the regulatory network of transcription and DNA replication.

6.3. Late and very late mRNAs synthesis and regulation

Promoters of late genes contain a TAAG sequence motif from which transcription is initiated. There are less TAAG motifs in baculovirus genomes than expected by random occurrence, suggesting that the activity of this sequence as a late promoter selects negatively its random distribution. The integrity of this motif is strictly necessary for transcription, while adjacent sequences up to eighteen nucleotides may affect the level of expression [46]. There may be more than one functional TAAG over a variable distance upstream the translational start codon of the regulated gene [47].

Late transcripts usually span more than one ORF; likewise, one specific ORF may be represented in transcripts with different 5' or 3' ends. The significance of these polycistronic messages is not known and it is generally assumed that only the leading gene in the message is translated into protein. Late genes are encoded in both DNA strands, distributed over the genome, therefore there may be opposite late transcripts with complementary stretches. It is not known if this may play any regulatory role considering that baculovirus genes are susceptible to silencing by double-stranded RNA [48]. Late transcripts are capped and polyadenylated at their 5' and 3' ends, respectively. At least two enzymatic activities required for capping reside in the LEF4 subunit of the RNA polymerase. This protein functions as RNA triphosphatase and guanylyltransferase but lacks activity of N7-methyltransferase, which is required for methylation of the cap structure in position N7 of guanine [49-50]. A gene responsible for this activity has not been identified in baculovirus. The structure of cap 1 mRNAs includes methylation of the 2'hydroxyl group of the ribose of the first transcribed nucleotide by an RNA cap 2'O-methyltransferase (MTase-I). Several alphabaculoviruses have a MTase-I gene. The gene of AcMNPV has been found to stimulate late gene expression in transient assays [51]. Late transcripts are terminated by the polymerase at U-rich sequences present in their 3'UTR, and subsequently the enzyme adds adenosine residues independently of template [52].

The most expressed very late genes in AcMNPV are those encoding polyhedrin and P10. Their transcription depends on a TAAG initiation promoter but their high level of expression depends on the presence of an AT-rich sequence known as the “burst” sequence, located between the TAAG and the translational start codon [53-54]. The burst sequence binds very late expression factor-1 (VLF1; [55]) originally identified in a temperature sensitive AcMNPV mutant defective in occluded virus production [56]. VLF1 is a baculovirus core gene that is essential for the packaging of DNA into normal nucleocapsids.


7. Cellular responses to infection and changes in host gene expression

Early in infection, baculoviruses produce cell cycle arrest at G2/M or S phase, prior to viral DNA replication [57]. The AcMNPV early transcription coactivator IE2 is considered to be involved in regulation of cell-cycle [38]. The progression of infection is accompanied by profound changes in the expression of cellular genes. The host protein synthesis is shutoff starting at around 12-18 hpi [58]. This was found to be mostly the result of a reduction in the levels of transcripts rather than in translation of mRNAs [59], though the actual mechanism of the decrease in the steady-state level of host messages is not known.

Despite host genes are eventually down-regulated at late times, Nobiron and co-workers [60] found that the transcript of a cognate heat shock protein (hsc) 70 gene was transiently up-regulated early in AcMNPV-infected Sf9 cells. In a comprehensive study of gene expression profile of Sf21 cells using microarrays designed from an EST database of S. frugiperda, Salem and co-workers [61] confirmed the general shutoff of host transcription over time of AcMNPV infection, but interestingly, they found that about 25% of host genes were slightly up-regulated at 6 hpi. The expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs) of the 70-kDa family in infected cells was followed by western analysis [62]. The results of this study showed changes in the cellular pattern of HSP/HSC70s. Moreover, the infection potentiated the response to heat shock, boosting the HSP/HSC70s content of cells several-fold in comparison with uninfected cells.

The actual level of cellular proteins during infection may vary with a different kinetics of that of the steady-state level of their mRNAs. For example, in a study by Rasmussen and Rohrmann [63], the level of TBP in AcMNPV-infected Sf9 cells, revealed constant until 72 hpi. In other study, TBP was actually found to increase between 16 and 72 hpi in Sf21 and TN368 cells, and to co-localize with viral DNA replication centers within the nucleus [64]. Therefore, TBP appears not be targeted for degradation as it is in other viral systems. However, the functional significance of its increment is unclear, given that it coincides with decreasing levels of transcripts synthesized by RNA pol II.

Currently, due to the relevance of AcMNPV as vector for the expression of proteins in cultured insect cells, it is of special interest to understand the global shutoff of host protein synthesis. In this system, the expression of foreign proteins is driven by the promoter of polyhedrin gene, which is most active at very late times of infection. By this time many processes and pathways appear highly compromised, and the expression of certain classes of proteins may be severely affected, especially those involved in traffiking through the ER and Golgi.

Baculoviruses induce apoptosis of infected cells [39]. Programmed cell death functions as an antiviral defense response to prevent production of virus progeny and spreading of the infection. To counteract the apoptotic response, baculoviruses encode antiapoptotic genes. P35 is a potent antiapoptotic protein of AcMNPV that inhibits the activity of effector caspases. The results of experiments using an AcMNPV p35 mutant that causes apoptosis upon infection in Sf21 cells showed that apoptosis is triggered by replication of the viral DNA [65]. Apoptosis induced by this mutant was inhibited when each one of the AcMNPV genes required for replication was independently silenced by RNAi. Silencing of these genes also inhibited shutoff of host proteins synthesis, suggesting that both processes are linked. These cellular responses resemble that of vertebrates which arises as consequence of cell cycle arrest or DNA damage. In a recent report Huang and co-workers [66] presented evidence indicating that infection of Sf9 cells with AcMNPV induces a DNA damage response which is required for efficient replication of the virus.


8. Baculoviral microRNAs

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small RNA molecules of ~20-22 nt that regulate gene expression posttranscriptionally in a sequence dependent way. miRNAs have been widely described in animals and plants and regulate expression of protein coding genes involved in numerous processes. Genes coding for miRNAs are transcribed by the RNA pol II. The primary transcript (pri-miRNA) containing a hairpin loop is processed by the RNase III-like enzyme Drosha releasing the precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA). The pre-miRNA is a ~80 nt molecule that contains an imperfect hairpin loop and is exported to the cytoplasm by Ran-GTP dependent Exportin 5. Once in the cytosol, the pre-miRNA loop is cleaved by another RNAse III enzyme, Dicer, leaving the RNA duplex consisting of the mature miRNA and its complement (miRNA*). One of these strands (the mature miRNA) is then incorporated in the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC), which is then ready to target the specific mRNA and either represses its translation or degrades it [67].

Viruses were also found to encode miRNAs. Strikingly, nearly all the virus encoded miRNAs were reported from DNA viruses, especially those that have a nuclear cycle, with access to the microRNA processing proteins. The majority of the viral miRNAs described belong to herpesviruses. Interestingly, studies of virus-host interactions revealed a complex miRNA regulation with both viral and host microRNAs regulating both viral and host mRNA targets [68-69]. Regarding insect viruses miRNAs, little is known yet. Two viruses, belonging to Ascoviridae and Baculoviridae, were reported to code for miRNAs. The first report of a miRNA encoded by an insect virus was from the Heliotis virescens ascovirus (HzAV). This virus codes for a miRNA that targets viral DNA polymerase and regulates viral replication [70]. More recently, Singh and colleges [71] presented a study in which they found and validated four miRNAs encoded by Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus (BmNPV): bmnpv-miR-1, -2, -3 and -4. This was achieved by sequencing small RNAs obtained from infected tissues of B. mori larvae followed by in silico analysis and validation using northern blot hybridization, stem-loop RT-PCR and poly(A)-tailed RT-PCR. Interestingly, closely related baculoviruses were found to contain these miRNA in their genomes in conserved positions. All four BmNPV miRNAs are present with 100% identity in AcMNPV, BomaNPV and PlxyMNPV whereas three miRNAs were conserved in RoMNPV and only one in MaviNPV. In contrast of what occurs in animals and plants (miRNAs coded in intergenic regions or introns), these microRNAs were found in genomic locations completely overlapping viral ORFs, either in the coding or the complementary strand. In silico predictions revealed putative targets, either viral or from the host. Viral predicted targets include dna binding protein, chitinase, bro-I, bro-III, lef8, fusolin, DNA polymerase, p25 and ORF 3 of BmNPV. Cellular predicted target genes encode proteins related to antiviral defense mechanisms, such as prophenoloxidase and hemolin, or proteins that play an important role in small RNA-mediated gene regulation like GTP binding nuclear protein Ran, DEAD box polypeptides and eukaryotic translation initiation factors [72].

A further study on bmnpv-miR-1 revealed the sequence dependent interaction of this miRNA with cellular Ran mRNA. The GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran is an essential component of the Exportin-5-mediated nucleocytoplasmic transport machinery involved in the transport of small RNAs from the nucleus to cytoplasm. Downregulation of Ran by the expression of bmnpv-miR-1 in viral infection triggers the reduction of the host small RNA population and increasing of the viral load in infected B. mori larvae. In this way BmNPV counteracts the small RNA mediated defense of its host for its effective proliferation [63].


9. Persistent infections

It is known that some viruses are capable of persisting in their hosts without causing disease. This can be accomplished by producing either a latent or a persistent infection. The main difference between both is that during latent infection the virus is not replicating and keeping a minimal gene expression while in persistent infections all the genes are expressing, at low levels, without causing any symptom. Herpesviruses can establish latent infections in specific cell types [73]. This state is characterized by a unique transcriptional program that involves the expression of latency-associated transcripts (LATs) as the only viral products synthesized in large quantities. The virus is maintained as an independent quiescent genetic material within the host cell nucleus. An alternative mechanism is observed in measles virus by which the virus remains at low levels with the production of viral proteins. This is usually referred to as persistent infection [74].

The White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV) is a non-occluded virus pathogenic to shrimp, phylogenetically related to baculoviruses. It was found at very low levels in asymptomatic shrimps. The virus may reside within cells in a quiescent state as in a latent infection or causing a persistent infection [75]. Similarly, a nudivirus was found infecting persistently the cell line IMC-Hz1, derived from the corn earworm Heliothis zea.

Baculoviruses are highly lytic, causing a lethal disease in infected larvae. Epizootics caused by these viruses can reduce dramatically their host population [76]. Persistence of baculoviruses in the environment is mainly thought to be due to the OBs that protect virions from UV light and allow horizontal transmission. But there seems to exist another way for baculoviruses to persist in the environment at low host densities. Baculoviruses can cause sublethal infections, and so be vertically transmitted from adult to offspring [77-79] or may as well become persistent or latent [80]. A laboratory colony of Mamestra brassicae was found to harbour an occult infection by the baculovirus MbMNPV with expression of viral genes at a low level [81]. Later, Burden et al. demonstrated the persistence of this virus in naturally occurring field populations of M. brassicae. RT-PCR analysis showed the presence of polyhedrin transcripts in asymptomatic larvae, indicating a covert infection [80-81]. Similar results were obtained using ie1 as a target [81]. Moreover, these studies revealed that covert infections could be induced to produce overt infections when infecting these larvae with another baculovirus. This means that the persistently infecting virus retains its ability to produce a lethal disease in the larva.

There is accumulating evidence of persistent baculoviral infections. Kemp et al [83] detected baculoviral presence (CfMNPV, CfDEFMNPV and a GV) in laboratory and field populations of Choristoneura fumiferana. Also, there were baculoviruses (SeMNPV and MbNPV) identified in Spodoptera exigua populations that could be reactivated to full lethal forms [84]. A study in field populations of Spodoptera exempta showed that virtually all the insects collected in the field were positive for S. exempta nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpexNPV) DNA and 60% of these insects had transcriptionally active virus, suggesting that SpexNPV is transmitted vertically at extremely high levels in field populations of S. exempta and can maintain a persistent infection without obvious symptoms [85].

On the whole, baculoviruses seem to use different strategies to persist in nature: on one hand OBs permit their subsistence outside the host for horizontal transmission while, on the other hand, they can persist as covert infections in the host, allowing vertical transmission too. Moreover, these covert infections can be triggered to overt infections producing the typical lethal disease in the host. Nevertheless, the mechanisms of reactivation of these sublethal infections remain to be elucidated.


10. Concluding remarks

Among nuclear DNA viruses, baculoviruses have developed a unique strategy to synthesize late mRNAs which consists in having their own DNA-directed RNA polymerase. This enzyme recognizes viral late promoters that are different to promoters responsive to the cellular RNA polymerase. By this means, the infected cell produces high levels of viral proteins at times of the infectious cycle at which the cellular protein synthesis is mostly shutdown. A late viral progeny with a distinct phenotype is embedded in proteinaceous occlusion bodies (OBs) that assemble after overexpression of the major OB protein. In order to exploit their high protein synthesis capacity, baculoviruses have been developed as vectors for expression of heterologous proteins in insect cells. This system is continuously evolving to new biotechnological applications. However, there is still a lack of knowledge about the molecular mechanisms governing the complex baculovirus infectious cycle. A better understanding of these mechanisms would also benefit the development of baculovirus as biopesticides. To this regard, the array of viral factors involved in regulation of gene expression is an important component of the specific virus-host interactions that determinate the susceptibility to the virus of different cell types within a host and of different hosts within a range of insect species.


  1. 1. Carstens EB, Ball LA. Ratification vote on taxonomic proposals to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2008). Arch Virol. 2009;154(7):1181-8. Epub 2009/06/06.
  2. 2. Herniou EA, Arif BM, Becnel JJ, Blissard GW, Bonning B, Harrison R, et al. Baculoviridae. In: King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ, editors. Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2011. p. 163-73.
  3. 3. Herniou EA, Jehle JA. Baculovirus phylogeny and evolution. Curr Drug Targets. 2007;8(10):1043-50. Epub 2007/11/06.
  4. 4. Szewczyk B, Lobo de Souza M, Batista de Castro ME, Lara Moscardi M, Moscardi F. Baculovirus Biopesticides. In: Stoytcheva M, editor. Pesticides - Formulations, Effects, Fate: InTech; 2011. p. 808.
  5. 5. Nagamine T, Kawasaki Y, Abe A, Matsumoto S. Nuclear marginalization of host cell chromatin associated with expansion of two discrete virus-induced subnuclear compartments during baculovirus infection. J Virol. 2008;82(13):6409-18. Epub 2008/04/25.
  6. 6. Rohrmann G. The baculovirus replication cycle: Effects on cells and insects. Baculovirus Molecular Biology: Second Edition [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information 2011.
  7. 7. Wilson ME, Miller LK. Changes in the nucleoprotein complexes of a baculovirus DNA during infection. Virology. 1986;151(2):315-28. Epub 1986/06/01.
  8. 8. Passarelli AL, Guarino LA. Baculovirus late and very late gene regulation. Curr Drug Targets. 2007;8(10):1103-15. Epub 2007/11/06.
  9. 9. Vaughn JL, Goodwin RH, Tompkins GJ, McCawley P. The establishment of two cell lines from the insect Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae). In Vitro. 1977;13(4):213-7. Epub 1977/04/01.
  10. 10. Hink WF. Established insect cell line from the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. Nature. 1970;226(5244):466-7. Epub 1970/05/02.
  11. 11. Ayres MD, Howard SC, Kuzio J, Lopez-Ferber M, Possee RD. The complete DNA sequence of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Virology. 1994; 202: 586-605.
  12. 12. Friesen PD. Regulation of baculovirus early gene expression. In: Miller LK, editor. The Baculoviruses. New York and London: Plenum Press; 1997. p. 141-70.
  13. 13. Guarino LA, Summers MD. Functional mapping of a trans-activating gene required for expression of a baculovirus delayed-early gene. J Virol. 1986;57(2):563-71. Epub 1986/02/01.
  14. 14. Miele SAB, Garavaglia MJ, Belaich MN, Ghiringhelli PD. Baculovirus: Molecular Insights on their Diversity and Conservation. Int J Evol Biol. 2011;2011:15.
  15. 15. Carson DD, Guarino LA, MD. S. Functional mapping of an AcNPV immediately early gene which augments expression of the IE-1 trans-activated 39K gene. Virology 1988;Feb;162(2):444-51.
  16. 16. Slack JM, Blissard GW. Identification of two independent transcriptional activation domains in the Autographa californica multicapsid nuclear polyhedrosis virus IE1 protein. J Virol. 1997;71(12):9579-87. Epub 1997/11/26.
  17. 17. Rodems SM, Friesen PD. Transcriptional enhancer activity of hr5 requires dual-palindrome half sites that mediate binding of a dimeric form of the baculovirus transregulator IE1. J Virol. 1995;69(9):5368-75. Epub 1995/09/01.
  18. 18. Olson VA, Wetter JA, Friesen PD. Baculovirus transregulator IE1 requires a dimeric nuclear localization element for nuclear import and promoter activation. J Virol. 2002;76(18):9505-15. Epub 2002/08/21.
  19. 19. Habib S, Hasnain SE. A 38-kDa host factor interacts with functionally important motifs within the Autographa californica multinucleocapsid nuclear polyhedrosis virus homologous region (hr1) DNA sequence. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(45):28250-8. Epub 1996/11/08.
  20. 20. Landais I, Vincent R, Bouton M, Devauchelle G, Duonor-Cerutti M, Ogliastro M. Functional analysis of evolutionary conserved clustering of bZIP binding sites in the baculovirus homologous regions (hrs) suggests a cooperativity between host and viral transcription factors. Virology. 2006;344(2):421-31. Epub 2005/10/04.
  21. 21. Berretta M, Romanowski V. Baculovirus homologous regions (hrs): pleiotropic functional cis elements in viral genomes and insect and mammalian cells. Current Topics in Virology. 2008;7:47-56.
  22. 22. Rohrmann G. The AcMNPV genome: Gene content, conservation, and function. Baculovirus Molecular Biology, 2nd ed. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US), NCBI; 2011.
  23. 23. Stewart TM, Huijskens I, Willis LG, Theilmann DA. The Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus ie0-ie1 gene complex is essential for wild-type virus replication, but either IE0 or IE1 can support virus growth. J Virol. 2005;79(8):4619-29. Epub 2005/03/30.
  24. 24. Grula MA, Buller PL, Weaver RF. alpha-Amanitin-Resistant Viral RNA Synthesis in Nuclei Isolated from Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus-Infected Heliothis zea Larvae and Spodoptera frugiperda Cells. J Virol. 1981;38(3):916-21. Epub 1981/06/01.
  25. 25. Fuchs LY, Woods MS, Weaver RF. Viral Transcription During Autographa californica Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus Infection: a Novel RNA Polymerase Induced in Infected Spodoptera frugiperda Cells. J Virol. 1983;48(3):641-6. Epub 1983/12/01.
  26. 26. Rice WC, Miller LK. Baculovirus transcription in the presence of inhibitors and in nonpermissive Drosophila cells. Virus Res. 1986;6(2):155-72. Epub 1986/11/01.
  27. 27. Passarelli AL, Miller LK. Three baculovirus genes involved in late and very late gene expression: ie-1, ie-n, and lef-2. J. Virol. 1993; 67: 2149-2158.
  28. 28. Rapp JC, Wilson JA, Miller LK. Nineteen baculovirus open reading frames, including LEF-12, support late gene expression. J Virol. 1998;72(12):10197-206. Epub 1998/11/13.
  29. 29. Kool M, Ahrens CH, Goldbach RW, Rohrmann GF, Vlak JM. Identification of genes involved in DNA replication of the Autographa californica baculovirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(23):11212-6. Epub 1994/11/08.
  30. 30. Lu A, Miller LK. The roles of eighteen baculovirus late expression factor genes in transcription and DNA replication. J Virol. 1995;69(2):975-82. Epub 1995/02/01.
  31. 31. Mikhailov VS, Rohrmann GF. Baculovirus replication factor LEF-1 is a DNA primase. J Virol. 2002;76(5):2287-97. Epub 2002/02/12.
  32. 32. de Andrade Zanotto PM, Krakauer DC. Complete genome viral phylogenies suggests the concerted evolution of regulatory cores and accessory satellites. PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3500. Epub 2008/10/23.
  33. 33. Mikhailov VS, Okano K, Rohrmann GF. Structural and functional analysis of the baculovirus single-stranded DNA-binding protein LEF-3. Virology. 2006;346(2):469-78. Epub 2005/12/27.
  34. 34. Wu Y, Carstens EB. A baculovirus single-stranded DNA binding protein, LEF-3, mediates the nuclear localization of the putative helicase P143. Virology. 1998;247(1):32-40. Epub 1998/07/31.
  35. 35. Pearson M, Bjornson R, Pearson G, Rohrmann G. The Autographa californica baculovirus genome: evidence for multiple replication origins. Science. 1992;257: 1382-1384
  36. 36. Nagamine T, Kawasaki Y, Matsumoto S. Induction of a subnuclear structure by the simultaneous expression of baculovirus proteins, IE1, LEF3, and P143 in the presence of hr. Virology. 2006;352(2):400-7. Epub 2006/06/20.
  37. 37. Taggart DJ, Mitchell JK, Friesen PD. A conserved N-terminal domain mediates required DNA replication activities and phosphorylation of the transcriptional activator IE1 of Autographa californica multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus. J Virol. 2012;86(12):6575-85. Epub 2012/04/13.
  38. 38. Prikhod'ko EA, Miller LK. Role of baculovirus IE2 and its RING finger in cell cycle arrest. J Virol. 1998;72(1):684-92. Epub 1998/01/07.
  39. 39. Clem RJ, Fechheimer M, Miller LK. Prevention of apoptosis by a baculovirus gene during infection of insect cells. Science. 1991;254(5036):1388-90. Epub 1991/11/29.
  40. 40. Lu A, Miller LK. Differential requirements for baculovirus late expression factor genes in two cell lines. J Virol. 1995;69(10):6265-72. Epub 1995/10/01.
  41. 41. Lin G, Blissard GW. Analysis of an Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus lef-11 knockout: LEF-11 is essential for viral DNA replication. J. Virol. 2002; 76(6): 2770-9.
  42. 42. Guarino LA, Xu B, Jin J, Dong W. A virus-encoded RNA polymerase purified from baculovirus-infected cells. J. Virol. 1998; 72:7985-7991.
  43. 43. Guarino, LA, Dong W, Jin J. In vitro activity of the baculovirus late expression factor LEF-5. J. Virol. 2002; 76: 12663-12675.
  44. 44. Lin G, Blissard GW. Analysis of an Autographa californica multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus lef-6-null virus: LEF-6 is not essential for viral replication but appears to accelerate late gene transcription. J. Virol. 2002;76: 5503-5514.
  45. 45. Guarino LA, Mistretta TA, Dong W. Baculovirus lef-12 is not required for viral replication. J. Virol. 2002;76(23):12032-43.
  46. 46. Morris TD, Miller LK. Mutational analysis of a baculovirus major late promoter. Gene. 1994;140(2):147-53. Epub 1994/03/25.
  47. 47. Thiem SM, Miller LK. Identification, sequence, and transcriptional mapping of the major capsid protein gene of the baculovirus Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus. J Virol. 1989;63(5):2008-18. Epub 1989/05/01.
  48. 48. Flores-Jasso CF, Valdes VJ, Sampieri A, Valadez-Graham V, Recillas-Targa F, Vaca L. Silencing structural and nonstructural genes in baculovirus by RNA interference. Virus Res. 2004;102(1):75-84. Epub 2004/04/08.
  49. 49. Guarino LA, Jin J, Dong W. Guanylyltransferase activity of the LEF-4 subunit of baculovirus RNA polymerase. J Virol. 1998;72(12):10003-10. Epub 1998/11/13.
  50. 50. Jin J, Dong W, Guarino LA. The LEF-4 subunit of baculovirus RNA polymerase has RNA 5'-triphosphatase and ATPase activities. J Virol. 1998;72(12):10011-9. Epub 1998/11/13.
  51. 51. Li L, Harwood SH, Rohrmann GF. Identification of additional genes that influence baculovirus late gene expression. Virology. 1999;255(1):9-19. Epub 1999/03/02.
  52. 52. Jin J, Guarino LA. 3'-end formation of baculovirus late RNAs. J Virol. 2000;74(19):8930-7. Epub 2000/09/12.
  53. 53. Ooi BG, Rankin C, Miller LK. Downstream sequences augment transcription from the essential initiation site of a baculovirus polyhedrin gene. J Mol Biol. 1989;210(4):721-36. Epub 1989/12/20.
  54. 54. Weyer U, Possee RD. Analysis of the promoter of the Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus p10 gene. J Gen Virol. 1989;70 ( Pt 1):203-8. Epub 1989/01/01.
  55. 55. Yang S, Miller LK. Activation of baculovirus very late promoters by interaction with very late factor 1. J Virol. 1999;73(4):3404-9. Epub 1999/03/12.
  56. 56. McLachlin JR, Miller LK. Identification and characterization of vlf-1, a baculovirus gene involved in very late gene expression. J Virol. 1994;68(12):7746-56. Epub 1994/12/01.
  57. 57. Ikeda M, Kobayashi M. Cell-cycle perturbation in Sf9 cells infected with Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus. Virology. 1999;258(1):176-88. Epub 1999/05/18.
  58. 58. Carstens EB, Tjia ST, Doerfler W. Infection of Spodoptera frugiperda cells with Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus I. Synthesis of intracellular proteins after virus infection. Virology. 1979;99(2):386-98. Epub 1979/12/01.
  59. 59. Ooi BG, Miller LK. Regulation of host RNA levels during baculovirus infection. Virology. 1988;166(2):515-23. Epub 1988/10/01.
  60. 60. Nobiron I, O'Reilly DR, Olszewski JA. Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus infection of Spodoptera frugiperda cells: a global analysis of host gene regulation during infection, using a differential display approach. J Gen Virol. 2003;84(Pt 11):3029-39. Epub 2003/10/24.
  61. 61. Salem TZ, Zhang F, Xie Y, Thiem SM. Comprehensive analysis of host gene expression in Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus-infected Spodoptera frugiperda cells. Virology. 2011. Epub 2011/02/01.
  62. 62. Lyupina YV, Dmitrieva SB, Timokhova AV, Beljelarskaya SN, Zatsepina OG, Evgen'ev MB, et al. An important role of the heat shock response in infected cells for replication of baculoviruses. Virology. 2010;406(2):336-41. Epub 2010/08/17.
  63. 63. Rasmussen C, Rohrmann GF. Characterization of the Spodoptera frugiperda TATA-binding protein: nucleotide sequence and response to baculovirus infection. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1994;24(7):699-708. Epub 1994/07/01.
  64. 64. Quadt I, Mainz D, Mans R, Kremer A, Knebel-Morsdorf D. Baculovirus infection raises the level of TATA-binding protein that colocalizes with viral DNA replication sites. J Virol. 2002;76(21):11123-7. Epub 2002/10/09.
  65. 65. Schultz KL, Friesen PD. Baculovirus DNA replication-specific expression factors trigger apoptosis and shutoff of host protein synthesis during infection. J Virol. 2009;83(21):11123-32. Epub 2009/08/27.
  66. 66. Huang N, Wu W, Yang K, Passarelli AL, Rohrmann GF, Clem RJ. Baculovirus infection induces a DNA damage response that is required for efficient viral replication. J Virol. 2011;85(23):12547-56. Epub 2011/09/16.
  67. 67. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281-97. Epub 2004/01/28.
  68. 68. Takane K, Kanai A. Vertebrate virus-encoded microRNAs and their sequence conservation. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2011;64(5):357-66. Epub 2011/09/23.
  69. 69. Grundhoff A, Sullivan CS. Virus-encoded microRNAs. Virology. 2011;411(2):325-43. Epub 2011/02/01.
  70. 70. Hussain M, Taft RJ, Asgari S. An insect virus-encoded microRNA regulates viral replication. J Virol. 2008;82(18):9164-70. Epub 2008/07/11.
  71. 71. Singh J, Singh CP, Bhavani A, Nagaraju J. Discovering microRNAs from Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrosis virus. Virology. 2010. Epub 2010/08/31.
  72. 72. Singh CP, Singh J, Nagaraju J. A baculovirus-encoded miRNA suppresses its host miRNAs biogenesis by regulating the Exportin-5 co-factor Ran. J Virol. 2012. Epub 2012/05/18.
  73. 73. Cohrs RJ, Gilden DH. Human Herpesvirus Latency. Brain Pathology. 2001;11(4):465-74.
  74. 74. Rima BK, Paul Duprex W. Molecular mechanisms of measles virus persistence. Virus Research. 2005;111(2):132-47.
  75. 75. Khadijah S, Neo SY, Hossain MS, Miller LD, Mathavan S, Kwang J. Identification of White Spot Syndrome Virus Latency-Related Genes in Specific-Pathogen-Free Shrimps by Use of a Microarray. Journal of Virology. 2003;77(18):10162-7.
  76. 76. Cory JS, Myers JH. The Ecology And Evolution Of Insect Baculoviruses. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2003;34(1):239-72.
  77. 77. Goulson D, Gory JS. Sublethal Effects of Baculovirus in the Cabbage Moth, Mamestra brassicae. Biological Control. 1995;5(3):361-7.
  78. 78. Kukan B. Vertical transmission of nucleopolyhedrovirus in insects. J Invertebr Pathol. 1999;74(2):103-11. Epub 1999/09/16.
  79. 79. Burden JP, Griffiths CM, Cory JS, Smith P, Sait SM. Vertical transmission of sublethal granulovirus infection in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Mol Ecol. 2002;11(3):547-55. Epub 2002/03/29.
  80. 80. Burden JP, Nixon CP, Hodgkinson AE, Possee RD, Sait SM, King LA, et al. Covert infections as a mechanism for long-term persistence of baculoviruses. Ecology Letters. 2003;6(6):524-31.
  81. 81. Hughes DS, Possee RD, King LA. Evidence for the presence of a low-level, persistent baculovirus infection of Mamestra brassicae insects. J Gen Virol. 1997;78 ( Pt 7):1801-5. Epub 1997/07/01.
  82. 82. Burden JP, Possee RD, Sait SM, King LA, Hails RS. Phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of persistent baculovirus infections in populations of the cabbage moth (Mamestra brassicae) within the British Isles. Arch Virol. 2006;151(4):635-49. Epub 2005/12/06.
  83. 83. Kemp EM, Woodward DT, Cory JS. Detection of single and mixed covert baculovirus infections in eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana populations. J Invertebr Pathol. 2011;107(3):202-5. Epub 2011/05/28.
  84. 84. Murillo R, Hussey MS, Possee RD. Evidence for covert baculovirus infections in a Spodoptera exigua laboratory culture. Journal of General Virology. 2011;92(5):1061-70.
  85. 85. Vilaplana L, Wilson K, Redman E, Cory J. Pathogen persistence in migratory insects: high levels of vertically-transmitted virus infection in field populations of the African armyworm. Evol Ecol. 2010;24(1):147-60.

Written By

Marcelo F. Berretta, M. Leticia Ferrelli, Ricardo Salvador, Alicia Sciocco and Víctor Romanowski

Submitted: October 12th, 2012 Published: November 20th, 2013