Open access

Bioactive Bead Type Cellulosic Adsorbent for Blood Purification

Written By

Shenqi Wang and Yaoting Yu

Submitted: November 22nd, 2011 Published: August 29th, 2013

DOI: 10.5772/56223

Chapter metrics overview

3,443 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Cellulose, a natural polymer, has been widely used in blood purification due to its good biocompatibility, and excellent processing which can be easily formulated into beads, membranes and hollow fibers. Sorbent-perfusion is a novel approach of blood purification which can specifically remove endogenous and exogenous pathogenic toxins from the blood of patients [1]. The technique involves passing whole blood or plasma of the patient through a cartridge filled with an adsorbent which can easily adsorb the toxin molecules, see Figure 1 a,b. According to selectivity, generally adsorbents can be classified as broad spectrum, affinity adsorbents and immuno-adsorbents, of which the latter has the highest selectivity [2-5]. Materials, most commonly used are activated charcoal [6], porous resins and fibers. The pathogenic substances in the blood of patients are adsorbed by the adsorbent via hydrophilic (electro-static forces) or hydrophobic interactions. Macroporous resins usually show high adsorption capacities especially for the removal of high molecular weight or “middle molecules” toxins [7-9].

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram of sorbent-perfusion


2. Preparation and activation of cellulosic beads

2.1. Preparation of cellulosic beads [10, 11]

One hundred grams of cotton (medical grade) was soaked in a flask containing 19% NaOH solution for 3 h at room temperature. The cotton was squeezed and weighed then placed in a 1500 ml conical flask at 25℃ for 3 days. Fifty milliliters of carbon disulfide was added to the conical flask which was then sealed and aged for 5 h to convert the cellulose into a viscose solution, which was then diluted to 1000 ml with 6% NaOH solution to make a 10% viscous solution of cellulose. In a reactor equipped with a stirrer, a mixture of 800 ml chlorobenzene, 200 ml carbon tetrachloride and 2.0 g of potassium oleate was stirred for 30 min at 300 rpm under room temperature. Then 300.0 ml of 10% cellulose viscose solution was added to the reactor slowly and continued stirring for 30 min until the liquid particles were dispersed uniformly. Thereupon, the temperature was slowly raised to 90℃ and kept for 2.5 h, after which it was cooled to room temperature to solidify the liquid particles into resin beads. Cellulosic beads were filtered (20–40 mesh) and washed thoroughly with alcohol and distilled water to remove all the impurities.

Compared to the gel type cellulosic beads, macroporous beads can greatly enhance the adsorption capacity for middle and high molecules in the therapeutic embolization of meningiomas [12-15]. It can be synthesized according to reference [16, 17]. In brief, a certain amount of pore-forming agent such as calcium carbonate granules, with an average diameter of about 0.2mm was added to a 10% viscous solution of cellulose, then mixed and dispersed to form cellulosic beads. After washing with dilute HCl to remove the pore-forming agent, various kinds of porous adsorbents could be prepared. Alternatively, macroporous cellulose beads could also be prepared from cellulose solution in ionic liquid by double emulsification [18, 19].

Recently, cellulosic microspheres with a particle size below 5μm have been widely adopted in blood purification [20, 21], which can be an excellent matrix for the preparation of adsorbent.

Bead porosity and density are calculated by the following equations: [10, 17]


where P stands for porosity percentage; rs stands for skeleton density; Q stands for water content; ρH2O stands for density of water; wtw stands for weight of wet beads; wtd stands for weight of dried beads; Vw stands for volume of wet beads; Dp stands for packing density.

Adsorption percentage and capacity can be calculated by the following equations,


Where AP and AC stand for adsorption percentage and adsorption capacity respectively; [C]B is the concentration before adsorption, [C]A is the concentration after adsorption, VP is the volume of plasma used during adsorption.

2.2. Activation of cellulose beads

Cellulose can be easily activated by reaction with epichlorohydrin which is frequently used for the preparation of cellulosic adsorbent [10,22,23].Briefly, 10 grams of cellulosic beads was activated with 10ml epichlorohydrin in 20ml 2mol/l sodium hydroxide solution. The mixture was stirred at 40℃ for 4 h. Then the epoxy-activated cellulosic beads was washed thoroughly with distilled water and further reacted with amino acids or proteins, see Figure 2. The concentration of sodium hydroxide solution used in the condensation reaction plays an important role on the amount of activated expoxy groups linked onto cellulose. This is attributed to the condensation and ring opening reaction of epichlorohydrin molecule that competes in the reactions, see Figure 3.

Figure 2.

Activation reaction of cellulosic beads

Figure 3.

Amount of epoxy groups on cellulose versus concentration of NaOH


3. Mechanism study of molecular recognition between the ligand and the pathogenic toxic molecule.

3.1. Molecular recognition

To understand the interaction mechanism of pathogenic toxins with different ligands is essential, since it not only provides fundamental insight to biomaterial science, but also can lead to the discovery of more efficient ligands for the removal of pathogenic toxins in human blood. Chemical modification of proteins has been frequently used in the studies of structure-function relationships of proteins, especially in the determination of the active sites in biologically active proteins [23,24]. In the present study, we selectively modified the arginine, tryptophan, lysine residues and carboxyl terminus on the protein for the molecular recognition studies.

Lianyong Wang et al [25] investigated the interaction between ss- DNA and IgGRF by selectively modification of the arginine, tryptophan, lysine residues and carboxyl terminus on IgGRF, which was purified from patients’ serum. It is well known that the density of negative charge is high on the surface of ss-DNA molecule, due to the large amount of phosphate groups. After the ss-DNA was covalently attached to the cellulose carrier, the immunoadsorbent is negatively charged, so it has a high adsorption capacity for the positively charged N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) modified IgGRF. The same situation occurred when N-Ethyl-N’-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide( EDC) modified IgGRF because of its decrease in negatively charged density. The low adsorption capacity for 1,2-cyclohexanedion(CHD) and pyridoxal 5-phosphate (PP) modified IgGRF may be attributed to the reduction of positively charged density after modification. From all the experimental results, it is assumed that there is an ionic bond formed between the modified IgGRF and the ss-DNA immobilized immunoadsorbent.

Shenqi Wang and Yaoting Yu et al [24] studied the mechanism of recognition and interactions of low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C) with different charged ligands on the adsorbents. Tryptophan, lysine residues and carboxyl terminus on LDL were chemically modified by PP,EDC and NBS respectively. Due to the effectiveness of L-lysine in the removal of LDL-C, it was selected to study the interaction of ligand with the modified LDL. Experimental results show that positive charge on the surface of LDL interacted with the negatively charged carboxyl groups of L-lysine by electrostatic force, thus resulting in the adsorption of LDL by the absorbent. We also found that increasing the positive charge on the surface of LDL could enhance the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent. On the contrary, increasing the negative charge could decrease the adsorption ability. Thus, different adsorbents containing sulfonic groups, phosphoric groups, L-lysine and carboxyl groups as the ligand were synthesized for investigating the effect of electric charge on their adsorption capacity. Results show that the adsorption capacity increases with the increase of the electro-negativity of the ligand on the adsorbent. See Table1

Terminus group of adsorbentTCLDL-C
Adsorption percentage (%)Adsorption capacity
(mg /ml)
Adsorption percentage (%)Adsorption capacity
(mg/ ml)
―SO3 2-52.581.99860.91.432
―PO4 3-43.861.66744.251.039
PP―PO4 3-40.391.53539.510.928
L-lysine―COO -31.681.20327.980.657
―COO -26.020.98913.750.323

Table 1

Adsorption capacity and percentage of total cholesterol(TC), LDL-C by cellulosic beads having different terminus groups. Source: Wang S Q et al, Reactive & Functional Polymers (2008), 68: 261-267

Figure 4.

The relationship of absorption capacity versus electronegativity of ligands immobilized on the adsorbent. (From Wang S Q et al, Reactive & Functional Polymers (2008), 68: 261-267, adapted)

Experimental results show that the adsorption capacity (mg/ ml or percentage) for TC and LDL-C decreased with decreasing of electro-negativity of ligands on the adsorbents (-SO32->-PO43->-COO-; -PO43->PP-PO43->DNA-PO43-), which demonstrate that the electro-negativity of ligand on adsorbent plays an important role in adsorbing TC and LDL-C. This relationship of the adsorption capacity to its electro-negativity is shown in Figure. 4

3.2. Spacer effect

Spacers have a significant effect on the adsorption property of the resin adsorbents. It can reduce the steric hindrance between the ligand and the large toxic molecules, resulting in an increase of adsorption capacity of the adsorbent. Different spacers have an obvious effect on the adsorption properties of adsorbents. The density of ligands on the carrier and the effect of steric hindrance are both important factors in specific adsorption. When the target substance is a small molecule, there may be no steric hindrance, see Figure 5 a, so the enhancement of the density of ligands can improve the adsorption capacity. But when the target substance is a large molecule, due to the presence of steric hindrance [26-33], a high density of ligands linked may display a low adsorption capacity of target protein, see Figure 5b. In theory, a flexible spacers can reduce the steric hindrance, see Figure 5c. In order to study flexible spacers play the role in reducing steric hindrance between the target protein and immobilized ligands, Xinji Guo et al [34]designed and prepared cellulosic adsorbents with L-lysine acid as ligands and PEG having different molecule weights as spacers.

Figure 5.

Schematic diagram of interaction between the ligand and target toxins

Note: a, Interaction between small target molecules and the immobilized ligands; b, Large target molecules having a steric hindrance to the immobilized ligands; c, Flexible spacer can reduce the steric hindrance,

In this study, carboxyl modified PEG spacer was synthesized and linked covalently to cellulose beads. L-lysine ligand was coupled to the spacer and its selective affinity for low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) was determined. It was found that the adsorption capacity and the efficiency of the ligand for adsorption of LDL-C were increased when PEG spacer was used. Experimental results showed that by increasing the molecular weight of PEG spacers from 1000Da to 6000Da, the average adsorption capacity of LDL-C was enhanced from 0.242mg/ml to 0.903mg/ml. According to the analytical data of cellulose adsorbents, the amount of L-lysine ligand could be calculated. Although the amount of L-lysine linked to the adsorbent with PEG spacers (10.5, 9.8, 9.0, 8.6 mg per ml cellulose adsorbent respectively) was lower than those without PEG spacers (121.6mg per ml cellulose adsorbent), see Table 2, the average adsorption capacity for LDL-C per ml cellulose adsorbent increased from 0.130 mg/ml to 0.903 mg/ml. After the introduction of PEG spacers, (see Table 3) and consequently the adsorption capacity for LDL-C per unit ligand increased significantly from 0.001 mg/mg L-lysine to 0.105 mg/mg L-lysine, see Table 4, the adsorption capacity of LDL-C per unit L-lysine ligand (0.027mg LDL-C/mg L-lysine) was much higher than that without PEG spacer (0.001mg LDL-C/mg L-lysine). This result indicated that in the presence of PEG spacer, the adsorption efficiency of L-lysine ligands was enhanced significantly, see Table 5. It is postulated that appropriate increasing the amount of the L-lysine ligands and the use of PEG spacers can enhance the adsorption capacity for LDL-C.

Molecular weight of PEG spacers (Da)TCLDL-C
Removal capacity (%)Removal amount (mg/ml)Removal capacity (%)Removal amount (mg/ml)

Table 3

Adsorption capacity and adsorption percentage of TC, and LDL-C by cellulosic beads with different molecular weight of PEG as a spacer. Source: Wang S Q et al, Reactive & Functional Polymers (2008), 68: 261-267

Table 3.Adsorption capacity of LDL-C per mg L-lysine. Source: Wang S Q et al, Reactive & Functional Polymers (2008), 68: 261-267
Mol. weight of PEG spacers (Da)L-Lysine amount (mg/ml)Average removal amount of LDL-C (mg/ml)Stoichiometric capacity (mg LDL-C/mg L-lysine)Efficiency of active site (%)*

Table 4

Adsorption capacity of LDL –C by L-lysine ligand. Source: Wang S Q et al, Reactive & Functional Polymers (2008), 68: 261-267

Mol .weight of PEG spacers (Da)L-lysine amount (mg/ml)Average removal capacity of LDL (mg/ml)Stoichiometric capacity (mg LDL/mg L-lysine)Efficiency of active site (%)*

Table 5

Adsorption capacity of TC and LDL by CPS beads with and without PEG as spacer. Source: Wang S Q et al, Reactive & Functional Polymers (2008), 68: 261-267


4. Typical bioactive bead type cellulosic adsorbent for blood purification

4.1. Cellulosic adsorbents for removing low density lipoprotein –cholesterol (LDL-C)

Familial hypercholesterolemia is characterized by a high concentration of plasma cholesterol in the form of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C). In order to decrease the LDL-C level in patients, drugs and surgical intervention were reported [35]. Sorbent-perfusion treatment is currently employed when the reduction of LDL-C level appears impossible to be achieved by drug administration [36-38]. Since the late 1970s, scientists have been engaged in developing different kinds of adsorbents to remove pathogenic substances [39-41].

Yaoting Yu and Shenqi Wang et al [42,43] have developed cellulosic adsorbent with amphiphilic ligands for the adsorption of (LDL-C) which was prepared by the following procedure: Cellulose beads were reacted with cholesterol N-(6-isocyanatohexyl) carbamate in the presence of pyridine in DMSO at 80℃ in order to introduce the hydrophilic moiety. It was then reacted with chlorosulfonic acid in dimethyl formamide to introduce the sulfonic group see Figure 6

The effects of sulfonation and grafting time of cholesterol on the swelling property of adsorbent were studied. Results showed that sulfonation and grafting time of cholesterol was 3 and 5 h, respectively. The amphiphilic adsorbent had a high adsorption capacity for LDL-C without significantly adsorbing high-density lipoprotein. Rabbit model was constructed according to the following method [44]. In brief, Japanese white male rabbits were purchased from local experimental animal institute and housed in a standard facility. After feeding with standard chow and water ad libitum for one week, the healthy rabbits were divided into control group (group 1, n=6) and hyperlipidemia group. Rabbits in the control group consumed standard chow from 120-150g/d and water ad libitum. In the hyperlipidemia model group, the rabbits were fed with standard chow supplemented with 0.5-1% cholesterol, 15% egg yolk and 5% animal oil. After 8 weeks, the rabbits in the hyperlipidemia group were further divided into two groups, that was group No.2 (n=6), (without any treatment) and group No.3 (n=6), (treated by sorbent-perfusion.). Experimental results showed that the LDL-C levels decreased significantly after 2 h perfusion indicating the adsorbent could effectively remove LDL-C, see Table 6. Furthermore, sorbent-perfusion also reduced all the subfractions of LDL-C, therefore decreased the risk for the development of atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction, see Table 7.

Figure 6.

Schematic structure of amphiphilic cellulose adsorbent. (From Wang S Q et al, Artif Cells Blood Sub (2002), 30: 285-292, adapted)

percentage (%)
percentage (%)

Table 6

Removal of lipoproteins by amphiphilic adsorbent. Note: n=6, Source: Wang S Q et al, Biomaterials (2003), 24: 2189-2194

ParameterBefore (mmol/l)After (mmol/l)Reduction (%)

Table 7

Removal of LDL-C subfraction by amphiphilic adsorbent. Note: n=6. Source: Wang S Q et al, Biomaterials (2003), 24: 2189-2194

The authors also developed the adsorbent with lysine and phosphate groups as ligand for the treatment of hyperlipidemia [34, 45]. Comparing to the amphiphilic adsorbent, the adsorbent with lysine as ligand has a lower adsorption capacity for LDL-C, total cholesterol and higher HDL-C. On the other hand, the phosphalated cellulosic adsorbent has a higher adsorption capacity for LDL-C and lower for HDL-C, see Table 8.

Before perfusionAfter perfusionChange=(A-B)/B×100%

Table 8

Effect of amount of coupled phosphate on adsorption capacity. Source: Wang T et al, Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering ( 2008), 27: 132-136

Haofeng Yu et al [46] synthesized PAA-grafted cellulosic adsorbent for the removal of LDL-C from human plasma. In-vitro studies showed that this adsorbent could remove total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, and triglyceride (TG) at levels of 5.55, 4.46, and 2.48 mg /m1 respectively. Unfortunately, it removed 30% HDL-C in the plasma.

4.2. Cellulosic adsorbents for removal of rheumatoid factors

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a rather wide-spread immune disease. Spector reported that there is about 1% of the world's population is infected by this disease. Lianyong Wang and Yaoting Yu et al [25] covalently linked ss-DNA to cellulosic beads for the removal of rheumatoid factors. In vitro and in vivo studies showed that the adsorbent had a high adsorption capacity for IgMRF, IgGRF and IgARF, see Figure 7. Furthermore, the adsorbent attained good blood compatible properties.

Sorbent-perfusion using the above mentioned adsorbent was conducted on 35 RA patients clinically. Clinical protocol was designed as follows: 46 patients were hospitalized from Dec. 1998 until Nov.2000 and diagnosed as RA sickness. The extent of joint pain, swelling, morning stiffness, nodules under the skin, titer of rheumatoid arthritis factor (RF), value of immune-globulin and X-ray diagnosis of sick ankle etc. were all performed. The patients were divided into several groups from the above 46 patients. 35 of them matched the American Rheumatoid Arthritis Standard of 1987[47].

Figure 7.

Adsorption capacity versus amount of DNA immobilized. Note:IU is abbreviation of international unit (Source: Wang L Y et al, Chemical Research in Chinese Universities(2004),20: 795-800)

RA patients were graded into 4 grades according to the functional ability of the sick joint. 11cases having grade II joint sickness, 20 cases having grade III and 1 case having gradeIV. Conventional method of treatment was performed on 30 cases. The control group compared to treated group with a significance of P>0.05.

After perfusion the levels of rheumatoid factor was reduced and platelet count showed no significant changes in 35 RA patients (P<0.05) during treatment. After one week joint pain, swelling, tenderness, morning stiffness disappeared in 90 percent patients; 80 percent abnormal indexes recovered to normal value. After two to three weeks, joint function of 82 percent patients were improved and reached grade II or I. Two to three months later, X-ray examinations showed 80 percent bone matrix destruction was restored. Results of follow-up (0.67-2.5 years) proved that effective rate (97.14%, 81.25%) and total remission rate (82.86%, 59.38%) all had a significant improvement and recovery when compared to routine therapy.

In conclusion, clinical results show that sorbent-perfusion by cellulosic adsorbents is an effective approach for the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis. The treatment is safe, without hemolysis or pyrogenic side reactions, the adsorbent is easy to sterilize and cost effective.

4.3. Cellulosic adsorbents for removal of endotoxin

Bacterial endotoxins (ET), frequently named as lipopolysaccharides (LPS), are components of the outer cell wall of gram-negative bacteria and supposed to be a key factor in the pathogenesis of endotoxemia and septic shock [48,49]. Sorbent-perfusion is one of the best methods to remove endotoxin. Hui Fang and Yaoting Yu et al [10] synthesized a new type adsorbent for the removal of bacterial endotoxins by immobilizing lysine covalently onto cellulosic beads. Results showed that the adsorbent has good biocompatibility, see Table 9. In order to evaluate the adsorbent’s properties, rabbit models were constructed by the following method [10]: Thirteen New Zealand white rabbits (weight 2.0-2.5 Kg) were injected intravenously with 0.20 mg LPS (E.coli O55: B5, sigma) to induce endotoxemia after being anaesthetized. The rabbits were classified into two groups, one was the treated group (n=8) perfused through adsorbents while the other was the control group (n=5) without undergoing perfusion. Sorbent-perfusion was conducted 1.5 hours after LPS administration and conventional equipments for perfusion were used. Blood was drawn from the artery and returned to the vein by peristaltic pump (Pharmacia-LKB). The perfusion was carried out at a rate of 5 ml/min for 2 hours and the adsorbent showed a strong ET-binding capacity. After perfusion, the blood ET level was decreased from 5.56±0.54 EU/ml to 0.41±0.26 EU/ml, see Figure 8. Liver function and renal function tests as well as SOD, malondialdehyde (MDA) assays were conducted. Results all showed that the septic symptoms were ameliorated with the removal of large amounts of ET in the blood which obviously prevented further damage to the organs, see Table 10, Figure 9 and 10.

Figure 8.

Note: EU is the abbreviation of Endotoxin unit, which is used to indicate the content of endotoxin (From Fang H and Yu Y T,et al, Biomaterials(2004), 25: 5433-5440)Figure 8.Removal of ET from rabbit’s blood by perfusion using Lys immobilized cellulosic beads
Amount of coupled phosphate(µmol/ml)068.494.3128.6
Adsorption capacity(mg/ml)TC0.8930.7350.9391.586

Table 9

Biocompatibility and toxicology properties of the adsorbent. R* index of sample=R index of extract – R index of sample tested=0.5/0- 0.5/0=0/0, PII** is the skin stimulation indexNote: The biocompatibility and toxicology tests of the adsorbent were conducted by the Testing and Evaluation Research Centre of Biomedical Materials in Tianjin, China according to the Criteria of GB/T16886.5-1997 in correlation to ISO 10993.4:2002, Source: Fang H and Yu Y T et al, Biomaterials (2004), 25: 5433-5440

Parameters testedResults
Hemolysis1.1% (standard <5% ),(n=3)
Platelet adhesion18.76% (n=3) (10% is excellent; 10-30% is good)
Whole body toxicologyWt. of rat before test Wt. of rat after test
21.5±0.61 (g) 24.4±2.04 (g) (n=5)
Allergic reactionGrade 1, not higher than negative control (n=10), none allergic
CytotoxicologyR* index of sample=0/0 (n=6), none toxic
Skin stimulationPII**=0.0-0.4, (N=15), very mild toxic

Table 10

Liver and renal function tests. Note: n=3Source: Fang H and Yu Y T,et al, Biomaterials (2004), 25: 5433-5440

Figure 9.

Improved activities of serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) versus ET removal by perfusion. Note: the NU is a unit that is used to indicate the activity of SOD, (From Fang H and Yu Y T et al, Biomaterials (2004), 25: 5433-5440)

Figure 10.

Decrease in malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations versus ET removal by perfusion. (From Fang H and Yu Y T et al, Biomaterials (2004), 25: 5433-5440)

4.4. Cellulosic adsorbents for removal of anti-DNA antibody in treatment of systematic lupus erythematosus

The abnormally high levels of anti-DNA antibodies and immune complex in the sera of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients can be removed by sorbent- perfusion. Yaoting Yu and Deling Kong [50] synthesized cellulose adsorbents with DNA as ligand for the removal of anti-DNA antibodies. The activation of cellulosic beads were conducted according to reference [50]: In brief, 2 ml of activated cellulose beads was added to 4.0ml buffer solution containing 4.0mg DNA in a flask and stirred at 25℃ for 20 h on a shaker. Then the immobilized DNA beads were washed consecutively with buffer solution and water, until no leakage of DNA in the rinse water was detected at 260nm by UV spectrometer. The immunoadsorbent thus obtained was stored at 4℃. In vitro adsorption tests showed that the DNA immuno-adsorbent could remove 40%-70% of anti-DNA antibody from plasma [29]. The maximum decrease of anti-DNA level was 80% after 60 min in a dynamic experiment. This high adsorption capacity shows a high potential for clinical application.

4.5. Cellulosic adsorbent for the treatment of myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by a disturbance in neuromuscular transmission that results in muscle weakness. Yaoting Yu and Li Yang et al [51, 52] synthesized immobilized tryptophan cellulosic adsorbent and evaluated its adsorption capacity for binding acetylcholine receptor in the plasma of MG patients. Experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis (EAMG) rabbits were induced by Ta183-200 peptide according to the following method: Briefly, Female rabbits weighing approximately 2 kg were injected intradermally at multiple sites with 500μg of Ta183-200, which was emulsified with an equal volume of Freund’s complete adjuvant. A booster injection of 500 μg Ta183-200 with Freund’s incomplete adjuvant was administered after 4 weeks.

The rabbits underwent extracorporeal whole blood perfusion for 2 h. Results showed no significant damages on blood cells and changes in the concentration of electrolytes. Whole blood sorbent-adsorption improved clinical manifestation and neuromuscular function of the EAMG rabbits, see Table 11

ParameterGroups0 min60 min 120 min

Table 11

Grading of clinical manifestation pre and 5th day after WBIA. Note: 0 stands for the rabbits recovered normally after therapySource: Yang L et al, Artif Cell Blood Sub(2004), 32: 519-528

The neuromuscular transmission function was evaluated by the stimulation of the deep peroneal nerve. The mean decrement of potentials evoked from the anterior tibial muscle, at three stimulation frequencies in the therapeutic rabbit group were determined. At 3Hz, the potential decreased from 21.87% to 17.87%, at 5Hz, decreased from 22.25% to 18.75% and at 10 Hz, decreased from 24.37% to 23.25%. Table 12 shows the changes of the electro-physiological features of EAMG rabbits after WBIA which was on the 5th (D5) and the 8th (D8) day after passive transfer. The same RNS was performed in the control rabbit group, but no decrement was found, see Table 12

No. of rabbitsPre WBIA5th day after WBIA
1+0 - +

Table 12

Comparison of the decrement of RNS between the therapeutic and the control group. Source: Yang L et al, Artif Cell Blood Sub(2004), 32: 519-528

The quantity of neuromuscular junction can reflect the neurotransmission function. On the 3rd day after WBIA (D8), the quantity of neuromuscular junction per unit area (25mm2) of the therapeutic rabbit group was determined. Figure 11 shows the quantity of neuromuscular junction per unit area increased from 9.825±3.401 to 10.90±2.879(P<0.05) after WBIA, which was higher than that of the control group (P<0.01)

Figure 11.

Neuromuscular junctions of the therapeutic rabbit group before and after WBIA on the 3rd day (×200). NOTE: a and b stand for the results before and after WBIA(From Li X H et al, Artif. Cell Blood Sub (2010), 38:186-191)

In conclusion, extracorporeal whole blood sorbent-adsorption is an effective and safe approach in treating the passive experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis by improving clinical manifestation, neuromuscular transmission function, enhancing the quantity of neuromuscular junction and antibody titer.


5. Conclusion and future perspectives

Intensive research and development of cellulosic bead type adsorbents by sorbent-perfusion in blood purification have paved a path for the treatment of patients with autoimmune diseases, hyperlipidemia and inflammatory disorders. Animal experiments and clinical trials have proved that it is safe, efficient and cost effective. Therefore, it is highly potential to be used clinically on patients for upgrading the quality of their living standard and prolonging their survival rates.


The authors highly appreciate the financial support of Key project of National Basic Science and Development (G1999064707), the Project of 863(N0.2002AA326060)and Tianjin-Nankai University Co-Construction Foundation.


  1. 1. BehimE.KlinkmannH.1989Selective and specific adsorbents for medical therapy. Int J Artif Organs. 12110
  2. 2. LupienP J.MoorjaniS.AwadJ.1976A new approach to the management of familial hypercholesterolaemia: removal of plasma cholesterol based on the principle of affinity chromatography,Lancet112611265
  3. 3. SinitsynV V.MamontovaA G.KonovalovG A.KukharchukV V.1990Apheresis of low density lipoproteins using a heparin-based sorbent with low antithrombin III binding capacityAtherosclerosis845559
  4. 4. MaaskantN.BantjesA.KempenH.J M (1986Removal of low density lipoprotein from blood plasma using cross-linked, sulfated polyvinylalcoholAtherosclerosis. 62159166
  5. 5. KojimaS.Harada-shibaM.ToyotaY.KimuraG.TsushimaM.KuramochiM.SakataT.UchidaK.YamamotoA.OmaeT.1992Changes in coagulation factors by passage through a dextran sulfate cellulose column during low-density lipoprotein apheresis.Int J Artif Organs. 15185190
  6. 6. YatzidisH.1964Research on extrarenal purification with the aid of activated charcoal. Nephron72310312
  7. 7. TermanD S.PettyD.Harbeck, Carr R I, Buffaloe G (1977Specific removal of DNA antibodies in vivo by extracorporeal circulation over DNA immobilized in collodion charcoalClin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 89096
  8. 8. Falkenhagen D; Schima H; Loth F (1999Arrangement for removing substances from liquidsin particular blood. United States Patent, #5,855,782.
  9. 9. Von AppenK.WeberC.LosertU.SchimaH.GurlandH J.FalkenhagenD.1996Microspheres based detoxification system: a new method in convective blood purification.Artif Organs 20420425
  10. 10. FangH.WeiJ.YuY T.2004In vivo studies of endotoxin removal by lysine-cellulose adsorbents.Biomaterilas. 2554335440
  11. 11. ZhaoY P.HuangM S.WuW.JinW.2009Synthesis of the cotton cellulose based Fe(III)-loaded adsorbent for arsenic(V) removal from drinking water. Desalination. 24910061011
  12. 12. KaiY.HamadaJ-I.MoriokaM.YanoS.NakamuraH.MakinoK.MizunoT.TakeshimaH.KuratsuJ-I.2006Clinical evaluation of cellulose porous beads for the therapeutic embolization of meningiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroadiol.2711461150
  13. 13. 1718951899Hamada J, Ushio Y, Kazekawa K, Tsukahara T, Hashimoto N, Iwata H (1996) Embolization with cellulose porous beads I An experimental study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.17:1895-1899
  14. 14. HamadaJ.KaiY.NagahiroS.HashimotoN.IwataH.UshioY.1996Embolization with cellulose porous beads II Clinical trial.AJNRAm J Neuroradiol.1719011906
  15. 15. KaiY.HamadaJ-I.MoriokaM.YanoS.NakamuraH.MakinoK.MizunoT.TakeshimaH.KuratsuJ-I.2007Preoperative cellulose porous beads for therapeutic embolization of meninggioma:provocation test and technical considerations. Neuroradiology. 49437443
  16. 16. WangD M.HaoG.ShiQ H.SunY.2007Fabrication and characterization of superporous cellulose bead for high-speed protein chromatographyJ Chromatogr A. 11463240
  17. 17. BaiY X.LiY F.2006Preparation and characterization of crosslinked porous cellulose beadsCarbohyd Polym. 64402407
  18. 18. DuK F.YanM.WangQ Y.SongH.2010Preparation and characterization of novel macroporous cellulose beads regenerated from ionic liquid for fast chromatography.J Chromatogr A. 121712981304
  19. 19. WangH F.LiB.ShiB L.2008Preparation and surface acid-base properties of porous celluloseBioResources3312
  20. 20. ThummlerK.FischerS.FeldnerA.WeberV.EttenauerM.LocthF.FaulkenhagenD.2011Preparation and characterization of cellulose microspheres. Cellulose.18135142
  21. 21. WeberV.EttenauerM.LinsbergerI.LothF.ThummlerK.FeldnerA.FisherS.FaukenhagenD.2010Functionalization and application of cellulose microparticles as adsorbents inextracorporeal blood purification. Macomol.Symp. 294
  22. 22. WeberV.LinsbergerI.EttenauerM.LothF.HoyhtyaM.FaulkenhagenD.2005Development of specific adsorbents for human tumor necrosis factor-a: Influence of antibody immobilization on performance and biocompatibilityBiomacromolecules618641870
  23. 23. ZhouH M.WangH R.1998Chemical Modification of Proteins. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.19 p.
  24. 24. WangS Q.LiC M.GuoX J.YuY T.WangW C.2008Interaction Study of LDL with Charged Ligands for Effective LDL-C Removing AdsorbentsReact Funct Polym. 68261267
  25. 25. WangL Y.LuJ.YuY T.2004Interaction of Rheumatoid Factor with Immobilized ss-DNAChem Res Chinese U. 20795800
  26. 26. YangY.2002Agarose resin for removal of rheumatoid arthritis factors. Master thesis.
  27. 27. HouK C.ZaniewskiR.1991Protein A immobilized cartridge for immunoglobulin purification. Biotechnol. Appl. Bioc. 13257268
  28. 28. AdrianM.RobertoF-L.JoseM G.2000Essential role of the concentration of immobilized ligands in affinity chromatography: Purification guanidinobenzoatase on an ionized ligand. JChromatogr B. 740211218
  29. 29. ChuJ Q.ZhangW H.YuY T.ZhuB R.ChenC Z.2004In vitro studies of the immunoadsorbent for removal of IgA-nephropathy(III). Chem JChinese U. 2514541457
  30. 30. LeckbandD E.KuhlT.WangH K.HerronJ.MullerW.RingsdorfH.1995anti-fliorescyl IgG Fab’ recognition of membrane bpund hapten: direct evidence for the role of protein and interfacial structure. Biochemistry-US. 341146711478
  31. 31. ZalipskyS.1995Chemistry of polyethylene glycol conjugates with biological active molecules. Adv Drug Deliver Rev.16157182
  32. 32. HarrisM J.StruckC E.CaseG M.PaleyS M.YalpanicM.Van AlstineM J.BrooksE D.1984Synthesis and characterization of poly(ethylene glycol)derivatives. J Polym Sci. 22341352
  33. 33. SoltysJ P.EtzelR M.2000Equilibrium adsorption of LDL and gold immunoconjugates to affinity membranes containing PEG Spacers.Biomaterials213748
  34. 34. WangS Q.GuoX J.WangL Y.WangW C.YuY T.2006Effect of PEG Spacer on Cellulose Adsorbent for the Removal of Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.Artif Cell Blood Subs. 34101112
  35. 35. ArmstrongV W.WindischM.WielandH.FuchsC.RiegerJ.KosteringH.NebendahlK.SchelerF.SeidelD.1983Selective continuous extractacorporeal ekimination of low-density lipoprotein with heparin at acidic pH. Trans. Am Soc. Artif. Intern Organs. 29323327
  36. 36. CaoN N.YuY Y.WangM Y.ChenC Z.In vitro study of a novel low density lipoprotein adsorbent (2002Artif Cell Blood Sub. 305361
  37. 37. SatoY.AgishiT.1996Low-density lipoprotein adsorption for arteriosclerotic patients. Artif. Organs. 20324327
  38. 38. ChenB.PanJ L.TongM R.YuY T.1993A study of adsorbents for the adsorption of low density lipoprotein (LDL). Ion Exch Adsorption. 9330334
  39. 39. SreenivasanK.1997Synthesis and evaluation of cyclodextrin 2 hydroxyethy methacrylate copolymer as anovel adsorbent. Polym Int. 422224
  40. 40. BoschT.1996Low density lipoprotein hemoperfusion using a modified polyacrylate adsorber:in vitro, exvitro and first clinical results. Artif Organs. 204344345
  41. 41. BoschT.SchmidtB.KleophasW.GillenC.OttoV.Passlick-deetjenJ.GurlandH J.1997LDL hemoperfusion-a new procedure for LDL apheresis: first clinical application of an LDL adsorber compatible with human whole blood.Artif Organs. 209977982
  42. 42. WangS Q.YuY T.CuiT.ChengY.2002Cellulose amphiphilic adsorbent for the removal of low density lipoproteinArtif Cell Blood Subs. 30285292
  43. 43. ChengY.WangS Q.YuY T.YuanY.2003In vitro, in vivo studies of a new amphiphilic adsorbent for the removal of low-density lipoprotein. Biomaterials. 2421892194
  44. 44. ChapmanM J.1980Animal lipoproteins: chemistry, structure and comparative aspects.J Lipid Res. 21789853
  45. 45. WangT.WangW C.WangL Y.WeiD.WangS Q.YuY T.KongD L.2008Phosphate-based affinity adsorbents for the removal of low density lipoprotein: Preparation and In vitro Adsorption capability testChinese J Biomed Eng. 27132136
  46. 46. YuH F.FuG Q.HeB L.2007Preparation and adsorption properties of PAA-grafted cellulose adsorbent for low density lipoprotein from human plasmaYu H F, Fu G Q, He B L (2007) Preparation and adsorption properties of PAA-grafted cellulose adsorbent for low density lipoprotein from human plasma. Cellulose. .1499107
  47. 47. ArnettF C.EdworthyS M.BlochD A.McshaneD J.FriesJ M.CooperN S.HealeyL A.KaplanL A.LiangM H.LuthraH S.MedsgerT A.MitchellD A.NeustadtD H.PinalsR S.SchallerJ G.SharpJ T.WilderR.HunderG G.1988The 1987 revised ARA criteria for rheumatoid arthritis Rheum. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 31315324
  48. 48. RaetzC.R H. Biochemistry of endotoxins (1990Annu Rev Biochem. 59129170
  49. 49. CalleryM P.KameiT.ManginoM J.FlyeM W.1991Organ interactions in sepsis. Host defense and the hepatic-pulmonary macrophage axis.Arch Surg-Chicago. 1262832
  50. 50. KongD L.ChenC Z.LinE F.YuY T.1998Clinical trials of type I and invitro studies of type? immunoadsorbents for systemic lupus erythematosus therapy. Artif Organs. 22644650
  51. 51. YangL.ChengY.YanW R.YuY T.2004Extracorporeal whole blood immunoadsorption of autoimmune myasthenia gravis by cellulose tryptophan adsorbent.Artif Cell Blood Sub. 32519528
  52. 52. LiX H.ChengY.YangL.WangS Q.YuY T.2010Extracorporeal whole blood immune-adsorption of passively transferred myasthenia gravis rabbits by cellulose-tryptophan column. Artif Cell Blood Sub. 38186191

Written By

Shenqi Wang and Yaoting Yu

Submitted: November 22nd, 2011 Published: August 29th, 2013