Open access

Rice Germplasm in Korea and Association Mapping

Written By

Aye Aye Khaing, Gang Li, Xiao Qiang Wang, Min Young Yoon, Soon Wook Kwon, Chang Yong Lee, Beom Seok Park and Yong Jin Park

Submitted: 11 April 2013 Published: 23 April 2014

DOI: 10.5772/56614

From the Edited Volume

Rice - Germplasm, Genetics and Improvement

Edited by Wengui Yan and Jinsong Bao

Chapter metrics overview

2,922 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Rice is a traditional staple food crop in Korea and many other countries. Although the center of rice origin is still unclear, it is believed to be introduced from China to the Korean Peninsula in the early Bronze Age via one of two possible routes—across the West Sea or along the northeastern seashore from China according to Hammer (2005) and Vavilov (1935). Rice germplasm has evolved through several millennia of cultivation and selection by our farming ancestors. An important consequence of the domestication of both plants and animals is a reduction of genetic variability (Hancock, 2004). Maintaining biodiversity is an important worldwide problem and different countries have various policies intended to preserve biodiversity. Because conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems is closely linked to the quality of human life, the preservation and improvement of ecosystems are problematic for agriculture.

Genetic diversity in a crop species is essential for sustained high productivity. Breeding efforts have been devoted to improving grain quality, yield potential, resistance to diseases and insect pests, and environmental stress tolerance. Progress in plant breeding requires a continuous supply of genes or gene-complexes. In this respect, the researcher is often handicapped by the limited availability of germplasm resources. The assembly of large varietal collections, systematic screening for desired traits and subsequent incorporation of the relevant genes into existing cultivars is imperative to meet these needs. The use of landrace varieties has increased in recent years. Wild rice accessions have contributed greatly to rice breeding as a source of resistance genes (e.g., Xa21, BPH14, BPH15) (Ronald et al., 1992; Song et al., 1995; Yang et al., 2004; Du et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2012). Much of the diversity in the rice gene pool is contained in gene banks around the world. Molecular biology has contributed significantly to an increased understanding of many aspects of plant biology by generating technologies and methods of analysis that provide new approaches or supplement classical methods of analysis. Plant genetic resource scientists and other researchers are increasingly aware of the potential benefits of applying new technologies to germplasm conservation and research.

The integration of genetic data with molecular biotechnology will help breeders produce new rice varieties with the desired traits and make the conservation of rice genetic resources more efficient. Because of newly developed methods for association mapping of genes or QTLs related to desired traits, many genome-wide association analyses have been conducted in rice and resulted in valuable genome-wide association maps to describe the genetic architecture of complex traits. However, further efforts are needed to obtain more genomic information to fill in the gaps of our knowledge and meet the needs and challenges of rice breeding. This chapter will focus on the status of rice germplasm preservation activities, research programs, and outcomes of association mapping in rice in Korea.


2. Research on rice germplasm in Korea

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (2009) had outlined eight major environmental issues as current threats to Korea; global warming, desertification, wildlife extinction, rain forest reduction, acid rain, depletion of the ozone layer, marine pollution, and air pollution. The rate of climate change is faster in Korea than the global average, leading to a rapid reduction in national biodiversity. One hundred and ninety families comprising 4000 species of vascular plants and ferns occur in Korea (Lee and Yim, 1978). Approximately 3700 different kinds of flowering plants are estimated to occur naturally (Chung, 1957; Lee, 1980). Four hundred and seven different endemic taxa in six genera are distributed throughout Korea (Lee, 1982). However, some plant species are on the verge of extinction because of pollution and a wide range of developmental activities during the last 20 years in Korea (Ministry of Environment, 1994), highlighting the importance of conservation efforts (Ahn et al., 1994). Conservation programs usually involve activities such as collection, characterization, evaluation, regeneration, documentation, and storage of each germplasm accession.

The National Biodiversity Strategy was implemented in 1997 to integrate and consolidate plans formulated by various ministries and government institutes, including Comprehensive Biological Resources Conservation Plans. The Rural Development Administration (RDA) Gene Bank is one of the institutions responsible for these plans. Rice research programs covering agronomic practices, physiology, post-harvest technology, grain quality evaluation, rice breeding and genetics, and biotechnology, are led by the National Institute of Crop Science (NICS) under the RDA. Other institutions affiliated with NICS carry out rice research programs to target specific problems in various regions of Korea. From 1980 to 1990, rice sheath blight (Acrocylindirum oryzae) was the most destructive disease affecting production from damaging approximately 555,000 hectares of rice paddy fields in Korea. Furthermore, rice pests including brown plant hopper, white-backed plant hopper, and small brown plant hopper attacked 586,000 hectares of rice nationwide during the same period (NASTI, 1996). A continuous cultivation of only five or six cultivars countrywide should be responsible to the extensive losses from the pests.

Rice season normally begins in mid-April and ends in mid-October in Korea. The lowest temperature in both April and October is 13°C. Because of the unprecedented yield loss due to cold damage in 1980 (damage to 80% of total rice hectarage and a yield reduction of 3.9 tons per hectare), cultivation of high-yielding “Tongil-type” rice cultivars declined rapidly, and only high-yielding japonica cultivars have been grown since 1990. In 2010, 20 mid- to late- maturing japonica cultivars were grown on 891,493 hectares, accounting for 92.9% of the total rice production area (Kang and Kim, 2012). Large decrease of temperature also occurred in 1971 and 2003, causing damage to 17% and 20% of total rice hectarage, respectively. Preharvest sprouting may become a serious problem for rice production, as well as for other crops, because of the trend in recent years for frequent and unusually heavy rain at harvest time. Breeders are making efforts to address this problem.

Rice breeders see the development of genetically improved cultivars using modern breeding techniques as an efficient way to reduce the losses in rice production caused by biotic and abiotic stresses. Sequencing the rice genome for genotyping and developing marker-assisted selection (MAS) system have fast-tracked research efforts. In the past, most national programs gave a lower priority to collecting wild relatives of rice than to collecting rice cultivars. Wild rice resources are agronomically unattractive, relatively expensive to conserve, and difficult to use. However, wild rice germplasms are known to contain a broad array of useful genes (Hodgkin, 1991). The benefits for the landrace germplasms to be used in breeding new cultivars in response to climate and environment changes in Korea are resistances to diseases in order to maintain superior qualities suited to consumers’ preferences. Plant germplasm resource activities in Korea are performed by The Basic Conservation Programme for Nature and Environment (1994–2003) under the Ministry of Environment (NASTI, 1996).

The RDA Gene Bank conserves 24,673 rice accessions, including Korean landraces and wild types. Many gene banks are having financial difficulty to maintain germplasm collections due to a rapid increase of accession number. These problems may restrict a full exploitation, evaluation, and utilization of these accessions, thus managing such collections presents major challenges (Holden, 1984). The concept of a core collection for resolving these problems has received increased attention over the last few years. Germplasm sampling methods include sequential, stratified, biased (for example, by ecology or country), and random sampling. An understanding of factors underlying the traits being sought will help reduce the time required for identification of useful genes. For very rare traits, such as some associated with resistance to virus infection, searching among wild Oryza species and O. glaberrima may be most appropriate. Efficient methods for evaluation of germplasm to identify genes for crop improvement will promote the use of conserved germplasm. Frankel and Brown (1984) proposed the concept of a core set of lines to resolve such problems. A desire core set should include the maximum genetic diversity in a crop species including its wild relatives with minimum repetition and provide a manageable set of accessions to gene bank managers, plant breeders, and research scientists. Such a core collection would become the focus of the search for desirable new characteristics, detailed evaluation, and development of new techniques. An initial set of 4406 rice accessions was selected based on ecological types and accession passport information, including their countries of origin. Using simple sequence repeat (SSR) genotype information, a final core set comprising the 166 conserved accessions currently used by the RDA was generated by a heuristic approach using the PowerCore software developed by Kim et al. (2007). Based on this resulted core set, some association mapping studies have been conducted and further researches are still being undertaken.


3. Association mapping in rice

Association mapping analyzes loci in diverse populations and associates them with both one another and with phenotypes. It is a powerful genetic mapping tool for crops and provides high-resolution, broad allele coverage, and cost-effective gene tagging for the evaluation of plant germplasm resources. Genetic mapping of QTL can be performed in two main ways (Ross-Ibarra et al., 2007): (1) Linkage-mapping as well as “gene tagging” using experimental populations (also referred to as “biparental” mapping populations) and (2) LD-mapping or “association mapping” using diverse lines from the natural populations or germplasm collections (Abdurakhmonov and Abdukarimov, 2008). LD mapping is based on identification of associations between phenotype and allele frequencies. The advantage of LD mapping for the breeder is that mapping and commercial variety development can be conducted simultaneously (Langridge and Chalmers, 2005). For phenotypes or traits that are governed by multiple genes or QTLs, diverse alleles or advantageous allele combinations should be mined by association mapping followed by gene-tagging efforts using biparental crosses.

The localization of alleles relies on creating a statistical association between markers and QTL alleles and on the efficacy of markers. For markers to be effective, they must be closely linked to the target locus and be able to detect polymorphisms in material likely to be used in a breeding program. Improvements in marker screening techniques have facilitated the tracking of genes (Subudhi et al., 2006). Isoenzyme and other protein-based marker systems had in wide long been used before DNA markers became popular (Langridge and Chalmers, 2005). Since then, a variety of DNA-based molecular markers have been developed, including restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs), random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs) (Williams et al., 1990), amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) (Vos et al., 1995), SSRs (Litt and Luty, 1989), single-strand conformational polymorphisms (SSCPs), cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers (Koniecyzn and Asubel, 1993), sequence tagged sites (STSs) (Olson et al. 1989), sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers (Martin et al., 1991), and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (Brookes, 1999). A total of 2740 SSRs were experimentally confirmed for rice in 2002 or approximately one SSR for every 157 kb (McCouch, 2002). The highly polymorphic nature of many microsatellites is of particular value (Banni et al., 2012, Yoon et al., 2012, Moe and Park, 2012, Zhao et al., 2012a; Khaing et al., 2013) for analysis of closely related genotypes or within narrowly adapted gene pools. Thus, the availability of a high-density SSR map is a valuable public resource for interpretation of the functional significance of the rapidly emerging rice genome sequence information.

The next generation of genetic markers is based on SNPs, which provide an attractive tool for QTL mapping studies and marker-assisted selection in plant breeding programs (Mohler and Schwarz, 2005). SNP discovery is performed primarily in silico or using new sequencing approaches (Henry and Edwards, 2009). Large-scale SNP analysis is now possible in plants using a range of platforms. The increasing ease of sequencing and automated genotyping has made association mapping in plants a more attractive option by altering the conventional plant genome mapping method, which involves linkage analysis in a segregating population. This trend is likely to continue as the sequencing of genomes increases. Recently, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with SNP variants have been conducted using new sequencing platforms (Table 1).

3.1. International rice association-mapping activity

Genome mapping of rice was first attempted using linkage analysis of appearance or phenotype (Nagao and Takahashi, 1963). Nowadays, improvement of the linkage map has been achieved using isozymes (Nakagahra, 1977) and RFLPs and SSRs (McCouch et al., 1988; Saito et al., 1991; McCouch et al., 1991 and Yu et al., 1991, Tanksley et al., 1991, Causse et al., 1994; Kurata et al., 1994; Harushima et al., 1998; McCouch et al., 2002). Relatively few association-mapping studies in rice have been performed. Some rice association-mapping studies using various populations and molecular markers are summarized in Table 1 in which most are conducted using SSR markers.

Whole-genome resequencing is a promising strategy to identify the relationship between sequence variation and normal or mutant phenotypes. High-throughput genome resequencing - if accurate - has the advantage of allowing researchers to identify the specific nucleotides associated with a given phenotype, and allowing the effective detection and analysis of genetic variations important for molecular breeding. An important application of NGS is the resequencing of targeted regions for the identification of mutant alleles, and we believe that mapping by sequencing will become a centerpiece in efforts to discover the genes responsible for QTLs. Generally speaking, the availability of a wide range of low- and high-multiplex single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay methods (sequencing accuracy and depth of coverage relies on the experimental design) makes SNPs an ideal marker option for QTL mapping, association analysis, MAS, and the construction of high-density genetic maps for fine mapping and cloning of agronomically important genes (McCouch et al., 2010).

SNP discovery by resequencing whole-genome or subgenome of sample materials is often among the first use of a reference genome sequence. For inbreeding species such as rice, lines to be resequenced are normally purified through 1 or 2 generations of inbreeding (via single seed descent). After a DNA sample is resequenced using NGS technology, SNPs can be identified by comparing the sequenced genome with a reference genome like Nipponbare for japonica rice. For example, using information on the features of the B73, Gore et al. (2009) targeted the gene fraction of the maize genome for resequencing in the founder inbred lines of the nested association mapping population. Two data sets comprising 3.3 million SNPs were used to produce a first haplotype map (“HapMap”) and to analyze the distribution of recombination and diversity along the maize chromosomes.

A suitable example is the construction of a comprehensive HapMap for rice that was used for the genome-wide associate study of 14 agronomic traits, such as heading date and tillering (Huang et al., 2010). The researchers made use of low-coverage (1-fold per rice line) sequence data across lines, for a combined coverage of ~508-fold, and detected 3.6 million SNPs which can explain ~36% of the phenotypic variance for 14 agronomic traits. This work provided a new approach to low-fold sequence coverage, which can be used to detect not only SNPs but also more complex polymorphisms, and partially overcome the need for deeper sequence coverage (Clark, 2010). Further study was performed with the similar strategy for 950 worldwide rice varieties by Huang et al. (2012) and thirty-two novel loci associated with flowering time and ten grain-related traits were identified. Additionally, 40 cultivated accessions selected from the major groups of rice and 10 from their wild progenitors (O. rufipogon and O. nivara) were resequenced to >15X raw data coverage (Xu et al., 2012). After mapping the sequence read back to an IRGSP reference genome, the authors investigated the genome-wide variation pattern in a comparative analysis. The data revealed examples of structural variation in genomes and included 6.5 million high-quality SNPs after excluding sites with missing data in any accession. Using these population and SNP data, the authors also identified thousands of new rice genes and tracked down those with a significantly lower diversity in cultivated, but not wild rice. These variants represent a valuable resource for those interested in improving rice cultivars.

Preferences in terms of the processing, cooking, and eating qualities of rice differ globally. Plant breeders are attempting to fulfill consumer demand for rice varieties with specific qualities. The major components of rice grain quality include appearance, milling, cooking, eating, and nutritional aspects. The chemical composition of rice grain is important because of its relationship with eating quality of rice. Amylose content is one of the most important traits that determine cooking quality, which is controlled by a major locus waxy (Wx) on chromosome 6 (Wang et al., 1992; He et al., 1999; Tan et al., 1999). Genes associated with amylose content, such as starch synthase IIa (SSIIa) and Wx, are of particular interest. Sano et al. (1986) identified two alleles of the Wx locus using RFLP markers that correspond to the indica and japonica subspecies. Most grain quality mapping studies have used the O. sativa germplasm (He et al., 1999; Tan et al., 1999, 2000, 2001; Zhou et al., 2003). Borba et al. (2010) conducted association mapping study on yield traits and grain quality traits including amylose content, and the significant association detected between amylose content and RM190 was in agreement with previous QTL analyses. Zhao et al. (2011) identified 44,100 SNP variants across 413 diverse rice accessions collected from 82 countries and observed GWAS for six categories of traits covering morphology related traits; yield-related traits; seed and grain morphology related traits; stress-related phenotypes; cooking, eating and nutritional-quality-related traits; and plant development, represented by flowering time. This study demonstrated that different traits have different genetic architectures.

Olsen and Purugganan (2002) elucidated the origin and evolution of glutinous rice based on the haplotype of the Wx gene. By using dCAPS markers, waxy mutations and waxy rice cultivation were shown to have occurred predominantly in the japonica line during the evolution of domestic rice cultivation (Yamanaka et al., 2004). Genetic polymorphisms of starch-synthesis genes have been demonstrated to be associated with starch physicochemical properties using molecular markers such as SSRs, SNPs, and STSs. These markers can be extremely useful in marker-assisted breeding (Bao et al., 2002; Bao et al., 2006a). SSIIa was identified as the major gene responsible for determination of gelatinization temperature (GT). Among four SNPs in the SSIIa gene, some that cause amino acid substitutions have been identified. The GC/TT SNP is strongly associated with GT (Bao et al., 2006b; Nakamura et al., 2005; Umemoto and Aoki, 2005; Waters et al., 2006).

Rice nutritional quality is another important factor for consumer acceptance. In developing countries where rice is the main food, its nutrient content makes a significant contribution to the intake of some essential nutrients. Interest in natural antioxidants in rice is growing due to their role in preventing oxidative stress-related diseases (Aguilar-Garcia et al., 2007; Willcox et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2013). Rice contains antioxidant compounds such as γ-oryzanols, tocols, and polyphenols, which are associated with a reduced risk of developing chronic diseases such as cardio vascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and some cancers (Liu, 2007; Tan et al., 2001; Toyokuni et al., 2002). Pigments and flavonoids in colored rice are positively correlated with the antioxidant capacity (Xia et al., 2003; Yawadio et al., 2007). Association mapping of pigments and flavonoid contents was carried out in brown rice using SSR markers. Significant correlations between phytochemical content and marker loci were found and markers associated with multi-phenotypic traits such as grain color, phenolic content and antioxidant capacity were identified (Shao et al., 2011).

The amino acid composition of rice grain is an important characteristic related to nutrient quality. Environmental conditions, potash, and nitrogen dramatically influence the amino acid and protein contents of rice (Wu et al., 2004). Few reports of mapping of QTLs for the contents of protein and amino acids in rice grain have been published. Twelve main effect QTLs (M-QTLs) were identified for 10 components of amino acid content in milled rice. Most of the main effect QTLs for amino acid content tended to co-localize within the genome (Lu et al., 2009).

Although many QTL analyses and genetic mapping studies of grain quality have been conducted, association-mapping studies of biotic and abiotic traits in rice are few in number. The genes or QTLs related to these traits are complex. Genetic mapping, including association mapping and linkage mapping, are useful methods of identifying alleles for these traits. As shown in Table 1, most association-mapping studies focused on morphological and agronomic characteristics. Four studies were related to grain and eating quality and only one addressed disease resistance and aluminum tolerance. Biotic and abiotic stress-tolerance traits remain to be explored by association mapping.

Reference Number of accessions and population type Number and types of markers used Traits
Virk et al., 1996 200 rice accessions 7 RAPD Ten morphological traits; culm number, culm length, culm diameter, grain length, grain width, leaf length, leaf width, days to 50% flowering, panicle length and seedling height
Zhang et al., 2005 218 inbred lines, worldwide germplasms 60 SSR, 114 RFLPs Multiple agronomic traits such as plant height, heading date, flag leaf length and width, tiller number, stem diameter, panicle length, grain length and width, grain length/width ratio, grain thickness, 1000-grain weight
Iwata et al., 2007 332 rice accessions 179 RFLPs Size and shape of milled rice grains
Agrama et al., 2007 183 rice accessions 123 SSRs Grain length and width, grain length/width ratio, 100 grain weight, grain thickness
Yan et al., 2009 90 accessions 108 SSRs + 1 indel Single, dual and total stigma exsertions and spikelet characteristics
Wen et al., 2009 170 rice accessions 126 SSRs, 6 indels Heading date, plant height, panicle length
Borba et al., 2010 242 inbred lines, worldwide germplasms 86 SSRs Yield, amylose content, head-milled rice
Huang et al., 2010 517 landraces including japonica and indica ~3.6 million SNPs Fourteen agronomic traits
Iwata et al., 2010 332 rice accessions 179 RFLPs Grain shape variation
Jin et al., 2010 416 rice accessions 100 SSRs Grain color
Ordonez Jr. et al., 2010 192 elite rice breeding lines and tropical japonica germplasm base 97 SSRs Grain quality and flowering time
Zhao et al., 2010 395 diverse O. sativa accessions 1,536 SNPs Amylose content
Famoso et al., 2011 373 diverse O. sativa accessions 36,901 SNPs Al tolerance
Hu et al., 2011 303 O. sativa accessions 24 SSRs Awness
Zhao et al., 2011 413 diverse accessions of O. sativa 44,100 SNPs Thirty-four traits of agronomic characteristics, cooking and eating quality, disease resistance
Bryant et al., 2011 174 accessions 156 SSRs Silica concentration in rice hulls
Li et al., 2011 217 accessions 154 SSRs and 1 indel Yield and yield components among 14 traits
Lou et al., 2011 48 accessions 218 markers (SSRs + indels) Grain metabolites
Shao et al., 2011 416 rice accessions including 361 white rice, 50 red rice, and 6 black rice 100 SSRs Color parameters of brown rice grain, phenolic content, flavonoid content and antioxidant activity
Zhang et al., 2011 A core collection consisting of 150 rice varieties 274 SSRs Six morphological traits: glume hair, phenol reaction, length of 1st-2nd rachis internode, glume color at heading, leaf hair, and grain length/width
Zhou et al., 2012 128 japonica rice varieties 152 SSRs Eleven quantitative traits of agronomic and economic importance
Huang et al., 2012 950 worldwide rice cultivars 1,345,417 SNPs Flowering time and grain yield traits
Jia et al., 2012 217 entries 154 SSR markers and 1 indel marker Sheath blight resistance
Li et al., 2012 203 accessions 154 SSRs and 1 indel Harvest index and related components among 14 traits
Clark et al., 2013 233 rice (Oryza sativa) accessions 36,901 SNPs Root growth and development

Table 1.

International association-mapping studies of various traits using various markers in rice.

3.2. Association mapping of rice in Korea

To identify useful alleles from a representative core set of rice lines for transferring into elite lines, an allele-mining set of 166 accessions (Zhao et al., 2010) was successfully developed from 4046 rice accessions which were selected from 10368 accessions in the Korea RDA Gene Bank by 39 phenotype traits (Chung and Park, 2009), through a modified heuristic algorithm approach based on 15 SSR markers using the PowerCore software (Kim et al., 2007). Chung et al. also employed the PowerCore software of Kim et al. to develop the first preliminary core set by phenotypes. The gene diversity and population structure (Q) were analyzed using PowerMarker 3.25 (Liu and Muse, 2005) and Structure 2.2 (Evanno et al., 2005) based on 170 SSR markers. Analysis of these data identified the major substructure groups when the number of populations was set at four (Fig. 1).

Association mapping was conducted on this core set of lines over the past 2 years (as shown in Table 2). Zhao et al. (2012b) analyzed 130 accessions from the core set using 170 SSR markers for association analysis of physicochemical traits related to eating quality. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns and distributions are of fundamental importance for genome-wide mapping associations. The mean r2 value for all intrachromosomal loci pairs was 0.0940. LD between linked markers decreased with distance. Marker–trait associations were investigated using the unified mixed-model approach considering both Q and kinship (K). In total, 101 marker–trait associations (P <0.05) were identified using 52 SSR markers covering 12 chromosomes (Fig. 2.). Although direct comparisons of the chromosomal locations of marker–trait associations with previously reported QTLs are difficult because different materials and mapping molecular markers were used, most marker–trait associations were located in regions containing QTLs associated with a given trait. Indeed, some were located in similar or proximal regions related to starch synthesis. The new markers related to eating quality will facilitate the understanding of QTLs and marker-assisted selection (Zhao et al., 2012b).

Figure 1.

Values of ΔK, with its modal value used to detect the true K of four groups (K = 4). For each K value, five independent runs (blue diamonds) were considered and averaged over the replicates (Zhao et al., 2012b).

Reference Numbers of lines and population type Number and types of markers used Traits
Zhao et al., 2009 84 accessions from land race core set 25 SSRs 16 amino acids
Zhao et al., 2012 130 accessions from core set 170 SSRs Eating quality
Lu et al., 2012a 104 accessions from core set 86 SNPs and indels Amylose content, RVA
Lu et al., 2012b 107 accessions from core set 83 SNPs, indels, and SSRs Amylose content, RVA

Table 2.

Rice association-mapping studies for various traits and marker types in Korea.

Figure 2.

The positions of markers used and marker–trait associations on 12 chromosomes except unmapped markers. Genetic distances are indicated as cM on the left of each map and the corresponding trait-marker names are indicated on the right. AC, amylase content; PKV, peak viscosity; TV, trough viscosity; BD, breakdown viscosity; FV, final viscosity; SBV, setback viscosity; PKT, peak time; fa, degree of polymerization (DP) ≤12; fb2, 24<DP ≤36; fb3, DP<36 (Zhao et al., 2012b).

Association analysis of candidate genes has been used to trace the origin of agronomically important traits. Lu et al. (2012a) used the rice core lines for association-mapping to investigate the relationship between sequence variations from parts of 10 SSRGs and the amylose content (AC) and rapid viscosity analysis (RVA) profiles. Eighty-six sequence variations were found in 10 sequenced amplicons including 79 SNPs, six insertion-deletions (indels), and one polymorphic SSR. Among them, 61 variations were exon-based, of which 41 should lead to amino acid changes. The association mapping results showed a sum of four significant associations between three phenotypic indices and three sequence variations. An ADP - glucose pyrophosphorylase small subunit 1 (OsAGPS1) SNP (A to G) was significantly associated with increased AC (P <0.001, r2 = 15.6%) while a 12-bp deletion of an AGPase large subunit 4 (OsAGPL4) (Table 3) was significantly related to decreased breakdown viscosity (P <0.001, r2 = 16.6%) in both general linear model (GLM) and mixed linear model (MLM) (Lu et al., 2012a). One SNP with a g/c transversion at the 63rd nucleotide downstream of the OsBEIIb gene termination codon on rice chromosome 2 was significantly associated with multiple trait indices in both the GLM and MLM, including the final viscosity (P <0.001, r2 = 23.87%), in both 2009 and 2010, and AC (P <0.01, r2 = 11.25%) and trough viscosity (P <0.01, r2 = 20.43) in 2010 (Table 4). This study provided a new perspective on the use of allele mining in breeding strategies based on marker-assisted selection (Lu et al., 2012b).

Table 3.

Association between sequence variations and phenotype

AAc, amino acid changes; P_GLM, adjusted P-values with 1000 permutations; P_MLM, P-values significant in the FDR test; amino acid code: S, serine; A, alanine; N, asparagine; D, aspartic acid; BDV, breakdown viscosity; AC, amylase content; FV, final viscosity (Lu and Park, 2012a).

Table 4.

Associations between sequence variations and eating quality indicators.

P_GLM: adjusted P-values with 10,000 permutations in GLM; P_MLM: nominal P-values in MLM; Q value: adjusted nominal P-value in MLM by false discovery rate; AC: amylose content; PV: peak viscosity; TV: trough viscosity; FV: final viscosity (Lu and Park, 2012b).

Zhao et al. (2009) evaluated the contents of 16 amino acids in brown rice by genotyping using 25 SSR markers. A total of 42 marker-trait associations for amino acid content covering three chromosomes (P <0.05) were identified by the MLM model (Fig. 4), which accounted for more than 40% of the total variation (Zhao et al., 2009). In our research group, association mapping of rice traits related to cold-stress tolerance during germination, preharvest sprouting resistance, salt tolerance, blast disease resistance, and grain physicochemical properties are undertaken using SSRs and SNP variants on advanced resequencing platforms.

Figure 3.

Three regions of putative marker–trait associations on three chromosomes (3, 7, and 8) for amino acid content in brown rice. Genetic distances are indicated in cM on the left of each map and the corresponding marker names are indicated on the right. Ala, alanine; Arg, arginine; Asp, aspartic acid; Glu, glutamine; Gly, glycine; His, histidine; Ile, isoleucine; Leu, leucine; Lys, lysine; Met, methionine; Phe, phenylalanine; Pro, proline; Ser, serine; Thr, threonine; Tyr, tyrosine; Val, valine (Zhao et al., 2009).

In conclusion, association mapping is a promising approach to overcoming the limitations of conventional linkage mapping in plant breeding. Recent research has demonstrated the significant potential of LD-based association mapping of physicochemical traits and other important agronomic traits in rice accessions using SSR/SNP markers. This type of mapping could be a useful alternative to linkage mapping for the detection of marker–trait associations, and lead to implementation of marker-assisted selection in rice breeding programs.


4. Future directions

4.1. Genomics and GWAS in germplasm research

With the development of next- and third-generation sequencing technologies, the whole genomes of individual rice accessions can now be sequenced with less than $ 1000 (US dollar). Also, new efficient genotyping technologies, such as RADs (Restriction Associated DNAs) (Baird et al., 2008) and GBS (Genotyping-by-Sequencing) allow the generation of genotyping data for up to 40,000 genes at low cost in few days.

Natural alleles and alleles obtained from artificially mutagenized populations provide an important resource for crop breeding. By using all available alleles and detailed phenotypic data from core sets of rice lines, new genes and useful traits can be identified. Molecular tags for useful traits developed using GWASs based on genotypic and phenotypic information can be used to track target traits during segregation of populations in rice breeding (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

A schematic illustration of inter-disciplinary relationships between genomic research and other fields in the breeding of crop species.

To identify new alleles from a representative core set of rice lines and transfer them into elite lines, we finally selected 166 from ~25,000 accessions in the RDA Gene Bank. We completed whole-genome resequencing of 84 core accessions with 7x coverage in 2012. We plan to resequence the whole genomes of the remaining 82 core accessions in addition to 84 bred varieties from a validation set in 2013. We are currently undertaking the phenotyping of the core accessions for agronomic traits, and chemical composition for the GWAS analysis with the resequence information. We are also planning to improve the software algorithm for the association analysis to increase the ability to identify alleles from the core set of lines using whole genomic SNP or indel genotype data and phenotypic information. More precise characterization of rice traits that confer resistance to stress from climate change is required to screen useful alleles using GWASs. Using whole-genome genotype information, we are able to develop large numbers of molecular tags across 12 different rice linkage groups based on their contributions to specific phenotypes.

4.2. Strategy for identification of major and minor QTLs for molecular breeding

The core accessions are highly diverse with many traits useful for rice breeding. Upon selection of an accession with a desirable trait, bi-parental mapping populations will be developed using two japonica varieties (Shindongjinbyeo and Junambyeo) and one indica variety (Hanareumbyeo). Major QTLs will be surveyed with an F8 RIL-segregating population using whole-genome resequencing of 96 samples for first mapping, and then, we can resequence this target region using the expanded 3000 to 5000 samples for fine mapping till the targeted gene can be cloned. We expect that all major QTLs will contribute more than 10% to target traits. To identify minor QTLs that contribute less than 10% to a target trait, BC4F1 population will be first developed, and then, selfing will be done till BC4F8. The recurrent parent will be an elite line for the purposes of QTL mapping and for transferring target traits into the elite lines. Mapping of minor QTLs will be performed using a BC4F8 segregating population (as shown in Fig. 5).

Natural variation results from the expression of different alleles during evolution. As a result of the contributions to farmers over the past ~8000 years, many important traits have been accumulated in the natural germplasm collections currently maintained in seed banks. Whole genome resequencing allows efficient identification of unused alleles from conserved germplasm. We are at present developing a platform for allele mining in rice breeding systems using GWAS approaches and diverse germplasm accessions with the support of the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (No.PJ009099) from Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea. We believe our effort will facilitate the molecular breeding of rice.

Figure 5.

Strategies for identification of major and minor QTLs in rice from selected accessions carrying useful traits through GWAS. The major QTLs will be localized and tagged by molecular markers in the F8 generation. Minor QTLs will be localized using a BC4F8 population.


  1. 1. Abdurakhmonov IY and Abdukarimov A (2008) Application of association mapping to understanding the genetic diversity of plant germplasm resources. International Journal of Plant Genomics. Vol. 2008, 1–18
  2. 2. Agrama H A, Eizenga GC and Yan W (2007) Association mapping of yield and its components in rice cultivars. Molecular Breeding, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 341–356
  3. 3. Aguilar-Garcia C, Gavino G, Baragaño-Mosqueda M, Hevia P, Gavino VC (2007) Correlation of tocopherol, tocotrienol, γ-oryzanol and total polyphenol content in rice bran with different antioxidant capacity assays. Food Chemistry 102(4): 1228–1232
  4. 4. Ahn WS, Kang JH and Yoon MS (1994) Genetic erosion of crop plants in Korea, In Proceedings of Genetic Conservation and Utilization of Biodiversity. Daegu, Korea: pp.13-27
  5. 5. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, Selker EU, Cresko WA, and Johnson EA (2008) Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers, Plos One 3:3376-84
  6. 6. Banni K, Moe KT and Park YJ (2012) Assessing genetic diversity, population structure and gene flow in the Korean red bean [Vigna angularis (Willd.) Ohwi & Ohashi] using SSR markers. Plant Genetic Resources 10: 74–82
  7. 7. Bao J, Corke H and Sun M (2002) Microsatellites in starch-synthesizing genes in relation to starch physicochemical properties in waxy rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theoretical and applied genetics 105(6-7): 898–905
  8. 8. Bao JS, Corke H and Sun M (2006a) Microsatellites, single nucleotide polymorphisms and a sequence tagged site in starch-synthesizing genes in relation to starch physicochemical properties in nonwaxy rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theoretical and applied genetics 113(7): 1185–1196
  9. 9. Bao JS, Corke H and Sun M (2006b) Nucleotide diversity in starch synthase IIa and validation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in relation to starch gelatinization temperature and other physicochemical properties in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theoretical and applied genetics 113(7): 1171–1183
  10. 10. Borba TC de O, Brondani RPV, Breseghello F, Coelho ASG, Mendonça JA, Rangel PHN and Brondani C (2010) Association mapping for yield and grain quality traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.), Genetics and Molecular Biology, 33(3): 515–524
  11. 11. Brookes AJ (1999) The essence of SNPs. Gene 234:177–186
  12. 12. Bryant R, Proctor A, Hawkridge M, Jackson A, Yeater K, Counce P, Yan W, McClung A and Fjellstrom R (2011) Genetic variation and association mapping of silica concentration in rice hulls using a germplasm collection. Genetica 139:1383–1398
  13. 13. Causse MA, Fulton TM, Cho YG, Ahn SN, Chunwongse J, Wu KS, Xiao JH, Yu ZH, Ronald PC, Harrinton SE, Second G, McCouch SR and Tanksley SD (1994) Saturated molecular map of the rice genome based on an interspecific backcross population. Genetics 138:1251–1274
  14. 14. Chung, TH (1957) Korean flora I & II, Singi Ltd., Seoul.
  15. 15. Chung JW and Park YJ (2009) Genetic diversity and population structure of Korean rice core collection. Korean J Intl Agri 21: 282-288
  16. 16. Clark RM (2010) Genome-wide association studies coming of age in rice. Nat. Genet. 42: 926-927
  17. 17. Clark RT, Famoso AN, Zhao K, Shaff J, Craft EJ, Bustamante CD, McCouch SR, Aneshansley DJ and Kochian LV (2013) High-throughput two-dimensional root system phenotyping platform facilitates genetic analysis of root growth and development. Plant, Cell and Environment 36, 454–466
  18. 18. Du B, Zhang WL, Liu BF, Hu J, Wei Z, Shi AY, He RF, Zhu LL, Chen RZ, Han B and He GC (2009) Identification and characterization of Bph14, a gene conferring resistance to brown planthopper in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 22163–22168
  19. 19. Evanno G, Regnaut S and Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611–2620
  20. 20. Famoso AN, Zhao K, Clark RT, Tung C-W, Wright MH, Bustamante C, Kochian LV, McCouch SR (2011) Genetic Architecture of Aluminum Tolerance in Rice (Oryza sativa) Determined through Genome-Wide Association Analysis and QTL Mapping. PLoS Genetics 7(8):e1002221
  21. 21. Frankel OH and Brown AHD (1984) Plant genetic resources today: a critical appraisal. In: J. H. W. Holden, and J. T. Williams (eds), Crop Genetic Resources: Conservation and Evaluation, 249–257. Allen & Unwin Ltd, London.
  22. 22. Gore MA, Chia JM, Elshire RJ, Sun Q, Ersoz ES, Hurwitz BL, Peiffer JA, McMullen MD, Grills GS, Ross-Ibarra J, Ware DH and Buckler ES (2009) A first-generation haplotype map of maize. Science 326: 1115-1117
  23. 23. Hancock JF (2004) Plant Evolution and the Origin of Crop Species, Second Edition. CABI Publishing, 875 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, USA. pp. 313
  24. 24. Hammer, K., 2005: Korea’s importance in the East Asiatic gene center. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52, 115-116.
  25. 25. Harushima Y, Yano M, Shomura P, Sato M, Shimano T, Kuboki Y, Yamamoto T, Lin SY, Antonio BA, Parco A, Kajiya H, Huang N, Yamamoto K, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Khush GS and Sasaki T (1998) A high-density rice genetic linkage map with 2275 markers using a single F-2 population. Genetics 148:479–494
  26. 26. He P, Li SG, Qian Q, Ma YQ, Li JZ, Wang WM, Chen Y and Zhu LH (1999) Genetic analysis of rice grain quality. Theor Appl Genet 98:502–508
  27. 27. Henry R and Edwards K (2009) New tools for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery and analysis accelerating plant biotechnology. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 7, pp. 311
  28. 28. Hodgkin T (1991) Improving utilization of plant genetic resources through core collections. In Rice germplasm: collecting, preservation, use. IRRI. Rice Germplasm Collecting, Preservation, Use. Proceedings of third international workshop, 10-12 May, 1990. pp. 99–104
  29. 29. Holden JHW (1984) The second 10 years. Pages 277–285 in Crop genetic resources: conservation and evaluation. 27—285. Allen and Unwin, Winchester
  30. 30. Hu G, Zhang D, Pan H, Li B, Wu J, Zhou X, Zhang Q, Zhou L, Yao G, Li J, Li J, Zhang H, Li Z (2011) Fine mapping of the awn gene on chromosome 4 in rice by association and linkage analyses. Chinese Sci Bull 56(9):835-839
  31. 31. Hu J, Li X, Wu CJ, Yang CJ, Hua HX, Gao GJ, Xiao JH and He GC (2012) Pyramiding and evaluation of the brown planthopper resistance genes Bph14 and Bph15 in hybrid rice. Mol Breeding 29: 61–69
  32. 32. Huang X, Wei X, Sang T, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Zhao Y, Li C, Zhu C, Lu T, Zhang Z, Li M, Fan D, Guo Y, Wang A, Wang L, Deng L, Li W, Lu Y, Weng Q, Liu K, Huang T, Zhou T, Jing Y, Li W, Lin Z, Buckler E, Qian Q, Zhang Q, Li J and Han B (2010) Genome-wide studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nature Genetics, Vol. 42, No. 11, 961–967
  33. 33. Huang X, Zhao Y, Wei X, Li C, Wang A, Zhao Q, Li W, Guo Y, Deng L, Zhu C, Fan D, Lu Y, Weng Q, Liu K, Zhou T, Jing Y, Si L, Dong G, Huang T, Lu T, Feng Q, Qian Q, Li J and Han B (2012) Genome-wide association study of flowering time and grain yield traits in a worldwide collection of rice germplasm. Nature Genetics 44:32–42
  34. 34. Iwata H, Ebana K, Uga Y, Hayashi T and Jannink JL (2010) Genome-wide association study of grain shape variation among Oryza sativa L. germplasms based on elliptic Fourier analysis. Mol Breeding 25:203–215
  35. 35. Iwata H, Uga Y, Yoshioka Y, Ebana K and Hayashi T (2007) Bayesian association mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci and its application to the analysis of genetic variation among Oryza sativa L. germplasms. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 1437–1449
  36. 36. Jia L, Yan W, Zhu C, Agrama HA, Jackson A, Yeater K, Li X, Huang B, Hu B, McClung A and Wu D (2012) Allelic analysis of sheath blight resistance with association mapping in rice. PLoS One 7:3, e32703
  37. 37. Jin L, Lu Y, Xiao P, Sun M, Corke H and Bao J (2010) Genetic diversity and population structure of a diverse set of rice germplasm for association mapping. Theor Appl Genet 121:475–487
  38. 38. Kang KH and Kim YG (2012) Temperate rice in Korea In KK Jena and B Hardly (ed.), Advances in temperate rice research, IRRI, pp. 43-48
  39. 39. Khaing AA, Moe KT, Chung JW, Baek HJ, et al. (2013). Genetic diversity and population structure of the selected core set in Amaranthus using SSR markers. Plant Breeding Doi:10.1111/pbr.12027
  40. 40. Kim KW, Chung HK, Cho GT, Ma KH, Chandrabalan D, Gwag JG, Kim TS, Cho EG and Park YJ (2007) PowerCore: a program applying the advanced M strategy with a heuristic search for establishing core sets. Bioinformatics 23, 2155–2162
  41. 41. Koniecyzn A and Asubel FM (1993) A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using co-dominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers. Plant J 4:403–410
  42. 42. Kurata N, Nagamura Y, Yamamoto K, et al. (1994) A 300-kilobase-interval genetic map of rice including 883 expressed sequences. Nat Genet 8:365–372
  43. 43. Langridge P and Chalmers K (2005) The Principle: Identification and Application of Molecular Markers. In H. Lorz and G. Wenzel (Ed.), Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry: Molecular Marker Systems in Plant Breeding and Crop Improvement. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 1–23
  44. 44. Lee TB (1980) Illustrated flora of Korea, Hyangmoon Ltd., Suweon.
  45. 45. Lee TB (1982) Classification of endemic taxa in Korea. Seoul Nat'l Univ. Agri. Research 8:71–113
  46. 46. Lee WT and Yim YJ (1978) Studies on the distribution of vascular plants in the Korean peninsula. Korean J. Pl. Tax. 8 (suppl): 1–33
  47. 47. Li X, Yan W, Agrama H, Jia L, Jackson A, Moldenhauer K, Yeater K, McClung A and Wu D (2012) Unraveling the complex trait of harvest index with association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS One 7:1 e29350
  48. 48. Li X, Yan W, Agrama H, Jia L, Shen X, Jackson A, Moldenhauer K, Yeater K, McClung A and Wu D (2011). Mapping QTLs for improving grain yield using the USDA rice mini-core collection. Planta 234:347–361
  49. 49. Litt M and Luty JA (1989) A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by in vitro amplification of a dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle actin gene. Am J Hum Genet 44:397–401
  50. 50. Liu RH (2007) Whole grain phytochemicals and health. Journal of Cereal Science 46(3):207-219
  51. 51. Liu K and Muse SV (2005) PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21: 2128–2129
  52. 52. Lou Q, Ma C, Wen W, Zhou J, Chen L, Feng F, Xu X, Lu X, Luo L, Mei H and Xu G (2011) Profiling and association mapping of grain metabolites in a subset of the core collection of Chinese rice germplasm (Oryza sativa L.). J. Agric. Food Chem., 59, 9257–9264
  53. 53. Lu FH and Park YJ (2012a) Sequence variations in OsAGPase significantly associated with amylose content and viscosity properties in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genet Res (Camb) 94: 179–189
  54. 54. Lu FH and Park YJ (2012b) An SNP downstream of the OsBEIIb gene is significantly associated with amylose content and viscosity properties in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Cereal Science 56: 706–712
  55. 55. Lu K, Li L, Zheng X, Zhang Z, Mou T and Hu Z (2009) Genetic dissection of amino acid content in rice grain. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 89(14): 2377–2382
  56. 56. Martin GB, Williams JGK and Tanksley SD (1991) Rapid identification of markers linked to a Pseudomonas resistance gene in tomato by using random primers and near-isogenic lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 88:2336–2340
  57. 57. McCouch SR, Kochert G, Yu ZH, Wang ZY, Khush GS, Coffman WR and Tanksley SD (1988) Molecular mapping of rice chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet 76:815–829
  58. 58. McCouch SR, Khush GS and Tanksley SD (1991) Tagging genes for disease and insect resistance via linkage to RFLP markers. In: Rice Genetics II. IRRI, Manila, Philippines, pp. 443–449
  59. 59. McCouch SR, Teytelman L, Xu YB, Lobos KB, Clare K, Walton M, Fu BY, Maghirang R, Li ZK, Xing YZ, Zhang QF, Kono I, Yano M, Fjellstrom R, DeClerck G, Schneider D, Cartinhour S, Ware D and Stein L (2002) Development and mapping of 2240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.). DNA Res 9:199–207
  60. 60. McCouch SR, Zhao K, Wright M, Tung CW, Ebana K,Thomson M, Reynolds A, Wang D, DeClerck G, Ali ML, McClung A, Eizenga G and Bustamante C (2010) Development of genome-wide SNP assays for rice. Breed. Sci. 60: 524-535
  61. 61. Ministry of Environment (1994) Illustrated Threatened Wild Animals and Plants in Korea. Ministry of Environment Ltd. (Seoul).
  62. 62. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (2009) Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Republic of Korea.
  63. 63. Moe KT and Park YJ (2012) Analysis of population structure revealed apparent genetic disturbance in Korea Cymbidium collection. Scientia Horticulturae 134:157–162
  64. 64. Mohler V and Schwarz G (2005) Genotyping Tools in Plant Breeding: From Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms to Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms. In H. Lorz and G. Wenzel (Ed.), Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry: Molecular Marker Systems in Plant Breeding and Crop Improvement. Springer–Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 1–23
  65. 65. Nagao S and Takahashi M (1963) Trial construction of twelve linkage groups in Japanese rice. Genetic studies on rice plant. XXVII. J Fac Agri Hokkaido Univ 53:72–130
  66. 66. Nakagahra M (1977) Genetic analysis for esterase isoenzymes in rice cultivars. Jap J Breed 27:141–148
  67. 67. Nakamura Y, Francisco P, Hosaka Y, Sato A, Sawada T, Kubo A and Fujita N (2005) Essential amino acids of starch synthase IIa differentiate amylopectin structure and starch quality between japonica and indica rice varieties. Plant Molecular Biology 58(2): 213–227
  68. 68. NASTI (National Agricultural Science and Technology Institute) (1996) Republic of Korea: Country report to the FAO international technical conference on plant genetic resource. pp.59
  69. 69. Olsen KM and Purugganan MD (2002) Molecular evidence on the origin and evolution of glutinous rice. Genetics 162(2): 941-950
  70. 70. Olson M, Hood L, Cantor C and Botstein D (1989) A common language for physical mapping of the human genome. Science 245(4925): 1434–1435
  71. 71. Ordonez Jr. SA, Silva J and Oard JH (2010) Association mapping of grain quality and flowering time in elite japonica rice germplasm. Journal of Cereal Science 51: 337-343
  72. 72. Ronald PC, Beng A, Rodante T, Abenes L, Wu KS, McCouch SR and Tanksley SD (1992) Genetic and physical analysis of the rice bacterial blight disease resistance locus, Xa21. Mol Gen Genet 236: 113–120
  73. 73. Ross–Ibarra J, Morrell PL and Gaut BS (2007) Plant domestication, a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, supplement 1, pp. 8641–8648
  74. 74. Saito A, Yano M, Kishimoto N, et al. (1991) Linkage map of restriction-fragment-length polymorphism loci in rice. Jap J Breed 41:665–670
  75. 75. Sano Y, Katsumata M and Omura K (1986) Genetic studies of speciation in cultivated rice. Inter- and intra-specific differentiation in the waxy gene expression of rice. Euphytica 35:1–9
  76. 76. Shao Y, Jin L, Zhang G, Lu Y, Shen Y and Bao J (2011) Association mapping of grain color, phenolic content, flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity in dehulled rice. Theoretical and applied genetics 122(5):1005–1016
  77. 77. Song WY, Wang GL, Chen LL, Kim HS, Pi LY, Holsten T, Gardner J, Wang B, Zhai WX, Zhu LH, Fauquet C and Ronald P (1995) A receptor kinase-like protein encoded by the rice disease resistance gene Xa21. Science 270: 1804–1806
  78. 78. Subudhi P K, Sasaki T and Khush GS (2006) Rice. In C. Kole (Ed.), Genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding in Plants, Volume 1, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 1–78
  79. 79. Tan YF, Li JX, Yu SB, Xing YZ, Xu CG and Zhang Q (1999) The three important traits for cooking and eating quality of rice grains are controlled by a single locus in an elite rice hybrid, Shanyou 63. Theor Appl Genet 99:642–648
  80. 80. Tan YF, Sun M, Xing YZ, Hua JP, Sun XL, Zhang QF and Corke H (2001) Mapping quantitative trait loci for milling quality, protein content and color characteristics of rice using a recombinant inbred line population derived from an elite rice hybrid. Theor Appl Genet 103:1037–1045
  81. 81. Tan YF, Xing YZ, Li JX, Yu SB, Xu CG and Zhang QF (2000) Genetic bases of appearance quality of rice grains in Shanyou 63, an elite rice hybrid. Theor Appl Genet 101:823–829
  82. 82. Tanksley SD, Ahn N, Causse M, Coffman R, Fulton T, McCouch SR, Second G, Tai T, Wang Z, Wu K and Yu Z (1991) RFLP mapping of the rice genome. In: Rice Genetics II. IRRI, Manila, Philippines, pp. 435–442
  83. 83. Toyokuni S, Itani T, Morimitsu Y, Okada K, Ozeki M, Kondo S, Uchida K, Osawa T, Hiai H and Tashiro T (2002) Protective effect of colored rice over white rice on Fenton Reaction-based renal lipid peroxidation in rats. Free Radical Research 36(5): 583–592
  84. 84. Umemoto T and Aoki N (2005) Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in rice starch synthase IIa that alter starch gelatinization and starch association of the enzyme. Functional Plant Biology 32(9): 763–768
  85. 85. Vavilov N.I. 1935. The phytogeographical basis for plant breeding. Theor. Basis Plant Breeding, Moscow (in Russian) 1: 17–75
  86. 86. Virk PS, Ford-Lloyd BV, Jackson MT, Pooni HS, Clemenot TP and Newbury HJ (1996). Predicting quantitative variation within rice germplasm using molecular markers. Heredity 76 296–304
  87. 87. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, and Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414
  88. 88. Wang AY, Yu WP, Juang RH, Huang JW, Sung HY and Su JC (1992) Presence of three rice sucrose synthase genes as revealed by cloning and sequencing of cDNA. Plant Mol Biol 18:1191–1194
  89. 89. Waters DLE, Henry RJ, Reinke RF and Fitzgerald MA (2006) Gelatinization temperature of rice explained by polymorphisms in starch synthase. Plant Biotechnology Journal 4(1):115–122
  90. 90. Wen W, Mei H, Feng F, Yu S, Huang Z, Wu J, Chen L, Xu X and Luo L (2009). Population structure and association mapping on chromosome 7 using a diverse panel of Chinese germplasm of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol. 119, No. 3, 459–470
  91. 91. Willcox JK, Ash SL and Catignani GL (2004) Antioxidants and Prevention of Chronic Disease. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 44(4):275-295
  92. 92. Williams JG, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA and Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535
  93. 93. Wu JG, Shi CH, Zhang XM and Katsura T (2004) Genetic analysis of non-essential amino acid contents in rice (Oryza sativa L.) across environments. Hereditas 141(2):128–134
  94. 94. Xia M, Ling WH, Ma J, Kitts DD and Zawistowski J (2003) Supplementation of diets with the black rice pigment fraction attenuates atherosclerotic plaque formation in apolipoprotein E deficient mice. The Journal of Nutrition 133(3):744–751
  95. 95. Xu X, Liu X, Ge S, Jensen JD, Hu F,12, Li X, DongY, Gutenkunst RN, Fang L, Huang L, Li J, He W, Zhang G, Zheng X, Zhang F, Li Y, Yu C, Kristiansen K, Zhang X, Wang J, Wright M, McCouch S, Nielsen R, Wang J and Wang W (2012) Resequencing 50 accessions of cultivated and wild rice yields markers for identifying agronomically important genes. Nat. Biotechnol. 30: 105-111
  96. 96. Yamanaka S, Nakamura I, Watanabe K and Sato YI (2004) Identification of SNPs in the waxy gene among glutinous rice cultivars and their evolutionary significance during the domestication process of rice. Theoretical and applied genetics 108(7): 1200–1204
  97. 97. Yan W, Li Y, Agrama H, Luo D, Gao F, Lu X and Ren G (2009) Association mapping of stigma and spikelet characteristics in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol. Breed., 24: 277–292
  98. 98. Yang HY, You AQ, Yang ZF, Zhang FT, He RF, Zhu LL and He GC (2004) High-resolution genetic mapping at the Bph15 locus for brown planthopper resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 110: 182–191
  99. 99. Yawadio R, Tanimori S and Morita N (2007) Identification of phenolic compounds isolated from pigmented rices and their aldose reductase inhibitory activities. Food Chemistry 101(4): 1616–1625
  100. 100. Yoon MY, Moe KT, Kim DY, Rho RI, Kim S, Kim KT, Won MK, Chung JW, and Park YJ (2012) Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) using SSR markers. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 15:71–85
  101. 101. Yu Z, Mackill D J, Bonman J M and Tanksley S D (1991) RFLP tagging of blast resistance genes in rice. Pages 451–458 in Rice genetics II. International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines.
  102. 102. Zhang GY, Liu RR, Xu G, Zhang P, Li Y, Tang KX, Liang GH, Liu QQ (2013) Increased α-tocotrienol content in seeds of transgenic rice overexpressing Arabidopsis γ-tocopherol methyltransferase. Transgenic Research 22(1):89–99
  103. 103. Zhang N, Xu Y, Akash M, McCouch S and Oard JH (2005) Identification of candidate markers associated with agronomic traits in rice using discriminant analysis. Theor Appl Genet 110: 721–729
  104. 104. Zhang P, Li J, Li X, Liu X, Zhao X and Lu Y (2011). Collection (Oryza sativa L.) investigated with SSR markers. PLoS One 6:1–13
  105. 105. Zhao K, Wright M, Kimball J, Eizenga G, McClung A, Kovach M, Tyagi W, Ali ML, Tung CW, Reynolds A, Bustamante CD and McCouch SR (2010) Genomic Diversity and Introgression in O. sativa Reveal the Impact of Domestication and Breeding on the Rice Genome PLoS One 5(5): e10780
  106. 106. Zhao K, Tung CW, Eizenga GC, Wright MH and Ali ML (2011). Genome-wide association mapping reveals a rich genetic architecture of complex traits in Oryza sativa. Nature Communications 2:467
  107. 107. Zhao WG, Chung JW, Kwon SW, Lee JH, Ma KH and Park YJ (2012a) Development and use of novel SSR markers for molecular genetic diversity in Italian millet (Setaria italica L.). Genes & Genomics 34(1): 51–57
  108. 108. Zhao WG, Lee GA, Kwon SW, Ma KH, Lee MC and Park YJ (2012b) Association analysis of physicochemical traits on eating quality in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica: 10.1007/s10681-012-0820-z
  109. 109. Zhao WG, Cho GT, Ma, KH, Chung JW, Gwag JG and Park YJ (2010) Development of an allele-mining set in rice using a heuristic algorithm and SSR genotype data with least redundancy for the post-genomic era. Molecular breeding 26: 639–651
  110. 110. Zhao WG, Park EJ, Chung JW, Park YJ, Chung IM, Ahn JK and Kim GH (2009) Association analysis of the amino acid contents in rice. J Integr Plant Biol 51: 1126–1137
  111. 111. Zhou PH, TanYF, HeYQ, Xu CG and Zhang Q (2003) Simultaneous improvement for four quality traits of Zhenshan 97, an elite parent of hybrid rice, by molecular marker-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet 106:326–331
  112. 112. Zhou J, You A, Ma Z, Zhu L and He G (2012) Association analysis of important agronomic traits in japonica rice germplasm. African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 11(12): 2957–2970

Written By

Aye Aye Khaing, Gang Li, Xiao Qiang Wang, Min Young Yoon, Soon Wook Kwon, Chang Yong Lee, Beom Seok Park and Yong Jin Park

Submitted: 11 April 2013 Published: 23 April 2014