Open access

Autophagy, the “Master” Regulator of Cellular Quality Control: What Happens when Autophagy Fails?

Written By

A. Raquel Esteves, Catarina R. Oliveira and Sandra Morais Cardoso

Published: April 17th, 2013

DOI: 10.5772/55196

Chapter metrics overview

2,317 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Autophagy an evolutionarily conserved process, is activated in response to nutrient deprivation, as well as to endogenous and exogenous stresses. It is currently known that the basic mechanism of autophagy has been well conserved during evolution since diverse organisms, including yeast, flies, and mammals, all carry a similar set of autophagy-related genes (ATGs), although there are some significant differences between yeast and higher eukaryotes. As a result, autophagy is a highly regulated process known to contribute to cellular cleaning through the removal of intracellular components in lysosomes showing therefore an important role in cellular quality control. Autophagy ensures that proteins damaged or incorrectly synthesized are removed from the cells by degradation, preventing thus the devastating cellular consequences associated with accumulation of malfunctioning proteins inside cells. Moreover autophagy works as a recycling system where it mediates the breakdown of proteins that are no longer needed into essential components (aminoacids, free fatty acids, sugars), which can then be used in the synthesis of new proteins. This has extreme importance in conditions of nutritional stress or starvation. At optimal physiological conditions in the absence of stressors, basal level of autophagy assures maintenance of cell homeostasis through regular turnover of proteins, lipids, and organelles. Therefore autophagy acts a cautious controller of cellular homeostasis. In addition, it also has an important role in cellular defence as in compromised situations it contributes to the proteolytic breakdown of components of invading pathogens and other types of biological cell aggressors. Autophagy may also modulate synaptic plasticity, which involves structural remodelling of nerve terminals and the trafficking and degradation of receptors and other synaptic proteins [1]. Finally, autophagy is also a key player in cellular adaptation since is able of changing very rapidly the rate of a particular protein’s degradation allowing fast modulation of the proteome in response to stress. The lysosomal system and specifically the autophagic pathway is the principal mechanism for degradating longer-lived proteins and is the only system in cells capable of degrading organelles and protein aggregates/inclusions. Similar to what happens with the proteasome system, protein aggregates and certain organelles have been shown to be tagged with ubiquitination for selective removal by autophagy [2]. An adaptor molecule with an ubiquitin-binding domain engages the ubiquitinated structure and couples it to the pre-autophagosomal isolation membrane for subsequent sequestration. The exact types of ubiquitin motifs recognized by the proteasome and autophagy may differ and the degree to which ubiquitination drives autophagic protein turn-over relative to that by proteasomes is still unclear.

There are three basic forms of autophagy, namely, macroautophagy, microautophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), which primarily differ in the way in which cytosolic components are delivered to lysosomes [3]. Moreover, the different types of autophagy share a common endpoint, the lysosome, but differ in the substrates targeted, their regulation, and the conditions in which each of them is preferentially activated.

In macroautophagy and microautophagy there is the sequestration of cytoplasmic components into vesicular compartments. In the case of macroautophagy, vesicles are form de novo from a limiting membrane of non-lysosomal origin that closes and forms a double membrane organelle called autophagosome [4]. Because the autophagosome lacks any enzymes, the trapped contents are not degraded until the autophagosome fuses with a lysosome, which provides all the hydrolases required for degradation of cargo. Autophagosomes are then transported along microtubules to the perinuclear region of the cell (where lysosomes are clustered) to enhance the probability of autophagosome-lysosome fusion to form autophagolysosomes. Lysosomes are single membrane organelles dedicated to degradation of both intracellular and extracellular components. Lysosomal membranes possess vacuolar H+ ATPases which are proton pumps that acidificate the autophagolysosome contents. This acidification is essential for the activation of lysosomal enzymes (including proteases, lipases, glycosidases, and nucleases), which are responsible for proteolysis of the components in the autophagolysosome and confer this organelle its high degradative capacity [5]. Although autophagy was initially considered to be a nonselective process, cargo-specific autophagy (the selective degradation of certain aggregated proteins and organelles) is now recognized to exist [6]. Numerous different types of cargo-specific autophagic processes have been described, like for instance mitophagy where damaged mitochondria are sequestered and degraded [7]. Macroautophagy occurs constitutively in cells and is markedly induced under stress conditions, such as starvation and has two major purposes: as a source to generate essential macromolecules and energy in conditions of nutritional scarcity, or as a mechanism for the removal of altered intracellular components [8].

In the case of microautophagy the engulfment of cargo occurs through invagination of the lysosomal membrane itself, to form vesicles that invaginate towards the lysosomal lumen [9]. Cytosolic regions are sequestered directly by the lysosome through invaginations or tubulations that “pinch off” from the membrane into the lysosomal lumen where they are rapidly degraded. Microautophagy participates in the continuous, slow “basal” turnover of cellular components in normal cellular conditions [10]. Furthermore microautophagy has been shown to be responsible for the selective removal of organelles when they are no longer needed [11]. The absence of mammalian homologs for the microautophagy yeast genes has made it difficult in gaining a better understanding of the pathophysiology of this process.

The third type of mammalian autophagy CMA distinguishes from the others because of its distinctive feature of selectivity. Unlike the other forms of autophagy, in which portions of the cytoplasm are typically engulfed, proteins degraded by CMA are identified and transported one-by-one by a cytosolic chaperone that delivers them to the surface of the lysosomes. First there is individual recognition of single proteins in the citosol, then the substrate proteins unfold and cross the lysosomal membrane. Only soluble proteins containing in their aminoacid sequence a pentapeptide motif related to KFERQ, are recognized by heat shock cognate protein of 70 kDa, hsc70, which mediates their delivery to the lysosomes for direct translocation across the lysosomal membrane [3, 12]. These pentapeptide motifs are recognized specifically by the cytosolic protein hsc70, the constitutively expressed member of the hsp70 family of cytosolic chaperones. hsc70 not only targets the CMA substract to the lysosomal membrane where it can interact with the CMA receptor but also facilitates substrate folding [13]. A second chaperone that also localizes on both sides of the lysosomal membrane is the heat shock protein of 90 kDa, hsp90. hsp90 is proposed to participate in substrate protein unfolding [14], and contributes to the stabilization of essential components of the translocation complex as they organize into a multimeric structure [15]. Additionally, the co-chaperone carboxyl terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein (CHIP) has been shown to mediate lysosomal degradation of proteins such as alpha-synuclein, a known CMA substrate [16], however, it is still undergoing investigation whether CHIP-mediated degradation occurs via CMA or via other forms of autophagy. The lysosome-associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP-2A) acts as a receptor for substrates of this pathway [17]. This protein is one of the three splice variants encoded by the lamp2 gene that share identical lumenal regions and different transmembrane and cytosolic tails [18]. Once the cytosolic proteins destined for CMA degradation bind to the cytosolic tail of the single-span membrane protein LAMP-2A, they promote its assembly into a high molecular weight complex of about 700 kDa at the lysosomal membrane required for translocation of the CMA substrates into the lysosomal lumen [15]. Multimerization is a required step for substrate translocation. However, the translocation complex is not stable at the lysosomal membrane and, once the substrate reaches the lysosomal lumen, LAMP-2A dissociates into monomers. hsc70 mediates the disassembly generating monomeric forms of LAMP-2A that are required for substrate binding in order to sustain cycles of binding and uptake. Other proteins have been shown to modulate the stability of the CMA translocation complex, such as, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and elongation factor 1 a (EF1a). One of the crucial functions of CMA is protein quality control via the selective degradation of damaged or altered proteins. Moreover proteins associated with several neurodegeneratives disorders have KFERQ-like sequences such as, alpha-synuclein, parkin, UCHL1 and Pink1, amyloid precursor protein (APP) and tau and huntingtin. These proteins can be degraded by CMA only when they are in soluble forms; once the insoluble inclusions are formed, they can only be degraded via other proteolytic pathways [19]. CMA is constitutively active in many cell types and similar to macroautophagy, CMA is maximally activated under stress conditions like nutritional stress or starvation and cellular stresses leading to protein damage [3]. Indeed, upon stressors that cause protein damage, such as oxidative stress, CMA is upregulated [20]. During starvation, macroautophagy is first activated, and if starvation persists, cells activate CMA, which selectively targets non-essential proteins for degradation to obtain the aminoacids required for the synthesis of essential proteins showing that macroautophagy and CMA act in a synchronized manner [21]. There are two lysosomal components that limit CMA activity: LAMP-2A and lys-hsc70. It is known that changes in the number of LAMP-2A molecules, as well as, in the membrane content of LAMP-2A, rapidly upregulate or downregulate CMA activity [17]. Levels of lys-hsc70 increase gradually with the increase in CMA activity, although the mechanisms modulating this increase are still poorly understood [14]. Furthermore, the activity of this autophagic pathway is also directly modulated by changes in other autophagic and proteolytic systems inside the cell. For examples, cells in culture respond to CMA blockage by upregulating macroautophagy [21]. Likewise, blockage of macroautophagy results in constitutive activation of CMA [22].

The identification of ATGs in yeast was a major breakthrough in the study of autophagy [23]. Until now more than 35 ATG genes have been found in yeast and many of them have orthologs in mammals to control the dynamic processes and different stages of autophagy. Indeed, autophagic activities are mediated by a complex molecular machinery including more than 35 ATG-related proteins and 50 lysosomal hydrolases. This dynamic macroautophagic process includes initiation, nucleation, elongation, maturation and degradation. Initiation involves formation of the phagophore, a cup-shaped membrane structure in the cytoplasm. Nucleation involves the recruitment and assembly of several proteins including Beclin-1 and Vps34, among others [24]. Vps34 has a phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) activity and produces phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate, which recruits molecular components involved in subsequent vesicle elongation. Subsequently elongation is a critical step in forming the complete autophagosomes and is controlled by two ubiquitin-like conjugation systems. The first involves the Atg7 E1-like enzyme that mediates the covalent linkage of Atg12 to Atg5 followed by formation of a complex of Atg12-Atg5 with Atg16L, which dimerizes and associates with the phagophore membrane. In the second one LC3 has to be cleaved by Atg4 to generate the cytosolic LC3 (that arises from microtubular-associated protein-light chain) that can subsequently be conjugated to a phosphatidylethanolamine tag by Atg7 and the E2-like enzyme Atg3. The resulting lipidated form of LC3, LC3-II, is attached to both sides of the autophagosome membrane. LC3-II is clearly necessary for autophagosome formation and is commonly used as a marker for autophagy. Finally, maturation and degradation steps, involves fusion with endosomes-lysosomes to form autophagic vacuoles (AVs) and requires a number of lysosomal proteins necessary for the degradation of the lumenal contents [25]. The transmembrane Atg9 protein also contributes to autophagic vesicle nucleation and elongation, possibly by mediating the transport of lipid molecules. At this stage, LC3 on the outer autophagosome membrane is removed by Atg4 for reuse, while inner membrane LC3-II is digested along with the cargo. The rate-limiting step in the autophagic process is autophagosome formation.

Autophagy can be regulated by mTOR-dependent signaling pathways and mTOR-independent signaling pathways. The serine–threonine kinase mTOR is a master negative regulator of autophagy that acts by blocking the activity of the ULK1/Atg1 complex [26]. mTOR is inhibited when nutrients are scarce, when growth factor signaling is reduced, and under ATP depletion. When mTOR is inhibited and the repressive effect of mTOR on autophagosome formation disappears an increase in autophagosome biogenesis occurs [27]. In pathways that act independently of mTOR, when in nutrient-rich conditions, Beclin-1 is bound to the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2. Under nutrient starvation, the stress-activated enzyme Jun N-terminal kinase 1 (JNK1) phosphorylates Bcl-2, which induces its dissociation from Beclin-1 [28]. Beclin can then interact with other members of the autophagic machinery and stimulate the induction of autophagy [29-30]. One of the mTOR-independent pathways can be mediated by the IP3 pathway and the Ca2+–calpain–G-stimulatory protein alpha pathway [31]. Generation of IP3 induces the release of Ca2+ from stores in the endoplasmic reticulum and high levels of cytosolic Ca2+ inhibit autophagy by activating calpains. After cleavage by calpains, the Ca2+–calpain–G-stimulatory protein alpha pathway becomes activated which, in turn, causes the production of more inhibitory cAMP [31]. On the other hand, decreased levels of IP3 signaling leads to reduced Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum and lower rates of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake, causing a reduction in mitochondrial activity and ATP depletion, which results in 5'-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation [32]. Activated AMPK directly phosphorylates ULK1, indirectly inactivating mTOR complex which leads to the induction of autophagy.


2. Autophagic failure at cellular level

Two of the main aggravating factors contributing to failure of autophagic pathways are believed to be oxidative stress and aging. Aging can lead to reductions in autophagosome formation and autophagosome-lysosome fusion [33]. Moreover leads to lysosomal alterations such as increased lysosome volume, decreased lysosomal stability, altered activity of hydrolases and intralysosomal accumulation of indigestible material such as lipofuscin [34]. These alterations are consistent with a decrease in autophagy, more specifically macroautophagy. Consequently, there is a reduction in the turnover of intracellular components as well as a reduction in the ability of cells to adapt to changes in the extracellular environment [35]. Ultimately this contributes to the intracellular accumulation of misfolded proteins in aged organisms [36]. Moreover, also a decline in CMA activity has been described in almost all cell types and tissues. This decrease is primarily due to a reduction in the levels of LAMP-2A at the lysosomal membrane [37]. In addition, the stability of LAMP-2A at the lysosomal membrane is markedly reduced with age, resulting in a decrease in the net content of this protein in lysosomes [38].

On the other hand, oxidative stress overloads the macroautophagic system, and oxidized proteins and damaged organelles engulfed by autophagosomes can become a source of ROS inside either autophagosomes or lysosomes. Subsequently ROS can react and damage lysosomal hydrolases and/or other components required for the lysosome/autophagosome fusion, resulting in the accumulation of undegraded products inside these cellular compartments, such as lipofuscin. Defects in basal autophagy could lead to altered neuronal homeostasis and degeneration through impaired utilization of nutrients or an imbalance of vesicular biogenesis and turnover. Alternatively, neuronal dysfunction might be a more direct result of failed protein degradation with resultant accumulation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates.

2.1. Lipofuscin accumulation

The most abundant pigment in the human brain is lipofuscin, a protein- and lipid-based pigment with broad distribution [39]. Lipofuscin is commonly considered to be a ubiquitous pigment within the brain, being recognized as a hallmark of aging [40]. Lipofuscin is a chemically and morphologically polymorphous and pigmented waste material that is formed exclusively in lysosomes where it can accumulate as well as in other lysosome-related vesicles due to incomplete digestion of engulfed components and subsequent intra-lysosomal oxidation [41]. Ivy and co-workers suggested that lipofuscin accumulation might result from age-related decrease in the activity of lysosomal enzymes, especially cysteine proteases, such as cathepsins B, H, and L [42]. However where some studies showed a decrease in lysosomal cysteine protease activity others did not because lipofuscin starts to accumulate immediately after birth and continues to do so more or less linearly through the life span [41]. Lipofuscin formation appears to depend on the rate of oxidative damage to proteins, the functionality of mitochondrial repair systems, the proteasomal system, and the functionality and effectiveness of the lysosomes. Major factors that contribute and enhance lipofuscin formation are increased autophagic activity, increased oxidative stress or decreased antioxidant defences, and high concentrations within the lysosomes of redox-active iron [43].

The cell recycles many of useful substrates by autophagic degradation to simple molecules, such as aminoacids, fatty acids and simple sugars, which may be reused after relocalization to the cytosol. Many of these macromolecules that are autophagocytosed contain iron, which is released from a variety of metalloproteins during their intralysosomal degradation [43]. Moreover ROS (mainly H2O2, which is produced in mitochondria by dismutation of O2•-) easily diffuse into lysosomes and by interacting with iron results in Fenton-type reactions which leads to excessive production of ROS and peroxidation of lysosomal protein content. Moreover the newly generated ROS are then able to interact with the proteins and lipids within the lysosome and form a complex array of Schiff bases and cross-linking of surrounding macromolecules culminating in lipofuscin formation [44]. This is supported by data that demonstrates that oxidative stress, high iron or decreased antioxidant systems stimulate lipofuscin formation whereas antioxidants and iron chelators attenuate lipofuscin formation [39]. Furthermore, oxidatively damaged mitochondria may contain some already peroxidized, undegradable macromolecules. In addition, such ineffective mitochondria are not only ferruginous but also may generate larger amounts of O2•- than do functional mitochondria. Inside the lysosome, such production of O2•- may continue for a while, as well as, iron-catalyzed oxidative modification of mitochondrial components. Moreover ATP synthase subunit c, a mitochondrial protein is a predominant component of lipofuscin from aged neurons [45]. Indeed, autophagocytosed mitochondria seem to be a major source for both macromolecular components of lipofuscin and the low mass iron that catalyzes the peroxidative reactions resulting in its formation. Therefore the primary constituents of lipofuscin are oxidatively modified protein residues, which are bridged into polymer complexes by acids, and lipid residues such as reactive aldehydes originating from the breakdown of triglycerides, free fatty acids, cholesterol and phospholipids, while carbohydrates form only a minor structural component [33]. Proteins within lipofuscin are linked by intramolecular and intermolecular cross-links; many of these cross-links are caused by nonproteineous compounds including oxidation products of other cellular components, such as 4-hydoxy-2-nonenal. Overall, the composition of lipofuscin is variable and dependent upon cell type, but in neurons, lipofuscin appears to be derived primarily from autophagocytosed mitochondria [46].

Hence, lipofuscin accumulation in post-mitotic tissues is both a hallmark of normal senescence and symptomatic of numerous age-related diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and age-related macular degeneration. In addition, lysosomal storage diseases (neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, or Batten’s disease) are also associated with the accumulation of lysosomal pigment displaying properties similar to that typical of lipofuscin. Lipofuscin complex is undegradable as the result of the excessive oxidation and cross-linking that occurs during its formation leading to the inability of the lysosome to degrade all incorporated materials. Lipofuscin inherently causes toxic effects, in part because of its ability to bind metals, such as iron, copper, zinc, manganese, and calcium, in a concentration up to 2% [47]. Being rich in heavy metals such as iron lipofuscin may jeopardize lysosomal stability under severe oxidative stress, causing enhanced lysosomal rupture and consequent apoptosis/necrosis. The only known mechanism allowing cells to get rid of lipofuscin is mitotic activity, which results in the dilution of the pigment. When lysosomes accumulate lipofuscin, lysosomal enzymes increasingly go to lipofuscin loaded lysosomes in an attempt to degrade the non-degradable material. Since the capacity to produce lysosomal enzymes for autophagy is not unlimited, the lack of lysosomal enzymes for autophagy leads to reduced ability to recycle other cellular organelles, such as mitochondria. Hence lipofuscin acts as a sink for newly produced lysosomal enzymes. If damaged mitochondria are not eliminated this subsequently results in a lower rate of ATP production and increased ROS production. Moreover, the release of the abundant iron from the aged intralysosomal compartment by free-radical-mediated membrane damage will also stimulate free radical production via Fenton chemistry, possibly leading to apoptotic cell death [46]. On the other hand, large numbers of lipofuscin-containing lysosomes, which also contain active hydrolases, may promote cellular damage if lysosomal membranes are destabilized by pathogenic factors (including oxidative stress), resulting in leak of hydrolytic enzymes into the cytosol. Because lipofuscin is separated from the rest of the cytoplasm by the lysosomal membrane, it cannot react directly with extralysosomal constituents. However, within lysosomes loaded lipofuscin iron may promote ROS production, sensitizing cells to oxidative injury through lysosomal destabilization. So, lipofuscin a yellowish-brown, autofluorescent, nondegradable polymeric substance that cells cannot get rid of it [48], reduce the lysosomal degradative capacity [34]. Interestingly, the rate of lipofuscin formation is inversely related to age and lysosomes containing lipofuscin have a reduced ability to fuse with autophagic structures [43].

Moreover, lipofuscin is able to decrease not only lysosomal degradation but also proteosomal degradation, perhaps as a result of binding proteasomal complexes in unsuccessful attempts of degradation [49]. Therefore, lipofuscin directly decreases cellular proteolysis by inhibition of the proteasomal turnover, resulting in reduced proteasomal activity [50]. Another reason for lipofuscin toxicity is the gradual filling of the cytoplasmic space over time, [51] resulting at first in decreased cellular functional capability, later in apoptotic cell death. In addition, also intracellular trafficking as well as cytoskeletal integrity may be compromised by the presence of large intracellular aggregates.

2.2. Defective autophagy

Defects in autophagy have been described to occur at very different levels within the cell and at very different diseases. Therefore understanding how autophagy step or steps are altered in specific disorders is a priority. There are several examples of defects that can arise in autophagy.

For example, initiation of autophagy may be compromised because of altered signaling through the insulin or mTOR pathways, which is tightly bound to activation of autophagy. Since autophagy can be cargo-specific which implicate cargo adaptors molecules that enable autophagosomes to identify specific substrates, alterations in the organelle-specific markers for degradation or in the autophagic machinery can impair autophagic turnover. For instance, if autophagosomes not recognize damaged mitochondria, defects in mitophagy occur which contributes to disease pathology, since removal of damaged mitochondria is impaired leading to high levels of ROS. Cells are then more susceptible to proapoptotic insults. Defects in cargo recognition occurs for instance in Huntington’s disease (HD). HD is caused by gain-of-function mutations that confer neurotoxic effects on the ubiquitously expressed protein huntingtin [52]. This gain-of-function impairs the ability of autophagosomes to recognize certain cargoes, while mutant huntingtin is efficiently incorporated into autophagosomes, it may reduce autophagic sequestration of other cargoes [53].

In other conditions, autophagosomes form correctly and sequester relevant cargo but they fail to be cleared from the cytosol. Problems with clearance could result from alterations at very different levels. For example, problems with vesicular trafficking could indirectly interfere with the mobilization of autophagosomes toward the lysosomal compartment [54]. The cytoskeleton is extremely important in the trafficking of organelles and in fact has the role to maintain the spatial organisation for autophagy by conducting the trafficking of organelles involved in different interactions during autophagy. Therefore, autophagy is microtubule-dependent [55]. When microtubules are disrupted by colchicine, autophagosome–lysosomal fusion is also disrupted leading to an increase in the number of autophagic vacuoles (AVs) [56].

Pathogenic proteins can also interfere with the fusion step, which, although still not completely elucidated at the molecular level, is known to depend on different SNARE proteins, the actin cytoskeleton and the histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) [57]. Furthermore, if organelle traffic through the axon is “jammed” we will have organelle transport problems [58].

It is also possible that problems in maturation of autophagosomes and their fusion with lysosomes also occur. The maturation of autophagosomes and their fusion with lysosomes is dependent on the motor protein dynein, which mediates autophagosome movement along the cytoskeleton towards the microtubule-organizing center where the lysosomes are clustered. Loss of dynein function also results in the accumulation of autophagosomes and reduction of the clearance of intracytoplasmatic aggregation-prone proteins [54].

Furthermore, lysosomal defects also have a negative impact on clearance of autophagosomes. Autophagosomes can form properly and sequester the usual cargo but they are not eliminated through the lysosomal system. The reasons for lysosomal failure could be multiple. For instance in most lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) the accumulation of undegraded products inside lysosomes limits their degradative capacity [59]. Undigestible material in lysosomes could build up or otherwise inhibit hydrolases, and could also dilute or divert the delivery of lysosomal hydrolases decreasing their efficiency. Interestingly, accumulation of β-amyloid (Aβ) 1-42, which has a high propensity to aggregate and therefore is less efficiently degraded, causes leakage of lysosomal enzymes into the cytosol [60-61].

Moreover the build up of AVs filled with undigestible material could inhibit secretory pathways interfering with nutrient uptake and response to growth factors or recovery from stress. Additionally, it could also inhibit organelle fusion or block the supply of aminoacids from autophagic protein breakdown, inducing cell starvation [62]. Additionally, conditions that alter lysosomal membrane stability, decreases lysosomal biogenesis or changes lysosomal pH inhibiting lysosomal proteolysis (because of the acidic pH requirements of their degradative enzymes) could also alter autophagosome clearance. Lysosomal hydrolases inhibition by defective acidification of the lysosomal lumen can be due to the inability to target to lysosomes one of the subunits of the proton pump that usually acidifies this compartment, or by direct inhibition of cathepsins that leads to reduced rates of autophagy. Changes in the lysosomal pH could be due to enhanced activity of the V-ATPase. The V-ATPase is a holoenzyme consisting of a membrane bound Vo and cytosolic V1 components, and both V1 and Vo are composed of multiple subunits. The Vo subunit a1 is required for acidification of degradative competent lysosomes [63]. Preservation of low pH is important for cargo release, lysosomal hydrolase and vesicle maturation, autophagy and neurotransmitter loading into synaptic vesicle [64].

Accelerated endocytosis also increases protein and lipid accumulation in endosomes and slows lysosomal degradation of endocytic cargoes [65], leading to lysosomal instability.

The process from protein sorting to endosomal-lysosomal fusion is maintained by the sequential interaction of four complexes termed the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT complexes). The four ESCRT complexes, numbered 0–III, are required for the degradation of aggregate-prone proteins by autophagy [66]. Mutations or depletions affecting ESCRT related genes results in deficient maturation of autophagosomes or in their inability to fuse with lysosomes and endosomes. This leads to autophagosomes accumulation without degradation of their cargo, as well as, ubiquitin-positive aggregates accumulation leading to neurodegeneration in many cases [67]. As proteasome is thought to be turned over by autophagy [68], blockade of proteasome turnover could disrupt additional degradative pathways.

More specifically alterations of CMA can also occur. Different pathogenic proteins have been shown to directly interfere with CMA activity [69]. For instance, mutant forms of alpha-synuclein fail to translocate to the lysosomal lumen whereas the wild-type protein binds to the lysosomal receptor and rapidly reaches the lumen for degradation. Consequently, mutant forms of alpha-synuclein block access of other cytosolic proteins to lysosomes via CMA by abnormally bind to the lysosomal receptor. Moreover, the accumulation at the surface of lysosomes of oligomeric forms of pathogenic proteins targeted via CMA destabilizes the lysosomal membrane and results in leakage of lysosomal enzymes into the cytosol, which often triggers cellular death.

2.2.1. Consequences of defective autophagy

Healthy cells harbour a high autophagic clearance capacity preventing the “traffic jams” of endosomes, autophagosomes, as well as, aggregated proteins and damaged organelles. Only unfolded monomer proteins can undergo degradation through any of these two systems: autophagy, specifically CMA and ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). Consequently, once organized in oligomers, protofibrils, and fibrils, proteins can only be removed by in-bulk degradation, such as via microautophagy or macroautophagy. Thus, oligomers and fibrils of particular proteins can block the proteolytic activity of the UPS and of CMA. These alterations in intracellular proteins can be due to exposure to intracellular or extracellular stressors, such as oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, ultraviolet radiation and other toxic insults. In addition, genetic mutations can generate proteins that cannot fold properly or are prone to aggregation. This can lead to the generation of misfolded proteins or modified soluble proteins resulting from protein cross-linking and oligomerization. The most toxic forms of altered proteins are complex organized structures, such as fibrils or oligomers, although the mechanism by which they exert their cellular toxicity is still controversial. In the absence of a properly functioning quality control system, and as a last attempt to prevent toxicity, cells favor formation of protein aggregates rather than fibrils and oligomeric complexes. The maturation of misfolded or unfolded protein into protein aggregates can vary across different disorders, but generally protein aggregation results from proteins that fold into an abnormal conformation, leading to the formation of oligomeric intermediates [70]. These smaller aggregates, both structured and unstructured, continue to grow and multimerize into larger aggregates or inclusions. Larger cytoplasmic inclusions can evolve further and coalesce into an aggresome, a pericentriolar, membrane-free cytoplasmic inclusion formed specifically at the microtubule organizing center. It has been proposed that the aggresome is a protective structure, formed to sequester proteins that cannot be degraded by the proteasome and packaged for degradation by autophagy. Moreover they sequester toxic monomeric or oligomeric species diluting its toxicity and facilitating the removal of these toxic species. However, aggregates are not completely harmless, because they interfere with normal cellular trafficking and become a sink for still-functional proteins that usually get trapped in these aggregates [71]. Their prolonged presence in neurons is indicative of some failure in fundamental cellular processes.

Taking this into account protein aggregation occurs and enhances the complexity that each neurodegenerative disorders presents. Interestingly, despite the unique features of each neurodegenerative disease, protein aggregation also shares several common characteristics. Generally, the major component of the inclusions is often ubiquitously expressed, such as huntingtin, alpha-synuclein and tau. Moreover the inclusions are found throughout the brain, and they do not correlate only to the pattern of neurodegeneration that occurs in each neurodegenerative disorder [6].

In addition, accumulation of defective, no longer functional organelles is also deleterious for the cells [72]. Whole organelles including peroxisomes and mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy. If AVs containing damaged mitochondria or peroxisomes are not degraded, damaged organelles will gradually accumulate [41, 73].Mitochondrial degradation by autophagy, known as mitophagy plays an important role in the regulation of mitochondrial function and remodeling. Mitophagy may also be important in attenuating apoptosis or necrosis, by clearance of damaged mitochondria. This could then prevent the release of cytochrome c, AIF (apoptosis-inducing factor) and other apoptotic factors that lead to cell death [74]. Clearly, autophagic removal of defective mitochondria is of crucial importance for cell survival. Inhibition of autophagy by 3-methyladenine in growth-arrested human fibroblasts, as a model of cell aging, results in the accumulation of lipofuscin-like material and of mitochondria, with a low-membrane potential [75]. Enlarged and structurally deteriorated mitochondria, showing swelling and disrupted cristae often result in the formation of amorphous material [76-77]. These mitochondria are defective in ATP production and produce increased amounts of ROS which are harmful for cells [78]. One would think that damaged mitochondria should be degraded, but their accumulation with age implies that they either acquire replicative advantage over normal mitochondria, or instead they accumulate due to a decrease in autophagic-lysosomal pathway.

Overall, autophagy is directly responsible for the maintenance of a proteome free of alterations [79]. Importantly, autophagy by mediating the removal of damaged organelles after stress restores organelles homeostasis being essential for the maintenance of cellular homeostasis and to guarantee cellular survival during stress. When quality control systems fail to accomplish its function is the basis for protein conformational disorders. In many late-onset neurodegenerative disorders, including Parkinson’s disease (PD) and HD, there is accumulation of intracellular protein aggregates in the brain [6]. The elimination of these intracellular protein aggregates is often correlated with amelioration of symptoms of the disease [6]. Indeed, in mice with deficiencies in either Atg733 or Atg534 constitutive autophagy is required for the clearance of cytosolic aggregate-prone proteins from neurons [80].


3. Autophagy in disease

The broad array of physiological functions attributed to autophagy justifies why alterations in this catabolic process lead to cellular malfunctioning and often cell death. Autophagy is closely involved in the etiology of several human diseases contributing to its pathogenesis, including cancer, neurodegenerative diseases and metabolic disorders [81-82].

3.1. Autophagic dysfunction in neurodegenerative disorders

Alzheimer’s disease

As AD progresses, either due to AD related genes or environmental/aging factors, several pathological changes of the lysosomal network occurs, such as deregulation of endocytosis and increased lysosomal biogenesis culminating in a progressive failure of lysosomal clearance mechanisms [83]. Enlargement of Rab5 and Rab7 positive endosomes is one of the earliest specific pathology reported in AD brain tissue which reflects a pathological acceleration of endocytosis. Interestingly, it develops in pyramidal neurons of the neocortex at a stage when plaques and tangles are restricted only to the hippocampus. Furthermore genes involved in endocytosis are up-regulated in AD and their corresponding proteins are abnormally recruited to endosomes promoting fusion and enlargement of early and late endosomes, which is a specific characteristic of AD and is not seen in normal aging brain. Acceleration of endosome pathology is also seen in individuals who inherit the ε4 allele of APOE, the major risk factor for late-onset AD [84-85]. Lipinski and co-workers recently reported that transcription of factors that promote autophagy are up-regulated in the brains of AD patients, while negative regulators of autophagy are down-regulated [86]. Indeed, cellular ultrastructural changes have been described in AD brain biopsies revealing a high level of AVs within dystrophic neurites [87]. AVs and lysosomes constitute more than 95% of the organelles in dystrophic neuritic swellings in AD. This means that autophagy initiation is up-regulated or its progression is either delayed or impaired. However the profuse and selective accumulation of AVs in dystrophic neurites indicates a defect in the clearance of AVs by lysosomes rather than an abnormally augment of autophagy. In the case of familial AD, for instance, presenilin 1 (a ubiquitous transmembrane protein involved in diverse biological roles) mutations hinder lysosome proteolysis and accelerate neuritic dystrophy which also supports a primary role for failure of proteolytic clearance. Presenilin 1 is required for lysosome acidification which is needed to activate cathepsins and other hydrolases that carry out digestion during autophagy. Mutations in Presenilin 1 result in impaired targeting of the a1 subunit of V0-ATPase from the endoplasmic reticulum to the lysosome. As V0-ATPase is required for acidification of the autolysosome contents, mutations in Presenilin 1 are proposed to be involved in the defective proteolysis of autophagic substrates in patients with AD [88]. Furthermore, Zhang and colleagues reported for the first time, a role for presenilins in regulating lysosomal biogenesis [89]. The role of impaired lysosomal degradation in the etiology of AD was underscored in a study of a transgenic mouse model of this disease. In these mice, deletion of cystatin B (an endogenous inhibitor of lysosomal cysteine proteases) stimulated the turnover of proteins by the lysosome, enhanced the clearance of the autophagic substrates (including Aβ), and rescued the deficient cognitive phenotype of the animals. Furthermore, in APP transgenic mouse models of AD, undigested autophagic substrates including LC3-II, p62, and ubiquitinated proteins accumulate in neuronal AVs [90]. This general failure to clear autophagy substrates affects clearance of various proteins relevant to AD pathogenesis, including the protein Aβ and tau promoting cell death [91]. These results indicate that mutant APP overexpression alone can lead to autophagic-lysosomal pathology. However the mechanism by which overexpression of mutant APP may lead to impaired autophagy and neuritic dystrophy, is not well understood. One possibility is that APP may affect the endosomal-lysosomal system. Strong overexpression of human Aβ42 in Drosophila neurons induces age-related accumulation of Aβ in AVs and neurotoxicity which is further enhanced by autophagy activation and is partially rescued by autophagy inhibition [92]. These authors propose that the structural integrity of post-fusion AVs may be compromised in Aβ42 affected neurons, leading to subcellular damage and loss of neuronal integrity in the Aβ42 flies. Moreover, expression of an APOΕε4 allele, but not the APOEε3 allele, in a mouse AD model increases levels of intracellular Aβ in lysosomes, altering their function and causing neurodegeneration [93]. Interestingly, inhibition of Aβ aggregation rescues the autophagic deficits in the TgCRND8 mouse model of AD [94]. Autophagy sequesters and digests unneeded or damaged organelles, some of which are APP-rich [95]. Autophagosomes are enriched in APP as well as APP substrates and enzymes that are responsible for processing APP into Aβ. Under normal circunstances Aβ is subsequently degraded by lysosomes [96-97]. Therefore autophagosomes are a site of intracellular production of Aβ, thus upon their cellular accumulation amyloid deposition occurs [98].

Failure of the autophagic system also compromises the elimination of aggregate forms of tau, a protein that also accumulates in AD neurons [99]. In fact, for certain types of tau mutations, pathogenic tau could contribute to the failure of macroautophagy, due to the toxic effect that the still soluble forms of the protein exert in the membrane of lysosomes when they are delivered to this compartment by CMA. Furthermore, particular mutant forms of tau have been shown to abnormally interact with components of the lysosomal CMA translocation machinery [100]. More interestingly, stimulation of autophagy is neuroprotective in a mouse model of human tauopathy [101]. In addition to the defects in late stages of autophagy, evidence suggests that autophagy might be disrupted at the level of autophagosome formation in patients with AD. Compared with healthy individuals, the brains of patients with AD show reduced expression of Beclin-1, which could lead to an impairment in the initiation of autophagy [95]. Transgenic mice that expressed a mutated form of the human APP on a Beclin-1 haploinsufficient background had disrupted autophagy, as well as, increased intracellular Aβ accumulation and neurodegeneration, compared with mice that expressed the mutated human APP in the context of a normal Beclin-1 background [95]. Caspase 3-mediated cleavage of Beclin-1 occurs in the brains of patients with AD; thus, increased activity of this enzyme might contribute to the loss of Beclin-1 function in individuals with this disease [102].

Parkinson’s disease

In PD the most common pathogenic protein, alpha-synuclein, is usually degraded by different autophagic and non-autophagic pathways. Soluble forms of the protein are substrates of both the UPS and of CMA [103]. However, macroautophagy is the only plausible way for the elimination of the pathogenic variants of this protein once they aggregate [104]. When alpha-synuclein aggregates can no longer be degraded by either the UPS or CMA, macroautophagy becomes the only proteolytic pathway able to remove these proteinaceous deposits from the neuronal cytosol. As in the other disorders, post-translational modifications and pathogenic forms of alpha-synuclein promote the formation of oligomeric species that interfere with the normal functioning of the UPS [105], CMA [103] and even macroautophagy at the level of autophagosome formation [106]. In fact, upregulation of wild-type alpha-synuclein leads to significant inhibition of macroautophagy [107] and mutant forms of alpha-synuclein A30P and A53T have been shown to be poorly degraded by CMA, because they are not translocated into the lysosome although they bind to the lysosomal membrane with high affinity. Furthermore, because of their high-affinity binding to the CMA receptor, they block the uptake and degradation of other CMA substrates, leading to a general CMA blockage [103]. Indeed, dopamine-modified alpha-synuclein, which is modified by non-covalent binding of oxidized dopamine, not only is poorly degraded by CMA but also block degradation of other substrates [108]. Subsequently, normal substrate proteins for CMA can no longer be turned over through this pathway and also end up accumulating inside the affected cells. Interestingly, inhibition of the UPS and CMA promote macroautophagy upregulation, [21] which maintains normal levels of protein degradation and removes the cytosolic toxic and aggregated alpha-synuclein [109]. AVs have also been described in melanized neurons of the substantia nigra in PD [110]. This accumulation is consistent with either an overproduction or impaired turnover of AVs. Additionally, LC3-II levels were increased in patients with diffuse Lewy Body Disease and PD, and LC3 co-localized with alpha-synuclein in most Lewy Bodies and Lewy neurites, suggesting an increase in macroautophagy, as well as, an attempt to clear alpha-synuclein pathology by up-regulating autophagic activation [111-113]. Furthermore, Alvarez-Erviti et al. revealed that CMA activity, as well as, LAMP-2A and hsc70 levels were significantly decreased in the substantia nigra from PD patients when compared to controls [114]. Likewise, cathepsin D immunoreactivity was significantly reduced in substantia nigra neurons of PD patients with an even greater decrease in alpha-synuclein inclusion-bearing cells [115].This suggests the presence of abundant and dysfunctional autophagosomes and lysosomes in PD and diffuse Lewy Body Disease. In several cell models, such as SK-SH5Y [116], BE-M17 [117], PC12 cells [118] , as well as, in primary mesencephalic [117] or cortical neurons [119], 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+) has been shown to perturb the autophagy flux, as mirrored by an evident increase in the number of LC3-positive autophagic vesicles, in association with apoptotic or nonapoptotic cell death. More interestingly, cells harboring PD patient’s mitochondria or in mitochondrial DNA-depleted cells show compromise quality control autophagic response and defective clearance of the AVs [120]. The recently identified physiological role for Parkin and Pink1, two PD-causative genes, in mitophagy, suggests that alterations of this selective form of autophagy could also contribute to the pathogenesis of this disease [121]. PINK1 encodes the serine–threonine kinase and is localized to the outer mitochondrial membrane, and PARK2 encodes Parkin, an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Under basal conditions, Parkin is mainly found in the cytosol where its ubiquitin ligase activity is inhibited by an unknown mechanism. Loss of mitochondrial membrane potential drives the recruitment of Parkin to the mitochondria. In fact, under physiologic and pathologic stress, Parkin is selectively recruited from the cytosol to damaged mitochondria in a PINK-1-dependent manner where ubiquinates membrane proteins such as voltage-dependent anion channel 1 and mitofusins 1 and 2, mediating the elimination of the mitochondria by mitophagy [122-124]. Neurodegeneration in PINK-1 and Parkin-positive familial forms of PD may result from a defect in mitophagy, leading to the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and excessive ROS production. In fact, Parkin-deficient mice accumulate dysfunctional mitochondria and oxidative damage [125] while Drosophila flies with mutated Parkin are particularly sensitive to oxygen radical stress [126]. In addition, other PD causative gene, DJ-1 also plays a protective role in autophagy. Loss of DJ-1 has been shown to result in decreased basal autophagy [127]. Moreover, Irrcher and co-workers demonstrated that DJ-1 deficiency leads to altered autophagy in murine and human cells [128]. McCoy and Cookson also showed that loss of DJ-1 leads to mitochondrial phenotypes including reduced membrane potential, increased fragmentation and accumulation of autophagic markers [129]. Moreover, Lrrk2 gene which is mutated in certain dominant forms of familial PD was shown to modulate autophagy. For instance, G2019S mutation induces autophagy via MEK/ERK pathway and inhibition of this exacerbated autophagy reduces the sensitivity observed in G2019S mutant cells [130]. Furthermore, Lrrk2 was shown to co-localize with markers of the endosomal–lysosomal pathway in cases of diffuse Lewy Body Disease [131]. Loss of function of Lrrk2 mutants have been shown to decrease neuritic arbor and to cause the accumulation of autophagic vesicles and swollen lysosomes containing tau inclusion bodies [132]. However, the precise mechanism(s) by which LRRK2 regulates autophagy are still elusive. Interestingly, recent data suggest a mechanism involving late steps in autophagic-lysosomal clearance in a manner dependent on NAADP (nicotinic acid-adenine dinucleotide phosphate)-sensitive lysosomal Ca2+ channels [133]. Other connection between autophagy and PD has been established in studies where mutant forms of the ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1 (UCHL-1) described in some familial forms of PD were shown to interact abnormally with CMA components, namely hsc70, hsp90, and LAMP-2A. The abnormally binding between UCHL-1 and these three CMA components was proposed to interfere with CMA activity [134].

3.2. Autophagic dysfunction in lysosomal storage disorders

Lysosomes are ubiquitous organelles that have crucial roles in cellular clearance. Individually rare, it is now known that about 1 in 7500 live-born infants in many populations will have a lysosomal disease [135]. The LSDs are a group of over 60 diseases, clinically characterized by a progressive phenotype involving multiple organs and tissues, including severe neurodegeneration [136]. Indeed, LSDs involving primary defects in lysosome function commonly exhibit prominent neurodegenerative phenotypes, including neuritic dystrophies closely resembling the ultrastructural morphologies of dystrophic neurites in AD and, in some of these disorders, neurofibrillary tangles as well as increased amyloidogenic processing of APP and diffuse Aβ deposits [137]. Walter and colleagues demonstrated in LSDs an accumulation of sphingolipids, as occurs in lysosomal lipid storage disorders and, decreases the lysosome-dependent degradation of APP C-terminal fragments that stimulates γ-secretase activity increasing the generation of both intracellular and secreted Aβ. Notably, primary fibroblasts from patients with different storage diseases show strong accumulation of potentially amyloidogenic APP C-terminal fragments [138]. LSDs are characterized by progressive accumulation of undigested metabolites such as glycogen, ceramide, heparin sulphate and glucocerebroside, among others, within the cell due to lysosomal dysfunction. Loss-of-function of lysosomal proteins causes accumulation of autophagic and endosomal substrates, and as a result lysosomal storage. Such proteins include lysosomal enzymes, lysosomal integral membrane proteins, and proteins involved in the post-translational modification and trafficking of lysosomal proteins. Defects in these proteins involved in lysosome regulation or function induce the accumulation of undigested molecules that can subsequently alter many cellular processes. These include lysosomal pH regulation, synaptic release, endocytosis, vesicle maturation, autophagy, exocytosis and Ca2+ homeostasis [139-140]. As a consequence, many tissues and organ systems are affected, including brain, viscera, bone and cartilage, with early onset central nervous system dysfunction predominating. Although individuals with LSDs can display early symptoms, the majority are clinically normal at birth which suggests that lysosomal dysfunction per se does not impact significantly the events of early brain development. Furthermore children typically meet early development milestones signifying that lysosomal storage does not affect neuronal function and maturation at early developmental stages. In patients with these disorders, dysfunction of a lysosomal enzyme (usually one of the many lysosomal hydrolases) causes impaired degradation of the enzyme’s substrate, which accumulates within lysosomes [136]. An abundance of AVs is a common feature of cells from patients with LSDs. Lysosomal storage impairs autophagic delivery of bulk cytosolic contents to lysosomes. This can be attributed to a defect in autophagosome–lysosome fusion as a result of dysfunction of the lysosomal compartment. This, in turn, leads to a progressive accumulation of poly-ubiquitinated protein aggregates and of dysfunctional mitochondria, suggesting that neurodegeneration in LSDs may share mechanisms with some neurodegenerative disorders in which the accumulation of protein aggregates is a prominent feature [141]. This defect in autophagosome-lysosome fusion can result from an impairment of vesicular trafficking due to a microtubule-based transport deficiency. The motor protein dynein mediates the movement of mature autophagosomes towards lysosomes. Indeed, mutations affecting dynein impair the autophagic degradation of aggregate‑prone proteins [54]. Another possible mechanism involves changes in the lipid composition of lysosomal membranes. In fact, lipids have been demonstrated to accumulate in a wide range of LSDs [142]. These lipids are the principal constituents of lipid‑rafts. Since lipid‑rafts play a critical role in membrane physiology influencing their plasticity, it is possible that the abnormal accumulation of lipids in LSDs leads to an increase in lipid‑rafts that affects the dynamics of lysosomal membranes and specifically their ability to fuse with autophagosomes. Indeed, in conditions that are similar to what is found in Niemann Pick type C diseases-1 and-2, cholesterol accumulation in late endosomes perturb the intra-endosomal trafficking affecting most likely autophagosome maturation [143].

Impaired autophagy has been reported in several models of LSDs, including Pompe disease, Niemann-Pick disease, the neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses, multiple sulphatase deficiency, and GM1-gangliosidosis. Additionally, lysosomal function is intimately linked to exocytosis (removal of cellular cargo by fusion of vesicle with the plasma membrane), and multiple LSDs, such as mucolipidosis type I, Niemann-Pick disease and sialidosis have been shown to have impaired exocytosis [144].

The first LSD in which an involvement of autophagy was reported was Danon disease (also called “glycogen storage disease due to LAMP2 deficiency” or “lysosomal glycogen storage disease with normal acid maltase activity”) [145]. It was reported an accumulation of AVs in several tissues, particularly the muscle, from a mouse model of the disease [146]. The disease, extremely rare, is inherited as an X-linked trait and the disease phenotype is characterized by severe cardiomyopathy and variable skeletal muscle weakness often associated with mental retardation.

Another LSD is Multiple sulfatase deficiency which is attributed to deficiencies in the activity of sulfatase enzymes. The sulfatases are a family of enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of sulfate ester bonds in a wide variety of substrates, ranging from complex molecules, such as glycosaminoglycans, to sulfolipids and steroid sulfates. These enzymes can be divided, at least in mammals, into two main groups based on their subcellular localization: those found in lysosomes (acting at an acidic pH) and those found in the endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi apparatus and at the cell surface (acting at a neutral pH) [147]. Sulfatases are activated upon a post-translational modification by sulfatase modifying factor 1. The gene encoding sulfatase modifying factor 1 in humans is mutated in this rare autosomal recessive disorder, in which the activity of all sulfatases is profoundly impaired [148]. As for other types of LSDs, the pathogenic mechanisms that lead from enzyme deficiency to cell death in Multiple sulfatase deficiency is not completely understood. An impairment of autophagy is postulated to play a major role in disease pathogenesis. In mouse models of multiple sulfatase deficiency, it was observed an accumulation of autophagosomes resulting from defective autophagosome-lysosome fusion which was demonstrated by the inefficient degradation of exogenous aggregate-prone proteins (expanded huntingtin and mutated alpha-synuclein) and defective organelles [59]. Moreover in chondrocytes from multiple sulfatase deficiency mice show a severe lysosomal storage defect and a defective autophagosome digestion leading to a defect in energy metabolism and to cell death [149]. Interestingly, the mechanisms underlying the impairment of the fusion between lysosomes and autophagosomes in multiple sulfatase deficiency seems to involve abnormalities of membrane lipid composition and SNARE protein distribution [150]. Overall, it seems that a global lysosomal dysfunction leads to the impaired autophagy observed in the pathogenesis of multiple sulfatase deficiency.

Niemann-Pick type C disease is caused by mutations in the NPC1 or NPC2 genes, [151] whose protein products are thought to act cooperatively in the efflux of cholesterol from late endosomes and lysosomes [152]. In the Niemann–Pick type C disease defects in lysosomal trafficking and biogenesis occur. Moreover, a marked accumulation of autophagosomes occurs in the brains of Niemann–Pick disease type C mice and in skin fibroblasts from Niemann–Pick disease type C patients [153-155]. Using human embryonic stem cell-derived neurons engineered to mimic the cholesterol lysosomal storage disease Niemann Pick type C, we have shown that excessive activation and impaired progression of the autophagic pathway lead to abnormal mitochondrial clearance [156]. NPC1 deficiency leads to both an induction of autophagy and an impairment of autophagic flux. The impairment in degradation of autophagic substrates may contribute to several aspects of NPC neuropathology, including the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins and the generation of ROS.

Gaucher’s disease is an autosomal recessive condition, due to deficient activity of lysosomal β-glucosylceramidase. The pathologically enlarged and often multinucleate ‘storage’ cell is a striking feature of Gaucher’s disease. Similarly to Niemann-Pick type C disease, also models of Gaucher disease show both an induction of autophagy and an accumulation of autophagosomes and autophagic substrates [157-158].

In LSDs the primary alteration of the lysosomal compartment can indirectly affect CMA activity. However, there are two LSDs for which alterations in CMA are not merely a consequence of the lysosomal alteration, but rather are due to the possible functional association of the mutant protein with CMA, such as galactosialydosis and mucolipidosis type IV. The first one is caused by a mutation or loss of cathepsin A gene which is a protease involved in CMA regulation and contributes to lysosomal activity and stability. Moreover is also involved in the degradation of LAMP-2A [159]. Loss of cathepsin A enzymatic activity leads to slower LAMP-2A degradation resulting to an increase in CMA activity which contributes to an extreme weight loss that characterizes these patients. In the second LSD the mutated protein, the transient receptor potential mucolipin-1 (TRPML1) which is a endolysosomal cation channel, interacts with HSPA8 (HSC70) and DNAJB1 (HSP40), two components of the CMA molecular machinery leading to decreased CMA activity in response to serum removal [160]. Moreover it has been suggested that TRPML1 mediates Ca2+ efflux from late endosomes and lysosomes indicating that TRPML1 is a key regulator of membrane trafficking along the endosomal pathway [161]. In fact, in TRPML1-deficient cells the delivery of cargo from the cell surface to the lysosome and fusion of lysosomes with the plasma membrane is impaired [162-163].

In spite of all the above mentioned differences among diseases in most cases there is an impairment of autophagic flux, causing a secondary accumulation of autophagy substrates and on the other hand an increase in factors involved in autophagosome formation, such as Beclin1, as an attempt to compensate for the impaired autophagic flux. Accordingly, LSDs can be seen primarily as “autophagy disorders.” [164].

3.3. Autophagic dysfunction in diabetes

In response to a variety of metabolic stressors such as nutrient starvation, growth factor withdrawal, high lipid content challenges or hypoxia macroautophagy and CMA can be induced [165]. Moreover autophagy is also capable of mobilizing energetically efficient molecules, such as lipids, glycogen and nucleic acids which can be used by TCA cycle, gluconeogenesis and glycolysis to produce ATP [165-166]. This capability of autophagy to maintain ATP production and support macromolecular synthesis makes it a pro-survival pathway of particular importance in organs with high energetic requirements, such as the heart or skeletal muscles. Therefore, alterations of this specific autophagic function can constitute the basis of some common metabolic disorders such as diabetes. Type II diabetes is caused, in most cases, by the inability of the body to buffer the free fatty acid concentration. This increases the redox pressure on the mitochondrial respiratory chain, increases ROS production, reduces mitochondrial function, and increases apoptosis of beta-cells [167]. Moreover it is characterized by insulin resistance and failure of beta-cells producing insulin. The most potent fatty acid causing insulin resistance is palmitate. As palmitate is the precursor of ceramide and sphingolipid biosynthesis, the sphingolipid pathway has been implicated in the etiology of insulin resistance [168]. Interestingly, ceramide has been shown to activate autophagy by upregulating beclin1 [169]. Moreover a decrease in intracellular aminoacid concentrations and a decrease in mTOR-dependent signaling may also contribute to the activation of autophagy by ceramide [170]. If in fact autophagy turns out to be up-regulated in type II diabetes, we could speculate that the onset of insulin resistance in elderly people could be an adaptive mechanism aiming to increase autophagy and helping to improve the ability to remove damaged organelles [171]. Autophagy is inhibited by the insulin -mTOR signaling pathway and can be activated either upon aminoacid depletion or by rapamycin administration. Insulin inhibits autophagy in two ways: first by activating mTOR in synergy with aminoacids, which results in the phosphorylation and inhibition of the protein kinase Atg1 (ULK1 in mammals); and second by protein kinase B-mediated phosphorylation and inhibition of the transcription factor FoxO3, which is responsible for the expression of ATG genes [172]. Because insulin inhibits autophagy in insulin-sensitive cells, such as beta-cells, autophagy might be increased. In addition, as a result of free fatty acid induced oxidative stress insulin resistance develops in response to over-feeding, which is one of the major causes of insulin resistance. Interestingly, ROS are known to be required to trigger autophagy, probably because they oxidize a critical cysteine residue in Atg4 [173]. A report from 2007 showed that oxidative stress induced by diabetes leads to ubiquitination and storage of proteins into cytoplasmatic aggregates that do not co-localize with insulin. Because accumulation of ubiquitinated protein may damage cells, such data suggests that autophagy may contribute to the regulation of beta-cell survival and death acting as a defense to cellular damage during diabetes [174]. To prove that a relationship between autophagy and beta-cell death indeed exists experiments were performed in a mouse model whose beta-cells were deficient in autophagic activity. In beta-cell specific Atg7 knockout mice it was reported by two different studies islet degeneration, decreased glucose tolerance, insulin secretion and accumulation of large ubiquitin-containing protein aggregates indicating that autophagy was impaired. This happened even with overexpression of LC3-binding protein p62, which is required for polyubiquitinated protein aggregates to be delivered to the autolysosome [175-176]. In beta-cells from diabetic animals the levels of autophagosomes was significantly increased in both diabetic db/db mice and in non-diabetic control mice fed with a high-fat diet. This can occur either as a result of impaired autophagosome/lysosome fusion, or impaired function of the lysosomal proton pump. Interestingly when Atg7(-/-) mice were fed with a high-fat diet their glucose tolerance decreased indicating once again the important role of autophagy in maintaining proper beta-cell function under stressful conditions. Ebato and colleagues also showed that free fatty acids which can cause peripheral insulin resistance associated with diabetes induced autophagy in beta-cells [176]. These findings suggest that basal autophagy is important for maintenance of normal islet architecture and function and protects beta-cells against cell damage [177]. Interestingly in autophagy-deficient beta-cells ubiquitinated proteins accumulated inside cells. Moreover also p62, a specific autophagy substrate also accumulated in autophagy-deficient beta-cells [178]. Furthermore, exposure of human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells to sera from type 2 diabetic patients with neuropathy is associated with increased levels of autophagosomes [179]. Jung and co-workers showed that the presence of defective beta-cell mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum presumably contributed to the reduced ability to produce insulin, indicating that decreased function and mass of beta-cells can result from mitochondrial dysfunction and endoplasmic reticulum stress, since both organelles are autophagic substrates [175].Moreover, deregulated autophagy may be involved in insulin resistance. In fact, mitochondrial impairment and defective endoplasmic stress response have been implicated in insulin resistance [180-182]. In pancreatic beta-cells, the endoplasmic reticulum is the crucial site for insulin biosynthesis. Consequently, perturbations to endoplasmic reticulum function of the beta-cell, such as those caused by high levels of free fatty acid and insulin resistance, can lead to an imbalance in protein homeostasis and ER stress, which has been recognized as an important mechanism for type 2 diabetes. Macroautophagy is activated as a novel signaling pathway in response to ER stress [183]. In the brain of young patients with poorly controlled type I diabetes mellitus and fatal diabetic ketoacidosis was demonstrated increased levels of macroautophagy-associated proteins as well as increased levels of the ER-associated GRP78. Therefore probably chronic metabolic instability and oxidative stress may cause alterations in the autophagy-lysosomal pathway [184].

Interestingly, insulin resistance, one of the major components of type II diabetes mellitus is a known risk factor for AD. Son and co-workers observed that insulin resistance promotes Aβ generation in the brain via altered insulin signal transduction, increased BACE1/β-secretase and γ-secretase activities, and accumulation of autophagosomes. These authors proposed that the insulin resistance that underlies the pathogenesis of type II diabetes mellitus might alter APP processing through autophagy activation, which might be involved in the pathogenesis of AD [185].


4. Targeting autophagy

The evidence indicating that induction of autophagy is cytoprotective in neurodegenerative disease models raises the possibility that this intracellular catabolic pathway may be exploited to clear toxic disease proteins and provide therapeutic benefit for patients. Consequently, novel approaches to manipulating autophagy in human patients are desirable.

Using a yeast screen, one recent study identified several small molecules capable of augmenting autophagy in mammalian cells and further demonstrated therapeutic benefit of these compounds in a Drosophila model of neurodegeneration [186].

Knockdown of autophagy blocks the protective effects of delayed aging, suggesting that neuroprotection associated with manipulation of aging pathways is autophagy dependent [97]. These results are consistent with the notion that protein aggregation neuronal dysfunction might occur coincidentally with age-related decline in cellular mechanisms to deal with misfolded protein species. Thus, the age-related onset of pathology in neurodegenerative conditions might be correlated with a decline in autophagic capacity beyond a critical threshold. However, additional studies will be required to define the precise relationship of aging, autophagy and neurodegeneration. In the case of some diseases autophagy is initially induced as a neuroprotective response in stressed or injured neurons, but is subsequently overwhelmed or impaired by disease-related factors. This could partly account for evidence that autophagy seems to be both induced and impaired in several major neurodegenerative diseases. Overexpression of HDAC6, a cytoplasmic deacetylase containing a ubiquitin-binding domain, was found to suppress neurodegeneration in a model of polyglutamine disease and to compensate for defects in the UPS by facilitating autophagic protein degradation [187]. These results suggest that HDAC6 functions at the intersection of the UPS and autophagy and identify HDAC6 as a promising target for pharmacological manipulation in neurodegeneration.

Pharmacological activation of autophagy can be achieved with rapamycin, a lipophilic macrolide antibiotic. Chronic low-level stimulation of autophagy through peripheral administration of rapamycin or other agents [188], or enhancing lysosomal proteolysis selectively [90, 189], can markedly diminish Aβ levels and amyloid load in APP transgenic mice, underscoring the importance of lysosomal clearance of Aβ. In both APP and triple transgenic mouse models of AD for instance peripheral administration of rapamycin significantly reduces Aβ deposition and tau pathology [188, 190-191]. Furthermore, by deleting an endogenous inhibitor of lysosomal cysteine proteases (cystatin B) in the TgCRND8 APP mouse model lysosomal pathology is rescued and abnormal autolysosomal accumulation of autophagy substrates including Aβ is decreased and learning and memory deficits also ameliorate [90]. In addition, inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin improves cognitive deficits and rescues Aβ pathology and intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles by increasing autophagy [192]. In a cell model of HD treatment with rapamycin reduced cellular toxicity by reducing bolth levels of soluble mutant huntingtin and the formation of intracellular aggregates [193]. Likewise this was also replicated in vivo in both Drosophila and mouse models of HD [194]. Furthermore, treatment of animals with rapamycin ameliorated neuronal toxicity in models of both Frontotemporal Dementia, spinocerebellar ataxia type 3, and PD [195-199]. However rapamycin shows autophagy-independent functions, such as regulation of ribosome biogenesis and protein translation. Taking into account that rapamycin may not be a good choice for the treatment in humans, other compounds that are independent of mTOR pathway are being studied. Moreover, long-term massive degradation of intracellular components as a result of the upregulation of macroautophagy can have possible negative consequences. Current efforts are now focused on the identification of other methods that can activate macroautophagy.

The mood stabilizer lithium used in bipolar disorder induces autophagy independently of mTOR through the inhibition of inositol monophosphatase therefore depleting the intracellular signaling molecule IP3 [200-201]. Lithium enhances clearance of aggregate-prone proteins, such as mutant forms of huntingtin and alpha-synuclein [202]. Likewise, sodium valproate and carbamazepine are other mood stabilizing drugs that can also reduce the accumulation and toxic effects of aggregation-prone mutant proteins in cell models and protect against neurodegeneration in vivo. Enhanced clearance of mutant alpha-synuclein and neuroprotective effects through lithium were demonstrated in cell-culture models and mice, underscoring the potential of lithium and related molecules for further evaluation [203-204]. An interesting study has shown that lithium (when given in addition to riluzole), significantly delayed the onset of disability and death in human Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients, compared to those administered riluzole alone [205]. In addition, prolonged lithium treatment alleviates memory deficits and reduces Aβ production in AD mouse models [206]. On 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced Parkinsonism mice valproate combined with lithium carbonate rescued dopaminergic neurons and ameliorated the loss of DOPAC, likely via activation of autophagic/lysosomal pathways [207].

The disaccharide trehalose is a stable disaccharide with unique physicochemical properties. This disaccharide directly acts as a chemical chaperone that can stabilize misfolded proteins but it also facilitates the clearance of aggregate-prone proteins. Trehalose was shown to augment autophagy and enhance the clearance of mutant forms of huntingtin and alpha-synuclein from neuronal cells in culture [208]. In APP(swe) mutant mice co-treatment with trehalose increases the expression of autophagic markers as well as the expression of chaperones and reduces the levels of Aβ peptide aggregates, tau plaques and levels of phospho-tau [209]. Moreover in PC12 cells overexpressing wild-type or A53T mutant alpha-synuclein trehalose promoted the clearance of A53T alpha-synuclein but not wild-type alpha-synuclein in PC12 cells, and increased LC3 and Lysotracker RED positive AVs by using lysotracker and LC3 staining [210].

These findings have opened the possibility of using autophagy modulators as therapeutic approaches for these types of pathology. Therefore the search for chemical autophagy modulators more selective and potency is ongoing. Nevertheless, there are certain limitations in the use of up-regulation of macroautophagy for anti-neurodegenerative purposes. One of the limitations is that they all act on early steps of macroautophagy enhancing autophagosome formation, but will not have a beneficial effect in those pathological conditions in which the autophagic defect is in steps past autophagosome formation. Moreover, it has been reported that not all protein aggregates are recognized by the macroautophagic machinery. Further studies are needed to address whether expression of other cellular components or specific post-translational modifications in the aggregated proteins could enhance their recognition by the autophagic systems. For example, pharmacological induction or inhibition of macroautophagy alters the rate of turnover of polyglutamine-expanded proteins, polyalanine-expanded proteins, as well as, wild-type and mutant forms of alpha-synuclein [193, 211].

A patent by Harvard and Cambridge Universities disclosed novel small molecule enhancers of autophagy, named SMERs (small molecule enhancers of rapamycin) [President and Fellows of Harvard College, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Cambridge Enterprise Ltd. Regulating autophagy. WO2008122038 (2008)]. In mammalian cells, the three most active compounds: SMER10, SMER18 and SMER28, augmented autophagosome formation in an mTORC1-independent fashion and without affecting the levels of Beclin-1, Atg5, Atg7 and Atg12, or enhancing the conjugation of Atg12 to Atg5. Importantly, SMERs enhanced the clearance of aggregation-prone mutant forms of alpha-synuclein and huntingtin in mammalian cells [186]. In addition, in cell lines and primary neuronal cultures SMER28 reduced the levels of Aβ and APP C-terminal fragments [188]. In addition, drugs that involve the serine/threonine-protein kinase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) are being currently examined for the treatment of metabolic disorders, such as diabetes mellitus. However future investigations are necessary [212]. Drugs that take advantage of the potential protective effect of autophagy in ER stress, such as glucagon like peptide-1, will be a promising avenue of investigation [183, 213].


5. Concluding remarks

The progression of research in the field of autophagy has taken the understanding of autophagy from a means of survival during starvation to a possible means of treating pharmacologically diseases where autophagy holds an important role. Progress in understanding autophagy has emphasized the importance of autophagy in cellular homeostasis and quality control; prevention of neurodegeneration in several animal models, and the significance of its deficiency in the development and pathogenesis of several disorders. This may provide further insights into the role that autophagy has in disease and how it may be possibly use it as a therapeutic strategy.



Work in our laboratory is supported by funds from PTDC/SAU-NEU/102710/2008. AR Esteves is supported by Post-Doctoral Fellowship (SFRH/BPD/75044/2010) from Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT-MCTES, Portugal). Sponsored by PEST-SAU/LA0001CNC.


  1. 1. Boland B, Nixon RA. Neuronal macroautophagy: from development to degeneration. Mol Aspects Med. 2006 Oct-Dec;27(5-6):503-19.
  2. 2. Youle RJ, Narendra DP. Mechanisms of mitophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011 Jan;12(1):9-14.
  3. 3. Cuervo AM. Chaperone-mediated autophagy: selectivity pays off. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Mar;21(3):142-50.
  4. 4. Tanida I. Autophagosome formation and molecular mechanism of autophagy. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011 Jun;14(11):2201-14.
  5. 5. Yoshimori T, Yamamoto A, Moriyama Y, Futai M, Tashiro Y. Bafilomycin A1, a specific inhibitor of vacuolar-type H(+)-ATPase, inhibits acidification and protein degradation in lysosomes of cultured cells. J Biol Chem. 1991 Sep 15;266(26):17707-12.
  6. 6. Yamamoto A, Simonsen A. The elimination of accumulated and aggregated proteins: a role for aggrephagy in neurodegeneration. Neurobiol Dis. 2011 Jul;43(1):17-28.
  7. 7. Goldman SJ, Taylor R, Zhang Y, Jin S. Autophagy and the degradation of mitochondria. Mitochondrion. 2010 Jun;10(4):309-15.
  8. 8. Mizushima N. The pleiotropic role of autophagy: from protein metabolism to bactericide. Cell Death Differ. 2005 Nov;12 Suppl 2:1535-41.
  9. 9. Mortimore GE, Lardeux BR, Adams CE. Regulation of microautophagy and basal protein turnover in rat liver. Effects of short-term starvation. J Biol Chem. 1988 Feb 15;263(5):2506-12.
  10. 10. Ahlberg J, Glaumann H. Uptake--microautophagy--and degradation of exogenous proteins by isolated rat liver lysosomes. Effects of pH, ATP, and inhibitors of proteolysis. Exp Mol Pathol. 1985 Feb;42(1):78-88.
  11. 11. Farre JC, Subramani S. Peroxisome turnover by micropexophagy: an autophagy-related process. Trends Cell Biol. 2004 Sep;14(9):515-23.
  12. 12. Kaushik S, Bandyopadhyay U, Sridhar S, Kiffin R, Martinez-Vicente M, Kon M, et al. Chaperone-mediated autophagy at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2011 Feb 15;124(Pt 4):495-9.
  13. 13. Chiang HL, Terlecky SR, Plant CP, Dice JF. A role for a 70-kilodalton heat shock protein in lysosomal degradation of intracellular proteins. Science. 1989 Oct 20;246(4928):382-5.
  14. 14. Agarraberes FA, Dice JF. A molecular chaperone complex at the lysosomal membrane is required for protein translocation. J Cell Sci. 2001 Jul;114(Pt 13):2491-9.
  15. 15. Bandyopadhyay U, Kaushik S, Varticovski L, Cuervo AM. The chaperone-mediated autophagy receptor organizes in dynamic protein complexes at the lysosomal membrane. Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Sep;28(18):5747-63.
  16. 16. Shin Y, Klucken J, Patterson C, Hyman BT, McLean PJ. The co-chaperone carboxyl terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein (CHIP) mediates alpha-synuclein degradation decisions between proteasomal and lysosomal pathways. J Biol Chem. 2005 Jun 24;280(25):23727-34.
  17. 17. Cuervo AM, Dice JF. A receptor for the selective uptake and degradation of proteins by lysosomes. Science. 1996 Jul 26;273(5274):501-3.
  18. 18. Gough NR, Hatem CL, Fambrough DM. The family of LAMP-2 proteins arises by alternative splicing from a single gene: characterization of the avian LAMP-2 gene and identification of mammalian homologs of LAMP-2b and LAMP-2c. DNA Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;14(10):863-7.
  19. 19. Wong E, Cuervo AM. Autophagy gone awry in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Neurosci. 2010 Jul;13(7):805-11.
  20. 20. Finn PF, Dice JF. Ketone bodies stimulate chaperone-mediated autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2005 Jul 8;280(27):25864-70.
  21. 21. Massey AC, Kaushik S, Sovak G, Kiffin R, Cuervo AM. Consequences of the selective blockage of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 11;103(15):5805-10.
  22. 22. Kaushik S, Massey AC, Mizushima N, Cuervo AM. Constitutive activation of chaperone-mediated autophagy in cells with impaired macroautophagy. Mol Biol Cell. 2008 May;19(5):2179-92.
  23. 23. Ohsumi Y, Mizushima N. Two ubiquitin-like conjugation systems essential for autophagy. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2004 Apr;15(2):231-6.
  24. 24. Matsunaga K, Saitoh T, Tabata K, Omori H, Satoh T, Kurotori N, et al. Two Beclin 1-binding proteins, Atg14L and Rubicon, reciprocally regulate autophagy at different stages. Nat Cell Biol. 2009 Apr;11(4):385-96.
  25. 25. Yang Z, Klionsky DJ. Mammalian autophagy: core molecular machinery and signaling regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010 Apr;22(2):124-31.
  26. 26. Metcalf DJ, Garcia-Arencibia M, Hochfeld WE, Rubinsztein DC. Autophagy and misfolded proteins in neurodegeneration. Exp Neurol. 2012 Nov;238(1):22-8.
  27. 27. Ravikumar B, Sarkar S, Davies JE, Futter M, Garcia-Arencibia M, Green-Thompson ZW, et al. Regulation of mammalian autophagy in physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2010 Oct;90(4):1383-435.
  28. 28. Wei Y, Pattingre S, Sinha S, Bassik M, Levine B. JNK1-mediated phosphorylation of Bcl-2 regulates starvation-induced autophagy. Mol Cell. 2008 Jun 20;30(6):678-88.
  29. 29. Cao Y, Klionsky DJ. Physiological functions of Atg6/Beclin 1: a unique autophagy-related protein. Cell Res. 2007 Oct;17(10):839-49.
  30. 30. Ku B, Woo JS, Liang C, Lee KH, Jung JU, Oh BH. An insight into the mechanistic role of Beclin 1 and its inhibition by prosurvival Bcl-2 family proteins. Autophagy. 2008 May;4(4):519-20.
  31. 31. Williams A, Sarkar S, Cuddon P, Ttofi EK, Saiki S, Siddiqi FH, et al. Novel targets for Huntington's disease in an mTOR-independent autophagy pathway. Nat Chem Biol. 2008 May;4(5):295-305.
  32. 32. Cardenas C, Miller RA, Smith I, Bui T, Molgo J, Muller M, et al. Essential regulation of cell bioenergetics by constitutive InsP3 receptor Ca2+ transfer to mitochondria. Cell. 2010 Jul 23;142(2):270-83.
  33. 33. Terman A, Brunk UT. Lipofuscin. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004 Aug;36(8):1400-4.
  34. 34. Terman A, Dalen H, Brunk UT. Ceroid/lipofuscin-loaded human fibroblasts show decreased survival time and diminished autophagocytosis during amino acid starvation. Exp Gerontol. 1999 Dec;34(8):943-57.
  35. 35. Ward WF. Protein degradation in the aging organism. Prog Mol Subcell Biol. 2002;29:35-42.
  36. 36. Kim I, Rodriguez-Enriquez S, Lemasters JJ. Selective degradation of mitochondria by mitophagy. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007 Jun 15;462(2):245-53.
  37. 37. Cuervo AM, Dice JF. Age-related decline in chaperone-mediated autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 6;275(40):31505-13.
  38. 38. Kiffin R, Kaushik S, Zeng M, Bandyopadhyay U, Zhang C, Massey AC, et al. Altered dynamics of the lysosomal receptor for chaperone-mediated autophagy with age. J Cell Sci. 2007 Mar 1;120(Pt 5):782-91.
  39. 39. Double KL, Dedov VN, Fedorow H, Kettle E, Halliday GM, Garner B, et al. The comparative biology of neuromelanin and lipofuscin in the human brain. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008 Jun;65(11):1669-82.
  40. 40. Nakano M, Oenzil F, Mizuno T, Gotoh S. Age-related changes in the lipofuscin accumulation of brain and heart. Gerontology. 1995;41 Suppl 2:69-79.
  41. 41. Brunk UT, Terman A. Lipofuscin: mechanisms of age-related accumulation and influence on cell function. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002 Sep 1;33(5):611-9.
  42. 42. Ivy GO, Kanai S, Ohta M, Smith G, Sato Y, Kobayashi M, et al. Lipofuscin-like substances accumulate rapidly in brain, retina and internal organs with cysteine protease inhibition. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1989;266:31-45; discussion -7.
  43. 43. Terman A, Gustafsson B, Brunk UT. Autophagy, organelles and ageing. J Pathol. 2007 Jan;211(2):134-43.
  44. 44. Szweda PA, Camouse M, Lundberg KC, Oberley TD, Szweda LI. Aging, lipofuscin formation, and free radical-mediated inhibition of cellular proteolytic systems. Ageing Res Rev. 2003 Oct;2(4):383-405.
  45. 45. Elleder M, Sokolova J, Hrebicek M. Follow-up study of subunit c of mitochondrial ATP synthase (SCMAS) in Batten disease and in unrelated lysosomal disorders. Acta Neuropathol. 1997 Apr;93(4):379-90.
  46. 46. Terman A, Brunk UT. Oxidative stress, accumulation of biological 'garbage', and aging. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006 Jan-Feb;8(1-2):197-204.
  47. 47. Jolly RD, Douglas BV, Davey PM, Roiri JE. Lipofuscin in bovine muscle and brain: a model for studying age pigment. Gerontology. 1995;41 Suppl 2:283-95.
  48. 48. Terman A, Brunk UT. Lipofuscin: mechanisms of formation and increase with age. APMIS. 1998 Feb;106(2):265-76.
  49. 49. Schmidtke G, Emch S, Groettrup M, Holzhutter HG. Evidence for the existence of a non-catalytic modifier site of peptide hydrolysis by the 20 S proteasome. J Biol Chem. 2000 Jul 21;275(29):22056-63.
  50. 50. Giasson BI, Duda JE, Murray IV, Chen Q, Souza JM, Hurtig HI, et al. Oxidative damage linked to neurodegeneration by selective alpha-synuclein nitration in synucleinopathy lesions. Science. 2000 Nov 3;290(5493):985-9.
  51. 51. Sitte N, Merker K, Grune T, von Zglinicki T. Lipofuscin accumulation in proliferating fibroblasts in vitro: an indicator of oxidative stress. Exp Gerontol. 2001 Mar;36(3):475-86.
  52. 52. Imarisio S, Carmichael J, Korolchuk V, Chen CW, Saiki S, Rose C, et al. Huntington's disease: from pathology and genetics to potential therapies. Biochem J. 2008 Jun 1;412(2):191-209.
  53. 53. Martinez-Vicente M, Talloczy Z, Wong E, Tang G, Koga H, Kaushik S, et al. Cargo recognition failure is responsible for inefficient autophagy in Huntington's disease. Nat Neurosci. 2010 May;13(5):567-76.
  54. 54. Ravikumar B, Acevedo-Arozena A, Imarisio S, Berger Z, Vacher C, O'Kane CJ, et al. Dynein mutations impair autophagic clearance of aggregate-prone proteins. Nat Genet. 2005 Jul;37(7):771-6.
  55. 55. Kochl R, Hu XW, Chan EY, Tooze SA. Microtubules facilitate autophagosome formation and fusion of autophagosomes with endosomes. Traffic. 2006 Feb;7(2):129-45.
  56. 56. Webb JL, Ravikumar B, Rubinsztein DC. Microtubule disruption inhibits autophagosome-lysosome fusion: implications for studying the roles of aggresomes in polyglutamine diseases. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004 Dec;36(12):2541-50.
  57. 57. Lee JY, Koga H, Kawaguchi Y, Tang W, Wong E, Gao YS, et al. HDAC6 controls autophagosome maturation essential for ubiquitin-selective quality-control autophagy. EMBO J. 2010 Mar 3;29(5):969-80.
  58. 58. Duncan JE, Goldstein LS. The genetics of axonal transport and axonal transport disorders. PLoS Genet. 2006 Sep 29;2(9):e124.
  59. 59. Settembre C, Fraldi A, Jahreiss L, Spampanato C, Venturi C, Medina D, et al. A block of autophagy in lysosomal storage disorders. Hum Mol Genet. 2008 Jan 1;17(1):119-29.
  60. 60. Yang AJ, Chandswangbhuvana D, Margol L, Glabe CG. Loss of endosomal/lysosomal membrane impermeability is an early event in amyloid Abeta1-42 pathogenesis. J Neurosci Res. 1998 Jun 15;52(6):691-8.
  61. 61. Glabe C. Intracellular mechanisms of amyloid accumulation and pathogenesis in Alzheimer's disease. J Mol Neurosci. 2001 Oct;17(2):137-45.
  62. 62. Sulzer D, Bogulavsky J, Larsen KE, Behr G, Karatekin E, Kleinman MH, et al. Neuromelanin biosynthesis is driven by excess cytosolic catecholamines not accumulated by synaptic vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):11869-74.
  63. 63. Williamson WR, Wang D, Haberman AS, Hiesinger PR. A dual function of V0-ATPase a1 provides an endolysosomal degradation mechanism in Drosophila melanogaster photoreceptors. J Cell Biol. 2010 May 31;189(5):885-99.
  64. 64. Mijaljica D, Prescott M, Devenish RJ. V-ATPase engagement in autophagic processes. Autophagy. 2011 Jun;7(6):666-8.
  65. 65. Cataldo AM, Mathews PM, Boiteau AB, Hassinger LC, Peterhoff CM, Jiang Y, et al. Down syndrome fibroblast model of Alzheimer-related endosome pathology: accelerated endocytosis promotes late endocytic defects. Am J Pathol. 2008 Aug;173(2):370-84.
  66. 66. Filimonenko M, Stuffers S, Raiborg C, Yamamoto A, Malerod L, Fisher EM, et al. Functional multivesicular bodies are required for autophagic clearance of protein aggregates associated with neurodegenerative disease. J Cell Biol. 2007 Nov 5;179(3):485-500.
  67. 67. Lee JA, Beigneux A, Ahmad ST, Young SG, Gao FB. ESCRT-III dysfunction causes autophagosome accumulation and neurodegeneration. Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 18;17(18):1561-7.
  68. 68. Cuervo AM, Palmer A, Rivett AJ, Knecht E. Degradation of proteasomes by lysosomes in rat liver. Eur J Biochem. 1995 Feb 1;227(3):792-800.
  69. 69. Koga H, Cuervo AM. Chaperone-mediated autophagy dysfunction in the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration. Neurobiol Dis. 2011 Jul;43(1):29-37.
  70. 70. Merlini G, Bellotti V, Andreola A, Palladini G, Obici L, Casarini S, et al. Protein aggregation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2001 Nov;39(11):1065-75.
  71. 71. Scheibel T, Buchner J. Protein aggregation as a cause for disease. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2006(172):199-219.
  72. 72. Tyedmers J, Mogk A, Bukau B. Cellular strategies for controlling protein aggregation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Nov;11(11):777-88.
  73. 73. Brunk UT, Terman A. The mitochondrial-lysosomal axis theory of aging: accumulation of damaged mitochondria as a result of imperfect autophagocytosis. Eur J Biochem. 2002 Apr;269(8):1996-2002.
  74. 74. Lee J, Giordano S, Zhang J. Autophagy, mitochondria and oxidative stress: cross-talk and redox signalling. Biochem J. 2012 Jan 15;441(2):523-40.
  75. 75. Stroikin Y, Dalen H, Loof S, Terman A. Inhibition of autophagy with 3-methyladenine results in impaired turnover of lysosomes and accumulation of lipofuscin-like material. Eur J Cell Biol. 2004 Oct;83(10):583-90.
  76. 76. Coleman R, Silbermann M, Gershon D, Reznick AZ. Giant mitochondria in the myocardium of aging and endurance-trained mice. Gerontology. 1987;33(1):34-9.
  77. 77. Terman A, Dalen H, Eaton JW, Neuzil J, Brunk UT. Mitochondrial recycling and aging of cardiac myocytes: the role of autophagocytosis. Exp Gerontol. 2003 Aug;38(8):863-76.
  78. 78. Sohal RS, Sohal BH. Hydrogen peroxide release by mitochondria increases during aging. Mech Ageing Dev. 1991 Feb;57(2):187-202.
  79. 79. Goldberg AL. Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature. 2003 Dec 18;426(6968):895-9.
  80. 80. Komatsu M, Waguri S, Chiba T, Murata S, Iwata J, Tanida I, et al. Loss of autophagy in the central nervous system causes neurodegeneration in mice. Nature. 2006 Jun 15;441(7095):880-4.
  81. 81. Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature. 2008 Feb 28;451(7182):1069-75.
  82. 82. Meijer AJ, Codogno P. Autophagy: regulation and role in disease. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2009;46(4):210-40.
  83. 83. Nixon RA, Cataldo AM. Lysosomal system pathways: genes to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2006;9(3 Suppl):277-89.
  84. 84. Ginsberg SD, Alldred MJ, Counts SE, Cataldo AM, Neve RL, Jiang Y, et al. Microarray analysis of hippocampal CA1 neurons implicates early endosomal dysfunction during Alzheimer's disease progression. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Nov 15;68(10):885-93.
  85. 85. Cataldo AM, Peterhoff CM, Troncoso JC, Gomez-Isla T, Hyman BT, Nixon RA. Endocytic pathway abnormalities precede amyloid beta deposition in sporadic Alzheimer's disease and Down syndrome: differential effects of APOE genotype and presenilin mutations. Am J Pathol. 2000 Jul;157(1):277-86.
  86. 86. Lipinski MM, Zheng B, Lu T, Yan Z, Py BF, Ng A, et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals mechanisms modulating autophagy in normal brain aging and in Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 10;107(32):14164-9.
  87. 87. Nixon RA, Wegiel J, Kumar A, Yu WH, Peterhoff C, Cataldo A, et al. Extensive involvement of autophagy in Alzheimer disease: an immuno-electron microscopy study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2005 Feb;64(2):113-22.
  88. 88. Lee JH, Yu WH, Kumar A, Lee S, Mohan PS, Peterhoff CM, et al. Lysosomal proteolysis and autophagy require presenilin 1 and are disrupted by Alzheimer-related PS1 mutations. Cell. 2010 Jun 25;141(7):1146-58.
  89. 89. Zhang X, Garbett K, Veeraraghavalu K, Wilburn B, Gilmore R, Mirnics K, et al. A role for presenilins in autophagy revisited: normal acidification of lysosomes in cells lacking PSEN1 and PSEN2. J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 20;32(25):8633-48.
  90. 90. Yang DS, Stavrides P, Mohan PS, Kaushik S, Kumar A, Ohno M, et al. Reversal of autophagy dysfunction in the TgCRND8 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease ameliorates amyloid pathologies and memory deficits. Brain. 2011 Jan;134(Pt 1):258-77.
  91. 91. Yang DS, Kumar A, Stavrides P, Peterson J, Peterhoff CM, Pawlik M, et al. Neuronal apoptosis and autophagy cross talk in aging PS/APP mice, a model of Alzheimer's disease. Am J Pathol. 2008 Sep;173(3):665-81.
  92. 92. Ling D, Song HJ, Garza D, Neufeld TP, Salvaterra PM. Abeta42-induced neurodegeneration via an age-dependent autophagic-lysosomal injury in Drosophila. PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4201.
  93. 93. Belinson H, Lev D, Masliah E, Michaelson DM. Activation of the amyloid cascade in apolipoprotein E4 transgenic mice induces lysosomal activation and neurodegeneration resulting in marked cognitive deficits. J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 30;28(18):4690-701.
  94. 94. Lai AY, McLaurin J. Inhibition of amyloid-beta peptide aggregation rescues the autophagic deficits in the TgCRND8 mouse model of Alzheimer disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Oct;1822(10):1629-37.
  95. 95. Pickford F, Masliah E, Britschgi M, Lucin K, Narasimhan R, Jaeger PA, et al. The autophagy-related protein beclin 1 shows reduced expression in early Alzheimer disease and regulates amyloid beta accumulation in mice. J Clin Invest. 2008 Jun;118(6):2190-9.
  96. 96. Bahr BA, Bendiske J. The neuropathogenic contributions of lysosomal dysfunction. J Neurochem. 2002 Nov;83(3):481-9.
  97. 97. Florez-McClure ML, Hohsfield LA, Fonte G, Bealor MT, Link CD. Decreased insulin-receptor signaling promotes the autophagic degradation of beta-amyloid peptide in C. elegans. Autophagy. 2007 Nov-Dec;3(6):569-80.
  98. 98. Yu WH, Cuervo AM, Kumar A, Peterhoff CM, Schmidt SD, Lee JH, et al. Macroautophagy--a novel Beta-amyloid peptide-generating pathway activated in Alzheimer's disease. J Cell Biol. 2005 Oct 10;171(1):87-98.
  99. 99. Wang Y, Mandelkow E. Degradation of tau protein by autophagy and proteasomal pathways. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012 Aug;40(4):644-52.
  100. 100. Wang Y, Martinez-Vicente M, Kruger U, Kaushik S, Wong E, Mandelkow EM, et al. Tau fragmentation, aggregation and clearance: the dual role of lysosomal processing. Hum Mol Genet. 2009 Nov 1;18(21):4153-70.
  101. 101. Schaeffer V, Lavenir I, Ozcelik S, Tolnay M, Winkler DT, Goedert M. Stimulation of autophagy reduces neurodegeneration in a mouse model of human tauopathy. Brain. 2012 Jul;135(Pt 7):2169-77.
  102. 102. Rohn TT, Wirawan E, Brown RJ, Harris JR, Masliah E, Vandenabeele P. Depletion of Beclin-1 due to proteolytic cleavage by caspases in the Alzheimer's disease brain. Neurobiol Dis. 2011 Jul;43(1):68-78.
  103. 103. Cuervo AM, Stefanis L, Fredenburg R, Lansbury PT, Sulzer D. Impaired degradation of mutant alpha-synuclein by chaperone-mediated autophagy. Science. 2004 Aug 27;305(5688):1292-5.
  104. 104. Webb JL, Ravikumar B, Atkins J, Skepper JN, Rubinsztein DC. Alpha-Synuclein is degraded by both autophagy and the proteasome. J Biol Chem. 2003 Jul 4;278(27):25009-13.
  105. 105. Stefanis L, Larsen KE, Rideout HJ, Sulzer D, Greene LA. Expression of A53T mutant but not wild-type alpha-synuclein in PC12 cells induces alterations of the ubiquitin-dependent degradation system, loss of dopamine release, and autophagic cell death. J Neurosci. 2001 Dec 15;21(24):9549-60.
  106. 106. Winslow AR, Chen CW, Corrochano S, Acevedo-Arozena A, Gordon DE, Peden AA, et al. alpha-Synuclein impairs macroautophagy: implications for Parkinson's disease. J Cell Biol. 2010 Sep 20;190(6):1023-37.
  107. 107. Xilouri M, Vogiatzi T, Vekrellis K, Park D, Stefanis L. Abberant alpha-synuclein confers toxicity to neurons in part through inhibition of chaperone-mediated autophagy. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5515.
  108. 108. Martinez-Vicente M, Talloczy Z, Kaushik S, Massey AC, Mazzulli J, Mosharov EV, et al. Dopamine-modified alpha-synuclein blocks chaperone-mediated autophagy. J Clin Invest. 2008 Feb;118(2):777-88.
  109. 109. Rideout HJ, Lang-Rollin I, Stefanis L. Involvement of macroautophagy in the dissolution of neuronal inclusions. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004 Dec;36(12):2551-62.
  110. 110. Anglade P, Vyas S, Javoy-Agid F, Herrero MT, Michel PP, Marquez J, et al. Apoptosis and autophagy in nigral neurons of patients with Parkinson's disease. Histol Histopathol. 1997 Jan;12(1):25-31.
  111. 111. Crews L, Spencer B, Desplats P, Patrick C, Paulino A, Rockenstein E, et al. Selective molecular alterations in the autophagy pathway in patients with Lewy body disease and in models of alpha-synucleinopathy. PLoS One. 2010;5(2):e9313.
  112. 112. Higashi S, Moore DJ, Minegishi M, Kasanuki K, Fujishiro H, Kabuta T, et al. Localization of MAP1-LC3 in vulnerable neurons and Lewy bodies in brains of patients with dementia with Lewy bodies. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011 Apr;70(4):264-80.
  113. 113. Tanji K, Mori F, Kakita A, Takahashi H, Wakabayashi K. Alteration of autophagosomal proteins (LC3, GABARAP and GATE-16) in Lewy body disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2011 Sep;43(3):690-7.
  114. 114. Alvarez-Erviti L, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Cooper JM, Caballero C, Ferrer I, Obeso JA, et al. Chaperone-mediated autophagy markers in Parkinson disease brains. Arch Neurol. 2010 Dec;67(12):1464-72.
  115. 115. Chu Y, Dodiya H, Aebischer P, Olanow CW, Kordower JH. Alterations in lysosomal and proteasomal markers in Parkinson's disease: relationship to alpha-synuclein inclusions. Neurobiol Dis. 2009 Sep;35(3):385-98.
  116. 116. Zhu JH, Horbinski C, Guo F, Watkins S, Uchiyama Y, Chu CT. Regulation of autophagy by extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases during 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced cell death. Am J Pathol. 2007 Jan;170(1):75-86.
  117. 117. Dehay B, Bove J, Rodriguez-Muela N, Perier C, Recasens A, Boya P, et al. Pathogenic lysosomal depletion in Parkinson's disease. J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 15;30(37):12535-44.
  118. 118. Cai ZL, Shi JJ, Yang YP, Cao BY, Wang F, Huang JZ, et al. MPP+ impairs autophagic clearance of alpha-synuclein by impairing the activity of dynein. Neuroreport. 2009 Apr 22;20(6):569-73.
  119. 119. Wong AS, Lee RH, Cheung AY, Yeung PK, Chung SK, Cheung ZH, et al. Cdk5-mediated phosphorylation of endophilin B1 is required for induced autophagy in models of Parkinson's disease. Nat Cell Biol. 2011 May;13(5):568-79.
  120. 120. Arduino DM, Raquel Esteves A, Cortes L, Silva DF, Patel B, Grazina M, et al. Mitochondrial metabolism in Parkinson's disease impairs quality control autophagy by hampering microtubule-dependent traffic. Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Aug 29.
  121. 121. Geisler S, Holmstrom KM, Treis A, Skujat D, Weber SS, Fiesel FC, et al. The PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy is compromised by PD-associated mutations. Autophagy. 2010 Oct;6(7):871-8.
  122. 122. Geisler S, Holmstrom KM, Skujat D, Fiesel FC, Rothfuss OC, Kahle PJ, et al. PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy is dependent on VDAC1 and p62/SQSTM1. Nat Cell Biol. 2010 Feb;12(2):119-31.
  123. 123. Narendra D, Tanaka A, Suen DF, Youle RJ. Parkin is recruited selectively to impaired mitochondria and promotes their autophagy. J Cell Biol. 2008 Dec 1;183(5):795-803.
  124. 124. Matsuda N, Sato S, Shiba K, Okatsu K, Saisho K, Gautier CA, et al. PINK1 stabilized by mitochondrial depolarization recruits Parkin to damaged mitochondria and activates latent Parkin for mitophagy. J Cell Biol. 2010 Apr 19;189(2):211-21.
  125. 125. Palacino JJ, Sagi D, Goldberg MS, Krauss S, Motz C, Wacker M, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage in parkin-deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 2004 Apr 30;279(18):18614-22.
  126. 126. Pesah Y, Pham T, Burgess H, Middlebrooks B, Verstreken P, Zhou Y, et al. Drosophila parkin mutants have decreased mass and cell size and increased sensitivity to oxygen radical stress. Development. 2004 May;131(9):2183-94.
  127. 127. Krebiehl G, Ruckerbauer S, Burbulla LF, Kieper N, Maurer B, Waak J, et al. Reduced basal autophagy and impaired mitochondrial dynamics due to loss of Parkinson's disease-associated protein DJ-1. PLoS One. 2010;5(2):e9367.
  128. 128. Irrcher I, Aleyasin H, Seifert EL, Hewitt SJ, Chhabra S, Phillips M, et al. Loss of the Parkinson's disease-linked gene DJ-1 perturbs mitochondrial dynamics. Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Oct 1;19(19):3734-46.
  129. 129. McCoy MK, Cookson MR. DJ-1 regulation of mitochondrial function and autophagy through oxidative stress. Autophagy. 2011 May;7(5):531-2.
  130. 130. Bravo-San Pedro JM, Niso-Santano M, Gomez-Sanchez R, Pizarro-Estrella E, Aiastui-Pujana A, Gorostidi A, et al. The LRRK2 G2019S mutant exacerbates basal autophagy through activation of the MEK/ERK pathway. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012 Jul 8.
  131. 131. Higashi S, Moore DJ, Yamamoto R, Minegishi M, Sato K, Togo T, et al. Abnormal localization of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 to the endosomal-lysosomal compartment in lewy body disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009 Sep;68(9):994-1005.
  132. 132. MacLeod D, Dowman J, Hammond R, Leete T, Inoue K, Abeliovich A. The familial Parkinsonism gene LRRK2 regulates neurite process morphology. Neuron. 2006 Nov 22;52(4):587-93.
  133. 133. Gomez-Suaga P, Luzon-Toro B, Churamani D, Zhang L, Bloor-Young D, Patel S, et al. Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 regulates autophagy through a calcium-dependent pathway involving NAADP. Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Feb 1;21(3):511-25.
  134. 134. Kabuta T, Furuta A, Aoki S, Furuta K, Wada K. Aberrant interaction between Parkinson disease-associated mutant UCH-L1 and the lysosomal receptor for chaperone-mediated autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2008 Aug 29;283(35):23731-8.
  135. 135. Poupetova H, Ledvinova J, Berna L, Dvorakova L, Kozich V, Elleder M. The birth prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders in the Czech Republic: comparison with data in different populations. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010 Aug;33(4):387-96.
  136. 136. Raben N, Shea L, Hill V, Plotz P. Monitoring autophagy in lysosomal storage disorders. Methods Enzymol. 2009;453:417-49.
  137. 137. Ohmi K, Kudo LC, Ryazantsev S, Zhao HZ, Karsten SL, Neufeld EF. Sanfilippo syndrome type B, a lysosomal storage disease, is also a tauopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 19;106(20):8332-7.
  138. 138. Tamboli IY, Hampel H, Tien NT, Tolksdorf K, Breiden B, Mathews PM, et al. Sphingolipid storage affects autophagic metabolism of the amyloid precursor protein and promotes Abeta generation. J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 2;31(5):1837-49.
  139. 139. Vitner EB, Platt FM, Futerman AH. Common and uncommon pathogenic cascades in lysosomal storage diseases. J Biol Chem. 2010 Jul 2;285(27):20423-7.
  140. 140. Bellettato CM, Scarpa M. Pathophysiology of neuropathic lysosomal storage disorders. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010 Aug;33(4):347-62.
  141. 141. Settembre C, Arteaga-Solis E, Ballabio A, Karsenty G. Self-eating in skeletal development: implications for lysosomal storage disorders. Autophagy. 2009 Feb;5(2):228-9.
  142. 142. Futerman AH, van Meer G. The cell biology of lysosomal storage disorders. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Jul;5(7):554-65.
  143. 143. Sobo K, Le Blanc I, Luyet PP, Fivaz M, Ferguson C, Parton RG, et al. Late endosomal cholesterol accumulation leads to impaired intra-endosomal trafficking. PLoS One. 2007;2(9):e851.
  144. 144. Schultz ML, Tecedor L, Chang M, Davidson BL. Clarifying lysosomal storage diseases. Trends Neurosci. 2011 Aug;34(8):401-10.
  145. 145. Nishino I, Fu J, Tanji K, Yamada T, Shimojo S, Koori T, et al. Primary LAMP-2 deficiency causes X-linked vacuolar cardiomyopathy and myopathy (Danon disease). Nature. 2000 Aug 24;406(6798):906-10.
  146. 146. Tanaka Y, Guhde G, Suter A, Eskelinen EL, Hartmann D, Lullmann-Rauch R, et al. Accumulation of autophagic vacuoles and cardiomyopathy in LAMP-2-deficient mice. Nature. 2000 Aug 24;406(6798):902-6.
  147. 147. Diez-Roux G, Ballabio A. Sulfatases and human disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2005;6:355-79.
  148. 148. Ballabio A, Gieselmann V. Lysosomal disorders: from storage to cellular damage. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Apr;1793(4):684-96.
  149. 149. Settembre C, Arteaga-Solis E, McKee MD, de Pablo R, Al Awqati Q, Ballabio A, et al. Proteoglycan desulfation determines the efficiency of chondrocyte autophagy and the extent of FGF signaling during endochondral ossification. Genes Dev. 2008 Oct 1;22(19):2645-50.
  150. 150. Fraldi A, Annunziata F, Lombardi A, Kaiser HJ, Medina DL, Spampanato C, et al. Lysosomal fusion and SNARE function are impaired by cholesterol accumulation in lysosomal storage disorders. EMBO J. 2010 Nov 3;29(21):3607-20.
  151. 151. Carstea ED, Morris JA, Coleman KG, Loftus SK, Zhang D, Cummings C, et al. Niemann-Pick C1 disease gene: homology to mediators of cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 1997 Jul 11;277(5323):228-31.
  152. 152. Kwon HJ, Abi-Mosleh L, Wang ML, Deisenhofer J, Goldstein JL, Brown MS, et al. Structure of N-terminal domain of NPC1 reveals distinct subdomains for binding and transfer of cholesterol. Cell. 2009 Jun 26;137(7):1213-24.
  153. 153. Pacheco CD, Kunkel R, Lieberman AP. Autophagy in Niemann-Pick C disease is dependent upon Beclin-1 and responsive to lipid trafficking defects. Hum Mol Genet. 2007 Jun 15;16(12):1495-503.
  154. 154. Liao G, Yao Y, Liu J, Yu Z, Cheung S, Xie A, et al. Cholesterol accumulation is associated with lysosomal dysfunction and autophagic stress in Npc1 -/- mouse brain. Am J Pathol. 2007 Sep;171(3):962-75.
  155. 155. Ko DC, Milenkovic L, Beier SM, Manuel H, Buchanan J, Scott MP. Cell-autonomous death of cerebellar purkinje neurons with autophagy in Niemann-Pick type C disease. PLoS Genet. 2005 Jul;1(1):81-95.
  156. 156. Ordonez MP. Defective mitophagy in human Niemann-Pick Type C1 neurons is due to abnormal autophagy activation. Autophagy. 2012 May 31;8(7).
  157. 157. Sun Y, Liou B, Ran H, Skelton MR, Williams MT, Vorhees CV, et al. Neuronopathic Gaucher disease in the mouse: viable combined selective saposin C deficiency and mutant glucocerebrosidase (V394L) mice with glucosylsphingosine and glucosylceramide accumulation and progressive neurological deficits. Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Mar 15;19(6):1088-97.
  158. 158. Mazzulli JR, Xu YH, Sun Y, Knight AL, McLean PJ, Caldwell GA, et al. Gaucher disease glucocerebrosidase and alpha-synuclein form a bidirectional pathogenic loop in synucleinopathies. Cell. 2011 Jul 8;146(1):37-52.
  159. 159. Cuervo AM, Mann L, Bonten EJ, d'Azzo A, Dice JF. Cathepsin A regulates chaperone-mediated autophagy through cleavage of the lysosomal receptor. EMBO J. 2003 Jan 2;22(1):47-59.
  160. 160. Venugopal B, Mesires NT, Kennedy JC, Curcio-Morelli C, Laplante JM, Dice JF, et al. Chaperone-mediated autophagy is defective in mucolipidosis type IV. J Cell Physiol. 2009 May;219(2):344-53.
  161. 161. Cheng X, Shen D, Samie M, Xu H. Mucolipins: Intracellular TRPML1-3 channels. FEBS Lett. 2010 May 17;584(10):2013-21.
  162. 162. Vergarajauregui S, Connelly PS, Daniels MP, Puertollano R. Autophagic dysfunction in mucolipidosis type IV patients. Hum Mol Genet. 2008 Sep 1;17(17):2723-37.
  163. 163. Medina DL, Fraldi A, Bouche V, Annunziata F, Mansueto G, Spampanato C, et al. Transcriptional activation of lysosomal exocytosis promotes cellular clearance. Dev Cell. 2011 Sep 13;21(3):421-30.
  164. 164. Lieberman AP, Puertollano R, Raben N, Slaugenhaupt S, Walkley SU, Ballabio A. Autophagy in lysosomal storage disorders. Autophagy. 2012 May 1;8(5):719-30.
  165. 165. Singh R, Cuervo AM. Autophagy in the cellular energetic balance. Cell Metab. 2011 May 4;13(5):495-504.
  166. 166. Kotoulas OB, Kalamidas SA, Kondomerkos DJ. Glycogen autophagy in glucose homeostasis. Pathol Res Pract. 2006;202(9):631-8.
  167. 167. Evans JL, Goldfine ID, Maddux BA, Grodsky GM. Oxidative stress and stress-activated signaling pathways: a unifying hypothesis of type 2 diabetes. Endocr Rev. 2002 Oct;23(5):599-622.
  168. 168. Tagami S, Inokuchi Ji J, Kabayama K, Yoshimura H, Kitamura F, Uemura S, et al. Ganglioside GM3 participates in the pathological conditions of insulin resistance. J Biol Chem. 2002 Feb 1;277(5):3085-92.
  169. 169. Scarlatti F, Bauvy C, Ventruti A, Sala G, Cluzeaud F, Vandewalle A, et al. Ceramide-mediated macroautophagy involves inhibition of protein kinase B and up-regulation of beclin 1. J Biol Chem. 2004 Apr 30;279(18):18384-91.
  170. 170. Hyde R, Hajduch E, Powell DJ, Taylor PM, Hundal HS. Ceramide down-regulates System A amino acid transport and protein synthesis in rat skeletal muscle cells. FASEB J. 2005 Mar;19(3):461-3.
  171. 171. Petersen KF, Befroy D, Dufour S, Dziura J, Ariyan C, Rothman DL, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in the elderly: possible role in insulin resistance. Science. 2003 May 16;300(5622):1140-2.
  172. 172. Meijer AJ, Codogno P. Autophagy: a sweet process in diabetes. Cell Metab. 2008 Oct;8(4):275-6.
  173. 173. Scherz-Shouval R, Shvets E, Fass E, Shorer H, Gil L, Elazar Z. Reactive oxygen species are essential for autophagy and specifically regulate the activity of Atg4. EMBO J. 2007 Apr 4;26(7):1749-60.
  174. 174. Kaniuk NA, Kiraly M, Bates H, Vranic M, Volchuk A, Brumell JH. Ubiquitinated-protein aggregates form in pancreatic beta-cells during diabetes-induced oxidative stress and are regulated by autophagy. Diabetes. 2007 Apr;56(4):930-9.
  175. 175. Jung HS, Chung KW, Won Kim J, Kim J, Komatsu M, Tanaka K, et al. Loss of autophagy diminishes pancreatic beta cell mass and function with resultant hyperglycemia. Cell Metab. 2008 Oct;8(4):318-24.
  176. 176. Ebato C, Uchida T, Arakawa M, Komatsu M, Ueno T, Komiya K, et al. Autophagy is important in islet homeostasis and compensatory increase of beta cell mass in response to high-fat diet. Cell Metab. 2008 Oct;8(4):325-32.
  177. 177. Mizushima N, Klionsky DJ. Protein turnover via autophagy: implications for metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. 2007;27:19-40.
  178. 178. Bjorkoy G, Lamark T, Brech A, Outzen H, Perander M, Overvatn A, et al. p62/SQSTM1 forms protein aggregates degraded by autophagy and has a protective effect on huntingtin-induced cell death. J Cell Biol. 2005 Nov 21;171(4):603-14.
  179. 179. Towns R, Kabeya Y, Yoshimori T, Guo C, Shangguan Y, Hong S, et al. Sera from patients with type 2 diabetes and neuropathy induce autophagy and colocalization with mitochondria in SY5Y cells. Autophagy. 2005 Oct-Dec;1(3):163-70.
  180. 180. Petersen KF, Dufour S, Befroy D, Garcia R, Shulman GI. Impaired mitochondrial activity in the insulin-resistant offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 12;350(7):664-71.
  181. 181. Ozcan U, Cao Q, Yilmaz E, Lee AH, Iwakoshi NN, Ozdelen E, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress links obesity, insulin action, and type 2 diabetes. Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):457-61.
  182. 182. Ozcan U, Yilmaz E, Ozcan L, Furuhashi M, Vaillancourt E, Smith RO, et al. Chemical chaperones reduce ER stress and restore glucose homeostasis in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Science. 2006 Aug 25;313(5790):1137-40.
  183. 183. Yin JJ, Li YB, Wang Y, Liu GD, Wang J, Zhu XO, et al. The role of autophagy in endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced pancreatic beta cell death. Autophagy. 2012 Feb 1;8(2):158-64.
  184. 184. Hoffman WH, Shacka JJ, Andjelkovic AV. Autophagy in the brains of young patients with poorly controlled T1DM and fatal diabetic ketoacidosis. Exp Mol Pathol. 2012 Oct;93(2):273-80.
  185. 185. Son SM, Song H, Byun J, Park KS, Jang HC, Park YJ, et al. Accumulation of autophagosomes contributes to enhanced amyloidogenic APP processing under insulin-resistant conditions. Autophagy. 2012 Aug 29;8(12).
  186. 186. Sarkar S, Perlstein EO, Imarisio S, Pineau S, Cordenier A, Maglathlin RL, et al. Small molecules enhance autophagy and reduce toxicity in Huntington's disease models. Nat Chem Biol. 2007 Jun;3(6):331-8.
  187. 187. Pandey UB, Nie Z, Batlevi Y, McCray BA, Ritson GP, Nedelsky NB, et al. HDAC6 rescues neurodegeneration and provides an essential link between autophagy and the UPS. Nature. 2007 Jun 14;447(7146):859-63.
  188. 188. Tian Y, Bustos V, Flajolet M, Greengard P. A small-molecule enhancer of autophagy decreases levels of Abeta and APP-CTF via Atg5-dependent autophagy pathway. FASEB J. 2011 Jun;25(6):1934-42.
  189. 189. Sun B, Zhou Y, Halabisky B, Lo I, Cho SH, Mueller-Steiner S, et al. Cystatin C-cathepsin B axis regulates amyloid beta levels and associated neuronal deficits in an animal model of Alzheimer's disease. Neuron. 2008 Oct 23;60(2):247-57.
  190. 190. Caccamo A, Majumder S, Richardson A, Strong R, Oddo S. Molecular interplay between mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), amyloid-beta, and Tau: effects on cognitive impairments. J Biol Chem. 2010 Apr 23;285(17):13107-20.
  191. 191. Spilman P, Podlutskaya N, Hart MJ, Debnath J, Gorostiza O, Bredesen D, et al. Inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin abolishes cognitive deficits and reduces amyloid-beta levels in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e9979.
  192. 192. Cai Z, Zhao B, Li K, Zhang L, Li C, Quazi SH, et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin: a valid therapeutic target through the autophagy pathway for Alzheimer's disease? J Neurosci Res. 2012 Jun;90(6):1105-18.
  193. 193. Ravikumar B, Duden R, Rubinsztein DC. Aggregate-prone proteins with polyglutamine and polyalanine expansions are degraded by autophagy. Hum Mol Genet. 2002 May 1;11(9):1107-17.
  194. 194. Ravikumar B, Vacher C, Berger Z, Davies JE, Luo S, Oroz LG, et al. Inhibition of mTOR induces autophagy and reduces toxicity of polyglutamine expansions in fly and mouse models of Huntington disease. Nat Genet. 2004 Jun;36(6):585-95.
  195. 195. Berger Z, Ravikumar B, Menzies FM, Oroz LG, Underwood BR, Pangalos MN, et al. Rapamycin alleviates toxicity of different aggregate-prone proteins. Hum Mol Genet. 2006 Feb 1;15(3):433-42.
  196. 196. Menzies FM, Huebener J, Renna M, Bonin M, Riess O, Rubinsztein DC. Autophagy induction reduces mutant ataxin-3 levels and toxicity in a mouse model of spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. Brain. 2010 Jan;133(Pt 1):93-104.
  197. 197. Menzies FM, Rubinsztein DC. Broadening the therapeutic scope for rapamycin treatment. Autophagy. 2010 Feb;6(2):286-7.
  198. 198. Liu K, Liu C, Shen L, Shi J, Zhang T, Zhou Y, et al. WITHDRAWN: Therapeutic effects of rapamycin on MPTP-induced Parkinsonism in mice. Neurochem Int. 2011 Jun 6.
  199. 199. Malagelada C, Jin ZH, Jackson-Lewis V, Przedborski S, Greene LA. Rapamycin protects against neuron death in in vitro and in vivo models of Parkinson's disease. J Neurosci. 2010 Jan 20;30(3):1166-75.
  200. 200. Arias E, Cuervo AM. Chaperone-mediated autophagy in protein quality control. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011 Apr;23(2):184-9.
  201. 201. Forlenza OV, de Paula VJ, Machado-Vieira R, Diniz BS, Gattaz WF. Does lithium prevent Alzheimer's disease? Drugs Aging. 2012 May 1;29(5):335-42.
  202. 202. Sarkar S, Floto RA, Berger Z, Imarisio S, Cordenier A, Pasco M, et al. Lithium induces autophagy by inhibiting inositol monophosphatase. J Cell Biol. 2005 Sep 26;170(7):1101-11.
  203. 203. Kim YH, Rane A, Lussier S, Andersen JK. Lithium protects against oxidative stress-mediated cell death in alpha-synuclein-overexpressing in vitro and in vivo models of Parkinson's disease. J Neurosci Res. 2011 Oct;89(10):1666-75.
  204. 204. Xiong N, Jia M, Chen C, Xiong J, Zhang Z, Huang J, et al. Potential autophagy enhancers attenuate rotenone-induced toxicity in SH-SY5Y. Neuroscience. 2011 Dec 29;199:292-302.
  205. 205. Fornai F, Longone P, Cafaro L, Kastsiuchenka O, Ferrucci M, Manca ML, et al. Lithium delays progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 12;105(6):2052-7.
  206. 206. Zhang X, Heng X, Li T, Li L, Yang D, Du Y, et al. Long-term treatment with lithium alleviates memory deficits and reduces amyloid-beta production in an aged Alzheimer's disease transgenic mouse model. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;24(4):739-49.
  207. 207. Li XZ, Chen XP, Zhao K, Bai LM, Zhang H, Zhou X. Therapeutic effects of valproate combined with lithium carbonate on MPTP-induced Parkinsonism in mice: possible mediation through enhanced autophagy. Int J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 17.
  208. 208. Sarkar S, Davies JE, Huang Z, Tunnacliffe A, Rubinsztein DC. Trehalose, a novel mTOR-independent autophagy enhancer, accelerates the clearance of mutant huntingtin and alpha-synuclein. J Biol Chem. 2007 Feb 23;282(8):5641-52.
  209. 209. Perucho J, Casarejos MJ, Gomez A, Solano RM, de Yebenes JG, Mena MA. Trehalose protects from aggravation of amyloid pathology induced by isoflurane anesthesia in APP(swe) mutant mice. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012 Mar;9(3):334-43.
  210. 210. Lan DM, Liu FT, Zhao J, Chen Y, Wu JJ, Ding ZT, et al. Effect of trehalose on PC12 cells overexpressing wild-type or A53T mutant alpha-synuclein. Neurochem Res. 2012 Sep;37(9):2025-32.
  211. 211. Kabuta T, Suzuki Y, Wada K. Degradation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-linked mutant Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase proteins by macroautophagy and the proteasome. J Biol Chem. 2006 Oct 13;281(41):30524-33.
  212. 212. Maiese K, Chong ZZ, Shang YC, Wang S. Novel directions for diabetes mellitus drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2012 Oct 24.
  213. 213. Jespersen MJ, Knop FK, Christensen M. GLP-1 agonists for type 2 diabetes: pharmacokinetic and toxicological considerations. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2012 Oct 24.

Written By

A. Raquel Esteves, Catarina R. Oliveira and Sandra Morais Cardoso

Published: April 17th, 2013