Open access

Ni25Ti50Cu25 Shape Memory Alloy Produced by Nonconventional Techniques

Written By

Tomasz Goryczka

Submitted: January 2nd, 2012 Published: April 3rd, 2013

DOI: 10.5772/48764

Chapter metrics overview

3,367 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Titanium-nickel alloys with a chemical composition close to equiatomic remain in the centre of interest due to the unique properties associated with shape memory effect (SME). In opposite to polymers or ceramic, mechanism of the shape memory effect is strictly correlated to the thermoelastic reversible martensitic transformation (MT). Modification of the course of the martensitic transformation influences the shape memory effect. Generally, course of the martensitic transformation can be influenced, separately or simultaneously, by two ways:

  • Modification of chemical composition: addition and/or substitution of the alloying elements (Otsuka at all 1998; Van Humbeeck 1997). Alloying elements such as aluminum, iron, cobalt, cause lowering temperatures of the martensitic transformation even down to -140°C. Addition of copper (Duerig at all 1990), hafnium or zirconium (Li at all 2006) causes an increase of the transformation temperatures. In case of hafnium and zirconium, it is possible to obtain high-temperature shape memory alloys, in which the reversible martensitic transformation occurs at temperatures between 300 and 400°C (Santamarta at all 1999; Monastyrsky at all 2002).

  • Modification of microstructure: way of production and/or farther alloy processing. The course of the martensitic transformation and its reversible nature is also affected by the structure of defects formed during the manufacturing or alloy processing. In order to change the transformation temperatures, in fact - the thermal range of the shape memory effect, mostly heat treatment or thermo-mechanical treatment is applied (Besseghini at all 1999; Kima at all 2006; Morawiec at all 1996). However, this requires an additional investments expenditure on devices. In consequence, it increases time of production process as well as its total cost.

Ternary NiTiCu alloy belongs to a large family of Ni-Ti alloys, which reveals shape memory effect (Mercier at all 1978). In the NiTiCu alloys content of titanium is close to 50at.% while nickel does not exceed 20at.%. The rest is copper (Melton at all 1979). Substituting either nickel or titanium results in increasing the characteristic temperatures of the martensitic transformation, when compared to a binary NiTi alloy. In results of that, a thermal range of the shape memory effect moves from the room temperature up to approximately 800C (Duerig at all 1990). Moreover, copper causes good stability of transformation temperatures as well as prevents from formation of Ti3Ni4 precipitation (Fukuda at all 1995). However, the most important feature is appearance of the multistep martensitic transformation and formation of different type of the martensite structures. It results in receiving shape memory alloy, in which a hysteresis of the martensitic transformation can be narrowed from about 30 degrees down to 15 degrees. Dependently on the copper addition, the course of the martensitic transformation can be as follows (Nam at all 1990; Nomura at all 1990; Nomura at all 1992):

  • the copper lower than 5-10 at% during cooling the parent phase B2 transforms directly to the B19’ monoclinic martensite; thermal hysteresis is about 20 degrees;

  • for 10-15at% Cu - transformation occurs in two steps: first, from the B2 parent phase the orthorhombic martensite B19 is formed, next the B19 martensite transforms to the B19’ monoclinic martensite; thermal hysteresis is about 30 degrees;

  • when the Cu content exceed 20%, again one-step transformation can be observed, however the B2 parent phase transforms directly to the B19 orthorhombic martensite; thermal hysteresis is about 10 degrees;

Special attention was drawn by alloy with nickel content of 25 at.% Ni and copper also 25 at.%. It was due to the wide possibility of its potential application (Gil at all 2004; Grossmann at all 2009; Colombo at all 2006). The reason for this is the narrow thermal hysteresis loop of the martensitic transformation. Its width does not exceed 150C.

Recently, for manufacturing of the NiTi-based alloys, intensive effort has been put to adoption of the nonconventional production techniques such as powder metallurgy (PM) (Goryczka at all 2008); Li, 2000), melt-spinning (MS) (Santamarta at all 2004; Morgiel at all 2002; Goryczka at all 2001; Rosner at all 2001) or twin roll casting (TRC) (Goryczka and Ochin 2005; Dalle at all 2003; T. Goryczka, (2004)). This creates a wider possibility of the alloy applications. Despite the fact that these techniques have been successfully applied to metals and alloys production, their application for SMAs manufacturing is quite new.

The subtle nature of martensitic transformation and shape memory effect requires the selection of appropriate process conditions and parameters. In fact not many references about the influence of the processing parameters on the shape memory alloys and transformation behavior in NiTiCu alloy can be found.

The chapter is focused on Ni25Ti50Cu25 alloy manufactured by powder metallurgy or rapid solidification techniques. Comparison of transformation behavior, structure, and microstructure is discussed.


2. Powder metallurgy

2.1. From powders to alloy

In order to produce NiTiCu alloy with the nominal chemical composition (25at.% Ni, 50at.% Ti and 5at.% Cu) commercial powders of elements (purity 99,7%) were weighted in proper ratio and mixed in a rotary mixer during 48 hours. Measured average particle size of as-received powders was 6.2 µm, 11.5 µm and 33.7 µm for Cu, Ni and Ti, respectively (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Particle size distribution for powders and their mixture.

During mixing the mixture was homogenized. Simultaneously, powders were agglomerated in mechanical alloying process (Fig. 2a). Due to the significant differences in hardness of the alloying elements (Cu - 369HV, Ti - 970HV, Ni - 638HV), this effect becomes clear between Ti and Cu as well as Ni and Cu. Figure 2b shows distribution of the elements from region marked in Figure 2a. The large particles were composed of Cu and Ti powders as well as Cu and Ni. In consequence, the powders were homogenously distributed in the mixture and its average particle size increased up to 95.9 µm (Fig. 1).

Figure 2.

SEM image of the powder’s mixture (a) and distribution of the elements from region marked in left image (red – titanium, green - nickel, blue – copper) (b).

From mixture, compacts were formed at room temperature under pressure of 8 MPa. They were in a shape of cylinder with diameter of 10 mm and 6 mm high. Sintering was carried out in a horizontal tube furnace under argon atmosphere. Sintering conditions were chosen in reference to the melting temperature (12640C). It varied from 8500C to 11000C and total sintering time from 7 to 20 hours. After sintering, furnace was slowly cooled down to the room temperature.

Figure 3.

X-ray diffraction patterns registered for powders mixture (a), alloy sintered at 8500C for 5 hours (b) and at 11000C for 7 hours (c).

In order to prove, that after sintering the NiTiCu alloys were obtained, X-ray diffraction analysis was done for compacts as well as blends. X-ray diffraction pattern were measured using the X’Pert Pro diffractometer with Cu radiation (Kα1 and α2) in the 2θ range: 20 ÷ 140 degrees. Figure 3a shows X-ray diffraction pattern registered for compact before sintering. It can be clearly seen that diffraction pattern contains diffraction lines, which belongs to the pure alloying elements. Separated phases were identified using the ICDD data base PDF-2. It was proved that powders mixture consisted from Ti, Ni and Cu (card no Ti: 065-3362; card no Ni: 04-0850 and card no Cu: 04-0836). Moreover, quantitative analysis done using the Rietveld refinement confirmed that measured chemical composition was comparable to the nominal one. The main goal of sintering was to produce transformable phase, which can be described by nominal chemical composition of the alloy as Ni25Ti50Cu25. For such composition, in a bulk alloy, the orthorhombic B19 martensite appears. It undergoes martensitic transformation at temperature above 750C creating the B2 parent phase (Duerig at all 1990). X-ray diffraction patterns registered at room temperature showed that independently on applied sintering conditions, the orthorhombic B19 martensite was found in all blends. However, sintering took an effect on the phase composition. One has to remember that mechanism of the alloying, which occurs during sintering is different from that, in tradition melting. During sintering alloying elements diffuse each one into other. Thus, from the ternary powder mixture reaction between alloying elements may be combined. In result of that various phases coming from the systems: Ni-Ti, Cu-Ni as well as Cu-Ti may be expected (Gupta 2002). Precursor of that is partial mechanical alloying, which occurred during powders mixing (Fig. 2).

Sintering conditionsFraction of phase [%]
Temperature [0C]Time [h]B19Ti2(Ni,Cu)NiCuTi
582.7 ± 2.913.7 ± 0.62.4 ± 0.31.2 ± 0.2
1083.9 ± 3.716.1 ± 0.6--
2086.1 ± 2.913.9 ± 0.5--
950789.7 ± 1.910.3 ± 0.3--

Table 1

Results of quantitative phase analysis done for blends sintered at various conditions

Lower sintering temperature in combination with short sintering time was not enough to provide a support for diffusion of the alloying elements. In consequence, apart of the B19 martensite also equilibrium phases appeared in sintered blends. Figure 3b shows X-ray diffraction pattern measured, at room temperature, for the blend sintered at 8500C for 5 hours. Qualitative phase analysis revealed that the blend contained also phases such as: NiCu (PDF-2 card no 47-1406), Ti2(Ni,Cu) – which has crystallographic structure of the Ti2Ni phase (PDF-2 card no 05-0687) as well as a solid solution of Ni in Ti (PDF-2 card no 89-3073). In order to study of phase contribution in sintered blends the Rietveld refinement was done. Values of reliability factors, which prove goodness of the refinement, were below 8%. Obtained results were compared in Table 1. Quantitative analysis showed that amount of the B19 martensite was about 83% in blends sintered at 8500C for 5 hours. Extending of the sintering time up to 10 hours was enough for nickel and cooper diffusion. Both phases: NiCu and pure titanium were not observed. Extending of the sintering temperature resulted in the limitation of the Ti2(Ni,Cu) phase formation. The best sintering condition was: temperature 11000C with sintering time of 7 hours. In the sintered blend only the B19 martensite was identified (Fig. 3c).

Obtained results were confirmed by observation carried out using the JEOL JSM 6480 electron scanning microscope. Observations were done on a circular cross-section of the cylindrical blends. Figure 4 shows images taken using back scattered electrons. In places, which varied in a contrast, a chemical composition was determined using energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) in the JEOL JSM 6480 microscope. Measurements were done in macro scale and 50 points were taken for calculation. Calculated ratio of the alloying elements was in a good correlation with the phases identified with use of X-ray diffraction analysis. SEM image observed for the blends, sintered at 11000C for 7 hours, proved that only the B19 martensite was present at the sample (Fig. 4a).

Figure 4.

SEM images observed at a cross-section of blends sintered at 8500C for 5 hours (a) and 11000C for 7 hours (b)

Sintering, mainly used for ceramic production, also produces pores. Their amount, size and distribution strictly depend on sintering condition as well as particle size of the elemental powders. Dependently on final application of the product, presence of the pores can be considered as a desired element of the microstructure. For example, in medical application pores can be considered as wanted ones, in which the collagen fiber finds way to grow-in. However, their diameter has to be appropriate and varied from 50 to 500 µm (Karageorgiou 2005; Itala 2001; Simske 1995). In case of shape memory alloys, pores do not provide a material, which undergoes the martensitic transformation. For that reason they can be considered as not desired element of the microstructure. In comparison to a bulk material, from the same volume of the sintered alloy lower transformation enthalpy can be received (Yuan 2006). Also, pores form natural barrier for diffusion of alloying elements. It may lead to inhomogeneity even in the frame of grains of the same phase. In order to overcome such inconvenience, sintering time should be extended and/or higher sintering temperature is required.

To bring more light for this problem in the Ni25Ti50Cu25 alloy, amount of pores was calculated basing on the SEM images taken over whole cross-section of the sample.

In general, the porosity in alloy sintered at 8500C did not exceed 5% (Fig. 5a). The pores were randomly distributed and clearly separated (Fig. 4a). However, pore size varied dependently on the sintering time. The average pore size in the alloy sintered 5 hours was about 8 µm (Fig. 5a). Increase of the sintering time to 20 hours was responsible for increase of the pore size to 38 µm. It is worthy to notice, that calculated values of standard deviation for pore size, in the alloys sintered for 5 or 10 hours, are very close (Fig. 5a). It means that relatively short sintering time did not influence on scattering of the pores size. The pores have similar diameter and were comparable in a shape. Completely different value of standard deviation was obtained for the alloy sintered for 20 hours. It was ±15 µm. Extending of the sintering time up to 20 hours caused formation of the pores, which varied in size from about 8 µm up to 60 µm. In most cases they have irregular shape.

Significant differences in porosity, size of pores and pores distribution can be observed for samples, which were produced applying higher temperatures (Fig. 4b). Increase of the sintering temperature up to 9500C or 11000C caused increase of porosity up to 21% or 27%, respectively (Fig. 5). However, alloy sintered at 9500C revealed comparable morphology to one observed in alloy sintered at 8500C for 5 or 10 hours. The pores, with average diameter of 41 µm, possessed similar regular elliptical shape. Increase of the sintering temperature up to 11000C caused differences in shape and distribution of pores. Average diameter of pores increased to 50 µm. Higher value of the standard deviation indicated that they varied in shape and size. At 11000C diffusion of alloying elements was more intense. In result of that, most of the small pores were joined into large one forming their irregular shape (Fig. 4b).

Figure 5.

Porosity and average diameter of pores versus sintering conditions

2.2. Martensitic transformation

In order to show influence of the sintering condition on the course of the martensitic transformation DSC cooling/heating curves were registered at temperature range between -1000C and +2000C. Measurements were done using differential scanning calorimeter Perkin Elmer DSC-7 with cooling/heating rate of 100C /min. Evolution of the DSC cooling/heating curves registered for sintered alloys is shown in Figure 6a. The characteristic temperatures of the martensitic transformation (start Ms, As and finish Mf, Af of the forward and reveres transformation, respectively) were determined using a slope line extension method. Enthalpy of transformation was calculated from the thermal peak (Fig. 6b).

Figure 6.

DSC cooling/heating curves (a) and parameters of the martensitic transformation (b) for alloy sintered at various conditions

Generally, all sintered alloys reveal presence of the reversible martensitic transformation. Thus, the main condition for appearing of shape memory effect is satisfied. However, course of the martensitic transformation varies dependently on applied sintering conditions. First, the Ms and Af temperatures show general tendency for decreasing when the condition for diffusion of alloying elements improves. In opposition to that, the As and Mf increases. It takes an effect on thermal ranges of the transformation. Second, the martensitic transformation occurs as one step or two steps transition.

Let’s discuss firstly change of the chemical composition as a result of the presence of non-transformable the Ti2(Ni,Cu) phase. It posses the same type of the crystal structure as the Ti2Ni phase. In the Ti2(Ni,Cu) phase, the ratio of Ni atoms to Cu is as 30:1. The presence of this phase decreases titanium content in the transformable phase. Also, one have to keep on mind that the fraction of the Ti2(Ni,Cu) phase decreases from 16% to 0% dependently on sintering conditions. In consequence, the Ms temperature slightly moved to lower region. Influence of the chemical composition on the Ms temperature has been known and used as key feature in designing of shape memory alloy. However, in ternary alloys this problem is more complex. The thermal behavior of the NiTiCu alloy depends on titanium-nickel ratio as well as nickel-copper ratio. Hanlon et all (Hanlon 1967) shown, that in the NiTi alloy with titanium content around 50-51at% takes a little effect on the Ms temperature. However, when the titanium content lowers from 50 to 49at% the Ms temperature may decrease from 500C to -1400C, respectively. In opposition to that increase of copper content, instead of nickel atoms, causes increase of the Ms temperature. For the B2↔B19 transformation in NiTiCu bulk, Mobelry and Melton (Moberly and Melton 1990) showed that increase of copper content from 20 to 25 at% caused increase of the Ms from 480C to 760C, respectively.

The presence of the non-transformable phase takes an effect on the transformation enthalpy (Fig. 6b). Enthalpy of the transformation, at fully transformable bulk alloy, equals about 12 J/g (Hanlon 1967). Presence of non-transformable phases decreases an amount of the phase, which undergoes the martensitic transformation. In result of that, the transformation enthalpy decreases.

Figure 7.

Distribution of the alloying elements, in the transformable phase, versus sintering conditions

The thermal behavior of the sintered alloy may also be a consequence of inhomogeneity of the chemical composition inside of the transformable phase. Figure 7 shows the distribution of the elements versus sintering conditions. Measurements were done in the transformable phase. Calculation of the chemical composition was done over 50 points spread on the cross-section of the sample. It has been clearly seen that a distribution of alloying elements, close to the nominal composition, was obtained in blends sintered at 11000C for 7 hours. It was as follows: Ti - 49.8at.%, Ni - 24.8 at.% and Cu-25.4 at.%. In order to analyze the homogeneity or inhomogeneity, a standard deviation was marked as a vertical bar. The sintering at 11000C for 7 hours causes a small deviation from the average content of the alloying elements and is characterized by relatively low value of the standard deviation. The value of the standard deviation calculated for sintering temperature 8500C and time 5 hours or 10 significantly increases to 5% for Ni and Cu as well as for Ti up to 4%. High inhomogeneity of these samples eliminates them as a shape memory material. Lower values of the standard deviation (about 3%) were obtained for sintering at 9500C and 10 hours. However, in this alloy Ti content increased up to 50.6at.%. This was a reason for increase of the Ms temperatures to 78.60C. In the sample sintered at 8500C for 20 hours the standard deviation was about 2%. However, measured chemical composition slightly varied from the nominal one.

Figure 8.

Thermal ranges of the reversible martensitic transformation versus sintering conditions

The local changes of the chemical and its inhomogeneity took an effect on the course of the martensitic transformation. For alloy, sintered at 8500C for 5 hours, the DSC curves reveal two maxima on cooling (at 58.60C and 69.40C) as well as two minima on heating (at 65.40C and 76.80C). The range of the martensitic transformation (Af–Mf) equals 42 degrees (Fig. 8 – green line). Thermal hysteresis (Af–Ms) is about 5 degrees (Fig. 8 – blue line). Difference calculated between position of maximum (on cooling) and corresponding minimum (on heating) keeps comparable value (80). The range of the thermal peak on cooling (Ms-Mf) as well as heating (As-Af) is wide and equaled 380 (Fig. 8 – red and black line, respectively). Measured X-ray diffraction pattern confirmed that at room temperature the B19 marteniste existed. Taking, all these facts into consideration, it can be concluded that the parent phase transforms to the B19 orthorhombic marteniste. However, in the thermal region of transformation two thermal peaks were overlapped. For such thermal behavior, inhomogeneity of chemical composition may be responsible. Calculated value of the standard deviation (Fig. 7) of measured composition shows significant inhomogeneity in samples. Regions of transformable phase, which differ in chemical composition, undergo martensitic transformation at close temperature, that’s why two overlapped peaks were observed.

Neither elongation of the sintering time up to 10 hours nor rising sintering temperature up to 9500C did not change course of the transformation – still two overlapped B2↔B19 transformations were observed. A completely different thermal behavior is observed in the alloys sintered at 8500C for 20 hours as well as 11000C and 7 hours. Instead of two peaks, one peak was found on cooling as well as on heating. In case of both sintering conditions the range of the martensitic transformation (Af–Mf) reduces to 340 (Fig. 8 – green line). Also, range of the thermal peak on cooling (Ms-Mf) as well as heating (As-Af) narrows and equals 300 (Fig. 8 – red and black line, respectively). Thermal hysteresis (Af–Ms) slightly differs and for 8500C/20 hours is about 5.70 and for 11000C/7 hours is lower and equals 5.10.

Figure 9.

Comparison of DSC cooling/heating curves registered for alloy sintered at 11000C for 7 hours after additional thermal treatment

For both sintered blends irregular shape of the thermal peaks measured on DSC cooling/heating curves was stated. It also may results in slight differences in chemical composition of the transformable phase (standard deviation was 2.2% or 1.2%). In order to improve quality of the alloy sintered at 11000C/7 hours it was quenched from 9000C and additionally annealed at 5000C for 24 hours. Influence of thermal treatment on a course of the martensitic transformation is shown in Figure 9. First, only one thermal peak was measured during cooling as well as heating. It has symmetrical shape. Second, in comparison to the as-received sample, quenching moved down transformation temperatures of about 34 degrees (Fig. 6b). It is a result of quenched-in structural defects. This effect is better visible in rapidly solidified alloy and will be discussed in next subchapter. Additional annealing at 5000C for 24 hours restored thermal region of the reversible martensitic transformation. In consequence, the Ms transformation temperature was comparable to that calculated for the as-received sample (Fig. 8a). Summarizing, additional thermal treatment:

  • did not change the chemical composition of the transformable phase: (Ti - 49.8at.%, Ni - 24.9 at.% and Cu-25.3 at.%);

  • alloy was stable and did not decompose to equilibrium phases;

  • homogeneity of the alloy was improved - calculated standard deviation of the chemical composition was 0.7%;

  • the transformation enthalpy is comparable to that determined for bulk alloy (Fig. 6b).

In result of that, the thermal range of the transformation as well as thermal width of forward and reversible transformation reduced to 23 degrees and 11 degrees, respectively (Fig. 8). However, width of the thermal hysteresis of the transformation increased from 6 (as-received sample) to 12 degrees. It may be caused by remains of the no-annealed point defects. Extending of the annealing temperature to 48 hours caused decomposition of the transformable phase. Again the Ti2(Ni,Cu) phase appeared.


3. Rapid solidification

Technologies for producing alloys in a finite shape directly from the molten state received a lot of attention. The rapid solidification techniques, realized in melt-spinning or twin roll casting technique, applied to the shape memory alloys offer not only a convenient and economical production technology but also possibilities to improve the alloys’ properties as well as to control in a relatively easy way the temperatures of the reversible martensitic transformation. The increase in the wheel speed causes the grain refinement and changes their morphology from equiaxial to columnar (Eucken 1990; Stoobs 1979; Morawiec 2003).

3.1. Melt-spinning

In order to produce melt-spun ribbons, ingots with nominal chemical composition were cast in an induction furnace. Ingots weighted about 10 g. Casting was carried out in a pre-evacuated chamber before melting. Melt was ejected with pressure of 0.02 MPa on a rotating wheel. Increase of cooling rate was realized by increase of wheel speed and/or temperature of melt. Four ribbons were produced with processing parameters shown in Table 2.

SymbolMelt temp.
Wheel speed

Table 2

Processing parameters and dimension of the ribbons

Generally, high cooling rate in the melt–spinning technique (106 K/s) causes inhomogeneity of the microstructure on the surface of the ribbons. It is due to fact that the liquid alloy is ejected onto fast rotating wheel. Firstly, the side, which has directly contact with rotating wheel, undergoes solidification. Secondly, until crystallization goes thorough the ribbon, the cooling rate lowers, and finally, the top surface solidify. This procedure produces two different surfaces: one what could be called “frozen” metal from the contact side and second one – top surface.

The combination of the wheel speed (11 m/s) and temperature of melt (1250oC) provided the lowest rate of cooling. It results in elongation of the time, when the liquid alloy contacts surface of rotating wheel. It provides enough time for crystallization of columnar grains, which extends along thickness of the ribbon (Fig. 10a).

Figure 10.

SEM images observed at the fracture (a) and on the surface (b) of the ribbons MS2

On the surface of the MS1 ribbon self- accommodating plates of the martensite were observed (Fig. 10b). Similar images were observed in the MS2 ribbon, which was produced with higher wheel speed - 15 m/s. X-ray studies confirmed the presence of the B19 martensite. X-ray diffraction patterns registered at room temperature for the MS1 was identified as belonging to the B19 structure (Fig. 11 – “Ribbon MS1”). In case of the MS2 ribbon, apart from the B19 phase, the B2 parent phase was also identified (Fig. 11 – “Ribbon MS2”). It is a result of increase of the cooling rate, which caused increased of the structural defects quenched-in.

Figure 11.

The X-ray diffraction patterns registered at room temperature for melt-spun ribbons

A different microstructure was observed in the MS3 ribbon (Fig. 12). Increase of the wheel speed to 19m/s, while the temperature of melt was the same (1250oC), did not provide a sufficiently time for crystallization of columnar grains. At the thickness of the ribbon three zones were formed (Fig. 12a). First, an amorphous layer, 3-5 µm thick, was formed as a contact side of the ribbon. The second zone, formed during solidification, is the area consisted of spherical grains with an average diameter of about 5-8 micrometers. Finally, the zone composed of the columnar grain is formed, which extends to the top surface of the ribbon. Microstructure of the ribbon is inhomogeneous. Images observed at the fracture, taken from various part of the ribbon, show the columnar grains with width to 35 µm extended along whole thickness of the ribbon. At this area, no amorphous phase was observed. Also in some parts of the ribbon, only small spherical grains were formed along the thickness (Fig. 12b).

Figure 12.

SEM images observed at the fracture of the MS3 ribbon

Observation of the contact surface shows that this area is not homogeneous. Among the amorphous phase two groups of crystalline “islands” were observed (Fig. 13a). They were randomly distributed and differed in size. Diameter of the “islands” varied from 5 μm to 25 μm. Inside of crystalline areas the martensitic plates were clearly visible. The plates transforms to the parent phase after heating above Af. After cooling, they reversibly transforms to the martensite.

X-ray diffraction patterns revealed that the MS3 ribbon consists of three phases: amorphous (weak broaden line), the B2 and the B19 (Fig. 11 – “Ribbon MS3”). Increase of the melt temperature to 13500C and wheel speed to 23 m/s formed almost amorphous ribbon - MS4. The cooling rate realized with these processing parameters does not provide enough time for full crystallization during solidification. The contact surface is completely amorphous. However, at the top surface some crystallized grain can be distinguished (Fig. 13b). The X-ray diffraction patterns shows two broaden maxima characteristic for the amorphous phase. Moreover, weak diffraction lines belonging to the B2 parent phase were identified (Fig. 11 – “Ribbon MS4”).

Figure 13.

SEM image of the contact side of the MS3 ribbons (a) and top surface of the MS4 ribbon (b).

From the point of the shape memory effect and the martensitic transformation presence of the amorphous phase is not desirable. The martensitic transformation as a coordinated atom movement at distance proportional to distance to the habit plane occurs only in the crystalline state. Presence of the amorphous phase increases amount of the transformable phase in the ribbons. In order to eliminate influence of the amorphous phase and quenched-in defects on the course of the martensitic transformation crystallization was carried out. Ribbon was heated up to 600oC, and then cooled to 0oC. Heating and cooling was done, inside of DSC calorimeter, with rate of 10 °C/min at argon atmosphere. Observed high temperature peaks correspond to the crystallisation process (Fig. 14). Crystallization of the amorphous phase starts at 445oC and finishes at 466oC. The value of enthalpy was 6.5 J/g. For further studies, the MS4 ribbon was used in crystalline state and denoted as “MS4C”.

Figure 14.

DSC heating curve registered for the MS4 ribbon

Applied casting parameters significantly influenced the course of the martensitic transformation. Figure 15a shows comparison of the DSC cooling/heating curves registered for the first cycle of heating-cooling. In order to obtain the full thermal cycle, the samples were cooled down to 0oC, then heated up to 110oC and again cooled to 0oC. The order and the shape of the thermal peaks occurring at thermograms proved that the martensitic transformation is reversible in all ribbons. However, they differ in the transformation temperatures. The DSC curves measured for the MS1 and MS4C ribbons contain one thermal peak on both heating and cooling curve, respectively. In comparison to that, the DSC curves measured for ribbons: MS2 and MS3 revealed a different course. The thermal peaks measured for the MS2 ribbon show irregular shape, whereas for the MS3 ribbon they were broadened and split. In result of that, for the MS3 ribbon two maxima at temperatures 33oC and 49oC for the forward martensitic transformation as well as two minima for the reverse transformation at 42oC and 55oC were found.

Figure 15.

DSC cooling/heating curves measured for the melt-spun ribbons (a) and parameters of the martensitic transformation (b)

The combination of the wheel speed and the temperature of melt, applied in the case of the casting the MS1 ribbon ensured the lowest speed of solidification - similar to the equilibrium condition. The transformation temperatures, determined from DSC curves, are comparable to that determined for the MS4C ribbon (Fig. 15b). For alloys with low concentration of structural defects, the thermal range does not exceed 15 degrees. In the case of the MS1 and MS4C ribbon the thermal range of the martensitic transformation was 12 and 15oC, respectively.

Increase of the wheel speed to 15 m/s caused increase of the cooling rate in the MS2 ribbon. The density of the structural defects increased. Figure 16 shows an example of the image observed with use of the electron transition microscope. Relatively high density of dislocations can be distinguished. Dislocations as well as point defects increase local stress, which has to be overcome when the marteniste plates are formed. It requires additional overcooling and in consequence, the transformation temperatures moves to lower thermal region. In case of the MS2 ribbon transformation temperatures were lower of about 20 degrees in comparison that in the MS1 ribbon. Thermal range of the martensitic transformation increased to 18°C.

Further increase of the wheel speed to 19m/s caused increase of density of the structural defects. In comparison to the MS2 ribbon, the Mf and As temperatures decreased of about 8°C whereas the Af and Ms increased of about 5°C. The thermal range of the martensitic transformation increased to 34°C.

Figure 16.

TEM image of the dislocation structure in the MS2 ribbon

3.2. Twin roll casting

Twin roll casting technique (TRC) has been known for almost 30 years in aluminum and iron casting industry (Berg, at all 1995) (Haga 2003). Thin strip, from 10 mm up to 0.5 mm, can be continuously produced replacing conventional processing techniques, which use an ingot and additional thermo-mechanical treatment (Goryczka, at all 2005). The main advantage of TRC is a relatively short processing route which joins casting as well as hot rolling in one step (Haga 2001). Also, low cost equipment, low energy consumption, space saving, strips are free of impurities which come from a crucible and surroundings etc. belong to the most desirable features of TRC technique. In spite of that, also, twin roll casting has some disadvantages. The main one is poorer mechanical properties of the strip in comparison to bulk.

SymbolMelt temp.
Rim materialRollers velocity
Ejection pressure
Pre-set gap
Nozzle hole

Table 3

Processing parameters and dimension of the strips

Four strips were produced from a previously cast ingots, with a nominal composition of Ni 25 at.%, Ti 50 at% and Cu 25 at.%. In order to get good quality strips processing parameters such a rolls velocity, a pre-set gap, an ejection pressure and diameter of nozzle hole were optimized and remained the same for all castings (Table 3). Casting parameters differs in solidification temperature, in the range 1395 - 14500C. Obtained strips were about 40 cm long and revealed smooth surface without any visible cracks and inclusions.

In twin roll technique ingot is placed to the quartz crucible fixed directly over a gap between two rolls. After induction melting, the melt is vertically ejected with argon pressure between two rolls rotated in opposite directions. Thin metal layers solidify on the surface of the rolls simultaneously, when the remaining liquid is spread from central part of the gap to its outer side forming the strip (Goryczka, at all 2005). As the crystallization front proceeds from both rolls the columnar grains are developed. Due to the two-sides solidification an interface between solidified shells is formed (Fig. 17).

However, final microstructure depends on the cooling rate, which is realized by combination between solidification temperature and roll velocity, as well as a gap between rotating rolls. In case of a narrow distance between rolls the strip solidifies over the end-point and is subjected to hot rolling. If the distance is wider the end-point is placed below roll’s centre interface consist of pores and discontinuities (Goryczka at all, 2005). The microstructure of surface observed in the strip T1395, is shown in Figure 18a. General, in the strip T1395 solidification on wheel surface causes mountain-like ranges continuously strength along the strip. Each range consists of two zones. First one (A), containing fine

Figure 17.

SEM image of fracture in the strip T1395

grains, is associated with hot rolling. Zone B reveals columnar grains growing perpendicular to the hot-rolling direction. Also, the highest applied cooling rate, realized in the strip T1450, causes formation of ranges, however, they consist of separated islands (Fig. 18b). Each island shows presence of zone A and B.

Figure 18.

Surface of the strip T1395 (a) and T1450 (b)

Influence of the solidification temperature on the course of the martensitic transformation was studied using DSC. Figure 19a shows comparison of the DSC cooling/heating curves measured for the as-cast strips. All DSC curves reveal only one exo- and one endothermal peak on cooling and heating, respectively. Similarly, to the sintered blends and melt-spun ribbons, the martensitic transformation occurs in one step. The parent phase transforms to the B19 orthorhombic martensite. From the DSC measurement the transformation temperatures were determined and compared in Figure 19b.

Figure 19.

Comparison of the DSC cooling/heating curves (a) and transformation parameters (b) for as-cast strips.

It can be clearly seen, that increase of solidification temperature affects the transformation temperatures. According to a general trend, the martensitic transformation temperatures represented by Ms, Mf, As and Af are lower in the strips than in the bulk alloys. Especially, this effect is enhanced in the melt-spun ribbons, where cooling rate is several times higher than in the strip. A progressive decrease of reversible and forward martensitic transformation temperature with respect to the bulk alloys was observed. For example, decrease of the Af temperature reached almost 15 degrees when compare to the results obtained for T1395 and T1450. This is a typical behavior of the as-quenched alloy. Decrease of martensitic transformation temperature is caused by increasing numbers of quenched-in vacancies and stress field surrounded precipitates. Figure 20 shows TEM images of precipitates which were observed in the strips T1395 and T1430. EDS analysis revealed that chemical formula of precipitates is Ti2(Ni,Cu), which is non-transformable phase – stated in the sintered blends.

Figure 20.

TEM images of precipitates observed in the strips T1395 (a) and T1430 (b)

Phase identification carried out using electron diffraction pattern proved the Ti2Ni type of structure for the Ti2(Ni,Cu) phase (Fig. 20b). Moreover, in the strip produced with higher solidification rate precipitates are surrounded by highly deformed zone (Fig. 20b). It affects the course of the martensitic transformation. In order to trigger martensitic transformation some critical energy is required for nucleation. Energy accommodated around vacancies, dislocation and precipitates decreases driving force of the martensitic transformation. The stress generated in these zones requires additional energy for triggering the start of the martensitic transformation. In consequence, further overcooling is required for transformation continuing. In results of that, the transformation temperatures are moved to the lower thermal region (Fig. 19b). Also, the range of the martensitic transformation and the thermal hysteresis increase (Fig. 21). Additional measure of increasing amount of structural defects and non-transformable phase is degradation of transformation enthalpy. Figure 21 (magenta line) shows enthalpy dependence on solidification temperature. Enthalpy determined for forward and reversible transformation reveal similar behavior – increase of the solidification temperature causes decrease of their value.

Figure 21.

Thermal ranges of the reversible martensitic transformation versus the solidification temperature


4. Summary

This chapter extends the state of knowledge about the technological possibilities of the Ti50Ni25Cu25 shape memory alloy manufacturing. It has been proved that, at the stage of alloy production, it is possible to control the reversibility, thermal range and thermal region of the martensitic transformation. Thus, it allows influencing the thermal range of the shape memory effect. Such methods for the Ti50Ni25Cu25 alloy manufacture are powders metallurgy, melt-spinning and twin roll casting.

The porous Ti50Ni25Cu25 shape memory alloys have been successfully manufactured by powder technology. However, only a correct combination of sintering temperature and time leads to a homogeneous alloy. The best sintering condition for the Ti50Ni25Cu25 alloy demands sintering temperature of 11000C with the sintering time of 7 hours. Additional thermal treatment such as quenching and additional annealing extends possibility for thermal control of the martensitic transformation. Produced alloy reveals a similar reversible martensitic transformation when compared to dense material. The porosity in homogenous samples does not exceed 25%.

Rapid solidification techniques, realized by means of melt-spinning as well as twin roll casting technique, allows producing fully transformable Ti50Ni25Cu25 alloy. The advantage of these techniques, in comparison to traditional casting, is wide possibility for controlling thermal region of the martensitic transformation. Moreover, thin ribbons or strips can be produced directly from the melt in thickness varied from 30 µm to 350 µm. It allows avoiding of mechanical treatment needed after traditionally cast alloy. Also, control of the cooling rate allows for steering of the course of the martensitic transformation.

In melt-spinning technique, the martensitic transformation is sensitive to the wheel speed – processing parameter. Applying speed from the range of 11 m/s -19m/s enables receiving Ti50Ni25Cu25 alloy, which transforms in the thermal range from 25oC to 80oC. Increase of the cooling rate, realized when melt temperatures is higher than 1350 oC and the wheel speed increases to 23 m/s, leads to obtaining alloy in amorphous state. However, it opens way for production of nanocrystalline Ti50Ni25Cu25 shape memory alloy (Ye Xu, 2009).

Application of the twin roll casting technique moves the thermal range of the martensitic transformation to region between temperatures: 20oC and 55oC.


The author thanks Dr. Patrick Ochin (ICMPE Institut de Chimie et des Matériaux Paris Est) for cooperation in shape memory alloys manufacturing with use of rapid solidification techniques.


  1. 1. B.YuanX. P.ZhangC. Y.ChungM. Zhu Materials Science and Engineering A 438-440.- (2006585588
  2. 2. BergB. S.Journal of Materials Processing Technology 53. (19956574
  3. 3. BesseghiniS.VillaE.TuissiA.Materials Science and Engineering A273-275. (1999390394
  4. 4. ChGrossmann J. Frenzel, V. Samphath, T. Depka, G. Eggeler, Metall. Mater. Trans. 40A.- (200925312544
  5. 5. F.DalleG.DespertPh. Vermaut, R. Portier, A. Dezellus, P. Plaindoux, P Ochin, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 346.- (2003320327
  6. 6. F.FukudaT.KakeshitaM.KitayamaK.SaburiJ.PhysI. V.1995PpC8717
  7. 7. F. J.GilE.SolanoJ.PenalE.EngelA.MendozaJ. A.PlanellJ.MaterSci. Mater. Med. 15- (200411811185
  8. 8. G. E.MonastyrskyV.OdnosumJ.Van HumbeeckV. I.KolomytsevYuN.Koval, Intermetallics 10- (200295103
  9. 9. GoryczkaT.and OchinP.Journal of Materials Processing Technology 162-163.- (2005178183
  10. 10. GoryczkaT.Van Humbeeck J Journal of Alloys and Compunds 456.- (2008194200
  11. 11. GuptaK. P.Article] // Journal of Phase Equilibria 232002541547
  12. 12. H. Funakubo Shape memory alloys, Amsterdam : Gordon and Breach Science Publisher, 1987.
  13. 13. H.MorawiecT.GoryczkaJ.LelatkoD.StróżM.GiglaP.TkaczArch. Mater. Sci. 24.- (2003521
  14. 14. H.RosnerP.SchloMacherA. V.ShelyakovA. M.Glezer, Acta Mater. 49.- (20011541
  15. 15. HagaT.SuzukiS.Journal of Materials Processing Technology 118.- (2001165168
  16. 16. HagaT.TakahashiK.IkawaM.Watari H Journal of Materials Processing Technology 140.- (2003610615
  17. 17. Van HumbeeckJ. J.Phys. IV France 7.- (1997C5C3C5-11.
  18. 18. Itala AI Ylanen HOEkholm C, Karlsson KH, Aro HT. J Biomed Mater Res. 58.- (2001679683
  19. 19. J.MorgielE.CesariJ.PonsA.PaskoJ.DutkiewiczJ.MaterSci. 37.- (200253195325
  20. 20. J. E.HanlonS. R.Butlerand R. J.WasilewskiTrans. AIME 239.- (196713231327
  21. 21. Karageorgiou V Kaplan DBiomaterials 26.- 200554745491
  22. 22. KimaH. Y.KimaJ. I.InamuraT.HosodaH.MiyazakiS.Mat. Sci.e and Eng. A 438-440.- (2006839843
  23. 23. LiB. Y.RongL. J.LiY. Y.GjunterV. E.Intermetallics 8.- 2000881884
  24. 24. LiC.ZhengY. F.Materials Letters 60- (200616461650
  25. 25. MeltonO.Mercierand K.N Met. Trans. A,.- (197910A387
  26. 26. MercierK. N.Meltonand O.Met. Trans. A,.- (19789A1487
  27. 27. MorawiecH.StróżD.GoryczkaT.ChrobakD.Scripta Materialia 35.- (1996485490
  28. 28. NomuraK.Tsujiand K. J.Mater. Sci., 27,.- 19922199
  29. 29. NomuraK.Tsujiand K.Scripta Metall., 24.- 19902037
  30. 30. OtsukaK.WaymanC. M.Shape Memory Materials Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, (1998
  31. 31. R.SantamartaE.CesariJ.PonsT.GoryczkaMetall. Mater. Trans. 35A.- (2004761770
  32. 32. S.ColomboC.CannizzoF.GariboldiG.AiroldiJ. Alloys Compd. 422.- (2006313320
  33. 33. S.EuckenJ. Hirsch Mater. Sci. For. 56-58.- (1990487
  34. 34. SantamartaR.SeguiC.PonsJ.CesariE.Scripta Materialia 41.- (1999867872
  35. 35. SimskeS. I.and SachdevaR.J Biomed Mater Res. 29.- (1995527533
  36. 36. T.GoryczkaM.KarolusH.MorawiecP. Ochin Journal de Physique IV, 11.- (2001Pr8345
  37. 37. T.GoryczkaP.OchinH. Morawiec Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 49.- (2004891906
  38. 38. T. H.NamT.Saburiand K.ShimizuMater. Trans. JIM., 31.- 1990959
  39. 39. T. W.DuerigK. N.MeltonD.StockelC.M. Wayman Engineering aspects of sahpe memory alloys- London : Butterworth-Heinemann, 1990
  40. 40. W. J.Moberlyand K.N. Melton at “Engineering aspects of shape memory alloys” by T.W. Duering K.N Melton, D. Stöckel, C.M. Wayman, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd. 199052
  41. 41. W. M.StoobsJ.V. Wood Acta Met. 27.- (1979575
  42. 42. Ye Xu Xu HuangA.G. Ramirez Journal of Alloys and Compounds 480.- (2009L13L16

Written By

Tomasz Goryczka

Submitted: January 2nd, 2012 Published: April 3rd, 2013