1. Introduction
Reconstructive surgery for the repair of nose deformities is challenging [1]. Nasal surgery involves autologous rib or septum cartilage grafts [2] and prosthetic devices [3] for reconstruction and reinforcement of the nasal skeleton. These conventional procedures are associated with donor site morbidity, limited tissue availability, and prosthesis related infection and extrusion [4]. Although tissue engineering is a promising method for repair and reconstruction of cartilage defects [5- 7], engineering cartilage with a delicate three dimensional (3D) structure, such as human nose, remains a great challenge in this field. Since in 1997 Cao
One major reason leading to the failure of
To overcome these problems, two crucial issues should be addressed. First, the PGA-based scaffold should be prefabricated into the exact shape of human nose. Second, the mechanical strength of the above-mentioned scaffold should be further enhanced so that it can retain the pre-designed shape.
In order to meet these requirements, in the current study, a computer aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique was employed to fabricate a set of negative molds, which was then used to press the PGA fibers into the pre-designed nose structure. Furthermore, the mechanical strength of the scaffold was enhanced by coating the PGA fibers with an optimized amount of PLA.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Preparation of scaffolds with different PLA contents
10 mg of unwoven PGA fibers (provided by Dong Hua University, Shanghai, China) were compressed into a cylinder shape of 5mm in diameter and 2mm in thickness. A solution of 0.3 % PLA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in dichloromethane was evenly dropped onto the PGA scaffold, dried in a 65 ºC oven, and weighed. The PLA mass ratio was calculated according to the formula: PLA%= (final mass-original mass)/final mass×100%. The above procedures were repeated until the predetermined PLA mass ratios of 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% were achieved. The scaffolds were examined by SEM (Philips XL-30, Amsterdam, Netherlands) [18].
2.2. Biocompatibility evaluation of the scaffolds
2.3. Mold fabrication by CAD/CAM
A patient’s normal nose was scanned by CT to obtain the geometric data (Figure 3). These data were further processed by a CAD system to generate both positive and negative of the normal nose, and the resultant data were input into a CAM system (Spectrum 510, Z Corporation) for the fabrication of the resin models by 3D printing. The negative mold was composed of two parts: the anterior part and the posterior part. (Figure 4A)
2.4. Fabrication of nose shaped scaffold
Two hundred milligrams of unwoven PGA fibers were pressed using the negative mold for over 12 hours. A solution of 0.3 % PLA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in dichloromethane was evenly dropped onto the PGA scaffold, dried in a 65 ºC oven, weighed, and pressed again with the negative mold. This procedure was repeated until the final PLA mass ratio of 20% was reached. The edge of the scaffold was carefully trimmed according to the shape of the positive mold.
2.5. Statistical analysis
The differences of cell seeding efficiencies (n=6) among the six PLA content groups were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. A
3. Results
3.1. SEM observation of the scaffolds with different PLA contents
PLA/PGA scaffold compositions were visualized under SEM. (Figure 1) The pure PGA scaffold (0% PLA added) appeared as a smooth fiber mesh. In PGA scaffolds supplemented with 10% PLA, the PLA coating can be seen connecting some fibers, particularly at nodes where PGA fibers cross. In the 20% PLA embedded scaffold, most mesh nodes visualized were covered with PLA. 30% PLA scaffold had not only most mesh nodes embedded in PLA, but also the PLA coating was seen covering small portions of the mesh itself, minimally obstructing the porosity of the fiber network. In the 40% PLA embedded scaffold, most of the mesh porosity is obscured by a PLA. In the 50% PLA scaffold, the mesh is almost completely obscured by a PLA sheet.

Figure 1.
SEM examination. Scaffolds with different PLA contents (0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50%) show different pore structures. The white arrows indicate the coated PLA.
3.2. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of the scaffolds with different PLA contents
Cell seeding efficiencies were performed to evaluate the influence of PLA contents on cell compatibility of the scaffolds. The results showed that the increase in PLA content could lead to the reduction in the ability of the scaffolds to absorb the cell suspensions (Figure 2A). Quantitative analysis (Figure 2B) demonstrated that all the groups with PLA presented significantly lower cell seeding efficiencies compared to the group without PLA (p<0.05). If the acceptable cell adhesion rate is defined over 80%, these results indicate that 20% but not 30% is an acceptable PLA amount for preparing the scaffolds in terms of cell seeding efficiency.

Figure 2.
The influences of PLA contents on cell seeding efficiency. (A): Scaffolds with different PLA contents absorb different volumes of the cell suspension. (B): Cell seeding efficiencies decrease with increasing PLA contents in the scaffolds with significant decreases (p<0.05).
3.3. Mold preparation and fabrication of the nose-shaped scaffold
Because good biocompatibility could be achieved in the scaffold with 20% PLA, this formulation was further used for the fabrication of the human nose shaped scaffold. In order to prepare the scaffold into a shape of normal nose, a set of negative molds was produced according to image of the normal nose (Figure 3). The resulting nose-shaped scaffold (Figure 4C) achieved a precise shape compared to its positive mold (Figure 4B). These results indicate that the mold produced by CAD/CAM technology is allowed to accurately fabricate a scaffold into a nose shape.

Figure 3.
image of a patient’s normal nose.

Figure 4.
Mold preparation and the fabrication of the nose-shaped scaffolds. (A): The resin negative mold: anterior part and posterior part; (B): The resin positive mold; (C): the nose-shaped PLA/PGA scaffold.
4. Discussions
Despite the rapid progress in cartilage engineering,
To achieve this, a negative mold corresponding to the desired shape is required. CAD/CAM, as a novel technique, has been widely used for the fabrication of anatomically accurate 3D models [20- 23]. Particularly, this method can accurately perform complicated manipulations of the original 3D data, including Boolean operations, mirror imaging, and scaling [24- 26]. CAD/CAM technique was therefore used in the current study for the production of the negative mold for a human nose. Using this mold, PGA fibers were able to be accurately prepared into the nose-shaped scaffold.
The mechanical strength of PGA scaffold alone is not sufficient for the shape maintenance, and thus PLA coating was used to strengthen its mechanical properties as reported [10, 11, 27]. However, a high amount of PLA in the scaffold would negatively affect cartilage formation because of poor cell compatibility [14]. Therefore, an appropriate PLA content in the scaffold is important for both shape maintenance and biocompatibility. In the current study, we evaluated the effects of six PLA contents on the scaffolds’ biocompatibility. According to the current results, although the mechanical strength of the scaffolds increased with increasing PLA content, 20% is an acceptable PLA amount for preparing the scaffolds in terms of cell seeding efficiency.
Finally, aided by CAD/CAM technique, the PGA fibers were prepared into the accurate shape of a human nose. Furthermore, by coating with PLA, the scaffold could obtain sufficient mechanical strength to retain the original shape. These results may provide useful information for future nose reconstructions by
In summary, this study established a method to precisely engineer a PGA/PLA scaffold with the shape of human nose. In future studies, we will also investigate the fate of these scaffolds after cell seeding, especially subcutaneous implantation in an immunocompetent animal model.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81101438 and 81201476).
References
- 1.
Anatomy, physiology, and general concepts in nasal reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North AmBloom J. D Antunes M. B Becker D. G 2011 19 1 1 11 - 2.
Cartilage grafting in nasal reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North AmImmerman S White W. M Constantinides M 2011 19 1 175 82 - 3.
rd, Pearson JM. Nasal implants. Facial Plast Surg Clin North AmRomo T 2008 16 1 123 32 vi. - 4.
Nasal tip ulceration from infection and extrusion of a nasal alloplastic implant. J Am Acad DermatolGraham B. S Thiringer J. K Barrett T. L 2001 Suppl):362 4 - 5.
Tissue engineering. ScienceLanger R Vacanti J. P 1993 260 5110 920 6 - 6.
It is time to reconstruct human auricle more precisely and microinvasively. Plast Reconstr SurgZhang L 2010 e-156e. - 7.
Tissue Engineering of Musculoskeletal Tissue. In: Pallua N, Suschek C, eds. Tissue Engineering: From Lab to Clinic:Springer,Zhang L Spector M 2011 - 8.
Transplantation of chondrocytes utilizing a polymer-cell construct to produce tissue-engineered cartilage in the shape of a human ear. Plast Reconstr SurgCao Y Vacanti J. P Paige K. T Upton J Vacanti C. A 1997 100 2 297 302 discussion 303-4. - 9.
In vitro tissue engineering to generate a human-sized auricle and nasal tip. LaryngoscopeKamil S. H Kojima K Vacanti M. P Bonassar L. J Vacanti C. A Eavey R. D 2003 113 1 90 4 - 10.
Repair of articular cartilage defect in non-weight bearing areas using adipose derived stem cells loaded polyglycolic acid mesh. BiomaterialsCui L Wu Y Cen L Zhou H Yin S Liu G Liu W Cao Y 2009 30 14 2683 93 - 11.
Di Cesare PE. Scaffolds for articular cartilage repair. Ann Biomed EngFrenkel S. R 2004 32 1 26 34 - 12.
Mini-review: Mechanical factors affecting cartilage regeneration in vitro. Biotechnol BioengHeath C. A Magari S. R 1996 50 4 430 7 - 13.
Comparison of scaffolds and culture conditions for tissue engineering of the knee meniscus. Tissue EngAufderheide A. C Athanasiou K. A 2005 - 14.
Characterization of polylactic acid-polyglycolic acid composites for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue EngMoran J. M Pazzano D Bonassar L. J 2003 9 1 63 70 - 15.
The impact of low levels of collagen IX and pyridinoline on the mechanical properties of in vitro engineered cartilage. BiomaterialsYan D Zhou G Zhou X Liu W Zhang W. J Luo X Zhang L Jiang T Cui L Cao Y 2009 30 5 814 21 - 16.
Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering. Eur Cell MaterGunatillake P. A Adhikari R 2003 5 1 16 discussion 16. - 17.
Engineering smooth muscle tissue with a predefined structure. J Biomed Mater ResKim B. S Mooney D. J 1998 41 2 322 32 - 18.
In vitro engineering of human ear-shaped cartilage assisted with CAD/CAM technology. BiomaterialsLiu Y Zhang L Zhou G Li Q Liu W Yu Z Luo X Jiang T Zhang W Cao Y 2010 31 8 2176 83 - 19.
Comparison of three types of chondrocytes in collagen scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomed MaterZhang L Spector M 2009 - 20.
Stereolithography in oral and maxillofacial operation planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac SurgBill J. S Reuther J. F Dittmann W Kubler N Meier J. L Pistner H Wittenberg G 1995 Pt 2):98-103. - 21.
CAD/CAM ear model and virtual construction of the mold. J Prosthet DentCiocca L Mingucci R Gassino G Scotti R 2007 98 5 339 43 - 22.
An opinion survey of reported benefits from the use of stereolithographic models. J Oral Maxillofac SurgErickson D. M Chance D Schmitt S Mathis J 1999 57 9 1040 3 - 23.
Rapid development of auricular prosthesis using CAD and rapid prototyping technologies. Int J Oral Maxillofac SurgSubburaj K Nair C Rajesh S Meshram S. M Ravi B 2007 36 10 938 43 - 24.
Al Mardini M Ercoli C,Graser GN. A technique to produce a mirror-image wax pattern of an ear using rapid prototyping technology. J Prosthet Dent2005 94 2 195 8 - 25.
CAD-CAM generated ear cast by means of a laser scanner and rapid prototyping machine. J Prosthet DentCiocca L Scotti R 2004 92 6 591 5 - 26.
Fabrication of an auricular prosthesis using computed tomography and rapid prototyping technique. J Craniofac SurgKarayazgan-saracoglu B Gunay Y Atay A 2009 20 4 1169 72 - 27.
The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. Tissue EngYang S Leong K. F Du Z Chua C. K 2001 7 6 679 89