Distribution of mean parental age for Down syndrome birth and nondisjunctional errors of chromosome 21 stratified by parent and meiotic stage of origin
Aneuploidy can be defined as presence of erroneous number of chromosome in organisms and in human aneuploidy is the major cause of birth wastage. Among all known recognizable human aneuploidies, trisomy 21 shows the highest frequency of occurrence, estimating approximately 1 in 700 live-births (Kanamori et al., 2000). The trisomy 21 condition originates due to non-separation or nondisjunction (NDJ) of chromosome 21(Ch21) during gametogenesis and as a result disomic gametes with two copies of a particular chromosome are formed and upon fertilization by haploid gamete from opposite sex lead to the formation and implantation of trisomic fetus. The trisomy 21 condition is popularly known as Down syndrome (DS) after the name of John Langdon Down who described the syndrome for the first time in 1866 (Down, 1866). Beside chromosomal NDJ, a small proportion of DS occurs due to post zygotic mitotic error or translocation of chromosome 21 to other autosomes.
Within the category of free trisomy 21 due to NDJ, overwhelming majority of errors occurs in maternal oogenesis particularly at meiosis I (MI) stage (Table 1). A little fraction of NDJ errors arise at paternal spermatogenesis. This preferential occurrence of maternal meiotic error is probably due to the mechanism of oocyte maturation in the ovary. Meiosis is initiated in the human foetal ovary at 11–12 weeks of gestation (Gondos et al., 1986), but becomes arrested after completion of homologous chromosome pairing and recombination. This meiotic-halt lasts for several years until the elevated level of LH and FSH resume the process at the onset of puberty. Then the oocyte completes meiosis I (MI) and enters meiosis II (MII) and again undergoes a phase of pause. It completes the meiosis II after the sperm enter its cytoplasm following fertilization. Thus, the oocyte, whose ovulation marks the menarche, remains in pause for shortest period and that ovulates just preceding menopause experiences longest period of arrest. This long tenure of oocyte development makes it vulnerable to acquire environmental hazards within its microenvironment which inevitably increases the risk of chromosomal NDJ.
In search of etiology of Ch21 NDJ, researchers have unambiguously identified two risk factors namely advancing maternal age and altered pattern of meiotic recombination. Beside these two risk factors, other environmental and behavioural factors have also been identified as risk of Ch21 NDJ and they exhibit several degrees of interactions with advancing maternal age and recombination pattern of Ch21. These make the etiology of DS birth a puzzle in the field of medical genetics.
2. Genetic risk factors
2.1. Advanced maternal age and related hypotheses
The age of the mother at the time of the conception of a fetus with DS is, by far, the most significant risk factor for meiotic NDJ of Ch21. As a woman ages, her risk for having a fetus with trisomy 21 significantly increases. This association was noted initially by Penrose in 1933 (Penrose, 1933). For all the populations studied so far, estimated mean maternal age of conception of DS baby is higher than that of controls i.e., having euploid baby and women with MII NDJ is older than women affected with MI NDJ.
Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain the link between advancing maternal age and higher incidence of aneuploid oocyte formation but no one has proved to be completely satisfactory. The most popular hypothesis (Gondos et al., 1986) holds that the protracted tenure of oogenesis interrupted with meiotic halts (Figure 1), probably makes the eggs more vulnerable to the aging effect than sperms. This long period of oocyte maturation results in the aging associated deteriorative changes to accumulate over time either in the oocyte or its milieu. Examples of such factors would be a diminishing amount of a meiotic proteins, like those maintaining sister chromatid adhesion (Hodges et al., 2005; Hunt & Hassold, 2008) or meiotic checkpoints components (Garcia-Cruz et al., 2010) or weakening of centromere cohesion due to age-related reduction in centromere associated proteins MCAK (Eichenlaub-Ritter et al. 2010). This list of age related risks may also include the accumulation of environmentally induced damage to the meiotic machinery over time or genetic changes such as mitochondrial deletions (Van Blerkom, 2011). Among all these variables, the spindle assembly check point (SAC) components and sister chromatid cohesion (SCC) were investigated thoroughly (Chiang et al.; 2010), as they are prospective genetic candidates that may explain the aging effect on aneuploid oocyte formation. The SAC is a molecular machine that ensures proper chromosome separation in both mitosis and meiosis. In meiosis SAC prevents anaphase until all chromosomes properly attach to the spindle. The SAC includes
A second hypothesis relates the “biological aging” or “ovarian aging” with the increasing rate of meiotic errors (Warburton, 1989; 2005). The central theme of this hypothesis is the prediction that biological aging is different among women of the same chronological age and that the frequency of trisomic conceptions depends upon the biological age of the woman rather than the chronological age (Warburton, 2005). The biological age of women can usually be assessed by counting the falling number of antral follicles with chronological age together with decrease in total oocyte pool size (Scheffer et al. 1999; Kline et al. 2004). These altogether alter the optimum hormonal balance in ovary, which is marked by falling concentration of serum inhibin A and B, decline in estrogens surge and elevated level of FSH (Warburton, 2005). This change in hormone balance is related to increased rate of aneuploidy at advanced maternal age. Support to this prediction is available from the experiment on mouse model (Robert et al. 2005). Alternative to this prediction was provided in the ‘limited oocyte pool hypothesis’ (Warburton, 2005), which stated that with biological age there is a decrease in the number of antral follicles, leaving only the premature or post mature oocyte to ovulate. The “biological aging” hypothesis predicts that women with a trisomic conception should on the average have an older “ovarian age” than other women of the same chronological age with a normal conception (Warburton, 2005) and women having trisomic pregnancy have average earlier (~1 year) age of menopause (Kline et al., 2000). If these were the facts, one would expect that after a trisomic conception, the risk of a subsequent trisomy for any chromosome should be higher than the maternal age-related risk. Support to this prediction comes from the recent data from prenatal diagnosis after a previous trisomic conception which shows that the risk of a subsequent trisomy birth is about 1.7 times the maternal age-related risk (Warburton et al., 2005). Mathematical model proposed by Kline and Levin (1992) estimated that women with trisomy pregnancy experience 0.9 years early menopause which suggests that such women suffer from advanced ovarian aging than the women with chromosomally normal pregnancies. Population sample survey for calculating the median age of menopause among the women with trisomic pregnancy loss also suggested an early cessation of menstrual cycle among them than the mothers with chromosomally normal foetus (Kline et al., 2000). Elevated level of FSH is reported among the women with DS pregnancy (Nasseri
The third hypothesis is concerned with ‘genetic age’ of women and stated that it is the genetic aging that underlies the all kind of degenerative changes in ovary and oocyte. The hypothesis was proposed by Ghosh et al., (2010). The authors estimated the telomere length of peripheral lymphocyte of women with DS child and compared with age matched controls. They found that beyond of age 29 years the DS bearing mothers exhibit rapid telomere shortening and hence rapid genetic aging than the controls. The authors inferred that DS bearing younger mothers do not experience any accelerated genetic aging; it is only the chronological older age when DS bearing mothers suffer from rapid genetic and molecular aging than the age matched mothers of euploid child. The authors proposed ‘Genetic aging hypothesis’ which stated that some women are predisposed to rapid genetic and molecular aging and its effect is exacerbated at advance age when age-related deteriorative changes also affect the chromosome separation system leading to NDJ. The notion has suggested some intuitive link between telomere maintenance system (i.e., system of molecular aging) and chromosome segregating apparatus at molecular level.
2.2. Altered pattern of recombination and its interaction with maternal age
Aside from maternal age, there is only one other factor that has been shown to associate increased susceptibility of maternal NDJ, namely altered recombination patterns. Warren et al. (1987) provided the first evidence to suggest that a proportion of maternal NDJ errors were associated with reduced recombination along Ch 21. Further examination has shown that, in addition to the absence of an exchange along the nondisjoined Ch 21, the placement of an exchange is an important susceptibility factor for NDJ. Examination of recombination along the maternal nondisjoined Ch 21 has suggested three susceptible exchange patterns: 1) no exchange leads to an increased risk of MI errors, 2) a single telomeric exchange leads to an increased risk of MI errors, and 3) a pericentromeric exchange leads to an increased risk of so-called MII errors. These patterns are similar to those observed in model organisms where absence or reduced recombination, along with sub-optimally placed recombinant events, increases the likelihood of NDJ (Rasooly et al., 1991; Moore et al., 1994; Sears et al.1995; Zetka and Rose, 1995; Koehler et al., 1996; Ross et al., 1996; Krawchuk and Wahls, 1999). Exchanges too close to the centromere or single exchange too close to the telomere seem to confer chromosomal instability.
Subsequently, researchers have identified a potential interaction between maternal age and pattern of recombination. The study on US population (Sherman et al., 1994) provided the first evidence in this regard and proved an age related reduction in recombination frequency among the MI cases, with older women (35 yrs. and more) having less recombination along 21q than younger women (< 35 yrs.), as suggested by estimated length (cM) of age-specific linkage map of Ch21. In exploring the interaction between maternal age and recombination and to gain further insight into the potential mechanisms of abnormal chromosome segregation, comparison had been made for frequency and location of meiotic exchanges along 21q (Lamb et al. 2005) among women of various ages who had an infant with DS due to a maternal MI error. While there was no significant association between maternal age and overall frequency of exchange, the placement of meiotic exchange differed significantly by age of conception. In particular, single telomeric recombination event was present in highest proportion among the youngest age group (80%), while the proportion in the oldest group of women and in control group were almost equal (14% and 10% respectively). Moreover, studies (Lamb et al., 1996, 2005) suggested that in maternal MI error cases, majority of single exchanges were located in the telomeric end of Ch21, whereas the single exchange within the peri-centromeric region was associated with maternal MII errors. In the independent age-stratified analysis on the US population by Oliver et al., (2008) and on the Indian population by Ghosh et al., (2009) a universal pattern of interactions among maternal age groups, chiasma placement and amount of meiotic recombination has been discovered. In these studies a major fraction of MI errors was recorded due to absence of any detectable exchange between non-sister chromatids of nondisjoined homologues. A trend of decreasing frequency of achiasmate meiosis (meiosis without recombination) with increasing maternal age is also observed in both the studies (Oliver et al., 2008; Ghosh et al., 2009), which suggests achiasmate meiosis without any recombination is maternal age-independent risk. According to the model of maternal risk factors for DS birth proposed by Oliver et al., (2008) and supported by (Ghosh et al. 2009, Ghosh et al.,. 2010) that any risk factor which is maternal age independent should present in highest frequency in the younger mother, the age group in which other risk factors are usually absent. In contrast, any risk factors whose frequency increases with increasing maternal age is regarded as maternal age dependent risk factor as its effect gets exacerbated in interaction with increasing maternal age. The chiasma stabilizes the tetrad and counter balances the pull from opposite poles which ensure the faithful segregation of homologues. In absence of chiasma, the chromosomes move randomly at MI, resulting in formation of disomic gametes. As the chiasma formation takes place in foetal ovary, the achisamate chromosome containing disomic oocyte may ovulate at any time in reproductive life and hence it is maternal age independent risk factor of Ch21 NDJ.
In both the studies on US and Indian populations (Oliver et al., 2008; Ghosh et al., 2009), the single telomeric chiasma and subsequent recombination were found in highest frequency among the women of younger age group i.e., age group below 29 years, who had a NDJ error at meiosis I stage of oogenesis and there was a gradual decrease in telomeric chiasma frequency with advancing maternal age. This observation suggests that the single telomeric chiasma formation is the risk of NDJ of Ch 21 even in younger women who otherwise do not suffer from deterioration related to the aging. Thus within the total risk probability of Ch21 NDJ, the single telomeric chiasma formation represent the highest proportion among the younger women of MI NDJ category. Two important inferences have been drawn from this finding. The first one is that the single telomeric chiasma formation is maternal age independent risk of Ch21 NDJ. The second is that the single telomeric chiasma probably induces some structural instability of Ch21 that segregates randomly at meiosis I which takes place in fetal ovary.
Understanding the exact mechanism how does single telomeric chiasma cause chromosomal mis-segregation has been obtained from the observations in model organisms like
Another chiasma configuration that poses susceptibility for NDJ of Ch21 is the pericentromeric exchange. In both the studies on US and Indian DS populations (Oliver et al., 2008; Ghosh et al., 2009), highest frequency of pericentromeric exchange was scored in older women having age >34 years. A trend of gradual increase in centromeric chiasma frequency with increasing age was recorded in both the studies with gradual shifting of chiasma from middle of the chromosome in younger age group to more proximal to centromere in older age group. In explaining the effect on chromosome segregation that single centromeric chiasma imparts two hypotheses have been put forward by the authors. The chiasma that is positioned very close to centromere may cause ‘chromosomal entanglement’ at MI, with the bivalent being unable to separate, passing intact to MII metaphase plate (Lamb et al., 1996). Upon MII division, the bivalent divides reductionally, resulting in disomic gamete with identical centromeres (Figure 2c). In this manner, proximal pericentromeric exchange, which occurs at MI, is resolved and visualized as MII error. According to an alternate model, studied in
The effect of pericentromeric exchange on meiotic chromosome separation gets exacerbated with maternal age related insults in ovarian environment, as suggested by greater proportion of DS births among older women who have experienced the particular pattern of chiasma formation. This relationship can be interpreted in two different ways: 1) pericentromeric exchange set up a sub-optimal configuration that initiates or exacerbates the susceptibility to maternal age-related risk factors, perhaps leading to an increase in premature sister chromatid segregation or 2) a pericentromeric exchange protect the bivalent against age related risk factor, allowing proper segregation of homologues, but not the sister chromatids at MII (Oliver et al., 2008). The former explanation is likely to the ‘
As far as effect of multiple chiasmata formation on the nondisjoined Ch 21 is concerned, two important reports have been published very recently. In their study Ghosh et al. (2010) found that two or more chiasmata formation is prevalent particularly in older age group (≥ 34 years). This infers that the older oocyte suffers from nondisjunctional errors even when Ch21 experiences formation of two or more chiasmata which are believed to be protective of NDJ; this is due to aging effects that imparts various degenerative changes in ovary. Analyzing the effect of multiple chiasmata of the 21q, Oliver
2.3. Genetic polymorphism and increasing susceptibility of Down syndrome birth
Maternal genetic factors such as polymorphism of certain gene probably make them susceptible for NDJ error. Experimental organisms have been used to identify genes that are important in the proper segregation of chromosomes. The potential candidates are those genes involved in the meiotic process such as homologue pairing, assembly of the synaptonemal complex, chiasmata formation and chiasma positioning, sister chromatid cohesion, spindle formation. Genetic variations of these genes are predisposing factors for chromosome NDJ.
The gene that has been identified first in this category is
This initial report had inspired several follow-up studies on the
The other way to find out the genes involved in human NDJ is to analyze the association of consanguinity and trisomy 21(Sherman et al., 2005). If such an association really does exist, it would provide evidence for a genetic effect for NDJ. The study of Alfi et al., (1980) provided one of the earlier reports suggesting an association between increased consanguinity among parents of individuals with DS in a study population in Kuwait. Authors postulated the existence of a gene that increases the risk for mitotic NDJ. Alternatively, they suggested that increased rates of consanguinity among parents would be correlated with those in grandparents and therefore, an autosomal recessive gene may be postulated to be involved in meiotic NDJ in the homozygous parents. But the reports from subsequent studies in other populations are contradictory and did not find any evidence for an association between consanguinity and human NDJ (Devoto et al., 1985; Hamamy et al., 1990; Roberts et al., 1991; Basaran et al., 1992; Zlotogora, 1997; Sayee & Thomas, 1998; Rittler et al., 2001).
Lastly, differences in the prevalence of DS among different racial groups may provide indirect evidence for genetic factors involved in human NDJ. However, such studies are difficult to conduct and to interpret. Differences (or similarities) may reflect the maternal age distribution of the population, accuracy of diagnosis, cultural preference and/or access to selective prenatal termination of pregnancies with trisomic fetuses, and as yet unidentified environmental factors (Sherman et al., 2005). Only one such study by Allen et al., (2009) reported demographic differences in mean maternal age of DS conception recorded in two different sample sets from USA. This study included DS samples from Atlanta Down syndrome project and National Down syndrome project and found that mothers enrolled in National Down syndrome project were on an average older than those of Atlanta. Moreover, the authors have also reported some ethnic differences in maternal age distribution. The Atlanta Down syndrome project had a higher proportion of cases and controls that were black and a significantly smaller proportion of Hispanics than did the National Down syndrome project. Comparison of mean maternal ages indicated variation by ethnic groups. In both the Atlanta Down syndrome project and National Down syndrome project, white mothers tended to be older than their black or Hispanic counterparts. Specifically, for both cases and controls, white mothers were found to be significantly older than black mothers (P< 0.01) and Hispanic mothers (P< 0.01); blacks and Hispanics were not significantly different from each other (P>0.05). To confirm such effect of demographic and ethnic differences on the etiology of DS birth, further large scale population based studies are needed to be conducted.
2.4. Paternal risk factor for chromosome 21 nondisjunction
The paternal error constitutes nearly 5 to 10% of total occurrence of live born DS cases, depending upon the populations studied. Unlike maternal cases the studies on the etiology of paternal NDJ are limited by insufficient sample size. The first significant report was provided by Savage et al., (1998) who found reduction in recombination in MI nondisjoined cases, but not in MII errors. Moreover, the authors inferred that altered chiasma positioning may not associate with NDJ in spermatogenesis, as the authors recorded very concordant pattern of chiasma distribution among DS cases and control. In their extension study with more paternally derived samples, Oliver et al., (2009) determined that majority of Ch21 NDJ errors in spermatogenesis occurs at MII (32%MI:68%MII), and the authors did not found significant reduction in recombination either in MI or in MII errors. Moreover, their sample did not exhibit any advanced age effect for either of meiotic outcome groups. The authors argued that the time scale of spermatogenesis is much shorter starting at puberty runs continuously without meiotic halt and this explains why advancing paternal age does not exacerbate and associate Ch21 NDJ in spermatogenesis. This study is significant in the realization that etiology of Ch21 NDJ differs in two sexes and case of paternal errors remains an enigma. In general the frequency of recombination for normally segregating chromosome is less in male than in female. But further reduction in recombination frequency may not cause NDJ in male. Moreover, epidemiological study on the risk factors for paternal NDJ of Ch21 is yet to be conducted.
3. Habitual risk factor for chromosome 21 nondisjunction
Beside maternal age and altered pattern of recombination, set of prospective environmental or habitual risk factors have been identified in several epidemiological studies. These factors show various degrees of associations with DS birth. The list includes maternal cigarette smoking, use of oral contraceptive, peri-conceptional alcohol consumption by mother, exposure to radiation and low socio-economic status. Number of studies reported a negative association between maternal smoking around the time of conception and the risk for DS birth (Kline et al., 1983, 1993; Hook & Cross, 1985, 1988; Shiono et al., 1986; Chen et al., 1999). One explanation for the negative association was that trisomic conceptuses were selectively lost prenatally among women who smoke (Hook and Cross, 1985; Kline
Very recently, population based epidemiological study by Ghosh et al., (2011) analyzed the effect of chewing tobacco and contraceptive pill use on the Ch21 NDJ in interaction with known risk variables like maternal age, meiotic stage of NDJ and pattern of recombination i.e., amount of exchange and positioning of chiasma on the recombining homologues. Various logistic regression models have been designed to examine every possible interaction among all above mentioned risk factors. Smokeless chewing tobacco was associated with significant risk for MII NDJ and achiasmate (nonexchange) MI error among the younger mothers. For both of these groups, the highest frequency of tobacco user was recorded in young age group (≤28 yrs) with successive gradual decrease in middle (29-34 years) and old (≥35 years) age group. According to risk prediction model (mentioned above) of DS birth, the chewing tobacco may impart some maternal age-independent risk of DS birth. In explaining the possible adverse influence of chewing tobacco on subcellular components of oocyte, the authors speculated that, regardless of oocyte age and the amount and location of recombination, tobacco probably affects some molecular system common both to meiosis I and meiosis II stages, for example the spindle apparatus. Conversely, the prevalence of oral contraceptive pill exhibited a trend of increasing frequency of occurrence with advancing maternal age, suggesting maternal age dependent risk of contraceptive pill in both the meiotic I and meiotic II error groups. Moreover, both risk factors, when present together, exhibited a strong age-dependent effect.
4. Epidemiology of environmental pollutants associated with Down syndrome birth
The epidemiological evidences in favour of the association between DS birth and environmental pollution are also surprisingly high, although controversial. Several pollution events are known to be followed by higher incidence of DS birth in an affected geographical locality. Early reports in the 1950s from USA suggested that fluoridation of water supplies might result in an increase in the frequency of DS birth (Dolk & Vrijheid, 2003). Subsequent comparison of overall DS birth rates in fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas in Massachusetts found no evidence for a difference (Needleman et al., 1974). In this study prevalence rates of DS at birth were compared for Massachusetts residents ingesting fluoridated and non-fluoridated water. The observations included nearly all children born alive with DS in Massachusetts during the 17-year period 1950–1966. A rate of 1.5 cases per 1000 births was found both for fluoride-related births and appropriate comparison groups. Analysis of data from 51 American cities also found no difference in maternal age-specific DS rates between fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas (Erickson, 1980).
Similarly, water contamination with pesticide trichlorfon has been reported to cause an outbreak of DS birth incidence. It was reported in the village of Hungary in 1990s (Czeizel et al., 1993) to increase in teratogenic births, including that of DS. In Woburn, Massachusetts, toxic chemicals (industrial solvents, mainly trichloroethylene) from a waste disposal site were detected in municipal drinking water wells (Dolk & Vrijheid, 2003) and people of this area reported increased incidence of several congenital anomalies. Lagakos et al., (1986) followed up this finding by compiling an exposure score for residential zones in Woburn, using information on what fraction of the water supply in each zone had come from the contaminated wells annually since the start of the wells. The authors found a positive correlation between contaminated water use and higher birthrate of DS in this locality.
The increase in DS birth incidence due to accidental exposure to radioactive materials or radiation remains as a subject of research interest for long time. The disaster at nuclear power plant of Chernobyl, located in former Soviet Union, now at Ukraine, is the worst nuclear accident of the century. The immediate fallout of the incidence was the exposure of a large number of people to the various degree of ionizing radiation, which created a new situation for epidemiological investigation. The accidental event prompted numerous studies on the genetic effects of low dose ionizing radiation in man and almost all studies reported a significant increase in Down syndrome birth along with other birth defects in the parts of Germany, Scandinavia and the Lothian region of central Scotland, nine months after the disaster (Burkart et al., 1997; Sperling et al., 1994; Verger, 1997). This incidence was suggestive for the deleterious effect of ionizing radiation on the chromosome segregation system in oocyte of the women who are exposed to the radiation. After conducting month wise birth prevalence study on DS birth in West Germany from January 1980 to December 1989, Sperling et al.,(1994) suggested that low dose of ionizing radiation might cause birth of cluster of trisomy21 children in that area. Further they hypothesized that the effect of radiation got worse owing to error susceptible process of oogenesis and rapid accumulation of radioactive iodine (I131) in body, as the people of that area suffered from iodine deficiency. Although the notion is intuitive, it is very compelling and needs further scientific investigation. Similarly, the effect of irradiation to which the women remained exposed for medical purpose has also been evaluated as DS birth risk in few studies (Uchida et al., 1979; Strigini et al., 1990; Padmanabhan et al., 2004), which suggest radiation may affect the younger women more severely and may increase the chance of having DS conception.
5. Future research
Attempt to resolve the etiology of DS birth is a continuous process and we hope this will bring new insight in the understanding the hidden truth in near future. But the problem lies in its multi factorial nature (Table 2) which inevitably suggests necessity of multi-faceted research efforts from the several directions. For example, it is needed to analyze the polymorphisms of certain genes that regulate meiotic recombination or genes that control maternal molecular aging or those who are involved in faithful chromosome segregation system in meiosis. In searching the cause of recombination anomaly,
|Reduced meiotic recombination
||Maternal age independent
||Not clear, possibly affected by genetic polymorphisms influence chiasma formation||MI||Lamb et al. (2005), Oliver et al. (2008), Ghosh et al. (2009), Ghosh et al. (2011).|
|Telomeric single chiasma||Maternal age independent||Not evident||MI||Oliver et al. (2008), Ghosh et al. (2009).|
|Pericentromeric single chiasma||Maternal age dependent||The risk exacerbates with increasing maternal age||MII
||Oliver et al. (2008), Ghosh et al. (2009).|
|Shifting of distal chiasma towards proximal one when two simultaneous recombination occur||Maternal age independent||Not evident||MI||Oliver et al. (2011)|
|Shifting of proximal chiasma towards centromere when two simultaneous recombination occur||Maternal age dependent||The risk exacerbates with increasing maternal age||MII||Oliver et al. (2011)|
|Genetic polymorphisms: MTHFR 677C→T, MTRR 66A→G||Possibly maternal age independent||Not evident||Not analyzed||James et al. (2004), Wang et al. (2004).|
|Maternal cigarette smoking
||Maternal age independent||Not evident||Not analyzed||Kline et al. (1983), Hook & Cross (1985); Yang et al. (1999).|
|Maternal chewing tobacco use||Maternal age independent||Possibly affects system that ensure non recombinant chromosome segregation and some components common to both MI and MII phases||Both MI and MII||Ghosh et al. (2011)
|Maternal oral contraceptive use||Debatable||Supposed to affect ovarian hormone level||MII||Martı´nez-Frı´as et al (2001), Ghosh et al. (2011)|
|Combined exposure to tobacco and oral contraceptive||Maternal age dependent||The risk exacerbates with increasing maternal age||Both MI and MII||Yang et al. (1999). Ghosh et al. (2011)|
|Maternal low socioeconomic exposure||Maternal age independent||Not evident||MII||Christianson et al. (2004)|
We are extremely grateful to Prof. Eleanor Feingold, Pittsburgh University, USA and Prof. Stephanie Sherman, Emory University, Atlanta, USA for their cooperation in Down syndrome research.
Alfi O. S. Chang R. Azen S. P. 1980 Evidence for genetic control of nondisjunction in man.Am J Hum Genet 32 477 483
Allen E. G. Freeman S. B. Druschel C. Hobbs C. A. O’Leary L. A. Romitti P. A. Royle M. H. Torfs C. P. Sherman S. L. 2009 Maternal age and risk for trisomy 21 assessed by the origin of chromosome nondisjunction: a report from the Atlanta and National Down Syndrome ProjectsHum Genet 125 41 52
9 1199 2000 Angell, R. (1994). Higher rates of aneuploidy in oocytes from older women. Hum Reprod 9:1199-2000
Angell R. 1995 Mechanism of chromosome nondisjunction in human oocytes.Prog Clin Biol Res 393 13 26
Baker D. J. Jeganathan K. B. Cameron J. D. Thompson M. Juneja S. Kopecka A. Kumar R. Jenkins R. B. de Groen P. C. Roche P. van Deursen J. M. 2004 BubR1 insufficiency causes early onset of aging associated phenotypes and infertility in mice.Nat Genet 36 744 749
Basaran N. Cenani A. Sayli B. S. Ozkinay C. Artan S. Seven H. Basaran A. Dincer S. 1992 Consanguineous marriages among parents of Down patients.Clin Genet 42 13 15
Beetstra S. Thomas P. Salisbury C. Turner J. Fenech M. 2005 Folic acid deficiency increases chromosomal instability, chromosome 21 aneuploidy and sensitivity to radiation-induced micronuclei. 578 317 326
Borel C. Cheung F. Stewart H. Koolen D. A. Phillips C. Thomas N. S. Jacobs P. A. Eliez S. Sharp A. J. 2012 Evaluation of PRDM9 variation as a risk factor for recurrent genomic disorders and chromosomal non-disjunction.Hum Genet 131 1519 24
Burkart W. Grosche B. Schoetzau A. 1997 Down syndrome clusters in Germany after the Chernobyl accident.Radiat Res 147 321 328
Burkart W. Grosche B. Schoetzau A. 1997 Down syndrome clusters in Germany after the Chernobyl accident.BMJ 309 158 162
Chen C. L. Gilbert T. J. Daling J. R. 1999 Maternal smoking and Down syndrome: the confounding effect of maternal age.Am J Epidemiol 149 442 446
Chiang T. Duncan F. E. Schindler K. 2010 Evidence that weakened centromere cohesion is a leading cause of age-related aneuploidy in oocytesCurr Biol 20 1522 1528
Christianson R. E. Sherman S. L. Torfs C. P. 2004 Maternal meiosis II nondisjunction in trisomy 21 is associated with maternal low socioeconomic status.Genet Med 6 487 494
Cuckle H. S. Alberman E. Wald N. J. Royston P. Knight G. 1990 Maternal smoking habits and Down’s syndrome.Prenat Diagn 10 561 567
Czeizel A. E. Elek C. Gundy S. Métneki J. Nemes E. Reis A. Sperling K. Tímár L. Tusnády G. Virágh Z. 1993 Environmental trichlorfon and cluster of congenital abnormalities. 341 539 542
Devoto M. Prosperi L. Bricarelli F. D. Coviello D. A. Croci G. Zelante L. Ferranti G. Tenconi R. Stomeo C. Romeo G. 1985 Frequency of consanguineous marriages among parents and grandparents of Down patients.Hum Genet 70 256 258
Dey S. K. Ghosh S. 2011Etiology of Down syndrome: Risk of Maternal age and altered meiotic recombination for chromosome 21 nondisjunction. In: S.K. Dey, ed. (2011). Genetics and Etiology of Down Syndrome. Croatia: InTech. 23 36
Dolk H. Vrijheid M. (2003 2003The impact of environmental pollution on congenital anomalies.Br Med Bull, 68 25 45
Dworkin A. M. Huangb T. H. M. Toland A. E. 2009 Epigenetic alterations in the breast: Implications for breast cancer detection, prognosis and treatment 19 165 171
Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Staubach N. Trapphoff T. 2010 Chromosomal and cytoplasmic context determines predisposition to maternal age-related aneuploidy: brief overview and update on MCAK in mammalian oocytesBiochem Soc Trans 38 1681 1686
Erickson J. D. 1980Down syndrome, water fluoridation, and maternal age. Teratology 198021 177 180
Garcia-Cruz R. MA Brieno Roig I. et al. 2010 Dynamics of cohesin proteins REC8, STAG3, SMC1 beta and SMC3 are consistent with a role in sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis in human oocytes. Hum Reprod 25 2316 2327
Gaulden M. E. 1992Maternal age effect: the enigma of Down syndrome and other trisomic conditions.Mutat Res 296 69 88
Ghosh S. Hong C. S. Feingold E. Ghosh P. Ghosh P. Bhaumik P. Dey S. K. 2011 Epidemiology of Down syndrome: new insight into the multidimensional interactions among genetic and environmental risk factors in the oocyteAm J Epidemiol 174 1009 1016
Ghosh S. Bhaumik P. Ghosh P. Dey S. K. 2010Chromosome 21 nondisjunction and Down syndrome birth in an Indian cohort: analysis of incidence and aetiology from family linkage data. Genet Res (Camb) 92 189 197
Ghosh S. Feingold E. Dey S. K. 2009 Etiology of Down Syndrome: Evidence for Consistent Association among Altered Meiotic Recombination, Nondisjunction and Maternal Age Across Populations.Am J Med Genet 149A, 1415 1420
Ghosh S. Feingold E. Chakraborty S. Dey S. K. 2010 Telomere length is associated with types of chromosome 21 nondisjunction: a new insight into the maternal age effect on Down syndrome birthHum Genet 127 403 409
Gondos B. Westergaard L. Byskov A. G. 1986 Initiation of oogenesis in the human fetal ovary: ultrastructural and squash preparation study.Am J Obstet Gynecol 155 189 195
138 2261 2271 Hached, K., Xie, S.Z. & Buffin, E. (2011). Mps1 at kinetochores is essential for female mouse meiosis I. Development 138, 2261-2271
Hamamy H. A. al Hakkak. Z. S. al Taha. S. 1990Consanguinity and the genetic control of Down syndrome. Clin Genet 37 24 29
Hawley R. S. Frazier J. A. Rasooly R. 1994 Separation anxiety: the etiology of nondisjunction in flies and people.Hum Mol Genet 3 1521 1528
Henderson J. Gray R. Brocklehurst P. 2007 Systematic review of effects of low-moderate prenatal alcohol exposure on pregnancy outcomeBJOG 114 243 252
Hodges C. A. Revenkova E. Jessberger R. Hassold T. J. Hunt P. A. (2005 S. M. 2005 SMC1beta-deficient female mice provide evidence that cohesins are a missing link in age-related nondisjunction.Nat Genet 3 1351 1355
Hook E. B. Cross P. K. 1985 Cigarette smoking and Down syndrome.Am J Hum Genet 37, 1:216-1224.
Hook E. B. Cross P. K. 1988 Maternal cigarette smoking, Down syndrome in live births, and infant race.Am J Hum Genet 42 482 489
Hunt A. Hassold T. J. (2008 2008Human female meiosis: What make a good egg go bad? Trend Genet 24 86 93
James S. J. Pogribna M. Pogribny I. P. Melnyk S. Hine R. J. Gibson J. B. Yi P. Tafoya D. L. Swenson D. H. Wilson V. L. Gaylor D. W. 1999 Abnormal folate metabolism and mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene may be maternal risk factors for Down syndrome.American Journal Clinical Nutrition 70 495 501
James S. J. 2004a Maternal metabolic phenotype and risk of Down syndrome: beyond genetics.Am J Med Genet A 127 1 4
James S. J. 2004b Response to letter: Down syndrome and folic acid deficiencyAm J Med Genet A 131 328 329
James S. J. Pogribna M. Pofribny I. P. Melnyk S. Hine R. J. Gibson J. B. Yi P. Swenson D. H. Wilson V. L. Gaylor D. W. 1999Abnormal folate metaboloism and mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene may be maternal risk factors for Down syndrome. Am J Cli Nut 70 495 501
Källén K. 1997Down’s syndrome and maternal smoking in early pregnancy. Genet Epidemiol 14 77 84
Kanamori G. Witter M. Brown J. Williams-Smith L. 2000Otolaryngolog manifestations of Down Syndrome. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 33 1285 1292
Kaufman M. 1983Ethanol induced chromosomal abnormalities at conception. 302 258 260
Kline J. Levin B. 1992 Trisomy and age at menopause: predicted associations given a link with rate of oocyte atresia.Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 6 225 239
Kline J. Kinney A. Levin B. Warburton D. 2000 Trisomic pregnancy and earlier age at menopauseAm J Hum Genet 67 395 404
Kline J. Kinney A. Reuss M. L. Kelly A. Levin B. Ferin M. Warburton D. 2004Trisomic pregnancy and the oocyte pool. Hum Reprod 19 1633 1643
Kline J. Levin B. Shrout P. Stein Z. Susser M. Warburton D. 1983 Maternal smoking and trisomy among spontaneously aborted conceptions.Am J Hum Genet 35 421 431
Koehler K. E. Hawley R. S. Sherman S. Hassold T. 1996 Recombination and nondisjunction in humans and fliesHum Mol Genet 5 1495 1504
Krawchuk M. D. Wahls W. P. 1999 Centromere mapping functions for aneuploid meiotic products: Analysis of rec8, rec10 and rec11 mutants of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.Genetic 153 49 55
Lagakos S. W. Wessen B. J. et al. 1986 An analysis of contaminated well water and health effects in Woburn, MassachusettsJ Am Stat Assoc, 81 583 596
Lamb N. E. Freeman S. B. Savage-Austin A. Pettay D. Taft L. Hersey J. Gu Y. Shen J. Saker D. May K. M. Avramopoulos D. Petersen M. B. Hallberg A. Mikkelsen M. Hassold T. J. Sherman S. L. 1996 Susceptible chiasmate configurations of chromosome 21 predispose to non-disjunction in both maternal meiosis I and meiosis II.Nat Genet 14 400 405
Lamb N. E. Sherman S. L. Hassold T. J. 2005 Effect of meiotic recombination on the production of aneuploid gametes in humansCytogenet Genome Res 111 250 255
Lejeune J. Gauthier M. Turpin R. 1959 Les chromosomes humains en culture de tissuesC R Acad Sci Paris 248 602 603
Martínez-Frías M. L. Bermejo E. Rodríguez-Pinilla E. Prieto L. 2001 Periconceptional exposure to contraceptive pills and risk for Down syndrome.J Perinatol 21 288 292
Mc Guinness B. E. Anger M. Kouznetsova A. Gil-Bernabé A. M. Helmhart W. Kudo N. R. Wuensche A. Taylor S. Hoog C. Novak B. Nasmyth K. 2009 Regulation of APC/C activity in oocytes by a Bub1-dependent spindle assembly checkpointCurr Biol 19 369 380
Migliore L. Migheli F. Coppedè F. 2009Susceptibility to aneuploidy in young mothers of Down syndrome children. Scientific World Journal 9 1052 1060
Moore D. P. Miyazaki W. Y. Tomkiel J. E. Orr-Weaver T. L. 1994 Double or nothing: a Drosophila mutation affecting meiotic chromosome segregation in both females and malesGenetics 136 953 964
Nasseri A. Mukherjee T. Grifo J. A. Noyes N. Krey L. Copperman A. B. 1999 Elevated day 3 serum follicle stimulating hormone and/or estradiol may predict fetal aneuploidy.Fertil Steril 71 715 718
Needleman H. L. Pueschel S. M. Rothman K. J. 1974Fluoridation and the occurrence of Down’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 291 821 823
Niault T. Hached K. Sotillo R. Sorger P. K. Maro B. Benezra R. Wassmann K. 2007Changing Mad2 levels affects chromosome segregation and spindle assembly checkpoint control in female mouse meiosis I. PLoS One 2, e1165.
Nicklas R. B. 1974Chromosome segregation mechanisms. Genetics 78 205 213
Oliver T. R. Bhise A. Feingold E. Tinker S. Masse N. Sherman S. L. 2009Investigation of factors associated with paternal nondisjunction of chromosome 21. Am J Med Genet A 149A, 1685 1690
Oliver T. R. Feingold E. Yu K. Cheung V. Tinker S. Yadav-Shah M. Masse N. Sherman S. L. 2008New insights into human nondisjunction of chromosome 21 in oocytes. PLoS Genet 4, e1000033.
Orr-Weaver T. 1996Meiotic nondisjunction does the two-step. Nat Genet 14 374 376
Padmanabhan V. T. Sugunan A. P. Brahmaputhran C. K. Nandini K. Pavithran K. 2004Heritable anomalies among the inhabitants of regions of normal and high background radiation in Kerala: results of a cohort study, 1988-1994. Int J Health Serv 34 483 515
Penrose L. S. 1933The relative effect of paternal and maternal age in Mongolism. J Genet 27 219 224
Pogribny I. P. Muskhelishvili L. Miller B. J. James S. J. 1997Presence and consequence of uracil in preneoplastic DNA from folate/methyl-deficient rats, Carcinogenesis 18 2071 2076
Rasooly R. S. New C. M. Zhang P. Hawley R. S. Baker B. S. 1991The lethal (1) TW-6cs mutation of Drosophila melanogaster is a dominant antimorphic allele of nod and is associated with a single base change in the putative ATP-binding domain. Genetics 129 409 422
Reuss M. L. Kline J. Santos R. Levin B. Timor-Tritsch I. 1996Age and the ovarian follicle pool assessed with transvaginal ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174 624 627
Rittler M. Liascovich R. Lopez-Camelo J. Castilla E. E. 2001Parental consanguinity in specific types of congenital anomalies. Am J Med Genet 102 36 43
Roberts D. F. Roberts M. J. Johnston A. W. 1991Genetic epidemiology of Down’s syndrome in Shetland. Hum Genet 87 57 60
Roberts R. Iatropoulou A. Ciantar D. Stark J. Becker D. L. Franks S. Hardy K. 2005Follicle-stimulating hormone affects metaphase I chromosome alignment and aneuploidy in mouse oocytes matured in vitro. Biol Reprod 72 107 118
Ross L. O. Maxfield R. Dawson D. 1996Exchanges are not equally able to enhance meiotic chromosome segregation in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93 4979 4983
Savage A. R. Petersen M. B. Pettay D. Taft L. Allran K. Freeman S. B. Karadima G. Avramopoulos D. Torfs C. Mikkelsen M. Hassold T. J. Sherman S. L. 1998Elucidating the mechanisms of paternal non-disjunction of chromosome 21 in humans. Hum Mol Genet 7 1221 1227
Sayee R. Thomas I. M. 1998Consanguinity, non-disjunction, parental age and Down’s syndrome. J Indian Med Assoc 96 335 337
Scheffer G. J. Broekmans F. J. Dorland M. Habbema J. D. Looman C. W. te Velde. E. R. 1999Antral follicle counts by transvaginal ultrasonography are related to age in women with proven fertility. Fertil Steril 72 845 851
Sciandrello G. Caradonna F. Mauro M. Barbata G. 2004Arsenic-induced DNA hypomethylation affects chromosomal instability in mammalian cells. Carcinogenesis 25 413 417
Sears D. D. Hegemann J. H. Shero J. H. Hieter P. 1995Cis-acting determinants affecting centromere function, sister-chromatid cohesion and reciprocal recombination during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 139 1159 1173
Sherman S. L. Freeman S. B. Allen E. G. Lamb N. E. 2005Risk factors for nondisjunction of trisomy 21.Cytogenet Genome Res 111 273 280
Sherman S. L. Petersen M. B. Freeman S. B. Hersey J. Pettay D. Taft L. Frantzen M. Mikkelsen M. Hassold T. J. 1994Non-disjunction of chromosome 21 in maternal meiosis I: evidence for a maternal age-dependent mechanism involving reduced recombination. Hum Mol Genet 3 1529 1535
Shiono P. H. Klebanoff M. A. Berendes H. W. 1986Congenital malformations and maternal smoking during pregnancy. Teratology 34 65 71
Sperling K. Pelz J. Wegner R. D. Dörries A. Grüters A. Mikkelsen M. 1994Significant increase in trisomy 21 in Berlin nine months after the Chernobyl reactor accident: temporal correlation or causal relation? BMJ. 309 158 162
Steuerwald N. Cohen J. Herrera R. J. Sandalinas M. Brenner C. A. (2001 2001Association between spindle assembly checkpoint expression and maternal age in human oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod 7 49 55
Strigini P. Sansone R. Carobbi S. Pierluigi M. 1990Radiation and Down’s syndrome. Nature 347, 717.
Subramanian V. V. Bickel S. E. 2008Aging predisposes oocytes to meiotic nondisjunction when the cohesin subunit SMC1 is reduced. PLoS Genet 4, e1000263.
Torfs C. P. Christianson R. E. 2000Effect of maternal smoking and coffee consumption on the risk of having a recognized Down syndrome pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 152 1185 1191
Uchida I. A. 1979Radiation-induced nondisjunction. Environ Health Perspect 31 13 17
Van Blerkom J. 2011Mitochondrial function in the human oocyte and embryo and their role in developmental competence. Mitochondrion 11 797 813
van Montfrans J. M. van Hooff M. H. Martens F. Lambalk C. B. 2002Basal FSH, estradiol and inhibin B concentrations in women with a previous Down’s syndrome affected pregnancy. Hum Reprod 17 44 47
Verger P. 1997Down syndrome and ionizing radiation. Health Phys 73 882 893
Wang X. Thomas P. Xue J. Fenech M. 2004Folate deficiency induces aneuploidy in human lymphocytes in vitro- evidence using cytokinesis-blocked cells and probes specific for chromosomes 17 and 21. Mutation Research 551 167 180
Warburton D. 1989The effect of maternal age on the frequency of trisomy: change in meiosis or in utero selection? Prog Clin Biol Res 311 165 181
Warburton D. 2005Biological aging and etiology of aneuploidy. Cytogenetics and Genome Res 111 266 272
Warren A. C. Chakravarti A. Wong C. Slaugenhaupt S. A. Halloran S. L. Watkins P. C. Metaxotou C. Antonarakis S. E. 1987Evidence for reduced recombination on the nondisjoined chromosomes 21 in Down syndrome. Science 237 652 654
Yang Q. Sherman S. L. Hassold T. J. Allran K. Taft L. Pettay D. Khoury M. J. Erickson J. D. Freeman S. B. 1999Risk factors for trisomy 21: maternal cigarette smoking and oral contraceptive use in a population-based case-control study. Genet Med 1 80 88
Zetka M. Rose A. (1995 1995The genetics of meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Trends Genet 11 27 31
Zlotogora J. 1997Genetic disorders among Palestinian Arabs: 1. Effects of consanguinity. Am J Med Genet 68 472 475