Open access

Are the Species of the Genus Avicennia L. (Acanthaceae) a “Superhost” Plants of Gall-Inducing Arthropods in Mangrove Forests?

Written By

Rita de Cassia Oliveira dos Santos, Marcus Emanuel Barroncas Fernandes and Marlucia Bonifácio Martins

Submitted: November 24th, 2011 Published: February 27th, 2013

DOI: 10.5772/55454

From the Edited Volume

Herbivory

Edited by Breno Barros and Marcus E. B. Fernandes

Chapter metrics overview

2,472 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Some plant species, especially angiosperms, present infestation by invertebrates that modify the general appearance of their vegetative and/or reproductive parts, known as galls. The galls are the result of abnormal growth of cells, tissues or organs due to an increase in cell volume (hypertrophy) and/or in the number of cells (hyperplasia) in response to feeding or to stimuli caused by foreign bodies, except for other inducing agents such as fungi and bacteria, which lead to amorphous tumor formation (Rohfritsch & Shorthouse 1982; Dreger-Jauffret & Shorthouse 1992; Raman et al. 2005; Raman 2007).

Gall-inducing arthropods have a highly specific relationship with their host plants, and normally attack only a single or a few closely-related plant species (Dreger-Jauffret & Shorthouse 1992). This degree of specialization facilitates the recognition of the diversity of gall-inducing insects, for example, in a given locality or plant species (Carneiro et al. 2009). The presence in some plant communities of species that support a relative rich fauna of gall-inducing insects has resulted in these plants being referred to as “superhost”, whose local and regional distribution have a decisive influence on the local and regional galling diversity (Veldtman & McGeoch, 2003; Espírito-Santo et al., 2007; Mendonça, 2007).

Some plant species, from a range of biogeographic regions and ecosystems, present a wide variety of gall morphotypes (Fernandes & Price 1988; Waring & Price 1989; Blanche 2000; Stone et al. 2002; Cuevas-Reyes et al. 2003). In the Neotropical region, for example, “superhosts” have been identified in a number of different habitat types, such as highland rocky grassland (“campo rupestre”), involving the species Baccharis concinna (Carneiro et al. 2005) and Baccharis pseudomyriocefala (Lara et al. 2002), and Copaifera langsdorffii (Oliveira et al. 2008), associated with litholic habitats (“canga”), as well as halophytic formations, where examples include Eugenia umbelliflora (Maia 2001b; Monteiro et al. 2004) and Guapira opposita (Oliveira & Maia 2005). In the temperate zone, Waring & Price (1989) and Gagné & Waring (1990) have also identified the creosote bush (Larrea tridentata) as a “superhost” for Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) species of the Asphondylia auripila group.

The vast majority of the studies of herbivory by insects in mangrove forests have focused on leaf-chewing species (Cannicci et al. 2008), adding the fact that little is known about interactions involving endophytic forms such as leaf miners or gall-inducing species (Gonçalves-Alvim et al. 2001; Burrows 2003; Menezes & Peixoto 2009).

The genus Avicennia has pantropical distribution, comprising the following species: A. alba Blume, A. bicolor Standley, A. eucalyptifolia (Zipp. ex Miq.) Moldenke, A. germinans (L.) Stearn, A. integra Duke, A. lanata Ridley, A. marina (Forks.) Vierh., A. officinalis L., A. rumphiana Hallier f. e A. schaueriana Stapf and Leechman ex Moldenke (WORMS 2010). Based on the fact that the genus Avicennia presents a great variety of gall morphotypes and hence many gall-inducing arthropods, the present study aims to review this plant-gall association describing what is known so far, and to verify whether the species of Avicennia are “superhost” plants of tropical mangrove forests.

Advertisement

2. Gall-inducing arthropods and their hosts in mangrove worldwide

Of the nine species of gall-inducing arthropods described for mangrove plants in different parts of the world, two species (Acari: Eriophyidae) were described in the genus Laguncularia L. (Combretaceae) (Flechtmann et al. 2007) and seven species (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in the genus Avicennia L. (Acanthaceae) (Cook 1909; Felt 1921; Gagné & Law 1998; Gagné & Etienne 1996). Besides, there are twenty-two morphotyped already described, totalizing 29 species of Cecidomyiidae recorded on four species of Avicennia (Table 1). Table 1 also presents three other groups of arthropods (Acari, Hemiptera, and Hymenoptera), which have been registered associated with mangroves around the world, and the family Cecidomyiidae stands out as the main group of galling in this ecosystem.

In fact, the species of the genus Avicennia have been identified as hosts of gall- inducing cecidomyiids in the Neotropical region since the beginning of the twentieth century. Gagné & Etienne (1996) reviewed the data on this phenomenon and proposed that the insect Cecidomyia avicenniae (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae), described by Cook in 1909 in Avicennia nitida in Cuba and Central America, should be reassigned to the species Meunieriella avicenniae (Cook). They also emphasized the fact that Tomlinson (1986) considered A. nitida to be a synonym of A. germinans.

Galls similar to those described by Cook at the beginning of the century were also identified subsequently in A. tomentosa in the Brazilian state of Bahia (Tavares 1918), and in Avicennia officinalis in French Guiana (Houard 1924). However, the two mangrove species identified in these studies were in fact A. germinans or Avicennia schaueriana, given that A. tomentosa is a synonym of A. germinans and A. officinalis is found only in the Old World (Tomlinson 1986).

Plant hostInducing taxonReference
A. germinansCECIDOMYIIDAE
(6 spp.)Meunieriella avicenniaeTavares 1918; Houard 1924; Gagné & Etienne 1996
Undet. sp. A
Undet. sp. B
Jiménez 2004
Undet. sp. BJiménez 2004
Undet. sp. CJiménez 2004
PSYLLIDAE
Telmapsylla minutaJiménez 2004
ACARI
Undet. sp. AJiménez 2004
A. marinaCECIDOMYIIDAE
(16 spp.)Actilasioptera coronataGagné & Law 1998
Actilasioptera falcariaKathiresan 2003
Actilasioptera pustulataGagné & Law 1998
Actilasioptera subfoliumGagné & Law 1998
Actilasioptera tuberculataGagné & Law 1998
Actilasioptera tumidifoliumGagné & Law 1998
Undet. sp. A
Undet. sp. B
Undet. sp. C
Undet. sp. D
Undet. sp. E
Sharma & Das 1994; Sharma et al. 2003
Undet. sp. BSharma & Das 1994; Sharma et al. 2003
Undet. sp. CSharma & Das 1994; Sharma et al. 2003
Undet. sp. DSharma & Das 1994; Sharma et al. 2003
Undet. sp. ESharma & Das 1994; Sharma et al. 2003
Undet. sp. FSharma & Das 1994; Sharma et al. 2003
ERYOPHYIDAE
Undet. sp. AGagné & Law 1998
COCCIDAE
Undet. sp. AGagné & Law 1998
ACARI or INSECTA
Undet. sp. AGagné & Law 1998
HYMENOPTERA
Undet. sp. ASharma & Das 1994; Sharma et al. 2003
A. officinalisCECIDOMYIIDAE
(4 spp.)Actilasioptera falcariaRaw & Murphy 1990
Undet. sp. ARaw & Murphy 1990
Undet. sp. BRaw & Murphy 1990
ERYOPHYIDAE
Eriophyes sp.Raw & Murphy 1990
A. schauerianaUndet. sp. AMaia et al. 2008
(3 spp.)Meunierilla aviceniaeMenezes & Peixoto 2009
Undet. sp. BPresent study

Table 1.

Gall-inducing arthropods on species of Avicennia

In addition, Gagné (1994) identified rounded and smooth galls in A. germinans in Florida (USA) and Belize, while Gagné & Etienne (1996) identified the same gall morphotypes in specimens of A. germinans in Guadalupe and San Martin, in Central America. In Belize, Central America, Farnsworth & Ellison (1991) identified two gall morphotypes in A. germinans, but without identifying the inducing agent. Jiménez (2004) highlighted the presence of leaf galls induced by Telmapsylla minuta (Psyllidae: Homoptera), by three undetermined species of Cecidomyiidae, and an unidentified mite species in A. germinans, in Costa Rica.

In Ranong, Thailand, the occurrence of four gall-inducing insects in A. officinalis was recorded, being two induced by undetermined species of Cecidomyiidae, one by an unidentified mite species belonging to the family Eriophyidae and another by Stefaniella falcaria Felt (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) (Rau & Murphy, 1990). Subsequently, Gagné & Law (1998) reviewed a material from Java and redescribed and transferred the species Stefaniella falcaria to the new genus Actilasioptera.

Regarding A. schaueriana, at least three species of Cecidomyiidae are involved in leaf gall-inducing in this species, two in southeastern Brazil, Meunieriella avicennae (= Cecidomyia avicennae) and an undetermined (Maia et al., 2008; Menezes & Peixoto, 2009), and another in the northern region (present study).

Gagné & Law (1998) described from Queensland, Australia, five gall-inducing insects of the family Cecidomyiidae in A. marina, all of which belong to a new genus, Actiolasioptera (A. coronata Gagné, 1998; A. pustulata Gagné, 1998; A. subfolium Gagné, 1998; A. tuberculata Gagné, 1998; A. tumidifolium Gagné, 1998). In addition to these midge species, a eriophyid mite (Acari), a coccid (Homoptera), and an unknown arthropod gall were identified in A. marina in Australia. In addition, Sharma & Das (1984) and Sharma et al. (2003) recorded six undetermined species of Cecidomyiidae (leaf gall) and an unidentified species of Hymenoptera (stem gall) for A. marina, from the coastal region of Andaman and Vikhroli, Marahashtra, India. Kathiresan (2003) also recorded Stephaniella falcaria (=Actilasioptera falcaria) in the mangrove forests of Pichavaram, southeastern coast of India. Burrows (2003), investigating herbivory in mangroves near Townsville, Queensland, Australia, recorded at least ten gall morphotypes to this mangrove species, without identifying, however, the gall-inducing agents.

Advertisement

3. Gall morphotypes in Avicennia

The vast majority of gall-inducing arthropods is restricted to a single host plant species, thus corroborating the idea that the gall morphotype can be used as reliable substitutes of gall-inducing species. In addition, polymorphism of galls, which could lead to the occurrence of failures in the identification of galls, appears to be a rather rare phenomenon (Carneiro et al. 2009).

Numerous surveys have been conducted in different regions of Brazil in an attempt to identify the diversity of gall-inducing agents in different ecosystems (Fernandes & Price 1988; Gonçalves-Alvim & Fernandes 2001; Fernandes & Negreiros 2006; Araújo et al. 2007; Maia et al. 2008; Carneiro et al. 2009). Given that some species of the genus Avicennia support many gall-inducing arthropods throughout their geographic distribution, it is expected a greater diversity of gall-inducing arthropods and a wide variety of gall morphotypes growing on their organs (Table 2).

Advertisement

4. New records of gall morphotypes in Avicennia of the north coast Brazil

Given the wide distribution of the genus Avicennia around the world, it is clear that the interaction between galls and Avicennia species is an import gap in our understanding of the role of these trees in the mangrove system. At this topic, in addition to the literature review, new records of gall morphotypes found in Avicennia on the Ajuruteua Peninsula (00o57,9’S-46o44,2’W), on Brazil’s Amazon coast (Fig. 1) will be also presented. Data collection was carried out in October/2010 and leaves from 20 individuals of A. germinans were collected simultaneously.

A total of 11,448 leaves were counted on the 20 specimens of A. germinans. Of this total, only 17% (n=1,970) had galls, which were classified in 14 distinct morphotypes, based on their coloration and morphological features (Fig. 2 and Table 3).

Among 4,787 morphotyped galls, conical ones were the most common (n=1,101 – 23%), while disc galls were the rarest (n=9 – 0.2%). The number of galls per leaf varied from one to 41, with an average of 4.7±1.5 galls. Table 3 also indicates that an additional 2,313 galls – almost a third of the total of 7,100 recorded in the study – were not identified, due to be either damaged (DAM) or in an initial stage of development (ISD). The total number of galls in the individuals of A. germinans sampled at the Furo do Taici must be higher, although stem galls have been observed in different branches, they were not counted in the present study.

Plant hostOrganFormGeographic locationReference
A. germinans or
A. schaueriana
LeafRound and smooth on the upper surface and warty on the lower surface, a craterlike exit hole eventually developsCubaCook 1909; Tavares 1918; Houard, 1924
A. germinansLeafNo descriptionBelizeFarnsworth & Ellison 1991
A. germinansLeafNo descriptionCosta RicaJiménez 2004
A. germinansLeafNo descriptionCosta RicaJiménez 2004
A. germinansLeafNo descriptionCosta RicaJiménez 2004
A. officinalisLeafGregarious small gallThailandRau & Murphy 1990
A. officinalisLeafNo descriptionIndiaKatherisan 2003
A. officinalisLeafSmall globular gallThailandRau & Murphy 1990
A. officinalisLeaf, Petiole and/or shootLarge globular gallThailandRau & Murphy 1990
A. officinalisLeaf (abaxial surface of midvein)Keel-like gallThailandRau & Murphy 1990
A. officinalisLeafLarge flattened gall ThailandRau & Murphy 1990
A. officinalisLeafSmall, widely scattered pouch gallThailandRau & Murphy 1990
A. officinalisLeafThe gall is a 1 cm diameter swelling situated on or very near leaf midvein, is unevenly round and apparent both leaf surfacesJavaGagné & Law 1998
A. germinans LeafRound and smooth on the upper surface and warty on the lower surface, a craterlike exit hole eventually developsBelize and USAGagné 1994
A. germinansLeafRound and smooth on the upper surface and warty on the lower surface, a craterlike exit hole eventually developsGuadeloupe and Saint MartinGagné & Etienne 1996
A. germinansLeafSpheroid on the abaxial and adaxial surfacesBrazilGonçalves-Alvim et al. 2001
A. marinaLeafNo descriptionIndiaKatherisan 2003
A. marinaLeafSmall, unevenly hemispheroid and warty on the upper surface, craterlike on the lower surface AustraliaGagné & Law 1998
A. marinaLeafCircular and flat on the upper surface, nearly evenly hemispherical on the lower surfaceAustraliaGagné & Law 1998
A. marinaLeafLarge, mostly soft, simple leaf swelling, apparent on only the lower surfaceAustraliaGagné & Law 1998
A. marinaLeafCircular basally, with one or more elongate, conical projections arising from it on the upper surface AustraliaGagné & Law 1998
A. marinaLeafLarge, simple, convex leaf swelling, apparent on both leaf surfacesAustraliaGagné & Law 1998; Burrows 2003
A. marinaLeafNo descriptionAustraliaGagné & Law 1998
A. marinaLeafNo descriptionAustraliaGagné & Law 1998
A. marinaLeafNo descriptionAustraliaGagné & Law 1998
A. marinaLeafEdge gallAustraliaBurrows 2003
A. marinaLeafTower/Spike gallAustraliaBurrows 2003
A. marinaLeafCabbage gallAustraliaBurrows 2003
A. marinaLeafYellow lamp gallAustraliaBurrows 2003
A. marinaLeafMarble gallAustraliaBurrows 2003
A. marinaLeafMidvein gallAustraliaBurrows 2003
A. marinaLeafAcne gallAustraliaBurrows 2003
A. marinaLeafRaised-pit gallAustraliaBurrows 2003
A. marinaLeafPimple gallAustraliaBurrows 2003
A. marinaStemStem gallAustraliaBurrows 2003
A. schauerianaLeafUnilocular globoid gallBrazilMaia et al. 2008;
A. schauerianaLeafNo descriptionBrazilMenezes & Peixoto 2009
A. schauerianaLeafNo descriptionBrazilPresent study

Table 2.

Gall morphotypes of Avicennia

Figure 1.

Location of the study area (Furo do Taici) on the Ajuruteua Peninsula, Bragança, Pará.

Figure 2.

2-17 Gall morphotypes observed on the leaves of A. germinans: GAB: Globular - 2) adaxial surface, 3) abaxial surface; GBD: Globular - 4) adaxial surface, 5) abaxial surface; GCC: Globular with a central concavity - 6) adaxial surface, 7) abaxial surface; GAD: Globular - 8) adaxial surface, 9) abaxial surface; GLO: Globoid - 10) adaxial surface, 11) abaxial surface; GTA: Globular with a tapering free portion - 12) adaxial surface, 13) abaxial surface; FLA: Flattened - 14) adaxial surface, 15) abaxial surface; CYL: Cylindrical - 16) adaxial surface, 17) abaxial surface.

Figure 3.

18-29 Gall morphotypes observed on the leaves of A. germinans: CON: Conical - 18) adaxial surface, 19) abaxial surface; VLC: Volcanic crater - 20) adaxial superfície, 21) abaxial surface; DIS: Discoid - 22) adaxial surface, 23) abaxial surface; MDR: Midrib - 24) adaxial surface, 25) abaxial surface; PET: Petiolar - 26: adaxial surface, 27) abaxial surface; AOV: Aggregated Ovoid Gall - 28) adaxial surface, 29) abaxial surface.

Six of the 14 morphotypes identified during the study were globular in shape (to varying degrees): i) lobular gall on the abaxial surface of the leaf – monolocular, with opening on the adaxial surface (GAB); ii) globular gall on the abaxial and adaxial surfaces – globular on both surfaces, with opening on the adaxial surface (GBD); iii) globular gall with central concavity – monolocular, with opening on the adaxial surface (GCC); iv) globular gall on the adaxial surface of the leaf – monolocular (GAD); v) globoid gall – monolocular, normally very close to one another and more globular on the adaxial surface (GLO); vi) globular gall – monolocular, globular base on the abaxial surface with a tapering free portion (GTA); vii) flattened gall with a slit-like opening – monolocular, globoid on the adaxial surface, with opening on the adaxial surface (FLA); viii) cylindrical gall – globoid on the adaxial surface, with opening at the base of the cylindrical portion, on the abaxial surface (CYL); ix) conical gall – monolocular gall with a conical shape on both surfaces of the leaf and opening on the adaxial surface, coloration changes from greenish to purplish during senescence (CON); x) volcanic crater gall – globoid on the adaxial surface, opening in the tubular portion on the abaxial surface, often grouped (VLC); xi) discoid gall – monolocular, globoid only on the adaxial surface (DIS); xii) gall on the midrib of the leaf – appears as a thickening of the midrib, often individually but also in closely-spaced agglomerations, opening on the adaxial surface (MDR); xiii) petiolar gall – appears as a thickening of the petiole (PET); xiv) aggregated ovoid gall – distributed very close together in circular, flower-shaped groups (AOV) (Table 4).

Finally, a subsample of the fourteen morphotyped galls were separated and placed in plastic pots to await the emergence of gall-inducing arthropods. Of the gall-inducing insects isolated from the leaves of A. germinans, seven morphotypes were identified as belonging to the family Cecidomyiidae (Table 3).

MorphotypeNumber of gallsMean galls per plant (±SD; n=20)%
IdentifiedCON1,10155.1±42.815.5
AOV92246.1±43.913.0
GAB68534.3±32.49.6
GCC59129.6±28.58.3
MDR39819.9±17.25.6
GLO39719.9±34.35.6
PET23711.9±29.73.3
GBD1467.3±9.92.1
CYL1417.1±16.82.0
VLC552.8±4.30.8
GAD542.7±4.90.8
GTA361.8±2.50.5
FLA150.8±2.00.2
DIS90.5±0.60.1
Subtotal4,787
UnidentifiedISD1,83791.9±71.925.8
DAM47623.8±23.56.7
Subtotal2,313
Total7,100355.4±244.6100

Table 3.

Number (total, mean ± standard deviation) and relative frequency (%) of galls by morphotype found on 1,970 leaves of Avicennia germinans (L.) Stearn (Acanthaceae), in the Furo do Taici of the Ajuruteua Peninsula in Bragança, in the Brazilian state of Pará. IDENTIFIED: CON = Conical gall; AOV = Aggregated Ovoid gall; GAB = Globular gall – Abaxial surface; GCC = Globular gall with a Central Concavity; MDR = Midrib gall; GLO = Globoid gall; PET = Petiolar gall; GBD = Globular gall – Abaxial and Adaxial surfaces; CYL = Cylindrical gall; VLC = Volcanic Crater gall; GAD = Globular gall – Adaxial surface; GTA = Globular gall with a tapering free portion; FLA = Flattened gall; DIS = Discoid gall. UNIDENTIFIED: ISD = Initial stage of development; DAM = Damaged; SD = Standard Deviation.

MorphotypeshapeOrgan/LocationColorPusbescenceChamberOcurrence
CONConicalLeafGreen/PurpleGlabrousOneIsolated
AOVAggregated ovoidLeafGreenGlabrousOneCoalescent
GABGlobular concavityLeafGreenGlabrousOneIsolated
GCCGlobular with central concavityLeafGreenGlabrousOneIsolated
MDRMidribLeafGreenGlabrousSeveralIsolated
GLOGloboidLeafGreenGlabrousOneCoalescent
PETPetiolarLeaf/PetioleGreenGlabrousSeveralIsolated
GBDGlobularLeafGreenGlabrousOneIsolated
CYLCylindricalLeafGreenGlabrousOneIsolated
VLCVolcanic craterLeafGreenGlabrousOneIsolated/
Coalescent
GADGlobular woodyLeafGreenGlabrousOneIsolated
GTAGlobular with tapering free portionLeafGreenGlabrousOneIsolated
FLAFlattenedLeafGreenGlabrousOneIsolated
DISDiscoidLeafGreenGlabrousOneIsolated

Table 4.

Description of the gall morphotypes identified on the leaves of Avicennia germinans (L.) Stearn (Acanthaceae), in the Furo do Taici of the Ajuruteua Peninsula in Bragança, in the Brazilian state of Pará. CON = Conical gall; AOV = Aggregated Ovoid gall; GAB = Globular gall – Abaxial surface; GCC = Globular gall with a Central Concavity; MDR = Midrib gall; GLO = Globoid gall; PET = Petiolar gall;.GBD = Globular gall – Abaxial and Adaxial surfaces; CYL: Cylindrical gall; VLC = Volcanic Crater gall; GAD = Globular gall – Adaxial surface; GTA = Globular gall with a tapering free portion; FLA = Flattened gall; DIS = Discoid gall;

Advertisement

5. Conclusions

The genus Avicennia presents a pioneer group of species which is highly tolerant of salinity (Hogarth 1999), and has leaves with high levels of total nitrogen (Medina et al. 2001), low levels of secondary compounds (Roth 1992), and high leaf productivity with less energy investment (Cannicci et al. 2008). In addition to the wide distribution of this genus, where Avicennia species occur they are often abundant and the dominant species. These characteristics, together with the reduced plant diversity of the mangrove ecosystem on a regional scale (Menezes et al. 2008), are probably among the key factors to determine the preference of endophytic herbivores for this species.

However, Blanche (2000) notes that the available studies have reported different effects of plant species richness on the diversity of gall-inducing insects, and according to Veldtman & McGeoch (2003), in some areas taxonomic composition of the vegetation appears to be more important than species richness.

At present, of the ten currently recognized species of Avicennia, four have already been registered with galls: A. germinans, A. marina, A. officinalis, and A. schaueriana. In total, 44 gall morphotypes have already been recorded for species of Avicennia (Table 2), and therefore it must be considered as a “superhost” genus. The terminology “superhost” for a botanical genus has been previously proposed by Mendonça (2007).

Avicennia germinans and A. marina are, by far, the mangrove species with the greatest known variety of gall-inducing arthropods, with 22 and 19 galls, respectively, which doubtless characterizes both species as “superhost” plants. In the case of A. germinans, the categories DAM and ISD, together with the stem galls, suggest that this particular species may have an even larger number of gall morphotypes. In addition, A. officinalis and A. schaueriana, may also be considered potential “superhost” plants, since available records showed four and three species of gall-inducing arthropods associated with both species, respectively (Table 1 and 2). The species of Avicennia are similar with respect to their chemical, morphological, anatomical and ecological traits, which favor its infestation by several species of galling arthropods in different geographic regions (Tomlinson, 1986; Burrows, 2003). This fact becomes even more pronounced in areas that have low mangrove plant diversity and where other plant species have characteristics that prevent colonization by arthropods (e.g. sclerophyllous leaves and high amounts of secondary compounds), as in the genus Rhizophora.

Thus, it is important to bear in mind that Avicennia species appears to have a similar role in the trophic chain of the endophytic herbivores of the mangrove forest. Of the ten species of the genus Avicennia, only four have been recorded on the literature. Thus, it is likely that with the increasing progress the work on the interaction of arthropods with this botanical genus, it also increases the number of records of the endophytic herbivores.

The effect of arthropod herbivore activities may negative and positively impact both the mangrove trees and the ecosystem. Cannicci et al. (2008) pointed out that herbivory is usually considered to be a negative impact, due to the fact that they are more apparent and readily measured than positive ones. Regarding the fact that many gall-inducing organisms are associated with the genus Avicennia, it may be a considerable positive contribution to the overall diversity of herbivores in mangroves. Likewise, the premature abscission of a large quantity of leaf material (Burrows 2003) and the conversion of leaves into frass by caterpillars (Fernandes et al. 2009) may cause positive impacts on either individual or ecosystem, respectively, by providing high leaf yield for the trees and rich nutrient supply for the mangrove per se.

Acknowledgement

We thank Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Pará (FAPESPA) (Edital No 004/2007) and Instituto Internacional de Estudos Brasileiros (IIEB) – Programa BECA (Scholarship – B/2007/02/BDP/05), for the financial support to RCOS.

References

  1. 1. AraújoW. SGomes-kleinV. LSantosB. B2007Galhas entomógenas associadas à vegetação do parque estadual da serra dos pireneus, Pirenópolis, Goiás, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biociências, 54547
  2. 2. BlancheK. R2000Diversity of insect-induced galls along a temperature-rainfall gradient in the tropical savannah region of the Northern Territory, Australia. Austral Ecology, 25: 311−318.
  3. 3. BurrowsD. W2003The role of insect leaf herbivory on the mangroves Avicennia marina and Rhizophora stylosa. Ph.D. thesis, James Cook University, 238 p.
  4. 4. CannicciSBurrows, D; Fratini, S; Smith III, T. J.; Offenberg, J. & Dahdouh-Guebas, F. (2008Faunal impact on vegetation structure and ecosystem function in mangrove forests: A review. Aquatic Botany, 89: 186−200.
  5. 5. CarneiroM. A. AFernandesG. WDe SouzaO. F. F2005Convergence in the Variation of Local and Regional Galling Species Richness. Neotropical Entomology, 34:547−553.
  6. 6. CarneiroM. A. ABrancoC. S. ABragaC. E. DAlmadaE. DCostaM. B. MMaiaV. CFernandesG. W2009Gall midge species (Diptera,Cecidomyiidae) host-plant specialists? Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 53365378
  7. 7. CookM. T1909Some insects gall of Cuba. Estación Central Agronomica de Cuba, 2: 143−146.
  8. 8. Cuevas-reyesPSiebeCMartinez-ramosMOyamaK2003Species richness of gall-forming insects in a tropical rain forest: correlations with plant diversity and soil fertility. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12: 411−422.
  9. 9. Dreger-jauffretFShorthouseJ. D1992Diversity of gall-inducing insects and their galls, 833In: J. D. Shorthouse & O. Rohfritsch (Eds.). Biology of insect-induced galls, New York, Oxford University Press, xi+285 p.
  10. 10. Espírito-santoM. MNevesF. SAndrade-netoF. RFernandesG. W2007Plant architecture and meristem dynamics as the mechanisms determining the diversity of gall-inducing insects. Oecologia, 153353364
  11. 11. FarnsworthE. JEllisonA. M1991Patterns of herbivory in Belizean mangrove swamps. Biotropica, 23: 555−567.
  12. 12. FeltE. E1921Javanese gall midges. Treubia, 1139151
  13. 13. FernandesG. WPriceP. W1988Biogeographical gradients in galling species richness: test of hypotheses. Oecologia (Berl.), 76: 161−167.
  14. 14. FernandesG. WNegreirosD2006A comunidade de insetos galhadores da RPPN fazenda bulcão, Aimorés, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Lundiana, 7111120
  15. 15. FernandesM. E. BNascimentoA. A. MCarvalhoM. L2009Effects of herbivory by Hyblaea puera (Hyblaeidea: Lepidoptera) on litter production in the mangrove on coast of Brazilian Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 25: 337−339.
  16. 16. FlechtmannC. H. WSantos-mendonçaI. VAlmeida-cortezJ. S2007A new species of Brachendus (Acari, Eriophyidae) associated with the white mangrove, Laguncularia racemosa (Combretaceae), in Brazil. International Journal Acarology 33195198
  17. 17. GagnéR. J1994The gall midges of neotropical region. Ithaca, Comstock, xiv+352 p.
  18. 18. GagnéR. JEtienneJ1996Meunieriella avicenniae (Cook) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) the leaf gall marker of black mangrove in the American tropics. Proceedings Entomological Society of Washington, 98: 527−532.
  19. 19. GagnéR. JLawL. J1998Actilasioptera (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), a new genus for Australiasian and Asian gall midges of grey mangroves, Avicennia spp. (Avicenniaceae), 22In: Csoka, G., Mattson, W.J., Stone, G.N. and Price, P.W (eds.). The Biology of Gall-Inducing Arthropods. Minnesota, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 329 p.
  20. 20. GagnéR. JWaringG. L1990The Asphondylia (Cecidomyiidae: Diptera) of creosote bush (Larrea tridentata) in North America. Proceedings Entomological Society Washington, 92649671
  21. 21. Gonçalves-alvimS. JFernandesG. W2001Comunidades de insetos galhadores (Insecta) em diferentes fisionomias do cerrado em Minas Gerais, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 18 (supl. 1): 289-305.
  22. 22. Gonçalves-alvimS. JSantosM. C. F. VFernandesG. W2001Leaf gall abundance on Avicennia germinans (Avicenniaceae) along interstitial salinity gradient. Biotropica, 33: 69−77.
  23. 23. HogarthP. J1999The biology of mangroves. New York, Oxford University Press, 288 p.
  24. 24. HouardC1924Les collections cécidologiques du laboratoire d’entomologie du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris: galles de la Guyane Française. Marcellia, 21:97−128.
  25. 25. JiménezJ. A2004Mangrove forests under dry seasonal climates in Costa Rica. In: Frankie, G. W., Mata, A. & Vinson, S. B. (Eds.). Biodiversity Conservation in Costa Rica: Learning the lessons in a seasonal dry Forest. Berkely and Los Angeles, California. University of California Press. 343 p.
  26. 26. KathiresanK2003Insect folivory in mangroves. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 32237239
  27. 27. LaraA. C. FFernandesG. WGonçalves-alvimS. J2002Tests of hypotheses on patterns of gall distribution along an altitudinal gradient. Tropical Zoology, 15: 219−232.
  28. 28. MaiaV. C2001bThe gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) from three restingas of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 8583630
  29. 29. MaiaV. CMagentaM. A. GMartinsS. E2008Ocorrência e caracterização de galhas de insetos em áreas de restinga de Bertioga (São Paulo, Brasil). Biota Neotropica, 8: 167−197.
  30. 30. MedinaEGiarrizoTMenezesMCarvalho Lira, M.; Carvalho, E. A.; Peres, A.; Silva, B. A.; Vilhena, R.; Reise, A. & Braga, F. C. (2001Mangal communities of the “Salgado Paraense”: Ecological heterogeneity along the Bragança peninsula assessed through soil and leaf analyses. Amazoniana, 16: 397−416.
  31. 31. Mendonça JrM. S. (2007Plant diversity and galling arthropod diversity searching for taxonomic patterns in an animal-plant interaction in the Neotropics. Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 4234
  32. 32. MenezesM. P. MBergerUMehligU2008Mangrove vegetation in Amazonia: a review of studies from the coast of Pará and Maranhão States, north Brazil. Acta Amazonica, 38: 403−420.
  33. 33. MenezesL. F. TPeixotoA. L2009Leaf damage in a mangrove swamp at Sepetiba Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Revista Brasileira Botânica, 32: 715−724.
  34. 34. MonteiroR. FOdaR. AConstantinoP. A. LNaraharaK. L2004Galhas: diversidade, especificidade e distribuição, 127141In: Rocha, C. F. D.; Esteves, F. A. & Scarano, F. R. (Orgs.). Pesquisas de longa Duração na Restinga de Jurubatiba: Ecologia, História Natural e Conservação, 1p. 127-141. São Carlos, RiMa Editora, vii+376 p.
  35. 35. OliveiraD. CDrummondM. MMoreiraA. S. F. PSoaresG. L. GIsaiasR. M. S2008Potencialidades morfogênicas de Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. (Fabaceae): super-hospedeira de herbívoros galhadores. Revista Biologia Neotropical, 5: 31−39.
  36. 36. OliveiraJ. CMaiaV. C2005Ocorrência e caracterização de galhas de insetos na restinga de Grumari (Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil). Arquivos do Museu Nacional, 63669675
  37. 37. RamanA2007Insect-induced plant galls of India: unresolved questions. Current Science, 92748757
  38. 38. RamanASchaeferC. WWithersT. M2005Biology, ecology, and evolution of gall-inducing arthropods, 1and 2. New Hampshire, Science Publishers Inc., xxi+817 p.
  39. 39. RauM. TMurphyD. H1990Herbivore attack on mangrove plants at Ranong. Mangrove Ecosystems Occasional Papers, 7
  40. 40. RohfritschOShorthouseJ. D1982Insect galls, 131In: G. Kahl & J. S. chell (eds.). Molecular biology of plant tumors, New York, Academic Press, xxiv+615 p.
  41. 41. RothI1992Leaf structure: coastal vegetation and mangroves of Venezuela. Berlin, Gebrüder Borntraeger, 172 p.
  42. 42. SharmaR. MDasA. K1984Further contribution to the knowledge of Zoocecidia of mangrove Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vier. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, 81: 123−126.
  43. 43. SharmaR. MJoshiP. VShindikarM2003First report on plant galls (zoocecidia) from mangrove swamps of Vikhroli, Maharashtra. Zoos’ Print Journal, 18: 1217−1219.
  44. 44. StoneG. NSchönroggeKAtkinsonR. JBellidoDPujade-villarJ2002The population biology of oak gall wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Annual Review of Entomology, 47633668
  45. 45. TavaresJ. S1918Cecidologia brazileira. Cecidias que se criam nas plantas das famílias das Verbenaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Malvaceae, Anacardiaceae, Labiatae, Rosaceae, Anonaceae, Ampelidaceae, Bignoniaceae, Aristolochiaceae e Solanaceae. Broteria: Série Zoológica, 162168
  46. 46. TomlinsonP. B1986The botany of mangroves. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 413p.
  47. 47. VeldtmanRMcgeochM. A2003Gall forming insect species richness along a non-scleromorphic vegetation rainfall gradient in South Africa: The importance of plant community composition. Australian Ecology 28113
  48. 48. WaringG. LPriceP. W1989Parasitoid pressure and the radiation of a gall-forming group (Cecidomyiidae: Asphondylia spp.) on creosote bush (Larrea tridentata). Oecologia, 79293299
  49. 49. WORMS2010World Mangroves database. In: Dahdouh-Guebas F. (Ed.) (2010). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species 1717pwww.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=235131 on 2011-02-11.

Written By

Rita de Cassia Oliveira dos Santos, Marcus Emanuel Barroncas Fernandes and Marlucia Bonifácio Martins

Submitted: November 24th, 2011 Published: February 27th, 2013