Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Lipids as Markers of Induced Resistance in Wheat: A Biochemical and Molecular Approach

By Christine Tayeh, Béatrice Randoux, Frédéric Laruelle, Natacha Bourdon, Delphine Renard-Merlier and Philippe Reignault

Submitted: November 14th 2011Reviewed: July 3rd 2012Published: January 23rd 2013

DOI: 10.5772/51279

Downloaded: 2065

1. Introduction

Plant disease resistance can be defined as the ability of the plant to prevent or restrict pathogen growth and multiplication. All plants, whether they are resistant or susceptible, respond to pathogen attack by the induction of a coordinated resistance strategy. Acceleration and/or amplification of the plant responses by the application of resistance inducers could provide a biologically, environmentally and commercially viable alternative to existing pathogen control methods [1].

Among pathogenic fungi, the obligate parasite Blumeria graminisf. sp. tritici(Bgt) is responsible for wheat (Triticum aestivum) powdery mildew, one of the most damaging foliar diseases of this crop, especially in Northern Europe. Worldwide yield losses due to wheat powdery mildew would be about 30% without chemical treatments, so that an extensive use of conventional fungicides is undertaken. Moreover, populations of Bgtresistant to the main chemical fungicides (ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors, EBIs and 2-aminopyridines) are rising, and these resistant strains emerged all over most European territories [2]. New disease management strategies based on the use of molecules that induce plant resistance viathe elicitation of defence responses are therefore developed in order to reduce the use of conventional fungicides. These strategies match the growing concern about the consequences of the use of fungicides on both health and environment [3,4].

Induced partial resistance against B. graminisf.sp. triticihas been obtained in wheat with different elicitors and resistance inducers. Infection level was reduced to 57% and 58% relative to controls when nonacetylated and acetylated oligogalacturonides, respectively, were sprayed on wheat 48h before inoculation with Bgt[5]. Trehalose, a non-reducing disaccharide found in a wide variety of organisms, confers a 60% protection level against powdery mildew [6]. It has also been shown that a double spraying of wheat plantlets with salicylic acid (SA) confers a 65% protection level against powdery mildew [7]. Prophylactic efficacies of Iodus 40® and heptanoyl salicylic acid (HSA) against wheat powdery mildew have been tested [8]. Iodus 40®, a commercial product, is used to decrease wheat powdery mildew damage in the field. Its active ingredient is laminarin, a storage β-1,3-D-glucan (polysaccharide), extracted from the brown alga Laminaria digitata. It induces protection in grapevine against Botrytis cinereaand Plasmopara viticola[9] as well as in wheat against powdery mildew [8]. HSA is synthesized by esterification of 2-OH benzoic acid by heptanoic acid [7]. Plantlets treated twice exhibited 60% and 100% protection levels, respectively [8]. A long up-to-run-off spraying of wheat leaves with Milsana®, an ethanolic extract from leaves of the giant knotweed Reynoutria sachaliensis, 48h before inoculation led to a 97% protection level against powdery mildew [10]. No direct effect against the fungus has been noticed for any of these elicitors [8] except for Milsana® which exhibited a direct fungistatic effect on B. graminisconidia germination [10]. It is now necessary to understand the mode of action and the cascade of cellular and molecular events triggered by these wheat resistance inducers.

In the last fifteen years, SA itself has been described as playing a key role in the activation of defence systems against pathogens in plants. Despite several reports [11-14], works focusing on SA as a resistance inducer are far from being as extensive as those concerning BTH, a functional analogue of SA, and, as far as we know, a single one involved wheat [8].

Plant lipids and lipid metabolic pathways have been shown to be of crucial importance during a plant-pathogen interaction. Many changes in membrane lipids are known to occur in plants at the site of infection. Moreover, lipids and lipid metabolites, released from membranes, function and act as signal molecules in the activation of plant defence responses [15].

Over the past few years, it has become increasingly clear that phosphatidic acid (PA) is involved in stress signaling because it is rapidly and transiently formed in response to various environmental stimuli [16]. PA could be generated by 2 distinct pathways as shown in figure 1: a first one involves phospholipase D (PLD) acting hydrolytically on membrane phospholipids, particularly phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE); a second one involves phospholipase C (PLC) acting sequentially with diacylglycerol kinase (DGK) viadiacylglycerol (DAG) phosphorylation [17].

Phospholipid-signaling pathways are complex, interrelated, and involve numerous enzymes and substrates [18]. As an ubiquitous enzyme family, phospholipases play various roles in stress responses [19]. Beside PLC and PLD, a main class of phospholipases A (PLA) hydrolyze phospholipids (such as PC) into the corresponding free fatty acid and lysophospholipid (such as lysoPC). Such a fatty acid can be a precursor for oxylipin biosynthesis, and lysoPC may be involved in multiple cellular processes [20]. One important finding on functions of lysoPC is that it can activate H+-ATPase in the tonoplast and cause cytoplasmic acidification, which is shown to activate defense responses and phytoalexin production [21]. The lipid messengers derived from hydrolysis of the plasma membrane are illustrated in figure 2.

Figure 1.

Formation and attenuation of phosphatidic acid (PA) [16]

Figure 2.

Lipid messengers derived from hydrolysis of plasma membrane [22]

Adaptation of higher plants to biotic and abiotic stress is often accompanied by the occurrence of lipid peroxidation and metabolites which derived therefrom are called oxylipins. Lipid peroxydation may be the result of a coordinated action of enzymes or the result of auto-oxidation (Figure 3). Oxylipins are potent signaling molecules in the defense response in plants [23]. The synthesis of oxylipins is first catalyzed by lipoxygenases (LOXs), which add molecular oxygen to polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) to yield the corresponding fatty acid hydroperoxides that are substrates for other enzymes (figure 4) [24]. Based on their regiospecificity, the dioxygenation occurs at C-9 or C-13 and LOXs have been thus classified as 9- and 13-LOX, which yield 9- or 13-hydroperoxides, respectively [25]. In the case of linolenic acid C18:3 and 13-LOX, the resulting product is 13-HPOT (hydroperoxy octadectrienoic acid) [15]. These LOX-derived hydroperoxides can be converted through different reactions of the LOX pathway, particularly by an allene oxide synthase (AOS) leading to jasmonic acid (JA). Most of the LOX-derived compounds are considered as acting in plant defense reactions: indeed, C6 volatiles induce defense-related genes expression [26], divinyl ethers are antifungal [27], and JA is an important signaling compound that is involved in plant response to biotic stress [28,29]. Jasmonates are primarily derived from the C18:3 FA, which is released from membrane lipids via the activity of phospholipase A1.

Figure 3.

Schematic illustration of biosynthetic pathway of JA and other related oxylipins [22]

The phospholipase A (PLA) superfamily which catalyzes the hydrolysis of membrane phospholipids, acts up-stream the LOX to generate the corresponding PUFAs and lysophospholipids [30]. PLA may be involved in the release of free fatty acids for the biosynthesis of JA during the activation of plant defence responses. Indeed, three tobacco genes that encode putative members of the patatin family of PLAs, were identified [31]. Their expression is induced by microbial elicitors and upon exposure to pathogen. The high expression level of these PLA genes precedes the accumulation of JA in pathogen-inoculated or elicitor-treated tissues. Activation of PLA has also been reported in response to TMV infection in tobacco [32] and elicitor treatment of cultured parsley cells [33].

Figure 4.

Enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms leading to the synthesis of oxylipins in plants [15]

FAs not only serve as the major source of reserve energy but also consist of complex lipids, which are essential components of cellular membrane lipids. Increasing evidence also shows the involvement of FAs and their derivatives in signaling and altering normal and disease-related physiologies in microbes, insects, animals, and plants. In plants, FAs modulate a variety of responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. For instance, PUFAs levels in chloroplastic membranes affect membrane lipid fluidity and determine the plant’s ability to acclimatize to temperature stress [34]. Linolenic acid (18:3) is involved in protein modifications in heat-stressed plants [35]. FAs also regulate salt, drought, and heavy metal tolerance as well as wound-induced responses and defense against insect and herbivore feeding in plants [36]. FA metabolic pathways play significant roles in defense against pathogens. Classically, only passive roles were assigned to FAs in plant defense such as providing biosynthetic precursors for cuticular components (studies of FA metabolic mutants also reveal an active signaling role for the cuticle in plant defense) or JA, well known for its role in wound responses and plant defense against insect pathogens. However, recent works demonstrate more direct roles for FAs and their breakdown products in inducing various modes of plant defenses. Both 16- and 18-carbon FAs participate in defense to modulate basal, effector-triggered, and systemic immunity in plants [37].

Furthermore, lipid transfer proteins (LTPs), located in the cell wall, participate in the in vitrotransfer of phospholipids between membranes and can bind acyl chains. Based on these properties, LTPs are thought to be involved in membrane biogenesis and regulation of intracellular FA pools [38]. Many roles were suggested for LTPs: involvement in cutin formation, embryogenesis, symbiosis and adaptation of plants to various environmental conditions [39]. Among them, defensive role of LTPs has been proposed. Indeed, LTPs have been naturally classified as members of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins belonging to the group PR-14 [40]. Some members of this family have the ability to inhibit the growth of fungal pathogens in barley and maize [41], in sunflower against Fusarium solani[42], in transgenic rice against Magnaporthe grisea, Rhizoctonia solaniand Xanthonomas oryzae[43]. In transgenic wheat expressing Ace-AMP,the corresponding encoded LTP showed enhanced antifungal activity against Bgt[44]. Ltp3F1,a novel gene encoding an antifungal protein against Alternaria sp., Curcularia lunata, Bipolaris oryzaeand Sarocladium oryzaewas characterized from wheat [45].

In this review, we will discuss further and extend the study conducted by Renard-Merlier et al. [46], where a global investigation of total FA content in relation to treatment with four inducers of resistance and to powdery mildew infection was undertaken. Previous studies established that lipid metabolism is altered by Milsana®, Iodus 40®, HSA, SA and trehalose [8,10]; therefore, our work aimed to characterize their impact at the total FA level. During a time course experiment, content (quantitative analysis) and percentage (qualitative analysis) of FAs were compared in treated plants and in controls, as well as in non-inoculated (ni) plants and Bgt-challenged plants (i). Previous results will be considered and discussed relatively to new findings.

Moreover, the effect of one resistance inducer, namely SA, on lipid metabolism is evaluated by molecular and biochemical approaches.

Phospholipids being the major membrane components, we investigated PC, PE, DAG and PA content variation in wheat leaves infiltrated with salicylic acid (SA). SA can modulate the content variation of these compounds, reservoirs from which biologically active lipids and precursors of oxidized lipids are released.

At the transcriptional level, a PLC-encoding gene expression was investigated in an attempt to assign any participation of this pathway in the phospholipids equilibrium described above.

We also investigated free FAs and PLFAs content variations in SA-infiltrated wheat leaves; this pool of lipids is quite interesting since it ensures several functions, from being an energy source to acting as cellular messengers; the latter being highly related to resistance induction in plants. The lipoxygenase response to SA-infiltration, at the molecular and enzymatic level, was also evaluated; this enzyme activity is important for oxylipins biosynthesis in plants, because of its position upstream the cascade of enzymatic lipid peroxydation.

An LTP-encoding gene expression was also monitored, taking into account the possible antifungal activity of LTPs as well as their ability to bind and transport membrane lipids, thus participating in lipid-mediated signaling mechanisms.


2. Material and methods

2.1. Treatments application

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivar Orvantis was used throughout the experiments. It was provided by Benoit C.C. (Orgerus, France). This cultivar is fully susceptible to the MPEBgt1 powdery mildew isolate. First leaf of ten-day-old wheat plantlets was infiltrated with salicylic acid (1g/L) solution using a hypodermic syringe without needle. Infiltrated area was delineated with a marker pen. Control plantlets were infiltrated with distillated water.

Ten-day-old wheat seedlings were treated with solutions of Iodus 40® (1g/L), HSA (1g/L), Milsana® (0.3% v/v) and trehalose (15g/L) as described by Renard-Merlier et al. [46]. Treatments consisted in “up-to-run-off” sprayings. Two days after inducer treatments, seedlings to be inoculated were sprayed with conidia of Bgtsuspended in Fluorinert FC43 at a concentration of 5.106 spores.mL-1.

2.2. RNA extraction and quantification of gene expression by real-time PCR

SA and water-infiltrated wheat leaves were sampled at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after infiltration (hai) and stored at -80oC until use. Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg plant tissue using RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Quiagen, The Netherlands) with some modifications of the protocol. cDNA synthesis was carried out using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Real Time qPCR was performed using ABI Prism 7300 detection system (Applied Biosystems, USA). The tuband ef1αgenes, encoding respectively for tubulin and elongation factor ef1alpha, were used as reference genes. The relative expression of the target genes was evaluated in SA-infiltrated wheat leaves compared with water-infiltrated leaves and normalized to the tuband ef1aexpression level. The analyses were performed using the relative expression software tool REST® as described in [47]. The experiments were repeated twice with similar results and representative results are presented.

2.3. LOX assay

LOX was assayed as described in [10] according to [48] and [49] with slight modifications. The results are the mean of three biological repetitions.

2.4. Fatty acid extraction and analysis

Total cellular FAs extraction and purification were performed by the authors in [46] using adapted protocols from [50]. The results are means of three independent repetitions.

Free FAs, PLFA and PL extraction was carried out according to the method described in [51]. Data shown are the results of the first experiment, which need to be confirmed by a biological repetition.


3. Results and discussion

3.1. PA content increases after SA infiltration

Because of its central position in the pathways mentioned above, the first results presented here have been obtained for PA. Table 1 shows the variations in PA levels in SA-infiltrated leaves, compared to the control. No change in PA content was observed during the first 24 hours after infiltration (hai) of SA, compared to the water-infiltrated wheat leaves; even though a slight accumulation of PA was observed in water-infiltrated leaves in comparison to the untreated plants, probably due to the stress generated by the infiltration. However, SA induced increases in PA content from 24 h till 96 hai, with a maximum of 6.2-fold increase at 72 hai.

Time after SA infiltration
PA content2.2-fold increase2.7-fold increase6.2-fold increase1.19-fold increase

Table 1.

Variations in PA levels in SA-infiltrated wheat leaves compared to the water-infiltrated control

These results confirm some variations in PA content reported by several authors. Treatment of A. thalianaprotoplasts with H2O2 increases PA content by 30% [52]. Furthermore, elicitors from plant pathogens activate the PLC-DGK pathway, which consisted of a rapid accumulation of PA within 2 minutes in transgenic tobacco cells treated with the race-specific elicitor Avr4 [53]. A transient accumulation of PA was also recorded in suspension-cultured tomato cells treated with the general elicitors N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetyl-chitotetraose, xylanase, and the flagellin-derived peptide flg22 [54]. In rice cells, the PA amount increased rapidly after treatment with N-acetylchitooligosaccharide elicitor [55]. Moreover, the PA increase is likely to occur upstream of the oxidative burst [53,55]. Furthermore, method of PA assessment. Furthermore, all these studies point out the rapid accumulation of PA upon treatments, generally within minutes. According to [16], signaling lipids, unlike structural lipids, are present only in minute amounts, yet their levels increase rapidly in response to certain stimuli. Such an accumulation is transient because the signal is rapidly down regulated. However, none of these characteristics, namely the rapid and transient accumulation upon treatment, met our results. SA induces a PA accumulation that occurred not earlier than 24 h after SA infiltration and seemed to last for at least 4 days. This result, that does not match the general trend, may be explained by a late induction of one or both of the phospholipases pathways leading to PA formation. Since the magnitude of PA change varies upon the treatment, tissue and method of PA assessment [17], our findings could be attributed to the treatment and/or to the tissue nature - infiltration of SA and PA assessment in planta- whereas most of the studies are conducted on cellular cultures.

3.2. PLCgene expression is up-regulated and DAG content increases in SA-infiltrated leaves

In order to corroborate the PA formation with the PLC-DGK pathway activation, the expression of the PLCgene, encoding a phospholipase C, was measured over the time-course experiment, compared to the water-infiltrated wheat leaves, and normalized to two reference genes, tuband ef1α, encoding tubulin and elongation factor, respectively (Figure 5). The expression pattern of the PLCgene consisted of three up-regulations: 3.5 and 4.8-fold increases were induced at 9 and 21 hai, respectively. Furthermore, this gene expression was strongly increased from 48 till 96 hai, with an average of 9-fold increase over this period. This late high up-regulation of PLCgene correlates with the late PA detection in wheat leaves between 48 and 96 h after SA infiltration. The accumulation of PA is probably due to this pathway’s stimulation after PLCgene’s expression and synthesis of the corresponding enzyme.

Figure 5.

PLCgene expression in wheat leaves infiltrated with SA

PA formation through the phospholipase C pathway results from two enzymes acting sequentially: PLC hydrolyses phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate [PtdIns(4,5)P2, also abbreviated as PIP2] into inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate [Ins(1,4,5)P3] and DAG. DAG remains in the membrane and is rapidly phosphorylated to PA by DGK (Figure 1). The variation in DAG levels in SA-infiltrated wheat leaves is presented in table 2. During the first 24 h after SA infiltration, no clear variation pattern in DAG content was observed. However, SA induced the accumulation of DAG from 24 till 96 hai, with a maximum of 2.18-fold increase at 72hai. Interestingly, DAG accumulation, as well as PLCgene expression, was recorded in the same period of the time-course experiment, 24 till 96 h after SA infiltration. The DAG accumulation seems to be the consequence of the induction of PLCgene expression.

Twenty four hours after infiltration, SA induces the expression of PLC-encoding gene, simultaneously with an accumulation of DAG and PA. One could think that DAG content must decrease in order to fulfill PA formation; indeed, the contribution of DAG could only be confirmed by the investigation of DGK activity. Even if the subsequent enzymatic conversion of DAG doesn’t lead to PA formation, one must keep in mind that the hydrolysis of PtdIns(4,5)P2 into Ins(1,4,5)P3 is of a great interest since the latter diffuses into the cytosol where it possibly triggers calcium flux/release from intracellular stores [20].

In addition, the simultaneous increase of these compounds could be due to the durable PLCgene expression, ensuring a continuous supply of DAG to be phosphorylated to PA.

Time after SA infiltration
DAG content1.1-fold increase1.1-fold decreaseØ1.26-fold increase1.62-fold increase2.18-fold increase1.56-fold increase

Table 2.

Variation in DAG level in SA-infiltrated wheat leaves compared to the control

3.3. PE and PC contents vary in SA-infiltrated leaves

PA could also be generated by the phospholipase D pathway which hydrolyzes structural membrane phospholipids such as PE and PC (Figure 1). The variations of PE and PC levels in SA-infiltrated leaves compared to the control are presented in table 3. While accumulation of PC was observed during the whole time-course experiment (except for 24 and 96 hai), PE accumulated the first 18h after treatment. Afterward, SA induced a decrease in the PE content between 24 and 96 hai, with a maximum decrease at 48 and 72 hai. These results match the increased PA level in SA-infiltrated wheat leaves in the same period, suggesting that this pathway is involved in PA formation. Since PC level was maintained and even increased, this phospholipid doesn’t seem to be involved in PA production, under SA treatment. The PE/PC ratio is also reduced from 48 till 96 hai. Substantial alterations in the lipid composition of plasma membrane are a widely known process to stress adaptation, such as water deficit: the PC/PE ratio changed from 1.1 in plants non-acclimated to water stress to 0.69 in acclimated ones [56].

Time after SA infiltration
PE content1.4-fold increase1.3-fold increaseØ1.3-fold decrease6.6-fold decrease6.2-fold decrease2.3-fold decrease
PC content1.4-fold increase2.9-fold increase3.8-fold increaseØ1.8-fold increase1.4-fold increaseØ

Table 3.

Variations in PE and PC levels (compared to the control) and PE/PC ratio induced in SA-infiltrated wheat leaves

In conclusion, SA seems to induce the formation of PA through the activation of phospholipases C and/or D pathways. In Arabidopsis, PLC signaling is involved in some responses mediated by ABA without any contribution of DGK activity or PA [57]. This signaling, viaIns(1,4,5)P3, is also reported as an early response to salinity and hyperosmotic stress [58,59]. The PLC-DGK pathway was sought in Arabidopsisafter cold exposure [60], in transgenic tobacco cells upstream the oxidative burst as in [53] and after contact with pathogens. In suspension-cultured alfalfa cells, the nod factor activates this pathway [61].

Treatment of tomato cell cultures with the fungal elicitor xylanase resulted in a rapid and dose-dependent nitric oxide (NO) accumulation, required for PA production via the activation of PLC-DGK pathway. PA and, correspondingly, xylanase were shown to induce ROS production [62].

The PLD pathway is involved in every mentioned stress signaling, except cold-induced stress. Several ArabidopsisPLDs were found to be induced in response to Pseudomonasinfection [63]. The PLD pathway contribution was also found in Arabidopsisupon drought [64], ethylene treatment [65], freezing [66] and wounding [67,68].

Moreover, signaling lipids can affect the activity of target enzymes. In [69], the authors showed an activation of a calcium-dependent protein kinase DcCPK1 by PA in Daucus carota. In Arabidopsis,the activation of AtPDK1, a protein kinase, target of PLD-generated PA, is involved in root hair growth [70]; the PLD-derived PA also interacts with ABI1 phosphatase and regulates ABA signaling [71].

All together, these results are the first evidence for SA as an inducer of PA formation in wheat leaves. Increases in PA levels in SA-treated wheat leaves seem to be highly related to the induction of plant genes encoding phospholipases that are involved in the synthesis or release of PA.

3.4. LOXgene expression and LOX activity are enhanced upon SA-infiltration

In the present experiments, the loxgene expression showed a 12 and 14-fold increase at 9 and 21 hai respectively, in SA-infiltrated leaves. This gene expression was also strongly induced later, with a 166 and 156-fold increase at 48 and 96 hai respectively (Figure 6).

In grapevine plantlets, rhamnolipids induced for loxgene expression a 7-fold increase 24 h after immersion in the rhamnolipids solution [72]. In wheat, transcripts of WCI-2(Wheat Chemically Induced gene) gene, which encodes a lipoxygenase, accumulated quickly in response to MeJA, SA and BTH treatments (from 2 h to 24h for MeJA, and from 4h and to 20 h for the other elicitors); however, SA induced this gene’s expression to a lesser extent than the other two compounds [73]. The contribution of SA to early signaling events by the stimulation of lipoxygenase-encoding genes is therefore established. Nevertheless, the authors didn’t record any accumulation of the transcripts of WCI-2gene the first 24 h after wheat seedlings inoculation with Bgtnor Bgh(incompatible interaction). However, accumulation of these transcripts was found in latter stages of wheat infection with powdery mildew. In infectious conditions, the loxgene seemed to be expressed quite late [74]. Infiltration with SA reproduced a similar lox-encoding transcripts profile with a late up-regulation of the loxgene to a 166 and 156-fold increase at 48 and 96 hai, respectively.

Figure 6.

loxgene expression in wheat leaves treated with SA

Figure 7 shows the LOX activity in leaf extracts at 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after SA infiltration in comparison to water-infiltrated leaves. During the first 48h, the LOX activity was decreased in SA-infiltrated leaves. However, SA induced significant 1.7 and 3.8-fold increases in LOX activity at 72h and 96hai, compared to the control.

Figure 7.

Time-course activity of LOX in water and SA-infiltrated wheat leaves. Data represent means of 3 independent experiments. Bars with an asterix are different from water control plantlets as determined by ANOVA followed by a multiple range test (LSD) (P<0.05).

When compared together, profiles of loxgene expression and LOX activity in SA-infiltrated leaves show interestingly that the first loxup-regulations, 24 h after SA infiltration, are not followed by the corresponding enzymatic activity. Induction of LOX activity by SA was only detectable after loxtranscripts accumulation was the most important, between 48 and 96hai.

In non-infectious context, the induction of a LOX activity was also assessed in wheat by Renard-Merlier et al. [8]. Wheat sprayings with HSA enhanced a 1.5-fold increase in LOX activity, compared to corresponding ethanol control, only 96 h after treatment. Thus, infiltration of SA as well as HSA sprayings induced similar LOX enzymatic activity profile. However, these authors didn’t report any significant difference in LOX activity between control and SA-sprayed leaves over the 4 days after treatment. This finding highlights the effect of SA functionalization, probably improving the penetration of HSA through the hydrophobic plant cuticle. Moreover, HSA, which increased the protection level against Bgtfrom 50% in SA-treated wheat leaves to 95%, induced an 8-fold increase of the LOX activity in inoculated conditions.

LOX-derived products such as hydroperoxy, hydroxyl and keto fatty acids accumulate in plants in response to attack by pathogens and treatment with inducers of plant defence responses [75]. For example, in A. thaliana, infection by P. syringaecauses accumulation of ketodienoic fatty acids in A.leaves as well as the cell death and induces expression of the GST1gene, which encodes a glutathione-S-transferase [76]. In another study, SA treatment was shown to cause the accumulation of 13 (S)-hydroxyoctadecatrienoic acid (13-HOTrE) in barley leaves, and application of 13-HOTrE induces the expression of the PR1B gene, suggesting the involvement of 13-HOTrE in SA signaling in barley [77]. One must keep in mind that the primary products of PUFAs enzymatic oxidation are often converted to oxylipins such as JA. In barley leaves, 13-HOD and 13-HOT (hydroxyl PUFAs after reductase on HPOD and HPOT respectively) accumulated suggesting that the reductase branch of the LOX pathway is the object of preferential induction upon SA treatment, among the various metabolic transformations of the LOX-derived 13-HPOT or 13-HPOD. No accumulation of other LOX pathway-products was observed. SA as well as 13-HOT induced PR1gene expression, 48h after treatment. In barley leaves, at least one specific LOX is transcriptionnaly activated by SA and JA. This LOX-100 is a 13-LOX located in the chloroplast. However, this LOX-100 gene was not expressed upon infection with powdery mildew in susceptible and non-susceptible barley lines [78]. The co-induction of LOX and PR1 by SA suggests a role in plant defense reaction.

3.5. FAs content varies in resistance inducers-treated wheat plants

3.5.1. Total FAs content vary in trehalose, Iodus40, Milsana and HSA-treated wheat leaves

In wheat, Renard-Merlier et al. [46] conducted a global investigation of total FA content in relation to treatment with four inducers of resistance and to powdery mildew infection.

Table 4 presents a summary of the observed variations of several FAs content at the quantitative and qualitative levels induced by the four tested resistance inducers and these results are now discussed on the basis of the most recent literature as well as our results presented above.

i4.0-fold increase2.4-fold increaseØØØØØ1.3-fold decrease
Iodus 40
niØØ1.2-fold increase2.2-fold increaseØØ1.5-fold decrease1.33-fold decrease
i2.8-fold increase1.5-fold increaseØØØØØØ
niØØØØØØ2.3-fold decreaseØ
i4.8-fold increase1.5-fold increaseØØØØ1.8-fold decrease2.0-fold decrease
niØØØØØ1.15-fold increaseØØ
iØØØØ1.6-fold increase1.15-fold increaseØØ

Table 4.

Summary of variations observed in C12:0, C18:1, C18:2 and C20:2 content at the quantitative (μ -1 dry weight) and qualitative (percentage of total FAs) levels induced by inoculation, trehalose, Iodus 40®, Milsana® or HSA sprayings. These variations are observed 4 days after sprayings in non inoculated (ni) plants and 2 days post inoculation in inoculated (i) conditions

Lauric acid (C12:0) content quantitatively increased after Iodus 40® (2.8-fold), Milsana® (4.8-fold) and trehalose (4-fold) treatment in (i) plants (2 days after inoculation). In [79], the authors showed that Vicia sativaseedlings treated with MeJA exhibit an increase in lauric acid ω-hydroxylase activity, an enzyme that converts C12:0 into hydroxylated forms potentially involved in cutin monomer synthesis. Moreover, C12:0 itself has several relevant biological properties such as antifungal, antiviral, antiparasite and antibacterial activities [80,81]. However, none of the four compounds induced any variation in C12:0 level in non-infectious conditions. Since no elicitation was observed in this context, priming effect on C12:0 accumulations could be proposed for these resistance inducers in wheat against Bgt.

Contents of C20:2 (eicosadienoic acid) decreased in Iodus 40®- and Milsana®-treated (ni) plants compared to the corresponding controls (4 days after treatment). The decrease was confirmed at the qualitative level only for Iodus 40®. In (i) conditions, only Milsana® induced a significant decrease in C20:2 content at both levels whereas TR induced a decrease perceptible at the qualitative level only. In (i) plants, C20:2 increased (data not shown). C20:2 content seemed to be affected by fungal infection of the plant to a greater extent than by any of the resistance inducing treatments, since similar quantities were found in water-control (i) plants as well as in resistance inducers-treated plants. The link between C20:2 and infection was also reported in [82].Transgenic A. thalianaplants producing C20:2 exhibited enhanced resistance to the aphid Myzus persicae, the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinereaand to the oomycete pathogen Phytophtora capsici.

C18:1 (oleic acid) in Iodus 40®-treated (ni) plants showed a quantitative 1.2 fold-increase. C18:1, as well as other C18 and C16 FAs, are well known substrates for cutin monomer synthesis [83]. One could suggest that Iodus 40®, by stimulating the accumulation of this FA, contributes to the reinforcement of the plant cuticule prior to fungal contamination. In cultured parsley cells, a biphasic time-course for C18:1 increase was obtained upon treatment with peptidic or fungal elicitors [84]. In [85], the authors suggested that chloroplastic C18:1 level is critical for normal pathogen defense responses in Arabidopsis,including programmed cell death and systemic acquired resistance (SAR). In [86], it was shown that the oleic acid-mediated pathway induces constitutive defense signaling and enhances resistance to multiple pathogens in soybean. C18:1 and linoleic (18:2) acid levels, in part, regulate fungal development, seed colonization, and mycotoxin production by Aspergillusspp. [87]. Direct antifungal activity has also been reported for C18:1, since it inhibits, in a dose-dependent manner, the germination of Erysiphe polygonispores [88].

The amount of C18:2 increased (1.6-fold) 4 days after HSA treatment in (i) plants. For C18:2, the accumulation in sorbitol-treated barley leaves was reported from 12 h till 72h after treatment [89]. Cold acclimating potato was found to accumulate linoleic acid (18:2) in the membrane glycerolipids of the leaves [90]. C18:2 is also a substrate for cutin monomer synthesis and can therefore contribute to cuticle reinforcement.

Among the four inducers tested, Iodus40® had the largest effects on FA levels, since it increased C12:0 and C18:1 and decreased C20:2. This product, which active ingredient is laminarin (polysaccharide), induced decreases in lipid peroxydation level all over the time-course experiment [8].

Trehalose and Milsana® had similar effects on FAs profile with induced increases in C12:0 and decreases in C20:2 contents. However, TR and Milsana® modes of action are quite different in the wheat-powdery mildew interaction. TR activates phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and peroxydase activity and enhances papilla autofluorescence and H2O2 accumulation. However, it does not affect catalase (CAT), cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD), LOX or oxalate oxidase (OXO) activities, and does not alter lipid peroxide levels [8]. According to the authors in [10], treatments of wheat with Milsana® enhance H2O2 accumulation at the fungal penetration site without any possible correlation with the activation of enzymes involved in ROS metabolism. Only LOX, involved in both ROS regulation and lipid peroxidation, showed a 26 to 32% increase 48h postreatment in Milsana-infiltrated leaves. This weak effect of Milsana® on wheat lipid metabolism was confirmed at the lipid peroxydation level, which was shown to decrease in treated plants.

While HSA sprayings enhanced an increase in C18:2 levels only, HSA exhibited the most numerous and the highest effects in the wheat-powdery mildew interaction. HSA induced H2O2 accumulation, increases LOX activity in (i) conditions and decreases CAT activity in (ni) context [8].

While barley leaves treated with salicylate [77], sorbitol [89] or JA [91] accumulated C18:3, none of the 4 compounds tested induced any increase in C18:3 in wheat leaves according to our results.

3.5.2. Free FAs and PLFAs content vary in SA-infiltrated wheat leaves

The profile of free FAs and phospholipids FAs (PLFAs) in SA-infiltrated wheat leaves were also investigated and are presented in Table 5 and Table 6.

μg/mg dry weight2.38-fold
2.36-fold increase
1.47-fold increase

Table 5.

Variations in free FAs content and % in SA-infiltrated leaves

μg/mg dry weight1.5-fold increase
1.9-fold increase
Ø2.7-fold decrease
2.28-fold decrease
%1.6-fold increase
2.5-fold increase
ØØ1.27-fold decrease

Table 6.

Variations in PLFAs content and % in SA-infiltrated leaves

Upon treatment with SA, free palmitic acid (C16:0) accumulation was observed from 48 till 96 hai with an average of 2.38 fold-increase over this period and 1.4-fold increase at the qualitative level over the whole time-course experiment. Similar results were observed for the PLFAs C16:0, essentially the last 3 days of the experiment. Since monomers of cutin are synthesized C16:0, SA seems to induce the reinforcement of the plant cuticule. In A. thaliana, levels of the C16:3 (hexadecatrienoic acid) increase within a few hours of exposure to an avirulent strain of P. syringae[92].

Increases in both classes of stearic acid C18:0 content and percentage were observed in SA-infiltrated leaves. In soybean, increased levels of C18:0 likely inhibit soybean seed colonization by the seed-borne pathogen Diaporthe phaseolorum[93].

A transient 2-fold increase in free FAs C18:1 content was recorded. A sharp and rapid increase in C18:1 level was observed in parsley cells treated with a fungal elicitor [83]. Recent studies suggest that free oleic acid (18:1) levels in the chloroplast regulate the defense response of plants to pathogens including programmed cell death and SAR [94].

A 2,7-fold decrease in C18:2 PLFAs was observed 72 till 96 hai of SA. In sorbitol-treated barley leaves, the accumulation of C18:2 occurred from 12 h till 72h after treatment [89]. The development of asexual spores, and the formation of cleistothecia and sclerotia of Aspergillusspp are affected by C18:2 and light [95]. Avocado fruits infected with Colletotrichumgleosporioidesspores accumulate C18:2 [96].

One of the most interesting results is the general decrease of C18:3 level after SA-infiltration. Most of the studies report increases in 18:3 levels such in suspension cells of California poppy (Eschscholtzia californica) treated with a yeast elicitor [97]. In A. thaliana,an increase of C18:3 occurred within a few hours of exposure to an avirulent strain of P. syringae[91]. The Arabidopsisfad7 fad8mutant defective in the generation of C18:3 in chloroplastic membranes is deficient in ROS production following infection with avirulent strains of Pseudomonas syringaeand shows enhanced susceptibility to this pathogen [92]. C18:3 stimulates NADPH oxidase activity in vitro,which suggests that C18:3 modulates ROS production and the subsequent defense responses during Rgene–mediated resistance in plants [92]. The Arabidopsisfad3 fad7 fad8triple mutant is unable to accumulate JA because of a deficiency in C18:3 and is highly susceptible to infection by insect larvae [98]. The fad3 fad7 fad8mutant plants are also highly susceptible to root rot by Pythiumjasmonium, and this susceptibility can be alleviated by the exogenous application of MeJA [99]. Rhizobacteria-induced enhanced resistance to Botrytis cinereais associated with the accumulation of C18:2 and C18:3 FAs in bean [100].

In barley leaves, 13-LOX are induced by SA and jasmonates. Upon SA treatment, free C18:3 and C18:2 accumulate in a 10:1 ratio reflecting their relative occurrence in leaf tissues [78]. The release of 18:3 from plant membrane lipids by stress-activated lipases is thought to provide the substrate for lipoxygenase and subsequent octadecanoid (oxylipin) pathway synthesis of JA and methyl jasmonate [101,102]. JA and methyl jasmonate participate in the signal regulation of a number of plant processes including wound and pathogen defense responses. Efforts have been successful to identify and characterize fatty acids esterifying lipases that are activated by pathogen attack and/or environmental stress. Results suggest that both A1 and A2 phospholipases are involved in 18:3 mobilization form membrane lipids [103]. In the C4 monocotyledon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.),SA induced genes of the octadecanoic acid pathway for JA synthesis which resulted in higher JA content [104].

However, in tobacco tissues expressing a hypersensitive response to TMV, an increase in the saturation of fatty acids contained in the microsomal phospholipids was observed while C18:3 content decreased by 9% [105]. Interestingly, the authors credited the change of FAs composition to a four-fold increase in LOX activity of the infected tobacco tissues.

The decreases in free FAs observed with our model could be explained by a rapid dioxygenation viaLOX activity. Furthermore, accumulation of C16:0 and C18:0 coupled with no significant increase in C18:1 means that elongation of C16:0 into C18:0 is not followed by desaturation into C18:1, C18:2 and finally, C18:3. Such results could explain the reduced content level of C18:3.

3.6. ltpgene expression is induced by SA infiltration

The effect of SA on the expression of a lipid transfer protein-encoding gene ltpwas also conducted according to the same time-course experiment (figure 8). SA induced a biphasic ltpexpression pattern: a 1.7-fold increase at 9hai followed by an average of 4.6-fold increase between 48 and 96hai.

The LTPs extracellular distribution in the exposed surfaces in vascular tissue systems, high abundance and corresponding genes expression in response to infection by pathogens suggest that they are active plant-defense proteins [106]. A combined expression of chitinase and LTP-encoding genes in transgenic carrot plants enhances resistance to Botrytis sp.and Alternaria sp.[107]. A high global expression of an ltpgene in resistant wheat to Tilletia triticiwas identified [108]. The nonspecific nsLTP-encoding gene expression profile was evaluated in grape cells suspension in response to various defense-realted signal molecules [109]. A rapid and strong accumulation of nsLTPs mRNAs was recorded upon treatment with ergosterol (5h after treatment with hybridation signal more than 300X A.U.) whereas JA, cholesterol and sitosterol promoted an accumulation but to a lesser extent (hybridation signal between 100 and 200X). However, SA had no effect on nsLTPs mRNAs accumulation.

Figure 8.

ltpgene expression in wheat leaves treated with SA

Moreover, LTPs are known to be differentially expressed during a pathogenic interaction because they are potentially good ligands to oleic C18:1, linoleic C18:2 and eicosadienoic acids C20:2 [110]. Among 28 identified wheat nsLTP, eight nsLTP expressed in yeast exhibited lipid binding activity [111]. These proteins could be involved in the intracellular traffic of phospholipids and in the transport of cutin monomers. Interestingly, SA induces the expression of the ltpgene in the same period when its impact on the lipid metabolism is the most important. One could think that the lipid transfer capacity of these binding proteins participate in the modulation of the lipid scenery upon resistance induction with SA.


4. Conclusion

The present chapter provides evidences for the effect of resistance inducers on wheat lipid metabolism and presents the strategy we used in order to characterize their mode of action at different levels: total FA content and relative proportion, PA, PE and DAG contents, expression of genes such as PLC and LTP-encoding ones. Lipid metabolism is therefore a marker of induced resistance in wheat. To our knowledge, such findings have never been presented before on Triticum aestivum.

Salicylic acid is very likely to induce the formation of PA through the activation of phospholipases C and/or D pathways: induction of PLCgene expression, together with DAG accumulation suggests that the PLC pathway is enhanced and leads to PA production. On the other hand, reduction of PE content suggests that PLD pathway is triggered upon SA infiltration in order to ensure PA synthesis. loxgene expression up-regulation and corresponding enzymatic activity, along with the decrease of linolenic acid content, suggests that SA modulates lipid enzymatic peroxidation. Moreover, the expression of ltpgene was induced by SA, showing the involvement of the corresponding protein in the lipid signaling metabolism.

The tested resistance inducers had some similarities in their mode of action, relatively to total FAs profiles. Trehalose and Milsana® seem to share similar modes of action via the increase of C12:0 and decrease of C20:2 contents. Iodus® exhibited the largest effects on FAs profiles, inducing increases in C12:0 and C18:1 and decreases in C20:2. HSA, however, was the only resistance inducer that modulated positively the content of C18:2.

Future investigations have to be extended to other genes expression and corresponding enzymatic activities acting downstream of lipoxygenase in order to figure out whether the LOX-derived hydroperoxides are metabolized during the JA synthesis. Furthermore, a global approach using microarrays based on wheat cDNA chips would be a useful tool for increasing our knowledge of the plant lipidome in our wheat-powdery pathosystem.



Christine TAYEH is supported by the French Ministry of National Education and Research.

© 2013 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Christine Tayeh, Béatrice Randoux, Frédéric Laruelle, Natacha Bourdon, Delphine Renard-Merlier and Philippe Reignault (January 23rd 2013). Lipids as Markers of Induced Resistance in Wheat: A Biochemical and Molecular Approach, Lipid Metabolism, Rodrigo Valenzuela Baez, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/51279. Available from:

chapter statistics

2065total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Jasmonate Biosynthesis, Perception and Function in Plant Development and Stress Responses

By Yuanxin Yan, Eli Borrego and Michael V. Kolomiets

Related Book

First chapter

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: What We Learn from Omics Studies

By Seyma Katrinli, Kamil Ozdil, Gizem Dinler-Doganay and Levent Doganay

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us