The unsteady flow of a fluid in cylindrical pipes of uniform circular cross-section has applications in medicine, chemical and petroleum industries [3,4,5]. For viscoelastic fluids, the unsteady axial decay problem for UCM fluid is considered by Rahman et al. ; and for Newtonian fluids as a special case. Rajagopal  has studied exact solutions for a class of unsteady unidirectional flows of a second-order fluid under four different flow situations. Atalik et al.  furnished a strong numerical evidence that non-linear Poiseuille flow is unstable for UCM, Oldroyd-B and Giesekus models. This fact is supported experimentally by Yesilata, . The unsteady flow of a blood, considered as Oldroyd-B fluid, in tubes of rigid walls under specific APGs is concerned by Pontrelli, [10, 11].
Flow of a polymer solution in a circular tube under a pulsatile APG was investigated by Barnes et al. [12, 13].The same problem for a White-Metzner fluid is performed by Davies et al.  and Phan-Thien . Recently, periodic APG for a second-order fluid has been studied by Hayat et al. . Numerical simulation based on the role of the pulsatile wall shear stress in blood flow, is investigated by Grigioni et al. .
The present paper is concerned with the unsteady flow of a viscoelastic Oldroyd-B fluid along the axis of an infinite tube of circular cross-section. The driving force is assumed to be a time-dependent APG in the following three cases:
APG varies exponentially with time,
A starting flow under a constant APG.
2. Formulation of the problem
The momentum and continuity equations for an incompressible and homogenous fluid are given by
where ρ is the material density,
where is the total stress, is the unit tensor, μ is a constant viscosity, λ1 and λ2, () are the material time constants, termed as relaxation and retardation times; respectively. The deformation tensor 1 is defined by
and “” denotes the upper convected derivative ; i.e. for a symmetric tensor we get,
The symmetry of the problem implies that and
which satisfies the continuity equation (2) identically. The substitution of Eq. (6), into Eqs. (1) and (3) yields the set of equations
Equations (8) and (9) imply that the pressure function takes the form; , so that
The elimination of from (7) and (8) shows that velocity field is governed by:
The non-slip condition on the wall and the finiteness of on the axis give
Introducing the dimensionless quantities
where R is the radius of the pipe, a characteristic pressure difference, L is a characteristic length, and are the Weissenberg and Reynolds numbers; respectively, into Eqs. (10),(11) and (12) we get
with the BCs.
Equation (14) subject to BCs. (15) is to be solved for different types of APGs; i.e. different forms of the function .
3. Pressure gradient varying exponentially with time
We consider the two cases of exponentially increasing and decreasing with time APGs separately.
3.1. Pressure gradient increasing exponentially with time
and assume that
where and are constants. The substitution of Eqs. (17) and (18) into Eq. (14) leads to
while the BCs. (15) reduce to
A solution of Eq. (19) subject to the BCs. (20) is
where I0 (x) is the modified Bessel-functions of zero-order, and
Therefore, the velocity field is given by
The solution given by Eq. (23) processes the following properties:
The time dependence is exponentially increasing such that for η ≠ 1 . It may be recommendable to choose another APG which increases up to a certain finite limit in order to keep finite.
The present solution depends on the parameter β in the same form as the solution for the UCM . For any value of β the Oldroyd-B fluid exhibits the same form as the UCM- fluid. However, in the present case β depends on λ in addition to H and α2. A close inspection show that for the UCM-fluid while the which coincides with the case of the Newtonian fluid, .
The parameter β is inversely proportional to λ where the decay rate increases by increasing the value of H. However, as mentioned above, as λ approaches the value λ = 1 all the curves matches together approaching the value β2= α2 asymptotically. The behavior of β as a function of λ, where H is taken as a parameter is shown in Fig. (1).
For small values of and by using the asymptotic expansion of I0 (x),
it can be shown that the velocity profiles approaches the parabolic distribution;
For the case of large the velocity distribution is given as;
This solution is completely different from the parabolic distribution and it depends on only in the neighborhood of the wall. Therefore, such a fluid exhibits boundary effects.
The rising-APG velocity field is plotted in Figs. (2a) and (2b) as a function of at different values of β for and .
3.2. Pressure gradient decreasing exponentially with time
The solution at present is obtained from the previous case by changing by . Therefore,
The discussion of this solution is similar to the case of increasing APG except that the velocity decays exponentially with time and the value is not permissible as it leads to infinite ; i.e.
The two cases of small and large produce similar results as the previous solution. Thus
4. Pulsating pressure gradient
The present case requires the solution of Eq. (14) subject to BCs. (15) in the form
K and n are constants. Assuming the velocity function has the form
The solution of this equation satisfying the BCs. (15) is :
Hence, the velocity distribution is given by:
Obviously; for small ,
and for large
Substituting from Eqs.(40,41,42) into Eq. (37), we get:
As , , and .
The velocity field φ(η,τ) is plotted in Figs. (3a) and (3b); respectively, against η for different values of β. The two limiting cases for small and large |β| are represented in three-dimensional Figs. (4a) and (4b) in order to emphasize the oscillating properties of the solution.
5. Constant pressure gradient
Here we consider the flow to be initially at rest and then set in motion by a constant ABG “-K”. Hence, ; Eq.(14), subject to BCs. (15) reduces to
Therefore, we need to solve the equation
subject to the boundary and initial conditions
Equation (46) can be transformed to a homogenous equation by the assumption
where Ψ(η,τ) represents the deviation from the steady state solution. Hence,
subject to the boundary and initial conditions
Assuming that , Eq.(49) separates to
Equation (52) has the solution,
where γ1 and γ2 are the roots of the Eq.( 52). On the other hand, Eq. (53 ) has the solution
The BCs. (50,51) implies that the constant αm takes all zeros of the Bessel-function J0 (α1, α2, ………). Hence,
Τhe initial condition (50) and BCs. (51) will not be sufficient to evaluate the constants Am and Bm. Hence, it is required to employ another condition. We assume that G(τ) is smooth about the value τ = 0 and can be expanded in a power series about τ = 0. Assuming G(τ) to be linear function of τ in the domain about τ = 0, then in Eq. (52). Hence
From which we obtain
To determine the constants Am and Bm we firstly satisfy the remaining condition (51). Owing to Eq. (58) and the initial condition, Eq. (51), we notice that,
Via the Fourier–Bessel series, Eq. (62) leads to,
Performing this integration we get
From Eqs. (61) and (64) we obtain :
Finally, the velocity field has the series representation
The constant-APG velocity field φ(η,τ) as a function of η shown in Fig. (5).
6. Results and discussion
The behavior of |β| as a function of λ where H is taken as a parameter is shown in Fig. (1). The behavior of β is inversely proportional to λ while it is fast-decreasing for higher H-values. For any β-value, the Oldroyd-B fluid exhibits the same form as the UCM-fluid. A close inspection of β2 = α2(1+α2H)/(1+λα2H) shows that UCM-fluid is obtained by while leads to the case of Newtonian fluid. For small values of |β| as well as |βη| and by using the asymptotic expansion of I0(x), it can be shown that the velocity profiles approaches the parabolic distribution.
For decay-APGs, Figs. (2a) and (2b) show that the velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B and UCM fluids are parabolic for small values of |βη| while for large |βη| they are completely different from this situation. The solutions depend on η only in the neighboring of the wall. Therefore, such fluids exhibit boundary layer effects ].
For pulsating-APG, the velocity distribution is represented in Figs. ( 3a ) and ( 3b). The smallest value of β in both curves is almost parabolic as shown by Eq. (36) while the largest value exhibits boundary effect as reviled by Eq.( 43 ). To emphasize the oscillating nature of the solution a three-dimensional diagrams (4a) and (4b) for the smallest and largest values of |β| are respectively sketched.
Grigioni, et al , studided the behavior of blood as a viscoelastic fluid using the Oldroyd-B model. The results obtained for the velocity distribution stands in agreement with the obtained results in the present work.
Grigioni, M., Daniele, C., and D' Avenio, G. The Role of Wall Shear Stress in Unsteady Vascular Dynamics, Vol. 7, No.3 Sep. (2002).
Thurston, G. B., The viscoelasticity of human blood, Biophysical Journal, 12, 1205-1217(1972).
Perspectives in fluid dynamics,A collective introduction to current research, Edited by: Batchelor, G.K., Moffatt, H.K. and Worster, M.G., Cambridge Univ. Press,(2000).
Tucker, C. L., Fundamentals of computer modeling for polymer processing, III, HANSER Publishers, Munich (1989).
Bird, R.B., Curtiss.C.F., Armstrong R.C. and Hassager, O., Dynamics of polymeric liquids, Vol.2, Wiley, New York (1987).
Rahaman, K. D. and Ramkissoon, H., Unsteady axial viscoelastic pipe flows, J.Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 57 (1995) 27.
Rajagopal, K.R., Int. J. Non-linear Mech. 17 (1982) 369.
Atalik, K. and R. Keunings,R., J. Non-Newtonian Fluid mech. 102, (2002) 299.
Yesilata, B, Fluid Dyn. Res. 31, 41 (2002).
Pontrelli, G., Pulsatile blood flow in a pipe. Computers & Fluids, 27 (1998) 367.
Pontrelli, G, Blood flow through a circular pipe with an impulsive pressure gradient. Math Models Methods in Appi Sci, 10 (2000) 187
Bames, H.A., Townsend, P. and Walters, K., Rheol. Acta.10 (1971) 517.
Bames, H.A., Townsend, P. and Walters, K., 244, Nature (1969) 585.
Davies, J.M., Bhumiratana, S. and Bird, R.B. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech, 3 (1977/1978) 237.
Phan-Thien, N. and DudekJ, J.Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 11 (1982) 147.
Hayat, T, Asghar, S. and Siddiqui, A.M., Some unsteady unidirectional flows of a Non -Newtonian fluid, Int. J. Eng. Science, 38 (2000) 337.
Schlichting, H., Boundary- layer theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968