Open access peer-reviewed chapter

In vitro Regeneration and Genetic Transformation of Soybean: Current Status and Future Prospects

By Thankaraj Salammal Mariashibu, Vasudevan Ramesh Anbazhagan, Shu-Ye Jiang, Andy Ganapathi and Srinivasan Ramachandran

Submitted: March 17th 2012Reviewed: October 11th 2012Published: January 2nd 2013

DOI: 10.5772/54268

Downloaded: 2597

1. Introduction

Soybean [Glycine max(L.) Merrill], grown for its edible seed protein and oil, is often called the miracle crop because of its many uses. It belongs to the genus Glycine under the family Leguminosae, and is widely cultivated in the tropics, subtropics and temperate zones of the world [1].

Soybean is now an essential and dominant source of protein and oil with numerous uses in feed, food and industrial applications. It is the world’s primary source of vegetable oil and protein feed supplement for livestock. The global production of soybeans is 250-260 million tons per year. The US is the largest producer with 90.6 million metric tons. Other major countries such as Brazil, Argentina, China and India contributing 70, 49.5, 15.2 and 9.6 million metric tons, respectively [2]. The US, Brazil and Argentina are the major exporters of beans; while China and Europe are the major importers. The annual world market value is around 2 billion US dollars, which stands second in world food production.

Recent nutritional studies claim that consumption of soybean reduces cancer, blood serum cholesterol, osteoporosis and heart diseases [3]. This has sparked increased demand for the many edible soybean products. The priority for more meat in diets among the world’s population has also increased the demand for soybean protein for livestock and poultry feed.

Soybean seeds are comprised of 40% protein, mostly consisting of the globulins β-conglycinin (7S globulin) and glycinin (11S globulin). The oil portion of the seed is composed primarily of five fatty acids. Palmitic and stearic acids are saturated fatty acids and comprise 15% of the oil. Soybean is rich in the unsaturated fatty acids like oleic, linoleic and linolenic, which make up 85% of the oil. Soybeans are a good source of minerals, B vitamins, folic acid and isoflavones, which are credited with slowing cancer development, heart diseases and osteoporosis [4].

The productivity of soybean has been limited due to their susceptibility to pathogens and pests, sensitivity to environmental stresses, poor pollination and low harvest index. Among the abiotic stresses, drought is considered the most devastating, commonly reducing soybean yield by approximately 40% and affecting all stages of plant growth and development; from germination to flowering, and seed filling and development as well as seed quality [5]. It suffers from many kinds of fungal diseases, such as frogeye leaf spot and brown spot [6]. As demand increases for soybean oil and protein, the improvement of soybean quality and production through genetic transformation and functional genomics becomes an important issue throughout the world [7].

The main objectives of soybean improvement include increase in yield, development of resistance to various insects, diseases and nutritional quality. Commercial breeding is still very important for the genetic improvement of the crop. However, breeding is difficult due to the fact that the soybean is a self pollinating crop, and the genetic base of modern soybean cultivars is quite narrow [8]. Most of the current soybean genotypes have been derived from common ancestors; therefore, conventional breeding strategies are limited in capability to expand the soybean genetic base. Recent advances in in vitroculture and gene technologies have provided unique opportunities for the improvement of plants, which are otherwise difficult through conventional breeding. The technology of plant transformation is only moderately or marginally successful in many important cultivars of crops, which can be a major limiting factor for the biotechnological exploitation of economically important plant species and the wider application of genomics.

Although numerous methods have been developed for introducing genes into plant genomes, the transformation efficiency for soybean still remains low [9]. Since the first successful transformation of soybean was reported [10], two major methods have been used in soybean transformation: one is particle bombardment of embryogenic tissue and another is Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of the cotyledonary node. Both methods have limitations: the former is highly genotype-dependent, requires a prolonged tissue culture period and tends to produce multiple insertion events, while the latter is labour intensive and requires specially trained personnel to undertake the work [9]

For soybean in vitroregeneration, two principal methods have been identified: somatic embryogenesis and shoot morphogenesis. Each of these systems presents both advantages and disadvantages for production of transformed plants, and each can be used with both of the predominant transformation systems [11]. A better understanding of physiology and molecular biology of in vitromorphogenesis needs focal attention to reveal their recalcitrant nature.

The present review gives an overview on the problems associated with low transformation efficiency, and the research conducted to improve tissue culture and transformation efficiency of soybean during the past (Table 1&2) and also discuss the future prospects, demands of these technologies and upcoming new technologies in soybean improvement.

YearExplant tissueMajor contributionReference
1973HypocotylAdventitious bud developmentKimball and Bingham, [13]
1980Cotyledonary nodeShoot morphogenesisCheng et al. [14]
1986Immature embryoPlant regeneration from callusBarwale et al. [18]
1986Cotyledonary nodeMultiple shoot formationBarwale et al. [19]
1986Cotyledonary nodeMultiple shoot formationWright et al. [20]
1987EpicotylCallus induction and shoot regenerationWright et al. [29]
1988Cotyledonary nodeTransfered nptII and gusgene by Agrobacterium mediated transformationHinchee et al. [10]
1988Immature seedsDeveloped transgenic soybean by Particle bombardmentMcCabe et al. [25]
1989Germinating seedsTransfered nptII gene by Agrobacterium mediated transformationChee et al. [45]
1989Immature seedParticle bombardment of meristemsChristou et al. [62]
1990Immature cotyledonPlant regeneration from protoplastLuo et al. [127]
1990Cotyledon, cotyledonary nodeEvaluated Agrobacteriumsensitivity and adventitious shoot formationDelzer et al. [44]
1990Immature cotyledon, plumule, cotyledonary nodeAnalysed plant regeneration efficiency of various explantsYang et al. [32]
1990Immature embryoOrganogenesis and plant regenerationYeh,[128]
1990Primary leaf nodeAdventitious shoot formationKim et al. [27]
1991Immature cotyledonPlant regeneration from protoplastDhir et al. [129]
1992Epicotyl and hypocotylInvestigated the stimulative effect of allantoin and amides on shoot regenerationShetty, et al. [21]
1993Shoot tipTransfered gusgene via particle bombardmentSato et al. [130]
1994Primary leaf nodeInvestigated the synergistic effect of proline and micronutrients on shoot regenerationKim et al. [40]
1996Cotyledonary nodeDeveloped transgenic soybean resistance to bean pod mottle virus (BPMV)Di et al. [131]
1997Cotyledonary node and hypocotylMultiple shoot induction by TDZKaneda et al. [22]
1998Cotyledonary nodeEvaluation of sonication assisted Agrobacterium mediated
transformation (SAAT) for cotyledonary node
Meurer et al. [50]
1998HypocotylAdventitious shoot regenerationDan and Reichert, [33]
1999Cotyledonary nodeAssessed the use of glufosinate as a selective agent in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybeanZhang et al. [61]
2000Cotyledonary nodeAgrobacteriumtwo T-DNA binary system as a strategy to derive marker free transgenic soybeanXing et al. [132]
2000Cotyledonary nodeEvaluated the effect of glyphosate as a selective agent for Agrobacteriummediated cotyledonary node transformation systemClemente et al. [60]
2000Embryonic axesUsed of Imazapyr as selection agent for selection of meristematic soybean cellsAragao et al. [47]
2001Cotyledonary nodeInvestigated the use of thiol compound to increase transformation frequencyOlhoft et al. [56]
2001Cotyledonary nodeIncreased Agrobacteriuminfection using L-cystineOlhoft and Somers, [16]
2001Cotyledonary nodeDeveloped transgenic soybean plants resistant to soybean mosaic virus (SMV)Wang et al. [133]
2001Cotyledonary nodeExpressed oxalate oxidase gene for resistant to sclerotinia stem rot caused by SclerotiniasclerotiorumDonaldson et al. [65]
2003HypocotylScreened soybean genotype for adventitious organogenic regenerationReichert et al. [41]
2003Cotyledonary nodeAssessed the effect of genotype, plant growth regulators and sugars on regeneration from calliSairam et al. [1]
2003Cotyledonary nodeUsed mixture of thiol compounds and hygromycin based selection for increased transformation efficiencyOlhoft et al. [57]
2004Cotyledonary nodeAssessed glufosinate selection for increased transformation efficiencyZeng et al. [134]
2004Cotyledonary nodeInvestigated the effect of seed vigor of explant source, selection agent and antioxidant on Agrobacteriummediated transformation efficiencyPaz et al. [15]
2004Cotyledonary nodeTransferred chitinase gene and the barley ribosome-inactivating protein gene to enhance fungal resistanceLi et al. [6]
2004Mature and immature cotyledonShoot regenerationFranklin et al. [31]
2004Embryonic tipEstablished regeneration and Agrobacteriummediated transformation systemLiu et al. [35]
2004Cotyledonary nodeEstablished liquid medium based system for selection transformed plantsYun, [58]
2005Cotyledonary nodeDeveloped repetitive organogenesis systemShan et al. [23]
2005Cotyledonary nodeExpressed Escherichia coli K99 fimbriae
subunit antigen in soybean to use as edible vaccine
Piller et al. [66]
2006Cotyledonary nodeAgrobacteriummediated transformation efficiency was improved by using half seed explant from mature seedPaz et al. [24]
2007Cotyledonary nodeInvestigated Agrobacteriumrhizogento transform soybean cotyledonary node cells.Olhoft et al. [59]
2007Cotyledonary nodeExpressed synthetic Bacillus thuringiensiscry1A gene that confers a high degree of resistance to Lepidopteran PestsMiklos et al. [135]
2007Cotyledonary node and leaf nodeEstablished organogenic callus induction and Agrobacteriummediated transformationHong et al ., [43]
2007Half seedExpressed jasmonic acid carboxyl methyltransferase in soybean to produce methyl jasmonate, which resulted in tolerant to water stressXue et al. [67]
2008HypocotylUsed silver nitrate to enhance adventitious shoot regeneration after Agrobacteriumtransformation and developed transgenic soybean producing high oleic acid content by silencing endogenous GmFAD2-1 gene by RNAiWang and Xu, [7]
2008Cotyledonary nodeImproved transformation efficiency using surfactant Silwet L-77 during Agrobacteriuminfection and L-cysteine during co-cultivationLiu et al. [136]
2008Cotyledonary nodeDeveloped rapid regeneration system using whole cotyledonary nodeMa and Wu, [2008]
2010Cotyledonary nodeProduction of isoflavone in callus cell lines by expression of isoflavone synthase gene.Jiang et al. [69]
2010Cotyledon and embryoDeveloped shoot regeneration from calli of soybean cv.PyramidJoyner et al. [39]
2011HypocotylTransgenic soybean with low phytate contentYang et al. [70]
2011CotyledonDeveloped transgenic soybean with increased Vitamin E content by transferring γ-tocopherol methyltransferase (γ-TMT) gene in to seedling cotyledonLee et al. [137]

Table 1.

Major landmarks in soybean organogenesis and transformation

Explant TissueYearMajor ContributionReference
Embryonic axes1983Embryoids development and plant regeneration viasuspension cultureChristianson et al.[77]
Immature cotyledon1984Somatic embryo InductionLippmann & Lippmann, [84]
Immature cotyledon1985Plant regeneration viasomatic embryogenesisLazzeri et al. [138]
Immature embryo1985Somatic embryogenesis and assessment of genotypic variationRanch et al. [139]
Immature embryo, cotyledon and, hypocotyl from germinating seedling1986Somatic embryogenesis from callusGhazi et al. [140]
Hypocotyl and cotyledon1986Embryoids development in suspension cultureKerns et al. [141]
Immature embryo and cotyledon1987Investigated the effect of nutritional, physical, and chemical factors on somatic embryogenesisLazzeri et al. [85]
Immature cotyledon1988Investigated the effect of auxin and orientation of explant on somatic embryogenesisHartweck et al. [142]
Immature cotyledon1988Analysed genotype dependency and High concentration of auxin on somatic embryo inductionKomatsuda and Ohyama, [143]
Immature cotyledon1988Investigated the interaction between auxin and sucrose during somatic embryogenesisLazzeri et al. [86]
Immature cotyledon1988Germination frequency of somatic embryo has been improved by reducing the exposure to auxinParrott et al. [87]
Immature cotyledon1988Developed rapid growing maintainable embryogenic suspension cultureFiner and Nagasawa, [82]
Immature cotyledon1988Histological analysis to investigate secondary somatic embryo formation.Finer, [79]
Immature cotyledon1989Demonstrated the effect of genotype on embryogenesisParrott et al. [144]
Immature cotyledon1989Developed primary transformants expressing zein gene by agrobacterium mediated transformationParrott et al. [105]
Immature cotyledon1989Assayed somatic embryo maturation for conversion into plantletsBuchheim et al. [94]
Immature cotyledon1989Investigated the developmental aspects of somatic embryogenesisChristou and Yang, [145]
Immature cotyledon1990Screened soybean genotypes for somatic embryo productionKomatsuda et al. [146]
Immature cotyledon1991Transformed embryogenic cultures with gusand hptgene viaparticle bombardmentFiner and McMullen., [64]
Immature cotyledon1991Analysed the interaction between genotype and sucrose concentration on somatic embryogenesisKomatsuda et al. [147]
Immature cotyledon1991Demonstrated adventitious shoot formation from cotyledonary and torpedo stage embryoWright et al. [148]
Immature cotyledon1992Somatic embryo proliferation by somatic embryo cycling.Liu et al. [83]
Immature cotyledon1993Improved germination efficiency of somatic embryos of cultivar H7190 by desiccationBailey et al. [101]
Immature cotyledon1993Demonstrated genotypic effect on induction, proliferation, maturation and germination of somatic embryoBailey et al. [96]
Immature cotyledon1993Investigated the factors affecting somatic embryogenesisLippmann & Lippmann, [149]
Immature cotyledon1993Soybean transformation by particle bombardment of embryogenic culturesSato et al. [130]
Immature cotyledon1994Developed transgenic soybean resistance to insect.Parrott et al. [150]
Immature embryos1995Investigated the effect of glutamine and sucrose on dry matter accumulation and composition of somatic embryo.Saravitz and Raper, [151]
Immature cotyledon1996Demonstrated the significance of embryo cycling for transformationLiu et al.[152]
Immature cotyledon1996Transformed embryogenic cultures with 12 different plansmid viaparticle bombardmentHadi et al. [115]
Immature cotyledon1996Developed transgenic soybean expressing a synthetic Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal protein gene (BtcrylAc) which is resistance to insectsStewart et al. [46]
Immature cotyledon1997Investigated the effect of ethylene inhibitors on embryo histodifferentiation and maturationSantos et al. [92]
Epicotyls and primary leaves1997Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from cotyledon, epicotyls and primary leavesRajasekaran and Pello, [153]
Immature cotyledon1997Studied the effect of explant orientiation, pH, solidifying agent and wounding on induction of soybean from immature cotyledonsSantarém et al. [81]
Immature cotyledon1998Studied growth characteristics of embryogenic cultures for transformabilityHazal et al. [113]
Immature cotyledon1998Established sonication-assisted Agrobacteriummediated transformation of soybean immature cotyledonSantarem et al.[48]
Immature cotyledon1998Established sonication-assisted Agrobacterium mediated transformation of embryogenic suspension culture tissueTrick and Finer, [108]
Immature cotyledon1998Improved proliferation efficiency of embryogenic cultures by modifying sucrose and nitrogen content in mediumSamoylov et al. [89]
Immature cotyledon1998Developed liquid medium based system for histodifferentiation of embryogenic culturesSamoylov et al. [154]
Immature cotyledon1998Studied soluble carbohydrate content in soybean somatic and zygotic embryo during development.Chanprame et al. [155]
Immature cotyledon1999Studied the factors influencing transformation of prolific embryogenic cultures using bombardmentSantarem and Finer, [116]
Immature cotyledons1999Developed transgenic plants with bovine milk protein, β-caseinMaughan et al. [114]
Immature cotyledons1999Transformed GFP into embryogenic suspension culture with the aim to improve transformation and regeneration strategyPonappa et al. [156]
Immature cotyledons2000Improved somatic embryo development and maturation by application of ABATian and Brown, [157]
Immature cotyledon2000Screened genotypes for proliferative embryogenesisSimmonds and Donaldson, [97]
Immature cotyledons2000Studied physical factors influencing somatic embryo development from immature cotyledons.Bonacin et al. [99]
Immature cotyledon2000Investigated the factors affecting Agrobacteriummediated transformation soybeanYan et al. [109]
Immature cotyledon1989Investigated maturation of somatic embryo for efficient conversion into plantletsBuchheim et al. [94]
Immature cotyledon2000Developed and evaluated transgenic soybean expressing a synthetic cry1Ac gene from Bacillus thuringiensisfor resistance to variety of insectsWalker et al. [158]
Immature cotyledon2001Effect of polyethylene glycol and sugar alcohols on soybean somatic embryo germination and conversionWalker and Parrott, [90]
Immature cotyledon2000Developed integrated bombardment and Agrobacteriumtransformation methodDroste et al.[159]
Immature cotyledon2001Screened soybean from different location in the US for uniform embryogenic responseMeurer et al. [103]
Immature cotyledon2001Studied the effect of osmotica for their influence on embryo maturation and germinationWalker & Parrott, [90]
Immature cotyledon2001Developed transgenic plant expressing 15-kD zein protein under β-phaseolin seed specific promoterDinkins et al. [125]
Immature cotyledon2001Somatic embryogenesis in Brazilian soybean cultivarsDroste et al. [160]
Immature cotyledon2002Somatic embryogenesis and particle bombardment for south Brazil cultivarsDroste et al. [100]
Immature cotyledon2002Histological analysis of developmental stages of somatic embryogenesisFernando et al. [161]
Immature cotyledon2002Screened soybean genotypes for somatic embryo induction and maturation capabilityTomlin, [162]
Immature cotyledon2003Investigated the effect of proliferation, maturation and desiccation on somatic embryo conversionMoon and Hildebrand, [88]
Immature cotyledon2004Improved transformation efficiently using Agrobacteriumstrain KYRT1 carrying pKYRTIKo et al. [111]
Immature cotyledon2004Developed transgenic plant containing phytase gene that store (produces) more phosphrous in seed.Chiera et al. [163]
Immature cotyledon2004Developed fertile transplastomic soybeanDufourmantel et al.[117]
Immature cotyledon2004Transferred chiand ripgene to enhance fungal resistanceLi et al. [6]
Immature cotyledon2004Improved transformation efficiency using Agrobacteriumstrain KYRT1Ko and Korban, [80]
Immature cotyledon2004Analysed media components and pH on somatic embryo inductionHoffmann et al. [80]
Immature cotyledon2005Developed transgenic soybean expressing maize γ-zein proteinLi et al. [124]
Immature cotyledon2005Modified soybean histodifferentiation and msaturation medium with the aim to improve the protein and lipid composition of somatic embryoSchmidt et al. [164]
Immature cotyledon2005Analysed the effect of carbon source and polyethylene glycol on embryo conversionKorbes et al. [91]
Immature cotyledon2006Improved fatty acid contentChen et al. [119]
Immature cotyledon2006Investigated the ontogeny of somatic embryogenesisSantos et al. [165]
Somatic embryo2006Developed transgenic soybean resistance to dwarf virusTougou et al. [120]
Immature cotyledon2006Investigated the influence of antibiotics on embryogenic cultures and Agrobacteriumtumefacienssuppression in soybean transformationWiebke et al. [166]
Immature cotyledon2006Developed transgenic soybean for increased production of ononitol and pinitolChiera et al. [167]
Immature cotyledon2007Developed transgenic soybean resistant to dwarf virus
Tougou et al. [168]
Immature cotyledon2007Improved somatic embryogenesis in recalcitrant cultivars by back cross with a highly regenerable cultivar JackKita et al. [104]
Immature cotyledon2007Evaluated Japanese soybean genotypes for somatic embryogenesisHiraga et al. [102]
Immature cotyledon2007Soybean seed over expressing the Perillafrutescensγ -tocopherol methyltransferase gene
Tavva et al. [123]
Immature cotyledon2007Improved protein quality in transgenic soybean transformed with modified Gy1 proglycinin gene with a synthetic DNA encoding four continuous methionines.EI-Shemy et al. [169]
Immature cotyledon2007Analysed the effect of Abscisic acid on somatic embryo maturation and conversion.Weber et al. [170]
Immature cotyledon2007Developed transgenic soybean resistance to soybean mosaic virusFurutani et al. [121]
Immature cotyledon2008Used a new Selectable Marker Gene Conferring resistance to DinitroanilinesYemets et al. [171]
Immature cotyledon2008Developed strategy for transfer of multiple genes viamicro projectile-mediated bombardmentSchmidt et al. [172]
Immature cotyledon2009Assessed the effect mannitol, abscisic acid and explant age on somatic embryogenesis in Chinese soybean cultivarsYang et al. [98]
Somatic embryo2009Developed transgenic soybean with increased oil contentRao and Hildebrand, [118]
Embryonic tip2010somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from the immature embryonic shoot tipLoganathan et al. [173]
Immature cotyledon2010Developed transgenic soybean with more tryptophan content in seedIshimoto et al. [122]
Immature cotyledon2010Screening of Brazilian soybean genotypes for embryogenesisDroste et al. [174]
Immature cotyledon2011Demonstrated Metabolic engineering of soybean seed coat for the production of novel biochemicalsSchnell et al. [126]
Immature cotyledon2011Investigated developmental profile of storage reserve accumulation in soybean somatic embryosHe et al. [175]
Immature cotyledon2011Improved transformation efficiency by Micro wounding with DNA free particle bombardment followed by Agrobacterium mediated transformation.Wiebke et al. [112]
Immature cotyledon2012Developed vacuum infiltration assisted Agrobacteriummediated transformation for Indian soybean cultivars.Mariashibu et al. [176]

Table 2.

Major landmarks in soybean somatic embryogenesis and transformation


2. Organogenesis and transformation

Organogenesis is characterized by the production of a unipolar bud primordium with subsequent development of the primordium into a leafy vegetative shoot. A successful plant regeneration protocol requires appropriate choice of explant, definite media formulations, specific growth regulators, genotype, source of carbohydrate, gelling agent, other physical factors including light regime, temperature, humidity and other factors [12]. Plant regeneration by organogenesis in soybean was first reported by Kimball and Bingham, [13] from hypocotyl sections followed by Cheng et al.[14] by culturing seedling cotyledonary node segments. Transfer of T-DNA into cotyledonary node cells by Agrobacteriummediated transformation was first reported by Hinchee et al. [10]. Advancement in soybean transformation appears to be slow compared to some of the recent improvement in cereal transformation (Paz et al. 2004). Olhoft et al. [16] stated that the efficiency of soybean transformation has to be improved 5-10 times before one person can produce 300 transgenic lines per year. Soybean transformation efficiency has been improved by optimizing the selection system, enhancing explant-pathogen interaction and improving culture conditions to promote regeneration and recovery of transformed plants.

2.1. Organogenesis

The successful application of biotechnology in crop improvement is based on efficient plant regeneration protocol. Soybean has been considered as recalcitrant to regenerate in vitro. Tissue culture responses are greatly influenced by three main factors viz. whole plant physiology of donor, in vitromanipulation, and in vitrostress physiology [17]. After the first report of adventitious bud regeneration from hypocotyl sections by Kimball and Bingham, [13] researchers have used different parts of the soybean plant as explants for successful shoot morphogenesis in soybean. These include cotyledonary node [10,14,18-24], shoot meristems [25], stem-node [26,27] epicotyls [28], primary leaf [29], cotyledons [30,31], plumules (32), hypocotyls [22,33,34], and embryo axes [25,35]. Plant regeneration viaorganogenesis from cotyledonary node was found to be the most convenient and faster approach in soybean. However, much improvement is needed for the cotyledonary node regeneration system. This limitation is mainly due to low frequency of shoot regeneration, long regeneration period and explant growth difficulties, which prevent the plant from being regeneration-competent[36].

The nutritional requirement for optimal shoot bud induction from different explants has been reported to vary with mode of regeneration. Media compositions have a key role in shoot morphogenesis, the basal medium MS [37] is most commonly used for soybean organogenesis and the medium B5 [38] are useful in some approaches. Benzylaminopurine (BA) has been the most commonly used plant growth regulator either alone or in combination with a low concentration of cytokinins, kinetin or thidiazuron (TDZ) [22, 39]. TDZ was reported to induce multiple bud tissue (MBT) from cotyledonary node axillary meristem which then gives shoots in the presence of BA [23]. The efficiency of shoot bud formation were enhanced by supplementing media with proline, increased level of MS micro nutrients [40], and ureide in the form of allantoin and amides [21].

Adventitious shoot regeneration from cotyledonary node or leaf node is based on proliferation of meristems. Use of pre-existing shoot meristems in transformation procedures can increase the chance of chimerism, so identifying tissues that can produce shoots in the absence of such pre-formed organs would be important [41]. Adventitious soybean shoots have been induced from hypocotyls [13]; cotyledons [18, 20], primary leaves [29] and epicotyls [28]. Hypocotyls of seedlings have been used as explants for adventitious shoot regeneration by Kaneda et al. [22]. Explants cultured on media supplemented with TDZ induced adventitious shoots more efficiently than BA. Histological analysis of adventitious shoot regeneration from the hypocotyl shows shoot primordias, formed from parenchymatous tissues of central pith and plumular trace regions [33]. Hypocotyls of seedlings have seldom been used as explants, even though the shoot regeneration frequency from hypocotyl segments was found to be higher than from cotyledons [22]. Franklin et al. [31] investigated the factors affecting adventitious shoot regeneration from the proximal end of mature and immature cotyledons. The presence of BAP and TDZ in the medium exerted a synergistic effect, in that regeneration efficiency was higher than for either cytokinin alone.

Indirect organogenesis is important as an alternative source of genetic variation in order to recover somaclones with interesting agronomic traits. Callus regeneration is advantageous over direct regeneration for transformation since effective selection of transgenic cells can be achieved [1]. However, the efforts made to regenerate plants from callus have yielded poor results since plants could not be regenerated from any type of soybean callus [42]. Yang et al. [32] compared different explants excised from immature and germinated seeds for callus mediated organogenic regeneration, although induction of organogenic callus was easily achieved by culture of immature cotyledons, development of adventitious buds from these calluses and the subsequent growth of these buds to shoots were inefficient, suggesting that only part of the callus was competent for regeneration. Sairam et al. [1] developed a rapid and efficient protocol for regeneration of genotype-independent cotyledonary nodal callus for cultivars Williams 82, Loda and Newton through manipulation of plant growth regulators and carbohydrates in the medium. Hong et al. [43] reported organogenic callus induction from cotyledonary node and leaf node explants in media supplemented with TDZ and BA, the system has been successfully utilized for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation

2.2. Genotype

Among the different factors affecting soybean regeneration, the genotypic dependence is ranked quite high. Since there is strong genotype specificity for regeneration of different soybean genotypes, a major limiting factor, it is pivotal to formulate genotype specific regeneration protocols. Genotype specificity for regeneration in soybean is well documented, although organogenesis is less genotype dependent and has become routine in several laboratories [18,20,28,29&33]. Reichert et al. [41] tested organogenic adventitious regeneration from hypocotyl explants excised from 18 genotypes. Plant formation from hypocotyl explants showed that all genotypes were capable of producing elongated shoots that could be successfully rooted. This study confirmed the genotype independent nature of this organogenic regeneration from the hypocotyl explant. Sairam et al. [1] developed an efficient genotype independent cotyledonary nodal callus mediated regeneration protocol for soybean cultivars Williams 82, Loda and Newton developed through manipulation of plant growth regulators and carbon source. Callus induction and subsequent shoot bud differentiation were achieved from the proximal end of cotyledonary explants on modified MS [37] media containing 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and benzyladenine (BA), respectively. Sorbitol was found to be the best for callus induction and maltose for plant regeneration. The genotypic dependence of regeneration from cotyledon explants could be reduced by the use of combinations of cytokinins (Franklin et al. [31]). Though there was no significant difference in shoot bud formation among different genotypes, but there was significant difference in conversion of the number of regenerated plants in each cultivar (Delzer et al. [44]).

2.3. Agrobacteriummediated transformation

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean was first demonstrated by Hinchee et al. [10] through delivering, T-DNA into cells in the axillary meristems of the cotyledonary-node. After that scientists have attempted to introduce a lot of genes using Agrobacterium[25, 45-47]. The cotyledonary-node method is a frequently used soybean transformation system based on Agrobacterium-mediated T-DNA delivery into regenerable cells in the axillary meristems of the cotyledonary-node [16]. The efficiency of this transformation system remains low, apparently because of infrequent T-DNA delivery to cells in the cotyledonary-node axillary meristem, inefficient selection of transgenic cells that give rise to shoot meristems, and low rates of transgenic shoot regeneration and plant establishment. The development of an effective Agrobacterium transformation method for soybean depends on several factors including plant genotype, explant vigor, Agrobacterium strain, vector, selection system, and culture conditions [48, 49]. Increased soybean transformation efficiency, may be achieved by further optimizing the selection system, enhancing explant-pathogen interaction and improving culture conditions to promote regeneration and recovery of transformed plants. It has been reported that soybean genotype contributed to variation in susceptibility to Agrobacteriumand regenerability in tissue culture [50, 51]. In addition, surface sterilization of plant tissue material for in vitrotissue culture and transformation is one of the critical steps in carrying out transformation experiments. While a short time of sterilization cannot completely decontaminate explants, prolonged sterilization may cause damage to explants and consequently affect their regenerability [52]. Antioxidant reagents such as cysteine, dithiothreitol, ascorbic acid and polyvinyl pyrrolidone have been used in plant transformation optimization to enhance either tissue culture response or transformation efficiency [53-55]. Recently, high transformation efficiency has also been reported in soybean by adding cysteine and thiol compounds to the cocultivation media [16, 56,57]. Liu et al. [35] established Agrobacteriummediated transformation using shoot tip explants of Chinese soybean cultivars. It had the advantage over the cotyledonary node by having no necrosis after infection, and showed more transient gusexpression as embryonic tips are more sensitive to Agrobacteriumbecause they contain promeristems and procambium. Yun, [58] established liquid medium to select transformed plants from the cotyledonary node. Liquid selection has proven to be more efficient than solid selection due to the direct contact of the explants with the medium and the selection agent in the medium. Olhoft et al. [59] transformed soybean cotyledonary nodes using Agrobacterium rhizogensstrain SHA17 for the first time. The transformation efficiency was as high as 3.5 fold when compared with Agrobacterium tumefaciensstrain AGL1. Clemente et al. [60] successfully used and evaluated the effect of glyphosate as a selective agent within the Agrobacterium mediatedcotyledonary transformation system. Imazapyr is a herbicidal molecule that inhibits the enzymatic activity of acetohydroxyacid synthase, which catalyses the initial step in the biosynthesis of isoleucine, leucine and valine. Aragao et al. [47] used Imazapyr as a selection agent for selection of meristematic soybean cells transformed with the ahasgene from Arabidopsis. The bargene encodes for phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT) which detoxifies glufosinate, the active ingredient in the herbicide. Zhang et al. [61] successfully used glyphosate to select transformed cells after Agrobacteriumtransformation of cotyledonary node cells.

2.4. Particle bombardment

Even though particle bombardment is a widely used technique for transforming soybean embryogenic cultures, it was rarely explored for shoot morphogenesis. McCabe et al. [25] was the first to report particle bombardment mediated transformation in soybean. Transforming meristems of soybean bu DNA coated gold particles followed by shoot regeneration in the presence of cytokinin, resulting in the development of chimeras. In subsequent studies, non-chimeric plants were obtained through the use of screening methods for the selection of plants that contained transgenic germ-line cells [32,62&63]. Shoot apex transformation is labour intensive because the meristematic tissue is diffcult to target and, without selection, a large number of plants must be regenerated and analysed [64].

2.5. Genes for trait improvement

Soybean has been improved by Agrobacteriummediated transformation followed by shoot regeneration. Wheat germin gene (gf-2.8) encoding an oligomeric protein and oxalate oxidase (oxo) genes were introduced into soybean to improve resistance to the oxalate-secreting pathogen Sclerotina sclerotiorum[65]. Li et al.[6] successfully utilized Agrobacterium-mediated transformation to transfer chitinase gene (chi) and the barley ribosome-inactivating protein gene (rip) into soybean cotyledonary node cells. Piller et al. [66] investigated the feasibility of expressing the major Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K99 fimbrial subunit, FanC, in soybean for use as an edible subunit vaccine. Xue et al. [67] successfully expressed jasmonic acid carboxyl methyltransferase (NTR1) gene from Brassica campestrisinto soybean cv.Jungery that produces methyl jasmonate and showed tolerance to water stress. Soybean oil contains very low level of α-tocopherol which is the most active form of tocopherol. The tocopherols present in the seed are converted into α- and β-tocopherols by overexpressing γ-tocopherol methyltransferase from Brassica napus(BnTMT) [68]. Jiang et al. [69] transferred isoflavone synthase (IFS) gene into soybean callus using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and the transgenic plants produced increased levels of the secondary metabolite, isoflavone. Transgenic soybean plant containing PhyA gene of Aspergillus ficuumexhibited a lower amount of phytate in different soybean tissues including the leaf, stem and root. This indicated that engineering crop plants with a higher expression level of heterologous phytase could improve the degradation of phytate and potentially in turn mobilize more inorganic phosphate from phytate and thus reduce phosphate load on agricultural ecosystems [70].

3. Somatic embryogenesis and transformation

Somatic embryogenesis is a process by which a plant somatic cell develops into a whole plant without gametic fusion but undergoes developmental changes as that of zygotic embryogenesis [71, 72]. The first demonstration of in vitrosomatic embryogenesis was reported in Daucus carotaby Reinert [73]. The concept of embryogenesis has drawn a lot of attention because of its significance in theory and practice. Primarily, somatic embryos can be produced easily and quickly, so that it provides an economical and easy way to study plant development. Secondly, synthetic seeds developed from somatic embryos open the possibility of developing high quality seeds and may allow us to produce seeds from those plants that require a long period for seed production. Somatic embryogenesis is also useful in plant genetic engineering since regeneration viasomatic embryogenesis is frequently single of cell origin, resulting in a low response of chimeras and high a number of true transgenic regenerants [74, 75].

3.1. Somatic embryogenesis

The first record of soybean somatic embryogenesis was reported by Beversdorf & Bingham [76], followed by Christianson et al. [77] who regenerated plants through the method. The immature cotyledon is the preferred explant for soybean somatic embryogenesis as it has pre-determined embryogenic cells. Somatic embryogenesis is a multi-step regeneration process starting with the formation of proembryogenic cell mass, followed by somatic embryo induction, their maturation, desiccation and finally plant regeneration [78].

Soybean somatic embryos were induced from immature cotyledon explants cultured on medium containing high levels of 2,4-D [79]. Even though NAA induced somatic embryogenesis from immature cotyledons, the mean number of embryos produced on 2,4-D was significantly higher [80]. Explant orientation, pH, solidifying agent, and 2,4-D concentration have a synergic effect on somatic embryo induction [81]. The early-staged somatic embryos can be maintained and proliferated by subculturing the tissue on either semi-solid medium [79] or liquid suspension culture medium [82]. Somatic embryos incubated in a medium containing NAA do not proliferate so well as those produced on a medium containing 2,4-D [83]. Somatic embryos initiated on NAA are more advanced in embryo morphology than those induced on 2,4-D and the efficiency of somatic embryo induction was highest with a medium containing 2-3% sucrose. Cultures initiated on lower sucrose concentrations tended to produce a higher amount of friable embryos, while increased concentrations of this sugar impaired embryo induction [80,84-86]. Histodifferentiation and maturation of somatic embryos doesn’t need exogenous auxin or cytokinins [87]. Indeed, poorly developed meristem or swollen hypocotyls may be an undesired outcome of the application of exogenous auxins and cytokinins, respectively. Moon and Hildebrand, [88] investigated the effects of proliferation, maturation, and desiccation methods on conversion of soybean somatic embryos to plants. Somatic embryos proliferated on solid medium showed a higher regeneration rate when compared with the embryos proliferated in liquid medium. The growth period of somatic embryo development can be reduced one month by culturing in a medium devoid of 2,4-D and B5 vitamins. Carbon source is critical for embryo nutritional health and improves somatic embryo maturation. The effects of carbohydrates on embryo histodifferentiation and maturation on liquid medium were analyzed by Samoylov et al. [89]. FNL medium supplemented with 3% sucrose (FNL0S3) or 3% maltose (FNL0M3) were compared. Data indicated that sucrose promotes embryo growth and significantly increases the number of cotyledon-stage embryos recovered during histodifferentiation and maturation. However, the percentages of plants recovered from embryos differentiated and matured in FNL0S3 was lower than those grown in FNL0M3 (Samoylov et al. 1998b). The quality of somatic embryos can be positively influenced by a low osmotic potential in maturation medium [90, 91]. Carbohydrates can act as an osmotic agent. Polyethylene glycol 4000, mannitol and sorbitol were tested as supplements to a liquid Finer and Nagasawa medium-based histodifferentiation/maturation medium FNL0S3, for soybean (Glycine maxL. Merrill) somatic embryos of ‘Jack’ and F138 or ‘Fayette’[90]. Overall, 3% sorbitol was found to be the best of the osmotic supplements tested. The ability of histodifferentiation and conversion of somatic embryo have been improved by the use of ethylene inhibitor aminoethoxyvinylglycine [92]. The effects of ethylene on embryo histodifferentiation and conversion were genotype-specific. The germination frequency of soybean embryos is very low [93], and therefore, partial desiccation of somatic embryos was emphasised with a view to improving the germination frequency in soybean [87,94&95]. Desiccation induced a physiological state there by increase the germination ability of somatic embryos [87].

3.2. Genotype

Soybean somatic embryogenesis is highly genotypic when compared to organogenesis. The existence of strong genotype specificity in the regeneration capacity of the different cultivars represents a major limiting factor for the advancement of soybean biotechnology. The embryogenic efficiency of soybean was shown to be different among cultivars at each stage (induction, proliferation, maturation, germination) of somatic embryogenesis [92,96] and it is very challenging to identify genotypes highly responsive to all stages. Simmonds and Donaldson, [97] screened 18 short season soybean genotypes for proliferative embryogenesis. Five genotypes produced embryogenic cultures which were proliferative for at least 6 months. Yang et al. [98] screened 98 Chinese soybean varieties for somatic embryogenesis and selected 12 varieties based on their embryogenic capacity. The greatest average number of plantlets regenerated per explant (1.35) was observed in N25281. Bonacin et al. [99] demonstrated the influence of genotype on somatic embryogenic capability of five Brazilian cultivars. Droste et al. [100] reported somatic embryo induction, proliferation and transformation of commercially grown Brazilian soybean cultivars for the first time. Soybean somatic embryo conversion is genotype dependent; germination frequency of H7190 was approximately three fold lower than that of PI 417138 [101]. Hiraga et al. [102] examined the capacity for plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis in Japanese soybean cultivars and identified Yuuzuru and Yumeyutaka as having high potential for somatic embryogenesis. Several cultivars were identified as uniformly embryogenic at the primary induction phase at all locations, among which Jack was the best [103]. Kita et al. [104] evaluated somatic embryogenesis, proliferation of embryogenic tissue, and regeneration of plantlets in backcrossed breeding lines derived from cultivar Jack and a breeding line, QF2. The backcrossed breeding lines exhibited an increased capacity for induction and proliferation of somatic embryos and were used successfully to generate transgenic plants.

3.3. Agrobacteriummediated transformation

Recovery of the first transgenic plant viasomatic embryogenesis in soybean was reported by Parrott et al. [105]. Immature cotyledon tissues were inoculated with Agrobacteriumstrain which contained 15 kD zein gene and the neomycin phosphotransferase gene. The explants were placed on medium containing high auxin for somatic embryo induction. Three transgenic plants containing the introduced 15 kD zein gene were regenerated. Unfortunately, these plants were chimeric and the 15 kD zein gene was not transmitted to the progeny. Sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (SAAT) of immature cotyledons tremendously improves the efficiency of Agrobacteriuminfection by introducing large numbers of micro wounds into the target plant tissue [48]. The highest GUS expression was obtained when immature cotyledons were sonicated for 2s in the presence of Agrobacteriumfollowed by co-cultivation for 3 days. Trick and Finer, [108] successfully employed Sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of embryogenic suspension culture tissue and when SAAT was not used, no transgenic clones were obtained. Yan et al. [109] demonstrated the feasibility of Agrobacteriummediated transformation of cotyledon tissue for the production of fertile transgenic plants by optimising the Agrobacteriumconcentration, using co-cultivation time and selecting proper explant. Ko and Korban, [110] investigated optimal conditions for induction of transgenic embryos followed by Agrobacteriummediated transformation. Using cotyledon explants from immature embryos of 5-8mm length, a 1:1 (v/v) concentration of bacterial suspension and 4-day co-cultivation period significantly increased the frequency of transgenic somatic embryos. The Agrobacteriumtumefaciens strain KYRT1 harboring the virulence helper plasmid pKYRT1 induces transgenic somatic embryos at a high frequency from infected immature soybean cotyledons [111]. Recently, the successful recovery of a high number of soybean transgenic fertile plants was obtained from the combination of DNA- free particle bombardment and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation using proliferating soybean somatic embryos as targets [112].

3.4. Particle bombardment

Particle bombardment is a widely used technique for transformation of embryogenic cultures of soybean; the major advantage of this technique over Agrobacteriumis the removal of biological incompatibilities. Particle bombardment in soybean was first reported by Finer and McMullen [64], in which embryogenic suspension culture tissue of soybean was bombarded with particles coated with plasmid DNAs encoding hygromycin resistance and β-glucuronidase. Analysis of DNA from progeny plants showed genetic linkage for multiple copies of introduced DNA. Using particle bombardment, fertile plants could be routinely produced from the proliferating transgenic embryogenic clones. Hazal et al. [113] studied growth characteristics and transformability of embryogenic cultures and found that cultures bombarded between 2-6 days after transfer to fresh medium showed more transient expression of the reporter gene. Histological analysis showed that the most transformable cultures had cytoplasmic-rich cells in the outermost layers of the tissue. Maughan et al. [114] bombarded embryogenic cultures with plasmid containing 630-bp DNA fragment encoding a bovine milk protein, β-casein. Hadi et al. [115] co-transformed 12 different plasmids into embryogenic suspension culture by particle bombardment. Hybridization analysis of hygromycin resistance clones verified the presence of introduced plasmid DNAs. Santarem and Finer [116] investigated the effect of desiccation of target tissue, period of subculture prior to bombardment and number of bombardments per target tissue for enhancement of transient expression of the reporter gene. Desiccation of proliferating tissue for 10 min, subculture on the same day prior to bombardment and three times bombardment on a single day enhanced the transient expression of β-glucuronidase [116]. Dufourmantel et al. [117] successfully transformed chloroplasts from embryogenic tissue of soybean using DNA carrying spectinomycin resistance gene (aadA) by bombardment. All transplastomic T0 plants were fertile and T1 progeny was uniformly spectinomycin resistant, showing the stability of the plastid transgene. Drosteet al. [100] successfully transformed embryogenic cultures of soybean cultivars recommended for commercial growing in South Brazil by bombardment, and this opened the field for the improvement of this crop in this country by genetic engineering.

3.5. Genes for trait improvement

Li et al. [6] attempted to transform two antifungal protein genes (chitinaseand ribosome-inactivating protein) by co-transformation. Transgenic soybeans expressing the Yeast SLC1 Gene showed higher oil content [118]. They reported that, compared to controls, the average increase in triglyceride values went up by 1.5% in transgenic somatic embryos and also found that a maximum of 3.2% increase in seed oil content was observed in a T3 line. Transfer of Δ6 desaturase, fatty acid elongase and D5 desaturase into soybean under seed specific expression produced arachidonic acid (ARA) in seeds of soybean [119]. In an attempt to enhance soybean resistance to viral diseases, several groups successfully generated transgenic plants by expressing an inverted repeat of soybean dwarf virus SbDV coat protein (CP) genes [120], or soybean mosaic virus (SMV) coat protein gene [121]. The nutritional quality of soybean has been improved for enhanced amino acid, proteins and vitamin production by transgenic technology [114, 122, 123, 124, and 125]. The feasibility of genetically engineering soybean seed coats to divert metabolism towards the production of novel biochemicals was tested by transferring the genes phbA, phbB, phbC from Ralstonia eutropha. Each gene was under the control of the seed coat peroxidase gene promoter [126]. The analysis of seed coats demonstrated that polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) was produced at an averge of 0.12% seed coat dry weight.

4. Conclusion and future prospects

As demands increase for soybean oil and protein, the improvement of soybean quality and production through genetic transformation and functional genomics becomes an important issue throughout the world. Modern genetic analysis and improvement of soybean heavily depend on an efficient regeneration and transformation process, especially commercially important genotypes. The transformation techniques developed until now till date do not allow high-throughput analyses in soybean functional genomics; though significant improvements have been made in the particle bombardment of embryogenic culture and Agrobacetriummediated transformation of the cotyledonary node over the past three decades. However, routine recovery of transgenic soybean plants using either of these two transformation systems has been restricted to a few genotypes with no reports of transformation on other locally available commercial genotypes. Therefore, development of an efficient and consistent transformation protocol for other locally available commercial genotypes, will greatly aid soybean functional genomics and transgenic technology.

© 2013 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Thankaraj Salammal Mariashibu, Vasudevan Ramesh Anbazhagan, Shu-Ye Jiang, Andy Ganapathi and Srinivasan Ramachandran (January 2nd 2013). In vitro Regeneration and Genetic Transformation of Soybean: Current Status and Future Prospects, A Comprehensive Survey of International Soybean Research - Genetics, Physiology, Agronomy and Nitrogen Relationships, James E. Board, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/54268. Available from:

chapter statistics

2597total chapter downloads

1Crossref citations

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Advancements in Transgenic Soy: From Field to Bedside

By Laura C. Hudson, Kevin C. Lambirth, Kenneth L. Bost and Kenneth J. Piller

Related Book

First chapter

Plant Tissue Culture: Current Status and Opportunities

By Altaf Hussain, Iqbal Ahmed Qarshi, Hummera Nazir and Ikram Ullah

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us