Dento-alveolar trauma and congenital absences are the most important causes of edentulism that are not associated with bacteria. However, the World Health Organization reports show that dental caries and periodontitis, two conditions of bacterial origin, are the most frequent oral diseases in humans . These conditions might be avoided if an adequate oral preventive health policy is implemented, including preventive and educational measures that, regardless of the population´s socioeconomic factors, have shown their effectiveness. Despite these facts, tooth extraction Tooth extraction was indexed (1965) in the MESH of the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Some synonyms are dental extraction, exodontia or pulling teeth.
Tooth extraction was indexed (1965) in the MESH of the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Some synonyms are dental extraction, exodontia or pulling teeth.
Tooth loss or edentulism affects the aesthetics and function of the stomatognathic system. The missing interproximal contact produces an intra-arch imbalance that is visible as dental misalignment and the formation of anterior/posterior diastema. Additionally, the tooth distal to the extraction site will drift mesially into the space, thus creating an oclusal collapse. Inter-arch disharmonies are observed as occlusal collapse, supereruption of antagonist teeth, and alteration of the vertical dimension of occlusion. The synergy of inter-/ intra- arch disequilibrium is associated with ATM dysfunction, muscle hyperactivity, nutritional imbalances, tooth wear, mobility, and potential harmful contact areas during mandibular eccentric movements or otologic symptoms .
Recovering aesthetics and function is only possible using some oral rehabilitation procedures such as fixed or removable prostheses. In the fixed restorations, titanium implant-based therapy appears as the “gold standard’, considering that successful rates of ~95% after 5 years have been reported.
The history of implantology has been divided in two different phases, namely the pre-osseointegration and post-osseointegration eras. Many audacious designs were developed to be used in sub- or endosteal areas in the former. The most commonly used implants were blades and plaques based on metallic alloys such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum and stainless steel (Figure 1). These types of devices have been associated to doubtful long-term clinical success. Initial clinical research reported by Branemark was criticized, but the basis for a new philosophy in dental therapy had been initiated. After completing training in Sweden, Zarb and colleagues from Toronto started a longitudinal study to verify the possibilities of osseointegrated implants . In 1982, the concept of osseointegration was discussed in a meeting in Toronto attended by people from the most important dental schools in North America. For more detailed information about the first steps of osseointegrated implants, the reader is referred to more specific literature [3, 4]. Branemark’s work described osseointegration as a biological phenomenon involving direct contact between bone and Ti surfaces, allowing for a new philosophy of therapy.
In general, it is accepted that implant therapy is a predictable treatment without any contraindications for partially and fully edentulous patients. However, several factors, such as implant design, surgical procedure, anatomic and osseous conditions, systemic diseases, prosthetic design (Figure 2), and two-stage or immediate loading may affect the prognosis and long-term success (Figure 3). A poor prognosis was observed in patients with insufficient quality and/or quantity of bone receptor. Patients exhibiting poor quality of bone (type IV) in the posterior area of the maxilla had a 35% implant failure. This retrospective study indicated that patients with type I, II and III showed only 3% failure .
Systemic diseases are potential factors that affect the prognosis. The available information is derived from empirical observational studies where multifactorial risks are considered. Moy et al. showed a 10-year retrospective cohort study where 1140 patients were evaluated. Their results presented evidence that smoking, history of diabetes, head and neck radiation and postmenopausal estrogen therapy were correlated with a significantly increased failure rate, while gender, hypertension, coronary arterial disease, pulmonary disease, steroid therapy, chemotherapy and absence of hormone replacement therapy for post-menopausal women were not associated with increased risk in implant failure . This study concluded that there are no absolute medical contraindications to dental implant rehabilitation, although they must be individually considered for each new patient.
The decision to put implants in patients treated for aggressive periodontitis is a challenge since controlled studies with large sample sizes are not available. Some case reports showed approximately 8% failure in patients previously treated for aggressive periodontitis. However, all the evaluated implants were placed in patients that had been previously treated for several years before the implants were put in place . Until more evidence becomes available, factors such as time before therapy, the presence of natural treated teeth or immune compromise might render these clinical situations unpredictable.
Reduced alveolar bone height appears as an important consideration when evaluating the prognosis of dental implants. Two different approaches are used to achieve clinical success. In situations of an extremely reduced amount of bone, the surgeon may employ bone augmentation procedures (Figure 3 and 4), which result in higher costs, greater morbidity, and longer treatment times. Another possibility includes the use of short implants, which are defined as devices shorter than 6 to 10 mm . Conflicting information is available about the success of this type of implants, with some authors reporting that short implants are unpredictable in cases of poor bone quality. However, alternative treatments are viable if other favourable factors are considered. A survival rate of approximately 94% for a five-year observation period was observed [8-10]. However, short implants have mechanical disadvantages as a consequence of implant-crown ratios and the amount of osseointegrated area around the implant .
In the last decade, there has been an important discussion related to loading implants immediately. Branemark’s group postulated that early loading affects the prognosis due to a fibrous capsule that may develop due to micro-movements, thus affecting osseointegration. They introduced the two-phase surgical procedure, in which the implant is submerged under gingival tissue and maintained unloaded during a 3 to 6-month period. However, new approaches have been introduced that include immediate loading based on the primary stability during surgical procedure and surface bioactivity .
The long-term success of an implant largely depends on the equilibrium between osseointegration and epithelial/connective tissue attachment. A complete soft tissue seal protects the newly formed bone from bacterial products originated in the oral environment.
Several animal and
An osseointegrated implant is a good alternative to replace missing teeth, but they are not exempt from failure and complications (Figure 5). Oral implant failures have been classified as: 1) biological failures, which can be observed before loading and are associated with reduced osseointegration. If they take place after loading, they are associated with failing to maintain the achieved osseointegration; 2) mechanical failures, which can be observed as implant or prosthetic structural failures; 3) iatrogenic failures, mainly associated with procedures that affect anatomical structures or the misalignment of implants, which render them impossible to restore; and 4) failures by inadequate patient adaptation that include phonetical, aesthetical or psychological problems .
Mobility is the most evident sign of implant failure and can be presented as rotational, lateral or horizontal, and axial or vertical mobility . There are different terms in the literature associated with biological implant failure or complications like peri-implant diseases, peri-mucositis and peri-implantitis, where the first two are reversible inflammatory reactions around a functioning implant. Peri-implantitis is a chronic inflammation with loss of the supporting tissues around the implant induced by bacterial colonization, facilitated by the implant/abutment gap and by the chemistry and surface roughness of the restorative components [14, 16].
Bacteria colonize and develop biofilms on the transmucosal abutment of osseointegrated dental implants. Like the gingival crevice around the natural tooth, the peri-implant mucosa covering the alveolar bone is closely adapted to the implant. In partially edentulous subjects, the developing microbiota around implants closely resembles the microflora of natural teeth . In addition to the dark-pigmented, gram-negative anaerobic rods, other bacteria are associated with peri-implant infections (
Metals, including Ti, may induce non-specific immunomodulation and self-immunity. In immunologic
The surface texture of dental implants affects the rate of osseointegration and biomechanical fixation. Surface roughness may be classified as “macro“, “micro“ and “nano“ sized topologies. The “macro” range, from millimetres to 10 μm, is directly related to implant geometry, with threaded screws and macroporous coatings helping the primary stability of the implants during the early phases of implantation. However, high surface roughness may increase peri-implantitis risk compared with moderate roughness (1-2 μm) within the “micron” range (1-10 μm), maximizing bone/implant interlocking. Surface profiles in the “nano” range play an important role in protein adsorption and osteoblast adhesion and thus, in osseointegration . No reproducible surface roughness is currently clinically available.
Dental implant failure is an active clinical research area. A number of strategies have been studied to modulate cell/material interactions, which play an important role in determining the short- and long-term implant success rate. This chapter will be mainly focused on the basic aspects to study cell/material interactions in dental implants using progenitor cells and
2. Strategies to study cell/material interactions
Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) are commonly isolated from perinatal tissues (i.e, placenta, umbilical cord and blood from the umbilical cord) and postnatal tissues (bone marrow, trabecular bone, alveolar bone, cartilage, hair follicles, fat, skin and dental pulp) . Bone marrow and pulp derived cells are frequently used in oral biology research to evaluate the biocompatibility of different dental materials. However, the frequency of MSCs in both tissues is not well known (0.001 to 0.01%). Bernardo
Different mechanical, chemical, or combined approaches have been used to disrupt the extracellular matrix to isolate MSCs from bone tissue bits or bone marrow. In the mechanical approach, the bone tissue is cut into small pieces using surgical blades, and then either suspended or plated. The main disadvantage of this procedure is shear-stress injury. The enzymatic digestion of the bone chips, with a combination of trypsin and collagenase (chemical-based approach) to obtain a cell suspension, should be avoided because trypsin might damage the cell membrane surface. If these cells are collected for some type of human cell therapy, a complete characterization of these proteases is required by regulatory agencies.
The number of sources for autologous MSCs for dentistry has increased due to the hundreds of mandatory extractions (e.g., third molars and premolars for orthodontic purposes) performed each year, since these tissues are routinely discarded. Many authors have shown that pulp-derived MSCs from deciduous and permanent teeth, as well as from periodontal ligament, might be isolated. These types of MSCs from different niches are heterogeneous and exhibit site-specific features, but in general they are able to produce bone, dentine, cement, and periodontal ligament-like structures [22, 25].
The successful isolation procedure of homogeneous populations is commonly based on morphology at early culture stages, considering that MSCs exhibit a fibroblast-like morphology. In the case of heterogeneous populations, the classification based upon specific markers is more desirable. Although specific and unequivocal markers are not available, an evaluation of non-specific multi-markers allows for a reasonable characterization. Tuan  reported that MSCs cells are positive for STRO-1, CD73, CD146, and CD106, and negative for CD11b, CD45, CD34, CD31 and CD117, preferably evaluated by fluorescence-active cell sorting (FACS). Other phenotypic approaches require the evaluation of MSCs capacity for trilineagemesenchymal differentiation (osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondroblasts) under standard
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s (D-MEM) and Minimal Essential Medium (α-MEM) are the most used standard cell culture media for
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) is an inexpensive choice to conduct
Antibacterial and antimycotic agents are other types of supplements that can be controversial. Both should be avoided because they may affect cell physiology and mask improper aseptic conditions. However, from a realistic point of view, considering the risk of losing irreplaceable MSCs, the standard use of antibacterials (e.g., Penicilin/Streptomycin, 100 IU/ml and 10mg/ml, respectively; Gentamicin, 10µg/ml) and antimycotics (e.g., Amphotericin B, 0.25µg/ml) is required. Also, tetracyclines are often used to take advantage of their Ca-binding and fluorescence properties under UV light, allowing for the quantification of matrix mineralization. Other tetracyclines, like doxycycline and minocycline, when in low concentrations, may stimulate the proliferation of human osteoblastic cells .
The main goal of long-term
The micro-environment affects the ability of the osteoblast to produce a mineralized matrix, thus compromising the bone repair/regeneration process. Roughness has been considered as a majoraspect in the osseointegration of titanium implants. Albrektsson and Wennerberg classified the surface implants as smooth (0.0-0.4 µm), minimally rough (0.5-1.0 µm), moderately rough (1.0-2.0 µm) and rough (>2.0 µm). Theoretically, an increased roughness can be associated with a stronger bone response but also a greater potential for peri-implantitis and a higher risk of ionic leakage . Other materials based on Co-Cr alloys and AISI 316L stainless steel have been used as dental implants. However, their use is controversial because corrosion products from Co-Cr alloys have been demonstrated to affect the cell viability, ALP activity and formation of a mineralized matrix
2.1. Bacterial adhesion process, biofilm formation and
in vitro models
Adherence mechanisms of oral bacteria are essential to bacterial colonization of the oral cavity. In their absence, bacteria become part of the salivary flow and are swallowed. As a result, oral bacteria have developed several mechanisms to fulfill this task. The mechanisms are highly specific; the oral cavity is colonized mainly by bacteria that are exclusively found in it. Through retention, these bacteria can form organized, intimate, multispecies communities referred to as dental plaque and biofilms [38, 39]. Microbial adhesion and the accumulation of pathogenic biofilms are considered to play major roles in the pathogenesis of peri-implantitis and implant loss . Therefore, knowledge about the microbiology around dental implants is essential.
After exposure of an osseointegrated implant to the oral cavity, an acquired pellicle is formed on the implant surface through selective adsorption of the environmental macromolecules including glycoproteins (mucins), proline-rich proteins, enzymes like α-amylase, histidine-rich proteins, phosphoproteins like statherin, and other molecules [38, 41]. These are derived mainly from saliva but, in the subgingival region, molecules originate from gingival crevicular fluid . The physicochemical surface properties of a pellicle, including its composition, packing, density, and/or configuration, are largely dependent on the physical and chemical nature of the underlying hard surface.
The adsorption of proteins from an aqueous solution onto a solid surface is the result of various types of interactions that simultaneously occur between all the components, namely the fluid, the solid and the solubilized proteins. The mechanisms involved in pellicle formation include electrostatic, van der Waals, and polarity forces. The polarity of each of these components has great impact on the adsorption process, which is reflected in the hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity of the interacting components [41, 43]. The pellicle plays a decisive role in microbial adhesion, as its constituents may interact with oral micro-organisms, either by direct interaction with them, or indirectly by influencing the thermodynamic conditions for microbial adhesion .
After formation of the acquired pellicle, bacterial attachment with initial colonizers followed by cell-to-cell adhesion with secondary colonizers occurs on the implant surface . An initial reversible adhesion involves weak, long-range, non-specific physicochemical interactions between the charge on the microbial cell surface and that of the acquired pellicle. Microorganisms are usually transported passively to the surface by the flow of saliva or gingival crevicular fluid or by active bacterial movement. A few species (e.g
During the second phase of adhesion, strong, short-range interactions between specific molecules on the bacterial cell surface (adhesins) and complementary molecules (receptors) present in the acquired pellicle can result in irreversible attachment. Oral bacteria generally possess more than one type of adhesin on their cell surface and can participate in multiple interactions both with host molecules and similar receptors on other bacteria (co-adhesion) .
The increase in attached cell numbers leads to biomass augmentation and the synthesis of exopolymers that form a biofilm matrix. This matrix is a common feature of all biofilms, and is more than a chemical scaffold to maintain the shape of the biofilm. It provides a significant contribution to the structural integrity and general tolerance of biofilms to environmental factors (e.g. desiccation) and antimicrobial agents. The close proximity of cells to one another in a biofilm facilitates numerous synergistic and antagonistic interactions between neighboring species. Within the biofilm, oral bacteria do not exist as independent entities but rather as a coordinated, spatially organized, and fully metabolically integrated microbial community, whose properties are more relevant than the sum of the individual composing species [41, 42, 49].
The physico-chemical characteristics of specific material surfaces are known to significantly influence the bacterial adhesion process. Both surface free energy and surface roughness are known to play major roles in this process [41, 50]. High surface roughness values significantly promote bacterial adhesion by reducing the influence of shear forces on initially attaching bacteria, while materials with high surface free energy values are known to increase bacterial adhesion . Furthermore, the bacterial adhesion process is influenced by the chemical composition, surface hydrophobicity, and the zeta potential of the material . An increased zeta potential, which refers to the electrostatic potential generated by the accumulation of ions on the surface, results in decreased bacterial attachment. Generally, hydrophobic microorganismsprefer to attach to hydrophobic substrata, and bacteria with hydrophilic properties prefer hydrophilic materials. Moreover, bacterial adhesion varies between the various bacterial species and strains [50, 53].
Understanding how bacteria relate and act within biofilms is essential for the prevention and proper management of dental and periodontal diseases . In order to increase the knowledgeconcerning biofilm physiology, the creation of models to study and evaluate this complex consorting under controlled conditions is of great interest. Over the past years, several
The currently available
The quantification of biofilms started with simpler methods based on the cultivation of the biofilm in the wall of test tubes or well plates, like the microtiter plate method. With this system, biofilms are grown on the bottom of the walls or in a substrate placed on the wells of a microtiter plate, for a desired period of time. Besides its simplicity, this method has several advantages, such as low cost and the small amount of reagents required and allows to perform a large number of tests simultaneously, remaining among the most frequently used models to assess biofilm formation. By running it under static conditions, the environment in the well will change during the experiment, unless the fluid is regularly replaced. Also, during biofilm formation, bacteria may deposit on the substrate and on the bottom of the well, and not actively attach to the surface [55, 61-63].
Recently, a new model where the substrate can be positioned vertically to assure active attachment of the bacteria to the surface was developed. This simple high-throughout active attachment model consists of a lid with 24 clamps were different substrates can be put. This lid is placed in a common 24-well plate allowing the substrates to be vertically positioned during the period of biofilm formation [59, 63, 64].
A very frequently used model in the dental research field is the constant depth film fermenter (CDFF), a steady-state model. This system consists of a rotating stainless steel disk in which plugs are located. Different materials can be placed and used as substrates for biofilm growth until a maximum thickness has been reached. When reached, the excess biofilm is scraped off and nutrients are distributed into the system. The reactor allows several parameters to be tailored, such as the possibility to choose growth conditions- aerobic or anaerobic- and the option to alter nutrient schemes. This model has been frequently used for dental plaque studies [56, 65, 66].
Another commonly used system is the CDC biofilm reactor developed in the Centers for Disease Control and Preventionby Donlan,
However, the systems described previously lack the possibility of continuously monitoring biofilm growth. Recently, microfluidics systems have been adapted to study biofilm formation. Microfluidics set-ups are normally fabricated through soft-lithography with the size of the channels in the range of 50 to 500 μm and flow rates typically very low, between 0.1–50 μl/min. These devices have the advantage of simulating biological phenomena with physiological flow velocities, low fluid-to-cell volume ratios, and biomimetic micro-/ nano-engineered surfaces (Figure 6). Also, the small size of the chambers allows for real-time microscopic analysis of biofilm formation [55, 69, 70].
3. Micro/nanoscale engineering of cell-material interactions
Understanding the interactions between cells and biomaterial surfaces at the micron-, submicron-, and nano-scale, is crucial for the production of functional biomedical devices (e.g. implants, biosensors, etc.). Biomaterials are known to elicit specific cellular responses (positive or negative) depending upon the surface chemical and/or physical properties. Surface topography (from the micron- down to the nano-scale), for instance, plays a crucial role in controlling important cellular processes such as adhesion, propagation, proliferation, orientation, migration, differentiation, and reactivity to certain hormones, growth factors and drugs, both
The effects of surface microtopography on cell behaviour have been widely documented. Previous research has shown that microtextured surfaces, independent of surface chemistry, exhibit a strong influence on
Surface microroughness affects
The effects of surface nanotopography on cell functions have been studied since the early 1960’s [86, 87]. Cells are known to be reactive to objects as small as a few nanometers (~ 5nm) . A number of different topographical patterns at the submicron and nano-scale (both randomly oriented and controlled) have been explored, including columns, dots, pits, pores, meshwork, gratings, nanophase grain, and random surface roughness [88-95].
Some studies have suggested that osseointegration is a function of the initial interactions that occur between the implant surface and blood. Park and collaborators found that platelet adhesion and activation were increased on micro/nanotextured titanium surfaces compared to polished ones , presumably due to the increase in actual surface area (leading to increased protein adsorption), and/or topographically-induced cytoskeletal rearrangement, which could have led to downstream intracellular signaling cascades resulting in platelets aggregation and granules release. This enhanced thrombogenic potential is expected to improve endosseous integration, as osteogenic cells reach the implant surface by migrating through the remnants of the initial osteo-conductive/inductive blood thrombus [97, 98]. Additional studies found that surface micro/nanotextures improve osseointegration due to the fact that the initial fibrin clot is mechanically stabilized by the topography [99, 100].
Finally, micro/nanostructured material surfaces have also been shown to provide a greater number of nucleation sites for the precipitation of minerals (e.g. Ca and P) from the blood plasma, which results in the formation of an amorphous apatite layer on the surface of the implant that could potentiate osseointegration[70, 101].
Another way surface micro/nanofeatures could lead to enhanced osseointegration is by directly influencing bone cell responses. Previous studies showed that the initial osteoblast-material interactions (i.e. adhesion, spreading and growth) could play an important role in leading to a long-term positive response at the bone-implant interface . Fewster,
Numerous studies have reported an enhanced osteogenic phenotype in response to surface micro- and nanotextures on polymeric, ceramic, and metallic materials [104-109]. Remarkably, Dalby,
Micro- and nanotextured surfaces also tend to promote increased adhesion in other cell models (e.g. fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, and chondrocytes), although the stimulus for topography-mediated increased cell adhesion seems to be more prominent for osteoblast cells . Similarly, topography-mediated changes in cell morphology, gene expression, proliferation, and migration, have been reported for human embryonic stem cells, rat aortic endothelial cells, murine macrophages, epithelial, and glial cells, among others [71, 113].
Although surface nanotopography for the most part has been shown to induce “positive” cell responses (e.g. increased adhesion, proliferation, differentiation), there are other reports that suggest that this phenomenon (i.e. topography-mediated cell responses) may be regulated to some degree by the specific geometrical (and perhaps chemical) properties of the patterns. Curtis,
To summarize, there is rather strong evidence suggesting that micro- and nanoscale surface structures have the potential to modulate cell responses, which could be used to better design biomedical devices (e.g. implants, sensors) by turning on/off specific responses depending on the application. However, the lack of systematic and more controlled studies limits the exploitation of this concept, as it is difficult to reach a consensus on a single micro- and/or nanotopography that could lead to optimum cell responses for any given application. Nevertheless, recent advances in the fields of micro- and nanofabrication are enabling the development of studies where different topographical parameters (e.g. feature size, organization, density, geometry) could be evaluated in a more controlled manner, which is expected to ultimately lead to a better understanding of the role of surface topography on cellular responses.
A host of different techniques have been developed to imprint features on the surface of a biomaterial at the submicron and nanoscale: laser irradiation, soft lithography, dip-pen nanolithography, capillary lithography, electron beam (e-beam) lithography, microimprinting, interference lithography, nanoimprint, X-ray lithography, polymer demixing, and colloidal lithography among others [88-90, 92, 93, 118-122].
4.1. Soft Lithography and Sol-Gel Technology
Lithography has been used since ancient years. Initially, photolithography was introduced in the editorial industry to achieve better printing results. However, this technique contributed later to the development of the integrated circuit industry, and it became the main contributor to the information technology. Photolithography is also essential to produce technology for sensors, microsensors, micromechanical systems (MEMS), microanalytical systems, micro-optical systems and integrated circuits [123, 124].
In 2006, Ferrari, et al. wrote “Less than twenty years ago photolithography and medicine were total strangers to one another …. And then, nucleic acid chips, microfluidics and microarrays entered the scene, and rapidly these strangers became indispensable partners in biomedicine” .
In basic terms, photolithography helps to create small structures in a massive scale, but it is not always the best option for all applications since it requires expensive technology. Poor results for curved substrates and the fact that it is limited to photosensitive materials are some of its drawbacks. These limitations inspired two important review papers introducing Soft Lithography (Figure 7) [123, 124].
The soft lithography process can be included among other techniques that are basically rapid prototyping processes. Figure 7 shows a 24h flow from the idea to the final prototyping . Establishing borders for soft lithography is a hard task because several techniques, such as microcontact printing (mCP), replica molding, microtransfer molding, micromolding in capillaries (MIMIC) and solvent-assisted micromolding (SAMIM), include the use of stamps or molds as key elements to produce micro- nano-patterns .
Elastomers, such as polydimethylsiloxane(PDMS) have been used in most applications of stamping. Other research groups have also used other elastomers such as polyurethanes, polyimides, and cross-linked Novolac resin (a phenol formaldehyde polymer) . PDMS exhibits advantages such as being chemically inert, good surface reproducibility, limited shrinkage, homogenity, isotropy, transparency, and easily modifiable by plasma. However, its main disadvantages are the swelling in the presence of non-polar solvents, such as toluene and hexane, and forces, like gravity. Adhesion and capillary forces exert stresses on the elastomeric features and cause them to collapse, generating defects in the produced pattern. Therefore, obtaining patterned surfaces with features smaller than 1 μm is difficult .
Sol-gel is called
First synthesis of silica was described by Ebelmen in 1844, but it found its commercial application in the early 1960´s . Since its beginnings in the 1940´s, the sol-gel processing has helped to obtain a new generation of materials (ceramic and glasses). Considering the initial precursors, the processing can be divided in aqueous solution of metal salts, metal alkoxide solutions or mixed organic, and inorganic precursors . Frequently, the alkoxides (TEOS/MTES) have been used to produce a hybrid sol. These precursors hydrolyze with the formation of partially hydrolyzed products and they subsequently undergo condensation with formation of an oxide network [133, 134]. The sol stage is used to produce thin films by spin coating, dip coating or imprinting.
In general, these materials present high purity and homogeneity, their particle size distribution may be controlled at the nano-scale level, and they require low temperatures to be prepared. In comparison with high temperature processes, these sol/gel materials and processes save energy, minimize evaporation losses and air pollution, and, in general, do not induce reactions with their containers. However, they are not free of disadvantages. Among these disadvantages, the high cost of raw materials, the large shrinkage during processing, the residual hydroxyls, carbon and microporosity, the long times for processing, and the difficulty to adapt them to produce large pieces are found. For additional information, the readers are invited to read more specialized reviews [134, 135].
For optical applications, surface relief features in or on thin films can be used. Specific geometries are used to produce couplers, filters, lenses, beam splitters and mirrors. For biomedical applications, Hench  described early that “
The synergy between soft lithography and sol-gel has been explored before in the production of membranes and waveguides with a feature size of 1 μm. Figure 8 shows anisotropic and isotropic PDMS molds and microstructured silica coatings produced by sol-gel. Specific shapes and dimensions can be selected depending on the application .
4.2. Bioactive Micropatterned Surfaces
Ceramic nanoparticles can be added to silica thin films in order to increase bioactivity and contact surface area. Hydroxyapatite (HA) is one of the most widely used synthetic calcium phosphates due to its chemical similarities to the inorganic component of hard tissues.
HA exhibits exceptional biocompatibility and bioactivity, key features for the formation of a direct and strong interface with bone, and in addition, osteoconductivity, which is the ability to serve as a template for the local formation and growth of new bone [139-141]. Current research is focused on the development of new HA formulations with properties closer to those of living bone, such as nano-sized and monolithic structures [139, 142]. Compared to conventional ceramic formulations, nanophase HA properties such as surface grain size, pore size, wettability, etc., could control protein interactions, thus modulating osteoblast adhesion and long-term functionality [95, 143]. These implant materials are suitable for bone replacement and could be useful for additional functions, such as the release of drugs, growth factors, or other substances .
Portland cement based materials (e.g. MTA) have been extensively used in the dentistry field for stimulating the formation of cement and dentin (Figure 9a-b) . The high content of Ca(OH)2 of hydrated Portland cement causes it to have an extremely basic pH (~12.5-13.0). This basic pH has been shown to be advantageous for endodontic applications as it prevents bacterial contamination. Moreover, the Ca(OH)2 released under physiological conditions interacts with phosphates in the medium to produce rapid precipitation of amorphous apatite. However, previous research by Gallego-Perez, et al. showed that the showed that the Ca(OH)2 present in hydrated Portland cement could be extremely cytotoxic [146, 147].
Suchtoxiceffecteffect may not be desirable in certain applications, like implants, as it will prevent adequate cell adhesion and propagation on the surface and cause the formation of a large necrotic zone around the implant after placement, provoking a chronic inflammatory response by the host, which could potentially lead to total rejection of the implant. To avoid this, Gallego-Perez,
5. Future considerations
Dental implantology is still an area of active research. A growing number of biomaterials, implant surfaces, and geometries, are currently available in the market. However, independent of the selected implant system, a successful therapy always results from the proper interplay between the implant, surrounding soft/hard tissues, and the oral environment.
Different approaches are constantly being developed to modulate the response of MSCs as precursors of differentiated cells. MSCs cells from craniofacial niches are desirable for the repair or replacement of soft and hard oral tissues. Although a host of surface modification strategies can be implemented, micro-/ nanoengineered surfaces have shown great promise for this application, in part due to their ability to properly control cell and tissue adhesion to the implant surface. A close apposition of gingival tissues helps to prevent apical migration of bacteria, which could be responsible for the resorption of the bone crest and implant failure.
Micro-/nanopatterned surfaces are an interesting model to study the basic phenomena associated with osseointegration and biofilm formation on dental materials. In addition, a number of other micro-/nanoscale technologies also facilitate the development of more complex model systems. As an example, microfluidic devices could help to study biofilm formation on micro-/nanoengineered surfaces under dynamic flow, thus resembling more closely the
Finally, the synergy between soft lithography and sol-gel chemistry provides several possibilities to develop a new generation of dental implants with micro-/nanopatterned hard surfaces that may lead to improved osseointegration and guided soft/hard tissue regeneration.
This work was supported partially by the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (Scholarship FCT/SFRH/BD/36220/2007 and Grant No. FCT/PTDC/CTM/100120/2008 “Bonamidi”), CRUP – Acções integradas Luso-Espanholas: E46/09, Acciones integradas Hispano-Portuguesas, MICINN: HP2008-0075.NSF Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center fellowship (NSF, Grant No.EEC-0425626), and an U.S. Air Force Ofﬁce of Scientiﬁc Research MURI (Grant No.F49620-03-1-0421).
Petersen P E 2003 The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century. The approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme.Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 31 3 24
Okeson J P 2003Causes of functional disturbances in the masticatory system in Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion, Okeson J P. London: Mosby 149 189p.
Sennerby L. 2008 Dental implants: matters of course and controversiesPeriodontol 2000. 47 9 14
Albrektsson T. Sennerby L. Wennerberg A. 2008 State of the art of oral implantsPeriodontol 2000. 47 15 26
Jaffin R. A. Berman C. L. 1991 The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis.J Periodontol. 62 2 4
Moy P. K. Medina D. Shetty V. Aghaloo T. L. 2005 Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 20 569 77
Al-Zahrani M S 2008 Implant therapy in aggressive periodontitis patients: a systematic review and clinical implications.Quintessence Int. 39 211 5
das Neves. F. D. Fones D. Bernardes S. R. do Prado C. J. Neto A. J. 2006Short implants--an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 21 86 93
Arlin M L 2006 Short dental implants as a treatment option: results from an observational study in a single private practice.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 21 769 76
Fugazzotto P A 2008 Shorter implants in clinical practice: rationale and treatment results.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 23 487 96
Herrmann I. Lekholm U. Holm S. Kultje C. 2005 Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 20 220 30
Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Branemark P. I. Zarb G. Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses. 1985Chicago: Quintessence Publishing.
Adell R. Eriksson B. Lekholm U. Branemark P. I. Jemt T. 1990 Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 5 347 59
Klinge B. Hultin M. Berglundh T. 2005Peri-implantitis. Dent Clin North Am. 49 661 76
Esposito M. Hirsch-M J. Lekholm U. Thomsen P. 1998 Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteriaand epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci. 106 527 551
Rimondini L. Cerroni L. Carrassi A. Torricelli P. 2002 Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 17 793 8
Tanner A. Maiden M. F. J. Lee K. Shulman L. B. Weber H. P. 1997Dental Implant Infections. Clin Infec Dis. 25: S 213S217.
Leonhardt A. Renvert S. Dahlen G. 1999 Microbial findings at failing implantsClin Oral Implants Res. 10 339 45
Lalor P. A. Revell P. A. Gray A. B. Wright S. Railton G. T. Freeman M. A. 1991Sensitivity to titanium. A cause of implant failure? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 73 25 8
Boyan B. Lohmann C. Dean D. Sylvia V. Cochran D. Schwartz Z. 2001 Mechanisms involved in osteoblast response to implant surface morphologyAnn Rev Mater Res. 31: 357 EOF 371 EOF
Brett P. M. Harle J. Salih V. Mihoc R. Olsen I. Jones F. H. Tonetti M. 2004Roughness response genes in osteoblasts. Bone. 35 124 33
Robey P. G. Bianco P. 2006 The use of adult stem cells in rebuilding the human face.J Am Dent Assoc. 137: 961 EOF 72 EOF
Bernardo M. Locatelli F. Fibbe W. E. 2009 Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: A Novel Treatment Modality for Tissue RepairAnn NY Acad Sci. 1176 101 117
Akintoye S. O. Lam T. Shi S. Brahim J. Collins M. T. Robey P. G. 2006 Skeletal site-specific characterization of orofacial and iliac crest human bone marrow stromal cells in same individuals 38 758 68
Machado E. Fernandes M. H. Gomes P. D. 2011 Dental stem cells for craniofacial tissue engineering.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 113 728 733
Tuan R. 2011 Role of adult stem/progenitor cells in osseointegration and implant loosening.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 26 5 62
Dominici M. Le Blanc K. Mueller I. Slaper-Cortenbach I. Marini F. C. Krause D. S. Deans R. J. Keating A. Prockop D. J. Horwitz E. M. 2006Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 8 315 317
Coelho M. J. Trigo Cabral. A. Fernandes M. H. 2000 Human bone cell cultures in biocompatibility testing. Part I: osteoblastic differentiation of serially passaged human bone marrow cells cultured in [alpha]-MEM and in DMEM. 21 1087 1094
Aldahmash A. Haack-Sørensen M. Al-Nbaheen M. Harkness L. Abdallah B. Kassem M. 2011 Human Serum is as Efficient as Fetal Bovine Serum in Supporting Proliferation and Differentiation of Human Multipotent Stromal (Mesenchymal) Stem Cells In Vitro and In VivoStem Cell Rev. 7 860 8
Deorosan B. Nauman E. A. 2011 The Role of Glucose, Serum, and Three Dimensional Cell Culture on the Metabolism of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem CellsStem Cells Int. 2011: 429187.
Gomes P. S. Fernandes M. H. 2007 Effect of therapeutic levels of doxycycline and minocycline in the proliferation and differentiation of human bone marrow osteoblastic cellsArch Oral Biol. 52 251 259
Coelho M. J. Fernandes M. H. 2000 Human bone cell cultures in biocompatibility testing. Part II: effect of ascorbic acid,[beta]-glycerophosphate and dexamethasone on osteoblastic differentiation. 21 1095 1102
Amaral M. Costa M. A. Lopes M. A. Silva R. F. Santos J. D. Fernandes M. H. 2002Si(3)N(4)-bioglass composites stimulate the proliferation of MG63 osteoblast-like cells and support the osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow cells. Biomaterials. 23 4897 906
Albrektsson T. Wennerberg A. 2004Oral implant surfaces: Part 1- review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont. 17 536 43
( Tomas H. Carvalho G. S. Fernandes M. H. Freire A. P. Abrantes L. M. 1997) The use of rat, rabbit or human bone marrow derived cells for cytocompatibility evaluation of metallic elements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 8 233 8.
Morais S. Sousa J. P. Fernandes M. H. Carvalho G. S. de Bruijn J. D. van Blitterswijk C. A. 1998Effects of AISI 316L corrosion products in in vitro bone formation. Biomaterials. 19 999 1007
Gomes P. S. Botelho C. Lopes M. A. Santos J. D. Fernandes M. H. 2010 Evaluation of human osteoblastic cell response to plasma-sprayed silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite coatings over titanium substratesJ Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 94 337 46
Whittaker C. J. Klier C. M. Kolenbrander P. E. 1996 Mechanisms of adhesion by oral bacteria.Annu Rev Microbiol. 50 513 52
Kolenbrander P. E. Andersen R. N. Blehert D. S. Egland P. G. Foster J. S. Palmer R. J. 2002Communication among oral bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 66 486 505
Burgers R. Gerlach T. Hahnel S. Schwarz F. Handel G. Gosau M. 2010 In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfacesClin Oral Implants Res. 21 156 64
Teughels W. Van Assche N. Sliepen I. Quirynen M. 2006 Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm developmentClin Oral Implants Res. 17 68 81
Marsh P. D. Moter A. Devine D. A. (201 Dental plaque. biofilms communities. conflict control Periodontol. 2000 55 16 35
Hannig C. Hannig M. 2009 The oral cavity--a key system to understand substratum-dependent bioadhesion on solid surfaces in manClin Oral Investig. 13 123 39
Hahnel S. Rosentritt M. Handel G. Burgers R. 2009 Surface characterization of dental ceramics and initial streptococcal adhesion in vitroDent Mater. 25 969 75
Lee A. Wang H. L. 2010 Biofilm related to dental implantsImplant Dent. 19 387 93
Marsh P D 2004 Dental plaque as a microbial biofilmCaries Res. 38 204 11
Scannapieco F A 1994 Saliva-bacterium interactions in oral microbial ecology.Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 5 203 48
Heuer W. Elter C. Demling A. Neumann A. Suerbaum S. Hannig M. Heidenblut T. Bach F. W. Stiesch-Scholz M. 2007Analysis of early biofilm formation on oral implants in man.J Oral Rehabil. 34 377 82
Branda S. S. Vik S. Friedman L. Kolter R. 2005Biofilms: the matrix revisited. Trends Microbiol. 13 20 6
An Y. H. Friedman R. J. 1998 Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces.J Biomed Mater Res. 43 338 48
Quirynen M. Bollen C. M. 1995 The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in manA review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol. 22 1 14
Faltermeier A. Burgers R. Rosentritt M. 2008 Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to esthetic bracket materialsAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 133: S 99 103
Buergers R. Rosentritt M. Handel G. 2007 Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic materialJ Prosthet Dent. 98 461 9
Shaddox L. M. Alfant B. Tobler J. Walker C. 2010 Perpetuation of subgingival biofilms in an in vitro modelMol Oral Microbiol. 25 81 7
Coenye T. Nelis H. J. 2010 In vitro and in vivo model systems to study microbial biofilm formationJ Microbiol Methods. 83 89 105
Sissons C H 1997 Artificial dental plaque biofilm model systems.Adv Dent Res. 11 110 26
McBain A J 2009 Chapter 4: In vitro biofilm models: an overview. Adv Appl Microbiol. 69 99 132
Guggenheim B. Guggenheim M. Gmur R. Giertsen E. Thurnheer T. 2004 Application of the Zurich biofilm model to problems of cariology.Caries Res. 38 212 22
Exterkate R. A. Crielaard W. Ten Cate. J. M. 2010 Different response to amine fluoride by Streptococcus mutans and polymicrobial biofilms in a novel high-throughput active attachment modelCaries Res. 44 372 9
Benoit M. R. Conant C. G. Ionescu-Zanetti C. Schwartz M. Matin A. 2010 New device for high-throughput viability screening of flow biofilmsAppl Environ Microbiol. 76 4136 42
Stepanovic S. Vukovic D. Hola V. Di Bonaventura G. Djukic S. Cirkovic I. Ruzicka F. 2007 Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci 115 891 9
Merritt J. H. Kadouri D. E. O’Toole G. A. 2005 Growing and analyzing static biofilms.Curr Protoc Microbiol. Chapter 1: Unit EOFB 1.
Silva T. C. Pereira A. F. Exterkate R. A. Bagnato V. S. Buzalaf M. A. Machado M. A. Ten Cate. J. M. Crielaard W. Deng D. M. 2012Application of an active attachment model as a high-throughput demineralization biofilm model. J Dent. 40 41 7
Deng D. M. Hoogenkamp M. A. Exterkate R. A. Jiang L. M. van der Sluis L. W. Ten Cate. J. M. Crielaard W. 2009Influence of Streptococcus mutans on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation. J Endod. 35 1249 52
ten Cate. J. M. 2006Biofilms, a new approach to the microbiology of dental plaque. Odontology. 94 1 9
Wimpenny J W 1997 The validity of models.Adv Dent Res. 11 150 9
Donlan R. M. Piede J. A. Heyes C. D. Sanii L. Murga R. Edmonds P. El -Sayed I. El -Sayed M. A. 2004Model system for growing and quantifying Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilms in situ and in real time. Appl Environ Microbiol. 70 4980 8
Goeres D. M. Loetterle L. R. Hamilton M. A. Murga R. Kirby D. W. Donlan R. M. 2005Statistical assessment of a laboratory method for growing biofilms. Microbiology. 151 757 62
Yawata Y. Toda K. Setoyama E. Fukuda J. Suzuki H. Uchiyama H. Nomura N. 2010 Bacterial growth monitoring in a microfluidic device by confocal reflection microscopyJ Biosci Bioeng. 110 130 3
Wang C. C. Hsu Y. C. Hsieh M. C. Yang S. P. Su F. C. Lee T. M. 2008Effects of nano-surface properties on initial osteoblast adhesion and Ca/P adsorption ability for titanium alloys. Nanotechnology. 19: 335709.
Flemming R. G. Murphy C. J. Abrams G. A. Goodman S. L. Nealey P. F. 1999Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials. 20 573 88
Zhao G. Raines A. L. Wieland M. Schwartz Z. Boyan B. D. 2007 Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. 28 2821 9
Wilkinson C. D. W. Riehle M. Wood M. Gallagher J. Curtis A. S. G. 2002 The use of materials patterned on a nano-and micro-metric scale in cellular engineering.Mater Sci Eng C. 19 263 269
Yim E. K. F. Leong K. W. 2005 Significance of synthetic nanostructures in dictating cellular response.Nanomedicine. 1 10 21
Francois P. Vaudaux P. Taborelli M. Tonetti M. Lew D. P. Descouts P. 1997 Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium. (II) Adsorption isotherms andbiological activity of immobilized fibronectin. Clin Oral Implants Res. 8 217 25
Keller J. C. Schneider G. B. Stanford C. M. Kellogg B. 2003 Effects of implant microtopography on osteoblast cell attachment.Implant Dent. 12 175 81
Martin J. Y. Schwartz Z. Hummert T. W. Schraub D. M. Simpson J. Lankford J. Jr Dean D. D. Cochran D. L. Boyan B. D. 1995Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res. 29 389 401
Raz P. Lohmann C. H. Turner J. Wang L. Poythress N. Blanchard C. Boyan B. D. Schwartz Z. 2004alpha,25(OH)2D3 regulation of integrin expression is substrate dependent. J Biomed Mater Res A. 71 217 25
Brunette D M 1988 The effects of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 3 231 46
Curtis A. Wilkinson C. 1997 Topographical control of cells. 18 1573 83
Curtis A. S. G. Clark P. 1990The effects of topographic and mechanical properties of materials on cell behavior. Crit. Rev. Biocompat. 5 343 363
Clark P. 1994 Cell behaviour on micropatterned surfacesBiosens Bioelectron. 9 657 661
von Recum. A. F. van Kooten T. G. 1995 The influence of micro-topography on cellular response and the implications for silicone implants.J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 7 181 98
Weiss P. 1958Cell contact. Int Rev Cyt. 7 391 423
Singhvi R. Stephanopoulos G. Wang D. I. 1994 Effects of substratum morphology on cell physiology.Biotechnol Bioeng. 43 764 71
Rosenberg M D 1963 Cell guidance by alterations in monomolecular films.Science. 139: 411 EOF 2 EOF
Rosenberg M D 1962 Long-range interactions between cell and substratumProc Natl Acad Sci USA. 48: 1342 EOF
Curtis A. S. G. Gadegaard N. Dalby M. J. Riehle M. O. Wilkinson C. D. W. Aitchison G. 2004Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 3 61 65
Kim D. H. Kim P. Song I. Cha J. M. Lee S. H. Kim B. Suh K. Y. 2006Guided three-dimensional growth of functional cardiomyocytes on polyethylene glycol nanostructures. Langmuir. 22 5419 26
Wood M. A. Wilkinson C. D. Curtis A. S. 2006 The effects of colloidal nanotopography on initial fibroblast adhesion and morphology.IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 5 20 31
Sapelkin A. V. Bayliss S. C. Unal B. Charalambou A. 2006 Interaction of B50 rat hippocampal cells with stain-etched porous silicon 27 842 6
Zhu B. Lu Q. Yin J. Hu J. Wang Z. 2005 Alignment of osteoblast-like cells and cell-produced collagen matrix induced by nanogroovesTissue Eng. 11 825 34
Zanello L. P. Zhao B. Hu H. Haddon R. C. 2006Bone cell proliferation on carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 6 562 7
Miller D. C. Thapa A. Haberstroh K. M. Webster T. J. 2004Endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) with nano-structured surface features. Biomaterials. 25 53 61
Webster T. J. Schadler L. S. Siegel R. W. Bizios R. 2001 Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectinTissue Eng. 7 291 301
Park J. Y. Gemmell C. H. Davies J. E. 2001 Platelet interactions with titanium: modulation of platelet activity by surface topography 22 2671 2682
Body S C 1996 Platelet activation and interactions with the microvasculature.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 27: 13.
Hong J. Andersson J. Ekdahl K. N. Elgue G. Ax Ã©n. N. Larsson R. Nilsson B. 1999Titanium is a highly thrombogenic biomaterial: possible implications for osteogenesis. Thromb Haemost. 82 58 64
Mendonca G. Mendonca D. Aragao F. J. L. Cooper L. F. 2008Advancing dental implant surface technology- from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials. 29 3822 3835
Grew J. C. Ricci J. L. Alexander H. 2008Connective-tissueresponses to defined biomaterial surfaces. II. Behavior of rat and mouse fibroblasts cultured on microgrooved substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A. 85 326 335
Kokubo T. Takadama H. 2006How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 27 2907 2915
Fewster S. D. Coombs R. R. H. Kitson J. Zhou S. 1994Precise ultrafine surface texturing of implant materials to improve cellular adhesion and biocompatibility. Nanobiology. 3 201 210
Wan Y. Wang Y. Liu Z. Qu X. Han B. Bei J. Wang S. 2005Adhesion and proliferation of OCT-1 osteoblast-like cells on micro-and nano-scale topography structured poly (L-lactide). Biomaterials. 26 4453 4459
Popat K. C. Leoni L. Grimes C. A. Desai T. A. 2007 Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells 28 3188 97
Popat K. C. Chatvanichkul K. I. Barnes G. L. Latempa T. J. Jr Grimes C. A. Desai T. A. 2007Osteogenic differentiation of marrow stromal cells cultured on nanoporous alumina surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A. 80 955 64
Matsuzaka K. Walboomers F. de Ruijter A. Jansen J. A. 2000 Effect of microgrooved poly-l-lactic (PLA) surfaces on proliferation, cytoskeletal organization, and mineralized matrix formation of rat bone marrow cellsClin Oral Implants Res. 11 325 33
Matsuzaka K. Walboomers X. F. de Ruijter J. E. Jansen J. A. 1999 The effect of poly-L-lactic acid with parallel surface micro groove on osteoblast-like cells in vitro. 20 1293 301
Groessner-Schreiber B. Tuan R. S. 1992 Enhanced extracellular matrix production and mineralization by osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces in vitro.J Cell Sci. 101 209 217
Abron A. Hopfensperger M. Thompson J. Cooper L. F. 2001 Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia modelJ Prosthet Dent. 85 40 6
Dalby M. J. Mc Cloy D. Robertson M. Agheli H. Sutherland D. Affrossman S. Oreffo R. O. 2006 Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographiesBiomaterials. 27 2980 7
Dalby M. J. Gadegaard N. Tare R. Andar A. Riehle M. O. Herzyk P. Wilkinson C. D. Oreffo R. O. 2007 The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorderNat Mater. 6 997 1003
Zhao L. Mei S. Chu P. K. Zhang Y. Wu Z. 2010 The influence of hierarchical hybrid micro/nano-textured titanium surface with titania nanotubes on osteoblast functions 31 5072 5082
Engel E. Martinez E. Mills C. A. Funes M. Planell J. A. Samitier J. 2009Mesenchymal stem cell differentiation on microstructured poly (methyl methacrylate) substrates. Ann Anat. 191 136 44
Curtis A. Wilkinson C. 2001 Nanotechniques and approaches in biotechnologyTrends Biotechnol. 19 97 101
Dalby M. J. Riehle M. O. Sutherland D. S. Agheli H. Curtis A. S. G. 2004 Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nano-columns produced by colloidal lithographyBiomaterials. 25 5415 5422
Dalby M. J. Berry C. C. Riehle M. O. Sutherland D. S. Agheli H. Curtis A. S. G. 2004 Attempted endocytosis of nano-environment produced by colloidal lithography by human fibroblastsExp Cell Res. 295 387 394
Kunzler T. P. Huwiler C. Drobek T. Voros J. Spencer N. D. 2007 Systematic study of osteoblast response to nanotopography by means of nanoparticle-density gradients 28 5000 5006
Teixeira A. I. Nealey P. F. Murphy C. J. 2004 Responses of human keratocytes to micro- and nanostructured substrates.J Biomed Mater Res A. 71 369 76
Lee K. B. Park S. J. Mirkin C. A. Smith J. C. Mrksich M. 2002Protein nanoarrays generated by dip-pen nanolithography. Science. 295 1702 5
Karuri N. W. Liliensiek S. Teixeira A. I. Abrams G. Campbell S. Nealey P. F. Murphy C. J. 2004Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells. J Cell Sci. 117 3153 64
Baac H. Lee J. H. Seo J. M. Park T. H. Chung H. Lee S. D. Kim S. J. 2004Submicron-scale topographical control of cell growth using holographic surface relief grating. Mater Sci Eng C. 24 209 212
Berry C. C. Dalby M. J. Mc Cloy D. Affrossman S. 2005 The fibroblast response to tubes exhibiting internal nanotopography. 26 4985 92
( Xia Y. Whitesides G. M. 1998) Soft Lithography. Angew Chem Int Edit. 37 550 575.
( Xia Y. Whitesides G. M. 1998) Soft lithography. Ann Rev Mater Sci. 28 153 184.
Ferrari M. Desai T. Bhatia S. 2006Therapeutic and Micro/Nanotechnology in BioMEMS and Biomedical Technology, Ferrari M. New York: Springer xxi p.
Arkles B. 2001 Commercial application of Sol-Gel derived Hybrid materials.MRS bulletin. 5 402 407
Chou T. P. Cao G. 2003 Adhesion of Sol-Gel-Derived Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Coatings on PolyesterJ Sol-Gel Sci Techn. 27 31 EOF 41 EOF
Nazeri A. Trzaskoma-Paulette P. P. Bauer D. 1997 Synthesis and Properties of Cerium and Titanium Oxide Thin Coatings for Corrosion Protection of 304 Stainless SteelJ Sol-Gel Sci Techn. 10 317 EOF
Zhang Q. Whatmore R. Vickers M. E. 1999 A Comparison of the Nanostructure of Lead Zirconate, Lead Titanate and Lead Zirconate Titanate SolsJ Sol-Gel Sci Techn. 15 13 EOF
Zhong J. Greenspan D. C. 2000 Processing and properties of sol-gel bioactive glasses.J Biomed Mater Res. 53 694 701
Livage J. 1997Sol-gel processes. Current Opin Solid St Mater Sc. 2 132 138
Dimitriev Y. Ivanova Y. Iordanova R. 2008History of Sol-Gel Science and Technology (Review). J Univ Chem Technol Metal. 43 181 192
Guglielmi M. 2010Glass: Sol-gel coatings in Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology, Buschow K H J, Cahn R, Flemings M, Ilschner B, Kramer E, Mahajan S, and Veyssiere P. Amsterdam: Elsevier 3575 3579p.
Brinker C. Ashley C. Cairncross R. Chen K. Hurd A. Reed S. Samuel J. Schunk P. R. R. W. S. Scotto C. 1996Sol-gel derived ceramic film- fundamentals and applications in Metallurgical and ceramic protective coatings, Stern K H. London: Chapman & Hall 112 151p.
Strawbridge I. 1992Glass formation by the sol-gel process in High-performance glasses, Cable M a P, JM. NJ: Chapman and Hall 51 85p.
Hench L L 1997 Sol-gel materials for bioceramic applicationsCurr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2 604 610
Marzolin C. Smith S. P. Prentiss M. Whitesides G. M. 1998 Fabrication of Glass Microstructures by Micro-Molding of Sol-Gel PrecursorsAdv Mater. 10 571 574
Pelaez-Vargas A. Gallego-Perez D. Ferrell N. Fernandes M. H. Hansford D. Monteiro F. J. 2010 Early spreading and propagation of human bone marrow stem cells on isotropic and anisotropic topographies of silica thin films produced via microstampingMicrosc Microanal. 16 670 6
Ferraz M. P. Monteiro F. J. Manuel C. M. 2004 Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: A review of preparation methodologies.J Appl Biomater Biomech. 2 74 80
Best S. M. Porter A. E. Thian E. S. Huang J. 2008 Bioceramics: Past, present and for the futureJ Eur Ceram Soc. 28 1319 1327
Vallet-Regi M. 2001 Ceramics for medical applicationsJournal of the Chemical Society- 97 108
Chevalier J. Gremillard L. 2009 Ceramics for medical applications: A picture for the next 20 yearsJ Eur Ceram Soc. 29 1245 1255
Manuel C. M. Ferraz M. P. Monteiro F. J. 2003 Synthesis of hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate nanoparticles preliminary studiesBioceramics 15. 240-2: 555 EOF 558 EOF
Muller-Mai C. M. Stupp S. I. Voigt C. Gross U. 1995 Nanoapatite and organoapatite implants in bone: histology and ultrastructure of the interface.J Biomed Mater Res. 29 9 18
Sarkar N. K. Caicedo R. Ritwik P. Moiseyeva R. Kawashima I. 2005 Physicochemical basis of the biologic properties of mineral trioxide aggregate.J Endod. 31 97 100
Gallego-Perez D. Higuita-Castro N. Quiroz F. G. Posada O. M. Lopez L. E. Litsky A. S. Hansford D. J. 2011 Portland cement for bone tissue engineering: Effects of processing and metakaolin blends.J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 98B: 308 15
Higuita-Castro N. Gallego-Perez D. Pelaez-Vargas A. Garcia Quiroz. F. Posada O. M. Lopez L. E. Sarassa C. A. Agudelo-Florez P. Monteiro F. J. Litsky A. S. Hansford D. J. 2012Reinforced Portland cement porous scaffolds for load-bearing bone tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 100B: 501 507
ings with Portland cement particles for dental implant surfaces based on sol-gel micromolding. in Pelaez-Vargas A. Gallego-Perez D. Higuita-Castro N. Ferrell N. Hansford D. Monteiro F. Silica coatings. with Portland. cement particles. for dental. implant surfaces. based on. sol-gel micromolding. 2009Pittsburg, PA: BMES CD PS 10A-23
Pelaez-Vargas A. Higuita-Castro N. Gallego-Perez D. Hansford D. Monteiro F. 2010Portland particulated silica coatings- Comparison between two coating techniques. J Dental Research. 89: 4006.
Carvalho A. Pelaez-Vargas A. Gallego-Perez D. Fernandes M. Hansford D. Monteiro F. 2011 Adhesion and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells on micropatterned thin films modified with nanohydroxyapatite particlesBone. 48: S106 EOF
Gallego D. Ferrell N. Sun Y. Hansford D. J. 2008 Multilayer micromolding of degradable polymer tissue engineering scaffoldsMater Sci Eng C. 28 353 358
- Tooth extraction was indexed (1965) in the MESH of the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Some synonyms are dental extraction, exodontia or pulling teeth.